Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/2024 - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL and REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY and LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY FORMAL MEETING AGENDA May 7, 2024 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas. Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Victoria Petro, Chair District 1 Chris Wharton, Vice Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy District 2 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7 Generated: 14:14:03  LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.The Board will approve the meeting minutes of April 18, 2023; May 2, 2023; May 16, 2023; June 6, 2023; and June 13, 2023. B.LBA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget; see the Capital Improvement Program Budget Book.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big construction projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   C.LBA CONSENT: 1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Board will set the dates of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget; see the Capital Improvement Program Budget Book.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big construction projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   D.LBA ADJOURNMENT:   REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. E.RDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS:   1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   F.RDA ADJOURNMENT:     SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     G.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of February 20, 2024 and April 2, 2024. 3.Mayor Mendenhall will present the proposed Salt Lake City budget, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. H.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items H1 and H2 will be heard as one public hearing.   1.Grant Application: Study to Improve Walking and Biking of One-Way Streets – Transportation and Land Use Connect(TLC) /Wasatch Front Regional Council The Council will consider approving a grant application request from the Transportation Division to the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) . If awarded, the grant would fund a study to consider the redesign of one-way streets (500 South and 600 South from I-15 to approximately 700 East) to make them more walkable and bikeable.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   2.Grant Application: Comcast Project UP – Assist Non-Profits with Digital Literacy Courses For Refugees The Council will consider approving a grant application request from the Housing Stability Division to Comcast Project UP. If awarded, the grant would assist the City in partnering with local non-profit refugee settlement organizations to provide digital literacy courses and laptops to refugees (through subawards).   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   3.Ordinance: Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would make the following amendments to City code: •Zoning Map Amendments: rezone properties to align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. •Zoning Text Amendments: establish a new zone, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 (MU-8), and rezone some properties within Ballpark Station Area to MU-8. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00169   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   4.Ordinance: MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00959.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   5.Resolution: Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation The Council will accept public comment for the proposed annexation of land located within an unincorporated peninsula of Salt Lake County, generally north of the Salt Lake City International Airport and west of the Jordan River, also known as Northpoint. This public hearing is a necessary step to accomplish the annexation, but is part of an extended public engagement process regarding the land use of the area first begun with development of the Northpoint Small Area Plan. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   6.Ordinance: Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to attached structures, including garages. In 2021, Utah State code was amended, changing standards required for these structures. The changes to the state code imposed limitations on what municipalities can require in terms of design elements. As a result, City code needs to be updated to match these regulations. The Planning Division is proposing a text amendment to update standards related to these structures, which include garages, entrance landings, and building foundations. The amendment focuses on aligning the standards with City goals and addressing state law. The proposed text amendments would apply Citywide. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00952.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   7.Ordinance: Rezone at Approximately 536 South 200 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties at approximately 536 South 200 West, 216 West Orchard Place, 224 West Orchard Place, 226 West Orchard Place, and 230 West Orchard Place from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The proposal would align with a recently approved D-2 to D-1 amendment for a neighboring property to the north. Future development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jason Boal, representing the property owners. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00730.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   8.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 West 1300 South The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of City-owned property at approximately 1050 West 1300 South from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi- Family Residential District). The proposed amendment would support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00609.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   9.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The proposed amendment includes an infrastructure loan pilot program to upgrade utilities while 2100 South is being reconstructed between 700 East and 1300 East, a State appropriation for Avenues City Cemetery road reconstruction and irrigation system upgrades, and additional funding for one-time police officer new hire bonuses among other items. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   10.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Metropolitan Water District, Property Tax Proposal The Council will accept public comment and consider approving the proposed property tax increase by the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy, for Fiscal Year 2024-25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 and Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   11.Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving the 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation Master Plan that was adopted in 1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight long-term policies called “key moves” and over 60 implementation actions to guide transportation decisions citywide over the coming decades. This is a continued hearing for people who have not yet commented on this item.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   I.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendments at Approximately 2760, 2800, and 2828 North 2200 West The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties at approximately 2760, 2800, and 2828 North 2200 West from AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District). The proposal includes properties of approximately 14.33 acres. Plans for future development were not submitted with these applications. Consideration may be given to rezoning the properties to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 1. Petitioner: Will Channell with OCC Industrial, who is under contract for the properties. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 19, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2.Ordinance: Window Requirements for New Construction in The City’s Local Historic Districts The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code and amend the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local historic districts and landmark sites. The proposed amendments add clarity to existing processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window installation in new construction projects. The City currently has 14 local historic districts and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00444.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   J.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) K.NEW BUSINESS:   1.Legislative Action: Consider Allowing Outdoor Events in The General Commercial Zone The Council will consider adopting a Legislative Action that would initiate a zoning petition for City staff to research and draft an ordinance that would allow live performance theater use in the General Commercial Zone either indoors or outdoors.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2.Legislative Action: Amend City Ordinance For The Amount of Time A Reconstructed Historic Building is Protected The Council will consider a Legislative Action that would initiate a zoning petition for City staff to research and draft an ordinance that would change the years reconstructed historic buildings must be protected from 25 to 50 years.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   3.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to reduce Athletic Facility Reservation and Twilight Golf Green Fees in advance of the FY25 budget.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   L.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2024- 25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   M.CONSENT: 1.Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2024-25 City Budget, including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City, Utah and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Capital City Revitalization Zone The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting creating a Capital City Revitalization Zone, which could potentially facilitate redevelopment around the Delta Center.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Metropolitan Water District, Property Tax Proposal The Council will set the second public hearing date of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving the proposed property tax increase by the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy, for Fiscal Year 2024-25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 and Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 and Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4.Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.3 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes required annual true-ups of property tax increments that go to the Utah Inland Port Authority, Convention Center Hotel, and the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   5.Resolution: Authorizing Assistance for Fairmont Heights Senior Housing Development at 2257 South 1100 East The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would adopt the conclusions of the public benefit analysis for the proposed Fairmont Heights Project at 2257 South 1100 East. The project would provide approximately 110 units of new affordable senior housing on a 0.81-acre property. The Administration intends to use $5.6 million in “dormant” funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and seeks authorization from the Council to negotiate final terms with the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 4, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   6.Ordinance Clarification: Zoning Text Amendment for Daycare Facilities The Council will correct an oversight from March 5, 2024 pertaining to the ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code for Daycare regulations. The clarification relates to (1) a clerical error that omitted a previously adopted ordinance relating to FB-MU11, (2) incorporating a licensing exemption already provided for in state law, and (3) reflecting that home daycares cannot be in dwellings in manufacturing zones. These provisions are consistent with the prior proposals considered by the planning commission or already codified through previously adopted ordinances (i.e., FB-MU11). Petition No.: PLNPCM2019-00225.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   7.Board Appointment: Mosquito Abatement District – Luz Escamilla The Council will consider approving the appointment of Luz Escamilla to the Mosquito Abatement District Board for a term ending December 31, 2027. This is a Council- appointed position, therefore an Administrative Recommendation letter is not included.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   8.Board Reappointment: Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board – Melanie Pehrson The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Melanie Pehrson to the Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board for a term ending May 7, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   N.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 3, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, April 18, 2023.  The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson –  Minutes & Records Clerk, Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk  The meeting was called to order at 7:04 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 1 LBA OPENING CEREMONY A.Board/Council Member Victoria Petro will conduct the formal meeting. B.Pledge of Allegiance. LBA CONSENT: Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD    Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to approve LBA Consent Agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Fowler to adjourn the Local Building Authority Meeting, and convene as the City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 2 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 7, 2023, and February 14, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of February 7, 2023.  Council Member Puy took a moment of personal privilege to recognize the Die Hard Pickleballer Club and presented the club with a Certificate of Recognition for their community involvement.  Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to approve Work Session minutes of February 7 and 14, 2023 and Formal minutes February 7, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.YouthCity Government will present the Youth State of the City Address. Diya Oommen, Hamda Ibrahim, Julia Summerfield, Rodrigo Fernandez- Esquivias, Cate Love presented the Youth State of the City Address to the Council. The YouthCity Government (YCG) thanked the council for their work with the group and spoke on the following topics regarding their impacts to the youth in the city: •SB16 Transgender Medical Treatment and Procedures Amendments •Women's Rights – overturn of Roe V Wade •Reproductive Rights  •Transgender Youth Rights  •YouthCity Government Helps and  The Council thanked Angela Romero and Juanita Escareno for their work with the YCG.  PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items E1 – E12 will be heard as one public hearing 1. Grant Application: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Housing Stability to the Department of Homeland Security. If awarded, the grant would fund seismic improvements on private single-family dwellings. The 2022 application includes duplexes and recruitment of homeowners who qualify as having low to moderate income. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 3 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 2. Grant Application: 2022 Public Art Challenge: Wake the Great Salt Lake Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Salt Lake City Arts Council to the Bloomberg Philanthropies. If awarded, the grant would fund A series of 3-5 major artworks across the City created by world-renowned artists. These artists will be selected with the intention of leveraging their notoriety and practice while bringing awareness of our water conservation, air quality, ecology of the lake, and environmental and social justice. A series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists and organizations in a multiplicity of disciplines will also be commissioned. The grant would also fund a part-time curator position and a part-time project coordinator. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 3. Grant Application: Consumer Recycling Education and Outreach Grant Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Waste and Recycling to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If awarded, the grant would fund four part-time Education Specialists to conduct reuse, reduce, and recycle presentations at community events, schools, and businesses; staff tabling events; monitor curbside recycling and green waste can contamination weekly on Westside routes; assist community recycling collection events; train Recycling Ambassadors; and support campaign outreach. It would also fund overtime for two Waste Recycling Equipment Operators to load and transport electronic (e-) waste collected at community MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4 recycling events to a disposal facility. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 4. Grant Application: Marathon Community Investments Program Grant: YouthCity Teen Program Transportation Solutions The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth & Family Services to the Marathon Petroleum Foundation. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of one 14-passenger van for YouthCity Northwest Teen programs. The van would be used to transport YouthCity Northwest Teen participants from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the Northwest Community Center, which is the site for YouthCity Northwest Teen programming. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 5. Grant Application: First Responder Mental Health Services Grant: Wellness and Peer Support Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of three NeurOptimal and Neurofeedback systems for use in its Wellness and Peer Support Program. These systems are being used to improve symptoms of post- traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, anxiety, trauma, panic, depression, and more.  FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 5 discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 6. Grant Application: Leading City Procurement Reform Grant: Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Purchasing and Contract Management to the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard. If awarded, the grant would fund training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 7. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Unity Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Unity Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 6 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 8. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 9. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Ottinger Hall The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Ottinger Hall summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 10. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Liberty Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Liberty Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 11. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Fairmont Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Fairmont Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 12. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Central City The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Central City summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Sylvia Richards introduced the grant items E1 – E12 for City programs to the Council.  Gale Daws expressed support for the YouthCity programming and the great impact on the community it would have to continue growing the programs.   Bernie Hart urged the Council to have more oversight on the use of the grant money to ensure it was being used as directed. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer items B1-B12 to a future consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 13. Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts). Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. The Council may consider modifications MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9 to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/downtownbuildingheights FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer introduced the Ordinance regarding the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment.  Cindy Cromer urged the Council to review the amendment and expressed concern about the negative impacts the ordinance would have on the environment.  Bernie Hart spoke on water issues. the new developments around SLC and asked the council to review impacts to the community. Doug Dansie expressed enthusiasm and concern for new growth, suggested additional criteria be included in the design for the Planning Commission to review the impacts of the height corridors.  Jake Seastrand expressed concern on the congestion created in their neighborhoods by the new developments, suggested more city oversight on the new developments and their impact on local resident's everyday life.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 14. Ordinance: Rezone at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M- 1 (Light Manufacturing District) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use District). The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. No development plans have been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The properties are within Council District 2. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 10  Petitioner: Cameron Broadbent, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00587 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer introduced the Ordinance of rezoning a Light Manufacturing District to a Residential/Mixed Use District.  Cameron Broadbent (Property Owner) expressed desire for the rezoning request to be approved and stated their commitment to contributing to the community and creating a modest development.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer action to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 15. Ordinance: Airport Title 16 Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would repeal and replace Title 16 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Airports. The proposed amendment would eliminate duplicate and outdated regulations. Changes also include moving codified commercial standards to standalone administrative documents for operators doing business at the airport. Language related to ground transportation rules and fees is removed where it’s duplicated on the City’s ordinance regulating business (Title 5). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11 Brian Fullmer introduced the Airport Title 16 Amendments No public comment on this item. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer the item to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in the City and modify existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. This petition was initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01068 The proposal includes: •A Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers; •Provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.50 to include additional considerations when mapping the HRC overlay and other related changes; and •Updated defined terms. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/HRCTextAmendment FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Council Member Dugan expressed desire for further discussion on this amendment and asked for specific clarification of the following initiative items: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 12 •Size of Homeless Resource Center (HRC) •the rules and processes each one must follow •Firearm procedures and process for the HRC •Reporting requirements for safety concerns •Combined city and state efforts for the HRC •Ensure the city was following the new legislation passed Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to defer the item to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2. Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Mano to approve Resolution 09 of 2023 adopting 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan funding allocations attached to the motion sheet as Exhibit A for CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA. I further move that it is the intent of the Council to review the City’s various Community Land Trust and Shared Equity Programs (such as the Westside Community Initiative and Perpetual Housing Fund), and work with the Administration to evaluate how to deliver this service most efficiently. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 13 3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 865 South 500 East The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District), this would also amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The property is located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Rick Service, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00301 & PLNPCM2022-00302 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 and Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt an ordinance to rezone the property at approximately 865 South 500 East, and complete a Master Plan Amendment. AYE: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano NAY: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 3 – 4 Fail COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Council Member Petro thanked the administration for their quick action and response to the flooding to help the community.  2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.)   Roland Vick spoke on representation in the Federal Congress and the Utah Legislature and gave solutions regarding taxes.   L. Maia Lavatai expressed interest in converting some of the tennis courts in their neighborhoods (Rose Park and Glendale) to pickleball courts. Lorin Schetselaar expressed concern on the involvement to keep the community safe, sidewalks clear and neighborhood regulations being followed.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 14 George G. Zinn reminded the Council to listen to their constituents and uphold the reputation of Salt Lake City.  Luke Ulstad expressed gratitude for the parks and other program around Salt Lake City and expressed concern for the following: •Dust from construction •Lights burnt out at the Trax & Bus station, creating safety hazards •Air Pollution Carl Moore urged the Council to keep the program for the Og-Woi Garden and continue their work in the community.  Larry Saggars thanked the Council for their work to mitigate the flood destruction and expressed frustrations with the City Council communications with their residents.  Nigel Swabey expressed concern for the I-15 expansion and excitement for the new Major League Baseball Stadium coming to the City.  Karina Villalba translated on behalf of neighbors stating their concerns for Rose Park residents and other needs in their neighborhood.  Leslie Evans expressed the need and success of the Og-Woi Gardens and presented the each district with a tree to plant. Bernie Hart expressed his gratitude for the city council meeting, the dinner activity before the formal meeting, expressed thoughts on the homelessness issues and need for more attention to their community needs.  Lionel Trepanier thanked the Council and spoke on the wonderful impacts on the community the Og-Wai Garden has had.  Dan Pots expressed the need to promote wildlife preserve on the West Side to bring more wildlife into the area. Jann McConkie expressed the want for paper ballots, in person voting and no rank choice voting.   George Shafer spoke on issues regarding the effects of actions having consequences and urged the city to look at those.  Jeremy King expressed appreciation for the regional park proposal, would like to see a pickleball court included in the plans.  Nateijie Hamilton spoke against the demolition order of the Og-Woi Gardens and urged the Council to save the Gardens. Dan Steenblik stated concerns about fallen branches on the Jordan river trail and the height of the riverbanks before the flooding gets worse.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 15 Jonathon Krausert expressed the need to plant more trees and grass in the city using less gravel and absentee landlord issues not fixing houses, keeping up yards and properties becoming dump sites.    Billy Palmer urged the Council to find other transportation solutions that do not involve the I-15 or other freeway expansions.  NEW BUSINESS: NONE. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Convention and Tourism Assessment Area The Council will consider adopting a resolution consenting to inclusion in Salt Lake County’s proposed Convention and Tourism Business Assessment Area (CTAA). The Salt Lake County Convention and Tourism Assessment Area (SLCo CTAA) is an assessment area proposed to provide specific benefits to payors, by funding district wide development & programming, and community and sales development with regional incentives programs for assessed lodging establishments. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Resolution 10 of 2023 consenting to inclusion in Salt Lake County’s proposed Convention and Tourism Assessment Area (CTAA). AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 16 CONSENT: 1. Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City, Utah and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD    Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD    Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 17 3. Ordinance: Early Notification Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would approve various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. The Council initiated this petition to clarify early notification regulations and public outreach. The purpose of the proposed changes is to increase awareness and participation by the public for various types of City projects while still providing a timely review process for applicants. Related provisions of the City Code may also be amended as part of this petition. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, September 15, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, October 6, 2020; Tuesday, October 20, 2020; Tuesday, December 7, 2021; and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Board Reappointment: Sister Cities Board – M. Nicole Pessetto The Council will consider approving the reappointment of M. Nicole Pessetto to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 2, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023    Staff Recommendation - Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 18 ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 19 Meeting adjourned at 8:46 pm Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________  City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________  City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.    This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, April 18, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 20 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 2, 2023. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – City Council Staff, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Nick Tarbet – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst The meeting was called to order at 7:08 pm   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 A.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the retreat meeting minutes of January 31, 2023. Motion: Moved by Board Member Mano, seconded by Board Member Dugan to approve the Retreat Meeting Minutes of January 31, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Victoria Petro Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 5.Mayor Mendenhall will present the proposed Salt Lake City budget, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Mayor Mendenhall presented the proposed FY2023-24 budget and read her message to the City (contained in the Meeting Materials). Council Member Puy reviewed the next steps for approving the budget and encouraged the public to be involved in the process. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB- UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts). Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. The Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/downtownbuildingheights   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 and Tuesday, MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 2 May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Brian Fullmer gave a brief introduction to the text amendment. Cindy Cromer reminded the Council of previous comments, spoke on how the proposal would affect the entire City, asked the Council to take the Historic Districts into account when approving this zoning, please remove the FBUN1, limit FBUN2 to the map in the meeting materials and consider less expensive housing that people could afford. Justin Matkin spoke to the property along 500 West and how the proposal would affect the development/owner of Home Depot; the proposal required a mid-block walkway through the middle of the store which was not feasible and would make stores such as Home Depot unable to build downtown. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano, seconded by Councilmember Fowler to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council Meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Victoria Petro Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3   Ben Luedtke gave a brief introduction to the budget amendment. No public comments. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to close the public hearing and defer the item to a future Council Meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Victoria Petro Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 3.Grant Application: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program Fiscal Year 2018-2023 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation and Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded this grant would fund the Salt Lake City traffic signal synchronization. The aim is to minimize the diversion of traffic to local and residential streets by installing radar detection equipment at an estimated 31 key intersections.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and defer the item to the Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Victoria Petro Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Sylvia Richards gave a brief introduction of the program. Tanner Josey said addressing air pollution and air quality was important but wanted more information on how the program was going to accomplish those goals. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4 C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1. Ordinance: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in the City and modify existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. This petition was initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01068 The proposal includes: •A Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers; •Provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.50 to include additional considerations when mapping the HRC overlay and other related changes; and •Updated defined terms. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/HRCTextAmendment    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Fowler to adopt Ordinance 19 of 2023; a Text Amendment for Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) and Shelters, subject to the following changes: - Specify that if privately owned HRCs/shelters prohibit firearms from within the building, they must provide signage at public entrances that firearms are not permitted and detection devices and provide secure storage while the individual is inside the HRC/Shelter. I further move that the Council adopt a Legislative Intent to support the development of comprehensive and effective metrics aimed at assisting Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in demonstrating their impact on individuals experiencing homelessness and the communities hosting HRCs. The Council intends for the City to collaborate with stakeholders, including MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5 State and County officials and service providers, to establish a robust set of metrics that can accurately measure the success of HRCs. The Council further intends to assist with resources to facilitate data collection efforts for service providers, with the aim of improving data capture and analysis that will not be needlessly cumbersome for those capturing the data, and ultimately improve the understanding of the impact HRCs have on their clients in the communities where the facilities are located. This will help inform funding decisions and guide the allocation of resources towards programs that have been proven effective in addressing homelessness. I further move the Council initiate a Legislative Action requesting the Administration research and develop a proposal to give the zoning administrator the ability to require and review CEPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) standards for other uses related to homeless services. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Nick Tarbet gave an overview of the proposal and background on the motions. Council Members discussed: •Language in the motions and the results of the suggested changes •What would happen with firearms if the language was removed from the motion •The issue with homeless individuals potentially stashing weapons around the facilities •The type of detection device a facility would need or require •Options for facilities to address weapon storage or detection •Whether or not to keep the firearm language in the ordinance 2. Ordinance: Rezone at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 (Light Manufacturing District) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use District). The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. No development plans have been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The properties are within Council District 2. Petitioner: Cameron Broadbent, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00587    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Ordinance 20 of 2023, for 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West Zoning Map Amendment including that the Applicant record a restrictive covenant limiting building height to 35 feet. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass D.COMMENTS: 1.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Council Member Puy reviewed the rules of decorum. Arthur Moss spoke to the interest in working with the City to help provide affordable housing. Kristina Robb spoke to the need for survey data to minimize the bias in information, create affordable, safe housing, prioritize local rental research across the City and support home ownership. MJ Powell spoke in support of the Mayor’s FY2023-2024 Budget, how it would benefit the City as a whole including individuals experiencing homelessness and funding for police reform. Rebel (no last name), Wendy Garvin, Joshua Mellowseed Story, Daniel Taylor, Kseniya Kniazeva, Brandee Woodword, Alex Stewart, Carl Moore, Bernie Hart, Tom Kalaher, Brandon (no last name), Chris Crosswide spoke to: •Lack of housing and shelters for individuals experiencing homelessness •Issues with and cost of abatements •Number of homeless individuals that were moved to the street with the closure of the winter shelters •Funding in the budget for staffing was not sufficient •Need to make housing a priority •A sanctioned campground would provide a place for people to be safe •Safety issues in shelters •Campground would provide a better option for individuals experiencing homelessness •Thanked the Council for supporting the supply drives for the homeless •Congregate shelters were not the solution •There were more viable options available and we need to do better MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7 •Healthcare, mental health options and addiction services were needed for the unhoused individuals •Where was the deeply affordable housing that was proposed at the end of last year •Emergency Services were being stretched too thin •The number of women pushed to the street in the last week •Sick individuals were being sent out on the streets to survive without healthcare •Homelessness being a common problem across the country •Look for more ways to address the homeless issue •Not making it more complicated than it needed to be E.NEW BUSINESS:   1.Resolution: Interlocal Agreement and Memorandum for 2023 Election Services The Council will consider approving a resolution for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County. It defines the services the County will provide the City for the 2023 General Election, through the Ranked Choice Voting method, on November 7, 2023. The City will be responsible for any additional charges exceeding the estimated cost such as a recount which would be invoiced to the City after the election.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Resolution 11 of 2023, for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for the 2023 municipal general election. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Resolution: Naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the Senator Garn Greeting Room The Council will consider adopting a resolution supporting Mayor Mendenhall naming of the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the “Senator Garn Greeting Room” after former Salt Lake City Mayor and Utah Senator Jake Garn. Senator Jake Garn was MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 8 elected Salt Lake City Commissioner in 1967 and Mayor in 1971. He went on the serve three terms as a United States Senator from 1974-1992.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt Resolution 12 of 2023, naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting room the Senator Garn Greeting Room. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Resolution: Local Emergency Declaration Extension – Flooding The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s April 12, 2023 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to flooding from spring runoff.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve Resolution 13 of 2023, the extension of Proclamation 1 of 2023, from the date of the Resolution until June 15, 2023, unless later extended or terminated by subsequent resolution of the Council or unless terminated pursuant to State Law. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9 E.NEW BUSINESS:   1.Resolution: Interlocal Agreement and Memorandum for 2023 Election Services The Council will consider approving a resolution for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County. It defines the services the County will provide the City for the 2023 General Election, through the Ranked Choice Voting method, on November 7, 2023. The City will be responsible for any additional charges exceeding the estimated cost such as a recount which would be invoiced to the City after the election.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Resolution 11 of 2023, for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for the 2023 municipal general election. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Resolution: Naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the Senator Garn Greeting Room The Council will consider adopting a resolution supporting Mayor Mendenhall naming of the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the “Senator Garn Greeting Room” after former Salt Lake City Mayor and Utah Senator Jake Garn. Senator Jake Garn was elected Salt Lake City Commissioner in 1967 and Mayor in 1971. He went on the serve three terms as a United States Senator from 1974-1992.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt Resolution 12 of 2023, naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting room the Senator Garn Greeting Room. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Resolution: Local Emergency Declaration Extension – Flooding The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s April 12, 2023 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to flooding from spring runoff.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Fowler, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve Resolution 13 of 2023, the extension of Proclamation 1 of 2023, from the date of the Resolution until June 15, 2023, unless later extended or terminated by subsequent resolution of the Council or unless terminated pursuant to State Law. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:   1.Resolution: Tentative Budget of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023- 24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to adopt Resolution 14 of 2023, adopting the tentative budget for Salt Lake City, Utah including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023- 24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.CONSENT: 1.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 9) for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 9) for Fiscal Year 2022-23.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   2.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – John Wilson The Council will consider approving the appointment of John Wilson to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   3.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Matilyn Mortensen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Matilyn Mortensen to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   4.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Ross Chambless The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ross Chambless to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Annie Quan The Council will consider approving the appointment of Annie Quan to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 13   6.Board Reappointment: Arts Council – Kathy Davis The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Kathy Davis to the Arts Council for a term ending May 2, 2026.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   7.Board Reappointment: Arts Council – Torle Nenbee The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Torle Nenbee to the Arts Council for a term ending May 2, 2026.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   8.Board Reappointment: Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA) – Deirdre (Dee-dee) Darby-Duffin The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Deirdre (Dee-dee) Darby- Duffin to the Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA) for a term ending May 2, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 14   9.Board Reappointment: Mosquito Abatement Board – Neil Vickers The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Neil Vickers to the Mosquito Abatement Board for a term ending December 31, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT:   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 15 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. I.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.The Board will approve meeting minutes of May 18, 2021; June 1, 2021; June 15, 2021; August 17, 2021; May 3, 2022; May 17, 2022; June 7, 2022; and June 14, 2022. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve the meeting minutes as listed. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass J.LBA UNFINISHED BUSINESS:   1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 16   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Resolution 1 of 2023, the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023- 24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass K.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Mano to adjourn the Local Building Authority meeting and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 17 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. L.RDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Mano to approve Resolution 09 of 2023, the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.RDA ADJOURNMENT:   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 18 Meeting adjourned at 8: 36 pm Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair Alejandro Puy _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, RDA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, May 2, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 2, 2023 19 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 16, 2023. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano The following Board Directors/Council Members were absent: Amy Fowler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kitrell – Deputy City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney – Minutes & Records Clerk, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Nick Tarbet – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:11 pm   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 1 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023   Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. No public comments Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Mano to close the public hearing and refer item to the public hearing on June 6, MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 2 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Mano to adjourn as the LBA and convene as the RDA. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Petro to close the public hearing and refer item to the public hearing on June 6, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. No public comment E.RDA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 4 Adjorn as the RDA and convene as the City Council AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of February 21, 2023. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Mano to approve formal meeting minutes of Feb 21, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall celebrating June 2023 as Pride Month. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt Joint Ceremonial Resolution 15 of 2023, celebrating June 2023 as Pride Month. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Council Member Mano read the resolution. Johnathan Foulk and Tanya Hawkins from the Utah Pride Center thanked the Council and Mayor for their support of the resolution and the LGBTQIA+ community. G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1. Ordinance: Early Notification Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would approve various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. The Council initiated this petition to clarify early notification regulations and public outreach. The purpose of the proposed changes is to increase awareness and participation by the public for various types of City projects while still providing a timely review process for applicants. Related provisions of the City Code may also be amended as part of this petition. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 6 For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCEarlyNotificationOrdinance.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, September 29, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, September 15, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, October 6, 2020; Tuesday, October 20, 2020; Tuesday, December 7, 2021; and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Items G2 – G10 will be heard as one public hearing. Nick Tarbet gave a brief overview of the text amendment. No public comment Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 2. Grant Application: Salt Lake, Summit, and Tooele Counties Transportation Alternatives Program Fiscal Year 2023 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation. If awarded, the grant would fund the 9-Line Trail Extension West of Redwood Road. The project constructs a new 4/10-mile segment of shared-use path along the north side of Indiana Avenue west of Redwood Road and improves three associated pedestrian/bicycle crossings to make key destination-focused connections.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 7 Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3. Grant Application: Backman School Community Open Space The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Parks & Public Lands to the Utah Department of Natural Resources. If awarded, the grant would fund a project that would develop the property located near the Backman Bridge and provide a safer route for children walking to school. The new space will become a community gathering place with a nature playground, native habitat, and an outdoor classroom programmed by Backman Elementary. The public spaces will allow children of all ages to engage and explore nature in an urban neighborhood. The park will also connect to the Jordan River Parkway providing access to more recreational opportunities that support an active lifestyle.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 4. Grant Application: Jordan River Water Trail Tree and Debris Removal The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Park & Public Lands to the Utah Department of Natural Resources. If awarded, the grant would fund removal of tree branches and other debris from the Jordan River Water Trail to improve the safety and accessibility of non-motorized watercraft.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 8 5. Grant Application: Drinking Water Service Line Inventory/Lead Service Replacement Plan Development Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Utilities to the Utah Division of Drinking Water. If awarded, the grant would fund wages for existing Department of Public Utilities staff to conduct record reviews, GIS work, and site inspections for the inventory related to the qualifying disadvantaged census tracts. The grant would also fund consultant services to complete a water service line inventory and develop a lead service line replacement (LSLR) plan related to the qualifying disadvantaged census tracts.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 6. Grant Application: Pole Mounted Surveillance Camera Installation The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to the Department of Homeland Security. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of mobile pole mounted cameras for the purpose of conducting surveillance in areas of the City experiencing high incidents of suspected intentionally set fires. The Fire Department will deploy the cameras in areas experiencing increased fire activity specifically providing targeted surveillance of arson.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 9 7. Grant Application: Emergency Management Performance Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Emergency Management to the Department of Homeland Security. If awarded, the grant would fund Emergency Management functions and programs.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 8. Grant Application: 2024 Police Traffic Services Equipment Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Highway Safety Office. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of radar units. If awarded the grant project period will be 12 months beginning October 1, 2023.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 9. Grant Application: 2024 Distracted Driving Prevention Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Highway Safety Office. If awarded, the grant would fund distracted driving enforcement/education overtime shifts. If awarded the grant project period will be 12 months beginning October 1, 2023.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 10 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 10. Grant Application: Race, Equity, and Leadership Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Economic Development to the National League of Cities. If awarded, the grant would fund a consultant to review City practices and resources and engage with City stakeholders to determine solutions to create a more equitable process for minority owned small businesses and entrepreneurs.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Ordinances listed below (G11 – G22) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May 16th and June 6th public hearings. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to close the public hearing and defer action on items G1-G10 to a future Council Meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Sylvia Richards gave a brief overview of the grant applications. Gayloe Dawes spoke to her family’s history in using Backman Elementary, thanked everyone involved in helping the community and expressed excitement over grant item G #4. 11. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 11 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 12. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 13. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 12 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 14. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 15. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 13 16. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023- 24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 17. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 18. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2023-24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 14 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 19. Ordinance: Accessible Parking Space Violation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code to adjust penalties for accessible parking space violations to better correspond with similar penalties described in the State of Utah Uniform Fine Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 20. Ordinance: Board Member Employee Status The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would clarify the status of members appointed to Salt Lake City Boards and Commissions who receive compensation for their service.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 15 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 21. Ordinance: Past Due Account Receivable Fees The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to past due accounts receivable fees and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 22. Ordinance: Removal/Bagging of Parking Meters The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to removal of parking meters and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 6, 2023 Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 16 close the public hearing and refer items G 11-G 22 to the public hearing on June 6, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the ordinances. Abdirizak Ibrahim spoke to the need of improving the Westside of Salt Lake City and reviewed the continued issues with homelessness and crime rates. Allen Sanderson and Allison Jones spoke to the water budget stating the following: •In support of the rate increase •Tier the rates to usage •Need to remove the water assessment from property taxes •Should be moved to the base rate and use rates •Ordinances required to reduce watering at specific times and dates Sarah Bushman spoke to the homeless situation in Salt Lake City, the need for more housing, voucher programs being over extended along with apartment waiting lists, asked if there was there a way for the State to help with the issue. Chris Robstock spoke to the urgent need to repair streets in District 1 and throughout the City. Duke Heninger spoke to the need for sidewalks in the area of 1000 East. H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 17 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Mano, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Ordinance 21 of 2023. amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of SLC including the employment staffing documents only for items as shown on the motion sheet. A-2: Additional One-time Funding for Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team ($300,000 from Rescope of CAN Personnel Vacancy Savings) A-3: Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for New Homeless Services ($73,418 from Recaptured Operations Rio Grande Funds) A-9: Natural Gas Cost Increase ($635,000 from General Fund Balance of which $135,000 to the Fleet Fund) A-11: Environmental Assessment Additional Funding ($50,000 from General Fund Balance) A-14: Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement ($4 Million from General Fund Balance to the RDA’s Westside Community Initiative for 9-Line Project Area Property Acquisition) Note the other proposed funds for this item will be considered by the Council at a future date. E-3: State Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY2023 Revision ($110,000 Rescope of Existing Grant Funds and $50,000 Reappropriation for Advantages Services from Prior Award) AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 2.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will consider approving a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCAirports   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 18 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Petro, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt Resolution 16 of 2023, for the airport revenue bond and recognize the date set for a public hearing was scheduled June 6, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. No questions 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Council Member Puy reviewed the rules of decorum. Robert Comstock spoke regarding issues surrounding Richards Street, including the replacement of homes with parking lots, the increase in unsheltered individuals that were camping in the parking lot, traffic calming was desperately needed off of 2100 South along Richard Street, asked Council Member Mano to schedule a time to meet over the issues. Michael Fraizer spoke to various issues with living in the City and how he was trying to better his life here. Maisie (no last name) spoke to the need for more affordable housing in the City and helping the unsheltered. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund – Trackland, LLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $350,000 loan for MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 19 Trackland, LLC., at 2117 East Wilson Avenue from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Trackland, LLC is a Sugar House based software as a service (SaaS) company that is an add on to Salesforce that improves its function. This loan will assist in the creation of 20 new jobs in the next year and retention of 8 current jobs.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Petro to adopt Ordinance 22 of 2023 approving a $350,000 loan for Trackland, LLC, from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will set the date of Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 20 2.Ordinance: Salt Lake School District Signs The Council will set the date of Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of Section 21A.46.052 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to pole signs on school properties. Public and private schools are located in various zoning districts around the City, and not all of the zoning districts permit freestanding pole signs. The signs are used to educate the community about activities at the school. Petitioner: Paul Schulte representing the Salt Lake City School District, Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00190   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 8) for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 8) for Fiscal Year 2022-23.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   4.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Ricardo Becerra The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ricardo Becerra to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 21 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Ronald Joe Zeidner The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ronald Joe Zeidner to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   6.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Ahimara Suarez The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ahimara Suarez to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   7.Board Reappointment: Sister Cities Board – Olga Efimova The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Olga Efimova to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 22   8.Board Reappointment: Sister Cities Board – Sheri Sorensen The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Sheri Sorensen to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSTAIN: Amy Fowler Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 23 Meeting adjourned at 8:00 pm Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair Alejandro Puy _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, RDA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 16, 2023 24 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 6, 2023. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano The following Board Directors/Council Members were absent: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Sam Owen – Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Mano presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 1 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. No public comments Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to cloose MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 2 the public hearing and refer the item to a future meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Councilmember Petro, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adjourn the Local Building Authority meeting and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 3   REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. No public comments E.RDA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to adjourn the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 4 Redevelopment Agency meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of April 4, 2023. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Petro to approve the Formal Minutes for April 4, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Cannon Greens Community Garden at 1300 South and 800 West, Public Benefits Analysis and Authorizing the Lease Rate and Terms The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize below-market rent for lease of properties at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. The Public Lands Department is proposing authorization of leases to the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Wasatch Community Gardens (WCG) for eight City-owned parcels, totaling 2.41 acres.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 6   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Allison Rowland gave a brief overview of the proposal. Georgina Griffith Yates spoke to the programing available for women at the shelter. 2.Ordinance: New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would adopt the proposed new five-year housing plan, Housing SLC. The City’s current housing plan, Growing SLC, expires at the end of the fiscal year, and a new moderate income housing plan is needed to meet State code requirements and receive priority consideration for State funding resources. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCHousingProposals.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 25, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Allison Rowland gave a brief overview of the proposal. Lance Spencer spoke to the cost of housing, expressed support for the proposed programs but it would not help the overall problems with housing in the city. Kseniya Kniazeva thanked Council for all the hard work on the housing issues, asked Council to help provide deeply affordable housing, sanctioned campgrounds and other options for housing the citizens of Salt Lake City. Kristina Robb thanked Planning Department Staff for the work on the proposal and expressed excitement for the next steps for affordable housing in Salt Lake City. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and defer action to a later date. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 7 Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Salt Lake School District Signs The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of Section 21A.46.052 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to pole signs on school properties. Public and private schools are located in various zoning districts around the City, and not all of the zoning districts permit freestanding pole signs. The signs are used to educate the community about activities at the school. Petitioner: Paul Schulte representing the Salt Lake City School District, Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00190   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Brian Fullmer gave a brief overview of the proposal. No public comment. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass 4.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCAirports.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 8 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 and Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Items G5-G12 will be heard as one public hearing.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to continue the public hearing to June 13, 2023 due to a noticing error. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Sam Owen gave a brief overview of the proposal. Jay Larson talked about tone of voice the speakers were using. 5.Grant Application: Community Project Funding Fiscal Year 2023 – 200 South Transit Corridor Phase 3 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. If awarded, the grant would fund transit signal priority, high visibility signage, and pavement markings to increase the capacity of the 200 South corridor to accommodate twelve Utah Transit Authority (UTA) bus routes providing roughly 1,100 bus trips per day for existing local routes and new regional routes serving South Davis County and the City’s Westside.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   6.Grant Application: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Capacity Building Grant – YouthCity Fairpark The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund salary, wages, and benefits for two full-time and ten MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 9 seasonal/hourly positions. The grant would also fund snacks used in youth programming, cell phones, fuel for vans, rent, staff background checks, and training.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   7.Grant Application: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Capacity Building Grant – Fairpark Family Learning Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund salary, wages, and benefits for two full-time and five seasonal positions, and snacks used in adult education programs. The grant would also fund computers, laptops, iPads, chairs for the Fairpark Family Learning Center (FFLC) Technology Center, cell phones, rent, staff background checks, training, and software licenses.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   8.Grant Application: Victims of Crime Grant – Salt Lake City Prosecutor Victim Advocates The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the City Attorney Office to the Utah Office for Crime Victims. If awarded, the grant would fund two victim advocate positions, continue the Victim Advocate funded by the 2021- 2023 Victims of Crime Grant (VOCA) award, and funding for a second victim advocate. Also included in the request is training with travel, office furniture, and an annual software subscription. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 10   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   9.Grant Application: Recreation Trails Program Grant – Jordan River Water Trail Tree and Debris Removal The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Lands to the Utah Department of Natural Resources. If awarded, the grant would fund the removal of dead and obstructing trees, branches, and debris from the Jordan River Water Trail corridor to enhance safety and accessibility for paddle boat navigation.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   10.Grant Application: Violence Against Women Grant – Salt Lake City Prosecutor Victim Advocate The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the City Prosecutor to the Utah Office for Crime Victims. If awarded, the grant would fund one victim advocate position. This position will provide services and resources to victims of sexual assault, dating violence, stalking, and domestic violence as their cases move through the criminal justice system.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 11 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   11.Grant Application: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant – Police Department Crime Lab Accreditation Fee The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant would fund the Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   12.Grant Application: Clean Energy to Communities Expert Match Grant – Training from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Energy and Environment to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. If awarded, the grant would fund short-term technical assistance from experts with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to build its staff capacities to use public data sources and tools to quantify emissions reductions and other benefits associated with renewable energy resources.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 12 Ordinances listed below (G13 – G24) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing.   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and refer items G-5 through G-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Sylvia Richards gave a brief overview of the proposal. Kristina Robb asked Council to support the violence against women grant (Item G10) and spoke to the demographic the grant would support. 13.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   14.Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 13 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   15.Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   16.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 14   17.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   18.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 15   19.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   20.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 16   21.Ordinance: Accessible Parking Space Violation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code to adjust penalties for accessible parking space violations to better correspond with similar penalties described in the State of Utah Uniform Fine Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   22.Ordinance: Board Member Employee Status The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would clarify status of members appointed to Salt Lake City Boards and Commissions who receive compensation for their service.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 17   23.Ordinance: Past Due Account Receivable Fees The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to past due accounts receivable fees and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   24.Ordinance: Removal/Bagging of Parking Meters The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to removal of parking meters and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 18   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. Terry Marasco spoke to funds allocated for projects on the Westside, the need to make funding available for projects throughout Salt Lake City, the need for the city to be unified as well as understand the issues on the Westside need to be addressed. Jim Webster spoke to the Continuous Improvement Program (CIP) funding for the Miller Bird Park, the lack of funding of the proposed CIP grant, a stadium on the East bench for the University of Utah was not appropriate and property should be used for a park. Abdirizak Ibahm spoke to the need to fix the issues on the Westside of Salt Lake City and improve the area for the residence. Christopher Butler spoke to the proposed police budget, need to look at better options that are proven to stop crime at the source and expressed support for the civilian groups that were working with the police but funding for these programs should be removed from the police budget. Jay Larsen spoke to why he did not pledge allegiance to the flag. Roger Miller discussed issues with the Other Side Tiny Home Village and the need to follow similar projects that were fiscally responsible as this project was not financially responsible. Keseniya Kniazecva spoke to the funds being spent on the Police Department that should be spent on housing, people need housing not more policing and asked Council to focus on affordable housing. Kristina Robb spoke to alleyways throughout the city, the need to improve alleyways to help with traffic congestion when roads are being worked on, and asked Council to please consider informing constituents how these areas can be improved. Evan Sugden spoke to E-bikes and asked for a portion of the funding to be used for security options/parking for bikes. Judi Short spoke to the time Council had spent on housing over the year, the displacement of people with construction projects and the lack of funding to start a tenant relocation project, please review the budget to find money for affordable housing and create development agreements to require 20% of affordable housing in new MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 19 apartment projects. Jack Ellefsen spoke to the need for improvements on 700 North and Riverside Drive specifically drainage, infrastructure and sidewalks as this has been an issue for many years and nothing had been done. Mavy Smith spoke about affordable housing and the lack of insulation used in the buildings causing people to need to apply for heat assistance. H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Ordinance: Early Notification Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. The Council initiated this petition to clarify early notification regulations and public outreach. The purpose of the proposed changes is to increase awareness and participation by the public for various types of City projects while still providing a timely review process for applicants. Related provisions of the City Code may also be amended as part of this petition. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCEarlyNotificationOrdinance.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, September 29, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, September 15, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, October 6, 2020; Tuesday, October 20, 2020; Tuesday, December 7, 2021; and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 20   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to adopt Ordinance 23 of 2023, approving various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts). Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. The Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/downtownbuildingheights   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 and Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 21   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt Ordinance 24 of 2023, to amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. Further move to adopt a legislative action initiating a petition to study bird- friendly glass and provide recommendations to the Council on best practices for its use. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to adopt Ordinance 25 of 2023, amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2022-23 only for items as shown on the motion sheet. A-1: Additional Funding for the Cultural Core ($291,000 from Salt Lake City’s Cultural Core Surplus Fund) A-4: Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain Rescope Change ($823,548 from CIP) A-5: Open Space Property Acquisition (City Parks) A-6: Open Space Property Acquisitions (Trails) ($300,00 from Impact Fees) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 22 A-7: Recapture Ont-time Emergency Solutions Grant CARES Act Funds ($209,552 Rescope from $200,000 of City Administration and $9,552 from VOA’s Homeless Outreach Program) A-8: Steiner Aquatics Center Roof Replacement ($1.38 million from General Fund Balance) A-10: Ranked Choice Voting Awareness Materials ($35,000 from General Fund Balance) A-12: Impact Fee Plan Consultant Contract Amendment ($27,000 Total; $9,000 Each from Fire, Parks, and Police Impact Fees) A-13: Flood Mitigation ($1 Million Total; $736,275 from General Fund Balance and Recapturing $263,725 of Unused NBA Allstar Game Activation Funding) A-14: Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement ($14,603,080 from ARPA) Note the $4 million to the RDA’s Westside Community Initiative was adopted on May 16 D-2: Fire Department – Other Reimbursements ($17,118 from General Fund) D-3: Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land Fund – Land Purchase near RAC ($395,442 from Parks Impact Fees and $500,000 back to Surplus Land Fund) D-4: Fire Impact Fee – Fee payment for Excess Capacity ($2.2 million of Fire Impact Fees of Which $1.7 million to the CIP Fund and $500,000 to the General Fund) D-5: Fire Training Center ($499,533 from General Fund to CIP Fund) D-6: Fisher Mansion Carriage House Impact Fee Reimbursement ($100,000 from Parks Impact Fees to CIP Cost Overrun Account) D-7: Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to Surplus ($129,688 from CIP Fund to Surplus Land Fund) D-8: Police Impact Fee – Unclaimed Refunds ($237,606 from Impact Fees to Police Impact Fees) D-9: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP ($25,000 from General Fund to Fleet Fund) D-10: Difference Between $4.3 Million Grant Adopted in Budget Amendment No.5 and the Actual $4.22 Million) ($78,560 from Misc. Grants) E-1: School-Age Quality 22 Grant (FY 22-25) ($780,000 from Misc. Grants (Funding and Award Title Correction)) E-2: School-Age Quality Summer Expansion FY22-23 ($373,338 from Misc. Grants) (Correction) G-1: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, FEMA – Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program ($115,472 from Misc. Grants) AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Councilmember Dugan, seconded by Councilmember Puy to adopt Ordinance 25 of 2023, amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget including the employment staffing document for item A-15 as shown on the motion MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 23 sheet. A-15: ARPA Funding to Perpetual Housing Fund External Developer ($10 Million from ARPA) Further move that funding for item A-15 is a contingent appropriation subject to Council approval of a term sheet, and the adoption ordinance shall be updated to reflect this condition. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. No questions 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Council Member Mano reviewed the rules of decorum. Steven Lemmon spoke to the statue of the mermaid at the Peace Gardens, the need to repair and provide security for the statue. Christopher Butler spoke to the Mayor’s comments about George Floyd’s death and the need to stop throwing funding at the police as they were not the answer to the issue. Kseniya Kniazeva spoke to the need to protect people and provide sanctioned campgrounds. Cindy Cromer spoke to the fire on 200 East, zero setbacks on the property next to the building (The Randy) and how setbacks affect the safety/views of surrounding properties. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments at Riverside Cottages The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning for portions of property located at 1500, 1516, 1520, & 1522 West 500 North from R1/7,000 (Single Family Residential District) to R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential District), and other portions of these properties from R-1/7,000 to SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 24 District), as well as amending the zoning of property located at 552 North 1500 West from R-1/7,000 to SR-3. In addition, the proposal would amend the Northwest Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of these amendment requests is to accommodate a redevelopment proposal to be submitted at a later date. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is located within Council District 1. Petitioner: Bert Holland of Hoyt Place Development LLC, representing the property owners. Petition No. PLNPCM2021-01075, PLNPCM2021- 01203, and PLNPCM2022-00674 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Monday, June 12, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2.Ordinance: Rezone at 1549 South, 1551 South, 1565 South, and 1000 West The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property located at 1549 South 1000 West, 1551 South 1000 West,1565 South 1000 West, and 1574 South 900 West from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi- Family Residential). The amendment is intended to allow the property owner to develop townhouses on the subject properties; however, no development plans have been submitted at this time. If the amendment is approved, the applicant could develop the site in accordance with the newly adopted RMF-30 zoning standards. The request did not require a master plan amendment. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The subject properties are located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Jordan Atkin, representing the property owner, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00733 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Monday, June 12, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 25 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 510 South 200 West from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The property is approximately 1.02 acres or 44,431 square feet. No development plans were submitted with this application. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petitioner: Jason Boel, representing the property owners. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01108. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 4.Ordinance: Nonconforming Signs The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Nonconforming Signs. The proposed amendment is generally focused on aligning sign standards with City goals, supporting businesses, and addressing any applicable state law. The proposed changes would also allow for more flexibility for the maintenance, reuse, modification, and updating of existing signs. The changes would also clarify when the removal of such signs is required. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00984 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 5.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.10) for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 10) for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 26 3.2rdinance 5e]one at $ppro[imately  SoutK  :est discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 6.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Melissa Greis The Council will consider approving the appointment of Melissa Greis to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 7.Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission – Jennifer Mayer-Glenn The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jennifer Mayer-Glenn to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 31, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 8.Board Reappointment: Housing Advisory and Appeals Board – Daniel Gaffin The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Daniel Gaffin to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board for a term ending December 31, 2027. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 27 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 9.Ordinance: Rezone at Approximately 1350, 1358, and 1370 South West Temple The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties located at approximately 1350, 1358, and 1370 South West Temple Street from RB (Residential Business District) to TSA-UC-C (Transit Station Area Urban Center Core). The request is to facilitate future redevelopment of the site to allow for a mixed-use structure that may include commercial and multi-family residential uses. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petitioner: Sattar Tabriz Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00810. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/WestTempleRezone. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve items L1-L8 from the consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve item L9 from the consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 28 RECUSED: Darin Mano ABSENT: Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 4 – 0 Pass Council Member Mano recused himself for item L9. Council Member Petro called for the motion and the vote. M. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:10 pm Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair Alejandro Puy _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, RDA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 6, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 6, 2023 29 The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 13, 2023. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Redevelopment Agency Director Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Sam Owen – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Wharton presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1     LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 2 of 2023 the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 2 Loca Building Authority of Salt Lake City for the Fiscal Year 2023-24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adjourn. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.RDA POTENTIAL ACTION:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 12 of 2023 approving the Fiscal Year 2024 RDA Budget reflected in the attached Key Changes spreadsheet. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass E.RDA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to adjourn. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 4 Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of January 3, 2023; February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023; April 11, 2023, and April 18, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 7, 2023; March 21, 2023, and April 11, 2023. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve the work session meeting minutes of January 3, 2023; February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023; April 11, 2023, and April 18, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023, and April 11, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Council Member Wharton read the resolution and thanked Betty Sawyer (Executive Director, Project Success Coalition & President, Ogden NAACP) and Representative Sandra Hollins for their attendance. Betty Sawyer spoke on the importance of the resolution, expressed appreciation for the City’s collaboration over the years, and thanked the Council for their commitment to the effort. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 18 of 2023 Joint Ceremonial Resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 6 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCAirports.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 and Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Sam Owen provided a brief introduction to the resolution. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1. Ordinance: Salt Lake School District Signs The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of Section 21A.46.052 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to pole signs on school properties. Public and private schools are located in various zoning districts around the City, and not all of the zoning districts permit freestanding pole signs. The signs are used to educate the community about activities at the school. Petitioner: Paul Schulte representing the Salt Lake City School District, Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00190    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 7 Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Council Member Fowler took a moment of personal privilege to note it was her last Council meeting, expressed gratitude to be a voting party to six budget years as a Council Member, spoke on the many programs that were important for the City to recognize/fund, and thanked fellow Council Members, Council Staff, Mayor, constituents of the City and many others. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 26 of 2023 Salt Lake School District Signs. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2. Resolution: Cannon Greens Community Garden at 1300 South and 800 West, Public Benefits Analysis and Authorizing the Lease Rate and Terms The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize below- market rent for lease of properties at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. The Public Lands Department is proposing authorization of leases to the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Wasatch Community Gardens (WCG) for eight City-owned parcels, totaling 2.41 acres.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 19 of 2023 authorizing below market rent for lease of properties located at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 8 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3. Ordinance: New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would adopt the proposed new five-year housing plan, Housing SLC. The City’s current housing plan, Growing SLC, expires at the end of the fiscal year, and a new moderate income housing plan is needed to meet State code requirements and receive priority consideration for State funding resources. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCHousingProposals.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 25, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances listed below (H4– H17) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.   Council Member Petro clarified for the record this was a State required plan for housing that specifically addressed what the City was doing for moderate housing, the specificity of the income level was intentional and conformed with State guidance. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 27 of 2023 New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 9 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 28 of 2023 Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 29 of 2023 approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund, including the contingent appropriations as listed on the motion sheet under Motion #2, items A through D. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 10 6. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 30 of 2023 setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24 as listed on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax Commission. A tax of .003599 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which: A. .002456 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $100,530,046 of ongoing revenue; and B. .000037 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $1,498,935 of one-time revenue; and C. .000580 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $24,916,220 of ongoing revenue; and D. .000424 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,342,055 of ongoing revenue; and E. .000007 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $293,207 of one-time revenue; and F. .000095 shall be credited as revenue in the special Governmental Immunity Fund for tort liability, generating $3,888,581 of ongoing revenue. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt $39,759,267 to be transferred into CIP, including approving $11,701,526 in funding as shown on the motion sheet. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 11 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Valdemoros, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5, items A through I. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 7. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   8. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 12   9. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023- 24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   10. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011, which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   11. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 13 of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   12. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   13. Ordinance: Accessible Parking Space Violation The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code to adjust penalties for accessible parking space violations to better correspond with similar penalties described in the State of Utah MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 14 Uniform Fine Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   14. Ordinance: Board Member Employee Status The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would clarify status of members appointed to Salt Lake City Boards and Commissions who receive compensation for their service.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   15. Ordinance: Past Due Accounts Receivable Fees The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to past due accounts receivable fees and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 15 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   16. Ordinance: Removal/Bagging of Parking Meters The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to removal of parking meters and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   17. Resolution: Public Safety Compensation Philosophy The Council will consider adopting a resolution identifying aspirational goals that public safety employees in the Fire Department and Police Department have compensation at or near the top of the local market.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt ordinances A through J as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 16 I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Council Members thanked and noted appreciation for the Mayor/Administration and Council Staff for a well thought out/balanced budget and for all the hard work directed to this years budget adoption. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Zakayrde Zufelt, Paige Huff, Jessica Lyman, Daniel Taylor, Wendy Garvin, Amanda DeBoard, Jessica Sweeten, Charlotte Brimhall, Jeanette Padilla, Dave John, Miranda Twitchell, Jonni (no last name), Kseniya Kniazeva, Destiny Newlin, Gucci Stacks, AJ Lonewolf, Roselynn Ellis, Brad Sahleen, and James Faircloth spoke in favor of proposed funding for sanctioned campgrounds. Comments included: more trash facilities and public utilities were needed in the downtown area so that public waste was not an issue for the homeless, abatements have been a constant issue, shelter bed availability was in constant demand, a safe place was needed to store personal items while away for jobs, interviews, etc., requesting the Council partner with Unsheltered Utah for a sanctioned campground, appreciation for the effort placed into prioritizing the safety and accessibility of resources to the City's homeless population, sanctioned campgrounds could allow for a greater co-op efficiency and receive resources from various entities, having a safe/secure home base would provide greater security and state of mind, it was a kindness to people to offer a safe place to be, funding efforts being a great start – but not enough, thankful for a Council who was innovative and took chances, and sanctioned campgrounds were an offer of hope that brought ambition. Jeneanne Lock praised the employees of the Rose Park Library, expressed gratitude for the approved Library budget, and asked the City to continue supporting City Libraries. Jay Larsen spoke of an ordinance passed in Spokane, Washington he supported regarding being a nuclear free City and encouraged the Council to pass a similar ordinance for Salt Lake City. Matt Lehnardt spoke regarding tiny home villages and detailed possible successes and benefits to the community as more of a permanent solution to homelessness. Kem Elbrader spoke regarding planned traffic calming measures near 1300 South/2100 East intersection and thanked the Council for the proposed projects and noted there was overwhelming support for the efforts in the neighborhood. Alison Elbrader spoke regarding planned traffic calming for 1300 South, the importance of traffic calming in this neighborhood and City-wide, and cited a recent dangerous vehicle vs. pedestrian experience involving her family. Council Member Puy took a moment of personal privilege and spoke regarding the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 17 Council’s action regarding catalytic funding being held for sanctioned camping/RV parking, his positive experiences visiting successful sanctioned campgrounds, and that this effort was the responsibility of many entities, not just the City. Council Member Wharton took a moment of personal privilege to encourage those supporting efforts for sanctioned camping/helping the unsheltered to reach out to other City Councils/government agencies to assist in similar efforts. Council Member Valdemoros took a moment of personal privilege to thank the Nomad Alliance and other similar groups supporting the sanctioned camping proposals and for all the work done on their part for the effort. Council Member Mano thanked those who attended the meeting and shared their experiences today. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space, Series 2023 The Council will consider adopting a resolution authorizing up to $25,500,000 Federally Taxable General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space; delegating authority to certain officials and officers of the City; and providing for related matters. Voters authorized $85 million for the bonds in November 2022. This would be the first issuance to fund several projects, three positions working on the bond projects, contingency funding, and public art. Some projects would be fully funded in the first issuance while others would have initial public engagement and planning. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCbonds.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 17 of 2023 authorizing up to $25.5 million of the City’s Federally taxable General Obligation Bonds for Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 18 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund – Salt Lake Sandwich Company, LLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $100,000 loan for Salt Lake Sandwich Company, Inc., at 1408 West Arapahoe Ave. from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Salt Lake Sandwich Company is a Poplar Grove based breakfast focused food truck. This loan will assist in the creation of 3.5 new jobs in the next year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Monday, June 12, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 39 of 2023 approving a $100,000 loan for Salt Lake Sandwich Company, LLC, from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinances: Rezone and Zoning Text Amendment at 754 South State Street The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at approximately 754 South State Street from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The purpose of the proposed amendment is to allow for the redevelopment of the property with an urban hospital. The Council will also consider an ordinance that would amend the text of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code to add Hospitals (including accessory lodging facility), and Ambulance Services (indoor & outdoor) as Conditional Uses in the D-1 Central Business District. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petitioner: Kirton McConkie, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01109   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 19 discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1782 South 1600 East The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Map for 1782 S 1600 E. The amendments are sought for the purpose of eventually legalizing the property in order to construct a single- family dwelling. The applicant is seeking to rezone the property from R-1/7000 (Single- Family Residential) to SR-3 (Special Development Residential). The applicant is also seeking to amend the Sugar House Future Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. No development plans have been submitted at this time. The properties are within Council District 7. Petitioner: Blaine Properties LLC, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01138 & PLNPCM2022-01139 The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation, therefore an ordinance has not been drafted. If the Council decides to approve the zone amendment, an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 20   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by CouncilMember Puy to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 21 Meeting adjourned at 8:43 pm. Council Minutes Approved: August 15, 2023. RDA Minutes Approved: September 12, 2023. LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair – Alejandro Puy _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, RDA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 13, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 22 Item B1 2 3 3 0 6 TO:Board Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Senior Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 MOTION SHEET LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY RE:MOTION SHEET – Resolution adopting Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority tentative budget for FY 2024-25 MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 1 Resolution No. of 2024 (Adopting the Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-2025) A resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025. PREAMBLE WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has created the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Building Authority”), and has appointed Mary Beth Thompson as the Budget Officer of the Building Authority (the “Budget Officer”); and WHEREAS, the Budget Officer has filed with the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Building Authority a tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority; and WHEREAS, the Board is required to review, consider, and tentatively adopt the tentative budget in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and data shall be a public record in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, available for public inspection at the Building Authority’s principal place of business during regular business hours for a period of at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget and shall be published, at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget in a public meeting, (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website and (b) on the Building Authority’s official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation; and WHEREAS, at the meeting in which the tentative budget for the capital projects fund is adopted, the Board shall establish the time and place of a public hearing to consider the adoption 2 and shall order that notice thereof be given at least seven days before the hearing (a) by publishing on the Utah Public Notice Website and (b) by publishing on the Building Authority’s official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority for the fiscal year 2024-2025, filed by the Budget Officer with the Board, is hereby adopted as the Building Authority’s tentative budget for the capital projects fund, and is ordered to be filed and maintained as a public record, available for public inspection in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, whose office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 451, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, until adoption of the final budget. 2. The Board shall hold a public hearing on the budget tentatively adopted. The public hearing shall be held at p.m. on , 2024 and , 2024, at the City & County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. Notice of the public hearing shall be given at least seven days before the hearing (a) by publishing on the Utah Public Notice Website and (b) by publishing on the Building Authority’s official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation. At the public hearing, the Board shall give interested persons in attendance or connected remotely an opportunity to be heard on the estimate of revenues and expenditures or any item in the tentative budget of the capital projects fund. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its approval and adoption. 3 Passed by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. PRESIDENT ATTEST: SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney Date: 5/1/2024 Item E1 2 3 3 0 7 TO:RDA Board Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Senior Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 MOTION SHEET REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY http://tinyurl.com/SLCFY25 RE:MOTION SHEET – Resolution adopting Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City tentative budget for FY 2024-25 MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Board approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Board not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO (Adopting the Tentative Budget of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-2025) A resolution of the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah adopting the tentative budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 77204/R-31-2016, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“Agency”) adopted a budget policy requiring the Agency, to the extent possible, to abide by all processes and procedures outlined in the Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah Cities (“Fiscal Procedures Act”); and WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Agency has filed a tentative budget with the Board; and WHEREAS, under the Fiscal Procedures Act, the Board is required to review, consider, and adopt the tentative budget in a regular or special hearing called for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and data shall be a public record available for public inspection for a period of at least ten days before the adoption of the final budget. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City that the tentative budget for the Agency for the fiscal year 2024-2025 attached hereto is hereby adopted as the Agency’s tentative budget and will be filed and maintained as a public record, available for public inspection at the Office of the City Recorder located in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah, until adoption of the final budget. Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, this day of May, 2024. Alejandro Puy Chair Approved as to form: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Allison Parks The Executive Director: does not request reconsideration requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director Attest: City Recorder The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, February 20, 2024.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney –   Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Allison Rowland –   Public Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant  The meeting was called to order at  7:00 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of December 5, 2023 and December 12, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of January 9, 2024 and January 16, 2024, and the January 2, 2024 Oath of Office meeting minutes. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the work session minutes of December 5, 2023 and December 12, 2023 as well as the formal meeting minutes of January 9, 2024, January 16, 2024 and the Oath of Office Minutes from January 2, 2024. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5.The Council will consider adopting a ceremonial resolution regarding peace. Council Members each read a section of the Resolution for Peace. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Resolution 03 of 2024, regarding peace. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 6.The Council will welcome representatives of the Department of Homeland Security who will give a brief introduction to their work on the state of hate and bias incidents. Council Member Petro welcomed the Department of Homeland Security. Nicole Rosich, Director of Non-governmental Organizations/Department of Homeland Security; and Haris Turee, Senior Director of Partnership and Engagement/Department of Homeland Security gave a brief overview of their purpose for traveling around the country meeting with minorities, college students, government officials and places of worship to address targeted violence, hate and bias incidents. They offer resources and training to ensure public safety and security in hopes of making all communities feel able to express themselves in a cohesive and safe manner.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2 1.Resolution: University of Utah Baseball Stadium Public Benefits Analysis The Council will accept public comment and consider authorizing a 99-year below- market ground lease to the University of Utah of 1.175 acres of Salt Lake City-owned property at approximately 1735 Sunnyside Avenue. This lease would facilitate the expansion of the University’s baseball field to meet the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) requirements for a competition field, but also result in the removal of one existing City-owned softball field and one multi-purpose field located at Sunnyside Park. In exchange for this lease, the University would commit $4.2 million to the City for improvements and new amenities at Sunnyside Park, as well as, possibly, other public benefits. The types of improvements and amenities would be determined through a community engagement process. Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the proposal. August Wachter spoke to issues youth baseball leagues had while trying to use the current baseball fields, asked the Council to not remove the two fields, review the use fees, and create more fields for youth baseball.  Josh Whitiker spoke to the use of the fields at Sunnyside Park by local sport leagues, the number of visitors that the leagues brought to the City, asked the Council to provide additional lighted softball fields somewhere in the City, and to keep the fields as they currently were.  Glen Seninger spoke in favor of the proposal, the fields were used not only by adults but by youth and a number of sports, the sports played in the park benefited mental health, and to use the money from the University of Utah (U of U) for not only upgrades but to make the park a destination spot. Kristina Robb spoke to the ball park's infrastructure, the quality of life for those who lived around the facility, issues with parking during U of U activities, and the need for safe access to and from the U of U through the neighborhood during events.  Jeremy Keele spoke in favor of the proposal, stated it was an incredible resource to the area at a low cost to the neighborhood, and was a great opportunity to reinvest into the park.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 3 B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Janet Hemming spoke in opposition to the baseball stadium, wanted more facts and impacts to be studied. Randy Jensen spoke in support of the proposal. James Webster spoke to history of the landscaping ordinance, other options would allow more growth in the area, asked Council to table the proposal and allow additional work sessions to address concerns. Cindy Cromer spoke to the funding for the proposal and that it would go into the General Fund and not be dedicated to open space, the construction phases were hazardous and not regulated, asked the Council to write something into the agreement regarding pedestrian and vehicle safety along Sunnyside Avenue during construction. James Sorenson spoke in favor of the proposal and reviewed the history of determining the location for the stadium. Robert Kingsford spoke to the benefits the park changes would have for youth sports and the community.  Daniel Mangiapani spoke regarding the cost for the youth baseball leagues to use the fields and asked the Council to lower the use fees for parks.  Lance Pendleton spoke in favor of the upgrades to the park that would allow various sports to host games. James Alfandre spoke in favor of the proposal however, it could be done to benefit the community in a better way, fair market value should be leveraged, give the community an opportunity to show the U of U what Sunnyside Park should be and have the U of U create it (not the other way around).  Michael Valentine thanked everyone for speaking, stated a ninety nine year lease was a long time; asked the Council to table the proposal for more discussion to determine what the money was used for and ensure the proposal was the best deal for the community.  Steve Alder spoke to the history between the U of U and Salt Lake City and ensuring impacts were mitigated prior to project being constructed. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 4 Brian Fullmer gave a brief overview of the ordinance. Arikka Fullmer spoke in favor of removing the covenant to allow construction of a garage and accessory dwelling unit on her property. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 06 of 2024 AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Rezone at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties located at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to CB (Community Business District). The proposal would allow for a wider range of land uses including multi-family, commercial, retail, and restaurants. Future development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 6. Petitioner: Tyler Morris, representing the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00385. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5 2.Ordinance: Avenues Restrictive Covenant The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would relinquish Salt Lake City’s interests in restrictive covenants on 18 single-family properties in the Avenues neighborhood near LDS Hospital in Council District 3. The proposal would not change the zoning of the affected properties. Brian Fullmer  gave a brief overview of the proposal. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Dugan to Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4.Ordinance: Community Benefit and Tenant Displacement Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance designed to prevent the loss of existing affordable housing, counteract tenant displacement, and provide tenant relocation assistance when they are displaced by new development. The amendments to Salt Lake City Code would enact a new ordinance on General Plans (Title 19)and make corresponding changes in sections related to zoning (Titles 18 and 21A). These changes are designed to help implement policies approved by the Council in 2023 in the Thriving in Place anti-displacement plan. Allison Rowland gave a brief overview of the proposal. En Canada spoke to the need to do more in terms of displacement, controlling the rental fees, restrictions needed on what could be built, and direct contractors toward home ownership options. Kristina Robb spoke in support of Thriving in Place, expressed concern that the infrastructure on the east side could not support the proposal, and asked the Council to keep the discussion open in a transparent manner to help communities determine how to use this proposal.  Cindy Cromer spoke to the need to understand the cost of replacing housing, what were the cost benefits, needed housing at eighty percent or less of Average Median Income (AMI), and change text regarding historic structure protection.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 6 Steve Erickson  thanked the Council Ior the work on the amendments encouraJed moYinJ it Iorward and makinJ chanJes as needed in the Iuture. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.  AYE: $leMandro 3uy Chris :harton 'aniel 'uJan 'arin 0ano Sarah <ounJ 9ictoria 3etro (Ya Lope] ChaYe] Final Result:  ±  3ass 5.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The proposed amendment includes over $1.8 million for police officer overtime related to the Clean Neighborhoods Program, three new full-time mechanics in the Fleet Division, $230,000 to expand a City air quality incentives program, and a new software tool to identify non-compliant short-term rentals among other items. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 7 Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Dugan to Council adopt Ordinance 07 of 2024 amending Fiscal Year 2024 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items and move to authorize release of the condition regarding the air quality incentives program expansion. • A-1: Air Quality Incentives Program Expansion for Electric Bikes and Indoor Air Purification ($230,000 from Nondepartmental Holding Account to the Sustainability Department One-time and Satisfying Condition on the Funds) • A-7: Increase in Fleet Maintenance Capacity ($399,909 from General Fund Balance of which $91,809 is ongoing and $308,100 is one-time) • A-9: Mobile Phone Data Extraction Software ($194,540 from the IMS Fund Balance ongoing) • A-10 Versaterm Case Service Software Upgrade ($203,148 from the IMS Fund Balance one-time) AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Ben Luedke  gave a brief overview of the budget amendment. Kristina Robb  spoke in support of the budget amendment especially items that affected Liberty Park, police overtime would also benefit those that were un-sheltered, and the new software tool would help with enforcement of short-term rentals. C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Item not held. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Council Member Puy reviewed the rules of decorum. Thayne Macarille spoke to the increase of un-sheltered persons at the Walgreens on 900 South, requested a camera system be put in place as well as additional police patrols in the area, reviewed the crimes being committed at the business, and asked the Council for help in addressing the increase in activity. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 8 Terry Marasco spoke to the druJ issues alonJ the -ordan 5iYer Trail unsheltered were eatinJ duck and Joose eJJs Tuestioned iI the trail could not be dealt with how could deYelopers be handled and noted the problem needed to be cleaned up immediately as it was unacceptable. Razan Alkhateeb, Ryeleigh Hewlett, Hannah Orr, Sam Shootman, Nicole Burnard, Karen Lowe, Sheherazada Hameed, Fran Lopez, Mahan Khalsa, William Buwaya, Miles Perrett, En Canada, Sahar Al- Shoubaki, Noah Patton, Ercillia Dott, Mackenzie Wood, Nova Evers, Stewart Robinson, Michael Sh-Han, Michael Valentine, Summer Joos, Ambreen Khan, Jakey Siolo, Ran Zamir, Michael Veranakis, Andrea Ramos, Aziz Ahbuzyah, Kaialani Cretty, Daniel White, Adam Stone, Veronica Seydoman, Chloe Duggar, Cali Wilson,  Shea Hardy, Zoe Wood, Natalie Diltz, Benjamin Fischer, Naomi Flinders, Marid Ruiz, Amir Kalay, Jill James, Maya Skurnik, Ethan Maryon, Laurel Hiatt, Abby Carroll, Kaile Akina, Heather Cox, Liz Defriez, Rodney Roberts, Olivia Marron, Josie Conn, Kower Bingham, Dani Erickson, Stephanie Mortensen, Jenna Martin, Zeaid Hasan, Jack Bellows, Leila Mujic, Hana Korkut, Fae Wilder, Weston Nichols, Trinity Siliman, Sariah Vanderveur, Quinn Murphy, Emily Roberts, Rachel Pernick,Serina Hammon, Fern Robin, Jenna Lieder, Jaz Dumas, Tangata’o Lakepa Tavai, Afa Aikona, and Melissa Espinoza spoke  to the war in Israel (in summary) stating the following: •Reviewed genocides throughout history •Questioned why language calling for a cease fire could not be included in the resolution •Needed to pressure Federal Government to get involved in the process, not just send money to Israel •Please recognize the number of people hurting, dying, and needing help in Israel and to do something now •Call for the cease fire even if it was a symbolic resolution •Peace Resolution was not what was asked for, please do what the community was asking for •Statistics of deaths in Israel since October 2023 •History of Zionism and the creation of the state of Israel •Protect the children and families of Israel •Key issue was to act sooner than later •People would continue to attend Council meetings calling for a cease fire until a Resolution with the requested language was created and passed •End all US aid to Israel and end the war •Implementation of hate crime protection for Palestinians in Salt Lake City should be a priority of the Council •What more could be done to get the point across that a cease fire was the only answer Rabbi Spector spoke to why a cease fire would not help the issues in Israel, reviewed problems with the Palestinian people, and thanked the Council for the Resolution of Peace focusing on the people of Salt Lake City.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9 Rabbi Zippel thanked the Council and Mayor for the Peace Resolution/dedication for peace and said a prayer of peace for all.  Hannah Follender, Sean Chady, Matthew Weinstein and Yotam Suoray spoke to the treatment of Jews in Salt Lake City stating (in summary): •Ensure the Peace Resolution meant something, not result in a hollow promise to the citizens of Salt Lake City •No one wanted the war to continue •The Jewish community was grateful for the Resolution for Peace •Jewish Americans in Salt Lake City were concerned over the threats of violence they were seeing on United States soil •Thanked the Council for the Peace Resolution that was passed at the beginning of the meeting Eret Meir encouraged new dialogues and new conversations as the old ones were not working. Brandon Jeanpierre spoke to gentrification of Salt Lake City and asked to speak to the Council in person.  Trinity Siliman spoke to the issues of the un-housed and stated an increase in policing would not help the issue.  E.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 704 East 900 South Extension The Council will consider adopting a resolution extending the time period for satisfying the conditions set forth in Ordinance No.6 of 2023 rezoning the property at approximately 704 East 900 South from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to SNB (Small Neighborhood Business). The deadline extension would give the property owner an additional year to satisfy the conditions of the ordinance. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 10 Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Resolution 04 of 2024, extending the time period for satisfying the conditions set forth in Ordinance No 06 of 2023 by one year. AYE: $leMandro Puy, Chris :harton, 'aniel 'ugan, 'arin Mano, 6arah <oung, 9ictoria Petro, (va Lopez Chavez Final Result:  ± 0 Pass F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. G.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment for Daycare Facilities The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to childcare facilities, including Daycare Centers, Home Daycares, and Home Occupations. The proposal would amend sections 21A.33 Land Use Tables, 21A.36.030 Home Occupations, 21A.36.130 Daycares, 21A.60.020 List of Defined terms, and 21A.62.040 Definitions of Terms. The proposed amendments intend to align City daycare related regulations more closely with Utah State Code and reduce zoning barriers to childcare facilities in the City. The proposed amendments would apply citywide. Petition No.: PLNPCM2019-00225. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 6, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 11 2.Ordinance: Zoning Map and General Plan Amendments at Approximately 2445 South 500 East (Woodland Commons) The Council will set the date oI Tuesday 0arch   at  p.m. to accept public comment and consider adoptinJ an ordinance that would amend the ]oninJ oI properties located at appro[imately  South  (ast Irom 5 SinJle)amily 5esidential to 50) 0oderate 'ensity 0ulti)amily 5esidential . This proposal would also amend the SuJar +ouse Community 0aster 3lan )uture Land 8se 0ap. The proposed amendments would Iacilitate the construction oI eiJht townhomes at this property. Consideration may be JiYen to re]oninJ the property to another ]oninJ district with similar characteristics. The proMect is within Council 'istrict . 3etitioner -ason )oster with $tlas $rchitects representinJ the property owner. 3etition 1o. 3L13C0 3L13C0. FYI – Project Timeline: subMect to chanJe per Chair direction or Council discussion) %rieIinJ  Tuesday )ebruary   Set 3ublic +earinJ 'ate  Tuesday )ebruary   +old hearinJ to accept public comment  Tuesday 0arch   at  p.m. T(1T$TI9( Council $ction  Tuesday 0arch   StaII 5ecommendation  Set date. 3.Ordinance: Yalecrest – Laird Heights Local Historic District The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map to apply the H-Historic Overlay District, establishing the Yalecrest-Laird Heights Local Historic District. The proposal includes 66 homes located on Laird Avenue from 1300 East to 1500 East, including the homes on Laird Circle and Uintah Circle. The project is within Council District 6. Petitioner: Kelly McAleer. Petition No.: PLNHLC2023-00074. For more information visit tinyurl.com/HistoricDistrictsSLC. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 6, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12 4.Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 803, 805, 807, and 815 West Simondi Avenue and 802, 806, 810, and 814 West 300 North The Council Zill set the date of Tuesday 0arch  2024 at  p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that Zould amend the zoning of properties located at appro[imately 03 0 0 and  :est Simondi Avenue and 02 0 0 and 4 :est 300 North from R/000  SingleFamily Residential  to R0F30 LoZ Density 0ultiFamily . The proposal Zould also amend the NorthZest Community 0aster Plan Future Land Use 0ap. The proposal Zould alloZ greater fle[ibility in housing types to develop these properties. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district Zith similar characteristics. The proMect is Zithin Council District 2. Petitioner: Neighbor:orks. Petition No.: PLNPC02023003  3LN3C00300. )or more information visit http://tinyurl.com/SimondiAve300NorthRezone. FYI – Project Timeline:  subMect to change per Chair direction or Council discussion Briefing  Tuesday February 3 2024 Set Public Hearing Date  Tuesday February 20 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment  Tuesday 0arch  2024 at  p.m. T(NTATI9( Council Action  Tuesday 0arch 2 2024 Staff Recommendation  Set date. 5.Ordinance: Zoning Terms and Definitions Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the zoning ordinance. The proposal would remove Chapter 21A.60 List of Terms and would also amend Chapter 21A.62 Definitions. Other amendments are made throughout Title 21A for clarity and consistency. No zoning standards or land use regulations are changed by this text amendment. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00194. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 13 6.Resolution: Authorizing the Salt Lake County Housing Authority to Operate within Salt Lake City for The Deeply Affordable Housing Development 44 North Apartments The Council will set the date oI Tuesday 0arch   at  p.m. to accept public comment and consider adoptinJ a resolution declarinJ there is a need Ior the Salt Lake County +ousinJ $uthority doinJ business as +ousinJ Connect to e[ercise its powers within the boundaries oI Salt Lake City. The 5esolution would allow +ousinJ Connect in partnership with the nonproIit )irst Step +ouse to deYelop  apartments oI one and two bedrooms as an aIIordable housinJ deYelopment at  and  1orth  :est. The rents would be aIIordable to tenants earninJ    oI area median income or $0I. FYI – Project Timeline: subMect to chanJe per Chair direction or Council discussion) %rieIinJ  Tuesday )ebruary   Set 3ublic +earinJ 'ate  Tuesday )ebruary   +old hearinJ to accept public comment  Tuesday 0arch   at  p.m. T(1T$TI9( Council $ction  Tuesday 0arch   StaII 5ecommendation  Set date. 7.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2024- 25.The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 14 8.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Alex Vandiver The Council will consider approving the appointment of $le[ 9andiver to the Racial (quity in Policing Commission %oard for a term ending 'ecember 2, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: subMect to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) %riefing - Tuesday, )ebruary 20, 2024 6et Public +earing 'ate - na +old hearing to accept public comment - na T(NT$T,9( Council $ction - Tuesday, )ebruary 20, 2024 6taff Recommendation - $pprove. 9.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Detria Taylor The Council will consider approving the appointment of 'etria Taylor to the Racial (quity in Policing Commission %oard for a term ending 'ecember 2, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: subMect to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) %riefing - Tuesday, )ebruary 20, 2024 6et Public +earing 'ate - na +old hearing to accept public comment - na T(NT$T,9( Council $ction - Tuesday, )ebruary 20, 2024 6taff Recommendation - $pprove. 10.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Chloe Raymundo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Chloe Raymundo to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 11.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Diya Oommen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Diya Oommen to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 15 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 12.%oard $ppointment Racial (quity in Policing Commission ± +eather 6tringfellow The Council will consider approving the appointment of Heather Stringfellow to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. )<, ± ProMect Timeline (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 13.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Jason Hinojosa The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jason Hinojosa to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 14.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Rodrigo Fernandez-Esquivias The Council will consider approving the appointment of Rodrigo Fernandez-Esquivias to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 16 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve. Motion Moved by Council Member :harton, seconded by Council Member <oung to approve the Consent agenda. $<( Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez )inal Result 7 – 0 Pass +.$'J28RNM(NT Meeting adjourned at 11:35 pm Minutes Approved:  _______________________________  City Council Chair Victoria Petro _______________________________  City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.  This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, February 20, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024  PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez The following Council Members were absent: Sarah Young Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lindsay Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Johnathan Pappasideris – Senior City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Achintya Mahajan – Constituent Liaison Intern The meeting was called to order at 7:02 PM MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1-B3 will be heard as one public hearing. 1.Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant will fund $9,280 for the Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2 2.Grant Application: Utah Department of Transportation Improvements to State Street Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Transportation Department to the Utah Department of Transportation. If awarded, the grant will fund improvements to State Street including the addition of a mid-block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3.Grant Application: Assistance to Firefighters Submission Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to FEMA. If awarded, the grant will fund the purchase of 12 Automated External Defibrillators and 5 CPR Devices to replace current devices past their service life. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 3 Sylvia Richards  provided a brief introduction to the three grants.  James Allen  spoke in support of adding pedestrian crossings across State Street and asked the Council to consider adding additional crossings in the downtown area which would provide additional access to transit and businesses.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to  close the public hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a future Consent  Agenda for action.   AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 4 Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 20 of 2024, for a temporary road closure of 7200 West between Interstate 80 and California Avenue. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 4.Ordinance: Temporary Closure of 7200 West Between Interstate 80 and California Avenue The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would temporarily close a segment of 7200 West between I-80 and California Ave to mitigate unsafe conditions. State law allows temporarily closing certain streets until the unsafe conditions are mitigated or up to two years, whichever is less. Recurring illegal dumping activity on and adjacent to the road has worsened the risk of fire and caused mitigation expenses to the City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ben Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the item. Jen Robinson spoke in support of the temporary road closure.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5 C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Rezone at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties located at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South from R-1/7,000 (Single- Family Residential District) to CB (Community Business District). The proposal would allow for a wider range of land uses including multi-family, commercial, retail, and restaurants. Future development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 6. Petitioner: Tyler Morris, representing the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00385. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt the Ordinance for a Rezone at 2260, and 2290 East 1300 South. NAY: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 0 – 6 Fail Council Members discussed the concerns of affordable housing in the area.  Council Member Dugan spoke in opposition to the motion to adopt the ordinance as there was no affordable housing offered and the developer was not open to making it affordable housing and provided and alternative motion. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to reject the Ordinance for a Rezone at 2260, and 2290 East 1300 South. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 6 Council Member Lopez Chavez asked Rachel Otto to speak to the illegal demolition of the 5th Ward House and the next steps for restoring the building. Rachel Otto read the following statement: The 5th Ward House located at 740 South 300 West was designated as a local landmark in 1979 and was subject to the requirements outlined in the Historic Preservation Overlay zone. It was unlawful to make any exterior alterations to a local landmark without obtaining approval. On Sunday, March 31, 2024,the City received notice that there was demolition work  begun on this property with no City permits. Our staff immediately went to the site and  issued a Stop Work order that day. Monday, April 1, 2024, Civil Enforcement issued a Zoning Notice and Order for two  violations: work without a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) and work without  permits. Each carry a$100/day fine, resulting in $200/day after “a reasonable time to  cure the violation," which in this instance would be restoration of the portion of the  building that has been demolished. We are working with the Attorney’s Office on what  reasonable can be defined as in this instance Finally, as discussed earlier during the Work Session, the Administration transmitted to the Council just last week a proposed text amendment that would apply to these types of situations in the future. It would: 1.Increase the fees for starting work on a historic structure without permits, 2. Eliminate the ability for a property owner to apply for economic hardship when demolition begins without a permit, 3. Prohibit the redevelopment of the property for 25 years if the building was not restored. This would add some additional tools the City could be used in situations like this in   the future. Thank you very much to the Council for your support on this; it has been  a difficult and devastating situation for many and we are taking this very seriously.  2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Frederick Jenny spoke to the Transportation Plan and asked the Council to include the Rio Grande Plan in the Transportation Plan, as a grand infrastructure project. Bernie Hart thanked the community and Council members for helping him to change the way he interacted with members of society, discussed the number of people using homeless services in Salt Lake City and the programs they were using. Dr. Kevin Donahue spoke to a plan that was submitted to the City to alter a 95-year old community that went through the appeals court, regarding a garage that was a dwelling unit. Josh Dee spoke to the war over seas in Gaza and the business of war. Sitina Piutau spoke to needing a grant or funds to assist refugees. Jim Webster spoke to the 5th Ward Meeting House demolition and how builders were more apt to violate the code and ask for forgiveness than to follow the code. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 7 would only start the annexation process. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval, including designating the zoning of the properties annexed into the City after it has gone through the public process. )<, ± 3URMHFW 7LPHOLQH (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 0RWLRQ 0RYHG E\ &RXQFLO 0HPEHU 3X\ VHFRQGHG E\ &RXQFLO 0HPEHU 3HWUR WR DGRSW 5HVROXWLRQ  RI  1RUWKSRLQW $UHD $QQH[DWLRQ ,QLWLDWLRQ $<( Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro $%6(17 Sarah Young )LQDO 5HVXOW 6 – 0 Pass E.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County, generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. This resolution F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund – Parea, LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $350,000 loan for Parea, LLC at 320 East 900 South from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Parea, LLC is a new restaurant/market for Greek food from Chef Manoli Katsanevas. This loan will assist in the creation of fifteen new jobs in the next year and the retention of thirty current jobs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 8 Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to  adopt Ordinance 21 of 2024 approving a $350,000 loan for Parea, LLC, from  the Economic Development Loan Fund.  AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Window Requirements for New Construction in The City’s Local Historic Districts The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code and amend the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local historic districts and landmark sites. The proposed amendments add clarity to existing processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window installation in new construction projects. The City currently has 14 local historic districts and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00444 2. Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving the 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation Master Plan that was adopted in 1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight long-term policies called “key moves” and over 60 implementation actions to guide transportation decisions citywide over the coming decades. 3. Ordinance: Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would make the following amendments to City code: • Zoning Map Amendments: rezone properties to align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 9 • Zoning Text Amendments: establish a new zone, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 (MU- 8), and rezone some properties within Ballpark Station Area to MU-8. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00169  2Udinance 08 =one SiJn 7e[t $PendPentV 7Ke CoXncLO ZLOO Vet tKe GDte oI 7XeVGD\ 0D\   Dt  SP to DcceSt SXEOLc coPPent DnG conVLGeU DGoStLnJ Dn oUGLnDnce tKDt ZoXOG DPenG YDULoXV VectLonV oI 7LtOe $ oI tKe Salt Lake City Code to eVtDEOLVK VLJn UeJXODtLonV IoU tKe )oUP %DVeG 0L[eG 8Ve  08 ]onLnJ GLVtULct 7Ke SUoSoVeG DPenGPentV DUe LntenGeG to eVtDEOLVK VLJn UeJXODtLonV IoU tKe SUoSoVeG 08 ]onLnJ GLVtULct 3etLtLon 1o 3L13C0  5eVolXtion 1oUtKSoint $Uea $nne[ation ,nitiation 7Ke CoXncLO ZLOO Vet tKe GDte oI 7XeVGD\ 0D\   to DcceSt SXEOLc coPPent IoU D UeVoOXtLon tKDt ZoXOG LnLtLDte tKe Dnne[DtLon SUoceVV IoU ODnG OocDteG Ln XnLncoUSoUDteG SoUtLonV oI SDOt LDNe CoXnt\ JeneUDOO\ OocDteG DOonJ  :eVt DnG ZLtKLn tKe DUeD LGentLILeG DV tKe 1oUtKSoLnt coPPXnLt\ 7KLV UeVoOXtLon ZoXOG onO\ VtDUt tKe Dnne[DtLon SUoceVV 7Ke Dnne[DtLon ZLOO eYentXDOO\ coPe EDcN to tKe CoXncLO IoU ILnDO DSSUoYDO LncOXGLnJ GeVLJnDtLnJ tKe ]onLnJ oI tKe SUoSeUtLeV Dnne[eG Lnto tKe CLt\ DIteU Lt KDV Jone tKUoXJK tKe SXEOLc SUoceVV 6. Ordinance: Enforcement on Work Without A Certificate of Appropriateness Zoning Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code for work done without a certificate of appropriateness. The proposal would address unlawful construction and demolition activities in the H Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay. The proposed amendments are intended to protect historic resources, including designated local historic districts and local landmark sites. The changes are aimed at adding enforcement tools to prevent and counter potential code violations and at establishing a clear process to remedy alterations or demolition that occur without approval. The proposed changes will affect Chapter 21A.34.020 and related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023- 00336.  7. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake – Fraser Nelson The Council will consider approving the appointment of Fraser Nelson to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake Board for a term ending April 2, 2028. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 10 0otion 0oYed Ey CoXncil 0ePEeU 0ano Veconded Ey CoXncil 0ePEeU 3Xy to aSSUoYe all itePV oI tKe ConVent aJenda otKeU tKan iteP *. $<( Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro $%S(17 Sarah Young )inal 5eVXlt 6 – 0 Pass 0otion 0oYed Ey CoXncil 0ePEeU 3etUo Veconded Ey CoXncil 0ePEeU 3Xy to aSSUoYe iteP * oI tKe ConVent aJenda $<( Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro $%S7$,1 Darin Mano $%S(17 Sarah Young )inal 5eVXlt 5 – 0 Pass + $'-28510(17 Meeting adjourned at 7:37 PM Minutes Approved:  _______________________________  City Council Chair Victoria Petro _______________________________  City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.  This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, April 2, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1  FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget SALT LAKE CITY FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL IOC FUTURE HOST COMMISSION VISIT FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL There will be no major tax increases in this budget. FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL investment to discount fees for all youth programs $57,000 YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS City to reimburse difference in fees for the past two years FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL PARKS & PUBLIC LANDS Groundbreaking for Glendale Regional Park Phase IAnticipated to open to the public in late spring or early summer of 2025 FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL MAIN STREET proposed for a comprehensive economic analysis $115,000 Main Street Promenade Conceptual Design Study to be released this week FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget SALT LAKE CITY FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL DELTA CENTER FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL AFFORDABLE HOUSING dedicated in March 2024 to affordable housing from RDA $17.7M additional funding for affordable housing via FY25 Budget $2.59M FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL HOMELESSNESS Doubling of the Rapid Intervention Team New Community Outreach Case Manager for the City Justice Court FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL PUBLIC SAFETY ●Medical Response Paramedic Team Deploy with Medical Response Team to provide basic care when we arrive on a scene with firefighters, EMTs, and social workers ●Renegotiated salary structures ●Applying for a federal grant To cover $1.5 million of costs over 3 years for 10-12 new police officers dedicated to the Jordan River and North Temple ●Ongoing training recommended by Racial Equity in Policing Commission Including leadership cohorts, school resource training, and culturally responsive therapy for negative police interactions FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget SALT LAKE CITY ARTS, CULTURE, EVENTS (ACE) FUND FY 2025 Budget MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL supported with grants in 2024 126 events proposed expansion to support community-driven arts, culture, and events $100,000 Complete Streets Reconstruction & Overlay 2025 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction Jordan River Revitalization, amplifying bond investment Neighborhood Byways Repair most fragmented sidewalks Courts and playgrounds Safer crossings citywide $970K $750K $6.25M $1.5M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $603K $4M $300K FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget SALT LAKE CITY Item H1 & H2 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items H-1 and H-2 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS MAY 7, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes. $276,000 from FY24 CIP appropriation for Urban Trails, which focused on the 9-Line Trail. None UDOT Safe Sidewalk Program Construct wide sidewalk on Redwood Rd. (900 South to Indiana Ave.), make crossing improvements to the Redwood Rd./Indiana Ave. intersection. Upgrade sidewalk, curb & gutter to a 10-12 foot width appropriate for use in a multi-use trail with a full-height curb and park strip. Needs Public Hearing No $100,000 UDOT Transportation Division 2.No.None.Comcast Project UP Partner with local non- profits which serve refugees. Through subawards, provide non-profits with funding to teach digital literacy courses and provide laptops to refugees. Needs Public Hearing No $150,000 Comcast Housing Stability Division Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Amy Dorsey, Sandee Moore Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com EC: Division of Transportation, Jon Larsen, Becka Roolf FROM: Adrienne Buhler DATE: December 8, 2023 SUBJECT: WFRC CRP Grant Application Notification FUNDING AGENCIES: Wasatch Front Regional Council GRANT PROGRAM: Transportation and Land Use Connect (TLC) REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $120,000 DEPARTMENT: Transportation COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: 12/6/2023 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Match Required $20,000 In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: This project will assess potential changes to Salt Lake City's one-way streets, 500 South and 600 South, from Interstate 15 to residential areas near 700 East. Redevelopment is reshaping the landscape from auto-centric businesses and warehouses to apartments, restaurants, and offices -- places where people live, work, and play. The streets are boundaries for three WFRC centers including the Salt Lake City Metropolitan Center; the streets themselves are transportation barriers, particularly for pedestrians and bicyclists, with a history of fatalities. This study will consider redesigning the streets as boulevards with improved walking and bicycling along them and better connections across them. This project will complete concept reports, cost estimates, and a summary of project engagement for transformative changes. The match for this project will be met with staff time and local cash funds. Item H1 & H2 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items H-1 and H-2 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS MAY 7, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes. $276,000 from FY24 CIP appropriation for Urban Trails, which focused on the 9-Line Trail. None UDOT Safe Sidewalk Program Construct wide sidewalk on Redwood Rd. (900 South to Indiana Ave.), make crossing improvements to the Redwood Rd./Indiana Ave. intersection. Upgrade sidewalk, curb & gutter to a 10-12 foot width appropriate for use in a multi-use trail with a full-height curb and park strip. Needs Public Hearing No $100,000 UDOT Transportation Division 2.No.None.Comcast Project UP Partner with local non- profits which serve refugees. Through subawards, provide non-profits with funding to teach digital literacy courses and provide laptops to refugees. Needs Public Hearing No $150,000 Comcast Housing Stability Division Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Amy Dorsey, Sarah Behrens Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com EC: Housing Stability Division| Heather Royal FROM: Adrienne Buhler DATE: April 24, 2024 SUBJECT: Comcast Project UP Grant Application Submission Notification Memo FUNDING AGENCIES: Comcast GRANT PROGRAM: Comcast Project UP REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $150,000 DEPARTMENT: Housing Stability COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: 4/19/2024 SPECIFICS: ☐Equipment/Supplies Only ☐Technical Assistance ☐Provides positions. ☐ Existing ☐New ☐Overtime ☐Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: ☐Match Required In-Kind Services and ☐Cash GRANT DETAILS: This application requests $150,000 to partner through sub-awards with local nonprofits experienced in administering refugee resettlement programs to provide digital literacy courses. In addition, this funding will be used to provide refugees with laptops through these partner nonprofits. Item H3 (motion 1) CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET #1 – Ballpark Station Area Rezone & Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00169 This motion sheet pertains to the majority of the petition. (Motion sheet #2 pertains to properties Council Member Mano will recuse himself from considering.) MOTION 1 I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. Item H3 (motion 2) CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET #2 – Ballpark Station Area Rezone & Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00169 This motion sheet pertains to the properties Council Member Mano has recused himself from. (Motion Sheet #1 pertains to the majority of the zoning petition) MOTION 1 I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: May 7, 2024 RE:Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00169 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 2, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 NEW INFORMATION The Council did not have any significant concerns or questions during the April 2 briefing. The Council supported including the additional uses recommended by Planning staff in the final draft of the ordinance. These include; amphitheater, health and fitness facility, community recreation center, plaza and stadium. The Council asked why the city owned property that includes the baseball stadium and parking lot are proposed to stay as PL. Planning staff said they will start the zoning changes for the city owned parcels now that the ballpark next project is wrapping up. They will bring zoning changes for the city owned parcels to the council to consider. Additionally, Council Member Mano had notified the Council staff and the Attorney’s Office that he owns some properties within the ballpark rezone area. In order to allow Council Member Mano to participate in the larger zoning discussion, the ordinance has been divided into two parts; the majority of the proposed zoning petition, then properties Council Member Mano has an interest in. The Attorney’s and Recorder’s offices recommended holding one public hearing, then when the Council considers action, Council Member Mano will recuse himself from the discussion and potential action on the properties he has a stake in. Two motions sheets will be provided: 1. Majority of the petition 2. Properties Council Member Mano is recusing himself from participation. Page | 2 The following information was provided for the April 2 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area plan (adopted by the council in October 2022), and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: Zoning Map Amendments would rezone properties to align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. Zoning Text Amendments would establish a new zone, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) Zoning District and would rezone some properties within Ballpark Station Area to MU-8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in support of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council. Sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. It has been transmitted to the Council office and will be considered concurrent with these zoning petitions. Zoning Maps The existing and proposed zoning maps are on page 2 of the transmittal letter. They are provided below for quick access. Page | 3 Existing Zoning Map Proposed Zoning Map ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Potential addition of uses to the final ordinance The transmittal letter includes a recommendation from planning staff for the Council to consider including the uses listed below as permitted in the land use table for the MU-8 zoning district. These recommendations came up after the Planning Commission reviewed and made their recommendation. o Amphitheater Formal o Amphitheater Informal o Health and Fitness Facility o Community Recreation Center o Plaza o Stadium The Council could choose to include these in the final ordinance without the petition going back to the Planning Commission because the potential changes are considered to be within the scope of the petition. If adopted, these uses would be added to the MU-8 zoning district and would be permitted wherever the MU-8 is located throughout the city. Properties with no Recommended Zoning Changes Not all parcels within the study area are being proposed to be rezoned. The following properties are proposed to stay with their existing zoning: Page | 4 o Most PL Public Lands (One PL parcel, currently a school, is proposed to be rezoned to MU-8) o RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot (This will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process.) o R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue o OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed-Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Creation of the Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) district Pages 6-8 of the Planning Commission staff report outline the following key components of the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Also, please see Attachment A to this report. It includes the MU-8 development standards proposed by Planning Staff. o The proposed MU-8 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. o The purpose of the district is to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. o The regulations allow buildings up to eight stories in height with focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. o The proposed development and design standards address ground floor activation, building form, massing, scale, and building placement. o The standards aim to facilitate a pedestrian friendly, engaging experience and mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties and properties located in low density zones. o Most of the properties proposed to be rezoned to MU-8 are currently zoned with a commercial designation. One parcel that is currently zoned PL is proposed to be rezoned to MU-8 as well. o The current Bees Stadium and the Parking lot to the north are not proposed to be zoned MU-8 in order to give the City maximum flexibility if/when the Ballpark Next process is completed. South State Street Corridor Overlay Zoning vs MU-8 Some of the properties in the project area are also in the South State Street Corridor Overlay , SSSC. They are zoned Public Lands and Commercial Corridor. Planning Staff is proposing to rezone properties in the overlay zone to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use District 8 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 and keep some of those properties out of the SSSC overlay because the standards are less restrictive than the design standards of the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zoning districts. (Planning Commission Staff Report, Pages 13-14) Policy Questions Does the Council support including the additional uses proposed by Planning staff as permitted in the MU-8 zoning district in the final ordinance? Does the Council wish to ask the Administration for more information on why the city owned property that includes the baseball stadium and parking lot are proposed to stay as PL? Future Land Use Area Boundaries This proposal considers zoning amendments for properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan: Page | 5 1. Heart of the Neighborhood 2. Main Street Area 3. State Street Area 4. Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area The key zoning map changes are summarized in the tables below. Please see the planning commission staff report for more details. 1. Heart of the Neighborhood (Planning Commission staff report pages 5-10) 2. Main Street & State Street Areas (Planning Commission staff report pages 11-14) 3. Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area (Planning Commission staff report pages 15-16) Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City Council – April 2, 2024 PLNPCM2023-00169 SLC BALLPARK STATION AREA // REZONES Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Establish Zoning Districts that align with the plan ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Establish a new zone, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommended approval REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area •Main Street & State Street PROJECT AREA & State Street Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Commercial Corridor (CC) •General Commercial (CG) •Commercial Neighborhood (CN) •Moderate Density Multifamily Residential (RMF-35) •Residential Business (RB) •Residential Mixed Use (R-MU) •Public Lands (PL) •Open Space (OS) EXISTING ZONING Salt Lake City // Planning Division REZONES: •Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) •Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1 (FB- UN1) •Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 (FB- UN2) •Public Land (PL) – Future Library Site •MU-8 & FB-UN2 exempt from SSSC Overlay PRESERVED ZONES: •PL & RMF-35 – Ballpark Properties •R-1-5000 •R-MU & OS – Jefferson Park PROPOSED ZONING Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Main Street & State Street OVERVIEW •High density form based mixed use zone •Eight stories in height •Uses: Residential, office, commercial/retail services, parks, community facilities, education/institutional MU-8 ZONE Salt Lake City // Planning Division FORMS ESTABLISHED •Row House •Multi-family/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use (Other) DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Height •Row House: 40 FT •Other: 50 FT, 90 FT Authorized through Design Review MU-8 STANDARDS Salt Lake City // Planning Division OPEN SPACE AREA •Row House: 25% of footprint •Other: 20% of lot area DESIGN REQUIREMENTS •Min. of 20% - vegetation •1 area min. dimension of 15’ by 15’ •Area over 500 SF – 1 usable element MU-8 OPEN SPACE Salt Lake City // Planning Division SIDEWALK WIDTH •Min. 10 FT GROUND FLOOR USE •Other: 80% of street facing facades •Retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries theaters or performing art facilities MU-8 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning MU-8 DESIGN STANDARDS •Entry Feature •Upper-Level Façade Step Back Adjacent to lower density zones •Durable Ground Floor Building Materials: 70% •Durable Upper Floor Building Materials: 50% •Ground Floor Glass: 60% •Upper Floor Glass: 15% •Building Entrance: 1 building entrance every 40 FT •Max. Length of a Street Facing Façade: 200 FT •Blank Wall: Max. Length of a blank wall 30 FT •Lighting Exterior •Lighting Parking Lot •Screening of mechanical equipment •Screening of service areas •Ground Floor Residential Entrance •Parking garage or structures •Tree Canopy Coverage: 66% •Min. Vegetation Standards •Street Trees •Minimize Curb Cuts •Overhead Cover •Streetscape Landscaping •Height Transitions Between Adjacent Buildings Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use OVERVIEW •Small scale residential: Urban House, Two-Family, Cottage, Row House •Height: 30 FT •Open Space: 10% min. •Subject to design standards FB-UN1 Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use OVERVIEW •Mix of uses •Forms: Cottage, Row House & Other •Height: 50 FT •Open Space: Vary by form •Subject to open space & site/building design standards FB-UN2 Salt Lake City // Planning Division CONTEXT AREAS •Transit: MU-8 & FB-UN2 •Zones surrounding mass transit •Minimal parking required •Neighborhood: FB-UN1 •1 space per DU •Proposal reduces parking required PARKING Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Affordable Housing Incentives •Adopted in Dec. •FB-UN1: Additional ½ story up to 30 FT •FB-UN2: Additional story •Proposed MU-8: 2 additional stories & Admin. Design Review •Provide additional height/density identified in the plan. AHI Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning BALLPARK PROPERTIES 2024 DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Use Considerations •Amphitheater Formal and Informal •Health and Fitness Facility •Community Recreation Center •Plaza •Stadium BALLPARK NEXT Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PUBLIC PROCESS June 2023 Input period began July-Oct. 2023 Proposal Modifications Oct. 2023 Planning Commission Recommendation Salt Lake City // Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION •Recommended approval of the zoning map and zoning text amendments. RECOMMENDATION Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Brooke Olson // Principal Planner Brooke.olson@slcgov.com 801-535-7118 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to two parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and located at 1058 and 1064 S West Temple to change the zoning from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Residential to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to two parcels located at 1058 and 1064 S West Temple in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to change the zoning from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Residential to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential to FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. 2 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ballpark Station Area Rezone_Two Parcelsv1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney By: ___________________________________ Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney 3 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 4 Proposed Zoning Map 5 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and 2 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR 3 ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ballpark Station Area Rezones_Areav1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney By: ___________________________________ Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 5 Proposed Zoning Map 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend: C =Conditional P =Permitted Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Amphitheater formal P Amphitheater informal P Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Community recreation center P Crematorium P Daycare 12 center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Health and fitness facility P Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P 13 Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Plaza P Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P 14 Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium P Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 15 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size 16 Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts feet from adjacent residential structures Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 17 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with X 18 Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ 21 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: 22 A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 23 Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lodge Meeting hall of membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 24 per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less sq. ft., whichever is less per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market Grain elevator Pet cemetery No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 28 Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum 34 Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum All Contexts: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 39 General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) No Maximum TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. 40 B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 41 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 42 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 43 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 44 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 45 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 46 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 47 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 48 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 49 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b. That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subpart (2) “Form Based Mixed Use Districts” as shown below and renumber the existing subparts as follows with no changes to the associated tables: (2) Form Based Mixed Use Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 Two additional stories with administrative Design Review. (3) Commercial Districts [codifier: no change to the associated table] (4) Form-based districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] (5) Downtown districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] (6) Other districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] SECTION 16. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON 50 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting MU8 (final)v5 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. _____ of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 11 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 12 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 13 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 14 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 15 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 16 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 24 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 25 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 26 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 27 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 28 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 29 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 30 districts: 3132 Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B. C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 34 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 35 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 36 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 37 CHAPTER 21A.25 38 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 39 40 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 41 42 A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use 43 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 44 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 45 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 46 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 47 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 48 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 49 50 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based 51 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 52 53 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed 54 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 55 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 56 may be found in this title. 57 58 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a 59 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 60 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 61 62 21A.25.020: Reserved 63 64 21A.25.030: Reserved 65 66 21A.25.040: Reserved 67 68 21A.25.050: Reserved 69 70 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 71 72 A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is 73 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 74 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 75 or near the subdistrict. 76 77 B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated 78 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 79 80 1. Row House Building Form Standards: 81 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: 82 (i). 1300 South 83 (ii). West Temple 84 (iii). Main Street 85 86 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 87 88 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form 89 Standards: 90 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 91 (i). 1300 South 92 (ii). West Temple 93 (iii). Main Street 94 95 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 98 99 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this 100 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 101 standards: 102 103 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, 104 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 105 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 106 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 107 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 108 requirement. 109 110 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ 111 by 15’. 112 113 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover 114 at least 50% of the open space area. 115 116 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one 117 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 118 119 a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; 120 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space 121 area; 122 c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to 123 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 124 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 125 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 126 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 127 128 D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are 129 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 130 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 131 132 133 TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 134 135 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 136 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 137 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 138 139 TABLE 21A.25.060.E 140 141 142 F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve 143 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 144 specific building form regulation. 145 146 G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in 147 this subdistrict. 148 149 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 150 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 151 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 152 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 153 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 154 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 155 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 156 8. 21A.46 Signs 157 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 158 159 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 160 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 161 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 162 A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 163 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 164 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 165 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 166 requirements of this title. 167 168 169 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 170 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 171 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 172 B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 173 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 174 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 175 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 176 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 177 178 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 179 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 180 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 181 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 182 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 183 MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 Legend: C =Conditional P =Permitted 185 Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Amphitheater formal P Amphitheater informal P Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Community recreation center P Crematorium P Daycare 12 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Health and fitness facility P Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Plaza P Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium P Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 187 Qualifying provisions: 188 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related 189 Establishments", of this title. 190 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 191 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 192 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or 193 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 194 administrative rules. 195 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this 196 title. 197 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 198 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 199 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a 200 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building 201 demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 202 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar 203 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 204 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 205 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 206 207 Commented [KP1]: Need these notes and to probably fix the superscript numbering in the table. 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 208 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 209 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 210 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 211 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 212 G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form 213 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 214 215 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 216 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 217 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 218 follows. 219 C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning 220 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 221 222 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 223 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts 224 Note: 225 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties 226 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 227 228 229 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 230 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 231 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 232 amended to read and appear as follows: 233 b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 234 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban 235 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11 236 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN- 237 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House 238 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this 239 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. 240 241 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 242 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 243 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 244 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 245 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts 246 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 Notes: 265 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the 266 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to 267 the building type being allowed in the zone. 268 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 269 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of 270 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 271 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall 272 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 273 274 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 275 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 276 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 277 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 278 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based 279 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 280 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 281 a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable 282 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing 283 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven 284 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, 285 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or 286 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of 287 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon 288 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative 289 interpretation application. 290 b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be 291 constructed of or contain: 292 (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. 293 (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing 294 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or 295 plywood. 296 297 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 298 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 299 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 300 amended to read and appear as follows: 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 301 302 303 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/loungelodge Meeting hall of membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less sq. ft., whichever is less per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 304 305 306 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 21 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm No Minimum Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Performing arts production facility Reception center Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Fashion oriented development Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 21 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 33 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 307 308 309 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, Maximum Parking Allowed 34 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT listed in another context area FB-SE, SSSC Overlay FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 10.5 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum No Maximum All Contexts: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum No Minimum No Maximum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility No Minimum No Maximum 38 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 39 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT the convenience of employees Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) No Maximum TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: 40 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 310 311 41 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 312 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 313 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 314 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 315 amended to read and appear as follows: 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 316 317 318 319 320 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 43 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 322 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 323 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 324 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 325 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 44 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 326 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 46 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 327 328 47 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 329 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 330 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 331 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 332 and appear as follows: 48 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 333 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 49 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 335 336 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b. 337 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 338 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new 339 subpart (2) “Form Based Mixed Use Districts” as shown below and renumber the existing 340 subparts as follows with no changes to the associated tables: 341 (2) Form Based Mixed Use Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 Two additional stories with administrative Design Review. 342 343 (23) Commercial Districts 344 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 345 (34) Form-based districts: 346 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 347 (45) Downtown districts: 348 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 349 (56) Other districts: 350 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 351 SECTION 16. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 352 first publication. 353 354 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. 355 356 357 ______________________________ 358 CHAIRPERSON 359 50 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 360 ATTEST: 361 362 ______________________________ 363 CITY RECORDER 364 365 366 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 367 368 369 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 370 371 372 ______________________________ 373 MAYOR 374 375 ______________________________ 376 CITY RECORDER 377 378 (SEAL) 379 380 Bill No. ________ of 2024. 381 Published: ______________. 382 Ordinance adopting MU8 (legislative)v5 383 _______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Received: 4/02/2024 Date sent to Council: 4/02/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 04/01/24 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:SLC Ballpark Station Area - Rezones STAFF CONTACT: Brooke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the zoning map and zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. The City is proposing SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Apr 2, 2024 14:20 MDT) associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station Area. Existing Zoning The project area is predominately zoned a variety of commercial and moderate density, multifamily residential zoning districts. The majority of the existing zoning districts within the project area do not provide the development standards, density, and land uses specified in the plan. Existing Zoning Map Proposed Zoning Map Proposed Zoning The City is proposing three new zoning districts in the area to align with the plan, including the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. Additionally, the City is proposing to exempt the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zones from the SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay zone which is mapped along the eastern boundary of the project area. Two properties located at 105 W 1400 S and 1410 S West Temple are owned by Salt Lake City Public Library. The properties are proposed to be rezoned from RMF-35 Multifamily Residential to PL Public Lands to accommodate the future development of a public library. Preserved Zoning The City is proposing to preserve the existing PL Public Lands and RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot, which will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. The City is also proposing to preserve an R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue, the OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Proposed MU-8 Zone The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district which allows buildings up to eight stories in height and a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The zone aims to facilitate the creation of quality, high density, pedestrian oriented developments. The standards of the zone are form based and vary for each building form established in the zone including row houses, multifamily residential, storefront, and vertical mixed use. The standards are also intended to mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties, and properties located in low density zones. Staff presented the proposal at a Planning Commission work session meeting on October 11, 2023. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 25, 2023, voted, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. It should be noted sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed sign regulations on January 24, 2024 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023-00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles The Ballpark Next community visioning process was initiated to establish guiding principles for the future use and development of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties. The draft Guiding Principles were published in January 2024 and will provide direction for decision making throughout the development process. As mentioned, the rezoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties will be considered in a second phase of this proposal to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. However, if there is a desire to implement the proposed MU-8 zone on either of the properties the Council should consider a modification to the proposed ordinance to allow the following land uses in the MU-8 zone which were identified in the Ballpark Next process. These uses were not specifically identified as permitted uses in the proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission but the Council may desire to add them to the proposed ordinance now. Amphitheater Formal Amphitheater Informal Health and Fitness Facility Community Recreation Center Plaza Stadium PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: April 2023 - An informational webpage posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. The webpage is regularly updated with new information as necessary. June 2, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. June 2, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. July 13, 2023 – Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. September 7, 2023 – Planning Staff modified the proposal based on the public input received and presented the proposal modifications at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal. September 8, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. September 8, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. October 16, 2023 - Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. October 25, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. Four members of the public spoke and the Ballpark Community Council submitted a letter. Several public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment D of the staff report. Initial modifications were made to the draft proposal in July through October 2023 in response to public comments received. A summary of the proposal modifications in response to public comments is provided in Attachment E of the Staff Report. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Memo of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) d)PC Agenda of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) e)PC Minutes of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) f)Planning Commission Staff Report of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request 5) Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 7) Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and 2 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 3 _________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ballpark Station Area Rezonesv2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:February 19, 2024 By: _ K Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 5 Proposed Zoning Map o 120 240 480 120 /\ -=----1====1Feet /N Proposed Zoning - Project Scope Project Area Boundart Ballpark Sign Overlay $SSC - South State Street CorridorOverlay OS - Open SpaceExisting Zoning to Remain PL - Public Lands R-1-5000 •Existing Zoning to Remain MU-8 - Form Based Mixed Use •Proposed FB-UN1 - Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1 FB-UN2 - Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 R-MU - Residential Mixed Use 'Existing Zoning to Remain PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-408-006-0000 1039 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-007-0000 1049 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-008-0000 1055 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-009-0000 175 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-010-0000 171 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-011-0000 165 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-012-0000 151 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-013-0000 1022 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-014-0000 1032 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-015-0000 1036 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-016-0000 1046 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-017-0000 1052 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-018-0000 1056 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-019-0000 1058 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-024-0000 1062 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-003-0000 129 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-004-0000 127 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-005-0000 111 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-006-0000 1025 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-007-0000 1035 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-008-0000 1043 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-011-0000 1051 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-016-0000 134 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-017-0000 128 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-018-0000 124 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-020-0000 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-021-0000 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-022-0000 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-023-0000 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-026-0000 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-031-0000 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-033-0000 1047 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-035-0000 1061 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-037-0000 133 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-038-0000 1001 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-040-0000 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-041-0000 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-042-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-043-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-044-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-003-0000 1091 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-004-0000 1095 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-009-0000 175 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-010-0000 167 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-011-0000 163 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-012-0000 159 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-013-0000 149 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-014-0000 147 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-015-0000 137 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-016-0000 135 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-029-0000 1089 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-030-0000 1085 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-031-0000 185 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-001-0000 1121 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-002-0000 1127 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-003-0000 1131 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-004-0000 169 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-005-0000 163 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-006-0000 157 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-007-0000 151 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-008-0000 145 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-009-0000 139 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-013-0000 1143 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-014-0000 182 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-015-0000 178 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-016-0000 172 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-017-0000 170 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-018-0000 166 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-019-0000 160 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-020-0000 156 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-429-021-0000 152 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-022-0000 138 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-023-0000 134 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-024-0000 132 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-025-0000 128 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-026-0000 122 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-433-001-0000 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-002-0000 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-003-0000 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-004-0000 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-005-0000 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-006-0000 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-007-0000 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-008-0000 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-009-0000 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-010-0000 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-011-0000 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-012-0000 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-013-0000 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-014-0000 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-015-0000 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-016-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-017-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-001-0000 121 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-002-0000 123 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-003-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-004-0000 127 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-005-0000 129 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-006-0000 131 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-007-0000 133 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-008-0000 135 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-009-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-001-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-002-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-003-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-004-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-005-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-006-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-007-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-008-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-009-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-010-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-011-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-012-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-013-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-001-0000 1167 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-002-0000 179 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-003-0000 175 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-004-0000 173 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-005-0000 165 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-006-0000 159 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-009-0000 147 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-010-0000 141 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-011-0000 137 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-012-0000 133 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-013-0000 129 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-014-0000 125 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-015-0000 121 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-016-0000 182 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-017-0000 178 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-018-0000 174 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-019-0000 170 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-020-0000 164 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-021-0000 160 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-022-0000 156 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-023-0000 150 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-024-0000 146 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-025-0000 142 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-026-0000 140 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-027-0000 132 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-476-028-0000 130 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-029-0000 126 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-030-0000 122 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-031-0000 118 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-032-0000 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-033-0000 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-034-0000 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-035-0000 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-036-0000 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-037-0000 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-038-0000 155 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-039-0000 151 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-002-0000 155 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-003-0000 125 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-004-0000 121 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-005-0000 119 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-006-0000 117 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-007-0000 115 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-008-0000 111 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-009-0000 105 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-010-0000 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-011-0000 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-012-0000 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-013-0000 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-12-477-014-0000 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-13-229-003-0000 105 W 1400 S RMF-35 PL 15-13-229-004-0000 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 PL 15-12-481-008-0000 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-009-0000 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-010-0000 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-011-0000 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-004-0000 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-005-0000 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-006-0000 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-007-0000 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-009-0000 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-228-006-0000 1414 S JEFFERSON ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-232-025-0000 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-12-479-018-0000 1234 S MAIN ST PL MU-8 15-12-477-019-0000 114 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-020-0000 1285 S RICHARDS ST CN MU-8 15-12-479-021-0000 34 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-022-0000 1270 S MAIN ST CN MU-8 15-12-481-007-0000 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST CN MU-8 15-12-477-018-0000 120 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-477-026-0000 180 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-480-001-0000 1338 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-001-0000 135 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-481-002-0000 1309 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-003-0000 1317 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-004-0000 1321 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-005-0000 1333 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-001-0000 1340 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-005-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-211-009-0000 150 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-211-010-0000 1376 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-011-0000 1380 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-012-0000 1386 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-013-0000 1390 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-226-007-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-227-001-0000 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE CG MU-8 15-13-227-002-0000 1385 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-227-008-0000 124 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-228-002-0000 1404 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-228-003-0000 1410 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-002-0000 1425 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-006-0000 119 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-229-007-0000 1411 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-430-001-0000 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-430-024-0000 36 W FREMONT AVE CC FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-430-028-0000 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-001-0000 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-002-0000 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-010-0000 1116 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-014-0000 60 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-015-0000 56 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-017-0000 1152 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-020-0000 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-432-009-0000 1155 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-010-0000 1159 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-011-0000 1165 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-012-0000 1171 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-016-0000 1150 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-017-0000 1160 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-018-0000 1164 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-019-0000 1172 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-001-0000 1185 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-010-0000 1186 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-13-231-022-0000 1400 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-023-0000 1414 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-024-0000 1430 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-028-0000 1380 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-305-010-0000 1175 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-018-0000 1160 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-019-0000 9 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-020-0000 17 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-021-0000 19 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-025-0000 1147 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-003-0000 1155 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-004-0000 1167 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-008-0000 1162 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-009-0000 33 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-010-0000 37 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-011-0000 41 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-352-001-0000 1185 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-011-0000 1222 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-016-0000 1207 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-001-0000 50 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-002-0000 58 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-003-0000 1190 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-004-0000 1207 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-005-0000 1212 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-006-0000 1209 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-007-0000 1213 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-008-0000 1225 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-019-0000 1241 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-354-013-0000 1325 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-014-0000 28 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-015-0000 1345 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-017-0000 1337 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-001-0000 40 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-002-0000 60 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-003-0000 1325 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-004-0000 1331 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-005-0000 1335 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-006-0000 1345 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-001-0000 1357 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-002-0000 1361 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-003-0000 1375 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-004-0000 1381 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-005-0000 1401 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-006-0000 1405 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-007-0000 1415 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-008-0000 1433 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-009-0000 1364 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-010-0000 1376 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-011-0000 1382 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-012-0000 1388 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-015-0000 1398 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-016-0000 1406 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 16-18-101-017-0000 1412 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-018-0000 1420 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-019-0000 1448 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-020-0000 23 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-021-0000 25 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-022-0000 29 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-023-0000 33 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-024-0000 1392 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-001-0000 1359 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-003-0000 1363 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-004-0000 1379 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-005-0000 1383 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-006-0000 1389 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-007-0000 1393 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-008-0000 1397 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-009-0000 1401 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-010-0000 1405 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-028-0000 1411 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-029-0000 1421 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-030-0000 1356 S STATE ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-032-0000 59 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 11 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 12 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 13 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 14 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 15 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 16 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 24 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 25 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 26 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 27 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 28 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 29 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 30 districts: 31 Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B. C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E.Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 34 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 35 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 36 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 37 CHAPTER 21A.25 38 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 39 40 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 41 42 A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use 43 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 44 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 45 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 46 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 47 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 48 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 49 50 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based 51 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 52 53 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed 54 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 55 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 56 may be found in this title. 57 58 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a 59 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 60 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 61 62 21A.25.020: Reserved 63 64 21A.25.030: Reserved 65 66 21A.25.040: Reserved 67 68 21A.25.050: Reserved 69 70 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 71 72 A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is 73 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 74 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 75 or near the subdistrict. 76 77 B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated 78 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 79 80 1. Row House Building Form Standards: 81 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: 82 (i). 1300 South 83 (ii). West Temple 84 (iii). Main Street 85 86 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 87 88 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form 89 Standards: 90 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 91 (i). 1300 South 92 (ii). West Temple 93 (iii). Main Street 94 95 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 97 98 99 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this 100 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 101 standards: 102 103 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, 104 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 105 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 106 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 107 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 108 requirement. 109 110 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ 111 by 15’. 112 113 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover 114 at least 50% of the open space area. 115 116 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one 117 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 118 119 a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; 120 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space 121 area; 122 c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to 123 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 124 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 125 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 126 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 127 128 D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are 129 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 130 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 131 132 133 TABLE 21A.25.060.D Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. 134 135 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 136 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 137 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 138 139 TABLE 21A.25.060.E Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 140 141 142 F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve 143 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 144 specific building form regulation. 145 146 G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in 147 this subdistrict. 148 149 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 150 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 151 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 152 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 153 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 154 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 155 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 156 8. 21A.46 Signs 157 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 158 159 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 160 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 161 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 162 A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 163 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 164 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 165 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 166 requirements of this title. 167 168 169 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 170 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 171 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 172 B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 173 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 174 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 175 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 176 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 177 178 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 179 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 180 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 181 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 182 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 183 MIXED USE DISTRICTS LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 11 184 Legend:C =Conditional P =Permitted 185 Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 14 Theater, movie Utility, buildings or structure Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P P10 P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 187 Qualifying provisions: 188 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related 189 Establishments", of this title. 190 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 191 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 192 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or 193 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 194 administrative rules. 195 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this 196 title. 197 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 198 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 199 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a 200 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building 201 demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 202 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar 203 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 204 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 205 206 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 207 208 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 209 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 210 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 211 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 212 G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form 213 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 214 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Pasker, Katherine 2023-12-18 23:51:00 -------------------------------------------- Need these notes and to probably fix the superscript numbering in the table. 15 215 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 216 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 217 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 218 follows. 219 C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning 220 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 221 222 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 223 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts 224 Note: 225 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties 226 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 16 227 228 229 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 230 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 231 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 232 amended to read and appear as follows: 233 b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 234 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban 235 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11 236 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN- 237 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House 238 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this 239 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. 240 241 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 242 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 243 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 244 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 245 246 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 Notes: 265 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the 266 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to 267 the building type being allowed in the zone. 268 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 269 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of 270 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 271 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall 272 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 273 274 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 275 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 276 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 277 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 278 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based 279 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 280 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 281 a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable 282 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing 283 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven 284 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, 285 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or 286 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of 287 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon 288 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative 289 interpretation application. 290 b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be 291 constructed of or contain: 292 (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. 293 (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing 294 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or 295 plywood. 296 297 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 298 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 299 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 300 amended to read and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 301 302 303 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 23 Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge Meeting hall membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 25 Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 26 304 305 306 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 307 308 309 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 34 Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 35 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 36 Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 310 311 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 40 312 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 313 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 314 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 315 amended to read and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 41 316 317 318 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 319 320 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 322 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 323 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 324 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 325 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 43 326 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 45 FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 327 328 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 46 329 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 330 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 331 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 332 and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 47 333 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 334 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 48 335 336 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 337 338 first publication. 339 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. 340 341 342 343 CHAIRPERSON 344 345 ATTEST: 346 347 348 CITY RECORDER 349 350 351 Transmitted to Mayor on . 352 353 354 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. 355 356 357 358 359 MAYOR 360 361 CITY RECORDER 362 363 (SEAL) 364 365 Bill No. of 2024. 366 Published: . 367 368 369 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (legislative)v2 370 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E.Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A.Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B.Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1.Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2.Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A.Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B.Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1.Row House Building Form Standards: a.Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i).1300 South (ii).West Temple (iii).Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1.Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2.Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 2.Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a).Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i).1300 South (ii).West Temple (iii).Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. C.Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1.Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2.At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3.Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4.Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a.A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b.A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c.An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d.Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D.Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a.Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b.A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. E.Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. F.Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G.Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1.21A.33 Land Use Tables 10 2.21A.36 General Provisions 3.21A.37 Design Standards 4.21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5.21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6.21A.42 Temporary Uses 7.21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8.21A.46 Signs 9.21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A.Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B.Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend:C =Conditional P =Permitted Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1.Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2.Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3.Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4.Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5.Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6.Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7.Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8.Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9.If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10.Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 15 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C.Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1.Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 16 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) Notes: 1.This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2.Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3.For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General 19 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2.Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a.Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b.Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1)Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2)Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 23 Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge Meeting hall membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 28 Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum 34 Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory No Minimum No Maximum 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 40 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 41 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 42 43 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 45 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 46 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 47 ________________________ ________________________ therine D. Pasker, Senior City SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (final)v2 48 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _February 19, 2024 By: Ka Attorney 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition:PLNPCM2023-00169 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. Mar. 22, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00169 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Apr. 2023 An informational webpage was posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. Apr. – Jun. 2023 Zoning map and text amendment proposal was refined and finalized. Jun. 2, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jul. 13, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jul. – Sept. 2023 Significant modifications were made to the proposal in response to public input received. Sept. 7, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal modifications at a Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the modified proposal. Sept. 8, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. Oct. 11, 2023 Staff presented the petition at a Planning Commission work session meeting to gather feedback, identify key issues, and answer questions in anticipation of a future public hearing. Oct. 13, 2023 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing is sent to property owners and occupants within 300 ft of the subject properties. Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are also posted in the project boundary. Oct. 16, 2023 Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director Oct. 25, 2023 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. Nov. 21, 2023 Draft ordinances requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Nov. 29, 2023 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on October 25, 2023. Jan. 29, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00169– Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Zoning District. The City is proposing associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station area, within a portion of the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street and State Street Areas. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00169. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST MEMORANDUM PLANNING DMSION DEPAR'IMENT ofCOM.MUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS To:Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc:LisaShaffer, auef AdministrativeOfficer; BlakeThomas, Department of Communityand NeighborhooclsDirector; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: March 1, 2023 Re:Initiate Petition toforZ011ingMapAmendments in the BallparkNeighborl10odandAssociated ZoningText Amendments This memo is to request that a petition is initiated directing the Planning Division to amend the zoning in portions of the Ballpark neighborhood in response to direction provided by the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan. This plan was approved by the City Council on October 18, 2022. The Ballpark Station Area Plan provides guidance for future development and land useto support tl1e livability and futme gro,-vth in the Ballpark neighborhood. One of the keyimplementation steps identified in the plan is updating the zoning to establish a framework for future growth. The Planning Division is recommending that the zoning changes be broken into two phases: •Phase1: 2'.oning changes for the "Heart of the Neighborhood" which is focused on the vicinity of 1300 Sand West Temple St, the Jefferson Park Mixed Use area Oocated north of the ballpark to the Interstate 15 viaduct)and the Main Street conidor between Kelsey Ave and Cleveland Ave. Please refer to the attached map for the areas intended to be addressed in Phase1. •Phase 2: The remaining area along Main Street, south of Cleveland Ave. It is anticipated that Phase 2 will be started in conjunction with the adoption process for Life on State, anticipated to start later this year. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the Cityadoption process for zoning map amendments, which includes contacting recognized organizations and mailing notices to all property owners and residents in the study area in addition to general citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. The division will also hold public engagement events in the neighborhood to provide propertyowners, residents and business owners a convenient wayto share their comments with staff. The adoption process will also include collaboration with other City Departments. The map below displays the initial proposal recommended by the Planning Division and identifies the areas that would be rezoned and the identified zoning dist1ict that most closely ali&'llS with the Ballpark Station Area Plan vision and goals. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451SOUTI-1STATE STREET,ROOM 406 PO BOX145480 SALT LAKECITY. UT84114-5480 WWW.SLC.GOV TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 BALLPARK STATION AREA - REZONE RECOMMENDATIONS N 0 90 180 360 540 -=---===Feet A In addition to the proposed zoning map amendments the working group recommended that some zoning text amendments be included as well. These amendments would help to ensure that the proposed zones meet the recommendations from the plan and may include such thing5 but not limited to greater height in the TSA areas than currently allowed and increased setbacks on heavily trafficked streets. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that isthe decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall 03/02/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date Signature: :E:,4:::H.=l09c=59 MST) Email: erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com •Page3 Created:2023-03-01 By:Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAApOqZtc1YmfRzmqEmDSum3FE4pzwkbfGu Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2 Final Audit Report 2023-03-02 "Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2" History 'El Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) 2023-03-01 • 11:27:54 PM GMT q Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-01 - 11:28:57 PM GMT 'El Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) 2023-03-02 - 5:23:12 AM GMT !D'0 Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) Signature Date: 2023-03-02 • 4:59:36 PM GMT• Time Source: server t,Agreement completed. 2023-03-02 - 4:59:36 PM GMT Powt<edby Adobe Acrobat Sign•I 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Ballpark NEXT Vision Statement Guiding Principles Ba/lpark NEXT Possible Strategies: attract health focused retail and dining; incorporate areas for physical activity and social cohesion in public spaces or parks; incorporate areas for programming of physical activities; incorporate design that ensure accessibility for all abilities; integrate greenspace that helps to alleviate urban heat island Community-Centered/A Space for Every Face Goal: support daily needs of residents; fosters community interaction and involvement Strategies: incorporate uses that serve the community and foster community collaboration and participation; encourage a mix of local businesses and non-profit organizations; provide spaces for local cultural expression Acknowledge the Past/ Honor the Neighborhood's History Goal: future visitors understand the history of the site and the neighborhood Strategies: Explore adaptive reuse of primary structure or preservation of distinct design elements.; Incorporate the history of the ballfield andneighborhood on the site 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED October 25, 2023 Hello Planning Commissioners, My name is Amy J. Hawkins, and I serve as Chair of the Ballpark Community Council. Thank you for your attention this evening during a lengthily virtual meeting. My additional thanks are plentiful and at the end of this comment. We only have three out of five Ballpark Community Council board positions filled as we come up to an election next week, so I hesitate to say that these comments are the official position of the board. However, they are informed by extensive public engagement sessions with the Ballpark Community Council. My remarks tonight are fundamental: we understand that fixed rail goes through our neighborhood. We hope to capitalize on the opportunities it provides for economic development, best practices in urban planning, and the ability for folks to live in what’s almost a “15-minute neighborhood”, without displacing our committed residents and businesses, allowing folks the opportunity to age in place, without sacrificing affordability or community safety. These desires sound completely reasonable to residents and yet aren’t an easy ask in one of the most rapidly developing neighborhoods in one of the most actively growing metropolitan areas in the United States. Residents are concerned about plans to add substantial housing density when 1) we are already short on public land and spaces to recreate to support residents’ health, and 2) we’re concerned about plans for rezoning that eliminate setbacks. I know some view setbacks as a way to make housing unnecessarily more expensive, but in a community that already has serious disparities in our neighborhood’s urban tree canopy, in health outcomes, and a demonstrable heat island effect, removing setbacks removes our remaining opportunities to grow our urban tree canopy and protect our future residents. Planning Commissioners, please view setbacks through the lens of what needs to happen to prevent our heat island effect from becoming worse in a neighborhood that is still hurting from the effects of redlining and the “People’s Freeway”—Interstate 15, the 9th South offramp, and State Street, that powerfully disconnect us from our neighbors. We realize that the guiding principles for the Ballpark NEXT project may direct future planners to meet some of these concerns, but since that project is now completely disconnected from this Ballpark rezone proposal, we can’t build in those expectations for the Ballpark space when the committee may choose to go in a completely different direction. Over and over, I heard from fellow residents that we want to avoid recreating the problems of 400 South in this new MU-8 zone in Ballpark. Do these new MU-8 ground floor activation requirements do enough to avoid the problems of 400 South? Are there special considerations to preserve the little mature tree canopy that we have? It is important to highlight that this plan proposes re-zoning a public school site from PL to MU-8. This is only obliquely referenced in your 145-page Staff Report a few times. Horizonte Instruction and Training Center is an alternative public high school in the Salt Lake City School District located at 1234 S. Main Street. Horizonte works with community organizations, including Catholic Community Services’ refugee resettlement program and the Odyssey House, to reach students from diverse backgrounds, and enrolls both high school-aged students and continuing education adults. In 2019, about 85% of the 217 12th grade students were low income, and those students collectively spoke more than a dozen languages. Horizonte is the is the only public school within our neighborhood boundaries. Maybe we could have emphasized this more during the Ballpark Station Area Plan meetings, which I was a part of, but during COVID and meeting over Zoom, we may not have thought to give this the emphasis that we should have. Community Council participation tends to select for people who experience the kind of privilege such that we might not have been taught at schools like Horizonte. Prior to the pandemic, Elizabeth, my neighbor across the street who grew up in Mexico and who learned English as a second language, was earning her GED at Horizonte. Does it serve the interests of equity and investing in human capital in the Ballpark neighborhood to rezone Horizonte? Does it serve the interests of economic development? I don’t know, but given the wider discussion about closing public elementary schools in Salt Lake City, it’s concerning that this isn’t part of the staff report and tonight’s discussion. Please discuss why we should consider rezoning this property. This is a huge project with big implications for the Ballpark neighborhood. I attended my first informal Ballpark Station Area Plan meeting with Christine Richman and Annaka Egan and others from GSBS Consulting to brainstorm about building the committee in November 2020. That means the Ballpark Community Council, along with and private and Planning Division partners, have been engaging on variations on this topic for three years, in spite of the pandemic. I applaud my community for showing up, online, on comment boards, on post-its, and then in person, even though we have been dealt what feels like a very significant blow of the Salt Lake Bees announcing that they are leaving our neighborhood. I also want to state our strong appreciation for how much the Planning Division, particularly Brooke Olson, John Anderson, and Nick Norris, have been willing to work with the Ballpark neighborhood and the Community Council in the past several months, working with us as we negotiated trying to find a new in-person meeting place—Thank you, Salt Lake Community College, for opening your doors to us—as we have been simultaneously juggling the engagement calendar of the engagement for this rezone, the Ballpark NEXT engagement plan, and the engagement for the 300 West Corridor and Central Pointe Station area plan. Not only did they and Nick Norris’s formidable e-bike show up for our in person meetings and our outdoor engagement event at Jefferson Park last week, but they heard our feedback and created a new form of zoning, MU-8, replacing the proposed TSA zoning. I’m grateful for the granular discussions they’ve had about Lucy and Paxton Avenue, activation requirements for ground floor use, and our concerns about greenspace. Their passion for community engagement is clear, and they have gone the extra mile to be collaborators with the community in this project. Sincerely, Amy J. Hawkins 1 Olson, Brooke From:Olson, Brooke Sent:Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:43 PM To:Ciara C Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Attachments:Tables4.pdf Hi Ciara, Thank you so much for reaching out with your questions and comments. Your comments will be provided to the City Council prior to the public hearing. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the proposal but the City's proposal is available on the project webpage: https://www.slc.gov/planning/2023/04/14/ballparkplan-rezones/. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the City's Ballpark Station Area rezone proposal on October 25th, 2023, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposal. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the City Council Office. Once transmitted, the City Council will hold a briefing and a public hearing for the proposal and make a final decision. To provide you with some brief background information, the City is proposing to rezone properties along Main Street and Major Street, 200 W, and West Temple to FB-UN2, Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. The City's rezone recommendations are based on land use, design, building height, and density recommendations specified in the Ballpark Station Area plan: http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Master%20Plans/Central%20Community/22-10-27_Ballpark.pdf The majority of these areas proposed to be rezoned to FB-UN2 are currently zoned CC, Community Commercial and RMF-35, Multifamily Residential. The existing zoning CC and RMF-35 regulations lack design standards, a mix of pedestrian oriented uses, and higher density allowance identified in the master plan. The plan calls for a moderate density mixed use development and buildings up to 4-7 stories in height, in the Main Street and State Street areas between 1300 S and Merrimac/Cleavland Avenue, as well as the Jefferson Park mixed use area along 200 W and West Temple. The proposed zoning changes are intended to establish a zoning framework which meets the master plan vision to create quality pedestrian oriented development that provides higher density housing, neighborhood amenities, and activates the neighborhood. The FB-UN 2 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The purpose of the FB-UN2 zone states the zone “Generally includes buildings up to four stories in height, with taller buildings located on street corner parcels, which may contain a single use or a mix of commercial, office, and residential uses. Development regulations are based on building type, with the overall scale, form, and orientation of buildings as the primary focus.” The standards of the FB-UN2 zone are based on specific building forms established in the zone including: • Cottage Development • Row House • Multifamily Residential/ Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use (Other) The FB-UN2 zoning regulations were recently changed to address several livability concerns identified in the zoning regulations including the lack of setback requirements and open space requirements as you mentioned. The code changes were recently adopted by the City Council earlier this year. The changes increased the design standards, open space design standards, and required landscape yards for specific building forms and uses. The new regulations are intended to create pedestrian oriented developments and mitigate impacts associated with higher density through a 2 variety of architectural design standards and additional setback requirements. Open space design standards have been added to ensure the open spaces on site consist of living vegetation and are usable by all occupants of a property. I've attached a summary of the current FB-UN2 development regulations, which list some of the general requirements of the zone. The development standards of the FB-UN2 zone can be found at this link: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-65370#JD_21A.27.050 Thank you again for reaching out and please let me know if you have any further questions. BROOKE OLSON | (She/Her/Hers) Principal Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: (801) 535-7118 Email: Brooke.olson@slcgov.com WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING WWW.SLC.GOV Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. -----Original Message----- From: Ciara C < > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 12:39 PM To: Olson, Brooke <brooke.olson@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Brook, I understand the comment period time for the Ballpark rezone has ended however I have simple question. This is not meant with anger or sarcasm but why is much of the rezone going to be FBUN 2? From what I understand that zone is extremely beneficial to the developer without much of a benefit to the neighborhood. Two examples are that the developer gets to build higher and without a setback. This seems like a negative to an area with many single family homes with the least amount of greenspace compared to any other area in the city. I truly want to know what the upside is. Thanks Ciara Sent from my iPhone 1 Olson, Brooke From:Charles Button < > Sent:Monday, October 30, 2023 2:32 PM To:Olson, Brooke Subject:(EXTERNAL) New Tag Comment Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Hello Brooke, Here is a new comment after attending planning commission for ballpark. As a homeowner on Jefferson street-I welcome the new zoning classification passed through the planning commission for the Ballpark proposal. I’m against TAGs amendments to change that new zoning to large scale RMU. Even TAG has made statements they want to align with ballpark plan but now sound like they just want to change for their purposes not the community/Ballpark Proposal. Planning Commission Berry and others almost voted against Ballpark plan due to wanted to remove 3 RMU zones near Jefferson street. Please deny TAGs two proposals. Thank you! Chuck B Jefferson Street Homeowner. Sent from my iPhone 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP WWC91 HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 847 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 951 WASHINGTON LLC 3037 E LOUISE AVE MILLCREEK UT 84109 LEE, CHRISTOPHER 955 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILCOX, STEFANIE 1589 W CHATEAU CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 WOLFSON WEST OLD KENTAPARTMENTS LIMITED PART 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 PITTSBURGH HOUSE LOFTSLIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9TH STREET CENTER LLC 1175 E 1850 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 DAVIS, TRAVIS 967 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 244 FAYETTE, LLC 3170 BANNOCK DR PROVO UT 84604 PROVOST, TIFFANIE 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, JOSE R &ROSALBA R; JT 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CAPITOL CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 FENTON & ELAINE BATES FAM TRET AL 6816 S ANDERSON WY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 SILVER ANTLER, LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD board UT 84104 UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY board UT 84101 WASATCH LIMITED COMPANY 926 S JEFFERSON ST board UT 84101 965 CENTRAL LC 70 NORTH MAIN #106 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 PRICE 959 SOUTH, LLC 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FACADE, LLC 64 W FAYETTE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 987 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STRONG DESIGN, LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 AND JUSTICE FOR ALL 205 W 400 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DKL PROPERTIES, LLC 560 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 AMAZING GRACE, LC 503 E TENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 WEST BROOKLYN, LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 5,LLC 11995 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 TWO HUNDRED WEST, LLC 720 N REXFORD DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZE FAM REV TRUST)1102 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZEF REV TRUST)1112 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARATHON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,LLC 3731 W SOUTHJORDAN PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 LONG, JIMMIE E 1049 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE; JTLONARDO, MARCUS A; JT 160 E FORT UNION BLVD MIDVALE UT 84047 ROBERTS, KATHLEEN M 175 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MYLECRAINE, DAN E 171 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SS CAPITAL, LLC 35 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ELK RIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC 526 E REDONDO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 GILES, KRISTIE 1022 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASIC, AMRA 1032 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 1036 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BUTTON, CHARLES E 1052 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CABRERA, LERNICE 1056 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THORPE, JAMIE L 1058 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TENFIFTEEN PARTNERS, LLC 3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DE ANZA-C9 LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CAUSEY, KATHRYN A 923 LONGLEAF DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JOHNSON BROTHERS INVESTMENTS,LLC 126 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MATINKHAH, AKBAR 2618 E SKYLINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 CARNEGIE HOLDINGS LLC 4019 S OLYMPIC WY HOLLADAY UT 84124 R AND J PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENTS LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 INTERMOUNTAIN LAND COMPANY LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 KETCH, GREGORY C 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 GONZALEZ B, RUBEN A &LOPEZ V, TIMOTEO S; JT 1035 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BAILEY, GREG R; TRET AL 639 MOUNTAIN VIEW CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 MIDGLEY, DAVID P 1051 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLAGER, DOUGLAS; JTWRIGHT, MARCUS; JT 134 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ALLEN, CARLETON J 128 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CONNELLY, CARL 2263 E HIGH MOUNTAIN DR SANDY UT 84092 KOMAROV, VADIM D; JTLAMB, CHRISTOPHER E; JT 1002-1006 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAM, RACHELLE 1008 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, RICHARD E 1010 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 400 EAST/WT APARTMENTS, LLC 11589 S SUMMERFIELD CIR SANDY UT 84092 ADAMS, STEVEN C 1042 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BEMIS, DAVID M 8479 S 1380 E SANDY UT 84093 HERNANDEZ, JOSEPH L 1047 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 2223 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BURT, ANDREW; JTBURT, CYNTHIA; JT 133 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SIERRA, ISMAEL G &OJEDA, JESUS J; JT 1001 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN M 1058 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN; JTRANDALL, KEVIN; JT 1064 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 13818 S VESTRY RD DRAPER UT 84020 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1697 N FORT LN LAYTON UT 84041 CURRENT OCCUPANT 440 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLORES, GUADALUPE 1091 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY 1530 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PEREZ, TERESA &CARDENAS, PASCUAL; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUNT, LARISSA M 167 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SOMEWHERE OTR, LLC PO BOX 9874 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TAYLOR, JAMES C &JESSICA M; JT 3556 S 5600 W #1-533 WEST VALLEY UT 84120 GOWON, JOB G 145-147 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANDERSON, LEE 137 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 TAG SLC, LLC 1089 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DOHENY-VIDOVICH PARTNERS 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CARDENAS, PASCUAL &PEREZ, MARIA T; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PEREZ, PEDRO CARDENAS 1127 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LARSON, JESSICA 1131 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THREE BIRDS, LLC 169 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TINOCO, ESTEBAN R. & SOPHIE R.4628 W 4695 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 KATHLEEN LOIS COCHRAN REV TRCOCHRAN, KATHLEEN 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 GARZARELLI, DAN O 950 HARBOR AVE HENDERSON NV 89002 BUSTAMANTE, JUAN R &RAMIREZ, GRISELDA A; JT 139 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HART, NATHAN 2359 E 3225 S MILLCREEK UT 84109 GARCIA, LEO PAUL 182 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CASS, JEREMY; JTCASS, SARA; JT 178 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FINLINSON, MITCHELL T 172 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BRUNELLE, BRIANA 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ORLANDINI, KIM; JTET AL 5951 W JUNIPER ACRES CT WEST VALLEY UT 84128 TUMINEZ, JESSA; JTLONARDO, ANDRE; JT 162 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARQUIS, TANGUY 156 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HADLEY, PATRICK L; JTMAYBURY, KAREN; JT 152 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC 111 W 33RD ST NEW YORK NY 10120 SHAPIRO, ALLIE R 1420 PEERLESS PL APT 123 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 DALE WINETEER TRET AL 132 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COATES FAMILY INVESTING,LLC SERIES 2 PO BOX 526344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 KANE, JOHN A; JTKANE, CAROLINE O; JT 122 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INC PO BOX 572070 MURRAY UT 84157 STATE OF UT, DIV OF FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MAN 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 HOUSING AUTHORITY OFSALT LAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STATE OF UTAH 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 10TH AND MAIN, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 8350 S VIA RIVIERA WY COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALTLAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STRONG DESIGN LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 N C CARRIDO INC 1085 N NOCTURNE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 COLLABORATIVE 1135 GP, LLC 1135 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLIAMSON, CARY AET AL 9938 S TULIP DR WHITE CITY UT 84094 D & P PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 10032 ROBIN OAKS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89117 SCHNEIDER, PROPERTIES, LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 35 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 1799 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 31 WEST FREMONT AVENUE LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 25 FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 21 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1127 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1133 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1139 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ACTION MOBILE REPAIRS, INC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 E7 PARTNERS, LLC 949 S DENVER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BLOCKYARD, LLC 1159-1161 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KCTH PROPERTY LLC 1165 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JAVA PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 71899 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 RIC-ROB LC 1130 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GS INVESTMENT, LLC 1160 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, EILEEN G; JTBROWN, MICHAEL J; JT 1148 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CUTTING, WILLIAM M III; JTET AL 1146 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLSON, SHEILA 1144 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG ROWHAUS, LLC 4035 W 58TH PLACE LOS ANGELES CA 90043 DAVID WULF & AARON NELSONLIVING TRUST 2845 S IMPERIAL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BENTLEY, ABBEY; JTABERMAN, MICHAEL; JT 1138 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCMAHON, JULIE R 1136 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICAL, LISA 1134 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TROP, DENNIS A 1132 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URRY, SLOAN 1130 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCKEON, KATHLEEN 1128 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 NELSON, JENIFER F 1126 S WESTTEMPLE ST #112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 QUINN, PATRICK &HAMILTON, ERIN; JT 1124 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MORTENSEN-MAHYERA LIV TRET AL 1122 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARNWINE, CAITLIN; JTARNWINE, MATTHEW; JT 1120 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THOMAS, LEAH 353 E 1500 N OREM UT 84057 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATI 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 SORENSON, SCOTT 121 W FREMONT AVE #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 OCAMPO, KRISHEILA 123 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GONZOL, DARREN &MLEYNEK, TARA; JT 125 W FREMONT AVE #119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WALKER, JESSE C &HOFELING, MARK; JT 127 W FREMONT AVE #120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASKETT, NATHAN T; JTWHITE, ADAM T; JT 129 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MASTAIN, HENRY S 131 W FREMONT AVE #122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCBRIDE, MARCUS 133 W FREEMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84701 FINLINSON, WHITNEY M 135 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOWMEOWNERS ASSOCIA 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 PARKSIDE CONDOS, LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOS,LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOMINIUMHOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION7931 BLAZE TRAIL CT ORANGEVALE CA 95662 PAXTON PLACE, LLC 77 DRY CANYON DR LINDON UT 84042 M-SHOT HOLDINGS, LLC 6629 TROUT CREEK CT PARK CITY UT 84098 HALVERSON, JOHN L 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SPOTTY DOG ENTERPRISES LLC 809 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TUCKER TOWING, LLC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALVERSON, MARY E; JTHALVERSON, STEPHEN J; JT 1471 E TUMBLEWEED WY DRAPER UT 84020 ASCEND PROPERTIES, LLC 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 I LOVE LUCY AVE, LLC 600 E GILBERT DR TEMPE AZ 85281 D D MANAGEMENT, LLC 13775 S KENNINGTON CT DRAPER UT 84020 COLONY B LLC 196 W GOLF COURSE RD LOGAN UT 84341 LOWE'S HIW INC PO BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE NC 28115 JACOBS, RYAN C 230 W 1300 S #8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ZACHARIAS, NATHAN 230 W 1300 S #9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HENDERSON, ELENA K; JTHENDERSON, MICHAEL S; JT 230 W 1300 S #10 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAGARACI, ISABEL 230 W 1300 S #11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MYRICK, TREVOR 230 W 1300 S #12 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NEWBERRY, ARIA; JTPASSEY, NICHOLAS C; JT 230 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDREA B MITTON LIV TRMITTON, ANDREA B; TR 230 W 1300 S #14 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CW THE LUCY, LLC 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 PUPAIBOOL, JAKRAPUN 942 W LOTUS BROOK DR SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84119 MORGAN STEWART INVESTMENTS,LLC 230 W 1300 S #2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBINSON, JASON R 7438 S DAN DR WEST JORDAN UT 84084 ERICKSEN, CHELSEA 230 W 1300 S #4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINS, MICHAEL G 230 W 1300 S #5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 URWIN, JEREMY 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 RICHARDS, CODY 230 W 1300 S #7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LING, MENG C 230 W 1300 S #29 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CROSSBOW PROPERTIES LLC 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 GOTHBERG, SPENCER 230 W 1300 S #31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKS, KRISTINA R 230 W 1300 S #32 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SQUIRES, BROOKE 230 W 1300 S #33 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FITZGERALD, MARISSA V 230 W 1300 S #34 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SIDDEEK, HANI 230 W 1300 S #35 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KUSHNER, JOSHUA 230 W 1300 S #22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MCLEOD, SUSAN; JTMCLEOD, CHRISTOPHER; JT 230 W 1300 S #23 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MATTHEWS, SHAUN 230 W 1300 S #24 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PAN, JANE Y; JTTAN, HAI B; JT 741 E 600 N ROOSEVELT UT 84066 LAPP, ROBERT ANDREW 230 W 1300 S #26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, GABRIELLA L 230 W 1300 S #27 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SASICH, MICHAEL J 230 W 1300 S #28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PETERSEN, LANDONPETERSEN, JAXON 230 W 1300 S #15 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEWOLF FAM TRDEWOLF, JANICE B; TR 1250 S NEVADA AVE PROVO UT 84606 HANSEN, JINKY GATUTEO JTHANSEN, TYLER STEVEN JT 230 W 1300 S #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WONG, DENISE 230 W 1300 S #18 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CHERNENKO, ALLA JTVAN HUELE, YANNICK JT 230 W 1300 S #19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROTTER, ERIN; JTSANDERS, SAMUEL; JT 230 W 1300 S #20 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BUSHNELL, DAVID W; JTBROCKSCHMIDT, VERONICA L; J 230 W 1300 S #21 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUCY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 ELLEFSEN, GIANNI 3010 S RICHMOND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 WARD, CLINT Z 179 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WHITLOCK, CAMERON T 175 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARLICK, SANDRA L 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KETCH, GREGORY C &KAREN A; JT 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 URBAN SENSE, LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 DOWLER ENTERPRISES LLC 1112 N 1100 W FARMINGTON UT 84025 DICKSON, KYLE 141 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GREENE, CHARLES A 137 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALL, KIM C 133 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JALALPOUR, JALEE 4121 WEBSTER ST OAKLAND CA 94609 KREMER, JORDAN 125 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUGHES, DON R 121 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F; JT 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F & SULIETI; TC 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GOODRICH, BENJAMIN P 174 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LEMASTER PROPERTIES, LLC 8084 S 1700 E SANDY UT 84093 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE 1055 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LUND, JENNY E &CHRISTIANSEN, KEVIN; JT 160 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GASS, PATRICK R 156 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KING, LARRY E, JR 150 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MILLS, DEXTER M; JTOVESON, JESSICA; JT 146 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ENGLAND, GEORGE M 211 E TRUMAN AVE SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 ELLIS, JODY R; JTELLIS, RONALD W; JT 130 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DEMILLE, JANIE A 132 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARIAS, JOSE G 140 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COBIAN, ANA D S 3683 S RIVER HORSE RD WEST VALLEY UT 84119 VIDAL, ARYS Q JR 122 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOOD, JAMES V 118 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOO, DAVID 2826 E DIMPLE DELL RD SANDY UT 84092 YBARRA, PETER E 1174 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 YBARRA, PATRICIA; SURVET AL 1178 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1182 WEST TEMPLE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HUGHES, LAUREN 1188 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WRIGHT, ANTHONY P; JTWRIGHT, MERRICK C; JT 1192 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN SENSE LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 KIM, SU H; JTBAE, JUNHYUK; JT 155 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARCIA, RUTH 125 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TANAKA, MELISSA R; JTTANAKA, ROGER H JR; JT 121 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ESMAY, RYAN K; JTCANENGUEZ, ANDREA M C; JT 119 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SAGONA, JORDAN M 117 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ZOBRIST, KARLY A 115 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, POMPILIO O 111 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 RAEMHILD, IAN 105 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALEY, MICHELE R 2967 E MORNINGSIDE DR HOLLADAY UT 84124 SCHEAR, ADAM G 1208 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICA, CADE S; JTMERICA, STEVIE Z; JT 1212 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KOCHERHANS, STEVEN 1216 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALTLAKE 1220 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 INDIAN WALK-IN CENTER INC 120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUTHLAND CORP, THE PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221 S L C CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 OIKOS 8 LLC 1185 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JENSEN, MARC R 1056 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OFEDUCATION 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BFR, LLC 907 E 250 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BFR, LLC 185 S STATE ST #800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1300 BALLPARK, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VINA, SHERRY &ANTHONY D; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 BIJCO LLC 8704 S SUGARLOAF DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 RJL, LTD 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JEFFERSON STREET LLC PO BOX 571217 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84157 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 1349 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY CORP 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT UT 84101 JUDD JONES REFRACTORY &ACID SPECIALTIES INC 2904 MILLCREEK CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 JEFFERSON BALLPARK, LLC 1240 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 VILLAS AT 1400 SOUTHHOLDINGS, LP 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY LOGAN UT 84321 RICK & MEG OSGUTHORPE REV LIVTRUST 02/05/2023; E58 S TROUT LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 SHELTER THE HOMELESS, INC 242 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 TABRIZ, SATTAR N 1429 E ROOSEVELT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 RENPRO TWO, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 HOME BASE APARTMENTS, LLC 3211 W STARLITE DR WEST JORDAN UT 84088 P STREET INVESTMENTS, LC 1328 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SANDSTONE CAFE LLC 2182 E BALD EAGLE CT DRAPER UT 84020 FIREFIGHTERS CREDIT UNION 124 W 1400 S #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BALL PARK APARTMENTS, LP 1380 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEER RUN TIMBER, LLC 8919 S RED WILLOW CIR SANDY UT 84093 KNAPHUS, BRADLEY R 1410 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CR TOWNEGATE COMMUNITIES, LLC 444 W BEECH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 RUECO, LLC; 41.46%TRADITION POINTE LLC; 58.54% 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 THOMAS, BRYSON 105-109 W 1400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3855 S 500 W SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 JOHNSON, RONALD K 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECO, LLCTRADITION POINTE LLC 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 VICTORIA JOURDIN, LLC 38 S NORTHRIDGE WY SANDY UT 84092 YUCATAN LLC 540 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 OLIVER, ANGELA 1116 N SONATA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 CHIDAMBARAM, PRIYADHARSHINI 1421 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLIAMS, MICHELLE L; JTWILLIAMS, ZACHARY R; JT 1429 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SILVA, DANIEL S; JTSILVA, MCKENZIE T; JT 68 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MISAKA, MARY S 62 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKHEAD, STANLEY J 1388 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RABAGLIA, JOSEPH 1396 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAWRENCE, ASHLEY &MAUSS, ANDREW; JT 1400 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLADE, CHRISTOPHER L; ET AL 1404 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CASH, GARY L 3 S ALTAWOOD DR SANDY UT 84092 CARLSEN, ERIKA 1418 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DUNCOMBE, EARL D &RENAE; JT 4051 S 3200 W WEST VALLEY UT 84119 MERRIMAC RENTALS, LLC 4893 GLENHOLLOW CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057 SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FAJARDO, HIRAM H; JTKINSLEY-HERNANDEZ, JESSICA; JT 1381 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAPIA-GUZMAN, JULIO CESAR 7617 NE 1ST CT MIAMI FL 33138 MENZEL, JORDAN 1399 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 EKEY, MADISON; JTMEDLER, JONATHAN; JT 1401 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DERBIDGE, CHRIS &ROSIELER; JT 1407 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MONOCHROMATIC LLC 553 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 2174 S MAIN ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 1430 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH PRIDE CENTER PO BOX 1078 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1360 S MAIN, LLC 1360 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 OMAHONY, RYAN E 32 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALLISON, JOHN B &TONI L; JT 30 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HOU, JIN HUA 286 E SNOWY RIVER CT SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 WHALEY, BRIAN; JTHAWKINS, AMY; JT 26 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NELSON, RICHELLE L 24 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BBP INTERMOUNTAIN 1494 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WOLF, THOMAS &KIMBERLY; JT 1478 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HAYDEN, JAMES H &WEST, SCOTT E; JT 1488 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1500 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1502 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DENISTON, SHAWN J; ET AL 1748 E MOUNTAIN VIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 HIGHCLIFF PROPERTYMANAGEMENT, LLC PO BOX 526110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 GABBOTT, LEWIS 1469 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAY, MARLIN D 1475 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LEBOUTILLIER, SHAWN T 1481 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOWEN, DONALD E; JTGOWEN, LAUREN V O; JT 1487 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDERSON, ADAM &AMANDA; JT 246 E HAMPTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAMPTON, MARY A M; JTET AL 65 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FLETCHER LEE STUMPH TRSTUMPH, FLETCHER; TR 1454 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ATWOOD, KIMBERLY M &GIBSON, STEVEN D; TC 1460 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JENNINGS, PAT &THOMAS L; JT 1470 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROWLAND, ANDREW C 1476 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAYLOR, CLAYTON R; JTMECHAM, SHELBIE A; JT 1482 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KETTLE CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC 13087 S 1300 W RIVERTON UT 84065 MIDDLETON, DORIS &SWARTZ, FLORENCE; JT 1494 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINSON, MONIQUE C; JTOBORN, CRAIG; JT 930 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, ET AL 1 EQUITY WY WESTLAKE OH 44145 KUNGA, THUPTEN &DOLMA, PHURBU; JT 64 W ANDREW AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TALLEY FAM LIV TRET AL 1964 E GYRFALCON DR SANDY UT 84092 RICHARDS0408 LLC 12786 S 600 E DRAPER UT 84020 TRAN DO REV TRTRAN, ANNA; TR 1859 W SIR JAMES DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BERGERA, JORDAN E; JTNINOWSKI, TIMOTHY J; JT 1455 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1463 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HYMAS, ANTHONY L; JTHYMAS, JULIE A; JT 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLASGOW, ROBERT E; JTGLASGOW, TIFFANY S; JT 1340 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JENNINGS-HILL, TIMOTHY 1487 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 YAMAGATA, MAKI 1491 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOHNS, KEELAN 2320 S 2100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GABBOTT'S ROW, LLC 650 S 500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 C Z PROPERTIES LLC 1476 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARCIA, RASHELL C 1484 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATIONASSOCIATION A NO 1488 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEFF SANDSTROM LIV TRSANDSTROM, JEFF; TR 35 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FOUR HOLDINGS, INC 1530 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARFF ENTERPROSES, INC 777 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, BILL B, TR 3433 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GARFF ENTERPRISES INC 64 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FOOD FORWARD HOLDINGS, LLC 439 E SEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANSEN & HANSEN PROPERTIES LLC 5840 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST #3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SHELTER THE HOMELESS II LC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CITY CREEK HOSPITALITY, LLC,LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ANDERSON, THOMAS E 3178 E VISTA BONITA CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 EVERGREENE CONSTRUCTION CO,LC 571 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CHEN'S INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 CHENS INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 DALE & LORILYN KINYON LIV TRET AL 1696 MUELLER PARK RD BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 RANDY TOPHAM PROPERTIES LLC 168 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 UNIQUE PROPERTIES, LLC 1677 E BURNING OAK DR DRAPER UT 84020 CREATESPACE SLC, LLC 2605 JEFFERSON AVE OGDEN UT 84401 FRESH START PROPERTIES LLC 1807 E VINTAGE OAK LN MURRAY UT 84121 KENTUCKY BOURBON LLC 832 E CLAYBOURNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CLARK, MARION B; TRSET AL 2500 E ARNETT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GREEN BEINGS LLC 563 E 3785 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84106 HODZIC, IRFAN &JASMINKA; JT 481 E 2700 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 CLATTERBUCK, ALISON O 1055 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 EVEREAL-ESTATE 2, LLC 11711 S GROVES MEADOW CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 PHOENIX WEST ENTERPRISE, LLC PO BOX 65694 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 OH MAI DOWNTOWN, INC 1102 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VASILIOU, GEORGE 1061 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCHOF SALT LAKE CITY 1090 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BECKSTRAND, DONALD S FAMILYLTD PARTNERSHIP 5727 S 675 E MURRAY UT 84107 ANDERSON, KATIE L 1144 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GODFREY, THOMAS; JTPACKER, KIERA K; JT 1150 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MAGAR, WILSON T 1154 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JORDAN, LAWRENCE W, JR 1160 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAEDER, RACHEL M 9 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SMITH, SEAN E; JTMARQUEZ, T'KEYA; JT 17 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VINA, SHERRY & RHETT B; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DSPTOO, LLC 1111 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 KUANG FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC 1623 W MORNING VIEW WY LEHI UT 84043 BROUSE, DONALD &SHARON; JT 1136 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LEDO ENTERPRISES PO BOX 9167 SPRINGFIELD MO 65801 60E LLC 2840 E JENNIE LN HOLLADAY UT 84117 DYNASTY CONDOMINIUMOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1623 W MORNING VIEW WAY LEHI UT 84043 PEREZ, INMER 1029 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VALINO, GABINO F &ROBIN L; JT 1149 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CASTRO, MCEDGAR G 1155 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORONODO, CLAUDIA 1167 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MARTINEZ, MARIO A 1535 S BRAVA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GRANT, TERI 1156 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILDING, THOMAS V 1162 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WALSTER, JOHN D; TR(JDWFT)PO BOX 65122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 KOTTWITZ, CASSINDA N 37 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GHIMIRE, BISHNU 41 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 45 EAST KELSEY, LLC 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SCHNEIDER PROPERTIES LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HUXFORD, TYLER; JTZUNIGA, YESENIA; JT 50 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MOORE, RYAN C; JTWILKINSON, OLIVIA E; JT 58 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1700 INVESTMENTS, LLC 1190 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 NATE WADE INVESTMENTCOMPANY 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BING KONG TONG INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1213 MAJOR STREET LLC 1539 E MEADOWMOOR RD HOLLADAY UT 84117 1200 STATE PROPERTY LLC 1418 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 BING KONG TONG, INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 GPKP, LLC 1220 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LANDEN PROPERTIES LLC 13 E WANDERWOOD WY SANDY UT 84092 FREE WESLEYAN CHURCH OFTONGA IN UTAH 57 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAGNEY GROUP LLC THE 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 BMP II VENTURES, L.L.C.1343 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BMP VENTURES LLC 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NATE WADE INVESTMENT 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LOCKHART, DORINA C 1398 N 640 W WEST BOUNTIFUL UT 84087 NATE WADE INVESTMENT CO 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BIG CHEEZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENTLLC 1345 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BROTHERS & SON RETAIL LLC 1302 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1324 SOUTH STATE, LLC PO BOX 31356 TAMPA FL 33631 VU, HAI T T 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 AXIOM PROPERTIES III, LLC 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SCHILLING, BRUCE C; TR 917 E MILLCREEK WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 DEVARGAS, MARVINE M; TR 3774 S 400 E SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 1405 MAIN, LLC 2014 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 FAMILY HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 J & S AUTO SERVICE INC 1433 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGSLLC PO BOX 9948 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS,LLC 1163 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 PEREZ ENTERPRISES, INC 2774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 JOHNSON, JORDAN 23 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DALIPE, DEN M T; JTLAYDA, NATHALIE J C; JT 25 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILKINS, HEATHER R 29 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LE, TRUC T 33 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOR-LOKKEN,SNOWOWLWOLFESCHLEGELSTEINH 1392 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HRM REAL ESTATE, LLC 5267 W SUN BLOOM CIR HERRIMAN UT 84096 CATALAN PROPERTIES LLC 215 S 400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CATALAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C 1383 S MAJOR ST #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS, DANIEL 1389 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUZA LAND LLC 2230 DOC HOLLIDAY DR PARK CITY UT 84060 FOUNDRY PROPERTIES LLC 722 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 WASATCH INN, LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1438 S PROPERTIES LLC 3424 S STATE ST #A SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 GJACK ENTERPRISES LLC 59 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BIG WORLD PROPERTY LLC 8126 S HIDDEN SPRINGS CV SANDY UT 84094 CONDIE MAIN STREET HOLDINGS LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 PSAMMOSLIN LLC 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BRIGHT BOLIDE LLC 976 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STATE OF UTAH DIV FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MGM 450 N STATE OFFICE #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 BEEHIVE STATE EMPLOYEESCREDIT UNION 40 NE LOOP 410 STE 607 SAN ANTONIO TX 78216 UTAH STATE BUILDINGOWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 MAJOR STREET BUILDING LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 RASMUSSEN, L NEIL &SALLY A; TRS 7988 S STAUNING CV COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 WASATCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1085 N MAIN ST BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BEN NELSON TRUST 12/14/2022NELSON, BENNY E; TR 1481 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WULFPAK PRODUCTIONS LLC 1483 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1485 MAJOR STREET, LLC 110 MATTERHORN DR PARK CITY UT 84098 MATTINGLY, PHILIP R TR PO BOX 375 HEBER CITY UT 84032 ATK, LLC 1017 W HIDDEN COVE DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 SUES ALTERATION UT INC 1441 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 KHANAL, BIPLOB; JTSHARMA, UMA; JT 1480 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BVT LLC 1484 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LASSETER, LINDA D 1463 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LOTUS 1492 STATE, LLC 338 E SOUTHTEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JKC LLC 2843 E WATER VISTA WY SANDY UT 84093 NGUYEN, VINH; JTVO, LOAN; JT 1774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 OSTROWSKI PEARCE LIV TRET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOSSELIN-URIBE, ALEXANDRE; JTLOUGHLIN, EMILY Q; J 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTESEN, STEPHEN M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MANNAN, BEENISH; JTRAHIM, FAHIM; JT 2850 SUMMIT DR POCATELLO ID 83201 PETERSON, CLAIRE 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GRAVES, LINCOLN R; JTWEISBERG, BRENT M; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #F SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, BRADY; JTPATEL, CHANDANI; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE # G SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SINGH, SAHIBA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #H SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUNDQUIST, TAYLOR B; JTLUNDQUIST, LISA K; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #J SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UHLIG, KYLE; JTUHLIG, ANAHI N; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #K SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DANIEL HOUPT AND SHAWNA CUANTRUST; ET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #L SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECK, JOSEPH E; JTRUESCK, LAUREN E; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #M SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JIANG, ZIYANG 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAM, TUNG X 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #P SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHREYER, TANNER 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #Q SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEHERRERA, SAMANTHA A 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #R SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANASIK, CLAYTON 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SORRENTINO, DIANA M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #T SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 APHICO, LLC 1055 E LAFAYETTE ST SANDY UT 84094 PATEL, RUPA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #V SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 M15 LOFTS CONDOMINIUMASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 5555 DRAPER UT 84020 Current Occupant 945 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 951 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 961 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 964 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 966 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 970 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 943 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 947 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 969 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 971 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 954 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 965 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 223 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 215 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 933 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 935 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 959 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 46 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 960 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 24 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 52 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 80 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 949 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 975 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1018 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1024 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1050 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1098 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1039 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1055 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1046 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1015 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1075 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1062 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 120 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 111 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1025 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1043 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 124 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1061 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1101 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1103 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 175 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 149 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 135 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 168 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 158 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 154 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 148 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 136 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 122 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 110 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1085 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 185 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 157 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 145 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1143 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 166 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 160 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 138 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 134 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 128 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 65 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1020 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1099 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1041 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1011 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1070 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1116 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 60 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 56 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1152 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 35 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 31 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 25 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 21 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1127 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1133 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1139 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1155 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1171 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1150 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1164 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1172 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 131 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 133 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #2 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #3 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #4 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #5 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #6 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #7 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #8 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #9 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #10 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #11 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #12 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 218 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 227 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 211 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 220 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 225 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 238 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 228 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #11 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #13 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #3 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #6 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #30 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #25 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #16 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM2 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1167 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 173 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 182 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 170 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 164 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 140 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 155 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 180 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 55 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1186 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1234 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1285 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 34 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1270 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1338 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 135 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1309 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1317 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1321 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1333 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1339 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 77 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 150 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1386 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1390 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1445 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 208 W PARAMOUNT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1365 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 126 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1385 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 124 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1404 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 149 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1425 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 105 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 119 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1355 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1409 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1417 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1429 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1422 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 50 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1415 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1494 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1478 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1502 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1447 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1455 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1461 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1469 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1487 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1493 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1451 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1501 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1497 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 68 W ANDREW AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1431 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1449 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1499 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1498 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1530 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 20 E 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 958 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1017 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1025 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 21 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 999 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 998 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1035 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1007 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1009 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1019 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1000 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1004 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1010 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1016 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1026 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1030 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1045 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1077 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1085 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1101 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 50 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1051 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1050 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1062 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1084 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1175 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 19 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1141 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1151 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1157 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1142 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1148 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1152 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1156 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1122 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 60 E HARVARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #201 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #202 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #204 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #206 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #205 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #208 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #203 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #101 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #102 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1145 S FOULGER ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1150 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1185 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1222 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1207 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST #REAR Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1209 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1213 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1225 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1200 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1216 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 85 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1241 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1325 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1345 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1337 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 40 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 60 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1325 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1331 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1318 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1324 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1330 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1332 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1361 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1375 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1364 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1398 S MAJOR ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1406 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1412 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1420 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1359 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1363 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1379 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1383 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1393 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1374 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1392 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1416 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1438 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1479 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1476 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1457 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1467 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 38 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1482 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 48 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 54 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 58 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1453 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1463 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 47 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 65 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1458 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1460 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1472 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1504 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1446 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #D Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #U Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 ______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received:02/27/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 02/27/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 20, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:SLC Ballpark Station Area - Rezones STAFF CONTACT: Booke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the zoning map and zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. The City is proposing SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Feb 27, 2024 08:54 MST) associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station Area. Existing Zoning The project area is predominately zoned a variety of commercial and moderate density, multifamily residential zoning districts. The majority of the existing zoning districts within the project area do not provide the development standards, density, and land uses specified in the plan. Existing Zoning Map Proposed Zoning Map Proposed Zoning The City is proposing three new zoning districts in the area to align with the plan, including the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. Additionally, the City is proposing to exempt the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zones from the SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay zone which is mapped along the eastern boundary of the project area. Two properties located at 105 W 1400 S and 1410 S West Temple are owned by Salt Lake City Public Library. The properties are proposed to be rezoned from RMF-35 Multifamily Residential to PL Public Lands to accommodate the future development of a public library. Preserved Zoning The City is proposing to preserve the existing PL Public Lands and RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot, which will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. The City is also proposing to preserve an R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue, the OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Proposed MU-8 Zone The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district which allows buildings up to eight stories in height and a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The zone aims to facilitate the creation of quality, high density, pedestrian oriented developments. The standards of the zone are form based and vary for each building form established in the zone including row houses, multifamily residential, storefront, and vertical mixed use. The standards are also intended to mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties, and properties located in low density zones. Staff presented the proposal at a Planning Commission work session meeting on October 11, 2023. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 25, 2023, voted, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. It should be noted sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed sign regulations on January 24, 2024 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023-00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles The Ballpark Next community visioning process was initiated to establish guiding principles for the future use and development of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties. The draft Guiding Principles were published in January 2024 and will provide direction for decision making throughout the development process. As mentioned, the rezoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties will be considered in a second phase of this proposal to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. However, if there is a desire to implement the proposed MU-8 zone on either of the properties the Council should consider a modification to the proposed ordinance to allow the following land uses in the MU-8 zone which were identified in the Ballpark Next process. These uses were not specifically identified as permitted uses in the proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission but the Council may desire to add them to the proposed ordinance now. Amphitheater Formal Amphitheater Informal Health and Fitness Facility Community Recreation Center Plaza Stadium PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: April 2023 - An informational webpage posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. The webpage is regularly updated with new information as necessary. June 2, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. June 2, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. July 13, 2023 – Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. September 7, 2023 – Planning Staff modified the proposal based on the public input received and presented the proposal modifications at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal. September 8, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. September 8, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. October 16, 2023 - Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. October 25, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. Four members of the public spoke and the Ballpark Community Council submitted a letter. Several public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment D of the staff report. Initial modifications were made to the draft proposal in July through October 2023 in response to public comments received. A summary of the proposal modifications in response to public comments is provided in Attachment E of the Staff Report. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Memo of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) d)PC Agenda of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) e)PC Minutes of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) f)Planning Commission Staff Report of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request 5) Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 7) Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and 2 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 3 _________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ballpark Station Area Rezonesv2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:February 19, 2024 By: _ K Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 5 Proposed Zoning Map o 120 240 480 120 /\ -=----1====1Feet /N Proposed Zoning - Project Scope Project Area Boundart Ballpark Sign Overlay $SSC - South State Street CorridorOverlay OS - Open SpaceExisting Zoning to Remain PL - Public Lands R-1-5000 •Existing Zoning to Remain MU-8 - Form Based Mixed Use •Proposed FB-UN1 - Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1 FB-UN2 - Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 R-MU - Residential Mixed Use 'Existing Zoning to Remain PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-408-006-0000 1039 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-007-0000 1049 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-008-0000 1055 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-009-0000 175 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-010-0000 171 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-011-0000 165 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-012-0000 151 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-013-0000 1022 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-014-0000 1032 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-015-0000 1036 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-016-0000 1046 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-017-0000 1052 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-018-0000 1056 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-019-0000 1058 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-024-0000 1062 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-003-0000 129 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-004-0000 127 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-005-0000 111 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-006-0000 1025 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-007-0000 1035 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-008-0000 1043 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-011-0000 1051 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-016-0000 134 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-017-0000 128 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-018-0000 124 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-020-0000 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-021-0000 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-022-0000 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-023-0000 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-026-0000 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-031-0000 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-033-0000 1047 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-035-0000 1061 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-037-0000 133 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-038-0000 1001 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-040-0000 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-041-0000 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-042-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-043-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-044-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-003-0000 1091 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-004-0000 1095 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-009-0000 175 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-010-0000 167 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-011-0000 163 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-012-0000 159 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-013-0000 149 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-014-0000 147 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-015-0000 137 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-016-0000 135 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-029-0000 1089 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-030-0000 1085 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-031-0000 185 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-001-0000 1121 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-002-0000 1127 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-003-0000 1131 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-004-0000 169 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-005-0000 163 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-006-0000 157 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-007-0000 151 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-008-0000 145 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-009-0000 139 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-013-0000 1143 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-014-0000 182 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-015-0000 178 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-016-0000 172 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-017-0000 170 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-018-0000 166 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-019-0000 160 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-020-0000 156 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-429-021-0000 152 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-022-0000 138 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-023-0000 134 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-024-0000 132 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-025-0000 128 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-026-0000 122 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-433-001-0000 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-002-0000 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-003-0000 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-004-0000 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-005-0000 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-006-0000 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-007-0000 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-008-0000 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-009-0000 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-010-0000 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-011-0000 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-012-0000 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-013-0000 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-014-0000 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-015-0000 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-016-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-017-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-001-0000 121 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-002-0000 123 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-003-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-004-0000 127 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-005-0000 129 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-006-0000 131 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-007-0000 133 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-008-0000 135 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-009-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-001-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-002-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-003-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-004-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-005-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-006-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-007-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-008-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-009-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-010-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-011-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-012-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-013-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-001-0000 1167 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-002-0000 179 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-003-0000 175 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-004-0000 173 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-005-0000 165 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-006-0000 159 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-009-0000 147 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-010-0000 141 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-011-0000 137 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-012-0000 133 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-013-0000 129 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-014-0000 125 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-015-0000 121 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-016-0000 182 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-017-0000 178 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-018-0000 174 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-019-0000 170 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-020-0000 164 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-021-0000 160 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-022-0000 156 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-023-0000 150 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-024-0000 146 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-025-0000 142 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-026-0000 140 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-027-0000 132 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-476-028-0000 130 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-029-0000 126 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-030-0000 122 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-031-0000 118 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-032-0000 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-033-0000 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-034-0000 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-035-0000 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-036-0000 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-037-0000 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-038-0000 155 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-039-0000 151 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-002-0000 155 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-003-0000 125 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-004-0000 121 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-005-0000 119 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-006-0000 117 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-007-0000 115 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-008-0000 111 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-009-0000 105 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-010-0000 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-011-0000 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-012-0000 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-013-0000 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-12-477-014-0000 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-13-229-003-0000 105 W 1400 S RMF-35 PL 15-13-229-004-0000 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 PL 15-12-481-008-0000 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-009-0000 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-010-0000 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-011-0000 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-004-0000 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-005-0000 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-006-0000 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-007-0000 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-009-0000 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-228-006-0000 1414 S JEFFERSON ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-232-025-0000 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-12-479-018-0000 1234 S MAIN ST PL MU-8 15-12-477-019-0000 114 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-020-0000 1285 S RICHARDS ST CN MU-8 15-12-479-021-0000 34 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-022-0000 1270 S MAIN ST CN MU-8 15-12-481-007-0000 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST CN MU-8 15-12-477-018-0000 120 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-477-026-0000 180 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-480-001-0000 1338 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-001-0000 135 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-481-002-0000 1309 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-003-0000 1317 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-004-0000 1321 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-005-0000 1333 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-001-0000 1340 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-005-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-211-009-0000 150 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-211-010-0000 1376 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-011-0000 1380 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-012-0000 1386 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-013-0000 1390 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-226-007-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-227-001-0000 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE CG MU-8 15-13-227-002-0000 1385 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-227-008-0000 124 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-228-002-0000 1404 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-228-003-0000 1410 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-002-0000 1425 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-006-0000 119 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-229-007-0000 1411 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-430-001-0000 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-430-024-0000 36 W FREMONT AVE CC FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-430-028-0000 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-001-0000 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-002-0000 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-010-0000 1116 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-014-0000 60 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-015-0000 56 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-017-0000 1152 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-020-0000 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-432-009-0000 1155 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-010-0000 1159 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-011-0000 1165 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-012-0000 1171 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-016-0000 1150 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-017-0000 1160 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-018-0000 1164 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-019-0000 1172 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-001-0000 1185 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-010-0000 1186 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-13-231-022-0000 1400 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-023-0000 1414 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-024-0000 1430 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-028-0000 1380 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-305-010-0000 1175 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-018-0000 1160 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-019-0000 9 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-020-0000 17 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-021-0000 19 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-025-0000 1147 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-003-0000 1155 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-004-0000 1167 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-008-0000 1162 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-009-0000 33 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-010-0000 37 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-011-0000 41 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-352-001-0000 1185 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-011-0000 1222 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-016-0000 1207 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-001-0000 50 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-002-0000 58 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-003-0000 1190 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-004-0000 1207 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-005-0000 1212 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-006-0000 1209 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-007-0000 1213 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-008-0000 1225 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-019-0000 1241 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-354-013-0000 1325 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-014-0000 28 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-015-0000 1345 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-017-0000 1337 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-001-0000 40 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-002-0000 60 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-003-0000 1325 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-004-0000 1331 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-005-0000 1335 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-006-0000 1345 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-001-0000 1357 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-002-0000 1361 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-003-0000 1375 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-004-0000 1381 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-005-0000 1401 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-006-0000 1405 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-007-0000 1415 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-008-0000 1433 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-009-0000 1364 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-010-0000 1376 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-011-0000 1382 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-012-0000 1388 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-015-0000 1398 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-016-0000 1406 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 16-18-101-017-0000 1412 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-018-0000 1420 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-019-0000 1448 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-020-0000 23 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-021-0000 25 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-022-0000 29 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-023-0000 33 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-024-0000 1392 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-001-0000 1359 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-003-0000 1363 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-004-0000 1379 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-005-0000 1383 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-006-0000 1389 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-007-0000 1393 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-008-0000 1397 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-009-0000 1401 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-010-0000 1405 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-028-0000 1411 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-029-0000 1421 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-030-0000 1356 S STATE ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-032-0000 59 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 11 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 12 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 13 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 14 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 15 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 16 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 24 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 25 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 26 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 27 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 28 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 29 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 30 districts: 31 Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B. C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E.Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 34 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 35 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 36 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 37 CHAPTER 21A.25 38 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 39 40 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 41 42 A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use 43 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 44 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 45 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 46 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 47 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 48 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 49 50 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based 51 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 52 53 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed 54 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 55 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 56 may be found in this title. 57 58 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a 59 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 60 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 61 62 21A.25.020: Reserved 63 64 21A.25.030: Reserved 65 66 21A.25.040: Reserved 67 68 21A.25.050: Reserved 69 70 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 71 72 A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is 73 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 74 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 75 or near the subdistrict. 76 77 B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated 78 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 79 80 1. Row House Building Form Standards: 81 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: 82 (i). 1300 South 83 (ii). West Temple 84 (iii). Main Street 85 86 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 87 88 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form 89 Standards: 90 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 91 (i). 1300 South 92 (ii). West Temple 93 (iii). Main Street 94 95 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 97 98 99 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this 100 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 101 standards: 102 103 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, 104 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 105 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 106 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 107 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 108 requirement. 109 110 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ 111 by 15’. 112 113 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover 114 at least 50% of the open space area. 115 116 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one 117 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 118 119 a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; 120 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space 121 area; 122 c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to 123 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 124 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 125 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 126 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 127 128 D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are 129 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 130 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 131 132 133 TABLE 21A.25.060.D Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. 134 135 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 136 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 137 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 138 139 TABLE 21A.25.060.E Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 140 141 142 F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve 143 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 144 specific building form regulation. 145 146 G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in 147 this subdistrict. 148 149 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 150 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 151 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 152 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 153 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 154 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 155 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 156 8. 21A.46 Signs 157 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 158 159 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 160 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 161 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 162 A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 163 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 164 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 165 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 166 requirements of this title. 167 168 169 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 170 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 171 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 172 B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 173 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 174 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 175 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 176 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 177 178 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 179 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 180 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 181 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 182 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 183 MIXED USE DISTRICTS LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 11 184 Legend:C =Conditional P =Permitted 185 Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 14 Theater, movie Utility, buildings or structure Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P P10 P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 187 Qualifying provisions: 188 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related 189 Establishments", of this title. 190 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 191 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 192 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or 193 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 194 administrative rules. 195 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this 196 title. 197 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 198 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 199 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a 200 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building 201 demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 202 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar 203 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 204 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 205 206 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 207 208 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 209 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 210 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 211 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 212 G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form 213 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 214 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Pasker, Katherine 2023-12-18 23:51:00 -------------------------------------------- Need these notes and to probably fix the superscript numbering in the table. 15 215 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 216 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 217 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 218 follows. 219 C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning 220 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 221 222 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 223 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts 224 Note: 225 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties 226 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 16 227 228 229 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 230 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 231 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 232 amended to read and appear as follows: 233 b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 234 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban 235 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11 236 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN- 237 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House 238 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this 239 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. 240 241 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 242 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 243 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 244 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 245 246 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 Notes: 265 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the 266 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to 267 the building type being allowed in the zone. 268 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 269 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of 270 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 271 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall 272 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 273 274 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 275 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 276 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 277 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 278 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based 279 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 280 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 281 a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable 282 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing 283 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven 284 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, 285 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or 286 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of 287 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon 288 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative 289 interpretation application. 290 b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be 291 constructed of or contain: 292 (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. 293 (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing 294 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or 295 plywood. 296 297 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 298 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 299 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 300 amended to read and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 301 302 303 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 23 Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge Meeting hall membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 25 Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 26 304 305 306 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 307 308 309 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 34 Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 35 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 36 Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory No Minimum No Maximum LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 310 311 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 40 312 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 313 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 314 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 315 amended to read and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 41 316 317 318 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 319 320 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 322 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 323 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 324 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 325 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 43 326 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 45 FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 327 328 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 46 329 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 330 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 331 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 332 and appear as follows: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 47 333 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 334 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 48 335 336 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 337 338 first publication. 339 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. 340 341 342 343 CHAIRPERSON 344 345 ATTEST: 346 347 348 CITY RECORDER 349 350 351 Transmitted to Mayor on . 352 353 354 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. 355 356 357 358 359 MAYOR 360 361 CITY RECORDER 362 363 (SEAL) 364 365 Bill No. of 2024. 366 Published: . 367 368 369 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (legislative)v2 370 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E.Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A.Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B.Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1.Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2.Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A.Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B.Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1.Row House Building Form Standards: a.Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i).1300 South (ii).West Temple (iii).Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1.Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2.Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 2.Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a).Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i).1300 South (ii).West Temple (iii).Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. C.Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1.Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2.At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3.Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4.Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a.A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b.A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c.An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d.Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D.Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a.Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b.A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. E.Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. F.Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G.Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1.21A.33 Land Use Tables 10 2.21A.36 General Provisions 3.21A.37 Design Standards 4.21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5.21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6.21A.42 Temporary Uses 7.21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8.21A.46 Signs 9.21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A.Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B.Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend:C =Conditional P =Permitted Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1.Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2.Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3.Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4.Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5.Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6.Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7.Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8.Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9.If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10.Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 15 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C.Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1.Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 16 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) Notes: 1.This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2.Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3.For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General 19 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2.Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a.Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b.Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1)Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2)Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 23 Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge Meeting hall membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 28 Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum 34 Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory No Minimum No Maximum 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 40 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 41 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 42 43 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 45 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 46 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 47 ________________________ ________________________ therine D. Pasker, Senior City SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (final)v2 48 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _February 19, 2024 By: Ka Attorney 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition:PLNPCM2023-00169 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. Mar. 22, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00169 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Apr. 2023 An informational webpage was posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. Apr. – Jun. 2023 Zoning map and text amendment proposal was refined and finalized. Jun. 2, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jul. 13, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jul. – Sept. 2023 Significant modifications were made to the proposal in response to public input received. Sept. 7, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal modifications at a Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the modified proposal. Sept. 8, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. Oct. 11, 2023 Staff presented the petition at a Planning Commission work session meeting to gather feedback, identify key issues, and answer questions in anticipation of a future public hearing. Oct. 13, 2023 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing is sent to property owners and occupants within 300 ft of the subject properties. Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are also posted in the project boundary. Oct. 16, 2023 Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director Oct. 25, 2023 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. Nov. 21, 2023 Draft ordinances requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Nov. 29, 2023 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on October 25, 2023. Jan. 29, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00169– Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Zoning District. The City is proposing associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station area, within a portion of the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street and State Street Areas. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00169. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST MEMORANDUM PLANNING DMSION DEPAR'IMENT ofCOM.MUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS To:Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc:LisaShaffer, auef AdministrativeOfficer; BlakeThomas, Department of Communityand NeighborhooclsDirector; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: March 1, 2023 Re:Initiate Petition toforZ011ingMapAmendments in the BallparkNeighborl10odandAssociated ZoningText Amendments This memo is to request that a petition is initiated directing the Planning Division to amend the zoning in portions of the Ballpark neighborhood in response to direction provided by the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan. This plan was approved by the City Council on October 18, 2022. The Ballpark Station Area Plan provides guidance for future development and land useto support tl1e livability and futme gro,-vth in the Ballpark neighborhood. One of the keyimplementation steps identified in the plan is updating the zoning to establish a framework for future growth. The Planning Division is recommending that the zoning changes be broken into two phases: •Phase1: 2'.oning changes for the "Heart of the Neighborhood" which is focused on the vicinity of 1300 Sand West Temple St, the Jefferson Park Mixed Use area Oocated north of the ballpark to the Interstate 15 viaduct)and the Main Street conidor between Kelsey Ave and Cleveland Ave. Please refer to the attached map for the areas intended to be addressed in Phase1. •Phase 2: The remaining area along Main Street, south of Cleveland Ave. It is anticipated that Phase 2 will be started in conjunction with the adoption process for Life on State, anticipated to start later this year. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the Cityadoption process for zoning map amendments, which includes contacting recognized organizations and mailing notices to all property owners and residents in the study area in addition to general citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. The division will also hold public engagement events in the neighborhood to provide propertyowners, residents and business owners a convenient wayto share their comments with staff. The adoption process will also include collaboration with other City Departments. The map below displays the initial proposal recommended by the Planning Division and identifies the areas that would be rezoned and the identified zoning dist1ict that most closely ali&'llS with the Ballpark Station Area Plan vision and goals. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451SOUTI-1STATE STREET,ROOM 406 PO BOX145480 SALT LAKECITY. UT84114-5480 WWW.SLC.GOV TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 BALLPARK STATION AREA - REZONE RECOMMENDATIONS N 0 90 180 360 540 -=---===Feet A In addition to the proposed zoning map amendments the working group recommended that some zoning text amendments be included as well. These amendments would help to ensure that the proposed zones meet the recommendations from the plan and may include such thing5 but not limited to greater height in the TSA areas than currently allowed and increased setbacks on heavily trafficked streets. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that isthe decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall 03/02/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date Signature: :E:,4:::H.=l09c=59 MST) Email: erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com •Page3 Created:2023-03-01 By:Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAApOqZtc1YmfRzmqEmDSum3FE4pzwkbfGu Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2 Final Audit Report 2023-03-02 "Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2" History 'El Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) 2023-03-01 • 11:27:54 PM GMT q Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-01 - 11:28:57 PM GMT 'El Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) 2023-03-02 - 5:23:12 AM GMT !D'0 Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) Signature Date: 2023-03-02 • 4:59:36 PM GMT• Time Source: server t,Agreement completed. 2023-03-02 - 4:59:36 PM GMT Powt<edby Adobe Acrobat Sign•I 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Ballpark NEXT Vision Statement Guiding Principles Ba/lpark NEXT Possible Strategies: attract health focused retail and dining; incorporate areas for physical activity and social cohesion in public spaces or parks; incorporate areas for programming of physical activities; incorporate design that ensure accessibility for all abilities; integrate greenspace that helps to alleviate urban heat island Community-Centered/A Space for Every Face Goal: support daily needs of residents; fosters community interaction and involvement Strategies: incorporate uses that serve the community and foster community collaboration and participation; encourage a mix of local businesses and non-profit organizations; provide spaces for local cultural expression Acknowledge the Past/ Honor the Neighborhood's History Goal: future visitors understand the history of the site and the neighborhood Strategies: Explore adaptive reuse of primary structure or preservation of distinct design elements.; Incorporate the history of the ballfield andneighborhood on the site 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED October 25, 2023 Hello Planning Commissioners, My name is Amy J. Hawkins, and I serve as Chair of the Ballpark Community Council. Thank you for your attention this evening during a lengthily virtual meeting. My additional thanks are plentiful and at the end of this comment. We only have three out of five Ballpark Community Council board positions filled as we come up to an election next week, so I hesitate to say that these comments are the official position of the board. However, they are informed by extensive public engagement sessions with the Ballpark Community Council. My remarks tonight are fundamental: we understand that fixed rail goes through our neighborhood. We hope to capitalize on the opportunities it provides for economic development, best practices in urban planning, and the ability for folks to live in what’s almost a “15-minute neighborhood”, without displacing our committed residents and businesses, allowing folks the opportunity to age in place, without sacrificing affordability or community safety. These desires sound completely reasonable to residents and yet aren’t an easy ask in one of the most rapidly developing neighborhoods in one of the most actively growing metropolitan areas in the United States. Residents are concerned about plans to add substantial housing density when 1) we are already short on public land and spaces to recreate to support residents’ health, and 2) we’re concerned about plans for rezoning that eliminate setbacks. I know some view setbacks as a way to make housing unnecessarily more expensive, but in a community that already has serious disparities in our neighborhood’s urban tree canopy, in health outcomes, and a demonstrable heat island effect, removing setbacks removes our remaining opportunities to grow our urban tree canopy and protect our future residents. Planning Commissioners, please view setbacks through the lens of what needs to happen to prevent our heat island effect from becoming worse in a neighborhood that is still hurting from the effects of redlining and the “People’s Freeway”—Interstate 15, the 9th South offramp, and State Street, that powerfully disconnect us from our neighbors. We realize that the guiding principles for the Ballpark NEXT project may direct future planners to meet some of these concerns, but since that project is now completely disconnected from this Ballpark rezone proposal, we can’t build in those expectations for the Ballpark space when the committee may choose to go in a completely different direction. Over and over, I heard from fellow residents that we want to avoid recreating the problems of 400 South in this new MU-8 zone in Ballpark. Do these new MU-8 ground floor activation requirements do enough to avoid the problems of 400 South? Are there special considerations to preserve the little mature tree canopy that we have? It is important to highlight that this plan proposes re-zoning a public school site from PL to MU-8. This is only obliquely referenced in your 145-page Staff Report a few times. Horizonte Instruction and Training Center is an alternative public high school in the Salt Lake City School District located at 1234 S. Main Street. Horizonte works with community organizations, including Catholic Community Services’ refugee resettlement program and the Odyssey House, to reach students from diverse backgrounds, and enrolls both high school-aged students and continuing education adults. In 2019, about 85% of the 217 12th grade students were low income, and those students collectively spoke more than a dozen languages. Horizonte is the is the only public school within our neighborhood boundaries. Maybe we could have emphasized this more during the Ballpark Station Area Plan meetings, which I was a part of, but during COVID and meeting over Zoom, we may not have thought to give this the emphasis that we should have. Community Council participation tends to select for people who experience the kind of privilege such that we might not have been taught at schools like Horizonte. Prior to the pandemic, Elizabeth, my neighbor across the street who grew up in Mexico and who learned English as a second language, was earning her GED at Horizonte. Does it serve the interests of equity and investing in human capital in the Ballpark neighborhood to rezone Horizonte? Does it serve the interests of economic development? I don’t know, but given the wider discussion about closing public elementary schools in Salt Lake City, it’s concerning that this isn’t part of the staff report and tonight’s discussion. Please discuss why we should consider rezoning this property. This is a huge project with big implications for the Ballpark neighborhood. I attended my first informal Ballpark Station Area Plan meeting with Christine Richman and Annaka Egan and others from GSBS Consulting to brainstorm about building the committee in November 2020. That means the Ballpark Community Council, along with and private and Planning Division partners, have been engaging on variations on this topic for three years, in spite of the pandemic. I applaud my community for showing up, online, on comment boards, on post-its, and then in person, even though we have been dealt what feels like a very significant blow of the Salt Lake Bees announcing that they are leaving our neighborhood. I also want to state our strong appreciation for how much the Planning Division, particularly Brooke Olson, John Anderson, and Nick Norris, have been willing to work with the Ballpark neighborhood and the Community Council in the past several months, working with us as we negotiated trying to find a new in-person meeting place—Thank you, Salt Lake Community College, for opening your doors to us—as we have been simultaneously juggling the engagement calendar of the engagement for this rezone, the Ballpark NEXT engagement plan, and the engagement for the 300 West Corridor and Central Pointe Station area plan. Not only did they and Nick Norris’s formidable e-bike show up for our in person meetings and our outdoor engagement event at Jefferson Park last week, but they heard our feedback and created a new form of zoning, MU-8, replacing the proposed TSA zoning. I’m grateful for the granular discussions they’ve had about Lucy and Paxton Avenue, activation requirements for ground floor use, and our concerns about greenspace. Their passion for community engagement is clear, and they have gone the extra mile to be collaborators with the community in this project. Sincerely, Amy J. Hawkins 1 Olson, Brooke From:Olson, Brooke Sent:Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:43 PM To:Ciara C Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Attachments:Tables4.pdf Hi Ciara, Thank you so much for reaching out with your questions and comments. Your comments will be provided to the City Council prior to the public hearing. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the proposal but the City's proposal is available on the project webpage: https://www.slc.gov/planning/2023/04/14/ballparkplan-rezones/. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the City's Ballpark Station Area rezone proposal on October 25th, 2023, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposal. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the City Council Office. Once transmitted, the City Council will hold a briefing and a public hearing for the proposal and make a final decision. To provide you with some brief background information, the City is proposing to rezone properties along Main Street and Major Street, 200 W, and West Temple to FB-UN2, Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. The City's rezone recommendations are based on land use, design, building height, and density recommendations specified in the Ballpark Station Area plan: http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Master%20Plans/Central%20Community/22-10-27_Ballpark.pdf The majority of these areas proposed to be rezoned to FB-UN2 are currently zoned CC, Community Commercial and RMF-35, Multifamily Residential. The existing zoning CC and RMF-35 regulations lack design standards, a mix of pedestrian oriented uses, and higher density allowance identified in the master plan. The plan calls for a moderate density mixed use development and buildings up to 4-7 stories in height, in the Main Street and State Street areas between 1300 S and Merrimac/Cleavland Avenue, as well as the Jefferson Park mixed use area along 200 W and West Temple. The proposed zoning changes are intended to establish a zoning framework which meets the master plan vision to create quality pedestrian oriented development that provides higher density housing, neighborhood amenities, and activates the neighborhood. The FB-UN 2 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The purpose of the FB-UN2 zone states the zone “Generally includes buildings up to four stories in height, with taller buildings located on street corner parcels, which may contain a single use or a mix of commercial, office, and residential uses. Development regulations are based on building type, with the overall scale, form, and orientation of buildings as the primary focus.” The standards of the FB-UN2 zone are based on specific building forms established in the zone including: • Cottage Development • Row House • Multifamily Residential/ Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use (Other) The FB-UN2 zoning regulations were recently changed to address several livability concerns identified in the zoning regulations including the lack of setback requirements and open space requirements as you mentioned. The code changes were recently adopted by the City Council earlier this year. The changes increased the design standards, open space design standards, and required landscape yards for specific building forms and uses. The new regulations are intended to create pedestrian oriented developments and mitigate impacts associated with higher density through a 2 variety of architectural design standards and additional setback requirements. Open space design standards have been added to ensure the open spaces on site consist of living vegetation and are usable by all occupants of a property. I've attached a summary of the current FB-UN2 development regulations, which list some of the general requirements of the zone. The development standards of the FB-UN2 zone can be found at this link: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-65370#JD_21A.27.050 Thank you again for reaching out and please let me know if you have any further questions. BROOKE OLSON | (She/Her/Hers) Principal Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: (801) 535-7118 Email: Brooke.olson@slcgov.com WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING WWW.SLC.GOV Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. -----Original Message----- From: Ciara C < > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 12:39 PM To: Olson, Brooke <brooke.olson@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Brook, I understand the comment period time for the Ballpark rezone has ended however I have simple question. This is not meant with anger or sarcasm but why is much of the rezone going to be FBUN 2? From what I understand that zone is extremely beneficial to the developer without much of a benefit to the neighborhood. Two examples are that the developer gets to build higher and without a setback. This seems like a negative to an area with many single family homes with the least amount of greenspace compared to any other area in the city. I truly want to know what the upside is. Thanks Ciara Sent from my iPhone 1 Olson, Brooke From:Charles Button < > Sent:Monday, October 30, 2023 2:32 PM To:Olson, Brooke Subject:(EXTERNAL) New Tag Comment Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Hello Brooke, Here is a new comment after attending planning commission for ballpark. As a homeowner on Jefferson street-I welcome the new zoning classification passed through the planning commission for the Ballpark proposal. I’m against TAGs amendments to change that new zoning to large scale RMU. Even TAG has made statements they want to align with ballpark plan but now sound like they just want to change for their purposes not the community/Ballpark Proposal. Planning Commission Berry and others almost voted against Ballpark plan due to wanted to remove 3 RMU zones near Jefferson street. Please deny TAGs two proposals. Thank you! Chuck B Jefferson Street Homeowner. Sent from my iPhone 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP WWC91 HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 847 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 951 WASHINGTON LLC 3037 E LOUISE AVE MILLCREEK UT 84109 LEE, CHRISTOPHER 955 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILCOX, STEFANIE 1589 W CHATEAU CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 WOLFSON WEST OLD KENTAPARTMENTS LIMITED PART 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 PITTSBURGH HOUSE LOFTSLIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9TH STREET CENTER LLC 1175 E 1850 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 DAVIS, TRAVIS 967 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 244 FAYETTE, LLC 3170 BANNOCK DR PROVO UT 84604 PROVOST, TIFFANIE 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, JOSE R &ROSALBA R; JT 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CAPITOL CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 FENTON & ELAINE BATES FAM TRET AL 6816 S ANDERSON WY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 SILVER ANTLER, LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD board UT 84104 UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY board UT 84101 WASATCH LIMITED COMPANY 926 S JEFFERSON ST board UT 84101 965 CENTRAL LC 70 NORTH MAIN #106 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 PRICE 959 SOUTH, LLC 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FACADE, LLC 64 W FAYETTE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 987 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STRONG DESIGN, LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 AND JUSTICE FOR ALL 205 W 400 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DKL PROPERTIES, LLC 560 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 AMAZING GRACE, LC 503 E TENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 WEST BROOKLYN, LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 5,LLC 11995 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 TWO HUNDRED WEST, LLC 720 N REXFORD DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZE FAM REV TRUST)1102 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZEF REV TRUST)1112 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARATHON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,LLC 3731 W SOUTHJORDAN PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 LONG, JIMMIE E 1049 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE; JTLONARDO, MARCUS A; JT 160 E FORT UNION BLVD MIDVALE UT 84047 ROBERTS, KATHLEEN M 175 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MYLECRAINE, DAN E 171 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SS CAPITAL, LLC 35 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ELK RIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC 526 E REDONDO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 GILES, KRISTIE 1022 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASIC, AMRA 1032 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 1036 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BUTTON, CHARLES E 1052 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CABRERA, LERNICE 1056 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THORPE, JAMIE L 1058 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TENFIFTEEN PARTNERS, LLC 3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DE ANZA-C9 LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CAUSEY, KATHRYN A 923 LONGLEAF DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JOHNSON BROTHERS INVESTMENTS,LLC 126 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MATINKHAH, AKBAR 2618 E SKYLINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 CARNEGIE HOLDINGS LLC 4019 S OLYMPIC WY HOLLADAY UT 84124 R AND J PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENTS LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 INTERMOUNTAIN LAND COMPANY LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 KETCH, GREGORY C 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 GONZALEZ B, RUBEN A &LOPEZ V, TIMOTEO S; JT 1035 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BAILEY, GREG R; TRET AL 639 MOUNTAIN VIEW CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 MIDGLEY, DAVID P 1051 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLAGER, DOUGLAS; JTWRIGHT, MARCUS; JT 134 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ALLEN, CARLETON J 128 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CONNELLY, CARL 2263 E HIGH MOUNTAIN DR SANDY UT 84092 KOMAROV, VADIM D; JTLAMB, CHRISTOPHER E; JT 1002-1006 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAM, RACHELLE 1008 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, RICHARD E 1010 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 400 EAST/WT APARTMENTS, LLC 11589 S SUMMERFIELD CIR SANDY UT 84092 ADAMS, STEVEN C 1042 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BEMIS, DAVID M 8479 S 1380 E SANDY UT 84093 HERNANDEZ, JOSEPH L 1047 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 2223 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BURT, ANDREW; JTBURT, CYNTHIA; JT 133 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SIERRA, ISMAEL G &OJEDA, JESUS J; JT 1001 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN M 1058 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN; JTRANDALL, KEVIN; JT 1064 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 13818 S VESTRY RD DRAPER UT 84020 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1697 N FORT LN LAYTON UT 84041 CURRENT OCCUPANT 440 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLORES, GUADALUPE 1091 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY 1530 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PEREZ, TERESA &CARDENAS, PASCUAL; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUNT, LARISSA M 167 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SOMEWHERE OTR, LLC PO BOX 9874 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TAYLOR, JAMES C &JESSICA M; JT 3556 S 5600 W #1-533 WEST VALLEY UT 84120 GOWON, JOB G 145-147 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANDERSON, LEE 137 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 TAG SLC, LLC 1089 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DOHENY-VIDOVICH PARTNERS 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CARDENAS, PASCUAL &PEREZ, MARIA T; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PEREZ, PEDRO CARDENAS 1127 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LARSON, JESSICA 1131 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THREE BIRDS, LLC 169 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TINOCO, ESTEBAN R. & SOPHIE R.4628 W 4695 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 KATHLEEN LOIS COCHRAN REV TRCOCHRAN, KATHLEEN 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 GARZARELLI, DAN O 950 HARBOR AVE HENDERSON NV 89002 BUSTAMANTE, JUAN R &RAMIREZ, GRISELDA A; JT 139 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HART, NATHAN 2359 E 3225 S MILLCREEK UT 84109 GARCIA, LEO PAUL 182 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CASS, JEREMY; JTCASS, SARA; JT 178 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FINLINSON, MITCHELL T 172 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BRUNELLE, BRIANA 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ORLANDINI, KIM; JTET AL 5951 W JUNIPER ACRES CT WEST VALLEY UT 84128 TUMINEZ, JESSA; JTLONARDO, ANDRE; JT 162 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARQUIS, TANGUY 156 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HADLEY, PATRICK L; JTMAYBURY, KAREN; JT 152 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC 111 W 33RD ST NEW YORK NY 10120 SHAPIRO, ALLIE R 1420 PEERLESS PL APT 123 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 DALE WINETEER TRET AL 132 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COATES FAMILY INVESTING,LLC SERIES 2 PO BOX 526344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 KANE, JOHN A; JTKANE, CAROLINE O; JT 122 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INC PO BOX 572070 MURRAY UT 84157 STATE OF UT, DIV OF FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MAN 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 HOUSING AUTHORITY OFSALT LAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STATE OF UTAH 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 10TH AND MAIN, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 8350 S VIA RIVIERA WY COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALTLAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STRONG DESIGN LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 N C CARRIDO INC 1085 N NOCTURNE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 COLLABORATIVE 1135 GP, LLC 1135 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLIAMSON, CARY AET AL 9938 S TULIP DR WHITE CITY UT 84094 D & P PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 10032 ROBIN OAKS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89117 SCHNEIDER, PROPERTIES, LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 35 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 1799 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 31 WEST FREMONT AVENUE LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 25 FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 21 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1127 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1133 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1139 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ACTION MOBILE REPAIRS, INC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 E7 PARTNERS, LLC 949 S DENVER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BLOCKYARD, LLC 1159-1161 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KCTH PROPERTY LLC 1165 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JAVA PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 71899 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 RIC-ROB LC 1130 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GS INVESTMENT, LLC 1160 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, EILEEN G; JTBROWN, MICHAEL J; JT 1148 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CUTTING, WILLIAM M III; JTET AL 1146 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLSON, SHEILA 1144 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG ROWHAUS, LLC 4035 W 58TH PLACE LOS ANGELES CA 90043 DAVID WULF & AARON NELSONLIVING TRUST 2845 S IMPERIAL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BENTLEY, ABBEY; JTABERMAN, MICHAEL; JT 1138 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCMAHON, JULIE R 1136 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICAL, LISA 1134 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TROP, DENNIS A 1132 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URRY, SLOAN 1130 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCKEON, KATHLEEN 1128 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 NELSON, JENIFER F 1126 S WESTTEMPLE ST #112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 QUINN, PATRICK &HAMILTON, ERIN; JT 1124 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MORTENSEN-MAHYERA LIV TRET AL 1122 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARNWINE, CAITLIN; JTARNWINE, MATTHEW; JT 1120 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THOMAS, LEAH 353 E 1500 N OREM UT 84057 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATI 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 SORENSON, SCOTT 121 W FREMONT AVE #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 OCAMPO, KRISHEILA 123 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GONZOL, DARREN &MLEYNEK, TARA; JT 125 W FREMONT AVE #119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WALKER, JESSE C &HOFELING, MARK; JT 127 W FREMONT AVE #120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASKETT, NATHAN T; JTWHITE, ADAM T; JT 129 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MASTAIN, HENRY S 131 W FREMONT AVE #122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCBRIDE, MARCUS 133 W FREEMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84701 FINLINSON, WHITNEY M 135 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOWMEOWNERS ASSOCIA 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 PARKSIDE CONDOS, LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOS,LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOMINIUMHOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION7931 BLAZE TRAIL CT ORANGEVALE CA 95662 PAXTON PLACE, LLC 77 DRY CANYON DR LINDON UT 84042 M-SHOT HOLDINGS, LLC 6629 TROUT CREEK CT PARK CITY UT 84098 HALVERSON, JOHN L 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SPOTTY DOG ENTERPRISES LLC 809 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TUCKER TOWING, LLC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALVERSON, MARY E; JTHALVERSON, STEPHEN J; JT 1471 E TUMBLEWEED WY DRAPER UT 84020 ASCEND PROPERTIES, LLC 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 I LOVE LUCY AVE, LLC 600 E GILBERT DR TEMPE AZ 85281 D D MANAGEMENT, LLC 13775 S KENNINGTON CT DRAPER UT 84020 COLONY B LLC 196 W GOLF COURSE RD LOGAN UT 84341 LOWE'S HIW INC PO BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE NC 28115 JACOBS, RYAN C 230 W 1300 S #8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ZACHARIAS, NATHAN 230 W 1300 S #9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HENDERSON, ELENA K; JTHENDERSON, MICHAEL S; JT 230 W 1300 S #10 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAGARACI, ISABEL 230 W 1300 S #11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MYRICK, TREVOR 230 W 1300 S #12 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NEWBERRY, ARIA; JTPASSEY, NICHOLAS C; JT 230 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDREA B MITTON LIV TRMITTON, ANDREA B; TR 230 W 1300 S #14 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CW THE LUCY, LLC 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 PUPAIBOOL, JAKRAPUN 942 W LOTUS BROOK DR SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84119 MORGAN STEWART INVESTMENTS,LLC 230 W 1300 S #2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBINSON, JASON R 7438 S DAN DR WEST JORDAN UT 84084 ERICKSEN, CHELSEA 230 W 1300 S #4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINS, MICHAEL G 230 W 1300 S #5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 URWIN, JEREMY 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 RICHARDS, CODY 230 W 1300 S #7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LING, MENG C 230 W 1300 S #29 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CROSSBOW PROPERTIES LLC 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 GOTHBERG, SPENCER 230 W 1300 S #31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKS, KRISTINA R 230 W 1300 S #32 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SQUIRES, BROOKE 230 W 1300 S #33 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FITZGERALD, MARISSA V 230 W 1300 S #34 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SIDDEEK, HANI 230 W 1300 S #35 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KUSHNER, JOSHUA 230 W 1300 S #22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MCLEOD, SUSAN; JTMCLEOD, CHRISTOPHER; JT 230 W 1300 S #23 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MATTHEWS, SHAUN 230 W 1300 S #24 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PAN, JANE Y; JTTAN, HAI B; JT 741 E 600 N ROOSEVELT UT 84066 LAPP, ROBERT ANDREW 230 W 1300 S #26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, GABRIELLA L 230 W 1300 S #27 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SASICH, MICHAEL J 230 W 1300 S #28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PETERSEN, LANDONPETERSEN, JAXON 230 W 1300 S #15 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEWOLF FAM TRDEWOLF, JANICE B; TR 1250 S NEVADA AVE PROVO UT 84606 HANSEN, JINKY GATUTEO JTHANSEN, TYLER STEVEN JT 230 W 1300 S #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WONG, DENISE 230 W 1300 S #18 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CHERNENKO, ALLA JTVAN HUELE, YANNICK JT 230 W 1300 S #19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROTTER, ERIN; JTSANDERS, SAMUEL; JT 230 W 1300 S #20 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BUSHNELL, DAVID W; JTBROCKSCHMIDT, VERONICA L; J 230 W 1300 S #21 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUCY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 ELLEFSEN, GIANNI 3010 S RICHMOND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 WARD, CLINT Z 179 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WHITLOCK, CAMERON T 175 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARLICK, SANDRA L 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KETCH, GREGORY C &KAREN A; JT 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 URBAN SENSE, LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 DOWLER ENTERPRISES LLC 1112 N 1100 W FARMINGTON UT 84025 DICKSON, KYLE 141 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GREENE, CHARLES A 137 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALL, KIM C 133 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JALALPOUR, JALEE 4121 WEBSTER ST OAKLAND CA 94609 KREMER, JORDAN 125 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUGHES, DON R 121 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F; JT 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F & SULIETI; TC 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GOODRICH, BENJAMIN P 174 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LEMASTER PROPERTIES, LLC 8084 S 1700 E SANDY UT 84093 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE 1055 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LUND, JENNY E &CHRISTIANSEN, KEVIN; JT 160 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GASS, PATRICK R 156 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KING, LARRY E, JR 150 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MILLS, DEXTER M; JTOVESON, JESSICA; JT 146 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ENGLAND, GEORGE M 211 E TRUMAN AVE SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 ELLIS, JODY R; JTELLIS, RONALD W; JT 130 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DEMILLE, JANIE A 132 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARIAS, JOSE G 140 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COBIAN, ANA D S 3683 S RIVER HORSE RD WEST VALLEY UT 84119 VIDAL, ARYS Q JR 122 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOOD, JAMES V 118 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOO, DAVID 2826 E DIMPLE DELL RD SANDY UT 84092 YBARRA, PETER E 1174 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 YBARRA, PATRICIA; SURVET AL 1178 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1182 WEST TEMPLE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HUGHES, LAUREN 1188 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WRIGHT, ANTHONY P; JTWRIGHT, MERRICK C; JT 1192 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN SENSE LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 KIM, SU H; JTBAE, JUNHYUK; JT 155 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARCIA, RUTH 125 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TANAKA, MELISSA R; JTTANAKA, ROGER H JR; JT 121 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ESMAY, RYAN K; JTCANENGUEZ, ANDREA M C; JT 119 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SAGONA, JORDAN M 117 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ZOBRIST, KARLY A 115 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, POMPILIO O 111 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 RAEMHILD, IAN 105 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALEY, MICHELE R 2967 E MORNINGSIDE DR HOLLADAY UT 84124 SCHEAR, ADAM G 1208 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICA, CADE S; JTMERICA, STEVIE Z; JT 1212 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KOCHERHANS, STEVEN 1216 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALTLAKE 1220 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 INDIAN WALK-IN CENTER INC 120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUTHLAND CORP, THE PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221 S L C CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 OIKOS 8 LLC 1185 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JENSEN, MARC R 1056 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OFEDUCATION 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BFR, LLC 907 E 250 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BFR, LLC 185 S STATE ST #800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1300 BALLPARK, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VINA, SHERRY &ANTHONY D; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 BIJCO LLC 8704 S SUGARLOAF DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 RJL, LTD 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JEFFERSON STREET LLC PO BOX 571217 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84157 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 1349 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY CORP 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT UT 84101 JUDD JONES REFRACTORY &ACID SPECIALTIES INC 2904 MILLCREEK CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 JEFFERSON BALLPARK, LLC 1240 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 VILLAS AT 1400 SOUTHHOLDINGS, LP 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY LOGAN UT 84321 RICK & MEG OSGUTHORPE REV LIVTRUST 02/05/2023; E58 S TROUT LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 SHELTER THE HOMELESS, INC 242 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 TABRIZ, SATTAR N 1429 E ROOSEVELT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 RENPRO TWO, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 HOME BASE APARTMENTS, LLC 3211 W STARLITE DR WEST JORDAN UT 84088 P STREET INVESTMENTS, LC 1328 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SANDSTONE CAFE LLC 2182 E BALD EAGLE CT DRAPER UT 84020 FIREFIGHTERS CREDIT UNION 124 W 1400 S #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BALL PARK APARTMENTS, LP 1380 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEER RUN TIMBER, LLC 8919 S RED WILLOW CIR SANDY UT 84093 KNAPHUS, BRADLEY R 1410 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CR TOWNEGATE COMMUNITIES, LLC 444 W BEECH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 RUECO, LLC; 41.46%TRADITION POINTE LLC; 58.54% 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 THOMAS, BRYSON 105-109 W 1400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3855 S 500 W SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 JOHNSON, RONALD K 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECO, LLCTRADITION POINTE LLC 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 VICTORIA JOURDIN, LLC 38 S NORTHRIDGE WY SANDY UT 84092 YUCATAN LLC 540 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 OLIVER, ANGELA 1116 N SONATA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 CHIDAMBARAM, PRIYADHARSHINI 1421 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLIAMS, MICHELLE L; JTWILLIAMS, ZACHARY R; JT 1429 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SILVA, DANIEL S; JTSILVA, MCKENZIE T; JT 68 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MISAKA, MARY S 62 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKHEAD, STANLEY J 1388 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RABAGLIA, JOSEPH 1396 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAWRENCE, ASHLEY &MAUSS, ANDREW; JT 1400 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLADE, CHRISTOPHER L; ET AL 1404 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CASH, GARY L 3 S ALTAWOOD DR SANDY UT 84092 CARLSEN, ERIKA 1418 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DUNCOMBE, EARL D &RENAE; JT 4051 S 3200 W WEST VALLEY UT 84119 MERRIMAC RENTALS, LLC 4893 GLENHOLLOW CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057 SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FAJARDO, HIRAM H; JTKINSLEY-HERNANDEZ, JESSICA; JT 1381 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAPIA-GUZMAN, JULIO CESAR 7617 NE 1ST CT MIAMI FL 33138 MENZEL, JORDAN 1399 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 EKEY, MADISON; JTMEDLER, JONATHAN; JT 1401 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DERBIDGE, CHRIS &ROSIELER; JT 1407 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MONOCHROMATIC LLC 553 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 2174 S MAIN ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 1430 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH PRIDE CENTER PO BOX 1078 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1360 S MAIN, LLC 1360 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 OMAHONY, RYAN E 32 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALLISON, JOHN B &TONI L; JT 30 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HOU, JIN HUA 286 E SNOWY RIVER CT SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 WHALEY, BRIAN; JTHAWKINS, AMY; JT 26 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NELSON, RICHELLE L 24 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BBP INTERMOUNTAIN 1494 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WOLF, THOMAS &KIMBERLY; JT 1478 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HAYDEN, JAMES H &WEST, SCOTT E; JT 1488 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1500 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1502 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DENISTON, SHAWN J; ET AL 1748 E MOUNTAIN VIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 HIGHCLIFF PROPERTYMANAGEMENT, LLC PO BOX 526110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 GABBOTT, LEWIS 1469 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAY, MARLIN D 1475 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LEBOUTILLIER, SHAWN T 1481 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOWEN, DONALD E; JTGOWEN, LAUREN V O; JT 1487 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDERSON, ADAM &AMANDA; JT 246 E HAMPTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAMPTON, MARY A M; JTET AL 65 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FLETCHER LEE STUMPH TRSTUMPH, FLETCHER; TR 1454 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ATWOOD, KIMBERLY M &GIBSON, STEVEN D; TC 1460 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JENNINGS, PAT &THOMAS L; JT 1470 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROWLAND, ANDREW C 1476 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAYLOR, CLAYTON R; JTMECHAM, SHELBIE A; JT 1482 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KETTLE CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC 13087 S 1300 W RIVERTON UT 84065 MIDDLETON, DORIS &SWARTZ, FLORENCE; JT 1494 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINSON, MONIQUE C; JTOBORN, CRAIG; JT 930 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, ET AL 1 EQUITY WY WESTLAKE OH 44145 KUNGA, THUPTEN &DOLMA, PHURBU; JT 64 W ANDREW AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TALLEY FAM LIV TRET AL 1964 E GYRFALCON DR SANDY UT 84092 RICHARDS0408 LLC 12786 S 600 E DRAPER UT 84020 TRAN DO REV TRTRAN, ANNA; TR 1859 W SIR JAMES DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BERGERA, JORDAN E; JTNINOWSKI, TIMOTHY J; JT 1455 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1463 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HYMAS, ANTHONY L; JTHYMAS, JULIE A; JT 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLASGOW, ROBERT E; JTGLASGOW, TIFFANY S; JT 1340 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JENNINGS-HILL, TIMOTHY 1487 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 YAMAGATA, MAKI 1491 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOHNS, KEELAN 2320 S 2100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GABBOTT'S ROW, LLC 650 S 500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 C Z PROPERTIES LLC 1476 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARCIA, RASHELL C 1484 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATIONASSOCIATION A NO 1488 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEFF SANDSTROM LIV TRSANDSTROM, JEFF; TR 35 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FOUR HOLDINGS, INC 1530 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARFF ENTERPROSES, INC 777 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, BILL B, TR 3433 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GARFF ENTERPRISES INC 64 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FOOD FORWARD HOLDINGS, LLC 439 E SEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANSEN & HANSEN PROPERTIES LLC 5840 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST #3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SHELTER THE HOMELESS II LC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CITY CREEK HOSPITALITY, LLC,LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ANDERSON, THOMAS E 3178 E VISTA BONITA CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 EVERGREENE CONSTRUCTION CO,LC 571 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CHEN'S INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 CHENS INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 DALE & LORILYN KINYON LIV TRET AL 1696 MUELLER PARK RD BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 RANDY TOPHAM PROPERTIES LLC 168 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 UNIQUE PROPERTIES, LLC 1677 E BURNING OAK DR DRAPER UT 84020 CREATESPACE SLC, LLC 2605 JEFFERSON AVE OGDEN UT 84401 FRESH START PROPERTIES LLC 1807 E VINTAGE OAK LN MURRAY UT 84121 KENTUCKY BOURBON LLC 832 E CLAYBOURNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CLARK, MARION B; TRSET AL 2500 E ARNETT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GREEN BEINGS LLC 563 E 3785 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84106 HODZIC, IRFAN &JASMINKA; JT 481 E 2700 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 CLATTERBUCK, ALISON O 1055 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 EVEREAL-ESTATE 2, LLC 11711 S GROVES MEADOW CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 PHOENIX WEST ENTERPRISE, LLC PO BOX 65694 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 OH MAI DOWNTOWN, INC 1102 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VASILIOU, GEORGE 1061 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCHOF SALT LAKE CITY 1090 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BECKSTRAND, DONALD S FAMILYLTD PARTNERSHIP 5727 S 675 E MURRAY UT 84107 ANDERSON, KATIE L 1144 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GODFREY, THOMAS; JTPACKER, KIERA K; JT 1150 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MAGAR, WILSON T 1154 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JORDAN, LAWRENCE W, JR 1160 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAEDER, RACHEL M 9 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SMITH, SEAN E; JTMARQUEZ, T'KEYA; JT 17 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VINA, SHERRY & RHETT B; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DSPTOO, LLC 1111 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 KUANG FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC 1623 W MORNING VIEW WY LEHI UT 84043 BROUSE, DONALD &SHARON; JT 1136 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LEDO ENTERPRISES PO BOX 9167 SPRINGFIELD MO 65801 60E LLC 2840 E JENNIE LN HOLLADAY UT 84117 DYNASTY CONDOMINIUMOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1623 W MORNING VIEW WAY LEHI UT 84043 PEREZ, INMER 1029 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VALINO, GABINO F &ROBIN L; JT 1149 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CASTRO, MCEDGAR G 1155 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORONODO, CLAUDIA 1167 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MARTINEZ, MARIO A 1535 S BRAVA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GRANT, TERI 1156 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILDING, THOMAS V 1162 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WALSTER, JOHN D; TR(JDWFT)PO BOX 65122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 KOTTWITZ, CASSINDA N 37 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GHIMIRE, BISHNU 41 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 45 EAST KELSEY, LLC 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SCHNEIDER PROPERTIES LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HUXFORD, TYLER; JTZUNIGA, YESENIA; JT 50 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MOORE, RYAN C; JTWILKINSON, OLIVIA E; JT 58 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1700 INVESTMENTS, LLC 1190 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 NATE WADE INVESTMENTCOMPANY 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BING KONG TONG INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1213 MAJOR STREET LLC 1539 E MEADOWMOOR RD HOLLADAY UT 84117 1200 STATE PROPERTY LLC 1418 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 BING KONG TONG, INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 GPKP, LLC 1220 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LANDEN PROPERTIES LLC 13 E WANDERWOOD WY SANDY UT 84092 FREE WESLEYAN CHURCH OFTONGA IN UTAH 57 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAGNEY GROUP LLC THE 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 BMP II VENTURES, L.L.C.1343 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BMP VENTURES LLC 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NATE WADE INVESTMENT 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LOCKHART, DORINA C 1398 N 640 W WEST BOUNTIFUL UT 84087 NATE WADE INVESTMENT CO 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BIG CHEEZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENTLLC 1345 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BROTHERS & SON RETAIL LLC 1302 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1324 SOUTH STATE, LLC PO BOX 31356 TAMPA FL 33631 VU, HAI T T 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 AXIOM PROPERTIES III, LLC 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SCHILLING, BRUCE C; TR 917 E MILLCREEK WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 DEVARGAS, MARVINE M; TR 3774 S 400 E SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 1405 MAIN, LLC 2014 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 FAMILY HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 J & S AUTO SERVICE INC 1433 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGSLLC PO BOX 9948 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS,LLC 1163 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 PEREZ ENTERPRISES, INC 2774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 JOHNSON, JORDAN 23 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DALIPE, DEN M T; JTLAYDA, NATHALIE J C; JT 25 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILKINS, HEATHER R 29 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LE, TRUC T 33 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOR-LOKKEN,SNOWOWLWOLFESCHLEGELSTEINH 1392 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HRM REAL ESTATE, LLC 5267 W SUN BLOOM CIR HERRIMAN UT 84096 CATALAN PROPERTIES LLC 215 S 400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CATALAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C 1383 S MAJOR ST #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS, DANIEL 1389 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUZA LAND LLC 2230 DOC HOLLIDAY DR PARK CITY UT 84060 FOUNDRY PROPERTIES LLC 722 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 WASATCH INN, LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1438 S PROPERTIES LLC 3424 S STATE ST #A SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 GJACK ENTERPRISES LLC 59 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BIG WORLD PROPERTY LLC 8126 S HIDDEN SPRINGS CV SANDY UT 84094 CONDIE MAIN STREET HOLDINGS LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 PSAMMOSLIN LLC 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BRIGHT BOLIDE LLC 976 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STATE OF UTAH DIV FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MGM 450 N STATE OFFICE #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 BEEHIVE STATE EMPLOYEESCREDIT UNION 40 NE LOOP 410 STE 607 SAN ANTONIO TX 78216 UTAH STATE BUILDINGOWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 MAJOR STREET BUILDING LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 RASMUSSEN, L NEIL &SALLY A; TRS 7988 S STAUNING CV COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 WASATCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1085 N MAIN ST BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BEN NELSON TRUST 12/14/2022NELSON, BENNY E; TR 1481 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WULFPAK PRODUCTIONS LLC 1483 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1485 MAJOR STREET, LLC 110 MATTERHORN DR PARK CITY UT 84098 MATTINGLY, PHILIP R TR PO BOX 375 HEBER CITY UT 84032 ATK, LLC 1017 W HIDDEN COVE DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 SUES ALTERATION UT INC 1441 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 KHANAL, BIPLOB; JTSHARMA, UMA; JT 1480 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BVT LLC 1484 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LASSETER, LINDA D 1463 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LOTUS 1492 STATE, LLC 338 E SOUTHTEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JKC LLC 2843 E WATER VISTA WY SANDY UT 84093 NGUYEN, VINH; JTVO, LOAN; JT 1774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 OSTROWSKI PEARCE LIV TRET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOSSELIN-URIBE, ALEXANDRE; JTLOUGHLIN, EMILY Q; J 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTESEN, STEPHEN M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MANNAN, BEENISH; JTRAHIM, FAHIM; JT 2850 SUMMIT DR POCATELLO ID 83201 PETERSON, CLAIRE 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GRAVES, LINCOLN R; JTWEISBERG, BRENT M; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #F SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, BRADY; JTPATEL, CHANDANI; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE # G SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SINGH, SAHIBA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #H SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUNDQUIST, TAYLOR B; JTLUNDQUIST, LISA K; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #J SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UHLIG, KYLE; JTUHLIG, ANAHI N; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #K SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DANIEL HOUPT AND SHAWNA CUANTRUST; ET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #L SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECK, JOSEPH E; JTRUESCK, LAUREN E; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #M SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JIANG, ZIYANG 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAM, TUNG X 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #P SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHREYER, TANNER 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #Q SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEHERRERA, SAMANTHA A 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #R SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANASIK, CLAYTON 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SORRENTINO, DIANA M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #T SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 APHICO, LLC 1055 E LAFAYETTE ST SANDY UT 84094 PATEL, RUPA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #V SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 M15 LOFTS CONDOMINIUMASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 5555 DRAPER UT 84020 Current Occupant 945 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 951 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 961 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 964 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 966 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 970 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 943 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 947 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 969 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 971 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 954 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 965 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 223 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 215 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 933 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 935 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 959 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 46 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 960 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 24 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 52 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 80 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 949 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 975 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1018 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1024 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1050 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1098 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1039 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1055 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1046 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1015 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1075 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1062 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 120 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 111 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1025 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1043 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 124 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1061 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1101 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1103 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 175 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 149 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 135 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 168 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 158 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 154 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 148 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 136 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 122 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 110 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1085 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 185 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 157 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 145 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1143 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 166 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 160 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 138 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 134 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 128 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 65 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1020 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1099 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1041 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1011 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1070 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1116 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 60 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 56 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1152 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 35 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 31 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 25 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 21 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1127 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1133 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1139 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1155 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1171 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1150 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1164 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1172 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 131 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 133 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #2 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #3 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #4 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #5 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #6 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #7 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #8 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #9 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #10 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #11 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #12 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 218 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 227 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 211 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 220 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 225 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 238 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 228 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #11 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #13 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #3 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #6 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #30 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #25 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #16 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM2 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1167 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 173 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 182 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 170 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 164 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 140 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 155 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 180 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 55 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1186 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1234 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1285 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 34 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1270 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1338 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 135 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1309 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1317 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1321 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1333 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1339 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 77 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 150 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1386 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1390 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1445 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 208 W PARAMOUNT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1365 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 126 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1385 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 124 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1404 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 149 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1425 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 105 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 119 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1355 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1409 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1417 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1429 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1422 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 50 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1415 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1494 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1478 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1502 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1447 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1455 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1461 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1469 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1487 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1493 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1451 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1501 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1497 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 68 W ANDREW AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1431 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1449 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1499 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1498 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1530 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 20 E 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 958 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1017 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1025 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 21 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 999 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 998 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1035 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1007 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1009 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1019 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1000 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1004 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1010 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1016 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1026 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1030 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1045 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1077 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1085 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1101 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 50 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1051 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1050 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1062 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1084 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1175 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 19 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1141 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1151 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1157 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1142 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1148 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1152 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1156 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1122 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 60 E HARVARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #201 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #202 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #204 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #206 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #205 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #208 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #203 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #101 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #102 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1145 S FOULGER ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1150 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1185 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1222 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1207 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST #REAR Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1209 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1213 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1225 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1200 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1216 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 85 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1241 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1325 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1345 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1337 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 40 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 60 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1325 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1331 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1318 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1324 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1330 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1332 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1361 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1375 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1364 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1398 S MAJOR ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1406 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1412 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1420 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1359 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1363 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1379 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1383 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1393 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1374 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1392 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1416 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1438 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1479 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1476 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1457 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1467 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 38 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1482 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 48 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 54 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 58 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1453 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1463 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 47 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 65 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1458 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1460 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1472 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1504 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1446 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #D Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #U Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Item H4 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET – MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00959 MOTION 1 I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: May 7, 2024 RE:MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00959 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 2, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 NEW INFORMATION The Council did not have any significant concerns or questions during the April 2 briefing. The public hearing is scheduled for May 7, 2024. The following information was provided for the April 2 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would amend sections chapter 21A.46 Signs to establish the sign regulations for the proposed Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) zoning district. This is a City initiated zoning text amendment that would help implement the vision and goals of the Ballpark Station Area Plan. The proposed amendments establish a variety of sign types in the zone, which are intended to provide appropriate signage primarily oriented to pedestrian and mass transit. This petition is related to the Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments (PLNPCM2023-00169) that the Council is considering concurrent to this petition. Page | 2 According to the transmittal letter, most sign types require a review and approval by the City and issuance of a building permit prior to installation. If sign regulations are not established for the MU-8 zone, very limited signage would be allowed in the zone such as building security signs, small public safety signs, and house number signs which are exempt from sign regulations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in support of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Below is a summary of the key changes, See pages 2-3 of the transmittal letter for further information. 1.Amendments to 21A.46.096 – Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts a. Amend the sign regulations for Form Based Districts to also include sign regulations for Form Based Mixed Use Districts. b. Add the MU-8 zone to the sign type specification tables. See chapter 21A.46.020 for sign type definitions. The following sign types would be permitted in the MU- 8 zone: o A frame o Awning or Canopy o Construction o Flat o Flat Sign Building Orientation o Marquee o Monument o Nameplate o New Development o Private Directional o Projecting o Projecting Parking Entry o Real Estate o Window 2. Amendments to 21A.46.125.B.3.d – Vintage Signs a. Add MU-8 to the list of zoning districts in which vintage signs can be relocated to for use as a piece of public art, subject to meeting specific requirements: o Original design and character of sign is retained or restored o The sign advertises a business no longer in operation Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City Council – April 2, 2024 PLNPCM2023-00959 TEXT AMENDMENT // MU-8 ZONE SIGN REGULATIONS Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Amend 21A.46 Signs to establish on- site sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council. REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division DETAILS •Modifications to 21A.46.096 •Signs for Form Based Districts PROPOSAL Salt Lake City // Planning Division •21A.46.125 – Vintage Signs •Vintage Signs can be relocated to MU-8 zone for use as public art PROPOSAL Salt Lake City // Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION •Recommended approval of the zoning text amendments. RECOMMENDATION Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Brooke Olson // Principal Planner Brooke.olson@slcgov.com 801-535-7118 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 03/20/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/20/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT:PLNPCM2023-00959 - MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments STAFF CONTACT: Brooke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopt the zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City initiated this petition to amend sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use Subdistrict 8. Specifically, amendments to chapter 21A.46 Signs, which addresses sign regulations in each zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. The MU-8 zone is proposed to be created and mapped in the center of the Ballpark Station Master Plan Area under petition PLNPCM2023-00169, the Ballpark Station Area Rezones. The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district, allowing buildings up to 8 stories in height and intended to facilitate the creation of high density pedestrian oriented developments. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zone on October 25, 2023 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023- SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 20, 2024 09:32 MDT) 00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Chapter 21A.46 establishes sign regulations for each of the City’s Zoning Districts. The regulations specify sign quantity, size, and placement regulations for various sign types permitted in each zone. Several sign types are exempt from the City’s sign regulations, however, most sign types require a review and approval by the City and issuance of a building permit prior to installation. If sign regulations are not established for the MU-8 zone, very limited signage would be allowed in the zone such as building security signs, small public safety signs, and house number signs which are exempt from sign regulations. The proposed amendments establish a variety of sign types in the zone, which are intended to provide appropriate signage primarily oriented to the pedestrian and mass transit. In comparison to the City’s high density commercial zones, proposed signage in the MU-8 zone is more pedestrian oriented, and limited in terms of sign types, size, and quantity. The MU-8 sign regulations are proposed to be located within chapter 21A.46.096, sign regulations for Form Based Districts and created to be consistent with the sign regulations for the newly adopted FB-MU11, Form Based Mixed Use 11 zone (previously titled FB-UN3). While the FB-MU11 and MU-8 zones vary in terms of some use and bulk regulations, both zones are high density form based mixed use zones intended to create quality pedestrian-oriented developments. Both zones consist of similar development regulations and seen as having similar needs for signage, therefore treated the same in regard to sign controls. Summary of Proposed Changes The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Zone: 1. Amendments to 21A.46.096 – Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts Amend the sign regulations for Form Based Districts to also include sign regulations for Form Based Mixed Use Districts. Add the MU-8 zone to the sign type specification tables. See chapter 21A.46.020 for sign type definitions. The following sign types would be permitted in the MU- 8 zone: o A-Frame o Awning or Canopy o Construction o Flat o Flat Sign Building Orientation o Marquee o Monument o Nameplate o New Development o Private Directional o Projecting o Projecting Parking Entry o Real Estate o Window 2. Amendments to 21A.46.125.B.3.d – Vintage Signs Add MU-8 to the list of zoning districts in which vintage signs can be relocated to for use as a piece of public art, subject to meeting specific requirements: o Original design and character of sign is retained or restored o The sign advertises a business no longer in operation PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: December 8, 2023 – An online open house posted to the Planning Division’s website. December 8, 2023 – Salt Lake City’s Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. January 4, 2024 - Planning Staff presented the proposal at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. January 4, 2024 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. No members of the public spoke to the petition. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the proposed text amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of January 24, 2024 b)PC Minutes of January 24, 2024 c)Planning Commission Memo of January 24, 2024 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 6 Subdistrict) 7 8 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 9 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959 to create sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed 10 Use 8 Subdistrict. 11 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 12 public hearing on January 24, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 13 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 14 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 15 establish sign regulations for that subdistrict. 16 WHEREAS, at its January 24, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.46.096. That 24 Section 21A.46.096 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Form Based 25 Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 26 21A.46.096: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE FORM BASED AND FORM BASED 27 MIXED USE DISTRICTS: 28 29 The following regulations shall apply to signs permitted in the form based code and form LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 30 based mixed use zoning districts. Any sign not expressly permitted by these district 31 regulations is prohibited. 32 33 A. Sign Regulations for the Form Based Code and Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 34 1. Purpose: Sign regulations for the form based code and form based mixed use zoning 35 districts are intended to provide appropriate signage oriented primarily to pedestrian 36 and mass transit traffic. 