HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/02/2025 - Meeting Minutes ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor �' � 9 and NEIGHBORHOODS
TAMMY HUNSAKER
Director
Salt Lake Art Design Board Meeting
Wednesday,July 2nd, 2025
5:00 — 7:00 pm
PRESENT: Colour Maisch Nate King Wisam Khudhair
Michelle Buhler Jenn Lopez
STAFF MEMBERS Felicia Baca, Executive Director,Arts Council
Laurel Cannon-Alder, Deputy Director,Arts Council
Renato Olmedo-Gonzalez,Public Art Program Manager,Arts Council
Amy Childress,Public Art Program Coordinator,Arts Council
EXCUSED: Tiffini Porter, Michael Mejia
GUESTS: Matthew Mazzotta,Commissioned Artist,Glendale Park
Mission: To amplify art in Salt Lake City to enrich, enhance, and build a dynamic city where
art and artists thrive.
I. Call to Order, Introductions, and Welcome
Ms. Colour Maisch welcomed everyone to the meeting and stated the Art Design Board's
mission.
II. Approval of May 7 h, 2025 Meeting Minutes
Ms. Maisch put forward a motion to approve the May 7th, 2025, meeting minutes. Mr.
Wisam Khudhair seconded, and all present voted in favor.
III. Discussion: Glendale Park Artwork Development
Mr. Renato Olmedo-Gonzalez introduced the Glendale Park Public Art project to the Board
and presented Matthew Mazzotta as the commissioned artist for the project. The project is
funded by the Parks and Public Lands' General Obligation Bond. Mr. Mazzotta's role within
the project includes both facilitating community engagement and designing, fabricating,a
nd installing a public artwork for Glendale Park. In April 2025, Mr. Mazzotta and the Arts
Council held four community engagement events with West Side neighbors which were
designed to gather feedback to inform his design process.The report from these events was
provided to the Board and the artist prior to the meeting.
Mr. Mazzotta will design the artwork based on the community input collected. In close
consulation with Public Lands staff and project stakeholders, a location within the
reimagined Glendale Park was chosen for the top of the main hill where the old water slides
used to be.This spot serves as a centerpiece for the park, offering panoramic views of the
Wasatch and Oquirrh mountains, downtown Salt Lake City, as well as the Great Salt Lake.
The hill was described as both a destination and a tranquil viewpoint, making it an ideal
setting for the public artwork.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O.BOX 145460,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5460 TEL 801.535.6230
During the meeting, Mr. Mazzotta shared several conceptual ideas and invited the Board's
feedback, specifically asking whether the final piece should be more of an experiential
artwork, a landmark, or a combination of both. To help the board visualize the location,he
shared photos and videos of the hill as it currently exists. His first concept featured a
stylized peacock sculpture, showing only the head and tail, inspired by the wild peacocks
that live in the Poplar Grove neighborhood. This design emphasized the idea of a
recognizable landmark.A full peacock sculpture was also considered,but concerns about
safety and people climbing on it led to focusing on the partial version. Mr. Mazzotta also
presented renderings from a recent project he had completed, a pink wind turbine house
with movable steel parts and seating beneath it. He also showed a design of a spiral walkway
structure that elevates visitors as they walk. Both of these designs demonstrated how
interactive elements could be incorporated into Glendale Park's artwork.
Building on those ideas, Mr. Mazzotta presented a hybrid concept—a pink tree inspired by
the Utah Juniper,featuring kinetic leaves and a spiraling trunk. This design would be a
landmark sculpture while also having moving and engaging elements. He also introduced a
concept focused on experience: several groupings of chairs arranged on slowly rotating
circles, allowing park visitors to enjoy the surrounding views at a gentle pace.These rotating
chair circles could be motorized or manually cranked. He presented different variations of
this concept, one with just one large circle and cooking areas,taking inspiration from the
engagement feedback,which highlighted the importance of food to the community, and one
with three circles or chairs. Finally, Mr. Mazzotta showed a concept that blended landmark
and experience elements into one piece. It featured a mountain-shaped structure with swing
sets underneath. Throughout the meeting, he emphasized the importance of Board feedback
to refine the project's direction, ensuring the final artwork reflects both community interests
and the park's character.
The Board, staff, and the artist discussed the proposals. Mr. Wisam Khudair expressed his
approval of the peacock proposal, noting that it reflected feedback from the community,
particularly in its use of vibrant colors and the peacock itself,which residents frequently
mentioned. He also liked the proposal of the three circles of chairs and cooking areas,but
suggested adding a shade structure, as the area could become very hot in the summer
months.
Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez, appreciated the overall strength of all of the proposals. He liked the
height of the more landmark designs since they would be visible from the surrounding area.
He particularly liked the chairs,viewing them as a potential interactive element that could
foster a sense of community.The idea of people hand-cranking the chairs added a playful,
engaging layer to the design,which he felt could encourage social interaction. However, Ms.
Maisch raised concerns about the accessibility of the chairs, suggesting that a larger, more
visible landmark piece might be more inclusive, as it could be appreciated by those who
might struggle to engage with smaller,localized elements physically.
Other Board members, including Mr.Nate King and Ms. Michelle Buhler,voiced support for
the kinetic elements in Mr. Mazzotta's designs.They were especially drawn to the kinetic
leaves,which they felt would provide a dynamic,visually appealing element that responded
to the environment. Mr. King also noted the panoramic experience offered by the rotating
chairs,where users could enjoy 36o-degree views of the hilltop. Ms. Jenn Lopez felt that
while the chairs and cooking spaces were functional, they lacked uniqueness when
compared to nearby facilities like Jordan Park,which offered similar gathering spaces. She
felt the half-sunken peacock proposal struck a balance between conceptual and
straightforward, offering both neighborhood representation and a more tangible form of
engagement. She also suggested incorporating a more interactive component into the
design,which was echoed by Ms. Felicia Baca,who proposed adding a kinetic or light
element to further enhance the experience.
