002 of 2010 - Budget Amendment No. 2 for FY 2009/2010. 0 10-1
B 09-12
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 2 of 20 10
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2009-2010)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 17 of 2009 Which
Adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1,
2009 and Ending June 30, 2010.
PREAMBLE
On June 16, 2009, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to
effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached
hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.17 of 2009.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing
changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall
be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above,
for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with
the requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 12 day of
January , 2010
ER ON
ATTEST:
CIT RECOR AER
Transmitted to the Mayor on January 15, 2010
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
.,„
MAYOR '-
ATTEST:
PP ROVED AB TOFO7=,M
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
CI Y REC RDER .,
(SEAL)
Bill No. 2 of 20 10
Published: 2_2_10 C .
HB_ATTY-#9683-V l-Budget_Amendment_FY09-10.DOC
3
Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Amendment # —January
General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
Section A New Items
1. Public Safety Building $125,000,000.00
Revenue $125,000,000.00
Expenditures $25,000.000.00
2. Street Signal Destroyed $25,728.00 $25,728.00
3. Governmental Immunity $125,000.00
Additional Claims
4. North Temple Viaduct $6,199,866.00
Storm Drain and
Carryover Budgets
5. Public Util Sewer Budget $8,955,100.00
Addition and Carryover
6. North Temple Viaduct $20,000,000.00
State Funding
7. Energy Performance $833,000.00
Contracting
8. North Temple Viaduct $16,450,000.00
Sales Tax Bond
9. East Sport Complex & $158,353.34
Sorenson Center Pool
Repairs
10. Liberty Patrol Precinct $1,200,000.00
Property Purchase
11. Public Safety Bldg $4,270,844.86
Impact Fees
52 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
12. North Temple Viaduct $4,300,000.00
Special Assess Area
(SAA)
13. Regional Sports Complex $41,044.00
Additional Design Costs
14. Regional Sports Complex $22,800,000.00
Construction
Revenues $22,800,000.00
Expenditures $2,000,000.00
15. Transfer FTE from $-28,939.00 $-62,702.00 -1 $28,939.00 $28,939.00
Admin Sery to CED
Elimination of 1 FTE
16. Change Fleet $.00
Management Director
Position
Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources
1. St of Utah Work Force $28,564.00
Sery Central City Youth
Grant
2. St of Utah Violence $19,698.61
Against Women Grant
Section C Grants For New Staff Resources
53 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
1. US Dept of Environ EPA $368,554.00 1
Sustainable
Transportation
Section D Housekeeping
1. Donation Fund Receipts $100,000.00
and Interest
2. Housing Fund Grant $1,359,101.00
Program Income
3. Publ Util Water Budget $2,244,000.00
Carryover
4. CIP and Class C $290,679.03
Recapture
5. North Temple Jordan $375,734.00
River Bridge
Replacement
6. CDBG Grant Recapture $302,619.89
7. Property Mgmt Budget $55,000.00
Increase
8. Intermodal Hub Fund $130,000.00
Encumb Carryover
9. Golf and Fleet Fund $465,452.00
Encumbrance
Carryovers
Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
1. US Dept of Justice JAG $964,678.00
Grant
54 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
2. US Dept of Justice $125,000.00
Forensic Science Grant
3. St of Utah Juvenile $250,000.00
Justice Drug Awareness
Grant
4. St of Utah Dept of $17,735.00
Natural Resources
Shoreline Trail Grant
5. St of Utah Public Safety $1,995,400.00
UASI Grant
6. US Dept of EPA Culinary $286,000.00
Water Protection Grant
7. Economic Dev Corp of $5,800.00
Utah Marketing Grant
8. US Dept of Energy Solar $267,700.00
Market Transformation
Grant
9. LeRay McAllister Land $20,000.00
Conservation Wasatch
Hollow Restoration
10. Us Dept of Energy Amer $2,116,500.00
Recovery Block Grant
(EECBG)
11. Utah Arts Council Youth $2,500.00
City Imagination
Celebration Grant
12. St of Utah Div Park and $1,500.00
Recreation Shoreline
Grant
55 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
Section F Donations
Section G Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards
1. St of Utah Dept of Public $320,000.00
Safety Homeland
Security—UASI Grant
2. St of Utah Historic $4,800.00
Preservation Grant
3. US Dept of Health Drug $125,000.00
Free Communities Grant
Section I Council Added Items
1. Sugar House Fireworks $15,000.00
2. Reconstruction of 900 $500,000.00
South 700 East to
Windsor CIP—Class "C"
3. Purchase property in $80,000.00
District Five
a
Initiative Name:
Public Safety Building
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
On Tuesday, November 3, 2009, Salt Lake City held a special bond election, City Proposition
Number 1, for the purposes of Acquiring, Constructing, Furnishing and Equipping a new
Public Safety Administration Building, Associated Underground Parking Facility, and an
Emergency Operations Facility. Salt Lake City's estimated cost for these critical facilities is
not to exceed One Hundred Twenty-Five Million Dollars ($125,000,000).
The facilities to be constructed are: a new Public Safety Administration building consisting of
132,000 square feet, an associated underground parking structure, sufficient to
accommodate 522 stalls, and an Emergency Operations Facility that will meet all the FEMA
426, 427, and 452 and related essential facilities standards and guidelines. The City's
Emergency Operations Facility will be 35,000 square feet.
If the State of Utah joins Salt Lake City, it is estimated that the square footage of the facility
will increase to 76,000 square feet and the project will incur additional costs for constructing
the State's portion of the Emergency Operations Facility.
It is anticipated that the Utah State Legislature will address the State's involvement with the
City in a joint emergency operations facility during the upcoming legislative session and a
decision should be made by March of 2010.
The Public Safety Building will be managed by a full-time Project Manager with City oversight
from the Engineering and Capital Asset Management divisions. It is recommended that the
City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project.
Initiative$A_1
i
Public Safety Building
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-1 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
(City Department) _ New Item
Department Type of Initiative
(Employee Name) (Contact Number)
Prepared By i Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact — —
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount _
General Fund
— —Total, $0 $0'
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0'
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund _ _ _ _
83 CIP Bond Proceeds $ 125,000,000.00
Total $ 125,000,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
f Position Title: - -
Initiative#A-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: _
Revenue:
Cost Center Number f Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 1980 $ 125,000,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number — Amount
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 25,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: -
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? — -- (Yes or No)- - -
-F
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-1 -b
Initiative Name:
Street Signal System Destroyed — Accident at California and Pioneer streets
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-2
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
On 10th of September 2009 an accident at California and Pioneer caused a high voltage line
to be pulled down on a mast arm signal pole. The traffic signals, pedestrian modules,
associated cable, power service, cabinet, control equipment and video detection equipment
were destroyed by the high voltage discharged during the accident.
The existing budget for Traffic Signals is funded to cover routine maintenance. It is not funded
to cover major replacements which must take place after a major accident like this one. As a
point of reference, the variable expense associated with this major accident represents 24.4%
of the maintenance materials budget for the Traffic Signals program.
Additional expense budget is being requested to cover variable expense items incurred by the
Streets Division from this accident. The department is not requesting additional expense
budget for labor and equipment already budgeted. Additional revenue budget is requested
due to the expected reimbursement from the private company causing the damage.
Initiative#A-2
•
Street Signal System Destroyed
Accident at California and Pioneer
streets
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-2 _ 2009-10
Initiative Number _ _ Fiscal Year
Public Services Department _ _ _ New Item
Department I Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 801-535-6123
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
-- - -- -- — - —
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
•General Fund
Reimbursement from private $ 25,728.00
company that caused accident
Total $ 25,728.00 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
03-12100 1860-12 $ 25,728.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
03-12100 Traffic Signals 2288-02 $ 356.00
03-12100 Traffic Signals 2288-01 $ 25,372.00
$ 25,728.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: NOT APPLICABLE
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-2-b
Initiative Name:
Governmental Immunity - Additional Claims
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Governmental Immunity Fund is used to cover the cost of settlements and judgments against
the City. As part of the City's budget reduction efforts, the amount budgeted for FY2010 is
$488,850. This amount is was substantially lower than the amount typically budgeted in prior
years. In fiscal year 2009 the amount was $703,750. Based on our claims experience over
the last several years, we thought that we would be able to manage them to that lower
amount for FY2010. However, based on results for the first four months (and in particular a
settlement that was much larger than we had anticipated), it is now apparent that we will be
unable to stay within that $488,850 budgeted amount. We are requesting an additional
$125,000 be appropriated from the Governmental Immunity Reserve Fund.
This does not include funding for the electronic discovery software, which is anticipated to
cost approximately $100,000. The procurement process is in an advanced stage, but we
advised the bidders last week that we are putting the procurement on hold until the end of the
year pending a review of our financial situation. If we do want to proceed at that point, an
additional budget opening likely will be necessary.
Initiative#A-3
•
Governmental Immunity - Additional
Claims
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-3 2009-10
Initiative Number _ _ Fiscal Year
City Attorney's Office New Item
Department _ - _ Type of Initiative
Edwin Rutan 801-535-7628
Prepared By y Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
- - - - - -- -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total _ $0 $0'
Enterprise Fund '
Total' $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of I 0 0
Position Title: 7
Initiative#A-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
85-01401 2546 $ 125,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: Not applicable
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-3-b
Initiative Name:
North Temple Viaduct and Carryover Storm Water Utility Budget
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Storm Water Utility is requesting to amend the 2009-2010 budget for construction of a
replacement line for the City Creek storm drain line under the North Temple Viaduct
estimated at $4 million, as well as funding for the design of the new Folson Avenue storm
water line for $200,000. The department is also asking to open the budget to finance
carryover projects from last year in the amount of $1,999,866.
Criteria: The financing for the City Creek line under the North Temple Viaduct needs to be
included in the budget amendment to allow the project to be included in the North Temple
Viaduct reconstruction. The new line on Folsom Avenue will increase the capacity of the city
creek drainage system and alleviate flooding along the North Temple corridor. The utility is
also requesting the budget be amended to fund projects which were budgeted last year, but
not expended until the current budget year. This will allow the continuation of the utilities
capital improvement program.
Condition: The North Temple storm drain corridor needs extra capacity to handle major storm
events. The construction of the Folson Avenue line will increase the capacity for a major
storm event. Also, the process to open the budget for carryover projects for each of the Utility
enterprise funds is required to continue the capital improvement program.
Effect: The financing of the Folson Avenue line and North Temple Viaduct line will reduce the
flood risk to the North Temple corridor and support the development of the UTA Airport TRAX
line.
Cause: The fiscal year ends on June 30th, which falls in the middle of our construction
season.
Projects are started in one budget and completed in the next.
Recommendation : We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement
program to continue as approved.