37 2. Applicability: This subsection applies to all signs located within the form based code 38 and form based mixed use zoning districts. This subsection is intended to list all 39 permitted signs in the zone. All other regulations in this chapter shall apply. 40 B.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards: 41 1. A-Frame Sign: 42 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 43 44 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 46 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU- 8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 2 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Placement On public sidewalk or private property. A-frame sign P P P P P Obstruction free area Minimum of 8 feet must be maintained at all times for pedestrian passage. 47 48 2. Awning or Canopy Sign: 49 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 50 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per window or entrance. Width Equal to the width of the window. Projection No maximum depth from building facade, however design subject to mitigation of rainfall and snowfall runoff, conflict avoidance with tree canopy, and issuance of encroachment permits where required. The awning or canopy can project a maximum of 2 feet into a special purpose corridor. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet of vertical clearance. Letters and logos Allowed on vertical portions of sign only. Awning or canopy sign P P P P P P Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face a special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 51 52 3. Construction Sign: 53 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per construction site. Height Maximum of 8 feet. Maximum of 12 feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Area Maximum of 64 square feet. Construction sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor, but must be located on private property. 54 55 4. Flat Sign: 56 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. No maximum width in FB-MU and MU-8. Height Maximum of 3 feet. No maximum height in FB-MU and MU- 8. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of store frontage. Flat sign P P P P P Projection Maximum of 1 foot. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 57 58 5. Flat Sign (building orientation): 59 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building face. Height May not extend above the roof line or top of parapet wall. Flat sign (building orientation) P P Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 60 61 6. Marquee Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. Height May not extend above the roof of the building. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. Marquee sign P P Projection Maximum of 6 feet. May project into right of way a maximum of 4 feet provided the sign is a minimum of 12 feet above the sidewalk grade. 62 63 7. Monument Sign: 64 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building. Setback 5 feet. Height Maximum of 20 feet. Monument sign P P Area 1 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 65 66 8. Nameplate Sign: 67 68 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 69 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Nameplate sign P P P P P P Area Maximum of 3 square feet. 70 71 9. New Development Sign: Sign Type FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per street frontage. Setback 5 feet. Height 12 feet. New Development sign P P Area 200 square feet. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 72 10. Private Directional Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity No limit. Height Maximum of 5 feet. Area Maximum of 8 square feet. Restriction May not contain business name or logo. Private directional sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 73 74 11. Projecting Sign: 75 76 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 77 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB-SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. Area 6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total. Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building façade. Projecting sign P P P P P Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 78 12. Projecting Parking Entry Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting Quantity 1 per parking entry. parking Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway.entry sign Height Maximum of 2 feet.(see projecting Area 4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total. sign graphic) Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet Projection within the special purpose corridor. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the P P P P requirements of the revocable permitting process. 79 80 13. Public Safety Sign: 81 82 83 84 85 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Public Quantity No limit. safety sign (see Height Maximum of 6 feet. definition in Area 8 square feet.this chapter)Projection Maximum of 1 foot. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the P P P P P P requirements of the revocable permitting process. 86 87 14. Real Estate Sign: 88 89 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 90 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Height Maximum of 12 feet. Area 32 square feet. 64 square feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Real estate sign P P P P P Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 11 91 15. Window Sign: 92 93 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 94 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per window. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Window sign P P P P P Area Maximum of 25% of window area. 95 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 12 96 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of Salt Lake City 97 Code. That Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Vintage 98 Signs), shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 99 d.Be relocated to a new site for use as a piece of public art, provided that the 100 original design and character of the sign is retained, or will be restored, and it 101 advertises a business no longer in operation. Vintage signs may only be relocated 102 for use as public art to sites in the following districts: D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, G-MU, 103 CSHBD1, CSHBD2, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, FB-SE, MU-8, TSA. 104 105 SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 106 first publication. 107 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. 108 109 110 111 CHAIRPERSON 112 113 ATTEST: 114 115 116 CITY RECORDER 117 118 119 Transmitted to Mayor on . 120 121 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. 122 123 124 125 MAYOR 126 127 128 CITY RECORDER 129 130 (SEAL) 131 132 Bill No. of 2024. 133 Published: . 134 135 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 signs (legislative)_v1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959 to create sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 24, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish sign regulations for that subdistrict. WHEREAS, at its January 24, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.46.096. That Section 21A.46.096 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 21A.46.096: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE FORM BASED AND FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS: The following regulations shall apply to signs permitted in the form based and form based 2 mixed use zoning districts. Any sign not expressly permitted by these district regulations is prohibited. A. Sign Regulations for the Form Based and Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 1. Purpose: Sign regulations for the form based and form based mixed use zoning districts are intended to provide appropriate signage oriented primarily to pedestrian and mass transit traffic. 2. Applicability: This subsection applies to all signs located within the form based and form based mixed use zoning districts. This subsection is intended to list all permitted signs in the zone. All other regulations in this chapter shall apply. B. Sign Type, Size and Height Standards: 1. A-Frame Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 3 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU- 8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 2 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Placement On public sidewalk or private property. A-frame sign P P P P P Obstruction free area Minimum of 8 feet must be maintained at all times for pedestrian passage. 2. Awning or Canopy Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 4 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per window or entrance. Width Equal to the width of the window. Projection No maximum depth from building facade, however design subject to mitigation of rainfall and snowfall runoff, conflict avoidance with tree canopy, and issuance of encroachment permits where required. The awning or canopy can project a maximum of 2 feet into a special purpose corridor. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet of vertical clearance. Letters and logos Allowed on vertical portions of sign only. Awning or canopy sign P P P P P P Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face a special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 3. Construction Sign: 5 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per construction site. Height Maximum of 8 feet. Maximum of 12 feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Area Maximum of 64 square feet. Construction sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor, but must be located on private property. 4. Flat Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. No maximum width in FB-MU and MU-8. Height Maximum of 3 feet. No maximum height in FB-MU and MU- 8. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of store frontage. Flat sign P P P P P Projection Maximum of 1 foot. 6 5. Flat Sign (building orientation): Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building face. Height May not extend above the roof line or top of parapet wall. Flat sign (building orientation) P P Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 6. Marquee Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. Height May not extend above the roof of the building. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. Marquee sign P P Projection Maximum of 6 feet. May project into right of way a maximum of 4 feet provided the sign is a minimum of 12 feet above the sidewalk grade. 7. Monument Sign: 7 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per building. Setback 5 feet. Height Maximum of 20 feet. Monument sign P P Area 1 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 8. Nameplate Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Nameplate sign P P P P P P Area Maximum of 3 square feet. 9. New Development Sign: Sign Type FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per street frontage. Setback 5 feet. Height 12 feet. New Development sign P P Area 200 square feet. 8 10. Private Directional Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Private Quantity No limit. directional Height Maximum of 5 feet.sign (see Area Maximum of 8 square feet.definition in this chapter)Restriction May not contain business name or logo. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the P P P P P P requirements of the revocable permitting process. 11. Projecting Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB-SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. Area 6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total. Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building façade. Projecting sign P P P P P Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 9 12. Projecting Parking Entry Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting Quantity 1 per parking entry. parking Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway.entry sign Height Maximum of 2 feet.(see projecting Area 4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total. sign graphic) Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet Projection within the special purpose corridor. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the P P P P requirements of the revocable permitting process. 13. Public Safety Sign: 10 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Public Quantity No limit. safety sign (see Height Maximum of 6 feet. definition in Area 8 square feet.this chapter)Projection Maximum of 1 foot. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the P P P P P P requirements of the revocable permitting process. 14. Real Estate Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Height Maximum of 12 feet. Area 32 square feet. 64 square feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Real estate sign P P P P P Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 11 15. Window Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Quantity 1 per window. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Window sign P P P P P Area Maximum of 25% of window area. ____________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of Salt Lake City Code. That Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Vintage Signs), shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: d.Be relocated to a new site for use as a piece of public art, provided that the original design and character of the sign is retained, or will be restored, and it advertises a business no longer in operation. Vintage signs may only be relocated for use as public art to sites in the following districts: D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, G-MU, CSHBD1, CSHBD2, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, FB-SE, MU-8, TSA. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 signs (final)_v1 12 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:March 11, 2024 By: _ K orney 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition:PLNPCM2023-00959 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. The proposal included the creation of a new zone, the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Nov. 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00959 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Dec. 8 2023 An online open house posted to the Planning Division’s website. Dec. 8, 2023 Salt Lake City’s Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jan. 4, 2024 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jan. 11, 2024 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are posted in the project area. Jan. 24, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning text amendments. Jan. 31, 2024 Draft ordinance requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Feb. 14, 2024 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on January 24, 2024. Mar. 11, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00959– Salt Lake City initiated this petition to amend sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use Subdistrict 8. Specifically, amendments to chapter 21A.46 Signs, which addresses sign regulations in each zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00959. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST MEMORANDUM PLANNING DMSION DEPAR'IMENT ofCOM.MUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS To:Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc:LisaShaffer, auef AdministrativeOfficer; BlakeThomas, Department of Communityand NeighborhooclsDirector; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: March 1, 2023 Re:Initiate Petition toforZ011ingMapAmendments in the BallparkNeighborl10odandAssociated ZoningTextAmendments This memo is to request that a petition is initiated directing the Planning Division to amend the zoning in portions of the Ballpark neighborhood in response to direction provided by the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan. This plan was approved by the City Council on October 18, 2022. The Ballpark Station Area Plan provides guidance for future development and land useto support tl1e livability and futme gro,-vth in the Ballpark neighborhood. One of the keyimplementationstepsidentified in the plan is updating the zoning to establish a framework for future growth. The Planning Division is recommending that the zoning changes be broken into two phases: •Phase1: 2'.oning changes for the "Heart of the Neighborhood" which is focused on the vicinity of 1300 Sand West Temple St, the Jefferson Park Mixed Use area Oocated north of the ballpark to the Interstate 15 viaduct)and the Main Street conidor between Kelsey Ave and Cleveland Ave. Please refer to the attached map for the areas intended to be addressed in Phase1. •Phase 2: The remaining area along Main Street, south of Cleveland Ave. It is anticipated that Phase 2 will be started in conjunction with the adoption process for Life on State, anticipated to start later this year. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the Cityadoption process for zoning map amendments, which includes contacting recognized organizations and mailing notices to all property owners and residents in the study area in addition to general citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. The division will also hold public engagement events in the neighborhood to provide propertyowners, residents and business owners a convenient wayto share their comments with staff. The adoption process will also include collaboration with other City Departments. The map below displays the initial proposal recommended by the Planning Division and identifies the areas that would be rezoned and the identified zoning dist1ict that most closely ali&'llS with the Ballpark Station Area Plan vision and goals. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451SOUTI-1STATE STREET,ROOM 406 PO BOX145480 SALT LAKECITY. UT84114-5480 WWW.SLC.GOV TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 BALLPARK STATION AREA - REZONE RECOMMENDATIONS N 0 90 180 360 540 -=---===Feet A In addition to the proposed zoning map amendments the working group recommended that some zoning text amendments be included as well. These amendments would help to ensure that the proposed zones meet the recommendations from the plan and may include such thing5 but not limited to greater height in the TSA areas than currently allowed and increased setbacks on heavily trafficked streets. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that isthe decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall 03/02/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date Signature: :E:,4:::H.=l09 c=59 MST) Email: erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com •Page3 Created:2023-03-01 Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAApOqZtc1YmfRzmqEmDSum3FE4pzwkbfGu Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2 Final Audit Report 2023-03-02 "Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2" History 'El Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) 2023-03-01 • 11:27:54 PM GMT q Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-01 - 11:28:57 PM GMT 'El Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) 2023-03-02 - 5:23:12 AM GMT !D'0 Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) Signature Date: 2023-03-02 • 4:59:36 PM GMT• Time Source: server t,Agreement completed. 2023-03-02 - 4:59:36 PM GMT Powt<edby Adobe Acrobat Sign•I Item H5 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET – Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation MOTION 1 I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future council meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: May 7, 2024 RE:Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: Public Hearing: Potential Action: May 7, 2024 NEW INFORMATION The Council did not have any significant concerns or questions during the April 2 briefing. During the formal meeting, the Council adopted the resolution that started the process. Since the briefing the Recorder’s Office sent information to property owners who would be impacted by the annexation, informing them of the process and the public hearing. The public hearing is scheduled for May 7, 2024. The following information was provided for the April 2 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a resolution that would initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County, generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. Page | 2 This resolution would only start the annexation process. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval, including designating the zoning of properties annexed into the city, after it has gone through the public process. The State annexation process requires a public hearing on the annexation initiation to be held no sooner than 30 days after the resolution is adopted. Staff proposes the Council hold a briefing and adopt the resolution initiating the annexation process on April 2. Then hold a public hearing on May 7. During that time City staff will reach out to stakeholders and property owners about the annexation. The Northpoint Small Area plan (adopted November 2023) included policy direction pertaining to potential annexations that are considered before a new zoning district is approved, that would help implement the polices and goals of the small area plan. That guidance states the following: “…any unincorporated land located within the Transitional area, upon annexation into the city, will be subject to the AG-2 zoning designation until such time as the City Council adopts a new zoning district or overlay that aligns with the envisioned plan. (Page 14, Northpoint Small Area Plan) Next Steps / Timeline A city led annexation would move forward according to the following timeline: 1. Adopt a Resolution initiating the process (proposed for April 2) a. Start noticing for the public hearing 14 days after adoption 2. Hold a Public Hearing (Proposed for May 7) a. No earlier than 30 days after resolution adopted to start the process b. Must provide 3 weeks’ notice 3. The protest period is between the adoption of the Resolution and the Public Hearing. a. Protest will be received by the City Recorder’s Office b. If 50% of the total land value and 50% of the total land area of private property owners submit a protest, then the annexation area must be re-evaluated and cannot continue. 4. Adopt Ordinance annexing properties into the city 5. Within 60 days of adoption file with the Lieutenant Governor’s Office a. Notice of Impending Boundary Action b. Final Local Entity Plat c. Adopted Ordinance The zoning of properties will be designated at the time of annexation, it is not required to go through the typical zoning process. However, if the Council chooses, they have the option to request the Planning Commission make a recommendation on the zoning. This could be done before the Annexation ordinance (step 3) is adopted. Page | 3 ______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received:03/24/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/24/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 03/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Northpoint Area Annexation STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director at nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution initiating the process to annex lands into the city as indicated in the attached Resolution. BUDGET IMPACT: None, however annexing land into the city increases property tax from the annexed properties, but also increases cost to provide municipal services. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this transmittal is to provide the City Council with a resolution to initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County. The land in question is generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. The city has the authority to annex land without a petition from property owners, under Utah Code Section 10-2-418. The Council is only being asked to initiate the process. If the annexation is initiated and ultimately approved as proposed, it would eliminate all islands and peninsulas in the general area. PUBLIC PROCESS: An annexation without a petition authorized under Utah Code requires the City Council to hold a public hearing no earlier than 30 days after adopting the attached resolution, which indicates the council’s intent to annex the area described in Exhibit B. The City SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 24, 2024 12:42 MDT) Council must give three weeks prior notice of the public hearing, which the City Recorder’s Office will assist with. The City council may adopt an ordinance approving the annexation upon conclusion of the public hearing. Utah code section 10-2-418 requires that North Salt Lake provide consent to the annexation because several years ago they amended their annexation policy to include some of the same land that is subject to this annexation proposal. EXHIBITS: 1) Resolution 2) Annexation maps and additional information Exhibit A Resolution RESOLUTION NO. OF 2024 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED PROPERTIES NORTH-NORTHEAST OF THE SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND NEAR THE SALT LAKE COUNTY BORDER WITH DAVIS COUNTY PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE SECTION 10-2-418 WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-2-418 allows a municipality to annex unincorporated areas without an annexation petition under certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, some owners of real property north of 2100 North Street and adjacent to 2200 West Street in unincorporated Salt Lake County near the Salt Lake County-Davis County border (the “Properties”) have expressed interest in annexing their land into Salt Lake City’s corporate limits; and WHEREAS, collectively, the Properties are contiguous to the corporate limits of Salt Lake City and are identified within an expansion area described as “Study Area 1 - West Airport” in the city’s annexation policy plan titled, “A MASTER ANNEXATION POLICY DECLARATION for Salt Lake City, Utah” adopted in 1979 and as shown on the map accompanying that plan titled, “SALT LAKE CITY Annexation Policy Declaration Proposed Future Boundaries”; and WHEREAS, a majority of the area consists of residential or commercial development with fewer than 800 residents; and WHEREAS, in addition to the privately-owned land in the proposed annexation area, over 200 acres of the Properties are owned by Salt Lake City Corporation, the majority of which was acquired through federal grants for such land to be used for airport purposes; and WHEREAS, the Properties constitute an unincorporated peninsula, as that term is defined in Utah Code Section 10-2-401; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake County Council approved an annexation near Rose Park Lane with the contingency that Salt Lake City make efforts to annex all of the unincorporated areas to the west and north of the Property; and WHEREAS, most of the area in the proposed annexation has received some Salt Lake City municipal-type services for many years and continue to receive those utility services; and WHEREAS, as part of an effort by private property owners to annex a portion of the Properties into North Salt Lake City in recent years, North Salt Lake City amended its annexation policy plan in 2021 to include some of the proposed annexation areas into that city’s proposed expansion area; and WHEREAS, some owners who sponsored the effort to annex into North Salt Lake City are now supportive of annexing into Salt Lake City’s corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Subsection 10-2-418(2) requires that unincorporated areas that are within the expansion areas of more than one municipality must receive the consent of all other municipalities whose annexation policy plans include the subject area in their respective expansion areas in order to annex the area; and WHEREAS, in pursuing its intent to annex the Properties, Salt Lake City acknowledges that it must receive the consent of North Salt Lake City before annexation of the Properties can be completed; and WHEREAS, because the Properties are within Salt Lake City’s expansion area in its 1979 annexation policy plan and because the Properties are collectively congruous to Salt Lake City corporate limits, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this resolution of intent to annex the Properties identified in Exhibit A hereto is in the city’s and private property owners’ best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: That Salt Lake City intends to pursue annexation of the area shown on the map in Exhibit “A” into Salt Lake City pursuant to Utah Code Section 10-2-418. DATED this day of , 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Resolution intent to annex properties per 10-2-418 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: March 18, 2024 By: Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT “A” (map of proposed area to be annexed) Legend Humer 51:.i31ble:s c:::::J City-Initiated Aru>exation c:::::J S:t.C/SLCO/Davis CooneyBoundary Proposed Annexation e Exhibit B: Annexation Maps and Additional Information N 2450 W atiReclam on Ditch J Reclamation Ditch N 2200 a 1 2 43567 SomersbyFarnham Dr98Rudy Duck W Center St W Cente1011Amazon DUT7W 3300 N W 330 12 13 14151819202116 172223242526 2730 28 2931 215323 3 27 68N 2200 W 343 53 6 215 37 38 39 W 2670 N 40 41 27 42 43 44 45 50 48 46 51 49 47 53 52 54 25 Reclamation Ditch W 2100 N W 2100 N W 0 0.13 Legend 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Salt Lake, Utah Geospatial Resource Center, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Salt Lake County, Maxar, Microsoft* Hunter Stables City-Initiated Annexation SLC/SLCO/Davis County Boundary Proposed Annexation W Cent0 N W 2670 Ndy Duck Clb Salt W 2670 N 0 N er S3200 W 2350 N er W tClRu 210 n RivbrordaRivSewaeeDrge Ca v JrinalBJRrSeworage Canal Sewage Canald enarJordan RiveSewage Canal n 00 WRn dRiveS 12aiverdN FoWaydanor2x2cy Pkwy NJ Staegaon DrLeL00 W Foxboro DrKent DrWaltgacy Pkwy N mfoN Boston rd DrHolloLnS 1200 WJor wDrr Jord er e Dr N 32 0 0 W N 32 0 0 W N 3200 W W N 22 0 0 W an Riv Foxboro eb Dr n Riv Jorda dwoo an Riv S Re d w oo d Rd d Rd N Re W er lJord320 0 0 W n Pkwy N n a Ro Lega se Pa r k Ln 8 cy P cy kw ega 1 L y L N 2 CDrWalto R N kr WN os in e P a rk L n cl a m ati o n Ditc h R e Oldham D rdsnchestRiverMaJordaner Dor D r r Re c l a ma t i on Ditch N N 3200 W Chatham Dr 2100 N N 2450 W atiReclam on Ditch a W 2670 SomersbyFarnham DrRudy Duck W Center St W CenteAmazon DUT7W 3300 N W 330 215 27 68N 2200 W 215 W 2670 N 27 25 Reclamation Ditch W 2100 N W 2100 N W 0 0.13 Legend 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Salt Lake, Utah Geospatial Resource Center, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Salt Lake County, Maxar, Microsoft* Hunter Stables City-Initiated Annexation SLC/SLCO/Davis County Boundary Proposed Annexation W Cent0 NNdy Duck Clb Salt W 2670 N 0 N er S3200 W 2350 N er W tClRu 210 n RivbrordaRivSewaeeDrge Ca v JrinalBJRrSeworage Canal Sewage Canald enarJordan RiveSewage Canal n 00 WRn J dRiveS 12aiverdN FoWaydanor2x2cy Pkwy NJ Staegaon DrLeL00 W Foxboro DrKent DrWaltgacy Pkwy N mfoN Boston rd DrHolloLnS 1200 W Reclamation Ditch Jor wDrr Jord er e Dr N 32 0 0 W N 32 0 0 W N 3200 W W N 22 0 0 W an Riv Foxboro eb Dr n Riv N 2200 Jorda dwoo an Riv S Re d w oo d Rd d Rd N Re W er lJord320 0 0 W n Pkwy N n a Ro Lega se Pa r k Ln 8 cy P cy kw ega 1 L y L N 2 CDrWalto R N kr WN os in e P a rk L n cl a m ati o n Ditc h R e Oldham D rdsnchestRiverMaJordaner Dor D r r Re c l a ma t i on Ditch N N 3200 W Chatham Dr 2100 N Item H6 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment PLNPCM2023-00952 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment PLNPCM2023-00952 BRIEFING UPDATE During the April 2, 2024 briefing Council Members clarified whether the proposed changes would make City code more stringent than what is required by the State and if the City would lose the ability to regulate anything as a result of proposed changes. Planning staff said City code would not be more stringent than State code. They also noted the City would no longer be able to regulate building roof color in the foothills zoning districts. Currently the City does not allow light colored roofing materials in these districts, so contrasting colors do not detract from the natural surroundings. Planning also clarified the proposed changes do not affect current local historic districts in the city. The following information was provided for the April 3, 2024 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal requested by the Salt Lake City Planning Division to update standards primarily for attached garages, but also includes design elements for attached structures, entrance landings, and building foundations. In 2021 Utah State Code was amended by the State Legislature (HB1003) which limits what design elements such as exterior building color, exterior glass, and roofing materials and color municipalities can require. The proposed text amendment addresses changes required by the legislation to better align City code with State code; clarifies where accessory structures can be in rear and side yards; and removes redundant language. Item Schedule: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 16, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 Page | 2 It is worth noting that the proposed text amendment strives to clarify that accessory structures should not be located closer than 1 foot to any property line through an update to the Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions in Required Yards.” This is not a change, but rather a clarification of the current interpretation of the Code. The proposed language changes the phrase “side property lines” to “all property lines,” to include both side and rear property lines. The word “all” is being used because of the frequent confusion with abnormally shaped lots in determining which part of their yard is considered “side” or “rear.” This does not align with the requirement for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to be at least three feet from the side or rear property lines. However, City code section 21A.40.200 related to ADUs says if there are conflicts with regulations in other sections of the code, the ADU requirements take precedence. Thus, the proposal would not change side or rear yard setbacks for detached ADUs. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed text amendment at its January 10, 2024 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Planning staff provided a summary of proposed changes on pages 2-3 of the Administration’s transmittal. It is replicated here for convenience. 1.Amendments to 21A.24.010 – General Provisions • Removal of language dictating design features such as exterior building colors, residential building foundation standards and entrance landing requirements. 2.Amendments to 21A.24.020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 100, 110, and 120 • Removal of language dictating the location of garages doors. This language is a design element that was made illegal to regulate by the updates to the Utah State Code. • Clarification on the location that replacement garages can be built. This language matches the historic interpretation at the city and increases readability and understanding of the code. • Clarification that in FP and FR districts, accessory buildings are not permitted in any required yard, but are permitted in non-required yards. 3.Amendments to 21A.36.190: Residential Building Standards For Legal Conforming Single- Family Detached Dwellings, Two-Family Dwellings And Twin Homes In Nonresidential Zoning Districts • Removal of language dictating foundation standards and entrance landings. This language is redundant and unenforceable in the zoning code because it is already addressed in building code. 4.Amendments to 21A.40.050: General Yard, Bulk, and Height Limitations: • Clarification and addition of language dictating the location of accessory buildings, especially those located in side yards. This language clarifies that accessory buildings are permitted in required interior side yards when located a minimum of 4 feet from any portion of the principal building. • Addition of an illustrative graphic which helps depict this regulation. Page | 3 • Clarification of language dictating the location of accessory buildings in rear yards, which is generally one foot from side and rear lot lines, and no closer than 4 feet to any portion of the principal building. • This clarification also helps distinguish pedestrian connections, such as breezeways, and helps distinguish ‘attached structures’ from structures that would not be considered attached. 5.Amendments to 21A.62.040 -Definitions of Terms • Clarification in the definitions that impact accessory and attached structures. • Clarification in the definition of the “front line of buildings” and that uncovered porches aren’t considered when determining the front line. This is because the location of attached garages can hinge on the location of the porch. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 2-3 of the Planning Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff report. Consideration 1 – How the proposal helps implement City goals and policies identified in Plan Salt Lake: Planning staff found the proposed zoning text amendment aligns with the Plan Salt Lake principle of “a local government that is collaborative, responsive, and transparent.” In addition, Planning stated “…this amendment adheres to the principles of collaboration, responsiveness, and transparency outlined in Plan Salt Lake by maintaining congruency between local and state authorities.” Consideration 2 – How the proposal implements State regulations: The proposed amendment will codify the City code limits HB1003 (2021) placed on municipalities and help align City and State codes. Consideration 3 – Impact to City: Planning noted removing design standards restrictions for color and materials will impact FP (Foothills Protection), and FR (Foothills Residential) districts by providing more flexibility. These restrictions do not exist for other zoning districts. Currently City code does not allow attached garages forward of the front line of the building unless they meet one of the following conditions: New attached garages that are replacing existing ones forward of the front line of the building are required to be constructed in the same location with the same dimensions. The proposed changes would provide additional flexibility by requiring them to be constructed in a “similar location with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance.” At least 60% of existing garages on the block face are forward of the front line of the building. The proposal lowers this threshold to 50%. Currently, doors on garages forward of the front line of the building are required to face a corner side lot line. The proposal would remove this requirement. These changes would apply to the FP, FR, single- and two-family residential, and Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay districts. In addition, the maximum garage door height of 8.5 feet in the Yalecrest overlay would be removed. Page | 4 Planning staff noted that the proposed text amendment would not alter language in City code related to local historic districts, therefore they would not be affected by the proposal. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment B (pages 14-15) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • November 17, 2023 – Petition initiated by Salt Lake City Planning Division and assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner. • November 21, 2023 – o Early notification sent to all recognized community councils. o 45-day comment period begins. • December 28, 2023 – Planning Commission public hearing notice posted at various library locations. • January 10, 2024 – o 45-day recognized community organization notice period ends. o Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • January 17, 2024 – Planning staff requested an ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • February 16, 2024 – Ordinance from the Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division. • March 19, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. ___________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received:03/19/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/19/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00952 Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Grant Amann, Associate Planner grant.amann@slcgov.com, 801-535-6171 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance as recommended by Planning Commission BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In 2021, Utah State code was amended (HB 1003) which imposed limitations on what municipalities can require in terms of design elements. The Salt Lake City Planning Division is proposing a text amendment to primarily update the standards and design elements for attached structures, which includes garages. This proposed amendment removes language stipulating exterior building color, exterior building glass, and roof material/color. This is a direct response to the state code update of 2021. It also removes requirements for standardized entrance landings and residential building foundations which require poured concrete footings because this is already addressed in the building code. The proposal clarifies general yard, bulk, and height standards for accessory structures and their connection to primary structures. This improves administration of the regulations but more importantly helps the public understand the code. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 19, 2024 11:35 MDT) All modifications proposed are in line with the State code requirements and seek to foster a beautiful city that is both adaptable and responsive to evolving needs and priorities. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed. 1. Amendments to 21A.24.010 – General Provisions Removal of language dictating design features such as exterior building colors, residential building foundation standards and entrance landing requirements. 2. Amendments to 21A.24.020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 100, 110, and 120 Removal of language dictating the location of garages doors. This language is a design element that was made illegal to regulate by the updates to the Utah State Code. Clarification on the location that replacement garages can be built. This language matches the historic interpretation at the city and increases readability and understanding of the code. Clarification that in FP and FR districts, accessory buildings are not permitted in any required yard, but are permitted in non-required yards. 3. Amendments to 21A.36.190: Residential Building Standards For Legal Conforming Single-Family Detached Dwellings, Two-Family Dwellings And Twin Homes In Nonresidential Zoning Districts Removal of language dictating foundation standards and entrance landings. This language is redundant and unenforceable in the zoning code because it is already addressed in building code. 4. Amendments to 21A.40.050: General Yard, Bulk, and Height Limitations: Clarification and addition of language dictating the location of accessory buildings, especially those located in side yards. This language clarifies that accessory buildings are permitted in required interior side yards when located a minimum of 4 feet from any portion of the principal building. Addition of an illustrative graphic which helps depict this regulation. Clarification of language dictating the location of accessory buildings in rear yards, which is generally one foot from side and rear lot lines, and no closer than 4 feet to any portion of the principal building. This clarification also helps distinguish pedestrian connections, such as breezeways, and helps distinguish ‘attached structures’ from structures that would not be considered attached. 5. Amendments to 21A.62.040 -Definitions of Terms Clarification in the definitions that impact accessory and attached structures. Clarification in the definition of the “front line of buildings” and that uncovered porches aren’t considered when determining the front line. This is because the location of attached garages can hinge on the location of the porch. PUBLIC PROCESS: Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community Councils on November 21, 2023. o No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal. The Planning Commission public hearing was held on January 10th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2. Project Chronology 3. Notice of City Council Hearing 4. Petition Initiation Request ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST 1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to attached and detached accessory structures.) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00952 pertaining to regulation regarding attached garage design standards. WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to standards regulating accessory structures pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00952; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its January 10, 2024, meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.24.010.H. That Subsection 21A.24.010.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Side Entry Buildings) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: H. Repealed. 2 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.010.P.3. That Subsection 21A.24.010.P.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Special Foothills Regulations: Design Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 3. Mechanical Equipment: Mechanical equipment including, without limitation, swamp coolers, air conditioning equipment, heat pumps, vents, blowers and fans shall be screened from view or painted to match the building color adjacent to the equipment. Roof mounted mechanical equipment, excluding solar panels which are subject to Section 21A.40.190 of this title, shall not extend above the highest roof ridgeline. SECTION 3. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.24.010.P.13. That Subsection 21A.24.010.P.13 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Special Foothills Regulations: Applicability to Existing Buildings and Structures) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: 13. Applicability To Existing Buildings And Structures: Colors and building materials on existing structures may be maintained and/or repaired with materials and colors similar to those existing before the enactment of this title. Such colors and materials may only be modified to bring them into closer compliance with subsection P3 of this section. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to additions to existing buildings and structures within the FR-1/43,560, FR-2/21,780, FR-3/12,000 and FP Districts. Additions after April 12, 1995, to buildings and structures existing prior to April 12, 1995, shall conform to all provisions of this subsection, except that building colors and materials may match the original building or structure SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.24.010.U. That Subsection 21A.24.010.U of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Special Foothills Regulations: Residential Building Foundation Standard) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: U. Repealed. 3 SECTION 5. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.24.010.V. That Subsection 21A.24.010.V of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Special Foothills Regulations: Entrance Landing) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: V. Repealed. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.020.K. That Subsection 21A.24.020.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: K. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors. 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section 21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 7. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.030.K. That Subsection 21A.24.030.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: K. Standards for Attached Garages: 4 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 8. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.040.K. That Subsection 21A.24.040.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: K. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least (50%) of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 9. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.050.H. That Subsection 21A.24.050.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: R-1/12,000 Single- 5 Family Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 10. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.060.H. That Subsection 21A.24.060.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: R-1/7,000 Single- Family Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or 6 b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 11. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.070.H. That Subsection 21A.24.070.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: R-1/5,000 Single- Family Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 12. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.080.H. That Subsection 21A.24.080.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 7 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section 21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 13. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.100.H. That Subsection 21A.24.100.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: SR-3 Special Development Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 14. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.24.110.H. That Subsection 21A.24.110.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: R-2 Single- and Two- 8 Family Residential District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors 2.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless: a.A new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage that is forward of the "front line of the building". In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance; or b.At least 50% of the existing garages on the block face are located forward of the "front line of the building". SECTION 15. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.120.F. That Subsection 21A.34.120.F of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District: Standards for Attached Garages) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: F. Standards for Attached Garages: 1.Located Behind or In Line with the Front Line of the Building: No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section21A.62.040 of this title), unless a new garage is constructed to replace an existing garage. In this case, the new garage shall be constructed in a similar location as the garage being replaced with dimensions that do not increase the degree of noncompliance. 2.Width of an Attached Garage: The width of an attached garage facing the street may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the width of the front facade of the house. The width of the garage is equal to the width of the garage door, or in the case of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors up to a maximum of three feet (3'). 9 SECTION 16. Amending the text of Table 21A.36.020.B. That Table 21A.36.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls: Obstructions in Required Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to change the second row and Note 3 only, with no other changes to the table, as follows: TABLE 21A.36.020B OBSTRUCTIONS IN REQUIRED YARDS1 Type Of Structure Or Use Obstruction Front And Corner Side Yards Side Yard Rear Yard Accessory buildings subject to the provisions of Chapter 21A.40, and located at least 1 foot from all property lines except for the FP and FR Districts where no accessory building is permitted in any required yard. Accessory buildings shall be at least 10 feet from a principal residential building on an adjacent lot X3 X Notes: 1."X" denotes where obstructions are allowed. 2.Reserved. 3.The accessory structure shall be located in accordance with Section 21A.40.050.A.3. SECTION 17. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.36.190.C. That Subsection 21A.36.190.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Residential Building Standards For Legal Conforming Single-Family Detached Dwellings, Two-Family Dwellings And Twin Homes In Nonresidential Zoning Districts: Residential Building Foundation Standard) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: C. Repealed. SECTION 18. Repealing the text of Subsection 21A.36.190.D. That Subsection 21A.36.190.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Residential Building 10 Standards For Legal Conforming Single-Family Detached Dwellings, Two-Family Dwellings And Twin Homes In Nonresidential Zoning Districts: Entrance Landing) shall be, and hereby is repealed as follows: D. Repealed. SECTION 19. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.40.050.A. That Subsection 21A.40.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations: Location of Accessory Buildings in Required Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: A. Location of Accessory Buildings: 1.Front Yards: Accessory buildings are prohibited in any required front yard and shall be set back at least as far as the principal building when the principal building exceeds the required front yard setback. Notwithstanding the foregoing, hoop houses and cold frame structures up to twenty four inches (24") in height may be placed in a front yard. 2.Corner Lots: No accessory building on a corner lot shall be closer to the street than the distance required for corner side yards. At no time, however, shall an accessory building be closer than twenty feet (20') to a public sidewalk or public pedestrian way and the accessory building shall be set back at least as far as the principal building. Notwithstanding the foregoing, hoop houses and cold frame structures up to twenty four inches (24") in height may be placed in a corner side yard. 3.Side Yards: Hoop houses, greenhouses, and cold frame structures associated solely with growing food and/or plants are allowed in any interior side yard. Other accessory buildings are permitted in a required interior side yard when located a minimum of 4 feet from any portion of the principal building and behind the rear wall of the principal building as shown in the illustration below: 11 4.Rear Yards: Accessory buildings shall be built a minimum of 4 feet from any portion of the principal building; however, pedestrian connections, such as breezeways, that do not exceed 5’ in width may be allowed. The minimum distance requirement does not apply to cold frames associated solely with growing food and/or plants. 5.Distance from lot lines: In residential districts, accessory buildings shall be built at least one foot from sides and rear lot lines except when sharing a common wall with an accessory building on an adjacent lot. 6.Distance from residential buildings: Accessory buildings shall be a minimum of 10' from any portion of a principal residential building on an adjacent lot when that adjacent lot is in a residential zoning district; excluding hoop houses, greenhouses, and cold frames associated solely with growing food and/or plants. This provision shall not be construed to limit the construction or expansion of a principal building. 7.Double Frontage Lots: On properties where two opposite ends of the lot have frontage on a street, accessory structures and buildings may be located in a front yard provided the accessory building or structure: a.Is located in a provided yard that is directly opposite to the front yard where the primary entrance to the principal building is located; b.Is in a location that is consistent with other accessory building locations on the block; 12 c.Complies with any sight distance triangle requirements of this title; and d.Complies with all other accessory building and structure requirements of this title. SECTION 20. Amending the text of Section 21A.62.040. That only the definitions of “ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE”, “BUILDING CONNECTION”, “BUILDING, FRONT LINE OF” and “GARAGE, ATTACHED” in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall be, and hereby are amended as follows: a.ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: A subordinate building or structure, located on the same lot as the principal building, occupied by or devoted to an accessory use. When an accessory building or structure is attached to the principal building by a common wall or is connected to the principal building by a roof that has a width of 5 feet or more, such accessory building shall be considered part of the principal building. b.BUILDING CONNECTION: Two (2) or more buildings which are connected in a substantial manner or by common interior space including internal pedestrian circulation. Where two (2) buildings are attached in this manner, they shall be considered a single building and shall be subject to all yard requirements of a single building. Determination of building connection shall be through the site plan review process. c.BUILDING, FRONT LINE OF: "Front line of building" means the line of that face of the building nearest the front or corner side lot line of the lot. This face includes sun parlors, bay windows, and covered porches, whether enclosed or unenclosed, but does not include uncovered steps less than four feet (4') above grade. d.GARAGE, ATTACHED: A garage that is attached to the principal building by a common wall or is connected to the principal building by a roof that has a width of 5 feet or more. An attached garage shall be considered part of the principal building. SECTION 21. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON 13 _________________________ _________________________ therine D. Pasker, Senior City ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance Changing Standards for Attached Garagesv1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:February 16, 2024 By: Ka Attorney 2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00952 – Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment November 17, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake City Planning Division November 17, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00952 was assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. November 21, 2023 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized community councils, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. December 28, 2023 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at various library public noticing points city wide. January 10, 2024 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. January 10, 2024 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a positive recommendation to approve the proposed text amendment. 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00952- The Salt Lake City Planning Division is proposing a text amendment to update the standards related to attached structures, which includes garages, entrance landings, and building foundations. In 2021, Utah State code was amended, changing standards required of these structures. The changes to the state code imposed limitations on what municipalities can require in terms of design elements. As a result, City code needs to be updated to match these regulations. The amendment focuses on aligning the standards with city goals and addressing state law. The text amendments apply citywide. As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Room 326, 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00952 The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.PETITION INITIATION REQUEST MEMORANDUM Pl..-\Nl'i'"NG Dn11SION D E PI E.. l\TofCO:-t:-IUNJn'andk-UGHEORHOODS To:Mayor ErinMendeohall Cc,Rache!Otto,a..,fofStaff;BlabThorws, entofCommUDityandNeighborboods MichaelaOktay,DeputyPlanniDgDirector From:lfdtNonis,l'ianniDgDirector Date:Claober3" 2023 Re:.Ameodweoritodw.pter21A.24and21A.30oflhez.ooing0rdiniulcetoa.ddressregulati0ns jlOOibitedbystatelawandtorem""' b!ildmgcoderelatedstandards. The Planning Division is requesting that youinitiatea zoningtextamendment toChapter 21A.24 Residential Districts and 21A.36 General Provisions to: A.Remove buildingdesign standardsthat conflict with state legislation: In 2021, UtahState adoptedlegislation limitingmunicipalities'authoritytoregulatebuildingdesign, includingexteriorcolor andplacemen! ofgar?):edoors. Asa result,somezoningstandards pertaining toattached garages insingleand two-lamJ!ydistricts and design standardsin tliefoothilldistricts needto beremovedormodified. B.Revisit provisions for attached garages: v'-lhileaddressing theimposed restrictionsin building designstandards, staffwillverifyifcurrent standardsfor attached garages (inparticular, snoutgarages) alignwithcitygoals andurbandesign best practio>.s,andwhether1t hasachieved theoutcomes expectedsinceitsadoption in 2016. C.Remove buildingcode related stand.u·ds: The zoningordinance containsstandards related tofoundation,landing, andsideentiytir residentialbuildings.Theseitemsaregenerallyoutsideofzoningpurviewandareaddressed inthe adoptedbuildingoode.As such,wewouldliketo remove themfromthezoningordinance. Apublicprocesswillbeconductedtogaugepublic input on1heproposedchangesand theproposal ¼illfollowthesame requiredstepsof anyothertextamendment, including notification torecognized communityorganizations,apublichearing withthePlanning Commission anda decisionfromCity Council. Thisnwno includes a sigrutllr<!block to initiate thepetition ifthat is thed<!cided courseofaction. If thedecidedcourseof actionistonot initiate theapplication,thesignatureblockcan remain blank. Pleasenotifythe Planning Division¼nen thememoissignedorif1hedecision is madenotto initiate thepetition. Pleasecontact meat ext.6173ornick.norris@slcgov.comifyouhaveanyquestions.Thankyou. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text mnendment petition as noted aboue. SALT LAKECITYCORPORATION 451SOUTH STATESTRE.fl. ROOM 06 POBOX 145480 S4J..TLAKE crrY. UT84114--5480 WWW.SLC.GOV Ta 801·53&.nSi FAA 601-535-6174 11/3/2023 ElinMendenlwl, Mayor Date •Paoe2 2023--10·31 By:MayaraSahegoDel.w:la (mayaraJima@slcgo'I.Com} Status: lrans.acoonD: Sioned CBJCHBCAABAAqx:).Jgq-OqaGn3)MGeqvr _nnOOGcJn Zoning Text Amendment - Attached Garages_Petition Initiation Final Audl Report 2023-11-03 "Zoning Text Amendment - Attached Garages_Petition Initiation" History 5 Document createdby Mayara Balhogo Do Lima (mayaraJima@slcgov.com) 2023·1<>-31 • 10:24.12 PM GMT Document emailed to Erin Mendenhal (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023·1<>-31 • 10:24.51 PM GMT f:I Email\llewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhal@slcgov.com) 2023·11-01 • 3:31::12 AM GMT Do Documentsigned by Ecin Mendenhall (erin.mend::mhaU@ cgov.com) Signan.re Date: 2023 11-03• 7:44:18 PMGMT• Time Source: sener 0 Ai,ee,,1ent compieteo. 2023-11-03 • 7:44:18 PM GMT .._......, ,.,, '·Adobe •'I Acrobat Sip Item H7 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: 536 South 200 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2023-00730 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: 536 South 200 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2023-00730 BRIEFING UPDATE Planning staff briefed the Council at the April 2, 2024 work session about a proposal to amend the zoning map for properties at 536 South 200 West, 216 West, 224 West, 226 West, and 230 West Orchard Place from their current D-2 (Downtown Support) zoning designation to D-1 (Central Business District) as shown in the zoning map below. Council Members discussed an adjacent parcel to the north which was rezoned from D-2 to D-1 in 2023. When asked if the subject and adjacent parcels are under the same ownership, the petitioner said they have different owners who had discussions about the properties, but details of what was discussed is not known. The difficulty of achieving the 100-foot minimum building height requirement in D-1 zoning on small parcels was also discussed. Planning staff said through design review buildings less than 100 feet tall can be built if they meet the D-1 zoning goals. They noted that there is greater development potential in D-1 zoning. Council Members also discussed increased value should not be the only reason to rezone property; the subject property being more developable under the current D-2 zoning than D-1; and to consider the implications of continuing to rezone the block. The petitioner said there is greater development density in the proposed D-1 zone and it would expand walkability to the south. He noted several uses allowed in the D-2 zone are auto-centric. A table comparing uses under the current D-2 and proposed D-1 zoning is included on pages 28-31 of the Planning Item Schedule: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 16, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 Page | 2 Commission staff report. It is worth noting that commercial laundry use is permitted under the current D-2 zoning designation, but not in D-1. If the proposed zoning map amendment is adopted by the Council, the existing dry-cleaning business would be allowed to continue as a legal non-conforming use. Area zoning map with subject properties outlined in yellow. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division. The petitioner sent a letter to the Council following up on the briefing discussion. This letter is included in the meeting packet. The letter includes the image below showing the subject parcels’ buildable area. It is the petitioner’s opinion that if a joint development with property to the north does not happen, at slightly less than 23,000 square feet, there is sufficient area on the subject parcels to construct a new structure under D-1 zoning. Page | 3 Image provided by the petitioner showing the subject parcels’ buildable area. In addition, the petitioner’s letter discusses the City’s Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Update adopted in 2023. It is their opinion that potential development under the D-1 zoning district would: Allow the City to review and potentially improve safety at the adjacent 200 West/Orchard Place intersection. Align transportation and land use to reduce vehicle trips with the properties’ proximity to nearby bus and Trax stops. Provide potential increased density allowing additional housing units in the Downtown area. For additional details, please refer to the petitioner’s letter. Snell & Wilmer 15 WEST SOUTH TEMPLE SUITE 12OO GATEWAY TOWER WEST SALT LAKE CIry, UT 84101 801 .257.1900 P 801.257.1800 F Jason Boal (8011257-1917 jboal@swlaw.com April 11,2024 Salt Lake City Council Salt Lake City 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Dear Salt Lake City Council Members, I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to provide further information and address the points discussed during the April 2,2024, work meeting regarding the rezoning request for the property located at 536 S 200 W in Salt Lake City. 1. The ability to utilize the parcel with D-l Zoning. The property owner, Overmoe Group, LLC, has engaged in discussions with the owner of the adjacent D-1 zoned parcel at the corner of 500 S and 200 W. While the details and results of those conversations are not known at this time, it's important to note that even if a joint development doesn't materialize, there is sufficient lot size at 536 S 200 W to construct a new structure independently, with an approximate area of 22,869 square feet, and a lot line of approximately sixty-six feet along 200 West. ALBUQUERQUE BOISE 4878-917'1_3621 PHOENTX PORTLAND DALLAS DENVER LAS VEGAS LOS ANGELES LOS CABOS ORANGE COUNTYRENO SALT LAKE CITY SAN DIEGO SEATTLE TUCSON WASHINGTON, D.C, Snell & Wilmer Salt Lake City Council April 11,2024 Page2 2. Dcsirc to expand the highcr donsity/intensity of the downtown core of Salt Lake City. Salt Lake City was awarded a grant from Wasatch Regional Council in202l. 'l'his grant was used to update Salt Lake City's ZoningOrdinance for the downtown area. The goal of this update was to revise the code in order to "accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures while developing standards for public spaces that improve the livability of the downtown area."r The desired result of these ordinance changes were to insure the future growth of the downtown area is safe, aligns transportation and land use to reduce vehicle trips, and encourage downtown living. Although modifications to the zoning map were ultimately not included in the approved ordinance, it was clear that an expanded D-l area would assist in accomplishing those goals. 1) Safe Development 'rL^ --^-^-^A -^-^^^ lo o'lionanf f^ 1AO \l/acf onrl f)rnhqrd Plqr.e Thc nnfenfialr rrE PlvP\rJv\l lvzullv rJ 4sJ4wwlll .v Lvv rr vrl .A^g redevelopment of this property, with the incentivization of more intense/dense development, would allow the city to review and improve pedestrian and vehicular I Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Updates (May 9, 2022) - https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stori esl2afa66ba9d684dacb48Oedec55f86ddl 4878-9177-3621 Snell & Wilmer Salt Lake City Council April I1,2024 Page 3 safety at this intersection. 2) Align transportation and land use to reduce vehicle trips. This site receives a "Walk Score" of 92 out of 100, Transit Score of 68 out of 100 and a Bike Score of 90 out of 100.2 The location is approximately 0.3 miles from a Route 4 (400 S) bus stop and a Route 451 (500 S) bus stop. Additionally, the Courthouse Station of the Red, Blue, and Green Trax lines is less than a ten-minute walk. The Walk Score website identifies this location as a "Walker's Paradise" where a car is not needed for daily errands. To expand transit usage in the downtown area, sites like this will need to be redeveloped with additional intensity/density, added to the existing car-centric uses that exist on the site today. 3) Encourages downtown living. The desire of Salt Lake City to increase residential opportunities is made clear, not only with the Downtown Zoning amendments, but also in the Housing SLC Plan.3 This plan acknowledges that the scarcity of developable land has increased land values where high density is permitted, which has resulted in the difficulty in developing housing, especially affordable housing, in the downtown area. One of the solutions the Housing SLC Plan presents is to increase density, which is exactly what this petition is seeking to do. Build Salt Lake recognized the alignment of the Housing SLC plan and the Downtown Zoningamendments.a The article states that: The city would also incentivize the creation of more affordable housing units in the D-I zone by allowing taller buildings tf they include more affordable units. (This type of incentive is sometimes referred to as a density bonus.) Under the proposed changes, the city's zoning mapfor the D-2 zone may be adjusted in two areas: Between 400 South and 700 South and 300 West to West Temple. Between 600 south to 800 south between the west side of state street and 200 West. 2 walk Score - https://www.walkscore.com/score/536-s-200-w-salt-lake-city-ut-g4101 3 Housing SLC - https://www.slc.gov/can/wp-contenVuploads/site s/8/2023i05/Housing-SlC-plan No- Appendices.pdf a Here are the big changes proposed for all new buildings in the greater Downtown areaa. Jacob Klopfenstein on May 20, 2O22 - https://buildingsaltlake.com/here-are-the-big-changes-proposed-for-all-new-buildings-in-the-greater- downtown-area./ a a 4878-91'17-3621 Snell & Wilmer Salt Lake City Council April 11,2024 Page 4 E { w400s 269 269 w?00s w900s E600s Bureau of E w 89 w900s N As stated before, the ordinance that was presented to Salt Lai<e City Council did not include the proposal to rezone portions of the D-2 zoneto D-l. However, the stated goals of that eftbrt do align with the rezone petition that we have presented to you. 3. Public Comment It was mentioned in the work meeting that there is an interest in hearing public comment regarding this application. We have been open and willing to discuss our petition with the public 0,J. 3 r 3 @ og IUoaLt 2!0 'at 3! Area initially discussed to be rezoned to D-L with the Downtown Buildlng Helght and Street Activation Updates E-1 TSA{ J I DA 48'.18-91'17 -3621 Snell & Wilmer Salt Lake City Council April I1,2024 Page 5 and/or the Downtown Community Council. However, this application was noticed twice and had two 45-day comment periods with the Planning Commission and no comments were received. We do look forward to any additional public comments at the public hearing with the City Council, but we do not anticipate much, if any, public comment. We do appreciate your thoughtful approach in considering our rezone petition. I am happy to answer any additional questions or concerns that you might have regarding this proposal. Please feel free to reach out to me at any time. Respectfully submitted, Sunu & Wrlupn AICP JB J 4878-9177-3621 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rachel otto (Mar 20, 2024 09:39 MDT)Date Received:03/20/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/20/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00730 Approx. 536 S. 200 W. Zoning Map Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Grant Amann, Principal Planner grant.amann@slcgov.com, 801-535-6171 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance amending the zoning map for the property at approximately 536 S. 200 W. as recommended by Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The applicant is requesting to amend the zoning map for 5 neighboring properties located near 536 S. 200 W. which are approximately 0.525 acres in size combined – 536 S. 200 W., 216 W. Orchard Pl., 224 W. Orchard Pl., 226 W. Orchard Pl., and 230 W. Orchard Pl. The applicant is seeking to rezone the subject properties from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). No development plans were submitted with this application. This rezone would be in line with a recently approved D-2 to D-1 amendment for a neighboring property to the north. The requested map amendments are in line with the applicable adopted guiding documents. The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation after a positive recommendation from City staff. The applicant is requesting the rezone as they are considering options for the property. PUBLIC PROCESS: Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all property owners and current occupants within 300 ft. on January 2, 2024. o No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal. The Planning Commission public hearing was held on February 28th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2. Project Chronology 3. Notice of City Council Hearing 4. Petition Initiation Request 500 S 500 S 20 0 W 20 0 W ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST 1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to five parcels located at approximately 536 South 200 West, 216 West Orchard Place, 224 West Orchard Place, 226 West Orchard Place, and 230 West Orchard Place to change the zoning from D-2 Downtown Support District to D-1 Central Business District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 536 South 200 West, 216 West Orchard Place, 224 West Orchard Place, 226 West Orchard Place, and 230 West Orchard Place, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, (the “Property”) to change the zoning from D-2 Downtown Support District to D-1 Central Business District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00730. WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing considering a petition submitted by Jason Boal, representing the property owner, to rezone the Property from D-2 Downtown Support District to D-1 Central Business District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00730; and WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1: Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property shall be and hereby is rezoned from D-2 Downtown Support District to D-1 Central Business District. ___________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Rezoning 536 S 200 W from D2 to D1_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: March 11, 2024 By: _ K orney Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tax Parcel No. 15-01-452-018-0000 Tax Parcel No. 15-01-452-024-0000 Tax Parcel No. 15-01-452-016-0000 Tax Parcel No. 15-01-452-014-0000 Tax Parcel No. 15-01-452-013-0000 A parcel of land situated in the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, Township I South, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of Orchard Place and the west line of 200 West Street said point being North 0º08'47" East 13.00 feet along the west line of said 200 West Street from the Southeast Corner of Lot 7, Block 31, Plat A, Salt Lake City Survey, and running; thence North 89º50'21" West 198.00 feet along the north line of said Orchard Place; thence North 0º08'47" East 3.50 feet along the north line of said Orchard Place; thence North 89º50'21" West 66.00 feet along the north line of said Orchard Place; thence North 0º08'48" East 148.50 feet to the north line of said Lot 7, Block 31; thence South 89º50'21" East 66.00 feet along the north line of said Lot 7, Block 31; thence South 0º08'48" West 86.00 feet; thence South 89º50'21" East 198.00 feet to the west line of 200 West Street; thence South 0º08'47" West 66.00 feet along the west line of said 200 West Street to the point of beginning. Contains 22,869 square feet. 0.525 acres 2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00730 – Approx. 536 S. 200 W. Zoning Map Amendment October 11, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake City Planning Division October 11, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00730 was assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. January 2nd, 2024 Early notification announcement of the project to all property owners within 300ft., providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. February 15, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at the property. February 16, 2024 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. February 28, 2024 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a positive recommendation to approve the proposed map amendment. 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00730- Jason Boal, representing the property owners, is requesting to amend the zoning map for the properties located at approximately 536 S. 200 W., 216 W. Orchard Pl., 224 W. Orchard Pl., 226 W. Orchard Pl., and 230 W. Orchard Pl. The applicant is seeking to rezone the subject properties from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The subject properties are approximately 0.525 acres in total. No development plans were submitted with this application. As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: TIME: PLACE: Room 326, 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00730. The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.ORIGINAL PETITION ZONING AMENDMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION CD CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at ZQ!)iog@s. ..mm. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the .C.itizeo Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step_g.ulct_e. REQUIRED FEES •Map Amd: $1,214 filing fee, plus $121 per acre (in excess of 1 ac). •Text Amd: $1,214 filing fee. •Additional required notice fees assessed after submission. APPLICANT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) Overmoe Rezone ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 536 S 200 W REQUEST Rezone from D--2 to D--1 NAME OF APPLICANT PHONE Jason Boal 801.257.1917 MAILING ADDRESS EMAIL 15 W South Temple, Suite 1200, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 jboal@swlaw.com APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*ow1ter'sconsentrnrJ1tired)IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST Owner Architect*Contractor* • Other* NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (ifdiJJerentfi-omnppticm1t) OVERMOE GROUP, LLC MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 1265 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 Urban Planner PHONE 801.410.8179 EMAIL brad@ionproperties.com OFFICE USE CASE NUMBER RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDEDFOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIREDFOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILLBECOPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS 4 PLANNING DIVISION// v7.1.23 Dale: 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY 1.This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2.By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3.I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4.I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. NAME OF APPLICANT Jason Boal MAILING ADDRESS 15 W South Temple, Suite 1200, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 APPLICATION TYPE Rezone EMAIL jboal@swlaw.com PHONE 801.257.1917 DATE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER CONSENT If the applicant is not the legal owner of the property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY A parcel of land situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian more p NAME OF OWNER OVERMOE GROUP, LLC MAILING ADDRESS EMAIL brad@ionproperties.com SIGNATURE DATE PO BOX 1265 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 Brad J. Overmoe Olgilaly tlrDmd J. Dvilrmoe c9 01' Jt.-33 16 -06lJO'September 7, 2023 1.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2.If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3.If a Home Owner's Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PART 5. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS 5 PLANNING DIVISION// v7.1.23 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please provide the following information with your application. Confirm that you have included each of the requirements listed below by adding a check mark for each item. CHECK STAFF REQUIREMENTS (21A.50.040.A) 0 Project Description: •A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. •A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned. •List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area. •Is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. •Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED INITIALS DISCLAIMER: I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SALT LAKE CITY REQUIRES THE ITEMS ABOVE TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE MY APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED. I UNDERSTAND THAT PLANNING WILL NOT ACCEPT MY APPLICATION UNLESS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS 6 PLANNING DIVISION// v7.1.23 5.MAILING LIST OWN_FULLOWN_ADD own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STAT OWN_ZIP X/SLC LLC 185 S STAT 1300 SALT LAKE UT 84111 MCDONAL ONE MCDONALD'S PL OAK BROO IL 60523 TWO FALLS 2345 E STRINGHAM AV SALT LAKE UT 84109 TWO FALLS 2345 E STRINGHAM AV SALT LAKE UT 84109 TWO FALLS 2345 E STRINGHAM AV SALT LAKE UT 84109 PARR-TAYL 7924 GRAPE ST LE MESA CA 91941 ALOHA PR 525 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALOHA PR 525 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 PARR-TAYL 7924 GRAPE ST LA MESA CA 91941 OVERMOE PO BOX 1265 SALT LAKE UT 84110 LC MSM IN 252 W ORCHARD PL SALT LAKE UT 84101 ROME MAL 545 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 LP SLC 510 500 W 5TH SUITE 700 AUSTIN TX 78701 OVERMOE PO BOX 1265 SALT LAKE UT 84110 ROME MAL 545 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRP PROPE 546 S 200 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 BAIRD ASS 2150 S 130 # 500 SALT LAKE UT 84106 600 SOUTH918 W IDAHO ST BOISE ID 83702 RODAK PR 2435 FORE # 200 SAN JOSE CA 95128 KEITH D KO 670 E NORTHCREST D SALT LAKE UT 84103 M6 SLC OW1441 W UT 130 PARK CITY UT 84098 ASSOCIATEPO BOX 478 SALT LAKE UT 84110 HADES MA 376 E 400 S 311 SALT LAKE UT 84111 171 WEST, 376 E 400 S 311 SALT LAKE UT 84111 Current Oc 620 S STATE ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 Current Oc 620 S STATE ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 Occupant PARCEL_A NEW_UNIT CITY ZIPCODE STATE Current Oc 230 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 210 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 511 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 261 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 257 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 235 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 523 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 262 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 236 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 230 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 226 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 224 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 536 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 240 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 533 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 510 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 216 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 225 W ORCHARD PL Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 250 W 600 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 214 W 600 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 176 W 600 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 517 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 179 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 171 W 500 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 539 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 154 W 600 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Item H8 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: 1050 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2023-00609 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: 1050 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2023-00609 BRIEFING UPDATE During the April 16, 2024 briefing, Council Members were generally supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment. They expressed a desire for the Administration to coordinate plans for roadway and sidewalk improvements with needed infrastructure upgrades if the property is developed. The Administration noted its plan to bundle several City owned parcels including the subject parcel and eventually put them into a community land trust to provide home ownership opportunities. There was a Council Member request for the City to do comprehensive planning to provide downpayment assistance, credit counseling, and other support to potential homeowners. The following information was provided for the April 16, 2024 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Administration to amend the zoning map for an approximately 1.4-acre vacant City owned parcel at 1050 West 1300 South in City Council District Two from its current R-1/5,000 (Single-family Residential) zoning designation to RMF-30 (Low-density Multi- family Residential). The Administration has not prepared a development plan yet, but affordable housing would likely be developed on the site if the proposed zoning map amendment is approved by the Council. Council Members will recall recently approving a similar request for property at 756 South Montgomery Street. The current request is the second in a series of similar requests for City owned parcels that will be Item Schedule: Briefing: April 16, 2024 Set Date: April 16, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 Page | 2 part of proposed West Side Infill Housing. Once the rezone process is complete for the properties, it is anticipated that a request for proposals will be issued to construct infill housing on the sites. The current R-1/5,000 zoning is limited to single-family homes and uses intended to serve them such as schools, churches, and parks. Area zoning is dominated by single-family residential as shown in the map below. The proposed RMF-30 zoning would allow small scale, low-density residential housing units. It allows different housing types including single- and two-family, townhomes, multi-family, row houses, and cottage developments. The zoning district can provide moderate density increases while minimizing negative impacts to single-family neighborhoods. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment during its February 14, 2024 meeting and held a public hearing at which three people spoke in opposition to the proposal. Concerns cited include impacts to neighborhood quality of life, the riparian corridor overlay, drainage issues, driveways, and required parking would all reduce the number of units that could be built on the site. Other comments included a desire for the property to be converted into a park as was the plan under a previously approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application (discussed below). Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. The Commissioner who voted against the proposal did not state a reason for his vote. Area zoning map with the subject property outlined in blue. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Since the property is owned by the City, the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what City goals for housing they have for potential development on the subject property such as if it will be used to advance affordability goals. 2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if they intend the proposed housing units to be for sale under the community land trust. Page | 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability) purchased the property in 2010 with the intention of developing it for housing. In 2021 approximately $150,736 was awarded through a constituent initiated CIP application to plan and design a park on the subject property. The CIP process missed that the proposed park did not conform to the current zoning for residential housing. The CIP process has been updated since then to include a zoning compliance check to avoid similar situations in the future. Following the application’s approval, the Administration analyzed the property’s suitability for a park, and housing was determined to be a better fit. The constituent was notified of the decision. Council staff will track the previously awarded funds for the Council to consider recapturing them for a new project in a future CIP cycle. It is the Administration’s intention to develop housing on the property. Because the property’s proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of it is within the riparian corridor overlay (RCO) which protects the river from impacts caused by development (see image below). If the property is developed, an RCO permit must be obtained. Areas within RCOs cannot be developed, which limits the potential number of dwelling units that can be constructed on the property. Image showing riparian corridor overlay and its impact on the subject parcel highlighted. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division The property is close to California Avenue and 900 West which are arterial streets with access to transit and bike lanes. However, the section of 1300 South where this property is located is narrow and lacks curbs and gutters. The road would need to be widened and improved to accommodate additional traffic generated by development on the site. Additionally, utilities and drainage systems will need to be upgraded to support proposed development. Page | 4 The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 5-9 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt Lake Planning staff found the proposal generally aligns with goals and initiatives of the 2014 Westside Master Plan, Plan Salt Lake (2015), and Housing Salt Lake (2023-2027) by adding incremental density to the area on underutilized property with a variety of housing types. Consideration 2 – Neighborhood Compatibility & Impact Planning staff received comments from nearby residents who expressed concerns with the proposal. These include impacts from increased density, and a desire to keep the property undeveloped. Planning staff noted that the property “has not been set aside for recreational or preservation purposes and could be developed under the current R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential zoning standards.” Design standards in the RMF-30 zone will allow development of new housing that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. In addition, this zone calls for durable materials, minimum requirements for glass, a maximum length of external blank walls and other requirements to provide an aesthetically pleasing development. The existing R-1/5,000 zoning does not have these requirements. In addition, development standards are similar for both the R-1/5,000 and RMF-30 zoning districts as shown in the table below. Required parking (shown in the table below) is to be provided on-site. This will help reduce on-street parking on 1300 South. Consideration 3 – Development Potential The RCO will reduce the parcel’s developable area to approximately 1.25 acres. Based on this, Planning staff calculated the following potential numbers of housing units under current and proposed zoning. It should be noted that roads and driveways on the site, parking, setbacks and landscape buffers, and maximum lot coverage may reduce these numbers. R-1/5,000 Single-family residential (current) 10 new single-family homes with minimum lot sizes of 5,000 square feet. RMF-30 (Low density multi-family residential (proposed) Up to 36 new cottage development units with minimum 1,500 square foot lot sizes. Up to 27 units of any other permitted housing type with minimum 2,000 square foot lot sizes. In addition, RMF-30 zoning allows a mix of housing types, so there is potential for some combination of single-family, duplex, row houses, cottages, and multi-family units if the zoning map amendment is approved and the property is developed. ZONING COMPARISON Page | 5 The following table compares building height, setback, and other requirements for the current R-1/5,000 and proposed RMF-30 zoning districts. R-1/5,000 (Current)RMF-30 (Proposed) Maximum Building Height 28 feet for pitched roof, 20 feet for flat roof. 30 feet. Front Yard 20 feet or average of the block face. 20 feet or average of the block face. Side Yard 4 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. Single family detached and two- family: 4 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. Multi-family (maximum of 8 attached units): 10 feet. Row Houses (maximum of 6 attached units): 6 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. Cottage Development: 4 feet. Rear Yard Minimum 25% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever is less. Minimum of 20% lot depth, need not exceed 25 feet (10 feet required for cottage developments). Parking Requirements Two spaces per dwelling unit.Two-family: Two spaces per dwelling unit. Multi-family: Studio and one bedroom: One space per dwelling unit. Two or more bedrooms: 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. Row House and Sideways Row House: Two spaces per dwelling unit. Cottage Developments: One space per dwelling unit. Lot Area/Width 5,000 square feet, with minimum lot width of 50 feet. Single family detached, two- family, multi-family, row houses: 2,000 square feet. Minimum lot width requirements are not applicable. Cottage developments: 1,500 square feet. Minimum lot widths are not applicable. Analysis of Standards Attachment E (pages 19-21) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards Page | 6 that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Development will require utility and drainage systems upgrades. City Department Review During City review of the petition, Public Utilities noted some offsite utilities will need to be upgraded as discussed above. Also, Transportation stated improvements to the section of 1300 South where this property is located will need improvements previously mentioned. No other responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal, but stated additional review and permits would be required if the property is developed. Additional information can be found in Attachment G (pages 24-26) of the Planning Commission staff report. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • July 27, 2023-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • August 17, 2023-Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner. • August 29, 2023-Notice sent to the Glendale Community Council informing them of the petition. 45-day recognized organization comment period begins. • September 27, 2023-Early notification notice mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject properties. • October 3, 2023-Online open house begins and runs through February 14, 2024 Page | 7 • October 13, 2023-45-day comment period for recognized organizations ends. No formal comments were submitted by the recognized organizations. • October 18, 2023-Planning staff presents proposal at the Glendale Community Council at the Chair’s request. • February 2, 2024- o Public hearing notice posted on property. o Planning Commission public hearing notices posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning Division listserv. o Notices mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject properties. • February 14, 2024- Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • XXX XX, 2024-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office. • XXX XX, 2024-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • March 26, 2024-Transmittal received in City Council Office. ______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Received: 3/26/2024 Date sent to Council: 3/26/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/25/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 - Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S STAFF CONTACT: Rylee Hall, Principal Planner 801-535-6308 or rylee.hall@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the petition for a zoning map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the zoning map designation of City-owned property at 1050 W 1300 S in July 2023. The request is to rezone the entirety of the subject property from the R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential zoning district to the RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district. The proposal is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. On February 14th, 2024, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the zoning map. If adopted, the new zone would facilitate construction of more residential units than would be allowed in the current zone as well as more options for housing types - including duplexes, townhomes, multi- family and cottage-style development. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 26, 2024 14:31 MDT) In 2010, the Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability) purchased the property with funds intended for housing development and the land was bookmarked for future housing development. Definitive plans for development are awaiting the outcome of the rezone process. The subject property is a large, vacant parcel with frontage on 1300 South. Properties directly adjacent to the site area are zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential and the subject site’s block is also entirely within the R-1/5,000 Zone and contains only single-family homes. The Jordan River and Jordan River Trail are located across the street from the property. Due to its proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of this property is within the RCO (Riparian Corridor Overlay) to protect this waterway from potential negative impacts caused by future development. Any development of the property, under the current or proposed zone, will be required to obtain a RCO (Riparian Corridor Overlay) permit, and the requirements for this permit will restrict development potential in regards to building placement and overall density. The requirements for obtaining a permit include a ‘no disturbance area,’ measured from the AHWL (Annual High Water Line) which lands roughly along the front boundary of the property. For undeveloped land that is greater than 1 acre, the ‘no disturbance area’ extends 100 ft. from the AHWL. This translates as an approximate 100 ft. setback from the front property line and the land within this setback may not be disturbed. Only a portion of the ‘no disturbance area’ can be used to calculate the development potential (density) of future development. The RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district is intended to create transitional residential development between neighborhoods primarily composed of detached single-family homes, like areas zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential, and denser multi- family and mixed-use development. The residential development allowed in this zone is small scale and low-density in nature. It is intended to maintain the existing character of established residential neighborhoods while allowing new small-scale multi-family development on underutilized lots to expand options for housing. The development regulations for the RMF-30 are similar to the existing zone with slightly higher allowable building height and lot coverage allowance. The RMF-30 Zone would also introduce design standards that are not required in the R-1/5,000 Zone, such as requirements for building materials, ground floor glass, and blank walls that face a street. Key Zoning Standards Comparison (Minimum Requirements) Zone Lot Area per unit Lot Width Max. Height Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Lot Coverage R-1/5,000 5,000 SF 50 ft. 28 ft. or 20 ft. flat roof Min. 25% of the lot depth or 20 ft., whichever is less 40% Single Family (detached) 4 ft. on one side & 10 ft. on the other Two- family RMF-30 Multi- family (max. 8 attached units) 2,000 SF N/A 30 ft. 20 ft. or the average of the block face 10 ft. Min. of 20% lot depth, need not exceed 25 ft.. 50% Row Houses (Max. 6 attached units) 6 ft. on one side and 10 ft. on the other Cottage Developm ent 1,500 SF 4 ft.10 ft. PUBLIC PROCESS: Early Notification - Information concerning this petition was sent to the Glendale Neighborhood Council on August 29th, 2023. The community council did not provide formal comments on this proposal. In addition to this, notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and residents within 300 ft. of the property on September 27th, 2023. An online open house has been posted on the Planning Division’s website since October 3rd, 2023. Planning Commission Meeting - The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on February 14th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. During the review process, Staff received some public comments from neighbors who have concerns about the proposal. These comments can be viewed in the Planning Commission Staff Report (link under Planning Commission Records). The general concerns were about impacts to their properties caused by an increase in residential density and a desire to maintain the existing undeveloped lot as is. Although the lot is vacant, it has not been set aside for recreational or preservation purposes and could be developed under its current zoning designation. Since the property was purchased by the City in 2010, there has been some discussion about developing the site as a park. In 2021, the city received and awarded funding for a CIP (Capital Improvement Program) grant for the ‘Three Creeks West Park Planning and Design’ through a constituent application. Following the approval of the CIP application, the city analyzed the property’s suitability for a park and ultimately, the property was deemed ineligible, and the constituent was notified of this decision. Two public comments were received prior to the Planning Commission meeting and after the publication of the staff report. These can be viewed in Exhibit 6 – Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication). Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access Report) d)Planning Commission Meeting Recording EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance 2. Project Chronology 3. Notice of the City Council Public Hearing 4. Original Petition 5. Mailing List 6. Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication) TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. ORDINANCE 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 5. MAILING LIST 6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT (RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION) 1.ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 1050 West 1300 South to change the zoning from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1050 West 1300 South, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, (the “Property”) to change the zoning from R- 1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609. WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing considering a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone the Property from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609; and WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1: Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District. e:___________________________ ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Rezoning 1050 W 1300 S from R-1 to RMF30_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Dat March 24, 2024 By: orney Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tax Parcel No. 15-11-381-053-0000 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND SITUATE IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN, SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH. COMPRISING 1.26 ACRES OF LOT “G” GLENDALE PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED AS PARCELS 1 AND 2 IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2003 AS ENTRY NO. 8896641, IN BOOK 8912, AT PAGE 4525 OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER, 0.03 ACRES OF THAT PARTICULAR REMAINDER PARCEL OF LOT “G”, GLENDALE PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 22, 2002 AS ENTRY NO. 8430946, IN BOOK 8689, AT PAGE 0350 OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER AND 0.12 ACRES OF THE REMAINDER PARCEL OF SAID LOT “G” HISTORICALLY USED AS ACCESS FOR THE PARCELS WITHIN SAID LOT “G”. BASIS OF BEARING FOR SUBJECT PARCEL BEING SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2869.92 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11. SUBJECT PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SALT LAKE COUNTY WELL MONUMENT MONUMENTALIZING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2135.87 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION AND NORTH 00º10’08” EAST 354.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 3 ROD WIDE STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01º01’42” EAST 246.07 FEET ALONG A CHAIN LINK FENCE TO A FENCE CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 86º25’53” WEST 40.17 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF CALIFORNIA PLACE PLAT C; THENCE NORTH 27º34’43” EAST (NORTH 27º20’00” EAST PER SAID PLAT) 66.44 FEET COINCIDENT WITH SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY TO A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548; THENCE NORTH 61º46’57” EAST 5.58 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION IN A FENCE LINE AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548; THENCE NORTH 89º10’21” EAST 20.18 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548; THENCE SOUTH 89º58’20” EAST 166.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6, CALIFORNIA PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAT “D” AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548; THENCE SOUTH 89º08’04” EAST 109.51 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, (SOUTH 89º24’28” EAST PER SAID PLAT), TO A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548 SAID REBAR LYING 1.08 FEET EAST OF A FENCE CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 50.95 FEET TO A POINT 0.40 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF A FENCE CORNER; THENCE NORTH 89º45’17” WEST 85.00 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 168.77 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID 3 ROD WIDE STREET; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES COINCIDENT WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 75º 58’22” WEST 25.28 FEET; SOUTH 67º09’43” WEST 201.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00609 July 27, 2023 Petition for the zoning map and amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. August 17, 2023 Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner. August 29, 2023 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Glendale Neighborhood Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. September 27, 2023 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. October 3, 2023 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The Online Open House was posted to the online open house webpage on October 3rd, 2023 through February 14th, 2024. October 13, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. October 18, 2023 The proposal was presented by Staff at the a Glendale Neighborhood Council meeting at the Chair’s request. February 2nd, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting on February 14, 2024. Public hearing notice mailed. February 14, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 14, 2024. By a majority vote of 6-1, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 – Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S – Mayor Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning map for city-owned property at the above-listed address. The proposal would rezone the property from R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) District. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. The project is within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/agendas/. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Rylee Hall at 801-535-6308 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at rylee.hall@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://aca- prod.accela.com/SLCREF/Default.aspx, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00609. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.ORIGINAL PETITION MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT ofCOMMUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: From: CC: Date: Re: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Nick Norris, Planning Director Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director July 20, 2023 Petition Initiation to rezone city-owned land located at 756 South Montgomery Street, 929 South Navajo Street, and 1050 West 1300 South This memo is to formally request that a petition be initiated to rezone city-owned land located at the referenced addresses. This proposal would rezone each parcel to RMF-30 to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Plan. Other zoning districts that are similar in scale may be considered based on community feedback. Please see the attached map for reference. This initiation would also authorize a lot line adjustment for the parcel located at 929 South Navajo Street in order to maintain the 9-Line trail. The Department of Community and Neighborhoods would coordinate with Parks and Public Lands and Engineering on the lot line adjustment. This memo includes a signature block to formally initiate the associated petitions. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the text amendment petitions as noted above. Erin Mend7ritiatt(Jul 25, 2023 09:41 MDT)07/25/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 WWW.SLC.GOV TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 Vicinity Maps of Subject Properties 756 South Montgomery Street •Page 2 929 South Navajo Street 1050 West 1300 South •Page 3 Created:2023-07-20 By:Nick Norris(nick.norris@slcgov.com) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAzUCdiPJg3AA-x-Nu4NWZt94vuRcB_RYH Rezone City Owned land in westside plan Final Audit Report 2023-07-25 "Rezone City Owned land in westside plan" History 'El Document created by Nick Norris (nick.norris@slcgov.com) 2023-07-20 - 11:03:08 PM GMT e. Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-07-20 - 11:03:55 PM GMT ti Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) 2023-07-21 - 4:50:46 AM GMT 0o Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) Signature Date: 2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT - Time Source: server 9 Agreement completed. 2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT 5.MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP ADAN GAMBOA MORGA 1226 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AGUSTIN LOPEZ 1188 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ALFREDO ARELLANO; XOCHITI VILLALOBOS; JUAN J GOMEZ VILLALOBOS (JT 1194 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ANDRZEJ FORYS; KRYSTYNA FORYS (TC)1191 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ANNA L MARTINEZ; MARIA A MARTINEZ (JT)1190 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ARIC CAMPBELL; VIRGINIA CAMPBELL (JT)1014 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AURORA GONZALEZ 1202 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BERNARDO E HERNANDEZ 1042 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHRISTOPHER E SHELTON; COTY A SHELTON (JT)1080 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CVN&TNIT 1117 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 EFRAIN VAZQUEZ SANCHEZ 1191 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 EPIFANIO SARINANA; MARTHA E SARINANA (JT)1204 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GILES C LARSEN 1030 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GTTC PROPERTIES LC 17 N EAGLEWOOD DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 HANS G EHRBAR 08/23/2006 3375 W MOUNT ELLEN WY TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129 HUBERT CARDENAS 1203 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 HUGO SILVA; ANA L SILVA (JT)1118 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JAMES B SWAYDAN & LORIE R SWAYDAN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/10/20 2959 PALMETTO CIR ST GEORGE UT 84790 JAMIE M FENN; JEREMY R FENN 1084 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JANET KNUDSEN 1018 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JEREMY P. KING 1205 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JERRY D VANDEMERWE 1088 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOEL W CANNON; SHAWN CANNON (JT)1183 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE A MORENO-ARRIAGA (JT)1187 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE CHAVEZ; REBECA CHAVEZ (JT)1066 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 JOSE LUIS ESTRADA; SANDRA ALFARO RIOS (JT)1197 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE OJEDA; BLANCA OJEDA (JT)1198 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE R HERNANDEZ; ROSALBA R HERNANDEZ (JT)1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 KAP HLUN; BLAK ZING (JT)1211 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 KEITH E TILLMAN; CARLA J TILLMAN (JT)1212 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 KEVIN HOBBS; TANNISHA HOBBS (JT)1106 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LORETTA J QUINTANA 1058 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LULU S JIMENEZ 2929 S LAZY J CIR WEST VALLEY UT 84120 LUONG H LE; BINH THANH NGUYEN (JT)1120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MANUEL SANTIAGO 1115 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MARGARET H MADSEN; SCOTT K MADSEN (JT)1199 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MARIA SALAZAR 1188 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MICHAEL C CLAPIER 6610 CHARLES ST RACINE WI 53402 MINH QUANG NGUYEN; SANG THI KIM LAI (JT)7088 W ECHOMOUNT RD WEST VALLEY UT 84118 OWEN QUINONEZ 1201 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PATRICIA QUIROZ; VICTOR RAUL QUIROZ (JT)1200 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PEDRO GUTIERREZ; NICOLASA GUTIERREZ (JT)1194 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PHAP VO; BICH LE T VO (JT)1197 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PHUONG VAN NGUYEN; TRUOC THI VO (JT)1093 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PROVO-JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY AUTHORITY PO BOX 146001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 RALPH PLESCIA; VONNA R PLESCIA (TC)1048 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 RAUL & MARIE SEOANE FAMILY TRUST 03/13/2018 7455 S 4950 W WEST JORDAN UT 84081 REYNALDO B ROSALES 1182 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ROBERTO C PONCE; CARMEN A PONCE (JT)1196 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ROLANDO GARCIA; EDGAR GARCIA (JT)1198 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ROSA GARCIA-PLANCARTE 1179 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SCOTT GOSLIN; VICKI GOSLIN (JT)1207 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SIRIAN ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ ROMERO; SERGIO GARCIA VARILLAS (JT)1197 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TALITA LATU; PASILI LATU (JT)1020 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TANIELA VAKE 1100 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 THANH DAC NGUYEN; TU THI HUYNH (TC)1123 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 THANH H SR NGUYEN; HUE T VO (JT)1057 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TIN CEU AUNG 1113 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1193 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1010 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 4657 E 20TH ST JOPLIN MO 64801 URIEL M RODRIGUEZ; MARIA D RODRIGUEZ (JT)1187 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VIET TRUONG MAI; CHAN P PYO; NEE LA; THEH P PYO 1217 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 WAYNE XIA; AMY XINGYUAN LI (JT)6535 S CANYON CREST DR HOLLADAY UT 84121 ZARA AND TAJ INVESTMENTS, LLC 1121 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 Occupant PARCEL_ADDR CITY STATE ZIPCODE Current Occupant 1127 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1123 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1109 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1103 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1091 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1120 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1110 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1108 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1060 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1050 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1042 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1032 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1040 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1086 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1082 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1189 S ONTARIO DR Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1026 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1063 W MODESTO AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1203 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1189 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1195 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1064 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1026 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1020 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1016 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1024 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 6.ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT (RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION) >-----Original Messap;e ---- >From: scott goslin, >Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 6:31PM >To: Hall, Rylee <rvlee-hall@slcgov.com> >Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Request for plans, information about PLNPCM >2023-00609 > >Hello Rylee, thanks )'OU for your response. >So I the neighbor have anything to sayingvoteabout this change? Or proposed change? >I think what may be built wouldaffect the overall decision >It originally stated a changein zoning, height ofstructureat center point and distances to other property. >You informed me that a? 20% >Size or distance would apply ( something like that clause). >I see it affectingly changing the traffics, infrastructure, property price( in re.sale), etc.. >I will be attendingand hoping they move the project to mayor Mendalls neighborhood!! Her policies do not help our area. >I also see a raising the base lot height to accommodate the drainage or septic systems. It a problem nei,."t to the rh<er, we havean additional pumping station L lhis neighborhood to deal With just that. >Pleaselet me knowany details for this projectsince in directlyin my BACKYARD! >Sincerely scott goslin Hello Rylee , I have some additional comment’s to say about this project. Even though this project does directly affect me in the backyard of my community, I have new thoughts about it and the current housing situation in Salt Lake City. I have seen new information on this topic through a local And nationwide view. Due to some PBS reporting. ( Harvard study). I was wrong in feeling about a loss of community value. This is a small view and not a community building issue. The extra traffic congestion, noise, sight lines, loss of green space etc. However I do feel that property values will slide down, but taxes go higher. With the city finding long term excuse to manage this property to keep its values. Once a property is Rezoned it cannot be undone. Thus forcing the neighborhood to deal with is short sighted vote. I see that rents and housing pricing is outrageous in all Community’s and in ours. I understand that city wants to help alleviate this issue in any way they can for it residents. However I do Not see this being realized. Lots of new housing and no cost breaks given to those tenants. But I do see several other issues that have fueled my opinion about this in a negative way. 1) A lot of housing but really not helping anyone but companies. The city removed a housing structure for homelessness, only to build a new overpriced building. I’m speaking of the downtown shelter. I’m sure the city has made money and “Rezoned” this land to accommodate these projects. Maybe the city sets up a long term deal with these resources. to help Provide housing at reduced rate for tax relief or something to relief these tenants. The current property’s of 1000w between Glendale , Modesto do not have septic connections to city. No sidewalks or lights. The property in discussion will have to be raised in base elevation to help with drainage. We have a pumping station to help with this matter already. A rise in base elevation will affect the overall height of these structures. These properties and the one for mentioned will also have a loss of 20 plus feet in lot size , to accommodate the street and infrastructure codes. Also this street that will be clogged due to heavier traffic. I see the need for a rezoning but nobody can show me a Proposed site plan. Just any long term thought to what this might be. With any details of the change of height restrictions ,( 2 feet increased height. This does not do anything except hide the views). The proposed setback will put neighboring house looking into my home. And restricting river and Mountain Views. These are some of the details that seems to be lacking in this debate. So I cannot believe anything good long term will Come out of this rezoning with out full ideas, some thought into what we need and want this land to be. Also some full disclosure of what the city wants and needs are. In writing this I have contacted my local councilman Alejandro Puy, still awaiting a response. 2) I see rezoning all over the city but not helping anyone but white men, ( and I’m white). The Conditional Use Permits have been done away with in salt lake county, city. Making it very hard to find a space to start and grow a business . ( explaining later) 3) I see a huge taxes increase for anything in SLC, and not getting anything out of it. Except Constant Construction, removal Of parking downtown. And more F$@king scooters on the sidewalks. And as a Pedestrian getting almost hit daily walking on sidewalks but Nobody using those bike lanes! The city has received monies from these companies and they park their product on city land. But this doesn’t improve anyone’s health. Just more fat dangerously unaware people! So much for bikes. I’m not a big fan of this bike program so far. I moved out of south salt lake after 17 years , when the huge increase of high rise apartments(ritz bowling ), and seemed lack of long term vision. It was I , whom lacked the vision and did not want live in such a congested area. ( and I have met Mayor Wood and like her vision at that time.) This was south salt city’s lack of Vision to me. And it only seems more money for the city as we cram more into a smaller space. They rezoned for the dodge dealerships and forced 6 blocks of traffic onto one street, Wentworth ave. Not good for the community. This being one of the reasons. I Moved to a lower income area. Better house 1910 to a 1998 build. Only to Have a 100% increased taxes in less than 4 years in (Glendale). So with the lack of clear vision, I would ask for a negative vote for this project. So I feel that Salt Lake City may be doing the same quick fixes. But lacking the best vision for long term growth. I do not appreciate how mayor Medhall is more Media savey, to Have a camera running for all Her great deeds. But not really for the greater good of our community. So The business side, Let me explain. I was going to start and new year round food business to provide fresh greens growing hydroponically, year round . But when researching this issue. However when trying to find space to have the business, almost impractical. The rise Land cost, city fees and lack of augiculture space. ( no rezoning or permits, C.U.P. Changes.) So with our Bad air and such seems uncontrolled growth, land, costs. I’ve chosen to Kill my business and keep my head above water. Now with high Interest rates not Even possible now! As for fair wages to pay for housing. I am a UNION member for 35 years. Being a union member helps my bottom Line. Only because we Believe in wages for work. I see a lack of good wages and people stretching to make ends meet. Paying more in a tip does not help people long term and insults the consumer. Pay a fair wages and this might float the boat! Amazing how nobody wants that? Furthermore all city wants is another team. Really more growth forcing people out. I’m sure these same issues are Occurring in the north part of the city. Forcing others to find somewhere else to live but nowhere to go, in SLC county, city. So in closing I’m glad to Hear the city wants to help. But I don’t think they have thought this out. Vote No ! Sincerely Scott Goslin (Insert Agenda Item # Here) CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY24 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, Allison Rowland, Jennifer Bruno, and Kira Luke DATE:May 7, 2024 UPDATED 6:13 PM RE: Budget Amendment Number Five of FY2024 MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPT STRAW POLLED TIME SENSITIVE ITEMS I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. I further move that the City seek reimbursement for item A-8 from the Utah Fairpark Area Investment and Restoration District. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference. The budget amendment is still open, and the Council may consider the remaining items at a future date. A-3: 2100 South Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East Capital Improvement Program Project ($7 Million one-time from General Fund Balance, Transferred to the CIP Fund, Repayments from Property Owners as a Connection Fee at TBD Times) A-8: North Temple Bridge Over the Jordan River Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement, Fencing, and Scope Expansion ($320,000 one-time from General Fund Balance) A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP Holding Account ($15 Million one-time from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) Note: the Council would need to release the funds from the holding account and allocate to specific projects before the funds could be used D-5: City Housing Authority Payment In Lieu Of Taxes or PILOT Check ($40,000 one-time to and from the General Fund; revenue in and equivalent expenditure out) I-1: Micro-shelter Community Site Preparation Costs and Electricity through June, and $100,000 Additional to Address Unexpected Costs Related to Homelessness ($393,791 – One Time from Holding Account) MOTION 2 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 3 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 4 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY24 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, Jennifer Bruno, Kira Luke, and Sam Owen DATE: May 7, 2024 RE: Budget Amendment Number 5 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 NEW INFORMATION: The Administration has forwarded a Second Revised Budget Amendment No. 5 transmittal which includes a Fund Balance update and several changes including: - Revised funding requests for two items: o A-3: 2100 South Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East and o A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement and Fencing - Two new administrative items: o D-9: Streets Impact Fee Excess Capacity Reimbursement and Funding Source Change, and o E-1 Utah DNR, Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands Grant - Two new Council-added items, I-1 was requested by the Administration after the second revised transmittal was sent and I-2 is a proposal from Council Member Puy: o I-1: Micro-shelter Community Site Preparation Costs and Electricity through June ($293,791 – One Time from Holding Account) o I-2: Funding to Catchup on Expungement Backlog ($300,000 one-time from General Fund Balance to Non-departmental) Sales Tax Revenue and Fund Balance Update: At the April 16 briefing, the Council received a sales tax revenue update from the Finance Department. To date, overall revenues are trending slightly above budget. Finance staff are projecting revenues to remain consistent with current estimates for the remainder of FY 2024. Modifications have been made primarily to sales tax revenues, resulting in a decrease of approximately (-$2.6 million) to regular sales tax while an increase of $3.7 million is projected for the Funding Our Future additional ½% sales tax. The updated fund balance is estimated to be 25.5% of the FY 2024 adopted budget or $55,558,724 above the 13% minimum target. Three changes resulted in this updated estimate. First, $10 million is no longer anticipated in revenues later this fiscal year largely driven by sales tax projected to be flat instead of growing. Second, the $7 million expenditure in item A-3 for 2100 South utility upgrades is changed to no longer be a loan with time certain repayment to the General Fund. Third, the Council voted on April 16 for the last remaining item in Budget Amendment #3 (downtown parking pay station replacements) to fully fund the $1.612 million cost to avoid $291,895 of interest expense under an alternative seven year debt repayment schedule. Project Timeline: Set Date: April 16, 2024 1st Briefing: April 16, 2024 2nd Briefing: May 7, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 3rd Briefing (if necessary): May 14, 2024 Potential Action: (tentative) May 21, 2024 Responses to Council Member Questions about item A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention (Total of $1,423,875 from General Fund Balance of which $1,159,375 one-time and $264,500 ongoing) At the April 16 briefing, Council Members asked several questions about item A-2. The questions and responses from the Police Department are below. - Improving Retention Question: Could the Administration please provide a comparison of police officer retention before and after the $8,500 bonus program began? o Response: The Police Department had a 27% reduction in separations over the last year and a 40% reduction versus the same period 2 years ago. - Comparing Recruitment Bonuses Question: If available, how much do other law enforcement agencies provide for lateral hiring bonuses? It would be helpful to understand how the $8,500 bonuses for lateral police officer hires compare to the City’s major talent competitors. Staff note: this is not a direct apples to apples comparison because of differences between programs such as repayment requirements if an officer leaves before the employment commitment period, whether income taxes and the pensionable portion is paid by the agency or the officer, and whether the bonus is based on performance or years of service. The responses below indicate that Salt Lake City offers the most generous bonus program in the Wasatch Front, which is $3,500 more than the closest competitors based on 18 agencies with whom HR was able to confirm amounts. o Response: HR provided the following local law enforcement agencies comparisons. The following entities have no police officer bonus program: Bountiful City, Davis County, Draper City, Farmington City, Lehi City, Murray City, Orem City, State of Utah Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol, Summit County, Taylorsville City, Unified Police Department, and Utah County. The following entities do offer police officer bonus programs: Layton City: $2,000 if a minimum of one year of uninterrupted full-time experience as a police officer with a similarly sized agency. Increases to $3,000 for two years of experience. Both bonus amounts come with a two-year employment commitment. Leaving employment before the two- years requires full repayment to the City. Salt Lake City’s bonus program only requires repayment of a prorated share of the bonus when the employee leaves before the two-year employment commitment ends. Ogden City: $5,000 is offered only to lateral hires. Provo City: $5,000 is offered only to lateral hires and split into two payments; $2,000 at time of hire and $3,000 at completion of a one-year probationary period. Sandy City: 1% of annual salary bonus depending on performance or 3% for officers at the top out (maximum) pay scale. South Salt Lake City: 4% of annual salary bonus one-time. Weber County: $4,000 split into two payments; $2,000 after first six months and another $2,000 after competing one-year of employment. o Response: The Police Department noted that agencies outside of the Wasatch Front sample listed above offer recruitment bonuses of $5,000 - $10,000 based on a review of 2023 media articles. - Bonus Program Participation Question: It was mentioned during the briefing that approximately 92% of current police officers have participated in the bonus program. Could you please confirm if this percentage is correct? o Response: As of 4/19 the retention participation was at 94.9%. - Need for Ongoing Lateral Hiring after Full Staffing Question: Why is providing bonuses for lateral hires recommended to continue with ongoing funding after the Department reaches full functional staffing levels? o Response: In order to maintain staffing levels, especially as the retention commitments begin to end in June of 2025, the Department needs to continue to be proactive in recruiting top candidates to fill vacancies. Hiring a lateral officer (an officer who already has police certification) is the fastest way to fill the Department’s vacancies. These employees can complete the Department’s in-house academy and be on the street providing services to community members much faster. Recently the Department took steps to expedite lateral officers into the field. - ARPA Dollars Question: Are there any ARPA funds budgeted but not spent that need to be obligated by the end of calendar year 2024 and could be used for the bonuses? o Response: We have $195,325 in ARPA funding that must be spent by June 30, 2024. - Vacancy Savings Question: Could you please share the results of the vacancy savings analysis for the Police Department? o Response: The below charts shows potential vacancy savings are estimated to be $857,669 in the Police Department through the end of the current fiscal year. Policy questions: Use ARPA Dollars to Reduce Drawing Down Fund Balance – The Council may wish to consider using $195,325 of ARPA funding that was previously budgeted but not spent and needs to be obligated this year under the U.S. Treasury’s guidance. This option would reduce the amount of Fund Balance needed by an equivalent amount. Use Vacancy Savings to Reduce Drawing Down Fund Balance – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the option of using some vacancy savings in the Police Department. Historically, the Department has considered vacancy savings to be an important part of the budget to cover unexpected overtime in case of major public safety incidents occurring in June when the current fiscal year ends but before the new fiscal year and those budget authorizations begin. The City has not identified an amount of vacancy savings to be available for this potential risk. The Council could ask the Administration to evaluate alternative budget options to address this annual potential need instead of relying upon vacancy savings which fluctuate and are not guaranteed to be available each year. REVISED A-3: 2100 South Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East Capital Improvement Program Project ($7 Million one-time from General Fund Balance, Transferred to the CIP Fund, Repayments from Property Owners as a Connection Fee at TBD Times) The Administration is requesting a straw poll for this item because of contractor supply ordering constraints A $7 million capital improvement project is proposed to upgrade utilities in tandem with the current street reconstruction of 2100 South from 700 East to 1100 East. Upgrading utilities while the street is already open for reconstruction is expected to reduce disruption to the neighborhood, potentially be lower cost, and better protect the public investment to avoiding new pavement needing to be cut into later. The Administration originally proposed the $7 million as a market-rate loan subject to reaching a loan agreement with The Thackeray Company representing several entities developing adjacent properties. The revised proposal removes the loan and rather treats the project as a General Fund capital improvement project where the property owners would repay the City at a TBD time when the developers are ready to connect to the upgraded utilities. The repayment would be a prorated connection fee with accrued market-rate interest. The obligation could be set in a connection agreement and recording a notice of the agreement against the property. The $7 million and interest could be identified as a receivable owed to the General Fund, however, the timing of repayment is uncertain and not guaranteed. Release of the funds could be contingent on the City negotiating a connection fee agreement with the developers that would include the market rate interest accrual and prorated share for repayments. Policy questions: Timing of Repayments – The Council may wish to ask the Administration about options to require repayments by a certain time, and what is the risk the General Fund would not be repaid if a property owner chose not to proceed with development? Coordinating Utility Upgrades with Street Reconstruction Projects – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to include coordinating street reconstruction project planning and utility upgrade project planning in the upcoming Capital Asset Plan (a 5-year CIP plan). Recently, the City successfully used this approach consolidating 10 projects across five departments along the 900 South corridor. REVISED A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridges - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement and Temporary Fencing ($320,000 from General Fund Balance) The Administration has updated this request to an increased amount of $320,000, and requests a straw poll to enable timely contract execution. This increase adds $34,500 to extend the rocks 50 feet on either side of the bridge, $60,000 to reflect an updated project scope from the contractor after assessing the site, and another $60,000 for fencing. The fencing is anticipated to be a combination of permanent and temporary, depending on the location. None of the fencing is intended to inhibit access to the Jordan River Trail itself. Permanent: - Area abutting Archuleta Bridge (1206 W 200 S) - replacing existing fencing and adding new - Northeast corner of the North Temple Bridge (approximately 1200 W North Temple) - repair/replacing damaged fencing Temporary (up to 120 days): - West side of the Jordan River Trail between the Archuleta Bridge and North Temple - Gadsby Trailhead (1223 W North Temple). This includes closing the boat ramp during bridge rock installation and another 90 days after for riverbank remediation. Authorized Rocky Mountain Power or City staff will still have access. The Administration reports that Rocky Mountain Power, who owns the parking lot land, is supportive of the closure. The Administration also reports that since the trailhead is not a City park, the City isn't required to undergo the legal process a temporary park closure needs. The City has an easement at the site - Northwest corner of the North Temple Bridge (approximately 1200 W North Temple). This closes access from the sidewalk to the bank adjacent to the bridge, the west bank of the Jordan River from the bridge to the footbridge, and the west bank of the footbridge - West side of the second footbridge (between 180 and 200 N) - South end of Constitution Park (1300 West 300 North) - North side of Folsom Trail (between South Temple and 100 South) between 900 and 1000 West, and the West side of 1000 West. Note: this is not a river-abutting site, but the fencing is intended to limit persistent camping and drug traffic in that area New Policy Questions Area Safety Plan – The Administration's writeup references this proposal as a critical element of the safety plan for this neighborhood. The Council may wish to ask for more details on the safety plan, in closed session if necessary. Permanent vs. Temporary Fencing – Most of the fencing planned is temporary. The Council may wish to hold a policy discussion considering what factors could determine areas that might be candidates for longer-term fencing. Duration of Administrative Closure – The Council may also wish to ask, if parts of the Folsom Trail are being closed with fencing, at what point would that closure require legislative authorization? D-9: Streets Impact Fee Excess Capacity Reimbursement and Funding Source Change ($6,943,500 from Streets Impact Fees to General Fund), and ($7,018,500 from Streets Impact Fees to CIP Fund.) This is a request for excess capacity reimbursement to be paid out of Streets Impact Fees to the General Fund in the amount of $6,943,500. It would also transfer these funds to streets impact fees to change the funding source of existing CIP project appropriations from streets impact funded to General Fund funded CIP Projects. These changes will allow the City to comply with the Impact Fee Act, the Impact Fee Facilities Plan, and to more efficiently utilize restrictive funding sources. The result of the eligibility of these funds has been the need to refund $58,826 plus interest of ~ $16,174 from streets impact fee funds. NEW E-1: Utah DNR, Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands Grant ($30,000 from Misc. Grants) The Utah Department of Natural Resources; Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands has rewarded the City with a grant for the Jordan River Water Trail Tree & Debris Removal project, which consists of the removal of certain trees and other organic matter and debris waste from the Jordan River Water Trail corridor to enhance safe and accessible nonmotorized watercraft navigation while minimizing bank erosion and strengthening bank stability. This grant was not acquired through an application but an offer of $30,000 communicated via email as it supported a previously funded project that requires ongoing maintenance. NEW I-1: Micro-shelter Community Site Preparation Costs and Electricity through June ($293,791 – One Time from Holding Account) The Council may consider a straw poll on this item since the micro-shelter community’s operations were extended beyond the expected April 30 end date This item would provide $263,791 for site preparation and private security costs incurred last calendar year by the City for the RDA owned property temporarily hosting the micro-shelter community (note it has also been called a temporary sanctioned campground). It would also provide $30,000 to cover the electricity bills for operating the site through June. On April 16, the Council approved a temporary land use regulation extending operations of the micro-shelter community through July 31. The Administration stated sufficient funding exists to cover July operational expenses so those would not need to be added to the FY2025 annual budget (for July as the first month of the next fiscal year). The monthly electric bills are between $3,200 - $3,800 and may increase during hotter summer months. A breakout of the site preparation costs is listed below: - $188,356 for new electrical service lines to the site - $44,506 for ground preparation - $21,127 for private security during site preparation work - $6,907 for temporary fencing - $1,595 for plumbing - $1,300 for electrical line to a portable restroom trailer The Council put a total of $1.5 million into a holding account for expenses related to the micro-shelter community. On February 6, the Council found that the conditional appropriation was satisfied and approved releasing from a Non- departmental holding account $500,000 one-time in Budget Amendment #3 for a reimbursement to the State for general operating expenses at the temporary sanctioned campground (not reimbursement for specific incurred expenses). At the time, the total estimated cost to operate the campground was $860,000 from December through April. The $860,000 operating cost didn’t include the City’s expenses to prepare the site (itemized above) such as utility upgrades, SLCPD and SLCFD public safety expenses, and the State’s cost to purchase the Foldum micro shelter units. Policy questions: Additional Funding Needs – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether additional funding requests related to the micro-shelter community are anticipated. The Council could provide additional funding from the holding account (such as $100,000) as part of this budget opening for unexpected costs related to the micro-shelter community and/or homelessness more broadly. The additional funding would provide the Administration flexibility to more quickly respond since Budget Amendment #5 is the last budget opening of FY2024 otherwise responses might need to wait for budget availability in the new fiscal year (July 1). Coordinating Closure of Temporary Site and Opening of Permanent Campground – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what preparations are underway to coordinate tenants moving from the temporary site to the State’s permanent campground. New I-2: Funding to Catchup on Expungement Backlog ($300,000 one-time from General Fund Balance to Non-departmental) This item is proposed by Council Member Puy to provide one-time funding for catching up on an expungement backlog. Recent changes to state law and the courts system processing of expungement requests has significantly increased the number of pending expungements. The funds would be placed in Non-departmental to give the Administration flexibility to determine how best to implement processing the documents. The funds could be used for an outside contract, in-house resources such as overtime, technology improvements, and/or a combination of approaches. Appropriating the funds in Non-departmental recognizes that multiple departments could be involved including the Police Department, IMS, and/or Finance. Some Council Members have mentioned that faster processing of expungements helps people access housing and jobs by removing a criminal record which can be identified during a background / security check. Criminal records can be a barrier to a landlord approving a rental application or a potential employer hiring the job candidate. The funding would need to be used or encumbered under a contract before the end of fiscal year (June 30) otherwise the appropriation would lapse and return to General Fund Balance unless the Council adds it to the FY 25 annual budget in Non-Departmental. Policy questions: Additional Resources Needs – The Council may wish to ask the Administration is the volume of expungement requests anticipated to continue increases and might additional resources be needed in future fiscal years? Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings  Item A-3 is a request for $7 million of one-time General Fund monies which would be used to negotiate a loan with the Thackeray Company, representing several businesses, who are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100 South in the Sugar House Business District. A fact sheet and additional info was pending at the time of publishing this report. Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs for the Next Annual Budget (See Attachment 1 at the end of this staff report) The chart of potential new ongoing General Fund costs for the FY2025 annual budget is available as Attachment 1 and included at the end of this document. If all the items are adopted as proposed by the Administration, then the FY2025 annual budget could have $380,882 of new ongoing costs. The total new ongoing costs from Budget Amendments 1 through 5 would be $7,568,554. It’s important to note that $3.1 million of that could be covered by the Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation State Grant assuming the Legislature continues to appropriate sufficient funds under the current formula and law. Fund Balance If all the items are adopted as proposed, then General Fund Balance would be projected at 28.12% which is $67,210,724 above the 13% minimum target of ongoing General Fund revenues. It’s important to note that while Fund Balance at this level is healthy the FY2025 annual budget (like the FY2024 annual budget) is anticipated to have a relatively large structural deficit necessitating use of one-time Fund Balance. The Administration has requested straw polls for the following items: A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million one-time from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund) D-5: Housing Authority PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) Check ($40,000 to General Fund) Revenues Update The Finance Department plans to provide a sales tax revenues update to the Council at the April 16 briefing. Overall revenues have improved since Budget Amendment #4 when total General Fund revenues were forecast to be $1.4 million below budget which was mostly driven by sales tax underperforming. The updated table shows total General Fund revenues are trending slightly above budget partly because of the Funding Our Future 0.5% sales tax coming in higher. The Department provided some additional details on revenue line items with significant changes: -Sales Taxes: The regular sales and use tax is $2.7 million below budget while the local option Funding Our Future (FOF) 0.5% sales tax is $3.7 million above budget. The two sales taxes have different exemptions and percentage splits between which government entities receive the resulting revenue. This is why the two sales tax revenues do not always trend in the same direction at the same time. The City took a conservative approach to budget projections for the FOF sales tax since it was enacted in 2018. The historical is being used to refine FOF sales tax projections for the FY2025 annual budget. -Charges from Services: The $1.2 million (25%) increase from charges for services is caused by police off-duty security (offset by an increase in actual police overtime). Also contributing is an increase in building civil enforcement revenue as those accounts have been turned over to the collections unit. -Franchise Taxes: The $925,203 (7.5%) increase from franchise taxes continues a recent trend after several years of multi-million dollar decreases in this revenue source. The increase is due to water rate increases of about 22% over prior year that are now impacting city revenue. This trend should continue as Public Utilities is requesting another rate increase in FY2025. -Rental and Other Income: The $419,599 (62%) increase is from facility rental revenue due to increased demand for city facilities and increases in city costs for water, gas, and power utilities which are passed through. There is an offsetting increase in these utility expenditures. Fund Balance Chart The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for Budget Amendment #5. Based on those projections the adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 25.86%. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached to the transmittal. The Administration requests that document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A.New Budget Items B.Grants for Existing Staff Resources C.Grants for New Staff Resources D.Housekeeping Items E.Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F.Donations G.Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I.Council Added Items Impact Fees Updates are pending further implementation of the City's new financial system (Workday) and integration with Accela that handles building permit records. The Administration’s transmittal provides an updated summary of impact fee tracking. The information is current as of 7/20/23. The table below has taken into account impact fees appropriated by the Council on August 15 as part of the FY2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all of FY2024 and FY2025. The transportation section of the City’s Impact Fees Plan was updated in October 2020. The Administration is working on updates to the fire, parks, and police sections of the plan. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $273,684 More than two years away - Parks $14,064,637 More than two years away - Police $1,402,656 More than two years away - Transportation $6,064,485 More than two years away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items. A-1: Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases for Fire Hydrant Rentals ($133,250 one-time from General Fund Balance) The Administration is requesting $133,250 to cover fee increases on maintenance costs on fire hydrants in the City. While Public Utilities refers to this as “rental” fee, it is not renting hydrants in the traditional sense of rent. The fee covers maintenance costs and use of the hydrants. Public Utilities increased this fee in FY 24, but it was overlooked while putting together the Fire Department budget that year. For FY 25, Finance is recommending that this cost be shifted to non- departmental as it is a City-wide expense for a City-wide benefit. A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention (Total of $1,423,875 from General Fund Balance of which $1,159,375 one-time and $264,500 ongoing) In Budget Amendment #5 of FY2023, the Council approved $5.5 million to offer $8,500 one-time bonuses to all police officers, except executive level (e.g., deputy chief and above), with a two-year employment commitment. The bonuses also included the City paying the pensionable cost of approximately $3,000 on average to the Utah Retirement System for the employee’s pension. If an officer left employment with the City before completing the two-year commitment, then they would need to repay a prorated share of the cost to the City. The date of the bonuses are staggered based on an employee’s hiring anniversary date. This item is requesting funding to continue providing bonuses to new hires using this same framework. The Administration is requesting $264,500 to provide 23 lateral hire bonuses. A lateral hire is when a police officer working at another law enforcement agency is hired to work at the Salt Lake City Police Department. A lateral hire is already POST certified and needs significantly less training than a new entry level hire. The estimated cost is $125,000 - $150,000 for a new entry level police officer from date of hire to completion of all trainings so they can fully operate as an officer out on patrol. The funding would be ongoing so bonuses could continue to be provided to lateral hires in future fiscal years. The Administration is also requesting $1,159,375 one-time to provide bonuses to new entry level and lateral hires expected in May and retention bonuses to existing officers that haven’t yet participated in the bonus program. The Department has relied on mandatory overtime to maintain minimum patrol staffing levels at times during recent years. The Police Chief stated this approach helps in the short-term but is unsustainable in the long term. The bonus program was designed to incentivize longer retention of officers and faster hiring of new officers. The program goal was to stabilize staffing levels and help the Police Department reach full staffing within two years. The Department reports a high participation rate by officers in the program and improved staffing levels. In March, 34 funded sworn officer positions were vacant and two additional vacancies were anticipated. Depending upon the completion rate of planned upcoming hiring classes, the Department could reach full functional staffing in 2024. Note that there are many unknowns outside the City’s control when projecting when the Police Department could reach full staffing such as the number of qualified candidates applying, the state of the Wasatch Front metropolitan and national economies, officers on leave, crime rates, etc. Policy questions: 1. Availability of Vacancy Savings is Pending – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on available vacancy savings in the Police Department that could be used instead of General Fund Balance to cover some of the costs for bonuses. An analysis of vacancy savings was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. 2. Limit of One Bonus – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to confirm that only a single bonus is offered. For example, if a sworn employee left, then would they be eligible for a second bonus upon returning in the future? 3. Need to Continue Lateral Hire Bonus Program after Reaching Full Staffing – The Council may wish to ask the Administration why providing bonuses for lateral hires is recommended to continue with ongoing funding after the Department reaches full functional staffing levels? 4. Unused ARPA Funds – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to check if there are any unused ARPA funds that were budgeted but not spent that should be recaptured and obligated for use by the federal deadline at the end of this calendar year. A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million one-time from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund) The Administration may be requesting a straw poll for this item (pending the fact sheet and updated info). In order to facilitate a faster, less disruptive, and less costly reconstruction of 2100 S from 700 E to 1100 E, the Administration proposes negotiating a market-rate loan of up to $7 million to The Thackeray Co. as the representative of several entities in the area that are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100 S. This funding would be put toward needed water and sewer upgrades in Sugarhouse and allow the City’s contractor to replace the infrastructure in conjunction with the road upgrades instead of in subsequent phases that would necessitate re-opening the road over the next several years. Release of the funds will be contingent on the City negotiating a loan agreement with the developer that would include a market-rate interest rate and adequate collateral should the development not take place for some reason. Additional information and a fact sheet will be shared with the council in the coming days. At the time of publishing this staff report the fact sheet and additional information was pending. The funding is proposed to be transferred to the Loan Fund for better tracking and so the funds don’t lapse to Fund Balance at the end of the fiscal year recognizing that more time might be needed to negotiate loan agreements. One option the Council could consider is approving the funds contingent upon later approval of the proposed loan terms. A-4: State Funding for Avenues Cemetery Road Reconstruction and Irrigation System Upgrades ($3 Million one-time State Appropriation to the CIP Fund) This budget amendment is requesting approval to receive additional $3,000,000 in State appropriated funds to be spent on the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation CIP bond project. This request will permit the Summer 2024 bidding and contracting to proceed without delays for the construction of the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation project. Funding any later than June 30 may delay bidding and contracting or add cost to the project PRJ-230007 8323213 - BD Cemetery. The project is funded by three sources: City's 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond (approx.$11,200,000); a state legislative appropriation ($3,000,000, this request); and by a private donor ($1,000,000, received through a donation agreement and budget amendment). Bond and donation amounts are combined in Row 20 of "Grant Information". The legislative appropriation can be given to the City in no fewer than two separate issuances once money is spent down (i.e., a reimbursement). However, the City needs the funds upfront to bid and award the construction contract. This funding will be reimbursed by the State once the City spends it (even partially) and reports on performance outcome measurements (likely FY 26/27). The funding allocation for the $3,000,000 from the state will not be recognized until the contract is complete, which is anticipated to happen by April 16th. The final “Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation” request for appropriation (RFA) from the legislature is also attached. The request for appropriation states that unused funding should be returned to the State at the end of FY2025 (June 30, 2025). The actual deadline will be determined in the funding agreement between the City and State which could be later. The total available funding for the Avenues City Cemetery road reconstructions and irrigation system upgrades is $15.2 million (from the bond, private donation, and state appropriation). This would significantly improve those aging assets but not fully fund the estimated need of $14.1 million for irrigation system upgrades and $20 million for road reconstructions. A-5: Traffic Signal for 2200 West and 2100 North Intersection ($450,000 one-time from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) The Administration is requesting $450,000 to add traffic signals at the 2200 W /2100 N intersection. This is currently a 2-way stop sign controlled intersection in a high growth area of the City. There is a worsening safety concern at this intersection that a traffic signal would address. Traffic at this intersection has increased faster than anticipated in recent years, and drivers turning off 2200 West onto 2100 North are finding it challenging to identify safe gaps in traffic. This has resulted in an increase in traffic accidents at this location including severe injuries. This issue is exacerbated by the relatively high speeds (45 mph) on 2100 North that makes it harder for drivers to accurately judge gaps in traffic. In past CIP discussions, the Council has expressed a willingness to fund capital projects to address legitimate and serious safety issues instead of waiting for the annual CIP process. Some Council Members have also commented that serious and urgent safety issues should not be forced to seek funding through the competitive CIP process. A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds ($47,592 one-time from Unappropriated Police Impact Fee Balance in CIP) The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not work for the police precinct. Disencumbering of these funds has resulted in the required refund of impact fees plus actual interest earned on the funds (as required by state law) due to their expiration. This refund will be funded with proceeds from unappropriated Police Impact Fees. $38,464 (principal)+ Approximate Interest $9,128 = Total $47,592. At the time of publishing this staff report, the option of using excess capacity to reimburse the General Fund for past eligible expenses was being explored. A-7: Update of the Transportation Section in the Impact Fees Facilities Plan ($29,817 rescope from last IFFP update and $30,184 from Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees) The City is in the process of updating the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) for Police, Fire and Parks. Updating the Streets IFFP at the same time will not only be cost efficient but is needed for the efficient CIP planning of Streets and Transportation. The Transportation bond is nearly complete and updating the Streets IFFP will aid Capital Asset Planning (CAP) in the preparation of the CAP 10-year Plan. One hundred percent of the cost is impact fee eligible and the scope includes Streets/Transportation Study and Preparation of the IFFP. The full request of $60,000 is to be funded by a rescope of the remaining $29,816.67 from the 2020 IFFP appropriation, with the remainder to come from unallocated Streets Impact Fees. A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement ($165,500 one-time from General Fund Balance) The Administration is requesting $165,500 to replace the rocks on the riverbank underneath the North Temple Jordan River Bridge. The project entails removing the existing rocks and replacing them with larger boulders considered uninviting for human activities. The request is framed as a reimbursement, but to date, the project is still in the permitting process and has yet to begin. In addition to discouraging unsanctioned access under the bridge, the rock replacement is anticipated to have a positive environmental impact. The Administration has worked with the State's stream alteration division to ensure that the project follows requirements to improve riverbank erosion control and will reduce scour (soil erosion around bridge supports, which threatens bridge stability). The North Temple Jordan River Bridge is currently the only location prioritized for this type of project. The rock replacement project is one of several complementary approaches to reduce illegal activities in the area. Other efforts include: a nearby trailhead parking lot closure, temporary fencing to limit access off the paved trail, targeted law enforcement and overall increased police presence - including a Mobile Control Center on the Fairgrounds parking lot and addressing limited lighting in the area (some of which is privately-owned). Policy questions: Need at other Bridges over the Jordan River – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how much this approach would cost at other bridges over the Jordan River that are also impacted by illegal activities. For example, public complaints and comments have noted campfires under bridges that caused wooden parts of the bridges to be damaged. Coordinating with the Folsom Trail – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on any impacts this project may have on the planned completion of the western portion of the Folsom Trail from 1000 West to the Jordan River. A-9: Additional Funding for 7 Days a Week Service from Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team Contract ($130,649 one-time from General Fund Balance) In the FY2024 annual budget, the Council approved a $598,000 increase to the $802,000 ongoing base budget for Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team contract. The new ongoing budget is $1.4 million. The Administration is requesting a one-time increase of $130,649 as a result of two changes that were made this fiscal year. First the Clean Team’s services were made immediately available to requests from the Police Department, and second, those services were expanded from five to seven days a week. These changes were made to reduce duplication of clean up requests, increase response times, and align the services hours with the seven days a week operating hours of the Police Department’s Camp Mitigation Squads. Without the additional funding the Mobile Clean Team would reduce services to five days a week to stay within budget. Services include cleanup of abandoned camp materials, voluntary trash removal from active encampments, and biowaste removal. The mobile clean team works with the City’s Rapid Intervention Team. Services are provided on public property except for biowaste removal which is available on private property. In limited circumstances trash removal is also provided on private property. Policy questions: 1. Clean Team Funding in the FY2025 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to evaluate whether another ongoing funding increase is needed to meet demand for the Clean Team’s Services. The Administration stated some services are seeing less demand such as the Rio Grande Clean Team and bathroom attendants. The Council may also wish to ask what is reducing demand for those services and if the need actually reduced, moved elsewhere, or perhaps there are opportunities for a more proactive cleaning approach. 2. Metrics – Would the Council like additional information about metrics for the Mobile Clean Team? A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP Holding Account ($15 Million one-time from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) The Finance Department is requesting a one-time transfer of $15 million from General Fund Balance to a CIP holding account for capital maintenance. This item is to ensure adequate fund balance levels, while also focusing on the financial need for capital maintenance across the city. The Administration is considering reconvening the CIP resident advisory board to help determine how best to use these funds in development of the FY2025 CIP budget. The funding recommendations would come to the Council for approval and release of the funds from the CIP holding account. The Council’s recent deliberations at the annual retreat, financial risks and reserves analysis briefing, and budget letter to the Mayor identified deferred maintenance as a top priority for the one-time Fund Balance tens of millions of dollars over the City’s 13% minimum target. Some specific examples include life and safety projects, energy efficiency, fleet vehicle replacements and maintenance, traffic safety infrastructure and signage, pavement maintenance, and the large 400 South bridge project. This proposal would seem to be in line with the Council’s recent retreat discussions about ways to prioritize one-time money. Policy questions: Council role - The Council may wish to confirm with the Administration that the Council will be involved in decisions about how funds are spent from this account. Prioritizing capital maintenance – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether other ongoing, underfunded City needs were considered for this transfer, and how the administration arrived at capital maintenance as a priority. The Council may wish to understand further the Administration’s definition of “capital maintenance” to better understand the types of projects this could fund. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources (None) Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position – Correction (Transfer of $14,548 from Misc. Grants Fund and $46,643 from CDBG Fund to General Fund, and $3,000 to IMS Fund) In Budget Amendment #3 of this fiscal year, budget was added to CDBG and Miscellaneous Grants funds for a Grants- related position within the Finance department. However, there was a miscommunication, and the budget should not have been added to CDBG and Misc. Grants. Both of those fund classes already have the maximum amount of budget added for personnel at the beginning of each fiscal year. What should have happened is the budget and FTE should have been added within the Finance department as a general fund funded FTE. The expenditures for this position would be periodically reimbursed by the CDBG and Misc Grant funds after a time-tracking report is submitted justifying a reimbursement. D-2: Recognizing Overtime Revenue in Budget ($1,736,505 from General Fund) The Police Department is requesting a budget appropriation for overtime that has associated revenues from special events, overtime staffing, contracts and task force reimbursements. The amount being requested is based on what has been received through February conservatively projected through the remainder of the fiscal year. D-3: Relocate CAN CRAG Funds ($100,000 from General Fund) On March 19, 2024, during their review of the annual HUD grant awards for FY 2025, Council asked the administration to evaluate other existing City rental assistance funding sources and return to the Council with options in relation to a funding gap for Housing Connect's HUD HOPWA program. This item provides recommendations and potential adjustments to reallocate the unused CAN CRAG funds to address Housing Connect's funding gap, and to fund another HUD applicant that was ineligible for FY 2025 HUD funds. - Housing Connect/The Housing Authority of Salt Lake County, HOPWA Program: $27,800 - Neighborhood House, Early Childhood Education Program: $72,200 Both recommendations are eligible activities per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee: Eviction Assistance & Rent Relief and Expanded Educational Opportunities. Note: Per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee, all CAN CRAG funds need to be spent by December 31, 2024. D-4: HOME Dormant Income Transfer (Transfers $3,463,696 from Housing Fund to Misc. Grants Fund) This housekeeping item moves the remaining HUD HOME dormant program income in the amount of $3,463,696.23 to the correct fund. Budget is currently posted to the Housing fund. Due to federal grant tracking purposes, as well as Finance wanting like to consolidate all grants in the grant fund, the department is requesting to move the HOME dormant program funds to the grant fund. This budget amendment would move existing budget/funds and will have a zero-sum budgetary impact. D-5: Housing Authority Payment In Lieu Of Taxes or PILOT Check ($40,000 one-time to and from the General Fund; revenue in and equivalent expenditure out) The Administration requested a straw poll for this item to facilitate affordable housing rental assistance The expenditure budget in the Non-Departmental Housing cost center currently sits at $85,000 while a total of $125,000 in expenditures is expected. This amendment will increase the budget to the appropriate level. D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment ($21,933,876 from Airport Fund) The Airport initially budgeted $121,528,000 in interest expense based on the gross amount rather than the net value. The actual forecast amount of interest expense is $142,900,000. This will adjust the Airport’s interest expense budget to match interest in our debt service schedules rather than net debt service (interest less capitalized interest). This amendment will budget the $21,933,876 difference from the Airport fund. D-7: Open Streets 2024 at TBD Location and Times ($250,288 rescope of unused funds from prior year Downtown Open Main Street events) The Economic Development Department has identified a total of $250,288 available to be rescoped for Open Streets events this year. The location, dates, and times are TBD. The Department stated that a different business district would be selected outside of downtown and the events would likely be held in the fall. The events would be smaller than the downtown Open Main Street events of the past three years and have a lower total cost. The Department anticipates no additional funding will be needed. There are three sources for the funding from the past two fiscal years of Open Main Street events: - $57,000 remaining from $500,000 approved in Budget Amendment #5 of FY 2023 for the 2023 Open Streets program - $69,128 remaining following the completion of the Open Streets 2023 event - $124,159.60 remaining from the $250,000 approved in Budget Amendment #1 of FY 2024 Policy Questions: Plans and Total Budget Need for Summer or Fall 2024 Open Streets – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on plans and total estimated budget needed to operate Open Streets at a new TBD location. In prior years, the summer events would be run for 15 weeks from Memorial Day to Labor Day, on Main Street from South Temple to 400 South, and from Noon to 2am on Fridays and Saturdays. Prior year events had significantly higher costs than $250,000 (double that amount). Summer vs Fall Timing for Open Streets – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the pros and cons of holding open streets events in the summer vs the fall. Public feedback from prior years suggested some businesses and attendees preferred summer events over fall events because of the warmer weather such as more comfortable outdoor dining arrangements, and the coordination with the greater number of special events happening at the same time which bring more people (attendees and performers) to the area. Final Report of Pedestrianizing Main Street Downtown – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on when the final report will be available about options and recommendations to permanently pedestrianize parts of Main Street from South Temple to 400 South. The study website is www.mainslc.com Rotating Locations – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether Open Streets events could be rotated around the city at different business districts. D-8: Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up ($3,675, 752 from General Fund – One-time) In late March, staff received an updated memo from the Salt Lake County Auditor. After receiving this memo (Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act”) staff are increasing the revenues and expenses by $3,675,752 accordingly to account for the final annual distribution. The corresponding memo is attached for additional detail. Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources (None) Section F: Donations (None) Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 4 G-1: Department of Environmental Quality – State of Utah – Service Line Inventory ($100,000 from Misc. Grants Fund) Department of Public Utilities (DPU) received $100,000 to conduct a service line inventory and produce a lead service line replacement (LSLR) plan for an estimated 13,894 water line connections in qualifying disadvantage census blocks meeting the Hardship Funding Criteria of Utah Department of Environmental Quality. On December 16, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adopted the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) Act that went into effect on January 16, 2021, and has a compliance date of October 16, 2024. DPU must complete a service line inventory that includes publicly owned and customer-owned portions of the service line and develop a lead service line replacement plan between 2023 and the LCRR compliance date. A public hearing was held May 16, 2023. Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 5 G-1: Safe Streets For All ($953,600 from Misc. Grants Fund) The Office of the Mayor requested $953,600 for the TravelWell Schools demonstration project on behalf of the nonprofit Children’s Media Workshop. The project tests and refines a multi-media and digital mapping tool augmented with an educational campaign to deliver multi-disciplinary messaging aligned with the Safe System Approach targeting underserved populations, citizen behavioral activities, and community engagement and empowerment. The anticipated outcome is transformational change through real-time identification of travel behaviors, problems, and solutions resulting in zero deaths on Salt Lake City roadways. Children’s Media Workshop and Mapps Lab LLC developed the TravelWell Schools digital mapping tool that the project will test on a small-scale to gauge effectiveness and assess for inclusion in the Safe Streets for All Action Plan under development by Wasatch Front Regional Council. Children’s Media Workshop has committed to providing the full $238,400 worth in non-federal match, which is often required for grants. This amount is strictly for the City’s grant match; however, it will not pass through or need to be budgeted for by the City. A public hearing was held November 7, 2023. G-2: Marathon Petroleum – Drone Funding ($4,532 from Misc. Grants Fund) Funding will provide for the purchase of a drone to train first responders and prepare for an emergency response. The public hearing was held January 16, 2024. G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Grant ($600,068 from Misc. Grants Fund) This funding is for the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force. This contract is for salaries and fringe for existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. Other expenses: travel, K9 contracts, supplies, equipment and other administrative costs. The public hearing was held March 5, 2024. G-4: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant ($9,280 from Misc. Grants Fund) The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. The public hearing was held June 6, 2023. Section I: Council-Added Items (None) ATTACHMENTS 1. Potential New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments (Chart) ACRONYMS ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit ANAB – ANSI National Accreditation Board CAN – Department of Community and Neighborhoods CDBG – Community Development Block Grant CIP – Capital Improvement Program Fund CRAG – Community Recover Assistance Grants DNR – Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands DPU – Department of Public Utilities FTE – Full Time Employee FY – Fiscal Year FOF – Funding Our Future GF – General Fund HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids HUD – Department of Housing & Urban Development IFFP – Impact Fee Facilities Plan IMS – Information Management Services Misc. – Miscellaneous RDA – Redevelopment Agency RFA – Request For Appropriation RFP – Request For Proposal SAA – Special Assessment Area UBFS – Utah Bureau of Forensic Services ATTACHMENT 1 Council Request: Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Note that some items in the table below are partially or fully funded by grants. If a grant continues to be awarded to the City in future years, then there may not be a cost to the General Fund but grant funding is not guaranteed year-over-year. Budget Amendment Item Potential Cost to FY2025 Annual Budget Full Time Employee (FTEs)Notes #2 Item A-1: Homeless General Fund Reallocation Cost Share for State Homeless Mitigation Grant $53,544 0.5 FTE Community Development Grant Specialist for Homelessness Engagement and Response Team (HEART) This position is proposed to be half funded from the State Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant and half by the General Fund for FY2024. The $107,088 reflects the fully loaded annual cost for the FTE. #2 Item A-5: Create a Public Lands Planning & Design Division $12,113 Reclassify an existing FTE to a higher pay grade and director of new division. Request position be appointed in a future budget opening. Transfer all four (4) full-time landscape architect positions and associated operating budget ($543,144) from the Engineering Division (Public Services Department) to this new division in the Public Lands Department. Returned as item D-1 in Budget Amendment #4 #2 A-6 Sorenson Janitorial and County Contract - Senior Community Programs Manager Budget Neutral (see note to the right) 1 Senior Community Programs Manager This item requires amending an existing interlocal agreement with the County. At the time of publishing this report, staff is checking whether the amendment could result in additional funding needs to maintain current levels of service. The item might not be budget neutral depending on the agreement changes. #2 A-7: Economic Development Project Manager Position $122,000 1 Economic Development Project Manager Would be focused on the creation of Special Assessment Areas or SAAs for business districts and renewal every three to five years. #2 A-9: Know Your Neighbor Program Expenses $6,500 Program expenses were inadvertently left out of the last annual budget #2 A-10: Love Your Block Program Expenses $55,750 Program expenses were inadvertently left out of the last annual budget Budget Amendment Item Potential Cost to FY2025 Annual Budget Full Time Employee (FTEs)Notes #2 Item E-3: Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Award $3,107,201 13 Existing FTEs: - 2 Police sergeants - 10 police officers - 1 Business & community liaison 4.5 New FTEs: - 1 Sequential Intercept Case Manager in the Justice Court - 0.5 Grant Specialist in CAN (half grant funded and half by the General Fund in item above) - 1 Police sergeant - 2 police officers Admin expects to apply for grant funding annually to cover these costs. General Fund would not need to cover costs if the State grant is awarded to the City to fully cover the costs. Note: Justice Court FTE is part of the City’s contribution towards implementation of the “Miami Model” of diversion out of the homelessness system. #2 G-1: Greater Salt Lake Area Clean Energy and Air Roadmap Coordinator Position $482,915 (funding is to cover four years of new FTE) 1 Coordinator Four years of salary and benefits. The position would be responsible for facilitating the sustained involvement of jurisdiction partners, managing consultants, assisting with community engagement, coordinating stakeholder and public engagement activities and presentations, and tracking task completion and achievement. #3 A-1: Fire Department (4 New FTEs)$292,638 4 New Medical Response Paramedic FTEs Annual cost; this assumes the Fire Department requests two new entry level firefighters to replace the two that were converted into civilian paramedics #3 A-4 City Attorney’s Office Legislative Division (4 New FTEs)$594,441 Legislative Affairs Director (E34) • Senior City Attorney (E39) • Special Projects Analyst (E26) • Administrative Assistant (N21) Focus on legislative affairs, with special emphasis on the legislative session Annual cost #3 A-9: Adding Multimodal Specialized Road Markings Maintenance Funding into the Streets Division’s Base Budget $200,000 #3 A-10: Downtown Parking Pay Station Replacements $271,985 Would be paid annually over six fiscal years from FY2025 – FY2030. The Council left Budget Amendment #3 open to consider this item later #4 A-2: Short-term Rental $49,000 Budget Amendment Item Potential Cost to FY2025 Annual Budget Full Time Employee (FTEs)Notes Identification Software #4 A-4: Liberty Park Greenhouses $62,500 #4 A-7: Increase Fleet Maintenance Capacity $312,585 3 New Mechanics 3 new FTE mechanics, education/training, software/hardware, maintenance from outside vendor. Request to finish this fiscal year is $399,909. #4 A-8: Police Officer Overtime $1,829,000 This item would double the annual line item for police officer overtime #5 A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention Ongoing amount of $264,500 #3 & #5 D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position - Correction $116,382 1 FTE Budget was mistakenly added to CDBG and Misc Grants. The General Fund will front the cost for the FTE and later the grants will reimburse the General Fund for eligible expenses TOTALS $7,568,554 33 FTEs of which 20 are New ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer Date Received: 04/23/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 04/23/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 23, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal SPONSOR:NA STAFF CONTACT: Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $12,456,948.96 $39,800,222.69 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 21,933,876.00 CIP FUND 32,393,500.96 17,546,276.29 IMS FUND 3,000.00 3,000.00 CDBG FUND 0.00 (46,643.00) MISC GRANTS FUND 1,697,480.10 5,146,628.33 TOTAL $46,550,930.02 $84,383,360.31 Gregory Cleary Gregory Cleary (Apr 23, 2024 15:16 MDT) April Patterson April Patterson (Apr 23, 2024 15:20 MDT) DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 rachel otto (Apr 23, 2024 15:24 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024. FY23-24 Amended Amended Variance Revenue FY23-FY24 Annual Budget Budget New Projection Favorable/(Unfavorable) Property Taxes 131,752,713 131,752,713 131,752,713 0 Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 114,465,900 (2,663,100) Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 13,273,330 925,203 Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 259,491,943 (1,737,897) Charges For Services 4,745,443 4,745,443 5,938,036 1,192,593 Fines & Forfeitures 2,561,547 2,571,547 2,607,446 35,899 Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0 Interfund Service Charges 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,041,511 (89,702) Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,159,621 25,000 Licenses 18,434,301 18,434,301 18,438,665 4,364 Miscellaneous Revenue 2,958,012 2,948,012 2,966,118 18,106 Parking Meter Revenue 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 0 Parking Tickets 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,499,955 (45) Permits 22,445,026 22,445,026 22,487,608 42,582 Property Sale Proceeds ---0 Rental & Other Income 681,604 681,604 1,101,203 419,599 Gain on Property Dispositions ---0 Operating Transfers In 9,938,944 10,130,410 10,130,410 0 Total W/O Special Tax 105,331,800 105,523,266 107,171,662 1,648,396 Sales Tax Addition 1/2%49,084,479 49,084,479 52,800,000 3,715,521 Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,837,585 419,463,605 3,626,020 To date, revenues are trending slightly above initial budget. At this time, Finance staff are projecting revenues to remaining consistent with current estimates for the remainder of FY 2024. Modifications have been made primarily to Sales Tax, resulting in a decrease of approximately $2.6 million, while an increase in revenue is projected in the Sales Tax Additional ½ % by an estimated $3.7 million. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #5. Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2023 Budget Projected FY2024 Budget FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 24,825,461 178,695,454 202,575,741 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608)(20,736,262)(22,836,870)(3,657,641)(29,211,158)(32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300)(17,260,909)(20,423,209)(2,592,884)(18,663,765)(21,157,931) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 18,574,936 130,820,531 148,549,011 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 22.79%25.00%24.85%35.49%33.36%33.42% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes ------ Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.)(2,257,746)(2,257,746)(2,484,423)(2,484,423) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 101,473,105 114,605,857 18,574,936 128,336,108 146,064,588 Final Fund Balance Percent 22.79%24.46%24.37%35.49%32.72%32.86% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment -(475,000)(475,000)--- BA#1 Expense Adjustment ---(204,200)(204,200) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment ------ BA#2 Expense Adjustment ----763,950 763,950 BA#3 Revenue Adjustment -6,000,000 6,000,000 --- BA#3 Expense Adjustment -(6,538,000)(6,538,000)-(1,434,220)(1,434,220) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment -194,600 194,600 --- BA#4 Expense Adjustment -(7,584,328)(7,584,328)-(2,890,480)(2,890,480) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment -----12,456,949 BA#5 Expense Adjustment -(5,940,349)(5,940,349)--(39,800,223) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment -19,120,198 19,120,198 --- BA#6 Expense Adjustment -(11,719,731)(12,219,731)-- Change in Revenue ---- Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase -------- Adjusted Fund Balance 21,928,113 157,840,137 178,933,386 18,574,936 124,571,157 114,956,364 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 38.05%38.05%38.05%35.49%31.76%25.86% Projected Revenue 57,634,742 414,859,025 470,299,454 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will adjust to 25.86 percent of the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $46,550,930.02 in revenue and $84,383,360.31 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in six (6) funds, with no change to FTEs in the city. The proposal includes ten (10) initiatives for Council review and additional housekeeping and grant related items. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Administration Proposed Council Approved Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Expenditure Revenue Amount Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Section A: New Items 1 Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases GF -133,250.00 One-time - 2 Police Recruitment and Retention GF -1,423,875.00 One-time - 3 2100 South Infrastructure GF -7,000,000.00 One-time - 3 2100 South Infrastructure CIP 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 One-time - 4 State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation GF -3,000,000.00 One-time - 4 State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation CIP 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 One-time - 5 Traffic Signal Improvement - 2200W/2100 N GF -450,000.00 One-time - 5 Traffic Signal Improvement - 2200W/2100 N CIP 450,000.00 450,000.00 One-time - 6 Police Impact Fee Refunds CIP -47,592.00 One-time - 7 Update of the Streets IFFP CIP -(29,816.67)One-time - 7 Update of the Streets IFFP CIP -29,816.67 One-time - 7 Update of the Streets IFFP CIP -30,183.33 One-time - 8 North Temple Jordan River Bridge - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement GF -205,500.00 One-time - 9 Salt Lake City Public Cleaning Contract GF -130,648.73 One-time - 10 Fund Balance Allocation to CIP GF 15,000,000.00 One-time 10 Fund Balance Allocation to CIP CIP 15,000,000.00 -One-time Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -GF Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -GF Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -IMS Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -CDBG Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -Misc Grants Correction 2 Recognize Overtime Revenue in Budget GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Rape Recovery Center)GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Housing Connect)GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Neighborhood House)GF 4 HOME Dormant Income Housing 4 HOME Dormant Income Housing 4 HOME Dormant Income Misc Grants 5 Housing Authority PILOT Check GF 6 Airport Interest Budget Adjustment Airport 7 Open Streets Funding Rescope GF 8 Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up GF 9 Streets Impact Fee Excess Capacity Reimbursement GF and Funding Source Change 9 Streets Impact Fee Excess Capacity Reimbursement CIP and Funding Source Change 61,191.00 - 3,000.00 - - 1,736,505.00 - - - - - - 40,000.00 - - 3,675,752.00 6,943,500.96 6,943,500.96 58,191.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 (46,643.00) (14,548.00) 1,736,505.00 (100,000.00) 27,800.00 72,200.00 (3,463,696.23) 3,463,696.23 3,463,696.23 40,000.00 21,933,876.00 - 3,675,752.00 6,943,500.96 7,018,500.96 Ongoing One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time 1.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Utah DNR, Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands Grant Misc Grants 30,000.00 30,000.00 One-time - Section F: Donations - Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda #4 1 Department of Environmental Quality - State of Utah Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time - Consent Agenda #5 1 2 3 4 Safe Streets for All Marathon Petroleum Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Misc Grants Misc Grants Misc Grants Misc Grants 953,600.00 4,532.10 600,068.00 9,280.00 953,600.00 4,532.10 600,068.00 9,280.00 One Time One Time One Time One Time - - - - Section I: Council Added Items Total of Budget Amendment Items 46,550,930.02 84,383,360.31 --1.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved 27,343,273.73 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Expenditure Revenue Amount Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #4: General Fund GF 12,456,948.96 39,800,222.69 --1.00 Airport Fund Airport -21,933,876.00 --- CIP Fund CIP 32,393,500.96 17,546,276.29 --- IMS Fund IMS 3,000.00 3,000.00 --- CDBG Fund CDBG -(46,643.00)--- Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 1,697,480.10 5,146,628.33 --- Total of Budget Amendment 46,550,930.02 84,383,360.31 --1.00 - - 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments Revenue FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget - Revenue BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,918 0.00 0.00 0.00 130,275.00 12,456,948.96 461,102,141.96 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 -0.00 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)4,681,185 4,681,185.00 Water Fund (FC 51)176,637,288 176,637,288.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)289,941,178 289,941,178.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,865,892 19,865,892.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)403,513,000 403,513,000.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)25,240,459 230,000.00 25,470,459.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)12,710,067 12,710,067.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,925,000 -3,925,000.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,108,969 36,800.00 975,177.00 732,909.00 33,853,855.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)36,254,357 9,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00 9,000.00 3,000.00 36,293,357.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 -5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 1,705,700.79 7,349,950.66 1,697,480.10 35,870,471.55 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 62,416.00 462,416.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)14,659,043 14,659,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)32,341,586 1,100,000.00 33,441,586.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)30,199,756 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 410,177.00 1,415,400.00 32,393,500.96 90,122,727.21 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,888,581 3,888,581.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)60,932,137 60,932,137.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 263,800.00 41,751,732.25 3,103,054.79 10,967,534.66 46,550,930.02 1,726,268,502.72 3 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Expenditure FY 2023-24 Adopted Budgetg - Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10)448,514,918 204,200.00 (763,950.00)1,730,731.89 2,890,480.00 39,800,222.69 492,376,602.58 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 664,293.70 2,364,293.70 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,119 6,044,119.00 Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 21,933,876.00 542,372,873.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 230,000.00 28,493,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 165,793.00 3,966,178.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 14,461,793.00 975,177.00 732,909.00 48,668,629.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 9,000.00 6,000.00 4,531,083.00 406,688.00 3,000.00 43,657,942.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 (205,177.00)1,100,000.00 10,594,823.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 46,642.50 (46,643.00)5,597,762.50 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 2,234,473.29 7,349,950.66 5,146,628.33 39,848,392.28 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 65,472.00 465,472.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 6,133,511.00 16,345,554.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 5,777,784.00 1,100,000.00 41,772,763.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 1,545,675.00 17,546,276.29 74,504,130.54 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 41,655,131.95 15,090,714.68 21,655,006.66 84,383,360.31 1,946,591,215.60 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 4 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Section A: New Items A-1: Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases – Fire Hydrant Rentals GF One-time $133,250.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For questions, please include Clint Rasmussen and Chief Karl Lieb Public Utilities has increased the rates the Fire Department and other municipalities must pay for fire hydrant rentals. This increase was overlooked during the annual budget creation cycle. Unfortunately, this adjustment cannot wait or be absorbed in the existing budget because of the size of the increase. Utilizing existing department funds to cover the increase would potentially delay or jeopardize public safety services. The request is for $133,250 to account for the increased expense. As part of the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget, staff will factor in new rates and associated expenses. At this time, the difference between the two required payments is $133,250 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 (One-Time). Public Utilities Costs (FY2023-24) Hydrant Rentals $9,000 per month, or $108,000 annually Public Utilities Costs (FY2024-25) - Ongoing Hydrant Rentals $20,104.18 per month, or $241,250 annually A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention GF One-time $1,423,875.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Laura Nygaard and Chief Brown In Fiscal Year 2023 the Police Department proposed a multifaceted approach to improving staffing while utilizing overtime to provide and maintain operational readiness, employing a proposed lateral hiring bonus and a retention bonus for current employees. The hiring bonus would provide additional sworn lateral staffing as a compliment to the new hire recruit classes and allow the department to bolster the staffing numbers on an accelerated timeline. Providing a retention bonus to existing sworn employees has provided incentives to retain staff at a higher level than is currently being experienced, while also providing a commitment from the city to the sworn staffing to maintain their pay at a level commensurate with their jobs and surrounding agencies. In March of 2023 the police department had 34 funded vacancies and 2 pending vacancies as well as the 20 unfunded positions. The department currently has a hiring class in May of 20 officers and 10 lateral applicants. It’s estimated that those applicants will fill all funded officer positions as well as hiring 3 officers into unfunded positions by the end of the fiscal year. An ongoing amount of $264,500 is being requested to continue lateral hiring retention bonuses in order to maintain necessary staffing levels. A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure GF One-time $7,000,000.00 CIP One-time $7,000,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Rachel Otto For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, and Jill Love The Administration proposes moving $7M from General Fund Fund Balance to CIP to perform water and sewer upgrades as part of the street reconstruction project on 2100 S from 700 E to 1100 E. Funding this work would be an investment of City funds that would be reimbursed by property owners when developing the benefitted properties, with reimbursement agreements required as a condition of tying into the new infrastructure. This proposal is intended to provide a substantial public benefit, as the City would be 1 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount performing the street reconstruction and the public utilities upgrades in tandem and avoiding the need to re- open new streets for additional street construction in the next few years, and all the associated disruptions and costs that would entail. A-4: State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation GF One-time $3,000,0000 CIP One-time $3,000,000 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Kristin Riker For questions, please include Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Amy Dorsey, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Mary Beth Thompson This budget amendment is requesting approval to receive additional $3,000,000 in State appropriated funds to be spent on the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation CIP bond project. This request will permit the Summer 2024 bidding and contracting to proceed without delays for the construction of the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation project. Funding any later than June 30 may delay bidding and contracting or add cost to the project PRJ-230007 8323213 - BD Cemetery. The project is funded by three sources: City's 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond (approx.$11,200,000); a state legislative appropriation ($3,000,000, this request); and by a private donor ($1,000,000, received through a donation agreement and budget amendment). Bond and donation amounts are combined in Row 20 of "Grant Information". The legislative appropriation can be given to the City in no fewer than two separate issuances once money is spent down (i.e., a reimbursement). However, the City needs the funds upfront to bid and award the construction contract. This funding will be reimbursed by the State once the City spends it (even partially) and reports on performance outcome measurements (likely FY 26/27). The funding allocation for the $3,000,000 from the state will not be recognized until the contract is complete, which is anticipated to happen by April 16th. The final “Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation” request for appropriation (RFA) from the legislature is also attached. A-5: Traffic Signal Improvement – 2200 W / 2100 N GF One-time $450,000.00 CIP One-time $450,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Jon Larsen For questions, please include Jon Larsen, Blake Thomas and Brent Beck $450,000 is being requested for a new traffic signal at the 2200 W /2100 N intersection. This is currently a 2-way stop controlled intersection in a high growth area of the City. There is a growing safety concern at this intersection that a traffic signal would address. Traffic at this intersection has increased dramatically in recent years, and drivers turning off 2200 West onto 2100 North are finding it challenging to find safe gaps in traffic. This has resulted in an increase in traffic accidents at this location. This issue is exacerbated by the relatively high speeds on 2100 North, making it harder to judge gaps in traffic, making crashes more severe. A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds CIP One-time $47,592.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith and Mary Beth Thompson The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not work to be used for the police precinct. The ensuing disencumbrance of these funds has resulted in the required refund of 2 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount impact fees plus actual interest earned on the funds due to their expirationThis refund will be funded with proceeds from unappropriated Police Impact Fees. $38,464 (principal)+ Approximate Interest $9,128 = Total $47,592. A-7: Update of the Streets IFFP CIP One-time ($29,816.67) CIP One-time $29,816.67 CIP One-time $30,183.33 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson / Jordan Smith For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith and Mary Beth Thompson The city is in the process of updating the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) for Police, Fire and Parks. Updating the Streets IFFP at the same time will not only be cost efficient but is needed for the efficient CIP planning of Streets and Transportation. The Transportation bond is nearly complete and updating the Streets IFFP will aid Capital Asset Planning (CAP) in the preparation of the CAP 10-year Plan. One hundred percent of the cost is impact fee eligible and the scope includes Streets/Transportation Study and Preparation of the IFFP. The full request of $60,000 is to be funded by a rescope of the remaining $29,816.67 from the 2020 IFFP appropriation, with the remainder to come from unallocated Streets Impact Fees. A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge – Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement GF One-time $205,500.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Andrew Johnston / Mark Stephens For questions, please include Andrew Johnston and Mark Stephens SLC Engineering has been working with the SLC PD, HEART, and the Mayor’s Office to find an intervention to decrease the use of the riverbanks underneath the bridge to use and deal drugs and avoid law enforcement. They have a plan to work with the State and replace the current rocks lining the banks on both sides, underneath the bridge with more deterrent rocks and landscaping to deter use of that location. Due to the limited window of time in the winter to do the work, the mayor’s office has been pulling together existing funds from departments and this budget amendment allocation would mostly function to reimburse those funds. The $205,500 would be to remove silt and existing rocks that allow for the unsheltered population to congregate and camp under the bridge, and to replace with larger rocks/boulders of size and type that are ‘uninviting’ and greatly deter the activities that are currently taking place. This new rock and grading would extend 50 feet out from the edge of the bridge in both directions to assist in further deterrence and erosion control. This is something that is an industry standard for communities across the nation encountering challenges with the unsheltered population under bridges. By excavating down and putting back these new rocks/boulders, the existing cross section of the river and hydraulic capacity remain the same and won’t require extensive hydraulic studies to ensure the hydraulic capacity is not decreased. This has been discussed with the State stream alteration division staff and they are in concurrence with the approach and don’t see any major difficulties getting the permit reviewed and approved. What this also serves as is erosion control on the banks of the Jordan River as well as eliminating scour around the bridge supports. This effort would check a few other boxes in addition to the deterrence of unfavorable activities by the unsheltered population in, under, and around the N. Temple Bridge over the Jordan River. UDOT, as part of their bridge inspections every other year (on even numbered years) measures and monitors scour so this would be an additional measure that would also be beneficial for the bridge structure itself.” A-9: Salt Lake City Public Cleaning Contract GF One-time $130,648.73 Department: CAN Prepared By: Andrew Johnston For questions, please include Andrew Johnston SLC Homeless Engagement and Response Team administers a contract with Advantage Services (AS), a private non- profit, to provide cleaning of public streets, sidewalks and other locations, mostly in response to unsheltered homelessness. Their work includes power washing of hardscapes, cleaning of biowaste, trash pickup, coordinating with 3 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Police when they are enforcing no camping situations, and working with SL County and on Encampment Impact Mitigations and City Rapid Intervention Team on other cleanings. This fiscal year, a change that was made to the services that Advantage provides the city was to offer the police department immediate access to Clean Team services. Dedicated AS workers now accompany PD's Camp Mitigation squad as they respond to camp locations throughout the city. This change was made because the HEART team was processing an unusually high number of clean-up requests coming from the police department via SLC Mobile. PD would have camps move or would come across an abandoned camp while on patrol and would submit a cleanup request to HEART via the app, creating a duplication of efforts and delay in cleaning time that was remedied quickly by this change. Several months ago, PD requested that AS’s services be expanded to provide 7-day coverage from 5 days, to match the Camp Mitigation squads 7-day coverage. This is a key factor in the rate of spend down outpacing the awarded budget. Without additional funds, AS will need to decrease the frequency of this work from 7 to 4-5 days/week, among other potential changes to their service delivery model. In lieu of reducing service, the total amount is being requested to ensure the current level of services will continue through the end of June. A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP (One Time) GF $15,000,000 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Greg Cleary The Finance Department is requesting the transfer of $15 million from general fund fund balance to CIP to address capital maintenance. This item is to ensure adequate fund balance levels, while also focusing on the financial need for capital maintenance across the city, as outlined in the City Council and Mayoral goals. As the FY 2025 Capital Plan is developed, staff will return to the City Council with proposed projects and/or funding uses: for authorization of the funds. At this time, no direct expense is identified. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position - Correction GF Ongoing $58,191.00 GF One-time $3,000.00 IMS One-time $3,000.00 CDBG One-time ($46,643.00) Misc Grants One-time ($14,548.00) Department: Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Randy Hillier, Greg Cleary and Mary Beth Thompson In Budget Amendment #3 of this fiscal year, budget was added to CDBG and Miscellaneous Grants funds for a Grants related position within the Finance department. However, there was a miscommunication, and the budget should not have been added to CDBG and Misc Grants. Both of those fund classes already have the maximum amount of budget added for personnel at the beginning of each fiscal year. What should have happened is the budget and FTE should have been added within the Finance department as a general fund funded FTE. The expenditures for this position would be periodically reimbursed by the CDBG and Misc Grant funds after a time-tracking report is submitted justifying a reimbursement. 4 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A$3,000 amount has also been included to cover the cost of the position’s technology related needs. D-2: Recognizing Overtime Revenue in Budget GF One-time $1,736,505.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Laura Nygaard and Chief Brown The Police Department is requesting a budget appropriation for overtime that has associated revenues from special events, overtime staffing, contracts and task force reimbursements. The amount being requested is based on what has been received through February conservatively projected through the remainder of the fiscal year. D-3: Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds GF One-time ($100,000.00) GF One-time $27,800.00 GF One-time $72,200.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Blake Thomas On March 19, 2024, during their review of the annual HUD grant awards for FY 2025, Council asked the administration to evaluate other existing City rental assistance funding sources and return to the Council with options in relation to a funding gap for Housing Connect's HUD HOPWA program. This item provides recommendations and potential adjustments to reallocate the unused CAN CRAG funds to address Housing Connect's funding gap, and to fund another HUD applicant that was ineligible for FY 2025 HUD funds. -Housing Connect/The Housing Authority of Salt Lake County, HOPWA Program: $27,800 -Neighborhood House, Early Childhood Education Program: $72,200 Both recommendations are eligible activities per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee: Eviction Assistance & Rent Relief and Expanded Educational Opportunities. Note: Per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee, all CAN CRAG funds need to be spent by December 31, 2024. D-4: HOME Dormant Income Housing One-time ($3,463,696.23) Housing One-time $3,463,696.23 Misc Grants One-time $3,463,696.23 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Suzanne Swanson This housekeeping item moves the remaining HUD HOME dormant program income in the amount of $3,463,696.23 to the correct fund. Budget is currently posted to the Housing fund. Due to federal grant tracking purposes, as well as Finance wanting like to consolidate all grants in the grant fund, the department is requesting to move the HOME dormant program funds to the grant fund. This budget amendment would move existing budget/funds and will have a zero-sum budgetary impact. D-5: Housing Authority PILOT Check GF One-time $40,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Suzanne Swanson For question, please contact Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Suzanne Swanson 5 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount The expenditure budget in the Non-Departmental Housing cost center currently sits at $85,000 while a total of $125,000 in expenditures is expected. This amendment will increase the budget to the appropriate level. D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment Airport One-time $21,933,876.00 Department: Airport Prepared by: Shaun Anderson For questions, please include Brian Butler, Shaun Anderson and Lorin Rollins The Airport initially budgeted $121,528,000 in interest expense based on the gross amount rather than the net value. The actual forecast amount of interest expense is $142,900,000. This will adjust the Airport’s interest expense budget to match interest in our debt service schedules rather than net debt service (interest less capitalized interest). This amendment will budget the $21,933,876 difference from the Airport fund. D-7: Open Streets Funding Rescope GF One-time $0.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Lorena Riffo-Jenson For questions, please include Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt and Jacob Maxwell The Department of Economic Development is requesting a rescope of funds totaling $250,287.60 to extend the Open Streets effort into the 2024 season. This amount will be derived from three sources; The first is $57,000 remaining from $500,000 allocated in budget amendment #5 of FY 2023, which was meant for the 2023 Open Streets program. This $57,000 was remaining after the City contracted with the Salt Lake City Downtown Alliance for Open Street 2023. The second source of funding is the $69,128 that remains following the completion of the Open Streets 2023 event. The third source of funds is $124,159.60 that remains from the $250,000 budgeted in budget amendment #1 of FY 2024. The $250,000 budgeted in BA #1 was to cover costs related to the Open Streets 2023 effort. Open Streets will happen in a different business district in Salt Lake City for 2024. D-8: Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up GF One-time $3,675,752.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt / Greg Cleary For questions, please contact Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary, and Danny Walz In late March, staff received an updated memo from the Salt Lake County Auditor. After receiving this memo (Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act”) staff are increasing the Revenues and Expenses by $3,675,752 accordingly to account for the final annual distribution. The corresponding memo is attached for additional detail. D-9: Streets Impact Fee Excess Capacity Reimbursement and Funding Source Change GF One-time $6,943,500.96 CIP One-time $7,018,500.96 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Rachel Molinari, Jordan Smith and Mary Beth Thompson This is a request for Excees Capacity Reimbursement to be paid out of Streets Impact Fees to the General Fund in the amount of $6,943,500.96. We are also requesting to transfer these funds to Streets impact Fee to change the funding source of existing CIP project appropriations from Streets Impact funded to General Fund funded CIP Projects. These changes will allow the City to comply with the Impact Fee Act, the Impact Fee Facilities Plan and to more efficiently 6 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount utilize restrictive funding sources. The result of the eligibility of these funds has been the need to refund $58,826 plus interest of ~ $16,174 from Streets Impact Fee Funds. Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources E-1: Utah DNR, Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands Grant Misc Grants $30,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Tyler Fonarow For questions, please include Tyler Fonarow, Aaron Price, Gregg Evans, Tyler Murdock The Utah Department of Natural Resources; Division of Foresetry, Fire& State Lands has rewarded the City with a grant for the Jordan River Water Trail Tree & Debris Removal project, which consists of the removal of certain trees and other organic matter and debris waste from the Jordan River Water Trail corridor to enhance safe and accessible non- motorized watercraft navigation while minimizing bank erosion and strengthening bank stability. This grant was not acquired through an application but an offer of $30,000 communicated via email as it supported a previously funded project that requires ongoing maintenance. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #4 G-1: Department of Environmental Quality – State of Utah Misc Grants $100,000.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Holly Lopez Department of Public Utilities (DPU) received $100,000 to conduct a service line inventory and produce a lead service line replacement (LSLR) plan for an estimated 13,894 water line connections in qualifying disadvantage census blocks meeting the Hardship Funding Criteria of Utah Department of Environmental Quality. On December 16, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adopted the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) Act that went into effect on January 16, 2021, and has a compliance date of October 16, 2024. DPU must complete a service line inventory that includes publicly owned and customer-owned portions of the service line and develop a lead service line replacement plan between 2023 and the LCRR compliance date. A public hearing was held on May 16, 2023. Consent Agenda #5 G-1: Safe Streets for All Misc Grants $953,600.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Joe Taylor / Jennifer Newell The Office of the Mayor requested $953,600 for the TravelWell Schools demonstration project on behalf of the non- profit Children’s Media Workshop. The project tests and refines a multi-media and digital mapping tool augmented with an educational campaign to deliver multi-disciplinary messaging aligned with the Safe System Approach targeting underserved populations, citizen behavioral activities, and community engagement and empowerment. The anticipated outcome is transformational change through real-time identification of travel behaviors, problems, and solutions resulting in zero deaths on Salt Lake City roadways. 7 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Children’s Media Workshop and MappsLab LLC developed the TravelWell Schools digital mapping tool that the project will test on a small-scale to gauge effectiveness and assess for inclusion in the Safe Streets for All Action Plan under development by Wasatch Front Regional Council. Children’s Media Workshop has committed to providing the full $238,400 worth in non-federal match, which is often required for grants. This amount is strictly for the City’s grant match, however, it will not pass through or need to be budgeted for by the City. Public Hearing was held November 7, 2023. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Misc Grants $4,532.10 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard Funding for a drone to train first responders and prepare for an emergency response. Public hearing was held January 19, 2024. G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Misc Grants $600,068.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This funding is for the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force. This contract is for salaries and fringe for existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. Other expenses: travel, K9 contracts, supplies, equipment and other administrative costs. Public Hearing is scheduled to be held February 20, 2024. G-4: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Misc Grants $9,280.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. Public Hearing was held June 6, 2023. Section I: Council Added Items 8 Attachments A-4 Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation Edit Reguest Requester Information Legislator: Weiler, Todd D. Creation Date: 2023-01-23 Submission Date: 2023-01-23 Section 1: Request Details Description: In Utah, the Salt Lake City Cemetery stands alone in the extent of its historic value and is a reminder of the settlement and rural community that was claimed in the 1800's by pioneers of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is a place that reveals information about the state's historic events, religions, lifestyles, and genealogy, more so than any other cemetery in the state. Unfortunately, the cemetery is threatened by natural forces such as weathering, eroding historic retaining walls, an aged irrigation system and roads that have decayed to a point they are becoming inaccessible for families traveling to visit their forefathers. The City is doing everything possible to fund improvements at the Cemetery, including the passage of a sales tax bond that will in part fund road and irrigation repairs, however, support from the State of Utah is also needed to help preserve this invaluable historic resource. Legislative designee contact information: •Name: Keith Van Otten •Organization: Salt Lake City Cemetery •Position: Sexton Section 2: ·Funding Information How will the appropriation be used? One-time Ongoing Personnel Services In-State Travel Out-of-state Travel Supplies and Equipment Technology Purchases Infrastructure/Capital Investments 2024: $0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3/12/24. 8:01 AM Requttt for Appropri3tions • Requttts Listing Other Charges/Pass Thru 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 $0.00 Expenditure Total One-time 2024 $0.00 Funding Sources: General Fund One-time 2025 $0.00 Ongoing 2025 S0.00 •Amount Requested 2024 (One-time) S0.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (One-time) S3,000,000.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (Ongoing) $0.00 Revenue Total One-time 2024 $0.00 One-time 2025 $3,000,000.00 Ongoing 2025 S0.00 Should unused funding be returned to the state at the end of the fiscal year? Yes Is this project scalable if the Legislature does not fund the full requested amount? Yes A short explanation describing how the project might be scaled Salt Lake City has allocated $11.2M toward the replacement of the cemetery irrigation system and roadways and has a S1M donation toward design and construction documents for the roads, irrigation and other projects identified in the master plan. State funding is needed to further work on the estimated $14.1M irrigation project and S20M road project. If partially funded, SLC would prioritize irrigation systems and roadways in greatest need of repairs. Section 3: Agency Information Subjects: Agency: 710 / Cultural and Community Engagement Type of entity to receive pass-through funding •State Government Section 4: Performance Outcome Measurement Who would benefit from this request (who is the target audience)? What is this project or program intended to accomplish? The Salt Lake City Cemetery is the largest municipal cemetery in the United States and covers 122 acres and has 9.5 miles of interior roads. Irrigation replacement will improve water efficiency, and provide better water management in drought conditions. Repairing the roadways will enhance accessibility and improve visitor experience. The SLC Cemetery gives Utah a sense of character and definition. This project is in large part for the benefit of the living, and perpetuates the memories of the deceased. An investment in the SLC Cemetery gives all Utahns a sense of character and definition by protecting our heritage and history. Investments 2025: $0.00 Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation Edit Reguest Requester Information Legislator: Weiler, Todd D. Creation Date: 2023-01-23 Submission Date: 2023-01-23 Section 1: Request Details Description: In Utah, the Salt Lake City Cemetery stands alone in the extent of its historic value and is a remind the settlement and rural community that was claimed in the 1800's by pioneers of The Church of Je Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is a place that reveals information about the state's historic events, re lifestyles, and genealogy, more so than any other cemetery in the state. Unfortunately, the cemeter threatened by natural forces such as weathering, eroding historic retaining walls, an aged irrigation and roads that have decayed to a point they are becoming inaccessible for families traveling to visi forefathers. The City is doing every1hing possible to fund improvements at the Cemetery, including passage of a sales tax bond that will in part fund road and irrigation repairs, however, support from State of Utah is also needed to help preserve this invaluable historic resource. Legislative designee contact information: •Name: Keith Van Otten •Organization: Salt Lake City Cemetery •Position: Sexton Section 2: Funding Information How will the appropriation be used? One-time Ongoing Personnel Services 2024: $0.00 $0.00 2025: $0.00 In-State Travel 2024: $0.00 $0.00 2025: $0.00 Out-of-state Travel 2024: $0.00 $0.00 2025: $0.00 Supplies and Equipment 2024: $0.00 $0.00 2025: $0.00 Technology Purchases 2024: $0.00 $0.00 2025: $0.00 Infrastructure/Capital 2024: $0.00 $0.00 3/ 2124. 8:01 Request for Appropriations - ◄ Other Charges/Pass Thru 2024: 0.00 2025: 0.00 Expenditure Total One-·me 2024 $0.00 Funding Sources: General Fund One-time 2025 $0.00 Ongoing 20 0.00 ler- of :!:SUS iligiol'ls. yis 1 syst,em •Amount Requested 2024 (One-time) 0.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (One-time) 3,000,000.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (Ongoing) $0.00 Revenue Total it their ttie 11:he One-·me 2024 $0.00 One-time 2025 $3,000,000.00 Ongoing 20 0.00 Should unused funding be returned to the state at the Yes Is this project scalable if the Legislature does not fun Yes A short explanation describing how the Salt Lake City has allocated $11.2M toward the replacement of the road ays and has a 1M dona·on toward design and construe·or other projects iden·fled in the master plan. State funding is needei $14.1 irrigation project and 20 road project. If partially funded and roadways in greatest need of repairs_ Section 3: Agency Information Subjects: Agency: 710 / Cultural and Community Engagement Type of entity to receive pass-through funding •State Government Section 4: Performance Outcome Measu Who would benefit from this request (who is the targE What is this project or program intended to accompli The Salt Lake Ci Cemetery is the largest municipal cemetery in t and has 9.5 miles of interior roads. Irrigation replacement will impri ........ ------------♦·--,I.--. .._....... ------.....1·..; □---·-·--- - ,,a• ._.._... waier managemem in arougm conamons. Kepa1r111g me roaaways visitor experience. The SLC Cemetery gives Utah a sense of char. large part for the benefit of the living, and perpetuates the memori, SLC Cemetery gives all Utahns a sense of character and definitio1 equests Listing $0.00 125 125 ! end of the fiscal year? d the full requested amount? project might be scaled ! cemetery irrigation system and 1 documents for the roads, irrigation and d to further work on the estimated I, SLC would prioritize irrigation systems irement wmennance access10111ry ana improve acter and definition. This project is in es of the deceased. An investment in the , by protecting our heritage and history. Attachments D-8 CHRIS HARDING CPA, CFE, CIA Salt Lake County Auditor RICHARD JAUSSI Chief Deputy Auditor ROSWELL ROGERS Policy Advisor OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY AUDITOR 2001 S State Street, N3-300 PO Box 144575 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4575 385- 468-7200 | TTY 711 RMarch 31, 2024 Salt Lake City Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer 451 South State Street Room 304 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Mary Beth Thompson, Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act,” the Office of the Salt Lake County Auditor has prepared the enclosed reports which include: [1] The total assessed property value within each project area for the previous tax year. [2] The base taxable value of each project area for the previous tax year. [3] The tax increment available to be paid to the agency for the previous tax year. [4] The tax increment requested by the agency for the previous tax year. [5] The tax increment paid to the agency for the previous tax year. [6] Sufficient detail on the calculations performed by the county auditor. For any questions or if you require further information, please reach out to Brandon Grable at bgrable@slco.org or call 385-468-7194. Sincerely, Chris Harding, CPA, CFE, CIA Salt Lake County Auditor Enclosures County Auditor Report on Community Reinvestment Agency Act Project Areas Salt Lake County Tax Year 2023 Community Reinvestment Agency Salt Lake City Project Area Assessed Property Value Base Taxable Value Available Tax Increment Tax Increment Estimate on Agency's Annual Report Tax Increment (Entitled Amount) Current Year 1 SLC CBD In 2,919,440,724 136,894,100 27,265,707 24,644,694 27,265,707 2 SLC CBD Out 926,676,340 0 0 0 0 3 Baseball Stadium 6,043,536 0 0 0 0 4 Depot District 867,431,325 27,476,425 6,071,665 5,422,435 6,071,665 5 Depot District - Non Collection Area 54,642,819 0 0 0 0 6 Granary 237,204,525 48,813,397 1,357,286 1,103,309 1,357,286 7 North Temple Viaduct Cmty Dev't 406,039,024 36,499,680 3,058,618 2,774,419 3,058,618 8 North Temple 294,046,112 84,073,572 1,513,475 1,008,715 1,513,475 9 Block 70 Cmty Dev't 329,362,729 58,757,937 2,133,992 1,829,228 2,133,992 10 Stadler Rail Cmty Dev't 59,174,218 3,710 157,991 141,298 157,991 11 State Street CRA 1,999,382,096 889,305,536 5,753,783 4,423,811 5,753,783 12 9 Line CRA 678,478,961 228,048,136 2,971,289 2,653,781 2,971,289 13 Northwest Quadrant CRA 1,104,786,297 735,791 2,451,087 1,398,548 2,451,087 14 Block 67 CRA 120,971,080 11,531,400 358,599 1 358,599 15 16 17 18 19 20 Totals 10,003,679,786 1,522,139,684 53,093,492 45,400,239 53,093,492 Report and Payment Notes: Base taxable values of inactive projects are unavailable or have not been updated Base taxable values of Community Dev't Areas vary for each participating Taxing Entity. Highest base value is shown on this report. If there is no estimated Tax Increment Financing amount for a listed project in the Agency report, $ 1 is placed for an eligible tax area or tax entity Final distributed amount determined by County Treasurer Agency & Tax Entities are responsible for monitoring performance benchmarks & rebate terms Office of the Salt Lake County Auditor 3/18/2024 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer Date Received: 04/02/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 04/02/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 2, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #5 SPONSOR:NA STAFF CONTACT: Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $5,513,448.00 $32,816,721.73 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 21,933,876.00 CIP FUND 18,450,000.00 3,527,775.33 LOAN FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 IMS FUND 3,000.00 3,000.00 CDBG FUND 0.00 (46,643.00) MISC GRANTS FUND 1,667,480.10 5,116,628.33 TOTAL $32,633,928.10 $70,351,358.39 Gregory Cleary Gregory Cleary (Apr 2, 2024 16:31 MDT) April Patterson April Patterson (Apr 2, 2024 17:19 MDT) DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 rachel otto (Apr 2, 2024 17:31 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024. FY23-24 Amended Amended Variance Revenue FY23-FY24 Annual Budget Budget New Projection Favorable/(Unfavorable) Property Taxes 131,752,713 131,752,713 131,752,713 0 Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 114,465,900 (2,663,100) Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 13,273,330 925,203 Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 259,491,943 (1,737,897) Charges For Services 4,745,443 4,745,443 5,938,036 1,192,593 Fines & Forfeitures 2,561,547 2,571,547 2,607,446 35,899 Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0 Interfund Service Charges 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,041,511 (89,702) Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,159,621 25,000 Licenses 18,434,301 18,434,301 18,438,665 4,364 Miscellaneous Revenue 2,958,012 2,948,012 2,966,118 18,106 Parking Meter Revenue 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 0 Parking Tickets 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,499,955 (45) Permits 22,445,026 22,445,026 22,487,608 42,582 Property Sale Proceeds ---0 Rental & Other Income 681,604 681,604 1,101,203 419,599 Gain on Property Dispositions ---0 Operating Transfers In 9,938,944 10,130,410 10,130,410 0 Total W/O Special Tax 105,331,800 105,523,266 107,171,662 1,648,396 Sales Tax Addition 1/2%49,084,479 49,084,479 52,800,000 3,715,521 Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,837,585 419,463,605 3,626,020 To date, revenues are trending slightly above initial budget. At this time, Finance staff are projecting revenues to remaining consistent with current estimates for the remainder of FY 2024. Modifications have been made primarily to Sales Tax, resulting in a decrease of approximately $2.6 million, while an increase in revenue is projected in the Sales Tax Additional ½ % by an estimated $3.7 million. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #5. Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2023 Budget Projected FY2024 Budget FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 24,825,461 178,695,454 202,575,741 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608)(20,736,262)(22,836,870)(3,657,641)(29,211,158)(32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300)(17,260,909)(20,423,209)(2,592,884)(18,663,765)(21,157,931) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 18,574,936 130,820,531 148,549,011 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 22.79%25.00%24.85%35.49%33.36%33.42% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes ------ Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.)(2,257,746)(2,257,746)(2,484,423)(2,484,423) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 101,473,105 114,605,857 18,574,936 128,336,108 146,064,588 Final Fund Balance Percent 22.79%24.46%24.37%35.49%32.72%32.86% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment -(475,000)(475,000)--- BA#1 Expense Adjustment ---(204,200)(204,200) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment ------ BA#2 Expense Adjustment ----763,950 763,950 BA#3 Revenue Adjustment -6,000,000 6,000,000 --- BA#3 Expense Adjustment -(6,538,000)(6,538,000)-(1,434,220)(1,434,220) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment -194,600 194,600 --- BA#4 Expense Adjustment -(7,584,328)(7,584,328)-(2,890,480)(2,890,480) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment -----5,513,448 BA#5 Expense Adjustment -(5,940,349)(5,940,349)--(32,816,722) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment -19,120,198 19,120,198 --- BA#6 Expense Adjustment -(11,719,731)(12,219,731)-- Change in Revenue ----10,000,000 Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase -------- Adjusted Fund Balance 21,928,113 157,840,137 178,933,386 18,574,936 124,571,157 124,996,364 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 38.05%38.05%38.05%35.49%31.76%28.12% Projected Revenue 57,634,742 414,859,025 470,299,454 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will adjust to 28.12 percent of the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $32,633,928.10 in revenue and $70,351,358.39 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in seven (7) funds, with no change to FTEs in the city. The proposal includes ten (10) initiatives for Council review and additional housekeeping and grant related items. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Administration Proposed Council Approved umber/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Expenditure Revenue Amount Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Section A: New Items -133,250.00 One-time - -1,423,875.00 One-time - -7,000,000.00 One-time - 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 One-time -3,000,000.00 One-time - 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 One-time - -450,000.00 One-time - 450,000.00 450,000.00 One-time - -47,592.00 One-time - -(29,816.67)One-time - -29,816.67 One-time - -30,183.33 One-time - -165,500.00 One-time - -130,648.73 One-time - 15,000,000.00 1 Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases 2 Police Recruitment and Retention 3 2100 South Infrastructure Loan 3 2100 South Infrastructure Loan 4 State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation 4 State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation 5 Traffic Signal Improvement - 2200W/2100 N 5 Traffic Signal Improvement - 2200W/2100 N 6 Police Impact Fee Refunds 7 Update of the Streets IFFP 7 Update of the Streets IFFP 7 Update of the Streets IFFP 8 North Temple Jordan River Bridge - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement 9 Salt Lake City Public Cleaning Contract 10 Fund Balance Allocation to CIP 10 Fund Balance Allocation to CIP GF GF GF Loan Fund GF CIP GF CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP GF GF GF CIP 15,000,000.00 - Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -GF Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -GF Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -IMS Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -CDBG Correction 1 Adding Budget for Finance Grant Positions -Misc Grants Correction 2 Recognize Overtime Revenue in Budget GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Rape Recovery Center)GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Housing Connect)GF 3 Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds (Neighborhood House)GF 4 HOME Dormant Income Housing 4 HOME Dormant Income Housing 4 HOME Dormant Income Misc Grants 5 Housing Authority PILOT Check GF 6 Airport Interest Budget Adjustment Airport 7 Open Streets Funding Rescope GF 8 Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up GF 61,191.00 - 3,000.00 - - 1,736,505.00 - - - - - - 40,000.00 - - 3,675,752.00 58,191.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 (46,643.00) (14,548.00) 1,736,505.00 (100,000.00) 27,800.00 72,200.00 (3,463,696.23) 3,463,696.23 3,463,696.23 40,000.00 21,933,876.00 - 3,675,752.00 Ongoing One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time One-time - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section F: Donations - 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda #4 1 Department of Environmental Quality - State of Utah Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time - Consent Agenda #5 1 2 3 4 Safe Streets for All Marathon Petroleum Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Misc Grants Misc Grants Misc Grants Misc Grants 953,600.00 4,532.10 600,068.00 9,280.00 953,600.00 4,532.10 600,068.00 9,280.00 One Time One Time One Time One Time - - - - Section I: Council Added Items Total of Budget Amendment Items 32,633,928.10 70,351,358.39 --- Administration Proposed Council Approved 27,303,273.73 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Expenditure Revenue Amount Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #4: General Fund GF 5,513,448.00 32,816,721.73 --- Airport Fund Airport -21,933,876.00 --- CIP Fund CIP 18,450,000.00 3,527,775.33 --- Loan Fund Loan Fund 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 --- IMS Fund IMS 3,000.00 3,000.00 --- CDBG Fund CDBG -(46,643.00)--- Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 1,667,480.10 5,116,628.33 --- Total of Budget Amendment 32,633,928.10 70,351,358.39 --- - - 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments Revenue FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget - Revenue BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,918 0.00 0.00 0.00 130,275.00 5,513,448.00 454,158,641.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 -0.00 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)4,681,185 4,681,185.00 Water Fund (FC 51)176,637,288 176,637,288.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)289,941,178 289,941,178.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,865,892 19,865,892.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)403,513,000 403,513,000.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)25,240,459 230,000.00 25,470,459.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)12,710,067 12,710,067.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,925,000 -3,925,000.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,108,969 36,800.00 975,177.00 732,909.00 33,853,855.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)36,254,357 9,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00 9,000.00 3,000.00 36,293,357.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 -5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 1,705,700.79 7,349,950.66 1,667,480.10 35,840,471.55 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 62,416.00 462,416.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)14,659,043 14,659,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)32,341,586 1,100,000.00 33,441,586.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)30,199,756 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 410,177.00 1,415,400.00 18,450,000.00 76,179,226.25 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,888,581 3,888,581.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)60,932,137 60,932,137.00 Loan Fund -7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 263,800.00 41,751,732.25 3,103,054.79 10,967,534.66 32,633,928.10 1,712,351,500.80 3 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Expenditure FY 2023-24 Adopted Budgetg - Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10)448,514,918 204,200.00 (763,950.00)1,730,731.89 2,890,480.00 32,816,721.73 485,393,101.62 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 664,293.70 2,364,293.70 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,119 6,044,119.00 Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 21,933,876.00 542,372,873.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 230,000.00 28,493,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 165,793.00 3,966,178.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 14,461,793.00 975,177.00 732,909.00 48,668,629.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 9,000.00 6,000.00 4,531,083.00 406,688.00 3,000.00 43,657,942.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 (205,177.00)1,100,000.00 10,594,823.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 46,642.50 (46,643.00)5,597,762.50 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 2,234,473.29 7,349,950.66 5,116,628.33 39,818,392.28 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 65,472.00 465,472.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 6,133,511.00 16,345,554.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 5,777,784.00 1,100,000.00 41,772,763.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 1,545,675.00 3,527,775.33 60,485,629.58 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00 Loan Fund -7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 41,655,131.95 15,090,714.68 21,655,006.66 70,351,358.39 1,932,559,213.68 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 4 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Section A: New Items A-1: Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases – Fire Hydrant Rentals GF One-time $133,250.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For questions, please include Clint Rasmussen and Chief Karl Lieb Public Utilities has increased the rates the Fire Department and other municipalities must pay for fire hydrant rentals. This increase was overlooked during the annual budget creation cycle. Unfortunately, this adjustment cannot wait or be absorbed in the existing budget because of the size of the increase. Utilizing existing department funds to cover the increase would potentially delay or jeopardize public safety services. The request is for $133,250 to account for the increased expense. As part of the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget, staff will factor in new rates and associated expenses. At this time, the difference between the two required payments is $133,250 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 (One-Time). Public Utilities Costs (FY2023-24) Hydrant Rentals $9,000 per month, or $108,000 annually Public Utilities Costs (FY2024-25) - Ongoing Hydrant Rentals $20,104.18 per month, or $241,250 annually A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention GF One-time $1,423,875.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Laura Nygaard and Chief Brown In Fiscal Year 2023 the Police Department proposed a multifaceted approach to improving staffing while utilizing overtime to provide and maintain operational readiness, employing a proposed lateral hiring bonus and a retention bonus for current employees. The hiring bonus would provide additional sworn lateral staffing as a compliment to the new hire recruit classes and allow the department to bolster the staffing numbers on an accelerated timeline. Providing a retention bonus to existing sworn employees has provided incentives to retain staff at a higher level than is currently being experienced, while also providing a commitment from the city to the sworn staffing to maintain their pay at a level commensurate with their jobs and surrounding agencies. In March of 2023 the police department had 34 funded vacancies and 2 pending vacancies as well as the 20 unfunded positions. The department currently has a hiring class in May of 20 officers and 10 lateral applicants. It’s estimated that those applicants will fill all funded officer positions as well as hiring 3 officers into unfunded positions by the end of the fiscal year. An ongoing amount of $264,500 is being requested to continue lateral hiring retention bonuses in order to maintain necessary staffing levels. A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan GF One-time $7,000,000 Department: Finance Prepared By: Rachel Otto For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, and Jill Love In order to facilitate a faster, less disruptive, and less costly reconstruction of 2100 S from 700 E to 1100 E, the Administration proposes negotiating a market-rate loan of up to $7 million to The Thackeray Co. as the representative of several entities in the area that are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100 S. This funding would be put toward needed water and sewer upgrades in Sugarhouse, and allow the City’s contractor to replace the infrastructure in conjunction with the road upgrades instead of in subsequent phases that would necessitate re-opening the road over the next several years. Release of the funds will be contingent on the City negotiating a loan agreement with the developer that would include a market-rate interest rate and adequate collateral. 1 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Additional information and a fact sheet will be shared with the council in the coming days. A-4: State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation GF One-time $3,000,0000 CIP One-time $3,000,000 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Kristin Riker For questions, please include Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans, Amy Dorsey, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Mary Beth Thompson This budget amendment is requesting approval to receive additional $3,000,000 in State appropriated funds to be spent on the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation CIP bond project. This request will permit the Summer 2024 bidding and contracting to proceed without delays for the construction of the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation project. Funding any later than June 30 may delay bidding and contracting or add cost to the project PRJ-230007 8323213 - BD Cemetery. The project is funded by three sources: City's 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond (approx.$11,200,000); a state legislative appropriation ($3,000,000, this request); and by a private donor ($1,000,000, received through a donation agreement and budget amendment). Bond and donation amounts are combined in Row 20 of "Grant Information". The legislative appropriation can be given to the City in no fewer than two separate issuances once money is spent down (i.e., a reimbursement). However, the City needs the funds upfront to bid and award the construction contract. This funding will be reimbursed by the State once the City spends it (even partially) and reports on performance outcome measurements (likely FY 26/27). The funding allocation for the $3,000,000 from the state will not be recognized until the contract is complete, which is anticipated to happen by April 16th. The final “Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation” request for appropriation (RFA) from the legislature is also attached. A-5: Traffic Signal Improvement – 2200 W / 2100 N GF One-time $450,000.00 CIP One-time $450,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Jon Larsen For questions, please include Jon Larsen, Blake Thomas and Brent Beck $450,000 is being requested for a new traffic signal at the 2200 W /2100 N intersection. This is currently a 2-way stop controlled intersection in a high growth area of the City. There is a growing safety concern at this intersection that a traffic signal would address. Traffic at this intersection has increased dramatically in recent years, and drivers turning off 2200 West onto 2100 North are finding it challenging to find safe gaps in traffic. This has resulted in an increase in traffic accidents at this location. This issue is exacerbated by the relatively high speeds on 2100 North, making it harder to judge gaps in traffic, making crashes more severe. A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds CIP One-time $47,592.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith and Mary Beth Thompson The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not work to be used for the police precinct. The ensuing disencumbrance of these funds has resulted in the required refund of 2 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount impact fees plus actual interest earned on the funds due to their expirationThis refund will be funded with proceeds from unappropriated Police Impact Fees. $38,464 (principal)+ Approximate Interest $9,128 = Total $47,592. A-7: Update of the Streets IFFP CIP One-time ($29,816.67) CIP One-time $29,816.67 CIP One-time $30,183.33 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith and Mary Beth Thompson The city is in the process of updating the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) for Police, Fire and Parks. Updating the Streets IFFP at the same time will not only be cost efficient but is needed for the efficient CIP planning of Streets and Transportation. The Transportation bond is nearly complete and updating the Streets IFFP will aid Capital Asset Planning (CAP) in the preparation of the CAP 10-year Plan. One hundred percent of the cost is impact fee eligible and the scope includes Streets/Transportation Study and Preparation of the IFFP. The full request of $60,000 is to be funded by a rescope of the remaining $29,816.67 from the 2020 IFFP appropriation, with the remainder to come from unallocated Streets Impact Fees. A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge – Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement GF One-time $165,500.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Andrew Johnston / Mark Stephens For questions, please include Andrew Johnston and Mark Stephens SLC Engineering has been working with the SLC PD, HEART, and the Mayor’s Office to find an intervention to decrease the use of the riverbanks underneath the bridge to use and deal drugs and avoid law enforcement. They have a plan to work with the State and replace the current rocks lining the banks on both sides, underneath the bridge with more deterrent rocks and landscaping to deter use of that location. Due to the limited window of time in the winter to do the work, the mayor’s office has been pulling together existing funds from departments and this budget amendment allocation would mostly function to reimburse those funds. The $165,500 would be to remove silt and existing rocks that allow for the unsheltered population to congregate and camp under the bridge, and to replace with larger rocks/boulders of size and type that are ‘uninviting’ and greatly deter the activities that are currently taking place. This is something that is an industry standard for communities across the nation encountering challenges with the unsheltered population under bridges. By excavating down and putting back these new rocks/boulders, the existing cross section of the river and hydraulic capacity remain the same and won’t require extensive hydraulic studies to ensure the hydraulic capacity is not decreased. This has been discussed with the State stream alteration division staff and they are in concurrence with the approach and don’t see any major difficulties getting the permit reviewed and approved. What this also serves as is erosion control on the banks of the Jordan River as well as eliminating scour around the bridge supports. This effort would check a few other boxes in addition to the deterrence of unfavorable activities by the unsheltered population in, under, and around the N. Temple Bridge over the Jordan River. UDOT, as part of their bridge inspections every other year (on even numbered years) measures and monitors scour so this would be an additional measure that would also be beneficial for the bridge structure itself.” A-9: Salt Lake City Public Cleaning Contract GF One-time $130,648.73 Department: CAN Prepared By: Andrew Johnston For questions, please include Andrew Johnston SLC Homeless Engagement and Response Team administers a contract with Advantage Services (AS), a private non- profit, to provide cleaning of public streets, sidewalks and other locations, mostly in response to unsheltered homelessness. Their work includes power washing of hardscapes, cleaning of biowaste, trash pickup, coordinating with 3 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Police when they are enforcing no camping situations, and working with SL County and on Encampment Impact Mitigations and City Rapid Intervention Team on other cleanings. This fiscal year, a change that was made to the services that Advantage provides the city was to offer the police department immediate access to Clean Team services. Dedicated AS workers now accompany PD's Camp Mitigation squad as they respond to camp locations throughout the city. This change was made because the HEART team was processing an unusually high number of clean-up requests coming from the police department via SLC Mobile. PD would have camps move or would come across an abandoned camp while on patrol and would submit a cleanup request to HEART via the app, creating a duplication of efforts and delay in cleaning time that was remedied quickly by this change. Several months ago, PD requested that AS’s services be expanded to provide 7-day coverage from 5 days, to match the Camp Mitigation squads 7-day coverage. This is a key factor in the rate of spend down outpacing the awarded budget. Without additional funds, AS will need to decrease the frequency of this work from 7 to 4-5 days/week, among other potential changes to their service delivery model. In lieu of reducing service, the total amount is being requested to ensure the current level of services will continue through the end of June. A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP (One Time) GF $15,000,000 CIP $15,000,000 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Greg Cleary The Finance Department is requesting the transfer of $15 million from general fund fund balance to CIP to address capital maintenance. This item is to ensure adequate fund balance levels, while also focusing on the financial need for capital maintenance across the city, as outlined in the City Council and Mayoral goals. As the FY 2025 Capital Plan is developed, staff will return to the City Council with proposed projects and/or funding uses: for authorization of the funds. At this time, no direct expense is identified. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position - Correction GF Ongoing $58,191.00 GF One-time $3,000.00 IMS One-time $3,000.00 CDBG One-time ($46,643.00) Misc Grants One-time ($14,548.00) Department: Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Randy Hillier, Greg Cleary and Mary Beth Thompson In Budget Amendment #3 of this fiscal year, budget was added to CDBG and Miscellaneous Grants funds for a Grants related position within the Finance department. However, there was a miscommunication, and the budget should not have been added to CDBG and Misc Grants. Both of those fund classes already have the maximum amount of budget added for personnel at the beginning of each fiscal year. What should have happened is the budget and FTE should have been added within the Finance department as a general fund funded FTE. The expenditures for this position would be periodically reimbursed by the CDBG and Misc Grant funds after a time-tracking report is submitted justifying a reimbursement. 4 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A$3,000 amount has also been included to cover the cost of the position’s technology related needs. D-2: Recognizing Overtime Revenue in Budget GF One-time $1,736,505.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Laura Nygaard and Chief Brown The Police Department is requesting a budget appropriation for overtime that has associated revenues from special events, overtime staffing, contracts and task force reimbursements. The amount being requested is based on what has been received through February conservatively projected through the remainder of the fiscal year. D-3: Reallocate CAN CRAG Funds GF One-time ($100,000.00) GF One-time $27,800.00 GF One-time $72,200.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Blake Thomas On March 19, 2024, during their review of the annual HUD grant awards for FY 2025, Council asked the administration to evaluate other existing City rental assistance funding sources and return to the Council with options in relation to a funding gap for Housing Connect's HUD HOPWA program. This item provides recommendations and potential adjustments to reallocate the unused CAN CRAG funds to address Housing Connect's funding gap, and to fund another HUD applicant that was ineligible for FY 2025 HUD funds. -Housing Connect/The Housing Authority of Salt Lake County, HOPWA Program: $27,800 -Neighborhood House, Early Childhood Education Program: $72,200 Both recommendations are eligible activities per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee: Eviction Assistance & Rent Relief and Expanded Educational Opportunities. Note: Per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee, all CAN CRAG funds need to be spent by December 31, 2024. D-4: HOME Dormant Income Housing One-time ($3,463,696.23) Housing One-time $3,463,696.23 Misc Grants One-time $3,463,696.23 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Suzanne Swanson This housekeeping item moves the remaining HUD HOME dormant program income in the amount of $3,463,696.23 to the correct fund. Budget is currently posted to the Housing fund. Due to federal grant tracking purposes, as well as Finance wanting like to consolidate all grants in the grant fund, the department is requesting to move the HOME dormant program funds to the grant fund. This budget amendment would move existing budget/funds and will have a zero-sum budgetary impact. D-5: Housing Authority PILOT Check GF One-time $40,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Suzanne Swanson 5 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount For question, please contact Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Suzanne Swanson The expenditure budget in the Non-Departmental Housing cost center currently sits at $85,000 while a total of $125,000 in expenditures is expected. This amendment will increase the budget to the appropriate level. D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment Airport One-time $21,933,876.00 Department: Airport Prepared by: Shaun Anderson For questions, please include Brian Butler, Shaun Anderson and Lorin Rollins The Airport initially budgeted $121,528,000 in interest expense based on the gross amount rather than the net value. The actual forecast amount of interest expense is $142,900,000. This will adjust the Airport’s interest expense budget to match interest in our debt service schedules rather than net debt service (interest less capitalized interest). This amendment will budget the $21,933,876 difference from the Airport fund. D-7: Open Streets Funding Rescope GF One-time $0.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Lorena Riffo-Jenson For questions, please include Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt and Jacob Maxwell The Department of Economic Development is requesting a rescope of funds totaling $250,287.60 to extend the Open Streets effort into the 2024 season. This amount will be derived from three sources; The first is $57,000 remaining from $500,000 allocated in budget amendment #5 of FY 2023, which was meant for the 2023 Open Streets program. This $57,000 was remaining after the City contracted with the Salt Lake City Downtown Alliance for Open Street 2023. The second source of funding is the $69,128 that remains following the completion of the Open Streets 2023 event. The third source of funds is $124,159.60 that remains from the $250,000 budgeted in budget amendment #1 of FY 2024. The $250,000 budgeted in BA #1 was to cover costs related to the Open Streets 2023 effort. D-8: Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up GF One-time $3,675,752.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt / Greg Cleary For questions, please contact Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary, and Danny Walz In late March, staff received an updated memo from the Salt Lake County Auditor. After receiving this memo (Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act”) staff are increasing the Revenues and Expenses by $3,675,752 accordingly to account for the final annual distribution. The corresponding memo is attached for additional detail. Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources Section F: Donations 6 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #4 G-1: Department of Environmental Quality – State of Utah Misc Grants $100,000.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Holly Lopez Department of Public Utilities (DPU) received $100,000 to conduct a service line inventory and produce a lead service line replacement (LSLR) plan for an estimated 13,894 water line connections in qualifying disadvantage census blocks meeting the Hardship Funding Criteria of Utah Department of Environmental Quality. On December 16, 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adopted the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) Act that went into effect on January 16, 2021, and has a compliance date of October 16, 2024. DPU must complete a service line inventory that includes publicly owned and customer-owned portions of the service line and develop a lead service line replacement plan between 2023 and the LCRR compliance date. A public hearing was held on May 16, 2023. Consent Agenda #5 G-1: Safe Streets for All Misc Grants $953,600.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Joe Taylor / Jennifer Newell The Office of the Mayor requested $953,600 for the TravelWell Schools demonstration project on behalf of the non- profit Children’s Media Workshop. The project tests and refines a multi-media and digital mapping tool augmented with an educational campaign to deliver multi-disciplinary messaging aligned with the Safe System Approach targeting underserved populations, citizen behavioral activities, and community engagement and empowerment. The anticipated outcome is transformational change through real-time identification of travel behaviors, problems, and solutions resulting in zero deaths on Salt Lake City roadways. Children’s Media Workshop and MappsLab LLC developed the TravelWell Schools digital mapping tool that the project will test on a small-scale to gauge effectiveness and assess for inclusion in the Safe Streets for All Action Plan under development by Wasatch Front Regional Council. Children’s Media Workshop has committed to providing the full $238,400 worth in non-federal match, which is often required for grants. This amount is strictly for the City’s grant match, however, it will not pass through or need to be budgeted for by the City. Public Hearing was held November 7, 2023. G-2: Marathon Petroleum Misc Grants $4,532.10 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard Funding for a drone to train first responders and prepare for an emergency response. Public hearing was held January 19, 2024. G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Misc Grants $600,068.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This funding is for the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force. This contract is for salaries and fringe for existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. Other expenses: travel, K9 contracts, supplies, equipment and other administrative costs. Public Hearing is scheduled to be held February 20, 2024. 7 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount G-4: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Misc Grants $9,280.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. Public Hearing was held June 6, 2023. Section I: Council Added Items 8 Attachments A-4 Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery Preservation Edit Reguest Requester Information Legislator: Weiler, Todd D. Creation Date: 2023-01-23 Submission Date: 2023-01-23 Section 1: Request Details Description: In Utah, the Salt Lake City Cemetery stands alone in the extent of its historic value and is a reminder of the settlement and rural community that was claimed in the 1800's by pioneers of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is a place that reveals information about the state's historic events, religions, lifestyles, and genealogy, more so than any other cemetery in the state. Unfortunately, the cemetery is threatened by natural forces such as weathering, eroding historic retaining walls, an aged irrigation system and roads that have decayed to a point they are becoming inaccessible for families traveling to visit their forefathers. The City is doing everything possible to fund improvements at the Cemetery, including the passage of a sales tax bond that will in part fund road and irrigation repairs, however, support from the State of Utah is also needed to help preserve this invaluable historic resource. Legislative designee contact information: •Name: Keith Van Otten •Organization: Salt Lake City Cemetery •Position: Sexton Section 2: ·Funding Information How will the appropriation be used? One-time Ongoing Personnel Services In-State Travel Out-of-state Travel Supplies and Equipment Technology Purchases Infrastructure/Capital Investments 2024: $0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3/12/24. 8:01 AM Requttt for Appropri3tions • Requttts Listing Other Charges/Pass Thru 2024: S0.00 2025: S0.00 $0.00 Expenditure Total One-time 2024 $0.00 Funding Sources: General Fund One-time 2025 $0.00 Ongoing 2025 S0.00 •Amount Requested 2024 (One-time) S0.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (One-time) S3,000,000.00 •Amount Requested 2025 (Ongoing) $0.00 Revenue Total One-time 2024 $0.00 One-time 2025 $3,000,000.00 Ongoing 2025 S0.00 Should unused funding be returned to the state at the end of the fiscal year? Yes Is this project scalable if the Legislature does not fund the full requested amount? Yes A short explanation describing how the project might be scaled Salt Lake City has allocated $11.2M toward the replacement of the cemetery irrigation system and roadways and has a S1M donation toward design and construction documents for the roads, irrigation and other projects identified in the master plan. State funding is needed to further work on the estimated $14.1M irrigation project and S20M road project. If partially funded, SLC would prioritize irrigation systems and roadways in greatest need of repairs. Section 3: Agency Information Subjects: Agency: 710 / Cultural and Community Engagement Type of entity to receive pass-through funding •State Government Section 4: Performance Outcome Measurement Who would benefit from this request (who is the target audience)? What is this project or program intended to accomplish? The Salt Lake City Cemetery is the largest municipal cemetery in the United States and covers 122 acres and has 9.5 miles of interior roads. Irrigation replacement will improve water efficiency, and provide better water management in drought conditions. Repairing the roadways will enhance accessibility and improve visitor experience. The SLC Cemetery gives Utah a sense of character and definition. This project is in large part for the benefit of the living, and perpetuates the memories of the deceased. An investment in the SLC Cemetery gives all Utahns a sense of character and definition by protecting our heritage and history. Attachments D-8 CHRIS HARDING CPA, CFE, CIA Salt Lake County Auditor RICHARD JAUSSI Chief Deputy Auditor ROSWELL ROGERS Policy Advisor OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY AUDITOR 2001 S State Street, N3-300 PO Box 144575 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4575 385- 468-7200 | TTY 711 RMarch 31, 2024 Salt Lake City Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer 451 South State Street Room 304 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Mary Beth Thompson, Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act,” the Office of the Salt Lake County Auditor has prepared the enclosed reports which include: [1] The total assessed property value within each project area for the previous tax year. [2] The base taxable value of each project area for the previous tax year. [3] The tax increment available to be paid to the agency for the previous tax year. [4] The tax increment requested by the agency for the previous tax year. [5] The tax increment paid to the agency for the previous tax year. [6] Sufficient detail on the calculations performed by the county auditor. For any questions or if you require further information, please reach out to Brandon Grable at bgrable@slco.org or call 385-468-7194. Sincerely, Chris Harding, CPA, CFE, CIA Salt Lake County Auditor Enclosures County Auditor Report on Community Reinvestment Agency Act Project Areas Salt Lake County Tax Year 2023 Community Reinvestment Agency Salt Lake City Project Area Assessed Property Value Base Taxable Value Available Tax Increment Tax Increment Estimate on Agency's Annual Report Tax Increment (Entitled Amount) Current Year 1 SLC CBD In 2,919,440,724 136,894,100 27,265,707 24,644,694 27,265,707 2 SLC CBD Out 926,676,340 0 0 0 0 3 Baseball Stadium 6,043,536 0 0 0 0 4 Depot District 867,431,325 27,476,425 6,071,665 5,422,435 6,071,665 5 Depot District - Non Collection Area 54,642,819 0 0 0 0 6 Granary 237,204,525 48,813,397 1,357,286 1,103,309 1,357,286 7 North Temple Viaduct Cmty Dev't 406,039,024 36,499,680 3,058,618 2,774,419 3,058,618 8 North Temple 294,046,112 84,073,572 1,513,475 1,008,715 1,513,475 9 Block 70 Cmty Dev't 329,362,729 58,757,937 2,133,992 1,829,228 2,133,992 10 Stadler Rail Cmty Dev't 59,174,218 3,710 157,991 141,298 157,991 11 State Street CRA 1,999,382,096 889,305,536 5,753,783 4,423,811 5,753,783 12 9 Line CRA 678,478,961 228,048,136 2,971,289 2,653,781 2,971,289 13 Northwest Quadrant CRA 1,104,786,297 735,791 2,451,087 1,398,548 2,451,087 14 Block 67 CRA 120,971,080 11,531,400 358,599 1 358,599 15 16 17 18 19 20 Totals 10,003,679,786 1,522,139,684 53,093,492 45,400,239 53,093,492 Report and Payment Notes: Base taxable values of inactive projects are unavailable or have not been updated Base taxable values of Community Dev't Areas vary for each participating Taxing Entity. Highest base value is shown on this report. If there is no estimated Tax Increment Financing amount for a listed project in the Agency report, $ 1 is placed for an eligible tax area or tax entity Final distributed amount determined by County Treasurer Agency & Tax Entities are responsible for monitoring performance benchmarks & rebate terms Office of the Salt Lake County Auditor 3/18/2024 Item H10 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sam Owen, Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE:Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Metropolitan Water District, Property Tax Proposal MOTION 1 I move the Council close this public hearing and refer to the next public hearing on the May 21st agenda. 1 Memo TO: City Council leadership DATE: February 2, 2024 FROM: Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy SUBECT FY25 Proposed Increase to the Certified Tax Rate CC: MWDSLS Board of Trustees ISSUES The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (“District”) needs an increase in revenue to address critical water infrastructure and to pay for the cost increases from other entities (i.e., Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, and Provo River Water Users Association). The following is a summary of these critical capital projects and costs from other entities: Description Annual Cost Type of Expense Long-Term Financial Impact Entity responsible for securing funding Cottonwoods Connection Project (District/SLC/SC) Purpose: Required project to address aging infrastructure and Salt Lake Aqueduct seismic and other elements of resiliency. $2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million (repayment of 30 year loan/bond) Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy Deer Creek Dam Intake Project (PRWUA costs) Purpose: Required project to replace aging dam infrastructure that delivers 85,000 AF of water (80% of water portfolio) to the Salt Lake Valley. $1,240,000 Capital $37 Million (30 years repayment) Provo River Water Users Association Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plant Capital and O&M (JVWCD costs) Purpose: Address aging infrastructure that delivers water to Northwest quadrant of Salt Lake City. $5,023,680 (5 year average) Capital and O&M $32.5 Million (10 years of capital projects) Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Central Utah Project OMR&R (CUWCD costs) Purpose: Expenses related to the District’s investment in Central Utah Project water. $1,501,500 O&M and repair and replacement of CUP facilities $6.9 Million (forecasted target increase) Central Utah Water Conservancy District Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million 2 RECOMMENDATION To meet the District’s revenue needs, the board of trustees recommends increasing the certified tax rate to 0.00035. By way of information, the District’s maximum tax rate is 0.0005. In 2008, the District increased the certified rate to 0.00035. Over time, the rate has eroded as the value of properties has increased. Since 2008, the District has not implemented a certified rate increase. Taxes are a reliable source of revenue and the investment in water infrastructure projects will benefit future generations. The investment in capital projects that will last more than 75 years supports generational equity. AUTHORIZATION FROM SALT LAKE CITY AND SANDY COUNCILS As of January 1, 2015 current statute (17B-2a-608) states than increasing the certified tax rate requires approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the board of trustees under Section 17B-2a-604.” The appointed board of trustees of the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy must receive approval from their appointed authority to increase the certified tax rate to 0.00035. The timing of the city councils’ approving the District’s certified tax rate needs to occur after the District adopts the tentative FY25 budget on April 15, 2024 and before the budget public hearing on May 20, 2024. The statutory deadline for budget adoption is June 22, 2024. With the approval of both city councils, the certified rate would increase as budgeted and be formally adopted after a Truth in Taxation hearing in August. A question to be resolved is how the two cities want to present the tax increase to their councils for approval. Attachment A describes in more detail the statutory requirements of each city council. CONCENSUS FROM CITY COUNCILS There must be consensus from both councils and each city will be taxed at a uniform and equal rate. If either council does not approve an increase to the certified tax rate, then the District will propose an increase to the water rate. The water rate must also be uniformly applied to all cities comprising this District. The District will propose an 39.33% water rate increase to both member cities (36.33% generates the revenue equal to the property tax and the 3% water rate increase was already forecasted in the FY25 budget). Table 1 calculates the annual impact of an increase to the certified tax rate to Sandy City and Salt Lake City property owners. On average, a property owner in the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy’s service area would see an annual property tax increase of $47.00. 3 Table 2 represents the net revenue generated from the certified tax rate increase. The District would receive an additional $8.6 million in tax revenue. Table 2 also shows the estimated tax revenue from each member city. Table 3 represents the current water sales revenue and the projected water rate increase of 36.33% to match the revenue net revenue increase of the proposed property tax. Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner City Median Market Value of Property Taxable Home Value (55% of median) Current Year Tax Rate Proposed Next Year Certified Tax Rate Percent Increase Annual Increase to property owner Monthly increase Sandy $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 0.00035 62.04% $46.28 $3.86 Salt Lake $576,000 $316,800 0.000200 0.00035 75.00% $47.52 $3.96 Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate City 2023 Tax Year Certified Tax Rate 2023 Tax Revenue Proposed Certified Tax Rate Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 0.00035 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 3: Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Percent Increase Estimated FY25 Water Sales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33% $ 9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33% $23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales to Member Cities $23,779,958 36.33% $32,419,217 $8,639,259 FY25 Property Tax Certified Rate Increase Proposal Salt Lake City Council Meeting April 2, 2024 Background The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy is a special district that provides drinking water to Salt Lake City and Sandy City. Sandy City joined the District in 1990. The District’s board is comprised of seven trustees. The Salt Lake City Council appoints five of the trustees. The Sandy City Council appoints two of the trustees.  Revenue Sources 25.113236 12.040679 12.93062 1.105537 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Water Sales Property Taxes Assessments Miscellaneous M i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s FY25 Escalating Costs and Capital Needs for Aging Infrastructure Description Annual Cost Type of Expense Long-Term Financial Impact Entity responsible for securing funding Cottonwoods Connection Project (District/SLC/SC) Purpose: Required project to address aging infrastructure and Salt Lake Aqueduct seismic and other elements of resiliency. $2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million (repayment of 30 year loan/bond) Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy Deer Creek Dam Intake Project (PRWUA costs) Purpose: Required project to replace aging dam infrastructure that delivers 85,000 AF of water (80% of water portfolio) to the Salt Lake Valley. $1,240,000 Capital $37 Million (30 years repayment) Provo River Water Users Association Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plant Capital and O&M (JVWCD costs) Purpose: Address aging infrastructure that delivers water to Northwest quadrant of Salt Lake City. $5,023,680 (5 year average) Capital and O&M $32.5 Million (10 years of capital projects) Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Central Utah Project OMR&R (CUWCD costs) Purpose: Expenses related to the District’s investment in Central Utah Project water. $1,501,500 O&M and repair and replacement of CUP facilities $6.9 Million (forecasted target increase) Central Utah Water Conservancy District Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million $9.3M of revenue needs FY25 Tentative Budget Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner City Median Market Value of Property Taxable Home Value (55% of Median) Current Year Tax Rate Current MWDSLS Tax (Annual) Proposed Next Year Certified Tax Rate Percent Increase MWDSLS Tax (Annual) Net Annual Increase Sandy City $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 $74.61 0.00035 62.04% $120.89 $46.28 Salt Lake City $576,000 $316,000 0.000200 $63.36 0.00035 75.00% $110.88 $47.52 Property Taxes versus Water Rates Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate City 2023 Tax Year Certified Tax Rate 2023 Tax Revenue Proposed Certified Tax Rate Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 0.00035 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 3:Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Percent Increase Estimated FY25 Water Sales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33%$ 9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33%$23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales to Member Cities $23,779,958 36.33%$32,419,217 $8,639,259  Council’s decision will determine if there is an increase to the certified tax rate. If not approved by either council, the District will increase water rates to both member cities. MWDSLS Property Taxes versus Water Rates Table 4: Certified tax rate increased to 0.00035 City 2023 Tax Revenue Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $3,010,170 $4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City $9,030,509 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 5: Water rates increased by 36.33% City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Estimated FY25 Water S ales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $6,658,388 $9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 $23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales $23,779,958 $32,419,217 $8,639,259 Background on Budget Process Tentative revenue and expenses projections Proposed certified tax rate of 0.00035 Open public meeting Work Session Presentation on FY25 Budget Posted FY25 Tentative Budget on Website Open public meeting FY25 Tentative Budget Adopted by the Board Statute 17B-2a-608 Requirements Consistent with current statute (17B-2a-608), increasing the certified tax rate requires approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the board of trustees under Section 17B-2a-604.” Salt Lake City and Sandy City Council must approve increasing the certified tax rate. Approval occurs after the District adopts tentative budget in April and before the District’s public hearing in May. Consensus required. Member Cities agreement requires equal application of certified tax rate and water rates. Note: MWDSLS Board of Trustees will evaluate property tax rate every 2 years and determine if the District needs to re-establish or increase property tax rate every 3 years.  FY25 Budget Process Timing Considerations March •Work Session Discussion on Budget. Open public meeting April •Board approval of the tentative budget May •Tentative budget public hearing June •Board meeting to approve FY25 budget. April/May •City Councils approve District’s increase to certified tax rate August •Certified tax rate hearing •Adoption of final tax rate and FY25 budget. September •Deadline for submitting budget to State Auditor. Thank you Item H11 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst DATE: May 7, 2024 RE: Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan - Connect SLC MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 3 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPT I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance replacing the 1996 Transportation Master Plan with Connect SLC as the Citywide Transportation Plan. MOTION 4 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. _______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 03/24/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/24/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods SUBJECT:Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC STAFF CONTACT: Joe Taylor, Transportation Planner IV, Joe.taylor@slcgov.com, or (801) 535-6679 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Administration has developed the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC (the Plan) to replace the existing Transportation Master Plan. The Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan, while a remarkable and progressive document for its time, was adopted in 1996. Much has changed since that time, including transportation planning practices and the zeitgeist of how we think about public rights-of-way. Mobility of goods and services is still of necessity, but it shares space with notions of safety, accessibility, and concerns for the environment. The policy landscape within Salt Lake City has also changed dramatically since the mid-1990s. Plan Salt Lake (2015) laid out the City’s vision, aiming to prepare our city for growth while simultaneously focusing on sustainability and livability. At the root of the vision is quality of life for current and future generations. Specifically, in the realm of transportation, Salt Lake City has adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2015) and a Transit Master Plan (2017). These SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 24, 2024 12:41 MDT) plans provide a list of projects that the City hopes to accomplish to bring transit and active transportation into parity with our current autocentric landscape. In this context, Connect SLC (formally the Transportation Master Plan) aims to take the values espoused by the former plans, as well as those we heard from the community during development of the Plan update, and to imbue all transportation projects, initiatives, and day-to- day operations with those values. Much like Plan Salt Lake, Connect SLC is intended to function as a Citywide plan that brings consistency not only to the Transportation Division’s work, but also to the City as a whole, recognizing that many divisions and departments of the City touch our transportation system in some way. According to the vision of Connect SLC “It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality.” KEY MOVES: The Plan lays out eight key moves to advance these values in our transportation network: 1. Authentic and Intentional Engagement Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the planning table. 2. Zero Traffic Deaths Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. 3. Great Networks for Active Mobility Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. 4. Transit Friendly Neighborhoods Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City. 5. Healing the East-West Divide Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. 6. Low Emission Mobility Options Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our streets. 7. Places for People Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. 