Loading...
1/12/2015 - Meeting Minutes (2) MINUTES CITY&COUNTY BUILDING CONSERVANCY AND USE COMMITTEE MONDAY,January 12, 2015, 4:00 P.M. Committee Members Present: Committee Members Not Present: Terry Wright, Chairman John Phillips Robert Young John McCarthy Steve Cornell Mark Vlasic Interested Parties: Jerod Johnson, Vice Chairman Liberty Valentine, Washington Square Café Bruce Brown, SLC Engineering Ex Officio Members Present: Dawn Wagner, SLC Engineering Jim Cleland, SLC Facilities Sean Fyfe, SLC Engineering Terry Wright welcomed everyone to the meeting and began with roll call. Terry noted that there is a quorum present. Agenda Item#1: Review and Approval of November 10,2014 Minutes. Robert Young motioned to accept the minutes as presented and Jerod Johnson seconded the motion. Terry asked if there were any comments regarding meeting minutes. There were no comments. The committee voted unanimously to approve the November 10, 2014 Meeting Minutes. Agenda Item#2: Washington Square Café Paint Request. Liberty Valentine, concessionaire of Washington Square Café, expressed that to her knowledge the café has not been painted for approximately 15 years and is in poor shape right now. She suggested this would be a good time to lighten up the place, noting the existing paint is a monotone color called "Bracken Brown" and almost everything is painted this same color. Liberty also explained that the lighting is so dim that anything that would help to brighten it up would be a pleasant surprise for her as well as for the customers. Liberty explained she has obtained the list of colors of original approved paints and has created some samples which she presented for the committee's review. The following colors were provided and Liberty explained her preferences are as follows: 1) Wall Color: "Porcelain", which Liberty explained is the same color as seen on the ceilings through-out the building; 2) Trim Color: "Black Forrest", to highlight the base and trim; 3) East Accent Wall Color: "Green Suede", a color Liberty suggests is currently approved and already used in the building; 4) Optional Color: "Glacier Gray" 5) Optional Color: Harvest Gold (not displayed but can be seen in the hall outside the Café. Discussion, Questions &Answers: • Are any of these colors specifically designated for"field"versus "trim"? • Liberty explained these colors are identified according to the paint schedule provided to her. • Is this all paint-grade material or is some of it stain-grade base? • Jim replied that he did not read the specs on the paint, but believes it is all paint-grade. • Liberty explained that there is a black plastic chair rail or trim all around the counter and the walls, which she said could open up a couple of options: 1) Create a two-tone effect with a tan 1 color on the bottom below the chair rail and the porcelain above the rail; or 2) Paint the walls in the Glacier Gray and paint the trim porcelain. • When they specify the colors for trim versus the field, is there going to be heartburn if we take a field color and put it in the field and vice-versa? • Jim Cleland responded that the paint as it is now is what was called out in the spec when the building was renovated. • Terry Wright commented that he thinks that the paint colors that were selected way back when were based on the historical colors that were utilized at the time. • Is there picture rail or cornice? • Liberty replied that there is a pillar, molding, chair rail, and some ornate molding in the bay window. • So is the color palette throughout the building a traditional palette for the period when the building was built? Do you know when they did the renovation; did they actually go through and figure out what the original paint colors were? • Terry said that he could not remember. Jim said he had never seen in writing that stated that they did that, but can't imagine that they didn't do some sort of research to determine the colors. • Liberty explained that there is another color on the ceiling in a 3 inch strip between the taupe colored trim which is a pinkish color, which she suggested painting a harvest gold color like the color that is out in the hallway. • Is the lighting florescent or is it still all candescent? • Jim explained that the lights in the wall sconces and the chandelier lamps were just replaced with broad-spectrum LEDs. Terry suggested the Committee walk down and take a look at the café. Robert Young motioned that the Committee take a field trip and walk down to the café. Mark Vlasic seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any further discussion on the motion. There was no further discussion. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the motion. The Committee reconvened in the café and began by viewing the paint colors painted on a corner wall. Discussion items: • Terry suggested the discussion and motion be made here in the café so that the Committee could point to and describe as we go through the process. • A suggestion was made to leave the ceiling as it is with no changes. • A question was raised about the color the base boards were to be painted. • Liberty responded the black paint was her choice for the base boards, trim and moldings and the white for the field. • Robert suggested the black would be good on the base boards, but would be too much of a contrast on the ceiling. He also mentioned keeping the ceiling as it is. • Steve suggested pulling from Liberty's color palette and applying the "Glacier Gray" on the molding and then applying the "Harvest Gold" on the flat piece while leaving the porcelain on the barrel rolls. Terry asked if we were ready to entertain a motion. 