08/05/2024 - Meeting Materials Here are the Transportation Division internal applications. Please drag and drop them into the right column in priority order, with
#1 being the highest priority.
Number of responses:19
Rank choice n Score Times Ranked
1. Livable Streets Program$3,000,000 117 19
2. Safer Crossings Citywide$600,000 _ 117 19
3. Neighborhood Byways Program$1,600,000 103 19
4. Urban Trails Program$1,500,000 95 19
5 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 89 19
$1,500,000
6 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 85 19
$2,700,000
7 Conceptual Design and Cost Estimates for FY26-FY28 84 19
Projects$600,000
8 Green Loop$10,000,000(Public Lands submitted with 84 19
Transportation as a partner)
9. Transportation Corridor Transformations$4,600,000 81 19
Lowest Highest
Here are constituent applications that are transportation-related. Please drag and drop them into the right column in priority
order, with #1 being the highest priority.
Number of responses:19
Rank Choice Distribution = Times Ranked
California Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvements
1 19
Construction-Concord St/Glendale Dr.$807,000
Guadalupe Neighborhood Streets Improvement
2. $2,517,000 1= 19
3 Marmalade-Fairpark East-West Connector Study -- 126 19
$80,000
4. 600 South Safety Improvements $530,000 -- 119 19
5. 500 East Raised Crosswalk(400 Block)$115,000 -- 116 19
Route 209-Accessibility,Bus Shelters,Benches,and 94
6' 19 Trash Cans $500,000
Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St.and Zenith
7 93 19
Ave. $500,000
8 Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St.and Elgin 92 19
Ave. $500,000
9. 700 East Median Tree Planting Project$2,400,000 62 19
10. Westminster Urban Forestry and Traffic Calming 54 19
Measures $477,000
Here is the combined list. Please drag and drop them into the right column in priority order, with #1 being the highest priority.
Number of responses:19
Rank Choice Distribution Score Times Ranked
1. Livable Streets Program $3,000,000 279 19
2. Safer Crossings Citywide $600.000 270 19
3. Neighborhood Byways Program $1,600,000 -- 269 19
4. Urban Trails Program $1,500,000 245 19
5 California Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvements _- 230 19
Construction-Concord St/Glendale Dr.$807,000
6 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 220 19
$1,500,000
7 Conceptual Design and Cost Estimates for FY26-FY28 214 19
Projects $600,000
8 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 209 19
$2,700,000
9 Green Loop$10,000,000(Public Lands submitted with . 205 19
Transportation as a partner)
10. Transportation Corridor Transformations $4,600,000 202 19
11 Guadalupe Neighborhood Streets Improvement _-- 196 19
$2,517,000
COMBINED (continued)
12. 600 South Safety Improvements $530,000 174 19
13. Marmalade-Fairpark East-West Connector Study 174 19
$80,000
14. 500 East Raised Crosswalk(400 Block)$115,000 161 19
15. Route 209-Accessibility,Bus Shelters, Benches,and 137 19
Trash Cans $500,000
16. Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St.and Zenith 135 19
Ave. $500,000
17 Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St and Elgin 127 19
Ave. $500,000
18. 700 East Median Tree Planting Project$2,400,000 92 19
19 Westminster Urban Forestry and Traffic Calming 71 19
Measures $477,000
Lowest Highest
Participating in this poll:
• 12 members of TAB (out of 13 current members)
• 7 members of BAC (out of 12 current members)
Urban Trail Joint Subcommittee with SLC Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)
Members
The Joint Subcommittee is anticipated to have representation from Salt Lake City's Parks,
Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT) Board as well as from Salt Lake City's
Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). Additional representation is anticipated from:
• Salt Lake City's Bicycle Advisory Committee
• Salt Lake County's Bicycle Advisory Committee
• Sweet Streets Committee
PNUT Board Members Kerri Nakamura and Ginger Cannon have expressed a willingness to
serve as PNUT Board representatives.
Per the PNUT Board by-laws, the appointment of any members of the subcommittee that are
not PNUT Board members will be made by the PNUT Board.
Work objective
Salt Lake City has developed and continues to add to an impressive network of paved urban
trails that are utilized not only for recreation, but are also an important part of the City's
transportation network. This urban trail network is different and separate from the soft surface
trails that are planned and constructed within the Foothills Natural Area and in select other
areas (e.g., 9-Line Bike Park, Miller Park, Hidden Hollow) of Salt Lake City.
The Salt Lake City Public Lands Department is charged with maintaining these trails that are, in
a very real sense, being viewed as linear parks that will require unique and creative
maintenance.
Coordination between at least the Transportation Division, Engineering Division, Streets
Division, and Public Lands Department is vital as urban trails serve multiple purposes with
sometimes differing goals and objectives and various players pertaining to implementation and
operations and maintenance.
An Urban Trails Joint Subcommittee might help Salt Lake City better realize the full potential of
the existing, planned, and potential urban trail network as a prized amenity in Salt Lake City.
From recommendations on pavement markings and signage, safety, marketing, to project
design, maintenance and operations, and the staging of events with a goal of increasing public
awareness and use of the urban trail network, a Joint Subcommittee could become an important
advisory group for Salt Lake City. The subcommittee can also focus on the City's goals around
transit to trails. The Joint Subcommittee can detail and document the focus of their work once
the group is formed and they begin working.
How does this work further the City's urban trails goals and strategies
Section 4 of the Reimagine Nature: Salt Lake City Public Lands Master Plan centers on the
concept of Connect. The goal statement reads:
"Well-maintained, welcoming trails, streets, public transportation, and sidewalks are
interconnected as the city's circulatory system. This system connects pedestrians, cyclists, and
riders to the city's green spaces and outstanding natural landscapes of Salt Lake City's Public
Lands: mountains, foothills, valley, wetlands, and lakes. The City will continue to enhance these
systems and increase connectors to include everyday destinations ranging from the daycare,
library, grocery store, pharmacy, and museum. This adds convenient access to walk or ride
along a greenway, adding steps to pedometers and enriching health and wellbeing."
Creation of an Urban Trail Joint Subcommittee will ensure that a community-based group has its
eye on this section of the Reimagine Nature plan to help Salt Lake City realize its stated goals
and objectives.
Similarly, creation of an Urban Trail Joint Subcommittee will further Salt Lake City's efforts as
outlined in the:
• 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan: Particular attention to page 55 - Multi-use trails
and neighborhood byways. https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/pbmp/
• 9-Line Trail Extension Study wherein the idea of connecting the mouth of Emigration
Canyon to the Jordan River is contemplated. "The 9-Line Corridor will be an attractive,
safe, and inclusive walking and bicycling connection between east and west Salt Lake
City, linking neighborhoods, business districts, and cultural destinations."
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2018/03/20/9-line-trail-extension-study/
• Plan Salt Lake, that among other objectives, aims to develop, "A transportation and
mobility network that is safe, accessible, reliable, affordable, and sustainable, providing
real choices and connecting people with places." chrome-
extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Protect
s/PlanSaltLake/final.pdf
• Complete Streets Ordinance, which outlines the need to consider pedestrians and
bicyclists in all City-owned transportation facilities in the public right of way.
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2019/08/Complete-
Streets-Ordinance.pdf.
Timeline
February 1: PNUT Board informally supported proposed creation of the Joint Subcommittee and
a creation timeline as follows:
February 2-29, 2024: Public Lands leadership reached out to Transportation Division leadership
to garner support for the idea of a joint subcommittee.
March 18, 2024: Presentation of the concept to the Bicycle Subcommittee with a request for
formal support
May 6, 2024: Presentation of the concept to the Transportation Advisory Board with a request
for formal support.
June 6, 2024: Formal adoption of the Subcommittee by the PNUT Board. Formal support of
members who are not members of PNUT.
June 2024: First meeting of the Joint Subcommittee held.
Schedule for Reporting
Formal Joint Subcommittee reports to both PNUT and TAB following scheduled subcommittee
meetings.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
Memo
To: Community Development and Capital Improvement Program(CDCIP) Advisory Board
From: Capital Asset Planning(CAP) Committee
Date: March 7, 2024
Re: CAP Committee Recommendations to CDCIP Board
Summary
The Capital Asset Planning Committee(CAP Committee) was established in 2023to evaluate Salt Lake
City department Capital Improvement Program (CIP) proposals and make recommendations to the
Community Development and Capital Improvement Program(CDCIP)Advisory Board.The goal of the
Committee is to reduce the amount of time it takes the Board to review internal applications.
Aligning with the Mayor's goal of One City, CAP Committee members represent major departments
and divisions in Salt Lake City government.The CAP Committee met regularly over the course of
several months to set a scoring criteria matrix and then applied these criteria while reviewing and
scoring applications. The CAP Committee reviewed, scored, and ranked a total of 32 internal
applications.The scoring matrix, criteria definitions, and detailed scoring summary are provided in
the appendices.
Background
The CAP Committee is tasked with reviewing and ranking internal Salt Lake City department/division
CIP applications and then sending recommendations to the CDCIP Board, with the goal of reducing
the amount of time it takes the CDCIP Board to review internal applications. The CDCIP Board is
responsible for reviewing, scoring, and ranking constituent and internal applications, and sending
recommendations to the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor.
The scoring criteria, definitions and weighted scores were builtfrom a framework of Resolution 29 of
2017 (see Appendix A) and Mayor's Goals.The CAP Committee intentionally developed the scoring
criteria to be neutral and quantitative, removing as much bias as possible from the scoring process.
Definitions for each of the scoring criteria can be found in the appendices. Salt Lake City's Capital
Improvement Program is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed to replace or
expand the City's public infrastructure. Capital improvements involve design, community
engagement, construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets, or other physical
structures. Capital assets are important to Salt Lake City and its management approach centers on
having a unified city approach that focuses on sustainability, equity, and meeting the growing needs
and demands on our public asset systems. City Council appropriation of CIP funding for a particular
project does not guarantee that the City will ultimately implement and complete that project.The
City reserves the right to withdraw or reappropriate funding forany project atthe City's sole
discretion.The City has withdrawn or reappropriated funding
from projects in the past, and it is anticipated that circumstances requiring the withdrawal or
reappropriation of funding for projects will arise in the future. In addition, capital projects that aren't
in capital plans/master plan can't be funded.
Upon completing the scoring process for FY25's internal CIP applications,the CAP Committee will
begin developing a 10-year CAP Plan that will be guided by Salt Lake City master plans, as well as
division and department capital plans.
CAP Committee
The CAP Committee began meeting in fa112023 to setthe scoring criteria and weights.Earlierthis year
SLC departments presented their CIP applications to the committee, committee members scored the
applications, and met to discuss the application scores.
The CAP Committee is comprised of directors, deputy directors,and other leaders from the following
Salt Lake City departments or divisions: Finance, Engineering,Transportation, Public Services,
Community&Neighborhoods, Public Lands, Police, Fire, Equity&Inclusion, Community Outreach,
Information Management Services, Public Utilities, Mayor's Office, Redevelopment Agency(RDA),
Economic Development, and Sustainability.
Committee Discussions
The Committee met multiple timesto discuss internal applications and the scores they assigned.They
discussed critical assets and critical failure at great length and found agreeing on scores for these two
criteria to be challenging.There was strong consensus that Critical Failure Category 1 should be
prioritized over all other requests. Further discussions revealed challenges with distinguishing
maintenance requests versus assets, the difference between projects and programs in several
applications,restrictions surroundingthe spending of Impact Fee funds,and scoring overall within the
limited criteria. The CAP Committee will work through and resolve these challenges prior to the
development of the 10-year CAP Plan and next year's scoring.
Scoring
The CAP Committee used the following criteria to score internal applications:
• Existing Asset
• Critical Failure Category 1, 2, or 3
• Legal/Contractual Obligation Category 1 or 2(determined by Attorney's Office)
• Risk:Life,Health&Safety
• Includes Outside Funding
• Project Phase
• Promotes Equity,Resiliency, Sustainability
• Reduce Cost/Increase Investment
• One City Approach
• Workforce Support
Seethe Appendices for the CAP Scoring Criteria and CAP Scoring Criteria Definitions.
The CAP Committee's scores are ranked by average score,in the order of highest to lowest.The scores
have been placed in the following groups: Renewal and Replacement, Program, New Public Asset
(Increase Level of Service), and New Asset that Supports City Operations.
Funding Requests
The funding amount being requested for internal applications is $72,593,600 and the funding
request for constituent applications is $17,796,496 for a total of $90,309,096. The total available
funding for FY25 is $39,300,000, of which an estimated $18,000,000 is Parks Impact Fees and is
restricted to eligible Parks projects.
CAP Committee Funding Recommendation
The CAP Committee has provided a ranked list of projects, and various other ways of looking at the
internal projects to aid the CDCIP Board in making their recommendation. Partial funding information
and guidance has been provided on each project by the internal applicant(s). Programs are intended
to receive funding year after year to elevate and maintain the City's assets at a reasonable and safe
level. Also provided are the desired/needed funding and the historical funding for each of these
programs.
Rank Project Title Score
1 Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 72.82
2 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 71.44
3 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 66.44
4 Public Way Concrete 2025 62.41
5 Complete Streets Overlay 2025 61.74
6 HVAC Control Replacement at PSB 60.76
7 Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase 1 59.71
8 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 57.76
9 Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents 57.76
10 700 South (Phase 7,4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding 57.06
11 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan 55.53
12 Safer Crossings Citywide 53.97
13 Sugar House Park-Two Pavilion Replacements for the Cost of One 52.47
14 Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation 51.91
Systems, and Reducing Water Use
15 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 51.38
16 Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request 50.94
17 Neighborhood Byways Program 49.65
18 Amplifying OurJordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment 49.65
19 Courts & Playgrounds 48.62
20 Police Department Training Center 48.18
21 Livable Streets Program 48.12
22 Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+ Preservation &Maintenance Plan 46.85
23 Transportation Corridor Transformations Program 46.44
24 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements 46.21
25 PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 43.50
26 Urban Trails Program 42.18
27 Green Loop Implementation 41.88
28 Alleyway Improvements 2025 41.29
29 Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 40.62
30 "Elevating Access":The Regional Athletic Complex's Blueprint for the Future 38.74
31 SLCPSB(Police Occupancy) Remodels 37.41
32 Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot at PSB 26.85
Appendices:
A. Resolution 29 of 2017
B. CAP Scoring Criteria Definitions
C. CAP Scoring Criteria
D. Ranked list of Internal Applications
E. Ranked List by Department/Division
F. Ranked List by Group
G. Program Amounts—easti m at@d a^^'1al Reed, minimum required and historical annual amounts
H. Partial Funding Details
Appendix A: Resolution 29 of 2017
R 17-1
R 17-13
RESOLUTION NO. _29 OF 2017
(Salt Lake City Council capital and debt management policies.)
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council" or"Council") demonstrated its
commitment to improving the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to better address the
deferred and long-term infrastructure needs of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, the analysis of Salt Lake City's General Fund Capital Improvement
Program presented by Citygate Associates in February 1999, recommended that the Council
review and update the capital policies of Salt Lake Corporation ("City") in order to provide
direction to the capital programming and budgeting process and adopt and implement a formal
comprehensive debt policy and management plan; and
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program and budgeting practices have
evolved since 1999 and the City Council wishes to update the capital and debt management
policies by updating and restating such policies in their entirety to better reflect current
practices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to improve transparency of funding opportunities
across funding sources including General Fund dollars, impact fees, Class C(gas tax)funds,
Redevelopment Agency funds, Public Utilities funds, repurposing old Capital Improvement
Program funds and other similar funding sources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
That the City Council has determined that the following capital and debt management
policies shall guide the Council as they continue to address the deferred and long-term
infrastructure needs within Salt Lake City:
Capital Policies
1. Capital Project Definition—The Council intends to define a capital project as follows:
"Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of
buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must
have a useful life of five or more years. A capital improvement is not a recurring
capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine) or a maintenance
expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). In order to be
considered a capital project, a capital improvement must also have a cost of
$50,000 or more unless such capital improvement's significant functionality can
be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project (such as software).
Acquisition of equipment is not considered part of a capital project unless such
acquisition of equipment is an integral part of the cost of the capital project."
2. Annual Capital Budget Based on 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan—The Council requests that
the Mayor's Recommended Annual Capital Budget be developed based upon the 10-Year
Capital Facilities Plan and be submitted each fiscal year to the City Council for consideration
as part of the Mayor's Recommended Budget no later than the first Tuesday of May.
3. Multiyear Financial Forecasts—The Council requests that the Administration:
a. Prepare multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts that correspond to the capital
program period;
b. Prepare an analysis of the City's financial condition, debt service levels within the capital
improvement budget, and capacity to finance future capital projects; and
c. Present this information to the Council in conjunction with the presentation of each one-
year capital budget.
4. Annual General Fund Transfer to CIP Funding Goal —Allocation of General Fund revenues
for capital improvements on an annual basis will be determined as a percentage of General
Fund revenue. The Council has a goal that no less than nine percent (9%) of ongoing General
Fund revenues be invested annually in the Capital Improvement Fund.
5. Maintenance Standard - The Council intends that the City will maintain its physical assets at
a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance
and replacement costs.
6. Capital Project Prioritization - The Council intends to give priority consideration to projects
that:
a. Preserve and protect the health and safety of the community;
b. Are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and
c. Provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in a preservation of the
community's prior investment, in decreased operating costs or other significant cost
savings, or in improvements to the environmental quality of the City and its
neighborhoods.
7. External Partnerships - All other considerations being equal, the Council intends to give fair
consideration to projects where there is an opportunity to coordinate with other agencies,
establish a public/private partnership, or secure grant funding.
8. Aligning Project Cost Estimates and Funding - The Council intends to follow a guideline of
approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year immediately following
the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as more time
passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital
projects in a timely manner.
9. Advisory Board Funding Recommendations - The Council intends that all capital projects be
evaluated and prioritized by the Community Development and Capital Improvement
Program Advisory Board. The resulting recommendations shall be provided to the Mayor,
and shall be included along with the Mayor's funding recommendations in conjunction with
the Annual Capital budget transmittal, as noted in Paragraph two above.
10. Prioritize Funding Projects in the 10-Year Plan - The Council does not intend to fund any
project that has not been included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan for at least one (1)
year prior to proposed funding, unless extenuating circumstances are adequately identified.
11. Cost Overrun Process - The Council requests that any change order to any capital
improvement project follow the criteria established in Resolution No. 65 of 2004 which
reads as follows:
a. "The project is under construction and all other funding options and/or methods
have been considered and it has been determined that additional funding is still
required.
b. Cost overrun funding will be approved based on the following formula:
i. 20% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets of$ioo,000 or less;
ii. 15% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets between $1oo,00l and $250,000;
iii. io% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets over $250,000 with a maximum overrun cost of$1oo,000.
c. The funds are not used to pay additional City Engineering fees.
d. The Administration will submit a written notice to the City Council detailing the
additional funding awarded to projects at the time of administrative approval.
e. If a project does not meet the above mentioned criteria the request for additional
funding will be submitted as part of the next scheduled budget opening.
However, if due to timing constraints the cost overrun cannot be reasonably
considered as part of a regularly scheduled budget opening, the Administration
will prepare the necessary paperwork for review by the City Council at its next
regularly scheduled meeting."
12. Recapture Funds from Completed Capital Projects - The Council requests that the
Administration include in the first budget amendment each year those Capital Improvement
Program Fund accounts where the project has been completed and a project balance remains.
It is the Council's intent that all account balances from closed projects be recaptured and
placed in the CIP Cost Overrun Contingency Account for the remainder of the fiscal year, at
which point any remaining amounts will be transferred to augment the following fiscal year's
General Fund ongoing allocation.
13. Recapture Funds from Unfinished Capital Projects — Except for situations in which
significant progress is reported to the Council, it is the Council's intent that all account
balances from unfinished projects older than three years be moved out of the specific project
account to the CIP Fund Balance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, account balances for bond
financed projects and outside restricted funds (which could include grants, SAA or other
restricted funds) shall not be moved out of the specific project account.
14. Surplus Land Fund within CIP Fund Balance — Revenues received from the sale of real
property will go to the unappropriated balance of the Capital Projects Fund and the revenue
will be reserved to purchase real property unless extenuating circumstances warrant a
different use. It is important to note that collateralized land cannot be sold.
15. Transparency of Ongoing Costs Created by Capital Projects —Any long-term fiscal impact to
the General Fund from a capital project creating ongoing expenses such as maintenance,
changes in electricity/utility usage, or additional personnel will be included in the CIP
funding log and project funding request. Similarly, capital projects that decrease ongoing
expenses will detail potential savings in the CIP funding log.
16. Balance Budget without Defunding or Delaying Capital Projects —Whenever possible,
capital improvement projects should neither be delayed nor eliminated to balance the
General Fund budget.
17. Identify Sources when Repurposing Old Capital Project Funds —Whenever the
Administration proposes repurposing funds from completed capital projects the source(s)
should be identified including the project name,balance of remaining funds, whether the
project scope was reduced, and whether funding needs related to the original project exist.
18. Identify Capital Project Details — For each capital project, the capital improvement projects
funding log should identify:
a. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board's
funding recommendations,
b. The Administration's funding recommendations,
c. The project name and a brief summary of the project,
d. Percentage of impact fee eligibility and type,
e. The project life expectancy,
f. Whether the project is located in an RDA project area,
g. Total project cost and an indication as to whether a project is one phase of a larger
project,
h. Subtotals where the project contains multiple scope elements that could be funded
separately,
i. Any savings derived from funding multiple projects together,
j. Timing for when a project will come on-line,
k. Whether the project implements a master plan,
1. Whether the project significantly advances the City's renewable energy or
sustainability goals,
in. Ongoing annual operating impact to the General Fund,
n. Any community support for the project -such as community councils or petitions,
o. Communities served,
p. Legal requirements/mandates,
q. Whether public health and safety is affected,
r. Whether the project is included in the io-Year Capital Facilities Plan,
s. Whether the project leverages external funding sources, and
t. Any partner organizations.