Initiative#A-4
North Tempie Viaduct and Carryover
Storm Water Utility Budget
Initiative Name 1
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-4 _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Utilities _ New Item
Department 1
1Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis _ 483-6773
Employee Name Telephone Contact
(Negative) _ Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total' $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total i $0 _-_ $0'
Enterprise Fund
Public Utilities _ $ 4,200,000.00
Total _ $ 4,200,000.00 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number -- Object Code Number Amount
Storm Water Fees $ 4,200,000.00
Total $ 4,200,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
53-10301 _ 2730-18 _ $ 5,809,866.00
53-10301 2730-05 $ 390,000.00
Total $ 6,199,866.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ _ N/A _
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative#A-4-b
Initiative Name:
Public Utilities - Sewer Budget Addition
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Sewer Utility is requesting to amend the 2009-2010 budget to include the $6.2 million
state revenue bond which was issued in November to finance the digester cover replacement
project. Also, included is the funding to start design work on the Orange Street sewer main
replacement project for $500,000 and to cover emergency repair cost of $630,000 when a
portion of the line collapsed under North Temple Street last summer. Funding is also needed
to cover costs associated with replacing sewer lines under the proposed route of the new
TRAX line from down town to the Airport in the amount of $1,545,000. The budget needs to
be adjusted for several projects budgeted in the prior fiscal year 2008-2009 that were not
completed in that fiscal year cycle in the amount of $2,980,100.
Criteria: The budget amendment is needed to finance the second phase of the digester cover
replacement and the construction of sewer line replacements for the TRAX line. Also, the
utility is requesting the budget be amended to fund projects which were budgeted last year,
but not expended until the current budget year. This will allow the continuation of the utilities
capital improvement program.
Condition: This is an established process to open the budget for carryover projects for each of
the Utility enterprise funds.
Effect: The Orange Street line is in extremely poor condition and needs to be designed and
replaced.
Cause: The fiscal year ends on June 30th and falls in the middle of our construction season.
Projects are started in one budget and completed in the next.
Recommendation : We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement
program to continue as approved.
Initiative#A-5
Public Utilities - Sewer Budget
Addition
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-5 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Utilities New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Prepared By i Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact ----
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total', $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
State Revenue Bond $ 6,300,000.00
Sewer Utility Reserves $ 2,655,100.00
Total $ 8,955,100.00 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
- - --- -- --Position Title:
Initiative#A-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Code N Object umber Amount
Cost Center Number i --_ _—
Sewer Utility Reserves $ 2,655,100.00
State Revenue Bond $ 6,300,000.00
Total $ 8,955,100.00
• Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
52-10201 2730-14 $ 3,726,000.00
52-12201 2720-30 $ 5,129,100.00
52-12201 2760-90 $ 100,000.00
Total $ 8,955,100.00
Additional Accounting Details:
_ Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? �, N/A
Initiative#A-5-b
Initiative Name:
North Temple Viaduct Funding From State of Utah
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This amendment creates both a revenue and expense budget for monies that will be received
by the City for construction of a viaduct on North Temple and 400 West.
During the last legislative session, the Utah Legislature passed HB 185, which authorized the
sale of bonds in order to provide a transfer of $20,000,000 from the State to the City for
project costs, including right of way acquisition,
reconstruction, renovations, or improvements to the highway.
The City will instruct UTA to hold this amount in an escrow account until such time as it is
expended on costs associated with with reconstruction of the North Temple viaduct. UTA will
maintain a record of transfers from the viaduct escrow account to fund the viaduct
reconstruction and shall make such record available to Salt Lake City upon request. Interest
accrued on any balance in the viaduct escrow account shall be credited to the principal
balance of the viaduct escrow account for future expenditure on the viaduct reconstruction
As of mid-November, these funds have not yet been received by the City. Conversations with
the Utah Department of Transportation confirm that the bonds authorized in HB 185 have
been sold, and that transfer is pending on necessary accounting entries. Once those entries
have been made, funds are expected to be transferred.
Initiative#A-6
North Temple Viaduct Funding From
State of Utah
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-6 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office _ New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Ben Adams _ 535-7704
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact - ------ --- - -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total _ $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total' $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other r Fund
83 - New Cost Center $ 20,000,000.00
Total $ 20,000,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of I 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-6-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
83-New Cost Center 1370 20,000,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 20,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
_ Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
--
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-6-b
Initiative Name:
Energy Performance Contracting - Phase I
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Recently, an Investment Grade Energy Audit was completed by Siemens Building
Tchnologies, Energy Solutions in twenty-four of fifty Salt Lake City owned facilities. The Audit
Report identifies energy efficiency improvement measures and provides a plan for retrofitting
critical systems using savings from future energy budgets to pay for energy efficiency
upgrades and capital renewal over time. The results of the audit are shown below:
SITE ENERGY SAVINGS
• 308,694 kWh / year reduction in electricity which translates into $23,070 /year
• 4524 Dth / year reduction in natural gas which translates into $30,745 / year
• 1285 kgal /year reduction in water which translates into $2,234 / year
• $56,049 / year combined total utility cost avoidance
• 222 Metric tons / year reduction in Co2 Carbon emissions reduction or the equivalent
of 40 vehicles removed from the highway / year.
BUDGET IMPLICATIONS:
• $887,769 in upgrades would be paid from savings in utility costs.
• $64,249 escalating annual debt service payments
• $55,181 in utility company incentives returned back to the City
• ESCO will guarantee all energy savings except small buildings with stipulated energy
use under determined baseline.
The net amount of proceeds from the leasing company is $833,000 and that same amount is
paid to the contractor from the leasing company. Which is the 887,000 upgrade costs less
the incentives paid directly to the contractor from the utility companies.
Initiative#A-7
On October 27, 2009, City Administrative staff met with the Council's Environmental
subcommittee. This project has been in development, planning and audit stage for 3 years.
The City staff and contractors are ready to roll on the first phase, with Council's approval.
Staff has prepared a briefing document. Financing with Bank of America is recommended,
using the existing agreement, with slight amendment to allow for 15 yr. term and the Fixed
Draw mechanism. Debt service would be approximately 80,000 per year for 15 years. During
FY09-10, approximately $516,000 would be drawn for construction. The remainder,
$316,000, would be drawn during July to September 2010. Debt service would not begin until
construction is completed, estimated to be in December of 2010. (Energy incentives would
reduce the principal balance)
Initiative#A-7
Energy Performance Contracting -
Phase I
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-7 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Dept. New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 801-535-6123
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0,
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
CIP Lease proceeds $ 833,000.00
Total $ 833,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
-- ------- -
- ------ - -- ----
i
Initiative#A-7-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center
1964 $ 833,000.00
Construction amount $ 888,000
Energy incentives $ (55,000)'I
Net for construction $ 833,000
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 $ 833,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-7-b
Initiative Name:
North Temple Viaduct Replacement - Sales Tax Bond
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-8
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
A request to establish a budget for $16.45 million Sale Tax bond process for the North
Temple Viaduct. This will support the $16.3 million for the construction of the North Temple
Viaduct and bond issuance cost of$150,000.
The original plan for crossing the railroad tracks called for weaving the TRAX line under the
eastern end of the existing North Temple Viaduct and then constructing a new viaduct
dedicated to the TRAX line. The Administration is now recommending that the existing
viaduct be demolished and replaced with a new single viaduct for vehicular and pedestrian
traffic and the TRAX line. This new single viaduct also would be approximately one block
shorter.
UTA has agreed to a not to exceed price of$71 million for the single viaduct. The $71 million
is expected to be funded as follows:
(1) $25 million from UTA. UTA has agreed to use the $25 million they had budgeted for the
original proposal toward the single viaduct proposal.
(2) $20 million from the State of Utah. A separate budget package has been prepared for
this component.
(3) $5 million from the Wasatch Front Regional Council. This involves a redirection of
federal funding by the Wasatch Front Regional Council.
(4) $730,000 from the Wasatch Front Regional Council. This involves redirection of an
additional source of federal funding from the 1300 East Street Project.
(5) $4 million from the Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department. A separate budget
package has been prepared for this component.
(6) $16.3 million sales tax bond issued by Salt Lake City. (The subject of this budget
package.)
The principal source of coverage for the sales tax bond issue will be $12 million from the
creation of a CDA. The CDA has been separately briefed to the City Council. Additional
coverage ($4.3 million) would come from a SAA, also previously briefed to the City Council.
Initiative#A-8
North Temple Viaduct Replacement -
Sales Tax Bond
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-8 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Admin Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Gordon Hoskins 535-6394
Prepared By - - - Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None _
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total', $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
_ Other Fund
83- Sales Tax Bond Proceeds $ 16,450,000.00
Total $ 16,450,000.00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0,
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative A-8-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center - 1980 -_ - - $ 16,450,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 16,300,000.00
83- New Cost Center 2328 $ 150,000.00
$ 16,450,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will __
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-8-b
Initiative Name:
Sports Complex and Sorenson Center Pool Repairs
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # A9
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
In an agreement between the City and Salt Lake County, the City agrees to pay for one-half of all
repairs and maintenance after the initial $3,000,of costs at the Sports Complex located on Guardsman
Way. Needed repairs to the indoor pool totaling $90,000 were made in October of 2009. The repairs
consisted of replacing the tile around the pool with a concrete surface. Typically the County will notify
the City that the repairs are needed or will be made however, in this case they did not. They have
billed the City $43,500 which the City is obligated to pay under the agreement.
The County has notified the City that the plaster surface of the outdoor pool at the Sports Complex
needs to be replaced with either plaster or a liner. The projected cost of the repair is $230,000 and is
to be bid in the fall of 2009 with construction to begin in the spring of 2010. The total City's share of
this repair will be $113,500.
In addition, the County has also billed the City for the installation of a VGB drain at the Sorenson Multi-
Cultural Center pool which was replaced in August in order to be Federally compliant by December of
2009. The agreement noted above, states that the City will pay for all repairs exceeding $3,000. The
City's share of this cost is $1,353.34.
This request is to allocate $158,353.34, from the CIP cost over run cost center, in order to pay the
County the $44,853.34 the City currently owes the County and to pay the $113,500 next spring for the
upcoming repairs.
Initiative#A-9
Sports Complex and Sorenson Center
Pool Repairs
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A9 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
CED -HAND New Item
Department I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark 535-6136
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0_
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total' $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative A-9-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 158,353.34
83-08099 2700 (117,798.72)
83-07099 I 2700 (40,554.62)
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-9-b
Initiative Name:
Liberty Patrol Precinct Property Purchase
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # A10
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Liberty Patrol currently operates out of the existing Public Safety Building (PSB), but is
not projected to operate out of the new PSB once construction is completed and police
operations move into the new facility. The Administration believes the Liberty Patrol can be
more responsive to the needs of the community it serves with an east -side location. The goal
of the Administration is to have the Liberty Patrol Precinct constructed and ready for
occupancy once the new PSB is completed and ready for occupancy in 2013. An east-side
piece of property has been located and the Administration would like to move forward with
purchasing negotiations. $1,200,0000 of Police impact fees are available and could be used
toward the purchase of the property.