Mr. Mazzotta clarified that,while the chairs may seem conceptual,they were indeed
straightforward in function and could offer long-term engagement through their interactive
nature. He also pointed out that budget constraints would influence how elevated the
artwork could be,limiting certain features like swings or higher structures. Mr. Mazzotta
will present his final proposal at the August meeting.
IV. Discussion: 9-Line/West Side Project Development
Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez introduced the g-Line West Side Public Art Project,which continues
the momentum of the"Iconic West Side Public Artwork"at Glendale Park. The project was
requested by the Mayor and is being funded by the CRA with potential total budget of up to
$450,000.The preferred site for this new artwork is at goo South and goo West. Unlike the
Glendale Park project,where artist Matthew Mazzotta collaborated with a landscape
architect,the artist for this new project will be responsible for the entire process
independently.
Two rounds of community engagement shaped the project's priorities—one in Summer
2023 and another in Spring 2025. Community members on the West Side emphasized the
importance of involving local artists, showcasing nature through the artwork, and ensuring
community involvement throughout both the creation and development processes.This
input is driving how the artist will be selected and how the final artwork will reflect
community values.
Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez asked the Board for input on the artist selection process, considering
options like an invitational, an open call, or inviting previous finalists from the Glendale
Park public art project to move directly into proposal development. Ms. Baca highlighted
the Arts Council's efforts to balance opportunities between local and national artists and
noted the city's interest in higher-volume art production with a more streamlined process.
Ms. Maisch suggested dividing the budget to support multiple artists, possibly both local
and national. However, there were concerns about staff capacity with managing multiple
artworks in a single project, and that the Mayor may want a larger, more landmark artwork
for the project. Board members supported the idea of possible collaboration between
national and local artists. Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez expressed support for exploring an
invitational approach with the possibility of inviting local artists.
V. Art Design Board— Executive Committee
Ms. Coulor Maisch put forward a motion to approve Nate King as the Vice Chair of the Art
Design Board. Ms. Lopez seconded, all Board members present voted in favor.
VI. Public Comment
No public comment was received.
VII. Other Business/Adjourn
Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez gave updates on the Public Art Program. PBS Utah has released its
short segment on the Life on State Public Art Project on YouTube.The Salt Lake City Arts
Council and the Public Art Program are currently working to add the Art Design Board to
their websites. Ms.Amy Childress will be reaching out to board members to collect the
necessary materials for this update.
Community engagement for the Fleet Block project is currently on pause, though the
Mayor's Office plans to take a more active role moving forward. Separately,the Public Art
Program is collaborating with the Redevelopment Agency(CRA) on a new mural initiative
for the Ballpark Neighborhood. This program will fund murals on private property and
utilizes the Pre-Qualified Artist Pool—io artists have been selected and are now in contract
negotiations.As this project is not on city-owned property, the Art Design Board is not
involved,but the Public Art Program is providing extensive technical assistance. The murals
will be installed beginning in August and through September.
Ms. Childress is leading community engagement for the next Out of the Blue mural,
scheduled for completion next summer. The goal is to inform and excite the public about the
upcoming change and to gather feedback on which artist should be commissioned.An
engagement survey will go live on August 4.Additionally, students from Rowland Hall
produced a documentary about Out of the Blue, featuring interviews with current mural
artist Mike Murdock and Mr. Olmedo-Gonzalez; it is now available on YouTube.
As for the Wake the Great Salt Lake project, contract negotiations are still underway with
the selected artist for the signature piece,with an announcement anticipated later this
month. For local activations, UMOCA recently opened Oscar Tuazon's installation on the
Abravanel Hall Plaza.A mural celebration will also take place in Rose Park on September
10.
Finally,the City Council did not approve the second tranche of the General Obligation (GO)
Bond funding for Public Lands,which includes the remaining $40o,000 designated for
percent-for-art projects tied to the bond. This could impact future public art at both the
Fleet Block and Warm Springs Park sites.
Ms. Baca gave the Board updates on the Salt Lake City Arts Council. The Salt Lake City Arts
Council received our NEA funding this year to support the Living Traditions Festival,while
many other local arts organizations did not receive NEA grants this year. Because of Mission
alignment,the Arts Council has moved from the Department of Economic Development to
the Department of Communities and Neighborhoods. This change was made through the
annual budget process and approved by City Council. Despite a flat overall city budget, the
Arts Council was granted a partial budget request to support the'Twilight Concert Series,
recognizing the challenges posed by changing venue dynamics. The Arts Council was invited
to present its budget directly to City Council as a standalone Division, rather than as part of
a department-wide presentation.
City Council has shown strong interest in more murals, increased public art output, and
accommodating department requests for public art. Council Member Puy, in particular,
advocated for more murals and lower barriers to creating public art. The discussion led to
follow-up questions about how the Arts Council allocates its time and resources, and how its
goals align with the Mayor's and Council's priorities. Small group meetings with Council
members are planned to continue these conversations. Current CIP funding for public art is
approximately$16o,000, pending City Council approval. Looking ahead, the Arts Council is
beginning to consider what will follow its current strategic plan,which ends in 2026—
whether that be a new strategic plan, a public art master plan, or a broader cultural plan.
Ms. Maisch made a motion to close the meeting.