020 of 2005 - Budget Amendment No. 6 for FY 2004-2005 0 05-1
B 05-7
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 20 of 2005
(Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004
which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2004-2005)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 63 OF
2004 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT
LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2004 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2005.
PREAMBLE
On August 24, 2004, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and finalized
the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the
fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said
budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt
Lake City, Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and
finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 7 day of
June , 2005.
CHAIRPE SON
ATTEST:
CHIEF E UTY CITY RE ORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on June 8, 2005
Mayor's Action: jr- Approved Vetoed
n-. \ MAYOR
,7:v. 1. ti ATTEST: .y�, � 4,pfi �
.
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY REC ER
fi i^>4;,,- ...' �'.;=O 4
C,!, t-;i,_ ;,4 .4,10,rt,,,Y'; ,-4r100
( ---:
(SEAL) E -
Bill No. 20 of 2005.
Published: 6-21-05 .
g:`ordinance 04\budget amendment#6 2004-2005
3
FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #6 — June
FY 2005 FY 2005
Initiative Gen. Fund Gen. Fund
Initiative Name Amount Impact FTE Fund Balance
Impact
Section A New Items
1. Banking Charges on $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Credit Card Payments
2. Cash for Cans Challenge $5,000.00
Award
3. Summer Park Crime $53,000.00 $53,000.00 $53,000.00
Suppression Patrol
4. Lori Hacking $105,571.00 $105,571.00 $105,571.00
Investigation
5. Sports Complex Boiler $205,000.00
CIP
6. Police Dept Additional $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Fuel Expense
Salt r ake County Permit $4-7,84 650 $47,� 840.50 The Council
did NOT adopt
this item.
Lei — $8-0400-007044 The Council
did NOT adopt
this item.
9. District Three Olympic $100,000.00
Legacy Project ��� �
10. CIP Fenway & Strong SID $40,000.00 I v 2
Match
11. Local Lobbyist Activities $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources
1. Police Dept Violence $1,000.00
Against Women Grant
2. Justice Court Violence $39,520.72
Against Women Grant
Section C Grants For New Staff Resources
Section D Housekeeping
1. Capital Equipment $2,711,336.46
Leasing Program
2. Rose Park Lighting SID $91,360.88
3. Zoo and Tracy Aviary $172,317.00
Bonding Interest
4. Risk Management $581,914.00
5. Reimbursed Police Dept $84,030.00 $84,030.00
Service Overtime
FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #6 — June
FY 2005 FY 2005
Initiative Gen. Fund Gen. Fund
Initiative Name Amount Impact FTE Fund Balance
Impact
6. Education Grant 3rd Year $216,340.00
Appropriation
7. Education Grant Program $17,438.31
Income
8. Police Dept Encumbrance $75,329.00 $75,329.00 $75,329.00
Carryover
9. Recapture Federal ($78,926.29)
Program Funds
10. CIT Grant Training $9,000.00
Registration Fees
11. Housing Reallocated $1,414,702.97
Program Income
12. Rail yard Special $17,381,200.00
Assessment Debt
Retirement
13. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds $47,625,000.00
Issuance
14. Interest on Sales Tax $80,000.00
Bonds
15. Land Purchase 200 East $110,000.00
600 South
Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
1. Critical Lands Inventory $15,000.00 S5,000.00 $5,000.00
& Preservation
Assessment
2. HUD and EDI Special $99,410.00
Project 9th and 9th
Streetscapes
3. Fire Dept FEMA Grant $36,538.00
4. Police Dept Homeland $1,201,877.00
Security Grant
5. Police Dept Justice $528,048.00
Assistance Grant(JAG)
6. Utah State Grant EMS $12,000.00
Citizen Corps Council
Section F Donations
1. State Farm Ins Safe $10,000.00
Neighbors Project
2. Constitutional Rights $500.00
Foundation -Youth City -
Martin Luther King Day
3. Police Dept Service Dog $2,500.00
2
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Initiative Name:
Local Lobbyist Activities
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-11
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
To support the local lobbyist activities for the City at the State and County level. The administration is
requesting an appropriation from the General Fund Fund Balance in the amount of$15,000.
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
•
•
Local Lobbyist activities
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Steve Fawcett 535-6399
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ($15,000)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund
09-00500 _ Fund Balance
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total _ $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total _ _ SO $0
Other Fund
Total $ $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 Local Lobbyist Activities.xls6/7/20051:36 PM
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
09-00500 Fund Balance $ 15,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
09-00500 2324 $ 15,000.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ _
Non-profit sector? NA
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 Local Lobbyist Activities.xls6/7/20051:36 PM
Initiative Name:
Banking Charges on Credit Card Payments
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Treasurer's Office has experienced a dramatic increase in bank "account analysis
charges" this fiscal year primarily from increased credit card usage and larger transaction
amounts for payments made by credit card. Costs charged by the credit card issuer per
transaction, or merchant discount fees, typically vary between one and three percent of the
value of the transaction. Merchant discount fees for transactions processed by the
Treasurer's Office, the Justice Court and the Internet, are charged against the Treasurer's
Division budget. In FY 2004 these fees totaled $76,285. During the first eight months of the
current fiscal year these fees totaled $74,171. There have been some sizable permit fees,
impact fees and even innkeepers taxes paid by credit card this year that have contributed to
the dramatic increases in merchant discount fees.
It is evident that the use of credit cards is a convenient and increasingly popular method of
payment. However, credit card companies do not allow governments to pass on the usage
fees to citizens and customers utilizing this payment option. There are a couple of
alternatives to consider for recouping or reducing some of these fees. First, it is possible to
charge a convenience fee but it must be a flat fee for all transaction types including cash,
check and credit card transactions. This convenience fee would need to be charged on all
locations offering similar services. For instance, if one golf course charged a convenience
fee, then all golf courses would need to charge the same convenience fee regardless of
payment type; or if a convenience fee were charged on internet transactions then both credit
card and e-check transactions processed through the internet would need to charge a
convenience fee. Another permissible alternative is to limit the type of transactions for which
credit cards will be accepted. In other words, it is permissible to say "The City no longer
accepts credit cards for paying permit fees and impact fees." However, it is not permissible to
limit the maximum transaction size. For instance, the City can not say that it no longer
accepts credit cards for transactions exceeding $10,000.
It should be noted that another means to lower transaction fees includes the use of "e-check",
which is essentially and ACH transaction over the Web that pulls funds directly from the
customer's checking account. The City began offering e-check as an alternative to credit
cards on its website on February 22, 2005 for water payments and parking tickets. From
inception through April 7th, there have been a total of 234 parking ticket transactions totaling
S6,898.00. The total cost to process these as ACH transactions at our contract rate of $.04
per transaction is $9.36. Alternatively, had these been transacted as credit card payments,
our merchant discount fee would have been approximately $137.96.
In evaluating whether the acceptance of credit cards as a payment option is reasonable and
appropriate for the type of charge or fee being paid and the customer service level desired, it
is important to consider that the benefits to the City may include:
Increased certainty of collection;
Reduced return check processing costs;
Accelerated payments and the availability of funds;
Improved audit trail;
Reduced cashiering costs;
Enhanced customer convenience.
, .
Banking Charges on Credit Card
, 1
' Payments
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-1 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services Treasurer Office New item
Department , Type of Initiative
Daniel A. Mule 535-6411
Prepared By 1 , I Telephone Contact i
I I I
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ($50,000.00)
1
Revenue Imnact By Fund:. 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 200445 - - . • FY 2005-06 - - •
General Fund
Total $O SO1
Internal Service Fund
Total, $O , $01
----Enterprise Fund 1 1. I
Total]
SO . $01
Other Fund ! .
. .
1 ,
Total: 0 i $01
1 ,
Staffing Impact:
'New Number of FTE's ij O. -- 0]
Existing Number of FTE's 1
1 0 ' 01
Total ! 0 0,
Description 1
1 •
! 1
, 1
! 7
—!-
_1 1
__ : •
_ _
Accounting Detail Grant#and CEDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number _ Amount
Expenditure.