The Liberty Precinct is estimated to cost approximately $16 million, which is based upon a
24,500 square foot facility. The cost projection is over $10 million less than what was
requested in the unsuccessful PSB bond request in 2007. The Police impact fee amount
eligible for the Liberty Patrol Precinct is 7.5% of the $16 million, or $1,200,000.
The Administration is requesting that a budget of $1,200,000 be established for the Liberty
Patrol Precinct property purchase. There is a current balance of Police Impact Fee cash of
$3,595,844.86. This request will leave a balance of $2,395,844.86 in cash.
Initiative#A-1 0
Liberty Patrol Precinct Property
Purchase
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A10 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services New Item
Department 1Type of Initiative
Sam Guevara/Sherrie Collins 535-6307/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0.00 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total', $0 $01
'Other Fund
Total l $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative A-10-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
_ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount _
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
84-New Cost Center 2700 $ 1,200,000.00
84-84001 2700 $ - (1,200,000.00)
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
;Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
.If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ NA
grantimpactcommunity grant - -- -_
Will the once the funds are i
eliminated? NA
Doesgrant duplicate licate services provided p by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-1 0-b
Initiative Name:
Public Safety Building Impact Fee Budget
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # All
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The new $125,000,000 construction of the Public Safety Building (PSB) is eligible for Impact
Fee fund use of 7.5% of the total project cost, or $9,375,000. Of this amount, 6% or
$7,500,000 is Police impact fee eligible and 1.5% or$1,875,000 is Fire impact fee eligible.
The Administration proposes to use the impact fee funds toward the property purchase for the
new PSB.
The cash in the police impact fee is currently at $3,595,884.86 the budget in the police impact
fee is at $3,363,754.93. We need to increase the revenue and expenditure budget in the
police impact fee by $232,129.93 to have the cash and budget equal.
As of November, 2009, the Police impact fee account has a current cash balance of
$2,395,884.86 after the impact fees are allocated for the Liberty Patrol Precinct and the Fire
impact fee account has a current cash balance of$4,019,639.47.
The Administration is requesting that a budget of $4,270,884.86 be established for the use of
Impact Fees toward property purchase for the new PSB. This action will utilize the remaining
$2,395,884 of Police impact fees collected to date leaving a zero balance and will utilize
$1,875,000 of Fire impact fees leaving a remaining balance of $2,144,639.47
The PSB is on the 10 Year Plan as an impact fee eligible expense. State legislation requires
that impact fees must be allocated and expensed within 6 years from being collected. Both
Police and Fire impact fees collected in 2005 are in jeopardy of having to be paid back to the
developer unless used by 2011. These funds were ear marked in the 10 Year Plan to be
allocated in 2007 when the first bond attempt failed. When the bond did not pass, funds
could not be expended as had been planned. By utilizing the amounts of impact fees above,
the Police impact fees will begin the 6 year time frame for the current fees collected and Fire
impact fees will be utilized through 2007 and partial fees collected in 2008, leaving the
remaining Fire impact fees collected in 2008 to be expensed by 2013.
Initiative#A-11
Public Safety Building Impact Fee
Budget
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#All _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Sam Guevara/Sherrie Collins 535-6307/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) _ Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
-- -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0.00 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0,
Other Fund
84-84001 $ 232,129.93
---- Total $ 232,129.93 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
!Position Title: -- _----- -- ----
Initiative A-11-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
:84-New Cost Center 2700 $ 2,395,844.86 1
;84-New Cost Center 2700 $ 1,875,000.00
84-84001 2700 $ (2,395,844.86)
84-84002 2700 $ (1,875,000.00)
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
i Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-11-b
Initiative Name:
North Temple Viaduct Replacement (SAA)
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-12
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Engineering is requesting that a property owner budget in the amount of $4,300,000 be created and
established for the Special Assessment Area (SAA), North Temple, from 300 to 500 West, to except
the property owners portion of funds that will fund a portion of the North Temple Viaduct replacement.
The estimated cost of the viaduct project is $71,000,000.
Initiative#A-12
North Temple Viaduct Replacement
f SAA)
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-12 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Joel Harrison/Sherrie Collins 535-6234/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
;Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
83- SAA Property Owners $ 4,300,000.00
Portion
Total $ 4,300,000.00 1 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
•
Initiative A-12-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83 New Cost Center 1125 f $ 4,300,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83New Cost Center 2700 $ 4,300,000.00
1f
I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
•
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
;If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
!eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-12-b
Initiative Name:
Regional Sports Complex - Project Preliminary Design Budget
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-13
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
In 2005 the Council appropriated $350,000 for consultant and Engineering management fees
for the preparation of a schematic design (concept plans) and preliminary master planning,
environmental analyis (begun), and cost estimating for the Regional Sports Complex.
During the course of the concept design process, the City needed to make a few alterations
to the project scope that has resulted in an increase in cost.
The existing budget will not cover the estimated costs to complete this design phase of the
project. An additional $41,044 is requested. This request will be funded from the CIP cost
over run account.
The Council will be briefed on this issue on January 5, 2010.
Initiative ftA_13
Prot-Regional SportsComplex1 nal ect
Preliminary Design Budget
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-13 2009-10
Initiative Number _ Fiscal Year
Public Services Dept. _ New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Rick Graham/Greg Davis 535-7747/535-6123
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (41,044)
Impact - - - - -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total' $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total+ $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0'
Position Title: - -
N/A
Initiative#A-13-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: --
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-09099 j 2700 $ (41,044.00)
83-06070 2329 $ 41,044.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: NOT APPLICABLE
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) -
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? T (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-13-b
Initiative Name:
Regional Sports Complex - Proposition #5 Complex - Construction
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-14
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Salt Lake Regional Sports Complex general obligation bond proposition was approved at
an election in November 2003. The election authorized the City to issue $15.3 Million in
bonds, subject to the City raising $7.5 Million in additional funds.
At the time of the bond election the estimated cost of the project was $22.8 Million. The City
has now determined that the original contemplated scope of the project at today's cost would
cost $42.691 Million. The City is in the final stages of developing the concept plans and
design. The City is contemplating proceeding with construction of the "Proposition #5
Complex" with the original budget of$22.5 million, but with fewer fields than originally
anticipated. The Proposition #5 Complex construction budget is estimated to be $25.691
Million. If additional funding can be identified to build more fields, the City could then proceed
with an expansion to the Complex.
The total funding for the Proposition #5 Complex would come from: 1) $15.3 million General
Obligation Bond, 2) $7.5 Million from Real Salt Lake Soccer, 3) $2.5 Million From Salt Lake
City Surplus Land Account budgeted for in the first amended budget for fiscal year 2010, 4)
$350,000 from preliminary design budgeted in 2006, and 5) $41,000 additional budget
request in this budget amendment for preliminary design. The $17 Million funding for any
Expansion of the Soccer Complex would come from from Salt Lake County. The total for the
complex and the Expansion (if pursued) would be $42.691 Million.
This budget amendment requests that a construction budget be authorized for the Proposition
#5 Complex project for the amount of$22.8 Million. The funding of this request would be the
2003 general obligations bond for $15.3 million and the $7.5 million from the letter of credit
from Real Salt Lake Soccer.
The Council will be briefed on this issue on January 5, 2010.
Initiative#A-14
Regional Sports Complex-Proposition
#5 Complex-Construction
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-14 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Dept. New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Rick Graham/Greq Davis 535-7747/535-6123
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Other Fund
CIP - Bond Proceeds $ 15,300,000.00
CIP - Private Donation $ 7,500,000.00
Total' i $ 22,800,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
- - N/A
Initiative#A-14-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 1980 $ 15,300,000.00
83-New Cost Center 1895 $ 7,500,000.00
- - - - - - $ - -- 22,800,000.00�-
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 $ 2,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: _ NOT APPLICABLE
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-14-b
Initiative Name:
Transfer of FTE From Admin Sery to CED; elimination of 1 FTE
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #A-15
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
As part of an administrative re-organization, the Administration is proposing to transfer an
FTE from the Department of Administrative Services to the Department of Community and
Economic Development. In addition, we are proposing to eliminate an existing position in the
Department of Community and Economic Development.
Currently, the Director's Office in the Administrative Services has an appointed 013
Adminstrative Assistant position. This position and associated funding for the remainder of
the fiscal year will be transferred to the Department of Community and Economic
Development. The amount to be transferred is $38,468.
In addition, an existing and currently vacant position in the Director's Office in the Department
of Community and Economic Development (Executive Assistant, 311) will be eliminated, as
well as funding for the remainder of the fiscal year. This will result in savings of$28,939 for
the remainder of the fiscal year, and on-going savings of$62,702.
Initimti, liA_1 c
Transfer of FTE From Admin Sery to
CED; elimination of 1 FTE
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#A-15 2009-10
Initiative Number - - Fiscal Year
Administrative Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Gina Chamness 535-7766
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- $ 28,939.00
Impact - - -- - - -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
- - - Total's - - $0 - -- -- - $0',r -Internal Service Fund
- - - - - --- - - Total $0 — - - - $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 0'
Staffin• Im•act:
Requested Number of 0'
Position Title:----- -- - -- --Executive Assistant -1
Initiative#A-15-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount - -
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
18-00100 2199 _ $ (38,468.001_
06-00100 2199 $ 38,468.00
06-00100 - 2199 $ (28,932.001
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?I (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-15-b
Initiative Name:
Change in Fleet Management Director - Position
Initiative Number:
BA#2 Fy2010 Initiative #A-16
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Administration proposes converting an existing 612 position in the Department of Public
Service, Fleet Management Director, to an appointed position, 006. This position is currently
vacant. The mid-point for the 612 position is currently $6,671 monthly, or approximately
$80,000 annually. The mid-point for the appointed level 006 is $7,033monthly, or
approximately $84,400 annually. We do not anticipate a significant change in budget for this
position as a result of this change, and are not requesting additional salary dollars.
The requirements for this position have been enhanced to include a focus on sustainability as
well as reducing fleet size and usage. Because this position is key to supporting the
initiatives of the Mayor, we recommend that this position be converted to an appointed
position, and that it be added to the Appointed Pay Plan.