Debt Management Policies
1. Prioritize Debt Service for Projects in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan - The Council
intends to utilize long-term borrowing only for capital improvement projects that are
included in the City's 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan or in order to take advantage of
opportunities to restructure or refund current debt. Short-term borrowing might be utilized in
anticipation of future tax collections to finance working capital needs.
2. Evaluate Existing Debt before Issuing a New Debt - The Council requests that the
Administration provide an analysis of the City's debt capacity, and how each proposal meets
the Council's debt policies, prior to proposing any projects for debt financing. This analysis
should include the effect of the bond issue on the City's debt ratios, the City's ability to
finance future projects of equal or higher priority, and the City's bond ratings.
3. Identify Repayment Source when Proposing New Debt - The Council requests that the
Administration identify the source of funds to cover the anticipated debt service requirement
whenever the Administration recommends borrowing additional funds.
4. Monitoring Debt Impact to the General Fund - The Council requests that the Administration
analyze the impact of debt-financed capital projects on the City's operating budget and
coordinate this analysis with the budget development process.
5. Disclosure of Bond Feasibility and Challenges - The Council requests that the
Administration provide a statement from the City's financial advisor that each proposed bond
issue appears feasible for bond financing as proposed. Such statement from the City's
financial advisor should also include an indication of requirements or circumstances that the
Council should be aware of when considering the proposed bond issue (such as any net
negative fiscal impacts on the City's operating budget, debt capacity limits, or rating
implications).
6. Avoid Use of Financial Derivative Instruments - The Council intends to avoid using interest
rate derivatives or other financial derivatives when considering debt issuance.
7. Maintain Reasonable Debt Ratios - The Council does not intend to issue debt that would
cause the City's debt ratio benchmarks to exceed moderate ranges as indicated by the
municipal bond rating industry.
8. Maintain High Level Bond Ratings —The Council intends to maintain the highest credit
rating feasible and to adhere to fiscally responsible practices when issuing debt.
9. Consistent Annual Debt Payments Preferred—The Council requests that the Administration
structure debt service payments in level amounts over the useful life of the financed
project(s) unless anticipated revenues dictate otherwise or the useful life of the financed
project(s) suggests a different maturity schedule.
io. Sustainable Debt Burden —The Council intends to combine pay-as-you-go strategy with
long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit continued AAA general
obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in case of
emergency.
ii. Lowest Cost Options —The City will seek the least costly financing available when evaluating
debt financing options.
12. Avoid Creating Structural Deficits —The City will minimize the use of one-time revenue to
fund programs/projects that require ongoing costs including debt repayments.
13. Aligning Debt and Project Timelines — Capital improvement projects financed through the
issuance of bonded debt will have a debt service that is not longer than the useful life of the
project.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 3rd day of
October , 2017.
CIT
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
v By:
R CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
By. Salt Lake City
City Recorder App7qed As To Form
By.
Oldroyd
D/aysen"
HB_ATTY-464309-0-CIP_and_Debt_Management—Policies
Appendix B:CAP Scoring Criteria Definitions
Critical Asset Failure: When reviewing this criterion, particular focus should be paid to whether the
request will prevent a failure of a critical asset.These applications will be marked non-discretionary to
highlight importance.
Legal/Contractual Obligations: When reviewing this criterium, considerations include coming into
compliance with ordinances and executive orders,various contractual agreements, or state and federal
mandates. Consideration of whether the issues penalize the City or puts the City in jeopardy. The
urgency of needing to meet these obligations and consequences of not meeting them will be
considered.
Risk: Life,Health,and Safety:When reviewing this criterium, particular focus should be paid to whether
the request will correct various types of code violations, increase safety/reduce crime, or safety
improvements toward eliminating fatalities and severe injuries related to mobility.
Includes Outside Funding:This criterium assesses whether there is external funding support for a
particular initiative, including federal and state grants, coordination with other agencies, public/private
partnerships, or donations. When analyzing outside funding, it should be noted how much of the
fundingwill still need to be provided by the City in addition to any outside support. (Enterprise funding
through the RDA and Public Utilities fundingwill be considered part of External Funding. Non-enterprise
external funding will be weighted higher than internal enterprise funding.)
Project Phase:This is in accordance with Resolution Number 29 of 2017 which states, "The Council
intends to follow a guideline of approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year
immediately following the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as
more time passes.The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital projects
in a timely manner."
Promote Equity:Consideration should be given to areas of the city in order to improve the infrastructure
of the city as a whole rather than improving some areas and allowing others to deteriorate. A map
showing the condition of the infrastructure of the city and existing tools could help in performing this
analysis.
Reduce Cost/Increase Investment:The main considerations for efficient investment are whether a
project reduces maintenance expenditures or will be leveraged with another CIP project,thereby
eliminating duplication of work or creating economies of scale. Funding projections should be as
accurate as possible and vetted through the Department of Finance.
Resiliency:This criterium involves analyzing whether a project supports resiliency efforts to better
enable the Cityto prepare for,prevent,orrespond to events that have the potentialto disrupt the City's
operations or the delivery of services.
Sustainability:This criterium involves assessing whether the projectsupports water conservation, green
infrastructure, materials resource reduction or a reduction in carbon emissions, fossil fuel use, and/or
criteria pollutants.
One City Approach: Does the project involve coordination across City Divisions and align with Mayor's
Goals?
Workforce Support:This criterium focuses on whether a project supports the physical, mental, or
economic well-being of City employees, in keeping with the Mayor's goal of supporting"Our City
Family".
Community Application:While the financial limitations of any municipality inhibit the ability to act on
every request-the concerns and desires of our residents are vital to understanding how bestto allocate
our limited resources, therefore, projects that are closely aligned with community requests should be
given proper consideration. (Yes/No)
Appendix CAP Scoring Criteria
Decision Tree with Weighted Scores
Y N Score Reference Question FY25 App
Step 1 Existing Asset Y/N Step 3 C Question#10
Step 2 Critical Failure Category 1 Step 3 q Question#12
Legal/Contractual Obligation Category 1 Step 3 C Question#21
Step 3 Scoring Criteria Scoring Scale (0-5) Weight Score
Critical Failure Category 2 or 3 2 C Question#12
Legal/Contractual Obligation Category 2 1 C Question#21
Risk: Life, Health&Safety 2 C Question#21
Includes Outside Funding 1 C Question#17
Project Phase(further along scores higher) 1 C Question#11
Promote Equity 1.5 C Question #18, 19,20
Resiliency 1.5 C Question#2
Sustainability 1 C Question#22
Reduce Cost/Increase Investment 1.5 C Question#16,21
10 One City Approach 11 q Question#16
11 Workforce Support 11 1Question#2
0
Weighted Score:
• Step 1 Existing Asset is worth 7.5 points.
• Step 2 Critical Failure Category 1 is worth 20 points.
• Step 2 Legal/Contractual Obligation Category 1 is worth 15 points.
• For Step 3, CAP Committee members gave a score ranging from 0-5 forthe eleven criteria lines. Those scores are then multiplied by the weight
assigned to the category in the next column to arrive at the score.
Appendix D: Ranked List of Internal Applications
Rank Project Title Average Requested$ Department Group
1 Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 72.82 $858,800 Fire Renewal and Replacement
2 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 71.44 $4,000,000 Engineering Renewal and Replacement
3 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 66.44 $4,500,000 Engineering Program
4 Public Way Concrete 2025 62.41 $750,000 Engineering Program
5 Complete Streets Overlay 2025 61.74 $3,500,000 Engineering Program
6 HVAC Control Replacement at PSB 60.76 $1,300,000 Facilities Renewal and Replacement
7 Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase I 59.71 $2,200,000 Facilities Renewal and Replacement
8 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 57.76 $2,700,000 Transportation Program
Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction
9 57.76 $921,700 Public Lands Renewal and Replacement
Documents
700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West)Additional
10 57.06 $4,500,000 Engineering Renewal and Replacement
Funding
11 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan 55.53 $2,756,500 Facilities Program
12 Safer Crossings Citywide 53.97 $600,000 Transportation Program
Sugar House Park—Two Pavilion Replacements for the
13 52.47 $960,000 Public Lands Renewal and Replacement
Cost of One
Transitioning to Regionally—Appropriate Landscapes,
14 51.91 $3,250,000 Public Lands Program
Adapting Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use
15 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 51.38 $1,500,000 Transportation Program
Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility
16 50.94 $500,000 Arts Council Renewal and Replacement
Improvement Request
17 Neighborhood Byways Program 49.65 $1,600,000 Transportation Program
18 Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond 49.62 $1,500,000 Public Lands New Public Asset
Investment (Increase LOS)
19 Courts&Playgrounds 48.62 $3,100,000 Public Lands Program
20 Police Department Training Center 48.18 $250,000 Police New Asset that Supports CityOperations
21 Livable Streets Program 48.12 $3,000,000 Transportation Program
Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+ Preservation &
22 46.85 $1,910,000 Public Lands Renewal and Replacement
Maintenance Plan
23 Transportation Corridor Transformations Program 46.44 $4,600,000 Transportation New Asset that Supports City
Operations
24 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements 46.21 $1,410,300 Fire New Asset that Supports City
Operations
25 PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 43.50 $874,400 Facilities New Asset that Supports City
Operations
26 Urban Trails Program 42.18 $1,500,000 Transportation Program
27 Green Loop Implementation 41.88 $10,000,000 Public Lands
New Public Asset
(Increase LOS)
28 Alleyway Improvements 2025 41.29 $500,000 Engineering Program
29 Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 40.62 $601,900 Facilities New Asset that Supports City
Operations
"Elevating Access":The Regional Athletic Complex's New Public Asset
30 Blueprint for the Future 38.74 $6,250,000 Public Lands (Increase LOS)
31 SLCPSB(Police Occupancy) Remodels 37.41 $650,000 Police Renewal and Replacement
32 Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot at PSB 26.85 $50,000 Police New Asset that Supports City
Operations
Appendix E: Ranked List of Internal Applications by Department/Division
Department Rank Project Title Average Requested$ Group
Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement
Arts Council 16 50.94 $500,000 Renewal and Replacement
Request
2 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 71.44 $4,000,000 Renewal and Replacement
3 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 66.44 $4,500,000 Program
4 Public Way Concrete 2025 62.41 $750,000 Program
Engineering
5 Complete Streets Overlay 2025 61.74 $3,500,000 Program
10 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West)Additional Funding 57.06 $4,500,000 Renewal and Replacement
28 Alleyway Improvements 2025 41.29 $500,000 Program
6 HVAC Control Replacement at PSB 60.76 $1,300,000 Renewal and Replacement
7 Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase 1 59.71 $2,200,000 Renewal and Replacement
Facilities 11 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan 55.53 $2,756,500 Program
25 PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 43.50 $874,400 New Asset that Supports City
Operations
29 Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 40.62 $601,900 New Asset that Supports City
Operations
1 Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 72.82 $858,800 Renewal and Replacement
Fire
24 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements 46.21 $1,410,300
New Asset that Supports City
Operations
Police 20 Police Department Training Center 48.18 $250,000 New Asset that Supports City
Operations
31 SLCPSB(Police Occupancy) Remodels 37.41 $650,000 Renewal and Replacement
Police
32 Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot at PSB 26.85 $50,000 New Asset that Supports City
Operations
9 Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents 57.76 $921,700 Renewal and Replacement
13 Sugar House Park—Two Pavilion Replacements for the Cost of One 52.47 $960,000 Renewal and Replacement
Transitioning to Regionally—Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting
14 51.91 $3,250,000 Program
Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use
Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond New Public Asset
18 Investment 49.62 $1,500,000 (Increase LOS)
Public Lands
19 Courts&Playgrounds 48.62 $3,100,000 Program
Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+ Preservation & Maintenance
22 46.85 $1,910,000 Renewal and Replacement
Plan
27 Green Loop Implementation 41.88 $10,000,000 New Public Asset
(Increase LOS)
"Elevating Access":The Regional Athletic Complex's Blueprint forthe 38.74 $6 New Public Asset
30 Future ,250,000 (Increase LOS)
8 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 57.76 $2,700,000 Program
12 Safer Crossings Citywide 53.97 $600,000 Program
15 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 51.38 $1,500,000 Program
Transportation 17 Neighborhood Byways Program 49.65 $1,600,000 Program
21 Livable Streets Program 48.12 $3,000,000 Program
AI.,... Acco+that Ciippnr*c fi*v
23 Transportation Corridor Transformations Program 46.44 $4,600,000 n, 1&New Public Asse (Increasel-OS)
26 Urban Trails Program 42.18 $1,500,000 Program
Appendix F: Ranked List of Internal Applications by Group
Group Rank Project Title Average Requested$ Department
20 Police Department Training Center 48.18 $250,000 Police
24 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements 46.21 $1,410,300 Fire
New Asset that
Supports City 25 PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 43.50 $874,400 Facilities
Operations
29 Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 40.62 $601,900 Facilities
32 Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot at PSB 26.85 $50,000 Police
18 Amplifying OurJordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment 49.62 $1,500,000 Public Lands
New Public
Asset(Increase 23 Transportation Corridor Transformations Program 46.44 $4,600,000 Transportation
LOS)
27 Green Loop Implementation 41.88 $10,000,000 Public Lands
30 "Elevating Access":The Regional Athletic Complex's Blueprint for the Future 38.74 $6,250,000 Public Lands
3 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 66.44 $4,500,000 Engineering
4 Public Way Concrete 2025 62.41 $750,000 Engineering
5 Complete Streets Overlay 2025 61.74 $3,500,000 Engineering
Program 8 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 57.76 $2,700,000 Transportation
11 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan 55.53 $2,756,500 Facilities
12 Safer Crossings Citywide 53.97 $600,000 Transportation
Transitioning to Regionally—Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation Systems,
14 51.91 $3,250,000 Public Lands
and Reducing Water Use
15 Transit Capital Program/ Funding Our Future Transit 51.38 $1,500,000 Transportation
17 Neighborhood Byways Program 49.65 $1,600,000 Transportation
19 Courts&Playgrounds 48.62 $3,100,000 Public Lands
Program 21 Livable Streets Program 48.12 $3,000,000 Transportation
26 Urban Trails Program 42.18 $1,500,000 Transportation
28 Alleyway Improvements 2025 41.29 $500,000 Engineering
1 Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 72.82 $858,800 Fire
2 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 71.44 $4,000,000 Engineering
6 HVAC Control Replacement at PSB 60.76 $1,300,000 Facilities
7 Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase 1 59.71 $2,200,000 Facilities
Renewaland 9 Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents 57.76 $921,700 Public Lands
Replacement
10 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding 57.06 $4,500,000 Engineering
13 Sugar House Park—Two Pavilion Replacements for the Cost of One 52.47 $960,000 Public Lands
16 Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request 50.94 $500,000 Arts Council
22 Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+ Preservation & Maintenance Plan 46.85 $1,910,000 Public Lands
31 SLCPSB(Police Occupancy) Remodels 37.41 $650,000 Police
Appendix G:Program Amounts
Department/Division Project Title Requested$ Minimum$Required Historical Annual Funding
Street Reconstruction
FY24:$7,793,000
FY23:$9,369,130
FY22:$2,046329
$4,500,000-Potential Street Improvements Construction Projects 2025 FY21:$2,546,329
Engineering Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 $4,500,000 which equates to 20.23 total lane miles. FY20:$4,801,400
$3,500,000-Potential Street Improvements Construction Projects 2025. Street Overlay
We have submitted 13.29 lane miles as candidates for Complete Streets FY24:$1,250,000
Overlay 2025.The 3.5 million asked would cover less than half of those FY22:$175,000
Engineering Complete Streets Overlay 2025 $3,500,000 13.29 lane miles. FY20:$1,000,000
Public Way Concrete
FY24:750,000
FY23:436,281
FY22:$750,000
Engineering Public Way Concrete 2025 $ 750,000 $750,000 FY20:$402,443
Alleyway Improvements
FY24:$250,000
$200,000 would allow us to address two alleys(this request would cover—5 FY23:$142,919
Engineering Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation 2025 $ 500,000 alleys) FY21:$200,000
Courts and Playgrounds
FY24:$1,574,000
Approximately$600,000 for one playground or$950,000 for one court, FY23:$521,564
Public Lands Courts&Playgrounds $3,100,000 depending on the location,size,need,and condition of the asset(s). FY22:$1,113,045
$500,000:design and new irrigation for roughly 2.5 acres.Replacing
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes, irrigation systems costs an average of$200,000 per acre,when factoring in Waterwise Enhancements
Public Lands Adapting Irrigation Systems,and Reducing Water Use $3,250,000 design,construction,and soft costs. FY20:$419,328
Facilities Asset Replacement
and Renewal
FY24:$2,848,771
FY23:$1,790,149
FY22:$1,570,509
FY21:$2,503,710
Public Services Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan $2,756,500 $1,366,350 FY20:$1,250,000
Livable Streets
FY24:$1,644,126
FY21:$270,000
Transportation Livable Streets Program $3,000,000 $500,000 FY20:$849,500
Neighborhood Byways
FY24:800,000
FY22:$1,545,000
Transportation Neighborhood Byways Program $1,600,000 $970,000 FY20:$150,000
Transportation Safety
FY24:$1,220,000
FY23:$1,013,313
FY22:$2,178,815
FY21:$2,284,945
Transportation Safer Crossings Citywide $ 600,000 $300,000 FY20:$452,000
Traffic Signal and
Intersection Upgrades
FY24:$400,000
FY23:$81,000
FY22:$1,014,450
FY21:$1,800,000
Transportation Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program $2,700,000 $800,000 FY20:$700,000
Transit Capital
FY24:$1,100,000
FY23:$1,100,000
FY21:$1,067,000
Transportation Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit $1,500,000 $500,000 FY20:$1,100,000
Urban Trails
FY24:$1,700,000
FY22:$2,231,750
Transportation Urban Trails Program $1,500,000 $600,000 FY21:$3,192,000
Notes:
Minimum$Required-How much funding is needed to accomplish critical items this fiscal year
The Historical Annual Funding column does not include dollar amounts allocated in Budget Amendments,Recaptures or Administrative Budget Adjustments
Appendix H:Partial Funding
Department/Division Project Title IL Requested$ Partial Funding Details
Yes'
Hardwood Floor Replacement$45,000
Lighting Upgrade-$35,000
Interior Accessibility Ramp $45,000
Lower-Level Artist Studio and Community Workspace Renovation$100,000
Econ Dev/Arts Council Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request $ 500,000 Office Suite Renovation$30,000
Yes,although it is not advised.Even if fully funded at this requested funding rate,we will still witness a continued degradation to the city street system as a whole and the city will be forced to
continuously seek bond after bond to improve the road network.Currently 447 Lane Miles have an OCI of less than 40(SLC has approximately 1,850 lane miles total).
Minimum funding needed:$4,500,000-Potential Street Improvements Construction Projects 2025 which equates to 20,23 total lane miles.
Engineering Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 $ 4,500,000 Recommended annual funding:$46,500,000 this is to achieve a backlog of 15%
Yes,this is a partial funding request.Even if fully funded at this requested funding rate,we will still witness a continued degradation to the city street system as a whole and the city will be forced
to continuously seek bond after bond to improve the road network.86.25 lane miles are eligible as of 2/21/2024.This is based on RAS maintenance recommendations of 40-50 OCI and
additional criteria set by the SLC Engineering Division.
Minimum funding needed:$3,500,000-Potential Street Improvements Construction Projects 2025.We have submitted 13.29 lane miles as candidates for Complete Streets Overlay 2025.The
3.5 million asked would cover less than half of those 13.29 lane miles.
Engineering Complete Streets Overlay 2025 $ 3,500,000 Recommended annual funding:$20,000,000.This would fund roughly 31.56 lane miles of overlays.
We are asking for a portion of the required amount.Construction ready but cannot start until fully funded.The request is as follows:Additional funding is needed to complete the package for
multiple reasons:a water main 1,300 feet long is required to be replaced($650,000)which is unfunded by SLC Public Utilities constrained budget;Styrofoam fill was proposed to mitigate
settlement over the water main as a cost savings method,however that proposal was rejected;Union Pacific changed the City cost of the rail crossing from$400,000 to$1,200,000;and inflation
continues to drive up the cost of construction
Engineering 700 South(Phase 7,4600 West to 5000 West)Additional Funding $ 4,500,000 Minimum funding needed:$4,500,000
Yes,we are asking for a portion of the required amount.Funding could be split among multiple CIP FY cycles,however each year of delaying project construction for additional funding increases
the final price tag.
Engineering 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction $ 4,000,000 Minimum funding needed:$4,000,000
Yes.A reduction from the requested amount will reduce the length of sidewalk and number of access ramps that can be constructed.This requested amount is sorely needed to improve the
current sidewalk network quality.Currently the city receives approximately 50%more service requests than can be addressed annually when this program is fully funded.Due to reduced funding
in previous years(54%in FY19/20,0%in FY20/21,and 58%in FY22/23)Engineering has a backlog of over 450 sidewalk service requests.
Minimum funding needed:$750,000
Engineering Public Way Concrete 2025 $ 750,000 Recommended annual funding:$750,000 based on current capacity;however,this figure is subject to change as data becomes available
Yes,although it is not advised as partial funding will reduce the number of alleys improved.It's worth highlighting that our current funding model operates more as a pilot program,addressing
requests on a case-by-case basis rather than through an established standard or policy for alleyway mitigation.
Minimum funding needed:$2001,would allow us to address two alleys(this request would cover-5 alleys)
Recommended annual funding:The precise value is currently unavailable as we await the results of an ongoing survey.These pending findings are expected to inform the establishment of a
Engineering Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation 2025 $ 500,000 standard selection procedure,aiding in determining the appropriate funding level.