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
01-00021 2329 _ $ 50,000.00_
Additional Description: - __-- --_ — -
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? _ N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A --
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _
Non-profit sector? _ - _N/A
Initiative Name:
Cash for Cans Challenge Award
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-2
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Salt Lake City competed in the US Conference of Mayors "Cans for Cash" City Recycling Challenge, a
national recycling competition. The Challenge took place from November 2nd — 15th, 2004. To help
educate the community and encourage recycling the City built and placed an extremely large
aluminum can recycling display on the lawn just south of mid-block at Library Square. The community
was able to see the amount of aluminum collected in this recycling effort. One of two $5,000 cash
awards was given to the City - the one for the most innovative idea to encourage recycling in the
community. The funds/award must go toward recycling efforts in the community.
. ,
Cash for Cans Challenge Award
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-2 2004-05
--- ,
Initiative Number , . . Fiscal Year
Public Services Department . New Item
,
Department Type of Initiative
Greg Davis, Lisa Romney 535-6397/535-7939
. ,
Prepared By • Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st-Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund I I I
_ ..
Total' $0 • $0
'Internal Service Fund ., I
Total , $0 i $0
lEnterprise Fund ,
, 1
I ; .
_ I Total' ' SO • $01
Other Fund I I
77 Trust Fund $ 5,000.00 , i 0!
-—f
_ L 1 :- •
Total $ 5.000 00 ! $0
1 , 1
Staffing Imnact:
New Number of FTE's I I 0 : 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 ; 01
;Total 0 • 0'
Description
. ,
; — - -
,_ • ;
• ,
. ,
' .
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
•
Revenue: _
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-00785 1792 S 5,000.00
I I i
Expenditures
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
'77-00785 2299 $ 5,000.00i
—i—
I � I
I � I
AdditionatAccounting Details: _
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name: 1
Summer Park Crime Suppression Patrol
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New Item
(Initiative Discussion:
We currently have eight officers plus a Sgt working each weekend day from 1400 to 2200
hours. Please note that the officers do not stay just at Liberty Park but visit other parks to see
where the activity is moving. The amounts expended in FY 04 (with the inception date of
June 12th to June 30, 2004 was managed within the existing resources of the department. FY
05 to date expenses are $ 38,758 and the budget request anticipates the demand for
additional enforcement this spring. We have automatically deployed enforcement and are
monitoring the situation to be able to respond if the need arises. Because of the submission
date of the budget amendment, the budget includes $ 14,000 for Spring of 2005 enforcement.
Summer Park Crime Suppression
1 Patrol
Initiative Name
BA#6 Initiative#A-3 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police , New Item
Department '
Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact
, I 1
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ' (553,000.00) !
I
Revenue Imi3act Bv Fund: fist Year 2nd Year
. . . przacht-os FY 2005-06
!General Fund 1 • : --
1 !
1 '
I Total' $0 $0
---
'Internal Service Fund ! • ;
! !
Tata $0 $a
1 Enterprise Fund 1
I .
, I
! '. I
Total, $0 $01
Other Fund
—I II
, ! •
Totall 0 $01
, 1
Staffina Impact:
New Number of FTE's ! 0. 0;
Existing Number of FTE's 1 0 0!
Total
1 0 0!
I
Description I 1
Overtime
, 1
i
1 ,
, .
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: --
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02- Police Department - 2133 $ 53,000.00
Additional:Accounting Details:
Grant information:
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will N/A
be eliminated at the end of the grant?
Will grant prcgram be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Wiil grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Dc9s grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ - - N/A
Initiative Name:
Police Dept Lori Hacking Investigation
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department is requesting additional budget appropriation to fund investigative
expenses related to the Lori Hacking investigation. Major source of additional costs include:
Overtime - $47,103, Assistance from Salt Lake Valley Solid Wast Management Council -
$41,673 and $ 16,795 in other investiagtive related expenses. These costs include only
additional investigative expenses and does not request funding for investigative personnel on
duty time.
Police Dept Lori Hacking investigation
InitiatIve Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-4 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By 1 , Telephone Contact
, i I
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ' ($105,571.00); '
Revenue lmnact By Fund: . lst Vier 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 Pr 2005-06.
General Fund ' ; !
TI
, 1 I
Total, $0
Internal Service Fund 1 1 I
1 1
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund ,
I I
1 Total $0 , $0
lOther Fund ; I
——
Total 0 : $0
---
Staffing-Impact: •
New Number of FTE's I 0 ! 01
,Existing Number of FTE's 1
1 0
Total I O. 01
Description 1 —
1 _
None ,
, :_ -
. 1 .
: , .
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
--- ------ - --- ----- ---- --- -- - -
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02 Police Department _ 2133 $ 47,103.00
02- Police Department 2590 $ 58,468.00
— i -- I _I ----- -- - ----- it
Total $ 105,571.00
Additional,Accounting.Details:
Grant Information: No grant funds —
1Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will -
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are N/A
eliminated?
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Sports Complex Boiler -CIP
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New Item
I
Public Services recently met with the County Parks and Recreation Division who informed
Public Services that the boiler system is in fail condition at the Salt Lake Sports Complex.
The City built and constructed the sports complex, but under an Interlocal Agreement, the
County manages the programs and facility. Included in the terms of the interlocal, the City is
responsible to pay for one-half of all capital costs above the first 53,000 which is paid by the
County.
The County has hired an engineering firm to complete the design portion of the project which
should be completed in May and be ready to bid. However, in an effort to avoid interruption to
this summer's swimming season, it is agreed that the new boiler should be installed in
September of 2005. The County is currently making repairs to the system in an effort to
facilitate this summers swimming season.
The current probable cost estimate made by the County's consultant is $325,000. The City's
portion of the cost, less the $3,000 is approximately $161 ,000.
In addition, the County informed PS of having to replace the facility's whirlpool/hot tub. The
City's portion of this cost is approximately $25,000.
The FY 04 CIP Fund Balance account has an approx budget of $812,031. This request of
$205,000 would reduce that amount to $607,031.
It is recommended that the Council adopt the necessary budget from the CIP Fund Balance
account to facilitate necessary improvements to the City's Sports Complex.
Sports Complex Boiler CIP
Title of Initiative '
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-5 2004-05
Initiative Number F Fiscal Year
Community Development-Hands New Item
Department 1 Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins _ 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
— - ---- —r -
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
I
Revenue ImpactBv Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY2004-05 FY 2005-0S
General Fund 0
I
I Total $ - $0l__
!Internal Service Fund
----1 Tata II SO $0'
Enterprise Fund 1 I
Total' SO $0!
!Other Fund I i
—183 CIP Fund (Fund Balance) $ (205,000 00)
— I
Total $ (205 000 00) • $0
Staffing Impact:-
New Number of FTE's I 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0'
;Total _ i 0 1 01
Description 1
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: None - Cont. Pending --
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure: •
Center Number ! Object Code Number Amount
Cost I Object -__ �
83-New cost center 2700 $ 205,000.00
-
Additional.Accounting Details:
Grant:Information: ---- ---
Grant funds employee positions? NA
_—
Is there a potential for grant to continue? '- NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' NA -
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? - NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? -_ - NA --
Polide Dept Additional Fuel Expense
•-a- N.3—e
FY2005 Initiative ;:'-A-5 2004-05
Police New Item
Th.ce c' :at
Jerry Burton 799-3S24
Frensir,-:: Ss; ieIe:nne Con: ::
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp, (032.300.00;
Revenuer knoactilirRindt • -- • •211c_i_t_ear
-Er:201F4415 _ . Fr200546 . •
'General Fund
Total SD SO'
- -
Internal Service Fund
Total SO SO
Enterprise Fund
Total SO SO1
Other Fund
Total 0 ' SO,
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
None
!Initiative Name:
Police Dept Additional Fuel Expense
Initiative Number:
BAm6 FY2005 Initiative �.4-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
FY 04 adopted budget for fleet fuel was $442,0O0 with year end expenses totaling $530,790.
FY 05 adopted fleet fuel budget was increased to S571 ,0OO anticipating continued pricing and
use. Using FY 05 seven month projections on an annual basis projects FY 05 year end
expense to exceed budget by $32,OOO. Request additional funding as pricing still remains
unstable. Fleet survey of gallons used has remained relatively consistent in calendar year
2003 350.4 7 4 gallons, 2004 351 ,70 7 gallons, 2005 estimated at 305,000 gallons - using only 3
months data). Price per gallon however has increased during the same period 2003 S1 .3O,
2004 $1 .64 (25P0 increase), 2005 -$1 .73 (An additional 10°o) and recent business reports
show no sign of reducing with potential of additional increases.