Initiative#A-16
Change in Fleet Management Director-
Position
Initiative Name
BA#2 Fv2010 Initiative#A-16 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services _ New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Gina Chamness 535-7766
Prepared By - - -- Telephone Contact - -
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
-- -- -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
- — - - - - -- - Total $0 $0 1-
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
-- - -- --- - Total I - - $0
- --- -- - $0
1
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Change from Fleet
Management Director, 612 to
Fleet Division Manager, 006
Initiative#A-16-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? - (Yes or NO)
Initiative#A-16-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah Department of Workforce Services, Central City Teen Program
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #B-1
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received an additional $28,564 grant from
the Utah State Department of Work Force Services under the Life Skills Grant Program. These funds
have been awarded to continue the Teen Program for high school aged children at the Central City
YouthCity site. This program provides a mix of prevention education, community service activities,
technology skills classes and arts education, providing a safe environment for students to experiment
and learn from both successes and failures.
Of these funds, $21,918 will be used to pay a portion of the hourly wage and FICA of two (2) program
facilitators, and one (1) office support tech; $1,250 will fund the fiscal grant monitors time for fiscal
oversight and grant management; $2,596 will be used to pay a contractual professional art teacher;
$900 will be used for printing, copying, postage and phone usage; $100 will be used for
conference/workshop registration; and $1,800 will be used for program supplies.
A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the Program Managers salary and
benefits; 25% of the teen program coordinator salary and benefits and other associated costs
including use of the Salt Lake City van for youth travel. Matching funds are budgeted for within the
YouthCity general fund budget.
The City Council adopted the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the
Work Force Service grant award and to sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of the
initial grant.
Initiative#B-1
State of Utah Department of Workforce
• Services, Central City Teen Program
7 Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#B-1 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Public Services Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund _
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
_ Total l $0 $0
Other Fund
72- $ 28,564.00
Total $ 28,564.00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Hourly PTE -3 $ 21,918.00
Fiscal Grant Monitor $1,250.00
Initiative#B-1-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 090985-93.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 28,564.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 28,564.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in gran
t funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
•eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
:Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#B-1-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations, PD Violence Against Women
Formula Grant (VAWA)
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #B-2
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department received a $19,698.61 grant from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim
Reparations for the continuation of their VAWA funded Victim Advocate Program. Of these funds,
$19,323.61 will be used to pay the salary and benefits of (.50) FTE victim advocate who provides on
scene crisis counseling and information pertaining to resource services to victims of domestic
violence; $175 will be used to pay the registration fees of one (1) victim advocate to attend the Utah
Domestic Violence Council Domestic Violence 2010 Conference and $200 will be used for emergency
victim assistance needs such as food, clothing, transportation, etc. The PD receives this grant on an
annual basis.
The grant requires a $6,581.55 cash match which will be satisfied with 267 hours of the Program
Coordinators time which is budgeted for within the Police Departments general fund budget.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, Office
of Crime Victim Reparations VAWA Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that
stem from the original Agreement.
Initiative#B-2
•
State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim
Reparations, PD Violence Against
Women Formula Grant(VAWA)
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#B-2 2009-10
_ Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Public Services Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
— -- Total'� $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72- 1 $ 19,698.61
Total' $ 19,698.61 • $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
1 .50 PIE (1040 Hours) 1 $ 17,950.40
RCA Medicare $1,373.21
19,323.61
Initiative#B-2-a
•
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 08-VAWA-23-16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 19,698.61
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 $ 19,698.61
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? Yes
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#B-2-b
Initiative Name:
US Department of Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Showcase Communities
Grant Program, Sustainable Transportation for a Sustainable Future
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #C-1
Grants Requiring New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Sustainability Division applied for a $386,554 grant from the US Department of Environmental
Protection Agency, under the Climate Showcase Communities Grant Program for the City's
Sustainable Transportation for a Sustainable Future program. The Division is currently waiting for
award documents to be issued. This transaction serves as a place holder and if award documents are
not received by the time of the briefing will be pulled from the budget opening and resubmitted either
as a consent agenda item or in a future budget opening.
The City, partnering with Salt Lake County, Salt Lake Solutions, Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT), Utah Clean Cities Coalition and Rio Tinto proposes to create and implement a Sustainable
Transportation for a Sustainable Future (STSF) program. The initiative is an extensive community-
based social messaging outreach program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution by
reducing the vehicle miles traveled in the City and County. The STSF program will create a blueprint
for permanent and sustainable changes in driving behavior that will transform the community as well
as provide a tool-kit for program replication by other communities.
The Sustainability Division proposes to used the grant funds to hire a full-time, grant funded
Sustainability Special Program Manager to maintain, create and implement the project, coordinate and
manage all team members and subcontractors in the collection of benefit/barrier input from the
community and development of community-based social market messages, coordinate logistics and
meetings, document progress results, prepare reports, summarize and compile all materials for the
STSF tool-kit, make presentations to the community and Utah League of Cities and Towns, and
attend the grantee conference convened by the EPA.
Initiative#C-1
The grant funds will be used as follows: $214,055 will be used to pay the salary and benefits for a
three year period of the program manager position; $5,216 will be used to pay for grant management
and over-site for the grant monitor time; $10,433 will be used for the Program manager to attend 3
annual EPA conference's to be held in Washington, DC and a two day training course in community
level behavior change methods held by McKenzie Mohr and Associates (site to be determined); and
contractual components totaling $137,700 which includes $56,700 for a facilitator/mediator to facilitate
the partner teams and community coalitions to develop and implement a collaborative strategic
approach to using community-based social messging principles to encourage reductions in vehicle
miles traveled, $35,000 for a public survey consultant for baseline data collection and evaluation
survey/poll $4,000 for translation services, and $42,000 to contract with the UDOT who will
subcontract with consulting groups to assist in the development of the social media messaging and
outreach and to produce and disseminate the printed and on-line materials, and to produce the STSF
tool-kit. The City will enter into an agreement with UDOT who will provide $90,000 of it's funds to this
effort and will act as the lead agency.
The grant requires a match which will be satisfied with $37,042 of the City's Environmental Program
Manager's and Environmental Outreach Coordinators time over a three year period; $30,336 of the
County's Environmental Coordinators, Assistant Bureau Manager's and Injury Prevention Specialists
time; $20,000 of UDOTS Transportation Managers time; $7,020 of the Utah Clean Cities Coalition
Directors time and and $90,000 of UDOT's funds for the contractual component as outlined above.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept US Environmental
Protection Agency grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original
grant.
Initiative#C-1
US Department of Environmental
Protection Agency, Climate Showcase
Communities Grant Program,
Sustainable Transportation for a
Sustainable Future
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#C-1 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring New
Management Services _ Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Vickie Bennett/Sherrie Collins _ 535-6540/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None _
Impact
_ Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
[General Fund
Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0 _
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 $ 368,554.00
Total $ 368,554.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 1 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative it. -]-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1890 368,554.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2700 368,554.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Do not know at this time
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? ' Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#C-1-b
Initiative Name:
Donations Fund receipts and interest
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-1
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Council initially appropriated $100,000 in FY 2010's budget for new donations or
additional donations to existing activities. Budget was added to cost centers for donations or
interest earned on donations and budget was subtracted for the "Donations Fund Master
Budget". The original $100,000 has now been utilized as a result of donations and interest. It
is requested that the 100,000 be restored to the master budget.
The $100,000 original has been used for donations in the following funds for the following
amounts: Parks and Recreation Maintenance (77-77108) $10,000; Salt Lake City Foundation
(77-77123) $3,035.01; Imagination Celebration (77-77130) $8,801.95; World Changers (77-
77163) $1,000; Police High School Scholarship (77-77169) $7,500, Police Explorer (77-
77176) $4,038.20; Envionmental improvements Districts 1 & 2 (77-77177) $25,000; Public
Safety Bond Public Education (77-77182) $32,500 and Memory Grove Foundation (77-
77900) $8,122.11. In addition, small amounts to bring the total to exactly $100,000, budgets
were increased $1.88 and $.85 in Energy Solutions - Police (77-77164) and WalMart Trust
(77-77167), respectively for interest earned.
Initiative#D-1
Donations Fund receipts and interest
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-1 _ 2009-10
Initiative Number _ Fiscal Year
Administrative Services Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact _- - - — -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0'
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0' -
Other Fund
Donations Fund $ 100,000.00
Total $ 100,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#D-1-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number _ Amount
77-77001 1895 $ 100,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77001 2590 $ 100,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-1-b
Initiative Name:
Housing Fund Grant Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-2
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Housing enterprise fund has generated program income in the following grant programs
in the following amounts:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $1,000,000
Renter Rehabilitation 34,764
HOME 314,306
American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) 10,031
Traditionally the Council has appropriated the program income generated by these activities
as added amounts to be used by the same activity that generated the program income. The
administration requests that the Council continue the tradition by re-appropriating this
program income back to be used by its source.
Initiative#D-2
Housing Fund Grant Program Income
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-2 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Administrative Services Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Hellmann 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
Genera l Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Housing Fund $ 1,000,000.00
Total $ 1,000,000.00 $0
'Other Fund
CDBG Operating Fund $ 1,000,000.00
Total ' $ 1,000,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#D-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
78-35010 1974-03 $ 1,000,000.00
71-35010 1974-78 $ 1,000,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
78-35010 2950 $ 1,000,000.00
78-00201 2950 $ 34,764.00
78-78325 2950 $ 314,306.00
78-78315 2950 $ 10,031.00
71-35010 2910-15 $ 1,000,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
In order to keep the budget in line with the actual flow of funds the additional offsetting budget entries are needed
78-00101 2910-71 $ 1,000,000.00
78-00101 2950 $ "1,000,000.00)
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-2-b
Initiative Name:
Public Utilities - Water Budget Carryovers
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Water Utility is requesting to amend the 2009-2010 budget for carryover projects in the
amount of $2,144,000. The projects were budgeted in the 2008-2009 budget but were not
able to be completed by the end of the fiscal year. They are currently under construction and
require the funding be moved forward into the current budget year.
Criteria: The utility is requesting the budget be amended to fund projects which were
budgeted last year, but not expended until the current budget year. This will allow the
continuation of the utilities capital improvement program.
Condition: This is an established process to open the budget for carryover projects for each of
the Utility enterprise funds.
Effect: This will alow the department to continue the planned capital improvement program for
this year.
Cause: The fact that the fiscal year ends on June 30th, which falls in the middle of our
construction season.
Projects are started in one budget and completed in the next.
Recommendation : We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement
program to continue as approved.
