Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/27/2023 - Meeting Minutes \11\1 11 5 I ROM I III CO\1\1l �I Il III \I I (WMI \I x( AI'I I:AI IMPROV'I \11 \I I'RO.If:('1 S ItO\RI>\11 I I I\( I( I)( II') lIll�nr7 1 Board Members Board.Alemliers Not Present Rra,i l 111"I"n.cn A irc( !un11 1,I)m ISnnk (( hair) h,«-1,h \11117,h% !lc�,,n Snc�chm�ci Alirnnrin Irnlr:r( -r;k , , ❑l Sri,�,�il !1i ij "Ici,i Staff Present �urtcc Ilasc fern l homas Rac Steinke 3. Annrocal of the Minutes Brad Christensen motioned to approve meeting minutes from If 13,2023.Andrea Schaefer seconded the motion. Jacob Skoa Y Teresa Greeori Y Devon Schechinaer Y Heidi Steed Abstain Minutes Here approved. 3. Reviem Public Engagement Survev Data/General Needs Hearing Information Kem Thomas introduced a presentation on last year's Public Engagement Outcomes. Dillon Hase requested that a visual breakdown be created and left in the drop box for the Board Members to look over. 4. Discuss Nano Session Questions While looking over the Nano Session questions from the prior year,many comments were made that resulted in adjustments made to the questions. Andrea Schaefer and Devon Schechinger agreed that question one and tour were too similar. It v,as requested a question be asked that specifies the previous years greatest successes. 1 he board agced that the addition ol'data to support program outcomes over the\cars, would be added to question one. (Question three was developed to ask how the project is identitying evolving community needs.and what adaptations take place to meet these needs. Question Blur NNas reworked conlpletely bv the board. I he linal decision was to ask what separates their proiect tFom similar proiecls. and what unique approaches does the orL'anization take., Jacob Sko'_' rtlotIoned to approve the ('I)('lll hoard Oucstions I6n' the Nano Scssior) feresa CtreL'oric seconded the Illotlon. Devoll Schechinwer Y Heidi Stced l Andrea S hacici 1 Brad Christensen Y Questions were approved. 5. Discuss CDBG Housing and Neighborhood Improvements Questions/Responses Ken Thomas reviewed the responses from the prior meetings application questions. Andrea Schaetcr requested that the Home Rehabilitation program respond with the requested information on what repairs had been accomplished in the 13 completed projects fronl the prior year. Teresa Gregoria clarified that the response from the SLC Neighborhood Improvement and Stabilization response did not answer the question that was asked. Teresa is wondering what the specific dollar arnount for the land owned versus the property owned. Dillon Hase was able to give a general explanation that the city owns 75% and the homeowner owns 25%. There was no follow-up that was necessary. 6. Discuss ESG Applications Brad Christensen requested a question be asked to Family Promise Salt Lake City, Prevention and RRH Services. The question is, how do they identify which families they are iioin2 to serve? Brad Christensen asked for clarification from city employees on ESG funding. He was wondering if a certain percentage is required to go towards some type of service. Kerry Thomas was able to clarify that shelter operations and homeless responses are the service component and Dillon was able to clarify further. Projects cannot spend more than 60%of funds for shelter and outreach. 7. Other Business Kerry Thomas had an update regarding the Ruff Haven Public Services application. After receiving a response from HUD, Kerry was informed that they would not qualify for funds due to the lack of services given to humans. Tyler Durfee gave a short presentation on the Housing Stability Dashboard. This dashboard is an overview of the data available for the Salt Lake City Housing Stability Division. 8. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 6:55pm. x CDCIP and Ch ' This document along Nvith the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the CDCIP Board meeting held November 27`h, 2023.