018 of 2008 - Budget Amendment No. 3 for Fiscal Year 2007/2008 0 08-1
B 08-5
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 18 of 2008
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2007-2008)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 24 OF 2007
WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, THE FISCAL
YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2008.
PREAMBLE
On June 12, 2007, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake
City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2007 and ending June 30, 2008, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter
6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing
document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The City's Policy and
Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder
proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the
employment staffing document, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the
City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
' L
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and
finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.24 of 2007.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2007 and ending June 30, 2008, in accordance with the requirements of Section 128,
Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a
copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 15th day of
April , 2008.
Lt--V-Q______
C IRPERSON
ATTEST:
CH D P TTY Y ORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on April 18, 2008
Mayor's Action: x Approved Vetoed
�`!: CITY);..',
''. ,' MA OR
`ice ,:�)� C ;*`':
♦Y• \►� �p(lp A SS Ai Y rf')V D AS rC s F.OF.?`:e
•f�_.,...kv.,,, S It Lake City Attorney's Office
Gate_ 3 —!/- ? '
4 rtyl,4,4*___—*/<•.-,---
CHIEF DEPUT IT RE RDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. 18 of 2008.
Published: April 25, 2008
HB_ATTY-#2169-v 1-Budget_amendment_l_2007-2008.DOC
3
General Fund - Fund Balance
For Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/08
Beginning fund balance as of June 30, 2007 $32,560,382
Budget book:
Total budgeted revenue 199,030,640
Total budgeted expenses (201,911.052)
Total budget book sources/(uses)of fund balance ($2,880.412)
Budget amendment#1 changes:
Initiative#A-3 Transportation-Engineer IV Position (72,281)
Initiative#A-1 Leonardo Seismic Retrofit (1.493,396)
Initiative#A-4 Land Use Attorney (89.229)
Initiative#A-9 Local Lobbyist (68,500)
Initiative#A-5 Impact fee waiver (22,100)
Initiative#A-11 Election costs (155,000)
Initiative#D-1 Encumbrance carryforward budgets (3 587,310)
Initiative#I-1 Rocky Mountain Power's bid to bury 800 South Transmission Lines (8.000)
Initiative#I-2 Additional staffing for Council office (112,000)
Total budget amendment#1 changes ($5.607,816)
Budget amendment#2 changes:
Initiative#A-4 1300 East Safety Study (100,000)
Initiative#A-11 Ground Transportation Inspection (234,981)
Initiative#A-2 CBD Recycling (61.821)
Initiative#A-1 State Road Transfer 1,504,149
Initiative#A-8 Engineering Manager-Airport TRAX extention (50,000)
Initiative#A-15 Prosecutors office additional staff (205,584)
Initiative#I-1 Legal Defenders Association (15.295)
Total budget amendment#2 changes $836,468
Budget amendment#3 changes:
Initiative#A-1 Downtown Alliance Parking Token Subsidy (42,000)
Initiative#A-2 GO Bonds Election Costs (42.280)
Initiative#A-5 New Amin Assist Position in Mayor's Office (19,915)
Initiatvie#A-6 Utah Museum Art Exhi (50,000)
Initiative#A-7 Salt Lake Solutions (26,000)
Total budget amendment#3 changes (S180.195)
Estimated Fund balance as of June 30, 2008 $24,728,427
FY2008 Revenues $199,030,640
Percentage of Fund Balance to Revenues 12.42%
Revenue Forecast
Salt Lake City Corporation
FY07/08
Variance FY 07/08 FY 07/08 Variance
Seven Months Seven Months Favorable Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Actuals (Unfavorable) Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Total General Fund 117,094,318 116,746,940 (347,378) 200,674,169 198,259,939 (2,414,230)
Selected Discussion Items
Total Property Taxes 54,082,250 54,598,417 516,167 63,946,017 64,327,885 381,868
Discussion:
Property taxes are showing a slight increase probably due to the
increase in appraised home value or new growth. The County will make
the final settlement at the end of March and we must wait until that time
to firm up these numbers.
Total Sales and Use Tax 20,297,196 20,463,809 166,613 52,857,326 53,000,000 142,674
Discussion:
The sales tax number is slightly up for the first five months of the year,
but we have not seen the December sales numbers yet. Because of
the two month accrual we are looking at just five months for the current
fiscal year.
Total Franchise Tax 12,141,446 13,517,176 1,375,730 25,206,972 25,589,682 382,710
Discussion:
Due to a colder winter and hot summer Questar and Pacific Corp.are
showing an increase.
Total PILOT 900,447 900,447 0 1,025,447 1,025,447 0
Discussion:
Total regulatory 4,129,411 3,644,329 (485,082) 8,062,806 7,420,185 (642,621)
Discussion:
Parking Tax is showing a decrease in the amount of$500,000. This is
due to a an increase in free parking from 30 min to 1 hour at the City
Library. Also a monthly parking fee collected at the Gallivan Center
that Ampco doesn't collect reduced the tax at the Gallivan Center.
License and Permits: 6,831,986 4,967,738 (1,864,248) 11,910,363 9,286,247 (2,624,116)
Discussion:
The City's permits are showing a general overall small decrease and we
are projecting a lower amount from the City Creek Project in the amount
of$3,003,900 this fiscal year.
Total Intergovernmental 939,653 1,145,778 206,125 4,757,678 4,894,482 136,804
Discussion:
Charges and Services 1,733,189 1,661,754 (71,435) 3,084,798 3,249,484 164,686
Discussion:
Total Fines&Forfeiture 4,532,924 4,484,097 (48,827) 8,614,657 8,660,826 46,169
Discussion:
Year end projections for fines and forfeitures indicate that these
revenue will be slightly better than budget primarily due to Justice Court
Fines.
Parking Meters 789,353 887,122 97,769 1,464,000 1,561,769 97,769
Discussion:
Year end projections for parking meter revenue indicates that these
revenues will come in slightly higher due to the bagging of meters in the
down town and gateway areas.
Interest income 2,780,434 2,335,697 (444,737) 5,300,000 4,855,263 (444,737)
Discussion:
This decrease is due to adjustment in the federal reserve rate and the
prime rate. The prime rate has dropped from a high of 8.25%to the
current rate of 6.00%with future decreases expected.
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,983,443 2,135,429 151,986 2443679 2,469,076 25,397
Discussion:
Total Interfund 4,948,948 4,998,496 49,548 9,950,440 9,890,453 (59,987)
Discussion:
Total Transfers 1,003,638 1,006,651 3,013 2,049,986 2,029,140 (20,846)
Discussion:
s.
Fiscal Year 2008 Budget Amendment #3 —April
General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
Section A New Items
1. Downtown Alliance $21,000.00 $21,000.00 RDA is sharing -$21,000.00
Parking Token Subsidy the costs by
funding$21,000.
