Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/26/2018 - Meeting Minutes MINUTES FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BOARD MEETING(CDCIP) Monday, November 26 2018 451 South State Street, Room 126 City & County Building Salt Lake City, Utah S:30 p.m. 1. Board Members Board Members Not Present Loree Hagen Logan Darling Hannah Lockhart Brooke Young Tony Mastracci Andrew Saalfeld Pamela Silberman Also Present Lani Eggersten-Goff Jen Schumann Dillon Hase Shyann Hugoe 2. Staff Updates Mr. Hase wanted to inform the Board about responses to their questions on November 19, 2018. Mr. Hase presented the following questions and responses to the Board: Housing Authority Oasis is currently occupied, do we know where the current residents will be placed? We would follow our normal relocation procedures, similar to the Denver Street project, sensitively relocating residents as needed. Who owns Oasis? It is privately owned a single individual. Her name is Carol, her legal entity is Georgia Apartments LLC Three for homeless, three for DV, three for SPIML If your primary target is homeless, why only 9 units for homeless individuals? This is a similar breakdown too many of our other tax credit developments. The intention for this site is to provide affordable housing while also addressing the call to aid in the homeless response. SLC En ineerin 800 W- Construction Is this a Bond eligible project? Sales Tarr eligible?Is this going to CIP? CDCIP Meeting Minutes November 26,2018 Page 2 The bond funding is currently being programed for the worst deteriorated streets in the City, which does include the 800 West segments between 600 South and 800 South. This CDBG funding would allow the City to address this street two to four years sooner and allow the local bond money to stretch further. Engineering is still unsure how the County sales tax funding will be applied or how much will be received for City streets. The City sales tax increase funds go to Streets Division for maintenance. If CDBG funding is not awarded, or partially awarded, Engineering plans to apply in the future for CIP funding. 3. A rovaj of the minutes of the November 19 2018 meetin . There were no minutes to approve. 4. Business A. Welcome Ms. Silberman welcomed the CDCIP Members and opened the meeting on November 26, 2018 at 5;32PM. B. CDBG and ESG Applications Discussion Ms. Silberman inquired about concerns staff might have with Community Development Corporation's application. Ms. Schumann explained that CDC's CFO has left and the new Executive Director is Mike Akerlow and staff has great confidence in the direction that CDC is heading. Ms. Silberman noted Salt Lake City's Emergency Fund application being a new program. She touched base on the fact that there used to be a program available for maintaining facilities and even with prevalent need the program went away. Ms. Silberman asked if this application originated from the previous program. Ms. Schumann stated that was correct. She explained that in the first year of the consolidated plan there was allowance for building improvements since it was a transition year. Ms. Schumann informed the Board that response from the community was comfortable with that program going away if there will be funds available on an emergency basis. C. General Needs and Nano Session Discussion Ms. Schumann described the General Needs Hearing as a public meeting for Salt Lake City residents to come and talk about needs in the community. Ms. Schumann explained the public outreach staff has done throughout the year and the top three priorities were Housing Options, Parks and Green Space, and Homeless Services, Mr. Saalfield stated that last year seems to be more teel-niology focused and this year it's the bottom priority. Ms. Silberman stated that people just assume that there isn't a digital divide anymore. Ms. Schumann stated that these selections are chosen based on what CDBG funds could be applicable towards. CDCIP Meeting Minutes November 26,2018 Page 3 Ms. Schumann informed the Board that during the Nano Sessions they would be asking questions in pairs and asked the Board what questions they would like to ask. There was open discussion about the Nano Session questions. Ms. Schumann inquired to the Board about the Nano Session process and if they would like one representative for each application, one representative for each organization, or two representatives for each organization. The Board discussed and decided two representatives per organization would be sufficient. D. Other Business There was no further business. 5. Adjournment There being no further business. The meeting was adjourned at 6:26 PM. CDCIP B z This document along with the digital recording constit to the official minutes of the CDCIP Board meeting held November 26, 2018.