Initiative#D-3
Public Utilities - Water Budget
Carryovers
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-3 2009-2010
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Utilities Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
------ --- — ----- Total -- $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title: - --------- --- --_------ --
Initiative#D-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
7
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
51-01301 2720-30 32,000.00
51-01301 2730-02 80,000.00
51-01301 2730-06 121,000.00
51-01301 2730-07 292,000.00
51-01301 2730-08 977,000.00
51-01301 2730-20 40,000.00
51-00801 2760-20 450,000.00
51-01701 2760-90 82,000.00
51-01701 2760-50 170,000.00
Total 2,244,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I N/A
Initiative#D-3-b
Initiative Name:
Recapture Remaining CIP and Class "C" Completed Projects
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # D4
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets of five (5) completed and closed CIP, and Class "C"
projects totaling $290,679.03, and increases the cost over run accounts of the respective programs for
future reprogramming.
Of these projects, three (3) are general fund CIP projects totaling $96,157.50; two (2) are Class "C"
CIP projects totaling $194,521.53.
Initiative#D-4
Recapture Remaining CIP and Class
"C" Completed Projects
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D4 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
CED -HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/ 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0!
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0'1
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0'
Other Fund
Total $0 $0'
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
:Position Title:
Initiative D-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
General Fund CIP
83-07041 CC Bldg. Energy Savings 2700 $ (2,318.01)
83-08045 Pavillion Roof Replacement 2700 $ (53,699.45)'
83-09041 Replace Roofs City Facilities 2700 $ - (40,140.04)
83-09099 GF CIP Cost Overrun i 2700 _ $ 96,157.50
'Class"C" 2700
83-06038 500 East Rehab 2700 $ (8,223.25)
83-08035 500 E., 900 to 1300 S. 2700 _ $ (186,298.28)
83-04097 Class C CIP Cost Overrun 2700 $ 194,521.53
- 7$ 290,E .03 9
Additional Accounting Details: -
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA _
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA _
Initiative#D-4-b
Initiative Name:
North Temple Jordan River Bridge Replacement
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # D5
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Engineering is requesting that a new Class "C" budget in the amount of $375,734 be established for
the North Temple Jordan River Bridge Replacement project. The Council has expressed an interest in
utilizing Class "C" funds as part of their discussion concerning the betterments and reconstruction of
the Jordan River Bridge, The bridge is being rebuilt to accommodate the Airport light rail project and
to be upgraded with enhanced urban elements matching the North Temple Boulevard project. These
funds will allow for the bridge to have a completely new deck with widened walkways, improved
pedestrian lighting, access to the river and decorative bridge railings.
To facilitate this request, Engineering is proposing to reallocate the remaining $160,734 Class "C"
funds from the 1300 East, South Temple to 500 South street improvement project to the North Temple
Jordan River Bridge Replacement. The administration has requested Wasatch Front Regional
Council transfer the approved $730,000 of federal funding allocated for this project to the North
Temple Viaduct replacement to increase the federal funding portion of that project. The $200,000 of
Class "C" funds allocated for the 1300 East project were budgeted as the required federal local match
money and for preparation of the design and environmental approval documents. The environmental
was completed and the City has paid UDOT. The 1300 East project has now been canceled due to
the federal money being transferred to the North Temple Viaduct replacement project.
Engineering is also proposing to reallocate $100,000 of the unobligated Class "C"funds remaining in
the 2009/2010 Street Pavement Overlay project. Construction bids on this project were lower than
anticipated because of the recent downturn in the economy resulting in less funding required to
complete the project than what was originally estimated.
Initiative#D-5
In addition, Engineering is proposing to reallocate $115,000 of unobligated Class "C" funds remaining
in the California Avenue, 4800 to 5600 West, Reconstruction project. This project was constructed
with Class "C" funds, general fund, property owner assessments and impact fees. Construction bids
received were lower than anticipated and a portion of the Class "C" and general fund were not used.
The property owner assessments and impact fees were utilized for a larger part of the project costs.
This project is nearly completed with only punch list items remaining.
Initiative#D-5
North Temple Jordan River Bridge
Replacement
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D5 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Joel Harrison/Sherrie Collins 535-6234/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total' $0 $0
!Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 1
Other Fund
Total i $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0,
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative D-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-New Cost Center 2700 $ 375,734.00
83-07036 2700 $ (160,734.00)
,83-10039 2700 $ (100,000.00)'
83-08034 2700 $ (115,000.00)
I I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? ' NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
i Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-5-b
Initiative Name:
Recapture Remaining Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Budgets
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative # D-6
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets of six (6) completed and/or closed US Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) projects including CDBG grants totaling $302,619.89, and
increases the cost over run accounts of the respective programs for future reprogramming as per
HUD Federal guidelines.
Initiative#D-6
Recapture Remaining Community
Development Block Grant(CDBG)
Budgets
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-6 _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
CED-HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Jennifer Schumann _ 535-6136/535-7276
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total) _ $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
!Other Fund
Total $0 $ . -
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 01
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#D-6-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Community Development Block Grant
86-06060 Riverside Park Streetscape 2700 $ (1,211.03)1
83-06098 CDBG CIP Cost Overrun 2700 $ 1,211.03
83-08051 Redwood Drive Street Reconsl 2700 $ (279,774.54)
83-08098 CDBG CIP Cost Overrun 2700 $ 279,774.54
83-09051 Bell Ave Street Design ` 2700 _ $ (553.33)
83-09052 Burbank Ave Street Design 2700 $ (9,202.74)
83-09098 CDBG CIP Cost Overrun 2700 $ 9,756.07
71-34055 Alliance House 2590 $ (11,643.00)
71-34052 Community Action Program H\ 2590 $ (235.25)
71-34099 CDBG Cost Overrun 2590 $ 11,878.25
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? -- NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-6-b
Initiative Name:
Property Management Budget Increase
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-7
Housekeeping
initiative Discussion:
Property Management has CIP budget available to use for costs associated with title searches,
closings and appraisals when purchasing property for the City. The remaining budget in this 83 CIP
fund is $25,912 with an outstanding bill of approximately $5,100. This request is to increase this
budget and move cash of$55,000 for a total budget of$75,812.
Property Management has cash available within the 83 CIP fund of$3,864,438.64 in the Surplus Land
account and this action will decrease that account by $55,000.
•
Initiative#D-7
Property Management Budget Increase
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-7 2008-09
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Property Management _ Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
_ John Spencer/Sherrie Collins 535-6398/535-6150
Prepared By - Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
;General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact - ---- — — -
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
'Other Fund •
83
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative D-7-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-94083 2700 55,000.00
83-81100 2700 (55,000.00)
Additional Accounting Details:
Transfer cash and budget from 83-81100
to 83-94083
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
ilf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-7-b
Initiative Name:
Intermodal Hub Fund - Encumbrance Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-8
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
State law requires that all budgets, except that of the Capital Project Fund, lapse at June 30th
or fiscal year end. Historically, purchase orders encumbered near the end of the fiscal year
are not paid by June 30th. Therefore the payment will occur in the next fiscal year. Because
the budget from the prior fiscal year lapsed, it is necessary to again appropriate funds to
cover the purchase commitments made in the prior year and paid in the current year. The
funding source for this type of transaction is typically fund balance. Cash or revenue
collected in the prior year and not spent lapses to fund balance or cash reserves and is
therefore available to cover the commitments made.
This amendment request will appropriate budget in the Intermodal Hub $130,000. This will be
funded from the Intermodal Hub Fund Reserves where there are adequate funds to cover this
request.
Initiative#D-8
Intermodal Hub Fund - Encumbrance
Carryover
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-8 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Administrative Service _ Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Teresa Beckstrand 535-6416
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title: -
Initiative#D-8-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number - Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number _ Amount
50-50002 2329 $ 130,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No)
Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No)
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No)
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No)
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? (Yes or No)
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO)
Initiative#D-8-b
Initiative Name:
Golf and Fleet Fund - Encumbrance Carryovers
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #D-9
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
State law requires that all budgets, except the Capital Project Fund, lapse at June 30th of
each fiscal year end. Historically, purchase orders encumbered at the end of the fiscal year
are re-appropriated in the next fiscal year. Because the budget from the prior fiscal year
lapsed, it is necessary to again appropriate funds to cover the purchase commitments made
in the prior year and paid in the current year. The funding source for this type of transaction
is the fund balance.
This amendment request will appropriate budget in the Golf Fund of $19,760. This
amendment will also appropriate budget in the Fleet Fund of $445,692.
Initiative#D-9
Golf and Fleet Fund - Encumbrance
Carryovers
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#D-9 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services - - Housekeeping
Department - Type of Initiative
Greq Davis 535-6123
Prepared By _ Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact - - -- - - -Revenue Impact By Fund: FY 2009-2010 Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
- Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 _
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#D-9-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
59-01000 2760 $ 8,450.00
59-01045 _ 2750 $ 11,310.00
_ Total $ 19,760.00
61-00001 2221 $ 20.00
61-00001 2225 $ 48.00
61-00001 _ 2299 $ 170.00
61-00001 _ 2350 $ 119.00
61-00001 2750 $ 13,128.00
61-00002 2232-01 $ 10.00
61-00002 _ 2233 -- $ — 691.00
61-00002 _ 2234 $ 37,217.00
61-00002 2234-01 $ 2,403.00
61--00002 2295 $ 27.00
61-00002 2298 $ 264.00
61-00002 2299 $ 380.00
61-00002 2760 $ 35,190.00
61-00003 2241-01 $ 1,751.00_
61-00003 2241-11 - -- - $ - - 619.00
61-00003 _ 2340-01 $ 45.00
61-00004 _ 2241-01 $ - - 425.00
61-00004 2241-04 $ 8,381.00
61-00004 I 12241-05 $ 1,150.00
61-00004 _ 2241-06 $ 85.00
61-00004 _ _ 1 2241-08 _ $ 100.00
61-00004 2241-09 $ 1,081.00
61-00004 _ 2395 $ 605.00
61-00004 I 2549-70 $ 112.00
61-00008 2231-01 $ 24,031.00
61-00008 2231-04 $ 61,006.00
61-00010 1 2299 $ 477.00
61-00020 _ _ 2234 $ 108.00
61-00020 2311 $ 108,297.00
61-00020 _ ' 2750 $ 147,752.00
Total _ $ 445,692.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Initiative#D-9-b
Initiative Name:
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant, (JAG)
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-1
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applies for and receives this grant annually. It is awarded to provide
operational support and services in the eligible areas of law enforcement, crime prevention and drug
courts. The City received $964,678, and as always, includes other Police jurisdictions funding. The
City will act as the lead agency, acting as the fiscal agent and reporting of the grant. Of the $964,678
awarded, the Salt Lake County Sherriffs Office will receive $164,237; West Valley City Police
Department will received $144,398; So. Salt Lake Police Department will receive $53,085; West
Jordan City Police Department will receive $49,733; Murray City Police Department will receive
$44,932; Sandy City Police Department will receive $45,476; Taylorsville City Police Department will
receive $44,026; and the Midvale Police Department will receive $28,807. The City's amount is
$389,984.