2. Nov 2007 GO Bond $42,279.92 $42,279.92 -$42,279.92
Election Costs
3. Special Assessment $300,000.00
Sidewalk Replacement
Owners Portion
4. Special Assessment $110,000.00
Sidewalk Replacement
City Portion
5. New Admin Assist $19,915.00 $59,744.00 1.0 $19,915.00 -$19,915.00
Position in Mayor's
Office
6. Utah Museum Art $50,000.00 $50,000.00 -$50,000.00
Exhibit
7. Salt Lake Solutions $26,000.00 $26,000.00 -$26,000.00
8. One Stop Counter $34,050.00 $212,002.00 3.0 $34,050.00 -$34,050.00
(BUZZ) Center Staffing
Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources
Section C Grants For New Staff Resources
Section D Housekeeping
Page 1
General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance -
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
1. Special Revenue Housing $1,591,427.00
Dev. Program Income
2. E-911 Fund $45,768.00
Encumbrance Carryover
3. Special Assessment $61,354.00
Districts Debt Service
4. Youth City Program $36,963.50
Income
5. Recapture CIP and $132,811.81
Impact Fee Completed
and Closed Projects
6. Recapture CDBG, ESG $423,675.25
and HOPWA Completed
and Closed Projects
7. CIP Gladiola St Project -0-
Description Change
Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
1. One Million Trees for $1,000.00
One Million People Grant
2. St of Ut Dept of Pub Sery $258,145.00
0 Metro Medical
Response Sys Grant
3. St of Ut Dept of Pub $2,500.00
Safety—Hazardous
Material Planning Grant
Section F Donations
Page 2
General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative •
Section I Council Added Items
1. Convert Seasonal $14,156.00 $68,000.00 1.0 $14,156.00 -$14,156.00
Employee to Full Time
Employee
2. Central City Community -0- -0- The Council will -0-
Center fund this project
in an amount to-
be-determined,
based on the sale
of the Kiwanis-
Felt Building.
The City's
portion of the
sale proceeds
will be
contributed
towards this
project.
3. Electronic Plan $357,000.00 $357,000.00 -$357,000.00
Submission and Review
Software
Page 3
Initiative Name:
Downtown Alliance Parking Token Subsidy
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Dowritown4illance subm' a request for the use of General Fund Fund Balance in the
amount of$42,000: This subsidy will enable them to continue the Downtown Token Program
through the end of July 2008. The program began in 2003 based on a business plan that it
would receive a City subsidy for the first three years to help it get established, after which the
program was anticipated to be Self-sustaining. In reality, the Alliance had to discount the sale
of the tokens to,participating merchantslbusinesse$to achieve a critical mass of use.
Therefore, the jp 00sirn has not been=able to be self-sustaining. Council approved a $15,000
subsidy last'fiscal Oar. The AllibriCe desires to Maintain the program until a Parking
Management entity:recommended in the draft Downtown Transportation Master Plan is
created to determine if the Token program should be continued as is, modified, or
discontinued. The ruest of$42,000 would provide for printing new points of purchase
Materials, marketing;of the pro ram; minting new tokens and providing a subsidy to
merchants and busses that purchase the token at a reduced rate.
There have been 172,000 tokens}purchased and distributed by the downtown businesses
since the inception of the program. The current usage rate has diminished somewhat for the
past several months since they-are basically operating on an unfunded program.
During the Budget Amendmentpublic hearing held 4/15/08; the City Council appropriated
$21,000 from fund balance with the understanding that the RDA would contribute $21,000.
Initiative#A-1
Do ov Aillan Parklsa Token
Subsidy
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-1 2007-08
Initiative Number L Fiscal Year
Comm Dev Transportation New Item
Department - - Type of Initiative r
Tim Harpst 535-6630
Prepared By _ _ Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ - (21,000.00) - --
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $01
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0 _
Enterprise Fund
- - _ Total - -- -- $0 -- -$0
Other Fund
----
Total 1 $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
_ Expenditure:
Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number Amount
03-11700 2399 $ 21,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: -
-
-
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? _ - N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? - - N/A —
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?, - - - N/A -
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
T
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A -
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-1 -b
Initiative Name:
November 2007 G.O. Bond Election Costs
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-2
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The general obligation bond election related to Proposition 1, funding public safety facilities,
was held November 6, 2007. Related costs incurred by the City for bond counsel services
provided by Chapman and Cutler, LLP as well as the cost of publishing the Notice of Special
Bond Election once per week for four consecutive weeks in the Salt Lake Tribune and the
Deseret Morning News were paid from the non-departmental cost center 09-00800. The cost
of bond counsel services incurred through the election was $23,463.92 and the cost of
publishing the Notice of Special Bond Election was $18,816.00, for a total of $42,279.92.
These costs were not budgeted since they would have been paid from bond proceeds if the
bond election had passed.
It is requested to fund this amount from the General Fund Fund Balance in the amount of
$42,279.92
Note: If another bond election for public safety facilities is held, and the election passes, the
City may be reimbursed for the above mentioned expenses from the resulting bond proceeds.
Initiative#A-2
November 2007 G:O. Bond Election
Costs
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-2 2007-08
Initiative Number j Fiscal Year
Mqmt Sery-Treasurer New'Item
Department j Type of Initiative
Dan Mule' 535-6411
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (42,279.92)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
I 1 I
Total $0 $01
(Internal Service Fund •
Total $0 ! $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
'Other Fund
Total $0! $0
Staffing Impact:
i Requested Number of 0', 01
'Position Title:
� � 1
Initiative#A-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
!09-00800 2825 $ 18,816.00
109-00800 2312 $ 23,463.92
i $ 42,279.92
I ,
Additional Accounting Details:
I
I ,
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? ! N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
I ,
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
!eliminated? N/A
� I
•Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-2-b
Initiative Name:
Sidewalk Replacement SAA, 1100 E. to 1700 E. and 1300 S. to 1700 S. Increase Property
Owners Portion
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
During the FY 07-08 CIP Process, $550,000 was awarded for Sidewalk Replacement, 1100
East to1700 East, ,and 1300 South to 1700 'South Special Assessment Area (SAA). The
property owners portion of the SAA was also-established in the amount of $550,000. These
funds were awarded to design, construct and create the SAA for improvements to include
ADA pedestrian ramps, replacement of trees, and some corner drainage improvements.
This request is to increase the property owners portion of the budget in the amount of
$300,000. This will create adequate budget to receive property owner assessments and
provide for optional driveway and sidewalk work when requested by individual property
owners. Each property owner will pay for the options they request.