2 Steve said he would make a motion and moved that we suggest putting 1) "Black Forest" on all the wood trim, including the base board, all the windows, the column, the detailing on the mechanical cover; 2) apply the "Porcelain" on field (walls) and the vaults on the ceiling; 3) applying the "Glacier Gray" on the moldings and soffit; 4) doing the "Harvest Gold" on the flat work between the molds; 5) on the brackets above the bay window alcove applying the "Glacier Gray" and bring in the "Harvest Gold" accents on the panels that are already accented; 6) as far as the request for the accent wall to be the "Suede Green" and the door color, I will keep my motion simple to be consistent and then we can have a discussion, so the wall to be the "Porcelain" and the trim work in the "Black Forest" and the door to be the "Glacier Gray". Terry asked if there was a second to the motion. Robert Young seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any discussion on the motion or questions as to the intent. • Liberty asked if the Porcelain would be in all areas on bottom and top. • The answer was that Porcelain would be the same above and below the chair rail. Terry asked if there is any discussion as to what to do with the plastic chair rail? Discussion items included: • The chair rail is too low on the wall with the taller tables and chairs. • It would be nice if the chair rail was wood. • Is the Concessionaire paying for this or will the City be paying? • Jim Cleland said it would be paid for from his budget. He also explained that the blades for the cutters for the original woodwork are still sitting at Granite Mill so we can still use the original blades. • Suggested making the chair rail appropriate to the chairs that are here. • What about the color question? Terry asked if there was a motion for the color question and the chair rail. Steve said he would like to make an amendment the motion to add chair rail if it is in the budget and to find compatible molding that would look good or if there is a precedent for this already in the building that we use it and the paint color to be "Black Forest". Terry asked if there was a second to this motion. Robert seconded the amendment. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the amendment. Terry asked if there is any additional discussion with regard to the original motion. There was no further discussion. The committee voted unanimously to accept the Original Motion. Terry suggested that this information gives direction to Jim to work out with his budgets. It was suggested that Joan would publish this information and send it to the committee to review and make revisions before we paint. The committee reconvened in the Cutler room. 3 Steve said he would make a motion. Steve moved that we suggest putting 1) "Black Forest" on all the wood trim, including the base board, all the windows, the column, the detailing on the mechanical cover; 2) apply the "Porcelain" on field (walls) and the vaults on the ceiling; 3) applying the "Glacier Gray" on the moldings and soffit; 4) doing the "Harvest Gold" on the flat work between the molds; 5) on the brackets above the bay window alcove applying the "Glacier Gray" and bring in the "Harvest Gold" accents on the panels that are already accented; 6) as far as the request for the accent wall to be the "Suede Green" and the door color, I will keep my motion simple to be consistent and then we can have a discussion, so the wall to be the "Porcelain" and the trim work in the "Black Forest" and the door to be the "Glacier Gray". Terry asked if there was a second to the motion. Robert Young seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any discussion on the motion or questions as to the intent. Discussion Items, Questions and Answers relative to the Motion: • Liberty asked is the Porcelain would be in all areas on bottom and top. • Yes the Porcelain would be the same above and below the chair rail. Terry asked if there is any discussion as to what to do with the plastic chair rail. • Mark noted that the chair rail is too low on the wall with the taller tables and chairs. • It would be nice of the chair rail was wood. • Is the Concessionaire paying for this or will the City be paying? • Jim Cleland said it would be paid for from his budget. He also explained that the blades for the cutters for the original woodwork are still sitting at Granite Mill so we can still use the original blades. • Suggested making the chair rail appropriate to the chairs that are here. • What about the color question? Terry asked if there was a motion for the color question and the chair rail. Steve said he would like to make an amendment the motion to add chair rail if it is in the budget and to find compatible molding that would look good or if there is a precedent for this already in the building that we use it and the paint color to be "Black Forest". Agenda Item#3: Washington Square NW Corner—Review of Updated Drawings. Bruce passed out packets to each committee member and explained that the first 4 pages in the packet are the NW corner design. Bruce explained that he has tried to go back and capture everything that we talked about and incorporate all of the items and changes that were discussed the last time the committee visited the site. Bruce noted the following changes: • There was concern that the planter was a little too close to the tree, so we shifted it away from the tree as far away as possible. The little circle that is not labeled next to the planter is a fire hydrant(shown on the 2nd page sketch) and we are kind of butting up against that and so this is about as far as we can take the planter without reducing the size of it. • The plantings stayed the same. • We've removed one of the benches and moved the monument more toward the corner of the planter and left one bench. • We have added a new tree just behind the planter(shown on the sketch as purple leafed tree). The type of tree would have to be determined with the Urban Forestry Department. • The one other thing that we did that was not on any of the previous drawings is making the back of the planter being flush