8. Operationalize Complete Streets Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership. PUBLIC PROCESS: Engagement began with the creation of a Community Advisory Council (CAC). Through a formal application process, we identified nine individuals who would be compensated hourly for their work on the project. The CAC gave ideas directly, helping shape the broader community engagement plan. They also participated in events, edited documents (including the final draft of the Plan), and perhaps most importantly, gave us access to their own networks. With the help of the CAC, we launched a public engagement effort that asked the community what they value most in their transportation system. Results from an online survey and in-person events conducted at pop-up vaccine clinics were weighted to reflect city demographics, in this case, adjusting for a lack of people 18 and under. Individuals who live, work, and/or go to school in Salt Lake City identified safety from harm, affordability, reliability, equity, and sustainability as their top transportation values. The project team then took these values and created a large menu of policy options to address them. The policy areas that received the most public support formed the basis of the second round of engagement, detailed below. A total of 879 (15 in Spanish, 864 in English) people responded to the City’s online survey and approximately 60 people participated through in-person outreach. While demographic information was not consistently collected for in-person participants, these events focused on reaching communities who were under-represented in online survey responses, particularly people who live in Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods. The full report for the first round of engagement, including geographic and demographic analysis of the respondents, is included in Exhibit 4 of this document. The second round of engagement took the values identified in the first round and created a menu of policy options that could potentially advance those values. These policy options were explained with both written explanations and visual representations. Participants could vote online for the concepts that best addressed their desires and concerns. Participants were also able to plot points on a map of the city and identify problems or highlight things that worked well. This process was also conducted at several in-person events where participants could use stickers and post-it notes to vote on the concepts. In-person engagement took place at the following locations: Three Creeks Park Dedication Northwest Recreation Center (timed to coincide with a soccer tournament) Living Traditions Festival West High School Gail Miller Resource Center Spy Hop Block Party University Neighborhood Partners/Partners in the Park Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Fair (Madsen Park) Since individuals could vote multiple times and demographic information was not collected, the exact number of individuals responding to the second round of engagement was not collected. However, we received thousands of responses during this round. We had a native Spanish speaker present to help with engagement at some of these events, and the results were significant enough to be highlighted in Key Move 1 of Connect SLC. After the second round of engagement, staff took two additional internal engagement steps. First, in order to address City representation, we presented the project to the Planning Commission and the City Council for the first time. Recommendations from these entities included focus on the following areas: safety, integration with land use policy, and continued effort toward complete street programs for critical east-west corridors These comments were integrated into the plan, specifically in Key Moves 2, 5, 7 and 8. Second, the work was presented to a meeting of City department directors. This work session allowed other departments and divisions to voice any concerns and create space for suggestions on how the Plan could better integrate with other City efforts across departments. The draft plan was presented to the Planning Commission on November 8, 2023. The Commission unanimously recommended adoption by the City Council with the following text amendment: “Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long term dialogue between the City, the local community, and other reginal partners. For Strategy 2.1 to establish a vision zero action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.” Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan 2)1996 Transportation Master Plan (Currently Adopted) 3) Draft Citywide Transportation Plan – Connect SLC 4)Survey Report (First round of public engagement) 5)2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (Adopted) 6)2017 Transit Master Plan (Adopted) EXHIBIT 1: Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. OF 2024 (Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan) WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a, the Municipal Land Use, Development, and Management Act (the “Act”), on December 7, 2015, the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) passed Ordinance No. 63 of 2015 to adopt Plan Salt Lake as a general plan; and WHEREAS, as part of Salt Lake City Corporation’s (“City”) general plan, on July 19, 1996, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 19 of 1996 adopting the Transportation Master Plan of 1996 (the “1996 Transportation Masterplan”) as a guiding document for transportation policy; and WHEREAS, since its adoption, significant changes in the state of transportation policy and practice, as well as concerns regarding safety, sustainability, mobility preferences, and equity considerations have rendered the adopted 1996 Transportation Master Plan valuable but obsolete; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 8, 2023 to consider recommending adoption of Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan (the “2023 Transportation Plan”), as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, at its November 8, 2023 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt the 2023 Transportation Plan as provided in Exhibit "A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that the adoption of this ordinance is in the City’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. Adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby adopted to replace the 1996 Transportation Masterplan as part of City’s general plan, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a. 2. Jurisdiction. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan shall apply within the City’s municipal boundaries to their full extent. 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. : _____________________ _____________________ Montoya, Senior C ity Atto SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: Victoria Petro, Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024 Published: . .2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date March 6, 2024 Sara M to Seni Cit Attorney EXHIBIT 3: Connect SLC :The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan Cafe AP HARDWARE T S RESTAURANT Cafe DOWNTOWN Salt Lake City · August 2023 DRAFT P GROCERIESPHARMACY As the capital city of Utah, it is important for Salt Lake City to not only recognize the First Nations peoples and the meaningful role they play within our everyday urban fabric, but also to lead out in true partnership with them. The contributions of the Ute, Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo, and Shoshoni are immeasurable and we strive as a city to move forward in consultation and true collaborative leadership with our relatives. —Mayor Mendenhall Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan2 3 Acknowledgments SALT LAKE CITY Joe Taylor, Project Manager Julianne Sabula Lara McLellan Becka Roolf Amy Thompson Michael McNamee Roxanna Orellana Ashley Cleveland C.J. Johnson UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Alex Beim Joey Alsop WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL Nikki Navio UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Angelo Papastamos Grant Farnsworth CONSULTANT TEAM Nelson\Nygaard Avenue Consultants Shiels Obletz Johnsen SPECIAL THANKS West High School Gail Miller Resource Center Salt Lake City Public Library Neighborworks Salt Lake Neighborhood House Northwest Rec Center Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan4 5 Contents 1.Our vision............................................................................................................6 2.Getting around Salt Lake City ...............................................................................16 3.Community engagement .....................................................................................22 4.Aligning transportation with our values................................................................32 5.Key Moves .........................................................................................................44 Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement..........................................................................50 Zero Traffic Deaths ..................................................................................................................................60 Great Networks for Active Mobility ......................................................................................................68 Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods.................................................................................................76 Healing the East-West Divide ................................................................................................................84 Low Emissions Options.............................................................................................................112 Places for People....................................................................................................................................126 Operationalize Complete Streets ............................................................................................130 6.Achieving our vision.........................................................................................................................140 Our vision Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan6 1 7 Connect SLC is a 20-year vision for transportation in Salt Lake City. It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality. Connect SLC identifies how we move today, what we value, how we want to improve public spaces, and what improvements would make it easier for us to move around Salt Lake City (SLC). Through our transportation programs, policies, and investments, we can directly influence the quality of life for people who live in, work in, and visit our city. Our streets are not just a means to move people and goods. They provide space for public life, economic exchange, and community gathering. A P T S Business people meet on the street to walk and talk. GROCERIES Kids learn about traffic safety and how to navigate the world while walking to school. P People take a leisurely midday bike ride. Tourists take a stroll, enjoying a street performance while heading out to dinner. RESTAURAN DOWNTOWN 8 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Residents gather on the street to protest. HARDWARE Plan Salt Lake Specialized Plans and Studies S L C O N N E C T Area and Community Plans SLC SLC Transit Pedestrian Master Plan Master Plan Complete Streets Ordinance Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide How does Connect SLC relate to other plans? Connect SLC is rooted in the building blocks of Plan Salt Lake to “Establish and articulate a citywide vision for Salt Lake City.” It focuses specifically on the Plan Salt Lake guiding principles of Neighborhoods, Growth, Transportation, Air Quality, Beautiful City, Equity, and Economy. Project timeline 2021 SUMMER Select Community Advisory Committee FALL Set Community Values, Vision, and Framework Phase 1 Engagement 2022 WINTER - SUMMER Develop Key Policies and Programs Phase 2 Engagement FALL Develop the Key Moves 2023 SPRING - SUMMER Compile the Plan FALL Adopt the Plan 9 What has SLC accomplished since the 1996 Transportation Plan? Salt Lake City’s last citywide transportation plan was completed in 1996. Since that time, our population has grown and our neighboring communities whose residents work and go to school in SLC have also expanded dramatically. We’ve taken many steps to improve the transportation options available for our growing community. The Winter Olympics leads to an expedited expansion FrontRunner commuter rail begins operating from SLC to Ogden The Downtown in Motion Master Plan presents a The North Temple multimodal corridor opens with bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and the Green Line TRAX serving SLC airport, providing an important multimodal east–west connection Bike corrals are first added to SLC streets at the request of local businesses, replacing a SLC publishes its Transportation Plan 1999 of I-15 that includes high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes 2007 vision for separated bike lanes downtown 2010 single car parking space with a 10-bike rack 1996 2002 2008 2011 A western segment of the The first TRAX light rail line opens from Downtown SLC to Sandy The Complete Streets Executive Order requires SLC streets to be designed, operated, and maintained for all modes of traffic, including for people walking and biking, and for travelers of all ages and abilities The Complete Streets Ordinance codifies the prior Executive Order, ensuring that the policy remains in place 9-Line Trail is constructed along the old 900 South railroad corridor 50 miles of new and redesigned bikeways open in SLC—the largest annual expansion in the city’s history 10 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan SLC’s first protected intersection for bikes opens, connecting protected lanes on 300 South to 200 West—the second protected intersection in America and the first one constructed using Federal funds The 600 East Neighborhood Byway opens—the first low-speed, low-volume street optimized for comfortable Streetcars return to SLC with the opening of the S-Line and the passage of the Sugar House Circulation Plan GREENbike, Utah’s non-profit bike share program, launches in SLC 2012 bicycle and pedestrian travel in Utah The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan declares walking and bicycling as integral to SLC’s transportation system Plan Salt Lake provides a 25-year vision to balance growth, sustainability, and livability 2016 The Transit Plan was developed, prioritizing the frequent transit network, pilot programs for shuttles, enhanced bus corridors, and transit access improvements 2018 Utah Transit Authority (UTA) establishes permanent on-demand service to Southern Salt Lake County and SLC Westside UTA pilots fare free transit for one month—“Free Fare February” 2022 2013 2015 2017 2021 Utah’s first bicycle traffic signal is installed on 1300 South and 600 East at the south end of Liberty Park SLC constructs its first protected bike lane, a 2-block segment along 300 East The McClelland Trail and the University to Downtown Bikeway opens Over 130 hybrid-electric or all-electric vehicles are included in the City’s fleet The first dockless scooter companies launch in SLC as part of an 18-month Dockless Shared Micro-Mobility pilot University of Utah and Brigham Young University sign deal with the UTA and issue free transit passes for all students SLC Council approves updates to residential and off-street parking requirements to support affordable housing and help meet climate goals 11 What key issues does Connect SLC address? SLC is one of the fastest growing urban areas in the country. In 2022, SLC was among the top ten fastest growing cities in the country,1 growing by 14,000 residents or 7.5% since 2010. An additional 30,000 residents are projected in the next 20 years.2 The surrounding metropolitan area, including Salt Lake and Tooele Counties, are projected to grow even faster. A growing population means more demand on our streets, and more people traveling in, around, and out of the city. SLC must focus on housing affordability and bringing people closer to destinations. Our transportation system supports a vibrant downtown core and provides access to businesses throughout SLC. Downtown in Motion was developed to revitalize the core and connect people to transit. Recent housing policy changes also allow for more density by permitting the construction of missing middle housing. When more homes and destinations are closer together, it is easier for people to take transit, walk, and bike to meet their daily needs. Effective transportation and land use policy is a powerful tool in addressing affordability by bringing residents closer to essential services, healthy food options, and jobs. Transportation decisions have divided SLC, hindering Westside neighborhoods. People living in Westside neighborhoods are disconnected from jobs, recreation, and essential services due to I-15, I-80, freight rail tracks, and other large projects. While investment occurs in the Westside, there has been a lack of outreach to and collaboration with historically marginalized communities, leading to distrust and an inability to address the needs of the community. Future transportation investments must reflect the voices and needs of people in the Westside neighborhoods. 12 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan There are limited transportation options to combat climate change. The American Lung Association 2022 State of the Air report card ranks SLC at 20th in the nation for short-term particle pollution,3 and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has consistently spotlighted the city for its dangerous levels of pollutants. Ozone pollution is exceptionally high in the region, of which 50% is directly generated by motor vehicles.4 Transformational changes are needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. Promoting active transportation and increasing use of public transit by expanding transit options are essential to meeting climate goals set forth in the SLC Climate Positive 2040 Resolution. Traffic deaths are on the rise. During the COVID-19 pandemic, motor vehicle traffic declined, but traffic deaths increased. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic fatalities and series injuries have gone up. Utah had a record number of bicycle and vehicle fatalities in 2021.5 In 2023, SLC committed to eliminating traffic fatalities by joining the Vision Zero Network. Changes to policy and public infrastructure are critical to protect and ensure the safety of our most vulnerable road users. Addressing safety encourages residents to walk, bike, and roll. Travel options are needed for people traveling at all times of day. Traffic in the morning and evening commute hours has decreased compared to pre- pandemic levels. The COVID-19 pandemic showed that travel for essential services is spread throughout the day. Future transportation decisions must be inclusive of all travel patterns, not just those of commuters during the typical peak hours. 13 Vision We envision a Salt Lake City where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices that support safety, health, and sustainability. Our commitment to a more equitable future Connect SLC centers equity in our transportation planning process, focusing on those who have been negatively impacted by past policies and investments, and highlighting the critical need to address the accessibility, connectivity, and mobility challenges experienced by people and communities who have historically been historically left out of the decision-making process. 14 Connect SLC Transportation Master Plan 2023 Goals Our goals—articulated through public input and crafted by the project’s Community Advisory Committee—inform the Key Moves and associated strategies and actions to achieve them. Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. 15 Getting around Salt Lake City 16 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 2 17 We envision a transportation system that is safe and reliable for people walking, rolling, biking, and taking transit. So safe and reliable, in fact, that they are preferred travel options! Currently, driving feels to many like the safest and most reliable way to get around, but not everyone can drive and our climate and city can’t sustain the impacts of so many vehicle trips. Our transportation system does not fully meet the diverse and varied needs of our community. Whether it’s commuting to work, taking a walk to nearby parks, or biking to school, more work is needed to overcome historical barriers for people who navigate the city without personal vehicles. Source: 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates 5% 3% (Other) 250K+ 63% Getting to work Most commutes are made by driving alone, putting stress on existing roadways and slowing our progress towards cleaner air. How do people get to work in SLC? people work within SLC. ENGAGEMENT SPOTLIGHT 18 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan drive alone to work 13% typically work from home (significant increase after the COVID-19 pandemic) 6% take transit, and fewer walk (5%) and bike (3%) 83% live outside SLC city limits and travel into SLC on a regular basis. Providing convenient regional transportation options is key to meeting the needs of longer- distance commuters. Each person in this graphic represents 10,000 commuters Source: LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics, 2019 “Please do a better job of accounting for people who don’t drive in cars everywhere they go. Streets seem designed only for drivers, and everyone else seems like an afterthought.” “The city has an overabundance of on-street parking… We should rethink our use of that space for greater public benefit, like micro-parks, placemaking, transit and pedestrian islands, and bicycle storage.” Pedestrian, bicyclist, and motorcyclist casualties from road- based collisions are rising. Source: UDOTZeroFatalities Year-to-Year Fatality Dashboard 94 Salt Lake County ... ... of which 94 fatalities took place within 12 ... representing an increase of 12 fatalities from 2021 14%3%138 Addressing safety challenges 322 traffic collisions claimed 322 lives in Utah in 2022 ... Riding a bike SLC enjoys great access to mountains and nature, with extensive trails outside the urban area. However, getting to these destinations without a private vehicle is challenging. Demand is rising for an all-ages-and-abilities bicycle network to make bicycling a viable means of reliably getting around the city both for commuters and for recreation. of streets in SLC have designated bikeway infrastructure.6 The citywide bicycle network is incomplete, with many gaps that prevent access to existing trails. of people ride a bike to work,7 but many others also bike to local stores, restaurants, and services. New projects such as the 9 Line and McClelland trails are helping to build out the 2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. miles of shared-use trails across SLC. While this is an invaluable resource, many trails still don’t connect safely to places where people live or need to go. 19 660ft blocks Salt Lake City Taking transit Transit ridership on UTA buses, FrontRunner, and TRAX light rail is well below pre- pandemic level, but people are coming back to transit.8 How much has ridership recovered since the pandemic? There are new opportunities that inspire hope for transit in SLC: A long walk around the block Standard blocks in SLC are twice as long as in most major cities, making it challenging to connect to transit and other destinations without using a personal vehicle. Ridership on the S-Line Streetcar surpassed pre-pandemic levels in summer 2022, as high-density residential developments are completed along the corridor. This is a testament to the benefit of transit-oriented development. UTA On Demand saw a 300% increase in ridership in the first year of service, with more than 1,000 rides provided in December 2022. 20 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan A P T S STORE 81%DOWNTOWN Bus ridership 67% FrontRunner rail ridership Light rail ridership 59% Source: UTA Ridership, Feb. 2020 and Feb. 2023 300ft blocks San Francisco Portland (OR) 200ft blocks Fe b 2 0 2 0 r i d e r s h i p DOWNTOWN Innovative transportation solutions are adapting to changes in the way we travel REMOTE AND HYBRID WORK A shift to remote and hybrid work has transformed how and when we travel. DEMAND AT ALL TIMES OF DAY Where traditional transit services remain scheduled to serve peak hour travel, the success of UTA’s On Demand and S-Line streetcar show how serving riders at all times of day is more important than ever before. NEW COMPLEMENTARY OPTIONS New mobility options will continue to play an important role to complement bus and rail services and provide more options for people in SLC to move around. 21 Community engagement Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan22 3 23 Connect SLC is a community-driven plan. It is grounded in ideas from families, youth, seniors, people of color, people with disabilities, people who are unhoused, people who are not fluent in English, and other people who have historically been left out of the conversation. We connected with people in three ways: •A community Advisory Committee •Two online surveys •In-person workshops and conversations with people at community events The Connect SLC engagement process sought to understand community values around transportation, identify what people saw as our biggest challenges and issues, and gain insight into key moves that would help address our most pressing needs. What was the community engagement timeline? 24 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 2021 2022 2023 Project Kickoff •Launch Project Webpage •Invite applications for the Community Advisory Committee Phase 1 Engagement •Identify community values for transportation Phase 2 Engagement •Design big ideas and key moves for transportation •Host SLC Westside Charrette Week Final Plan •Unveil final Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan How to effectively engage the community CAC members provided feedback on the public engagement plan for Connect SLC Goal setting CAC members refined plan goals and values, and defined opportunities and challenges facing our transportation system Key Moves and strategies The CAC informed solutions and strategies to improve our streets and transportation network Solutions for east– west connectivity The CAC walked parts of the city where I-15 and rail tracks divide our neighborhoods and discussed future solutions 25 Who is the Community Advisory Committee? Connect SLC convened a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) to ensure diverse perspectives of the community were represented in shaping the plan. We developed a framework for selecting a representative group of residents, then put out an open call for membership applications. Members were selected based on their diverse skills, experiences, community involvement, and unique transportation perspectives, and were compensated for their time. The CAC included nine members from the SLC community bringing diverse professional and lived experiences of navigating the transportation network as people of color, people with disabilities, and other underrepresented populations. The CAC helped shape the plan through meetings and tours covering: City staff also met with CAC members in smaller groups to review plan goals, key moves for the future of transportation, and other critical elements of the draft plan. Throughout the planning process, CAC members played a key role in conducting in-person engagement and outreach directly in their communities. Phase 1: Transportation Values Connect SLC engagement began with a focus on understanding what community members valued and how systems for mobility and access influenced our collective ability to achieve those values. Connect SLC vision and goals are drawn from these conversations. What we did We collected public feedback on transportation values online and in-person. This effort coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing much of our in-person efforts to pivot from their original design. •An online survey was available in English and Spanish and asked respondents to rank what they value in a transportation system. •An interactive Community Values Tapestry activity asked community members to prioritize values in a transportation system during in-person events. Due to the pandemic, in-person events were limited to pop up vaccine clinics at Westside elementary schools. While the number of responses was smaller than we might have hoped, the people we heard from represent historically underrepresented communities. 939 community members reached through in-person events and online surveys The Community Values Tapestry was an interactive activity asking the community to share their most important values related to transportation. 26 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Values The community’s top values were Reliability, Air Quality and the Environment, Safety, and Affordability. The CAC added Equity as a value. EQUITY RELIABILITY AIR QUALITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY AFFORDABILITY What we heard Outcomes Community members identified the following important outcomes. Improve zero- and low-emission options (walking, bicycling, transit) Increase transit frequency and reliability Reduce traffic speeds Improve road pavement conditions Enhance street lighting Widen sidewalks Ensure transit is affordable 27 DOWNTOWN A B DOWNTOWN Phase 2: Big Ideas The second phase of community engagement presented 14 potential strategies to improve our transportation network and support the Connect SLC vision and values. We called these strategies our “Big Ideas” for transportation. What we did Pop-up events 2,479 Interactions 7 Events The project team and the CAC conducted multiple in-person pop-up events. These events were focused on reaching underrepresented populations, such as unhoused people, youth, and residents of Westside neighborhoods. We asked people to give feedback on the Big Ideas and had a map available for participants to note specific improvements. At least one Spanish-speaking staff member was present at each pop-up. Pop-ups were organized at the following locations and events: •Gail Miller Resource Center •Art @ The Confluence •West High School •Living Traditions Festival •Spy Hop •University Neighborhood Partners •Northwest Recreation Center These boards asked the public to weigh in on which ideas to improve transportation in SLC were most important to them. The prevention of traffic deaths, making transportation affordable, expanding transit, and creating public spaces were the four highest rated suggestions of the 14 options shown. Photo: Salt Lake City. 28 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan StoryMap A web-based StoryMap provided in English and Spanish was distributed online to complement the Pop-Up events. The StoryMap included a short description of each Big Idea and allowed people to indicate their level of support. An interactive map allowed participants to place points and draw lines in places where they saw opportunity for transportation improvements. Westside Connections Charrette Week The Westside Connections Charrette Week brought together residents, community-based organization leaders, city staff, and agency partner staff to document gaps and identify ideas for transportation and public space improvements between Westside and Eastside neighborhoods. Activities included stakeholder interviews and a facilitated walking tour, or “Walkshop.” The Walkshop, which included members of the CAC, provided a first-hand experience of the persistent challenges of Westside transportation infrastructure and barriers crossing I-15 and the railroad tracks. 800+ Visits to the StoryMap 702 StoryMap interactions 120 Points and lines added to the map Interactive online map survey from StoryMap engagement. Photo: Connect SLC Local residents and city staff came together for a “walkshop” along major divides between the Westside and Eastside neighborhoods to discuss challenges and opportunities. Photo: Salt Lake City 29 What we heard Participants in the Phase 2 online survey and in-person events voiced the strongest support for these five Big Ideas: •Price options relative to people’s income: Provide free transit, continue Free Fare February, and expand the existing Free Fare Zone. •Grow the city’s tree canopy: Increase the tree canopy in support of climate adaptability. •Create more safe places to cross the street: Improve safety at intersections, crosswalks, and on the streets in general. Fast vehicle speeds and the width of streets make it discouraging and dangerous for people to walk. •Support frequent, connected transit: Provide frequent and connected transit that is a reliable and sustainable alternative to driving. Improve service in Westside neighborhoods and expand transit to run on evenings and weekends. Install improved bus stops that provide shelter. •Reconnect neighborhoods: Reconnect neighborhoods that have been divided by highways. Augment public space and improve connections between neighborhoods for people who walk, roll, and bike. People also shared their own Big Ideas for transportation. •Improve and add protected bike lanes. Connect existing bike lanes to form a network and separate them from pedestrians and cars to facilitate more bike trips. •Enforce and educate for safety. Enforce lower speed limits. Educate drivers and transit operators to look out for people walking and biking. •Prioritize people, not cars. Design for more density in the city. Decrease dependency on cars to improve air quality, especially on high inversion days. Focus on increasing foot traffic to support local businesses. On wide streets, reallocate space used for cars to space for people—widen sidewalks and add bike lanes. 30 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Internal engagement The Connect SLC team engaged staff from many City departments that help deliver and manage the City’s mobility options. These people bring an important perspective and can represent input from the very many citizens they interact with in their work. Presentations and check-ins Progress on the plan was presented to the following internal organizations throughout the process. Feedback was collected and incorporated at every stage. •Bicycle Advisory Committee •Accessibility and Disability Commission •Transportation Advisory Board •Salt Lake City Planning Commission •Mayor’s Office of Equity and Inclusion •Salt Lake City Council Internal City workshops A series of internal City workshops with staff and Division Directors were conducted to help shape the plan. These workshops were critical to gain buy-in and allow the various divisions that work in the right-of-way to provide critical input to ensure successful implementation of the plan. “I really enjoyed getting to work with other people in my community who are passionate about improving transportation for everyone. Our meetings were always collaborative and focused on making sure the most underserved members of our community had a voice in the proposed changes. With lots of events and feedback, we were able to create a plan that aims to include all of the diverse groups within SLC.” —Testimonial from CAC member Tessa Nicolaides 31 Aligning transportation with our values 32 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 4 Connect SLC is rooted in our community’s values and collective desire to provide equitable access to jobs, schools, housing, parks, and community resources. Our community values affordable transportation options, clean air and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and streets that keep everyone—especially our most vulnerable travelers—safe. Community values shape Connect SLC From November 2021 through January 2022, Salt Lake City (SLC) conducted an online and in-person citywide survey to understand the public’s priorities and values for transportation. This engagement was the foundation for shaping the Connect SLC vision and goals. Five goals emerged, informed by the values we heard from the community: Equity: Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety: Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options: Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability: People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability: Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. 33 Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Our challenges Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods are home to the city’s greatest concentration of people of color, people with low incomes, young people, people with disabilities, and people who speak English as a second language. Streets, sidewalks, and transportation infrastructure and services in Westside neighborhoods have been shaped by historic disinvestment and many of the most polluting, harmful transportation uses have been located in this area. Westside neighborhoods have more sidewalk gaps, fewer transit options, and fewer bike facilities than other parts of the city. While Westside neighborhoods are some of the most affordable places to live in SLC, residents are at a high risk of displacement.9 The City must balance new investment with strategies to prevent displacement. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City has made progress in improving transportation options and facilities for Westside neighborhoods. The reconstruction of 900 South and the 300 North pedestrian and bicycle bridge provide much-needed west-to-east connections. The Westside Transportation Equity Study proposes many equity-driven engagement strategies and transportation projects and the City was awarded a Reconnecting Communities grant in 2023 to help foster east–west connectivity. The City has also recently initiated complementary efforts for equitable food access, housing, and gentrification mitigation. 34 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan “Equitable access to the community through transportation, especially for marginalized communities, should be the primary focus of any plan. Focus on making transportation improvements in low-income areas in ways that residents will use and appreciate.” “Me preocupa que el transporte público aumente los precios de la renta y la vivienda. Me gustaría que nuevos proyectos tomen en consideración el impacto económico en las comunidades de bajos ingresos porque no quiero que mi comunidad sea desplazada.” “Everyone should have equal access to the transportation, regardless of ability or disability.” 35 This map presents the census tracts within Salt Lake City limits by equity score, which represents the concentration of people of color, with low income, with disabilities, and other factors within the tract. Areas with the highest concentration are on the west side of I-15. Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other mobility device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Our challenges SLC’s streets pose a challenge to safety. There were 400 severe and fatal crashes in SLC from 2016-2020; 40% involved someone walking or riding a bicycle. SLC’s block lengths and streets widths are twice as long and wide as other major U.S. cities. People are more likely to drive faster when streets are wide, and higher vehicle speeds in crashes involving pedestrians mean a lower chance of survival. Wide streets also mean it takes people longer to cross the street, and they are more exposed to vehicles travelling at high speeds. This risk is even higher for people who move slower due to age or disability. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City is committed to Vision Zero, the goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries. To meet this goal, the City will build on the work of the multi-department Safe Streets Task Force to analyze crashes and identify where future interventions are needed to prevent traffic injuries and deaths. The City has also partnered with the Utah Department of Transportation’s Zero Fatalities program for safety education. Along with our partners at the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC), SLC is one of six communities to receive a Federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant. The grant will allow WFRC to coordinate with the selected communities on the creation of a regional traffic safety action plan. The work will help SLC and its neighbors to generate new and useful ideas and policy for safer streets regionwide. 36 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan “I often fear for my safety any time I’m not traveling in a car. This is mostly due to wide roads and unsafe crossings. Cars travel too fast and too close to the sidewalk in many places.” “I would like to bike and walk more; many streets and sidewalks don’t make me feel safe.” “Zero transportation related deaths should be the #1 priority.” “I just want protection from the drivers. I’d like to see young and old feel confident moving around their home city on their feet or bicycle without risking their lives.” 37 This map shows the locations within SLC where fatal and severe injuries from traffic collisions took place, with the highest concentration of collisions clustered in Downtown and along Redwood Road and State Street. mph25 mph30 mph50 Vehicle speed and risk of pedestrian fatality There is a strong correlation between vehicle speeds and the risk of pedestrian fatality or severe injury.10 Lower speeds are a key component of improving roadway safety for all. chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan38 25%50%90% “Reliability is important for me because I work full-time at a hospital and being on time for work is a priority.” “People need to be able to trust their transportation when planning for their day.” Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Our challenges A reliable transportation system gets people where they need to go on time and provides a smooth, comfortable experience. If transit comes at unpredictable times, or sidewalks always need maintenance and are covered in snow or debris, then people have a hard time depending on taking transit or walking. In SLC, transit typically takes much longer than driving, buses and trains don’t come often enough, and transit stops aren’t always close enough to provide a seamless connection. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City has identified a Frequent Transit Network to target fast, reliable bus service through infrastructure improvements like transit lanes and signal improvements. The City is also working with UTA to build multimodal mobility hubs to connect great walking and biking options to transit service and concentrate amenities like bikeshare, bike parking, and public space. “If I can’t count on the system, I’m not going to use it.” 39 Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Our challenges Housing and transportation are the biggest expenses for most households. Affordability continues to be a primary concern for residents in SLC.11 On average, housing and transportation costs account for 39% of household spending, and the cost of transportation increases as residents live further away from the central area of SLC.12 People with low incomes typically cannot afford to live near their workplaces and have longer commutes.13 For people who are unhoused or living in severe poverty, the costs of car ownership or transit passes can be an obstacle to meeting daily needs. What’s in motion? There are several programs in SLC to support transit affordability: •UTA Reduced Fare FAREPAY Card provides a 50% discount off the public fare to all qualifying seniors, youth, persons with disabilities, and individuals who qualify based on income. •Hive Pass Program is a half-price ($42/mo) pass available to SLC residents. •Student Pass Programs provide passes to students of all ages. All students in the SLC school district and their parents receive free passes. Students, staff, and faculty at the University of Utah and Brigham Young University can access free transit by using their campus ID cards, thanks to a partnership with UTA. •Fare Free February was a pilot in February 2022 where UTA provided free transit for one month to increase ridership and to remove the cost burden of transportation for all Utahns. 40 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Fare Free February was touted as a success with noticeable increases in ridership during the fare free month. The largest increases were observed on Saturdays. Average Saturday ridership in February was up 58.1% over January. Weekday ridership was up 16.2% and Sunday ridership was up 32.5%.14 Source: UTA Fare Free February Final Report (2022) “I work with a lot of underprivileged folks in the community and wish it were easier and cheaper to use the bus and TRAX.” “Affordability means more access to more people.” “Public transportation should be free to people under the poverty line.” 41 This map illustrates the areas in SLC with households that spend the greatest proportion of their income on housing and transportation costs. People living in the most northeastern and southeastern parts of the city bear the highest transportation cost burden, corresponding to the lack of transit access in those neighborhoods. The costs are increasingly higher the farther one lives from Downtown. Sustainability The people of Salt Lake City can use convenient transportation options that help to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality. Our challenges Salt Lake City’s air quality is among the worst of any U.S. city. Poor air quality is particularly harmful to children, the elderly, and people with chronic conditions such as heart and lung disease, and disproportionately affects people with lower incomes and people of color. Researchers from the University of Utah found that schools in SLC with predominantly low-income and non-white students were disproportionately exposed to air pollution, even on What’s in motion? Salt Lake City’s Climate Positive 2040 aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2040 and will focus on transportation emissions. The Clean the Air Challenge and Idle Free Utah are two initiatives SLC has in place to encourage more sustainable modes of transportation. ZERO WASTE RENEWABLE ENERGY clean air days. Motor vehicle emissions are a major contributor to climate change, which has exacerbated the drought conditions that are contributing to rapidly reduced water levels in the Great Salt Lake. The drying lake poses the threat of toxic arsenic-laced dust being blown into the city. EFFICIENT BUILDINGS 50% RENEWABLES FOR MUNICIPAL ELECTRICITY RESILIENC Y SUSTAINABLE FOOD 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR COMMUNITY ELECTRICITY CLEAN TRANSPORTATION 80% REDUCTION IN GREENHOUSE “Air quality is worsening in Salt Lake City and I want our children to inherit a ENHANCED PREPAREDNESS & LIVABILITY 2020 2032 GAS EMISSIONS 2040 healthy city.”Source: Salt Lake City Climate Positive 2040 (2017) 42 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan “Climate change is our biggest threat. I would love to see a more expansive public transport system across different areas in the valley.” REDUCTION IN POLLUTION & CARBON EMISSIONS 50% Motor vehicles account for about half of all emissions in Salt Lake City Improvements in vehicle technology have led to cleaner air ￿Emissions Why is air quality a major problem in Salt Lake City? Salt Lake City’s air quality is among the worst of any U.S. city #8 for high ozone days #17 for daily particle pollution Particulates are high in the winter when the Salt Lake Valley experiences inversions Warm air high in the atmosphere acts like a lid Cold air and pollution are trapped lower down between the mountains Ozone is high in the summer Bad air quality is bad for residents’ health Parts of SLC have a higher rate of asthma than 95% of the nation Kids and other vulnerable populations are especially impacted Data Sources: American Lung Association, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, CDC Places 43 Key Moves Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan44 5 Key Moves are how we move to action and achieve our transportation goals This section describes the eight Connect SLC Key Moves as well as their strategies, actions, and evaluation metrics. The Key Moves are: Authentic and Intentional Engagement Zero Traffic Deaths Great Networks for Active Mobility Transit Friendly Neighborhoods DOWNTOWN Healing the East- West Divide Low-Emissions Mobility Options Places for People Operationalize Complete Streets 45 KEY MOVE 1 KEY MOVE 2 Overview of Key Moves, strategies, and actions Authentic and Intentional Engagement Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the planning table. 1.1 Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices Action: Improve staff understanding of the local community by meeting people where they are Action: Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and build capacity for public engagement Action: Center community input and needs in directing future investments for the Westside 1.2 Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation Action: Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower neighborhood voices in leading outreach efforts Action: Compensate community participants to value their time and contributions 1.3 Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City and the local community Action: Establish embedded community focus groups or advisory panels Action: Actively demonstrate the outcomes of community input Action: Update the engagement guide with a workplan for recurring, collaborative co-creation Zero Traffic Deaths Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. 2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan Action: Convene a Vision Zero working group Action: Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety Action: Analyze crash history and create a plan for action 2.2 Create safer streets Action: Take advantage of federal funding opportunities Action: Focus on high-injury corridors and intersections Action: Reduce vehicle speeds 46 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Great Networks for Active Mobility Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. 3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity Action: Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network Action: Adopt crossing guidelines Action: Identify the greatest needs for improving active mobility 3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options Action: Implement low-stress facility design Action: Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy Action: Improve work zone standards 3.3 Create active spaces Action: Create slow, shared, and car-free streets Action: Activate alleys Transit Friendly Neighborhoods Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City. 4.1 Make transit convenient and reliable Action: Institutionalize SLC and UTA partnership with a joint taskforce on advancing transit Action: Expand the city’s bus lane and transit signal priority (TSP) network 4.2 Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces Action: Expand SLC’s Downtown Ambassadors program to support and staff transit facilities Action: Work with UTA to upgrade bus stops in SLC with passenger amenities Action: Harness technology to modernize major transit facilities and waiting areas 4.3 Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option Action: Establish multimodal mobility hubs in local areas of importance and future growth Action: Improve access-to-transit infrastructure to complete the city’s street network Action: Use Small Area and Circulation plans to encourage dense development around station areas 47 KEY MOVE 3 KEY MOVE 4 Healing the East-West Divide Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. 5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy Action: Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most impacted by transportation infrastructure Action: Center human safety, health, and experience Action: Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action 5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks Action: Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east–west divide Action: Develop bold concepts to repair and build community Action: Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable east–west travel 5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale Action: Create a program to bring life and community identity to “below the freeway” spaces Action: Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses for “in between” spaces Action: Rethink freeway ramps 5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared Action: Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods Action: Use grade and elevation to create great experiences Low-Emissions Mobility Options Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our streets. 6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options Action: Hire a transportation options program manager to enhance employer outreach Action: Expand student and education pass programs Action: Implement a transportation wallet Action: Incentivize developers to incorporate transportation demand management (TDM) into the development process 6.2 Manage existing parking supply Action: Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program Action: Understand parking utilization and performance Action: Optimize a single mobile parking application 6.3 Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand Action: Create an updated parking brand and communications plan Action: Prioritize clear and consistent wayfinding and signage Action: Pilot a park-once-and-walk district in Downtown SLC 6.4 Develop a curb management strategy Action: Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across Salt Lake City Action: Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses Action: Develop Curb Management Guidelines 48 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan KEY MOVE 5 KEY MOVE 6 Places for People Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. 7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas Action: Create public realm action plans Action: Incentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans Action: Establish a green street network 7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts Action: Value street and alley vacations Action: Require midblock pathways Operationalize Complete Streets Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership. 8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management Action: Integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle Action: Structure project development teams to ensure accountability Action: Establish a Complete Streets Steering Committee 8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making Action: Update the Quality Transportation Improvement Program screening tool to align with Connect SLC Action: Develop data-driven storytelling tools to support Complete Streets assessments Action: Align capital projects with policies and best practice 8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Action: Formalize use of the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in project development Action: Require compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in the Complete Streets assessment 49 KEY MOVE 7 KEY MOVE 8 KEY MOVE 1 Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Build lasting relationships and empower diverse community voices to shape transportation decisions. Centering equity and community voices in decision-making rejuvenates public enthusiasm and trust in the transportation planning process. We continue to build on the active and inclusive engagement started during Connect SLC to shape a future informed by community. Supporting our values Equity: Salt Lakers are informed and involved participants in the planning process. Equity: Solutions for transportation are co-created with the community, not just for the community. Equity: Salt Lake City residents have trust in the planning process, feel that their voices are actively being heard by decision-makers, and see the results. Our strategies 1.1 Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices 1.2 Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation 1.3 Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City and local community 50 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: Salt Lake City WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •A lack of trust and relationships has opened a chasm between the community and the agencies that are making transportation decisions. •SLC has identified best practices for existing engagement practices, but more still needs to be done. The community is looking for more transformative, participatory means of direct engagement with transportation planning. •Historically underserved communities, particularly those living in Westside neighborhoods, are skeptical that top-down planning decisions will serve their needs. •Salt Lake City’s Civic Engagement Team has an established Engagement Guide that details best practices, tactics, and checklists on the technical aspects of engagement. •The Westside Transportation Equity Study is a landmark report that calls out the disparity in transportation infrastructure across different neighborhoods in SLC, highlighting the need for a transformative approach to reengage the Westside. •The State of Transportation Equity in Utah (Utah Division of Multicultural Affairs) is a 2022 report conducted by the state of Utah, outlining the disparities that exist in transportation access in the state. •Connect SLC established a process to pay community members to serve on the Community Advisory Committee. Engagement Spotlight “Transformation in our approach [to public engagement], rather than more techniques.” —SLC Westside Transportation Equity Study “Our historic and personal biases are far from just. In this process, as in all our work, the goal is to take ownership of the past and strive to do better in the future.”—SLC Westside Transportation Equity Study 51 “Meet people on the street, at bus stops, at grocery stores, and other gathering places to ask for their input.” —Community Advisory Committee, Connect SLC ACTION Strategy 1.1: Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices Amplify the voices of communities that have been historically disenfranchised by planning processes and level the playing field in civic participation. Improve staff understanding of the local community by meeting people where they are Formal public meetings can be a barrier to many people, since they traditionally take place during the evenings when white-collar workers (including planners) are available, while those with varying shift jobs are not. This skews engagement toward those who work during the day and have the time, energy, and resources to attend, while often missing the voices of those directly impacted by changes. To truly meet our residents where they are means beginning with an understanding of who they are and what challenges they face. Strategies include: •Tabling at shopping centers, community centers, and places of worship at all hours and on all days of the week. •Recognizing that not all of our residents speak English well or at all, and won’t engage unless they feel confident they will be understood. •Compensating participants and providing childcare services, recognizing that not everyone has the time and ability to engage meaningfully. 52 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Case Study: NYCDOT Street Ambassador Program (New York, NY) NYC Department of Transportation’s Street Ambassador program engages residents in their communities. The program was launched in 2015 to engage residents around upcoming projects and establish long-term, ongoing connections with the community to increase their understanding of planning concepts and the changes that are possible on city streets. Best Practice Takeaways: •Be intentional about seeking out and hearing from marginalized groups. •Assemble a multi-lingual team ready to engage with residents regardless of English language proficiency. •Think creatively about where to engage with residents. As well as places like senior centers and libraries, Street Ambassador teams canvass at malls, public beaches, and movie theaters. •Design the engagement strategy as an entry point into the planning profession, creating pathways to leadership and future opportunities for community members. NYCDOT Street Ambassadors tabling and meeting community members at a public event booth. Source: NYCDOT Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and build capacity for public engagement Partnering with community-based organizations (CBOs) helps to achieve robust community participation and understanding of community needs. SLC should partner with–and pay – a diverse group of CBOs, representing a range of community interests. Planning staff and CBOs should also jointly establish clear roles, goals, and expectations for successful partnerships. Partnerships with organizations should include a commitment to Center community input and needs in directing future investments for the Westside The Westside of SLC—segregated from the Eastside by I-15 and at- grade freight rail—has long been disproportionately impacted by inequitable transportation investment, causing long-standing frustration and distrust towards City planning processes. In 2023, SLC received a federal Reconnecting Communities grant to study options for healing the East-West divide. This is a landmark opportunity to correct and remedy past harms by practicing authentic and intentional community partnerships. Some example strategies include: build capacity. This includes training planning staff to work with CBOs and understand their unique skillsets and ensuring that CBO members have access to resources that explain planning concepts and best practices for partnering with agencies (for example, understanding procurement or how to write a proposal). •Convening focus groups with people of diverse lived experiences and personal histories. •Using visual communication and visual preference surveys over text- based information and surveys. •Allocating sufficient staff time to be responsive to community questions and concerns. Case Study: Los Angeles Metro Equity Platform & Community Based Organization Partnering Strategy (Los Angeles, CA) LA Metro (the regional transit provider in Los Angeles, CA), adopted an equity platform in 2018 to define equity for the agency and outline its approach to centering equity in internal and external processes. A key component of the platform is developing and investing in an engagement program oriented to community-based organizations (CBOs). In 2021 the agency released its CBO Partnering Strategy that includes a set of recommendations to improve LA Metro’s growing partnerships with community organizations. Best Practice Takeaways: •Create accountability and set clear and consistent parameters for partnering with CBOs. Mutually agreed upon scope of work and timeline should be revisited throughout the duration of a project. •Make room to acknowledge and address any preexisting agency-CBO tensions that may impact collaboration. •Establish an internal resource library, including sample contracting templates for CBOs. 53 ACTION ACTION Local Spotlight: Salt Lake City Westside Transportation Equity Study (2021) The Westside is home to the highest concentrations of minority populations in SLC and the wider Wasatch Front region. Yet one’s transportation options and access in the Westside neighborhoods differ drastically from those in Downtown, the University of Utah, or other neighborhoods to the east of I-15. In a joint effort, SLC, UDOT, and UTA conducted the Westside Transportation Equity Study to identify strategies to engage with and invest in the historically underserved Westside neighborhoods. Some opportunities from the study include: •Improve community engagement and direct infrastructure improvements to the Westside. •Build trust in engagement processes. 48% of residents in Districts 1 and 2 (Westside) are Latinx, but only comprised 7% of respondents to past project surveys. •Involve the community in actual design processes to improve public confidence in future investments. Opportunities for community co- creation of ideas, projects, and programs hold the most promise for meaningful change and relationship building. Examples of this include bus stop design workshops that took place in the Rose Park neighborhood, where local CBOs worked hand-in-hand with agency staff. Community members and city staff paint road surfacing as part of a community workshop. Source: Salt Lake City Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan54 ACTION ACTION Strategy 1.2: Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation Weave community members’ participation into the process to collaboratively develop solutions with planning staff. Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower neighborhood voices in leading outreach efforts A proactive and inclusive approach to community engagement creates opportunities for co-creation. This strategy empowers both government and the public to collaborate in decision-making, jointly designing, planning, and executing project work. A key component of co-creation is centering events designed and led by residents, including bike rides, walk audits, charrettes, and healing spaces. These events cement residents’ ownership of the narrative surrounding their communities and the changes they wish to see. City staff should be trained to support and empower local voices to lead in these contexts. Establish a compensation program for direct payment to citizen and community organization participants Community-based organizations and residents bring valuable time and irreplicable insight to the planning table and should be compensated for their work. Compensation for community member participation is becoming a standard practice nationally, but procurement and contracting procedures can add complicated barriers. SLC should establish clear internal practices around compensation. Partnering with umbrella organizations will help to ensure that organizations and community members are paid fairly and with ease. 55 Case Study: LADOT Vision Zero dignity-infused community engagement strategy (Los Angeles, CA) LADOT’s Vision Zero Dignity-Infused Community Engagement model takes an expansive and restorative approach to engagement. The model seeks to atone for the negative impacts of past planning practices and to incorporate a wide range of lived experience and perspective in the technical planning process. A Vision Zero project on LA’s Avalon Boulevard created an inclusive experience for residents by training them as street team leaders, working with local street vendors to spread awareness and increase participation in neighborhood Vision Zero events, and providing support for community led bike rides. Best Practice Takeaways: •Partner with local CBO to stand up a street team that created employment opportunities for residents along the project corridor. •Meet with local street vendors and residents to disseminate project information in culturally relevant ways. •Build capacity for residents to lead engagement by hosting bi-weekly trainings. •Collaborate with neighborhood residents to create culturally relevant programming. LADOT Livable Streets South LA Vision Zero Community Healing Space. Source: LADOT and VisionZeroLA Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan56 ACTION ACTION ACTION Strategy 1.3: Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City, the local community and other regional partners Rebuild community trust by establishing a forum for lasting conversations. Establish embedded community focus groups or advisory panels The establishment of standing equity cabinets or working groups will help elevate issues and perspectives lived by underserved populations to the planning table. Actively demonstrate the outcomes of community input Transparent communication is key to rebuilding trust between communities and planning staff. Building this transparency includes reporting back to community members after engagement to make it clear that their insights were valued and thoughtfully considered. A plan for reporting on outcomes should be included at the outset. This means working with partners to determine an appropriate and feasible reporting timeline, as well as the best mechanisms for sharing decisions – e.g., through social media, a formal report, or a series of community meetings. SLC’s Civic Engagement team already makes “closing the loop” a key part of their engagement practice. Update the engagement guide with a workplan for recurring, collaborative co-creation Salt Lake City’s Civic Engagement Team currently maintains an official Engagement Guide, which documents specific tools and best practices for engagement activities. As the authoritative document on public engagement for the City, the Engagement Guide should be expanded to include a wider range of strategies as proposed in this Key Move, including long-term engagement and compensation practices. Codifying how agency staff should identify opportunities for engagement at community locations, walk shops, and other co-creation-based activities will help ensure implementation. 57 “Improve the City’s public progress reporting to support public accountability and support transportation investments.” —Salt Lake City Staff Survey, December 2021 Case Study: SDOT Transportation Equity Workgroup (Seattle, WA) The Seattle Department of Transportation first convened the Transportation Equity Workgroup in April 2019 with the goal of building trust and accountability between SDOT and historically underinvested communities. The Workgroup is composed of members with expertise in community work, and affiliation with CBOs that represent populations of interest. The Workgroup serves as a steward for the Department’s Equity Framework, which seeks to level the playing field and guide equitable decision- making for transportation programs and projects across Seattle. Workgroup members serve two-year terms, with a 3-month onboarding process and commitment to two meetings per month. Members who complete on-boarding are compensated at $75 per hour for their time, up to 100 hours per year, and are required to sign a memorandum of agreement with the Department. Best Practice Takeaways: •Create standing committees that co-create with agency staff to impact official policy. •Foster capacity building and civic engagement for community members who work at the grassroots level. •Identify actionable steps for the agency to move forward with. Metrics •Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members. •Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide demographics. •Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses. Source: Barbara Mendez, SDOT 58 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 59 KEY MOVE 2 Zero Traffic Deaths Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. Every member of our community is safe on our streets and has access to safe, healthy, equitable mobility. Supporting our values Equity: We design our transportation system to protect the most vulnerable people. Health and Safety: Traffic deaths and debilitating injuries are eliminated by 2035. Sustainability: People can choose transportation options that reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions without fear of losing their lives. Our strategies 2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan 2.2 Create safer streets 60 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: Salt Lake City WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •Streets in SLC are not designed to protect people who walk, use wheelchairs, or bicycle. •High motor vehicle speeds are a major factor in people’s perception of safety. •Additional funding and partnerships are needed to implement key safety improvements. People enjoy a protected bicycle lane in SLC. Source: Salt Lake City. •In 2023, SLC announced its commitment to becoming the first Vision Zero city in Utah. A proclamation by the Mayor set a goal to achieve zero traffic fatalities and serious traffic injuries by 2035. •The Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide provides a framework for multimodal street design that considers land use context and mobility needs. •SLC staff analyze crash history when deciding where to make transportation improvements. •The City regularly implements proven safety improvements such as: –Reducing the number of travel lanes to reduce the ‘multiple- threat’ problem faced by pedestrians who have to cross multiple lanes of traffic moving in both directions –Adding center medians –Enhancing pedestrian crossings at unsignalized, signalized, and stop controlled locations Key Stats From 2017-2020 there were 46 fatal crashes and 236 serious injury crashes in SLC, an average of 1.5 per week 95 fatal or serious injury crashes involved people walking and 30 involved someone riding a bicycle, over 40% of the total 6611 ACTION ACTION Strategy 2.1: Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City Build a strong foundation to eliminate traffic deaths by 2035. Convene a Vision Zero working group Traffic safety is influenced by many systems, including transportation, law enforcement, land use policy, public health, technology, and communication. To reduce or eliminate traffic deaths and debilitating injuries, communities need to ensure meaningful interagency collaboration. The existing Safe Streets Task Force may be the appropriate place to continue this work; the City should address whether a broader coalition of partners is needed. The Vision Zero Working Group should meet regularly and support consistent communication, coordination, and revisions to the Action Plan over time. Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety The Safe Systems approach to preventing traffic deaths and serious injuries represents a shift from a reactive focus on individual behavior to proactively designing systems that accommodate human error. Adopting this approach often requires a culture change within agencies and in the community. Through the Vision Zero Working Group, community engagement, and other venues, policymakers, City staff, and Salt Lakers should be educated to create a culture of shared responsibility. 62 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Engaging with impacted communities People who are unhoused, older adults, and people who rely on walking are more likely to be killed or seriously injured in crashes. SLC should seek to understand who is most impacted by crashes locally and engage with community groups and advocates about potential solutions. Traditional Approach 63 Analyze crash history and create a plan for action A Vision Zero Action Plan should analyze historic crash trends and input collected from the public to identify safety needs and priorities. Crash analysis should include the most recent five years of available data and answer the following questions, with a focus on crashes that result in a fatality or serious injury: How do the Safe Systems approach and Vision Zero work together? The Safe Systems approach is a distinct departure from the current paradigm of transportation planning. It recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to ensure those inevitable mistakes do not result in severe injuries or fatalities. Safe Systems is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries on SLC roadways. It is informed by the Safe Systems approach, recognizing that traffic deaths are preventable even if human error is not. It factors in human limitations as part of infrastructural, policy, and planning designs to make streets safe for all ages and abilities. This means that transportation designers and policymakers are expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. •Where do crashes take place? •Who is most likely to be involved in crashes? •When do crashes occur? •Why do crashes occur? •What types of crashes are most common? The plan should lay out actionable strategies, Prevent Crashes Improve Human Behavior Control Speeding Individuals are Responsible React Based on Crash History assign responsibility, provide an estimate of budget and other resource needs, and provide a framework for monitoring outcomes. Prevent Death and Serious Injury Design for Human Mistakes and Limitations Reduce System Kinetic Energy Shared Responsibility Proactively Identify and Address Risks ACTION Safe System Approach Case Study: Vision Zero (Denver, CO) In 2017, Denver introduced its Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) in its commitment to zero traffic-related deaths and serious injuries by 2030. It has five goals: Process & Collaboration, Safe Streets, Safe Speeds, Culture of Safety, and Data & Transparency. The VZAP is effective because it is supported by data for compelling communication to policy makers and the public. It also maps out a High Injury Network (HIN) with Communities of Concern (CoC) to equitably target Vision Zero actions. The VZAP is a collaboration effort between Denver and partners from multiple disciplines, including the Denver Vision Zero Coalition, Denver Health & Hospital Authority and many others. Source: Vision Zero Action Plan, City and County of Denver DENVER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN High Injury Network All Modes The HIN includes all types of Denver streets, but is mostly multi-lane arterials. It is comprised of the following types of streets: •96% arterial streets •1% collector streets •3% local streets HIN: City of Denver Street HIN: State Highway Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Source: DPW; DPD 8 64 ACTION ACTION ACTION Strategy 2.2: Build and operate safer streets Implement proven strategies to make streets safer. Take advantage of federal funding opportunities With a Vision Zero Action Plan in place, SLC will be able to take advantage of funding opportunities such as the federal Safe Streets 4 All grant program to make infrastructure improvements. Wasatch Front Regional Council is developing a regional safety plan and will be a key partner for funding and implementation. Focus on high- injury corridors and intersections A large proportion of traffic deaths take place on a relatively small number of streets. SLC will see the greatest safety benefit by focusing improvements on the streets and intersections (including rail crossings) where most traffic deaths and serious injuries occur. The Federal Highway Administration collects research and provides guidance on safety measures that are effective in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. SLC should use this resource to select measures that are tailored to the types of crashes that take place at high-injury locations. Reduce vehicle speeds Higher motor vehicle speeds increase the likelihood that someone will die or suffer a life-altering injury in a crash, particularly when people walking or bicycling are involved. A driver moving at greater speed has reduced peripheral vision and must react more quickly to prevent a crash. For this reason, safe speed is one of the core elements of the safe systems approach to achieving Vision Zero. 65 Examples of our tools for safer streets Road diets reallocate the available pavement between curbs to slow speeds by reducing the number of general-purpose motor vehicle lanes, which also allows for bicycle lanes, pedestrian refuge islands, exclusive transit lanes, transit stops, or parking. Bicycle signal phases provide separate control of bicycle movements at intersections. These separate phases reduce the number of conflicts between turning vehicles and bicycles traveling through the intersection. Speed humps are an elongated mound in the roadway pavement surface extending across the travel way at a right angle to the traffic flow. Typically 3 inches in height and 12 feet in length, the vertical deflection causes a reduction in prevailing speed along a roadway. Chicanes are extensions of the curb arranged in an alternating pattern that require cars to oscillate between sides of a roadway. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons combined with pedestrian and/or bicycle warning signs are used at mid-block crossings and at intersections of minor streets with major streets to enhance marked crosswalks. Curb extensions improve safety because they increase visibility, reduce speed of turning vehicles, encourage pedestrians to cross at designated locations, shorten the crossing distance, and prevent vehicles from parking at corners. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan66 20 MPH 30 MPH 40 MPH Why speed matters Reducing vehicle speeds is not just a matter of changing the posted speed limit. The way streets are designed has a big impact on how fast people drive. Wider lanes and greater distances between intersections make people feel comfortable driving faster. Narrower lanes and streets with a diversity of uses like sidewalks, bicycle facilities, parked cars, and transit lanes and stops encourage people to slow down. Signals can also be timed to set the pace of traffic. SLC has seen success with the Livable Streets traffic calming program for neighborhood streets, but a different approach is needed for the high-speed, high- volume arterials where most traffic deaths occur. The Street Typology Design Guide and a review of City engineering design standards are tools to achieve this. 63 ft 119 ft 164 ft Metrics •Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations). •Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.). •Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street typologies. Thinking Braking 67 KEY MOVE 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. Active transportation is the mode of choice for shorter trips in Salt Lake City. Supporting our values Reliable Options: Connected walking, rolling, and bicycling networks get people to their destinations, whether they travel within their neighborhoods or across town. Health and Safety: Walkways and bikeways are designed to provide a safe, low-stress experience for all ages and abilities, including older adults, children, and people with disabilities. Sustainability: More trips are made using zero-emissions transportation modes. Our strategies 3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity 3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options 3.3 Create active spaces Photo source: Salt Lake City 68 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •Crossing the street is challenging due to long blocks, wide streets, and a lack of pedestrian improvements. •People walking and bicycling are often forced to go out of their way to find a safe and comfortable route – there is a need to both improve existing facilities and create new connections. •Emerging mobility, such as shared e-scooters and e-bikes, should be explored to provide more transportation options to more people. Key Stats 166 miles of designated on-street bicycle lanes and routes, including 3 miles of protected lanes •Salt Lake City adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan in 2015, which is guiding ongoing projects such as the 9-Line Trail and 300 West reconstruction. •City staff follow guidelines for pedestrian crossing design based on the speed and width of the road. •Through the Livable Streets Program, SLC has identified 400 miles of streets for safety improvements, and planning efforts have begun for the top four priority zones, two of which are on the Westside. •In May 2022, the City Council voted to reduce neighborhood speed limits from 25 mph to 20 mph. •The City is rebuilding streets like 900 S and 2100 S to be safer and more comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists. •The Alleyway Pilot program is rejuvenating alleys for community use. The share of Salt Lakers using active transportation to get to work has decreased, from 3.0% in 2010 to 2.7% in 2020 6699 Strategy 3.1: Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity Create guidelines and networks that help people in Salt Lake City connect to key destinations safely. Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network Salt Lake City should build on the pedestrian priority corridors and neighborhood byways identified in the 2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan to designate a citywide network of pedestrian centers and corridors. Designated pedestrian centers and corridors also guide the City in the development of capital improvement projects that make infrastructure improvements where demand for walking and bicycling is greatest. What are pedestrian centers and corridors? Pedestrian centers and corridors are places where safety and comfort for people walking and rolling in wheelchairs are enhanced by applying more robust design standards and guidelines, such as wider sidewalks, pedestrian-scale lighting requirements, and crossing spacing maximums (see Crossing Guidelines Action below). •Pedestrian centers are neighborhoods and districts with a high density of residents and/or jobs and a mix of existing and planned land uses that enable short trips between homes and destinations. •Pedestrian corridors provide connections to important destinations such as schools, parks, shopping centers, and transit stops. Corridors can be designated in multiple tiers based on the roadway classification, level of demand, and land use. In 2023, SLC began construction of the 9-Line Trail that will provide an important east–west connection, linking neighborhoods, business districts, and cultural destinations. 70 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan The 9-Line Trail will provide an important east–west connection for people walking and biking. Source: Salt Lake City ACTION 71 Adopt crossing guidelines Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines are policy documents that guide City staff in determining where and how to make crossing improvements. SLC should build on the Downtown Master Plan Mid-Block Walkway Design Guide and the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide to create a citywide policy that addresses the location and design of marked crossings. The Guidelines may include: •A desired crossing spacing maximum for major corridors and centers to ensure that people do not have to go too far out of their way to find a place to cross the street (e.g., marked crossings should be no more than 800 feet apart). •A decision-making process for determining the exact location for new crossings. •A toolbox of crossing treatments for both controlled and uncontrolled crossing locations. •A standardized guide that helps determine the most appropriate pedestrian crossing designs and improvements. Case Study: Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines (Denver, CO) Denver’s Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines provide guidance for installing new marked crossings at locations that do not have a traffic signal or stop sign. When deciding where to locate crossings, staff consider: the distance to the nearest existing marked crossing; the traffic volume of the street; whether the crossing will serve a school, park, or shared-use path; latent pedestrian demand; the volume of pedestrian activity in the area; and design considerations such as ability to install curb ramps and sight distance. Considering latent demand—where more people would walk and roll if conditions were safer—is an important aspect of the analysis. By looking at population and employment density and connections to destinations (including transit stops), the latent demand analysis elevates locations where people are likely to walk more after an improvement is made. The Guidelines also provide recommended treatments for crossings based on the size, speed, and volume of the roadway. Vehicle ADT ≤9,000 Vehicle ADT >9,000 to 15,000 Vehicle ADT ≥15,000Roadway Type ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph 2 Lanes (1 lane in each direction) A 1 2 4 6 A 4 6 B 4 6 A 4 6 A 4 6 C 4 6 B 4 6 B 4 6 C 4 6 3 lanes with raised median / Single lane one-ways (1 lane in each direction) A 1 2 3 6 A 3 6 B 3 6 B 2 3 6 B 3 6 B 3 6 B 2 3 6 B 3 6 C 3 6 3 lanes w/o raised median (1 lane in each direction with a left-turn lane) A 1 2 3 4 6 A 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 B 3 4 6 3 B 4 6 C 3 4 6 3 C 4 6 C 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 4+ lanes with raised median (2 or more lanes in each direction) A 3 5 6 A 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 B 3 5 6 3 B 5 6 C 3 5 6 3 C 5 6 C 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 4+ lanes w/o raised median/ Multilane one-ways (2 or more lanes in each direction) A 3 4 5 6 B 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 B B 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 C C C 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 Guidance for locating new marked crossings and selecting the appropriate design treatments is complemented by engineering design standards for crossing elements such as pedestrian refuge islands. Geometric Enhancements: 1.Raised Crosswalk 2.In-street pedestrian sign 3.Advanced “yield here to” markings & signage 4.Pedestrian refuge island 5.Road diet 6.Curb Extensions Notes: Refer to the table instructions on the previous page for more information on how to use this table, such as when exceptions may be required or permitted. Explore geometric enhancements prior to the implementation of the treatment identified in the table. The recommendations in this table were updated based off of research summarized in the Federal Highway Administration’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (FHWA-SA-17-072). When applying this table at an uncontrolled intersection leg on a signalized corridor, Level A may be upgraded to B with approval of the City Traffic Engineer. Level A may also be upgraded to B if a gap study reveals insufficient gaps to safely cross. Source: Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines, City and County of Denver ACTION Level Treatment A Markings & Signing B RRFB C PHB or Signal Case Study: PedPDX Marked Crossing Guidelines (Portland, OR) PedPDX, the City of Portland’s Pedestrian Plan, establishes a desired spacing between marked pedestrian crossings. The desired spacing varies depending on the type of street and nearby land use. Areas with a higher level of pedestrian activity and demand should have marked crossings approximately every 530 feet (every other block based on Portland’s standard block length), while other major streets should have marked crossings about every 800 feet, at minimum. Transit stops should always have a marked crossing within 100 Identify the greatest needs for improving active mobility Salt Lake City should carry out a citywide assessment to determine where sidewalks and curb ramps need to be installed or improved. This assessment could help support an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan, with the goal of making all sidewalks and crossings accessible for people with disabilities. To guide where improvements are made first, the City should develop a set of criteria that uses data on equity, safety, and access to destinations. Improvement projects can be organized into implementation phases based on the result of the analysis. Additional funding will likely be needed to support this work. feet, regardless of street classification. Source: PedPDX Marked Crossing Guidelines, PBOT 72 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION ACTION ACTION ACTION Strategy 3.2: Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options Provide comfortable facilities for people to bike, scoot, and roll. Implement low- stress facility design Salt Lake City should continue to implement the recommended low-stress bikeway network using facility selection and design guidance from the NACTO Urban Bikeways Design Guide and develop locally-specific neighborhood byway design guidelines, including traffic calming elements and design options for major street crossings. City engineering design standards should be consistent with bike facility design best practices. Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy Salt Lake City should continue to work with private shared mobility operators to ensure bikes and scooters are deployed in neighborhoods with more low-income residents and people who depend on transit, walking, and biking. Given how quickly offerings are changing, shared mobility agreements and deployment should be reviewed frequently and adapted as new devices and new reservation and payment technologies become available. Improve work zone standards Temporary or intermittent closures due to construction make travel less safe, reliable, and convenient for people walking and bicycling. Construction that impacts the public right-of- way in SLC is required to have a traffic control plan that includes an ADA-compliant pedestrian path. Requirements for bicycle accommodation in work zones are less clear. SLC should adopt more robust standards and guidelines, putting more resources toward enforcement, and providing training on updated standards to help make sure people have a seamless travel experience during construction. 73 Case Study: Washington DC Work Zone Policy (Washington DC) Washington DC’s Pedestrian Safety and Work Zone Standard provides preferred methods for safely routing pedestrians and bicyclists through work zones that occupy the public right-of-way. Standards for walkways in work zones include dimensions for flooring and roofs, and ensures walkways have lighting, transit access, and signage, and are ADA compliant. Prioritization of preferred methods for pedestrian protection are based on phase of construction, and generally prioritize the method that is most convenient for pedestrians to use. The standards describe how pedestrian accommodations around work zones may impact the bicycle right-of-way and should be considered in traffic control plans. Training is an essential part of implementing these standards in a traffic control plan. Strategy 3.3: Create active spaces Bring our streets to life through street programs and activated alleyways. Create slow, shared, and car-free streets Salt Lake City should expand the Livable Streets Program to identify candidates for shared curbless or car-free street design and add appropriate design features to the Livable Streets Toolkit. Features could include low-cost, easy-to- implement materials like paint, benches, and planters. Streets should be prioritized based on the City’s equity goals and community input. Case Study: Los Angeles People St Program (Los Angeles, CA) The Los Angeles People St Program transforms streets into public spaces. The program was created in collaboration with the City of Los Angeles departments of Public Works and City Planning, the Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). Community groups apply to participate and work with LADOT to design their own projects, choosing from a menu of low-cost materials to create plazas, parklets, and bicycle corrals. Non-profits, business improvement districts, and groups of property owners are examples of eligible community partners. Community partners are responsible for the installation, operation, management, and maintenance of parklets. Projects are permitted for one year with the option to renew the permit. A new parklet with herbs and community garden plots installed on Motor Avenue in Los Angeles, as part of the People St program. Source: LADOT Livable Streets 74 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION Activate alleys The Alleyway Pilot Program partners with neighbors and community councils to improve and maintain alleys. SLC should identify long-term funding to make the program permanent and consider including it as part of an expanded Livable Streets Program. Candidate locations for improvements could be identified in two categories: alleys with potential to be better connections for people walking and bicycling, and alleys with potential to be redesigned as public space. Pursuing and supporting partnerships with neighborhood-based groups to implement and maintain alleys will be crucial to success. Prioritization criteria should be established, and funding sources identified that align with the functional objectives of a specific alley project (for instance, a green alley could be funded through stormwater management funds whereas active alleys for pedestrians and bicyclists could be funded by non-motorized transportation grants or capital funds). Metrics •Change in walking and bicycling mode share. •Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings. •Change in access to all-ages-and-abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile). 75 ACTION KEY MOVE 4 Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City. To face the environmental and mobility challenges of the next 20 years, SLC will support the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) in promoting a safe, reliable, and convenient transit experience. Supporting our values Sustainability: Public transit is the preferred way to travel to school and work. Health and Safety: All people can reliably and affordably get where they need to go by transit. Sustainability: Station areas are lively urban spaces, designed for people and the communities they belong to. Reliable Options: People can depend on transit, and the experience of transferring between modes of travel is seamless, safe, and convenient. Our strategies 4.1 Make transit convenient and reliable 4.2 Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces 4.3 Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option 76 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: Salt Lake City WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •Negative perceptions of public transit remain the largest barrier to transit use. Safety, convenience, and reliability of service need to be improved. •Longer distance commutes and trips into SLC with multiple transfers are difficult to navigate. •More attractive, inviting urban spaces near transit are needed to support transit ridership. •Salt Lake City adopted a Transit Master Plan in 2017, which presents a blueprint for addressing some of the community’s greatest concerns around transit. •The Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) is updating its 2023-2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which identifies inter-county connectivity and air quality as major transportation priorities. The previous RTP (2019) set aside $5.3 billion for transit- related investments over the next 27 years. •Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is in the process of updating its 30-year Long-Range Transit Plan (LRTP), which will assess the long-term needs and implementation strategies for systemwide improvements. •Community led initiatives such as the Rio Grande Plan reflect public desire for transformative transit-oriented spaces. •Other projects such as the Future of Light Rail Study and the development of high-capacity transit corridors across SLC are underway. Key stats 5% of commuters in SLC travel by public transit (US Census, 2021 ACS) Only 17% of existing bus stops in SLC have a bench or shelter 32% of UTA survey respondents say “inconvenience” is their biggest barrier to riding transit 33% of UTA survey respondents live near TRAX stations, but a third of them don’t take transit 77 ACTION ACTION Strategy 4.1: Make transit convenient and reliable Support UTA in making transit a viable and competitive alternative to driving by investing in transit-priority streets. Institutionalize the SLC and UTA partnership with a joint taskforce on advancing transit SLC and UTA priorities are deeply intertwined. Going beyond an interlocal agreement, a bilateral taskforce can take initiative to establish a transit-centered vision for the city where plans can be accelerated and processes can be coordinated. Expand the City’s bus lane and transit signal priority (TSP) network Across North America, transit priority treatments such as dedicated bus lanes and optimized and prioritized traffic signals have proven to be effective at reducing travel times on transit. The speed and on-time reliability of transit are significant factors that influence a person’s travel decisions. Investing in transit priority corridors will help make transit more competitive with driving. SLC can play an innovative role in helping deliver the Frequent Transit Network identified in the SLC Transit Master Plan. 78 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Speed and reliability investments make transit faster •San Francisco, CA: dedicated bus lanes have reduced travel times on local buses by up to 32%. Source: SFMTA Van Ness Blvd project website •Austin, TX: new half-mile bus lane reduced PM peak travel time by 52% across 6 bus routes. Source: CapMetro Streets for Transit Report “Work with UTA so that TRAX doesn’t have to stop at every intersection. That really slows it down and makes it somewhat frustrating to ride.” —Connect SLC community input ACTION 79 Who benefits from transit priority investments? A bus-only lane in downtown saves the bus time and keeps it running on schedule... Explore regional transit connections and fill gaps in the external and intercity travel market As the region’s largest urban center, 83% of people employed in SLC commute from outside the city limits on a regular basis. Given the prevalence of these trips, improving the quality of regional transit connections and exploring opportunities for intercity bus services will ensure critical connections are served and regional auto travel is reduced. Source: Nelson\Nygaard ...which means the bus saves time along the entire route. People outside of downtown benefit from an on-time departure too. As transit travel times become more competitive with driving, more people take the bus, relieving traffic congestion and improving air quality citywide. ACTION Strategy 4.2: Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces Design transit spaces and experiences that are comfortable, accessible, and human-centered. Expand SLC’s Downtown Ambassadors program to support and staff transit facilities Since its inception in 2018, the SLC Downtown Street Ambassadors program has been successful in supporting local residents and businesses as a community safety and wayfinding resource. Ambassadors provide directions, coordinate resources with local agencies, and serve as visible faces of the community. Expanding the program and meeting the needs of transit riders can help alleviate ongoing concerns over safety at bus stops and station areas. 80 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Local Spotlight: Salt Lake City Downtown Ambassador Program “In 2020, Downtown Ambassadors performed 6,591 wellness checks on individuals in the downtown area, referred 1,448 individuals to shelter and services, and responded 2,859 times to merchants who needed assistance.” —SLC City Blog While UTA is in the process of procuring transit ambassadors for TRAX light rail, coordinating resources between the City and transit agency can provide better coverage and support to riders waiting for buses and trains, and otherwise interacting with transit spaces. Source: Downtown Alliance Work with UTA to upgrade bus stops in SLC with passenger amenities Bus stop amenities are not only investments for transit riders. Shelters, benches, street lighting, greenery, and wayfinding signage help to liven the streetscape and public space for everyone. Transit riders depend on a comfortable place to wait and plan their trips, and citywide upgrades at major transit stops can help make riding transit a valued way of life. Stops and stations are the access points where people enter, exit, and interact with the transit system. First impressions matter. Harness technology to modernize major transit facilities and waiting areas Real-time bus information screens can help alleviate uncertainty and provide accessible information to those without access to an online smartphone app. Solar powered e-paper displays are being trialed across the world as the energy-efficient, all-weather readable solution to expensive LED screens. Major transit facilities such as rail stations and mobility hubs can benefit from interactive kiosks, electric charging stations, digital bike lockers, and bikeshare stations to maximize convenience. ACTION ACTION “Upgrade transit facilities—bus stop shelters would be nice.” —Connect SLC community input Example elements of a major transit facility Secure bike storage Real-time information Wayfinding and mobile ticketing Bikeshare services Carshare 81 Do w n t o w n . . . 3 minDo w n t o w n . . . 6 min 123 Strategy 4.3: Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option Tailor the surrounding urban environment to incentivize transit development and usage. Establish multimodal mobility hubs in local areas of importance and future growth Mobility hubs put people first, emphasizing comfort and safety for riders to transfer between modes of travel. Amenities such as secure bike lockers, e-scooters, and bike share stations make transit more attractive when first- and last-mile trips are more convenient to make. Furthermore, upgrading transit centers and park-and-rides across SLC would be a great first step in reducing car dependency. UDOT currently manages a mobility hub program which falls under the agency’s transportation demand management (TDM) efforts. The City can partner with UDOT and UTA to tailor mobility hub solutions within city limits, targeting land uses and developments that are ideal for a density of transportation options. Case Study: Eastgate Mobility Hub (Bellevue, WA) The Eastgate Mobility Hub 2025 is a conceptual vision formed from partnerships between King County Metro, the City of Bellevue, Washington Department of Transportation, Sound Transit, and other Eastgate stakeholders. The Eastgate Mobility Hub vision transforms Eastgate Park- and-Ride into an integrated mobility hub connecting nearby employees, students, and passengers with transportation options. In addition to a park- and-ride, the space would host a variety of travel options such as carpool, carshare, bike parking and a micromobility hub. The conceptual pedestrian plaza would have weather protection and public art installation, offering placemaking opportunities that create an enjoyable user experience. Source: Eastgate Mobility Hub Vision, King County Metro 82 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION PARKINGAva i l a b l e : 88Occupied:412 P Nex t Bus . . . 3 minNex t Bus . . . 6 min Improve access- to-transit infrastructure to complete the city’s street network For transit to be effective, SLC residents must feel safe and comfortable accessing transit stops and stations from where they live and work. Completing sidewalks and implementing protected bicycle infrastructure and high visibility street crossings around station areas will connect people to transit and make first-/last-mile connections more seamless. Asset inventory of right-of-way infrastructure should include its proximity and utility to transit. Use Small Area and Circulation plans to encourage dense development around station areas The effectiveness of public transit is constrained or enhanced by the land uses surrounding it, and transit-oriented development (TOD) facilitates easy access to jobs and services by concentrating people and employment near major bus and rail facilities. Small Area Plans, Circulation Plans, and Station Area Plans are valuable planning tools that can design a vision for communities that are served by high-capacity transit, tailoring development priorities and uses to the needs of each context. SLC can also further coordinate development review processes to better serve the potential of TOD around station areas. ACTION ACTION Metrics •Change in transit mode share. •Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year. •Change in travel time for commuters traveling into SLC. •Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities. •Transit rider satisfaction survey results. 83 “Support bus journeys by increasing frequency and providing comfortable pathways to and from bus stops.” —Community input KEY MOVE 5 Healing the East-West Divide Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. Salt Lake City provides safe, clear, and dignified linkages and culturally relevant public spaces designed with and for communities who have been most harmed and disadvantaged by past infrastructure. Everyone has access to attainable housing options and essential goods and services using connected networks that promote walking, rolling, bicycling, and transit ridership. Supporting our values Sustainability: Westside neighborhoods have access to sustainable transportation options that help improve air quality. Equity: Transportation improvements are prioritized in areas most in need; policy development, planning, and design efforts center the voices, experiences, and desires of SLC’s Westside residents, BIPOC communities, and others who have been harmed or marginalized by transportation investments. Affordability: Affordable transportation options are available for those who need them. Health and Safety: Our transportation system provides equal opportunity for safety, health, and overall quality of life for Westside residents. Reliable Options: People living on the Westside can connect easily to neighborhoods throughout SLC. Our strategies 5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy 5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks 5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale 5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared 84 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •The Westside is a historically redlined area of the city where residents were more likely to be denied mortgages to secure homeownership and build general wealth. •People living in Westside neighborhoods feel disconnected from Downtown SLC and the Eastside neighborhoods. •People don’t feel safe crossing the east–west divide. People walking and bicycling are exposed to unsafe travel conditions, highway ramps, and unwelcoming environments. •Significant street and public space investments are needed to close gaps caused by I-15, the Union Pacific railroad tracks, I-215, and S.R 201. •There is a lack of trust in local government from years of feeling unheard during major transportation decisions that have divided community members from the rest of the city. •People who live in Westside neighborhoods feel anxiety about being displaced by new residents with higher incomes who are being attracted to the area by increased market-rate housing development and public investments in bike lanes and transit station improvements. These experiences are reflected by the physical extent and pervasiveness of the infrastructure that creates them. •Recognizing our history: The 2020 Westside Transportation Equity Study identifies the lack of transportation equity in SLC’s Westside neighborhoods. Identifying and documenting historic harm and current inequity in our transportation system is one small step in progressing toward a more just city. •Making investments: Salt Lake City and the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) launched UTA On Demand service on the Westside to provide transportation to neighborhoods that lack fixed transit routes. New Westside routes have been implemented as of August 2022 that are part of the Frequent Transit Network and include upgrades to bus stops, making them more accessible to transit riders of all ages and abilities. •Planning a connected future: The US DOT launched a first-ever program – the Reconnecting Communities Pilot—to reconnect communities that are cut off from opportunity and burdened by past transportation infrastructure decisions. In 2023, SLC was successful in obtaining a $1.9M federal planning grant to continue to work with community partners to heal the City’s east–west divide. •Critical Connections: While not yet in process at the time of this plan, the work from the Reconnecting Communities grant should create design-level solutions to the east-west divide co-created with the community. 8855 Redlining map of Salt Lake City (ca. 1933–1939). Source: National Archives 86 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Divided through history Historic transportation investments bifurcate SLC and perpetuate socio-economic inequities, threaten community cohesion, and are a cause of environmental injustice. The time has come to reverse the community harm caused by these investments and SLC is pursuing this end. To do so, it is important to understand how we arrived at this place. Bold and human-centric decisions, made with the historic context of past harms in mind, will be needed to change the march of history, which has placed economic gain and mechanization over community, safety, and well-being. SLC’s original 660-foot square blocks were platted and built emanating from Temple Square after white settlers arrived. Late 1870s Industry takes hold and locates along the Jordan River, polluting it with industrial waste. 1880s–1920 Redlining maps were drawn, marking Westside neighborhoods undesirable for federally-backed mortgages compared to Eastside neighborhoods. 1960s–1970s I-15 was expanded, including rebuilding many interchanges and creating many of the current long, auto-centric viaducts that connect east to west across the freeway and railroad tracks. 2023 1850s–1860s Late 1800s A spur of the Transcontinental Railroad was constructed, setting a rail pathway that is in place today. 1939 Rapid railway expansion supported industrial growth; by 1910, there were three parallel railroad tracks running in the pathway of Third West. 1997–2001 I-15 was constructed, removing several blocks of historic gridded neighborhood streets, homes, and businesses in SLC. UDOT evaluated options to further widen I-15 from 400 South in SLC to Farmington. “Good health and connected communities” are among the project’s purpose and need statements. History shows that freeway expansions in urban areas benefit those traveling through and from suburban communities at the expense of residents who chose or are forced to live close to the freeway envelope. 87 The lands of the Salt Lake Valley are the ancestral home of and an important gathering place for the Ute, Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo, and Shoshoni people. Residents’ view on the divide The Connect SLC project team met members of the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and walked areas around I-15 and the railroad lines. The team conducted interviews with organizations who serve communities in need and people and communities affected by freeway and railroad corridors. The community identified three key challenges: Significant investment is needed to close gaps and provide more public space. Multiple agencies must coordinate to address infrastructure issues. Local government must center the voices of community members to build trust. From this process, four key opportunities emerged: Embed equity to produce community- first outcomes. Invest in safe and efficient pathways for people. Retrofit streets and transit facilities to offer dignified and welcoming experiences. Incentivize the development of complete, transit-oriented neighborhoods. 88 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 1 2 3 4 Key stats The Westside is younger and more racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse than Salt Lake City as a whole. 36%￿￿The Westside is home to 36% of SLC residents. Source: US Census ACS 2018 5-Year Estimates (2014- 2018) Source: US Census ACS 2018 5-Year Estimates (2014-2018) 77% of fatal crashes in SLC take place on the Westside. Source: Fatality and Serious Injury Data, Utah Department of Transportation Zero Fatalities Neighborhoods adjacent to I-15 and I-215 are exposed to more air pollution than the rest of Salt Lake City. When compared to nationwide pollution rates, Westside census tracts rank in the 80th percentile or above for diesel particulate matter and ozone and have a high risk of cancer and asthma. Source: Environmental Justice Screening Tool, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 89 are non-white, non-Hispanic (34.6% citywide). 55.1% living below the poverty level (17.9% citywide). 25.8% are under 18 years old (19.6% citywide). 30.7% are persons with disabilities (10.5% citywide). 22.7% 80th percentile 1800 N Railyard State Capitol ROSE PARK 600 N 300 N Utah State N Temple St DOWNTOWN SLC Salt Lake FAIRPARK Fairgrounds 900 W Central Station E 1000 W Jordan River Trail Redwood Rd POPLAR GROVE 200 S 400 S 9-Line Trail 800 S 900 S Jordan Park 1300 S Jordan River Trail GLENDALE WESTSID E 1700 S Auto-centric corridor Frequent transit corridor Low-stress walking and bicycling corridor At-grade railroad crossing Disconnected street High collision corridor 90 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan University of Utah Existing challenges to the east–west divide EAST CENTRAL ASTSID E Liberty Park South of the railyard, there are more than 30 locations where the street grid is disconnected due to I-15 and the railroad tracks. BALLPARK At-grade railroad crossings are active hundreds of times a day, with no published schedule for when freight trains pass through. This causes significant travel delays for everyone who travels on these corridors. Most through-streets are auto-centric with high traffic volumes and speeds. People walking and bicycling have only two low-stress options. Six of the 11 east-west through-streets are high-crash corridors. 2100 S 91 ACTION Strategy 5.1: Develop a community-driven East-West Transportation Strategy Improve safe east–west connections to knit the city together. Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most impacted by transportation infrastructure The Westside Transportation Equity Study and ongoing efforts reveal the economic impacts and social and environmental harms from I-15 and railroad expansion. SLC has an opportunity to gather as a community, elevate voices, and join in a process of co-creation to break down barriers and create a better city for generations to come. With City funding dedicated to solving east–west connectivity problems and a grant from the USDOT, SLC is positioned to tackle these problems in a manner that centers equity and the experience of those harmed by previous transportation infrastructure investments. A process that centers equity and human voices will require new structures for planning and community co-creation. 92 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Case Study: Reconnecting South Park (Seattle, WA) Reconnecting South Park is a community-led, community-centered effort to rethink, remove, and/or repurpose a segment of State Route 99 in Seattle, WA. This segment of highway divides one of Seattle’s most diverse, impoverished, and environmentally impacted neighborhoods. The City of Seattle hired a group of neighborhood-based organizations active in South Park to lead the community visioning effort. A technical team will support urban design, housing, transportation analysis and engineering, and equitable development, but local community-based organizations are leading the vision. The process is structured to shift power to community members and organizations and embrace a process of co-creation with government, advocate, and community partners. Source: Nelson\Nygaard 93 ““ Center human safety, health, and experience The east–west divide plays a pervasive role in dictating cultural, racial, economic, and psychological outcomes for SLC residents. The Connect SLC vision is for a city in which living east or west of the “divide” has no impact on one’s education, safety, daily routine, or economic stability. Safety Short-term and long-term strategies and projects to improve safety are needed and can provide opportunities to make crossings more welcoming and comfortable, especially for people walking or bicycling. Health Numerous environmental health reports show significantly elevated cardiovascular mortality risk, lung cancer, and childhood asthma for people living near heavily traveled freeways. Gaseous and particulate pollutants emitted by fossil fuel-burning vehicles have negative health impacts and have been shown to cause disease and poor health outcomes. Wind directions, wind speed, time of day (level of traffic), and other factors all affect risk of exposure. A 2019 study showed that children living near a highway experienced development delays at two times the national average. Diesel-powered trains also produce high levels of dangerous air pollutants, making the combination of busy mainline rail lines, rail switching yards, and an interstate highway a community health hazard. A 2019 study showed that children living Source: Salt Lake City 94 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan near a highway experienced development delays at two times the national average.15 ACTION As SLC and its partners at UDOT and in the development community build and redesign spaces around the freeway, there are many tactics that can help to reduce impacts. Transportation •Vehicle electrification •Train electrification •Travel options and reduction in driving •High use of transit •Infrastructure improvements such as filtration systems, sound walls, etc. •Decking over or tunneling freeways or rail tracks Urban design and development •Landscaping barriers •Land use buffers •Tree planting •Urban design treatments that protect people from wind patterns •Smart location of parks and public spaces •Building siting and design that affects wind patterns User Experience Changing the mentality of crossing under a highway is a tall order. Infrastructure designed to move thousands of vehicles is difficult to bring to a human scale, but many cities have tried with great success. Many of the most successful examples use spaces adjacent to streets to create activated public spaces. These spaces also require active programming, security, and lighting to succeed over the long term. This graphic from the report Improving Health in Communities Near Highways illustrates how smart development can help shield people in public spaces from airborne particulates. Source: Community Assessment of Freeway Exposure and Health, Tufts University 95 Case Study: Underpass Park (Toronto, ON) Toronto’s Underpass Park is a great example of a radical transformation of space under an urban freeway that is well used by community members. Community-based programming that delivers public amenities desired by the community and appropriate for the location is essential. Part of Toronto’s Underpass Park includes basketball courts and a skate park next to the concrete support columns. Source: Waterfront Toronto ACTION Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action People who travel across and near freeway and railroad corridors in SLC experience both physical and psychological barriers to access destinations like jobs, education, health care, and grocery stores. Safety and travel time challenges have long been documented for Westside communities. The city and its partners should mitigate these barriers by designing, planning, and managing city assets, curbs, streets, and infrastructure to prioritize the safe and efficient movement of people, especially those who are most underserved and marginalized. An East- West Transportation Strategy will identify community-derived strategies that improve access to jobs and services, reduce travel time, make travel more reliable, and solve longstanding safety challenges. Bold work to rethink how urban freeways and rail infrastructure impact our communities is gaining traction across the United States. However, these efforts remain small and often on the fringe compared to the multibillion-dollar industries that power freeway expansion. Critical efforts to reduce reliance on vehicular mobility require community- driven leadership, bold thinking, and realistic and sequenced implementation programs. HARDWARE HUMAN SCALE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SPACE STORE CLINIC ENHANCED PUBLIC PHARTMRAANCSIYT SAFE AND DIGNIFIED LINKAGES DOWNTOWN 96 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan COMMUNITY CO-CREATION BEYOND ENGAGEMENT AP EQUITABLE T DEVELOPMENT S GROCERIES EQUITABLE MOBILITY OPTIONS RESTAURANT P PILOTS AND EARLY ACTION PROGRAMS Cafe 97 ACTION Strategy 5.2: Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks Create safe and reliable linkages between Eastside and Westside neighborhoods. Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east–west divide Short-term enhancements help improve the travel time and experience for people living in Westside neighborhoods. These improvements can help to save lives and make crossing safer while larger infrastructure solutions are developed and implemented. These opportunities should focus on the mobility needs of communities experiencing poor safety outcomes and having the greatest needs according to the UDOT Healthy Places Index. Strategies to improve at-grade rail crossings: •Improve sidewalks and provide curb ramps on all streets leading to at-grade rail crossings. •Channelize space for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians as they approach a crossing gate (e.g., a fixed median with flexible bollard can prevent people from trying to drive under a descending gate). •Add hinged pedestrian gate skirts at all at-grade pedestrian rail crossings. •Examine feasibility of installing Accessible Pedestrian Signals at all at-grade rail crossings. •Improve crossing surfaces where people cross rail tracks at-grade. •Increase warning time for pedestrians and bicyclists at rail crossings. •Keep all paint lines and markings fresh and visible (use “Keep Clear” paint markings in track zone). 98 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Pedestrian Gate Skirts The use of a technology called a Hinged Pedestrian Gate Skirt is effective at reducing risk factors for at-grade pedestrian rail crossings. Combined with enhanced sidewalk infrastructure, the addition of these pedestrian- focused drop arms helps improve safety outcomes. Hinged Pedestrian Gate Skirts reduce safety concerns for at grade pedestrian rail crossings. Source: USDOT “Many times, I feel boxed in on this side of town. It is very common for me to be blocked by a train when I am commuting by bicycle to the granary, Central Ninth, Ball Park, or downtown areas.” —Connect SLC community input Salt Lake City should also pursue continued investment in pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly under or overpasses that provide seamless connections and community gathering spaces. These represent larger capital projects and take longer to plan and implement, but a series of grade-separated crossings like the 300 North Bridge can be delivered much more rapidly than major infrastructure projects that require changes to mainline rail tracks or the highway. 300 North Bridge Under Construction (2023). Source: Salt Lake City Develop bold concepts to repair and build community The impact of the infrastructure that divides the city is both physical and psychological. The sheer size of highway viaducts, looming overpasses, and freight tracks shape a hostile landscape that is, at best, intimidating to people walking and bicycling. People in the Westside neighborhoods feel acutely the sense of disconnection and exclusion from the full offerings of the city. 99 ACTION Opportunities to heal the east–west divide 1800 N New Complete Street connections give everyone more options for traveling to and from the Westside. Many existing through-streets are connected to freeway ramps. Creating new street connections provides a safer experience with lower traffic speeds. ROSE PARK FAIRPARK Utah State Fairgrounds New multi-use trails, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and enhancements to existing biking and walking facilities provide more comfortable Jordan River Trail options for vulnerable travelers.POPLA Modernized interchanges and reconfigured highway access ramps improve safety for all modes, create new connections, and open up land for development and public space. Mobility Hubs bring different travel options W E together. This includes transit service, shared mobility, and improved connections for people walking and bicycling. EMERGEN CY 100 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan EASTEAST CENTRALCENTRAL Liberty Park University of Utah Railyard N Temple St 600 N 300 N State Capitol DOWNTOWN SLC New complete street connection New grade-separated trail connection Added protection for walking and bicycling Modernized interchange Mobility hub Salt Lake Central Station EASTSID E Frequent transit corridor Potential I-15 cap and train box 200 S BALLPARK R GROVE 400 S 9-Line Trail Jordan Park 900 W 1300 S STSID E Jordan River Trail 1700 S GLENDALE 2100 S 101 BIG IDEA Big ideas to heal the east–west divide The scope and scale of the infrastructure that divides us dictates the need for equally big moves to reconnect our neighborhoods. Bury I-15 I-15 bisects SLC, looming above the street grade and creating a physical and psychological barrier. What is it? •Replace the aging I-15 viaduct with a cut- and-cover tunnel in Central Salt Lake City •Extent could stretch from north of 600 N to south of Ballpark •Create acres of space for housing, commercial uses, public services, parks, and public space Inspiration: The replacement of the State Route 99 Viaduct in Seattle with a new highway tunnel has created a generational opportunity to reconnect people with the City’s waterfront. Source: Waterfront Seattle Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan102 Trench the train Mainline rail tracks are the most disruptive feature of SLC’s transportation system and the number one cause of poor reliability for travelers. What is it? •Build a train trench along 500 W •A community vision includes restoration of the Rio Grande Depot to serve as the main passenger rail and transit hub •Create acres of space for housing, commercial uses, public services, parks, and public space Reconsider freeway ramps I-15 ramp connections to the city are some of the most dangerous places for travelers of all modes and impact development opportunity. What is it? •Reconstruct the 600 N interchange to be a safe and viable east- to-west crossing for all modes •Rebuild 500 S and 600 S to reduce intrusion and impact on the city •Reconsider the 500 S / 600 S interchange to reconnect the street grid over/under the highway and tracks while providing urban- scale freeway access •Remove the 900 S ramp to open land for public uses and development in the Ballpark/Central 9th neighborhood where the ramps consume 8+ acres Inspiration: Cap atop the Reno train trench. Source: Downtown Reno Partnership Seattle’s Lid I-5 Study determined that lidding the below-grade sections of the freeway could add 10 acres of public park and 4,500 new housing units, reconnect historic grid streets, and help reduce noise and pollution. Source: WSP/City of Seattle BIG IDEA BIG IDEA 103 Break the berm South of 900 S I-15 is constructed largely on a raised berm with very few places to cross through or over. What is it? •Add multimodal crossings between 900 S-1300 S, 1300 S–1700 S, and 1700 S–2100 S. •Use highway elevation and stub streets to create new connections •Focus on creating safe, well-lit crossings for people walking, rolling, and bicycling •Create crossings that aren’t influenced by high-speed traffic and freeway ramps Source: Google Streetview Integrate development Transit-oriented development opportunities are plentiful in Ballpark, the Granary, the Depot District, and Gateway. New privately owned or developed public spaces could include crossings integrated with new buildings, parking, or other development. What is it? •Use public and private development projects along the tracks to created activated crossing opportunities •Leverage redevelopment of the Depot District and Salt Lake Central (UTA) to create public crossings •Work with TOD partners—including UTA and SLC Redevelopment Authority (RDA)—and private developers to build privately owned public spaces that create community crossings, plazas, and gathering spaces Inspiration: View of the entrance to a proposed pedestrian crossing of mainline rail tracks from integrated development at Sacramento Valley Station in California. Source: Perkins & Will Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan BIG IDEA BIG IDEA 104 At the time of this plan, UDOT was considering another widening of I-15. Without significant mitigation and community-centered design, further expansions to the highway will worsen many conditions described in this chapter. Cities like Boston and Seattle have buried or covered major highways as a strategy to maintain vehicular mobility, while restoring urban fabric. While these approaches add capital cost, the long-term fiscal and community benefits can be overwhelmingly positive, prove to be a major regenerative force, and provide space for cherished public lands and spaces, parks, trails, housing, and other community-centric uses. Image: The Rose Kennedy Greenway in Boston resulting from the undergrounding of the Central Artery. Source: Rose Kennedy Greenway 105 Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable east– west travel A critical and cost-effective approach to breaking down east–west travel barriers is through improved travel options. Public transit has several grade-separated crossings of I-15 and the rail tracks, but these lines are not always convenient to access in Westside neighborhoods. Along with improvements to transit (see Key Move 4), creating mobility hubs and providing local services that bring people to them is a critical strategy. Local Spotlight: North Temple Mobility Hub Project Salt Lake City’s North Temple Mobility Hub Project is an excellent example of how physical design, programming, and digital connectivity can combine to enhance access to east–west TRAX light rail service that is not vulnerable to delay. Mobility hubs should integrate community- desired features such as public spaces, retail, or family-/youth- oriented amenities. Combined with housing and development that meets community needs and levels of affordability, mobility hubs can put more people in easy reach of reliable mobility options. Mobility hub features identified by the North Temple Study. Source: Salt Lake City 106 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan “Sidewalks under the freeway end abruptly and I am scared drivers won’t see me coming.” —Connect SLC community input ACTION Strategy 5.3: Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale Reimagine the spaces between to be safe, secure, and supportive of the community. Create a program to bring life and community identity to “below the freeway” spaces The absence of human scale features, such as lighting, shade, and active frontages around underpasses make people feel uncomfortable, unsafe, and exposed. A program to bring activities and public art below the freeways would help transform people’s experiences and bring purpose and community gathering places to life. The Below the Freeway Program could fund things like lighting, skate parks, bicycle pump tracks, and culturally appropriate public art. Partnerships and interagency agreements between SLC and UDOT will be needed to make improvements to the right-of-way around the freeways. Case Study: Progress Park (San Francisco, CA) In 2012, a parcel of land under the I-280 on-ramp in the Dogpatch neighborhood of San Francisco was transformed into a park and neighborhood hub. Before the transformation, the land was prone to dumping and inappropriate uses. Neighboring families and residents lobbied for change, and with help from a partnership with Public Works the parcel became Progress Park, a public green space with walking paths and seating, street workout fitness amenities, and a bocce court. Despite being under a freeway, the park hosts a variety of events attended by families, children, and neighborhood residents. Progress Park has no official sources of funding and is maintained entirely by volunteers, demonstrating the tremendous power of a community coming together to create better public spaces. Source: Green Benefit District 107 ACTION Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses for “in-between” spaces Local leaders in arts, culture, and community organizing can be powerful forces of change. City-supported programs that offer small grants to improve safety, security, and public space can lead to transformative change. SLC should develop a new grant program to encourage neighborhood-driven improvements to existing underpasses and in-between spaces to generate projects that improve these areas and celebrate local community. In South Boston local artists imagined and brought to life a “Starry Night” sky using LED lights. Initially a temporary installation, the City has agreed to make the improvements permanent. Source: Pharos Controls Rethink freeway ramps Highway on- and off-ramps consume large amounts of urban real estate, create gaps in walkable, bikeable neighborhood grids, and pose safety risks for people of all modes as vehicles transition from highway to urban driving. All highway expansion projects should carefully consider how key on-and off- ramps interface with the city. Dallas deconstructed the St Paul ramp from the Woodall Rogers Freeway to develop Klyde Warren Park, which sits on a 1,200 foot-long cap over the depressed freeway. Source: Thomas McConnell via Highline Network 108 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION ACTION ACTION ACTION Strategy 5.4: Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared Bring community-supported development and amenities and an enhanced sense of place to the Westside neighborhoods. Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods Westside neighborhoods tend to host far fewer opportunities for jobs, education, recreation, and socialization within reach using existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian networks than Eastside neighborhoods. The city should explore ways to leverage the ongoing surge in private and public sector development as a pathway to increase affordable housing, culturally appropriate public and open spaces, jobs, and services like grocery stores to reduce the need for people to travel outside their neighborhoods to meet their daily needs. Use grade and elevation to create great experiences New development provides opportunity to bring public spaces above ground level and create opportunity for pedestrians to cross at-grade rails or roadways without typical intersection conflicts. Almost all of SLC RDA redevelopment districts are adjacent to or cross the east–west divide. As these areas redevelop, the City, the RDA, and development partners should seek opportunities to leverage new development to bridge the divide. Seattle’s Convention Center and Freeway Park was one of the first freeway capping projects in the world and continues to bridge rapidly developing neighborhoods on both sides of I-5. Source: Wikimedia Commons via Planetizen The “Blox” development in Copenhagen includes a museum, shops, and other public amenities, creating a public space that bridges a highway separating the city from the waterfront. Source: Arup 109 Metrics •Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south. •Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N. •Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods). •Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc). •Percent of income spent on transportation (Housing + Transportation Index). Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan110 111 KEY MOVE 6 Low Emissions Options Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our streets. Salt Lake City is able to achieve an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 to meet the Climate Positive 2040 goals by offering convenient, low emission transportation and mobility options. Supporting our values Equity: Public spaces are reimagined for low- and no-emission travel options, improving mobility and access for all. Health and Safety: Salt Lake City enjoys cleaner air quality from reduced vehicle emissions. Affordability: Residents and employees have low-cost alternatives to driving alone. 112 Our strategies 6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options 6.2 Manage existing parking supply 6.3 Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand 6.4 Develop a curb management strategy Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: UTA WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •Curb space is a finite resource with growing and competing demand from e-deliveries, passenger pick-up and drop-off, dining, electric vehicle charging, on-street parking and parking for bikes and scooters. •Affordable housing is in short supply, yet the oversupply of parking spaces remains a costly barrier to optimizing use of land. •Driving remains the dominant way of travel in SLC; alternative travel options are not available or are not well understood. •While there have been many studies over the past decade recommending changes to SLC’s parking, curb usage, and alternative mobility options, implementation has been limited. •Ride with Hive is a program that offers a 50% discount to SLC residents to ride buses, TRAX, and the S-Line Streetcar. •The SLC School District transit pass program offers transit passes to students, faculty, and staff district-wide at no cost, promoting both transit use and improved air quality. •Smart Trips was a City-sponsored program offering free transit passes, bike gear, and education materials to help people take advantage of transportation options. •Off-street parking regulations provide parking minimums and maximums based on proximity to transit and land use. In areas with a mix of land uses that are near transit, developers may be exempt from providing a minimum number of vehicle parking spaces. •The City Permit Parking (CPP) program is SLC’s residential permit parking program, managing all day non-resident vehicle parking in and near residential areas. •The Sidewalk Dining Design Guidelines balance the competing demands for use on public sidewalks and curb space. Local Spotlight: Climate Positive 2040 Plan SLC’s Climate Positive 2040 Plan outlines strategies to achieve an 80% reduction in Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2040 compared to the 2009 baseline. Transportation-related strategies to achieve the goal include increasing the use of public transit, promoting active transportation, accelerating electric vehicle adoption, and reducing emissions from air travel.113 ACTION ACTION Strategy 6.1: Build awareness and use of transportation options Promote transportation and mobility options as sustainable and affordable alternatives to driving alone. Hire a transportation options program manager Providing businesses, employees, and residents with a single source of information for transportation options can simplify communications and facilitate participation in transportation options programs. SLC should hire a transportation options (TO) program manager to lead the creation of a branded centralized website for TO information, as well as strengthen partnerships with TO providers including UTA, GREENbike, and other micromobility options. The program manager should conduct education and outreach with employers to increase awareness and participation in TO programs, reducing car travel and increasing the proportion of people who bike, walk, take transit, and share rides. Expand student and education pass programs Students from elementary to university are great pioneers of building a transit culture. TO programs catered to school travel greatly support the education system and help meet climate goals. UTA and the SLC School District have recently partnered to offer a one-year pilot program with free transit passes for all K-12 students, while 15 universities and private schools have discounted transit passes negotiated with UTA. Free or discounted pass programs alone will not systemically get more people on transit. The City should explore complementary strategies to help encourage and promote transportation options. Actions include promoting bus access options to popular afterschool activity centers and recreational destinations, creating a “bike bus” program, and setting up a transit “buddy system” to help new students navigate public transportation together. 114 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Case Study: PBOT Transportation Wallet (Portland, OR) The Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) designates parking districts throughout Portland and offers packaged transportation wallets to reduce parking demand and incentivize transportation by all modes within the districts. The transportation wallet includes bundled transportation incentives, including an annual streetcar pass and credit for transit; and bikeshare, scooter, and carshare credits. People living and working in the parking districts can purchase transportation wallets for 87% off the retail cost. Alternatively, they can receive the wallet for free when they trade in an eligible parking permit or if they qualify for TriMet’s Low Income Transit Fare. Implement a transportation wallet A transportation wallet incentivizes people in areas with good access to transportation options to give up their residential parking permits in exchange for transit passes or other transportation credits. The wallet should include a package of transportation options such as transit passes, bikeshare and micromobility credits, and ridehailing or carshare credits. This does not prohibit the use of a car, but disincentivizes private car ownership to alleviate demand on parking while meeting transportation and emissions goals. Source: Portland Transportation Wallet 115 ACTION ACTION Case Study: Shift Transportation Options (TO) Program (San Francisco, CA) San Francisco established Shift, a TO program designed to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) induced by new development by setting a VMT reduction target and implementing TO measures. Targets are set based on proposed land uses and number of accessory parking spaces built. Developers work with the City to select from a menu of TO measures to create a TO plan and achieve the VMT target. Examples include improved pedestrian infrastructure, bicycle facilities, on-site childcare, unbundling of parking costs from housing costs, and parking cash-out. The TO plan is then submitted to the City and included as a condition of approval of the development. Property owners must routinely report on compliance with the TO plan. Source: Transportation Demand Mnaagement Program, City and County of San Francisco Incentivize developers to incorporate TDM into the development process Achieving mode shift will take commitment from the development community. SLC can incentivize developers to reduce anticipated traffic impacts and improve multimodal access to and from the site. Examples of incentives can include density bonuses, reductions in parking minimums, and reductions in right-of-way fees. The City should develop an online menu of multimodal strategies and programs for developers to choose from to achieve maximum flexibility in their design while providing the greatest benefit to the City. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan STANDARDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED AUGUST 4, 2016Version 3. Updated March 11, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION 116 ACTION ACTION Strategy 6.2: Manage existing parking supply Use a data-driven approach to track and achieve transportation and climate goals. Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program SLC’s parking functions are spread across several City departments. The City should better coordinate parking-related functions under a single parking program and hire a parking program manager. The new program manager should be a seasoned parking professional with experience managing municipal systems of similar complexity and demonstrated understanding of parking’s role in an integrated, multimodal transportation system. The parking manager should be responsible for managing public on- and off-street parking facilities, including implementing a robust parking utilization and performance tracking system, optimizing a parking mobile application to improve the parking experience, and implementing a unified brand and wayfinding program. This role should also support developers to draft shared parking agreements. Understand parking utilization and performance Better parking management requires proper understanding of the utilization and performance of existing parking infrastructure. SLC should develop performance and utilization metrics to understand and manage the city’s current on- and off-street parking inventory. This set of metrics should form a parking information database that is maintained by SLC. Parking data from the parking application provides insights on when, where, and how parking is used. A public-private partnership between the City and private parking companies should be formed to share performance and utilization data to improve parking management and price parking effectively throughout the city. 117 Centralized management and leadership in parking Salt Lake City last completed a parking management study in 2012. The 2012 study found inadequate coordination among the City’s municipal divisions for parking management. Today, City staff are advocating for improved parking management coordination, performance monitoring, and communication with residents and visitors about parking concerns. Optimize a single mobile parking application With a mix of public and private parking options throughout SLC, parking cost and availability need to be better communicated. ParkSLC is an existing mobile application intended to help users pay for parking in SLC. Resources should be dedicated to upgrade ParkSLC to be consistent with changes in branding (Strategy 6.3) and tie in with parkingslc.com functions such as finding parking. App operations should be integrated with physical parking infrastructure, including wayfinding and signage, to alleviate frustration with finding and paying for parking. Case Study: Parking Kitty (Portland, OR) Parking Kitty is a mobile pay app managed by the City of Portland. It allows patrons to pay and add time to parking sessions directly from their phone and will send reminders when a parking session is almost over. On-street parking and publicly owned parking garages in Portland are marked with Parking Kitty signs and zone numbers to make it easy to pay for parking. Parking Kitty is also available on mobile browsers. Source: parkingkitty.com, City of Portland 118 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION ACTION ACTION ACTION Strategy 6.3: Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand Provide clear parking guidance to facilitate a park-once experience for those who need to drive. Create an updated parking brand and communications plan Establishing a brand communicates a consistent, recognizable message. Currently, parkingslc.com offers a wealth of information on where and how to find parking in garages, lots, and on-street. SLC should create a brand—a unified look and feel for all things parking—to support a centralized parking program. An updated website should be the foundation of the brand, in addition to maps, wayfinding and signage, and other communications materials. Prioritize clear and consistent wayfinding and signage SLC’s parking supply is underutilized. In areas where parking is perceived to be limited, such as Downtown SLC, wayfinding should direct people to available parking, facilitate vehicle flow, and make it easy to pay for parking. Wayfinding should also be available for people who walk, roll, and bike. In addition to helping with navigation, signage should display real-time information at lots or garages such as number of available spots, or alternative available parking locations to reduce confusion and frustration. Pilot a park-once- and-walk district in Downtown SLC A park-once-and-walk district means visitors can park once and access multiple destinations without using a car. Currently, Downtown SLC is part of UTA’s Free Fare Zone where TRAX and buses are free. It is also classified as “Transit Context” per the City’s parking code, which means businesses can provide minimal off-street parking. SLC should pilot a park-once-and-walk district to reduce traffic, promote shared parking, and improve parking availability for businesses. Revenue from parking in the district should be directly reinvested to upgrade pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks, benches, and street trees or fund transportation options programs. Parking revenue can also fund bike parking and other micromobility options. 119 J. Crew CupcakesDots Soap KitchenPlanta RorinLo Sephora Kings Row Gastropub Kreation Zemrus Escrow En t r e No u s French Bistro Pink Sugar & Wax Scizzor Hair Salon Madewell Seiho International He r m a n Mi l l e r LoveSac Wa r b y Parker Kabuki N D E L A C E Y AVE Allbirds Michael Hall Fi n e Ar t Rothy’s Aesop Mil l e r Alley Alfred Bo k a o s Av e d a Place Vendôme Sa l t & Straw Ni k e Running Fi n n + Willow MA U M M. Ge n e r a l Andonia Do u g l a s Alley Kicksneaker Mignon Chocolate Sh a n t ’ s Cl o c k Yi Fang Fruit Tea Med WeightLoss Vans We Oli v e & Win e Bar Hu s t l e r Hollywood Bar Celona SORRISO Club 54 Prix Adornment Su s h i St o p DeWitt Algorri Algorri U St r e e t Pizza Un i o n Restaurant Ch i g n o n Ha i r Salon Redirect Ele c t r i c Drive Mk t g Ke n d a l l Alley Le g g e Alley Un i o n Sandwich 95 9 Head Spa EN Massage Room Harmony Nail Steiner Library Dog Haus W W A L N U T ST E W A L N U T ST Case Study: OldPasadena Parking Pasadena Shell Gas Station Telacu Courtyard Apartments Pacific Alley Memorial Park The Memorial Park Band Shell dates to the 1930s and is host to Band Shell District (Pasadena, CA) Old Pasadena is a downtown historic district with more than WALKER’S PARADISE WALK SCORE BIKER’S PARADISE6 BIKE SCORE free concerts under the stars. Playground Restrooms Memorial Park Gold Line 200 destinations and attractions for shopping, dining, arts, and entertainment. Visitors can park at on-street metered parking, and revenue from meter parking is used to fund programs to maintain the HOLLY ST LEONARD V. PIERONI ST Homage Tortas Mexico Courtyard at Fair Oaks Old Towne Pub Pe a r l Th a i Eatery Tib e t Ne p a l House Go l d Bug SW A Architects Hayes Alley The Blind Donkey Slater’s 50/50 E HOLLY ST 80 N. Raymond Condominiums Tea Rose Garden Kaviar Sushi Emblush Beaute Station Body Firm Clo t h e s Heaven Curatorial Au d i o Element Whitmore Rare Books streetscapes and alley walkways W UNION ST E UNION S T in Old Pasadena. Visitors are encouraged to park at any of the three Park & Walk garages that are centrally located and provide walkable Christensen Alley Leafy Enchantress CoffeeCafé & Plants Santorini Roll Factory by Stray Cat Bonham Aly Hugus Alley Parachute Skin Laundry 21 Choices Frozen Yogurt Russell’s One Colorado Exchange Alley DelightPastry SOH Grill House The Speakeasy Bunker Experience Jimmy John’s Gourmet Sandwiches AT&T Brainard Alley access to the variety of destinations 75 W.3 W.1 E.65 E.83 E. without having to drive. Park & Walk W C O L O R A D O BLVD E COLORADO BLVD garages are marked on maps withP&W icons and offer hourly and daily True Food Kitchen Banana Republic Old Town Gymnasium Fraser Alley Fight Academy Taco Libre Edwin Alley Edwin Mills Prolece Tea El Toreo Café Chef Tony Dim Sum One Zo Boba The Cellar Mercantile Place T-Mobile Sprint Cheeks & Co. House of Intuition Plotkin Alley Morgan Alley pricing so drivers do not have to McCormick Alley by Equator Bickley Printing Bar Method Tacos Super Gallito Old Pasadena General Store Church of Scientology move their vehicles during their visit. Source: Old Pasadena Walking Map Compass Martin Alley De Lacey Whimsy Pasadena Beer & Claw All India Café Yuzu Shabu & Grill Brooklyn Square 85°C Bakery Café Himalayan Café De Lacey Nails Moom 48 Thai Schoolhouse Amara Café W GREEN ST E GREEN ST Color Me Mine PURE Nails Spa Designer Domicile Cozy Stylish Chic W DAYTON ST Daddy’s Chicken Shack All Love Collections Pilates Sculpt Pure Barre Castle Green turns heads with its architectural pedigree and prowess Castle Green Library Hall Lofts N Bicos Hospitality Central Court Playground 120 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Hair by Cesaré Union Salon W VALLEY ST Grandview Palace Sushi Roku Industrious Jake’s Dog Bakery Beard Papa’s Blue Bottle Coffee Roots & Rye Acai Bar De La Ruio Lashes Sanctuary Fitness Crêpes de Paris Panache Bridal Burke Williams SpaRoom & Board Blick Art Materials I Like Pie Bakeshop SATO Ramen House Neon Retro Arcade Gloss Nail Spa Lucky Baldwins Pub Specstacular Anthropologie Twigzz Elevated Physical Therapy Richard Holbrook Design Old Pasadena Pharmacy & Marketplace Romanesque Room Fishbecks Patio Center Cigars by Chivas Royalty Salon Scizzor 91 Copa Vida Sweet Life The Next Jamba Father Nature Boba Cha Cha Idealab PatagoniaRococo Room The Container Store Der Wolf Fishwives Marine Building Law Offices MarriottCourtyard by Marriott Friendship Pasadena Church CTRL Collective Eco Auto Care Ch a Redefine Pasadena Senior Center 48 S. 82 S. 10 0 N. 44 N. 16 N. 175 S. N P A S A D E N A A V E S P A S A D E N A AVE Carnelian Salon CorePower Yoga Pinot’s Palette Pa p e r Source In t e r i o r De f i n e Fr e e Pe o p l e Ur b a n Outfitters Th e Sh a d e Store Restoration Hardware Tempur-Pedic Te s l a Mo t o r s 2n d St r e e t USA Cir c a Lighting Peloton Scotch & Soda Lululemon Athletica Starbucks Su n g l a s s Hu t Av o c a d o Mattress Pas. Elite Fitness Ta n g l e s Sa l o n FM Financial Ca r r Alley Zara Ma r m o r a Alley So f a U Love Gameology Motto Tea Cafe Po p p i n g Yolk MINISO S D E LA C E Y AVE Bu c a di Beppo Th e Kitchen Tif f a n y & Co. Cr a t e & Ba r r e l De s i g n St u d i o Fo o t l o c k e r - Ho u s e of Hoops Gyu-Kaku Japanese BB Q Dining Design Wit h i n Reach Th e He t t e m a Group Ol d Pa s a d e n a Collection Apartments Le Ch a t e a u de Tie n Tao 3C a t e a Go Ch o n g Qi n g Ya o M e i Ho t p o t Ap p l e Store Fa r r o w & Ball Custom Comfort Mattress Rocco’s Tavern Ag n e s Re s t a u r a n t Cr a f t by Sm o k e & Fire Boiling Point Jin Tea Shop Gorjana Lather Pasadena Endoscopy Center Ro c h e Bobois Mi l l s Place Sm i t h Alley Ba k e r Alley Factory N F A I R O A K S AVE S F A I R O A K S AVE Subway Th e 35 e r Ba r He l l o Gelato Hey, That’s Amore! Mama M Sushi Ma i n Chick Tacos 1986 Pa p e r Rice Dir t D o g Naughty Panda Elisa B. Je n e t t e Bras Kit c h e n & Bakery Br a l e y Court Ele c t r i c Drive Perle N RA Y M O N D AVE S R A Y M O N D AVE Me + Crepe Classic Kickboxing Do s Besos Bi g Ba n g The o r y Way Bi g Ba n g Th e o r y Way Anderson Business Sushi Enya Ha i r Salon Ch a s e Bank S A R R O Y O P K W Y Big BangTheoryWa y Everson Royce Wine & Tasting Armory Center for the Arts Raymond Renaissance Maude Woods Lemon Tree Pasadena Viero Bridal Chado Tea Room OSAWA Restaurant FoundrSpace Bodegon No. 69 Bone Kettle Maestro Pasadena Be a u t y Bar King Taco Home Brewed Bar Oakobing IPIC Theaters Sage Vegan Bistro Il Fornaio Bakery Il Fornaio Cucina Italiana One Colorado Courtyard Cr a v e Cafe Ev a n t h é Aveda IX Ta p a Cantina Ramen Tatsunoya Eil e e n Fisher Dr . Ma r t e n s Store We l l s Fargo Mi Pia c e Italian NE O Pasadena Sameday Health bb . q Chicken Romantix Intelligentsia In d i a n a Colony Pottery Barn Crown City Loan No o d l e St. Ho t Win g s Café Q’s Bil l i a r d Club Ba r n e y ’ s Beanery Lucid Motors Su n r i g h t Tea Po k e Sa l a d Bar Cheesecake Valentine Sweets Crossroads Trading Co. Pasadena Fire Dept. Station 31 Livery Studio Incycle Bicycles Park Old Pasadena Directory Map Central ACTION ACTION Strategy 6.4: Develop a curb management strategy Modernize curb management practices to meet expanding demands on the curb. Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses While there are many possibilities for improved and dynamic curb uses, not all are equally applicable to different contexts. Pilot projects allow the City to conduct trials in a controlled setting and at a smaller scale, illuminating how different stakeholders will respond to the change in curb uses. Conducting pilot projects is also a great way to involve local residents, employers, and the surrounding community in the design process, clearly addressing their needs and concerns. Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across SLC To better understand the opportunities and challenges of managing curb space, SLC should conduct a comprehensive survey of existing conditions and peer review of best practices. Inventorying existing curb uses will help staff and the public better understand how curb space is being used today and the potential opportunities that exist. Interviews with partner agency staff will also help the City understand how various stakeholders impact curb space and identify the diverse needs and perspectives of curb users from parking to delivery services to bus stop placement. 121 Why manage the curb? Curbs are one of SLC’s largest public assets, playing a multitude of roles within the city—they are a physical barrier between the street and sidewalk, a loading zone for goods and people, a storage facility for parking automobiles and, in some cases, shared mobility devices, and more. Several of these uses compete for space, often resulting in prioritization of parking for single occupancy vehicles over other uses. Use of the curb has a direct and substantial impact on placemaking, especially in high use areas. A curb management strategy is needed because the curb: •Is one of our largest public resources •Has a growing number of demands •Connects us to transportation options •Can be a tool to achieve community goals to reduce emissions and encourage people to bike, walk, take transit, and share rides 3 How we manage the curb will change 4 2 3 1 Today, the curb is ...Prioritized for cars.At odds with our climate goals. Subsidized – even in areas with priced parking, the true cost is not passed on to drivers. Confusing – it’s difficult to understand what is allowed where. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 1 2 4 122 PHA RMAC Y P PARKINGAvailable:88Occupied:412 No ParkingTow Zone 9:00PM– 3:00AM 2 hourParking 7:00 A M – 9:00P M THU R– SAT THU R– SAT 2 hour No Parking Park i n g Tow Zone7:00 A M –9:00 P M 9:00PM–3:00AM THU R – S A T THU R – S A T 2 hour No Parking Park i n g Tow Zone7:00 A M –9:00 P M 9:00PM–3:00AM THU R – S A T THU R – S A T U T A + P AR K I N G C O M E DY B A N K R E S T A U R A N T 2 hour No Parking Parking Tow Zone 2 hour No Parking Parkin g Tow Zone 7:00AM –9:00P M 9:00PM – 3:00AMTHUR –SAT THUR– SAT 7:00AM –9:00PM 9:00P M– 3:00AMTHUR –SAT THUR– SAT 4 3 2 1 Tomorrow, our curbs should be ... Prioritized for shared transportation options like carshare, shuttle, and carpoolers. Supportive of delivery services, ridehail loading, and eventual autonomous vehicles. Priced appropriately to shift people away from private vehicles. Activated for other uses like parklets and dining. 123 1 3 2 4 loading PHA RMAC Y P PARKINGAva i l a b l e : 88Occ u p i e d : 412 loading loading 15 min 15 min 15 min U T A + P AR K I N G C O M E DY B A N K R E S T A U R A N T pARKING 2 hour Case Study: SFMTA Curb Management Strategy and Design Guidelines (San Francisco, CA) Recognizing that curb space is a finite resource, San Francisco Muni published a new framework categorizing the hierarchy of curb functions and presented a list of strategies and policies to overhaul the management of curb space. The Guidelines support planners and engineers in curb zone placement and design as part of SFMTA projects and include guidance on data collection from surveys to video observations. Some notable recommendations include: •Standardize curb data inventory •Develop public communications and information campaigns on parking and loading regulations •Study pricing to address curb use impacts •Expand the use of loading zones that vary based on time of day •Prioritize disability access in curb management Source: SFMTA Curb Management Strategy Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 1 40’ Coach Bus 32 Shared Bikes22 Mopeds/Motorcycles4 Private Vehicles 32225 6380 feet of curb can serve: 124 Develop Curb Management Guidelines The above two actions will set up SLC to establish a blueprint for the future, defining how curb space should be prioritized based on the local context, community goals, and current and future demands on urban streets. Based on the curb use inventory and results of the pilot project(s), SLC should create a document that outlines Curb Management Guidelines to help prioritize how curbs are used and managed across the city. Metrics •Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). •Percentage of curb space not allocated for parking. •Percentage of parking revenue invested in mobility options. •Parking performance (occupancy, turnover, violations). •Awareness of transportation options programs via biennial citywide transportation surveys. ACTION 125 KEY MOVE 7 Places for People Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. Tools, incentives, and standards help to leverage private development and create places for people. Supporting our values Sustainability: Facilities are built to support people to bike, walk, take transit, and share rides more often. Equity: Capital funding is distributed equitably by creating priority networks. Our strategies 7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas 7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts What we heard •Homogeneous residential districts put daily destinations farther away, which means trips are longer and people have a hard time biking, walking, and taking transit. •Long blocks make it challenging for people to connect to destinations. •Investments—along with new development—are needed to help create attractive public spaces in our communities. 126 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: Salt Lake City ACTION ACTION Strategy 7.1: Leverage private investment in high growth areas Invest in open and green space to support development and create beautiful public spaces. Create public realm action plans Public realm action plans in high growth neighborhoods help guide mobility and public space investments. These plans identify opportunities for pocket parks, linear parks, alley revitalization, and land acquisition opportunities to create more open and green space. SLC should reallocate right-of-way (ROW), leverage multi-agency partnerships, and repurpose land acquisition funds to create park- like spaces in the ROW in areas that lack public parks and green space. Incentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans Street concept plans provide a common vision shared between community members, property owners, developers, and city officials. Multiple property owners typically implement street concept plans over time as parcels on the block redevelop. Ten percent street concept plans should be developed for signature streets in the areas that have the most potential for transformation. The plans should be formally adopted by the SLC Transportation Department to provide confidence to developers that they have been properly vetted by subject matter experts to reduce their risk in the review process. Incentives to encourage implementation could include density bonuses or a reduction in right-of-way fees during construction. 127 Case Study: Street Design Concept Plan Program (Seattle, WA) The City of Seattle’s Street Design Concept Plan Program includes formally adopted concept plans for more than a dozen streets, such as Terry Avenue, that have a high potential for new development. Terry Avenue street concept plan (Seattle, WA). Source: Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd. via Community Design + Architecture Establish a Green Street network Green Streets are legislated in the land use code and designed to give priority to pedestrian circulation and open space. Discretionary pedestrian improvements on Green Streets enable private development to receive bonus density. The Green Street network should include streets that are conducive to green stormwater infrastructure, including soil infiltration, slopes, and right-of-way availability. As a first step, SLC has committed to developing a downtown Green Loop to be built over the next 5-10 years, which will feature urban linear parks and urban forests. Expansion to a codified, citywide initiative can transform the public realm and promote healthy, walkable communities across the city. Key steps to develop a Green Street network include: •Create a Green Streets GIS layer in the Complete Streets StoryMap. •Develop interdepartmental agreements to foster partnerships between Department of Public Works and Department of Public Safety. •Dedicate staff resources to tracking and coordinating with private development to foster partnerships in a timely way. Case Study: City of Seattle Public Life Program (Seattle, WA) The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) developed the Public Life Program in 2017 to collect and elevate ‘people data’ through public life studies to understand how our public spaces are being used and by whom through observational research methods. The results of a public life study provide SDOT with people-centered data to make investment decisions, evaluate designs and interventions, and understand what makes a successful public space. Vine Street in Seattle, WA. Source: Mike Nakamura, via NACTO Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan ACTION 128 ACTION ACTION Strategy 7.2: Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts Enhance connectivity to help people get around easily. Value street and alley vacations A street or alley vacation is a type of easement in which a public agency transfers the right-of-way of a public street to a private property owner. Salt Lake City should put a high value on street and alley vacations beyond the appraisal, recognizing that street vacations can limit the permeability of the network for pedestrians over time. Street vacations should be offset with comparable public benefits to the pedestrian and public space network. Require midblock pathways Salt Lake City has some of the longest blocks in the country, hindering connectivity. To avoid large blocks that exceed 300’ in length, SLC should require midblock pathways between or through parcels to achieve more permeability at the block level to encourage walking and to add more visual interest and depth to large scale developments. Implementation of midblock through connections can also be achieved through public benefits resulting from street and/ or alley vacations, incentive programs, and/or cost waivers for right-of-way improvements. Metrics •Number of uninterrupted blocks (without midblock crossings) in the city. •Creation of and progress on Green Streets. 129 KEY MOVE 8 Operationalize Complete Streets Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership. Streets are the lifeblood of our neighborhoods. Their design affects our behaviors and decisions—how safe we feel, where we can or choose to live, how we get around, how easy it is to get to the doctor, whether our kids walk or bike to school, and our physical, environmental, and economic health. To ensure our streets are designed for the people of Salt Lake, we must foster a cultural shift at the City of Salt Lake to support Complete Streets outcomes from planning to implementation to asset management. Supporting our values Sustainability: Our streets and transportation assets are built and maintained to help people travel sustainably. Equity and Affordability: Investments in transportation ensure safe and reliable travel for everyone in all parts of the city. 130 Our strategies 8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management 8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making 8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Photo source: Salt Lake City WHAT WE HEARD WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW What’s happening in SLC? •There is a lack of coordination across city departments and no centralized role in charge of street projects for their lifetimes. •Improved coordination between divisions and departments is needed to implement complete street projects (particularly planning, design, utilities, and maintenance). •Support and partnership are needed to ensure complete street outcomes on UDOT owned streets. •Chartering and interdepartmental agreements are needed for utility and street tree conflicts and street lighting. •The Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide defines designs for 17 distinct types of streets. •A Complete Streets Ordinance was adopted in 2010, requiring streets to be designed, operated, and maintained for all modes of travel, including people walking and biking and for travelers of all ages and abilities. •Complete Streets assessments are completed in the Transportation Division but commitments are often the first thing to fall off when budgets are constrained. 131 Photo Source: Lance Tyrell via slc.gov What does a Complete Street feel like? Complete streets and intersections ensure safe and equitable access, mobility, and opportunities for people of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, ethnicities, and genders. They are: •Sensitive and responsive to land use and ecological contexts. •Slow, encouraging responsible movement through physical design. •Inclusive of diverse transportation choices (bus and rail transit, bikeways, walkways, diverse curbside uses, mobility devices, motor vehicle lanes, shared spaces, and/or freight, depending on context). •Interconnected, providing a network of streets that allow people to get from place to place directly and safely. •Balanced, providing space for mobility, access, greening, placemaking, and other MID-BLOCK CROSSWALKS provide safe and convenient walking paths and reduce vehicle speeds TRANSIT STOPS include amenities to make transit more desirable and accessible WIDE SIDEWALKS provide ample room for people walking and rolling, enhance the public realm, and spur activity REfSunTctiAonUs oRf aAstNreeTt.STORE CLINIC PHARMACY Not every street needs to contain all elements, but a complete streets network ensures that everyone has a safe and convenient travel option. DOWNTOWN 132 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan STREET PARKING AND LOADING is strategically planned to maximize utilization BIKE LANES provide protection from vehicle and pedestrian traffic LANDSCAPING creates a comfortable and inviting pedestrian environment and establishes green streets BIKE PARKING makes it convenient to visit nearby attractions STREET LIGHTING increases safety and creates human scale A P T HARDWARE S GROCERIES Cafe P 133 ACTION ACTION Strategy 8.1: Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management Engage a broader multidisciplinary team in project development to ensure consistent, high-quality Complete Streets outcomes. Integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle Salt Lake City has an adopted ordinance, leadership support, and staff resources that are dedicated to Complete Streets. For change to infiltrate throughout the organization, the process needs to become decentralized and integrated into how the City plans, develops, designs, manages, and maintains its streets and transportation assets. All departments and divisions involved in these activities should have ownership of Complete Streets outcomes, which are central to the community vision and goals of Connect SLC. Structure project development teams to ensure accountability City staff with different skills and responsibilities are involved in planning, designing, and implementing street projects. Each has accountability for distinct outcomes and when projects transition between divisions, design outcomes can naturally shift. SLC should engage all accountable parties early and keep everyone engaged throughout the project development, delivery, and maintenance lifecycle to ensure safety, equity, and mobility outcomes are balanced and community inputs are realized. A Complete Streets Steering Committee (see action at right) can ensure leadership support. At the staff level, creating a project development division (or comparable staff structure) will ensure engagement of all needed subject matter experts early and continually. The case study at right describes a success story for this approach. 134 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Establish a Complete Streets Steering Committee A Complete Streets Steering Committee should be established to provide regular coordination between key department and division leadership and joint accountability for various stages and functions of Complete Street planning, design, delivery, and maintenance. The Committee will also be responsible for making policy and organizational recommendations to ensure effective Complete Streets processes and outcomes, consider and grant exceptions to policy, coordinate funding and budgeting, and create an annual report on Complete Streets efforts in the city. The Committee should include the following members or their appointees: •Transportation Division Director •Engineering Division Director/City Engineer •Planning Division Director •Building Services Director •Streets Division Director •Department of Airports Director •Public Lands Division Director •Public Utilities Division Director •Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Case Study: Complete Streets Program (Seattle, WA) The Policy and Planning Division of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) administers the Complete Streets program. Program management includes accountability, tracking, and training to ensure that the framework is in compliance with the legislated mandate and in keeping with best practice. However, the Complete Streets assessment for each capital project is the responsibility of the “project developer,” who resides in the Project Development Division. This process requires signing off on the scope of work by a core team of interdisciplinary subject matter experts before a project can advance past 30% design. A project manager in the Capital Projects Division participates in the 0-30% phase (planning and concept design) and continues in the management of later design phases ensuring that the Complete Streets assessment and goals are realized. This process weighs each subject matter expert equally. If there is disagreement at the staff level by any subject matter expert, then the project is escalated to an Executive Steering Committee for final decisions on scope of work and budget. Prior to the establishment of a Project Development Division, Policy and Planning was responsible for finalizing all Complete Streets assessments for capital projects, in accordance with the Complete Streets ordinance. This resulted in a ‘watch dog’ role within the organization; Complete Streets outcomes were more sporadic and were often reliant on the good will of the project manager. The organizational changes resulted in institutional change and broader accountability over Complete Streets outcomes. ACTION 135 Source: Complete Streets Program, SDOT ACTION ACTION Strategy 8.2: Develop tools to guide decision-making Update the Quality Transportation Improvement Program screening tool to align with Connect SLC Salt Lake City’s Quality Transportation Improvement Program (QTIP) is a tool that uses criteria aligned with City values and priorities— including equity-centered criteria—to inform decision-making about capital project and program priorities. An update of the QTIP tool will align with Connect SLC goals and ensure smaller projects—and those that provide critical connections to areas in need—are better positioned for funding. Recommended updates are provided below: •Criteria Review: Update the existing criteria to align with Connect SLC goals including a review of equity criteria. •Safety: Move away from heat map analysis for severe and fatal crashes so that every incidence is considered. •Automated Scoring: Automate the scoring process to improve the speed at which projects can be scored. •Connectivity Metric: Create a metric to evaluate a project’s value with respect to the larger mobility context (e.g., a small completion of a larger trail network that would not otherwise score very highly). Develop data-driven storytelling tools to support Complete Streets assessments Operationalizing Complete Streets with easy-to-use tools and easy linkages to relevant data is critical to ensure the process is manageable and useful to City staff. Clear communication tools can also ensure equity and safety are centered in the process and staff have clear communication tools when meeting internally and with the public. A GIS StoryMap can serve as a universal tool to walk project managers through the Complete Streets assessment with data sources hyperlinked to each section. 136 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Align capital projects with policies and best practice City staff require data-based protocols and tools to ensure that the policy intent of our Complete Streets Ordinance is implemented through street design and operations. Analytical tools, metrics, and/ or thresholds that have historically been used to assess project- level impacts often favor vehicular level of service (LOS) and can make it difficult to implement multimodal transportation projects. SLC should develop tools and policies that can help measure and balance Complete Streets goals. •Create a Multimodal Level of Service policy to apply to capital projects that establishes acceptable levels of vehicle delay if and when LOS for other modes like biking and transit improves. •Establish pedestrian and bicycle crossing policies based on system needs and actual use patterns or projections. •Develop and use a form of preventative modeling to assess safety risks for vulnerable street users instead of using crash data to justify safety improvements – understanding how, why, and where crashes may happen. 137 ACTION Case Study: Vehicular Level of Service Policy Application for Capital Projects (Seattle, WA) Seattle has robust Complete Streets policies and support from leadership to shift to a sustainable transportation network. However, multimodal capital projects were often evaluated using the same metrics and thresholds as vehicular-based projects. A level of service (LOS) policy was developed to ensure that vehicular delay did not serve as a roadblock to multimodal project implementation. The Complete Streets assessment requires an agreement between the project manager and the traffic engineer to agree on alternative metrics that will be used to assess potential multimodal impacts. (For example, an important metric for a bike project may be the resultant delays to transit.) ACTION ACTION Strategy 8.3: Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Formalize use of the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in project development The SLC Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide provides direction on how street design can shape the city around our values and goals. Its 17 street typologies should be used to guide implementation and inform dimensional standards for street capital projects. The SLC Transportation Division should work with development review teams to ensure the guidelines are used when developers rebuild street frontages or street and alley segments. For example, ensuring pedestrian clear space and greening dimensions as a buffer between sidewalk and travel lanes are met can improve the quality of the pedestrian experience. Require compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in the Complete Streets assessment Capital projects should reflect project relevant dimensions of the street type assignment. For instance, if a protected bike lane is proposed, it should match the facility design and corresponding dimensions that are illustrated in the Design Guide. For projects that do not meet the dimensional standards depicted in the Design Guide, a deviation for capital projects should be required as part of the Complete Streets assessment. 138 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Metrics •Track compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide, particularly the number of deviations granted. •Track Complete Streets elements added to projects as a result of the interdepartmental process. •Provide a public facing dashboard where finalized Complete Streets assessments can be viewed. 139 Achieving our vision Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan140 6 141 Connect SLC is a guide for how we move and connect people, goods, and our community. It is an expression of our collective values and a roadmap for how we work together to achieve our goals as a community. Achieving the Connect SLC vision requires commitment to creating ongoing community conversations, better organizing our City departments for coordinated project delivery, leveraging partnerships with other organizations, and upholding our commitment to report on key outcomes to hold ourselves accountable. 1 2 3 4 5 An ongoing community conversation Implementation of Connect SLC starts with a commitment to engaging the community in new ways. Connect SLC sets the stage for the City, agency partners, and the community to engage in ongoing conversations to help ensure transportation projects, programs, and investments reflect the needs of—and are co-created with—the community. SLC recognizes that Westside neighborhoods lack transportation equity and have been marginalized by past infrastructure choices. All transportation investments and processes must be led with a racial equity framework, recognizing that racial inequities are deeply ingrained in our processes and often unintentionally perpetuate harm. Leading with racial equity provides the opportunity to proactively integrate racial justice in our decision-making, and ultimately our policies, practices, and institutional culture. Look back to move forward This framework will help SLC learn from the past and move toward a more equitable future. Understand the history of racist mobility policies Analyze how communities benefitted or were harmed Acknowledge impacts on mobility access today and the need to change Identify strategies, investments, and programs needed to avoid displacement and continued disinvestment Create a process to report back on key outcomes 142 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Strategies Investments Programs Organizing for success Cities are complex places. We barely think about our travel experience when all goes well, but behind the scenes there is a lot happening to make our travel experiences smooth, safe, and enjoyable and ensure that the thousands of other people traveling simultaneously have the same experience. An integrated transportation system is the result of careful long-term planning, investment, and day-to-day operations that keep people safe, signals on, systems moving, and goods arriving. Many SLC departments are working to ensure our travel options are safe, reliable, and effective and that the way we allocate our finite street space aligns with our safety, equity, and climate goals. How these departments work together and manage the many needs of our streets is critical to reaching the aspirations set forth in this plan. 143 How SLC is structured to deliver Connect SLC Salt Lake City reorganized its Transportation Division in the Department of Community and Neighborhoods to improve capital project delivery. This was in response to a significant increase in transportation funding starting in 2019. As part of the reorganization, the Transportation Division created new work groups to allow for specialization. Previously, project managers had been expected to lead every element of a project from securing funding through construction. The new structure separates out the general planning work group into three groups: a strategic planning and programming team, a project delivery team, and a safety and analytics team. The Division increased staffing and redefined certain staff roles to better utilize several new sources of capital project funding as well as better organize project prioritization and grant writing efforts. Despite this reorganization, SLC’s transportation planning, delivery, and maintenance processes are relatively diffuse compared with agencies that have a consolidated department of transportation. SLC’s diffuse structure has pros and cons. The involvement of multiple departments can include a broader set of City leadership in decision- making and can lead to strong partnerships at the leadership level. However, coordination requires time and resources and it can be challenging to ensure the full lifecycle of a project or program is considered from the outset when multiple leaders are responsible for budgeting and staffing. TRANSPORTATION-FOCUSED All or most transportation functions are in one department that is primarily focused on transportation. Sometimes these departments also have a partner agency (e.g., Engineering, Public Works) that handles certain TRANSPORTATION-INCLUSIVE All or most transportation functions are in a larger department that is not solely focused on transportation, such as an Engineering Department or a Department of Public Works. responsibilities like construction or maintenance.Note: Adapted from NACTO’s “Structured for Success” (2022) 144 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan TRANSPORTATION-DIFFUSE Transportation functions are spread across multiple departments, none of which is solely focused on transportation. Keys to a successful Connect SLC implementation Keys to success How Connect SLC moves us forward What to do next Clear goals Articulates our transportation vision and values and the strategies and actions to move the dial •Create an Action Plan that helps to prioritize what we’re doing first, next, and in the future •Maintain strong Director-level coordination Reliable and recurring funding Sets a strong vision for our transportation system to support asks for new funding, both locally and from Federal and State partners •Sustain and develop reliable local funding sources that can support projects and programs needed to meet the Connect SLC vision •Continue to be opportunistic, seeking grant funds and public-private partnerships to achieve the vision Strong coordination and hand-offs Documents how to integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle •Map project development process/delivery chain •Create a Complete Streets Working Group •Use the Complete Streets process and committee as a delivery tool and approach to ensuring shared commitments are realized •Update project planning and development process to ensure all phases of the project lifecycle are included, all the necessary departments are involved throughout project development, particularly those responsible for operations and maintenance Commitment to evaluation Identifies a set of key metrics to track plan progress •Create an Action Plan that documents how progress will be tracked and communicated to the community •Continue to manage and update the project prioritization process to ensure community goals are being met through the Quality Transportation Improvement Process (QTIP) Manage change Identifies resources, staffing, and partnerships to tackle our most serious challenges •Develop a Vision Zero task force and rapid response team, taking both a structure planning approach and responding immediately to known threats •Develop an East-West Transportation Strategy to address immediate needs and inspire bold action Investment in staff Identifies the need to improve staff understanding of the local community Recommends that staff involved in the decision-making are more representative of the community •Work with local schools, professional organizations, trade unions, and community-based organizations (CBOs) to increase the number of underrepresented populations in vocational professions across the City’s departments •Train planning staff to work with CBOs to understand their unique skillsets and ensure that CBO members have access to resources Strategic communications and community engagement Provides an engagement framework to co- create with community •Partner with the Equity and Inclusion team to update SLC’s Engagement Guide •Tie equitable engagement to staff and leadership decisions through an Equity Working Group or Cabinet Note: Keys to success adapted from NACTO’s “Structured for Success” (2022) 145 Joining with our partners Implementation of Connect SLC will require strong coordination with agency partners, key stakeholders, and community-based organizations. Engage with our communities Partner with neighborhoods and Recognized Community Organizations to identify participants for the Equity Working Group. •Equity and Inclusion Team of Salt Lake City •Community Outreach Team of Salt Lake City •Neighborhood and Community Organizations –Westside Coalition –Community Councils of SLC –NeighborWorks Salt Lake City –All community-based organizations representing the people of SLC Improve health and safety Partner with law enforcement and other public health and safety divisions and organizations to achieve Vision Zero goals. •Law enforcement •Salt Lake County Health Department •SLC Police Pioneer Bike Squad •SLC Unified School District •SLC schools, colleges, and universities •Wasatch Front Regional Council 146 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Provide transportation options and services Partner with transportation options service providers to improve awareness of options and increase the number of people biking, walking, and taking transit for more trips. •UTA •GREENbike •UDOT TravelWise Manage the right of way Partner with right-of-way operators and the divisions that manage public land and utilities to ensure Complete Streets implementation is seamless and safe connections are made. •SLC Public Utilities Department •SLC Public Lands Department •UDOT •Freight rail operators Improve our public spaces Partner with our economic development and tourism partners to enhance our public spaces and attract equitable development. •Department of Economic Development •Downtown Alliance •SLC Redevelopment Agency •SLC Arts Council •Visit Salt Lake 147 DOWNTOWN Measuring our progress Connect SLC sets a vision for Salt Lake City’s transportation future. But how will we know if we’re making progress to achieve the vision? This section outlines the performance measures for Connect SLC—organized by our values outlined in Chapter 4—to help track our progress. Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. Our values Our Key Moves Our measure Our metric Target Equity •Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Design engagement to foster co-creation •Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members •Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Expanded engagement to underserved populations to prioritize marginalized voices •Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide demographics •Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses N/A •Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Improved safety for people living and working in Westside neighborhoods •Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N •Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Improved awareness of transportation options •Change in awareness of transportation options (from biennial transportation survey) 148 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Our values Our Key Moves Our measure Our metric Target Health and Safety •Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths •Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Eliminate traffic-related fatalities and reduce serious injuries from traffic collisions •Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods) •Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.) •Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street typologies •Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility Increase the amount of safe facilities for people walking and biking •Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings •Access to all ages and abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile) •Percent of people walking and bicycling for all types of trips •Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods Improve the transit rider experience •Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities Reliable Options •Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods •Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Increase the number of transportation options people have available •Percent of people who take transit for all types of trips (from biennial transportation survey) •Percent of parking revenue reinvested in mobility options Enhance reliability of our transportation system •Person hours of delay•Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods •Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options •Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year •Transit rider satisfaction survey results (from UTA onboard survey) •Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Improved reliability to the Westside neighborhoods •Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south Affordability •Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods •Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Decrease the percent of income spent on transportation •Percent of income spent on transportation (H+T Index) Sustainability •Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Reduction in transportation- related emissions •Reduction in VMT 149 Endnotes 1 The American Growth Project, UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School. 2022’s Fastest Growing U.S. Cities, Ranked. https://kenaninstitute. unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/american-growth-project- 10122022r.pdf 2 Utah Governor’s Office of Management and Budget Municipal Population Projections. https://mountainland.org/img/Data/ Projections/GOMBSmallAreaProjections.pdf 3 American Lung Association. State of the Air 2022. https://www.lung. org/getmedia/74b3d3d3-88d1-4335-95d8-c4e47d0282c1/sota- 2022 4 Clean the Air Challenge. https://cleartheairchallenge.org/wp- content/uploads/5791_CTAC_FactSheetRevise.pdf 5 Utah Department of Transportation Zero Fatalities. Up-to-date Fatality and Serious Injury Data (2023). https://zerofatalities.com/ statistics/ 6 Salt Lake City GIS Open Data Portal. 7 US Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2021). 8 UTA February 2020 Ridership Data. Weekday Mode-Level Boardings. 9 Salt Lake City Thriving in Place Strategy Website (2023). https://www. thrivinginplaceslc.org/ 10 Tefft, Brian, ‘Impact speed and a pedestrian’s risk of severe injury or death,’ Accident Prevention and Analysis (2013). 11 Salt Lake City Resident Survey (2021). http://slcdocs.com/ims/ Survey2021.pdf 12 Housing and Transportation Index, Salt Lake City, Utah. https:// htaindex.cnt.org/fact-sheets/?lat=40.75962&lng=-111.886798&focu s=place&gid=26322#fs 13 US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (2021). 14 UTA Free Fare February Final Report (April 2022). 15 Environmental Research, Volume 174, July 2019. Prenatal and early life exposures to ambient air pollution and development. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/ S0013935119301987 150 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan 151 Item I1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 – 1:00 PM Version RE: MOTION SHEET – Zoning Map Amendment: AG-2 to M-1 2760 N, 2800 N and 2828 N 2200 W PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701 MOTION 1 (adopt with additional DA language) I move that the Council adopt the rezone subject to the conditions outlined in attachment A. I further move that the following language be added to the form of development agreement: “If a Package Delivery Facility is an accessory use at the Property, then no more than 25 percent of the gross square footage of any building on the Property shall be used as a Package Delivery Facility.” MOTION 2 (adopt without additional DA language) I move the Council adopt the rezone subject to the conditions outlined in attachment A. MOTION 3 (reject) I move the Council reject the rezone. MOTION 4 (defer action) I move the Council defer action to a future council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: May 7, 2024 RE:Zoning Map Amendment: AG-2 to M-1 2760 North, 2800 North and 2828 North 2200 WestPLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: March 19, 2024 Set Date: March 26, 2024 Public Hearing: April 16, 2024 Potential Action: May 7, 2024 NEW INFORMATION During the April 16 public hearing many people participated in the meeting, asking the Council to reject the rezone for the following reasons: increase traffic, air quality, loss of farmland and wildlife habitat. Others talked about how the development of warehouses in this area is having a significant impact on the quality of life for residents. And some others spoke in favor of the rezone because warehouses are already in the area. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future council meeting. In response to a request from Council Member Dugan raised during the hearing, staff worked with the developer, Planning and the Attorney’s offices on a potential addition to the development agreement that would add further clarity to the prohibition on a package deliver facility being a primary use in the future development. The draft below would clarify that a package delivery facility must be an accessory use and may not be greater than 50% of the gross square footage. (bolded language is the suggested addition) Page | 2 “To that end, the Property shall not be used for “Package Delivery Facility” as defined in Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code as a principal use. If a Package Delivery Facility is an accessory use at on the Property, then no more than 50 percentage of the gross square footage of any building on the Property shall be used as a Package Delivery Facility.” The developer said they would support this addition and requests that it be no greater than 50%. The motion sheet will include an option to include this language in the final draft of the development agreement The following information was provided for the April 16 public hearing. It is provided again for background purposes. During the March 19 work session briefing the council discussed the proposed zoning amendment with Planning staff and the applicant. The Council gave staff the following direction for the draft development agreement. 1. Add language to clarify package delivery is allowed secondary to the primary use. 2. Prefer to keep the proposed number of trees as proposed in the first draft, require as screening adjacent to residential, allow clustering in other areas. 3. Keep requirement to complete subdivision process. Based on that direction the Administration updated the draft development agreement (see Attachment A). The applicant has reviewed the draft and is supportive of it. The key obligations of the developer that were discussed by the Council are outlined below. Please see pages 2-4 of Attachment A to see the full list of conditions. 1. Structures on the Westerly Parcels shall be limited to a 33% building coverage ratio and no structure on the Property shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from finished floor elevation to the top of the building (the height exception of 5’ for parapet The Property shall not be used primarily as a “Package Delivery Facility” o package delivery facility is defined as: a facility for the receipt, transfer, short term storage, and dispatching of goods and packages. 2. Install landscaping in accordance with the city’s landscaping and Northwest Quadrant overlay district landscaping ordinances. Lots abutting a residential use (as depicted in the development agreement exhibit) will have a 15’ vegetative buffer. Vegetative buffer will include a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees with at least one planted every 30 ft. Property lines directly abutting residential use will have 1 tree for every 15 linear feet and 1 shrub every 3 feet, with mature height of no less than 4 feet. 3. A condition of any future building permit for the Property shall limit construction activity to between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday and 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday 4. Property Developer shall apply for a preliminary subdivision plat and comply with all applicable subdivision standards. Page | 3 The following information was provided for the March 19 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would rezone three parcels located at 2760 North, 2800 North and 2828 North 2200 West from AG-2 to M-1. In January 2023 this petition was tabled by the Planning Commission until the Northpoint Small Area plan was finalized by the City Council. The Northpoint Plan was approved by the Council on November 14, 2023. This petition was heard by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2023, and received a positive recommendation. The Northpoint Small Area plan included policy direction pertaining to zoning changes that are considered before a new zoning district is approved, that would help implement the polices and goals of the small area plan. That guidance states the following: “…any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s zoning regulations are adopted.” (Page 14, Northpoint Small Area Plan) With that direction in mind, the applicant and Planning staff have been working on a development agreement that would be adopted as part of the zoning amendment. (See Attachment A) The agreement is not yet finalized, but the concepts outlined on page 2 of the transmittal letter are being considered as part of the discussion. See Policy Questions section below (page 3) for Development Agreement Discussion. Vicinity Map From Transmittal Letter, Page 1 Red square shows where this rezone fits the larger area of the city Page | 4 POLICY QUESTIONS Page | 5 1. The applicant, City Planning, Attorneys office, and Council staff have been discussing concepts that would be included in the development agreement to ensure the vision and policies of the Northpoint Small Area Plan are implemented. Does the Council support the concepts outlined below being included in a potential development agreement between the developer and the City? Not allow package and delivery services Maximum of 33% building coverage of the property Maximum 40 ft height (city ordinance allows an additional 5’ to include a parapet to help mask mechanical equipment on the roof) Landscaping buffer adjacent to residential shall include a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, with at least one tree planted every 30 feet as shown Infrastructure to accommodate a minimum of 5% EV Capable parking will be provided Buildings will be designed and constructed to be solar ready. 2. A significant point of discussion during the adoption of the small area plan was a prohibition on warehouse distribution uses. With that in mind the draft development agreement includes language that would prohibit package delivery uses. However, the developer has noted delivery and packaging uses will likely be needed as a part of the overall business operations by potential tenants who manufacture or build a product on site that would then need to be shipped from their location. Does the Council support allowing delivery services as a secondary use to business in the development agreement? 3. The City has received many reports of community concerns about impacts from the development going on in the area. The Council may wish to consider how the development agreement could be used to help mitigate impacts that result from construction, such as limiting times when construction may occur, address potential street closures, traffic safety, and work in the public right of way, etc. The Applicant has included in the draft development agreement conditions that would: a. Limit construction operations between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday and 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday. b. Provide a phone number and email address for a contact person for neighbors to reach out to if there are any construction related concerns/comments. PUBLIC PROCESS January 11, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting o Early Notification was sent August 5, 2022 Page | 6 o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Westpointe Community Council on August 5, 2022. o The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 7-1 to table the petitions until the North Point Small Area Plan was approved and adopted by the City Council. December 13, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting o Early notification was sent November 29, 2023 o December 8, 2023, Public hearing notice mailed. o The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-1 (with one abstention) to send a favorable recommendation for the petitions to the City Council. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Adjacent land use and zoning o This area of the city is a mixture of single family residential, agriculture, natural habitat and much of it is transitioning to light industrial uses such as warehouses, industrial assembly land offices. 2. Northpoint Small Area Plan o In recent years this area has experienced substantial growth that has led to some conflict between industrial development adjacent to agriculture and residential uses, and developments adjacent to or abutting critical habitat areas (i.e. wetlands and upland). o Industrial development has begun, and is expected to continue, to develop in this area of Salt Lake City. The Northpoint vision is to balance the anticipated growth of light industrial and manufacturing uses with the existing and continued residential and agricultural uses of the area. o The Northpoint Small Area Plan includes a variety of policies meant to help mitigate the effects of high-impact development on the residential, agricultural uses as well as the natural environment. Some of these methods include: • Appropriate buffering, building design, and development characteristics to reduce the impacts on residential and agricultural uses, important wildlife habitats, and other uses within the area. • Design standards to reduce the negative impacts that future land uses may have on air quality, water quality, noise, and light. • Recommends a Northpoint-specific development code that codifies the recommended design standards and includes incentive-based tools for open space preservation. WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Salt Lake City Corporation Attn: Planning Director 451 S. State Street, Suite 406 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Tax Parce Nos. 08-09-476-028-0000; 08-10-300-012-0000; 08-09-476-026-0000 DEVELOPMENT AND USE AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AND USE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a political subdivision of the State of Utah (“City”) and ________________________ (“Developer”). City and Developer may be referred to herein collectively as “Parties.” RECITALS A. Developer is the owner of approximately 12.174 acres of land located at 2722 North 2200 West Street and 2828 North 2200 West Street in Salt Lake City (the “Property”), which land is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit “A”. The Property is compromised of three (3) tax parcels, Parcels 08-09-476-026-0000 and 08-09-476-028-0000 (“Westerly Parcels”) and Parcel 08-10-300-012-0000 (“Easterly Parcel”). B. Developer submitted petitions to amend the zoning map with respect to the Property to change the zoning from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District (Petition Nos. PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700, and PLNPCM2022-00701). C. The Salt Lake City Planning Commission made a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on Developers’ petitions at its December 13, 2023 meeting. D. On Month XX, XXX the city council voted to approve Developer’s petitions subject to Developer entering into a development agreement requiring Developer to design its development project to be compliant with the design standards established in the Northpoint Small Area Plan. E. City, acting pursuant to its authority under the Municipal Land Use, Development, and Management Act, Utah Code §§ 10-9a-101, et seq., as amended, and in furtherance of its land use policies, goals, objectives, ordinances, and regulations of Salt Lake 2 City, in the exercise of its legislative discretion, has elected to approve and enter into this Agreement. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in reliance on the foregoing recitals, City and Developer agree as follows: 1. Incorporations of Recitals. The Parties hereby incorporate the foregoing recitals into this Agreement. 2. Obligations of the Parties. a. Developer hereby agrees that the Property shall be bound to provide an environment for light industrial uses that produce no appreciable impact on adjacent properties, that desire a clean attractive industrial setting, and that protects nearby sensitive lands and waterways. To that end, the Property shall not be used for “Package Delivery Facility” as defined in Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code as a principal use. The Property may seek approval for all other permitted or conditional uses in the underlying zoning district and conduct accessory uses thereto in accordance with such approval(s). Further, structures on the Westerly Parcels shall be limited to a 33% building coverage ratio and no structure on the Property shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from finished floor elevation to the top of the building (the height exception of 5’ for parapet would apply if needed per 21A.36.020.C). b. The Property shall be subject to a 75-foot setback from the Reclamation Canal. c. The Property shall be subject to a 65-foot setback from existing residential dwellings. d. Developer hereby agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.48 of the Salt Lake City Code as well as the Northwest Quadrant Overlay District landscaping requirements set forth in Subsection 21A.34.140.B.2 thereof. All lots abutting a residential use shall provide a 15’ planted vegetative buffer within the required interior side or rear landscape yard (except for the emergency only access drive as shown on Exhibit B). At a minimum, such vegetative buffer shall include a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, with at least one tree planted every 30 feet as shown in red on Exhibit B. The property lines directly abutting the residential use, as shown in green on Exhibit B, shall provide 1 tree for every 15 linear feet and 1 shrub every 3 feet, with a mature height of no less than 4’, shall be required along the length of the landscape buffer. All landscaping on the Property shall consist of native and drought-tolerant plants found in the “Salt Lake City Northwest Quadrant Plant List”. Grass turf is prohibited. 3 e. To mitigate the contrast of the built and natural environment, Developer agrees to utilize the following building materials on principal structures on the Property: brick, natural stone, wood, tinted/textured concrete. Exterior plastic vinyl siding or any reflective or shiny polished materials shall not be used. Light reflective roofing material with a minimum solar reflective index (SRI) of 82 shall be used for all roofs. f. Developer hereby agrees to install and maintain lighting fixtures on the Property that are International DarkSky Association-approved fixtures and are compliant with Northwest Quadrant Overlay District requirements. g. Developer shall utilize detention or retention ponds that meet requirements established by the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. h. Mirrored or highly reflective glass shall not be installed on structures on the Property to support bird-friendly design in accordance with Subsection 21A.34.140.C.1.a of the Salt Lake City Code. i. Structures on the Property that face 2200 West Street shall not exceed a maximum continuous building frontage of 250 feet . j. Developer hereby agrees that decorative fencing features installed on the Property that could be hazardous to wildlife shall be prohibited including: (a) pointed or narrow extensions as the top of fences, (b) wires that may entangle animals , and (c) hollow fence posts that are open at the top when birds or other small animals may become entrapped in open cavity. The fencing material may not be more than 49% opaque. k. Developer hereby agrees that excavation methods shall be consistent with Salt Lake City requirements. l. Developer hereby agrees that access to loading docks and truck turnaround areas on the Property shall be provided to the side or rear of buildings and shall not be in any required buffer areas. m. Developer will work in good faith with future occupants to encourage and support occupants that engage in sustainable processes and produce minimal emissions. n. Developer will include a food truck pad in the side or rear yard of the Westerly Parcels. o. A condition of any future building permit for the Property shall limit construction activity to between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday and 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday. 4 p. Developer will provide the public a phone number and email address for a contact person for neighbors to reach out to if there are any construction related concerns/comments. q. Prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any principal building constructed on the Property Developer will provide infrastructure to accommodate a minimum of 5% EV Capable parking. Developer will install the electrical panel capacity with a dedicated circuit and a continuous raceway from the panel to the future EV parking spots (“EV Capable”). r. Prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any principal building constructed on the Property Developer will design and construct a building that is solar ready. Developer will design the roof load capacity, pre-install capped conduit that is sized to accommodate system capacity to the main electrical room, and install a PV main service upstream of the distribution breaker. s. Prior to applying for a building permit for any development on the Property Developer shall submit a FAA Form 7460 to the Federal Aviation Administration. t. Prior to development of the Property Developer shall apply for a preliminary subdivision plat and comply with all applicable subdivision standards. No building permit for a development pursuant to this Agreement shall be issued by the City until a final plat is recorded. The landscaping buffers in Exhibit “B” shall be subject to modification to comply with all lot and easement boundaries established through the platting process. u. Developer shall record this Agreement against the Property by filing this Agreement with the Salt Lake County Recorder. v. City agrees to publish Ordinance___of 2024 within 21 days of Developer providing proof that this Agreement has been recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. 3. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of any term or provision of this Agreement to a particular situation, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement, or the application of this Agreement to other situations, shall continue in full force and effect unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the Parties. 4. Other Necessary Acts. Each Party shall execute and deliver to the other any further instruments and documents as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the objectives and intent of this Agreement. 5. Construction/Interpretation. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both the City and Developer, and no presumption or rule that ambiguities 5 shall be construed against the drafting Party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. 6. Other Miscellaneous Terms. The singular shall include the plural; the masculine gender shall include the feminine; “shall” is mandatory; “may” is permissive. Terms that are undefined in this Agreement shall be interpreted using the definitions provided in Chapter 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code, or its successor. 7. Covenants Running with the Land. The provisions of this Agreement shall constitute real covenants, contract and property rights, and equitable servitudes, which shall run with the land subject to this Agreement. The burdens and benefits of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties, and to their respective successors, heirs, assigns, and transferees. Developer shall record this Agreement against the Property with the Salt Lake County Recorder. 8. Waiver. No action taken by any Party shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of compliance by such Party with respect to any representation, warranty, or condition contained in this Agreement. 9. Remedies. Either Party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies, institute an equitable action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation thereof, enforce by specific performance the obligations and rights of the Parties hereto, or to obtain any remedies consistent with the foregoing and the purpose of this Agreement. 10. Utah Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah. 11. Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Each Party shall use its best efforts and take and employ all necessary actions in good faith consistent with this Agreement to ensure that the rights secured by the other Party through this Agreement can be enjoyed. 12. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is between the City and Developer. No other party shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary or have any rights under this Agreement. 13. Force Majeure. No liability or breach of this Agreement shall result from delay in performance or nonperformance caused, directly or indirectly, by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the Party affected (“Force Majeure”), including, but not limited to, fire, extreme weather, terrorism, explosion, flood, war, power interruptions, the act of other governmental bodies, accident, labor trouble or the shortage or inability to obtain material, service, personnel, equipment or transportation, failure of performance by a common carrier, failure of performance by a public utility, or vandalism. 14. Entire Agreement, Counterparts and Exhibit. Unless otherwise noted herein, this Agreement is the final and exclusive understanding and agreement of the Parties and 6 supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and Developer. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein for all purposes: Exhibit “A” (legal descriptions of the Property); Exhibit “B” (landscaping and development site plan). 15. Term and Termination. This Agreement includes covenants, conditions, and restrictions regarding the development and use of Developer’s Property, which shall run with the land in perpetuity. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions may only be modified or terminated with the express authorization of the Salt Lake City Council. 16. REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. Developer represents that it has not: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (2) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (3) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (4) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. 17. GOVERNMENT RECORDS ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT ACT . City is subject to the requirements of the Government Records Access and Management Act, Chapter 2, Title 63G, Utah Code Annotated or its successor (“GRAMA”). All materials submitted by Developer pursuant to this Agreement are subject to disclosure unless such materials are exempt from disclosure pursuant to GRAMA. The burden of claiming an exemption from disclosure shall rest solely with Developer. Any materials for which Developer claims a privilege from disclosure shall be submitted marked as “Business Confidential” and accompanied by a concise statement of reasons supporting Developer’s claim of business confidentiality. City will make reasonable efforts to notify Developer of any requests made for disclosure of documents submitted under a claim of business confidentiality. Developer may, at Developer’s sole expense, take any appropriate actions to prevent disclosure of such material. Developer specifically waives any claims against City related to disclosure of any materials required by GRAMA. [Signature Page to Follow] 7 EFFECTIVE as of the _____ day of , 2024. CITY: ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah By: _____________________________ By: _______________________________ Mayor Erin Mendenhall Salt Lake City Recorder STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE On the this day of , 2024, personally appeared before me Erin Mendenhall, who being by me duly sworn did say for herself, that she is the Mayor of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and the said Mayor duly acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. ____________________________________ Notary Public Approved as to form: ________________________________ City Attorney’s Office Date:____________________________ SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE 8 DEVELOPER: By: _____________________________ Its: _____________________________ By: _____________________________ Its: _____________________________ STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. County of _________) On the ____________________, personally appeared before me, ______________________, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he executed the foregoing instrument as the __________________ of _______________________, a ________________________, and said person acknowledged to me that said _________________________ executed the same. __________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in ___________ County, Utah 9 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of Developer’s Property located at 2722 N 2200 West and 2828 N 2200 West: Tax ID No. 08-09-476-028-0000 PARCEL 1: Beginning at the center of a 4 rod street at the extension of an existing fence line being 930.97 feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and running thence along said fence line South 89°17'15" East 231.37 feet to a found rebar and cap marking a Boundary Line Agreement in Book 8538 at Page 5539, in the Salt Lake County Recorder's office; thence along said Boundary Line Agreement the following two (2) courses, (1) thence South 89°52'05" East 528.95 feet; (2) thence South 89°44'09" East 437.26 feet, more or less, to an existing fence corner marking the West line of the Salt Lake City No. 2 Ditch; thence along said fence line South 46°26'25" East 156.46 feet; thence South 45°13'18" East 488.92 feet to an existing fence corner marking the Boundary Line Agreement in Book 9169 at Page 3763, in the Salt Lake County Recorder's office; thence along said Boundary Line Agreement North 89°47'55" West 428.68 feet; thence along an existing fence line North 89°24'13" West 118.06 feet; thence continuing along said existing fence South 89°53'29" West 228.26 feet, more or less, to an irrigation ditch; thence North along said ditch 280.40 feet, more or less, to the extension of an existing fence line; thence along said fence line South 89°53'23" West 550.00 feet; thence North 141.20 feet, more or less, to the extension of an existing fence line; thence along said fence line North 89°49'45" West 333.00 feet, more or less, to the center of a 4 rod street; thence North along the center of said street 34.48 feet to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly portion of subject property lying within the bounds of 2200 West Street. PARCEL 1A: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress by vehicular and pedestrian traffic as more particularly defined by that certain Grant of Access Easement and Agreement recorded December 17, 2013 as Entry No. 11777223 in Book 10199 at Page 9395 of official records. Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000 PARCEL 2: Beginning at a point South 89°59'57" West 90.60 feet along the section line and North 473.796 feet and East 432.125 feet and North 45°34'00" West 643.198 feet and South 89°51'55" East 114.548 feet to the true point of beginning from the Northeast corner of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and running thence South 89°51'55" East 516.654 feet along an old fence and boundary agreement line; thence along the Westerly right of way of the proposed I-215 Project Number SP-0067(1)0 for the following three courses; South 10 20°02'53" West 326.750 feet; South 17°35'05" West 61.470 feet; South 24°11'59" East 23.016 feet; thence North 45°34'00" West 553.875 feet along the Northeasterly line of the Salt Lake City Drainage Canal to the point of beginning. Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026-0000 PARCEL 3: Beginning 416.46 feet North and 333 feet East and 22.36 feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian; thence East 550 feet; thence North 257.64 feet; thence West 550 feet; thence South 257.64 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO: Beginning 556.46 feet North from the Southwest corner of Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian; thence South 117.64 feet; thence East 333 feet; thence North 117.64 feet; thence West 333 feet to beginning. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion lying within the bounds of 2200 West Street. ______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 01/22/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 01/22/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 22, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Petitions PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701 Zoning Map Amendment 2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N. 2200 West STAFF CONTACT:Diana Martinez, Senior Planner (801) 535-7215 or diana.martinez@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendations of the Planning Commission to approve the petitions for a zoning map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT:None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Will Channell with OCC Industrial, representing the property owner of 2800 N. and who is under contract for the properties at approximately 2760 and 2828 N. at 2200 West, is requesting a Zoning Map Amendment to allow the development of the properties. The proposed amendment would rezone three parcels from AG-2 (Agricultural) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject properties, in total, are approximately 14.33 acres (624,216 square feet). Plans for future development were not submitted with these applications. Two of the subject parcels front along 2200 West, and the third (triangular) parcel is to the east of the other parcels. The area immediately to the north of the subject properties is zoned agricultural, however, it is under the jurisdiction of Salt Lake County. The area to the direct west is zoned BP (Business Park) and has been quickly developing over the last year with large distribution warehouses. The area immediately to the south of the subject properties is zoned AG-2 Agricultural Zoning District. In total, including the subject property, this area currently zoned AG-2 is about 67 acres. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Jan 22, 2024 11:50 MST) On November 14, 2023, the North Point Small Area Plan was approved and adopted by the Salt Lake City Council. The Plan’s Vision Overview was adopted with an annexation and zoning amendment policy that states (on pg.14), “…any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s zoning regulations are adopted.” The application request for zoning map amendment must comply with the standards of review listed in the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Staff’s analysis shows that those standards and goals were met and had recommended approval of these petitions to the Planning Commission with a condition of approval that all three parcels will have a development agreement signed between the parcel owners and the City stating the proposed development will meet the intent of the North Point Small Area Plan and that the property owner will comply with the Development Agreement. PUBLIC PROCESS: ●Early Notification for the January 11, 2023 Meeting – o Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on August 5, 2022 o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Westpointe Community Council on August 5, 2022. A comment letter was submitted to the planning staff and is in the original staff report dated January 11, 2023. ●Planning Commission Meeting – On January 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to table the petitions until the North Point Small Area Plan is approved and adopted by the City Council. Early Notification for the December 13, 2023 Meeting- o November 29, 2023- Public hearing notice sign posted on the property. o December 8, 2023.- Public hearing notice mailed. Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. Planning Commission Meeting- On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 (with one abstention) to send a favorable recommendation for the petitions to the City Council. PLANNING RECORDS: a) PC Agenda of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) b) PC Minutes of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) c) PC Staff Report of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) d) PC YouTube Video of the January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) e) PC Agenda of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) f) PC Minutes of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) g) PC Staff Report of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) h) PC YouTube Video of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITIONS 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00699 – Zoning Map Amendment Request PLNPCM2022-00700- Master Plan Amendment Request PLNPCM2022-00701- Master Plan Amendment Request approximately 2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N., 2200 West July 12, 2022 All three petitions for the zoning map amendment w er e received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. August 1, 2022 Petition assigned to Diana Martinez, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing. August 8, 2022 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Westpointe Community Council to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. August 8, 2022 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. September 22, 2022 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. Formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. December 29, 2022 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. January 6, 2023 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of January 11, 2023. Public hearing notice mailed. January 11, 2023 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing January 11, 2023. By a vote of 7-1, the Planning Commission voted to table the proposed Zoning Map Amendment until the North Pointe Small Area Map is approved and adopted by the City Council. November 29, 2023 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. December 8, 2023 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of December 13, 2023. Public hearing notice mailed. December 13, 2023 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on December 13, 2023. By a vote of 6-1 (with one abstinence), the Planning Commission voted to send a favorable recommendation for the zoning map amendment petition to the City Council. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2022–00699. PLNPCM2022- 00700, and PLNPCM2022-00701 - Salt Lake City has received a request from Will Channell with OCC Industrial, who is under contract for the property, requesting a zoning map amendment to allow development of the property located at approximately 2800 N., 2880 N. and 2760 N. 2200 West. The proposed zoning amendment would rezone three parcels from AG-2 (Agricultural) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject properties, in total, are approximately 14.33 acres (624,216 square feet). Plans for future development were not submitted with these applications. The following two petitions are associated with this request: Zoning Map Amendment- The subject properties are currently zoned AG-2 (Agricultural) and would be rezoned to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). Case Numbers PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700, and PLNPCM2022-00701. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Diana Martinez at 801-535-7215 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at diana.martinez@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 or PLNPCM2022-00701. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include aids and services. Please make requests at least advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3.ORIGINAL PETITION I - Signature of Owner or Agent: W·111 Ch Digitally Signed by Will ChomAII Date: 6.29.22 an n e 11 �����i-t =l ; wc Oi'.118 2022.06 2909'11·29-06'00' O Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance 0 Amend the Zoning Map OFFICE USE ONLY Rerei,od BY•Oate Received Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment: I Pcoj&t•• Address of Subject Property (or Area): 2828 N 2200 W Name of Applicant: OCC Industrial - Will Channell Address of Applicant: PO Box 12437 Denver, CO 80212 E-mail of Applicant: will.channell@occindustrial.com Applicant's Interest in Subject Property: 0 Owner ID Contractor D Architect 0 Other: Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant): Larkin Enterprises LLC Cell/Fax: Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate Information Isprovided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee or $1,07S plus $121per acre in excess of one acre Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,075, plus fees for newspaper notice. Plus, additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will be .issessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Updated 8/21/2021 Zoning Amendment PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION E-mailo_'-- ,..............;;;;========:::_- ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided by Salt Lake Citv for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it Is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. Name of Applicant: ace Industrial - Will Channell Mailing Address: APPLICANT SIGNATURE Application Type: Zoning Amendment or Rezone Application AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. FEE TmE OWNER SIGNATURE Sie Leg ,p .. p y The following shall be provided if the name of the applicant is different than the name of the property owner: 1.If you are not the fee owner attach a copy of your authorization to pursue this action pro..,ided by the fee owner. 2.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 3.If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership 4.If a Home Owner's Association is the applicant than the representative/president must attache a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. Be advised that knowingly making a false, written statement to a government entity is a crime under Utah Code Chapter 76-8, Part S. Salt Lake City will refer for prosecution any knowingly false representations made pertaining to the applicant's Interest In the property that is the subject of this application. Updated 4/19/22 Email: w1ll.cl1annell@occinduslrial.com Signature: Will Channell Fax: Date: 6.29.22 Name of Owner: Larkin Enterprises LLC Ma :.. UTAH NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE (JURAT) State of Utah County of S?:ll-tLoi.I( Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) to before me on this ffn-l day of Jvf.,'1 (month), in the year ?ozz.by LcX,v'f-t'vt, [Name of Document Signer). Witness my hand and official seal (Seal) Notary Public CHLOE CYPERS Notary Publlc State ot Utah My Commission Expires on: June 15, 2026Comm. Number: 725261 I I To Whom It May Concern, This request for zoning map amendment is in regards to the property located at 2828 N 2200 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, Parcel Number 08094760280000 (See attached image below with parcels outlined in yellow). The property is approximately 8.06 Acres and is currently zoned as AG-2. The purpose for the request to amend the zoning map is to implement M-1 zoning and to accommodate future uses allowed under the M-1 zoning. Many properties in the area surrounding this parcel have applied for rezoning from AG-2 to M-1 and have been approved. We are requesting to have parcel 08094760280000 rezoned as M-1 to conform to the surrounding parcels rezone applications. This application is being submitted concurrently with the Zoning Amendment - Banford Application. See maps in both applications for reference. Rezoning this parcel to M-1, and amending the zoning map, will be an improvement to the community, a best use of the property, and is consistent with the initial draft of the Northpoint Small Area Plan prepared by Logan Simpson. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Will Channell Signature of Owner or Agent: OigilalyEignadbyWillClt:imatl Date: 6 29 22 ·11I ChannelION:C-US,E<v,IIICl>a!lllOl!@oCCindwtlla.eom,O<"WC •' W o.,.,2022.06.29 09:11:29-06'00' OCC,LLC", OU='WC OCC, LLC'. CN=WiUChannell D Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance 0 Amend the Zoning Map Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Address of Subject Property {or Area): 2828 N 2200 W Name of Applicant: OCC Industrial - Will Channell Address of Applicant: PO Box 12437 Denver, CO 80212 Applicant's Interest in Subject Property: D Owner O Contractor O Architect IZI Other: Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant): Larkin Enterprises LLC Phone: Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION If you have any questions regarding the requirements or this application, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,075 plus$121 per acre in excess of one acre Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,075, plus fees for newspaper notice. Plus, additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will beassessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will bequired. Updated 8/21/2021 Zoning Amendment OFFICE USE ONLY I P,oject# E-mail o • e I a I I., I Pho E-mail of Applicant: will.channell@occindustrial.com ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided by Salt Lake City for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. I understand that m11 application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications.I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings.This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. Name of Applicant: OCC Industrial• Will Channell Mailing Address: APPLICANT SIGNATURE Application Type: Zoning Amendment or Rezone Application Em.iii:will.channell@occinduslrial.com Phone:Fax: Signature: Will Channell Date: 6.29.22 AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. FEE nnE OWNER SIGNATURE Name of Owner: Larkin Enterprises LLC The following shall be provided if the name of the applicant is different than the name of the property owner: 1.If you are not the fee owner attach a copy of your authorization to pursue thisaction provided by the fee owner. 2.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 3.If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture er partnership 4.If a Home Owner's Association is the applicant than the representative/president must attache a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. Be advised that knowingly making a false, written statement to a government entity is acrimeunder Utah Code Chapter 76-8, Part 5. Salt Lake City will refer for prosecution any knowingly false representations made pertaining to the applicant's interest in the property that is the subject of this application. Updated 4/19/22 UTAH NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE (JURAT) State of Utah County of S;<.{-t LoV{ Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) to before me on this 8TT-l day of Jvi,'1 (month), in the year ?o2.Z. by JO/f/'A.l LC1N"0'vi., [Name of Document Signer). Witness my hand and official seal (Seal) Notary Public CHLOE CYPERS Notary Publlc State ot Utah My Commission Expires on: June 15, 2026 Comm. Number: 725lli_ To Whom It May Concern, This request for zoning map amendment is in regards to the property located at 2828 N 2200 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, Parcel Number 08103000120000 (See attached image below with parcels outlined in yellow). The property is approximately 2.21 Acres and is currently zoned as AG-2. ... : The purpose for the request to amend the zoning map is to implement M-1 zoning and to accommodate future uses allowed under the M-1 zoning. Many properties in the area surrounding this parcel have applied for rezoning from AG-2 to M-1 and have been approved. We are requesting to have parcel 08103000120000 rezoned as M-1 to conform to the surrounding parcels rezone applications. This application is being submitted concurrently with the Zoning Amendment - Sanford Application. See maps in both applications for reference. Rezoning this parcel to M-1, and amending the zoning map, will be an improvement to the community, a best use of the property, and is consistent with the initial draft of the Northpoint Small Area Plan prepared by Logan Simpson. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Will Channell 1 Signature of Owner or Agent: W• 111ChannelI.ON. c,us.E=-..J1.c1unn"l@oco,-.i.,,,...,1...,.,, o=-wcor11ia1y ,,gl'\IXIt.iy wincnar'll1a11 Date: 6.29.22 OCC.lLC· OU:"WC OCC. lLC".CN-WllCh:lon(l!I OalO. 2022.06,2000.t0;31-06'00' DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A934DD-7698-407F-A8F4-9EFFB1E1A0EE .. ''<t: .cfl '<.l .,.�,,,J,1111......��..... Zoning Amendment D Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance 0 Amend the Zoning Map OFFICE USE ONLY Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Address of Subject Property (or Area): 2722 N 2200 W Address of Applicant: PO Box 12437 Denver, CO 80212 E-mail of Applicant: will.channell@occindustrial.com Applicant's Interest in Subject Property: 0 Owner ID] Contractor O Architect E) Other: Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant): Banford Family Revocable Trust Please note that additiona in ormat,on may e require e proiect p anner to ensure aclequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,075 plus $121per acre in excess of one acre Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,075, plus fees for newspaper notice. Plus, additional fee for mailed public notices. Noticing fees will be assessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Updated3/21/2021 Name of Applicant: OCC Industrial - Will Channell E-mail of Property Owner: .... I Pcoje<t ffc DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A934D0-769S-407F-A8F4-9EFFB1E1AOEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided by Salt LakeCity for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete bythe assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the recuired submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for thisapplication to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. Name of Applicant: OCC lndus1rlal - Wlll Channell Mailing Address: APPLICANT SIGNATURE Application Type: Zoning Amendment or Rezone Applica1ion 7897 South 2175 East South Weber, UT 84405 Email: will.channell@occindustrial.oom Fax: Signature:Will Channell Date: 6.29.22 AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner lo pursue the described action_ FEE TITLE OWNER SIGNATURE Name of Owner: Banford Family Revocable Trust Legal Description of S1.1bject Property: The following shall be provided if the name of the applicant is different than the nJme of the property owner: l. If you are not t1e fee owner attach a copy of your authorization to pursue this action provided by the fee owner. 2.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 3.If a Joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership 4.If a Home Owner's Association is the applicant than the representative/president must attache a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. Be advised that knowingly making a fal.se, written statement to a government entity isa crime under Utah Code Chapter 76-8, Part 5. Salt Lake City will refer for prosecution any knowingly false representations made pertaining to the applicant's interest in the property that is the subject of this application. Updated 4/19/22 UTAH NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE (JURAT) State of Utah County ofSet(± Lo<ff, Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed} to before me on this 511-1 day of .,J_J,_0f--1---_ (month), in the year '2c2.2--by Pzt,vtfovo( fv T [Name of Document Signer). Witness my hand and official seal (Seal) Notary Public CHLOE CYPERS Notary Public State of Utah My Commission Expires on: June 15. 2026Comm. Number: 725261 DocuSign Envelope ID: 22A934DD-7698-407F-A8F4-9EFFB1E1A0EE To Whom It May Concern, This request for zoning map amendment is in regards to the property located at 2722 N 2200 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, Parcel Number 08094760260000 (See attached image below with parcel outlined in yellow). The property is approximately 4.06 Acres and is currently zoned as AG-2. The purpose for the request to amend the zoning map is to implement M-1 zoning and to accommodate future uses allowed under the M-1 zoning. Many properties in the area surrounding this parcel have applied for rezoning from AG-2 to M-1 and have been approved. We are requesting to have parcel 08094760260000 rezoned as M-1 to conform to the surrounding parcels rezone applications. This application is being submitted concurrently with the Zoning Amendment - Larkin Application. See maps in both applications for reference. Currently, we are reviewing a few different use options for the mentioned parcels which include flex space and/or light industrial. Rezoning this parcel to M-1, and amending the zoning map, will be an improvement to the community, a best use of the property, and is consistent with the initial draft of the Northpoint Small Area Plan prepared by Logan Simpson. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Will Channell 4. MAILING LIST BRADLEY C AUGER; REBECCA AUGER (JT)1015 EAGLE POINTE DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 Current Occupant 2026 W 2670 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 2030 W 2670 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 DALENE J HOUCHIN; DONLEY G HOUCHIN (JT)2042 W 2670 N #NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Current Occupant 2054 W 2670 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 2080 W 2670 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 HAMID MIRZAAKBARI 2688 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Current Occupant 2691 N 2200 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 2704 N 2200 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 2760 N 2200 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 VT FM TR 2770 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 LATINA J RUSSELL; LATINA M HERLITZ; DESTINY D HERLITZ (JT)2790 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Current Occupant 2800 N 2200 W Salt Lake City 84116 UT Current Occupant 2806 N 2200 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 2828 N 2200 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 JOHN L PAYNE 2848 N 2200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 KEVIN D ALLEN & ASSOCIATES INC 2861 E 7000 S COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 ROBERT B SWANER COMPANY; ET AL 649 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CODY D PAVELKA 6714 S CASSIDY LN #NFF1 WEST JORDAN UT 84084 BANFORD FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 03/29/2021 7897 S 2175 E SOUTH WEBER UT 84405 LARKIN ENTERPRISES LLC; LARKIN ENTERPRISES, LLC PO BOX 1344 BOUNTIFUL UT 84011 Diana Martinez -Principal Planner PO BOX 145480 SLC UT 84114-548 Will Channell -Occ Industrial PO BOX 12437 Denver UT 80212 5. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning of properties located at 2760 North, 2800 North, and 2828 North 2200 West Street from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District) An ordinance amending the zoning map about properties located at 2760 North, 2800 North, and 2828 North 2200 West Street from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District pursuant to Petitions No. PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022- 00701. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on December 13, 2023, on a petition submitted by Will Channel with OCC Industrial to rezone parcels located at 2760 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026- 0000), 2800 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000), and 2828 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No.08-09-476-028-0000) (collectively, the “Properties”) from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District; and WHEREAS, at its December 13, 2023, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) on said petitions; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby are rezoned from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District. 1 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code§10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ,2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) BillNo. of 2024. Published: Ordinance amending zoning of2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N. 2200 West 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: Janu By:- Pau ,::::::!:,,-- -- City Attorney EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description of Properties to be Rezoned: 2760 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026-0000): SEC 09 TWNSHP 1N RNG 1W 1Q 0406,BEG 416.46 FT N & 333 FT E & 22.36 FT N FR SW COR OF SE 1/4,OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 9, T1N, R1W, SLB & M; E 550 FT; N 257.64,FT; W 550 FT; S 257.64 FT TO BEG. ALSO, BEG 556.46 FT N FR,SW COR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC 9, T1N, R1W, SL 2800 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000): SEC 10 TWNSHP 1N RNG 1W 1Q 1226,BEG S 89?59'57" W 90.60 FT & N 473.796 FT & E 432.125 FT & N,45?34'00" W 643.198 FT & S 89?51'55" E 114.548 FT FR NE COR,SEC 16, T1N, R1W, SLB & M; S 89?51'55" E 516.654 FT; S,20?02'53" W 326.750 FT; S 17?35'05" W 61.470 FT 2828 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No.08-09-476-028-0000): 1218,BEG IN CEN OF A 4 RD STREET ( 2200 WEST ST ), N 930.97 FT FR,SW COR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 9, T1N, R1W, SLB & M; S,89?17'15" E 231.37 FT; S 89?52'05" E 528.95 FT; S 89?44'09",E 437.26 FT; S 46?26'25" E 156.46 FT; S 45?13'18" E 488.92,FT; N 89?47' 3 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT:Petitions PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701 Zoning Map Amendment 2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N. 2200 West STAFF CONTACT:Diana Martinez, Senior Planner (801) 535-7215 or diana.martinez@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendations of the Planning Commission to approve the petitions for a zoning map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Will Channell with OCC Industrial, representing the property owner of 2800 N. and who is under contract for the properties at approximately 2760 and 2828 N. at 2200 West, is requesting a Zoning Map Amendment to allow the development of the properties. The proposed amendment would rezone three parcels from AG-2 (Agricultural) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject properties, in total, are approximately 14.33 acres (624,216 square feet). Plans for future development were not submitted with these applications. Two of the subject parcels front along 2200 West, and the third (triangular) parcel is to the east of the other parcels. The area immediately to the north of the subject properties is zoned agricultural, however, it is under the jurisdiction of Salt Lake County. The area to the direct west is zoned BP (Business Park) and has been quickly developing over the last year with large distribution warehouses. The area immediately to the south of the subject properties is zoned AG-2 Agricultural Zoning District. In total, including the subject property, this area currently zoned AG-2 is about 67 acres. On November 14, 2023, the North Point Small Area Plan was approved and adopted by the Salt Lake City Council. The Plan’s Vision Overview was adopted with an annexation and zoning amendment policy that states (on pg.14), “…any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s zoning regulations are adopted.” The application request for zoning map amendment must comply with the standards of review listed in the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Staff’s analysis shows that those standards and goals were met and had recommended approval of these petitions to the Planning Commission with a condition of approval that all three parcels will have a development agreement signed between the parcel owners and the City stating the proposed development will meet the intent of the North Point Small Area Plan and that the property owner will comply with the Development Agreement. PUBLIC PROCESS: ●Early Notification for the January 11, 2023 Meeting – o Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on August 5, 2022 o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Westpointe Community Council on August 5, 2022. A comment letter was submitted to the planning staff and is in the original staff report dated January 11, 2023. ●Planning Commission Meeting – On January 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to table the petitions until the North Point Small Area Plan is approved and adopted by the City Council. Early Notification for the December 13, 2023 Meeting- o November 29, 2023- Public hearing notice sign posted on the property. o December 8, 2023.- Public hearing notice mailed. Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. Planning Commission Meeting- On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 6-2 (with one abstention) to send a favorable recommendation for the petitions to the City Council. PLANNING RECORDS: a) PC Agenda of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) b) PC Minutes of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) c) PC Staff Report of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) d) PC YouTube Video of the January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here) e) PC Agenda of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) f) PC Minutes of December 13, 2023, meeting Click Here) g) PC Staff Report of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) h) PC YouTube Video of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITIONS 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE Item I2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts PLNPCM2023-00444 MOTION 1 (adopt-allow vinyl windows so long as not readily visible from street) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 (adopt with changes-allow vinyl windows on any façade, but only as an affordable housing incentive) I move that the Council amend and adopt the ordinance to allow vinyl windows to be installed on any facade, but only as an affordable housing incentive per chapter 21A.52 of Salt Lake City Code. MOTION 3 (adopt with changes-allow vinyl windows so long as not readily visible from street, but only as an affordable housing incentive) I move that the Council amend and adopt the ordinance permitting vinyl windows to be installed so long as they are not readily visible from the street, but only as an affordable housing incentive per chapter 21A.52 of Salt Lake City Code. MOTION 4 (adopt with changes-only allow windows constructed with non-vinyl materials) I move that the Council amend and adopt the ordinance to only allow windows constructed with non-vinyl materials. MOTION 5 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rachel otto (Feb 22, 2024 15:08 CST)Date Received:02/22/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 02/22/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 15, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 – Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts STAFF CONTACT: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner (801) 535-6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning Commission both voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Proposal Snapshot: The proposed text and guideline amendments impact properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local historic districts and landmark sites. Salt Lake City currently has 14 local historic districts and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. The proposed changes add clarity to existing processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window installation in new construction projects. The following summarizes the proposed changes: Proposed Changes/Additions: Adds a section to 21A.34.020(H) to clarify prohibited window material (vinyl) and window location, as well as a minimum window installation depth (3”). SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Adds additional language to the Residential and Historic Apartments & Multi-family Design Guidelines to clarify historically appropriate window materials (Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass) in new construction, the appropriate location and use of vinyl windows in new construction, and the use of aluminum storefront windows at the ground floor where there is a commercial use or amenity space associated with a multi-family building. Issue Origin: Like many historic districts throughout the United States, new infill construction is a regulated design subject to review by local municipalities. In many cases, cities have created design guidelines that help define common elements of historic buildings that should be reflected in new construction. Many cities and towns also have specific ordinance standards addressing new construction as opposed to standards for the treatment of historic structures. This is the case for Salt Lake City. The approach to the design of alterations to historic structures, where it is critical to incorporate and conserve historic materials, forms, and details naturally vary from approaches toward new construction, in which the primary goal is to integrate the new building into the surrounding historic environs that create the character of the historic property or district. Salt Lake City has followed many of its peers in creating a dual set of standards for historic and new buildings in its historic districts, as well as creating design guidelines to specifically address new construction. A rudimentary set of standards were included in the city’s first preservation ordinance in 1976, with most design reviews of new construction reviewed by the then Historic Landmark Committee informally using unadopted, externally developed guidelines, usually developed based on national thinking at the time. In many cases, standards for additions were adapted for new construction. Issues of consistency raised their heads at times. Efforts to standardize both the approach and processes used by the HLC culminated in a new set of standards set forth in the 1995 zoning ordinance rewrite, shortly followed by published design guidelines completed in 1998, which included an extensive section on new construction. Consistent application and interpretation, particularly regarding design details such as window design, continued to be a problem. This factored into a larger reexamination of the city’s preservation program, in which clear and consistent, easy-to-understand standards and guidelines were cited as a goal by stakeholders including residents, developers, and policymakers. In 2012, the city rewrote its design guidelines for residential buildings, greatly expanding the guidelines for new construction. Guidelines for multi-family residential and commercial new constructions soon followed in 2015. Later, the city updated its ordinance standards for new construction, again with the goal of increased clarity and consistency. This evolution has gradually improved the success of projects, both in design and length of review processes and required design revisions. In particular, the new ordinance standards in 21A.34.020.H provide vastly improved clarity for applicants, planning staff, and the members of the HLC in the course of evaluating new construction. While the concepts of the earlier ordinance remain, the new standards elaborate on these concepts and provide clearer standards of approval that can be tied to adopted design guidelines. Evaluation: While broader issues such as building scale, massing, form, and primary materials are being successfully addressed with recent changes, it is increasingly apparent that the standards and guidelines could be improved for clarity when it comes to the design details of new buildings. In particular, issues have emerged in how the existing ordinance standards and guidelines are applied in the case of windows on new principal buildings (single and multifamily), particularly in terms of window material and the manner in which a window is installed. Issues with Current Standards and Design Guidelines: In general, there is ample direction in the city’s standards and guidelines regarding window size, shape, types, fenestration pattern, and location. All of these attributes are clearly apparent in the building design when it is submitted for review. Planning staff is able to make findings for the HLC, who can then determine whether the project meets these standards and determine whether the windows are appropriate. At present, inconsistencies arise in review in terms of window material and window installation. The issue is actually three fold: • First, the current design standards and guidelines somewhat dance around the use of vinyl as an appropriate window material. The design guidelines “discourage” the use of vinyl windows as they are not considered to be a historically appropriate nor a durable material, but they do not outright prohibit their use. There is little guidance toward consistency in what determines an appropriate window material, other than discouraging the use of vinyl as a non-durable material, and encouraging the use of “durable materials” (presumably wood, metal clad wood, composite, etc). As a result, the HLC has required wood or metal clad wood windows on some projects, fiberglass or composite on others, has approved vinyl in many instances, and in rare cases not addressed a window material at all in their final approval. • Second, design standards and guidelines are somewhat vague regarding the requirement for windows to be set back from the primary wall plane. Section 21A.34.020.H(6)(c) of the zoning ordinance states, “Windows and other openings are incorporated in a manner that reflects patterns, materials, and detailing established in the district and/or setting.” This is based on traditional building patterns and is also intended to provide variation in the wall plane, creating visual interest, and again references traditional design and construction methods. In response to this zoning requirement, planning staff has typically asked developers to include a minimum 3” window reveal and the HLC has approved this window installation detail many times. That said, nowhere in the design standards and guidelines is the depth of a window reveal outlined or stipulated. • Finally, the manner in which the issue of appropriate window materials and installation in new construction projects is not consistent between the various design guideline documents (Residential and Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings), and therefore they cause confusion and uncertainty. The Historic Apartment & Multifamily Building Guidelines are in fact more extensive and descriptive than the Residential Design Guidelines in terms of windows in new construction, however both documents could be ameliorated to provide more clarity. Consistency and clarity is needed between these documents, as well as the zoning ordinance, to further address windows in new construction projects. Scope and Severity of Problem: The problem outlined here is most apparent in large-scale multi-family residential projects which take up more and more time on each HLC agenda. Again, this is not a new phenomenon; ordinance revisions, new design guidelines, and process changes dealing specifically with window approvals are evidence that the HLC has wrestled with this many times before. However, the HLC is wrangling with an approach to windows in a broader building climate in Salt Lake City that has seen a record number of large-scale, multifamily residential projects proposed throughout the city. Logically, it also follows that the larger the building, the more windows the building will have. The window cost in multifamily buildings typically takes up a larger proportion of the overall budget than in smaller projects, making it an attractive line item on which to make changes or opt for less expensive, often vinyl, windows. Likewise, current design trends tend toward the use of materials that do not create a change in depth between the face of the wall plane and the face of the window. While the design guidelines call for materials that “provide a solid masonry character for lower floors and for the most public facades of the building.” (Guideline 12.69) it is typical to use another material such as siding or stucco on the upper stories of a large multifamily building, particularly those in which several levels of stick-built construction sit on a two or three-story concrete framed base. It is much more difficult to place a recessed window in these types of walls. Problems such as those enumerated above are much more common on these upper stories, and it is in these locations where problems are most apparent. Taking the observational or anecdotal data as well as the data analysis above into account, it is apparent that a goal for further reviews of new construction is to: • Ensure that the ordinance standards and design guidelines are met with regard to windows installed in new construction projects; • Provide consistency in windows approved for new construction projects; address the specific use of vinyl windows and window installation. Adopted Policy: Preservation Policy: In November, 2011, the Salt Lake City Council adopted a Preservation Philosophy (Resolution 53 of 2011) to guide the City’s Preservation Program. Some of the policy directives from this document relate directly to the current project, namely: • Achieve a successful city-wide historic preservation program by clearly conveying historic preservation objectives, opportunities, and benefits while consistently interpreting and applying the City's adopted standards and efficiently administering the process. • The Historic Preservation Overlay District standards are to be used as the basis for decision making when considering applications for Certificates of Appropriateness. Apply standards in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. The proposed amendments aim to make standards clear and predictable to improve applicants’ understanding of the requirements and decision makers’ ability to efficiently administer the zoning ordinance. Community Preservation Plan: Another significant guiding document for Salt Lake City’s historic preservation program is the Community Preservation Plan (2012). This document adds context, detail, and direction in implementing the broad outlines of the city’s adopted preservation philosophy. The Community Preservation Plan has a number of policies related to the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments include new language to clarify appropriate and inappropriate window materials, placement/location, and installation in new construction projects in the City’s local historic district. The following policies outlined in this plan are relevant to the proposed amendments: Policy 4.2b: Improve user-friendliness of the decision-making process. The City will work to make participation in the preservation program as clear, predictable, and as easy as possible. This will be achieved through developing informational resources and making necessary procedural changes. Policy 4.2c: Ensure informational resources are available to assist applicants in knowing the requirements, and timeframes for each step to help them successfully navigate the process. Policy 6.1c: Encourage the use of sustainable building practices that comply with adopted policy, guidelines and regulations relating to historic preservation in the renovation and maintenance of historic structures. Policy 6.1d: Ensure adopted guidelines and regulations allow for the appropriate use of green building practices as they emerge. Policy 6.1e: The incorporation of green building practices is encouraged whenever they are compatible with best historic preservation practices. Plan Salt Lake: Finally, preservation is mentioned as a specific objective of Plan Salt Lake (2015), Salt Lake City’s citywide master plan with the guiding principle of “maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past.” Additional context and guidance are given to this citywide objective through a series of initiatives, many of which directly relate to and support the proposed changes. Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. Retain areas and structures of historic and architectural value. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Improve education and outreach about the value of historic preservation. The purpose statement for the H – Historic Preservation Overlay District is as follows: In order to contribute to the welfare, prosperity and education of the people of Salt Lake City, the purpose of the H historic preservation overlay district is to: 1. Provide the means to protect and preserve areas of the city and individual structures and sites having historic, architectural or cultural significance; 2. Encourage new development, redevelopment and the subdivision of lots in historic districts that is compatible with the character of existing development of historic districts or individual landmarks; 3. Abate the destruction and demolition of historic structures; 4. Implement adopted plans of the city related to historic preservation; 5. Foster civic pride in the history of Salt Lake City; 6. Protect and enhance the attraction of the city's historic landmarks and districts for tourists and visitors; 7. Foster economic development consistent with historic preservation; and 8. Encourage social, economic and environmental sustainability. The proposed amendments, in clarifying and updating language to incorporate new development criteria that are critical to the implementation of the city’s Historic Preservation Program are fully consistent with these purposes. Commission Recommendations: The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed this application on November 2, 2023, and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission considered this application on January 10, 2024, and subsequently voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. PUBLIC PROCESS: March 2, 2023 – Work Session – A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC asked for some additional follow-up information. May 4, 2023 – Windows Tour – Conducted a tour with the Historic Landmark Commission to look at various examples (both good and bad) of window types and installations, in and around the Capitol Hill and South Temple Local Historic Districts. May 4, 2023 – Work Session – A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in new construction in the City’s historic districts. August 21, 2023 – Open House – An on-line open house was posted to the Planning Division’s website to solicit comment from the public regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. October 23, 2023 – Consistent with State law, a notice of the Historic Landmark Commission meeting was posted at the Marmalade, Sweet, Anderson Foothill, and Main Libraries. October 19, 2023 - Public notice for the November 2, 2023, HLC hearing was posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. November 2, 2023 – Historic Landmark Commission public hearing. The HLC voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. January 10, 2024 – Planning Commission public hearing. The PC voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. HISTORIC LANDMARK & PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS: a) HLC Agenda of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) b) HLC Minutes of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) c) HLC Staff Report of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) d) PC Agenda of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) e) PC Minutes of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) f) PC Staff Report of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 January 2023 Petition assigned to Lex Traughber. March 2, 2023 A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC asked for some additional follow-up information. May 4, 2023 Conducted a tour with the Historic Landmark Commission to look at various examples (both good and bad) of window types and installations, in and around the Capitol Hill and South Temple Local Historic Districts. May 4, 2023 A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in new construction in the City’s historic districts. June 6, 2023 Petition initiated by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall. August 16, 2023 A notification was sent to all Recognized Organizations to solicit comment regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. August 21, 2023 An on-line open house was posted to the Planning Division’s website to solicit comment from the public regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. October 19, 2023 Public notice for the November 2, 2023, HLC hearing was posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. October 23, 2023 Consistent with State law, a notice of the Historic Landmark Commission meeting was posted at the Marmalade, Sweet, Anderson Foothill, and Main Libraries. November 2, 2023 Historic Landmark Commission public hearing. The HLC recommended a couple of small wording changes, but voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. January 10, 2024 Planning Commission public hearing. The PC voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. January 11, 2024 Requested an ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office. January 26, 2024 Received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office. February 12, 2024 Transmittal submitted to CAN. 2.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 – Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic District – A request made by Mayor Erin Mendenhall directing the Planning Division to update the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance and the Historic Residential and Multifamily/Historic Apartment Design Guidelines, to address the use of vinyl windows in new construction projects in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs). As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location. **This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Lex Traughber at (801) 535-6184 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at lex.traughber@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: May 9, 2023 Re: Initiate Petition to Amend Text in the Zoning Ordinance, Residential and Multifamily Design Guidelines to Update, Coordinate, and Clarify the Use of Vinyl Windows in New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs) This memo is to request that a petition be initiated directing the Planning Division to update the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, the Historic Residential and Multifamily/Historic Apartment Design Guidelines, to coordinate and clarify the use of vinyl windows in new construction projects in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs). Two work sessions have been held with the Historic Landmark Commission to discuss the matter and obtain proposal direction. The first work session was held on March 2, 2023 and the second was held on May 4, 2023. At the work session in May, the Historic Landmark Commission directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in the City’s LHDs. A “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows includes the exploration of where vinyl windows may be appropriate in new construction projects, how any vinyl windows are installed, and the relation of the vinyl window to proposed building cladding. A hybrid approach would allow for the reasonable use of vinyl windows on a new construction project along with the use of more historically appropriate windows such as wood, wood clad, or composite windows. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the City’s adoption process for zoning text amendments, which includes citizen input and public hearings with the Historic Landmark Commission, Planning Commission, and the City Council. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS 4. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and amending the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District.) An ordinance amending Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023- 00444. WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023, the Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission (“Landmark Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00444) to amend Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and WHEREAS, at its November 2, 2023 meeting, the Landmark Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) and the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its January 10, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.34.020.H. That Subsection 21A.34.020.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Standards for Certificate of Appropriateness Involving New Construction or Alteration of a Noncontributing Structure) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Certificate of Appropriateness Involving New Construction or Alteration of a Noncontributing Structure: In considering an application for a certificate of appropriateness involving new construction, or alterations of noncontributing structures, the historic landmark commission, or planning director when the application involves the alteration of a noncontributing structure shall, using the adopted design guidelines as a key basis for evaluation, determine whether the project substantially complies with each of the following standards that pertain to the application to ensure that the proposed project fits into the established context in ways that respect and contribute to the evolution of Salt Lake City’s architectural and cultural traditions: 1. Settlement Patterns and Neighborhood Character: a. Block and Street Patterns: The design of the project preserves and reflects the historic block, street, and alley patterns that give the district its unique character. Changes to the block and street pattern may be considered when advocated by an adopted city plan. b. Lot and Site Patterns: The design of the project preserves the pattern of lot and building site sizes that create the urban character of the historic context and the block face. Changes to the lot and site pattern may be considered when advocated by an adopted city plan. c. The Public Realm: The project relates to adjacent streets and engages with sidewalks in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects should maintain the depth of yard and height of principal elevation of those existing on the block face in order to support consistency in the definition of public and semi-public spaces. d. Building Placement: Buildings are placed such that the project maintains and reflects the historic pattern of setbacks and building depth established within the historic context and the block face. Buildings should maintain the setback demonstrated by existing buildings of that type constructed in the district or site’s period of significance. e. Building Orientation: The building is designed such that principal entrances and pathways are oriented such that they address the street in the pattern established in the historic context and the block face. 2. Site Access, Parking, and Services: 2 a. Site Access: The design of the project allows for site access that is similar, in form and function, with patterns common in the historic context and the block face. (1) Pedestrian: Safe pedestrian access is provided through architecturally highlighted entrances and walkways, consistent with patterns common in the historic context and the block face. (2) Vehicular: Vehicular access is located in the least obtrusive manner possible. Where possible, garage doors and parking should be located to the rear or to the side of the building. b. Site and Building Services and Utilities: Utilities and site/building services (such as HVAC systems, venting fans, and dumpsters) are located such that they are to the rear of the building or on the roof and screened from public spaces and public properties. 3. Landscape and Lighting: a. Grading of Land: The site’s landscape, such as grading and retaining walls, addresses the public way in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. b. Landscape Structures: Landscape structures, such as arbors, walls, fences, address the public way in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. c. Lighting: Where appropriate lighting is used to enhance significant elements of the design and reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. 4. Building Form and Scale: a. Character of the Street Block: The design of the building reflects the historic character of the street facade in terms of scale, composition, and modeling. (1) Height: The height of the project reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects taller than those existing on the block face step back their upper floors to present a base that is in scale with the historic context and the block face. (2) Width: The width of the project reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects wider than those existing on the block face modulate the facade to express a series of volumes in scale with the historic context and the block face. (3) Massing: The shape, form, and proportion of buildings, reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. (4) Roof Forms: The building incorporates roof shapes that reflect forms found in the historic context and the block face. 5. Building Character: 3 a. Facade Articulation and Proportion: The design of the project reflects patterns of articulation and proportion established in the historic context and the block face. As appropriate, facade articulations reflect those typical of other buildings on the block face. These articulations are of similar dimension to those found elsewhere in the context, but have a depth of not less than 12 inches. (1) Rhythm of Openings: The facades are designed to reflect the rhythm of openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) established in the historic context and the block face. (2) Proportion and Scale of Openings: The facades are designed using openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) of similar proportion and scale to that established in the historic context and the block face. (3) Ratio of Wall to Openings: Facades are designed to reflect the ratio of wall to openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) established in the historic context and the block face. (4) Balconies, Porches, and External Stairs: The project, as appropriate, incorporates entrances, balconies, porches, stairways, and other projections that reflect patterns established in the historic context and the block face. 6. Building Materials, Elements and Detailing: a. Materials: Building facades, other than windows and doors, incorporate no less than 80% durable material such as, but not limited to, wood, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete and/or cut stone. These materials reflect those found elsewhere in the district and/or setting in terms of scale and character. b. Materials on Street-Facing Facades: The following materials are not considered to be appropriate and are prohibited for use on facades which face a public street: vinyl siding and aluminum siding. c. Architectural Elements and Details: The design of the building features architectural elements and details that reflect those characteristic of the district and/or setting. 7. Windows: Windows and other openings are incorporated in a manner that reflects patterns, materials, and detailing established in the district and/or setting. a. Window installation depth: Window reveals shall be a minimum of three inches. b. Prohibited window material: Vinyl windows are not considered to be historically appropriate nor durable, and are prohibited for use where they are readily visible from the street (public and private). 8. Signage Location: Locations for signage are provided such that they are an integral part of the site and architectural design and are complementary to the principal structure. 4 SECTION 2. Amending the text of “A Preservation Handbook for Historic Residential Properties & Districts in Salt Lake City”. That the adopted design standards for residential structures in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District set forth in the manual titled “A Preservation Handbook for Historic Residential Properties & Districts in Salt Lake City” shall be, and hereby is amended to revise Chapter 12 in the section pertaining to “Windows” that begins on page 12:13 thereof to read as follows: Windows Window openings often provide a considerable degree of modeling to the building facades, with a distinctive recess (window reveal) of the plane of the window from the plane of the wall. This characteristic enhances the visual strength of a facade, conveying a sense of the depth and solidity of the wall, and distinct areas of shadow which change with the time of day and the season. This recess also helps to shelter the window and the window frame. Windows also provide a medium for fine detail and craftsmanship, using decorative pattern, lead and often stained glass. 12.20 Windows with vertical emphasis are encouraged. • A general rule is that the height of a vertically proportioned window should be twice the dimension of the width in most residential contexts. • Certain styles and contexts, e.g. the bungalow form, will often be characterized by horizontally proportioned windows. • See also the discussions of the character of the relevant historic district (PART III) and architectural styles (Ch.4, PART I). 12.21 Window reveals should be a characteristic of most facades. • This helps to emphasize the character of the facade modeling and materials. • It should enhance the degree to which the building integrates with its historic setting. • It also helps to avoid the impression of superficiality which can be inherent in some more recent construction, e.g. with applied details like window surrounds. • Typical historic window reveals are 3-4” in depth. 12.22 Windows and doors should be materials that appear similar in scale, proportion and character to those used traditionally in the neighborhood. 5 • Double-hung windows with traditional reveal depth and trim will be characteristic of most districts. • Window profiles should project from the plane of the glass creating a distinct hierarchy of detail for the window opening and the composition of the facade. • Durable window frame construction and materials should be used. • Window frame finish should be of durable architectural quality, chosen to complement the building design. • Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass are generally appropriate window materials. • Vinyl should be avoided as a non-durable material in the regional climate. • Vinyl windows, on rear and secondary facades, where they are not readily visible from the street (public or private), will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • See also the rehabilitation section on windows (PART II, Ch.3) as well as the discussions of specific historic districts (PART III) and relevant architectural styles (PART I, Ch.4). SECTION 3. Amending the text of “Design Guidelines for Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings in Salt Lake City”. That the adopted design standards for apartment and multifamily structures in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District set forth in the manual titled “Design Guidelines for Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings in Salt Lake City” shall be, and hereby is amended to revise Chapter 12 in the section pertaining to “Windows” that begins on page 12:57 thereof to read as follows: WINDOWS Of the many architectural characteristics of the design of a building façade, the design of the windows is perhaps the most important. Window openings provide a considerable degree of modeling and detail to the facades, with the window reveals creating a distinctive recess of the plane of the reflective window from the plane and texture of the wall. Window reveals enhance the sense of visual strength of the facade, conveying an impression of the depth, solidity and permanence of the wall. The difference in plane between window and wall surface also creates distinctive light, shadow and reflection which will change with the time of day, and also with the season. This recess also helps to shelter the window and the window frame, and helps to moderate solar gain. Window openings and design are the focus of finer frame detailing and craftsmanship, in the past using classical frame profiles, decorative subdivided or leaded lights and often stained glass. The form, the subdivision and the profiles of the window framing, their finishes and 6 colors, play a major role in creating the modeling, detailing, quality and richness, and consequently the perceived scale of the building. Design Objective The design of a new multifamily building should include window design subdivision, profiles, materials, finishes and details which ensure that the windows play their characteristic positive role in defining the proportion and character of the building and its contribution to the historic context. 