Accounting Detail. Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue::
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
.Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ' Amount
02- Police Department 2390-01 82,000.00
1
---
!
AdditionatAccounting
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? 1 N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Reimbursement to Salt Lake County for Salt Palace Expansion Permit Fees
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The City received a request from Salt Lake County to reimburse fees paid to the City fo
Phase I of the Salt Palace Expansion. The request was for a refund of $46,588.50 in building
permit fees, $30,382.53 in plan review fees, and $42,648.12 in impact fees.
The Administration is recommending that the building permit fee be refunded in the amount of
$47,840.50 (which is the actual amount paid to the City) as provided for in the Protocol
Agreement that governs such refunds/waivers. The Administration is not recommending a
refund of the plan review or the impact fees as there is no provision for this in city ordinance.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
reimbursement of Permit Fees to Salt Lake County for Phase I of the Salt Palace Expansion
project.
Reimbursement to Salt Lake County for Salt
Palace Expansion Permit Fees -Phase I
Initiative Name
BAM6 FY2005 Initiative #A-7 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development _ _ New Item
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-7236/535-6150
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ;
1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1stYear 2nd.Year •
FY 2004-05 • FY 2005-06 .
!General Fund
Permit Fees 1 $ 47,840.50
TotalI $ 47 840.50 $01
Internal Service Fund
Total) $0 $01
!Enterprise Fund
- Total i SO $0
'Other Fund
Total' $0'
Staffing Impact: •
New Number of FTE's 0 01
:Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 01
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
06-00200 1251-01 $ 47,840.50
'Expenditure: .
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
'06-00200 2553 47,840.00
Additional_Accounting.Details
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is `here a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA _
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA ___
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Initiative Name:
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Issuance Salt Palace Expansion
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #A-8
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Salt Lake City's contribution to the Salt Palace Expansion is 88.000,000 and is due July 1 ,
2005. The sale of Sales Tax Revenue Bonds is scheduled to occur on May 24, 2005. Since
Capital Improvement Project budgets do not lapse at year end, the 88,000,000 will
automatically carry over to Fiscal Year 2006 when the actual payment will be made.
It is recommended that the City Council budget for the proceeds from the issuance of the
sales tax revenue bonds and appropriate the funds necessary to meet the $8,000,000
obligation to Salt Lake County.
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Sales Tax Revenue Bond Issuance
(Salt Palace Expansion)
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#A-8 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue ImaactBv Fungi • -let-Year- 2ndYear
FY2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund
Total SO $0
Internal Service Fund
0
Total SO $0
Enterprise Fund
Total SO $0
Other Fund
CIP Fund Bond Process $ 8.000,000 00
Total $ 8 000 000 00 $0
Staffina!made
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description -
BA B F'Y2:20 Inerat!ve#A-3 Sales Tax Rev Bonds Salt Palace Exc5,2;2005 " 20 A 1
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 Mare
Accounting Detail " rant an•" • pp rca• e:
Revenue-
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 1980 S 8,000,000.00
$ 8,000,000.00
Expenditure: ...
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83- New Cost Center 2700 S 8,000,000.00
$ 8,000,000.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
BAm6 F'r 2CO5 'nivauve A-S Sales Tax Rev Bones Salt Palace Exp5.2!200511.20 AM
•
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - Police Dept - Violence Against Women Grant (VAWA)
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #B-1
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Salt Lake City Police Department received their annual State of Utah, Office of Crime
Victims Reparations VAWA grant in January of 2005. It was awarded for partial costs
associated with one Victim Advocate position. The State recently allocated a supplemental
amount of $1 ,000 to pay the registration fees for 10 Domestic Violence Detectives and Victim
Advocates to attend the 8th Annual Crime Victims Conference at the South Towne Exp.
Center.
This request will increase the budget by $1,000 to facilitate expenditure of the additional funds
awarded.
A Resolution was previously adopted by the City Council, authorizing the Mayor to accept and
receive this grant and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to this grant. It is
recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to accept and facilitate this
grant.
State of Utah.Office of Crime Victims
Reparations Violence Against Women Grant
Award VAWA-PD Supplemental
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#B-1 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police Department Grant For Existing Staff
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund 1I
i I
! I I
Total' S0: $01
Internal Service Fund
•
Total S0 $0
Enterprise Fund J j
I I
Total Sal $01
Other Fund 1
72 Misc Grant Fund $ 1,000.00 '
Total $ 1,000.00 I $0
I I
Stafflnp Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 01
Existing Number of FTE's 1 0
Total 1 0
Description
1 j
•
I I I I
1
1 I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 04 VAWA-39 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
I72-20506 j 1370 $ 1,000.00
1 I
Expenditure: •
Cost Center Number Object Code Number i Amount
72-20506 2394 $ 1,000.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? , Yes
;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
,Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I I No
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - Justice Courts Office of Crime Victims Reparations Violence Against
Women Grant Award VAWA
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #B-2
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Management Services City Courts Division received these funds to continue the full-time
court clerk position to process domestic violence cases filed with Salt Lake City Justice Court.
This position tracks, manages and provides follow-up on each Domestic Violence case to
monitor offender compliance with court ordered probation, community service, counseling,
drug treatment, etc.
A 25% city match, or $13,177.55, is required and will be met within the personnel services off
the Criminal Section Manager, the Justice Court Director and the Domestic Violence Judge,
which is currently budgeted for within courts general fund budget.
A Resolution was previously adopted by the City Council, authorizing the Mayor to accept and
receive this grant and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to this grant. It is
recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to accept and facilitate this
grant.
State of Utah,Office of Crime Victims
Reparations Violence Against Women Grant
Award VAWA
Initiative Name i
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#B-2 2004-05
Initiative Number j Fiscal Year
Grant For Existing Start
Management Services -Justice Court Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Mary JohnstonlSherrie Collins I 535-7173/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue ImpactBy Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005=06
General Fund
Total $01 I $01
lInternal Service Fund
Total $0• I $01
Enterprise Fund
Total) $0 $0
Other Fund
.72 M,sc {Grant Fund $ 39,520.72 I
Total $ 39,520.72I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0: 0
Existing Number of FTE's 1, 0
Total 1; 01
Description 1 I
1 FTE $ 27,102 40
Benefits $ 12,418.32 •
I i
1 $ 39.520.72 '
� I I
j I �
I i I I
1
I
Accounting Detail Grant It and DMA*If Applicable: 04 VAWA-39 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I j Object Code Number Amount
172 New cost center 1370 39,520.72 j
i I l
I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 New cost center 2199 27,102.40
72 New cost center 2590 12,418.32
I �
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
:Grant funds employee positions? Yes
1-PTE. The Victim Advocate Court Clerk position.
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
'This is the second year the Justice Court has received these funds.
They will continue to apply if available. •
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
I �
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? Yes
Program will continue but at a decreased level.
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? i No
Initiative Name:
Capital Equipment Leasing Program
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
It has been determined by the Finance Division and the External Auditors that all proceeds to vendors
in behalf of Salt Lake City and to Salt Lake City directly from GE Capital Leasing Company escrows
should be recognized as revenue and have a corresponding offset in expense. No additional fees
have been or will be required of Refuse Fund or Fleet Replacement. The funding has resulted from
GE Capital Leasing already in place. In future fiscal years, the revenue and expense from such
proceeds will be included in the submitted base budgets.
•
Capital Equipment Leasing Program
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-1 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Housekeeping
Department - Type of Initiative _
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I
Revenue Impact By Fund 1st Year 2nd Year-
n.2004-05 - FY 2005-06
General Fund •
1
—--- -- ------- Total � $0 $0
— - --
Internal Service Fund
,Fund 61 Fleet Management _ 2,023,954.57
Total! _ 2 023.954.57. $01
:Enterprise Fund
;Fund 57 Refuse 1 687,381,89 _
Total 687.381 89 $01
Other Fund
Totalr 0. $01
Staffing Imaact:
New Number of FTE's i 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0f
!Total I 0 01
:Description --
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
61-00020 1985 2,023,954.57
57-O0570 --- --- ---- 1985 687,381.89
_ r
Expenditure: •
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
61-00020 2785 2,023,954.57
'57-00570 2785 j 687,381.89
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:. —
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
•
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
N/A --
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Rose Park Lighting SID
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The neighborhoods assessment portion of the Rose Park Lighting SID currently has cash in
the amount of $763,805.88 and a budget of $701,445.00, a difference of $62,360.88. In
addition, the City has collected an additional $29,000.00 of cash assessment fees from the
neighborhood for the Rose Park Lighting Project.