with the grass and then sloping gradually until we have about 6 inches. Discussion, Questions and Comments: • There is no drinking fountain. Did we decide to take that out? • It was decided it would be removed completely. • Will the flat edge of the planter rising to 6 inches be a skateboard issue? • Someone could try it, but it would be more difficult with the bench and monument in the way. • Skateboard bumps could be installed if necessary just like the ones at the Public Safety Building. • Is this pre-cast or poured in place? • It is poured in place. • What were we trying to model it after or match it to? • Early on we discussed trying to match some of the coping on the fountains, but later on we talked about simplifying it and making it a simple curb rim planter. • We did talk, at one time, about using some different concrete with some ad mixed into it similar to what Public Safety has done. An architectural concrete with a sort of granite look to it. • Is that something we would still want to do? • The idea of putting skate board preventers on a 6 inch curb isn't appealing. • If skateboarding becomes a problem we could attach something later. • Relative to the concrete curb, the plans show a radius but the sketch-up you've got some joints in the curbing. Is it segments or will it be a radius? • It will be a radius. • Did we want a raised curb to prevent people from walking through there or what was the reason? • The main reason was the concern about bikes racing through and we wanted to try to create some sort of gentle barrier. 4 • There is a funny elevation right behind where the fire hydrant is located. There was a hump in the grass and the bikes would cut across off the sidewalk and jump across to the other sidewalk. The hump is gone, but the bikes are still riding across the grass. • If we are really trying to prevent people from walking through here, why don't we raise the curb and make it a taller planter? • This design is really good for mowing because they have a level mowing space and they don't have to do so much weed trimming. • At one point the whole thing was a raised planter. • One of the reasons why we leveled the back was specifically for mowing, but the other three sides could be taller. • It would be a little more functional if it were a little higher and could also serve as a place to sit, but should be something other than just concrete. This is a real prominent corner and kind of a main thoroughfare for people coming to Washington Square. • We were trying to keep it as benign as possible and not focus on it. It was super huge and when we actually went out and walked it, it was just a big empty space on a hot day. We wanted to increase the paved area on Washington Square as little as possible. The guidelines suggest not increasing the amount of hard surfacing. • If we raise it are we thinking granite would be the appropriate material? • Whatever the height of the curb, we would be better served with some type of stone rather can just an unattractive concrete curb. • We did try originally to get it to match the base around the fountains which are concrete, which are decorative with the rounded edges. • That is what we had in the original proposal, but the thought was that it was too prominent a feature so we lowered it down just to curb height. Terry asked if there were further discussion. There was none. Terry reviewed the consensus: • Overall the design is very acceptable • The exception right now seems to be the height of the curb and whether the curb adjacent to the grass is at grass level and the curb that is near the bench whether it is at 6 inch height or a 12" height and the two sides are the slope. • Whether or not that this is concrete or a stone material. The stone material could be a stone cap on top of the concrete foundation wall. The question then would be, "what is the appropriate stone cap material that we would consider?" • If we do raise it to put a cap on it then we need to entertain some kind of deterrent for skate boards and decide what that should be. • The budget is tight on this project and we need to be appropriate and not get carried away. Terry suggested the committee deal with each one of these items individually. Terry asked if there was an overall motion to accept the configuration and current design, leaving as a question the curb and the curb height. Robert Young moved to accept the motion as stated by Terry. Terry asked if there was a second to the motion. 5 Jerod Johnson seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any question on that motion. There were no questions. Terry asked for a vote to approve the motion. The Committee unanimously voted to approve the motion. Terry suggested the next item is the question on the curb height. Discussion, Questions and Answers: • Once the vegetation is planted and growing, is it going to be enough of a buffer to deter people from walking through? How big are these plants right from the onset? • You can plant any type of plant. • If you used five gallon material as opposed to 1 gallon materials you would get a different effect. • It would fill in a lot quicker. • If that were the case, then putting everything flush down at the same grade as the sidewalk would not be an issue. • If you put enough plants in there at least 90%of folks will respect it and the other 10%will walk through no matter what. • Are you suggesting getting rid of the curb? • Put it flush with the sidewalk on the front side and on the back side it would need some sort of edging. • Steel edging would work. • If our argument is that the plants are going to be tight in the space and tall enough then is there even a need for a curb? • It would just be the back side and everything else would go away. Steve Cornell suggested that the curb actually provides some deterrent from people walking through it and his opinion is that it just needs to be a