017 of 2006 - Budget Amendment No. 4 for FY 2005-2006 4.
0 06-1
B 06-5
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 17 of 2006
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2005-2006)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 26 OF
2005 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, AND
ORDINANCE NO. 48 OF 2005 WHICH RATIFIED AND RE-ADOPTED THE FINAL
BUDGET THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2005 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
2006.
PREAMBLE
On June 21, 2005, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
On August 23, 2005, the City Council ratified and re-adopted the final budget.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
µ ! w
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 26 of 2005 and Ordinance No. 48
of 2005.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting
as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said
budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with
the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 21 day of
March , 2006.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CHI DEPU REC RDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on 3-21-06
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
OR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake Ci Attorne 's Office
Date 1
EF DE U Y 0 ER
8Y J'
(SEAL)
Bill No. 17 of 2006. ''
Published: 4 I E,(QCn ;� �e4~`
I:\Ordinance 06\Budget\Budget Amendment#4 2005-2006.doc
3
-rrr.....r� .riaiff�MW+�Ihi6n5iiWA7wernrllYi _ - e'Aw,w"r '.s "- "` •• `. .,. ..."
FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #4 —March
FY 2006
Gen.Fund�o��I�„
Gen Fund F un if�a3 ,I Initiative # Impact Bala A 3,
Impact
Section A,: ,; a v;.4 New Ite -..;.
1. CIP - Pavement $15,000.00
Condition Inventory
3. CIP—Jordan River Tail $25,000.00
Rose Park Bridge
4. CIP—Jordan River Trail $50,000.00
Security Lighting
Sherwood Park
5. CIP—Jordan River Trail $62,000.00
Security Lighting 1000
North to Golf Course
6. CIP Fremont $55,000.00
&Remington Street
Improvement
7. CIP— 1100 W Jordan $23,000.00
River Bridge
Replacement
8. CIP—Class C Asphalt $1,500,000.00
Overlay
9. CIP—Class C 1300 S $300,000.00
Viaduct
10. CIP— 1300 East Crossing $285,652.15
11. CIP—Class C 900 S $900,000.00
Rehab Main to 700 E
12. Citywide Interoperable $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $1,470,000.00
Communications
13. Main Street Flower $54,860.00 $54,860.00
Project
14. Airport Property $219,939.00
Insurance Increase
15. CIP and General Fund $4,000,000.00 $4,000,000.00 $4,000,000.00
Grant Tower Railroad
Realignment
16. Police Dept Fleet Fuel $290,000.00 $290,000.00 $290,000.00
Cost Increase
17. Public Service Fleet Fuel $470,000.00 $109,000.00 $109,000.00
Cost Increase
18. Landscape on State Road $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00
SR201
19. Public Services Natural $330,835.00 $295,836.00 $295,836.00
Gas Increase
FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #4 —March
e.. \, ,„ ��•;"��%r,‘ '\ -w Fy 2006 FY 20 ; 4,°,a'''.
y; ej , *
In
itia i Gen.Fund
Vti
? e Amok :Via.. Impact Be
Impact
20. Tree Spraying $112,000.00 $112,000.00 $112,000.00
21. CIP- 900 S 900E $215,000.00
Streetscape
22. Police Dept. Automatic $350,197.00
Vehicle Locater System
23. Additional Legal Support $6,700.00 .25
24. E-911 Furniture Upgrade $150,000.00
25. Justice Court $54,025.00 $54,025.00 $54,025.00
26. CIP—Cemetery $5,000.00
Historical Survey
27. Street Lighting Funding $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
Analysis
28 Ground Transportation $26,405 $26,405 $26,405
Administrator
Section "B .,
:; GGrants`'For Existing Staff Resources
1. Police Dept Victim $18,161.21
Advocate Grant
2. Police Dept Crisis $50,000.00
Intervention Team Grant
3. Justice Court Victim $39,927.84
Advocate Grant
4. Local Emerg. Planning $2,500.00
Committee Grant
5. Leonardo Dept of Ed $99,200.00
Grant to Global Artways
6. Leonardo Dept of Ed $8,710.00
Grant to HAND Admin
Section C ," a N.` �
�t ��taff,�tesvurces ` °f°�� ."
Secti � ��': �'� � ,.�_`. .mow
of z._ Housekeepingz `'� ..,
1. Youth City Program $36,430.20
Income
2. Economic Development $1,279,088.00
Loan Program Income
3. Move CDBG CIP from 71 $761,219.41
Fund to 83 Fund
4. Housing Loans Program $1,306,554.00
Income
2
FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #4 —March
FY 2006 ,1-1/4- ,FY 2006
d
‘34111'• JAE ,
111111110fr Impact %dance
Impact
Section E ,..,(icauts Requiring No New Stiff Resources
1. Improving Crime Data $34,920.00
Grant
2. Cemetery Historic Survey $2,500.00
Grant
3. Kennedy Center Global $7,500.00
Artways Grant
4 VAWA Grant— $16,875
Prosecutor's Office
Victim Empowerment
Program
Section F I. Donations r
1. Ottinger Hall Renovation $5,000.00
2 Wayfinding Signs for $15,518
Emigration Visitors
District
Sectinn New Items added*City Council „
1 Reduce Donation Budget $(185,000.00)
2 Portable Digital $11,500 $11,500 $11,500
Recording System
3
Initiative Name:
Pavement Condition Inventory -Job No. 104018
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Funding in the amount of $100,000 was awarded in the FY 2005/2006 CtP Process to
perform a detailed pavement condition inventory of the 575 miles of street pavement in Salt
Lake City. This survey is performed every five years and forms a basis for determining street
resurfacing strategies and CIP needs. During selection of the survey consultant, it was
determined that an additional $15,000 would be needed to provide upgrades to the pavement
survey method and to include digital pavement crack analysis, an enhanced method of rating
pavement conditions.
There is a current budget in the amount of $100,000 for this project. This request is to
increase the budget and cash in cost center 83-06040 in the amount of $15,000 and to
reduce,the cash and budget in the Class "C"cost over-run account by the same amount.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the cash and budget of cost center 83-
06040 in the amount of$15,000 and reduce the 04 Class "C" cost over-run account by the
same amount to facilitate this project.
:::PaVeriferittiiiiditiftin Inventory: poi
..:.... . . ................ ............ .............
Nn 104018 »><
Initiative Name
: ::$A#4:FY2006.Initiative#A='('"::: :: ::::2005-06:`':<. :' ::.
M. Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
Community:.eve opment: .:. • • • ew eM>>:::::::• :
• Department Type of Initiative -
.::;;LuAnn..Clark!S :rr'ne:.Collins..::.::...: : :•535-61:36#535-i1° 0::::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
II Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year111 IIIFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
I.
il Staffing Impact:I -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04097 2700 $ (15,000.00)
83-06040 2700 $ 15,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Jordan River Trail - Rose Park Bridge to Davis County Line
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The City has received a $405,000 Federal Highway Enhancement Grant from UDOT, for use
in developing the Jordan River Trailway between Rose Park Bridge and the Davis County
Line. The City's matching amount for the grant is $175,000 which is being requested in the
2006/2007 CIP process. Engineering is requesting $25,000 of the match be allocated from
the CIP general fund cost overrun account now in order to proceed with the design study
report and documents, so the project can be constructed in 2007, and the City can enter into
the cooperative agreement with UDOT.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $25,000 of necessary budget to facilitate
this project.
.......................... ... . ........... ......
. ...... ... .....::..... .: ....
:Jordan:. ver:Tra -.Rose .ark r dge
> >to:Davis.:County line : :
Initiative Name
BA#4.:FY2006:i titiative:#A-3....;::;:::::: :.:: 2005-06: ::::;•;:
• Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year -
Pu:blic Services : :. :. . Atsvie '>> :::: ::::
Department Type of Initiative -
LuAnn Ciark!Stterrbe:Co.ilin .535-6 :36f535-6150 .:
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
II FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
IOther Fund
Total 0 $0
111
1.Staffing Impact: MI
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04099 2700 (25,000.00)
83- New Cost Center 2700 25,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Jordan River Parkway Trail Security Lighting - Sherwood Park
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Over the past several months, vandals have stolen wire from the Jordan River Trail Security
Lighting System and destroyed power distribution panels at Sherwood Park.
Two light poles and fixtures were broken off at the ground along the traiiway at approximately
900 So. and 300 West and one pole west of the Kaboom playground in Glendale/Modesto
Park. This leaves much of the trailway along this section without lighting and has completely
removed the power feed for the Sherwood Park baseball fields, security lighting,' restrooms
pavilions etc. These sites are highly used by the public and baseball leagues are scheduled
to use Sherwood Park in early spring.
This request is to create a new project by appropriating $50,000 of budget and cash from the
CIP cost over-run account to address the needed improvements immediately.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this project.
v . v, ., .�.y, ...: . ;. ""'Wi, .AIY Mai. ,... ., _ .. .. _„a _ •v, ww.. ._ ,. ,.
1 I
Jordan River Trail Secur ty:-ucht€nq
Sh rarirocid:i5.ir
Initiative Name
SA#4 rY2ti 6 lnttiat,ve 14::::::;-': r: :: : ;:
III Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year -
Caru:riiu:�i1ty'Development:.:::. Never iiiiii::::::::: ::...::
• Department I Type of Initiative -
LuAnri Clarik!S me Collies a 5354t361535-1 `:
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
•Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year• II
2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
ll Staffing Impact: MI
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04099 2700 (50,000.00)
83- New Cost Center 2700 50,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Jordan River Parkway Trail Security Lighting - 1000 North to Rose Park Golf Course
Bridge
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
In FY 2005/2006, the City Council appropriated $62,000 for security lighting to the Jordan
River Parkway Trail from No. Temple to the State Agriculture Building. Engineering is
currently working on the part of the trailway from 1000 North to the Rose Park Golf Course
Bridge. The trail along this section between the fencing/property lines and the river is very
narrow. The conduits for power and security lighting should be placed at the same time the
trail is being built.
Engineering is requesting to use the security lighting funds allocated in FY 2005/2006 for the
No. Temple to the State Agriculture Building project, on the trailway between 1000 North and
the Rose Park Golf Course Bridge in an effort to save time and funds by installing the conduit
now.