Initiative#A-3
Sidewalk Replacement SAA. 1100 E.to
1700 E. and 1300 S.to 1700 S. Increase
Property Owners Portion
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-3 2007-08
j Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Dev Hand New Item
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) ! Positive
!General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
1General Fund
Total $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
1
1
Total] $0' $0!
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
(Other Fund
ICIP 83-08081 $ 300,000.00
I I I
Total', $ 300,000.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title: 1
1 � i
Initiative#A-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-08081 1125 $ 300,000.00
•
1 I
ICI
I I
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
183-08081 2700 $ 300,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
I eliminated? I I N/A
� I i
IDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-3-b
•
Initiative Name:
Sidewalk Replacement SAA, 1100 E. to 1700 E. and 1300 S. to 1700 S. Increase
Reallocation of Budgets
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
During the FY 04-05 CIP Process, $600,000 of was awarded for Sidewalk Replacement,
Sunnyside Ave. to 1300 South, 1500 to 1900 East Special Assessment Area (SAA). These
funds were awarded to design, construct and create the SAA for improvements to include
ADA pedestrian ramps, replacement of trees, and some corner drainage improvements. This
project is complete with a remaining budget of$122,187.11 of CIP funds.
This request is to appropriate, $110,000 from the surplus budget in the sidewalk replacement
special assessment and allocate it to the City's share of the special assessment area - 1100
East to1700 East and 1300 South to1700 South project. This increase will create adequate
City budget to be used in constructing optional driveway and sidewalk work when requested
by individual property owners. The property owner's share of the special assessment area is
addressed in Initiative #A-3 of this budget opening.
The remain surplus in the sidewalk replacement of$12,187.11 will be transferred to the CIP
Fund Balance at a future date.
Initiative#A-4
•
•
Sidewalk Replacement SAA, 1100 E. to
1700 E.and 1300 S.to 1700 S. Increase
Reallocation of Budgets
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-4 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Dev-Hand New Item
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) • Positive
(General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
1
Total] $0 $01
'Internal Service Fund
Total' I $0 $0!
Enterprise Fund
Total $0' $0
Other Fund
Total $0, $01
•
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0, 0
Position Title:
I
•
I
Initiative#A-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
1
•
•
! •
I I I i
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
83-05046 2700 $ (110,000.00)
183-08031 2700 $ 110,000.00
I� I
•
Ali '
! I I
Additional Accounting Details:
•
' I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
i If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
1 Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? NIA
Initiative#A-4-b
Initiative Name:
New Administrative Assistant Position in Mayor's Office
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
One additional FTE to assist in Intergovernmental, Policies and Procedures in the Mayor's
Office.
This position will be responsible for providing professional research policy development
support, and project assistance. It will also be responsible for assisting with front office
reception and constituent response functions. Research sources, collect and tabulate data,
and prepare statistical, informational, legal and financial reports that support thorough
analysis of issues. Survey other local and national jurisdictions and professional
organizations for back up material for various studies and reports.
Additionally, this position will provided confidential administrative and secretarial support to
the Mayor's Office staff. They will answer telephone, greet and screen visitors and provide
assistance in other projects as needed.
Initiative#A-5
I
New Administrative Assistant Position
in Mayor's Office
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 initiative#A-5 2007-08
•
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office I New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Char Sylvester _ 535-7705
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance- I $ (19,915.00)j j
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
I I
TotallI $0 $01
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
!Enterprise Fund
' I
Total, $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
!Requested Number of 01 0
Position Title:
jAministrative Assistant I $ 19,915.00 $ 59,744.00 j
I i
i I
Initiative#A-5-a
I ,
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number ! Object Code Number Amount
I � I
li I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
108-00100 2111-01 $ 13,666.00
08-00100 2191-10 $ 1,045.00
108-00100 2191-15 $ 1,588.00
108-00100 2191-18 $ 211.00
1 08-00100 2195 $ 3,405.00
Total $ 19,915.00
I I I
1
Additional Accounting Details: I
I �
Grant Information:
IGrant funds employee positions? NIA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I 1
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
i •
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? 1 N/A
1 1
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
INon-profit sector? N/A
I I
Initiative#A-5-b
Initiative Name:
Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) World Class Art Exhibit
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) has matured into the leading center for art, culture
and visual arts education in Utah. For decades it has collected gifts of art objects from
prominent Utah families. It is a collection of over 17,000 works of art, spanning 5,000 years of
human creativity, representing over 100 cultures.
The Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) has asked all government agencies, including the U
of U, for contributions to fund this art exhibit.
The World Class Art Exhibit will bring in people from all over the region to visit, which will
increase the revenue to the City and State.
One of the mayor's goal is to support the Arts.
Initiative#A-6
UMFA World Class Art Exhibit
Initiative Name i
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-6 2007-08
Initiative NumberI Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Char Sylvester 535-7705
Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact
(Negative) 1 Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (50,000.00),
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
IGeneral Fund
1
Total $0' $0j
!Internal Service Fund
1
Total i $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
I �
Total $0 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
'Position Title:
•
t � i
Initiative#A-6-a
I , I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
i I I
' ! I
I � I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
08-00100 2580 $ 50,000.00
I I I
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? N/A
� I
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? I N/A
'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
' I
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-6-b
Initiative Name:
Salt Lake Solutions
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
To help establish and facilitate meetings with the program steering committee, and to conduct
project assessments to identify Salt Lake Solutions projects and project managers/facilitators,
a contractor will work with the Office of the Mayor, specifically the Communications Director to
develop the Salt Lake Solutions program. This will include, but not limited to the following
tasks:
Help to establish, and facilitate meetings with the program Steering Committee
Conduct project assessments to identify one or two initial Salt Lake Solutions projects
Act as project manager/facilitator for the initial Salt Lake Solutions projects
Develop mechanism for soliciting, and criteria for selecting, additional Salt Lake Solutions
projects
Develop and provide training for City staff on principles of collaborative government, and
the Salt Lake Solutions programs
Be available for coaching and mentoring to City staff as they implement collaborative
government and the Salt lake Solutions programs
Assisting drafting communication materials about the Salt Lake Solutions program
The contract will be for six months with renewable and renegotiable terms.
Initiative#A-7
Salt Lake Solutions
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-7 2007=08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office New item
Department I Type of Initiative
Char Sylvester 535-7705
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
;General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (26,000.00),
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total) $0 $01
i Internal Service Fund
Total'i $0' $0
Enterprise Fund
i I
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
Total' $0 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0; 0
Position Title:
1 I
I II
I I
1 i
Initiative#A-7-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
1 ,
i l
I I
I !