The SLCPD proposes to use these funds to purchase and install 65 @ $5,999.75 each, in-car E-
Ticketing and Traffic Accident Reporting Package Systems. The systems will enable Officers to
submit electronic ticketing, accident reporting and fingerprinting from their patrol vehicles which will
significantly reduce the amount of time it takes Officers to submit these reports manually.
No match is required.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department of
Justice, JAG funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-1
US Department of Justice, Bureau of
Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-1 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Police Department New Staff Resources -
Department - - Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn /Sherrie Collins - _ 535-3265 1535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
---- $ 964,678.00 - - ---------
Total $ 964,678.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#E-1-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 2009-DJ-BX-0246 16.738
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 1360 964,678.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 2590 964,678.00
•
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
1Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? 1 NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-1-b
Initiative Name:
U.S. Department of Justice, Paul Coverdell National Forensic Sciences Improvement
Act Formula Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-2
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
THE SLCPD applied for and received $125,000 grant from the US Department of Justice under the
Paul Coverdell National Forensic Sciences Formula Grant program for crime lab equipment needed to
process firearm examinations.
The City currently sends all firearm examination requests to the Utah Bureau of Forensic Services
(State Lab). The State Lab has one qualified firearm examiner who provides examinations for the
entire state, which results in a backlog and untimely return of evidence. It is the SLC Crime Lab's goal
to become a full service laboratory. The goal is to have one (1) Crime Lab technician certified as a
firearm examiner. The National Firearms Examiner Academy consists of four training phases, Phase I
is a four (4) month training period with pre-course assignments; Phase II is a fifteen (15) week training
period held at the AFTE Forensic Science Lab in Ammendale, Maryland; Phase III is a four (4) month
training period where the student returns home to complete a research project and other assignments;
and Phase IV is a two (2) week training period in which the student returns to AFTE to present his
research project and follow-up instruction. There are no training fees to the student or agency to
attend the Academy, however there are related travel costs.
The SLCPD proposes to purchase equipment necessary to set up and operate a state of the art Crime
Lab capable of processing firearm examinations. Equipment costs of approximately $115,000
includes Leica FS M Manually - controlled Forensic Comparison Macroscope, a Team Fabrication
Water Tank, Bullet Catcher, a Replacement Kevlar for Bullet Catcher and other incidental equipment,
and to use approximately $10,000 for travel/training expenses related to the training for the
certification of the firearm examiner.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department of
Justice grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-2
U.S. Department of Justice,
Paul Coverdell National
Forensic Sciences
Improvement Act Formula
Grant
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-2 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
• Police Department New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
i -
Total', $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total' $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $ 125,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title: � ------------- --- ---' -- -
I iliativc
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2009-CD BX 0063-16.742
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 1360 125,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 2590 125,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? 1 NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-2-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ) Pharmaceutical
Drug Crime Project Public Awareness
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-3
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The SLCPD applied for and received a $250,000 grant from the State of Utah, CCJJ, under their
Pharmaceutical Drug Crime Project Public Awareness grant program.
The State of Utah recently formed the Utah Pharmaceutical Drug Crime Project (UPDCP) committee
which includes prevention, treatment, law enforcement, judiciary, environmental quality, health
specialists, medical providers, prosecutors, faith-based and Tribal Nations members. This committee
was formed to bring together federal, state and local law enforcement and drug education/prevention
specialists to develop a comprehensive, statewide program to address Utah's pharmaceutical
problem.
The UPDCP will utilize a multi-agency Public Awareness Committee co-chaired by CCJJ Staff and the
SLCPD. SLCPD will contract with a qualified advertising, marketing, or public relations agency to
create and implement a public awareness campaign that will heighten awareness and serve as a call
to action to Utah's citizens to become involved in efforts to eliminate non-medical pharmaceutical use
in Utah. The contracting agency will utilize TV, radio, print and other non-traditional media,.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah CCJJ
grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-3
State of Utah, CCJJ
Pharmaceutical Drug Crime
Project Public Awareness
Initiative Name
_ BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-3 _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Police Department _ New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn /Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact - — -- -- ----
_ Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
i
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total_ $0 $0
Other Fund
72 $ 250,000.00
Total $ 250,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title: ----- - -- -- - --- '
lintiativc#E 3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 9A69
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 1370 250,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 2590 250,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-3-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-4
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Management Services applied for an received a $17,735 grant to perform maintenance to the
Bonneville Shoreline Trail (Red Butte Gardens to City Creek Canyon) from the State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources. The proposed trail maintenance includes 12.41 miles of needed
maintenance to trail surface, grooming vegetation, switchbacks, retaining walls and water diversion
structures along the Bonneville Shoreline Trail and 3.8 miles of access trails from the Red Butte Creek
trailhead north to the Salt Lake County border.
The City will contract with the Cottonwood Canyon Foundation for $20,992 who will oversee the
project and approximately 120 volunteers who will conduct minor repairs and maintenance. In
addition, the City's Trail and Open Space Coordinators will develop a public awareness brochure at a
cost of approximately $822; water diversion structures or dips will be created to prevent rutting and
erosion at a cost of $838; and two (2) retaining walls will be built using pressure treated lumber at a
cost of$700. $883 will be expensed for grant management and over-site.
The grant requires a 100% match which will be satisfied with $5000 cash from the City's CIP Open
Space fund which will be used with the grant to contract with the Cottonwood Canyon Foundation and
to pay for the brochure, $9,755 will be met with the volunteer time of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Committee and Cottonwood Canyons Foundation and $4,495 will be met by donated time and tools by
the Cottonwood Canyons Foundation.
In addition to this grant, the Open Space Coordinator expects to receive an additional $1,500 grant
from the State Park's Board as recommended by the State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources.
Verification of this has not been confirmed at this time but will be brought into a budget opening when
the award comes.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the
original grant.
Initiative#E-4
State of Utah, Department of Natural
Resources, Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-4 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Emv Storeheim/Sherrie Collins 535-7730/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact --- - - i----
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 $ 17,735.00
Total $ 17,735.00 $0
_ Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#E-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 1370 17,735.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 2590 17,735.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
iDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-4-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security (HSG) , 2009
Urban Area Security Initiative Grant (UASI) Program
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-5
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Emergency Management Division in a joint effort with Salt Lake County received a $2,315,400
grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, 2009 Homeland Security Grant, under the
Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant program. This grant was awarded to continue the UASI
efforts in purchasing equipment and materials needed to plan and prepare in the event of a natural
disaster or terrorist attack. The City is the lead agency and will receive $1,278,494.14 of the grant
funds. The remainder, or$1,036,905.86 will be provided to the County.
The Council, as a conset agenda item, recently allocated $320,000 of the City's portion of budget so
that the SLC Fire Department could purchase the inter-operable communications equipment for the
two new communication support trucks purchased with 08-UASI grant funding, and have it installed
before the trucks were shipped to SLC. The Emergency Management Division is now requesting that
the remainder of budget totaling $1,995,400 be allocated.
Of the City' s remaining allocation of $958,494.14, the Emergency Management Division will expense
$150,000 under the risk management category which includes performing an all-hazards GIS
inventory to identify and protect critical infrastructure/transportation systems and strengthening the
capabilities for medical response by purchasing $148,129 of pharmaceutical antidotes to protect first
responders; $43,414.60 will be expensed by SLC Fire to provide training, drills and excercise's for
communications specialists and technicians to operate the two new vehicles purchased with 08-UASI
funds and equipment recently purchased; $55,800.54 will be expensed on equipment under the
planning category which includes video conference telecommunication, communications and
surveillances systems and grant managlment over-site; $360,000 will be used for community
preparedness activitites including public education and outreach literature and campaigns and 72 hr
kits for local school districts; and $201,150 will be used to purchase data fusion/synthesis equipment;
and the remaining $1,036,905.86 will be allocted to the County.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State UASI grant
and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-5
•
State of Utah, Department of Public
Safety, Division of Homeland Security
(HSG) , 2009 Urban Area Security
Initiative Grant(UASI) Program
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-5 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Alicia Johnson/Sherrie Collins 535-7221 /535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
- ------------- ------
72- $ 1,995,400.00
Total $ 1,995,400.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
:Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative t-a-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: UAS 9-FY09-97.067
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1370 1,995,400.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 1,995,400.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-5-b
Initiative Name:
US Department of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Culinary Water Supply
Protection Project
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-6
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Public Utilities applied for and received a $286,000 grant from the US Department of EPA for a
culinary water supply protection project that includes an analysis and report of SLC's drinking water
Well #18 and perchloroethylene (PCE) Plume located in the 700 South 1600 East area. Well #18 is
an important component of SLC's culinary water supply and is affected by a known deep groundwater
plume of volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination, primarily PCE.
The grant funds will be used to contract with a qualified environmental consulting and engineering firm
to access additional delineation and characterization of the PCE Plume, the hydrogeological
conditions affecting both the PCE Plume and Well #18, and make recommendations for the
development of water treatment alternatives to prevent PCE from affecting the culinary water supply
from Well #18 and design the recommended alternatives for implementation and construction to
protect the culinary water supply from the PCE Plume.
The grant requires a 45% match and will be satisfied through Public Services environmental
consulting and engineering services for the project.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department of
EPA grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-6
US Department of Environmental
Protection Agency(EPA), Culinary
Water Supply Protection Proiect
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-6 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Public Utilities New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Laura Briefer/Sherrie Collins _ 483-6741 /535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact - ---------- ----
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0,
Other Fund
72- -- --- $ 286,000.00 ---- - ----
Total $ 286,000.00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative 4t-b-a
Initiative#E-6-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 66.202
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1360 $ 286,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 $ 286,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the po sition will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? ----—_--- NA -
1 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
r
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-6-b
Initiative Name:
Economic Development Corporation of Utah - Marketing Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-7
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Economic Development Division of CED applied for and received three (3) grants from the
Economic Development Corporation of Utah (edcUtah). The grants were allocated for Marketing,
$3,000; Sponsorship, $2,000; and Professional Development $800.
The Marketing grant of $3,000 was awarded for updating the City's marketing materials. The
materials currently being used are out dated and do not adequately promote Salt Lake City as a
premier business location. The proposed marketing packet will include a kit cover, blank inserts, a
brochure and large envelope at an estimated cost of $10,000. The grant funds will be used to offset
costs associated with development of the marketing kit. The required match and remainder of the
Marketing Kit costs will be met and is budgeted for within the Economic Development Divisions
general fund budget.