This request is to increase the budget to match the cash by S91,360.88, making cash and
budget for this project, at $792,805.88
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
the cash management and expenditures for this project.
Rose Park Lighting SID
Initiative Name
BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-2 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development -
Transportation Division Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Tim Harpst/Sherrie Collins _ 535-7148/535-6150
Prepared ByContact Number
,General Fund ( Fund Balance) impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 •
,General Fund
—_— _ ----- Totall--- I SO $0
Internal Service Fund
Total, SO $0'1
,Enterprise Fund
Total, $0 $01
Other Fund
Fund 30 SID Accounts 91,360.88
Total, 91,360.88 $0,
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0! 0!
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total ! 0 01
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
30-40500 1890 8 91,360.88
--- --- — --------- --------- --
a.
Expenditure:.
I Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
30-40500 2700 91,360_88
I �
I I
Additional Description::
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
f j
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will -
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
,Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Zoo and Tracy Aviary Bonding Interest
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
In April of 2004, General Obligation Series 2004, was issued to fund the construction o'
new facilities at the Tracy Aviary and the Hogle Zoo. At the time the bonds were issued the
proceeds were deposited with the Trustee contracted for the issue. Since then the proceeds
have been earning interest. This interest may be used in addition to the original construction
proceeds to fund construction of the respective projects.
In order to utilize these funds they will need to be appropriated for construction purposes.
A total of $17,208 for the Aviary and $155,109 for the Zoo has accumulated in each
respective fund. These amounts reflect interest earned during both fiscal year 2004 and the
first nine months of fiscal year 2005.
Zoo and Tracy Aviary Bonding Interest .
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-3 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services/Treasurer Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Dan Mule/Randy Hillier 535-6411 /535-6641
Prepared By r Telephone Contact
I
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 . Pt 2005-06
1General Fund 1 . I—
Total! $0 $0
Internal Service Fund I _
---
—I --
Total! $0 I $01
_ Enterprise Fund 1 —
Total' $0 I $0
(Other Fund I '
783 CIP Fund Tracy Aviary 1 17,208 00 I__
'83 CIP Fund Hogle Zoo 155,109 00'
I Totall 172,317.00 I $01
Staffing Impacts
(New Number of FTE's 0 OI
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0'
Total 0 01_
Description ' 1
_ I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CEDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-040 7 3 1830 S 17,208.00
--------- ---- ---- --
83-04074 1830 S 155,109.00
•
Expenditure: - . .
Cost Center Number • Object Code Number Amount
83-04073 2700
--- --- -- — - ---- -17,208.00
83-04074 2700 S 155,109.00
Additional Description:
The 83-04073 Is the Tracy Aviary Construction Fund •
The 83-04074 Is the Hogle Zoo Construction Fund
Grant Information: _Grant funds employee positions? N/A
1
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
--
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Risk Management
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The purpose of this amendment is to adjust revenue and expenditure budgets to be in line
with the estimated year end actual revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year.
Risk Management
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-4 2004-05
Initiative Number ', Fiscal Year
Management Services -Finance Division Housekeeping
Department I ' Type of Initiative
Jeffrey Hill 535-6478
Prepared By [
, I • Telephone Contact
1 •
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1 I
Revenue Impact By Fund: ist Year . 2nd Year
FY.2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund I
--
i
1 ! .
-
Total SO $01
Internal Service Fund 1 . 1
87 Fund Risk Management , 581,914 Oa : 1
1 I I
I Total i $581,914 00 I SO!
Enterprise Fund I I
1 ,
, ' I
Total! I SO, $0:
Other Fund , ,
I r
- - - —
I I I
Total I 0 $0I
. . .
Staffinalmuact .- . .
•
New Number of FTE's I 0 : 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 . 0
'Total 0 i 01
Description I .
I _
I
, 1
. ,
- —
1 I____ ,
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: - -
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount __
87-40030 1860-60 S 42,860.00
- --- --- - ------
87-40040 1860-60 $ 98,200.00
87-40510 1860-60 S 13,760.00
87-40540 1860-60 $ 3,200.00
187-40590 1860-60 $ 13,200.00 '
'87-30030 1860 $ 17,000.00
87-30030 1860-65 S 60,676.00
'87-30540 1860 $ 4,400.00 I
87-30540 1860-65 S 203,020.00
187-10870 1860 , $ 50,598.00 '
87-50870 1860-41 $ 75,000.00 .
Expenditure:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
87-40030 2196 I I $ 42,860.00
87-40040 2196 $ 98,200.00
I87-40510 2196 $ 13,760.00
I87-40540 2196 $ 3,200.00 i
87-40590 ! 2196 $ 13,200.00 I
87-30030 2565 $ 17,000.00
11
87-30030 2197-02 ! $ 60,676.00 '
87-30540 2197-01 $ 85,000.00
87-30540 2197-02 • $ 46,400.00
187-30540 2197-03 • S 72,000.00 I
_ '87-30540 2565 $ 4,020.00
'87-10870 2546 $ 50,598.00 ,
87-50870 i 2549-41 $ 75,000.00 I_
Additional Accounting Details::
Unemployment I I i —_
Workers Compensation _
Long Term Disability I
Dental
Grant Information: '
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Reimbursed Police Department Service Overtime
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-5
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department provides police services to a variety of law enforcement taskforces
and off duty events on an overtime basis. These expenses are processed thru the
department's payroll system and this request is to recoginize those reimbursements by
increasing the overtime budget by a like amount. Different from past fiscal years is that with
FY 05, overtime budgets for estimated revenue/expenses were posted as part of the budget
adoption process. Amounts requested are in those areas where actuals exceed original
estimates. DUI enforcement $ 9,372, Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force $ 8,573,
Various Off Duty Security $ 5,000, Violent Crimes Task Force $ 1,743, Joint Terrorism Task
Force $ 16,243, Metro Narcotics and Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Task Activity
(RMHIDTA) $ 30,413, Salt Lake Area Gang Project $ 2,756, Project Safe Neighborhoods $
2,651, Seat Belt Safety Program $7,279.
Reimbursed Police Department
Service Overtime
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-5 _ _ 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative 1
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact •
1
Revenue Impact By Fund: - 1st Year 2nd Year •
FY 20O4.05 FY 2005-06. •
General Fund I
;Police Department I $84.030 00
1 Total I $84,030 00 $0'
'Internal Service Fund I I I
- --. --_ Total SO I $01 _
:Enterprise Fund ,
Total 50 $01
Other Fund I I
I --
Total 0' I $01
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 01
,Existing Number of FTE's j 0 0'
1
'Total 0 0'
Description
None
I '
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:.-
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02- Police Department _ 1446 S 84,030.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02- Police Department 2133 84,030.00 _
Additional.Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? _ N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
US Department of Education
Supplemental Congressional Appropriation - Year 3
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-6
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
I
Initiative Discussion:
Vuniic Services, YoutnLity Nrogram was awarded an additional Longressionai Appropriation
in the amount of $894,150 from the US Department of Education in FY 2003-2004. This
award is for a five year period from 2003 to 2008. The funding was allocated for continuation
and expansion of the current programs YouthCity provides.
The City adopted the budget for years 2003 and 2004. This budget request is for the 3rd
year of the 5 year award.
$149,340 of these funds will continue to fund the salary & benefits of the administrative
assistant, site coordinators, and hourly PTE teacher positions in FY05-06. No new positions
are required. In addition, $3,000 has been awarded for travel, $5,000 for equipment, $4,000
supplies, $5,000 for O&M and $50,000 for the contractual components that provide various
programs to youth at YouthCity sites which include, Fairmont, Liberty, Central City, Sorenson
Multi-Cultural Center and Glendale Middle School.
The City Council previously adopted the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign
and accept the US Department of Education appropriation and to sign any additional
contracts and awards related to the grant. It is recommended that the City Council
appropriate the necessary budgets for the continuation of this grant.
