Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/13/2026 - Meeting Materials (3) IW I- �"!: ,•; 1 �� - �i. v' - .ram ,1-- ! �Y ter•.�'�i�_ - _ _ \,AKF - 1841 Our Team OPosition in Org Chart: - Mayor's Office - Department of Community and Neighborhoods - Engineering Division Mission: O To serve the City and its growth by striving to exceed constituent expectations during right-of-way design and construction, with a focus on providing sustainable infrastructure In Short: • We manage activities in the public right of way (including private permited construction) ff How Do We Serve Our Cit Roadway CIP Group Public Way Permits GIS and Asset City Surveyor Group Public Outreach & Group Management Group Information Group - Design and - Monitor work - Preserve - Provide - Manage public construct public way performed in the engineering professional land outreach and projects approved public way records survey services communication on through CIP - Ensure City - Manage public public way projects standard are way assets upheld inventory FY2026 Initiatives Accomplishments Pavement Condition Survey -A - Complete and assess the Local Streets Projects new pavement condition Virginia St Survey West Temple - Update maintenance r guidelines „ °°°°° - Determine a timeline for �;,HIN i future repairs Bike lane OCI assessed this Spring GIS Mapping tool Work interdepartmentally to Engineering - finalize a new GIS mapping Accomplishments - to ct future projects and and Initiatives work zones efficiently Overall Conditi Percent of Total Distance Percent of 2025 Pavement Condition Total Area on Index(OCI) Total Area (Centerline Network Range Description (yd2) (yd2) Miles) Miles Condition Survey 86-100 Good 4,429,599 M= 177.51 _ 71-85 Satisfactory 3,126,441 22.81% 138.62 23.1% 56-70 Fair 1,714,338 12.51% 77.92 13.0% Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS) performed a 41-55 Poor 1,448,523 10.57% 60.61 10.1% pavement condition assessment of our City's r 26-40 Very Poor 1,8 13.85/ 97,947 � 88.92 streets in Fall 2025 L -11-25 Serious 1,008,759 7.36% 51. RAS calculated an Overall Condition Index 0-1 Failed 79,075 0.58% 4.29 0.7% (OCI) using their collected Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and International Roughness Index Total of Rated Segments 13,704,682 100.0% 599.61 100.0% (IRI) data: OCI = (0.88 X PCI) + (0.11 X IRI) 511, y. 10 Pavement Condition Results & Health Metrics Network Average PCI The national average we see is a 65-75. Overall Condition • Less than 5%score above an 80 Surface: All Percent of Excellent Roads 20-30%is about the average we see across 200 30.8% the nation 180 Ln .• Ui Percent of Backlog _ These are the Very Poor,Serious, & Failed roads. Less than 10%is ideal zCO) and 15%is a maximum recommended mark. 209,6 and greater is difficult to UJ '' _ catch up from z .• - I, 0 Shape of Curve ' There will always be streets in all • condition categories, Excellent to Very ' ' ' ' ''Good Poor. City has invested to maintain the Poor Satisf actory overall network average and it is OCI CATEGORY fiscally impossible to elevate all roads to a"Good"condition I•..,I1/. `, -.I'I��I I 1q,r �I 1I,I 4 I - , - E .. w V alp 1.11 W TEMPLE hank ou . ............