Expenditure:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
108-00100 2324 1 1 $ 26,000.00 1
1
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: •
:Grant funds employee positions? I NIA
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
(Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? N/A
•
Initiative#A-7-b
Initiative Name:
One Stop Counter (BUZZ) Center Staffing
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #A-8
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
eorgan'la � ion focuses off :
•Improving customer ice,
•Commitment thong range planing,
•Enhancement of the public process through support for boards and commissions,and
•Ordinance review and process resolution.
This budget y ' '.. . fQr" these objectives n by. i
dig a One-Stop
customer service " :,the Buzz Orton., Buz r operation,i*'rtit Building
Services as a part of�.Planning ° r • ati e" _ March,hagi proven that.cOstomers are better
served in a consolidated operation The Planner of the y(POD)system,previously used by Planing
to meet customer service needs used an estimated -2 of the planners'time. The Buzz Center also
allows the Planning Division to fails on the other three objectives.with less interruption,increasing
operational efficiency. We anticipate thati4141diugServices staff w l experience'similar heightened
efficiency as the BuzZ.Centerminimizes interruptions-to Plan Review and Permit sta'
The purpose of the Buzz Center is two fold:to assist the apre-appl ca nt customer and to advise
customers on planning applications; Buzz Center staff assist the pre-applicant customer with general
information and direction regarding a wide array of planning and building projects., Information
shared with the customer is documented(with a copy given to thecustomer)throughthrough=in-house
database. With the launch of the*mils software,this customer intake informationdon will be stored in
that new system.
Initiative#A-8
The second purpose of the Buzz Cater is to receive and,advise custtmerson planning applications
and/or planning processes appropriate for their project. Prior to the Buzz Center mot project,
customers often had to visit both Sae Planning Dal on on the 4th floor,as well as the Building
Services Division on the 2nd`floor in order to receive assistance. Many customers made multiple trips
to each floor on a profit,0#en inadvertently reuniting in confusion and m is nformation. The
Buzz Center prow idescwtomers with the opportunity to receive inputon land use regulations as well
as building permits in one location.
Durinng March 2008, 5 additional customers visited Room 215 as compared tnMareh 2007. The
significant chnge is a result of the addition of he Buzz Center in eaSly March ,sopS, This has
provided real time in ormati on about the demands on staff time required to fulfill customers'needs,as.
veil as customers' . ive.rep to the Buzz Center Overwhelmingly,customers have responded
Positively to ihe itOnlifAdated Buss center and their ability to get clearer,more concisiinformation
and ass star
The pilot Buzz has been functioning with current staffing. However,the consequence to the
Planning Dives , the lo4s of personnel vital r completion of other key functions. Building
�has ' �* t etc the pilot Buzz Center,
r,resulting in ncar.-easing turn around times due
to staff reso �u far the fuzz Center. requested w will restore previous staffing
levels and .,, divisions' . ,i :t ' .. , rkfocused on
aOnnitted PM. iav+ a „ { and t ;and other denitilled City
Priorities- A ino 41 ,f, 4 e studratiout work a fi i could be eon&cted during this next year.
To operate eff and allowcqrrentsta to f + their-regular assignment assignments,lbree Firs are
requested:two Pri,n441'P to n;d a a t hew Plainer I, The*an;benefits,and
ongoing equipment Costs for, Plannersthee is a to 6,701`each,in " �and
benefits,plus a one time cost of$.��. a.peach for office set- . The Peyelepuieut:fevjew Planner I is
anticipated to cost$58,600,includingsalary and benefits plus a one time cost of 750 for a cubicle.
Jr
Initiative#A-8
t igiUZZ Cindy
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#A-8 ' 2007.08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Development New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Orion Goff 535-6681
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) - Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- j $ (34,050.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
--- - Total -- - - $0 i $OI- ---
Internal Service Fund j
Total r $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Requested Number of 3 0
Position Title: fi
2- Principal Planners - --
1- Plans Examiner
Initiative#A-8-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount - -
06-00500 2100 $ 16,800.00
06-00500 2700 $ 17,250.00
$ 34,050.00
--
Additional Accounting Details: One Month Cost Full Year Costs
Planners $ 10,700.00 $ 153,402.00
Examiner $ 6,100.00 $ 58,600.00
$ 16,800.00 $ 212,002.00_
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? _ - N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-8-b
•
Initiative Name:
Special Revenue Housing Development Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Housing Section of Housing and Neighborhood Development (HAND) has generated
program income from principal and interest payments received from borrowers. The Council
usually appropriates this program income in the House Section to fund additional loans. It is
requested that the Council once again appropriates this program income to fund additional
loans for use by the Housing Section in its Renter Rehabilitation, CDBG and Home Programs.
This will allow additional loans to the citizens of Salt Lake City.
Initiative#D-1
!
Special Revenue Housing
Development Program Income
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-1 2007-08
1 Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mgmt Sery-Finance Housekeeping
Department I Type of Initiative
Elwin=Heilmann 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) j Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0' $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0' $01i
Enterprise Fund
78 Housing Loans Fund $ 1,151,427.00
•
Total I $ 1,151,427.00 : $0
!Other Fund
171 CDBG Operating Fund $ 440,000.00
Total $ 440,000.00 $0j
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0! 0
'Position Title: I
I I
I I
I I I
Initiative#D-1 -a
i I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number i Amount
78-00201 Renter Rehab. 1305 $ 171,111.00
78-33010 CDBG Loans 1974-03 ' $ 440,000.00
78-78325 Home Prog. Income 1305 $ 540.316.00
:Total Enterprise ! $ 1,151,427.00
71-32010 CDBG Housing Loans 1310 $ 440,000.00
Total Special Revenue i $ 440,000.00
I I I
I C
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
78-00201 Renter Rehab. I 2950 $ 171,111.00
'78-33010 CDBG Loans 2950 $ 440,000.00
78-78325 Home Prog. Income 2950 $ 540,316.00
I I
Total Enterprise $ 1,151,427.00
71-32010 CDBG Housing Loans 'i 2910-15 $ 440,000.00
'Total Special Revenue $ 440,000.00 II
I ' I
Additional Accounting Details:
For Accounting Purposes Only:
•
Because there are Balance Sheet postings in these transactions we are including a positive amount
in object code 2910-71 and a negative amount in object code 2950 in the same cost center 78-00101
in this budget opening. I I
Grant Information: j
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? • NIA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?I N/A
!Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
•
!Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? I I N/A
• j
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or •
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-1 -b
•
Initiative Name:
E-911 Fund Encumbrance Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Establishing a budget for the encumbrances in the E-911 Fund as of 6/30/07
The carryover contracts are: first Qwest Communication in the amount of $8,295 for
enhancements on the 911 system, auto ID and Location ID. The second one is with Qwest
Enterprise America Inc. for $37,473 for the Orion Mapstar System for dispatch.
