Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/2026 - Meeting Minutes Community Development&Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 9 March 2026 w MINUTES FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT& CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CDCIP) ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 2 March 2026 Board Members Present Brad Christensen, Chair Dallin Jones, Co-Chair Cooper Fankhauser Jenny Bonk Joseph Murphy Sean Weeks Staff Present Finance Department: Rachel Molinari-Capital Improvement Program Manager Bret Montgomery- Financial Analyst IV Sherif Basta- Financial Analyst IV Ben Luedtke- Deputy Chief Financial Officer Mike Atkinson-Capital Asset Planning Manager Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) Department: Becka Roolf, Senior Planning Strategist, Transportation Division Mark Stephens, City Engineer, Engineering Division Business A. Welcome & Roll Call Rachel Molinari welcomed the CDCIP Board members and City staff and opened the meeting. Roll call was conducted and Board members introduced themselves for the public record. Community Development&Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 9 March 2026 B. Questions and Discussion on Proposed C I P Projects- I nternaL Transportation and Engineering Division Projects Staff provided an overview of project goals, infrastructure needs, and planning considerations. Details were provided on pavement asset condition scoring and classification of available treatments. Street Reconstruction 2027 Mark Stephens explained this project as a core engineering function involving full roadway reconstruction and related infrastructure improvements such as roadway pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage infrastructure, and other concrete work. They said the project would also incorporate"complete streets"design elements intended to support pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and vehicles. Mark Stephens stated that the City had significant roadway maintenance backlog. Approximately 24-25 percent of roadways have an Overall Condition Index(OCI) score of 40 or lower, which indicated poor condition. Board members asked how constituent requests for roadway improvements were incorporated into the City's prioritization process. Staff explained that roadway projects were primarily prioritized based on pavement condition data derived from a citywide pavement condition survey and that constituent requests may be incorporated when opportunities arise to coordinate improvements efficiently. Traffic Signal Replacements& Upgrades 2027 Becka Roolf provided information regarding the condition of the City's traffic signal infrastructure. They explained that many signals have exceeded their intended lifespan and required replacement to ensure reliable operation and compatibility with modern technology. Ongoing maintenance would allow the signals to remain operational, but full replacement was necessary to ensure long-term performance. Street Overlay 2027 Mark Stephens explained that the project focused on resurfacing roadways that remain structurally sound but are beginning to deteriorate. Applying overlays at the appropriate stage in the pavement lifecycle would extend roadway longevity and help prevent more extensive reconstruction. Brad Christensen asked about the benefits of overlays compared with full roadway reconstruction. Staff explained that overlays were generally more cost-effective when roadways were still in acceptable condition; however, reconstruction becomes necessary Community Development&Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 9 March 2026 when pavement deterioration progresses beyond the point where preventative maintenance is effective. GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027;Bike Rack Replacements Becka Roolf presented an overview of the GREENbike program and associated infrastructure improvements. They explained that the bike share system operated through a partnership between Salt Lake City and regional agencies, with operations managed by a nonprofit partner. Sean Weeks asked whetherthe project required matchingfunds and whetherfunding delays would affect project timelines. Staff explained that if funding were not provided in the current cycle, upgrades could be delayed and matching funds would likely need to be requested again in the future. Dallin Jones asked about the age of the bike rack infrastructure. Staff explained that racks vary in age and were typically replaced when damaged