US Department of Education
Supplemental Congressional
Appropriation Year- 3
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-6 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services -Youth City Program Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative _ _
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-77121535-6150
Prepared By 1
1 1Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact - —__ I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year• .
FY 2004-05 , .FY 200546 .
[General Fund
Total' $0 $01_
[Internal Service Fund
Totalll $0 $0,
[Enterprise Fund
I Total f $0 $01
[Other Fund I I
IMisc 72 Grants I i 216,340.00 i
Total l 216,34C 00 $0' ---
Staffing Impact:- • ...
New Number of FTE's I 0 01
[Existing Number of FTE's I 1 1 OI
Total 1 I 0'1
!Description _—I I
� l I
This amount includes salary& benefits ' 149,340.00
of 4 FTE's, the YouthCity
Administrative Assistant, 3 Site
Coordinators & several PTE hourly '
teacher positions. No new positions
are recurred.
•
Accounting Detail. Grant#and CEDA#If Applicable: 84-215K
• Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New cost center 1360 216,340.00
*—
Expenditure: • • • • ••• • • . .•• • ••• •
. •
Cost Center Number Object Code Number . Amount
;72- New cost center 2199 •
149,340.00
72 -New cost center 2590 67,000.00
Total! 216,340.00_
Additional-DescriptiOn: • • . •
-
- - _
Grant InfOrmation: •
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
!Grant will continue to fund 1 current FTE position and PTE hourly teacher positions
N. additional FTE's are required.
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
YcuthCity is continuing to apply for Congressional appropriations.
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
V,1,11 grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Vvill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
P'oaram cull continue but at a decreased level.
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Department of Education Grant Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-7
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Youth City programs funded under the US Department of Education grant, have received
program income generated from fees at Fairmont Cottage, Ottinger Hall, Liberty Park, Central
City, and Global Artways. This action establishes a budget for those funds and allows the
program income to be reallocated back into the individual programs for continued
programming.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary increase for these budgets.
Dept of Education Grant - Program
Income _ _
Initiative Name '
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-7 2004-05
Initiative Number i Fiscal Year
CD -Housing & Neighborhood
Development Housing keeping
Department Type of Initiative ,
Janet Wolf/LuAnn Clark;Sherrie Collins 5 3 5-771 2153 5-61 3 6/5 3 5-61 5 0
Prepared By Contact Number
T—
i
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
.FY.2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund I 1
1 Total.
_ SO $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total, I SO $01
'Enterprise Fund 1 I
I
Total) SO SOI!
Other Fund I 1
,72 Grant Funds I _ 17,438 31-
Total1 17,438.31 $0
I
Staffing Impact:
'New Number of FTE's 1 0 i 01
Existing Number of FTE's I 0 01
Total I 0 0'
'Description 1 _I_
1
— f
I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:.
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-63001 - Fairmont 1890 6,071.31
72-63002 - Ottinger 1890 1,173.00
'72-63003 - Liberty Pk. 1890 2,720.00
72-63005 - Central City 1890 7,283.00
72-63006 - Global Artways 1890 191.00
1 Total 17,438.31
Expenditure:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount
72-63001 - Fairmont j 2590 1 • 6,071.31
'72-63002 - Ottinger 2590 1,173.00
72-63003 - Liberty Pk. 2590 2,720.00
;72-63005 - Central City 2590 7,283.00
'72-63006 - Global Artways 2590 191.00
•
Total 17,438.31
Additional Accounting Details: _ I _
Grant Informatiorr.
Grant funds employee positions? ! NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? ' NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA -
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ NA
Initiative Name:
Police Department Encumbrance Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-8
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
in September 2004 on Budget Amendment #2 the encumbrance carryovers for the General
Fund was address. There was an encumbrance in the Police Department that was missed.
This amendment is adding to those encumbrance carryover for the Police Department.
. ,
Police Department Encumbrance
Carryover
Initiative Name •
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-8 2004-05
Initiative Number i Fiscal Year
Police Housekeeping
Department I Type of Initiative •
,
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact
_ L
General Fund ( Fund Balance) imp ($75,329.00)
— I
Revenue Impact By Fund:. 1st Year • • • 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 . . FY2005-05
.
.
LGeneral Fund 4 . I
I i
1 ' 1
Total SO ' $0
',Internal Service Fund
1 I •
, !
Total SO SD
1 —
Enterprise Fund 1
, ----4
1 _1 I • 1 _
4-,
Total l $0 , $0'
Other Fund --
Total l 0 , $0
1 I
Staffincr Impact
•
New Number of FTE's 1
I _._ 0 0,
Existing Number of FTE's 0 OI
Total , 0 0
Description
---,None 1 I
, 1 ,
--1
1 , 1
---r-
— -
BA7:6 FY2005 Initiative#D-8 Police Dent Encumbrance Carryover4/18/20052.17 PM
Accounting Detail Grant#and.CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure: ---
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02- Police Department 2254 75,329.00-
Additional Accounting Details:
f
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
—
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
BA#6 FY�005 innnative#D-3 Police Dept Encumbrance Carryover4118i20052.17 PM
Initiative Name:
Recapture Federal Program Funds
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-9
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This action will decrease the remaining budgets of completed and or closed HOME
Investment Partnership Program (HOME); Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG); and Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Funded Projects and increases the budget o
ESG, HOME and HOPWA Fund Balance in various years to add to the 2005-06 grant
funding. This action involves closing eight (8) projects totaling $68,687.73 for HOPWA;
$10,005.00 for HOME and $233.56 for ESG.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate action to decrease the
remaining budgets of completed HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME);
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG); and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
Funded Projects and increase the amount available of ESG, HOME and HOPWA Funds to be
added to the new 2005-06 grants.
Recapture Federal Program Funds
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-9 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By - Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact '
Revenue Impact By Fund: '1st Year 2nd Year
.FY 200445 FY 2005-06
General Fund '
1 1
Total' I $0 $01
;Internal Service Fund 1
Total] SO I $Ol
-- Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
'Other Fund •
Total I $0 $01
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's O. 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0
0 01
t Description
•
1
Accounting Debit - Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number - Amount
Miscellaneous HOPWA Funded Projects (See
detai below) 1360 S (68 687 73)_
Miscellaneous HOPWA Fund Balance Accts
(See detail below) __ 1360 S 68,687 73
Miscellaneous HOME Funded Projects (See I
0 G05 00'
detail Delow) 1360 S (= — ) -
Niisceliac,eous HOME Fund Balance Accts. '
(See detail below) -- 1360 $ 10,005 00
'Miscellaneous ESG Funded Projects (See
detail below) 1360 $ (233 56),
Miscellaneous ESG Fund Balance Accts (See
detal below) 1360 $ 233 56
i
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Miscellaneous HOPWA Funded Projects (See
detail below) 2590 • $ — (68,687 73)
'Miscellaneous HOPWA Fund Balance Accts
(See detail below) 2590 i $ 68,687 73
Miscellaneous HOME Funded Projects (See
detail below) 2590 $ (10,005 00)
Miscellaneous HOME Fund Balance Accts. I ,
(See detail below) I 2590 $ 10,005 00
I
Miscellaneous ESG Funded Projects (See
detail below) 2590 $ (233 56) _
'Miscellaneous ESG Fund Balance Accts. (See
detail below)
2590 $ _ 233 56
Additional Accounting Details:
—
HOPWA Fund Budget i —
72-604 12 Housing Authority of SLC I ( .61] 0'So)l
72 60412 Robert Willey Apartments (1,113 00) __-
72-60412 Ogden Housing Authority (28_881 16) 1
72-60412 Catholic Community Services (30,J33 03) -_-
72-60412 Kenyon Consulting (588 J8) _ ___
—
72-60427 FY04 HOPWA Fund Balance 68.294 27
72-60312 Ogden Housing Authority (393 46)' I
72-60527 FY04 HOPWA Fund Balance i 393.46
HOME Fund Budget _
72-60411 Utah Nonprofit Hsg Jacob Apts. )
72-60324 FY 2003 HOME Fund Balance 10 005 00
ESG Fund Budget --
_` 0 C7 CCS- Manllac House
26 ESG 2004 Fund Balance 2336 __—
Budget Only - —
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? � ------ ------ — ----- ' --- ----NA -- ----- ----
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I ----- -- � � ---- NA-- - ---i----
Initiative Name:
CIT Grant Training Registration Fees
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-10
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Classes sponsored by the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) are offered to law enforcement
outside of the SLC Police Department. A registration fee is charged and the revenue is
projected thru June 30, 2005 with a corresponding expenditure budget that falls within grant
guidelines.