Yes.The project could be phased through 4 different areas.In order of priority:
Required for all areas:
•Engineering and Design$196,617.00
•Contractor OH&P 17%,Bonding&Insurance 3.5%,Owners Construction Contingency 10%,Escalation 32%,SLC Engineering Fees 0.8%
1.Turn-Out Cleaning Room expansion and PPV-$40,240
2.Security System and lights-$37,669
3.Grounds-excavation,re-grading,curb and gutter,landscaping,storm water,backfill,paving,extrication pads,and technical props-$436,431
4.Fencing-$86,200
Fire Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements $ 1,410,300 Minimum funding needed:Required Amount(varies)+Turn-Out Cleaning Room expansion and PPV$40,240
No.The project cannot be partially funded as each step is contingent on the other.The work is as follows:
1.Div 01-Erect Scaffolding and Prepare Existing Surface$333,040
2.Div 03-Patch and Repair Spalled Concrete$99,445
3.Div 07-Concrete Waterproofing$58,140
4.Div 32-Misc.$25,000
Subtotal$515,625
5.General Conditions$103,125
6.Overhead&Profit$51,563
7.Bonds&Insurance$10,313
8.Contingency$77,344
Total$757,969-adjusted for 2024=$858,800
Fire Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration $ 858,800 Minimum funding needed:$858,800
Yes,the Structural Assessments and Concept Design(the constituent application's scope)could be completed separately.Funding both the constituent application($124,000)and this internal
application($921,700)would be preferable and would fund concept design and construction document development,which are both critical steps that must occur before an accurate
construction/implementation funding request can be made in FY 26.
Another note:Public Lands is currently exploring emergency improvements to the east bay of the Liberty Park Greenhouse to allow this one part of the greenhouse to be used for operations
Public Lands Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents $ 921,700 while a larger renovation project is underway.
This is likely to be a programmatic,reoccurring application with annual funding requests for replacement of irrigation systems(critical infrastructure)that support the city's living landscape.
The minimum effective amount of funding for this fiscal year's request is$500,000:design and new irrigation for roughly 2.5 acres.Replacing irrigation systems costs an average of$200,000 per
when factoring in design,construction,and soft costs.Fully funding this request would fund new irrigation systems for up to 16 acres(which is less than 2%of the Public Lands
Department's irrigated landscapes).Due to the 25-30 year lifespan of irrigation systems and some landscapes,and in order to replace and/or upgrade systems that irrigate 3-5%of the Public
Lands'landscapes per year,on-going requests would be around the$6 million to$9 million per year range going forward,though that determination has not been made or included in the
department's capital asset plan.
Replacement of irrigation systems significantly reduces the use of water,a critical resource in our climate.Water costs are also the single largest operating cost for the Public Lands Department.
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes,Adapting Irrigation Systems, The Department suggests that irrigation system upgrades or replacements and turf reduction strategies(for the same site)be funded and occur at the same time.This will allow new landscaping
Public Lands and Reducing Water Use $ 3,250,000 to be appropriately cared for rather than retrofitted to fit an unaccommodating,inefficient irrigation system.
Yes,in the following order.
1.A minimum of$700,000(for design and construction)in 1/4 Cent transportation funding is needed to match the federal grant for State Streets addition of active transportation facilities.
2.An additional$5 million would fund full design(i.e.,create bid documents readyfor construction)for 3-5 blocks of 200 East.Design is typically estimated at 10%of project construction costs.
The combination of State Street match(for design and construction)and 200 East(for design)would bring a partial funding request to$5.7 million.
3.Fully funding this request(including the above and the remaining$4.3 million)in FY 24/25 would provide the Green Loop team more flexibility and leverage when exploring additional funding
sources to bring strategic segments to construction as quickly as possible.Not funding the remaining$4.3 million would push a much larger construction funding request to FY 25/26.
Additional funding requests are likely in FY 25/26 and other future application rounds.If no additional,outside funds are available,a minimum construction strategy might focus this$10 million
Public Lands Green Loop Implementation $10,000,000 funding request(along with state funds awarded or pending)to construct at least one prototype block on 200 East,tentatively in 2026.
Yes.This Memory Grove Park application comprises two possible phases:Phase 1 consists of urgent repairs while Phase 2 is focused on the development of a Preservation&Maintenance Plan.
1.The full request for the Preservation&Maintenance Plan($160,000)should be considered essential.It must work hand-in-hand with any of the urgent repairs(Phase 2)that are funded.
2.Nine(9)urgent repairs have been prioritized by City staff(see project description for the complete list).If needed,the order of priority and/or number of repairs could be adjusted to meet
Public Lands Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+Preservation&Maintenance Plan $ 1,910,000 nearly any partial funding amount.It should be noted that performing repairs in separate phases would result in a higher overall cost(particularlydueto"softcosts").
Yes-this is a phased project.We are seeking funding for phase 1.
Phase I-Estimated Cost$2.2 Million(adjusted for inflation),a reduction in funding would allow us to address some of the items below.
•Design Life safety,access controls,and security systems
•Upgrade Life safety,access control,and security systems
•Design HVAC System
•Upgrade Key HVAC Systems
Phase II-Estimated Cost$2 Million(not adjusted for inflation)
•Upgrade piping and terminal units on floors 1-3
Phase III-Estimated Cost$2 Million(not adjusted for inflation)
•Upgrade piping and terminal units on floors 4-6
Phase IV-Estimated Cost$1 Million(not adjusted for inflation)
•Upgrade air handlers
Public Services Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements-Phase 1 $ 2,200,000 •Repair parking structure and canopy
Yes.The project is broken into 3 phases,currently seeking funding for phase 1 and 2,currently 7 electrical vechicles are in this lot and only 4 EV chargers.Chargers to be added in phase 2.In
order of priority:
1.Phase 1—Addition of a utility switch,500kVA Utility Transformer,and 1600A 208V 30 SES-EV-1-$499,043
2.Phase 2-(8)L2 Chargers-$102,836
3.Phase 3-(8)L2 Chargers-$305,715
Public Services Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 $ 601,900 Minimum funding needed:$499,043+302,836
Yes.The project is broken into 3 phases,currently seeking funding for phase 1 and 2 to capture the needs for the current and incoming PD and Fire EV.In order of priority:
1.Phase 1—Addition of a 3000kVA Utility Transformer,2500A 208V 30 SES-EV-1,Proposed 1200A 208V Panel,and(6)L2 Chargers-$709,633
2.Phase 2-1000A 208V Panel and(8)L2 Chargers-$164,749
3.Phase 3-(6)L2 Chargers-$76,118
Public Services PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 $ 874,400 Minimum funding needed:$709,633
Public Services HVAC Control Replacement at PSB $ 1,300,000 No,all of the controls will need to be addressed at the same time.
We are seeking$250,000 in funding for the second phase of our initiative,aimed at conducting a comprehensive feasibility study for anew training facility.The current facility's inadequacy in
capacity and condition is exacerbated by the anticipated growth in the Northwest region,driven by an inland port and business developments.With projected population growth in the
downtown area and the potential addition of two more professional sports teams,the demand on the Salt Lake City Police Department(SLC PD)and Salt Lake City Fire Department(SLC FD)is
expected to surge.Meeting these increasing demands necessitates additional trained personnel to address the heightened call volume from residents and visitors.Anew training center is central
to our ability to adequately train current and future first responders,making planning for these anticipated increases vital to ensuring the safety and security of our growing community.
The requested funds will be used to conduct the feasibility study,addressing Public Safety,Public Services,and Community Access components.This study is essential for identifying design
requirements and establishing a well-defined project scope,laying the foundation for subsequent project phases.
Police Police Department Training Center $ 250,000 Mini mum funding needed:$75,000(this is our on-call purchasing limit,for scoping,designing,and rendering the project we will require the full amount.)
Police Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot $ 50,000 No,all of the electrical trenching for the booth,cameras,and lighting will need to be addressed at the same time.
Yes.The project could be phased through 4 different areas.In order of priority:
Priority 1
•ROOM 4621-$186,902.30
Priority 2
•ROOM 3445-$78,942.40
Priority 3
•ROOM 2214-$112,994.30
Priority 4
•4th ROOM 2251-$142,499.50
•4th ROOM 2412-$26,868.40
•4th ROOM 2263-$96,801.90
Police SLC Public Safety Building(Police Occupancy)Remodels $ 650,000 Minimum funding needed:$265,744.70(Priority 1&2)
Yes.The minimum partial funding amount would be approximately$600,000 for one playground or$950,000 for one court,depending on the location,size,need,and condition of the asset(s).If
the CDCIP Board,Mayor,or City Council would like to inquire about one or more specific sites,Public Lands will provide a more accurate(and potentially less expensive)estimate.
However,this application expresses a programmatic,reoccurring need with annual funding requests for the replacement of courts and playgrounds that support the city's ability to provide safe
recreation and active play infrastructure.The expected life cycle of each playground/court is roughly 20-25 years.Based on the number of courts and playgrounds in Salt Lake City's inventory,
two to three playgrounds and two to three courts should be funded for replacement each year(an approximately$4.5 to$5 million recurring request).
The General Fund is the only funding source eligible for these project types,unless an expansion of level of service is desired for any court or playground replacement(in which case that part of
the work would be impact fee eligible).
The following is a list of potential parks where courts and/or playground replacement projects could occur with this year's and subsequent years'funding requests,in descending order of priority
(including condition,opportunity,geographic need,and equity criteria).
1.Popperton Park(playground)
2.Wasatch Hollow Park(playground)
3.Sunnyside Park(courts)
4.10th East Senior Center(courts)
5.Riverside Park(courts and playground)
6.Fairmont Park(courts,possibly playground)
7.Warm Springs Park(courts)
Public Lands Courts&Playgrounds $ 3,100,000 8.Westpointe Park(courts and playground)
The bulk of this request($1,250,000)could be partially funded at any dollar amount in order to increase the impact of GO Bond funding.Any partial funding dedicated to this part of the scope
would go towards expanding improvements funded by the GO Bond,specifically in Bend in the River,Modesto Park,and the International Peace Gardens.Planning,design,and immediate
Public Lands Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization:Doubling Bond Investment $ 1,500,000 improvements at the International Peace Gardens could also be funded independently at$350,000.
This project could be funded in three separate phases.However,funding more than one phase at a time(in the following order of priority)would ensure better project outcomes,less overlap or
rework,and lower costs.
1.Planning,Design,and Engagement for the RAC and the Rose Park Lane Open Space:Must be completed prior to construction(see#2,below)and is estimated to cost$1,300,000(likely 100%
impact fee eligible).
2.Construction(also known as Phase 1 Construction):Two multi-use fields,walkways,and the northern parking lot in the RAC are estimated to cost$4,100,000(likely 100%impact fee eligible).If
only partial funding is available,this request could be reduced to fund one field($1,750,000 each)and the parking lot and walkways($600,000)for$2,350,000,orjust the parking lot and
walkways for$600,000 as they are essential to facilitating use of any new fields.
Public Lands "Elevating Access':The Regional Athletic Complex's Blueprint for the Future $ 6,250,000 3.Rose Park Lane Trail Reconstruction and Beautification:This part of the scope could be implemented by itself or along with any other phase for$850,000,and is partially impact fee eligible.
No,not very easily.Salt Lake County(a 50/50 funding partner)can only match what the City funds.Due to the County's funding decision occurring between the time of this writing(February
2024)and the City's CIP funding award(August 2024),partial funding by the City would result in only a 33%match,which is at odds with the City's and County's cooperative funding agreement
Public Lands Sugar House Park—Two Pavilion Replacements for the Cost of One $ 960,000 for Sugar House Park.Delays in Salt Lake City's or Salt Lake County's funding would also increase the risk to and costs of this project and future projects.
Yes,although it is not advised as these critical and deferred assets will increase the risk of a costly critical failure and will be more expense to replace in the future due to inflation.The program
could be addressed at the following funding levels:
1.Critical Components—Priority land 2-$1,366,350
2.Critical Components—Priority 1,2,and 3-$2,756,500
Minimum funding needed:$1,366,350
Recommended annual funding:$9,240,000(IFMA National Standard(,we currently recieve$350K ongoing and variable$1.7M to 2.2M through CIP requests,ideally this can also become
Public Services Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan $ 2,756,500 ongoing,bringing our total to$2,500,000.
Transportation Transportation Corridor Transformations $ 4,600,000 $560,000
Transportation Livable Streets Program $ 3,000,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
Transportation Neighborhood Byways Program $ 1,600,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
Transportation Safer Crossings Citywide $ 600,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
Transportation Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program $ 2,100,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
Transportation Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit $ 1,500,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
Transportation Urban Trails Program $ 1,500,000 See Transportation specific spreadsheet
4A
�\J
Q Q o�Quo Qc Quo Q ce .z Qco C. �e� P� �ep�a `o��a a�Qray yJQQ�°�rec y°Jtc
1 Livable Streets Program(Zone 10-15) ,000,000 $500,000 1 - Average$500,000 per zone;amount varies with zone size,street
1 characteristics,traffic intensity,etc.
i
2 Safer Crossings Citywide $600,000 $300,0001 limited to minor - At current costs,single crossing(HAWK+bulbouts)may cost in
I
treatments excess of the$600,000 being requested.$300,000 would allow
some RRFBs or other less expensive treatments.
i
3 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Pr $2,700,000 $800,000 i 2 signals Yes. Full funding would help us to retire aged traffic signals closer
to their normal retirement age of 30 years,decreasing
1 maintenance costs and improving safety.This program has been
Ichronically underfunded for over a decade. Need flexibility for
i
11
4 Neighborhood Byways Program $1,600,000 $970,000
Kensington Neighborhood 6A i $1,600,000 $400,000 $400k as match, Pending state TTIF $1,120,000 If pending state grant is received,$400,000 needed for match. If
Byway(700 E crossing) or$1.6 million to FLM;scored#5 no grant,$1,600,000 will enable this crossing to go forward w/
1 proceed without statewide prior Kensington CIP&federal funds. Otherwise this crossing will
I
TTIF award be held until additional funds are received.
800 East Neighborhood 6B i $570,000 $570,000 match or design Pending state TTIF $1,330,000 If pending state grant is received,$570,000 needed for match for
Byway(400 S to 1300 S) FILM;scored#7 design&construction. If not received,$570,000 would go toward
1 statewide(tied) design and/or other citywide.
800 East Neighborhood 6C 1 $480,000 $480,000 If pending state grant is received,$570,000 needed for match for
Byway/1300 South / design&construction. If not received,$570,000 would go toward
Intersection I design and/or other citywide.
Other citywide/ 6D 1 $150,000 Funds to ensure completion of projects listed above and/or to be
contingency used strategically toward design and construction of other
neighborhood byways in Salt Lake City.
I
5 Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Futur $1,500,000 $500,000 Note:FOF Transit UTA matches with generally This project is highly scalable.Partial funding could be used to
1 funding source for shelters and doubles our construct fewer stops and connections. These investments are
this program. amenities investment budget neutral for maintenance,except when custom furnishings
are used,which will be included at key locations as part of FTN
branding. UTA funds the maintenance of the furnishings at
standard bus stops,but will not fund the maintenance of custom
furnishings.
6 Urban Trails Program $1,500,000 $600,000AL
j
I
Sugar House Greenway 8A $450,000 $300,000 State legislature $16,000,000 S-Line Extension under construction in later part of 2024;without
Extension(to accompany S- I earmark,UTA funding UTA will require an ugly chainlink fence to provide a
Line Extension) I funds physical barricade between pedestrians and the train.
Alphabet Trail(along east 8B 1 $500,000 $300,000 Concrete only;no WFRC federal $11,700,000 Complete Streets Ideal construction timing with 1300 East reconstruction in 2025.
0
side of 1300 East,Alphabet I landscaping or grant($8 million), ordinance
Streets area) 0 lights. SLC Bond
The Other Side Village to 8C $500,000 $500,000 design only Construction preparation:Soil testing,design,and permitting for
Orange Street Transit Hub I trail skirting or on top of retired SLC landfill on SLC-owned land
Citywide/contingency 8D $50,000 Funds to ensure completion of projects listed above and/or to be
1 used strategically toward design and construction of other urban
i
trails in Salt Lake City.
v VAKF
C.
N <
I861
Mayor's Recommended
Capital Improvement
Program Budget
Including Capital Maintenance
Funding
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Table of Contents
CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Page:
FY 2024-25 PROJECTS OVERVIEW 1
FY 2024-25 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 5
DEBT SERVICE CIP
DEBT SERVICE CIP 19
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES 22
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 27
400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 28
Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration 29
Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 30
Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents 31
Complete Streets Overlay 2025 32
Public Way Concrete 2025 33
Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan 34
Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase 1 35
Transit Capital Program/Funding Our Future Transit 36
Safer Crossings Citywide 37
Sugar House Park-Two Pavilion Replacement(50/50 Cost Share) 38
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes,Adapting Irrigation Systems,and Reducing Water Use 39
HVAC Control Replacement at PSB 40
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design 41
Neighborhood Byways Program 42
Courts&Playgrounds 43
Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program 44
Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment 45
Riverside Park Pathway Loop 46
Street Futsal Courts 47
Playground Shade 48
Pocket Park Community Space-Jake Garn Way 49
Equal Grounds Project(Calisthenics-Fitness Area) 50
5th West Commons Conversation Center(s) 51
Historic Signs/Markers 52
Concrete Replacement 53
700 South(Phase 7,4600 West to 5000 West)Additional Funding 54
Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs+ Preservation &Maintenance Plan 55
Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request 56
Green Loop Implementation 57
Fairmont Park Basketball Court 58
Table of Contents
Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation 2025 59
Cost Overrun 60
Percent for Art 61
ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS
Fed Ex Utilities and Roadway 66
Decommission R/W 14-32&T/W Improvements 67
Taxiway U &V Proper Design 68
Taxiway U &V Proper Construction 69
Taxiway G from E to North of Delta Ramp 70
Taxiway H1 &End Runway 16L/34R Repair 71
Taxiway F Reconstruction(F1 - F2) 72
Runway 16L/34R&Taxiway Complex Ext Environment Assessment 73
SVRA Randon Aviation Taxilane&Infrastructure 74
SVRA Pavement Preservation &Apron Expansion 75
Bus Plaza EV Stations 76
Economy Lot Bus Lane Reconstruction 77
Landside Pavement Management FY25 78
QTA Equipment Replacement 79
Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations- Phase IV(FY25) 80
GA Hangar Demo- Hughes&Upper Limit 81
GA Hangar Demo- Rows 6,7, &15 and Pavement Preservation 82
State of Utah-Sky Harbour Roadway&Site Improvements 83
GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS
Tee Box Leveling 86
Pump Replacement 87
Maintenance Equipment 88
Range Fence 89
Property Fencing Project 90
New Construction Projects 91
Irrigation Improvements 92
Cart Path Improvements 93
Bridges 94
On Course Restroom 95
Range Hitting Pad Extension 96
Golf Carts 97
PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
Water Main Replacements 100
Treatment Plant Improvements 101
Table of Contents
Deep Pump Wells 102
Meter Change-Out Program 103
Water Service Connections 104
Storage Reservoirs 105
Pumping Plants&Pump Houses 106
Culverts, Flumes&Bridges 107
Distribution Reservoirs(Tanks) 108
Shops,Storehouse,Other Buildings(Water Utility) 109
Treatment Plants 110
Collection Lines 111
Lift Stations 112
Shops,Storehouse,Other Buildings(Sewer Utility) 113
Storm Drain Lines 114
Riparian Corridor Improvements 115
Landscaping 116
Storm Water Lift Stations 117
Detention Basins 118
Shops,Storehouse,Other Buildings(Storm water Utility) 119
Street Lighting Projects 120
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS
City Creek Daylighting 122
Japantown Construction Documents 123
Japantown Art 124
This page intentionally left blank
R
h�
'e
ts
M
S
f
h- x
L �
.� •ram
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction and Overview
Salt Lake City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed
to replace or expand the City's public infrastructure.The principal element that guides the City in determining the
annual infrastructure improvements and budget schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget.
The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development&Capital Improvement Program
(CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district.The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety
of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor.
The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for
the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the
Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and
adopting the final CIP budget.The details of the recommended FY2024-25 CIP Budget are included in this book.
In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital
improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition,the repair and
maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a
positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into
the decision-making process.
Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the
departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs.
The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress.All projects older than three years that do not show
significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready
projects.The Administration continuously evaluates the City's funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because
the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City's capital improvement projects,the
City analyzes the effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio.
Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017/Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management
Policies
Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify
the expectations of the City's Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in
determining how to best address the City's deferred and long-term maintenance needs.
Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include:
- A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a
recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not
include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches.
- A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of$50,000 or more, with few exceptions.
- Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and
minimize maintenance and replacement costs.
- Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are
mandated by the state and/or federal government; and provide for the renovation of existing facilities
resulting in the preservation of the community's prior investment.
- The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an
existing balance remains on a completed project.
- Debt Service(excluding G.O. Bonding).
1 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Allocations
Salt Lake City's FY2024-25 adopted CIP budget appropriates $557,079,648 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Capital
Maintenance, Class"C" Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent Tax Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise
Funds, and other public and private funds.
The City's General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a
payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project.The Library Fund covers the Local
Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the
construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through
the City's Class C Road fund. Funds to pay debt service, equaling$10,825,204, are included in the adopted annual
budget.
Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City's capital improvement projects.
Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City.
A total of$2,880,000 was recommended for Transportation projects. Of this amount,the budget appropriates
$1,500,000 of Funding our Future funds, $1,250,000 in Cent Tax funding, and $130,000 in Capital Maintenance
funding. Programs funded include Transit Capital, Safer Crossings, Neighborhood Byways, and Traffic Signal
Replacement.
The recommended budget for Parks,Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total
appropriation of$12,783,990 from the General Fund, Capital Maintenance funds, Parks Impact Fee funds, and
Funding our Future funds. Projects funded include Liberty Park Greenhouse, Sugar House Park Pavilions,
Transitioning to Regionally Appropriate Landscapes,Adapting Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use, Citywide
Park Restroom Planning Study, Courts and Playgrounds,Jordan River Revitalization, Riverside Park Pathway Loop,
Street Futsal Courts, Playground Shade, Pocket Park Community Space, Calisthenics Fitness Area, Conversation
Centers, Memory Grove Park Repairs, Green Loop Implementation, and Fairmont Park Basketball Courts.
Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of$25,365,300. Of this
amount, the budget appropriates $4,866,350 from the General Fund, $11,280,150 from Capital Maintenance
funding, $4,250,000 of Class C funding, $1,358,800 of Funding our Future funds, and $3,610,000 in Cent Tax
funding. Programs funded include 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction, Complete Streets Reconstruction
and Overlay, Public Way Concrete, Concrete Replacement, Stabilizing the Fire Training Tower, Facilities Replacement
and Renewal Plan, Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements, HVAC Control Replacement at the Public Safety Building,
Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation, and Phase 7 of a project on 700 South.
Capital Maintenance funding totaling $500,000 was recommended for Salt Lake City's Art Barn to address
infrastructure and accessibility improvements.
An additional $30,000 in one-time funding for Historic Signs/Markers was also recommended.
Capital Projects
The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2024-25 Budget.These pages provide a
breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project.The total for capital
projects in the FY2024-25 budget is $41,559,290.
Enterprise Fund Projects
The City's enterprise functions;Airport, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Redevelopment, Refuse Collection and Golf-
are by nature,very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and
capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality.
Airport Fund-The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive
any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City's system of airports.The Department of Airports (the
2 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Airport) has 664 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports
that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience.
The Fiscal Year 2025 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures. The
budget no longer contains Covid-19 relief grants that were used to recover lost revenue as well as subsidize the
rates and charges for commercial and cargo carriers.The Salt Lake City International Airport(SLCIA) continues to
benefit from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law(BIL)grants awarded for FY2025.The BIL grants will continue to
provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects that are moving from design
into actual construction.The Airport will be bringing on five gates located on Concourse B as well as the opening of
the much anticipated central tunnel in October 2024.These openings bring additional staffing and maintenance
staff requirements while seeing the complete elimination of the remaining hardstand operations.
The developed FY25 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues
that help offset increased operating expenses.The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These
projects include the Phase III and Phase IV of construction of gates on Concourse B. In addition, critical projects
found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport's owned
facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the
growth we are projecting into future years.
Public Utilities Funds-Salt Lake CU De artm.e.nt of Public Utilities(SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities: water,
sewer, storm water, and street Ilghtl g. E ch utility Is operated as a separate enterprise tund.Tax money Is not used
to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees,fund reserves, revenue
bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government subsidized loan.The department is utilizing a Water
Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act(WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility
construction, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities(BRIC)grant to fund a portion of the City Creek
Water Treatment Plant reconstruction, and an American Rescue Plan Act grant to fund the Granary District
Floodplain Mitigation Re-mapping. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been
established for each fund.The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure
intensive and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning.
The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year 2025,the
department has over 60 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects.
Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects to be designed in
one year and constructed in subsequent years.The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the
Department's Capital Asset Program (CAP).The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project
undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require
increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950's and early
60's. Planning is underway for each of the plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement, with the
City Creek re-construction proceeding towards a 2027 completion date. A unique aspect of capital projects in
SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities.Adding to the complexity are water
rights and exchange agreement obligations.
RDA Funds-The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City(RDA)strengthens neighborhoods and commercial
districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity, and foster authentic, equitable communities.The RDA
utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the
City's housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability.The RDA's primary
source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the
specific budget account.
The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure
projects.As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year
funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent
on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects' costs and details are known. Depending on
the project,the timeline for this process may not follow the City's CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The RDA fiscal year 2025 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects:
• City Creek Daylighting: Allocates an additional $50,000 towards designing the daylighting of City Creek along
the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West, supplementing the fiscal year 2024's $100,000 appropriation
3 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
for final construction drawings.The total project, aimed at improving access to nature,water quality, and
flood mitigation, is estimated to cost between $15 million and $20 million.
• Japantown Construction Documents: Designates $100,000 to produce detailed construction documents for
the Japantown Design Strategy, essential for estimating costs and guiding redevelopment.The plans aim to
revitalize the neighborhood while honoring its historical significance and fostering community engagement
and connectivity.
• Japantown Art: Designates a total of$336,577 for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art
installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown's
heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for
both residents and visitors.
Sustainabilit Fund-Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance with federal, state and local
regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within
the permitted footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no capital projects for FY 2024-25.
Golf Fund-The Golf Division operates.seven ful servo olf courses at six Salt I,ake CitV locationsprQvidira c�ualit
recreational experiences at a c mpetitive price or Sa t L�ke City residents and visitors r"om surrounding ing Nei an
various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily,from excess revenue generated by
user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing
funds into long-overdue projects.
In addition,for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9
holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future
projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $7,709,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY25. The Golf Division is in the
middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box
areas at each course and has allocated $60,000 in FY25 from the Golf CIP Fund.The Golf Division is in the middle of
a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated $525,000 for
FY25.The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course
budgeted at$4,400,000. Other significant projects include replacing the driving range fence at Bonneville and
driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses,the Golf Division will be using
$663,951 in FY25 to purchase additional equipment.
4 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Debt Service
Projects
Sales Tax Series $ 744,551 $ 744,551
2014B Bond
Sales Tax Series $ 2,008,941 $ 2,008,941
2016A Bond
Sales Tax Series $ 357,351 $ 357,351
2019A Bond
u Sales Tax Series $ 518,668 $ 518,668
i 2021
4A Sales Tax Series $ 2,005,851 $ 2,005,851
2022B Bond
C Sales Tax Series $ 3,090,117 $ 3,090,117
2022C Bond
ESCO Debt $ 923,600 $ 923,600
Service to Bond
Fire Station#3 $ 677,575 $ 677,575
Fire Station#14 $ 498,550 $ 498,550
Debt Service $10,825,204 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $10,825,204
Projects Total
Ongoing Projects
Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000
City Leases $ 560,000 $ 560,000
Facilities $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Maintenance
to Urban Trail $ 200,000 $ 200,000
c Maintenance
to Planning and $ 350,000
r- Design $ 350,000
Public Lands $ 250,000 $ 683,152 $ 933,152
Maintenance
Community and
Neighborhoods- $ 700,000 $ 700,000
Surplus Land RES
Ongoing Projects $ 2,810,000 $ - $ 683,152 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 3,693,152
Tota I
Other Ongoing
to Public Services-
ESCO County $ 155,300 $ 155,300
0 Steiner
pPublic Services
Memorial House $ 20,000 $ 20,000
a�
s
FY25 Landfill $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Other Ongoing $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,675,300 $ 1,675,300
5 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
• Ma ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
New/
Maintenance
Projects Total
Stabilize the Fire
Training Tower $ 858,800 $ 858,800
Deterioration
400 South Jordan
River Bridge $ 3,140,000 $ 860,000 $ 4,000,000
Reconstruction
Liberty Park
Greenhouse $ 124,000 $ 124,000
Restoration
Complete Streets
Reconstruction $ 1,000,000 $3,500,000 $ 4,500,000
2025
Liberty Park
Greenhouse
Design and $ 804,500 $ 117,200 $ 921,700
Construction
Documents
Complete Streets $ 750,000 $2,750,000 $ 3,500,000
Overlay 2025
Public Way $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Concrete 2025
a
u Facilities
Replacement and $ 1,366,350 $ 1,390,150 $ 2,756,500
Renewal Plan
Z Plaza 349 HVAC
Improvements- $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000
Phase I
Transit Capital
Program/ $ 750,000 $ 750,000
Funding Our
Future Transit
Safer Crossings $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Citywide
Sugar House Park
-Two Pavilion
Replacements $ 480,000 $ 480,000
(50/50 Cost
Share)
Transitioning to
Regionally-
Appropriate
Landscapes,
Adapting $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Irrigation
Systems, and
Reducing Water
Use
HVAC Control
Replacement at $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
PSB
6 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Citywide Park
Restroom
Planning Study/
Fairmont $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Restroom
Conceptual
Design
Neighborhood $ 20,000 $ 950,000 $ 970,000
Byways Program
Courts& $ 549,150 $ 904,450 $ 54,490 $ 1,508,090
Playgrounds
Traffic Signal
Replacement and $ 130,000 $ 730,000 $ 860,000
Upgrades
Program
Amplifying Our
Jordan River
Revitalization: $ 200,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000
Doubling Bond
Investment
Riverside Park $ 530,000 $ 530,000
Pathway Loop
Street Futsal $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Courts
c
u Playground Shade $ 500,000 $ 500,000
a Pocket Park
u Community Space $ 330,000 $ 330,000
-Jake Garn Way
Equal Grounds
Z Protect
(Calisthenics $ 86,200 $ 86,200
Fitness Area)
5th West
Commons $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Conversation
Center(s)
Historic Signs/ $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Markers
Concrete $ 750,000 $ 750,000
Replacement
700 South(Phase
7,4600 West to
5000 West) $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000
Additional
Funding
Memory Grove
Park Urgent
Repairs+ $ 1,910,000 $ 1,910,000
Preservation&
Maintenance Plan
7 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
• Ma ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Art Barn Failing
Infrastructure and
Accessibility $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Improvement
Request
Green Loop $3,140,000 $ 3,140,000
Implementation
u Fairmont Park $ 75,400 $ 678,600 $ 754,000
a Basketball Court
u Alleyway
Improvements $ 500,000 $ 500,000
and Mitigation
z 2025
New Projects $ 7,330,000 $15,000,000 $3,154,490 $4,250,000 $3,824,800 $8,000,000 $ — $41,559,290
Total
Cost Overrun $ 223,171 $ 223,171
Percent for Art $ 167,378 $ 167,378
Total General
Fund/Other
Fund/Class C
Fund/Impact Fee $21,355,753 $15,000,000 $3,837,642 $4,250,000 $3,824,800 $8,200,000 $ 1,675,300 $58,143,495
Fund/Surplus
Land Fund CIP
Projects
8 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Airport CIP
Projects
FeclEx Utilities and
Roadway $ 3,935,000 $ 3,935,000
Decommission R/
W 14-32&T/W $ 3,605,000 $ 3,605,000
Improvements
Taxiway U &V
Proper Design $ 4,725,000 $ 4,725,000
Taxiway U &V
Proper $102,320,400 $102,320,400
Construction
Taxiway G from E
to North of Delta $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Ramp
Taxiway H1 &End
Runway 16L/34R $ 4,939,000 $ 4,939,000
Repair
Taxiway F
Reconstruction(F1 $ 9,524,000 $ 9,524,000
- F2)
Runway 16L/34R
&Taxiway
c Complex Ext $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Q- Environment
y Assessment
a
SVRA Randon
Aviation Taxilane $ 760,000 $ 760,000
&Infrastructure
SVRA Pavement
Preservation& $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Apron Expansion
Bus Plaza EV
Stations $ 1,162,000 $ 1,162,000
Economy Lot Bus
Lane $ 3,067,000 $ 3,067,000
Reconstruction
Landside
Pavement $ 942,000 $ 942,000
Management FY25
QTA Equipment
Replacement $ 248,000 $ 248,000
Electrical Vehicle
Charging Stations $ 1,549,000 $ 1,549,000
- Phase IV(FY25)
GA Hangar Demo
- Hughes&Upper $ 718,000 $ 718,000
Limit
9 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
GA Hangar Demo
y Rows 6,7, &15
and Pavement 1,223,000 $ 1,223,000
Preservation
c State of Utah-Sky
u Harbour Roadway
&Site $ 3,260,000 $ 3,260,000
c Improvements
CL
Total Airport CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $148,477,401$148,477,40(
Q Projects
Golf CIP Projects
Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Pump $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Replacement
Maintenance
Equipment $ 456,538 $ 456,538
Range Fence $ 900,000 $ 900,000
Property Fencing
Project $ 55,000 $ 55,000
New Construction $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Projects
� Irrigation
Improvements $ 4,400,000 $ 4,400,000
Cart Path
Improvements $ 525,000 $ 525,000
Bridges $ 74,000 $ 74,000
On Course
Restroom $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Range Hitting Pad
Extension $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Golf Carts $ 206,305 $ 206,305
Total Golf CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $8,371,843 $ 8,371,843
Projects
10 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Public Utilities
CIP Projects
Water Main $10,093,000 $10,093,000
Replacements
Treatment Plant $62,850,000 $62,850,000
Improvements
Deep Pump Wells $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000
Meter Change
Out Program $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Water Service
Connections $ 3,950,000 $ 3,950,000
Storage Reservoirs $ 1,075,000 $ 1,075,000
Pumping Plants&
Pump Houses $ 320,000 $ 320,000
Culverts, Flumes
&Bridges $ 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000
Distribution $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Reservoirs(Tanks)
Shops,
Storehouse,
Other Buildings $ 80,000 $ 80,000
-, (Water Utility)
+Z+ Treatment Plants $214,575,333 $214,575,333
Collection Lines $24,993,000 $24,993,000
a Lift Stations $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Shops,
Storehouse,
Other Buildings $ 280,000 $ 280,000
(Sewer Utility)
Storm Drain Lines $ 2,155,000 $ 2,155,000
Riparian Corridor
Improvements $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Landscaping $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Storm Water Lift
Stations $ 5,914,000 $ 5,914,000
Detention Basins $ 3,635,000 $ 3,635,000
Shops,
Storehouse,
Other Buildings $ 40,000 $ 40,000
(Storm water
Utility)
Street Lighting $ 1,240,000 $ 1,240,000
Projects
Total Public
Utilities CIP $— $— $— $— $— $— $341,600,333 $341,600,333
Projects
11 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
General Fund /Capital Maintenance/Class C/ Impact Fee/1/4 Cent Sales Tax/Enterprise Fund/Other CIP
Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECTMa ance • FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Redevelopment
Agency(RDA)CIP
Projects
City Creek
a Daylighting 50,000 $ 50,000
C Japantown
Construction $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Documents
Japantown Art $ 336,577 $ 336,577
Total RDA CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 486,577 $ 486,577
Projects
>% Sustainability
CIP Projects
Z
c No Projects $ —
Total
3 Sustainability $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
�n CIP Projects
Total Enterprise
and Other Fund $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $498,936,153 $498,936,153
CIP
GRAND TOTAL $21,355,753 $15,000,000 $3,837,642 $4,250,000 $3,824,800 $8,200,000 $500,611,453 $557,079,648
12 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
Impact Fee Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
Parks imp-.
PROJECT Fees
Impact Fee Projects
Amplifying OurJordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
Riverside Park Pathway Loop $ 530,000 $ 530,000
u) Street Futsal Courts $ 350,000 $ 350,000
LL Playground Shade $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Pocket Park Community Space-Jake Garn Way $ 330,000 $ 330,000
Equal Grounds Project(Calisthenics-Fitness Area) $ 86,200 $ 86,200
5th West Commons Conversation Center(s) $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Fairmont Park Basketball Courts $ 678,600 $ 678,600
Total Impact Fee by Type $ 3,824,800 $ 3,824,800
13 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Salt Lake City
Unfunded Projects
Fiscal Year 2025
ProposalOrganization General
Name
Fire Fire Training Grounds Site 1600 South Industrial Rd. Salt Lake City, $ 1,410,300 $ 1,410,300
Improvements UT 84104
Transportation Livable Streets Program Citywide $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
Constituent Jordan River Trail Safer Crossing 1200 W 200 S,Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Improvements
Police Police Department Training 475 S 300 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Center
Constituent Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St at Elgin Ave,Salt Lake City, $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Richmond St.and Zenith Ave. UT 84106
Transportation Transportation Corridor Citywide $ 4,600,000 $ 4,600,000
Transformations Program
Approximately 400 North &1500 West
Constituent Jordan River Trail Food Forest+ and County Mile Marker 40,along the $ 385,000 $ 385,000
Partner Garden Jordan River Parkway Trail, Salt Lake
City, UT 84116
Transportation Urban Trails Program Citywide $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Constituent Route 209-Accessibility, Bus 5th and E,Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Shelters, Benches,and Trash Cans
Constituent Fairmont Park East Enhancement 1100 East Sugarmont Drive,Salt Lake $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000
City, UT 84106
Alleyway between Main Street and
Main Street Alley Improvements, Richards Street,for two blocks in
Constituent from No Tell Motel to Utah Pride particular:from 1380 S. Main Street to $ 170,000 $ 170,000
u Andrew Avenue(1500 South),Salt Lake
City, UT 84115.
a
Constituent Faultline Park Playground 1050 E 400 S,Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 337,000 $ 337,000
v Constituent Guadalupe Neighborhood Streets N 500 W from 200 N to 500 N Salt Lake $ 2,517,000 $ 2,517,000
Improvement City, UT 84116
Public Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 349 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 601,900 $ 601,900
Services and 2
500 East Raised Crosswalk(400
Constituent Block) 440 S 500 E Salt Lake City, UT 84106 $ 115,000 $ 115,000
Public PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2 475 S 300 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 874,400 $ 874,400
Services
Constituent Poplar Grove Street Lighting 750 S Emery Street,Salt Lake City, UT $ 620,000 $ 620,000
p g g 84104
California Avenue Pedestrian 1250 California Avenue Salt Lake City,
Constituent Safety Improvements UT 84104 $ 807,000 $ 807,000
Construction
Constituent 600 South Safety Improvements 600 S from 200 E to 600 E Salt Lake City, $ 530,000 $ 530,000
UT 84102&84111
Constituent Victory Park Tennis Courts 1004 Markea Ave SLC, UT 84102 $ 52,600 $ 52,600
Constituent Curtis Park Reimagined 1421 S 2200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 960,000 $ 960,000
Constituent Marmalade-Fairpark East-West 400 N 400 W,Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 80,000 $ 80,000
Connector Study
Fayette Avenue Improvements 215 and 223 West Fayette Avenue, Salt
Constituent between Washington Street&200 Lake City UT 84101 $ 560,000 $ 560,000
West
"Elevating Access":The Regional 1932 and 2280 Rose Park Lane,Salt
Public Lands Athletic Complex's Blueprint for Lake City, UT 84116 $ 6,250,000 $ 6,250,000
the Future
Police SLC Public Safety Building(Police 475 S.300 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 650,000 $ 650,000
Occupancy) Remodels
14 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
Organization
ProposalName
Constituent International Peace Gardens 1160 Dalton Ave S,Salt Lake City, UT $ 512,696 $ 512,696
84104
Constituent 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and 1200 E Zenith Ave.Salt Lake City, UT $ 347,000 $ 347,000
Repave Street 84106
Constituent 700 East Median Tree Planting From 1300 S 700 E to 2100 S 700 E,Salt $ 2,400,000 $ 2,400,000
Project Lake City, UT 84105 and 84106
Constituent First Encampment Park 1704 S 500 E,Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 145,000 $ 145,000
Constituent Alley Improvement A798 521 East Driggs Avenue, Salt Lake City, $ 69,000 $ 69,000
UT 84106
Constituent Westminster Urban Forestry and 1227 E Westminster Ave, Salt Lake City, $ 477,000 $ 477,000
Traffic Calming Measures UT 84105
c
Constituent Harvey Milk Blvd LGBTQ+and Harvey Milk Blvd 1100 East to 900 West, $ 500,000 $ 500,000
c Neighborhood Visibility Salt Lake City, UT(multi zip code)
Constituent 200 E 1910 S Public Art 200 E 1910 S,Salt Lake City, UT 84115 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
uAlleyways east of 1100 east between
Alleyways between Sherman/
•o Constituent Hariso and Harrison/Browning Sherman/Harrison and Harrison/ $ 134,000 $ 134,000
Browning,Salt Lake City, UT 84105
L-
a. Constituent Jackson Park Art 481 N Grant St, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
M
800 E from South Temple to 900 S, Salt
Constituent 800 East Parks and Pathway Lake City, UT 84102 $ 174,000 $ 174,000
Constituent Fairpark Placemaking Signage Multiple locations along the Fairpark $ 55,000 $ 55,000
neighborhood boundaries
Constituent Liberty Wells Community Garden 700 E 1800 S,Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 280,000 $ 280,000
Police Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the 475 S.300 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Rear Parking Lot
Constituent Sugar House Map and Historic Various locations throughout Sugar $ 95,000 $ 95,000
Recognition Project House
1950 East Devonshire&approx. 1700
Constituent East Bench H Rock Preserve South,Salt Lake City, UT 84108 to 2000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000
East Lakeline Drive&approx. 1800
South,Salt Lake City, UT 84109
Total Unfunded CIP Projects $ 34,158,896 $34,158,896
15 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
w r
a 0-w KeyBank
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1 _ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ;.
�. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Oak i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-- ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ N NET
a�■■ ■■■■■■
:���■e mow.
r' W niilllll
man Mupr
If'�"'rM1 sEiii-- . n:Gl•ii iied:i.
-- - ■�a/1 �lells��l���r.
wwww •+-�--Y
�-- no ■oe■iii/i - M�■■r
•� ,ap Iol 1ma1 Iowa laws
Moll I'mall
MEMO
•-�" •• ■t -wwwwwsasc -ww� •- -•
■ IHim 111/ph'...
�I on ■■■■■■■■ ■■■ •■■a1
1: 1., ■■ ■■■■■■■■ 1■/A 1��!■1 "��
--loll-- •--'-
ME ■■/■■■■�! IONS •---•
141 ■sonE■oi gown �■■■1
roi ■//■■!/■ Ili■/I 1■■■1
loll -----
l �! �C: iiii■iiii ■■■ �m■■1
■ A11Rf4��A11 1■/!1
on .- loss•
An
..:'�I� � is■ : 1
1■//1 ll•onEmlIiL--. ma 1■
-- 1 11P(` •.■..■■. lolwwwwww E■ �it
0.0,0 *,*� � �r �'�
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$744,551 Sales Tax Revenue _d
Bonds September 2014 October 1, 2034 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B,were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring,
constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property, and roads.
The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of$10,935,000.As of June 30, 2024, $6,945,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2034.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$2,008,941 Sales Tax Revenue June 2016 October 1, 2028 General Fund
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the
Series 2009A Bonds.The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City
offices and other capital improvements within the City.
Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the
Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of$21,715,000. As of June 30, 2024, $11,755,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2028.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$357,351 Sales Tax Revenue December 2019 April 1, 2027 General Fund
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of
the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the
Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown.
The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of$2,620,000. As of June 30, 2024, $975,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April
1, 2027.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$518,668 Sales Tax Revenue December 2019 October 1, 2034 General Fund/Library
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021, were issued in December 2021 to refund a portion of
the Series 2013A Bonds and a portion of the LBA Series 2013A and 2014A Bonds.
19 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
The Series 2021 bonds were issued with a par amount of$15,045,000.A portion of the debt service is paid by the
Library for the LBA 2013A and 2014A(Glendale and Marmalade libraries). As of June 30, 2024, $14,305,000 in
principal remains outstanding.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$_ Sales Tax Revenue January 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund/RDA
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A, were issued in January 2022 to refund the Series
2012A Bonds. The Series 2012A Bonds were originally issued to fund the construction and improvement of various
City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard.
The Series 2022 A bonds were issued with a par amount of$8,900,000.As of June 30, 2024, $7,705,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the RDA related to the North Temple
Viaduct project. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt
service and for the North Temple Boulevard portion.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1.The bonds mature
October 1, 2032.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022B
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$2,005,851 Sales Tax Revenue November 2022 October 1, 2042 General Fund
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022C
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$3,090,117 Sales Tax Revenue November 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund
Bonds
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022B&C, were issued in November 2022 to finance all or a
portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving capital improvement projects, including: City Cemetery
irrigation and road repairs and reconstruction; Pioneer Park; 600 North Corridor; new radio towers for City
communication; an upgrade of the electrical transformer at the Central Plant and emergency back-up generators;
Westside railroad quiet zones; Warm Spring Plunge structure stabilization; Smith's Ballpark; urban wood re-
utilization equipment and storage additions; and Fisher Mansion stabilization; and various other capital
improvement program projects.
The Series 2022B bonds were issued with a par amount of$40,015,000.As of June 30, 2024, $40,015,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2042.
The Series 2022C bonds were issued with a par amount of$24,240,000.As of June 30, 2024, $22,315,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1.The bonds mature
October 1, 2032.
20 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
ESCO Lease Debt Service
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$96,200 Capital Lease December 2019 March 2026 General Fund
This lease provides energy efficient equipment to Public Services Facilities Division.
ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$155,300 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County
$155,300 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 General Fund
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of
this facility is shared 50%with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment.
ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$516,800 Capital Lease August 2012 March 2026 General Fund
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for City parks.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$498,550 LBA Lease Revenue March 2016 April 15, 2037 General Fund
Bonds
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City(LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March
2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of$6,755,000. As of June 30, 2024, $4,940,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15.The bonds mature
on April 15, 2037.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$677,575 LBA Lease Revenue April 2017 April 15, 2038 General Fund
Bonds
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City(LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April
2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project.
The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of$8,115,000. As of June 30, 2024, $6,630,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15.The bonds mature on
April 15, 2038.
21 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES
Crime Lab Rental Payments
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$600,000 General Fund
Yearly rental payments for Crime Evidence Lab.
City Lease Payments
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$560,000 General Fund
Yearly payments for City Leases.
Facilities Maintenance
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$350,000 General Fund
The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City's building stock.
Urban Trail Maintenance
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$200,000 '/4 Cent Tax
These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails and trail segments
that potentially come online during the fiscal year.The maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe
for all that use them and so they can be used year-round.
Planning and Design
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$350,000 1General Fund
These funds will be used to for a Pilot Program and CIP Planning and Design for FY26-28. Funding will help shape
the planning and design of upcoming projects and help with cost estimates.
Public Lands Maintenance
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$250000 General Fund &
$683:152 Funding Our Future
The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets.The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger failures in the City's park stock.
Percent for Art
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$167,378 General Fund
To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, and other works of art. (1.5% of CIP)
22 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
Cost Overrun
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$223,171 General Fund
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
CIP Memorial House
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$20,000 Other- Rental
A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation.
Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use
of the funding is to be determined.
Real Estate Services-Surplus Land
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$700,000 General Fund
Salt Lake City Corporation holds several properties in its real estate inventory that are not used for City functions
but that are either vacant or are leased to third parties.This fund is for the maintenance, security, and improvement
of these properties.
FY25 Landfill
2025 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$1,500,000 Other
The landfill CIP accounts have been receiving revolving funds for various ongoing landfill projects.The funds placed
in the accounts are applied to individual projects and then reimbursed.The reimbursable funds need to be in place
for current and future projects on a revolving basis. One project currently in design will replace the South Landfill
Gas Header and provide horizontal and vertical methane extraction wells required to maintain the landfill's
compliance with state air quality regulations.The gas header and wells consist of HDPE piping that cross the landfill
to extract methane and carry it to the flare and electrical generators.
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B
2025 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$_ Sales Tax Revenue October 2019 April 1, 2038 RDA
Bonds
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A,were issued in October 2013 for the purpose
of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, and equipping a performing arts center and related
improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B.
The RDA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the RDA is unable to pay
any of the debt service,the City's General Fund would be responsible for it.
The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000.As of June 30, 2024, $56,300,000 in principal remains
outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on
April 1, 2038.
23 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
i f -
t T
General Fund
Capz'*tal Proj'oects
7.7
MOIL
i+a110. -k
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration
Project Address: 1600 South Industrial Rd, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
The fire training tower is experiencing significant deterioration, posing safety concerns that necessitate urgent
attention.To rectify the situation, essential measures include patching spalled concrete, addressing rebar
corrosion, repairing cracks, and implementing waterproofing measures. Ensuring the structural integrit of the
tower is paramount, not only to maintain its functionality but also to safeguard the well-being of indlvidyuals
utilizing the facility for training purposes.
The wncrete Fire Training Center Proposal ID: FY25#5
building.
Department: Fire
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal
I
W , i
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $858,800 $858,800
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Significantly reduce future degradation of the structure and related maintenance calls. We should continue to
reapply the water proofing on a 4-6 year basis to extend the life of the structure.
27 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction
400 South over the Jordan River(approximately 1130 West), Salt Lake City, UT
Project Address: 84104
Project Description:
This project will reconstruct the 400 South vehicle bridge over the Jordan River.This bridge has deteriorated to a
rating below 60 on the Bridge Health Index(BHI)as determined by UDOT bridge inspection. Engineering had
planned a rehabilitation project for the existing bridge structure in previous years, however continued
degradation, accelerated by the 2020 earthquake, has made reconstruction necessary.A consulting firm with
specialized experience will be used for this project.
' Proposal ID: FY25#29
Department: Engineering
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $4,000,000 $860,000
Capital Maintenance $3,140,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No budget impact
28 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration
Project Address: 600 E 1300 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84102
Project Description:
The purpose of this proposal is to identify steps to secure the Liberty Park Greenhouse (LPG), restore it to its
once historical prominence, and identify innovative ways to renovate/redesign the building to enhance its
educational/recreational/environmental conservancy value to the community. This work will be completed in
advance of other funded work to produce design and construction documents for the reconstruction of the
greenhouse.
Due in part to budgetary constraints,the facility has fallen into a state of disrepair limiting its past use in
providing seasonal floral displays to enhance the Park and serving as a staging area for SLC's "Native Plant
Restoration Project" aimed at restoring the region's ecological diversity and environmental resilience. Currently,
both programs have been outsourced or moved to other facilities as a recent system audit of SLC properties
identified safety and structural issues that rendered the building unserviceable. Within the past few months,the
facility closed, which encourages vandalism and loitering in the area as the building appears unkept. Immediate
action is needed to save the LPG; the cost of doing so will only increase in the future.
CIP INITIATIVES
1) Facility Structural Audit Initiative- Funds would be used to develop/issue a call for proposals, select a vendor,
and pay for contracted engineering services to assess in detail the current condition of the facility, identify
construction services, and develop construction documents to support structural restoration.
2) Facility Redesign Initiative-Working from/building upon the Facility Structural Audit,funds would be allocated
to support a case competition conducted the University of Utah's College of Architecture and Planning
Department aimed at completing design work that preserve the facility's historical roots, provide multiple
programming to enhance the community's biodiversity/recreational/educational interests as well as contribute
to Liberty Park's overall aesthetic beauty.
{ ProposallD: 451299
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $124,000 $124,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
29 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including street pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and
pedestrian access improvements.
Proposal ID: FY25#26
" 11 Department: Engineering
1 Project Type: Capital
Potential Street Improvements Construction Projects 2025
j� Category: Renewal
• 1300 East(2100 South to southern city border)
• 600/700 North(800 West to Redwood Road)
• Garnette Circle(Garnette Street to Cul-de-Sac End)
• Nebula Way(Silver Star Drive to Terminus End)
• Emily Circle(800 North to Terminus End) ,
• Goodwin Circle(Garnette Street to Cul-de-Sac End)
• Irving Street(800 North to Cul-de-Sac End)
• Van Ness Place(400 East to Terminus End)
• Princeton Avenue(1100 East to Douglas Street)
• Park Street(Browning Avenue to Sherman Avenue)
• Redondo Avenue(600 East to 700 East)
• 600 South(900 West to 800 West)
• 100 South(University Avenue to 1495 East) ®_
I 1
w. II J.
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Class C $3,500,000 $3,500,000
Capital Maintenance $1,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decrease
30 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents
Project Address: 600 East 900 South (Harvey Milk Blvd), Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Project Description:
This application funds Step 4 of the City's phased strategy for the design and reconstruction of the Liberty Park
Greenhouse facility(described in more detail below).This is an urgent request due to operational and safety
impacts.
In 2023, the Salt Lake City Public Services Department and Facilities Division completed a Facility Condition
Assessment for the greenhouse.This report identified the overall facility condition as poor/failing.The report
also recommended the building no longer be used or occupied by City staff or operations. As of January 2024,
Public Lands is no longer using the facility(previously used by the Native Plant Propagation program)for
operational purposes.
The Liberty Park Greenhouse, first constructed in 1902, has been the primary greenhouse facility in Salt Lake City
to propagate, grow, and store flowers, native plants, and shrubs for planting throughout Salt Lake City's Public
Lands system. Over the past four years,the facility has also been used to establish the City's first native plant and
biodiversity program for the propagation of unique and rare native plants.The greenhouse has been a critical
operational facility for the Public Lands Department and has become an iconic and historic public asset within
the City's largest park.
A unified Public Lands, Public Services, and Engineering team solicited architectural services to help develop a
proposed phased strategy for the design and reconstruction of the facility.The strategy includes:
1. Initial Facility Condition Assessment: Completed in 2023.
2. Detailed Structural Assessment for East Greenhouse: Funding acquired through FY 24 Budget Amendment 2.
3. Complete Structural Assessment: Funding recommended through an FY 25 constituent CIP application.
4. Design and Construction Documents for New Greenhouse Facilities:This request, building off of Phases 1-3.
5. Renovation of the east greenhouse and reconstruction of the remaining greenhouses: Future/timeline TBD,
based on successful, subsequent funding request in FY 25-26.
ProposallD: FY25#36
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $804,500 $804,500
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $117,200 $117,200
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated construction (Phase 5) budget is currently between $5,000,000 and $5,500,000. Maintenance and/or
operation expenses would depend highly on the outcomes of Phases 2-4.
31 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Complete Streets Overlay 2025
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds the overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the level of deterioration where
full reconstruction is required.This Engineering Division overlay program includes a 3"or greater depth asphalt
mill and overlay(thicker than Streets Division maintenance overlays of 2"or less), curb and gutter replacement
and sidewalk replacement in select locations, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate Complete
Streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements.
Potential Street Overlay Construction Projects 2025 Proposal ID: FY25#27
• 2"°Avenue(T Street toUStreet) Department: Engineering
• 5'"Avenue(U Street to Virginia Street)
• 16th Avenue(Hilltop Road to 17"Avenue) Project Type: Capital
• Alta Street(Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road)
• Hilldon Avenue(Military Way to Circle Way) or Cate Renewal
• South Temple Street(University Street to South Temple traffic circle) Category:
• 500 South(600 East to 700 East)
• 1000 East(100 South to 200 South)
• Belmont Avenue(900 East to 1000 East)
• Beverly Street 12700 South to Stratford Avenue)
• Connor Street(900 South to Sunnyside Avenue)
C Komas Drive(Afapeen Drive to Blackhawk Way)
• Princeton Avenue(McClelland Street to 1100 East)
• 2060 East(2100 South to south terminus)
" • Wilmington Avenue(1900 East to 2000 East)
• 800 South(300 West to 200 West) '7'�A'
• Brava Street(Amiga Drive to North terminus)
• Jefferson Street(Jefferson Circle to 1700 South)
• Navajo Street(El Harris Avenue to Andrew Avenue)
• 1730 South(4370 West to 4250 West)
w aoo • Westwood Avenue(West Temple Street to Cul-de-sac end) ,B
• 1200 West(Dupont Avenue to 1008 N Dupont Avenue)
• Catherine Street(1000 North to Goodwin Avenue)
• Livingston Avenue(Star Crest Drive to Omni Drive) r7
• North Temple Street(300 West to 200 West)
• Wiley Post Way(Charles Lindbergh Drive to Wright Brothers Drive)
• Venture Way(West Temple Street to Hammerhead end)
• Gustin Road(Califorrua Avenue to Nlnigret Drive)
• Awl Circle(Nlnigret Drive to Cul de-sat end)
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $2,750,000 $2,750,000
Capital Maintenance $750,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decrease
32 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Public Way Concrete 2025
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and
gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement.
-- ------------ Proposal ID: FY25#30
""°°" Department: Engineering
0
Project Type: Capital
i Category: Renewal
s°°tom.
Cry W. i
A.,,t v 0O W CDOs,p "000 00
'V
OD 0
_ 0 00-Mllwfl =O� ,A
W IMI 0 Q O�Q(�BLO 5 0 . A..
V 9,.,.. o W
$° 00 0 °BS� ^ �Do g °t�cn
aoW,)ws o (�pJ 0°09S C o
„ � o
6auM 0 F 7tb O
t�t o
.. $ ou
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets $500,000 $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No budget impact
33 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
The Facility Renewal and Deferred Asset Management Initiative for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) is a targeted effort
aligned with the 10-year plan. Our goal is to strategically manage the existing backlog of deferred assets by
categorizing and prioritizing them based on building and component criticality.This Involves dividing the current
backlog into three equal parts, enabling us to address an approximately consistent number of assets per year.
Additionally,we aim to proactively tackle 50% of incoming deferred assets to prevent further accumulation. This
focused approach ensures efficient resource allocation and sets the foundation for sustained facility
enhancement over the coming years. It's crucial to highlight the ongoing facilities condition assessment.This
assessment will provide insight into the overall health of our buildings and components, enabling us to make
more informed decisions regarding replacement and renewal.
ProposallD: FY25#25
HIERARCHY OF A HEALTHY BUILDING Department: Public Services
Project Type: Capital
Aesthetics 8 Beauty Category: New
❑ Functional
Improvements
O These three
Capital Renewal foundational
m components are
nle"nal comfort supported through
strategic asset
replacement,renewal,
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ and enhancement.
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
aaaa
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,366,350 $1,366,350
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Capital Maintenance $1,390,150
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decrease future maintenance and reduce operational expenses by installing higher efficient units. Reduce
maintenance calls/work orders.
34 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements- Phase I
Project Address: 349 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Project Description:
Plaza 349 is critical to the day-to-day operations of the city by hosting several key departments including: Human
Resources, Engineering, Information Management Services,Transportation, and Building Inspection divisions. In
2019 a space planning and vulnerability study identified key elements to be updated that included life safety,
access controls, and security. Facilities has also identified key assets that include the HVAC system and parking
structure. This CIP application is for the first phase of the project and will include upgrading life safety, security,
HVAC design, and key HVAC asset upgrades. In 2022, Colvin Engineering completed an HVAC replacement
feasibility study, which will aid in this initiative.
ProposallD: FY25#6
Department: Public Services
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
I
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $2,200,000 $2,200,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Reduce future maintenance, decrease electrical and water expenses, and receive Rocky Mountain Power rebate.
35 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Continue Salt Lake City's partnership with UTA installing bus stops, mobility hubs, and accessible first/last-mile
connections, all on frequent transit routes.This program implements two of the key recommendations of the
Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe, and comfortable for people of all ages and
abilities. UTA provides stop amenities in-kind and maintains them for the life of the assets. Some of the new
shelters are now equipped with lighting,which will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators,
as well as to increase safety and security while they are waiting.Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a
highly visible frequent service brand has been developed and Is ready for deployment of this brand and
associated enhanced amenities at Frequent Transit Route bus stops throughout the city. These investments in
branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and
comfortable transit access and waiting experience.
Proposal ID: FY25#19
Department: Transportation
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
. I!
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Transit $750,000 $750,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
These investments are budget neutral for maintenance except when custom furnishings are used, which will be
included at key locations of Frequent Transit Network(FTN) branding. UTA funds the maintenance of the
furnishings at standard bus stops but will not fund the additional maintenance of custom furnishings. These
costs would be covered through the Funding Our Future Transit Operations contract with UTA.
36 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Safer Crossings Citywide
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Pedestrian-focused crossings such as HAWK Beacons, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons, raised crosswalks,
curb extensions, and other similar safety improvements.
Proposal ID: FY25#17
Department: Transportation
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
s
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $300,000 $300,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
N/A: Future maintenance and/or operational expenses will be based on the specific improvements installed as
part of this project,to be determined.
37 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Sugar House Park-Two Pavilion Replacement(50/50 Cost Share)
Project Address: 1330 East 2100 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
Sugar House Park's seven pavilions are over 50 years old—beyond their lifespan—and do not meet code or
accessibility guidelines. Failure of the pavilions could lead to injury or death.A 2016 Pavilion Study by Salt Lake
County recommends full replacement of all seven pavilions. This application seeks funding to match the County's
funding to replace one of these seven, as well as associated amenities(signage, tables, barbecues, landscaping,
water, and accessibility features).Approving this funding will bring the total number of pavilions that have been
or can be replaced to two. (Recent City and County funding will replace the Fabian Lakeside Pavilion in 2024.) Five
remain to be funded.
Approval of this request will provide park patrons(typically Salt Lake City residents)with one complete pavilion
replacement(a $960,000 project value)for the cost(to the City) of just half of one.
In 1957, with the incorporation of Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County made a contractual
agreement to jointly own the park property and appropriate funds for facilities. The Sugar House Park Authority
depends on these appropriations from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County to carry out the park's purpose as an
equitable, regional park of the highest quality. Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County are committed to matching
one another's funds(1:1)and continuing this partnership to improve or replace more assets in the future.
Proposal ID: FY25#33
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal
a
■
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $480,000 $480,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance costs are covered by the Park Authority and County.And, because this is for construction/
replacement of existing assets,there will be not be additional funding requests for ongoing maintenance and/or
operation expenses.
38 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes,Adapting Irrigation Systems,
Project Title: and Reducing Water Use
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This climate-forward project will help shape a more water-and resource-conscious future for our public lands
system by(1) improving Irrigation efficiency and (2) replacing some turf areas with low-water, regionally-
appropriate plantings. Many of our public lands' irrigation systems are 50-60 years old.They use more water,
take more time, and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Improved or new systems can help Salt Lake
City build more resilient, shady, and enjoyable spaces in preparation for a hotter, drier future. Converting
irrigation systems so that trees can be watered separately from turf reduces water usage and protects these
critical assets,too.
Updating irrigation systems is also an opportunity to identify and make changes to the different kinds of areas
and plant cover in our parks and public lands. Low-use and passive areas(e.g. park strips, medians, and
underutilized areas of parks and public lands)could be converted to regionally appropriate plant species that(1)
require less water, maintenance,fertilizer, and soil amendments, and (2) are valuable wildlife habitats. There is
still a need for conventional turf that can withstand heavy use, such as playfields. With irrigation system
upgrades,these areas will be able to be irrigated separately for more efficient use of water. During extreme
drought conditions, upgraded irrigation systems can also dramatically reduce or even turn off turf irrigation
while continuing to water trees.
The minimum effective amount of funding for this fiscal year's request is $500,000: design and new irrigation for
roughly 2.5 acres. Fully funding the request($3.25M), however,would fund new irrigation systems for up to 16
acres (which is less than 2% of the Public Lands Department's irrigated landscapes). Due to the 25-30 year
lifespan of irrigation systems and some landscapes, ongoing requests would likely need to be around the $6M to
$9M per year. If partially funded, as recommended in the Mayor's Budget, the Public Lands Department will
choose up to two acres from one or more of the following six priority sites within three types of public lands
(natural lands, parks, and islands): Miller Park, Wasatch Hollow Park and Preserve, Ensign Peak, Allen Park, 1200
East islands(from South Temple to 400 South), and 1300 East median and park strips (from Parkway Ave to
Claybourne Ave).
Proposal ID: FY25#38
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
t
4
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $500,000 $500,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
With more up to date irrigation systems and less grass to mow and fertilize, maintenance needs will be reduced.
39 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: HVAC Control Replacement at PSB
Project Address: 475 S 300 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Project Description:
At the Public Safety Building,we have outdated Microsoft servers unsupported beyond Windows Server 2016
and an obsolete Siemens Apogee building controls system. These vulnerabilitiesjeopardize both operational
efficiency and public safety.To address these pressing concerns, we advocate for a holistic upgrade strategy.
This involves transitioning from the unsupported Microsoft 2012 and Siemens Apogee systems to Utah Yamas
Controls. Our proposed solution encompasses upgrading the City's EBO platform, provisioning advanced
automation servers, modernizing essential building systems, replacing antiquated temperature sensors, and
deploying new communication wiring throughout the facility. By implementing these upgrades, we aim to
enhance operational reliability, security, and resilience at the critical public safety building, safeguarding both
personnel and the community.