little bit higher. He suggests making it 12 inches and maybe put a stone cap on it, but then just eliminate the sides and the back so instead of becoming a container it becomes a front to that area and the plants would grow up over and it becomes more of a barrier. Discussion and Comments: • Will the whole thing be made out of stone? • It could be a concrete wall with a stone cap or if we find the right concrete with the right aggregates maybe that is what it is. • We would have to get a good contractor because he has seen a lot of bad low concrete walls. There is no guarantee we will get a good contractor. • It would be the low bid contractor. • Could we do a value based selection? • It is possible, but it is a long drawn-out process and the concrete work would most likely end up being task order contract, which is low bid. • If we are going to do this we should bring it out 18 inches and make it 18 inches wide so people to sit on it and not put a cap on it. • Are you saying 18 inches wide? • 18 inches high by 18 inches wide because 12 inches is a little hard for some people to sit on. 6 • The bench would need to be removed. • An 18 inch wall would hide all the plants. • We would need to take another look at the plant design if we do an 18 inch wall. • If we are eliminating the sides and the back we would gain some space for the front and would only need the steel edge on the back. • The steel edging affects the top roots that are closest to the surface and these are what kill the trees. • If we made it seating along that area and we look at eliminating the bench, would we look at relocating the monument too? • This leaves the space wide open and then we have the skateboard issue again. • We could consider lowering the wall and curving it on the top. • We could just get rid of the curb altogether all around it and let the concrete edge be and just beef up the plants/shrubs along with edges. • We could take a look at it down the road and determine if people and actually walking through and determine what is needed. • No curbing at all would reflect what already exists out along the east sidewalk where the sidewalk makes up the edge of the planting areas. Terry asked if there were any other items for discussion. There were none. Terry asked if anyone is willing to make a motion. Mark Vlasic motioned to eliminate the curb in the design altogether. Terry asked if there was a second to the motion. Robert Young seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any discussion on the motion. There was none. Terry called for a vote. Four Committee Members voted to approve the Motion and One Committee member voted to oppose. The motion passed. Terry instructed Bruce to eliminate the curb from the design and request for bigger plants. The Committee agreed that Bruce did not need to come back with a new drawing. The Committee thanked Bruce for his hard work on this project. Terry asked if Bruce wanted to give an update relative to the North East Corner. Bruce told the Committee he had some options relative to the past discussions in which we were heading towards getting rid of doing any new concrete and relocating the monument to a place where it is more noticeable and not just another box. He designed three options where he looked at moving the monument away from trees as much as possible and use just small pads of concrete. The first option is circular. The second is a modified design. The third option is to just take it straight across, and as Bruce explained is probably be the easiest as fair as maintenance and sprinklers are concerned. Bruce said a bench could easily be added if wanted. Discussion, Questions and Answers: 7 • The third option is good and doesn't look as forced as the other two options look. • What direction the statue facing? • The statue faces east. You would face the plaque towards the statue so they are looking at the statue while reading the plaque. • Wouldn't it make more sense on option three to flip-flop the bench and the statue so the statue is more "front and center" so the statue is more towards the plaza and the bench is more off to the side? • Bruce said he tried to move that box as far away from the other boxes as possible so it stands out and is not just another box. Robert Young made a motion to accept option three as drawn. Terry asked if there was a second to this motion. Jerod Johnson seconded the motion. Terry asked if there was any question or discussion on the motion. There was none. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the motion. Agenda is Item#4: Open Meetings Training. Terry suggested that since Jaysen is absent Joan should add this item to next month's agenda. It was suggested that since there were only a couple of the Committee Member's that missed the initial training, this item should be the last item on next month's agenda. Mark Vlasic asked to go back to the first agenda item regarding the North West Corner. He asked if another bench could be purchased and added to the corner with the money saved by not doing the concrete. Bruce said another bench could be added and asked if the monument should be moved back to the middle. Mark said he just thought another bench in between the fire hydrant and the existing bench would be good. Mark also asked Bruce if he will be sure to harden the concrete underneath the bench. Terry asked Mark if he wanted to make a motion. Mark motioned for the northwest west corner plaza to include an additional bench to be located between the fire hydrant and the existing proposed bench. Terry asked if there were any questions about the motion. There were none. The committee voted unanimously to approve the motion. Agenda Item#5: General Committee Business. Joan Swain explained that while reviewing the information sent to her by the Historic Landmarks Committee relative to finding any sort of master plan for Washington Square, she