A CIP request has been submitted for the FY 2006/2007 process for security lighting for the
section of trail from North Temple to the State Agriculture Building.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this project.
1
Jordan.River Trail.SeCuritii:Lit htinq.-..
1:000:North to Rose:lark Golf Course
Bridgte:. :: :: ::.::
Initiative Name
: :: A#A FY2006 Initiative#A >°;:::::::.:: ::2OO5 :::::::::.
Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
.: CCOVItmIu n tv Development , ><::<::> •:': New item..:: :
II Department I Type of Initiative -
"' LUAnn:GlarklShei le.:Collins.::::;>>> :: 535 6136/535 6150:::
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year 111
ll FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
1.1 MI
1111 Staffing Impact: IM
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-06025 2700 $ (62,000.00)
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 62,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Fremont Ave./Remington Way Street Improvements - Project No. 102122
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative#A-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This project was awarded $372,000 of CDBG funds for the street improvements to Fremont and
Remington. The original proposal did not include funds to provide underground conduit for future
street lighting and due to significant cost increases in construction and materials the current budget is
not adequate to facilitate the project.
Engineering is proposing that;the current budget be increased by $55,000 from the CD8G cost over-
run account to facilitate the cost increases and the underground conduit.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $55,000 of CDBG cost over-run funds to facilitate
this project.
•
•
Fremont Aue:IReimtingto°n Way:=
Initiative Name 1
BAD:FY2006 initiativve#A-6....: •::::2005 6::'::<> > ::»'.
...........
• Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year -
': : Commu.nityDevetoprmiertt .:: .: > New It4M.:::::.:..•:.:
• Department Type of Initiative -
:UuA ii::Cis t»I rie Co.liins>:::::. ...535=61:361535-61:50:::
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83-CDBG
Total 0 $0
II Ell
111Staffinq Impact:I -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05098 2700 (55,000.00)
83-06053 2700 55,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
1100 West Jordan River Bridge Replacement Job No. 107006
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The 1100 West Jordan River Bridge replacement was awarded $900,000 of Federal Highway
funding and construction was completed in 2004. Final cost adjustments, which include
additional consultant 1 construction engineering costs, have been submitted to the City by
UDOT for final payment to UDOT of$27,410.13.
Currently there is a balance of $4,904.92 for this project. This request is to increase the
budget and cash in cost center 83-01044 in the amount of $23,000. and to reduce the cash
and budget in the Class "C" cost over-run account by the same amount.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the cash and budget of cost center 83-
01044 in the amount $23,000 and reduce the 04 Class "C" cost over-run account by the
same amount to facilitate final payment to UDOT.
r „�.... 'mow ...... ,�,..°°,-,.,,d w p' '.•.
; :: 1100>West Jordan River:Bridue.
:: :Replacement:::
:::::... Initiative Name
BA#4:FY20061nitiative:#A-7>::;::::.:: • :.. ..2105:a06.:::::•::: >:
Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
Community::Deyelopment • •• New :
iii Department I Type of Initiative -
Lunn Cla Sherrie: ollin :......:: : > . 535-61:36f535-61150 ::•.
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
III Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year li
• FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
I Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
1111
II Staffing Impact:I -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description -
W ilomm 4. 1 - i_ N gr"' A N AfM A6 Y I6 Ail )- — iid wr V aw Ke X mat
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04097 2700 (23,000.00)
83-01044 2700 23,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Asphalt Overlay - Class "C"
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-8
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This project is included in FY 2006/2007 CIP request for funding within the Class "C" Fund.
As in prior years, expedited budget approval of this project is being proposed to allow the
work to begin in the spring of 2006 and be completed during the 2006/2007 construction
season. This project will increase pavement life, provide smoother street surfaces for
improved ride ability and will enhance streetscape appearance. In addition, ADA barriers will
be removed and sidewalk access ramps constructed and deteriorated curb and gutter
replaced. This request also includes approximately $100,000 to design the fiscal year
200712008 overlay project.
This request is to appropriate $1,500,000 of 2006/2007 Class "C"fund.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $1,500,000 of FY06/07 Class"C"funds
to facilitate this project.
.:............................... ....................
.................................. ...... ........
............................................... .......... .........
............................. . ..... ... ... .
: Asphalt:Oveilay :Class"CI.
Initiative Name
BA#4:FY2006:Init etiva#A-8 0 5�€f6::: :;:` ;<
Fiscal Year -
Initiative Number I :::: ::NewItrii .. :..::Cammunit Development ..
�. Department.........:....... .I Type of Initiative -
LuAnn:ClarklSharrie C ollins 35-> Ir# 6 5A: : :
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
II Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year I
1111 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
I Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83-Class "C" Fund $ 1,500,000.00
Total $ 1,500,000.00 $0
• IN
II Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 1381 $ 1,500,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 $ 1,500,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
1300 So. Viaduct - Job No. 107010
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-9
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Engineering has received preliminary approval for Federal Bridge Replacement funding in the
amount of $4.4 million for the rehab and seismic upgrade of the 1300 So. Viaduct This
request is to appropriate $300,000 of 2006/2007 Class "C" Funds now, in order to proceed
with the environmental and design study report which is mandated by the Federal Highway
Administration. This project is included in the 2006/2007 CIP request for funding within the
Class "C" Fund.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $300,000 of FY06/07 Class "C"-fund to
facilitate this project.
•
1 t i ttiuct :;l i t�IQ7 1O
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2006:Initiative#A-9 : ;:;::
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Gt mmun t :D v iopmer>Et.:::.:: 1 ••
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnri ClarklSl rrie Collins :
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83-CIP Class "C" Fund $ 300,000.00
Total $ 300,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 1381 $ 300,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 300,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
.a_.q'\U , "_Y,. ^Y..W 1Y",'. ..MM1 Iry '4.a ..4b'! , ✓,a.n mw..,a .e, .. t 6" a .. w'WVYW"+i»." .may yy,...^ Awrr.+xr x
Initiative Name:
1300 East Crossing/Sugarhouse Rails to Trails
Initiative Number:
1 , III,�1
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-10
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The recent Federal Highway Bill (SAFETEA-LU) approved $10.5 million for the Parley's Creek
Trail project." This trail, which was recently master planned by Salt Lake County in
coordination with the City and the Parley's Rails, Trails and Tunnels Coalition (PRATT),
defines a bicycle/recreation trail running from the mouth of Parley's Canyon to the Jordan
River. It is estimated that the federal grant combined with a local match contribution of
approximately $2,345,000 from the County and the $285,652 of City match will fund
construction of the trail from Parley's Historic Nature Park to Hidden Hollow in Sugarhouuse,
including the Sugarhouse "Draw" crossing at 1300 East. The County has indicated they plan
to fund the major portion of the local match requirement.
The,first step in the Federal Highway/UDOT project delivery process is:to proceed with the
environmental study and design study report. The City currently has approximately $285, 52
of CIP funds for these projects. $200,000 was allocated for the 1300 East Crossing and there
is a balance of $85,652 left in the Sugarhouse Rails to Trails project. Engineering., is
proposing that these funds be combined and the project scope be expanded to allow for the
City to participate with Salt Lake County in preparation of the Federal Highway/UDOT
required environmental and design study documents.
An interlocal agreement between the City, County and UDOT will be prepared for Council
approval which outlines the federal funding and local match responsibilities of the participants.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this project.
.l. 1
13 East:Crossinq/Sugarh►o, se Rails
..............
o Trails:;:
Initiative Name
BA FY2006:Initiativie`#A.:1Q.:::..::: ::; :::;;2005A6H;H:::
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
Community Development >: ..: `::>New Iter i::;;> <:< ::::
II... . .............. partment...............I...:.:.. Type of Initiative -
De
LuAnn Clari/S rrie:Collins. : .::.:>:: 535=61.36f 35.6150:::::
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Ill Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
Ill FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 I $0
Staffing Impact: ■ =
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04022 2700 $ (200,000.00)
83-05033 2700 $ (85,652.15)
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 285,652.15
Additional Accounting Details:
Create New Cost Center
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
900 South Rehab - Main Street to 700 East
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-11
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This project will provide major rehabilitation of 900 South from Main Street to 700 'East
Approximately $1,800,000 has been previously allocated for this project. Due to significant
increases recently experienced in materials and construction costs, $900,000 of additional
C1P funds are needed to complete this project.
This request is to appropriate $700,000 of 2006/2007 CIP Class "C" funds now, in order to
begin the project in the spring of 2006 and complete the project during the 2006/2007
construction season. This project is included in the 2006/2007 CIP request for funding within
the Class"C" Fund. Also included in this proposal, is reducing the budget by $200,000 in the
900 So. Main Street to Jordan River CIP project which is substantially complete.__ Excess
funds are available due to good bids received and minimal change orders and- material
quantity overruns.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustments to facilitate
this project.
000 South a eti: IVlain Street ta:700:
Initiative Name
... .. ::.;::..
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Community D velopme f :
Department Type of Initiative
Lui40n' ar hem Collins
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
•
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83 CIP Class C Funds $ 700,000.00
Total $ 700,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
-aa, ....... a ,.< .. �.. .tl" .. ,`.�», ,� "" -•! M - 'tlrW'. ..,_4 M' et .� •Y iar-- rw.. , �.m..,.yy.
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83 CIP New Cost Center 1381 $ 700,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04035 2700 $ (200,000.00)
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 900,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
City-wide Interoperable Communications
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-12
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Administration is proposing to use some of last year's surplus revenue to fund phase IV ,
the final phase, of the interoperable communication system. This last phase will totally
integrate all the City's communication systems into one totally integrated City-wide
telecommunication network. Phase IV will implement the hardware infrastructure necessary to
place the Airport and Public Utilities/Public Services and Community Development,on the
existing public safety network. The complete narrative is attached in the Council transmittal
documentation.
Initially, the Administration is asking the Council to appropriate the entire $3,000,000 needed'
to complete the implementation and training to get the entire City up on the existing system,
however, the enterprise funds will be required to pay back the General Fund for their pro-
rated share of the remaining $3,000,000 needed to complete the system build-out and
integration. The enterprise funds will be given the next five years to implement a repaymentplan for reimbursing the General Fund. Based upon the number of radios operating on the
system, the Airport's share of the $3,000,000 is $1,170,000 or approximately 39 percent, and
Public Utilities will reimburse the General Fund $360,000, or approximately 12 percent.