Proposal ID: FY25#10
Department: Public Services
Project Type: Capital
� D���Q� rL�fld Category: New
Oq UN q@F IN 1�
�00 A2 T@
0
U � � o
D
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decrease in maintenance costs, reduce utility expenses, and receive Rocky Mountain Power rebates(estimated
$100K).
1
40 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design
Project Address: Citywide & Fairmont Park, 1040 East Sugarmont Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
Friends of Fairmont Park propose a Restroom Pilot CIP for 2024-25 for: (1) a planning study to update planning
guidance for city-wide parks restroom policy and practice, (2)conceptual design for a new restroom if warranted
by the study; (3)with the recommendation that a new design be built and tested in Fairmont Park to
demonstrate whether or not any new guidance is workable in the Salt Lake context. Note that it is expected that
the new design strategy will reduce vandalism and maintenance costs and increase restroom uptime and safety.
The intent is to benchmark a proposed new restroom configuration against the current design In other parks, to
test the viability of this approach, developing best practice in park restroom management for the city. Restroom
safety and vandalism present ongoing problems in City parks, especially the large, heavily used parks.
Proposal ID: 451184
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal, Constituent
W
K ya/
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $100,000 $100,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
N/A. Planning and design documents only.
41 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Neighborhood Byways Program
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This project requests design and construction 30% matching funds for two neighborhood byways currently
under consideration for 70% state funding, under UDOT's Transit Transportation Investment Program, First-Last
Mile(TTIF-FLM). At this writing, UDOT has released their scoring for submitted projects, using metrics focused on
better mobility, good health, connected communities, and a strong economy.
The 800 East Neighborhood Byway, Phase 2(1300 South to the 900 East TRAX Station, 1.5 miles),would construct
a first-last mile connection to Red Line TRAX. UDOT has ranked this project#10 statewide. If state funds are not
received,this request will enable the project to construct intersection improvements at 1300 South to connect
the completed Phase 1 portion of the byway(1300 S to 1700 S)to future phases north of 1300 S. Funds would
also be used for the design from 1300 S to 900 E TRAX station,with construction funds to be sought in a
subsequent year.
The Kensington Neighborhood Byway(1500 South,from West Temple to the McClelland Trail) has already
received both CIP and federal funds. However, construction costs have escalated, and a more robust crossing of
700 East(a state highway) has been negotiated with UDOT than previously anticipated. It is part of the east-west
neighborhood byway traversing most of the city east of I-15, connecting to the westside via the 1300 South
viaduct. This crossing has also been nominated for TTIF-FLM, and ranked #11 statewide, right behind the 800
East Project. If state funds are not awarded, additional funds would be needed to complete the funding package.
Proposal ID: FY25#16
"�• — -�— Department: Transportation
:3 • F Project Type: Capital
Category: New
K
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Transit $20,000 $20,000
1/4 Cent Tax $950,000 ___r_$950,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
N/A. Future maintenance and/or operational expenses will be based on the specific improvements installed on
800 East, to be determined. For Kensington,the primary cost is the new signal at 700 East; it is TBD whether this
will be UDOT's or the City's responsibility.
42 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Courts & Playgrounds
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This application will fund the replacement of one playground or partial reconstruction or resurfacing of at least
one court(some of our system's most well-used and high-demand assets)that are in the poorest condition. 63%
of Public Lands assets have been evaluated to be in poor or fair condition.With a typical Ilfespan of 20-30 years,
it is essential that, going forward,the City replace at least two playgrounds and one to two courts every year to
ensure safe and accessible features in our parks.
The following is a list of potential parks where court improvements or one playground replacement project could
occur, in descending order of priority(including condition, opportunity, geographic need, and equity criteria).
1. Popperton Park(playground)
2.Wasatch Hollow Park(playground)
3. Sunnyside Park(courts)
4. 10th East Senior Center(courts)
5. Riverside Park(courts and playground)
6. Fairmont Park(courts, possibly playground)
7.Warm Springs Park(courts)
8.Westpointe Park(courts and playground)
ProposallD: FY25#23
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
r Category: New
a'7F •f�-= T,� L �
r t��._✓•t Cam .- - _..�
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $549,150 $549,150
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $54,490
Capital Maintenance $904,450
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$5,000 per year per asset for inspections, maintenance, and regular repairs and preventative measures.
43 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Based on condition rankings,the proposed allocation will fund the replacement of two traffic signals in failing
condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies.The typical life of a traffic signal is 30 years.After that
age, frequent repairs are needed, and the structural supports for the traffic signal may be at risk of failing, such
that the signal might fall over including potentially onto people or vehicles. But age is only one factor in ranking.
Ranking has been determined by an independent study,that combines equipment age, equipment condition,
and maintenance staff input. Signals that need frequent repairs are targeted for replacement.
Depending on actual construction costs, this amount may be sufficient to also upgrade one intersection signal
detection (which triggers a signal to respond to traffic, bicyclists, and pedestrians)to current standards, and to
replace one non-functional CCTV camera, used to monitor signal operations to allow real-time signal
adjustments in collaboration with UDOT's valley-wide network.
Proposal ID: FY25#18
Department: Transportation
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
74
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets $500,000 $500,000
FOF Transit $230,000 $230,000
Capital Maintenance $130,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Rebuilding signals reduces maintenance costs and allows operational flexibility for improved travel times.
44 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment
Jordan River Pkwy Trl: Indiana Avenue(850 South)to California Avenue (1330
Project Address: South), Salt Lake City, UT 84104; and adjacent public lands spaces
Project Description:
Doubles the impact of the estimated $1,250,000 in GO Bond funding planned for the segment of the Jordan River
corridor between Indiana Avenue and California Avenue. Bond funding is intended to focus on overall corridor
improvements,water trail development, irrigation,tree health, and the Parkway Trail: namely, non-impact fee
eligible costs.This impact fee funding, however, will be used on increasing level of service along and near the
Jordan River corridor and its public lands spaces, particularly focused on increasing safety, activation, and
recreation amenities. Some likely, high-priority improvements may include water and resource-efficient irrigation
and planting where they do not currently exist, additional lighting, nature-focused pathways, river interaction
and education opportunities, and additional features that activate the corridor.
The River corridor's Indiana Avenue to California Avenue segment has the highest concentration of destinations
and activity: seven parks and open spaces, and active transportation intersections of the 9-Line Trail, the Jordan
River Parkway Trail, sidewalks, and bike lanes on Indiana, 900 West, and California. Of these seven spaces, the
International Peace Gardens, Bend in the River, and Modesto Park face difficult challenges that have made them
high-need, high-priority areas for both the Public Lands Department and the surrounding communities.
Public engagement through the ongoing Emerald Ribbon Action Plan is building exciting momentum with
community members who have repeatedly expressed disillusionment with the City's planning processes.
Funding this application will position Public Lands to deliver real, responsive, and new changes,guided by this
recent and effective community engagement,following the completion of the Plan in late 2024.The public
engagement and conceptual designs completed through the Action Plan will recommend the ultimate vision,
immediate capital projects to be funded by at least the $10,300,000 allocated for the entire Jordan River corridor
from the GO Bond and impact fees, and the maintenance and operations best practices specific to these areas.
Proposal ID: FY25#24
' Department: Public Lands
1 Project Type: Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Capital Maintenance $200,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
This exact figure depends on the final outcomes from the Emerald Ribbon Action Plan and the features/changes
selected by the community. It is anticipated that long-term maintenance and asset quality will improve with
activation of the corridor. Some maintenance and operational costs will decrease while others will likely increase.
This is anticipated to improve long-term maintenance efficiency by reducing damaging and dangerous activities
that deteriorate the quality of these spaces and create community and personal safety concerns.
45 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Riverside Park Pathway Loop
Project Address: 1490 W 600 N, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
Create a looping recreational pathway that accommodates multiple user types that goes through the park and
utilizes the Jordan River Parkway Trail. Creating a looping path gives the people who recreate at Riverside Park a
place to continuously walk and recreate in a fixed location that Is ADA accessible. Potentially something that
resembles something like the looping pathways at Liberty and Sugar House Parks.
Improve or widen strategic pathways in the park:As an important community asset that has been historically
underserved and not seen capital improvements in 27 years,we believe this park and our community deserve
the investment required to have amenities on par with Liberty Park and Sugar House Park. Making the pathways
at Riverside Park more accessible, connected, and purposeful serves to improve the health and happiness of our
communities.
Proposal ID: 451282
Department: Public Lands
R �E Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
IL
III,
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $530,000 $530,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual Maintenance: $7,000
46 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Street Futsal Courts
Project Address: Parks Citywide
Project Description:
"Free the Game" is a SLC-based non-profit on a mission to make soccer(the world's game) more accessible to all.
Over the years, soccer has become more of a business than a game- requiring you to play for a club or a team to
be able to play. Around the world,the game is played in neighborhood parks and features low-maintenance
materials [Ike chain link fencing and concrete. This proposal may convert unutilized or underutilized concrete
courts(or add new concrete pads) at several of the following parks in Salt Lake City into"futsal"or street soccer
courts. Salt Lake City funding would be a 50% match for private funding from "Free the Game".
Proposed locations:
Jordan Park(1060 South 900 West)
9th South River Park(1000 West Gennessee Avenue)
Liberty Park(600 East 900 South), dependent on Historic Landmark Commission approval
11th Avenue Park(581 North Terrace Hills Drive)
Jefferson Park(1084 South West Temple)
Fairmont Park(1040 East Sugarmont Avenue)
Proposal ID: 451757
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $350,000 $350,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual Maintenance: $3,000/court
47 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Playground Shade
Project Address: Playgrounds Citywide
Project Description:
Install shade clothes over up to five existing playgrounds. In the summer, playground equipment is too hot to
use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds,the community will enjoy Increased use of all play
equipment for the full day in the summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer.
The playgrounds selected, based on solar exposure, usage during the day, and feasibility, at which shade clothes
and structures could be added may be (in no order): Fairmont Park, Poplar Grove Park, Wasatch Hollow Park,
Westpointe Park, and Donner Trail Park.
Proposal ID: 451259
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
r.
r-
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $500,000 $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$8,000 annual maintenance (put up/take down shade cloth, replacement and repairs, cleaning)
48 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Pocket Park Community Space -Jake Garn Way
Project Address: 1597 W Jake Garn Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
Utilize this underutilized and unprogrammed small, city owned parcel more fully by creating a pocket park and
installing a playground on it. Proximity to residential areas, high concentration of single family homes, and
underutilized functionality make this a logical space for recreation and community gathering. Many master plans
overlap with this project area and initial input from the community has been overwhelmingly positive.While
protecting current trees and vegetation, community members would like to see an engaging play structure,
seating area,garbage can, and signage.
Proposal ID: 452312
- - Y,_ Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
e�
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $330,000 $330,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$7,000 estimated annual maintenance
49 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Equal Grounds Project(Calisthenics-Fitness Area)
Primary Proposed Location:
Liberty Park, 600 Harvey Milk Blvd, Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Alternate Proposed Locations:
Pioneer Park, 350 South 300 West Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Sugar House Park, 1330 East 2100 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Address: Jordan Park 1060 South 900 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
Building a calisthenics/fitness area within the confines of Salt Lake City's Liberty Park(District 5), dependent on
Historic Landmark Commission approval.As alternative options, I would propose Pioneer Park(District 4), Sugar
House Park(District 7) and Jordan Park(District 2)are also centrally located and heavily utilized by the public. Salt
Lake City Public Lands staff have added several other possible alternatives: Riverside Park, Poplar Grove Park,
Jefferson Park, and Westpointe Park.
The proposal is to devote 900-1500 square feet within the park to an area where 12-20 patrons could utilize
cemented/in-place calisthenic bars, and potentially weight equipment, who currently enjoy the park, or would
prospectively.To provide everyone with an equal and free opportunity for strength fitness, and another option
for the community.As the city continues to grow in size and diversity, and with continued challenges associated
with economic and healthcare inequity,this project will be an extension and evolution to activities already
provided, with the hope of forwarding community and social progress for all.
j
Proposal ID: 452322
�. Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
�a I:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $86,200 $86,200
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual cleaning and surface maintenance: $2,600
50 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: 5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)
Project Address: 150 South 500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Project Description:
Install tables and chairs/seats to facilitate face-to-face meetings- conversations.Tables would make it possible to
eat, play games, with others. We need a way to foster community. This might be a low cost first step. I suggest we
start with the area about 150 South 500 West.The area is under trees but has a pronounced slope. Some grading
may be required.The tables will be installed in the park blocks along 500 West, between 50 North and 500 South.
The concrete picnic tables will be placed on hard surface paving and will not require bolting.The exact product
chosen may differ from what is displayed below.
ProposallD: 452106
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $50,000 $50,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$2,000 per year for cleaning and graffiti removal.
51 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Historic Signs/Markers
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Additional one-time funding for creating and installing metal historic markers around the City to highlight
underrepresented communities and equity.The City's Human Rights Commission and Racial Equity in Policing
Commission could provide site selection prioritization feedback. Potential sites could include Japantown, Plum
Alley, Greektown, Radio City Lounge as the oldest gay bar west of the Mississippi, and Seraph Young casting the
first vote by a woman in a US election, among others.
W, Proposal ID: NA
Department: Mayor's Office
2> Project Type: Capital
5 — -- Category: New
LOW 1,
I - r {rt�i �I
i
Mt`h f
r
5 M1M1 }
4k N !.
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $30,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
N/A
52 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Concrete Replacement
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This one-time City funded project addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks in the public way
through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement.
Proposal ID: NA
Department: Engineering
Project Type: Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $750,000
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
N/A
53 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: 700 South (Phase 7,4600 West to 5000 West)Additional Funding
Project Address: 700 South Street from 4600 West to 5000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
The project is desperately needed to complete the last half mile of 700 South's 4.6 mile long reconfiguration from
25 Ft wide deteriorated asphalt road to a 50 FT wide concrete street with bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
and storm drainage from Redwood Rd to 5600 West. Where 700 South meets the Union Pacific rail at 4800 West
is the City's worst street/rail intersection.The rail crossing restricts emergency services, causing re-routing delays,
and brings a plethora of constituent service requests each year.
Proposal ID: FY25#28
i,
r Department: Engineering
Project Type: Capital
Category: Phased
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Capital Maintenance $4,500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No Budget Impact
54 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs + Preservation & Maintenance Plan
Project Address: 300 N Canyon Rd, Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Project Description:
Memory Grove is one of Salt Lake City's most iconic park spaces. It is one of the thriving cultural centerpieces of
Salt Lake City's parks system. But the features that draw visitors to the Park-the historic features and mature
trees that give Memory Grove its unique atmosphere - are in a state of accelerating deterioration.
This funding would facilitate the completion of significant improvements to Memory Grove Park through two
phases:
(Phase 1, $1,750,000) Urgent capital repairs to be completed as soon as possible, with the guidance of historic
landscape architects and the Utah State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO). It is critical to the continued success
of Memory Grove that the City begins now to restore, preserve, and renew the assets that create the unique
character of Memory Grove. (Phase 2, $160,000)The development of a Preservation & Maintenance Plan for
Memory Grove Park and the Freedom Trail.
Proposal ID: FY25#40
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: Renewal
I
J r
w
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Capital Maintenance $1,910,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated annual maintenance impacts will be reduced by improving the quality of the assets within and
planning for the future of the park.
55 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request
Project Address: 54 Finch Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 84102
Project Description:
The Salt Lake City Arts Council, part of the Department of Economic Development, requests will address failing
infrastructure(due to flooding, neglect, and lifespan end),ADA requirements, energy efficiency, and the option to
provide additional services to the public. Items include: Interior Accessibility Ramp, Energy Efficient Gallery
Lighting Upgrade, Hardwood Floor Replacement, and Lower Level Community workspace/office renovations.
Proposal ID: FY25#3
Department: Arts Council
Project Type: Capital
Fall)of&dl ha t
./ r `0flooding Category: New
cannot be sa
"prove Accessibility:
2 areas within the f
building challenge or
prohibit wheelchair
«ess. Positive&habitable
environment
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Capital Maintenance $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Replacement of the gallery lighting would potentially reduce utility costs for energy efficient lighting. No
additional operational expenses are anticipated as a result of the improvements.
56 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Green Loop Implementation
The full build-out of the envisioned Green Loop is primarily within the 84111 and
84101 zip codes of Salt Lake City, with some segments within 84103 and 84150:
200 East from South Temple to 900 South; 900 South from 200 East to 500 West;
500 West from 900 South to North Temple; North Temple from 490/500 West to
State Street; State Street from North Temple to South Temple; South Temple from
Project Address: State Street to 200 East.
Project Description:
This funding request is a joint application between Public Lands and Transportation,with active participation
from several other departments. The Green Loop project reimagines part of the City's underutilized public rights-
of-way as functional green space in the heart of downtown.Transformation of the public right-of-way requires
design and construction of both above-ground improvements (sidewalks, paths, bikeways, plazas, roadway,
forest, plantings, park features, and rain gardens) and below-ground infrastructure (public and private utilities).
Project costs include design and construction of above-ground green space, roadway reconstruction, and some
utility(public and private) relocation.The intent of this application is to allocate funding to bring strategic
segments of the Green Loop to construction as soon as possible, particularly where there are timely
opportunities to leverage grant funds and/or develop financial partnerships. Robust pu bli c engagement is
currently informing an In-progress planning, and design process to develop a schematic design for the 200 East
segment of the Green Loop (South Temple to 900 South)and potentially others as opportunities arise.
ProposallD: FY25#39
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
.`�,..� .. �:�•-' _ ` Category: New
• `\y �ff�j. } � 1LG91��
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $3,140,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated annual maintenance impact amounts/costs are being developed in the schematic design currently
underway,with all maintenance partners actively included in the discussions.
57 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Fairmont Park Basketball Court
Project Address: 11030 E Sugarmont Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
Over the last few years,there has been a lot of investment in Fairmont Park.The improvements to the pond,
playground, dog park,jogging paths, and pickleball courts have brought a lot of new activity and users to the
park. More activity means that usage of the basketball court has increased, as well.The court is currently a half-
court size, with one hoop, no lines to indicate the free throw or 3-point line, no lighting, and uneven concrete.
The latter often results in puddles after rain.The single hoop and small court create a bottleneck in the park, and
users often must wait to use the court on summer evenings.This proposal would create a standard full-size
court(94 ft by 50 ft)with six hoops(one full court and four perpendicular half courts)and lighting for evening
use. Improvements to the basketball court would not impact the adjacent soccer fields and would require
minimal grading.These improvements would be similar to those made to the basketball court in Sugar House
Park and would be well used given the growth in apartments and housing in Sugar House.
r' Proposal ID: 452074
Department: Public Lands
Project Type: Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $678,600
Capital Maintenance $75,400
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$5,000 per year; actual cost dependent on concrete type(post-tensioned vs. non-post-tensions), hoop and
backboard materials, and other amenities added to the site(lighting, benches, etc.), all of which would be
determined through the design process.
58 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation 2025
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program, kicked off in 2021 by Mayor Mendenhall and Council Member Mano, funds reconstruction
or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements, as necessary.
Proposal ID: FY25#31
` ✓" • ' `' Department: Engineering
Project Type: Capital
w Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Capital Maintenance $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No Budget Impact
59 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Cost Overrun
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
Proposal ID: NA
UN
Department:
COST Q Project Type: Overrun
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $223,171
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
6o Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
Project Title: Percent for Art
Project Address: Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to provide art at City developed projects.
Proposal ID: NA
Department:
Project Type: Art
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $167,378
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
61 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Enterprise Fund
Ca ]'total Projects `
i
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
The Department of Airports
The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any
general fund revenues to support the operation of the City's system of airports. The Department of
Airports (the Airport) has 664 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing,
and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel
experience.
The Fiscal Year 2025 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures.
The budget no longer contains Covid-19 relief grants that were used to recover lost revenue as well as
subsidize the rates and charges for commercial and cargo carriers. The Salt Lake City International
Airport (SLCIA) continues to benefit from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law(BIL) grants awarded for
FY2025. The BIL grants will continue to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital
infrastructure projects that are moving from design into actual construction. The Airport will be bringing
on five gates located on Concourse B as well as the opening of the much anticipated central tunnel in
October 2024. These openings bring additional staffing and maintenance staff requirements while seeing
the complete elimination of the remaining hardstand operations.
The developed FY25 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers
and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important
capital projects. These projects include the Phase III and Phase IV of construction of gates on Concourse
B. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be
funded to ensure that all Airport's owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the
growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years.
65 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: FedEx Utilities and Roadway
Project Description:
This project is for an access roadway and infrastructure improvements to allow for expansion of the
north cargo apron for FedEx. Work Includes design and construction of a 1,200-ft roadway including
new underground utilities to future cargo facility improvements.
Project Justification:
In order for the FedEx cargo facility to expand in the north support area of the Airport campus,
existing infrastructure and access needs to be developed to accommodate growth in expected air
cargo traffic.This project will develop a site that will allow SLCDA to increase Its air cargo handling
capacity
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 November 2024 June 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$3,087,000 $475,000 $62,000 $2,000 $309,000 $3,935,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,935,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-FED EX Access Roadway and Infrastructure ' r
ig—
`L lI
�t k
1 ,
66 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Decommission R/W 14-32 &T/W Improvements
Project Description:
This project will remove the asphalt pavement along Runway 14-32 south of Taxiway P and modify the
existing taxiway connections at Taxiways J, M, P, and Q. Work includes removal of existing electrical,
communication, and stormwater infrastructure. Soil preparation and seeding will also be completed for
areas impacted by pavement removal and utility work. Electrical work includes removal of the existing
runway visual NAVAIDs and modifications to the existing taxiway lighting and associated infrastructure.
Work also includes updates to the Airfield Lighting Control and Monitoring System (ALCMS).