CIT Grant Training Registration Fees
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-10 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police Housekeeping
Department , Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
- --, --1 ,—
Prepared By . ,
, Telephone Contact
, 1
1 .
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact .
Revenue Impact By Fund: istYear • - •2nd Year .
FY 2004-05 Pt 2005.-08.
General Fund I I 1 1 ,
, .
— 1 ,
I Total, $0 $0
---7- -I -—
Internal Service Fund 1
1 I
. :
Total, SO $0'
,Enterprise Fund 1 ,
— i
TotaL SO $0
Other Fund 71
---i---
1
— -
72 Mise Grant Fund ! $ 9,00C 00 Ol
•
Total] $ 9 000 00 $01
I
Staffincr Itnnact- . •
. •
.
New Number of FTE's 0 ' °I
Existing Number of FTE's O. : 01
To1-11 0 01
-— -
De,cription
None — _I
i
, 7
--- , -
1 , 1
1 •
__- -1-
1 ,
1 7--
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and.CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-20502 1890 9,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ' Amount
172-20502 2133 $ 2,180.00 -
'72-20502 2590 $ _-6,820.00
Additional Accounting Details: —
il
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? 1 N/A
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A -
Does grant duplicate services-provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ - N/A
Initiative Name:
Housing Reallocated Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-11
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
These Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funded programs, have received program
income from re-payment of loans or repayment of liens. The repayments from the Cit
Center Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) are reallocated to the City's Revolving Loan
Fund. (Resolution 93 of 1991) This action establishes a budget for those funds and allows
the program income to be reallocated back into the individual programs for continued
programming.
It is a HUD Federal Guideline that Program Income be reallocated to programs that have the
same eligible activity.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment for these budgets.
Housing Reallocated Program
Income _
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-11 2004-05
Initiative Number , Fiscal Year ._
CD-Housing and Neighborhood
Development Housingkeeping
Department
, Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By i ; Contact Number
; I • I
:General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact '
1 ,
Revenue Impact By Fund: lstYear 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 •
.General Fund
;
! !
Totall SO $11
Internal Service Fund 1 1
1 i ,
I
Total $0 $0
!Enterprise Fund
i .
. .
•
! 1
TotaliI $0 ' $0
Other Fund . •
! I ;
i72and 78 Fund Misc. Grants I 1,414,702.97
i Total; 1.414.702.97' ' $0i
1 . 1
--'
Staffing-Impact:
New Number of FTE's I 0 1 0
Existing Number of FTE's I 0 • 0!
I9L
0 • 0'
'Description
I -I
:•
1 -
1 1
- . .
' 1 ,
, 1
1 ,
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue: _ _ -
_ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71-20015 Utah Heritage Found. 1890 22,292.33
71-70631 Cleaning & Securing - 1890 17,385.71
78-30010 Housing Rebabilitation 1890 744,122.00
Program 9
78-78325 Housing First Time _ 1890 361,557.00 •
Homebuyer Program
.72=00720 City Center UDAG i 1890 269,345.93
T
for Revolving Loan Fund
' — Total 1,414,702.97
Expenditure:
' Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71-20015 Utah Heritage Found. 2590 22,292.33
71-70631 Cleaning & Securing -_ 2590 17,385.71
78-30010 Housing Rebabilitation 2590 _ 744,122.00
I Program
.78-78325 Housing First Time - 2590 • 361 ,557.00
Homebuyer Program _
72-00720 Revolving Loan Fund 2590 269,345.93
_ Total 1,414,702.97
Additional Accounting Details.
Grant Information:.
Grant funds employee positions? _ _ No
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA _II
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _-
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
Railyard Special Assessment Debt Retirement
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-12
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
'Initiative Discussion:
The Boyer company, who is the sole property owner in the Railyard District, has decided it will
be to their advantage to retire these bonds in full.
While all transactions take place directly between Boyer and the bond trustee, the debt is
legally that of Salt Lake City and all transactions need to be reflected in Salt Lake City's
books. Salt Lake City therefore needs to show the effects of the debt retirement, including a
legally adopted budget that provides an appropriation for the retirement.
It is recommended that the City Council budget for the additional special assessment revenue
and appropriate the funds necessary to retire the outstanding debt.
I
Railyard Special Assessment Debt
Retirement
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-12 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services Finance Div Housekeeping
Department , Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 535-6424
Prepared By 1 • Telephone Contact ,
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact Bv Fund: • • . ist Year •
' 2nd Year • .
. • • . , . Fl 2004-05 . --,' Pt 2005-0. 6
General Fund
11
1
I , -I
Total' SO. $0
Internal Service Fund .
01
1 Total I SO $01
Enterprise Fund ,
1 I ,
T
1 1
Total SO $01
Other Fund 1
.20 FundSpecial assessment Debt Fd 1 $ 16,825,0C° 00 ' f
1 .
Totall $ 16 825.000 CO $0'
1 . . . ..
Staffing Impact: ' • '• .. . : . •• • ' - .
New Number of FTE's I 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's O. 1 0
Total 0 . 01
Description 1 1
--I
1
1 1
— ;
. 1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
20-88006 1125 S 16,825,000.00
Expenditure:.
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
20-88006 2811 $ 16,825,000.00
additiorra[Description::.
— — —
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A __
Initiative Name:
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Issuance
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-13
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Salt Lake City has decided to refund all remaining Municipal Building Authority Bonds before
the end of fiscal 2005. The source of funds will be the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds.
In order to properly reflect these transactions, it is necessary to budget the principal
retirement amount in the Debt Service Fund as a transfer to the Municipal Building Authority
internal service fund. The revenue source is the issuance of the bonds
It is recommended that the City Council budget for the proceeds from the issuance of the
sales tax revenue bonds and appropriate the funds necessary to: (A) advance refund the
outstanding Municipal Building Authority debt as a transfer to the Municipal Building Authority
and (B) pay the associated issuance costs.
. .
Sales Tax Revenue Bond Issuance
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-13 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services Finance Div Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
1 1
1 1
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
1 1
Revenue Impact BV Fund: istYear • • 2nd.Year
- • -..FY 200445' , FY 2005-06
General Fund ,
1 1 1
1 I
1 1
Total' 1 $0 $01
Internal Service Fund 1 1
1 , i 0
•
Total, SO $0
Enterprise Fund I ,
I 1 ,
I1 1
Totall SO $0'
Other Fund 1 I
81 Fund -Debt Service Fund $ 47,625,000 OC 1
1
Total' $ 47 625 000 00 $0'
1 1 1 I
StaffincrImnact. - . '.. . . . : ••• . .` • . . . .
New Number of FTE's 1 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's 1 0 0
Total 0 01
Description 1
1 1
I 1
i - —
______
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: ---
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
81- new number 1980 S 47,625,000.00
Expenditure: • • •
. • •
• • . . •
. . .
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
81- new number 2910-13 5 47,125,000.00
81- new number 2825 500,000.00
•
ar'..Ilona Description: •
The transfer to the Municipal Building Authority is broken down as follows
$10.795,000 is MBA 99A, $24,935.000 is MBA 998, and $11,395,000 is MBA 2001
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? 1 N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?1 N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Initiative Name:
Interest on Sales Tax Bonds
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-14
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, are variable rate bonds with weekly reset rates
and interest paid monthly. The amount budgeted as interest expense for the current fiscal
year was based on anticipated interest rates at the time the bonds were issued, September
2004. However, interest rates have risen much faster than expected, and interest expense
will exceed the amount appropriated by year end. Furthermore, there are quarterly
remarketing fees and letter of credit provider fees that are paid quarterly in arrears. It was
thought that the fourth quarter fees would be charged to July, 2005, the monthy they are paid.
However, these costs need to be accrued and the expense charged to FY 2005. A total o
approximately $80,000 is needed to cover interest and fees.