Communications
Initiative Name
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Manaclenlent:Services:: ::
Department Type of Initiative
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($1,470,000)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Fund Balance
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description -
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
General Fund Fund Balance $ 1,470,000.00
General Fund Acct Rec Airport $ 1,170,000.00
General Fund Acct Rec Public Utilities $ 360,000.00
83 CIP New Cost Center 1974-01 $ 3,000,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
09-00700 2910-01 $ 3,000,000.00
83-CIP new cost center 2700 $ 3,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or N/A
Non-profit sector?
Initiative Name:
Main Street Flower Project
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-13
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The RDA requested that Public Services provide flower pots and hang flower baskets from
street lights on Main Street between South Temple Street and 400 South. The RDA agreed
to pay for flower pots, baskets, seeds, soil, and hardware associated with this initiative. An
interlocal agreement was entered into between the RDA and Public Services. This budget
amendment provides budget for the revenue the RDA will pay Public Services. This budget
amendment also provides budget for the expense Public Services incurred to provide the'
requested services for the RDA.
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY titi6`.l[t �tia#Ette#A$3 .... :: wQ6::::
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Public Servic ::: New item .•:>:::»
Department Type of Initiative
..... . ....
Greg �ay s
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
RDA $ 54,860.00
Total $ 54,860.00 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
04-12775 1955-20 $ 54,860.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
04-12775 2277 $ 5,085.00
04-12775 2730-20 $ 49,775.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or N/A
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Airport Property Insurance increase
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-14
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
In 2004, an appraisal was done on the Airport property and the values went up. This caused
an increase in the Airport's insurance premium to a new total fo $1,207,486.78, leaving them
with a shorage of $219,939. This amount will be billed to the Airport. Airport administration
has been invloved in this new appraisal of the properties.
Airport:Prc rty Insi rar ce Increase::
Initiative Name
::::BA#4:FY2008:Ifitiative#444•:: :.;: 2005-08::::>::::::.•.•.•.....;:.;
IlInitiative Number Fiscal Year -
' Attorney R(Sk.•M > < ::::::::; :
::...:: Newaiem>::: ::
' ::
.. :.::.;:
ii Department Type of Initiative -
TimattiY Rodriquez . 53 020
Prepared ByI
Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
II FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
87 Risk Airport Premiums $ 219,939.00
Total $ 219,939.00 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
IIII
111 Staffing Impact: -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 011
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
87870-01 1860 $ 219,939.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
87870-01 2549 $ 219,939.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
4towour
Initiative Name:
Grant Towers Railroad Realignment
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-15
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Realignment of Grant Tower railroad curves. This would be a loan from the General Fund
until bonding is provided. These funds would be used for property acquisition and
construction design.
The project would eventually be bonded for. The loan from the General Fund would be paid
back from those bond processes. It is estimated that the bonding for the total project Would
be about$11 million.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this project.
:Grant Towers Railroad :eaisoninent:
1 Initiative Name
B.A#4.FY200 iiiitiaiive:#A 15 .::i. :::: 2tit}5=tfl
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Ma r's:t ffice »»:::: ` : Neris :Iterrr: ` ::>:i.
II Department Type of Initiative -
D Baxter :: :i 5$5473; . : : ..:::.::
IPrepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($4,000,000)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year II
FY 2005-06 II
FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service FundI
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
111
II Staffing Impact: I.
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83 New Cost Center 1974-01 4,000,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
09-00700 2910-01 $ 4,000,000.00
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 4,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Fleet Fuel Cost Increase
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-16
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department continues to experience higher than budgeted fleet fuel costs and
requests an additional appropriation of$ 290,000 for FY 06 to provide sufficient funding sing
6 months expense projections.
During the budget adoption process for both FY 05 and FY 06 the department represented
best estimate increases available to provide full year funding. Pricing increased at higher
than anticipated rates. Miles drive have`remained relatively consistent with miles driivenfor
Year 2003 - 350,474, Year 2004 - 351,707, Year 2005 -371,793.
Fleet Fuel Costs lncreasi� ::::
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2006 lfnitiati a#A-16.::: 2005»0�i
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
vv 1t 1: •
Department I Type of Initiative
Ju ry Burton ' »> > fConta t:I I tuber `..:
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp ($290,000)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
0
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's none none
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Overtime
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02-01000 2390-01 $ 290,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Fuel for Vehicles
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-17
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
In the current fiscal year fuel prices for vehicles have risen significantly higher than originally
budgeted. Unleaded fuel has averaged $1.80 a gallon and Diesel fuel $2.15 a gallon through
December 2005. While fuel prices are very volatile and unpredictable, Fleet projects fuel
costs will continue to remain at a high level through the end of the fiscal year. This budget
amendment will increase the expense and revenue budget for Fleet and increase the
expense budget for Public Services, Fire, and Golf.
>;>Fuel:for Vehicles :
Initiative Name
>< BA#4 FY2006:iktitiative#A-17`>' : .. 2005:E16. ;: .: >::
Initiative Number El
Year
Public:Services ' :.:.:. Newaterri": `:. i:::
111 Department _ Type of Initiative -
`: Greg Davit::» .:.:.535-6397.. ::::. :.
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($109,000)
II Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year IllFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
I Internal Service Fund
Fleet Fund $ 470,000.00
Total $ 470,000.00 $0
I Enterprise Fund
59 Golf Fund Balance $ (13,000.00)
Total $ (13,000.00) $0
I Other Fund
Total 0 $0
Ell MI
II Staffing Impact: MI
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
'Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue: I.
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
16100008
1953-20 $ 470,000.00
I.Expenditure: -
Cost Center NumberI Object Code Number Amount
6100008 2231-01 $ 220,000.00
6100008 2231-04 $ 250,000.00
$ 470,000.00
03-10300 2390-01 $ 100.00
03-10610 2390-01 $ 22,000.00
03-10620 2390-01 $ 5,350.00
03-10730 2390-01 $ 350.00
03-11410 2390-01 $ 8,900.00
03-11530 2390-01 $ 6,300.00
03-11900 2390-01 $ 1,750.00
03-12000 2390-01 $ 2,550.00
03-12100 2390-01 $ 3,550.00
03-12220 2390-01 $ 250.00
03-12200 2390-01 $ 150.00
07-00095 2390-01 $ 100.00
03-12400 2390-01 $ 4,500.00
04-10630 2390-01 $ 1,350.00
04-12300 2390-01 $ 16,400.00
04-13600 2390-01 $ 200.00
04-81102 2390-01 $ 2,700.00
07-00091 2390-01 $ 750.00
04-11510 2390-01 $ 1,750.00
$ 79,000.00
12-00060 2390-01 $ 30,000.00
59-01000 2390-01 $ 1,300.00
59-01015 2390-01 $ 1,100.00
59-01025 2390-01 $ 2,700.00
59-01035 2390-01 $ 1,300.00
59-01045 2390-01 $ 1,550.00
59-01055 2390-01 $ 3,800.00
59-01065 2390-01 $ 1,250.00
$ 13,000.00
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
1
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Landscape on State Road SR201
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-18
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah is upgrading State.Road 201 from the Jordan River to Bangerter
Highway. UDOT approached the City with a proposition for upgrading their property at
the Redwood Road and Bangerter exits. They would be willing to pay for substantially
upgraded landscaping that they designed in exchange for our agreement to pay for
the water and power meter hookups and maintain the property at City expense after it
was landscaped.
The City limits only include the exit on the north of SR-201 and the south side of the
road in West Valley City. West Valley City has entered into an interlocal agreement
to participate for their side. Public Services estimates the costs for this interlocal
agreement to be as follows:
One time water meter hookup for both locations = 8,000
One time power meter hookup for both locations = 500
Total one time costs = 8,500
Ongoing annual (8 months) maintenance costs:
Maintenance staffing & materials = 8,000
Snow Removal staffing & materials = 300
Utilities: water&electricity = 2,000
Total annual costs = 10,300
For fiscal year 2005-06, only 3 months of ongoing maintenance will be needed is$4,000
Initiative Name
::BA#4 FY2006Initiattua`#A48::1 ; >::: `:2005:06:<:`......::
- Initiative Number I I Fiscal Year -
: Public Servides• ::;» New'iteiiti ' <
- Department Type of Initiative -
G.req Davii :: > :i:-:::::: :5 39T:::.: ::: :
IPrepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impz ($12,500)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year El FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
I Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
I Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
II Ell
-Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 8 landscape on SR201.x1s3/30/20061:39 PM
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
04-13100 District#1 Park Maint 2590 $ 8,500.00
04-13100 District#1 Park Maint 2590 $ 4,000.00
$ 12,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
8A FY2006 Initiative#A-18 landscape on SR201.x1s3/30/20061:39 PM
- _ '
Initiative Name:
Natural Gas Price Increase
•
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-19
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
During 2005, Questar Gas who provides natural gas to Salt Lake City Corporation, received
approval to increase natural gas rates on two separate occasions from the Public Utilities
Commission. The first increase of 14.4% took effect as of June 2005. The second increase
of 20.3% took effect in November 2005. The compound effect of these two rate increases is
37.62%. This is an average rate impact across all rates, The impact SLC Public Services is
experiencing is 45.6% ($6.63/decatherm in Dec 2004 vs $9.65/decatherm in Dec 2005.) This
budget amendment will increase the expense budget for SLC Public Services to cover the
impact of the rate increases.
..,err. .• - •. r�- "' L_ 1+ Ir'... ., .,�' "i M Y +� y - 'C M , e. * ---- -
Natural as Price Increase:: : :
Initiative Name
:.4 BA#$FY2flfl6:Initlatrv'le:#A-19: » >: • ':: •• :2005-06...
• Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
:::: :.0 ic: ervices epa meR ' .. New tsfii;:;;::; :,;;;;;
iii Department I Type of Initiative -
.:G:rea:GavEs>: : >:::>>: »:> $354391':::::::::..