or when corrosion affected the structural condition. Urban Trails Mark Stephens presented proposed urban trail improvements, including projects associated with the Red Butte Creek Trail and the Airport Trail and explained that these projects were part of broader city transportation and recreation planning efforts aimed at expanding the trail network and improving connectivity. Jenny Bonk asked how the City determined whether a trail project was managed by the Transportation Division or the Parks Division. Staff explained that departments collaborate to determine project leadership based on whether a trail primarily serves transportation or recreational purposes. Vision Zero Corridors& Safety Improvements Cit-ywide 2027 Becka Roolf explained that the Vision Zero program focused on reducing serious traffic injuries and fatalities through targeted safety improvements. They said that crash data and safety analysis were used to identify corridors where infrastructure improvements could have the greatest impact on reducing traffic-related incidents. Board members asked how Vision Zero projects were prioritized relative to other transportation initiatives. Staff explained that Vision Zero projects were primarily driven by crash history and safety data, whereas other projects may focus on pavement condition or transportation network connectivity. Community Development&Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 9 March 2026 Transit Capita(Program 2027 Becka Roolf stated that the proposal focused on improvements that support public transit infrastructure and coordination with regional transit services. The project was intended to improve transit reliability, accessibility, and integration with other transportation systems throughout the city. Missing Sidewalks Mark Stephens explained that the project focused on constructing sidewalks in locations where pedestrian infrastructure was incomplete or absent. Completing these missing segments would improve pedestrian accessibility, strengthen connectivity between neighborhoods, and increase safety for individuals traveling on foot. Bikewa-y Gaps 2027 Becka Roolf said this proposal was designed to address gaps in the city's bicycle network and focused on connecting existing bicycle facilities where short discontinuities currently existed. Brad Christensen asked how locations for bikeway gap improvements were identified. Staff explained that mapping analysis and consultation with advisory groups such as the Bicycle Advisory Committee and Transportation Advisory Board helped to identify priority locations. Jenny Bonk asked how bikeway gap projects differ from Vision Zero initiatives. Staff explained that Vision Zero projects focused on crash history and safety data, while bikeway gap projects were intended to improve network continuity. C. Funding Source Overview and Scoring Instructions Rachel Molinari provided an overview of the scoring files for the Board, explained the instructions, and set the deadline to receive them back. They also reviewed the funding sources available for CIP projects and explained that each source had specific eligibility requirements that must be considered when allocating funds. The documents are attached. D.Adjournment Motion made by: Joseph Murphy Second: Jenny Bonk Vote: Unanimous Community Development&Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 9 March 2026 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. X Brad Christenpen (Mar 25, 2026 10:13:57 MDT) CDCIP Board Chair This document, along with the digital recording, constitutes the official minutes of the CDCIP Advisory Board meeting held March 9, 2026. �+y. � j... "'ems. r C � •.} - •'L � s •1gy� , � r�'..� r i 9►<L�..tti1. �►5.-�5., y':::• � � ,�,-�{j ..r R.. .t . sty ""��' ' __; INN PIK I=Aaim sa0. —11177� v .� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS v DEPARTMENT Q � an � of NEIGHBORHOODS 1841 Public Way Assets & Trans ortation � . =_ y _ ti p - ry ■ Safety r • Impactful Resource Allocation BUTTON ✓ Accessibility (ADA) �► FOR• - t*_ Sustainability y • Good Governance ✓ Asset Condition „ - ✓ Master Plans ✓ Partnerships / $ OWN Humans make mistakes, but ; mistakes shouldn't be fatal. y r FEE[ Safetyr existing asset failure z AT�" p"= ��- - r �,/ ■ %V �r ri Proven safety counter- measures can improve SLC assets to prevent serious injuries and deaths. _ • Pedestrians & bicyclists were 45% of traffic fatalities in SLC in recent years. • Need for slower traffic, _ POO(F ' more forgiving - -- infrastructure. • ; r� • . • • • • • min