The Sponsorship grant of $2,000 was awarded to help offset costs associated with the Neighborhood
Business Districts Conference which will be offered by the Economic Development Division in Jan of
2010. This conference will provide local participants with knowledge of how to effectively develop a
successful business district, how business districts can help individual businesses succeed, the role
the city plan plays in development, successful marketing strategies, planning, zoning and design
issues, how to interface with residents of the neighborhood, the best practices, and how to hold
special events and promotions. The conference is estimated to cost $15,000. The grant funds may
be used to offset marketing/conference materials, food, and speaker costs of travel and hotel. The
required match and remainder of the Conference costs will be met and budgeted for within the
Economic Development Divisions and CED's general fund budget, donations and other private
contributions including commitments from Downtown Alliance and the Chamber of Commerce.
Initiative#E-7
The Professional Development grant of $800.00 was awarded to help offset the costs of 2 people to
attend the annual or semi annual National Association of Foreign Trade Zones conference which will
be held Jan through June of 2010. The required match and remainder of the travel costs will be met
and is budgeted for within the Economic Development Divisions general fund budget.
Initiative#E-7
Economic Development Corporation of
Utah -Marketing Grant
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-7 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Public Utilities _ New Staff Resources _
Department Type of Initiative
Bob Farrington /Sherrie Collins /535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72
- - — —
Total $ 5,800.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title: - - - -- -- --- _-
initiative gt-i-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA-Private Grant Source
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1895 5,800.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 3,000.00
72 2590 2,000.00
72 2590 800.00
5,800.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Please set up three cost centers
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? 1 NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-7-b
Initiative Name:
US Department of Energy (DOE) - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Solar
Market Transformation Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-8
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Sustainability Division applied for a $267,700 grant from the DOE, under the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act, for continuation of the Solar Market Transformation program. The City is
currently waiting for award documents to be issued. This transaction serves as a place holder and if
award documents are not received by the time of the briefing will be pulled from the budget opening
and resubmitted either as a consent agenda item or in a future budget opening.
This grant was awarded to continue Phase II of a collaborative set of strategies with the City's partner
agencies that include Salt Lake County, Utah Clean Energy, Kennecott Land Company, and the Utah
Governors Office of Economic Development to address the barriers impacting the widespread
deployment of solar technologies in Utah, .
The objectives of Phase II of the Solar Salt Lake Project are to increase the installed capacity of solar
energy in SLC and the County, reaching 10MW of solar by 2015; remove key financial and regulatory
barriers to widespread, large -scale solar development in the Salt Lake Valley through: a. Expansion
of Solar-PV Utility Rebate (buy down) Program, b. Regulatory ruling on Third Party Power Purchase
Agreements, c. Identification and implementation of replicable alternative financing structures for both
the City and County, d. Stakeholder outreach and education on each of the aforementioned strategies
and other solar related issues that arise; and serve as a model for other cities and jurisdictions in Utah
and nationwide that wish to address financial and regulatory barriers to solar deployment.
Initiative#E-8
These funds will be used to extend the contractual agreement, for a two year period, with Utah Clean
Energy in the amount of $159,845. Utah Clean Energy has been the consultant during Phase I of the
grant and provides the promotion of energy efficiency and renewable energy through advocacy,
education and formation of diverse partnerships. In addition, Utah Clean Energy has assisted SLC
with program implementation, including barrier identification, strategy development and program
execution. The City will also contract with the County in the amount of $95,661 to provide travel funds
for one staff member to attend the annual Solar Market and Solar American Cities Annual
Conferences and to sub-contract with Ballard Spahr for consulting services for regulatory and
technical issues. $6,532 will be retained by the City for grant management and over-site and $5,662
will be used for travel to the Solar Market and Solar America Cities Annual Conferences.
The grant requires a match which will be met with $24,452 of the salary and benefits cost of the City's
Office of Sustainability and the Environment Director, $5,000 of donated time by Kennecott Land
Company, $42,855 of donated time from Salt Lake County, $35,000 of donated time by Utah Clean
Energy, and $5,000 of time donated by the Utah Governors' Office of Economic Development.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department
Energy, Solar America grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the
original grant.
Initiative#E-8
US Department of Enemy(DOE) -
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act Solar Market Transformation Grant
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-8 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Vickie Bennett/Sherrie Collins 535-6540/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund d Balance- None
Impact ------ ---- -- ---
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total' $0 $0
Other Fund
72 267,700.00
Total $ 267,700.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative ft-ts-a
Initiative#E-8-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1360 267,700.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 267,700.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? I NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-8-b
Initiative Name:
LeRay McAllister Critical Land Conservation Fund -Wasatch Hollow Restoration
Project
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-9
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Sustainability Division applied for a $20,000 grant from the LeRay McAllister Land Conservation
Fund for the Wasatch Hollow Restoration Project.
The 10 acres of the Wasatch Hollow Open Space Land consists of 3.5 acres donated by the LDS
Church, 2 acres purchased by the SLC and the County, 2.5 acres donated by the Presbyterian Church
and 1 acre of street right of way that is in the process of being vacated. The City has partnered with
Utah Open Lands, Salt Lake County, Wasatch Hollow Community Council, Wasatch Hollow
Community Association, and Dr. A. Tyrone Harrison at Westminster College to restore the upland,
meadow and riparian habitat of Emigration Creek in Wasatch Hollow.
This project proposes weed control on all 10 acres of property and will be the focus of long-term
management to ensure invasive non-native species are controlled. The 3.5 acres will be focused on
as the first phase of restoration and the remaining 6.5 acres, which requires significant earth works to
accomplish restoration of in-stream, riparian meadow and upland habitat restoration will be the focus
of the second phase of restoration.
These funds will be used for phase one including weed control, and clean up of all 10 acres. The
funds will be spent for material and supplies as follows: Herbicide - $800; Native Grass and Flower
Seeds - $4,000; and Mycrorizy Fungus for planting establishment - $250. In addition $14,950 will be
used to hire professional consultants/contractors as follows: Invasive Tree Control Professional -
$7,200; Debris Removal Contractor - $5,000; Soil Preparation Contactor - $750; and Herbicide
Application Labor- $2,000.
Initiative#E-9
The grant requires a 100% match which will be satisfied with $20,000 cash from the City's CIP Open
Space fund which will be used to contract with Millennium Group Consulting which is currently being
negotiated. There is currently a cash balance in the Open Space fund of 172,878.92 after the $5,000
allocated for the State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Bonneville Shoreline Trail grant and
there will be a remaining balance of $152,878.92 after this allocation.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept LeRay McAllister grant
funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-9
LeRav McAllister Critical Land
Conservation Fund -Wasatch Hollow
Restoration Project
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-9 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Emv Storheim/Sherrie Collins 535-7730/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact -------
_ Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 ---- $ 20,000.00 -- ---
Total $ 20,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title:
- ---- ----- ----
initiative Ott-a-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA-Not Federal Funding
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1890 20,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2700 20,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#E-9-b
Initiative Name:
US Department of Energy (DOE) -American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Energy
Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-10
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Sustainability Division applied for and received $2,116,500 grant from the DOE, under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, EECBG program. Salt Lake City's Energy Blueprint
outlines the City's goals and strategies for reducing energy use, improving air quality, and reducing
carbon dioxide emissions within the City. The EECBG grant funds were awarded to aid the City in
reaching several of it's goals and objectives outlined in the blueprint which include reducing
community energy use and CO2e Emissions, reduce energy use and CO2e emission in City
operations and increase the quantity of renewable energy produced in the City.
To meet the grant objectives, the City proposed to the DOE to allocate $1,446,030 to contractual
services as follows: $153,000 for a carbon emissions/sustainability consultant to a conduct
community carbon inventory and collect baselines, develop carbon/energy reduction goals, verify and
report findings to the Climate Registry, develop a long term energy reduction strategy and formulate
the SLC Sustainability Plan; $91,000 for a decorate asphalt specialty contractor to install 2.1 miles of
four-foot wide green shared-lane (bicycle and auto) striping on roadways; $38,000 for design
development, printing and promotions of a brochure, maps and a public display; $25,000 to Downtown
Alliance to purchase 5,000 strands of three watt LED holiday lights for installation throughout the
downtown business district; $415,000 for a lighting contractor to provide and install an estimated 415
LED street lights; $167,326 for a planning and zoning consultant to produce energy efficiency building
and alternative energy production and energy efficiency transportation ordinance amendments;
$32,370 for a solar energy contractor to supply and install a solar-hot water system at Fire Station #8;
$207,724 for a traffic signal management consultant to complete the synchronization of 200 traffic
lights within the City; $50,000 to Utah Clean Energy to assist state-wide policy efforts,
legislation/policy education and informative actions for regulatory issues with public utilities; $249,000
for Utah Transit Authority to remodel 1,700 square feet of intermodal hub space for a Bicycle Transit
Center and for operations of the center; and $17,610 for a web designer to design and publish a
Sustainability/Community Carbon Reduction website.
Initiative#E-10
In addition, the City proposed to retain $86,100 to purchase and install approximately 1,400 yellow 12-
watt LED traffic signals, $400,000 for the Energy Efficient Revolving Loan Fund that will provide
approximately 80 loans between $5,000 and $100,000 to for-profit business within the City to upgrade
the energy efficiency of their buildings; $173,870 for the salary and benefits of time spent on grant
related activities over the grant three year period of the grant monitor for over-site and financial
management of the grant, the environmental planner to process environmental reviews, the
community development grant specialist to track and report Davis bacon wage activities and the
Economic Development Divisions Loan Fund Coordinator for over site and management of the
EECBG Revolving Loan Fund; and $10,500 to pay for the Climate Registry membership for three
years.
There is no match requirement.
•
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department
Energy grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-1 0
US Department of Energy(DOE) -
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act, Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant(EECBG)
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-10 2009-10
Initiative Number __ Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services New Staff Resources _
Department Type of Initiative
Vickie Bennett/Sherrie Collins 535-6540/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact -- - - - --
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72 $ 2,116,500.00
Total' $ 2,116,500.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative gt-iu-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: DE-EE0000892-81.128
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 1360 2,116,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 2,116,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I No
Initiative#E-1 0-b
•
Initiative Name:
Utah Arts Council, Arts Education Program -YouthCity Artways Imagination Celebration
Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-11
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah, Utah Arts Council awarded the Salt Lake City Foundation a $2,500 grant for the
YouthCity Artways, Imagination Celebration program.
The Imagination Celebration of Salt Lake city is a year-round arts education program that fosters
creativity in the community by providing young people and their families with opportunities to explore
and experience the fine arts together. Through activities and performances in schools, libraries and
community settings, participants express their creativity, experience professional artists, and develop
a greater appreciation for the arts. The Imagination Celebration encompasses events in a variety of
art forms including dance, opera, drama, music and visual arts, providing a diverse array or activities.
The grant funds received from the Utah Arts Council will cover the costs associated with workshops
for the "Imagine the Earth..." piano monster concert to be held at West High School on May 27, 2010.
The concert brings together pianists of many ages and abilities to play ten grand pianos on one stage.
Participants in workshops led by YouthCity Artways teaching artists will create multi-media art pieces
which will be incorporated into the performance. Funds will also be used to support the "Six Tribes,
one Vibe" workshops at Glendale Middle School during the course of the 2009/2010 school year. This
program uses traditional folk arts to connect school-age youth to the past. Students work with
professional folk artists from a variety of countries to learn the cultures and dances of different
geographic regions, culminating in a public performance at Glendale Middle School.
There is no match requirement.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the Utah Art's Council
grant funds and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Initiative#E-11
Utah Arts Council,Arts Education
Program -YouthCity Artways
Imagination Celebration Grant
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-11 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Public Services New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Ken Perko/Sherrie Collins 535-6540/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
--- Impact --------
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total' $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0,
Other Fund
72 2,500.00
Total $ 2,500.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
initiative#t-i i-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
7777123 1370 2,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- 2590 2,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-11-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Utah Division of Park and Recreation, Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #E-12
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Management Services, Sustainability Division received an additional award of $1,500 from the State of
Utah, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation. These funds were awarded in addition to the $17,735
awarded from the State Department of Natural Resources to be used for the same purposes.
Management Services received a $17,735 grant to perform maintenance to the Bonneville Shoreline
Trail (Red Butte Gardens to City Creek Canyon) from the State of Utah, Department of Natural
Resources. The proposed trail maintenance includes 12.41 miles of needed maintenance to trail
surface, grooming vegetation, switchbacks, retaining walls and water diversion structures along the
Bonneville Shoreline Trail and 3.8 miles of access trails from the Red Butte Creek trailhead north to
the Salt Lake County border.
The City will contract with the Cottonwood Canyon Foundation for $20,992 who will oversee the
project and approximately 120 volunteers who will conduct minor repairs and maintenance. In
addition, the City's Trail and Open Space Coordinators will develop a public awareness brochure at a
cost of approximately $822; water diversion structures or dips will be created to prevent rutting and
erosion at a cost of $838; and two (2) retaining walls will be built using pressure treated lumber at a
cost of$700. $883 will be expensed for grant management and over-site.
The grant requires a 100% match which will be satisfied with $5000 cash from the City's CIP Open
Space fund which will be used with the grant to contract with the Cottonwood Canyon Foundation and
to pay for the brochure, $9,755 will be met with the volunteer time of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Committee and Cottonwood Canyons Foundation and $4,495 will be met by donated time and tools by
the Cottonwood Canyons Foundation.
This request will establish budget to facilitate the additional grant of $1,500 for the Bonneville
Shoreline Project.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the
original grant.
Initiative#E-12
State of Utah, Department of Natural
Resources, Bonneville Shoreline Trail
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-12 _ _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Management Services _ _ New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Emv Storeheim/Sherrie Collins _ 535-7730/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
--- ---Total $0-- ---- $0
.Other Fund
72 1,500.00
Total $ 1,500.00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#E-12-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 1370 $ 1,500.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 2590 $ 1,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? ---- No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-12-b
Initiative Name:
Utah Department of Public Safety, 2009 Homeland Security Grant, Urban Area Security
Initiative - UASI
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #G-1
Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards
Initiative Discussion:
The Emergency Management Division in a joint effort with Salt Lake County received a $2,315,400
grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, 2009 Homeland Security Grant, under the
Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant program. This grant was awarded to continue the UASI
efforts in purchasing equipment and materials needed to plan and prepare in the event of a natural
disaster or terrorist attack. The City is the lead agency and will receive $1,278,494.14 of the grant
funds. The remainder or$1,036,905.86 will be provided to the County,
The Emergency Management Division is currently requesting that budget in the amount of $320,000
be established so that the SLC Fire Department can purchase the inter-operable communications
equipment for the two new communication support trucks purchased with 08-UASI grant funding, and
have it installed before the trucks are shipped to SLC. The inter-operable equipment will insure that
the trucks are mission ready and will allow for communications with local, state and federal agencies.
This request is to allocate budget of $320,000. The remainder of the grant, or $1,995,400 will be
brought into budget amendment#2. See item number E-5
Already funded by the grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account.
Initiative#G-1
Utah Department of Public Safety, 2009
Homeland Security Grant, Urban Area
Security Initiative- UASI
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#G-1 2009-10
Initiative Number I IFiscal Year
Council Consent
Management Services Agenda-Grant Awards
Department Type of Initiative
Alicia Johnson/Sherrie Collins _ 535-7221/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
;General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0',
Enterprise Fund
Total' $0 $01
Other Fund
72-99999 $ 320,000.00
Total $ 320,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title: - ---� ---- —
Initiative#G-1-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: UAS9-FY 09/ 97.067
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount _
72-99999 1370 $ 320,000.00
_ Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-99999 2590 $ 320,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? - No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is fundingposition is it a expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
1 Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#G-1-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Certified Local Government (CLG) Program, Intensive Level Survey
Historic Preservation
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #G-2
Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah, Department of Community Culture awarded the Salt Lake City Planning Division a
$4,800 Certified Local Government grant to provide funding to begin the process of designating City-
owned historic properties as Landmark Sites by completing intensive level documentation of eligible
properties. Currently, the City has many significant properties that are not listed as Landmark Sites on
the SLC Register of Cultural Resources.
Of these funds, $3,600 was awarded to hire a professional consultant to complete a historic intensive
level survey and provide documentation on approximately four (4) City owned historic properties for
designation as Landmark Sites, and $1,200 was awarded for a professional consultant to prepare an
Historic National Register nomination for the Northwest Pipeline building (Public Safety Building).
The remaining three buildings will be determined by Planning Staff.
The grant requires a $4,800 match which will be satisfied with the Preservation Planning Staff time
and is budgeted for within the Planning Division's budget.
Already funded by the grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account
•
Initiative#G-2
State of Utah, Certified Local
Government(CLG) Program, Intensive
Level Survey Historic Preservation
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#G-2 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Consent
CED Agenda -Grant Awards
Department Type of Initiative
Janice Lew/Sherrie Collins 535-7265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total
Enterprise Fund
Total, $0 $0
'Other Fund
72-99999 $ 4,800.00 _
Total $ 4,800.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0',
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#G-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-99999 - 7 1370 $ 4,800.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-99999 2590 $ 4,800.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#G-2-b
Initiative Name:
US Dept of Health and Human Services SAMHSA - Drug Free Communities Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #G-3
Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office applied for and received $125,000 of grant funding from the Department of Health
and Human Services for continuation of the Mayor's Drug Free Communities Support program. This
program supports the Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs in the reduction and
prevention of substance abuse in Salt Lake City. This is year two of the grant which has been
awarded for an additional 5 year period.
Of these funds, $66,417 has been awarded for the salary and benefits of the Coalition Coordinator,
who coordinates and supports the coalition strategy in program implementation and activities that
include training, data collection, dissemination of findings, and liaising between the Coalition, the
Mayor's Office and the community, and $5,371 will fund the Grant Monitors time for the fiscal
monitoring and oversight of the grant. In addition, $10,171 has been awarded for travel and training of
the Coalition Coordinator, a coalition member, four (4) students and one (1) advisor to four (4)
mandatory conferences that include the grantee meeting, and the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of
American (CADCA) trainings and Youth Leadership Initiative; $14,435 will be used for memberships,
registration for conference's listed above, printing, photocopying and postage; and $ 28,606 will be
used for other contractual components to include continuation of program evaluation and needs
assessment data collection and analysis for the Coalition, Salt Lake IMS web-site domain, a
contractual strategic planning facilitator to assist the Coalition in its annual strategic planning process,
stipends paid to high school teachers who serve as school advisors for Governing Youth Councils,
and graphic design costs for brochures, posters mailings, etc.
The grant requires a $166,724 in-kind match which will be met with the Mayor's Office staff, IMS staff
time for Community Forum tapings, a portion of the consultants time for the evaluation services and
data collection, Coalition members time and SLC Public Utilities expense related to the production and
mailing of four publications of the Salt Lake City News with articles featuring Coalition prevention
messages and is included in the City's water bill.
Already funded by the grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account.
Initiative#G-3
US Dept of Health and Human Services
SAMHSA- Drug Free Communities
Grant
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#G-3 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Consent
Mayor's Coalition on ATOD Agenda -Grant Awards
Department - Type of Initiative
Abbie Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-7936/535-6150
Prepared By 1Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- i None
---- Impact — ---
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0' _
Internal Service Fund
Total _ $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total _ $0 $01
Other Fund
72-99999 $ 125,000.00 --
Total $ 125,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact: _
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#G-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 93.276-5H79SP012433-07
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-99999 1360 $ 125,000.00
7 --
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-99999 2590 $ 125,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? _ _ Yes _
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I - _- Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ - Yes
Will grant impact the a community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? Yes _---
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ No
Initiative#G-3-b
Initiative Name:
Funding for Sugar House Park Fireworks
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #I-1
Council Added Item
Initiative Discussion:
Council Member Simonsen asked for Council support to consider reallocating $15,000 of funding for a
local group which is considering organizing and staging the summer fireworks program at Sugar
House Park.
The funding was previously allocated in the Non-Departmental budget by the Council during the FY
2010 budget process to assist the Sugar House Park Authority with the annual fireworks program.
Originally, the Council required a match from Salt Lake County as a conditionof the funding. This
proposal would remove the condition and provide more flexibility. This is one-time funding.
Initiative#I-1
Funding for Sugar House
Fireworks
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#I-1 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Office Council Added Item
Department Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
-- - -Impact ---- ___
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
- - - Total � - - $0 -- $0 -.
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
- - -- -- - -- -- - - -- -
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
FTE's:
Position Title:
Initiative#1-la
_ Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
r
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
09-00407 { 2580 _ $ 15,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Budget is already in this cost center
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA —
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services prov ided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#I-lb
Ditrict 5 Property Purchase
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative #I-3
Council Added Item
Initiative Discussion:
Council Member Love asked for Council support to fund the potential purchase of property in District
5. The City will participate in an auction for the property in order to preserve options for the
neighborhood for an open space project. Funding source: Surplus Land Account.
Initiative#I-3
Herbert Park Open Space
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#I-3 _ _ 2009-10
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Office _ _ Council Added Item
Department _ Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656 _
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact �- - - - -
_ Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount _
General Fund
-
Total $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund _
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0
_ Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0'
FTE's:
Position Title: — -- —Initiative#I-3a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number Amount _
83-81 New Cost Center 2700 $ 80,000.00
83-81000 2700 $ (80,000.00)
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? - NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
Ifgrant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
program completegrant g frame? -- - -- -Will grant ro ram be in funding time NA
Will grant impact the community once the a grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#I-3b