Project Justification:
This project will remove Runway 14-32 from the runway system as recommended by the SLCIA Master
Plan to prevent runway incursions and address numerous non-standard geometry challenges. Project
design is currently underway and options to repurpose existing pavement are being evaluated by the
FAA and SLCDA stakeholders. FAA CATEX required prior to construction/demolition.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$3,053,000 $166,000 $61,000 $20,000 $305,000 $3,605,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$2,703,750 $901,250
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-n Decommission R/W 14-32 and T/W Improvements
Site
Ifill a:
top_ ItIl 11m 111,
Imo._
e'
Solt Lake City
67 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Taxiway U &V Proper Design
Project Description:
This project is the second of two phases that includes constructing two new parallel Taxiways U and V to connect
the west and center runway.The new taxiways will tie into a new structure constructed with Phase 1 of this
project that will allow the taxiways to cross over 4000 West. Work includes site preparation, earthwork and
excavation, concrete paving, new airfield lighting, drainage systems, utilities, and striping.
Project Justification:
The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified Taxiways U and V as a new cross field taxiway system
between the north cargo support area and existing concourses. Currently Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway
connections between Runways 16R/34L- 16L/34R and the terminal area.The construction of Taxiways U and V
will provide alternative taxi routes to improve aircraft circulation and overall airfield efficiency and safety,
particularly during snow removal operations on Taxiways E and F.This project will provide an immediate benefit
to flow of aircraft on the airfield as well as improving safety by reducing traffic in a very congested area on the
airfield. With passenger numbers growing and the airlines expecting to Increase operations at SLCIA,there is a
need to expand the airfield capacity.Additionally,the new taxiway system will allow for future maintenance to
occur on Taxiways E and F as well as provide an enabling project for a future Concourse C.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 June 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$4,725,000 $4,725,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$4,725,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC -Taxiways U &V Proper (Construction) j i
f
`CL�ra
Project Site
u[ruwer�uvwrs i A,
68 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Taxiway U &V Proper Construction
Project Description:
This project is the second of two phases that includes constructing two new parallel Taxiways U and V to connect
the west and center runway.The new taxiways will tie into a new structure constructed with Phase 1 of this
project that will allow the taxiways to cross over 4000 West. Work includes site preparation, earthwork and
excavation, concrete paving, new airfield lighting, drainage systems, utilities, and striping.
Project Justification:
The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified Taxiways U and V as a new cross field taxiway system
between the north cargo support area and existing concourses. Currently Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway
connections between Runways 16R/34L- 16L/34R and the terminal area.The construction of Taxiways U and V
will provide alternative taxi routes to improve aircraft circulation and overall airfield efficiency and safety,
particularly during snow removal operations on Taxiways E and F.This project will provide an immediate benefit
to flow of aircraft on the airfield as well as improving safety by reducing traffic in a very congested area on the
airfield. With passenger numbers growing and the airlines expecting to increase operations at SLCIA,there is a
need to expand the airfield capacity.Additionally,the new taxiway system will allow for future maintenance to
occur on Taxiways E and F as well as provide an enabling project for a future Concourse C.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
March 2026 October 2028
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$71,957,400 $21,895,000 $1,924,000 $100,000 $6,444,000 $102,320,400
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$76,278,600 $26,041,800
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC -Toxiwoys U &V Proper (Construction) _may a_
� V- u +
' ! i
Project Site
sznnrKvsi.rrns � _ �a�
69 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Taxiway G from E to North of Delta Ramp
Project Description:
This project is a continuing phase to maintain the Airport's infrastructure.The project is a continuation of
rehabilitating the centerline panels on Taxiway G.The work will consist of replacing panels on Taxiway G between
the Airport Redevelopment Program (ARP) pavement on the north side of Taxiway E to the last phase of workjust
north of the Delta ramp. Work will include demolition of existing concrete pavement and econocrete base,
unclassified excavation of soft areas, placement of engineered fill, placement of new econocrete base course and
portland cement concrete. Also included is pavement marking and reinstalling in-pavement centerline lights
complete with new underground cabling and connectors.
Project Justification:
Taxiway G connects the north cargo area with the terminal area. It has a high volume of aircraft use and serves as
a major taxi route for cargo aircraft as well as other aircraft during deicing operations.The taxiway concrete
panels are showing signs of pavement distress including spalling full depth slab cracking, and mild to moderate
map cracking.This area has longitudinal cracks that have been filled along the panels, however the cracks are
continuing to widen, becoming an ongoing maintenance concern. This project will make a significant contribution
to safety and capacity by ensuring that the taxiway pavements integrity is preserved to minimize potential FOD.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 April 2025 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$3,124,000 $450,000 $94,000 $20,000 $312,000 $4,000,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,000,000 $1,000,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-Taxiway G from E to north of Salta Ramp
'ft 9yrg>'.i �. ( -.,•+'-++�tl rape _ - .e .� l y_ •.
vJ
' '2 T17� ��—•r .�. ) �%•a
i
Ir��� � �� t;✓� - Project Site _ f
,ll _ —
-3 -9-
Slt O[PIAIY[AI OF 110.POAP5
M EIJI
70 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Taxiway H1 & End Runway 16L/34R Repair
Project Description:
This project is a continuing phase to maintain the Airport's infrastructure.The project will consist of rehabilitating
and/or replacing spalled concrete panels on Taxiway H1 and the concrete panels at the ends of Runway 16L-34R.
Work will include diamond grinding, spall repair, and joint repair.This project may include select demolition and
replacement of existing concrete panels including econocrete base course and new portland cement concrete
placement.
Project Justification:
Runway 16L-34R is a critical component of our airfield. It serves as one of three runways for arriving and
departing aircraft.The runway concrete panels and joints are showing signs of distress including surface spalling,
full cracking, and corner breaking.This project will make a significant contribution to safety and capacity by
ensuring that the runway pavement integrity is preserved while minimizing FOD.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 April 2025 September 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$3,800,000 $663,000 $76,000 $20,000 $380,000 $4,939,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,000,000 $1,939,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Runway 1 6L-34R Concrete
Pavement Ends &Taxiway H 1
,?
_ Project Site
G
pin
r�
/ _ e
SIL REPIR7YEXi OF RIRPRR75
71 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Taxiway F Reconstruction (F1 - F2)
Project Description:
This project is the 4th phase to reconstruct the east half of Taxiways E and F and bring the geometry to current
FAA standards.This project will consist of replacing the pavement on Taxiway F between Taxiways F1 and F2.
Work will include demolition of existing concrete pavement and econocrete base, unclassified excavation,
placement of engineered fill, placement of new econocrete base course and new portland cement concrete.Also
Included is pavement marking and reinstallation of in-pavement centerline and taxiway edge lights complete with
new underground cabling and connectors.
Project Justification:
Taxiway F connects Runway 16R-34L and Runway 16L-34R with the terminal area. It has a high volume of aircraft
use because it serves as a major taxi route for arriving and departing aircraft.The taxiway concrete panels are
showing signs of pavement distress including surface spalling, full depth slab cracking, and corner breaking.The
Pavement Condition Index(PCI)for this section of pavement has a rating ranging from 57 - 66 indicating that the
pavement is in fair condition. This area has received multiple patches where the concrete has settled indicating
probable base failure.This project will make a significant contribution to safety and capacity by ensuring that the
taxiway pavement integrity is preserved and FOD is minimized.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 April 2025 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$7,598,000 $994,000 $152,000 $20,000 $760,000 $9,524,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$5,698,500 $3,825,500
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-Toxiwoy F Reconstruction F 1-F2
7j).
-. Project Site _
aLLV
72 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Runway 16L/34R&Taxiway Complex Ext Environment Assessment
Project Description:
An Environmental Assessment(EA) is required as part of the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) process for
Runway 16L-34R Extension program.The runway extension program (the proposed action) includes several
enabling projects to construct a runway extension to increase the length of Runway 16L-34R to the north from
12,000 feet to a final length of 14,500 feet. Enabling projects potentially include the power line relocation, taxiway
extensions to the new runway threshold, and the realignment of 2100 North.The EA will state the purpose and
need of the proposed action, identify reasonable alternatives, and assess potential environmental impacts of the
project.
Project Justification:
The EA is required by NEPA and represents the first phase of Runway 16L-34R Extension program which includes
several enabling projects.The runway extension project will allow long-haul international commercial operations,
as well as provide operational take-off efficiencies to all carriers operating at SLCIA by allowing reduced thrust
departures.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 April 2025 September 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,500,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-Runway 16L-34R and Taxiway Complex Extension Environmental Assessment
- Project Site
■`e
' r r
r t�s�ti .ram
`4_ v
l
7 .
SI[L'MIIYi111f 1ldIS _.y
73 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: SVRA Randon Aviation Taxilane & Infrastructure
Project Description:
This project will construct a new taxilane and Infrastructure for a future Randon Aviation Hangar. The work will
include the excavation and removal of existing materials, storm drain installation, import of engineered fill,
installation of hangar utilities to the lease line of the facility, and construction of a new taxilane.
Project Justification:
Randon Aviation is wanting to expand their operations to the South Valley Regional Airport(SVRA).They are
currently negotiating their lease and want to break ground on this facility next year.This project will build a
taxilane and Infrastructure at SVRA that will accommodate the proposed future location of the Randon hangar
site.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Desi&n, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$551,000 $138,000 $11,000 $5,000 $55,000 $760,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$760,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SVR-Ranoon Aviotion Toxilone &in/rostructure l
{ • iC t -- w
Project site
at r�r r 1r�s
Li.ia1
74 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: SVRA Pavement Preservation &Apron Expansion
Project Description:
This project consists of an asphalt mill and overlay on the north section of apron at the South Valley Regional
Airport(SVRA).Work will include removing existing tie down anchors, removing existing asphalt surface by cold
milling, placing a new 3-inch thick asphalt surface course, and installing new tie down anchors in their original
locations.
Project Justification:
The apron at South Valley Regional Airport(SVRA) has areas of cracking, rutting, and loose aggregate, creating a
foreign object debris(FOD) concern.The surface has also become oxidized and brittle over time.The 2019
Pavement Condition Index(PCI)for this apron has a PCI value ranging from 56- 69, indicating that the pavement
is in fair to poor condition. Over the next 5 years,the apron pavement will further deteriorate to the point of
requiring a full replacement. To extend the useful life of the pavement and to reduce FOD,the pavement surface
will require rehabilitation.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$794,000 $129,000 $12,000 $5,000 $60,000 $1,000,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$900,000 $100,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SVR - Apron Prosorvafion & Exponsion
6 -
Project Site -
w
SEC IEPMRIVENT IF AIRPORTS
� M M
75 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Bus Plaza EV Stations
Project Description:
The project for the electrical charging infrastructure involves the design, construction, and management of an
electrical charging station to support the Airport's fleet of Electric Shuttle Vehicles(ESV).The infrastructure will
include four(4) Level 3 charging stations located at the Airport's bus plaza.
Project justification:
AIP funding has secured a portion of the project funding through supplemental awards which significantly
reduces the financial burden on the Airport. However, the Airport needs to fund the remaining portion of the
project. This project promotes energy efficiency, leading to long-term cost savings in terms of fuel expenses. It
also contributes to a reduced carbon footprint,which decreases greenhouse gas emissions, helping the Airport
achieve its NetZero carbon goals and improve air quality around the Airport.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$860,000 $164,000 $9,000 $43,000 $86,000 $1,162,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$534,750 $627,250
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC�BuUsaza Ev Stations -
-
IA.V •.a1 a t :7•• Q �'-
N.•u6. '••. .. :,••..,t! .t:r::a.t: ' : ,R�,•: Project Site �..
•4.".. !l. .•i.i.9La'Jf; �7•'J.::,. f r , r;,.�lw-� � - '-s
..is-.._ .;,wr.:.c•.4'-'.7'�.T� ".JtrYilt-r .i. _.:S7 ... .-. �. � �� � _ �! ,.. .
Z;'iT—W... 1Ift'LAV "• `~ Y:�..'. A'i
{.1ri 1. MIS 3.1ST•4 , .. —� f
..l.L'4.:X3t3 .i7itT..•.CS. R.:'...7 •4 M,•-�• n , � , Q..-I - _
f :r:sit. J.:�s.s•::tl: t� -. ; = f i ..-u'�' 'r.z-r - -1 �L
a ..
L`iti.{6.1°7�s: l�4tA:•:.t.:i �t•:� �i _._zR_�T -"5 .r
'itYJri7:•':T«': ::77R:J�wA '�
76 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Economy Lot Bus Lane Reconstruction
Project Description:
This project will remove approximately 12,000 square yards of failed asphalt pavement along the bus lane in the
Economy Parking Lot and construct a new 10" thick Portland Cement Concrete(PCC) heavy-duty pavement
section. Work also includes concrete panel replacement and repair, asphalt milling and overlay, and pavement
markings.
Project Justification:
Uninterrupted shuttle service in the Economy Parking Lot is critical for transporting passengers to the Terminal.
Portions of the existing bus lane are showing sips of pavement distress including rutting and fatigue cracking
indicating the pavement is at the end of its useful service life.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$2,370,000 $393,000 $47,000 $20,000 $237,000 $3,067,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,067,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-Economy Lot- Bus Lane Reconstruction
Project Site
T,
$IG DEPARTMENT Of AIRPORTS
HWua
77 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: Landside Pavement Management FY25
Project Description:
This project is part of the ongoing Pavement Management Program to maintain the Airport's pavement network
at an acceptable level of service while minimizing the cost of maintenance and rehabilitation.The project will
consist of surface preparation, asphalt milling and overlay, and surface treatment.The primary areas to receive
surface treatment are the exit plaza, portions of the economy parking lot, park and wait lot, and the economy lot
perimeter road.
Project Justification:
Various roads and parking lots throughout the Airport campus are showing signs of distress and require
corrective action to avoid further aging and deterioration. Maintaining and preserving a pavement in "good"
condition versus rehabilitating a pavement in "fair to poor" condition is four to five times less expensive and
increases pavement useful life.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$698,000 $140,000 $14,000 $20,000 $70,000 $942,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$942,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-Landside Pavement Management FY25 _ �I
Project Site
.S'S4E
SIL OE/A0.iY[N7 YF A10.PO0.7S �'1
78 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: I QTA Equipment Replacement
Project Description:
This project will replace certain equipment along with other facility upgrades that include the following: 1.
Repairing and upgrading the existing bay area lighting. 2. Replacing the existing split mechanical systems. 3.
Replacing the existing car wash pressure washers.4. Replacing the existing radiant tube heaters located in the car
wash bays. 5. Upgrading the existing vacuum room exhaust systems.
Project Justification:
Rainwater has leaked through the upper parking deck at some locations in the QTA causing damage to several
existing lower-level light fixtures that need to be replaced and sealed to eliminate further damage. Increased
lighting at the fuel and vacuum stations is required for work to be efficiently completed at these locations.The
split HVAC system units are starting to fail, requiring increased levels of maintenance.The current pressure car
wash system located within the car wash bays requires excessive maintenance due to the continual spray of
water from the car wash.An alternate system to replace the inside pressure wash system with an exterior water
cannon would help reduce the maintenance from water damage, eliminate the need for car wash prep stations,
reduce costs of chemical usage, and be more efficient with the reuse of reclaimed water. Additionally,the existing
radiant tube heaters within the car wash areas are reaching the end of their life within the next few years and will
need to be replaced.The vacuum room exhaust systems are under designed and not adequate to maintain a
normal room temperature level for the vacuum motors to operate properly, resulting in considerable additional
maintenance problems.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 January 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$198,000 $23,000 $4,000 $3,000 $20,000 $248,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$248,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-QTA Equipment Replacement
s Project Site
SIC IFMRIYFNI II YR%AIS �-. =.-� - s R 1•_-�.•(- �-�-� + 1}1+ ++'+ Y i l:1
79 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: I Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations- Phase IV(FY25)
Project Description:
SLCDA has created a Master Plan for a phased installation program for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations(EVCS)
and infrastructure relative to the annual purchase of electric vehicles in Utah. For the past several years,the
Airport has received rebates from Rocky Mountain Power and grants from the Utah Clean Air Partnership (UCAIR)
which have reimbursed 50% of the cost to purchase and install EVCS on the Airport campus.This year the Airport
will apply for funding incentives to install eighteen (18) Level II EVCS in two locations at the Airport.Three(3) EVCS
will be installed in Lot 3 and fifteen (15) EVCS in the Economy Parking Lot.
Project Justification:
Salt Lake City is designated as a Serious Nonattainment Area for EPA's 24-hour standard for particulate matter
PM2.5. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 is an air pollutant resulting from motor vehicle emissions that contribute
to respiratory problems.The project will promote additional options for sustainable transportation and will
reduce area emissions that contribute to fine particulate matter.The Airport is proposing to install infrastructure
and purchase and install eighteen (18) Level II EVCS at two separate locations at the Airport.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Desi&n, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$1,291,000 $122,000 $2,000 $5,000 $129,000 $1,549,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,549,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC- Ev Charging Stations Ph Iv �I
�y � r
Project Site
. k 1
SIC IENIRIYENI O(L HUTS
8o Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: GA Hangar Demo- Hughes & Upper Limit
Project Description:
This project is for site development within General Aviation Zone 3 on the eastside of Salt Lake City International
Airport(SLCIA)to support future corporate hangar expansion. Work will include the demolition of the existing
GA-35 and GA-36 hangars,the removal and capping of all utilities, and site restoration and preparation to
accommodate future development. Hughes will be building a new hangar in Zone 3 immediately east and south
of the FAA FMP building with anticipated construction starting late 2023. Upper Limit has plans to relocate to
South Valley Regional Airport(SVRA) in the coming year. Both of their current leases are month to month to
facilitate the subsequent demolition and move to the new locations.The parcel that exists after the demolition
will be redeveloped by AirMed for a new U of U facility allowing demolition of their existing facility upon
completion of their new hangar and building.
Project Justification:
The only remaining undeveloped area in General Aviation Zone 3 on the eastside of SLCIA cannot currently
accommodate larger ADG II aircraft for future hangar facility development.This project will demolish existing
structures and complete the site work to allow for the construction of infrastructure for future growth.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 October 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$531,000 $121,000 $11,000 $2,000 $53,000 $718,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$718,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-CA Hangar Demo
Hughes and Upper Limit
a�
Project Site
I
81 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: GA Hangar Demo- Rows 6, 7, &15 and Pavement Preservation
Project Description:
This project is for site development within General Aviation Zone 1 on the east side of Salt Lake City International
Airport(SLCIA)to support future expansion.Work will include demolition of T-hangars (Rows 6, 7 and 15)along
with asbestos mitigation, if necessary, and disconnecting existing utilities.
Project Justification:
This project will further our GA strategy by reducing the number of based general aviation aircraft at SLC, and
provide our FBO operators with available sites that are developmental ready for corporate aircraft/large box
hangars that will contribute to the Airport's revenue. Rows 6 and 7 are two of the oldest rows the airport has and
are almost half vacant due to the aging condition of the hangars, doors, and paneling.This project will demolish
facilities that are way past their useful lives and enable the Airport to systematically continue to redevelop the
east side for additional corporate general aviation activities and less single engine T-hangar activities.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 September 2024 June 2025
Construction Desi&n, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$950,000 $139,000 $19,000 $20,000 $95,000 $1,223,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,223,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC - GA Hangar Demo- Rows 6, 7, and 15
_Ad r'
-� Project Site
3 „xt ^A s�cfAV.
- a
82 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
Project Title: State of Utah -Sky Harbour Roadway&Site Improvements
Project Description:
This project is for site development to allow for corporate hangar expansion for the State of Utah's aeronautical
activities Including the Utah Highway Patrol (UHP), Civil Air Patrol, and corporate hangar development. Work
includes design and construction of a 2,000-ft roadway including new underground utilities to future hangar lease
lines and a new taxiway connection.
Project Justification:
North and west of the Boeing Facility is a tract of land that has been undevelopable for 38 years as Boeing has a
right of first refusal (ROFR)to develop it.Airport Properties has negotiated a take back of approximately 20 acres
immediately west of the Boeing facility.This will accommodate much needed aeronautical development with
airfield connectivity. This work is necessary to enable aeronautical developments on property that is
unencumbered by agreements and will result in additional revenue to the SLCDA.The project enables the SLCDA
to house the State of Utah in one area which will enable the Airport to demolish and redevelop existing State
properties.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2024 October 2024 June 2025
Construction Design, Construction Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost
Cost Admin., & Inspection at Completion
$2,525,000 $411,000 $51,000 $20,000 $253,000 $3,260,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,260,000
PROJECT LOCATION
SLC-State of Utah-Sky Harbour Roadway g
&Site Improvements
I Project Site
977
-- 1
-v" ��� i ,, rf' .. tie, . }��AI--��•x a��l ter. .- _r �
k,
SIC......YIX10F........ ,i ,• - _- -
83 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
The Salt Lake City Golf Division
The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality
recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding
cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess
revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years
and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects.
In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per
every 9 holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for
additional future projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $7,709,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY25. The Golf Division is
in the middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding
many of the tee box areas at each course and has allocated $60,000 in FY25 from the Golf CIP Fund. The
Golf Division is in the middle of a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new
carts paths and has allocated $525,000 for FY25. The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing
a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course $4,400,000. Other significant projects include
replacing the driving range fence at Bonneville and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will
be using $663,951 in FY25 to purchase additional equipment.
85 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Tee Box Leveling
Project Address: All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing tee box leveling at all 6 courses($60,000). Salt Lake City customer satisfaction
surveys and course evaluation initiatives have shown that the biggest area of needed improvement is the
condition of the tee boxes. This is an area where course labor can be utilized to perform a large portion of the
work.The Golf Division proposes utilizing Golf CIP funds to pay for needed equipment and supplies. Each course
will undertake a four-year plan to address tee box leveling of existing tee boxes and to begin construction of new
forward tee boxes.
t Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvement
Category: Capital
H
• _TF-.
-:IF:� .� _ _ .,_'.fib":.''.,., SE•: .,..�.