INV- • • • w � r rl ,��/►s . Mark pUSH BUTTON ADA required FOR federal legal requirement to meet "_' 1 current standards , • ■ New Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) as of December 2023. = - - ► ■ All alterations to the public way require bringing to j • j -rr current standards. Example:ped button with audible/ vibrotoctile walk indicators WV s Sustainability existing asset failure / existential viability of SLC • Climate change ■ Air pollution / Clean Air Act ■ Dust from Great Salt Lake ■ Air quality is leading cause of premature death, globally ■ Economic development / business retention AIR QUALITY is the #1 reason businesses leave Salt Lake. • Allow SLC to grow and increase tax base Good Governance: Asset Condition ( Pavement) OCI (Overall Condition Index) serves as a decision-guiding factor for many public way projects, rating road conditions on a scale from 0 (failed) to 100 (best). Theoretical Deterioration Curve 100 Treatment Type New OCI* Ideal Roadway Preventive Conditions Patch &Crack Seal +10 Maintenance -�, Slurry Seal +10 O aa) 75 _ o Streets _0o Chip Seal +20 Preservation c ($$) � 2" Inlay Fixed98 o Life Performance Curve 3" Overlay Fixed y Rehabilitation ($$$) Surface 0) Fixed 100 > Reconstruction Engineering o Older Roads Deteriorate FASTER g g Full Depth 1 1 1 Reconstruction Fixed 100 Reconstruction *New OCI post-treatment type 20 40 Years in Service Good Governance: Other Asset Conditions While not called OCI, an asset condition approach can be applied to assets besides pavement. An annual report provides information about replacement needs for the traffic signals that govern traffic flow in SLC. 1/3 of traffic signals 18% of traffic signals are in poor, very poor, are not reliably triggered Over 30 traffic signals or failing condition. by traffic. are over 40 years old. Good Governance: Master Plans State law requires all construction Slit-City 1"14 PEDESTRIAN&BICYCLE projects to be included in one or PLLLA,N11S.ALT LAKE n more of the city's adopted general EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WIM plans (10-9a-406). yk n ,mf r ...and many others... Good Governance: Partnerships / Funding Among our projects, several have outside funding from partners including UTA, UDOT, and WFRC. Opportunities for a "dig once" approach across city projects is also a goal. Complete Streets Reconstruction 2027 Description: This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including: • Street pavement, • Curb, gutter, drainage improvements as necessary, • Sidewalk, • Appropriate "complete streets" improvements - bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access. These are determined with reference to Council-adopted plans, technical assessment, safety considerations including crash history, as well as public engagement. 200 South(University Street to 1300 East) Funding Request: $8,327,500 600 East(100 South to 400 South) Pending funding and final review 900 South(Diestel Drive to LeGrande) Ashton Avenue and 1100 East(Simpson Avenue to Highland Drive) Partial Funding: Possible but not advised. Center Street(Main Street to 200 West) Emerson Avenue(1500 East to 1700 East) 500 West Recommended Annual: $50-60 million to achieve a backlog of Gilmer Drive(Douglas Street to 1300 East) (600 s to 900 s) 15%, in keeping with industry standards. Military Drive(1700 East to 900 South) Belaire Drive(Scenic Drive to Glen Oaks Drive) This is the first year without funds from the 2018 Streets Bond. Texas (north terminus to 2100 South) Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 Description: Replace 4 signals in failing condition. • Poles rusting out: potential fall hazards. Al ■ Failing detection: redlight running or other dangerous behavior. ■ Increased maintenance: wire patches, staff time. ■ Legal compliance: ADA, city plans. r - I t Funding Request: $2,500,000 Partial Funding: Possible but not advised. Replace (tentative): Alternates Recommended Annual: $5,000,00046,000,000 to bring . 1300 East 100 South 0 1300 East / 200 South signals to industry standard over 10 years. 0 Main Street / North Temple p Arapeen & Sunnyside •Signals have seen some of the highest inflation in the 600 East / 500 South500 East / 600 South construction industry. Complete Streets Overlay 2027 Description: Annual program to repave City streets that are not deteriorated enough to need full reconstruction. Focus on local streets. • Prevents need for full reconstruction. - ■ This amount will fund approximately 5 lane miles. A lane mile is 12' wide, a mile long. ■ 3" removal of old asphalt, then 3" paving with new asphalt. - • Sidewalk, bike lanes, bus stops - as needed. 