12.71 Windows should be designed to be in scale with those characteristic of the building and the historic setting. • Excessive window scale in a new building, whether vertical or horizontal, will adversely affect the sense of human scale and affinity with buildings in the district. • Subdivide a larger window area to form a group or pattern of windows creating more appropriate proportions, dimensions and scale. 12.72 Windows with vertical proportion and emphasis are encouraged. • A vertical proportion is likely to have greater design affinity with the historic context. • It helps to create a stronger vertical emphasis which can be valuable integrating the design of a larger scale building within its context. • See also the discussion of the character of the relevant historic district and architectural styles (PART I). 12.73 Window reveals should be a characteristic of most facades. • These help to express the character of the facade modeling and materials. • Window reveals will enhance the degree to which the building integrates with its historic setting. • A reveal should be recessed into the primary plane of the wall, and not achieved by applying window trim to the façade. • This helps to avoid the impression of superficiality which can be inherent in some more recent construction, e.g. with applied details like window trim and surrounds. • A hierarchy of window reveals can effectively complement the composition of the fenestration and facades. • Typical historic window reveals are 3-4” in depth. 7 12.74 Windows and doors should be materials that appear similar in scale, proportion and character to those used traditionally in the neighborhood. • Window profiles should project from the plane of the glass creating a distinct hierarchy of detail for the window opening and the composition of the facade. • Durable window frame construction and materials should be used. • Window frame finish should be of durable architectural quality, chosen to complement the building design. • Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass are generally appropriate window materials. • Vinyl should be avoided as a non-durable material in the regional climate. • Vinyl windows, on rear and secondary facades, where they are not readily visible from the street (public or private), will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • Aluminum storefront windows may be appropriate at the ground floor where there is a commercial use or amenity space associated with a multi-family building, and will be considered on a case by case basis. • Dark or reflective glass should be avoided. • See also the rehabilitation section on windows (PART II, Ch.3) as well as the discussions of specific historic districts (PART III) and relevant architectural styles (PART I). SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . 8 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance amending window regulations new construction in historic districts (final) 9 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: January 26, 2024 By: Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney Item K1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Nick Tarbet, Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE:Legislative Action: Outdoor Live Performance Events General Commercial Zone Motion to Initiate Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a legislative action starting the process for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would allow live performance theater use either indoors or outdoors in the General Commercial zone and other districts that may be appropriate based on the intensity, scale and location of the district, by changing the title “theater, live performance” to “theater, live performance (indoor or outdoor)” in the land use tables. 5.7.2024 Announcements Legislative Action: Consider allowing outdoor events in the CG (General Commercial) zone. Issue Summary The council will consider adopting a legislative action that would initiate a zoning petition for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would allow live performance theater use in the CG (General Commercial) zone either indoors or outdoors. Currently they are only allowed indoors. If the Council supports this action, it may consider formally adopting the legislative action in the May 7 formal meeting. Motion to Initiate Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a legislative action starting the process for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would allow live performance theater use in the CG (General Commercial) zone either indoors or outdoors by changing the title “theater, live performance” to “theater, live performance (indoor or outdoor)” in the land use table for commercial districts in Chapter 21A.33.030 of Salt Lake City Code. Item K2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Nick Tarbet, Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE:Legislative Action: Amend city ordinance for the amount of time a reconstructed historic buildings is protected from 25 to 50 years. Motion to Initiate Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a legislative action starting the process for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would change the years a reconstructed historic buildings must be protected to 50 years (from 25). 5.7.2024 Announcements Legislative Action: Legislative Action: Amend city ordinance for the amount of time a reconstructed historic buildings is protected from 25 to 50 years. Issue Summary The council will consider adopting a legislative action that would initiate a zoning petition for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would change the years a reconstructed historic building must be protected to 50 years (from 25). On April 16 the Council adopted an ordinance that set the years at 25. It was published before the next formal meeting. Council Member Wharton wanted to change the ordinance to make it 50 years and intended to recall the vote on May 7. However, since the ordinance was published, that is not an option. So, the Council would need to adopt a legislative action initiating the process for this zoning change to be made. If the Council supports this action, it may consider formally adopting the legislative action in the May 7 formal meeting. Motion to Initiate Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a legislative action starting the process for city staff to research and draft an ordinance that would initiate a zoning petition to change the years a reconstructed historic building must be protected to 50 years (from 25). Item K3 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Lehua Weaver DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET, Reductions to Consolidated Fee Schedule Athletic Facility Reservations and Twilight Golf Fees MOTION 1 (adopt BOTH youth field fees and golf fees) I move that the Council suspend the rules and adopt the ordinance amending the Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify certain fees related to recreational facilities. MOTION 2 (adopt ONLY youth field fee reduction) I move that the Council suspend the rules and adopt the proposed reduction to youth athletic facility reservation fees. MOTION 2 (adopt ONLY the golf twilight fee) I move that the Council suspend the rules and adopt the proposed reduction to golf green fees for a twilight rate. MOTION 4 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance {and consider at a later date}. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Lehua Weaver DATE: May 7, 2024 RE:FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET, Reductions to Consolidated Fee Schedule Athletic Facility Reservations and Twilight Golf Fees ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Administration has requested that the Council consider a reduction to the athletic field reservation fees and golf “twilight” fees. This request is being considered outside the annual budget process, because adjusting these seasonal fees for field use and golf is helpful for consistency. In addition, the proposal is to reduce these two categories, which can be considered more quickly by the Council without a public hearing. A full update to the Consolidated Fee Schedule will be submitted with the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for the upcoming annual budget discussions. Proposed changes: Create a new category for youth reservations, so the fee would decrease as follows: o Tier B fields from $18.00 to $10.00 per hour o Tier C fields from $14.00 to $8.00 per hour Item Schedule: Briefing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 7, 2024 Page | 2 Reinstate a discounted “twilight” rate to late afternoon/evening rounds of golf: o Average $10 discount off the adult, young adult, and senior golf rates o NOTE: Any changes to green fees other than the twilight rate will be transmitted with the annual budget and are not being considered now. MOUNTAIN DELL GREEN FEES SENIOR RATES YOUNG ADULT RATES POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Proposed Youth reservation changes: a. Does the Council support reducing the rate for youth reservations at City athletic facilities? b. Does the Council support implementing a refund opportunity for leagues that may have already paid the higher rate for youth field reservations? 2. Regarding the twilight golf fee, does the Council support that rate change or have any questions about the proposal? BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Council enacted ordinances in May 2011 creating the consolidated fee schedule (CFS) which organizes fees into one chart and organized by department, function and identifies relevant City ordinances authorizing each fee. Some ordinances designate a specific maximum fee, formula to use or a general authorization to charge a fee for a particular service. The CFS is intended to improve transparency by centralizing fee information into one document and accountability by designating where fees are authorized. The Finance Department coordinates the CFS with other City departments and performs cost justification analysis as needed. The CFS is typically reviewed as a whole during the annual budget process, and then as needed throughout the year. ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 04/30/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 04/30/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 26, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Changes to Consolidated Fee Schedule (CFS) STAFF CONTACT: Kristin Riker or Lisa Hunt DOCUMENT TYPE: Consolidated Fee Schedule Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the council adopt changes to Athletic Facility Reservation and Twilight Golf Green Fees in advance of the FY25 budget. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Athletic Facility Reservation Fee: In FY23, the City removed all fee reductions for non- profit and charitable organizations to better comply with Utah Code 10-8-2. This change has had a huge impact on the youth leagues and their ability to rent fields. Parks Division would like to reduce the hourly fee for Youth Organized Leagues for use of Tier B and C Fields as follows: Tier B from $18.00 to $10.00 Tier C from $14.00 to $ 8.00 April Patterson April Patterson (Apr 30, 2024 14:00 MDT) DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403 rachel otto (Apr 30, 2024 14:24 MDT) Changes to CFS Transmittal to City Council Twilight Golf Green Fee: The Golf Division would like to reinstate twilight rates for Mountain Dell for the 2024 season in line with other price changes the division has made. Twilight rates had been approved previously by the Council and had appeared in previous versions of the CFS. Twilight rates are designed to keep the golf course full as much as possible to the end of daylight. A discounted rate is offered because the customer may not have enough daylight to complete a full 18 holes. These rates will be posted in the golf shop and on the golf website. This reflects a $10 discount to the Adult, Young Adult, and Senior Public rates and includes a cart rental. New Rates will be as follows: $54 - Adult (Age 26-59) $44 - Young Adult (Age 17 through 25) $48 - Senior Public (Age 60 and older) The golf professional may adjust starting times as needed, but in the past, it has been offered every day after 4:00 p.m. April - September, after 3:00 p.m. in October, and after 2:00 p.m. in November. PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify certain fees regarding the use of Salt Lake City’s recreational facilities.) WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to modify certain fees regarding the use of specified recreational facilities that Salt Lake City (“City”) makes available to the public, as shown in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to Athletic Facility Reservations set forth in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to the implementation of various twilight golf fees as set forth in the attached Exhibit B. SECTION 3. That a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney 3 EXHIBIT A Athletic Facility Reservations Service Fee Additional Information Section Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $23 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $17 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Organized League Use per Hour per Field Tier B Field Tier C Field 15.16.010 Youth $10 $8 15.16.010 Adult $18 $14 15.16.010 Recreational tournaments with season reservations $122 Per Day Recreational tournaments without season reservations $243 Per Day 3.50.080 Any cleaning required after field usage $48 Per Staff Hour 15.16.010 4 EXHIBIT B Green Fees – Tax included in listed green fees General Public Rates Time frame subject to change as needed by Golf Director Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes General Public Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Bonneville weekend before 2 PM $42.00 $42.00 Sat/Sun before 2PM 16.16.031 Forest Dale $17.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Glendale $18.00 $36.00 All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Mon – Wed) $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Wed, all day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Thur – Sun) NA $42.00 Thur – Sun until 4 PM, 18-hole only 15.16.031 Nibley Park $16.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Rose Park $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $54 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Senior Rates – Age 60 and above See Section 15.16.031.B. Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $48 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Regular LoyalTee Program Rates 5 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Regular LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Senior LoyalTee Program Rates Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $11.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Young Adult Rates – Age 18 – 25 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Young Adult Time Frame Section Bonneville $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $12.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates 6 Mountain Dell NA $44 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Junior Rates – Age 6 through Age 17 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Junior Rates Time Frame Section Bonneville $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $10.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $10.00 $20.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $9.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $9.00 $18.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify certain fees regarding the use of Salt Lake City’s recreational facilities.) WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to modify certain fees regarding the use of specified recreational facilities that Salt Lake City (“City”) makes available to the public, as shown in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to Athletic Facility Reservations set forth in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to the implementation of various twilight golf fees as set forth in the attached Exhibit B. SECTION 3. That a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney 3 EXHIBIT A Athletic Facility Reservations Service Fee Additional Information Section Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $23 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $17 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Organized League Use per Hour per Field Tier B Field Tier C Field 15.16.010 Youth $10 $8 15.16.010 Adult $18 $14 15.16.010 Recreational tournaments with season reservations $122 Per Day Recreational tournaments without season reservations $243 Per Day 3.50.080 Any cleaning required after field usage $48 Per Staff Hour 15.16.010 4 EXHIBIT B Green Fees – Tax included in listed green fees General Public Rates Time frame subject to change as needed by Golf Director Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes General Public Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Bonneville weekend before 2 PM $42.00 $42.00 Sat/Sun before 2PM 16.16.031 Forest Dale $17.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Glendale $18.00 $36.00 All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Mon – Wed) $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Wed, all day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Thur – Sun) NA $42.00 Thur – Sun until 4 PM, 18-hole only 15.16.031 Nibley Park $16.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Rose Park $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $54 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Senior Rates – Age 60 and above See Section 15.16.031.B. Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $48 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Regular LoyalTee Program Rates 5 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Regular LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Senior LoyalTee Program Rates Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $11.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Young Adult Rates – Age 18 – 25 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Young Adult Time Frame Section Bonneville $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $12.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates 6 Mountain Dell NA $44 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Junior Rates – Age 6 through Age 17 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Junior Rates Time Frame Section Bonneville $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $10.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $10.00 $20.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $9.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $9.00 $18.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify certain fees regarding the use of Salt Lake City’s recreational facilities.) WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to modify certain fees regarding the use of specified recreational facilities that Salt Lake City (“City”) makes available to the public, as shown in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to Athletic Facility Reservations set forth in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees, and corresponding fee information, related to the implementation of various twilight golf fees as set forth in the attached Exhibit B. SECTION 3. That a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney 3 EXHIBIT A Athletic Facility Reservations Service Fee Additional Information Section Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $23 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Recreational (Non-organized or affiliate group), one-time use Tier B field $17 Per hour/two hour minimum 15.16.010 Organized League Use per Hour per Field Tier B Field Tier C Field 15.16.010 Youth $10 $8 15.16.010 Adult $18 $14 15.16.010 Recreational tournaments with season reservations $122 Per Day Recreational tournaments without season reservations $243 Per Day 3.50.080 Any cleaning required after field usage $48 Per Staff Hour 15.16.010 4 EXHIBIT B Green Fees – Tax included in listed green fees General Public Rates Time frame subject to change as needed by Golf Director Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes General Public Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Bonneville weekend before 2 PM $42.00 $42.00 Sat/Sun before 2PM 16.16.031 Forest Dale $17.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Glendale $18.00 $36.00 All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Mon – Wed) $21.00 $42.00 Mon – Wed, all day 15.16.031 Mountain Dell (Thur – Sun) NA $42.00 Thur – Sun until 4 PM, 18-hole only 15.16.031 Nibley Park $16.00 NA All Day, Every Day 15.16.031 Rose Park $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $54 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Senior Rates – Age 60 and above See Section 15.16.031.B. Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior Rate Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates Mountain Dell NA $48 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Regular LoyalTee Program Rates 5 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Regular LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $15.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $18.00 $36.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Senior LoyalTee Program Rates Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Senior LoyalTee Time Frame Section Bonneville $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $13.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $13.00 $26.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $15.00 $30.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $11.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Young Adult Rates – Age 18 – 25 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Young Adult Time Frame Section Bonneville $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $14.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $14.00 $28.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $16.00 $32.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $12.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $12.00 $24.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Twilight Rates 6 Mountain Dell NA $44 Time frame to be determined by course and posted in the clubhouse. Cart included 15.16.031 Junior Rates – Age 6 through Age 17 Courses 9 Holes 18 Holes Junior Rates Time Frame Section Bonneville $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Forest Dale $10.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Glendale $10.00 $20.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 1 PM 15.16.031 Mountain Dell $11.00 $22.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 2 PM 15.16.031 Nibley Park $9.00 NA Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Rose Park $9.00 $18.00 Mon – Fri, all day & Sat/Sun after 12 PM 15.16.031 Item L1 2 3 3 0 5 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Senior Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY http://tinyurl.com/SLCFY25 RE:MOTION SHEET – Resolution adopting Salt Lake City and Library Fund tentative budgets for FY 2024-25. MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 1 Resolution No. of 2024 (Adopting the Final Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-2025) PREAMBLE WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has created the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Building Authority”), and has appointed Mary Beth Thompson as the Budget Officer of the Building Authority (the “Budget Officer”); and WHEREAS, the Budget Officer previously filed with the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Building Authority a tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority (the Building Authority not having any operational expenses and therefore no need for an operating budget); and WHEREAS, on , 2024, the Board adopted the tentative budget by Resolution No. of 2024; and WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and data was a public record in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, available for public inspection at the Building Authority’s principal place of business during regular business hours for a period of at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget and was published, at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget in a public meeting, (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website and (b) on the Building Authority’s official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation; and WHEREAS, following due notice of a public hearing given at least seven days before the hearing (a) by publishing on the Utah Public Notice Website and by publishing on the Building 2 Authority’s official website or, if the Building Authority did not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation, at its , 2024 and , 2024 meetings, the Board held a public hearing on the budget tentatively adopted, at which hearing interested persons in attendance or connected remotely were given an opportunity to be heard on the estimate of revenues and expenditures or any item in the tentative budget; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt a final budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority for fiscal year 2024-2025. All conditions precedent to the adoption of the final budget have been accomplished. 2. The budget attached hereto and made a part of this resolution shall be, and the same hereby is adopted as, the final budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority for the remainder of the fiscal year 2024-2025, in accordance with the Fiscal Procedures for Special Districts Act, Utah Code Title 17B, Chapter 1, Part 6. 3. The Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said final budget in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, whose office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, as required by Utah Code Section 17B-1-615. Said final budget shall be available to the public for inspection during regular business hours. 4. The Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said final budget with the State Auditor as required by Utah Code Section 17B-1-614 within 30 days after its adoption. 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its approval and adoption. 3 Passed by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. PRESIDENT ATTEST: SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney Date: 5/1/24 Economic Impact of Delta Center, Utah Jazz, and NHL t “Sports, arts, and entertainment are driving downtown visitation.” - Downtown Alliance Downtown Alliance Of the Top Visitation Days in Salt Lake City Data For Managing the Future of Downtown Salt Lake City 76% Had Delta Center Events 72% Had Conventions in Town Annual Basis ●2022: $326M Annual Total Economic Impact to Salt Lake City - GSBS Consulting Report: Utah Jazz Economic Impacts April 15, 2022 Peer reviewed by the Kem Gardner Institute Utah Jazz and Delta Center Utah NHL Hockey ●2024: $288M Annual Total Economic Impact to Salt Lake City - DA Davidson & C0, May 6, 2024 Under peer review by the Kem Gardner Institute $294M 2023 NBA All-Star Weekend Total Economic Impact to Salt Lake City $27.9M UFC Total Economic Impact to Salt Lake City July 2023 Event Basis Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout Front of Handout: Revitalization of Japantown What Does S.B. 272 Do? • Allows the City to designate up to 100 acres as a “Capital City Revitalization Zone” after a qualified applicant (Smith Entertainment Group - SEG) submits an application and the Council and Revitalization Committee approves a participation agreement. • The zone is required to be around a “currently existing qualified stadium.” (In this case, the Delta Center). • Allows the City to enact a 0.5% sales tax increase City-wide, with the requirement that all funds generated by that tax be spent inside the zone for a period of 30 years. • Allows a qualified applicant to use these funds within that area to reconstruct a stadium, service debt on bonds for a stadium, infrastructure, and/or “associated uses including entertainment and recreational uses…” • Creates a “Capital City Revitalization Zone Committee” made up of state leaders that will receive regular reports from the City and applicant on the plan, including how funds are spent. Note: SB 272 creates an entirely new process and City Attorneys are still working with State Attorneys and the private sector to refine a shared understanding of the required information and steps. Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com. Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates. Back of Handout: What is the City’s Role in this Process? City Council: Consider adopting a participation agreement • After a qualified applicant (SEG) submits an application to the City, the City’s Administration negotiates a "participation agreement" based on that application. • SB 272 has a deadline of September 1 for this step, although it may be sooner. City Council: Consider approving a sales tax increase • As a part of the plan above, the participation agreement may identify the tool of increased sales tax revenue to fund the proposed project. • SB 272 has a deadline of December 31 for this step, although it may be sooner, and may be tied to the adoption of the participation agreement. City Attorneys are still working through this. Planning Commission and City Council: Rezoning to facilitate development Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout • The City is required to process any zoning adjustments to accommodate the development by September 1. Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com. Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates. 1 Memo TO: City Council leadership DATE: February 2, 2024 FROM: Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy SUBECT FY25 Proposed Increase to the Certified Tax Rate CC: MWDSLS Board of Trustees ISSUES The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (“District”) needs an increase in revenue to address critical water infrastructure and to pay for the cost increases from other entities (i.e., Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, and Provo River Water Users Association). The following is a summary of these critical capital projects and costs from other entities: Description Annual Cost Type of Expense Long-Term Financial Impact Entity responsible for securing funding Cottonwoods Connection Project (District/SLC/SC) Purpose: Required project to address aging infrastructure and Salt Lake Aqueduct seismic and other elements of resiliency. $2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million (repayment of 30 year loan/bond) Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy Deer Creek Dam Intake Project (PRWUA costs) Purpose: Required project to replace aging dam infrastructure that delivers 85,000 AF of water (80% of water portfolio) to the Salt Lake Valley. $1,240,000 Capital $37 Million (30 years repayment) Provo River Water Users Association Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plant Capital and O&M (JVWCD costs) Purpose: Address aging infrastructure that delivers water to Northwest quadrant of Salt Lake City. $5,023,680 (5 year average) Capital and O&M $32.5 Million (10 years of capital projects) Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Central Utah Project OMR&R (CUWCD costs) Purpose: Expenses related to the District’s investment in Central Utah Project water. $1,501,500 O&M and repair and replacement of CUP facilities $6.9 Million (forecasted target increase) Central Utah Water Conservancy District Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million 2 RECOMMENDATION To meet the District’s revenue needs, the board of trustees recommends increasing the certified tax rate to 0.00035. By way of information, the District’s maximum tax rate is 0.0005. In 2008, the District increased the certified rate to 0.00035. Over time, the rate has eroded as the value of properties has increased. Since 2008, the District has not implemented a certified rate increase. Taxes are a reliable source of revenue and the investment in water infrastructure projects will benefit future generations. The investment in capital projects that will last more than 75 years supports generational equity. AUTHORIZATION FROM SALT LAKE CITY AND SANDY COUNCILS As of January 1, 2015 current statute (17B-2a-608) states than increasing the certified tax rate requires approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the board of trustees under Section 17B-2a-604.” The appointed board of trustees of the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy must receive approval from their appointed authority to increase the certified tax rate to 0.00035. The timing of the city councils’ approving the District’s certified tax rate needs to occur after the District adopts the tentative FY25 budget on April 15, 2024 and before the budget public hearing on May 20, 2024. The statutory deadline for budget adoption is June 22, 2024. With the approval of both city councils, the certified rate would increase as budgeted and be formally adopted after a Truth in Taxation hearing in August. A question to be resolved is how the two cities want to present the tax increase to their councils for approval. Attachment A describes in more detail the statutory requirements of each city council. CONCENSUS FROM CITY COUNCILS There must be consensus from both councils and each city will be taxed at a uniform and equal rate. If either council does not approve an increase to the certified tax rate, then the District will propose an increase to the water rate. The water rate must also be uniformly applied to all cities comprising this District. The District will propose an 39.33% water rate increase to both member cities (36.33% generates the revenue equal to the property tax and the 3% water rate increase was already forecasted in the FY25 budget). Table 1 calculates the annual impact of an increase to the certified tax rate to Sandy City and Salt Lake City property owners. On average, a property owner in the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy’s service area would see an annual property tax increase of $47.00. 3 Table 2 represents the net revenue generated from the certified tax rate increase. The District would receive an additional $8.6 million in tax revenue. Table 2 also shows the estimated tax revenue from each member city. Table 3 represents the current water sales revenue and the projected water rate increase of 36.33% to match the revenue net revenue increase of the proposed property tax. Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner City Median Market Value of Property Taxable Home Value (55% of median) Current Year Tax Rate Proposed Next Year Certified Tax Rate Percent Increase Annual Increase to property owner Monthly increase Sandy $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 0.00035 62.04% $46.28 $3.86 Salt Lake $576,000 $316,800 0.000200 0.00035 75.00% $47.52 $3.96 Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate City 2023 Tax Year Certified Tax Rate 2023 Tax Revenue Proposed Certified Tax Rate Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 0.00035 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 3: Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Percent Increase Estimated FY25 Water Sales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33% $ 9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33% $23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales to Member Cities $23,779,958 36.33% $32,419,217 $8,639,259 FY25 Property Tax Certified Rate Increase Proposal Salt Lake City Council Meeting April 2, 2024 Background The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy is a special district that provides drinking water to Salt Lake City and Sandy City. Sandy City joined the District in 1990. The District’s board is comprised of seven trustees. The Salt Lake City Council appoints five of the trustees. The Sandy City Council appoints two of the trustees.  Revenue Sources 25.113236 12.040679 12.93062 1.105537 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Water Sales Property Taxes Assessments Miscellaneous M i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s FY25 Escalating Costs and Capital Needs for Aging Infrastructure Description Annual Cost Type of Expense Long-Term Financial Impact Entity responsible for securing funding Cottonwoods Connection Project (District/SLC/SC) Purpose: Required project to address aging infrastructure and Salt Lake Aqueduct seismic and other elements of resiliency. $2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million (repayment of 30 year loan/bond) Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy Deer Creek Dam Intake Project (PRWUA costs) Purpose: Required project to replace aging dam infrastructure that delivers 85,000 AF of water (80% of water portfolio) to the Salt Lake Valley. $1,240,000 Capital $37 Million (30 years repayment) Provo River Water Users Association Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plant Capital and O&M (JVWCD costs) Purpose: Address aging infrastructure that delivers water to Northwest quadrant of Salt Lake City. $5,023,680 (5 year average) Capital and O&M $32.5 Million (10 years of capital projects) Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Central Utah Project OMR&R (CUWCD costs) Purpose: Expenses related to the District’s investment in Central Utah Project water. $1,501,500 O&M and repair and replacement of CUP facilities $6.9 Million (forecasted target increase) Central Utah Water Conservancy District Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million $9.3M of revenue needs FY25 Tentative Budget Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner City Median Market Value of Property Taxable Home Value (55% of Median) Current Year Tax Rate Current MWDSLS Tax (Annual) Proposed Next Year Certified Tax Rate Percent Increase MWDSLS Tax (Annual) Net Annual Increase Sandy City $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 $74.61 0.00035 62.04% $120.89 $46.28 Salt Lake City $576,000 $316,000 0.000200 $63.36 0.00035 75.00% $110.88 $47.52 Property Taxes versus Water Rates Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate City 2023 Tax Year Certified Tax Rate 2023 Tax Revenue Proposed Certified Tax Rate Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 0.00035 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 3:Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Percent Increase Estimated FY25 Water Sales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33%$ 9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33%$23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales to Member Cities $23,779,958 36.33%$32,419,217 $8,639,259  Council’s decision will determine if there is an increase to the certified tax rate. If not approved by either council, the District will increase water rates to both member cities. MWDSLS Property Taxes versus Water Rates Table 4: Certified tax rate increased to 0.00035 City 2023 Tax Revenue Estimated 2024 Tax Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $3,010,170 $4,877,590 $1,867,420 Salt Lake City $9,030,509 $15,802,603 $6,772,094 Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 $20,680,193 $8,639,514 Table 5: Water rates increased by 36.33% City FY24 Water Sales Revenue Estimated FY25 Water S ales Revenue Net Revenue Increase Sandy City $6,658,388 $9,077,381 $2,418,993 Salt Lake City $17,121,570 $23,341,836 $6,220,266 Total MWDSLS Water Sales $23,779,958 $32,419,217 $8,639,259 Background on Budget Process Tentative revenue and expenses projections Proposed certified tax rate of 0.00035 Open public meeting Work Session Presentation on FY25 Budget Posted FY25 Tentative Budget on Website Open public meeting FY25 Tentative Budget Adopted by the Board Statute 17B-2a-608 Requirements Consistent with current statute (17B-2a-608), increasing the certified tax rate requires approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the board of trustees under Section 17B-2a-604.” Salt Lake City and Sandy City Council must approve increasing the certified tax rate. Approval occurs after the District adopts tentative budget in April and before the District’s public hearing in May. Consensus required. Member Cities agreement requires equal application of certified tax rate and water rates. Note: MWDSLS Board of Trustees will evaluate property tax rate every 2 years and determine if the District needs to re-establish or increase property tax rate every 3 years.  FY25 Budget Process Timing Considerations March •Work Session Discussion on Budget. Open public meeting April •Board approval of the tentative budget May •Tentative budget public hearing June •Board meeting to approve FY25 budget. April/May •City Councils approve District’s increase to certified tax rate August •Certified tax rate hearing •Adoption of final tax rate and FY25 budget. September •Deadline for submitting budget to State Auditor. Thank you ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer rachel otto (Apr 30, 2024 07:53 MDT)Date Received: 4/30/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 4/30/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 30, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT:Salt Lake City Library Budget Amendment #3 SPONSOR:NA STAFF CONTACT: Greg Cleary, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2023-24 Library Fund adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE LIBRARY FUND $ 2,893,769.00 $ 2,893,769.00 TOTAL $ 2,893,769.00 $ 2,893,769.00 April Patterson April Patterson (Apr 30, 2024 06:56 MDT) DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Library Administration is requesting a $2,893,769 increase to the FY2023-24 Library budget. This increase is required to budget and account for pass-through property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County and remitted directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the Convention Center Hotel pass through funds. Additional detail is outlined in the attached memo. PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Third Amendment to the Final Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24) An ordinance amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 28 of 2023, which adopted the final budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024. PREAMBLE On June 13, 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 28 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128, of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City’s Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd MEMO | April 22, 2024 To: Salt Lake City Library Board of Directors Salt Lake City Council From: Noah Baskett, Executive Director Re: Library Budget Amendment 3 for FY2023-24 The Library’s FY2023-24 budget includes an estimate of revenue and expenditure accounts for the Inland Port and Convention Center Hotel pass through funds. Along with various other entities, the Library is required by State law to account for these funds that are never actually deposited into the Library’s accounts. The FY23 budget amounts for these offsetting revenues and expenditures were $600,000, while the actual amount of the pass through was $987,705. In FY24, $800,000 was budgeted for the pass through and the Library has now received notice that the actual amount is $1,557,572. In March, the Board of Directors approved a budget amendment to address this Inland Port and Convention Center Hotel pass through. In addition, staff has recently determined that another pass through exists to fund the Community Reinvestment Agency. The revenue and expenditure assessed to the Library for this pass through in FY24 is $2,136,197. These amounts will require a budget amendment increasing the Library’s General Fund budget by $2,893,769, as outlined in the table below: Account Name Current Budget Amount Proposed Budget Amount Difference Funding Source Property Taxes-Pass Through 800,000 3,693,769 2,893,769 Totals $800,000 $3,693,769 $2,893,769 Expenditures Payments to Other Governments 800,000 3,693,769 2,893,769 Totals $800,000 $3,693,769 $2,893,769 The net impact of this adjustment is zero as the expenditure increase is offset by the increase in revenue. Library staff is actively working with the City’s Finance Department to forecast and align our budgets for the pass through revenue in the future. Recommended Motion: Move to approve an increase in the Library’s FY24 General Fund budget of $2,893,769, inclusive of the prior approval for an increase of $757,572. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:May 7, 2024 RE: RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZING ASSISTANCE FOR FAIRMONT HEIGHTS SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 2257 SOUTH 1100 EAST ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on an informal public benefits analysis conducted by the Administration to evaluate the possibility of offering either a lease or a loan to a development project called Fairmont Heights, at 2257 South 1100 East. The project would provide approximately 110 units of new affordable senior housing on a 0.81- acre property. The Administration intends to use $5,633,510 in one-time, “dormant” funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which the Council allocated to an affordable housing use as part of the Fiscal Year 2024 budget. A public hearing is required by City and State code on any public benefits analysis or proposal for below-market-rate assistance. This has been scheduled for May 21, 2024. The Administration also requests formal Council approval to proceed with a ground lease or loan for the Fairmont Heights project, which would allow the developers to meet the application deadline for 9% LIHTC (Low-Income Housing Tax Credits) credits. Council action is tentatively scheduled for June 4, and conducting the straw polls on three questions listed in the Policy Questions section (below) would further facilitate the developers’ application process. The project also was awarded a $1,000,000 loan through the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Housing Development Loan Program. Goal of the briefing: Review the public benefits analysis and consider straw polling three questions: to approve the public benefits analysis; to determine that City assistance is appropriate; and, to authorize the Administration to negotiate the final terms of the transaction. ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND AND INFORMATION A.Project Overview and City Funding Options. Item Schedule: Briefing: May 7, 2024 Public Hearing: May 21, 2024 Potential Action: June 4, 2024 Page | 2 1.Project Overview. Specifics of the project have not changed from the two proposals submitted for the 2024 Affordable Housing Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), and the High-Opportunity NOFA. Currently, the Administration plans to purchase a 0.81-acre property at 2257 South 1100 East for the development of a housing project with the following characteristics: Intended for seniors aged 62 and up. Approximately 110 one- and two-bedroom units, in two buildings. About 80% of the units would be affordable to households at 80% or less of area median income (AMI). About 50% of the units would be affordable to 50% or less of AMI. In response to a staff question about the relatively high cost-per-unit of this project (the highest of the 15 applications to the NOFA), HASLC’s executive director noted three factors: High land costs in the heart of Sugarhouse; Dated initial estimates from over a year ago that are now being updated for the much more competitive 2024 construction pricing market; and, The need for a full parking structure underneath one building, which will accommodate both phases of the project. 2.Ownership Structure. The development would be operated directly or indirectly by the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC). Ownership would be split in a limited partnership between two entities: Lincoln Avenue Communities, an affordable housing developer which is located in California and part of a Lincoln Avenue Capital, LLC, a private equity company; and Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (HAME), which is a 501(c)(3) affiliated with HASLC. HAME would be the lessee of the ground lease if approved by the City Council, and would entitle, finance, permit, and commence construction on the first phase of the project by June 30, 2026. 3.Previous Funding. In its role as the RDA Board, the Council approved a $1,000,000 loan from the Housing Development Loan Program (HDLP) to Lincoln Avenue Communities for acquisition and construction costs for the project. Preliminary terms for that project were approved at the same time. In response to a Council staff question, CAN clarified the following: “If the Council approves the ground lease structure, HAME/Lincoln may be interested in utilizing the RDA loan as their contribution to the purchase price, which is effectively [equivalent to] their prepayment for the first 20 years of the ground lease. However, we will need to clarify with the RDA to ensure that would be allowed under the current RDA Board approval. This would free up their other capital for predevelopment costs (architecture, engineering, etc.). However, they are prepared to contribute their own capital at closing if this is outside of the RDA Board approved parameters.” B.Options for City Funding. The Administration intends to use $5,633,510 in one-time, “dormant” funds from the CDBG program run by the Housing Stability Division, which is located in the Community and Neighborhoods Department (CAN). By way of reminder, these funds were in unallocated accounts managed by the Housing Stability Division. In order to comply with HUD regulations, the City agreed to prioritize expenditure of these funds in allowable areas, one of which is senior housing. The Council and the Administration agreed to designate these funds to acquire property suitable for an affordable housing development by either the City/RDA or the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC). Page | 3 As the Administration negotiates final terms with the developer, it will determine which of the two following two options for making the proposed Fairmont Heights property available for development is more advantageous. 1. The Administration’s preferred option is the below-market ground lease of the property, specifically, in the form of a 99-year below-market ground lease. 2. A second option would be a below-market interest rate on an acquisition loan, which would convert to a permanent loan at below-market interest rate once construction is complete. The Administration plans to determine which of these two options is more advantageous as it negotiates final terms with the developer. Its preference is the below-market ground lease. C.LIHTC Application. The developers intend to apply for 9% LIHTC credits, and applications are due on June 11. Because HAME is a nonprofit entity, the City is allowed to waive the fair-market rental rate ordinarily required for use of City-owned property, after a public hearing about the waiver and Council authorization of the land lease agreement. The land lease structure would make the tax credits more viable. The developer seeks formal approval for the ground lease structure by the City Council prior to this deadline, and Council action is tentatively scheduled for June 4. Straw polls listed in the Policy Questions section would be helpful to provide direction to HAME on how to frame the project in their LIHTC application, that is, as a loan or ground lease. D. The Public Benefits Analysis. 1.Legal Framework. Utah Code requires that a municipal legislative body must receive a public benefits analysis and hold a public hearing before deciding to appropriate any funds to any type of entity or individual other than a nonprofit entity. The public hearing for this item is scheduled for May 21, 2024. 2.Public Benefits Identified. In the informal Public Benefits Analysis, the Administration concluded that “the numerous community benefits provided by the Project justify the use of the City’s resources, and the Ground Lease payments, although below market-rate, will still return the City’s initial capital investment and provide a revenue stream to the City over time.” The PBA identified the following specific public benefits received in exchange for a waiver of fair-market rent for a land lease (see transmittal Attachment B). a. Geographic distribution of affordable housing for seniors near transit, healthcare, socialization opportunities, fitness centers, educational opportunities, fresh food, green space, and essential services. b. Affordable housing promotes healthy aging in communities, especially for older adults who have limited incomes. c. The project would provide rarely-available Federal funding for rental assistance for seniors, in the form of rent subsidy. d. Support for numerous goals and objectives in Housing SLC (the City’s Five-Year Housing Plan) and Thriving in Place (the City’s anti-displacement plan): new units of affordable housing, geographic distribution of affordable housing, partnerships with the HASLC, housing for seniors, long-term affordability, and access to transit. Page | 4 E. Council Priorities. The Fairmont Heights project would match several Council priorities, including transit-accessible affordable housing for seniors, and the geographic distribution of affordable housing development. The project would also apply to goals and objectives listed in Housing SLC and Thriving in Place (see section on Accomplishing Salt Lake City’s Goals in the transmittal). F.Environmental Assessment. To comply with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) environmental standards the City is in the process of conducting an environmental assessment on the property. This will ensure the correct noticing and mitigation standards are met. POLICY QUESTIONS To facilitate the developers’ application for 9% LITHC consideration, the Council could consider the following straw polls: 1. Does the Council support adopting a resolution which would approve the informal public benefits analysis? 2. Has the Council determined that City assistance is appropriate for this project? 3. Does the Council authorize the Administration to negotiate the final terms of the transaction, including the decision to provide $5,633,510 for this project either through a below-market ground lease or a below-market interest rate on an acquisition loan, which would convert to a permanent loan. FAIRMONT HEIGHTS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT Financial Assistance Terms //May 7, 2024 PROPERTY •0.81 acres •~$7,000,000 acquisition price •2257 South 1100 East PROJECT •~110 units •Senior housing •Phased development •~80% of units affordable to 80% AMI and below •~50% of units affordable to 50% AMI and below •Developer: Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (a non-profit entity of the Housing Authority of SLC) in partnership with Lincoln Avenue Communities Budget (approved): •$5,600,000, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding Terms of assistance: •Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipality may “authorize municipal services or other nonmonetary assistance to be provided to a nonprofit entity, whether or not the municipality receives consideration in return.” Utah Code §10-8- 2(1)(a)(v) •An informal public benefits analysis has been provided for the Council’s consideration •Resolution, if approved, would facilitate either a loan to Developer to acquire the Property or for the City to acquire the Property and issue a below-market ground lease COUNCIL’S ROLE City issues loan for Developer to acquire property and develop the Project Acquisition loan terms: •Deferred payments •0% interest that converts to 3% if the loan has not converted to a permanent loan by 2/2026 •Option to purchase the property if project is not initiated by 7/2026 •Converts to a permanent loan upon receipt of construction financing Permanent loan terms: •Up to a 40-year term •1% interest rate •Interest-only payments from cash flow •Outstanding principal and interest due at loan maturity OPTION #1: ACQUISITION TO PERMANENT LOAN City Acquires Property and Issues a 99-year Ground Lease to Project ~$7,000,000 purchase price: •~$5,600,000 City •~$1,400,000 Developer (applied as the ground lease payment for the first 20 years) Ground lease fee: •Year 0-20: ~$1,400,000 •Year 21-99: o $70,000 in year 21with a 3% annual escalator, compounding annually, applied each year thereafter through the end of the term, payment subject to available cashflow o This could equate to almost $11 million dollars over years 21-99 of the term OPTION #2: CITY ACQUISITION & GROUND LEASE Affordable housing in a high opportunity area •New units of affordable housing •Located near transit, healthcare, opportunities for socializing, fitness centers, continuing education, fresh food, green space, and essential services Senior housing •By 2050, the number of adults aged 65 years and older is expected to double in the U.S. •A key lever to promote healthy aging in communities is affordable housing, especially for older adults with have limited incomes. Rental assistance •HASLC has secured rental assistance for the project Ground lease •City’s land ownership and long-term participation in development projects PUBLIC BENEFIT HIGHLIGHTS: Environmental review: •Currently completing a Phase II environmental assessment •Additional testing is required in order to meet HUD requirements •Impacted the City’s ability to wire funds to an escrow account, as previously planned, in order to expend funds by the CDBG timeliness deadline Tax credit deadline: •9% Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program application deadline is June 11 OTHER INFO: _________________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL jill love jill love (Apr 23, 2024 13:23 MDT)Date Received: 04/23/2024 Jill Remington Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 04/23/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 23, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods SUBJECT:Informal Public Benefits Analysis for the development of an approximately 110-unit affordable housing project to be located at 2257 S 1100 East in exchange for a below-market ground lease of property or below-market interest rate on an acquisition loan. STAFF CONTACT: Tammy Hunsaker, Deputy Director, Community and Neighborhoods Department, 385-315-3315, tammy.hunsaker@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Consideration of the attached resolution approving the final terms of the transaction with Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (HAME) in order to facilitate the construction of a ~110-unit affordable housing project. BUDGET IMPACT:N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Through the fiscal year 2024 (“FY24”) budget process, the City Council allocated $5,633,510 of dormant Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program income for either the City, the RDA, and/or the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC) to acquire property for the development of affordable housing. Earlier this year, the Administration entered into discussions with the HASLC regarding 0.81 acres of property located at 2257 South 1100 East (“Property”). Acquisition of the Property will facilitate the development of approximately 110 units that are targeted to seniors, and that are a mix of one and two-bedrooms, with approximately 80% of the units affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) and below and approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below (“Project”). This transmittal provides an overview of the Administration’s proposed funding commitment for the Project, including the potential for the Property to be acquired by the City and subsequently ground leased to the Project subject to authorization by the City Council of a below-market lease rate. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Development Team The Project will be developed by Fairmont Heights Apartments, LP, a Utah Limited Partnership to be owned by HAME, a 501(c)(3) affiliated with HASLC for the purposes of affordable housing development, in Partnership with Lincoln Avenue Communities (collectively the “Developer”). Funding Commitment Structure The Administration intends to contribute the CDBG funds to the Project to facilitate its financial feasibility and timely development. The funding is proposed to be structured as one of the following options: Option 1 – Loan: The City would loan Developer, or its affiliates, the CDBG funds as an acquisition loan that converts to permanent financing. The acquisition loan would be structured with deferred payments, 0% interest that converts to 3% interest on February 1, 2026 if the loan has not converted to permanent financing by that time. Upon receipt of construction financing and tax credits through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, the City’s short- term acquisition loan would convert to permanent financing with a 40-year term, 1% interest rate, and interest-only payments from cash flow, with the outstanding principal and interest due at loan maturity. Option 2 – City Acquisition and Ground Lease: The City would acquire the Property with the CDBG funds and subsequently ground lease the Property to Developer for a below market value (the “Ground Lease”), with the terms as further described in Exhibit A. At this time, the Administration is requesting that the City Council approve the funding assistance terms for the Project. Refer to Exhibit A for the Administration’s proposed terms for the Ground Lease, Exhibit B for an informal public benefits analysis, and Exhibit C for a resolution that, if adopted by the City Council, would approve the funding terms. Note that the project was awarded a $1,000,000 loan through the RDA’s Housing Development Loan Program. To allow for flexibility, the attached resolution would permit the Administration to issue the CDBG funds as either Option 1 or Option 2. Proposed Ground Lease Terms While the Project is viable under Option 1, the Developer’s preference is Option 2 for more competitive financing applications. Since an affordable housing deed restriction will limit the Project’s value and annual generation of cash flow, the lease payment affordable to the Project is much lower than for a market-rate housing project. To balance the viability of the Project and while still providing rental income to the City, including the return of the City’s initial investment of $5,633,510, the acquisition of the Property and Ground Lease is proposed to be structured as follows: City’s acquisition of the Property for $7,040,000 o City contributes $5,633,510 in CDBG funds. o Developer contributes $1,406,490, or the balance of the purchase price plus any closing and escrow fees. Annual Ground Lease payments: o Year 0-20: Developer’s $1,406,490, or the final contribution to the purchase price, is consideration for the first 20 years of the Ground Lease. o Year 21-99: In year 21, the annual Ground Lease payment shall be subject to available cash flow and shall be $70,000 with a 3% escalator, compounding annually, applied each year thereafter through the end of the term. This could equate to almost $11 million dollars over years 21-99 of the term. The term of the Ground Lease shall be the earlier of 99 years or upon discontinuation of the affordable housing use; notwithstanding the affordable housing use shall remain in effect for a minimum of 50 years. Upon such termination, Developer shall have the option of acquiring the Property for the then current fair market value of the land. Reasoning for a Below-Market Ground Lease The high cost of land on the city’s east side is a deterrent to the development of affordable housing, and projects developed on high valued land are less competitive for the 9% LIHTC program or related funding. The acquisition of the Property by the City and the subsequent Ground Lease to the Developer will make the Project more financially viable and its development timelier, as the Project is pursuing a 9% LIHTC award. Projects applying to the 9% LIHTC program are scored competitively, and a lower total development cost (TDC), which is based on land costs, soft costs, and construction costs, receive a higher score. The cost of the land would not be factored into the TDC under the Ground Lease scenario, thereby making the Project more competitive for a LIHTC award. In addition to making the Project more competitive for a LIHTC award, the Ground Lease structure would further the City’s priority of land ownership and long-term participation in development projects. Public Benefits A comprehensive analysis of public benefits is provided as Exhibit B, and a summary is as follows: Affordable housing is the key to reducing intergenerational poverty and increasing economic mobility. An adequate supply of safe and affordable housing is essential in reducing homelessness and the associated public costs. The location of the Project is deemed to be a “high opportunity area,” or a neighborhood that provides economic and social benefits to residents living there. The development of affordable housing is challenging in these areas due to impediments such as high land costs, lack of buildable land, and zoning restrictions. The Project will provide geographic distribution of affordable housing for seniors near transit, healthcare, socialization opportunities, fitness centers, educational opportunities, fresh food, green space, and essential services. Affordable housing is an important social determinant of physical and mental health and well- being. By 2050, the number of adults aged 65 years and older is expected to double in the United States. A key lever to promote healthy aging in communities is affordable housing, especially for older adults who have limited incomes. Rental assistance for seniors in the form of rent subsidy is very rare as federal funding for such is limited. This project brings this very benefit to the public as HASLC has formally allocated and approved such subsidy for at least 15 years. In addition to the public benefits listed above, the Project supports numerous goals and objectives in Housing SLC and Thriving in Place, such as new units of affordable housing, geographic distribution of affordable housing, partnerships with the HASLC, housing for seniors, long-term affordability, and access to transit. Regulations and Environmental Compliance In order to issue the funding for either Option 1 or Option 2, the Administration is required to ensure that City and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations are met. This includes complying with the federal requirement 24 CFR 58.5 regarding HUD environmental standards. The City is in the process of conducting an environmental assessment process that will inform the correct noticing and mitigation standards are met. PUBLIC PROCESS: Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipality may “authorize municipal services or other nonmonetary assistance to be provided to a nonprofit entity, whether or not the municipality receives consideration in return.” Utah Code §10-8- 2(1)(a)(v). Because HASLC is a special purpose government agency and HAME is a nonprofit entity, the City may waive the fair-market rental rates it would ordinarily be required to receive for use of City-owned property so long as the municipal legislative body first holds a public hearing regarding the waiver and authorizes the Administration to enter into the land lease for the below-market lease rates. While a formal public benefits analysis is not required pursuant to Utah law, an informal public benefits analysis is provided as Attachment B to provide an analysis of the public benefits to be received in exchange for a waiver of the fair-market rents for a land lease. EXHIBITS: A. Ground Lease Term Sheet B. Public Benefits Analysis C. Resolution EXHIBIT A GROUND LEASE TERM SHEET FAIRMONT HEIGHTS 2257 South 1100 East GROUND LEASE TERMS Project Description:One or more affordable housing buildings, targeted to seniors, that may be developed in one or more phases, with approximately 110 units, that are a mix of one and two- bedrooms, with approximately 80% of the units affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) and below and approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below (“Project”). Lessee:Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (“HAME”) or its affiliates. Term:The earlier of 99 years or upon discontinuation of the affordable housing use; notwithstanding the affordable housing use shall remain in effect for a minimum of 50 years. Upon termination of the affordable housing use at or after 50 years, Lessee shall have the option to maintain ownership of the Project and to acquire the land for the current fair market value of the land, unless a discounted purchase price is approved at that time by the Salt Lake City Council. Term Commencement Date: The ground lease shall be executed upon closing on the City’s acquisition of the property. The City shall acquire the property for a price equal to $7,040,000 plus any applicable closing and escrow costs and fees, which is anticipated to be paid as follows: (i) $5,633,510 shall be paid by the City, and (ii) the balance of the purchase price plus any closing and escrow fees and costs will be paid by Lessee. Ground Lease Payment:Years 0 – 20: The amount paid by Lessee for the purchase of the property shall be credited as compensation for the first 20 years of the term. Years 21 – 99: Beginning in year 21, an annual ground lease payment of $70,000 shall be paid out of surplus cash flow, with a 3% escalator beginning in year 22 through the end of the term. If sufficient surplus cash flow is not available in a particular year, the respective ground lease payment shall be reduced accordingly. Timeliness Requirement: Lessee or an affiliate thereof shall entitle, finance, permit, and commence construction on the first phase of the Project on or before June 30, 2026. If Lessee does not commence construction on the first phase of the Project on or before June 30, 2026, and if the ground lease has been executed as of such date, the City may terminate the ground lease and, upon termination of the ground lease, shall refund Lessee for the remaining years of the term. Termination of the lease by the City shall be subject to budget approval by the Salt Lake City Council to refund any balance due for the remaining years of the term. Subordination:The ground lease may be subordinated to one or more Land Use Regulatory Agreement recorded by Utah Housing Corporation. In addition, the ground lease may be subject to standstill provisions as may be required by the Project’s tax credit investor and lenders. Affordability Requirement: Upon and after commencement of redevelopment of the property, the Project shall be developed and continuously operated as affordable housing, with a majority of the units affordable and restricted to households earning up to 80% of the AMI and below. Over the first 50 years of the term, approximately 80% of the units shall be affordable to households at 80% AMI, with approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below. After the first 50 years of the term, the affordability levels of the units may be adjusted upon approval by the City notwithstanding at least 80% of the units shall be affordable to 80% AMI and below at all times. Tenant Selection and Fair Housing: Upon and after commencement of redevelopment of the property, the Project shall comply with federal fair housing laws and tenant selection policies pursuant to the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program or its successor. Reporting Requirement:On an annual basis, Lessee will submit to City a report on the project’s financial status, including the submission of audited financial statements, and sufficient information to demonstration compliance with the City’s ground lease, containing such information a reasonably requested by City. Ground Lease Structure:It is the intent of the parties that the ground lease be structured in a manner that results in the Lessee being the owner of any and all improvements on the property for federal income tax purposes during the term of the ground lease. Project Phases If the Project is to be developed in two or more phases, the City may amend the ground lease to incorporate any changes to the development of the Project. Assignment:The ground lease may be assigned by Lessee upon the sale of the Project, provided that such assignee assumes the obligations of Lessee under the ground lease and that the Property is transferred subject to the terms and conditions of the ground lease. Note: A $1,000,000 loan was awarded through the RDA’s 2024 Affordable Housing Notice of Funding Availability to HAME’s development partner, Lincoln Avenue Communities. These funds are intended to be utilized for acquisition and construction costs for the project. EXHIBIT B INFORMAL PUBLIC BENEFITS ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM TO: City Council Members SUBJECT: Informal Analysis of Public Benefits Provided by Fairmont Heights Apartments, LP, a Utah Limited Partnership, in Exchange for a Below-market Ground Lease of Property or Below-market Interest Rate on an Acquisition Loan for the Property. INTRODUCTION Fairmont Heights Apartments, LP (collectively the “Developer”), is a limited partnership between Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (HAME), a 501(c)(3) corporation formed by the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC), and Lincoln Avenue Communities. Developer has executed a purchase and sale agreement to acquire 0.81 acres of property located at 2257 South 1100 East in Salt Lake City (“Property”) for the purposes of developing an affordable housing project that will be operated by HASLC or a third party under its control. The development, which may be constructed in multiple phases, will be targeted to seniors, with approximately 110 units, that are a mix of one and two-bedrooms, with approximately 80% of the units affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) and below and approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below (“Project”). Through the Fiscal Year 2024 (FY 24) budget, the City Council allocated $5,633,510 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program income (“Affordable Housing Funds”) for the acquisition of property to be used for the development of affordable housing. The City intends to contribute the Affordable Housing Funds to the Project to facilitate its financial feasibility and timely development. The funding is intended to be structured as one of the following: Option 1 – Loan: The City would loan HAME, or its affiliates, the Affordable Housing Funds, with the loan structured as an acquisition loan that converts to permanent financing. The interest rates for the loan are below market interest rates. Option 2 – City Acquisition and Ground Lease: The City would acquire the Property and subsequently ground lease the Property to HAME for a below market lease rate (the “Ground Lease”), with the terms as further described herein. While the Project is viable under Option 1, the Developer’s preference is Option 2 for more competitive financing applications. Under both options, the Administration proposes to provide a loan or lease at a below market rate (the “City Assistance”)and the Administration is requesting that the City Council approve the City Assistance for each option. Though a formal analysis of the benefits to be received by the City in exchange for the benefit provided to HAME is not required under Utah Code ⸹10-8-2 as a non-profit corporation, this informal analysis has been prepared to help assist the City Council’s evaluation of the recommended action. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipality may “authorize municipal services or other nonmonetary assistance to be provided to a nonprofit entity, whether or not the municipality receives consideration in return.” Utah Code §10-8-2(1)(a)(v). Because HASLC is a federally funded Special Purpose Government Agency and HAME is a non-profit corporation, the City may waive the fair-market rental rates and interest rates it would ordinarily be required to receive for use of the City Property so long as the municipal legislative body first holds a public hearing regarding the waiver and authorizes the Administration to enter into the Ground Lease at the below-market lease rate or the loan at the below market interest rate. Utah Code §10-8-2(3) outlines the purposes for which a municipal body may appropriate funds as “for any purpose that, in the judgment of the municipal legislative body, provides for the safety, health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort, or convenience of the inhabitants of the municipality.” The factors that must be considered in determining the propriety of such an appropriation or waiver if made to any type of entity or individual other than a nonprofit entity as set forth under Utah Code §10-8-2(3)(e). Here, it may be helpful to consider the same factors: (1) The specific benefits (including intangible benefits) to be received by the City in return for the arrangement; (2) The City’s purpose in making the appropriation, including an analysis of how the safety, health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort or convenience of the residents of Salt Lake City will be enhanced; and (3) Whether the appropriation is “necessary and appropriate” to accomplish the reasonable goals and objectives of the City in the area of economic development, job creation, affordable housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the preservation of historic structures and property, and any other public purpose. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT The high cost of land on the city’s east side is a deterrent to the development of affordable housing, and projects developed on high valued land are less competitive for the 9% LIHTC program or related funding. The acquisition of the Property by the City and the subsequent Ground Lease to the Developer will make the Project more financially viable and its development timelier, as the Project is pursuing a 9% LIHTC award. Projects applying to the 9% LIHTC program are scored competitively, and a lower total development cost (TDC), which is based on land costs, soft costs, and construction costs, receive a higher score. The cost of the land would not be factored into the TDC under the Ground Lease scenario, thereby making the Project more competitive for a LIHTC award. In addition to making the Project more competitive for a LIHTC award, the Ground Lease structure would further the City’s priority of land ownership and long-term participation in development projects. TERMS OF THE TRANSACTIONS AND PUBLIC BENEFITS PROVIDED I. Terms of Ground Lease; Costs to the City Under the Ground Lease scenario, the City collects rent in return for the Developer to develop and operate the Project on the Property. This allows the City to maintain long-term ownership of the land and also receive a stream of rental income. Since affordable housing deed restrictions will limit the Project’s value and annual generation of cash flow, the ground lease payment affordable to the Project is much lower than for a market-rate housing project. To balance the viability of the Project while still providing rental income to the City, including the return of the City’s initial investment of $5,633,510, the acquisition of the Property and Ground Lease is proposed to be structured as follows: City’s acquisition of the Property for $7,040,000 o City contributes $5,633,510 in Affordable Housing Funds o Developer contributes $1,406,490, or the balance of the purchase price plus any closing and escrow fees. If possible, Developer may utilize the proceeds of the loan approved for the Project by the RDA Board to free up other capital for predevelopment costs. Annual Ground Lease payments: o Year 0-20: Developer’s $1,406,490, or the final contribution to the purchase price, is consideration for the first 20 years of the Ground Lease. o Year 21-99: In year 21, the annual Ground Lease payment shall be subject to available cash flow and shall be $70,000 with a 3% escalator, compounding annually, applied each year thereafter through the end of the term. This could equate to almost $11 million dollars over years 21-99 of the term. The term of the Ground Lease shall be the earlier of 99 years or upon discontinuation of the affordable housing use; notwithstanding the affordable housing use shall remain in effect for a minimum of 50 years. Upon such termination, Developer shall have the option of acquiring the Property for the then current fair market value of the land unless a reduced purchase price is approved by the City Council at that time. While the proposed payments for the Ground Lease are below the value of a lease rate for a market-rate housing project, the numerous community benefits provided by the Project justify the use of the City’s resources, and the Ground Lease payments, although below market-rate, will still return the City’s initial capital investment and provide a revenue stream to the City over time. II. Terms of the Loan While not the preferred option, if the City were to provide the loan at a below market interest rate, if the Project is approved for tax credits, the City would receive a return on its investment through interest payments over the life of the loan and the Project would continue to provide public benefits as described herein. With a loan, the Project’s tax credit application is less competitive but still possible to be approved. The acquisition loan would be structured with deferred payments, 0% interest that converts to 3% interest on February 1, 2026 if the loan has not converted to permanent financing by that time. Upon receipt of construction financing and tax credits through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, the City’s short-term acquisition loan would convert to permanent financing with a 40-year term, 1% interest rate, and interest-only payments from cash flow, with the outstanding principal and interest due at loan maturity. III. Public Benefits Provided by the Project The Project as planned will provide approximately 110 units of affordable housing that will be targeted to seniors, with approximately 80% of the units affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) and below and approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below. A lack of affordable housing costs the City public resources, and also causes numerous negative social outcomes. Providing City Assistance to facilitate the development of affordable housing will save public resources and provide better outcomes for residents, as follows: Housing is the key to reducing intergenerational poverty and increasing economic mobility. Research shows that increasing access to affordable housing is the most cost-effective strategy for reducing poverty and increasing economic mobility in the United States. Unaffordable housing is the most significant contributor to homelessness. An adequate supply of safe and affordable housing is essential in reducing homelessness and the associated public costs. The location of the Project is deemed to be a “high opportunity area,” or a neighborhood that provides economic and social benefits to residents living there. The development of affordable housing is challenging in these areas due to impediments such as high land costs, lack of buildable land, and zoning restrictions. The Project will provide geographic distribution of affordable housing for seniors near transit, healthcare, socialization opportunities, fitness centers, educational opportunities, fresh food, green space, and essential services. Affordable housing is an important social determinant of physical and mental health and well-being. High-quality housing limits exposure to environmental toxins that impact health. Stable and affordable housing also supports mental health by limiting stressors related to financial burden or frequent moves. By 2050, the number of adults aged 65 years and older is expected to double in the United States. Lower income adults become economically insecure older adults who do not have the resources to pay for a decent quality of life in those remaining years. A key lever to promote healthy aging in communities is affordable housing, especially for older adults who have limited incomes. Rental assistance for seniors in the form of rent subsidy is very rare as federal funding for such is limited. This project brings this very benefit to the public as HASLC has formally allocated and approved such subsidy for at least 15 years. III. Salt Lake City’s Purposes and Enhancing the Quality of Life for Residents. Through the benefits listed above, the Project aims to increase the city’s supply of affordable housing and to provide safe, stable housing for aging residents that are 62 years and older. Further, the Project will provide a high quality of life for residents by being located in a high opportunity area that is adjacent to transit and green space, and in a neighborhood that is walkable with fresh food, essential services, employment opportunities, and entertainment opportunities. Without this type of housing, the city’s senior residents may struggle with homelessness, unsafe housing, unstable housing, overcrowding, and cost burdens. IV. Accomplishing Salt Lake City’s Goals. Once constructed, the Project fulfills several of the Council’s priorities, including transit- accessible affordable housing for seniors, and the geographic distribution of affordable housing development. Specifically, the Project fulfills the following goals and objectives identified in Housing SLC and Thriving in Place: Housing SLC: 2023 - 2027 o Goal 1: Make progress toward closing the housing gap of 5,500 units of deeply affordable housing and increase the supply of housing at all levels of affordability. o Strategy O: Apply for or partner with an entity that applies for state or federal funds or tax incentives to promote the construction of moderate income housing, an entity that applies for programs offered by the Utah Housing Corporation within that agency’s funding capacity, an entity that applies for affordable housing programs administered by the Department of Workforce Services, an entity that applies for affordable housing programs administered by an association of governments established by an interlocal agreement under Title 11, Chapter 13, Interlocal Cooperation Act, an entity that applies for services provided by a public housing authority to preserve and create moderate income housing, or any other entity that applies for programs or services that promote the construction or preservation of moderate income housing. o Strategy T: Ratify a joint acquisition agreement with another local political subdivision for the purpose of combining resources to acquire property for moderate income housing. o Strategy U: Develop a moderate-income housing project for residents who are disabled or 55 years old or older. Thriving in Place: Salt Lake City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy o Guiding Principle 3: Produce more housing, especially affordable housing. o Strategy Priority 3C: Create more diverse housing choices in all areas so that people can find housing that meets their needs in locations that work for them. o Strategy Priority 3D: Utilize publicly owned property to leverage land assets in support of long-term affordability and equitable development. o Strategy Priority 3E: Prioritize long-term affordability, integration of supportive services, and access to transit and other amenities to create stable living environments where lower income families and residents can thrive. The City Assistance is necessary and appropriate to accomplish the reasonable goals and objectives, as outlined above, of the City for the public purpose of affordable housing. CONCLUSION The development of the Project by Developer will be a benefit to the residents of the city. Providing the City Assistance is an appropriate use of City resources to achieve the “reasonable goals and objectives of the City in the area of economic development, job creation, affordable housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the preservation of historic structures and property.” The Project helps to achieve the City’s goals by creating a net increase of affordable housing for seniors in a high opportunity area of the city that is near transit, healthcare, socialization opportunities, fitness centers, educational opportunities, fresh food, green space, and essential services. RESOLUTION NO. OF 2024 (Approving the Public Benefit Analysis for the Fairmont Heights Project located at 2257 South 1100 East, Salt Lake City) WHEREAS, Fairmont Heights Apartments, LP, a Utah limited partnership, or another special purpose entity owned or to be owned by Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (“HAME”) in partnership with Lincoln Avenue Communities (the “Developer”), desires to develop an affordable housing project that will be targeted to seniors, with approximately 110 units, that are a mix of one and two-bedrooms, with approximately 80% of the units affordable to households at 80% of the area median income (AMI) and below and approximately half of the units affordable to 50% AMI and below (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, Developer and the City desire to locate the Project on approximately 0.81 acres of the real property that may be acquired by HAME or the City and that is located at 2257 South 1100 East, Salt Lake City (the “Property”); WHEREAS, the primary beneficiaries of the construction of the Project will be low income seniors in an effort to expand the city’s affordable housing stock near transit, green space, healthcare, recreation, and services for economically insecure older adults; and WHEREAS, if the City provides assistance in the form of either a below-market lease rate or a below-market loan interest rate, the City’s assistance will ensure the financial viability and timely development of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to provide assistance to Developer in either the form of a 99-year below-market ground lease or an acquisition loan converting to a permanent loan at below-market interest rate (individually and together, the “City Assistance”); and WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-8-2(1)(a)(i) allows public entities to provide nonmonetary assistance and waive fees to and for nonprofit entities after a public hearing; and WHEREAS, though Utah Code Section 10-8-2 does not require a study for such waiver or assistance, in this case the Administration voluntarily performed an analysis of the nonmonetary assistance to the nonprofit corporation (the “Analysis”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing relating to the foregoing, in satisfaction of the requirements of Utah Code Section 10-8-2; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the Analysis, and has fully considered the conclusions set forth therein, and all comments made during the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The City Council hereby adopts the conclusions set forth in the Analysis, and hereby finds and determines that, for all the reasons set forth in the Analysis, the City Assistance is appropriate under these circumstances. 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City administration to negotiate the final terms of the transaction for the purchase and ground lease of the Property or loan secured by the Property, and execute the relevant documents consistent with this Resolution and incorporating such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney’s office. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, on , 2024. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office By: Kimberly Chytraus, Senior City Attorney 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to childcare facilities) An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to childcare facilities pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00225. WHEREAS, on October 11, 2023, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall to amend Salt Lake City’s land use regulations pertaining to childcare facilities (Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00225); and WHEREAS, at its October 11, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: 2 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF - 30 RMF - 35 RMF - 45 RMF - 75 RB R- MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 3 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.020 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995). 3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 4. Reserved. 5. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review. 7. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.02.050 of this title. 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.24.010.S of this title. 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 10. In the RB Zoning District, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 11. Accessory guest or servant’s quarters must be located within the buildable area on the lot. 12. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.150 of this title. 13. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 14. Large group homes established in the RB and RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 4 15. Small group homes established in the RB and RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 16. Large residential support established in RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 17. Small residential support established in RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 18. Reserved. 19. Subject to Section 21A.36.170 of this title. 20. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 21. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Daycare center, child P P P P P P P b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.030 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Development in the CS District shall be subject to planned development approval pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. Certain developments in the CSHBD Zone shall be subject to the design review process pursuant to the provisions of Subsection 21A.26.060.D and Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 5 3. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural resources (see Subsections 21A.26.010.S and 21A.26.010.K of this title). 4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.36.140 of this title. 6. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use. 7. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Influence Zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title. 8. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 11. In CN and CB Zoning Districts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 13. Residential units may be located above or below first floor retail/office. 14. In the SNB Zoning District, bed and breakfast use is only allowed in a landmark site. 15. Medical and dental offices are not allowed in the SNB Zoning District, except for single practitioner medical, dental and health offices. 16. Permitted in the CG Zoning District only when associated with an on site food service establishment. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any Residential Zoning District boundary and subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this title. 18. Reserved. 19. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 20. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 6 21. Reserved. 22. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 23. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.035 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions for specific land uses: 1. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 2. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Influence Zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title. 3. Surface parking lots as a principal use located on a lot that has frontage on a public street are prohibited. 4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 5. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 6. Reserved. 7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this title. 7 9. Drive-through windows are prohibited on any public street facing facade and automobile stacking is prohibited between public street facing facades and the adjacent public right-of-way. 10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 for drive-through use regulations. 11. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 12. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.050 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District (Section 21A.34.110 of this title). 3. A car wash located within 165 feet (including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed. 4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review (Chapter 21A.59 of this title). 5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 8 7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors. 11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 12. Reserved. 13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title. 16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with the exception of associated public leasing/office space. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 19. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. 9 b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.060 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.300, ”Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 5. Subject to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.40.065, “Outdoor Dining”, of this title. 6. Reserved. 7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 9. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. No conditional use permit shall be granted for any property which abuts a Residential Zoning District, except for places of worship, public/private utilities and related facilities, residential facilities for persons with a disability and educational facilities. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: 10 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P P 11 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.070 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 3. When located on an arterial street. 4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains. 6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. 8. Kennels, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. 9. Trails and trailheads with signage are subject to Section 21A.46.120, “Sign Regulations for Special Purpose Districts”, of this title. 10. Greater than three ambulances at location require a conditional use. 11. Maximum of one monopole per property and only when it is government owned and operated for public safety purposes. 12. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 13. If located on a collector or arterial street according to the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan - major street plan: roadway functional classification map. 14. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 12 15. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 16. Reserved. 17. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 18. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 19. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property to mitigate impacts to wildlife. 20. When customarily provided with the principal use and is accessory to the principal use. 21. New antennae and communication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS Open Space District for public safety, public security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department purposes only. 22. Reception centers may be allowed in parks of 100 acres or more where the reception center is a subordinate use to the principal use of the property as a park. Reception centers are allowed in existing buildings, are limited to 1 reception center per park, and hours of operation are limited to park hours. Removal of existing recreation areas to accommodate the stand alone reception center use, including areas to accommodate parking for the reception center use, is not permitted. 23. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 24. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.33.080. That Section 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Daycare center, child P P P P P 13 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.080 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Reserved. 2. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 6. Only allowed on a ground floor when the use is located behind another permitted or conditional use that occupies the required ground floor use space. 7. Subject to parking location restrictions of Subsection 21A.27.060.C.3. 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.030. That Section 21A.36.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Home Occupations), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.36.030: HOME OCCUPATIONS: A. Purpose: This section establishes regulations for home occupations within all dwellings to ensure they are compatible with any surrounding residential land uses and do not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood. Home occupations are intended to promote local and sustainable economic growth and development. B. Permitted Home Occupations: All home occupations not specifically listed as prohibited may be permitted subject to their compliance with the standards specified in Subsections G and H of this section. 14 C. Home Occupations Prohibited: The following businesses, regardless of their conformance with the standards in Subsection G of this section, are prohibited as home occupations: 1. Auto repairs; 2. Kennels; 3. Welding shops or machine shops; 4. Large appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service (washers, dryers, refrigerators and other appliances or equipment that are too large to be carried in 1 individual’s arms); 5. Truck hauling; 6. Deliveries; 7. Stables; 8. Bottling plant; 9. Commercial bakery; 10. Industrial assembly; 11. Laboratory, medical, dental, optical; 12. Laboratory, testing; and 13. Any use that causes the emission of odor, smoke, gas, dust, vibration, magnetic or electrical interference, offensive noise, or other similar impacts extending beyond the property line of the lot where the occupation is located is prohibited. D. Application: Applications for home occupations shall be filed with the Salt Lake City Business Licensing Division. Business license applications shall include the following information: 1. A complete description of the type of business proposed including the location of the storage and operations area for the home occupation; 2. The expected hours of operation of the business; 3. The expected number of clients per hour and total expected number of clients visiting the home per day; and 4. For home daycares, the applicant must submit the expected number and ages of children, the number of employees, both total for the day and the expected maximum number to be on the premises at any given time, along with proof of appropriate licensing from the State of Utah, or where applicable, proof of exemption. First and second home daycares each require a separate business license. 15 E. License Required: It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association to engage in a “home occupation” as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title without first obtaining a license pursuant to the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 of this code. Prior to issuance of said license, the standards set forth in this section must be satisfied and all applicable fees shall be paid. All home occupation business licenses shall be valid for one year, and may be renewed annually. F. Determination of Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a home occupation, the zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness pursuant to Section 21A.10.010 of this title. G. General Standards: Home daycares are exempt from the following standards and shall be subject to the standards in Subsection 21A.36.030.H. All other home occupations shall comply with the following standards: 1. The home occupation must be clearly incidental and secondary to the primary use of the dwelling for residential purposes; 2. The dwelling unit must be the principal place of residence for the person(s) conducting the home occupation; 3. The area of the residence, used for home occupations shall remain in character with the rest of the home except for such minor alterations necessary to conduct an approved home occupation; 4. The home occupation shall not be conducted in, nor in any way use, carport, or any portion of the yard. A home occupation may use a garage or other fully enclosed accessory structure provided all other standards in this section are met. As per Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter, a home occupation license to distribute produce grown on the premises for off premises sales may be conducted in the rear yard and include the use of accessory buildings but may not occupy required parking areas; 5. The home occupation work conducted at the residence shall not involve more than one employee from outside of the home, persons lawfully living in the residence may be employed; 6. Except for those vehicles identified by this chapter (urban farms), and the applicant’s personal transportation, there shall be no vehicles or equipment stored outdoors, which would not normally be found at a residence. Service vehicles defined as an “automobile” in Chapter 21A.62 of this title which double as a personal vehicle such as taxicabs, limousine, or other vehicles used for mobile businesses and used for off site services may only be parked on site in a legal parking area; 7. Delivery of merchandise, goods, or equipment, to the site of the home occupation, shall be made by a vehicle typically employed in residential deliveries. No deliveries to the site of the home occupation by semitractor/trailer truck shall be permitted. 16 Loading and deliveries to the site of the home occupation shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.; 8. No mechanical or electrical apparatus, equipment or tools shall be permitted in the home occupation except those which are commonly associated with a residential use or as are customary to home crafts, and which do not exceed 220 volts; 9. Tools, items, and equipment which are offensive or noxious by reason of the emission of odor, smoke, gas, dust, vibration, magnetic or electrical interference, noise, or other similar impacts extending beyond the property line of the lot where the occupation is located, are prohibited. Tools, items, and equipment used for the operation and maintenance of an urban farm must comply with those storage requirements itemized by Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter; 10. Stock in trade, inventory or other merchandise shall be allowed to be kept only in the interior space of the dwelling; 11. No outdoor storage is permitted in conjunction with the occupation other than produce for off premises sales, outlined in Subsection G.4 of this section; 12. Home occupations involving visitations from pedestrian or vehicular traffic shall only be conducted between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M.; 13. Any home occupation requiring client(s) visitation shall not occur at a frequency of greater than two clients per hour, and no more than one client may be served at one time and not more than one place of vehicular parking shall be occupied by a client at any time. Client(s) shall include one or more person(s) with a unified interest in visiting the home occupation at one specific time; 14. Only one nonilluminated nameplate, with a maximum sign face as specified in Chapter 21A.46 of this title, stating the name of the business or occupant and mounted flat against the building, shall be allowed. Except for the permitted nameplate, the home occupation shall not make or require any internal alterations, other than those necessary for an approved home occupation, nor any external alterations to the residence that creates the appearance of a commercial operation, nor shall the home occupation provide any visible evidence from the exterior that the building is being used for any other purpose than that of a residence; and 15. Direct retail sales are prohibited. Incidental or secondary sales ensuing from the services provided in conjunction with the home occupation are permitted. Limited sales or distribution of produce grown from an urban farm shall be permitted as specified by Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter. H. Home Daycare Standards: A home daycare as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title may be allowed as a home occupation within a legally established residential dwelling, except in the M-1 and M-2 Districts. Home daycares shall comply with the following standards: 17 1. Group size shall not exceed 16 children at any one time, supervised by the number of caregivers required according to state licensing requirements; 2. Outdoor play areas provided for the home daycare shall be located only in the rear or side yards of the dwelling; 3. The home daycare must be accessory to the primary residential use of the dwelling (a second home daycare is exempt from this standard as permitted by state regulations); 4. The dwelling must be the home daycare provider’s primary residence (a second home daycare is exempt from this standard as permitted by state regulations); 5. The dwelling used for the home daycare shall remain in character with the residence except for minor alterations necessary to conduct the home daycare; and, 6. A provider operating a home daycare within their primary residence may obtain an additional business license for a second home daycare within a separate residential dwelling that is not their primary residence as allowed by state regulations, provided: a. The first home daycare is operating under an active business license, and the home occupation is in good standing with the city; and b.The structure is not altered in any way that would prevent future use as a residential dwelling. I. Decision by the Zoning Administrator: The zoning administrator shall issue a permit for the home occupation if they find that the standards of this title are met. J. Loss of Home Occupation Use: The zoning administrator may terminate any home occupation use upon making findings that support either or both of the following conclusions: 1. Any of the required licenses or permits necessary for the operation of the business have been revoked or suspended; or 2. Any of the provisions of this section have been violated. K. Termination of Home Occupation: The licensee shall be responsible for the operation of the licensed premises in conformance with this code. Any business license issued by the city may be suspended or revoked per the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 and this section. L. Appeals: 1. Any termination of a home occupation may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 of this code as if the termination were a business license revocation. 18 2. Any person adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a permit for a home occupation may appeal that decision to the appeals hearing officer pursuant to Chapter 21A.16 of this title. M. Existing Home Occupation Licenses: Existing licenses for home occupations which were legal under the prior zoning ordinance regulating home occupations but which are not permitted under this title are subject to the provisions of Chapter 21A.38 of this title. N. Nontransferability: Permits for home occupations are personal to the applicant, nontransferable and do not run with the land. SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.130. That Section 21A.36.130 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Child Daycare), shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety as follows: 21A.36.130: RESERVED. [The codifier is instructed to make the appropriate change to the Chapter 21A.36 index.] SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. Amending the definition of “DAYCARE.” That the definition of “DAYCARE” shall be amended to read as follows: DAYCARE, CHILD: Persons, associations, corporations, institutions or agencies providing on a regular basis care and supervision (regardless of educational emphasis) to children separated from their parents or guardians, as allowed by state regulations. b. Amending the definition of “DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD.” That the definition of “DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD” shall be amended to read as follows: DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD: An establishment providing care to any number of children at any one time, as allowed by state regulations, separated from their parents or guardians. This includes hourly centers, commercial centers, and preschools. “Child Daycare Center” 19 does not include:(i) home daycares; or (ii) care provided in a facility or program exempt under Utah State Code. c. Amending the definition of “HOME OCCUPATION.” That the definition of “HOME OCCUPATION” shall be amended to read as follows: HOME OCCUPATION: A business, profession, occupation, or trade conducted for gain or support and located and conducted within a dwelling unit subject to the regulations set forth in Section 21A.36.030 of this title. d. Amending the definition of “SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE.” That the definition of “SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE” shall be amended to read as follows: SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE: “Public or private schools” means an institution of learning or instruction primarily catering to minors, whether public or private, which is licensed at such facility by either the city or the state of Utah. The definition includes kindergarten, elementary schools, junior high schools, middle high schools, senior high schools or any special institution of learning under the jurisdiction of the state department of education. This does not include professional and vocational schools, charm schools, dancing schools, music schools or similar limited schools nor public or private universities or colleges. e. Adding the definition of “DAYCARE, HOME.” That the definition of “DAYCARE, HOME” be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DAYCARE, HOME: A use providing educational and/or daycare opportunities for children located within a building intended for residential use that is licensed or registered by the State of Utah. f. Deleting definitions. That the following definitions are hereby deleted from the definitions of terms: DAYCARE, NONREGISTERED HOME DAYCARE, REGISTERED HOME DAYCARE OR PRESCHOOL 20 SECTION 11. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance amending childcare facilities regulations (final)v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney ________________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rachel otto (Mar 25, 2024 16:31 MDT)Date Received:03/25/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/25/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 03/21/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Proposed Changes to Recent Adopted Ordinance - Zoning Text Amendment for Daycare Facilities PLNPCM2019-00225 STAFF CONTACT: Cassie Younger, Senior Planner, Cassie.younger@slcgov.com, 801-535-6211 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopts the proposed changes to the Ordinance that was previously adopted on March 5, 2024, regarding daycare facilities BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: An ordinance that provided zoning text amendments regarding daycare facilities was transmitted to the City Council on November 27, 2023. The City Council held a public hearing and adopted the ordinance on March 5, 2024. After the ordinance was adopted, Staff found three minor issues in the ordinance language, which are technical in nature. Planning Staff worked with the City attorney and drafted revisions to the ordinance to ensure that the ordinance is consistent with the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the City Council. The proposed changes are as follows: Revising the land use table for the form-based districts to include the newly adopted FB- MU 11 zoning district; Including language that exempts a home daycare provider from providing proof of state licensing when no state licensing is required; and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 Adding language that prohibits home daycare in the Light Manufacturing and Heavy Manufacturing Zoning Districts. FB-MU 11 Summary This issue is related to the timing of the adoption of the ordinance that created the FB-MU 11 zone and the timing of the newly adopted daycare regulations. The daycare ordinance was going through the transmittal process in November of 2023 and the FB-MU 11 Zone was adopted the following month. The daycare ordinance and the ordinance adopting the FB-MU 11 zoning district modify the land use tables for the form-based districts. Due to the timing of the transmittal of the daycare ordinance and the adoption of the FB-MU 11 zoning district, a conflict was created in the land use tables. In order to be consistent with the adopted FB-MU 11 Zone, changes to the daycare ordinance have been updated to include FB-MU 11 in the land use table and include footnotes specifically associated with the FB-MU 11 district, which were not shown in the daycare ordinance. State Licensing Exemption The City Business License process requires proof of licensing by the State for a Home Daycare, but there are many instances where exemptions from this license occur under the current State Law. Currently, any home daycare providing care for six children or less is not required to receive a State License. The Utah Legislature recently passed a law increasing this number to eight children, which will go into effect this May. The daycare ordinance language recommended by the Planning Commission included language that would allow for proof of exemption of a Home Daycare license from the State when applying for a City Business License. Language to allow for “proof of exemption” is now listed in the application process for Home Daycares. Manufacturing Zone Prohibition The ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission stated that home daycares are allowed in “legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings within commercial and nonresidential districts excluding M-1 and M-2 Districts.” This language was included because residential uses are not allowed uses in the manufacturing districts. The final ordinance transmitted to the City Council was simplified to state that home daycares are allowed in legally established residential dwellings. This proposed ordinance correction re-inserts the language specifically excluding home daycare from the manufacturing districts to make it clear that they are not permitted in those zones. To view the original transmittal, please refer to the following City Council agenda: City Council March 5, 2024 Agenda For additional information regarding Planning staff’s recommendation, the child daycare shortage, current zoning regulations, and the proposed amendments, please refer to the following report: Planning Commission Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Ordinance SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to childcare facilities) An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to childcare facilities pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00225. WHEREAS, on October 11, 2023, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall to amend Salt Lake City’s land use regulations pertaining to childcare facilities (Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00225); and WHEREAS, at its October 11, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: 1 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF - 30 RMF - 35 RMF - 45 RMF - 75 RB R- MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 2 3 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.020 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995). 3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 4. Reserved. 5. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review. 7. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.02.050 of this title. 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.24.010.S of this title. 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 10. In the RB Zoning District, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 11. Accessory guest or servant’s quarters must be located within the buildable area on the lot. 12. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.150 of this title. 13. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 14. Large group homes established in the RB and RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 4 15. Small group homes established in the RB and RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 16. Large residential support established in RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 17. Small residential support established in RO Districts shall be located above the ground floor. 18. Reserved. 19. Subject to Section 21A.36.170 of this title. 20. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 21. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Daycare center, child P P P P P P P b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.030 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Development in the CS District shall be subject to planned development approval pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. Certain developments in the CSHBD Zone shall be subject to the design review process pursuant to the provisions of Subsection 21A.26.060.D and Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 5 3. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural resources (see Subsections 21A.26.010.S and 21A.26.010.K of this title). 4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 5. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.36.140 of this title. 6. Greater than 3 ambulances at location require a conditional use. 7. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Influence Zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title. 8. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 11. In CN and CB Zoning Districts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total. Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square feet in an outdoor patio area. 12. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 13. Residential units may be located above or below first floor retail/office. 14. In the SNB Zoning District, bed and breakfast use is only allowed in a landmark site. 15. Medical and dental offices are not allowed in the SNB Zoning District, except for single practitioner medical, dental and health offices. 16. Permitted in the CG Zoning District only when associated with an on site food service establishment. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of any Residential Zoning District boundary and subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this title. 18. Reserved. 19. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 20. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 6 21. Reserved. 22. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 23. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.035 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions for specific land uses: 1. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 2. A community correctional facility is considered an institutional use and any such facility located within the AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District is subject to the land use and sound attenuation standards for institutional uses of the applicable Airport Influence Zone within Section 21A.34.040 of this title. 3. Surface parking lots as a principal use located on a lot that has frontage on a public street are prohibited. 4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 5. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. 6. Reserved. 7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Subject to Section 21A.36.110 of this title. 7 9. Drive-through windows are prohibited on any public street facing facade and automobile stacking is prohibited between public street facing facades and the adjacent public right-of-way. 10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 for drive-through use regulations. 11. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 12. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.050 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District (Section 21A.34.110 of this title). 3. A car wash located within 165 feet (including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed. 4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review (Chapter 21A.59 of this title). 5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 8 7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors. 11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 12. Reserved. 13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title. 16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with the exception of associated public leasing/office space. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 19. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. 9 b. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.060 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.300, ”Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 4. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 5. Subject to the requirements set forth in Section 21A.40.065, “Outdoor Dining”, of this title. 6. Reserved. 7. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 9. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. No conditional use permit shall be granted for any property which abuts a Residential Zoning District, except for places of worship, public/private utilities and related facilities, residential facilities for persons with a disability and educational facilities. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Daycare center, child P P P P P P P P P P 10 11 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.070 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 3. When located on an arterial street. 4. Subject to Salt Lake Valley Health Department approval. 5. In conjunction with, and within the boundaries of, a cemetery for human remains. 6. Radio station equipment and antennas shall be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that the color, design and location of all proposed equipment and antennas are screened or integrated into the architecture of the project and are compatible with surrounding uses. 7. When approved as part of a business park planned development pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 21A.55 of this title. 8. Kennels, whether within penned enclosures or within enclosed buildings, shall not be permitted within 200 feet of an existing single-family dwelling on an adjacent lot. 9. Trails and trailheads with signage are subject to Section 21A.46.120, “Sign Regulations for Special Purpose Districts”, of this title. 10. Greater than three ambulances at location require a conditional use. 11. Maximum of one monopole per property and only when it is government owned and operated for public safety purposes. 12. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 13. If located on a collector or arterial street according to the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan - major street plan: roadway functional classification map. 14. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 12 15. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. 16. Reserved. 17. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 18. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 19. Prior to issuance of a building permit in the Development Area and the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest Quadrant Overlay, consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is required to obtain recommendations on siting and equipment types for all solar arrays on a particular property to mitigate impacts to wildlife. 20. When customarily provided with the principal use and is accessory to the principal use. 21. New antennae and communication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS Open Space District for public safety, public security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department purposes only. 22. Reception centers may be allowed in parks of 100 acres or more where the reception center is a subordinate use to the principal use of the property as a park. Reception centers are allowed in existing buildings, are limited to 1 reception center per park, and hours of operation are limited to park hours. Removal of existing recreation areas to accommodate the stand alone reception center use, including areas to accommodate parking for the reception center use, is not permitted. 23. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 24. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.33.080. That Section 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. That the use category “Daycare center, child” is amended to read and appear as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Daycare center, child P P P P P 13 b. That the use categories “Daycare, nonregistered home daycare” and “Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool” are hereby deleted. c. That the qualifying provisions for the table in Section 21A.33.080 are amended to read as follows: Qualifying provisions: 1. Reserved. 2. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 3. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 6. Only allowed on a ground floor when the use is located behind another permitted or conditional use that occupies the required ground floor use space. 7. Subject to parking location restrictions of Subsection 21A.27.060.C.3. 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.030. That Section 21A.36.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Home Occupations), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.36.030: HOME OCCUPATIONS: A. Purpose: This section establishes regulations for home occupations within all dwellings to ensure they are compatible with any surrounding residential land uses and do not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood. Home occupations are intended to promote local and sustainable economic growth and development. B. Permitted Home Occupations: All home occupations not specifically listed as prohibited may be permitted subject to their compliance with the standards specified in Subsections G and H of this section. 14 C. Home Occupations Prohibited: The following businesses, regardless of their conformance with the standards in Subsection G of this section, are prohibited as home occupations: 1. Auto repairs; 2. Kennels; 3. Welding shops or machine shops; 4. Large appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service (washers, dryers, refrigerators and other appliances or equipment that are too large to be carried in 1 individual’s arms); 5. Truck hauling; 6. Deliveries; 7. Stables; 8. Bottling plant; 9. Commercial bakery; 10. Industrial assembly; 11. Laboratory, medical, dental, optical; 12. Laboratory, testing; and 13. Any use that causes the emission of odor, smoke, gas, dust, vibration, magnetic or electrical interference, offensive noise, or other similar impacts extending beyond the property line of the lot where the occupation is located is prohibited. D. Application: Applications for home occupations shall be filed with the Salt Lake City Business Licensing Division. Business license applications shall include the following information: 1. A complete description of the type of business proposed including the location of the storage and operations area for the home occupation; 2. The expected hours of operation of the business; 3. The expected number of clients per hour and total expected number of clients visiting the home per day; and 4. For home daycares, the applicant must submit the expected number and ages of children, the number of employees, both total for the day and the expected maximum number to be on the premises at any given time, along with proof of appropriate licensing from the State of Utah, or where applicable, proof of exemption. First and second home daycares each require a separate business license. 15 E. License Required: It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association to engage in a “home occupation” as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title without first obtaining a license pursuant to the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 of this code. Prior to issuance of said license, the standards set forth in this section must be satisfied and all applicable fees shall be paid. All home occupation business licenses shall be valid for one year, and may be renewed annually. F. Determination of Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a home occupation, the zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness pursuant to Section 21A.10.010 of this title. G. General Standards: Home daycares are exempt from the following standards and shall be subject to the standards in Subsection 21A.36.030.H. All other home occupations shall comply with the following standards: 1. The home occupation must be clearly incidental and secondary to the primary use of the dwelling for residential purposes; 2. The dwelling unit must be the principal place of residence for the person(s) conducting the home occupation; 3. The area of the residence, used for home occupations shall remain in character with the rest of the home except for such minor alterations necessary to conduct an approved home occupation; 4. The home occupation shall not be conducted in, nor in any way use, carport, or any portion of the yard. A home occupation may use a garage or other fully enclosed accessory structure provided all other standards in this section are met. As per Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter, a home occupation license to distribute produce grown on the premises for off premises sales may be conducted in the rear yard and include the use of accessory buildings but may not occupy required parking areas; 5. The home occupation work conducted at the residence shall not involve more than one employee from outside of the home, persons lawfully living in the residence may be employed; 6. Except for those vehicles identified by this chapter (urban farms), and the applicant’s personal transportation, there shall be no vehicles or equipment stored outdoors, which would not normally be found at a residence. Service vehicles defined as an “automobile” in Chapter 21A.62 of this title which double as a personal vehicle such as taxicabs, limousine, or other vehicles used for mobile businesses and used for off site services may only be parked on site in a legal parking area; 7. Delivery of merchandise, goods, or equipment, to the site of the home occupation, shall be made by a vehicle typically employed in residential deliveries. No deliveries to the site of the home occupation by semitractor/trailer truck shall be permitted. 16 Loading and deliveries to the site of the home occupation shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.; 8. No mechanical or electrical apparatus, equipment or tools shall be permitted in the home occupation except those which are commonly associated with a residential use or as are customary to home crafts, and which do not exceed 220 volts; 9. Tools, items, and equipment which are offensive or noxious by reason of the emission of odor, smoke, gas, dust, vibration, magnetic or electrical interference, noise, or other similar impacts extending beyond the property line of the lot where the occupation is located, are prohibited. Tools, items, and equipment used for the operation and maintenance of an urban farm must comply with those storage requirements itemized by Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter; 10. Stock in trade, inventory or other merchandise shall be allowed to be kept only in the interior space of the dwelling; 11. No outdoor storage is permitted in conjunction with the occupation other than produce for off premises sales, outlined in Subsection G.4 of this section; 12. Home occupations involving visitations from pedestrian or vehicular traffic shall only be conducted between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M.; 13. Any home occupation requiring client(s) visitation shall not occur at a frequency of greater than two clients per hour, and no more than one client may be served at one time and not more than one place of vehicular parking shall be occupied by a client at any time. Client(s) shall include one or more person(s) with a unified interest in visiting the home occupation at one specific time; 14. Only one nonilluminated nameplate, with a maximum sign face as specified in Chapter 21A.46 of this title, stating the name of the business or occupant and mounted flat against the building, shall be allowed. Except for the permitted nameplate, the home occupation shall not make or require any internal alterations, other than those necessary for an approved home occupation, nor any external alterations to the residence that creates the appearance of a commercial operation, nor shall the home occupation provide any visible evidence from the exterior that the building is being used for any other purpose than that of a residence; and 15. Direct retail sales are prohibited. Incidental or secondary sales ensuing from the services provided in conjunction with the home occupation are permitted. Limited sales or distribution of produce grown from an urban farm shall be permitted as specified by Section 21A.36.200 of this chapter. H. Home Daycare Standards: A home daycare as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title may be allowed as a home occupation within a legally established residential dwelling, except in the M-1 and M-2 Districts. Home daycares shall comply with the following standards: 17 1. Group size shall not exceed 16 children at any one time, supervised by the number of caregivers required according to state licensing requirements; 2. Outdoor play areas provided for the home daycare shall be located only in the rear or side yards of the dwelling; 3. The home daycare must be accessory to the primary residential use of the dwelling (a second home daycare is exempt from this standard as permitted by state regulations); 4. The dwelling must be the home daycare provider’s primary residence (a second home daycare is exempt from this standard as permitted by state regulations); 5. The dwelling used for the home daycare shall remain in character with the residence except for minor alterations necessary to conduct the home daycare; and, 6. A provider operating a home daycare within their primary residence may obtain an additional business license for a second home daycare within a separate residential dwelling that is not their primary residence as allowed by state regulations, provided: a. The first home daycare is operating under an active business license, and the home occupation is in good standing with the city; and b.The structure is not altered in any way that would prevent future use as a residential dwelling. I. Decision by the Zoning Administrator: The zoning administrator shall issue a permit for the home occupation if they find that the standards of this title are met. J. Loss of Home Occupation Use: The zoning administrator may terminate any home occupation use upon making findings that support either or both of the following conclusions: 1. Any of the required licenses or permits necessary for the operation of the business have been revoked or suspended; or 2. Any of the provisions of this section have been violated. K. Termination of Home Occupation: The licensee shall be responsible for the operation of the licensed premises in conformance with this code. Any business license issued by the city may be suspended or revoked per the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 and this section. L. Appeals: 1. Any termination of a home occupation may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of Title 5, Chapter 5.02 of this code as if the termination were a business license revocation. 18 2. Any person adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a permit for a home occupation may appeal that decision to the appeals hearing officer pursuant to Chapter 21A.16 of this title. M. Existing Home Occupation Licenses: Existing licenses for home occupations which were legal under the prior zoning ordinance regulating home occupations but which are not permitted under this title are subject to the provisions of Chapter 21A.38 of this title. N. Nontransferability: Permits for home occupations are personal to the applicant, nontransferable and do not run with the land. SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.130. That Section 21A.36.130 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Child Daycare), shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety as follows: 21A.36.130: RESERVED. [The codifier is instructed to make the appropriate change to the Chapter 21A.36 index.] SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms), shall be and hereby is amended as follows: a. Amending the definition of “DAYCARE.” That the definition of “DAYCARE” shall be amended to read as follows: DAYCARE, CHILD: Persons, associations, corporations, institutions or agencies providing on a regular basis care and supervision (regardless of educational emphasis) to children separated from their parents or guardians, as allowed by state regulations. b. Amending the definition of “DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD.” That the definition of “DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD” shall be amended to read as follows: DAYCARE CENTER, CHILD: An establishment providing care to any number of children at any one time, as allowed by state regulations, separated from their parents or guardians. This includes hourly centers, commercial centers, and preschools. “Child Daycare Center” 19 does not include:(i) home daycares; or (ii) care provided in a facility or program exempt under Utah State Code. c. Amending the definition of “HOME OCCUPATION.” That the definition of “HOME OCCUPATION” shall be amended to read as follows: HOME OCCUPATION: A business, profession, occupation, or trade conducted for gain or support and located and conducted within a dwelling unit subject to the regulations set forth in Section 21A.36.030 of this title. d. Amending the definition of “SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE.” That the definition of “SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE” shall be amended to read as follows: SCHOOLS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE: “Public or private schools” means an institution of learning or instruction primarily catering to minors, whether public or private, which is licensed at such facility by either the city or the state of Utah. The definition includes kindergarten, elementary schools, junior high schools, middle high schools, senior high schools or any special institution of learning under the jurisdiction of the state department of education. This does not include professional and vocational schools, charm schools, dancing schools, music schools or similar limited schools nor public or private universities or colleges. e. Adding the definition of “DAYCARE, HOME.” That the definition of “DAYCARE, HOME” be added and inserted into the list of definitions in alphabetical order to read as follows: DAYCARE, HOME: A use providing educational and/or daycare opportunities for children located within a building intended for residential use that is licensed or registered by the State of Utah. f. Deleting definitions. That the following definitions are hereby deleted from the definitions of terms: DAYCARE, NONREGISTERED HOME DAYCARE, REGISTERED HOME DAYCARE OR PRESCHOOL 20 ___________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City At SECTION 11. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance amending childcare facilities regulations (final)v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:March 11, 2024 By: _ K torney ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 4/4/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 4/4/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 4/4/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Melanie Pehrson member of the Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. . ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 April 4, 2024 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Petro, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership re-appointment for the Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. Melanie Pehrson to be re-appointed for a three year term starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor