019 of 1992 - Vacating a portion of an alley running north to south Adjacent to 620 East Hollywood, pursuant to PeSTATE OF UTAH,
City and County of Salt Lake,
I Anisa Brown
{
1
ss.
Deputy
52 19°6 10
20 MARCH 92 03:15 PM
KATIE L.: DIXON
RECORDER, SALT LAKE t:sUNYr UTAH
SL CITY RECORDER
REC BY: REBECCA GRAY DEPUTY
, City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby
certify that the attached document is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance 19 of 1992,
,Yaoatin€;, Q•.P9rti.on of qn. a119y V nning' north to south.. P•Cli cent, to, 620, East, Hollyiaood,
.pursua.vt.to.Petitio .No..4007986-92,
6, VED
MAY.1.2.19P,
crry rlrr �pnrr.
passed by City Council/Executive Action of Salt Lake City, Utah, Larch. i 7 19.92 .
as appears of record in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said City,
this 19tb. day of March 19. 92.
Deputy City Recorder
Published ....March. 25 19.92 .
01 COd8n919
0 92-1
P 92-30
Affects Sidwell Numbers:
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 19 of 1992
(Vacating a portion of an alley running
north to south adjacent to 620 East Hollywood,
pursuant to Petition No. 400-986-92)
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY RUNNING NORTH TO
SOUTH ADJACENT TO 620 EAST HOLLYWOOD, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-
986-92.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after
public hearing that the City's interest in an alley running north
to south adjacent to 620 East Hollywood described below is not
necessary for use by the public as an alley and that vacation of
said alley will not be adverse to the general public's interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt
LakE City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That a portion of an alley running north to south
adjacent to 620 East Hollywood, which is the subject of Petition
No. 400-986-92 and which is more particularly described below, be,
and the same hereby is, VACATED and declared no longer to be needed
or available for use as an alley.
Said alley is more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 23, Block 1,
Rosedale Addition; thence south 130 feet to the Southeast
}corner of Lot 27; thence east 16 feet to the Southwest
corner of Lot 22; thence north 130 feet to the Northwest
corner of Lot 22; thence west 16 feet to the point of
beginning.
co
CO
c°�
SECTION 2. RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. The above vacation
is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights -of -way and
easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of the property and also
SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of
maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said
utilities, including the City's water and sewer facilities, and all
of them. Said vacation is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights -of -
way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become
effective on the date of its first publication and shall be
recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
`',-fir' day of
ATTEST:
CI "RED R
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's action:
ATTEST:
-2-
, 1992.
Z 1 COOd8 9/9
BILL NO. 19 OF 1992.
Published: March 25, 1992 .
BRB:rc
0 92-1
P 92-30
Affects Sidwell Numbers:
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 19 of 1992
(Vacating a portion of an alley running
north to south adjacent to 620 East Hollywood,
I pursuant to Petition No. 400-986-92)
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY RUNNING NORTH TO
SOUTH ADJACENT TO 620 EAST HOLLYWOOD, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-
986-92.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after
public hearing that the City's interest in an alley running north
to south adjacent to 620 East Hollywood described below is not
necessary for use by the public as an alley and that vacation of
said alley will not be adverse to the general public's interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt
LakE City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That a portion of an alley running north to south
adjacent to 620 East Hollywood, which is the subject of Petition
No. 400-986-92 and which is more particularly described below, be,
and the same hereby is, VACATED and declared no longer to be needed
or available for use as an alley.
Said alley is more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 23, Block 1,
Rosedale Addition; thence south 130 feet to the Southeast
corner of Lot 27; thence east 16 feet to the Southwest
corner of Lot 22; thence north 130 feet to the Northwest
corner of Lot 22; thence west 16 feet to the point of
beginning.
SECTION 2. RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. The above vacation
is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights -of -way and
easements of all public utilities of any and every description now
located on and under or over the confines of the property and also
SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of
maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said
utilities, including the City's water and sewer facilities, and all
of them. Said vacation is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights -of -
way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become
effective on the date of its first publication and shall be
recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
\°\-day of
ATTEST:
CI RE • a `D R
, 1992.
X4\ CHAIRPER
PACAL.
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's action:
ATTEST:
CITY RE DE
-2-
•
BILL NO. 19 OF 1992.
Published: March 25, 1992 .
BRB:rc
0 92-1
0 92-6
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 20 of 1992
(City Contracts)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 3.24.010, 3.28.030, 3.28.040,
3.28.050, 3.28.060, 3.28.090, 3.28.100 AND 3.28.110 OF THE SALT
LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO CITY CONTRACTS.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That Sections 3.24.010, 3.28.030, 3.28.040,
3.28.050, 3.28.060, 3.28.090, 3.28.100 and 3.28.110 of the Salt
Lake City Code, be, and the same hereby are, amended as follows:
Section 3.24.010 Contract validity and execution.
A. Expenditures -- Public Purpose. * * *
B. Contract Procedures. No contract may become valid or is
binding against the City until:
1. The contract has been reduced to writing;
2. The City has received certification from its Department
of Management Services that funds are lawfully available within
budgeted appropriations to fulfill the City's financial
obligations thereunder;
3. Where appropriate, there are appropriate certifications
of compliance with federal contract or grant assurances and the
documents are approved as to form by the City Attorney;
4. The contract has been executed by:
(a) The Chairperson of the City Council or designee
for professional consulting and personnel services contracts
made within the scope of the City Council's legislative
authority; or
(b) The Mayor or the Mayor's designee authorized to
sign in a prior written executive order for contracts except
those City Council contracts described in subparagraph (a);
and
5. The signature has been attested by the City Recorder.
The authority provided in subparagraph 4(a) above shall apply
only to City Council professional consulting and personnel
services contracts; and accordingly, the Chief Procurement
Officer, as provided in Sections 3.24.050 through 3.24.210, shall
order and purchase supplies and other contractual services needed
by the City Council unless the City Council adopts a resolution
providing otherwise.
3.28.030 Notice and
proposals.
A.
* * *
solicitation of competitive
sealed
B. For each project in which a contract for such
professional services is contemplated, the City shall make a
solicitation and give a notice of the work opportunity to the
relevant professional association as determined by the Director
of the City Council office, department head, or division manager
requesting such services and by the Chief Procurement Officer.
C.
* * *
3.28.040 Selection and evaluation process.
A. Except as hereafter provided, the responsible department
head or the Director of the City Council Office, if applicable,
shall select a minimum of three applicants for interview purposes
2
from among those applicants responding to the notice and
solicitation; however, if three or less responses are received,
all shall be interviewed.
B.
* * *
* * *
3.28.050 Selection committee.
For matters involving professional service fees, except City
Council professional consulting and personnel services contracts
as described in Section 3.24.010 4(a), anticipated to be in
excess of ten thousand dollars but not exceeding fifty thousand
dollars, a selection committee shall, unless waived by the Mayor
in writing, be utilized for consultant solicitation, screening
and interviews in accordance with the process prescribed in this
chapter. The committee shall be advisory to the department head
responsible for implementation of the project under consideration
and shall be comprised of the following:
A.
* * *
* * *
3.28.060 Advisory review committee.
For matters involving professional service fees, except City
Council professional consulting and personnel services contracts
as described in Section 3.24.010 4(a), anticipated to be in
excess of fifty thousand dollars, an advisory review committee
shall, unless waived by the Mayor in writing, be utilized for
consultant, solicitation, screening and interviews in accordance
with the process prescribed above. The committee shall be
3
advisory to the department head responsible for implementation of
the project under consideration and shall be comprised of the
following:
A. * * *
* * *
3.28.090 Exceptions to chapter provisions.
The requirements of this chapter do not apply to the
following types of contracts:
A. * * *
* * *
G. The Mayor, with cause specified in writing, may waive
any or all of these requirements for specific contracts, and the
City Council, for professional consulting and personnel services
contracts described in Section 3.24.010 4(a), may, with cause,
also waive these requirements.
3.28.100 Contract review and award.
All awards for professional service contracts, including
those involving fees under ten thousand dollars shall be made as
designated by the City Council, if applicable, or Mayor, upon
recommendation of the responsible department head and after such
contracts have been reviewed and approved, as to form, by the
City Engineer, or the Chief Procurement Officer and City
Attorney, or his/her designee. However, no contract shall be
valid or binding on the City until the applicable formalities
provided in City ordinance and state law have been completed.
4
3.28.110 Contracts under ten thousand dollars.
For all professional service contracts, except City Council
professional consulting and personnel services contracts as
described in Section 3.24.010 4(a), for which the estimated cost
is less than ten thousand dollars, the department head or
division manager requesting the professional service shall, in
conjunction with the Chief Procurement Officer or City Engineer,
establish a selection process to obtain the needed professional
services at a reasonable cost to the City. The selection
procedure shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Department of Management Services prior to solicitation for
professional services. The Director of the Department of
Management Services shall be responsible for certifying to the
Mayor that the selection process and its implementation have
procured the necessary professional services for the City at a
reasonable cost.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect on the date of
its first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
17th day of March , 19 92
ATTEST:
CHAIRPERSON ,
t.
the
the
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attomey's Office
Date
Transmitted to the Mayor on March 18, 1992
Mayor's Action: XX Approved
ATTEST:
FMN:cY'
3/16/92
Published: March 26, 1992
Bill No. 20 of 1992.
6
Vetoed