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($295,836)
•Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
III FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
61 Fleet Fund Balance $ (9,121.00)
Total $ (9,121.00) $0
Enterprise Fund
59 Golf Fund Balance $ (25,878.00)
Total $ (25,878.00) $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
MI
Staffing Impact: -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-19 Natural Gas Increase.xls3/30/20061:40 PM
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue: -
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure: -
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
03-10600 2332-01 $ 17,274.00
03-12190 2332-01 $ 2,905.00
04-10610 2332-01 $ 26,875.00
04-10630 2332-01 $ 11,857.00
04-12245 2332-01 $ 30,052.00
07-00093 2332-01 $ 13,664.00
07-00091 2332-01 $ 181,121.00
07-00927 2332-01 $ 8,134.00
07-00095 2332-01 $ 3,954.00
$ 295,836.00
59-01000 2332-01 $ 1,505.00
59-01010 2332-01 $ 2,246.00
59-01015 2332-01 $ 295.00
59-01020 2332-01 $ 4,150.00
59-01025 2332-01 $ 295.00
59-01030 2332-01 $ 4,560.00
59-01035 2332-01 $ 143.00
59-01040 2332-01 $ 5,542.00
59-01045 2332-01 $ 581.00
59-01050 2332-01 $ 82.00
59-01060 2332-01 $ 2,845.00
59-01065 2332-01 $ 295.00
59-01070 2332-01 $ 2,968.00
59-01075 2332-01 $ 295.00
59-01095 2332-01 $ 76.00
$ 25,878.00
61-00001 2332-01 $ 9,121.00 .
Additional Accounting Details:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 9 Natural Gas Increase.xls3/30/20061:40 PM
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant Is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 9 Natural Gas Increase.xls3/30/20061:40 PM
Initiative Name:
Tree Spraying
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-20
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This past season (calendar 2005) London plane trees have been host to unusually severe
combinations of disease and insects. Anthracnose is a fungus organism that proliferates in
cool, wet spring weather. It caused leaf dieback and shedding throughout the spring. During
the summer powdery mildew became very severe and produced additional leaf shed and
further tree decline. Leaves that remained on the trees, which were uncharacteristically
sparse, then became host to plant bugs. The combined effect of these problems not only
damaged the appearance of the city's largest and most beautiful plane trees but also
impaired their health.
Although severity of anthracnose and powdery mildew are related to weather conditions, a
repeat in this outbreak in 2006 could result in dieback of large branches and for some trees,
already in advanced decline, death. To provide the plane trees some protection from further
stress and loss of vitality. Public Services proposes they be sprayed. The intervention_isaa
series of three treatments, all to be applied in the spring,during fiscal year 2006. Projected
cost of the treatments is$112,000. (2,500 trees, $44.80 per tree, or$14.93 per application
for 3 applications each tree).
Tree spraying
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A 20 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp; ($112,000)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
•
•
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 01 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's none 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 01 0
•
Description
I i
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-20 Tree spraying.xls3/30/20061:44 PM
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
04-81102 Forestry 2329 $ 112,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
r
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A-20 Tree spraying.xls3/30/20061:44 PM
Initiative Name:
900 South 900 East Streetscape
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-21
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Sufficient funds were available to award the base bid, but did not include the alternates which
include the median island lighting and colored concrete pavement in the 900 So. 900 East
intersection. A polling of the property owners indicated their desire to complete all phases of
the project All owners were asked to comment on an increase to their assessment Eight of
twenty-two owners responded. Seven were in favor with one opposed to the increase,
With the majority of responses approving an increase to the assessment, it is recommended
that the City approve the increase of $85,000 to the property owners assessment budget to
provide for construction of the median island lighting and increase the Class "C" budget by
$130,000 to provide colored concrete in the intersection.
Excess Class "C" funds are available in the 900 So., Main Street to Jordan River CIP Project
due to good bids received and minimal change orders and material quantity overruns, It is
proposed that this project budget be reduced by$130,000 to increase the current budget for
the 900 So. 900 East project.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget increases to facilitate
this project.
900 south 900:East:str tsca ;_Job:
........ .. ........ . . . ..... . . ....... .
:No:::i:0604: : :
Initiative Name
BA#4:Ff2006Initiative:#A-21::::.:::'::: :::::20:05:-06 < :: :
• Initiative Number I L Fiscal Year -
Cotrirnun1ty Development»: .:.:.:::.:..... <;:>:Newkerb. :: >>:
• Department I Type of Initiative III
LuAn n Olark1S rile:Co:llins>:.>::::::: 535- 4.361535-6150: :::
Prepared ByI
Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd YearII IIFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83-04035 CIP Assessments $ 85,000.00
Total $ 85,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact: -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
.;er...rrs_Ww�..wn►..._ .,y _ Y"—"�itYW+"' `W1°"FWD""` _"` iYv' _7, ..-d,. .., _ _.
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05041 1125 $ 85,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04035 2700 $ (130,000.00)
83-03036 2700 $ 130,000.00
83-05041 2700 $ 85,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
,
Initiative Name:
Automatic Vehicle Locater
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-22
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Versaterm
AVL/GPS system
AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION SYSTEM
The need for efficient, safe and expedient police response to crises has most certainly been heightened
in light of the tragic events of September 11, 2001 =and current world situations. These circumstances
have reinforced the need for an integrated logistics information tool capable of'coordinating the
movement of personnel resources when responding to emergencies.
Automatic vehicle location systems (AVL)are computer-based vehicle tracking systems.
These systems are used extensively both for military and civilian purposes, including police vehicles
and_ambulances. Their use and application within law enforcement environments continues to grow,
driven forward by numerous expected benefits. Automatic .vehicle location systems operate by
measuring the actual real-time position of each vehicle and relaying the information to: a central
location. Actual measurement and relay techniques vary, depending on the needs of the,transit system
and the available technology systems:
Automatic vehicle location allows for enhanced police service to the.community by providing the
dispatch center with precise locations of available units, minimizing officer en-route tune. .Officer
safety, a critical concern of the Police Association and the Department, is expanded. Officer location is
immediately available in the event additional assistance is required or if an officer becomes
incapacitated or unable to use their radio.
Our agencies computer program provider"Versaterrri"'provides the AVL with the new MDT version
(7.0). Versaterm provides AVL as a visual aid,to help dispatchers in locating and/or identifying current
unit location(as well as unit status and the current call they are assigned to, if any) to help dispatchers
in identifying what unit to send/dispatch to a call: - '
- -'v x-Ati*WI f° `" V If9W�' S .AwA+ — M 100 i,. .,., ram .a .r v r-a
Deployment Strategy;
AVL units would be placed in all first responder vehicles,this would include patrol,traffic,and gang
unit.
Estimated First Year Cost
Versaterm - $ 225,000
Placer units - $ 127,600
25 ft cable - $ 4,840
Antenna- $ 8,250
Bracket- $ 1,290
Installation- $ 27,500
Monitors - $ 10,000
Total - $ 404,480
Estimate approximately 9 % contingency for unknown items in implementation. Project
cost estimate at$ 442,905.
Assumes first year maintenance covered under warranty with future years estimate to be included in
PD general fund department request for FY 08
L
Automatic Vehicle Locatek: :: :
1 Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#A:22. :::::::: ::2005.-06.::::..:':
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
Pdlite:::. ... ::. N it rrt:.... :
II Department Type of Initiative -
::::Ti rt :Fritz:: ......... (Contact:Number):
Prepared ByI
Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
'Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 III
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
IEnterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
IOther Fund
73 Fund Fund Balance $ 350,197.00 0
Total_ $ 350,197.00 $0
II
ilStaffinq Impact: MI
New Number of FTE's none none
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Overtime
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
73-73002 2700 $ 117,117.00
73-73005 2700 $ 5.00
73-73010 2700 $ 233,000.00
73-73012 2700 $ 22.00
73-73015 2700 $ 53.00
$ 350,197.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Asset Forfeiture Fund Budget available of $ 92,660.32 in CC 73-73002 for a total project
cost estimate of$442,857.
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Additional Legal Support for Public Utilities and Mgmt Services
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-23
Initiative Type: New
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Attorney's Office is asking for an additional one-quarter (1/4) FTE for additional legal work for
Public Utilities and Management Services (franchises) matters. Current staffing levels are insufficient
to perform this work in a timely manner. The cost of the one-quarter FTE on an annual basis'would be
$30,000. If approved effective March 1, 2006, .the FY 2005-2006 cost would be $10,000.
Administrative fees will charge two-thirds of the costs to Public Utilities and the general fund will be
charged for one-third the costs. This one-quarter time would be added to the attorney that was added
for the RDA three-quarter time to make one full time attorney.
Note:The City Council authorized the increase of 0.25 FTE. The City Attorneys Office will absorb$3,300 of the
requested funding.
ADDITIONAL LEGAL U PORT FOR:
............................ ..... .............................
PUBU C:UTIt;ITIES ANR
MANAGEMENT SERVICES:':::
Initiative Title
BA#4 FY2006 1 ' 2OO5. I6:
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Department I Type of Initiative
Ed RutanlSandra 53 =7fi 815 5: 99:: ::
P ared B y —.... P
Tele hone Contact
Pre
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Admin Fees Public Utilities $ 6,700.00 $ 20,000.00
Total $ 6,700.00 $ 20,000.00
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0.25 0.25
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
15-01400 1900 $ 6,700.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
15-01400 2111-01 $ 6,700.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Communication's E-911 Furniture & Workstations
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-24
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Through the collection of E911 funds to support upgrades and improvements to level of E911
service provided to the community, We are asking to use fund balance to replace the
furniture in the 911 Area.
The furniture in the center is used 24 hours a day, 365 days a year taking a lot of use being
adjust by 47 different people. In order to provide an ergonomic work stations for the=call
takers. We request consoles in the dispatch area be replaced. Also due to extensive wiring
under the sub floor we are required to rewire and have vendors move their specific equipment
meeting the manufacturers specifications. Cost in this area are also to have someone move
the old furniture out, pay for any additional wiring issues and monitoring of the 911 phone
system while the installation takes place. Without interruption of service to the cothmunity.