Initiative#D-2
•
E-911 Fund Encumbrance Carryover
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 initiative#D-2 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By ; Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0, $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0,
Enterprise Fund
1
Total r $0 so
Other I
Total $0i $0,
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
I I
I I
i II
1 I
i I
Initiative#D-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
I t
I I,
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
160-00620 2700 $ 45,768.00
1
Additional Accounting Details:
1
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
I I
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? I N/A
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-2-b
Initiative Name:
Special Assessment Districts Debt Service
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2007A, SID number 106018 (9th & 9th) and Series
2007B, SID numbers 102109 (Strong's Ct) and 102129 (Fenway Avenue) were issued in
August of 2007, during fiscal year 2008. During fiscal year 2008, debt service payments for
these two series of bonds falls on December 1,2007 and June 1, 2008. Expenditures for
these costs were not included in the FY 2008 budget since the amounts were not known at
the time of budget development. As such, we need to amend the budget to allow for the debt!
service payments to be made during this fiscal year.
The property owners will be assessed the payment amount.
Initiative#D-3
Special Assessment Districts Debt
Service
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mgmt Sery-Treasurer Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Randy Hillier/"Dan Mule' 535-6641 1535-6411
Prepared By ( Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0 $0,
IInternal Service Fund
Total $01 $0
I Enterprise Fund
I '
Total $0 $0
(Other Fund
ISID Fund 20 $ 61,354.00
Total ! $ 61,354.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
!Requested Number of 0; 0
Position Title:
Initiative#D-3-a
I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
20-06018 1125 ' $ 45,432.00
120-02109 1125 $ 8,917.00
'20-02129 1125 $ 7,005.00
$ 61,354.00
I
i I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number • I Amount
,20-06018 I 2811 $ 34,000.00
20-06018 2821 i $ 11,432.00
20-02109 2811 $ 6,720.00
'20-02109 2821 $ 2,197.00
i I
120-02129 2811 I $ 5,280.00
120-02129 ' 2821 $ 1,725.00
I I $ 61,354.00
j i I
Additional Accounting Details:
I j
I i
1
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? N/A
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
!Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? i N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or •
Non-profit sector? I N/A
Initiative#D-3-b
, .
111 $376,000 -Salt Lake City, Utah
Special Assessment Bonds
Special Improvement District#C-106018
(900 South, 900 East Streetscape Upgrade), Series 2007A(Zions Non-callable)
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l Fiscal Total
08/28/2007 - - -
12/01/2007'� - - 3,894.31EV" 3,894.32✓ -
06/01/2008 34,000.00 3.770% 7,537.40 41,537.40 45,431.72
12/01/2008 - - 6,896.50 6,896.50 -
06/01/2009 31,000.00 3.840% 6,896.50 , 37,896.50 44,793.00
12/01/2009 - - 6,301.30 6,301.30 -
06/01/2010 33,000.00 3.880% 6,301.30 39,301.30 45,602.60
12/01/2010 - - 5,661.10 5,661.10 -
06/01/2011 34,000.00 3.910% 5,661.10 39,661.10 45,322.20
12/01/2011 - - 4,996.40 4,996.40 -
06/01/2012 36,000.00 3.960% 4,996.40 40,996.40 45,992.80
12/01/2012 - - 4,283.60 4,283.60 -
06/01/2013 38,000.00 4.010% 4,283.60 42,283.60 46,567.20
12/01/2013 - - 3,521.70 3,521.70 -
06/01/2014 40,000.00 4.060% 3,521.70 43,521.70 47,043.40
12/01/2014 - - 2,709.70 2,709.70 -
06/01/2015 41,000.00 4.110% 2,709.70 43,709.70 46,419.40
12/01/2015 - - 1,867.15 1,867.15 -
06/01/2016 43,000.00 4.170% 1,867.15 44,867.15 46,734.30
12/01/2016 - - 970.60 970.60 -
06/01/2017 46,000.00 4.220% 970.60 46,970.60 47,941.20
Total $376,000.00 - $85,847.82 $461,847.62 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $2,103.13
Average Life 5.593 Years
Average Coupon 4.0819010%
Net Interest Cost(NIC) 4.1532231%
True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.1604769%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0775983%
All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 4.9254132%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.0819010%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.593 Years
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
F9e I SID 2007.SF I SID C-106018 9th 8 9th No I 8272007 I 10:51 AM
Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC
Public Finance Page 3
. ._ _.
$129,000 -Salt Lake-City, Utah—
Special Assessment Bonds
Reconstruction Special Improvement District(Zions Non-Callable)
#C-102109 (Strongs Court) and#C-102129 (Fenway Avenue), Series 2007B
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
08/28/2007 v. _ 1,335.89-�- 1,335.89 ✓ -
- - -
12/01/2007
06/01/2008 12,000.00 3.770% 2,585.60 14,585.60 15,921.49
12/01/2008 - - 2,359.40 2,359.40 -
06/01/2009 11,000.00 3.840% 2,359.40 13,359.40 15,718.80
12/01/2009 - - 2,148.20 2,148.20 -
06/01/2010 11,000.00 3.880% 2,148.20 13,148.20 15,296.40
12/01/2010 - - 1,934.80 1,934.80 -
06/01/2011 12,000.00 3.910% 1,934.80 13,934.80 15,869.60
12/01/2011 - - 1,700.20 1,700.20 -
06/01/2012 12,000.00 3.960% 1,700.20 13,700.20 15,400.40
12/01/2012 - - 1,462.60 1,462.60 -
06/01/2013 13,000.00 4.010% 1,462.60 14,462.60 15,925.20
12/01/2013 - - 1,201.95 1,201.95 -
06/01/2014 13,000.00 4.060% 1,201.95 14,201.95 15,403.90
12/01/2014 - - 938.05 938.05 -
06/01/2015 14,000.00 4.110% 938.05 14,938.05 15,876.10
12/01/2015 - - 650.35 650.35 -
06/01/2016 15,000.00 4.170% 650.35 15,650.35 16,300.70
12/01/2016 - - 337.60 337.60 -
06/01/2017 16,000.00 4.220% 337.60 16,337.60 16,675.20
Total $129,000.00 - $29,387.79 $158,387.79 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $719.83
Average Life 5.580 Years
Average Coupon 4.0826298%
Net Interest Cost(NIC) 4.2215525%
True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.2401813%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0782639%
All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 6.0185470%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.0826298%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.580 Years
rent Lel%
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
File I SID 2007.SF I SID C-102109 8 C102129 No I 8/27/2007 1 10:52 AM
Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC
Public Finance Page 3
SID 106018 12/1/2007 Pmt 6/1/2008 Pmt Payment Totals
SID 106018 Principal $0.00 $34,000.00 $34,000.00
SID 106018 Interest $3,894.33 $7,537.40 $11,431.73
SID 106018 Payment Totals $3,894.33 $41,537.40 $45,431.73
SIDs 102109 & 102129 12/1/2007 Pmt 6/1/2008 Pmt Payment Totals
SID 102109 Principal (56%) $0.00 $6,720.00 $6,720.00
SID 102109 Interest (56%) $748.11 $1,447.94 $2,196.05
SID 102109 Subtotals $748.11 $8,167.94 $8,916.05
ISID 102129 Principal (44%) $0.00 $5,280.00 $5,280.00
SID 102129 Interest (44%) 587.80 1137.66 $1,725.46
SID 102129 Subtotals $587.80 $6,417.66 $7,005.46
SIDs 102109 & 102129 Grand Totals $1,335.91 $14,585.60 $15,921.51
Initiative Name:
Youth City Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Youth City programs funded under the US Department of Education grant have received
$36,963.50 of program income generated from fees received for services provided at
Fairmont Cottage, Ottinger Hall, and Liberty Park YouthCity sites. Federal regulations require
that program income generated while grant funds still remain, be allocated back into the
program and that program income be spent before the grant funds. During the period this
program was received, Youth City still had grant funding available.
This request establishes additional budget needed to meet the existing cash available and
allows the program income to be reallocated back into the individual programs for continued
programming.
initiative#D-4
•
Youth City Program income
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-4 2007-08
Initiative Number j [ Fiscal Year
'Publice Services Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf!,Sherrie Collins 535-4210/535-6150
Prepared By ; Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
:General Fund - Fund Balance-
; Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
;General Fund
Total fi $0: $0
!Internal Service Fund
I i I
Total $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund I
Total $0 $0
;Other Fund
72 Fund $ 36,963.50
Total $ 36,963.50 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 01 0
Position Title:
� I
Initiative#D-4-a
•
I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
172-67002 1350 $ 14,905.00
i72-67003 1350 $ 7,093.50 !I
72-67004 1350 $ 14,965.00
I I I
'Total $ 36,963.50
j I I
I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I I Object Code Number Amount
72-66006 2590 $ 36,963.50
' I
I I
1
I ! I
Additional Accounting Details:
� � I
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A 1,
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
j
IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
,
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
'Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-4-b
Initiative Name:
Recapture CIP and Impact Fee Completed and Closed Projects
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-5
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets of nine(9) completed and closed General,
Class "C" and Impact Fee CIP Projects, totaling $132,811.81 and increases the fund balance
accounts of the respective program for future reprogramming.
Of these projects, seven (7) are CIP totaling $70,306.95; one (1) is Class "C" totaling
$43,063.58; and one is Impact Fee totaling $19,441.28 which will be returned to the Parks
Impact Fee fund balance.
Initiative#D-5
Recapture CIP and Impact Fee
Completed and Closed Projects
• Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-5 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Dev- Hand Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) j Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
(General Fund
I � i
Total $0' $0
(Internal Service Fund
Total) $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total] $01 $0
I I I
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 01 0
Position Title:
) I
I I
I I
I I
?
Initiative#D-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
' I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
CIP
83-03071 Legacy District 1 2700 $ (12,798.80)1
83-03073 Legacy District 3 2700 $ (1,766.39)1
83-03075 Legacy District 5 2700 $ (196.05)1
83-03077 Legacy District 7 1 2700 $ (5,281.02)
183-05023 Fenway/Strong 2700 $ (31,076.94)1
183-06075 Jordan Trail Lighting 2700 $ (13,908.80)
83-98013 Rotary Glen Master Plan 2700 $ (5,278.95),
183-07099 CIP Fund Balance 2700 $ 70,306.95
Class"C' 1
83-07037 900 South 2700 $ (43,063.58)1
83-04097 Class"C"Fund Balance 2700 $ 43,063.58
Impact Fee
,84-05002 Jordan River Lighting 2700 $ (19,441.28)1
184-84843 Impact Fee Parks Fund Balanc 2700 $ 19,441.28
Additional Accounting Details:
,II
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? _ N/A
;Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-5-b
•
Initiative Name:
Recapture CDBG, ESG and HOPWA Completed and Closed Projects
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-6
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets of thirty-six (36) completed and/or closed US
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs and projects, totaling
$423,675.25, and increases the Fund Balance accounts of the same program and year. Of
these programs/projects, thirty-one (31) are both public service and CIP Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs/projects totaling $408,373.85; two (2) are
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) programs totaling $4,449.33; and three (3) are Housing
Opportunities for People with Aids (HOPWA) programs totaling $10,852.07.
Remaining funds are recaptured when projects/programs that have been completed or have
not spent funds within the allotted timeframe. HUD requirements mandate that the
recaptured funds be returned within their respective programs for future reprogramming.
These recaptured funds will be re-allocated as part of the 08-09 CDBG funding process.
Initiative#D-6
I
Recapture CDBG,ESG and HOPWA
Completed and Closed Projects
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-6 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm m Dev-Hand Housekeeping
Department ! Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) j Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact •
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0,
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
I Enterprise Fund
Total $01 $0
Other Fund
Total'1 C $0i $0
Staffing Impact:
I Requested Number of 0 0
I Position Title:
•
i I
I � I
Initiative#D-6-a
•
I 1 I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
! Cost Center Number Object Code Number ': Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71-20015 Heritage Foundation 2700 $ (66,665.04)1
I71-20098 20th Yr CDBG Fund Balance 2700 $ 66,665.04 .
71-27013 HAND Lead Based Paint 2700 $ (14,550.00)'
71-27056 Westminster Small Plan 2700 $ (3,955.00)
171-27099 27th Yr CDBG Fund Balance ' 2700 $ 18,505.00
71-30015 SLC CDC Acquisition/Rehab 2700 $ (27,290.00)1
71-30066 Wasatch Plunge Study I 1 2700 ' $ (429.94)i
j71-30099 30th Yr CDBG Fund Balance ' 2700 $ 27,719.94
71-31015 SLC CDC Acquisition/Rehab $ (75,000.00)1
71-31018 Capitol West Boys/Girls $ (1,171.00)1
71-31031 Weigand Homeless Day Care 2700 $ (2,210.03)
,71-31037 Mobile Neighborhood Watch I 2700 $ (366.92)
'71-31045 Utah Alcohol Foundation 1 $ (2,592.00)1
71-31052 CCS-Admin Bldg/Parking Lot $ (9,900.00)
71-31058 CSC-Generator 2700 $ (62,982.00)
71-31059 Odyssey House-Boiler 1 2700 i $ (34,654.00)1
71-31060 Salvation Army- Dock/Kitchen $ (958.64)'
183-06057 100%Sidewalk Replacement 1 $ (547.85)
183-06062 ADA Park Improvements $ (3,964.54)
;71-31099 31st Yr CDBG Fund Balance $ 189,834.59
83-06098 31st Yr CIP CDBG Fund Balance $ 4,512.39 1
i71-32011 Assist $ (63,596.07)
j71-32012 NHS ! 1 $ (1.00)
j71-32014 SLC CDC 1 $ (1.12)
71-32019 Marillac House 1 $ (10,000.00)
j71-32034 Guadalupe Early Learning i 1 $ (1.00)1
'71-32037 Mobile Neighborhood Watch 1 $ (101.82)1
71-32038 YMCA After School Program 1 $ (1,934.76)1
,71-32040 English Skills Learning Center $ (0.40)1
171-32041 Somali Community Development $ (582.78)1
71-32044 SLC School District $ (5,000.00)1
.71-32045 Utah Alcohol Foundation $ (2,700.00)1
171-32053 CCS-St Vincent 1 $ (3,342.15)'
71-32055 Alliance House 1 $ (3,180.00)1
[71-32061 Liberty Wells Historic Dist $ (850.00)1
83-07052 Stewart St.-Construction $ (9,845.79)1
71-32099 32nd Tr CDBG Fund Balance $ 91,291.10
83-07098 32nd Yr CDBG Fund Balance $ 9,845.79 !