reviewed the Salt Lake City Ordinance Chapter 2.39 "Building Conservancy and Use Committee as well as the Rules of Procedure for the Conservancy and Use Committee and discovered the following information that she 8 was unaware of and wanted to see what the Committee's recommendations were to get things back on track: • The Committee should hold Elections of Officers in July or August at a regular meeting. This was not done this past August and the only record in the minutes showed the last time elections were held it was in 2012. • The Committee should hold an Annual Meeting in November for the purpose of approving the annual report, reviewing committee policies and procedures, formulating goals, recommending items for preventative maintenance and capital improvement budgets and other business the Committee deems appropriate. Joan also presented an updated list of the Committee Members and noted that the following: • SLC Arts Council Representative—John McCarthy is acting until a new member is approved. • Utah Historical Society-This position is vacant. Terry explained that he thought we had that on the agenda to do in October and then forgot about it. Jim noted that he did not think there was a quorum in October's meeting. Joan explained that she had read through past minutes and the only election information she found was from November 2012. She also explained that the first meeting that she attended was June, 2013 and in that meeting they were approving the minutes from November, 2012 because there had not been a quorum at meetings up to that time and it was the November minutes that discussed the election of officers. Terry suggested that the election of Officers needed to be put on the February agenda and noted that the Bylaws related to Chairman and Vice Chairman state that a Chairman can only serve two terms and his term would be up with the next election. Joan was asked to add the election of Officers to next month's agenda. Terry suggested that we reach out to the Utah Historical Society to ask them for a representative and we should also do the same for the SLC Arts Council as well and ask them if they will accept John McCarthy as their representative or provide us another representative. Jim Cleland said that he would write some letters to these two groups before the next meeting. Terry asked if there were any questions regarding the elections or the committee member representatives. Robert Young asked if the requirement is fora Licensed Architect was the position he filled, explaining that he is not licensed and does not want anyone to be mislead into thinking he was claiming to be licensed. Joan reported that the Mayor's office approved his application and listed him as the Architectural representative. Jim commented that he did not think it was a requirement, but that the representative just comes from the architectural community. 9 Discussion relative to annual meeting: • Mark said that to his knowledge they had not ever held an annual meeting, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't. He also suggested that the bylaws could be changed as well. • Terry suggested that the agenda for the annual meeting in November would have all the items suggested in the Rules of Procedure and be more of a housekeeping meeting. • Terry suggested amending the Rules to state that an annual meeting will be held in September. • Jim explained that this is going to be a critical time in the history of the building with the stone renovation project and the seismic upgrades and we will have contractors reporting of progress and will be both a busy and exciting time for the Committee. • The question was asked if the elections were a required to be part of the annual meeting. • The Rules of Procedure say the Election of Officers is held in August. • Terry said that his recollection was that the elections held in the past two years were in September. • Mark asked if we would try to tag those on to the July date when everybody's terms are up. • Terry suggested that he thinks this is why it was changed to August so that all the new people are to in to vote. • Mark asked if we would back date it to August then or just 18 months forward. • Terry suggested that this would be part of a motion. He suggested changing the term to 18 months and make the elections in September, because sometimes August is skipped because of all the other commitments. Terry asked if we hit all of the agenda items and items of concern. Joan replied that we did. Terry asked if there was a motion to adjourn. Robert Young motioned to adjourn Steve Cornell seconded the motion. The Committee unanimously motion to adjourn. 10 400 SOUTH PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANTICAL NAME COMMON NAME 0 SHRUBS 0 0 Corpus alba 'Baton Rouge' BATON ROUGE REDTWIG DOGWOOD SCORE JOINT,TYPIG 0 Cotoneaster aplcuIota CRANBERRY COTONEASTER „K • Li Toxus baccata repandans DWARF ENGLISH YEW PERENNIALS 0 �— C3 Echlnacea purpurea 'Amazing Dream' CONEFLOWER ® Geranium x. 'Rozanne' ROZANNE HARDY GERANIUM NEW BENIIIIIIV O Hemerocallis 'Baja' BAJA DAYLILY C RELOCATED MONUMENT C• Hemerocallls 'Pardon Me' PARDON ME DAYLILY 0 Heuchera x. 'Melting Fire' MELTING FIRE CORAL BELLS © Iris pallida 'Albo Varlegata' VARIEGATED IRIS I- 14I Salvia nemorosa 'Caradonna' CARADONNA PERENNIAL SALVIA J / 0 Veronica splcata 'Goodness Grows' GOODNESS GROWS VERONICA tf1 i /\/:IA . pr CURB iillif"(fr . _ f , _ fEXIST. CRANBERRY REDTWIG DWARF ENGLISH YEW TYPICAL COTONEASTER DOGWOOD NORTH 0 0' 5' 10' 20' 77MJIM7 • ..::•' -,i. .,.: 'Z.•,-Al "'TTT 'n .0-.: r I l`,� + ' I .. • \ -,, , • , •_ . ,, . . .. ... . , , , . „ .,.. •,,,,.• , ...._ . - .i... , ,,, _ f,:.r"Ilt\ .I .� 4 _< -,'S s \+- - t �* ia ...�d,I \i ��;'f / , y • • is. �' .A. r,. Vila ! ,} ,l _4;" .•-kti ——‘ZANNE BAJA DAYLILY PARDON ME MELTING FIRE VARIEGATED IRIS GARADONNA RDY GERANIUM DAYLILY CORAL BELLS SALVIA .. , _—_--_-- ------ , , , V // .. \ —'"-- '.'' '.''