It is recommended that the City Council allow the use $ 150,000 of fund balance added to
existing line item capital budget of $ 270,000 for a total project cost of $ 420,000, This Will
purchase new stations for the Police (16) and Fire (4) as they serve as an overflow if the PD
gets busy.
w441,4111 ....,.." i;-.. iW- _d _.ite .A"_.Via."— plot A i,4164 At 'h.*le",tr e.ce. .,yy. A
.:.do.i uin:it ation `E`9110iirniture &`
Initiative Name
•BA#4 FY2006:Initiative#A 24: : ::;::::: :: .2 6::::
Initiative Number . : . ::
Fiscal Year -
;i l t: .....::::New its >:i.::::::
- Department I Type of Initiative -
..... Jerry Burtftft. >..::::..... :7 3824:'::.::::::..:..
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
-Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year III FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
0
60- E-911 Fund Fund Balance $ 150,000.00
Total $ 150,000.00 $0
• -
-Staffing Impact: EllNew Number of FTE's none none
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Overtime
.wMg- • 1 l' l' . �.A OC A" br,#" ..a N r fo. ,40-ire+tea#t S'M'Yn .'N\ M ... WAMOIN10103~1~-'
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
60-00620 2700 $ 150,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Justice Court Staffing
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-25
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Administration proposes that $130,294 from the General Fund (fund balance) be
appropriated to increase staffing levels at the Justice Court. The recent management audit
of the Justice Court recognized that the court is operating at a much higher level of caseload
per judge and caseload per staff member than any of the other courts surveyed. The audit
also recommended a weighted caseload study to determine whether staffing levels should ,be
increased. However, in the discussion of the Justice Court it was noted that because the
caseload to staffing levels are so much higher than the the other courts surveyed(377% of
the average), additional staff are needed now. The immediate staffing needs are 9 positions:
an additional judge with 3 clerks, one additional clerk for each of the 4 current full-time judges,
and a file clerk to scan completed cases.
The Court would like to get the authorization for another full-time judge position immediately
in order to begin the hiring process. The next available mandatory trainings for a new judge
are in either May or in September, and a typical hiring time frame is at least three months. -
Because of this hiring time frame, no budget for personal services for the judge position is
requested in the FY 2005-06 budget. Authorizing the judge position now would allow the
Court to have a judge in place to take advantage of the September training. The part-time
judge positions are expected to remain in place. These judges fill in when the full-time judges
are not available, and also hold regularly scheduled calendars to relieve the workload of full
time judges, although cases cannot be assigned to those judges for the purpose of case
management and probation supervision,
The new clerk positions will be housed on the second floor of the building. The four Attorney-
Client rooms on that level will be remodeled to house a total of six clerks. Two small walls will
need to be removed, office cubicle furniture will be installed, and key card access will be
installed for security. Remodeling costs will also include relocating the Attorney-Client areas
to new cubicles on the second floor in the public open area. The other new positions will be
able to use the computers and desk areas in the courtrooms. The judge position, as noted
above,will not require:a computer and phone until the FY 2006-07 budget year.
The clerk positions would he trained._in-house to be ready for the new judge. The duties for
the additional clerk for each full-time judge would be updating calendars, following up on
tickler files, filing, and performing case Management tasks (e.g.monitoring probation and
fines). The two clerks currently assigned to°each judge are not usually able.to keep up with
all of these tasks. In addition to the current staffing of two clerks per judge, the criminal
section also, has five pool clerks who issue warrants, take phone calls, work at the counter to
answer questions from the public, pull calendars, coordinate juries and interpreters, and do
some case management. These clerks will continue to perform these functions, and` no
increase is requested.
The breakdown of costs is as follows:
Personal Services:
7 Justice Court Clerks for 3 months - $72,300
1 File Clerk for 3 months - $9,500
Equipment (object codes 2340 and 2506):
High Speed Scanner(one time expense)- $10,000
1 Printer/copier/fax machine (one time expense) - $4,000
6 Computers (leased for$46 /month for 3 months - $828
6 Telephone lines ($37/month for 3 months) $666
Software licensing for JEMS (object code 2225 05):
8 New users at$2500 per license(one time expense) - $20,000
Remodeling (object codes 2760 50 and 2299):
Furniture, cubicles - $10,000
Key card access for offices -$3000
The Justice Court agrees that a weighted caseload analysis would be helpful, and Court staff
intends to do an in-house analysis using local weighted caseload data, The Court,would also
welcome an independent study with the help of the National Center foe StateCourts In'the
next budget year. If either weighted caseload;study should show staffing levels too°`high fn
any of the areas in which staff are added, adjustments,will be made to decrease the Staffing
levels as needed. Additional staff now will also alleviate some of the workload so the staff will
have the time to participate in a weighted caseload analysis.
Revenue from the criminal caseload will be increased by,adding a full-time judge, but it takes
quite some time before that revenue is realized. Bringing more cases to a disposition will
eventually increase revenue, but the cases will-Jake_at least three to six months to be
completed. The increase in revenue from criminal cases is expected no sooner than raid year
in FY 2006-07. An increase of$130,000 (20% for half of the year), is estimated.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
increase in staffing.
Note: The City Council did not authorize this.requesti but instead appropriated $54,025 from
fund balance for 4 contract employees on a contractual basis.
J usti:ce Court Staffing •::
•
Initiative Name
20D 6
.......;.:
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
:: : Mande nt:Sarvtces
Department I Initiative Type
Prepared By Phone Contact
General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact ($54,025)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Justice Court Criminal Fines 0 $ 130,000.00
Total $0 $ 130,000.00
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0.00 0.00
Existing Number of FTE's 48.10 48.10
Total 48.10 48.10
Description
New Positions
Criminal Court Judge 006 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Clerk 218 0.00 0.00
File Clerk 216 0.00 0.00
Existing Positions (comparable
to new positions)
Criminal Court Judge 006 4.00 4.00
Justice Court Judge PT 1.50 1.50
Justice Court Clerk 218 13.00 13.00
File Clerk PT 0.50 0.50
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
01-00028 Personal Services $ -
01-00028 2506 $ -
01-00028 2340 $ -
01-00028 2760 50 $ -
01-00028 2225 05 $ -
01-00028 2299 $ -
01-00028 2163 $ 54,025.00
$ 54,025.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
CIP Cemetery Historical Survey
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #A-26
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Parks Division received a $2,500 grant from the Utah Humanities Council
for a historical survey of the Salt Lake City Cemetery. The grant requires a match of$11,635,
which will be met with $5,045 of in-kind services of personnel time, supplies, printing, etc.,
within the Public Services Park Division, a cash match of $5,000 which is being proposed to
be funded with GIP general fund cost over-run monies and the consultant, who will perform
the study is requesting private donor's provide an additional $2,500 to match the grant,
This request is to appropriate $5,000 of CIP general fund cost over-run funds to be used as
match for the Utah Humanities grant.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this project.
OtP:- Cemetery Historical Study
Initiative Name
BAiitFY2006;liti4tE Fe#A 26:':•::::: : 20:0.-06.::...'..... .:
M. Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
Community eve opulent ::::: ; Ei ew iiii:::: :
• Department I Type of Initiative III
LuAnnrn O[arklStteiii*. allins.... '535-61361535-1 0::.:.
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
IIII Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
• FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-04099 2700 $ (5,000.00)
83 New Cost Center 2700 $ 5,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Street Lighting Funding Analysis
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-27
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
It is proposed that $75,000 be appropriated from fund balance to facilitate the hiring of a
specialized consultant to analyze options for funding a city-wide street lighting program.
The current lighting program is funded from several sources, none of which is guaranteed.
The existing lighting infrastructure is not currently being funded sufficiently to adequately
maintain and replace lighting. Citizens are also interested in converting to decorative fighting.
Funding methods and sources, with associated pros and cons, to fund the capital, operating
and maintenance costs need to be identified and evaluated to provide the information needed
to determine the type of lighting program(s) to be offered and the associated funding level
and source.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
project.
1. 1
Street right€nit:FtindLnci Arnalysts
Initiative Name
B0.4:FY2006:tfiitlathre#A-2 ::2 6»0*::: .:.
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
CommunitY:Deuet :pi iiiittra:ns ortatton Newitiarb::H::.':: :
Department I Initiative Type -
..i. Ti.rn Harpst:::::.::... :: 5354530 :::..::::.
Prepared ByI
Phone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($75,000)
Ill Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
II FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
IEnterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
IOther Fund
Total_ 0 $0
MI
Staffing Impact: IM
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-new cost center 1974-01 $ 75,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-new cost center 2590 $ 75,000.00
09-00700 2910-01 $ 75,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
,e.�, q .��. ,<-s: •nr. as..I -_ iMi ,,.,.y-w w � •d _ .... , ,.d r�Ya, ,�. .._ _ a_..� r .i ry ,. .. ,
Initiative Name:
Ground Transportation Administrator
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #A-28
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
It is proposed that $26,405 be appropriated from the General Fund fund balance to facilitate
the hiring of a full time position to provide oversight of the transportation industry ordinances,
which will include the new contract form of regulation. The position will report directly to the
Director of Building Services and Business Licensing. The position would be a 606 level
employee. The range of pay for this pay class is $42,390 (entry) to $52,998 (midpoint).
Salary and benefits for the full year at the mid point would be $68,897. An-additional $3,085
is needed for computer lease, telephone, cell phone and cubicle installation. The total cost for
a full fiscal year would be$71,982.
Currently the ground transportation industry is regulated through the Business License Office
using Certificates of Convenience and Necessity. Recently the Council adopted a resolution
to change to a contract form of regulation. That change will require an RFP and bids from
several potential providers. This new FTE is vital to oversee the development of the,RFP and
begin to fashion a program for enforcement under the new contract.It is also recommended
that an additional sum of$24,384 be budgeted each year for additional enforcement by third
parties and overtime for staff The third parties may be off-duty police officers or private
security firms. The cost for the first fiscal year would be $6,096.
The cost for fiscal year 2005-06 is $26,405. Salary and benefits for one quarterly of the year
is $17,224, $3,085 computer, telephone, cell phone and cubicle installation with $6,096 for
third party enforcement and staff overtime.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate_the necessary budget to facilitate this
project.
a .