Funding Recommendations
CD CIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $60,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
86 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Pump Replacement
Project Address: Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing the first of five irrigation pumps at Glendale golf course ($25,000). The
replacement of these pumps will take place over a 5-year period. This is the first of 5 pumps that are nearing
their life expectancy. At any time if one of these pumps goes down it will have impact on our ability to irrigate
the golf course.
- _--, } Proposal ID:
- - Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Replacement
.; Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $25,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
87 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Maintenance Equipment
Project Address: All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using
$456,538 in FY25 to purchase additional used equipment(usually lease-return equipment from high-end private
courses).The plan would be to purchase equipment if available such as Sprayer, Groundsmaster, Greensmaster.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Equipment
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf Operating Fund $456,538
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
88 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Range Fence
Project Address: Bonneville
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing driving range fencing at Bonneville golf course ($900,000). The projects consist
of removal of existing damaged fencing and replacing It with new fencing material.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvement
Category: Capital
II
I �
s
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $900,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
89 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Property Fencing Project
Project Address: Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing property fencing at Nibley Park golf course($55,000). The projects consist of
removal of existing damaged fencing along the northern perimeter(500 east) and replacing it with new fencing
material.
w Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvement
Category: Capital
if
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $55,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
go Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: New Construction Projects
Project Address: Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be entering into the planning phases of a new construction project at Glendale Golf Course
($1,500,000). The projects consist of a double-decker range structure and new fencing at Glendale.This project
will position the Glendale driving range to take advantage of changing market conditions and will expand the
range capacity and extend the use of the range b 3 to 4 additional months annually, having a significant
increase in driving range revenue generation an4roviding an enhanced recreation opportunity for City
residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Construction
Category: Capital
a �
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $1,500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
91 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Irrigation Improvements
Project Address: Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing irrigation improvements at Rose Park($4,400,000).The current mainline system is
as old as 65 years and is in desperate need of replacement. This project also includes a turfgrass reduction plan
and some redesign of certain holes to allow for a more efficient system, utilizing fewer heads and potential water
use reduction of up to 40%.
•� / ,`'' a Proposal ID:
• • j "s'• Department: Public Lands- Golf
• • • • Project Type: Improvements
• • Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $4,400,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
92 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Cart Path Improvements
Project Address: All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing cart path improvements at all 6 courses($525,000). Well-maintained golf cart
paths are critical for the overall customer experience and for helping to preserve golf course playing conditions.
The existing paths are decades behind receiving proper repair and expansion. Additionally, with slight
modifications, many cart paths can be used by non-golfers during the off season or other times when conditions
are not ideal for golf.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $525,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
93 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Bridges
Project Address: Forest Dale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing some on course bridges at Forest Dale($74,000). The existing road base/asphalt
bridges at Forest Dale are prone to washouts during heavy rain events. Steel bridges will address the washout
problem as well as beautify the course.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvements
Category: Capital
wV
j
f
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $74,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
94 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: On Course Restroom
Project Address: Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing a on course restroom at Glendale($150,000).The Glendale course does not have
a permanent restroom structure on the course. It is a highly requested amenity by customers.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvements
Category: Capital
s� -
"3i
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $150,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
95 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Range Hitting Pad Extension
Project Address: Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be extending the hitting pad surface at Nibley Park($20,000).This increases the number of
stalls for customers and increases driving range revenue, especially during inclement weather.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $20,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
96 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
Project Title: Golf Carts
Project Address: Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will purchase 31 new golf carts for Nibley Park($206,305).The current fleet is over seven years
old and is due for replacement as ongoing maintenance and repair costs continue to increase as well as related
downtime, which impacts revenue negatively. New carts produce higher rental revenue numbers as well.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Lands- Golf
Project Type: Replacement
Category: Capital
`-
i
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $206,305
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are
developed within the Golfs annual operational budgets.
97 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
The Salt Lake City Public Utilities
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities: water, sewer, storm
water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not
used to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund
reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government subsidized loan. The
department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a
portion of the water reclamation facility construction, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and
Communities (BRIC) grant to fund a portion of the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction,
and an American Rescue Plan Act grant to fund the Granary District Floodplain Mitigation Re-
mapping. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established
for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure
intensive, and administration of these assets requires longterm project and financial planning.
The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year
2025, the department has over 60 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on
existing projects. Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common
for projects designed in one year and be constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes projects
rated as a high priority in the Department's Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water
reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also
experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three
water treatment plants were built in the 1950's and early 60's. Planning is underway for each of the plants
to determine the best approaches for their replacement, with the City Creek re-construction proceeding
towards a 2027 completion date. A unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and
local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange
agreement obligations.
99 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Water Main Replacements
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 1,300 miles of aging water pipe.To support continued operation of this system the FY 24/25
budget includes $2,500,000 for the rehabilitation of the Upper Conduit transmission line. This budget includes
$3,500,000 for the construction of the North Bench Pump Station and $200,000 for design of the Victory Road -
Ensign Downs Phase II master plan projects. This category also includes $3,893,000 to support routine
replacement of pipelines in poor condition at various locations in the system.The department is continuing to
develop a more robust way to identify pipeline replacement priorities and corrosion related issues within the
system.
Proposal ID:
r Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
-% Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $10,093,000
Priority: Project specific
s
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
100 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Treatment Plant Improvements
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
All three city-owned water treatment plants(WTPs)were built in the 1950's and early 1960's. Each plant is
nearing the end of its expected life and will need to be rebuilt. The City Creek WTP will be rebuilt first based on
DPU's receipt of a FEMA BRIC grant for this project.The grant is a 70% match up to $36.6M. Work during the
coming FY includes on-going design completion ($2,000,000), construction ($45,000,000), and continued public
engagement($300,000).
The reconstruction of the Big Cottonwood WTP will be delayed until sufficient budget is available to design and
construct this important project. However, construction of the Big Cottonwood WTP Intake Screenings
($2,000,000)will be progressed to maintain operations, and the SLA Replacement- Cottonwoods Connection
pipeline($8,200,000)will continue as part of a regionalization approach that allows Big Cottonwood Creek water
to be treated using available capacity of the existing Little Cottonwood WTP.This pipeline will serve as
redundancy to both the Big Cottonwood WTP and the portion of the Big Cottonwood Conduit that conveys
drinking water from the plant to the City's drinking water distribution system.
This cost center also includes replacing failing components as they wear out as part of annual budget
($1,000,000)to ensure regulatory compliance until larger projects can be funded.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects -
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $62,850,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of$500,000 per/year(City Creek)
101 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Deep Pump Wells
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
Deep pump wells provide the city with reliable and redundant water supplies that supplement surface water and
third-party water supply agreements.The Department is working to address critical water supplies issues
associated with its deep wells.This budget addresses the Artesian Well ($800,000),which was destroyed in a
recent tree collapse. Regulations associated with PFAS require the department to implement Advanced
Treatment for Wells, with design implementation first starting with the 1500 E well ($300,000). This budget
request also includes funding to repair the Millcreek/Evergreen Well ($900,000)to replace pumps as required to
ensure operability and reliability.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
C \ Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
Enterprise Fund
-� Enterprise Funds: $2,000,000
Priority: Project specific
r
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
$69,000/year associated with 1500 E well PFAS removal.
102 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Meter Change-Out Program
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The budget includes the continuation of the small meter change out program piloted in 2015 and initiated in
2018. Metering water consumption by customers is the source of our revenue. Approximately 51,100, or 63%,
of the system's water meters have been replaced with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) read meters. With
optimal conditions, 10,000 to 12,000 meters per year can be replaced. Supply chain issues have created delays
thus replacement is planned at 8,000 meters per year. The plan is to complete the residential AMI meter change
out program in the next 4 to 4 1/2 years. AMI technology provides hourly usage information instead of relying on
monthly data. An online portal provides our customers with information to better manage their water usage and
alerts them to the status of their water service. Better information will assist us in water conservation efforts.
A smart water meter has been installed at your Proposal ID:
address to help you manage your water usage)
Department: Public Utilities
Saft Lake City Public Utilities
would like to Invite you to set up your'Pub#c Utilities Customer Portil'. Project Type:
Please scan the OR Code below or visit Water Utility CIP Protects-
sic.govlutilitieslpublicutilitiescustomerportall to sign up and Category: Y J
watch our setup video for your Public Utilities Customer Portal. Enterprise Fund
"" ®•' Enterprise Funds: $2,500,000
�IIi 111111111�1.
Priority: Ongoing program
s._— so
i hitp J s.condlogin.htmIMignin C
�Public
utllltles
Customer Portal
Please Sign in
N.d H*?c,a n A 3D14834M
Email Address
EmailAW—
Password
P--d
0sh-P--W
o, 0 1
Your Account p:
O
For assistance please call Customer Service at 801 483 6900
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
103 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Water Service Connections
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
Water service extends beyond the corporate boundaries of Salt Lake City. Approximately 37% of our service
connections are in this outlying area. Repair and replacement of these connections are part of an ongoing
program. The components of this program are service line replacements, new connections, and small and large
meter maintenance and replacement. Public Utilities is determining the best way to implement the EPA's Lead
and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) including developing inventories, sampling plans, public outreach, and lateral
service line replacements. The plan will include resources, personnel, and capital needs. Budget associated with
the LCRR includes $1,000,000 to support pothole work associated with inventory development and service line
material identification.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $3,950,000
Priority: Project/need specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of$100,000 per year associated with LCRR line replacement and temporary
filters.
104 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Storage Reservoirs
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU owns and operates seven raw water reservoirs that store snow run-off. Little Dell and five of SLCDPU's
reservoirs are used to store water that is treated for drinking water. All seven of the reservoirs are a contingent
way for the Department to meet exchange agreements for secondary water. Three of the reservoirs are used by
ski areas for snowmaking, and three of the reservoirs are used for flood control. The raw water storage reservoir
at Mountain Dell has a $250,000 proposed budget to continue construction of the outlet replacement. SLCDPU
has received a 30% matching funds,grant of$265,000 in December of 2022 for engineering and planning for
Lake Mary Dam's restoration,which Is supplemented by a $500,000 budget request for the match and additional
design and emergency planning associated with the grant award.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $1,075,000
Priority: Project specific
ILE�_
• .. •� \ .
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
105 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Pumping Plants & Pump Houses
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
As a result of its size and topography, the water distribution system consists of more than 50 different pressure
zones. Pump stations are often connections between pressure zones, pumping treated water from one pressure
zone to another.The utility has over thirty pump stations with many needing back-up power and replacement to
support system resiliency. Planned protects for this fiscal year are the Arlington Hills Pump Station Full Backup
Power project($50,000), the 3900 South Pump Station ($150,000), and the Emigration Pump Station Drain Field
Assessment and Upgrade($120,000).
loe
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Y Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $320,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
io6 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Culverts, Flumes & Bridges
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
These secondary water conveyance systems are critical to maintaining our water exchange agreements. Major
planned projects within this category are the flume from Double Barrels to the railroad tracks for$1,500,000 and
the JSL Canal Enclosure at Millcreek for$700,000.These projects are intended to support the long-term resiliency
and reliability of systems that are critical to maintaining water deliveries.Additional projects in this category
include the Little Cottonwood Flume ($250,000),which is required to monitor and administer water rights
agreements, and the Rehabilitation and Replacement of the JSL($100,000)which will address emergent JSL
replacement needs required to maintain water exchange.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
' Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $2,550,000
"- Priority: Project specific
Nor
I t
a A
v
� 4-
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
107 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Distribution Reservoirs(Tanks)
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 100,000,000 gallons of finished water storage in 22 tanks and reservoirs. These components
require on-going inspection and maintenance. The location and elevation of these facilities is critical to the
operation of the water distribution system. The budget includes $200,000 dedicated to pre-design assessment
of Neff Tank and $100,000 associated with project planning inspections for various tanks.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $300,000
Priority: Project specific
�i
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
io8 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings(Water Utility)
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The SLCDPU West Campus building is located at 500 S and 1805 W and is used to support SLCDPU engineering.
SLCDPU needs additional workspace to support existing operations for various workgroups.The budgeted
$80,000 is to expand cubicle space at the existing West Campus facility to provide for the consolidation of work
groups and to open available space at the SLCDPU administration building for various workgroups.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $80,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
log Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Treatment Plants
Project Address: 1365 West 2300 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
The largest budgeted item in this category is for the construction of a new water reclamation facility. The
$213,125,333 estimate represents the continuation of a multi-year project and includes design, construction, and
program management. Existing plant improvement projects include Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Upgrades
for$1,300,000 and trickling filter rehabilitation for$150,000.These existing plant improvements are critical to
maintaining existing operations while the new water reclamation facility is commissioned.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
•► Project Type:
Cate or Sewer Utility CIP Projects-
g y' Enterprise Fund
J. r Enterprise Funds: $214,575,333
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
The operational cost of the wastewater treatment facility is anticipated to increase by$6,000,000 annually, or by
approximately 40%,with the completion of the New WRF project.This increase in operational costs is associated
with increased chemical, power, and other miscellaneous operational costs attributed to the new treatment
process. This estimate will be refined as construction progresses.
110 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Collection Lines
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 667 miles of aging sewer collections pipelines. Proposed budget within this category includes
pipe renewal &replacement projects, City/County/State driven projects, and master plan projects. Master plan
projects budgeted item in this category and total $7,500,000. This Includes $1,500,000 for 500 South Capacity
Upgrades (3400 West to Orange Street) design and $6,000,000 for 1800 North Sewer Realignment Phase 3
construction. Master plan projects identified within this category support system condition improvements and
growth-related capacity constraints. Pipe renewal & replacement projects are budgeted for$8,500,000 and
consist of emergency operations support and rehabilitation of the West Temple segment of the 1200 West trunk
sewer. Project budgets to support City, County and State driven projects are estimated at $8.2M which includes
Misc. Public Services Projects ($200,000),the 700 N Sewer Rehabilitation construction ($5,500,000)which is to be
completed in advance of the planned roadway improvements, and the 500 South FM Bio Tower($2,500,000).The
Bio Tower is intended to extend the useful life of the 1200 W trunk sewer through active odor and corrosion
mitigation.
s Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category:
Sewer Utility CIP Projects-
Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $24,993,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of$50,000 per year associated with bio tower electrical and O&M.
III Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Lift Stations
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU operates 41 sewer lift stations. The proposed lift station renewal and replacement program anticipates
one project for FY 2024/2025,which includes the Industrial Lift Station Improvements budgeted for$2,500,000.
This project is intended to fund construction and replacement of the existing lift station to improve operating
conditions and to mitigate sanitary sewer overflows that have been experienced over the past several years.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
ti ' LI Project Type:
{-' Category:
Sewer Utility CIP Projects-
Enterprise Fund J
A Enterprise Funds: $2,500,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
112 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings(Sewer Utility)
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The SLCDPU West Campus building is located at 500 S and 1805 W and is used to support SLCDPU engineering.
SLCDPU needs additional workspace to support existing operations for various workgroups.The budgeted
$80,000 is to expand cubicle space at the existing West Campus facility to provide for the consolidation of work
groups and to open available space at the SLCDPU administration building for various workgroups.
The lift station storage facility budget($200,000) is intended to provide design for an equipment storage facility
intended to support operational emergency response,to include storage for bypass pumps and generators.This
storage facility is to be located on the west side of the city and is intended to support operational readiness,
emergency response, inventory management, and access to equipment where it is needed.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects-
g y: Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $280,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
113 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Storm Drain Lines
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The SLCDPU has over 350 miles of storm drain in the system.This category has $1,361,000 for projects budgeted
for supporting City, County, and State driven projects. Other projects in this category total $344,000 for various
collection lines and $300,000 for public utility defined projects to Include 800 South storm drain improvements.
Other local area projects to be completed by city crews at various locations are budgeted to be $150,000.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Mr
Project Type:
- r Storm Water Utility CIP
� m Category: Projects- Enterprise Fund
H Enterprise Funds: $2,155,000
s,.
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
114 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Riparian Corridor Improvements
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The City places a high value on protecting its riparian corridors and SLCDPU serves as a steward to those
corridors.The planned riparian project for FY 2024/2025 is Emigration -Allen Park($450,000).This project will
include feasibility, design, and construction for improvements within Allen Park.These efforts are to be
coordinated with overall capital improvement efforts by the city to open and activate Allen Park to the public.
Project will consider streambank and channel stabilization, culvert removal, emergent benches, and debris
basins.
r' Proposal ID:
fir- "�ubd
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP
Projects- Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $450,000
- Priority: Project specific
�r-
r
� J
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
115 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Landscaping
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
Stormwater landscaping provides an important role to water quality and the aesthetic value of the city.The
landscaping budget includes $50,000 for the Northwest Oil Drain canal remediation and $50,000 for Cornell
Wetlands Revegetation.This Northwest Oil Drain budget is to reserve funding for cleanup and closeout on the
remediated portions of the Northwest Drain.The Cornell Wetlands Revegetation project is to eliminate invasive
vegetation and revegetate open areas of the Cornell Wetland area with hardy, open-space vegetation.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
3 Category: Storm Water Utility CIP
g y: Projects- Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $100,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
116 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Storm Water Lift Stations
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The storm water utility manages 26 stormwater lift stations. Storm water lift station work planned with the FY
24/25 budget to support the stormwater utility includes the construction of the Northwest Drain Lift Station
($5,200,000). This will provide improved capacity and reliability along the northwest drain.Additional projects in
this category include SIr Timothy Lift Station Upgrades($357,000) and Lieutenant Lift Station Upgrades
($357,000); both are intended replace pumps and improve SCADA/electrical systems to extend the stations
useful life.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP
g y' Projects- Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $5,914,000
Priority: Project Specific
s
�■ •�� �'��i�W
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
117 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Detention Basins
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
Stormwater detention basins serve a critical role in managing storms and mitigating associated flooding.
Detention Basins work planned for FY 24/25 includes the continuation of the design of the Granary District
Floodplain Mitigation and Re-Mapping. Project.This project will construct detention basins within the city to
reduce the Granary Floodplain and will remap the floodplain. The Granary District Floodplain Mitigation and Re-
mapping is budgeted for$3,635,000.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Storm Water Utility CIP
Category: Projects- Enterprise
Fund
71 Enterprise Funds: $3,635,000
{ Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
118 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings(Storm water Utility)
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
The SLCDPU West Campus building is located at 500 S and 1805 W and is used to support SLCDPU engineering.
SLCDPU needs additional workspace to support existing operations for various workgroups.The budgeted
$40,000 is to expand cubicle space at the existing West Campus facility to provide for the consolidation of work
groups and to open available space at the SLCDPU administration building for various workgroups.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
- - Storm Water Utility CIP
Category: Projects- Enterprise
Fund
Enterprise Funds: $40,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
iiq Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
Project Title: Street Lighting Projects
Project Address: Various Locations
Project Description:
Street lighting projects planned for FY 2024/2025 are budgeted for$1,240,000 to upgrade to high efficiency
lighting and other system improvements on arterial streets, collector streets, and in neighborhoods. This
includes budget to hire a contractor to perform inspections on new street lighting facilities, consultant support to
further develop an Implementation Plan, and budget for improvements for base level lighting services and three
enhanced lighting groups. The master plan developed with the implementation plan determines and guides best
practices for upgrades and new lights.
Proposal ID:
Department: Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Street Lighting Utility CIP
Projects- Enterprise Funds
Enterprise Funds: $1,240,000
Priority: Ongoing program
i
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Reduction in electricity costs.
120 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City(RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts
to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA
utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that
enhance the City's housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental
sustainability. The RDA's primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and
program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account.
The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned
infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that
anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval
process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects
costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the
City's CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The RDA fiscal year 2025 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects:
• City Creek Daylighting: Allocates an additional $50,000 towards designing the daylighting of City
Creek along the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West, supplementing the fiscal year 2024's
$100,000 appropriation for final construction drawings. The total project, aimed at improving
access to nature, water quality, and flood mitigation, is estimated to cost between $15 million and
$20 million.
• Japantown Construction Documents: Designates $100,000 to produce detailed construction
documents for the Japantown Design Strategy, essential for estimating costs and guiding
redevelopment. The plans aim to revitalize the neighborhood while honoring its historical
significance and fostering community engagement and connectivity.
• Japantown Art: Designates a total of$336,577 for enhancing the cultural landscape through
various art installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and
preserve Japantown's heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an
engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors.
121 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
Project Title: City Creek Daylighting
Project Address: Folsom Corridor- North Temple Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds to support a design plan to daylight(bring to the surface) a portion of City Creek that runs
north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. Project goals include increasing access to nature,
improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding.The City/Agency recently completed the City Creek
Daylighting Design Plan which provides a design concept for the daylighting concept.This funding request of
$50,000 will supplement the fiscal year 2024 appropriation,totaling$100,000, for final construction drawings to
provide cost estimates to implement the project. Landscaping improvements and other pedestrian amenities will
also be recommended as a part of the design plan to activate the trail and create a welcoming centerpiece for
the westside community. The total cost for Implementation is estimated to be between $15,000,000 and
$20,000,000.
Proposal ID:
Department: RDA
Project Type:
Category:
! e. owl _*
� a
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (RDA) $50,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis, but it's anticipated that City Parks and Public Utilities will
maintain the creek and associated amenities.
122 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
Project Title: Japantown Construction Documents
Project Address: Central Business District Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of$100,000 to fund the drafting of construction documents to implement the Japantown Design
Strategy. The funding will be used to create detailed construction plans that are crucial for determining
construction costs,guiding redevelopment efforts and revitalizing the neighborhood while honoring its historical
significance. The plans will also include community-centric designs aimed at fostering engagement and
connectivity among residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department: RDA
Project Type:
Category:
i� 5 yf 1W
Ak
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (RDA) $100,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
123 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
Project Title: Japantown Art
Project Address: Central Business District Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds for the Japantown Art project, totaling $336,577.The proposed funding for this project is
$300,000 from the Central Business District and an additional $36,577 from Block 67 North project area.The
funding is designated for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art installations recommended in the
Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown's heritage.The initiative aims to beautify the
neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department: RDA
Project Type:
Category:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (RDA) $336,577
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
124 Mayor's Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25