1000 North(Featherstone Drive to Redwood Road) 1200 West(1400 South to Andrew Avenue) Funding Request: $3,300,000 Pending funding 1500 West(Hayes Avenue to American Avenue) and final review Alta Street(Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road) Connor Street(Sunnyside Avenue to 900 South) Partial Funding: Possible but n o t advised Livingston Avenue(Star Crest Drive to Omni Drive) Omni Drive(Omni Avenue to Livingston Avenue) Recommended Annual Funding: Recommended annual South Temple Street(University Street to South Temple traffic circle) funding: $20,000,000. This would fund roughly 31 .56 lane miles Village View Street(Village Hill Avenue to Village Park Avenue) of overlays. Brava Street(Amiga Drive to cul-de-sac end) Reveille Circle(Colonel Road to cul-de-sac-end) GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Replacements Description: This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, 1 or missing capital infrastructure. R • Matches $860,000 in awarded federal grants for \, GREENbike. - - ■ Replace falling-apart bike share stations and bikes. • Almost half the stations in Salt Lake can no longer be repaired due to lack of replacement parts. �._ , r ar����. ` • Replace dozens of missing / rusting city-owned bike racks - on the public way. Funding Request: $65,000 Partial Funding: Possible but not recommended. This is less than $10,000 for bike racks. t - Recommended Annual Funding: $100,000, most of which is match for outside grants. Urban Trails 2027 Description: Design the Red Butte Creek — h, „r�i dill If Trail and Airport Trail Rehabilitation. • One of five key moves in Connect SLC, the _ 2024 citywide transportation plan. • Airport Trail is currently 30 years, old r - having been opened in 1996. ■ Pavement and tunnels both need assessment and rehabilitation to ensure ( i continued operation. - JI Funding Request: $450,000 Partial Funding: Possible. Recommended Annual Funding: $4.6 r million, to complete trails in Ped Bike Master Plan by 2036. 1700 S sidewalk gap Airport trail, opened in 1996. Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements 2027 Description: Traffic fatalities / serious injuries are preventable, not just inevitable from travel in a city. This project will construct proven safety measures to help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders. • People walking / biking were 45% of SLC's 66 traffic fatalities 2021 -24. • Recommendations in a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) led by Wasatch Front Regional Council. - � { ■ Redwood Road, 900 West, & 800 South are primary �_- -- corridors. ■ Strategic safety improvements at other locations citywide. • No other city asset is killing people at this rate. =_ Funding Request: $2,300,000 Partial Funding: Possible but not advised. I 9 22080 TON 00 3N COMPREHENSIVE IL SAFETY ACTION PLAN Recommended Annual Funding: $12 million per year. Ill Transit Capital Program 2027 Description: Leverages outside funds from UTA for bus POWER STATION MOBILITY HUB CONCEPT shelters, benches, trash cans, mobility hubs and accessible ' Q laze space to bring together transit first/last mile connections to transit. T Fill— _ amenistops,multi-modal _ � amen nes,MobilityHub space, / \ `• :/ H and sense of place.There is Flexibilnym have both sides,one side or larger or smaller plazas. 0 New bus stop locations with ■ Makes all transit stops accessible, safe, and comfortable „t, - - - transit shelter and quality waiting _ mentor comfort,lighting, Dashed for people of all ages and abilities. - �transit el-clon=;� routing TBD. Shade trees(typ.) ■ Required by federal law, especially when streets are -- — ©Bikeandscooter TRAX RAIL PLATFORM � Q Blkeandscootershare re p a ve d. ©Bike lockers or racks Q Bench seating(typ.) ate.. O Pickup-drop-off zone QCafe seating Funding Request: $500,000 "' ll__ 0 Communitywayflndiry 0 --.-� T ® Kiosk for mabiayservkes,cafe, orothercommunity oriented use. QD Potential space for Mobility Hub community uses such as cafr Partial Funding: Yes, this program is scalable. Likely mobility services,or thether.e. !, it Likely on one side or the other. ®Potential special paving to further bring the Mobility Hub spacetogether and create a Power FUTURE u District gateway thatslowe traffic Recommended Annual Funding: $1 -1 .5 million. As many MIXED USE BUILDING ®Enhanced crossings / 2-way protected bike path bus stops have now been upgraded, this years is a smaller O ®potential ped.scramble: crosswalks running diagonally request. DRAFT June 2025 FUTURE rhW eth own actionnal Chat hase. ,.