Gtiurid:'i• spQrtatiiorr Almintstratbr
•
Initiative Name
>; BA#4:FY2006.initiative#A-YS`.:.:.:..:
Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year
mun t
evetcplrltlBusies ::::: •
Licetsii
Department
I Initiative Type
Prepared By Phone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impz ($26,405)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
• Total 0r $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
06- New Cost Center 2100 $ 17,224.00
06- New Cost Center 2300 $ 9,181.00
$ 26,405.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
State of Utah VAWA Grant - Police Dept Victim Advocate Position
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-1
Initiative Type:
Grants For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received, $18,161.21 of grant funding from the State
of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations under the Violence Against Women Grant
Program. The PD receives this grant annually and funds will continue to be used to pay the
salary and benefits of 1 existing PTE Victim Advocate Position. This Program currently has 3
FTE's and 1 PTE that are budgeted within the PD's general fund budget and 4 PTE's'who are
grant funded.
The grant requires a $6,651. in-kind match which will be met with the Program Coordinators
salary and,budgeted for within the PD's general fund budget.
This program provides services that include resources, referrals, information support,
community education, court advocacy and crisis intervention to victims of domestic violence.
Of the 4,792 temporary protective, orders and the 2,263 permanent protective orders issued in
2004 on behalf of victims of domestic violence,40% of each category were issued from the
3rd District Court which serves residents of Salt Lake City, From Jan 1 to October 15, 2005
the SLC PD responded to 2,805 domestic violence incidents.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant.
The Council previously passed the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
a i
state:cif tar>1AffA' rant Police
Dept Victim Adv cate Position
Initiative Name
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Gran for Exis�tif : ::'
Department Type of Initiative
_ €Cr€sta 1�u'nnt he r€e Collins 799=
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
•
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grants $ 18,161.21
Total $ 18,161.21 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0.50 0
Total 0.50 0
Description
1040 hours at $16.76 per hr.
Plus benefits
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: 05-VAWA-24 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 18,161.21
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2111-01 $ 18,161.21
•
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) - State of Utah - Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-2
Initiative Type:
Grant for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received this $50,000 grant from the State of Utah,
Department of Health for their Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Program to administer,
coordinate, and promote CIT training efforts throughout the State. This program was initiated
to assist Law Enforcement Officers in effectively dealing with a person experiencing a mental
health crisis, as well as every day interaction with mental health consumers.
These funds will be used as follows: $25,165 for partial salaries and benefits of the SLCPD
Program Director and Coordinator who administer the Statewide CIT Program, $10,320 for
travel, training, workshop and conference expenses which include remote CIT presentations,
trainings for the Director and Coordinator and workshops and conferences; and $14,515 for
supplies to include manuals, certification pins, lanyards, and food provided during the
trainings and equipment necessary for conducting CIT trainings.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the grant agreement and to appropriate the necessary budget to
facilitate this grant.
Crisis:Intervention Team:(CII) State
...................... .. .........................
.......... of:Utah: Girarit``` :
Initiative Name
• ;: BA#4 FY2006:Innitiative#B-2. >:::; :; :: ..:: -.
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
•... Grant or Existing:Staff;:
<:: Po ice. > ;><>::<:::: .. ::Resource:
Ill Department Type of Initiative -
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Colli>rt :::.:: :::: ^.:. 799r3729J535 150:: .::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
:Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0_I $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grant $ 50,000.00
Total_ $ 50,000.00 $0
MI
III Staffing Impact:
I MI
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 50,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 50,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
State of Utah VAWA Grant - Justice Court Clerk
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-3
Initiative Type:
Grants For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Management Services City Courts Division applied for and received, $39,927.84 of grant
funding from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations under the Violence Against
Women Grant Program, The Justice Court receives this grant annually and fullds wilt be
used to continue to fund the full-time court clerk position to process domestic violence cases
filed with the with Salt Lake City Justice Court. This position tracks, manages and provides
follow-up on each domestic violence case to monitor offender compliance with court ordered
probation, community service, counseling, drug treatment, etc.
A 25% city match or $20,578.65 is required and will be met within the personnel services of
the Justice Court Director, the Criminal Section Manger, the Domestic Violence Court Judge,
and is currently budgeted for within the courts general fund budget.
it is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant
The Council previously passed the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
•
`z.AMY.46 ✓ BTA 1.a `e. M` �." Nli. Atoka " !"'AP-"
State of Utah.11 ►31 :Graff Jiust ce.
Co urt:Cl€erlt::•
:.,
Initiative Name
: .
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
....... ..
::.Gra rtts`for::Existi bqq....
Management:S rvices : ::::.:: Staff Resources::<:.::
Department 1 Type of Initiative
Mary Jahnstot/Sherrie: ollins>::':::; 535-7173#v354150::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grant $ 39,927.84
Total $ 39,927.84 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 1.00 0
Total 1.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 05-VAWA-23 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 39,927.84
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2111-01 $ 39,927.84
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-4
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Management Services Emergency Preparedness Office applied for,and received this $2,500.
Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) grant from the State Department of Public
Safety. This grant is received on an annual basis and is used to offset some of the personnel
expenses of the Emergency Manager salary for activities with the LEPC and web-site
expenses.
The $2,500 grant requires a 20% or $625.00 match which will be met within Management
Services general fund budget in the personnel expense.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant.
The Council previously passed a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
.WR l' W' ..b,. -, v .o..' - ..3 ".;Y"-Ott,4PAV M AVW.1, ,,,,,hOili`l WV . i$ 4 -
Local:Emergeni.V.Planning
Committee(LEPCI:Grant<
Initiative Name
::BA 4:FY2006:.int`.tiative#8 :....: . 2005-06.:« > ::: .
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
:;<:Gr ints foe:Existing
Management:Services:: c:
Resources
ii Department Type of Initiative -
Michael Stever#Sherrie Conine 535411a0(53546150:::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
ii Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year M
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
I
72 Fund Grants $ 2,500.00
Total $ 2 500.00 $0
Ell
MI
II Staffing Impact: I.
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
w As- WN imOme "' .. ,..�^.,aoir . 440 r s. - wa,.. .rt .,smiNelowe.owsloolo—r,. ,...*we— erx
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA # If Applicable: 20.703
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 2,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 2,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Leonardo Dept of Education Pass through to Global Artways
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-5
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Leonardo received a US Department of Education Grant and is contracting with the City's
Global Artways program for collaboration of arts education and programming at the Leonardo,
The Leonardo awarded Global Artways $99,200 for arts programming. Global will use
$22,500 for seasonal teachers for the Summer Arts Apprentice Program and Shakespeare in
the Park productions, $38,700 for equipment which includes a sound studio and production
materials needed, and $38,000 for contractual components which include a Performance Art
Piece with SLC Bicycle Coalition, 21st Century Play Festival and the workshop for Children's
Opera.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant.
The Council previously passed a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
.1eonardo:.Dept;:of:Ed:pass through ta:
Global Artii ays : :
Initiative Name
: BA#4 FY2006 n iative'#BZ: ::::::: 20b5:-06<. >i. ::::
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
`: r:Existi :itiwa Gtant:Fo ft`
P ubl.i c:Services Youth Cit
• Department I Type of Initiative -
Janet iN if#Sherrie:C l:l:inis 535-771215356150:::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
El Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd YearIll IIFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
I Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grants $ 99,200.00
Total $ 99,200.00 $0
II
II Staffing Impact: -
I New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
•
Description
Seasonal employees/teachers for
specific programs
- , _, W B J_P- #ei.Pb',c1W AP°P 114. 5 4.4 00-14x wW- 1°
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1360 $ 99,200.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 99,200.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Leonardo Dept of Education Pass through to Housing and Neighborhood Development
for Grant Consultation
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #B-6
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Leonardo received a US Department of Education Grant and is contracting with the City's
Housing and Neighborhood Development for grant consultation.
The Leonardo will pay Housing and Neighborhood Development over a period of 5 years,
funds totaling $8,710. for grant consultation pertaining to the Leonardo's Department of
Education Grant. More specific, HAND will monitor project fund disbursements and required
Federal reporting by Leonardo.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant
The Council previously passed a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
.. K ., .v .f - ,E,r- `+ ,N• i! Ye A, °"""`."w .. ,v, w.. .. rr err �'mi�. c
Leonard :Dep t of.Ed Rase throur_ah to
.:..:.:::.::. .....
itii risa art eiti: :or oa
. .........
Develo erne.:::`: <«
Initiative Name
BA# :FY2006 iltiative#::::: : :: 2005:-6::::.. .::.::•:•:
Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
;«::Gra:11ts fo r:::Exiatl nq: :::.
CommunityDevelopment -stat eso rces >>:
II Department -
Type of Initiative
LuAnn Curt- i :e Collins:' :::`:: 5.35-6436I535€: :50.
IPrepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year 1111
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grants $ 8,710.00
Total $ 8,710.00 $0
• ME
II Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1360 $ 8,710.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 8,710.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
US Department of Education -YouthCity Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
YouthCity Programs generate program income from fees collected for programming services
provided to youth at Ottinger, Liberty, Fairmont and Central City YouthCity sites. This request
is to create budget to facilitate the expenditure of the program income. Program Income is re-
allocated back into the programs where it was received.
It is recommended that the Council appropriate the necessary budgets to continue facilitation
of these programs.
1
USUS:Departmentof Education:Program:
Income::-;YouthOitv.:Program Income
Initiative Name
;:::::: BA#4'FY.2006:Initi41140#D4: »:.:. 2 $O6. » :::: ::
1111 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
::Commiinitv•:Development :: ';» ;: Hpiu.sek epirl :
• Department I Type of Initiative -
<:<>;LuAtrt:ClatidShet ie t llitit::: ::::: S384.1:36PS.36.4160
IPrepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) 1 Impact
III Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year IIFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
II Other Fund
72 Fund - Program Fees $ 36,430.20
Total $ 36 430.20 $0
IIIEll
Staffinq Impact:I -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-66003 1305 $ 7,364.50
72-66004 1305 $ 11,058.00
72-66005 1305 $ 170.00
72-66006 1305 $ 12,216.00
72-66005 1305 $ 30.00
72-66005 1305 $ 156.50
72-66002 1305 $ 783.50
72-66004 1305 $ 1,767.25
72-66006 1305 $ 2,884.45
$ 36,430.20
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-66003 2590 $ 7,364.50
72-66004 2590 $ 12,825.25
72-66005 2590 $ 356.50
72-66006 2590 $ 15,100.45
72-66002 2590 $ 783.50
$ 36,430.20
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Economic Development Loan Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The City Center Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) loan has generated program
income from payments received from the. borrower. The reallocation of these funds is
directed by Resolution Number 93 of 1991 which states repayments of the City Center UDAG
be used as a source of funding to support the Neighborhood Revitalization Element of the
Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund.