72-60722 CCS Marillac House I $ (3,282.63)1
72-60723 CCS Weigand • $ (1,166.70)
72-60829 ESG Fund Balance $ 4,449.33
72-60734 West Valley HA j $ (191.94)
72-60736 Kenyon Consulting $ (938.00),
72-60731 CAP I $ (9,722.13)
Initiative#D-6-b
•
72-60739 HOPWA Fund Balance $ 10,852.07
j I I
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? N/A
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-6-b
•
Initiative Name:
CIP Gladiola Street - 900 So. To California Ave. - Project Description Change
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #D-7
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Gladiola Street Project - 900 South to California Ave. (1330 So.), was allocated $250,000
of Class "C" funds and $250,000 of Impact Fee funds during the FY 06 CIP Process. These
funds were awarded to construct improvements on Gladiola Street, from 900 South to
California Ave.
Ninigret Technology has submitted subdivision plans to construct the section of Gladiola from
1530 South to the south side of the City-owned Lee drain, at approximately 1660 South. This
budget amendment request is to change the current description of the project to extend the
improvements from California Ave. South to 2100 South to allow the roadway to be
constructed across the Lee Drain, opening Gladiola from 900 to 2100 South.
This request is to change the project description only. No budget adjustments are required at
this time.
A, I , I
Initiative#D-7
•
CIP Gladiola Street-900 So.To
California Ave.- Project Description
Change
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#D-7 2007-08
Initiative Number ' Fiscal Year
Comm Dev-Hand • Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total! $0 $0,
Enterprise Fund
I �
Total', $0'' $0',
!Other Fund I
I I
Total; $0 $01
Staffing Impact:
(Requested Number of 0! 0
Position Title:
I ! I
I II
li
Initiative#D-7-a
•
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
� I
I i �
I I �
I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number • Amount
' I
I i
� I I
Additional Accounting Details: I
i I
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? • N/A
I I
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
IWill grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
•
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
IDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#D-7-b
•
Initiative Name:
One Million Trees for One Million People Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #E-1
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Salt Lake County Council has approved Resolution Number 4095 authorizing execution of the
Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake County for its Open Space Program and Salt Lake City- One
Million Trees for One Million People Project- EH 07144
This is a pass through grant from the State to the County then to the City to purchase the trees.
Salt Lake County has been awarded a $10,000 Community Forestry Grant for its One Million Trees for
One Million People Initiative. The County will grant Salt Lake City up to $1,000.00 to purchase trees
under this grant program.
The term of the agreement is August 1, 2007 to July 31, 2008.
Initiative#E-1
One Million Trees for One Million
People Grant
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#E-1 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Publice Services Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
I � f
Total $0 $01
Internal Service Fund
Total! $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total i $0' $0',
Other Fund
72 Fund $ 1,000.00
Total $ 1,000.00 $0j
I I I
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0 0
I Position Title:
II �
Initiative#E-1 -a
•
I I �
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1398 $ 1,000.00
� I i
i I
� i l
I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72-New Cost Center 2276 $ 1,000.00
j I
Additional Accounting Details:
' � I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NO
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NO
,If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? YES
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NO
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? YES
Initiative#E-1-b
•
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - Dept Pub Sery - Metropolitan Medical Response System Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #E-2
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department applied for and received $258,145 from the State of Utah, Department
of Public Services, under the Homeland Security Metropolitan Medical Response (MMRS)
grant program. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions across the County to
plan and implement a medical response mechanism in the event of a mass casualty or a
weapons of mass destruction terrorist attack.
The SLC Fire Department is the lead agency partnering with local health, police, fire,
hospitals, ambulance and other agencies who make up the MMRS team.
The Fire Department will use $50,000 of these funds to purchase equipment and $12,000 will
be used to provide a training/drill exercise for jurisdictions valley wide; $98,145 will be
awarded to local hospitals to purchase equipment and for their costs associated with
participating in the training/drill exercise; $2,000 will be awarded to the Salt Lake Valley
Health Department for their costs associated with participating in the training/drill exercise;
$6,000 will be awarded to Southwest Ambulance to purchase an Automated Vehicle Locator
(AVL) System; and $90,000 will be used to pay for the two contract personnel who provide
pharmaceutical oversight and clerical duties required by the Fire Department in order to
disburse pharmaceuticals and provide grant related management.
There is no required match.
Initiative#E-2
j
State of Utah -Dept Pub Sery-
Metropolitan Medical Response
System Grant
i Initiative Name j
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#E-2 j 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Fire Staff Resources
Department j j Type of Initiative
John Vuvk I Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund •
I I j i
I I
Total $01 $0
IInternal Service Fund
•
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
i I
Total $0 $0j
Other Fund
72 Fund $ 258,145.00
Total $ 258,145.00 $0j
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
I Position Title:
�I I
' I
Initiative#E-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 07-LEPT-MMRS-001 -97.067
Revenue:
Cost Center Number ! Object Code Number Amount
;72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 258,145.00
•
I I !
� I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
!72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 258,145.00
! I
I t
Additional Accounting Details:
i •
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? I NO
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? YES
I I
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? YES
I
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? YES
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
I I
Initiative#E-2-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - Dept Pub Safety - LEPC Hazardous Materials Planning Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #E-3
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Office of Emergency Management receives this annual grant from the State of Utah,
Department of Public Safety. It is awarded to jurisdictions to perform hazard analysis and
develop or update local emergency plans which includes integrating the SLC LEPC plans and
activities into Region II Hazmat and emergency response planning, create community
awareness program for hazardous materials, sustain development efforts, integrate local
LEPC planning, training and exercises into support of Utah Region II hazardous materials
planning, perform needs assessment for early alert and warning system and integrate the
hazardous materials transportation and storage into all hazards emergency management and
homeland security activities.
