Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/03/2026 - Meeting Materials (5) OMMUNITY GRANTS QUESTION SCORING CRITERIA Project EliqibilljlI��MM Yes No Unclear Is the project/organization located within SLC boundaries? Does the applicant have land use permission? Does the project comply with relevant City/County/State Code? Is the type of qroup applying eliqible for the program? Is the proposed project an approved fund use? Is this a duplicate application Organization type No points given for this qua tion Clear description of Adequate description of Unclear or minimal description of organization and mission given organization and mission is given organization and mission given or Mission and organization is directly and organization has at least organization is not connected to purpose of connected to purpose of the some demonstrated connection to grant program grant program purpose of grant program. Organization is led by groups Organization closely collaborates that are directly impacted by with individuals impacted by the the issue that they are issue that they are addressing and Organization is not led by people directly addressing.Those that are leadership has close relationships impacted by the issue they are addressing directly impacted or benefit and may not appear to acknowledge the Leadership&Structure from the program serve in to the communities that they importance of bottom-up leadership.Cunent decision-making roles.Current serve.Impacted people are programs and history do not demonstrate programs and recent members in the organization; potential to executive their goals.No accomplishments demonstrate history/programs and the a indicate co- accomplishments are mentioned. strong history and potential to creation and the ability to achieve executive their goals. goals. Populations served/engaged by Populations served/engaged by populations served/engaged by Populations Served&Engaged organization strongly match organization somewhat match with priority populations with priority populations identified organization do not include priority identified for this grant program for this grant program populations identified for this grant program Funding �Wm Strong Adequate Weak Funding amount requested No points given for this question No points given for this question Funding priority category Project proposal is strongly Project proposal is connected to connected to one or more of at least one of the priority funding Project proposal does not seem to be the priority funding categories categories connected to the priority funding categories Budget for project is laid out Budget for project lacks some No clear budget or description of spending clearly,project proposal is clarity,it is uncertain if project is provided or the proposal does not seem Budget Description feasible with the funding proposal is feasible with the feasible or reasonable within requested offered,and identifies how all funding offered,and/or unclear budget. funds will be spent. how funds will be spent. P Strong Adequate Weak Project proposal is feasible, project proposal seems feasible, states a strategy(ies)to but strategies may be unclear Project proposal does not seem feasible Project Description improve food access,and is how they will effectively improve and the project does not apepar to improve clearly connected to the food access. food access. purpose of this grant Impact of the project is clearly Impact of the project seems good positive and well aligned with and project is connected to the The impact of the project is not clear or is the purpose and goals of this purpose and goals of the grant not aligned with the purpose and goals of Impact grant program.Improving food the grant program.Project does not access is addressed in a program.Improving food access meaningfully address or engage with food meaningful and actionable way is addressed by the project accem blity. by the project proposal. proposal. Provides clear and achievable Provides timeline but with limited Does not provide timeline or is outside the Timeline timeline within the the scope of details and/or is unclear. scope of this work. this grant. Provides clear goals and Provides an unclear expectation No goals or expectation for success Success realistic expectations for for success. provided. success. Outcomes and strategies for Strategies for measurement are measurement are clear and Outcomes and strategies for measurement Evaluation achievable and project has unclear or unachievable,and/or are rwl clearly identified or impact of capability to have a positive and capability for project impact is project seems weak. meaningful impact. Unsure. Organization works with a few Organization does rat have any Organization works with a partners that are representative of organizational community relationships with diverse set of partners from impacted communities and or Partnerships&Community Support partners from impacted communities and impacted communities. demonstrates close community Demonstrates close community relationships.If community buy-in demonstrates no or very liftle collaboration with otters.There is rw community buy-in relationships and strong is not present,there is a clear for the project or the ability to develop community buy-in. strategy to develop community community support. support. Project incorporates Project may include some Project doesn't use sustainable practices or Sustainable Practices sustainable/environmentally sustainable practices,but it isn't a a poor or inaccurate description of beneficial practiceste a core core part of the project. sustainable practices is provided part of the protect Additional Information(optional):If desired,please use this space to briefly share anything else that you would like the Selection No points awarded for this question but information added here can inform scoring in other sections Committee to know or consider about your work that the application questions did not address. Location where organization serves Overall budget sizelAccess to other funding opportunities Pastfunded project Use this space to indicate any notes,questions,or concerns you have about the application that might give you pause in No points awarded for this question but information added here can inform scoring recommending them for funding How well does this applicant meet the goals of the grant program?