In addition, the UDAG Revolving Loan Fund has generated program income from the
repayments of principal and interest made to the City from borrowers. The Council has
traditionally re-appropriated this program income back to the UDAG Revolving Loan Fund
program to fund additional loans for economic development.
It,is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary adjustments to the
budgets to continue facilitation of these programs.
Economic Development Loan' :::;:
'Program Income
Initiative Name
::: BA#4:1= 006::Iriitiative#D-Z:: :::::::; 2005:-06:-06 ; ::
II Initiative Number I Fiscal Year II.
Commuiiity.:Development ::: Housekeeping
• Department I Type of Initiative -
: LuAnn Clark{Sherris Gallins::::: 5354136t535-611:50 `
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
11.Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year ll
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund UDAG Revolving $ 1,061,340.00
Payback(7215607)
72 FundCity Center Loan Fund $ 217,748.00
(7200720)
Total $ 1,279,088.00 $0
MI
Staffinq Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
.. .,�..... .. °a M1_ X{Z.'_F".,./`! "V"4 f .., ., .,. .. ,.- ...o ... ,. p ,.... `i' .:4'^"ip'Me` y!`f► .A ,,.
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-15607 1305 $ 1,061,340.00
72-15607 1305 $ 217,748.00
$ 1,279,088.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-15607 2950 $ 1,061,340.00
72-15607 2950 $ 217,748.00
$ 1,279,088.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Move CDBG CIP from 71 to 83 Fund
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
These projects are CDBG Public Building Improvement projects. This action will move
budgets and cash of these capital improvement projects from the 71 fund to the 83 fund
which includes all capital improvement projects. This will allow Housing and Neighborhood
Development to easier track and monitor all CIP Projects.
It is recommended that the Council appropriate the necessary adjustments to the budgets to
continue facilitation of these projects.
.Move COBG CIp From 71 to:83 Fund :
Initiative Name
BA#4::FY2006:Initiative#D:3 `:; ; <>
<<: 2005:.ft6:...:::.:::::
- Initiative Number Fiscal Year -
:Community eve oilmen :.....:.:.:.:::.:.:. ousts eea n. :: :...
- Department Type of Initiative -
LaAnn Clark!Sherrie:Co.11iins ::.:::::::::: 535/61:88I83:' 1:50:
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
-Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year II- FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0 $0
I Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
M MI
-Staffing Impact:I -
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant #and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71-31013 1310 (107,400.00)
71-31018 1310 (15,000.00)
71-31052 1310 (9,900.00)
71-31053 1310 (19,600.00)
71-31030 1310 (41,564.00)
71-31058 1310 (62,982.00)
71-31057 1310 (10,000.00)
71-31043 1310 (17,300.00)
71-31059 1310 (59,400.00)
71-31060 1310 (60,000.00)
71-31044 1310 (8,000.00)
71-31055 1310 (5,500.00)
71-31045 1310 (27,723.00)
71-31054 1310 (3,400.00)
71-31056 1310 (16,975.00)
71-31036 1310 (118,000.00)
71-30054 1310 (15,000.00)
71-30055 1310 (7,500.00)
71-30057 1310 (10,000.00)
71-30059 1310 (7,975.41)
71-30060 1310 (120,000.00)
71-30063 1310 (18,000.00)
(761,219.41)
83-New Cost Center 1310 107,400.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 15,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 9,900.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 19,600.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 41,564.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 62,982.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 10,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 17,300.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 59,400.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 60,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 8,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 5,500.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 27,723.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 3,400.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 16,975.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 118,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 15,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 7,500.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 10,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 7,975.41
83-New Cost Center 1310 120,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1310 18,000.00
761,219.41
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71-31013 2590 (107,400.00)
71-31018 2590 (15,000.00)
71-31052 2590 (9,900.00)
71-31053 2590 (19,600.00)
71-31030 2590 (41,564.00)
71-31058 2590 (62,982.00)
71-31057 2590 (10,000.00)
71-31043 2590 (17,300.00)
71-31059 2590 (59,400.00)
71-31060 2590 (60,000.00)
71-31044 2590 (8,000.00)
71-31055 2590 (5,500.00)
71-31045 2590 (27,723.00)
71-31054 2590 (3,400.00)
71-31056 2590 (16,975.00)
71-31036 2590 (118,000.00)
71-30054 2590 (15,000.00)
71-30055 2590 (7,500.00)
71-30057 2590 (10,000.00)
71-30059 2590 (7,975.41)
71-30060 2590 (120,000.00)
71-30063 2590 (18,000.00)
(761,219.41)
83-New Cost Center 2590 107,400.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 15,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 9,900.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 19,600.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 41,564.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 62,982.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 10,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 17,300.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 59,400.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 60,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 8,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 5,500.00
83-New Cost Center _ 2590 27,723.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 3,400.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 16,975.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 118,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 15,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 7,500.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 10,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 7,975.41
83-New Cost Center 2590 120,000.00
83-New Cost Center 2590 18,000.00
761,219.41
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
h"`.f•"/ _d. .'tit AS.'sw.evn+a it.dl ''44+N( A" .. .. -$
Initiative Name:
Housing Loans Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Housing Section of Housing and Neighborhood Development has, generated program
income from principal- and interest payments received from borrowers. -The Council has
traditionally re-appropriated this program income back to the Housing section:-to fund
additional loans. It is requested that the Council again follow this practice and appropriate
this program income to fund additional loans for use by the Housing section in its Renter
Rehabilitation, CDBG and Home programs.
NOTE: The $487,067 appears twice due to the accounting system established for CDBG with
mirror accounts. There is only $487,067 of cash available for expense by HAND.
It is recommended that the Council appropriate the necessary adjustments to these budgets
to continue facilitation of these programs.
MT" `..'•..., _ _ .. . 4 .w .e-a �p mew ». waN 'Ya a r .yes r e.,w '...•, r ..- - s ..-+w r r w rwxxrq..ri..w;eiM6.xr..+w_a_vrwn.ww. .ise
:::Housi g:LoanPrograr Income :
Initiative Name
: BA#4:FY2'OO6:Initiative#D4::::.....::: 2006fo6:: ::::::::
• Initiative Number I Fiscal Year II.
Ootrmu:iiity;:Developmerit Housekeepin :::::.::::::
• Department Type of Initiative -
;::: Lu oieii Clark/Sherrie collirts:::•••••••••` : 535-13:6153561�:` ':
Prepared ByI Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
II FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
Other Fund
78 Fund Program Income $ 819,487.00
71 Fund Program Income $ 487,067.00
Total $ 1,306,554.00 $0
liStaffinq Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
x."`Y. • ••"N ..X 1'-"._:. '.'\' .1h' ..*-._4.. ..v _It°k« '.N3" '°- IBM.YM`.94.`A' i...11tl k' ?'C l �. . `t,b#-FJ 9.nw 6 `M' ""'' a
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
78-00201 1305 $ 249,793.00
78-31010 1974-03 $ 487,067.00
71-31010 1310 $ 487,067.00
78-78325 1974-78 $ 82,627.00
1,306,554.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
7800201 2950 $ 249,793.00
7831010 291071 487,067.00
7131010 291015 487,067.00
7878325 2950 82,627.00
1,306,554.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
Improving Crime Data (ICD) - Georgia State University
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #E-1
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received this $34,920 grant from Georgia State
University. It is a pass-through grant from the Department of Justice and will be used to
upgrade the PD's Interoperable data communications equipment, pay IMS to create a
program application, and a consultant to provide in-house training to access and analyze
shared data generated by the new system.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the grant agreement and to appropriate the necessary budget to
facilitate this grant.
A,yr t _ ,.- .a ..., - a `- �-' aw['Wn4e"'Wif."'A `_,r tvr m Aw'Ms.,-. ,- .. .�° _ x • -wv .....
l iprbuiiic Griiii C)a a(idbf deotOia':
: State Universit Grarrt
Initiative Name
BA#4:FY200ga:nitietive#E-t::::: .:2005 06;:: ` :::
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
.:.:::... ..
GrantRea.uirin :No `:
::::::Police'
:: Neer Staff Reu rees
Department I Type of Initiative Ell
E(rista::Durin/Sherrie.Collin : :::79943729/535 154:
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
In Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 II
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
IEnterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
IOther Fund
72 Fund Grant $ 34,920.00
Total $ 34,920.00 $0
II Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
A. ,..._ ' a _ w, ., a AWOL. " I'<.;A Y„' `Mr',#" - i v `+�. �' l "` .t* x .t..Air VW' Atoa# aw' _^ ar
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1360 $ 34,920.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 34,920.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Cemetery Historic Survey - Utah Humanities Council
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative#E-2
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Department applied for and received this $2,500 grant from the Utah Humanities
Council These funds, and the required $11,635 match, will be used to conduct historical research,
field work, and produce documentation for the Historic American Landscapes Survey (HALS) of the
Salt Lake City Cemetery. The information documented in this study will be used to educate youth
groups, school classes and general public about the importance of cemeteries as historical places.
The required $11,635 match will be met with $5,045 of in-kind services of personnel time, supplies,
printing, etc., within the Public Services, Parks Division, a cash match of $5,000 is being requested as
a separate item within the CIP General Fund contingency, and the consultant, who will perform the
study is requesting private donor's provide an additional$2,500 to match the grant apPlication.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign
the grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants, and appropriate budget to facilitate this
grant.
.r,'z+ _ .......... d �,.A" .X W.Vi✓..�.r. �. .. ° .,.......� ,W:.. ,. ... J. :V ._._... du. ezAyr ..,` e �.,
Cemetery�:t istoric S rvey.:::: Utah
•
Ha.manittes'=;:Salle Lake City: .
Initiative Name
•: BAi F'Y i:I. itiative 1 E=2
Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year
.Grant iRel:uiring: i :<
PubIi a vi css::: Nev taf#R uF <:
Department I Type of Initiative
REdt Gratta:ml her ie Collins:: . 535-77741535.6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 fund Grant $ 2,500.00
Total $ 2,500.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0.00 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicable: 12007 001 2103 0604
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1895 $ 2,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 2,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Global Artways -The Kennedy Center for Performing Art Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative#E-3
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Global Artways received a $7,500 grant from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
Education Department for their Imagination Celebration program. The grant must be met with a one
for one match which will be met within Global Artways general fund budget for personnel expenses.