` MIXED USE BUILDING Creates great connectivity among busand train platforms. so too' Active ground floor uses Higher levels of funding may be needed in future years. Missing Sidewalks 2027 Description: Address gaps inactive r transportation network. J • One of five key moves in Connect SLC, the - 2024 citywide transportation plan. • Link recent projects together into a network. ■ Strategic sections of sidewalk. This fundingamount is like) to complete y p WL I about 2-3 blocks of sidewalk, citywide. Funding Request: $125,000 _ Partial Funding: Possible. ' Recommended Annual Funding: Missing sidewalks & bikeway gaps need being assessed. 1700 S sidewalk gap 500 E sidewalk constructed 2019 Bikeway Gaps 2027 Description: Address gaps inactive transportation network. I • One of five key moves in Connect SLC, the 2024 citywide transportation plan. • Link recent projects together into a network. ■ Strategic sections of quick-build paint-and - bollard bikeways. f `III i Funding Request: $125,000 Partial Funding: Possible. Recommended Annual Funding: Missing sidewalks & bikeway gaps need being assessed. A quick-build bikeway prior to Highland Drive reconstruction. r teBrilliant 4 --- - -� UL Thank you! ¢\.AKF�� FY27 1 DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 7g41 CDCIP Board Funding Award Considerations The intent of this one-sheet is to provide a high-level overview of considerations that staff noted from CDCIP Board deliberations over the years. This is not a comprehensive list but a reference to help board members consider how to balance the many competing needs. New Assets vs Capital Maintenance — Protecting past investments by funding capital maintenance helps prolong the useful life of an asset. Funding new assets invests in the City's future and serves a growing population. Types of Assets — Board members have sometimes expressed an interest to spread CIP funding between asset classes to avoid one class significantly falling behind over the years. Generally, assets are classified by the City office responsible for it including Engineering and Transportation which often coordinate on projects (e.g., sidewalks, streets, traffic calming, and bridges), Facilities (e.g., buildings), and Public Lands (e.g., parks, trails, and natural areas). Varying Geographic Needs — Board members have sometimes expressed an interest to spread CIP funding around the City to ensure multiple Council Districts and neighborhoods benefit from annual capital investments. The degree and type of need varies between areas of the City. Some applications have a specific location while some annual program applications are listed as citywide because the program addresses assets in multiple neighborhoods which varies each year based on program prioritization criteria (e.g., data-driven, coordination with other construction plans). Ongoing Annual Programs vs One-time Projects — Annual program applications are typically from departments and reflect ongoing funding needed to keep up with the lifecycle of capital assets such as replacing deteriorated assets. One-time project applications are typically single investments that do not need annual funding or propose a specific project location that would otherwise be addressed in the regular course of an annual program. Full Funding vs Partial Funding — Partially funding a project can sometimes allow part of the request to proceed spreading limited funding to more applications. However, when a project is split into multiple phases the costs often increase for later phases resulting in a greater total cost than if full funding was awarded in a single CIP cycle. Partial funding sometimes sits dormant waiting for full funding in later CIP cycles (e.g., partially funding a bridge reconstruction). Larger vs Smaller Projects — Projects that are not "shovel ready" often go through planning, public engagement, and design phases before construction. The time to progress through these phases can be the same for a large project as a smaller project. A single large, high-dollar project might be completed faster and more efficiently than several smaller dollar projects. Different Funding Sources — Staff will identify application eligibility for each funding source which are listed below from the least to most restrictive with a brief description for reference. Generally, awarding the most restrictive funding first