There is no required match.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and
any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-3
State of Utah -Dept Pub Safety-LEPC
Hazardous Materials Planning Grant
! Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#E-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Publice Services Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Mike Stever/Sherrie Collins 535-6030/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
;General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
(General Fund
Total) $0 $0'1
Internal Service Fund
Total I $0 $01
!Enterprise Fund '
Total) $0 I $0
Other Fund
72 Fund $ 2,500.00
Total $ 2,500.00 1 $0
I I I
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
I I i
Initiative#E-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: DES-2008-LEPC-SLC-20.703
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
. 72-New Cost Center i 1370 $ 2,500.00
� I
� I
I I
I I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
,72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 2,500.00
i I
I
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
ii
Grant Information:
;Grant funds employee positions? NO
Is there a potential for grant to continue? YES
� I
I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? YES
I � I
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
leliminated? YES
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? INO
I
Initiative#E-3-b
Initiative Name:
Convert Seasonal Employee to Full Time Employee
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #I-1
Initiative Type:
Council Added Item
Initiative Discussion:
The staffing for the Council Office currently includes a seasonal employee land-use policy
analyst. Due to the number of*tad-use issues the Council is dealing with, the Council Office
is in need of adcitibral support in'this area. This request will Convert the existing seasonal
employee to a full time position T The funding needed for this request for the remainder of this
fiscal year is $14,158. The funding source is the general fund Fund Balance. The total salary
and benefits for the full year is $68,000.
Initiative#I-1
1
Convert a m*OntOloveo to Full
Time r n)lovee
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 initiative#1-1 _ _ 2007.08
Initiative Number - - Fiscal Year
Council _ Council Added item
Department - Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared By - -- - - Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (14,156.00) --
Impact - - - -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0� -
Internal Service Fund
Total l $0 $0 I'I
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0.40 0
Position Title:
Land-use Policy Analyst I-
- --
Initiative#I-1 -a
•
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
19-00100 2100 $ 14,156.00
Additional Accounting Details: -
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?-7 N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#I-1 -b
Initiative Name:
Central City Community Center
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #I-2
Initiative Type:
Council Added Item
Initiative Discussion:
The City Councilusly y ; b; for contributing $1 milrionlo the-Central City
Community Ceritiii.4 This moneyould=be o rbiwith o sy the County that has -
f`.
budgeted for n ' repairs and.=r'enO ns at-the Center. Per en E-mail from Erin Litvack,
the Department Director for the County's Community Services, the County has budgeted
$3.14 for the project, and the proposed list of improvements could include:
The original sco of the Centl City CommunityCenter remotion projectfor$3.16 ink
the following:
Upgrade form alarm system
Upgrade/replace plumbing
Upgrade HVAC system
Repair roof
Asbestos abatement
Renovate restrooms
Add fire sprinkler system
enlarge fitness area
ADA Compliance
An additional $1 million would contribute towards additional upgrades, such as:
Interior flooring repcement
Painting
Additional interior renovations t a open things up or reconfigure the space
New office furnishings and equipment
New locker rowel (with upgraded r trooms)
Upgraded kitchen facilities
New windows and window coverings
Outdoor improvements could include:
Initiative#I-2
•
playground equipment
Parking lot resurface (possible ',expansion/alterations)
Signage
Outdoor seating/picnic area
Note:
No cost projections for these individual items at this time
Priorities for the 'ist=could be established by the project development team and the operator
(SLC, Community representative could be part of the team)
Ms. Litvack wrote;f."not mentioned overall is the opportunity to pursue new market tax credits,
based on our cohac,iitants:profections we could receive additional funding et approximately
30% based on tie « •ject budget. In other words it the project remains at$.1 million we
will attempt to get uA 0,000 additional for the project bringing the total budget to about $4.1
million. If we st tat$4.16 million (CountyOils Solt Lake City Corp contribution)that
ihererases to$1;, tilion addObpal to the Project bringing the total project budget to about
$15.4 million `The more funding e have in total,the, more'lteirls on the list We can
accomplish Eitithig the AApri1lt5°th public hearing, the:City-Council agreed to fund this
project in an amountto•be-determined at a later time. It is the Intent of the Council that
the Administri move forward with the Bale of the Klwanis»Felt Building, and that the
City's portion of the sale pro4.eds be contributed to Salt Lake County for the Central
City Community Center project. (in other word$, this is a placeholder.)=
Initiative#I-2
Central CitvCoiri unity Center
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY200 It tlaltive.#I-2 2007-08
Initiative Number - - Fiscal Year r
Council Council Added Item
Department Type of Initiative
Lehua Weaver _ 535-7653
Prepared By Telephone Contact -- -
(Negative) - Positive -
General Fund - Fund Balance- $
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund _ f
Total $0 $0,
Internal Service Fund
-- -- Total, i $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
$0
--it $0r -
Other Fund
- _ - - Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0,
t-
Position Title: i -
}
Initiative#I-2-a
•
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number - Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Additional Accounting Details:
}
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
- T _
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#I-2-b
•
Initiative Name:
Electronic Plan Submission and Review Software
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative #I-3
Initiative Type:
Council Added Item
Initiative Discussion:
The City C4t.u*4‘kkas received comments from:the development community regarding
the inconvenie1re,of the Cit 's inability to accept electronic plans for review. The
City has been:supportive of Moving in the policy direction of implementing the One-
Stop Shop/Buzz Center and providing electronic tools to assist with coordination
among the departments.
The Council Chair and Vice Chair were made aware of this interest and wanted to
bring this item to the attention of the full Council. Additional information will be
provided by the Administration on April 8th during the budget amendment
discussion.
The electronic plan (ePlan) submission and review software is one component that
was not purchased as part of the Accela program. This purchase would stream-line
the City's review processes. Other benefits of the ePlan software include reducing
paper storage and paper consumption. Electronic plan submission and plan check
availability will;allow citizens, contractors, and developers to upload their projects to
the City 24 hours a day, 7 dflys a week. Plan check and re-submittal of drawings
would be handled electronically.
Initiative#I-3
•
Elect* ?bin Sutprission and
Review Software
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2008 Initiative#1-3 _ 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Council Added Item
Department j Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (357,000.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
— ---- Total $0 $0,
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund -
Total $0 $0
•
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
f
- -
Initiative#I-3-a
•
•
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
-- L
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
06-00500 - -y 2321-01 - $ 357,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
—
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? _ N/A - --
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the rant. N/A
grant?
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or -
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#I-3-b