The Kennedy Center Imagination Celebration (KCIC) at Salt Lake City is an arts education festival that
engages young people, teachers and families in exploring and celebrating the creative process. The
KCIC brings world-class artists, performances and events into schools and communities; to create
powerful experiences for all participants.
Global Artways will use these funds to conduct the imagination celebration art workshop which is an
exhibit and public art making activity designed to bring young people and their caregivers together in
an enriching experiences.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign
the grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants, and appropriate budget to facilitate this,
grant.
1
.Global:A� -<The::Kennedy Center.
:for:Peirf'orminq'Arts•Grant: :
Initiative Name
::: BAt#4 iFY 6.Initiativ #E=3:;: .:.:::: 20:5:06::::::.:.:.:.....:.:
• Initiative m Nuber I I Fiscal Year -
Grant::Retiti! ri4 No :.;:::
:: Public Services:;> ' New Staf Resources.t
• Department Type of Initiative -
Janet Nelf#Sherrie:Collins:::...... :.::>535-771.2#535-6150::. ::
Prepared ByII
Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year111 IIFY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Grants $ 7,500.00
Total $ 7,500.00 $0
Ill MI
Ill Staffing Impact: I.
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
.< 4l• /n'I°'gyp." .K A" w✓" .c.7Wl\`# I" 4 ,5 .�. r u ,./ W J— yy ib _ m r,'eMN"tlShlteNW"'.>„m ..,
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 84.351
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1360 $ 7,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 7,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
State of Utah VAWA Grant - Prosecutors Victim Empowerment Program
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY 2006 Initiative #E-4
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Prosecutors Office applied for and received $16,875 from the State of Utah, Office of
Crime Victim Reparations and will be used to contract with an outside agency to provide
counseling services to women who are victims of domestic violence.
The Prosecutors Office, collaborating with Salt Lake County Probation Services, the Trauma
Awareness Center, and the YWCA, will develop and implement a victim empowerment
counseling program for women who are reluctant to participate in trial proceedings against
their abusers. Victims routinely seek dismissal of the perpetrator's charges, assert marital
privilege, recant or otherwise make themselves unavailable so as not to testify and hold the
offenders accountable. These grant funds will provide for counseling services of
approximately 150 victims.
The grant requires a $7,001.09. in-kind match which will be met with the grant program
coordinator's salary and use of equipment which is budgeted for within the Prosecutor's
budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate budget to facilitate this grant.
The Council previously passed the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the
original grant and to accept and sign any additional related grants.
r wM, y. n v+ raw _ yrwa
State.of Utah VAWA Grant-
Prosecutors Victim EmiK owerment ::
Initiative Name
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant:Reciutrtnq.Nod:
...........Ste `tesources::
Department I Type of Initiative
:Padma
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 Fund Misc Grant $ 16,875.00
Total $ 16,875.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.00 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 05-VAWA-25 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 16,875.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 16,875.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Possibly
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Ottinger Hall Renovation
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #F-1
Initiative Type:
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
The renovation of Ottinger Hall was initially funded by a $100,000 donation from the Rotary
Club of Salt Lake and the City's matching funds of $200,000 from a federal education grant.
The completion of the project is expected to be complete the first two weeks of March 2006.
The Ottinger Hall renovation project is very close to exhausting its funds. During the course of
the renovation project some unplanned changes were needed in the design. The Public
Services Department is requesting an additional funding of $5,000. The $5,000•will be
donation by the Rotary Club of Salt Lake. The Rotary Club of Salt Lake is willing to donate up
to $5,000 to make sure the project is completed.
Otti ngerHair Renovation: :
Initiative Name
:: >BA#4:FY2tit 6:initiative#F ::::• :•: 200.t-015.:: »: ::.:
• Initiative Number I I Fiscal Year -
Public:Seivices:Dep�artment:: •;::•:':-':'::-:-: Donation :::.
i .. I.. ... Type o....«f Initiative::... -
Department
reO:Davls: :.. 53'�-6397:::::: ::::
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
•Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Yearll IIFY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
11
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
CIP Fund 83-05042 $ 5,000.00
II Total $ 5,000.001 $0
•Staffing Impact: -
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
ll Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue: -
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05042 1895 $ 5,000.00
1.Expenditure: -
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05042 2700 $ 5,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Wayfinding Signs for Emigration Visitors District
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #F-2
Initiative Type:
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
In the Fall of 2004 the City Council budgeted $25,000 in CIP fund to be used to purchase and
install wayfinding signs for the Emigration Visitors District (EVD). A stipulation for use of the
funds was that the EVD would need to provide the remaining amount of funds required for
the project in the amount of $18,010 for a total project cost of$43,010. The project was
later revised to a total project cost of $40,518 requiring the EVD match to be $15,518„ Over
the past year city has worked with the EVD and the sign company (YESCO) to finalize the
design and placement of the signs and we are now ready to purchase the signs. On February
2, 2006 the city received a check for $15,518 from EVD and deposited into the CIP fund Cost
Center 83-05030 using Object Code 1895 as instructed by Sherrie Collins.
The contract with YESCO is being renewed this April at which time the cost for the fabrication
and installation of the signs will increase dramatically. If the signs are not purchased before
that time, we will not have sufficient funds for the project.
-'A Aiw.._ "AY_ iiir- - * Alk at eA 4."A -:9 A 8 .o.W`**SOW. M lg„ .' , m .. ,... ..J -, ., ..... a.._.e, ... .. W _ ..
avtfi rid i nq:Stgria:.f`or>Emkira#to n
usftors DEsfri t::.
Initiative Name
.::: 8A#4'FY2006Initiative =2 >:.:.2 5.:>:: H*:
Initiative Number I -
Community Development ... ::::» Donation
:::::::::::`:::
• Department Type of Initiative -
Dan: erstent• hai. 3 -�'�€i3 .:.::::..
Prepared ByI
Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
El Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year IIM FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
I
CIP Fund 83-05030 $ 15,518.00
Total $ 15 518.00 $0
1.11
Staffing Impact: MI
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05030 1895 $ 15,518.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05030 2700 $ 15,518.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Reduce Donation Budget(Special Revenue Donation Fund)
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #G-1
Initiative Type:
New Item added by request of City Council
Initiative Discussion:
A donation fund is used to account for contributions held in trust by the City for
contributions received for a specific purpose. For the last few years, the
Administration requested and the Council appropriate $400,000 annually for
donations with the understanding that the appropriations will be held in a "budget
only cost center" until cash is received. As contributions are received and interest
earned, appropriations are moved from the "budget only cost center" to the project to
match the actual amount of available cash.
The Council Chair and Vice Chair have suggested that the Council may wish to be
informed of each new donation via budget amendment rather than appropriate an
unspecified $400,000 each year. The Administration recommends that the Council
appropriate $50,000 in the donation fund with the understanding that each budget
opening the Council will be informed of the appropriation that were used in the prior
quarter which would bring the budget amount back to the $50,000 level. As of
March 10, 2006, appropriations of about $235,000 remain in the "budget only cost
center" for future donations. This budget amendment would reduce that amount by
$185,000 leaving the $50,090 appropriation.
,_.,.. .._., m. ,,.. ,. .. �.,�, w w .,�,��,.,�.Y"`¢ .. _ .. ,w .w,
l I
........ ...................................... .
::Reduce Donation Budciet.(Speatal: :
>:.> Revenue Doii itioi° :Fuintt}
Initiative Name 1
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#G-'i ::::.i i:: 2 6' `:
MInitiative Number I Fiscal Year -
itv Coup it: : Ne 'item:::::::::: ::
• Department Initiative Type -
Sylvia Jones 53.57656
Prepared Phone Contact
General Fund ( Fund
By Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year .
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
11
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
I
77-77001 Donation Fund $ (185,000.00)
Total $ 185 000.00 $0
IM
II Staffing Impact: II =
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77001 1895 $ (185,000.00)
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77001 2590 $ (185,000.00)
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Portable Digital Recording System for Neighborhood
Outreach Meetings and City Board Meetings
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative #G-2
Initiative Type:
New Item added by request of City Council
Initiative Discussion:
The FTR system used by the Recorder's Office can be installed on a notebook
computer that would have similar abilities as the computers in the Council Chamber
and the committee room. The cost for the hardware and software would be a one
time purchase price of about $8,600. In addition there would be about $1,100 per
year in software maintenance charges. This would not be a live system to the
internet as currently available, but the public would be able to listen to each meeting
after it has been published to the internet. The portable system would also be
available for other meetings where a digital recording might be needed such as
meetings of City boards, presentations, etc. Further, IMS is purchasing a channel
mixer, 6 microphones with stands, and microphone cable at an estimated cost of
$1,300. The equipment could be rented; however, it would be more cost effective to
purchase it given the cost to„rent and the anticipated number of times it will be
used.
The digital recording system in Room 126 does not have all the capabilities as:.the
systems in the Chamber and the Committee Room. A portable digital recording
system could also be used in Room 126, but perhaps a better solution would be to
upgrade the system in Room 126 with the "log note template" software at a cost of
$500.
At the Work Session March 7th, the Council generally was in favor of budgeting:for
these items for a total cost of$11,500.
Portable:Dirdtal Recordi g System for
€fie€ghborhood:aria:C€ty:Board
`: Meetinga::;
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2006 Initiative•#G=2::....:..: 2005-06:.•.: '::::.
1111 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year -
C•ity Council >: ;: : .. :>::>::New+i Item:::.:::: :
Department Initiative Type IN
`Sylvia Jones ......... ::::535:7656:::::::::::::
Prepared ByI
Phone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imps ($11,500)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year IIII
El FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
65 Fund Transfer from General $ 1,300.00
Fund
Total $ 1300.00 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 $0
IOther Fund
Total 0 $0
III
illStaffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
65-03550 1974-01 $ 1,300.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
07-00041 276051 $ 10,200.00
09-00700 2321 $ 1,300.00
65-03550 2300 $ 1,300.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A