helps preserve flexibility. General Fund Dollars: The most flexible funding which can be spent on any application. Funding Our Future Local Sales Tax: Eligibility is limited to five critical need categories which are affordable housing, public transit, streets, public safety, and parks maintenance. Class C Funds: From the State gas tax and a portion is provided to cities for transportation. County 4t" Quarter Cent & 5th 5th Sales Taxes: Limited to transportation uses per state law. Impact Fees: A payment from a developer for increased demand on City facilities caused by population and employment growth. There are four types that may appear in CIP (typically not each year) which are fire, parks, police, and transportation. Example of Internal Application Scoring: 1 2 4 Board Member Name: Internal Projects Traffic Signal Replacements& GREENbike Federal Grant Street Reconstruction 2027 Upgrades 2027 Street Overlay 2027 Match 2027;Bike Rack Replacements Internal Project Board Member Score Reference Column High/Med/Low Score Hlgh/Med/Low Score High/Meo/Lue: Swie HIF,h/Med/Low Score 1 E)dsting Asset Low/Medium/H M NOR= 15.OD 15.00 1 HNIN 15.00 15.00 Scoring Scale Scoring Scale Max Scoring Scale Max Scoring Scale Max Scorin Criteria Weight (0-5) Max Score (0-5) Score 10-51 Score (0-51 Score 2 Critical Asset Failure 0&P 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Legal/Contractual Obligation 0&R 2 4.00 8.00 3.00 6.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 4 Risk:Life Health&Safety S,T.U&V 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 Reduce Cost/Increase Efficient W X&Y 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 Resiliency 2 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Project Phase(further along scores higher) AA&AB 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 Workforce Support AC 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 Sustainabitity AD i 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 Includes OutsideFundin 1.5 2.00 30.00 1.41.50 0.00 0.00 5.00 7.50 11 One City Approach _ AF 1 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.D0 0.001 0.00 0.00 26.00 22.50 19.00 28.50 Example on Constituent Application Scoring: 33 34 35 36 Board Member Name: Constituent Applications Atkin Avenue Curb and Emerson Street 1500 East- Highland Park Elementary 700 E Beautification Project Gutter 1600 East Replacement Sidewalks(Kenwood& Atkin) Constituent Applications Board Member Score Reference Question FY27 App Hi h/Med/Low Score Hi h/Med/Low Score Hi h/Med/Low Score Hi h/Med/Low Score i - 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 Scoring Scale Max Scoring Scale Max Scoring Scale Max Scoring Scale Max Scoring Criteria Weigh (0-5) Srnrp fn-51 Score fn-51 Scnre f0-51 Srnre 2 Critical Asset Failure Question#28 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 legal/rontrartnalnhligatinn Qllestinn#13 2 1.00 9.no 1.00 1 9.00 9.00 4.00 3.00 6.n0 4 Risk:Life Health&Safety Question#4 13 19 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 Reduce Cost/Increase Efficiency Question#25 33 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 Resiliency Question#1 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Project Phase(further along scores higher) Question#27 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 Community Support Question#7/Dots 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 Sustaii ability Ouestion#14 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 Includes Outside Funding 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 Community Benefit Question#1112 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.001 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 19.00 6.00 Meeting Minutes 3.9.2026 Final Audit Report 2026-03-25 Created: 2026-03-18 By: Rachel Molinari(Rachel.Molinari@slc.gov) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA19pQ9ZwWXV5XVMMfxgau4HBv5dF1RrZs "Meeting Minutes 3.9.2026" History Document created by Rachel Molinari (Rachel.Molinari@slc.gov) 2026-03-18-4:22:00 PM GMT Document emailed to brad.r.christensen@gmail.com for signature 2026-03-18-4:22:25 PM GMT Email viewed by brad.r.christensen@gmail.com 2026-03-18-4:40:05 PM GMT FS® Signer brad.r.christensen@gmail.com entered name at signing as Brad Christensen 2026-03-25-4:13:55 PM GMT 6© Document e-signed by Brad Christensen (brad.r.christensen@gmail.com) Signature Date:2026-03-25-4:13:57 PM GMT-Time Source:server Agreement completed. 2026-03-25-4:13:57 PM GMT y Powered by Adobe Acrobat Sign