• ''''. , .........„1 ‘''''' ' lf:1 • ' . . ., ., .. f•). .., - \. 1 .,‘ ,.., (. , , ...,• ...:••. .•.,. / • • . '.• . , • / 'V •'':1..,I . .• .. .. / • •. • // ^ a. .. ". .•...• a..'''- . •. ' . . $,, ,., ,i; .• ',.1,..1 .,'.. . . . '.7:4,)?' . .. ,.• '''` ' . . ,.., . .. . '.. ,La , ... 1 .. .. .. t — .. . 41011k-' ‘It*ti.l.' - ,- OVIV. , ...*1`_ NO . • • , -' ' . ., . , , '. . ..• , .• •— . . . ' -. . •'. 0 . -...., . . , — . . . \ , l# ' . ' /' \\ •i . I - / ______ / , _ ,Fet- ..,I.. 0 ,Z.,' 'i i t ' '1' iiii I 11 ;"414111' . . t il . ,._ . 411111pill. i' \ \.,. -'f'''• .4• ,,`•`- 4.i.L,, --._ .-3 . I . i . .4.4,,,,*;,. ' --r•vs• '-- `.ipc:r,,:,s,,,..r, •-6- , ,. .., , N . •,..- ....... _.‘ - 1 ... -le'. •- 14 _ . Li\\.,,,............ ..., _ _ , . I . _= . . ... . .... #), , ., . .. . .. . . . .. _ . . . . I .. r 1,, , / , . ,�.�i '/ / / / •V \//// 1, r/ ' 1 it ' 1,.:i .../..:: il.:..'4.k , / i 4.,. • ,t., k..' . '''). Ic \ . - . , �` /r \._ 1 'I r • • . , , i'l ,. ..-- \ ,; ' ' .-- 1,' - I"4 .I -- I/ \ :. e / :- M L j f,. .� sfifr1 ' `I �l r�..1 `� , I will nit ' ✓Jvy �, .y --- • . ‘...• 14.',( alb . i 1., .r... �r.;r-; `' I r f 1,)iitil1,U111bI j.1�1J.tijil11 ,_„ > ' -- ,�• .-- 4 • 3 I I I. 111 if / \ 1, ,.... .,•\ _ If . ...,- .. 1,) ,... - , . . .F.1" • I.- ,' • 1 -'ei..-, .- .. _ , \ i'/ ' •i \',Il ', ' ' ''' 't .\,/,. --.' • i ' ' ' / ',.,',i' -kilt'''. , ,t , , . - ..— • \- \ ,I , . I- ' ' , 1 . , •..... . ,,,,,,;,... , ‘ 1 ,t_ . . 1, - ,• „ .1 , ..... \\ 7 ,,,,, • .4t....:-..t,,,, ,,,, /1'. .. , •'‘ ',,,,i, ,- v•' ' . -•\ t ?, ''eLl. • ' ,' , 11 I,: . ': 4 r-0.. , .. -----,,,, \ \I , .•,•,,,, , - i ' ' ' / ' : • _ ' _\ \" , i ...I ! 1• ' 1 =-• ' 1 '4' . .1 1,i, \ 01/.-., ,:-!1,1 -.-.,•-•'''\ \ / , 1 ‘,f ' ,, ‘filit: ' 1;it • ' . i •.1 ',I .1 • I . .,.......,./ \ , •i 4 • • ' \ I 0 1 '" \ • . -• • d• 1 ti 1 '. ,--. , • -I . ••'! ..:414%, .'''',/ •I I'. 4. '. . 1-> P i•,,, . ..,.---;,/- • . , ..,),40., • , . , i on . — . . — ., o','-..• • . -__ -,, ' /:. . '• ' '' ),I, , • , ‘,1„.1>. ..1-.t' '...1.11.:•:7..,1::.4".1.••: .. ' \ j • ''\ 'i, • •• s„ 01 i I (11 i 1 / —_—__ , . .... ‘ ;'.'1 4 i --,.., •' ''- '• t 4' t i 1 • II I .11 1 f. .... 40 •• , ,, , , >411. t mil / •,,.. , . . . • , ,. ... 1 . •,, . ,„ , • - - - f • •,. • . . • . , • , ir• •.1 ;Oft If 1111frailL - e• ... . :.' / 4) •i, . . , tnit. (1, .:':NtsV-44--.'s*,.-•);,-"''b.1.‘:;,t,v,-v.:a„ . ,n-7;e"...- 7 . ., „ I , '51',.,z..t. ---,.-1-.,, ,is.....-4,-..-4,, .• ,.,: -•v147, ,.. , -•.„1. r ',f', ' 0 ' • „..... i, . • IONE" LII .-• —','4.-:0 f.4iffl•-' :' - -;- ",„vo 11,7,1WA':C.', 4( 'ri ,.r.:•. •-• 45'...' - ,•-••'C' 1&. iist._ -IF . It • • I .,,, • "'I r 'ffir 1 illr.' --1•"--, .) • - .: .',,:"-14- 1111111111111111111k ,,, ,, ..-..,;:._ -,-- 1 111111111111111111111111 _ MR 1 INF .--...,.....-_ NIP me WI EXIST. BOLLARD -EXISTING TRAFFIC x x x SIGNAL 0 0 RELOCATED STATUE O PLAQUE NEW GONG PAD/71) a " EXIST. ABOVE GROUND UTILITY BOX EXIST. ABOVE GROUND UTILITY BOX EXIST. EXIST SIDEWALK LAWN EXISTING STATUE / x NORTH 0' 5' 10' 20' EXIST. BOLLARD -EXISTING TRAFFIC x x x SIGNAL 0 \ / u �j O RELOCATED STATUE OO PLAGUE NEW GONG PAD C15 0 ' EXIST. ABOVE GROUND UTILITY BOX irEXIST. ABOVE GROUND UTILITY BOX EXIST. SIDEWALK EXIST LAWN EXISTING STATUE /II I11 I'LI lt NORTH 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 . 77M:MMIII -EXISTING TRAFFIC x x x SIGNAL -"(:51- x O RELOCATED MONUMENT DESCRIPTION NEW BENCH k NE GONG PAD W 0 O i .\ EXIST. POWER BOX EXIST. POWER BOX • x ,.... 1,1,1,1„11 NORTH 0' 5' 10' 20' 400 SOUTH 400 SOUTH k SCORE JOINT, TYPIG L • rp l • o / 1p C / / RELOCATED MONUMENT Ci / (I OFB)NCH 1- / / NEN Li ILI Li ILI I I� JL Nl k iu Li F „4 o s. i H O ������ )�r�r N O a ��'=�r _� a,_6? PLcANTE- 44416) h,_s . LAWN EDGE 11W- 41111111. pp p .A. •— EXIST. TREE, II IIIIi • '1111111 TYPICAL NORT NORT O' 5' 10' 20' O' 5' 10' 20' 1 • 1 • PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANTIGAL NAME COMMON NAME TREE Gornus alternifolia PAGODA DOGWOOD SHRUBS OGornus alba 'Baton Rouge' BATON ROUGE REDTWIG DOGWOOD Cotoneaster apiculata CRANBERRY GOTONEASTER Taxus baccata repandans DWARF ENGLISH YEW PERENNIALS Echinacea purpurea 'Amazing Dream' GONEFLOWER thOr Geranium x. 'Rozanne' ROZANNE HARDY GERANIUM 0 Hemerocallis 'Baja' BAJA DAYLILY (i Hemerocallis 'Pardon Me' PARDON ME DAYLILY Heuchera x. 'Melting Fire' MELTING FIRE CORAL BELLS 0 Iris pallida 'Albo Variegate' VARIEGATED IRIS Salvia nemorosa 'Caradonna' CARADONNA PERENNIAL SALVIA 0 Veronica spicata 'Goodness Grows' GOODNESS GROWS VERONICA shade sail r� I■ ' I .I h L� LJ4 �1 p 'l i 1 - -1 _ i 1 .._ 1 I •� . eb , 1 101,.... 7....=. i I �' I I exposed aggregate con - - 1 i� 1 I I I 'Vt�_NM,•. '�.. - LLJ I t — Iiii .''ili' I I i I Q 1 i III 1 Ti o u c 1 I , _ i _ _A . .. . 1 .!—7 . v.. OZ ornamental iron screen formal hedge Jo �Tan . 12ra.. . '''' LLJ J ` — �` ornamental iron " fence&gate ^ i lattice/canopy post 4Ia-_ (�-`)— ii` 09 February 2015 , Washington Square Cafe immimmii A0 1/8"=I' north , tiL, Ili I L . . !L__:_ j 4 1 r - 1 Co Ali _ i010 lI - l , I d lc T L is ; � cDZ 1 i w • r_ IL- ll� 44 ' • ,li t _ i a:410 , AP. I it ) `‘O 1111,H t i t if 14 I:ir l'iPqr 4 i' "1-iiiii i 7 "jai ' - < U ° 5 o V O g 09 February 2015 Washington Square Cafe - East Elevation GENERAL NOTESI revisions WASHINGTON SQUARE CAFE 451 STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT PROJECT LOCATION SHEET INDEX PLANS PREPARED BY CV1-COVER SHEET E1 3rd Ave N 10 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE D101-DEMOLITION PLAN tale Temple Square 2na Ave C100-NOTES F South Temple St SHALAE LARSEN C200-GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Solutions Arena • , 0 City Creek Center 801-390-9925 C300-DETAILS V Salt Palace 7 V) Ill 614 24TH STREET C301-DETAILS Convention Center 8 $ OGDEN UTAH 84401 S101-SITE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN m m S102-LAYOUT PLAN m ° Salt Lak tty tas , STAMP -TOPSOIL PLAN (� CENTRAL CITY S401-SITE DETAILS w ES001-LIGHTING NOTES ao ES101-SITE LIGHTING PLAN LS101-PLANTING PLAN w son S E 800 S E 80i1 S LS401-PLANTING DETAILS IR101-IRRIGATION PLAN woos E9ui S I E9Ui CONSULTANTS IR401-IRRIGATION DETAILS IR402-IRRIGATION DETAILS c i rn 0 Liberty1 ark -I in E t IJ I(;s a ,QSCd Ne www.iolandarch.com l aa°N MUNICIPALITY o'e'mu el SALT LAKE CITY 248 EAST 600 SOUTH PROJECT SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84111 Washington Square Cafe 801-535-6631 JIM CLELAND C,',u;"ni„u,;^„rrr CVI COVER SNEET GENERAL NOTES/revisions i8 B RB TOtil IO IS• L3 KEv rvDTESX18TING ASPHALT TO REMAIN ' 1 EXISTING BIKE RACK TO BE REMOVED / j /� �'•fJ .- ` EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO BE REMOVED • TB / EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN ,0 //: ` 1 1 /`2i EXISTING CONCRETE TO DEMOLISH �j�/ i / -� EXISTING CONCRETE VAULT TO REMAIN 1 _ j / EXISTING UTILITY VAULT TO REMAIN {r { � 5 EXISTING FILL TANK TO BE REMOVED(SEE CIVIL) • '••• '•'•' - 0. EXISTING ISOLATION'MOAT`LOVER TO REMAIN /-' 10. EXISTING LAWN CLEAR AND GRUB ,._• • 11. EXISTING METAL COVER TO BE POWDER COATED 13. EXISTING METAL GRATE TO BE POWDER COATED �� 13. EXISTING MOAT BRIDGE/RAMP TO BE REMOVED 13 I 10. EXISTING SHRUB BED CLEAR AND GRUB 15. EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED EXISTING UTILITY BOXES TO REMAIN 17. EXISTING VENT STACK TO BE RELOCATED(SEE CIVIL) • LEGEND 1 1 - � 16 . . LIMIT OF WORK vm me EXISTING BE CLEARED BED OR LAWN AREA TO CLEARED AND IIr---I GRUBBED � EXISTING HAROSCAPE TO BE 1 ... .. DEMOLISHED S 11 STAMP S , •5 30 FT QDEMOLITION PLAN • • CONSULTANTS 1111 DEMOLITION NOTES ,, THE DEMOUTION PLAN PRESENTED HERE SHALL BE Id 1N PHASED VARIOUS EaOES FTHE L•• I FCT REPROPOSEOIMPROVEMEMeARECON3DIFat CONTRACT NC RECORDS VISIT THE PROJECT SITE LOCADON AND CONDITION OF a LL EXISTING UTILAR ITIITES IRE www.iolandarch.com GROUND FEATURES PROPOSED FOR DEMOLITION ,, CONTRACTOR NALL PROTECT IN UTILITIES AND GROUND PLACE AU_ FASTING IN USE ALL DAMAGED gd° a«DI TTLERCTTRNsTOENfNRED By ONRACTORAT OPERATION ha OW ,,, THE CONCRETE FLATWORK PROPOSED FOR REAIOVAL IS TO BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST CONSTRUCTION JOINT. PROJECT BUCH LIIYLICENSEDFDRTHEDISPDNALDF Washington Square MATERIAL 6 THE CONTRACTOR NILL NOTIFY GUESTAR GAS AND ROCKY Cafe MOUNTAIN POWER FOR ALL WORK OROUNDOAS AND 461 Sok/61M Enal ROMER UTILITIES Salt Lake City Utah 04111 D101 DEMOLITION PLAN • GENERAL NOTES/revisions D. m 1 NOTES • , A I. EXISTING ASPHALT— —— - �/ Z EXI STINGCRETE LURE EXER PINCER COAT', EXTE POWDER COATEDH/ 5. EXATION'MOAT COVER6I EXN PROTECT AND REPSA1.I MEBEE DETAIL X2.10A 4 NER BY OTHERS i 6 J,I�J IC NEW EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE SEE DETAIL � in 'Ii , t 1 10. NEW GE MOAT BEE DETAIL X%/Sld • Il L 11. NEW ORNAMENTAL IRON GATE SEE DETAIL XXIS104 j-l�I r 0 12. NEW ORNAMENTAL IRON FENCE SEE DETAIL XX/S101 �/ 13. NEW ORNAMENTAL IRON GATE SEE DETAIL XX/6104 1 • ,a NEW ORNAMENTAL IRON LATTACE AND CANOPY POST SEE It IS. NEW SHRUB ' �\ 10 15. NEW TENSION WI � TENSION WIRE CANOPY r 10. NEW STONES �rr�� CONCRETE CURB R MATCH EXISTING r�I�/p 15. ADA ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP • • D \// 'Al6TINGl,ilz VAULT LOVER ADJUST HEIGHT TO MATCH R l ' -. LEGENOOPO6ED FINISHED GRADE II • NEW EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE • • NEW ORNAMENTAL IRON FENCE J • NEW CANOPY TENSION WIRE STAMP 0 5 10 E 2O FT (417). SITE PLAN CONSULTANTS LAYOUT LEGEND • PHASE i LINE la d sca N e A• HITECT RE EXISTING HARDSCAPE www.Iolandarch.com PROPOSED HARDSCAPE ly 05 0,,,s El HANDICAP RAMP SEE OTLI SHT o5em urNea�°"ao, C301 • EXPANSION JOINT PROJECT I I TK5SHRETEFIATWDRKBEETCG� Washington Square Cafe SITEsvI L,Re������,�aa,,, IMPROVEMENT NOTES OUnNGCONOTRUCTON CONTRACTOR MWLL BE SSO1R IRBLf TOREPNR OHMAGE TONTI FASTING INFRASTRUCTURE AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTIOACTINTIES N S 101 SITE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN GENERAL NOTES/revisions CENTER ON DOORNVINDOW OPENING 30 3,0. SITE LAYOUT NOTES . 4,13- , i- 1---- -1 rirElr=TI:gilOrn""'"""""' __...i...: 1 k X tl.,.1.c0=.5110.11.1.91MEMEtlin TAKEH FRolA THE Mo., = .— . 3 ...011.15.OMEN..af vnii1010315,141,5 IS il..5.0 UMLE55 01...5.E HnlEO --... ' ='['1';'111:1.'ST17.:Lpi.13EITOA:117:47471i::Ef; •— ..----, CIVIL ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR 5 ALL 5105,441.1(L.01.17 Ex.,Of COOROIHAITO NM/VIE . C-) j.: :.' - ON..R.REsENTAIIVE PRIOR TO PIXEME111,1113 CO.6.11.1.. ----ALIGN POSTS. .. , PERPENDICULAR TO FRONT POSTS AT , EDGE OF MOAT TYP. • . . / .• EYPA.10.1.ris sHAL:PRO:13E0 AT LOUT::E. REGIIESERTAINE • STAMP 0 5 10 . SOFT (+)LAYOUv.T.P.I.A,..0.N ---.10.11 111MMI ...—, CONSULTANTS • LAYOUT LEGEND a clsca,•#e A• -HITI:Cl. RE PHASE 1 UNE EXISTING HARDSCAPE WWW.Iola ncia rch.co m 18."4.Vrar PROPOSED HARDSCAPE . att LEN HANDICAP RAMP SEE DTL I SET C301 PROJECT EXPANSION JOINT Washington Square I I 4'THICK CONCRETE FLATWORK Cafe 15.1 Sou.204 Ea al SEE OTL 5 SHT C300 Sell La.Cily 1.1.4.0111 .... S102 LAYOUT 5 GRADING PLAN GENERAL NOTES/revisions Canopy PumaNp.Typ,-. ♦ , —-- ScreanCamce Panel Typ. — - —__ Double Gab Fence Pane.Typ.— _ _ — _ __ — ♦ ` yy • ll I. ��1 l�lr 1�tS—^ y -- U — — — 2.i.. 4 I prawing Tale] • STAMP Canopy PoaVlalllce Typ(Side view) v Genapy CONSULTANTS • .-ewWLaNm Panel TyP. li Id scare n 'FI ITE L:T1_RE F""°Pn"T9 www.iolandarch.com • A Imo 1",1a1.°o - V F (>ed.n UiB1 pl A l — — - - - - --- - j - PRO FCT I Washington Square .]Growing Tama a'•a�" _—�, - - r'p Cafe srae v South 200 �' ryr.wlnynml Sall le.cny`I:n.,al. S201 GENERAL NOTES/revisions KEY 1PEm�INe J diii ulm par _ pyr cal ll d A n - sym the - -Thu aro — ., (•r ---pro bes va cot luc off 1111 ! tax med / 1\ '/ O -euo for / `�� c cal acu W / A. / 1 O pen alo -II - phy opu IIII - _ O sib Thy `'- prulau — perennial mix STAMP 0 5 10 16 20FT +.)PLANTING PLAN_ CONSULTANTS • PYntuat•57mple j ' PLANTING NOTES ID H low'LEWNeme ICPmMennom •SPHseWNales RnINFIG a SCd Ne a..E! 21:9uw MuapNy...VBE Oe�m NFMW_EM.CEEEMB¢_Jy_ I 1 ANY ALTERATIONS TO THESE ORNAINGS DURING B. ALL RANTS SHALL BE TAGGED AND APPROVED BY THE /�{, T= r:R Isis sslll SIClemsls'Center O&PPS 1701Gnbr SISP Cies. V1 1 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ONTERB OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AT THE NURSERY PRIOR TO REPRESENTATIVE AND RECORDED ale.BUILT. DIGGING OR DELIVERY TO SITE DRAWINGS BY THE CONTRACTOR ]. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ANDVEJUFY ALL ALL PUNT MATERIAL aHALI CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PANTING AND SHALL WWW.IOIendarch.com GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN CONFLICTS TO OWNERS NURSERYSTANDARD FOR STOOK PUBLISHED BY THE REPORT ANY ISiIGwiBeirri*A AMERICAN NURSERY ASSOCIATION.INC. O. STAXE LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED PLANTING FOR L ALL PLTSTO BEBALLFO ENO BIPiLAPFEO OPAPPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR S u15Ia0I PLANTS TO THE CONTAINER GROWN,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON MMENLEMENT OF PLAITING. THE PLAID.UST. s. ALL PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE SW COMPOSTED SANK A. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUCH IN ODUARITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE 1O AL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROPERLY PLANTING SHOWN ON THE SANMNGB PROTECTED MIMIC CONSTRUCTION.PROTECTION PROJECT __ a OSEDSUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECES TECHNIERSREPRE SHML EREATIVE. NDAPPRWEDm Washington Square AIDE WITH PUNTS OF EEIVAENT OVERALL THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. FORM,HEIGHT,BRANCHING HABIT,FLOWER,LEAF, Cafe COLOR,FRUR AND CULTURE ONLY AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. Sall LAIN ON Utah eI111 PL101 PUNTING PLAN GENERAL NOTES/revision. I 1 Jr I II i j;. .9]?....:Ti I �� O 7 1 r + 7 I I i : .:,1. , II,.._ :411111111%.------'"\\\ Mi , , if STAMP _ e 5 ,G 15 ZO ET (�\IRRIGATION PLAN _ 1 )Scale:1M'=1'-0• CONSULTANTS • IRRIGATION NOTES s NEW DRIP IRRIGATION VALVE SYTEEMWILLRONS OR XCEEDTHDESIGN SUCATION TO PPLY CAPACITY IRRIGATION TO ITi SI EMU WiA OR LIARIT, la dscaNe SYSTEM WuROT EXCEED THEDESIGN SLPPLY PSI FOR 1"POLTETHELENE I ALL RTHIS OTOR ZMONES,,SO PSI FSIGNED OR LL SPRAY ZOERATE AT NES,AND AO S EOF S DESIGN SLOPE TO MANUAL DRAM IF FIELD ENT ORM A' HITECTi RE PSI FOR ALLDO NOT EMCEED SO Ns NE W SMTATE MOTION.MAN 5,THESE GPM PER ZONE MAXIMUM DEMAND\MTH THE OPERATION DRAMS 511ALL BE INSTALLED FOR L.MPLETE D MULTIPLEOF ZONES NULL NOT EXCEEDMAINTAIN 50 GPMM N OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH ZONE TO THE LASTGRAVEL SUMP UNDER EACH DRAW ALL DRAMS SHALL BE www.Iola ndarch.corn MEAD 1 TRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AMIrvIMUN OESBELOwGRME a IGIW.UfrdYy6. INSTALLATION LAYOUT OF THEIRRIGATIORSYSTEM IN ]ACCORDANCE OATH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACTOR'S ZAA.uaa BT svoNseLunroFAMIUAMZE HMBELF Dge4141aDI THEN µNUFAC UERSS oRD HEAD INDIC TEp wN REDUNEnrocaLPRETETHE RRIG.nL»R D B urACTURERS STANQARO HEAOSIrvmC MEuA RECOMMENDED SURGE AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION EQUIPMENT ON ALL CONTROLLERS dLLONS PER MINUTE PROJECT A THE GoNTRACTOR SHALL BE ABLE ,apM -' STATIONNUMBER REPAIRING AND/OR aQ.�FO („�; Washington Square DURING THE COURSE OFCO„STRUCTOT E ELECTRIC CONT..VALVE SIZE Cafe 200 Emit IR101 IRRIGATION PLAN Council Partial Term Partial Term 1st Term 1st Term 2nd Term 2nd Term Contact District Appoint Expire Appoint Expire Appoint Expire Member/representative Robert A.Young 3 1/7/2014 7/18/2017 Architect Steven Cornell 3 4/2/2013 7/24/2017 Utah Heritage Foundation Mark Vlasic 5 1/2/2007 7/21/2008 8/19/2008 7/18/2012 7/18/2016 Landscape Architect Jerod G.Johnson 11/17/2009 7/15/2013 7/30/2017 Engineer John McCarthy 1 6/1/2013 7/24/2014 pending Arts Council John Phillips 4 4/28/2009 7/15/2012 7/18/2016 At Large Vacant Utah Historical Society Terry K.Wright 10/13/2009 7/15/2012 7/18/2016 At Large 2.39.020:CREATION OF COMMITTEE: A. There is created the city and county building conservancy and use committee which body shall consist of eight(8)appointed voting members. The mayor,the city attorney,the support services manager and the city engineer,or their desgnees,shall be ex offcio nonvoting members B. Members of the committee shall be as follows: 1. One licensed architect; 2. One member of the Utah Heritage Foundation; 3. One member of the Salt Lake arts council; 4. One landscape architect; 5.One member of the Utah Historical Society; 6. One licensed engineer;and 7.Two(2)at large representatives. (Ord.67-91 §2, 1991) cast iron ornamentation i A cast iron finials ili.,,, 1 ,-• 1 y1 --��'' RYj j({�� +`}[j' j�`f� r. J p ,J 7 1.7 l4•AL... J�+ i '— — ' « I 1 1 4 J � O Y -rW R; ___ �_ _ .1_ I'1 t1t ` � �� a1j1 '� i ' -. l 1 /` y �.. s • aN 4 N I wrought iron pickets • �; •• >''�-; r° x r �' i _- • rt � ' _ I & rails a�� T[ � ��K � ,=a ;; ) a .. U 5 YI la Iron Picker I en.c S 7I 11•Gat Iron Garc Pasta !,, ,,. ./- cast iron ornamentation . , .,."" > LLI -91 rogi li ri Iwo 0 1 . , 1. s . , _ (Above) All cast iron fence I � I I I- -I-I Historically appropriate N 1I I I I. - Cast iron is more brittle than wrought iron T wrought iron pickets - More expensive II &�_, � & rails - Much of the detail will be hidden by the low �/ r, Riktnrti., zas•Fl;.ra. hedge that we have planned in the design , iii co E 1I1 - U U° � 1 UN F r -- (Left&Above) Hybrid wrought and cast iron fence 0 - - Historically appropriate O i -About half the cost of all-cast components I - More durable than all-cast ip a — 2 February 2015 Washington Square Cafe