The MBA Bond Fund has cash available to cover the anticipated shortfall in the Sales Tax
2004 Bond Fund. The source of these funds is the result of interest earnings in the MBA
Reserve Fund that flowed to the MBA Bond Fund and was used for semiannual debt service
during the current fiscal year, thus freeing up funds that were budgeted to pay the debt
service.
f
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Interest on Sales Tax Bonds
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-14 2004-05
Initiative Number _ Fiscal Year
Management Services /Treasurer _ House Keeping
Department Type of Initiative
Dan Mule /Randy Hillier 353-6411 /353-6641
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact SO
Revenue-Impact By-Fund:.-- -- 'fstYear 2nd Year
FY 2004-05. FY 2005-06.
General Fund
Total SO SO
Internal Service Fund
Total SO $0
Enterprise Fund
•
Total _ SO S0
Other Fund
81 Fund Transfer from MBA Fund $ 80,000 00
Total $ 80.000 00 $0
Staffina Impact:
New Number of FTE's _ _ _ 0 _ 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total _ 0 0
Description
Arienaments FYC5,Buoaet Amenament 46 EA#6 FYCC'cc ..,o..e TD-14 Interest on Sales Tax Bonas Frscol Data
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 Mato,
Accounting Detail Grant#and CEDA#If•Applicable. NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
81-81820 1974-08 S 80,000.00
Expenditure:. . .
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
81-81820 2821 S 75,500.00
81-81820 2825 S 4,500.00
Additional Description: '
Grant information: -
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _
Non-profit sector? NA
J Amenaments FYO5'Bucaet,amenament#6,BA#6 FY:::5 ix:a r:e=D- Interest cn Saies Tax hems F'sca,Data
Initiative Name:
Purchase of Property at 200 East 600 South
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #D-15
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
During the March budget opening Property Management submitted a request for funding in
the amount of $440,000 for the purchase of property located on the southeast corner of 200
East and 600 South. At that time we still did not have the appraisal report, therefore the
$440,000 was an estimate of value. A copy of the appraisal report has been provided to us
and the fair market value of the property, which consists of .386 acres and a 4,000 square
foot building is $528,000. The appraisal report reflected, and the owner concurred, that the
building will require a new roof. Therefore, this request is submitted to increase the original
budget amount by a total of $110,000. This will cover the incremental difference of $88,000
between the original requested amount and the actual fair market value, an estimated cost to
replace the roof of $20,000, and $2,000 for closing costs. Since the building still has some
economic life left, it will be used on an interim basis by the City until such time as the decision
is made on the outcome of the entire assembled property or portion thereof.
The greater value is in the ability to group the total parcels of land together.
Land Purchase at 200 East 600 South
In,t.ative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#D-15 _ _ _ 2004-05
Initiative Number _ Fiscal Year
Management Services _ __ _ Housekeeping
Department Property Purchase
Linda Cordova 535-6308
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
RevenueimpactBv Fund: lstYear 2nctYear
FY 2004-05 .-. FY 2005-01
General Fund
Total SC $0
Internal Service Fund
Total SO $0
Enterprise Fund
Total SO $0
Other Fund
CIP Surplus Land - - - $ (110,000 00)
Total $ (110.000 00) $0
Staffnct Impact: -
New Number o_f FTE's 0 0'
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total _ 0 0
Description
SO
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: ;redi
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount - - - -
Expenditure: . .
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05047 2710 $ 110,000.00
600 South Land Purchase
Additional Accounting Details: --
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? -- - N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? - - N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Critical Lands Inventory & Preservation Priority Assessment
Initiative Number:
BA#A FY2005 Initiative #E-1
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
initiative Discussion: J
The Planning Department applied for and received this $10,000 grant from the Utah Quality
Growth Commission under the Governor's Office of Planning & Budget.
The goal of the Salt Lake City Critical Open Lands Inventory and Preservation Priority
Assessment is to evaluate the natural development, and ownership constraints on critical
open lands in the City and to develop a hierarchical classification of designated open lands to
aid the City in sustainable community planning.
The Planning Division will contract with an outside consultant to compile an inventory of data
on open lands parcels in the City and provide a written inventory and report of the data
collected from various existing sources. City planning staff will assess the potential land use
constraints impacting open lands using the inventory provided. Following the assessment
phase, planning staff will propose an open lands preservation priority, using the classification
system. The findings will be considered and presented for adoption as an amendment to the
existing Salt Lake City Open Space Plan and the eight community master plans.
The grant requires a $10,000 Match. The Planning Division has not identified the cash match
needed of $5,000 and is requesting that this be allocated from the general fund balance. The
remaining $5,000 match will be met with planning staff time allocated to this project.
It is recommended that the Council adopt the necessary resolution authorizing the Mayor to
sign and accept this grant and to sign any subsequent agreements stemming from this
original grant and to appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this project.
1
Critical Lands Inventory& Preservation
Priority Assessment
Title of Initiative I !
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative# 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
CD-Planning Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Doug Wheelwright/Sherrie Collins 535-6178/535-6150
Employee 535 6178
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ($5,000.00),
Revenue Impact By Fund: lstYear 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund 1 0
Total $ - I $01
Internal Service Fund
Total SO' I $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $01
lOther Fund
172 Misc Grant Fund $ 10,000.001
Total 1 $ 10,000 00 ! I $01
Staffing Impact.
iNew Number of FTE's 0! 0
Existing Number of FTE's Oi 0
Total _ 0: I 0l
!Description
� I
' I I
i i 1 I
11 1 I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: None - Cont. Pending
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
I I I
72- New cost center 1370 $ 10,000.00
72- New cost center 1974-01 5,000.00
Transfer from the Gen Fund
1
I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72 - New cost center 2324 I 15,000.00
09- General Fund 2910-72 5,000.00
Transfer to Misc Grants
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
i
Is there a potential for grant to continue? No
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? 1 NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? No
I I
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
•
Initiative Name:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Economic Development
Initiative (EDI) - Special Project 9th & 9th Streetscapes
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-2
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
Salt Lake City applied for and received an Economic Development Initiative (EDI) grant from
the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), for streetscape
improvements to the intersection at 900 South and 900 East.
The goals of the 9th & 9th streetscape improvements are to create a distinct small.
neighborhood business district with enhancements to support merchants, increase vitality to
the area, create a model walkable community and improve the infrastructure in an aging
section of the City.
The EDI funds will used for sidewalk repairs, installation of ADA corner ramps, update traffic
signals, additional pedestrian scale street lights and countdown signals, replacement of bus
benches and new landscaping. Construction of these improvements will be performed in
conjunction with the other work planned for the 9th & 9th area.
It is recommended that the City Council pass the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor
to accept this grant, and to adopt the necessary budget to facilitate expenditures of this grant .
I i I
� I
US Department of Housing and Urban
Development(HUD) Economic Development
Initiative (EDI) 9th &9th Streetscape
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#E-2 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Community Development Staff Resources
Department L ! Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By f Telephone Contact
.General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005 06.
General Fund
Total SO $0
Internal Service Fund
Total] S0! $01
Enterprise Fund
Total SO $0
lOther Fund
172 Misc Grant Fund $ 99,410.00
1 j
Total $ 99,410.00 ; I $01
Staffing Impact.
'New Number of FTE's 0i 01
]Existing Number of FTE's 0l 0
!Total j 0' 01
!Description
I � I
I � I
I I
1 I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable Will provide later
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number I Amount
I I
72- New Cost Center I 1360 $ 99,410.00
I I
I I
I i
� I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
,72- New Cost Center 2700 $ 99,410.00
•
Additional Description:
� I
I �
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
there a potential for grant to continue? NA
I i
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I ! NA
.Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? ! NA
' I
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
I I
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
FEMA - Emergency Preparedness and Response - Fire Department
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-3
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department applies for and receives this grant from FEMA, under the Emergency
Preparedness and Response Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program on an annual basis.
They were awarded $36,538.00 which will be used to contract with Heath Metrics, Inc., to
provide Certified Fitness Coordinator Training to approximately 32 firefighters and to
purchase equipment that includes two assessment kits, five treadmills and five elliptical
trainers to replace aerobic training equipment which was donated to the Department over 10
years ago. The grant requires a match of $15,658, which will be met within the Fire
Departments general fund budget.
Physical fitness and regular health evaluations are now the top priority for the SLCFD to
insure the safety of its incumbent firefighters and new recruits. Heart attack continues to be
the leading cause of death among firefighters nationally, accounting for 45 percent of all on-
duty deaths. SLCFD wants to assist its firefighters in attaining appropriate physical condition
to advance their performance.
A resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and
any future grants or agreements stemming from the original grant. It is recommended that the
City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant.
FEMA Emergency Preparedness and
Response - Fire Department i
Initiative Name 1
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#E-3 2004-05
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Fire Department Staff Resources
i Department 1 .
.
1 L Type of Initiative
___.
John Vuyk/Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150
Prepared By I Contact Number
'General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1
_[ 1
Revenue Impact By Fund: lstYear • 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
[General Fund
,
,
, . -
1 I 1
Total[ SO . $0'
Internal Service Fund
I I I
J.._.
1 . 1
Total 1 SO; $0'
[Enterprise Fund I
- ,
-- --7- -
[ 1 .
---1 -
Tal I $C $01
Other Fund 1 I I
i ----
.72 Fund Misc Grants 1 $ 36,538.00
I Totak $ 36.538 00 $0,
I I I
StaffIna Impact:.
New Number of FTE's
I 0 a
- -
,Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
[ _
Total LI 0 0'
- -
Description [ I
' 1 .
, 1
--,- , 7
, 2
, .
1 1 ,
, 1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: EMW-2004-FG-12939
Revenue:--=-- -- 97.044
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New cost center 1360 $ 36,538.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
1
72-New cost center 2590 $ 36,538.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
- I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
_ Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Utah Department of Public Safety Region II Homeland Security
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-4
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
/Initiative Discussion: '
The Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of Emergency Services and Homeland
Security awards Region II, Homeland Security Region, approximately $9 million on an annual
basis. The Salt Lake City Police Department is one of eleven agencies within Region II and
has been sub-awarded $485,118.67.
Of this amount, $150,538.45 has been awarded for Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention
(LETP) and $344,580.22 for State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) .
The SLCPD proposes to use the funds to purchase interoperable communication equipment.
This will provide for, and improve joint communication and coordination of regional
responders, agencies and city departments in the event of a major emergency.
A resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and
any future grants or agreements stemming from the original grant. It is recommended that the
City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant.
•
' Utah Department of Public Safety Region II
Homeland Security Region
I I Initiative Name 1
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#E-4 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Department Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Contact Number
1 I
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd.Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
General Fund 1 •
_
Total $C. I $0
Internal Service Fund L---;
1
I
Total SO $0
Enterprise Fund I
I
Total $01 I $01
Other Fund I
72 Fund Misc Grants $ 485,118,67,
TotaII $ 485,118,67I I $01
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 01
Existing Number of FTE's 01 0
Total 0 I 0
1Description I
I
1
1
I
I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 97.004
Revenue: _ _
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount
_ I
!72- New cost center 1370 $ 150,538.45
72- New cost center 1370 j $ 334,580.22
Total j $ 485,118.67
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New cost center 2700 $ 150,538.45
!Grant number DES-2004-LETP-002
72- New cost center 2700 $ 334,580.22
Grant number DES-2004-SHSP-002
Total j $ 485,118.67
Additional Accounting Details:
' I�
, I
, I
Grant Information-_ 1
'Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
I PD receives this grant annually
'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? j Yes
;Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? I I Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector?
No
,
'Initiative Name:
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program - Law Enforcement
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-5
Initiative Type:
I Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applies for and receives the Department of Justice, Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) annually. It has been renamed the Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program but carries all of the same Federal requirements as the LLEBG.
Funding is awarded to provide operational support and services in the eligible areas of law
enforcement, crime prevention and drug courts. In addition, the City was awarded Salt Lake
County's portion of the grant funds and will act as the lead agency. The PD has written the
required MOU between the City and County for the joint program as outlined, contracting with
the County for their portion of the grant. The City's portion of the grant is $345,123 and the
County's is $182,925.
The SLCPD proposes to fund the following projects/programs at the levels indicated: $22,000
for directed community policing over-time. This allows for the patrol and investigative
divisions to focus on community issues that arise in their divisions and to direct overtime to
work directly with the community to solve the problem. $110,000 for 130 Tasers which will
provide all street level officers with tasers, $5,000 for a 17" laptop with burn capabilities and
wireless internet access for SWAT, Narcotics and Vice. $15,000 for 3 K-9 dogs @ $5,000
each. $20,000 for supplemental training for sworn personnel in specialized units, $20,000 for
civilian training, $9,123 for Public Order Unit Training and $12,000 for officers to attend the
West Point Academy and $3,000 for Peer Support Training/Conferences for Officers.
Contractual components include, $15,000 for continued programming of Peer Court, $12,000
for the continuation of the McGruff Program and $2,000 for printing crime prevention
pamphlets and brochures, and $100,000 for Salt Lake County Criminal Justice for the
continuation of the Restorative Justice Programs.
In addition, the County will use the funds they receive to purchase equipment.
A resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and
any future grants or agreements stemming from the original grant. It is recommended that the
City Council adoct the necessary budget to facilitate this grant.
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant Program- Law
Enforcement
Initiative Name
BA46 FY2005 Initiative#E-5 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Department Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By I i Contact Number
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact _ I
I
Revenue ImpactBv Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
'General Fund I
l - —
I - - - - — Total1 $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
l —
I
Total SO $U
'Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
72 Fund M;sc Grants $ 528,048 CO I f
1 Total, $ 528,048.00 i $0
Staffina Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0, 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0'
'Total 0 01
Description - —
Office' OT $22 OOO.
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 16.738
Revenue-
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New cost center 1360 S 528.048.00
•
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New cost center 2590 I $ 528,048.00
Additional Accounting Details:
•
- ------ - ------ --
------- --- ---
Grant Information: _Grant funds employee positions? No --
Officer Overtime
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable
If grant is funding aposition is it expected the position will _
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Utah Department of Public Safety EMS Citizen Corps Council
Initiative Number:
• BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-6
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Emergency Management Services Division receives this grant annually from the State of
Utah, Department of Public Services to organize, develop and implement a city wide strategic
plan and to organize and implement the Citizen Corps Council.
These funds will be used to defray the costs associated with the training and implementation
of the Citizen Corp Council in training/educating individuals to be on the Citizen Corps Council
and to pay costs associated with marketing and advertising special events in an effort to
promote citizen corp community preparedness and family safety issues.
The Corp is comprised of various community leaders, local service provider organizations,
volunteers, city employees and neighborhood groups.
A resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and
any future grants or agreements stemming from the original grant. It is recommended that the
City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant.
Utah Department of Public Safety . Divisicn
of Emergency Services & Homeland Security
- EMS Citizen Corps Council
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #E-6 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Management Services Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Mike Stever/Sherrie Collins 535-6030/535-6150
Prepared By ' ' Contact Number
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: . . 1st Year 2nd Year
• • • . . FY 201I4-05 FY 20.05.05.
General Fund I i
1 Total SO S0
Internal Service Fund 1
Totali SO $0 -
Enterprise Fund I
•
Total I $0 • $0
IOther Fund 1
•
72 Fund fvtisc Grants '$ 12.000 00 -- '----
I Total $ 12.000 00 $0.
Staffinalmnact:
•New Number of FTE's I - _ 0 0'
Existing Number of FTE's I 0 0
Total 0 0'
Description I '
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: D ES-2005-C IT-008
Revenue- 97.067
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New cost center 1370 S 12,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New cost center 2590 $ 12,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
i
Grant Information:. _- - --— —
Grant funds employee positions? _ No Is there a potential for grant to continue? _ Probable
1
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?' NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes __-
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? _- Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No ____
Initiative Name:
State Farm Ins - Safe Neighbors Project
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #F-1
Initiative Type:
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
The Police and Fire Departments received this $10,000 corporate donation from State Farm
Insurance to implement a Safe Neighbors Project within Salt Lake City. Police and Fire will
work collaboratively with State Farm to educate homeowners about crime prevention and
home safety techniques, as well as disaster preparedness and response. Police officers and
firefighters will conduct neighborhood education meetings and will then spend six hours in
seven different neighborhoods, assessing homes for crime and safety hazards, educating
homeowners about crime prevention and safety techniques, and distributing safety and crime
prevention devices such as security lights, fire extinguishers, and carbon monoxide detectors.
Funds will be used for Officer and Firefighter OT totaling $6,048 and the remaining funds will
be used to purchase the items that will be distributed.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project.
State Farm Insurance-Safe Neighbors
Project -_---
Initiatbve Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative#F-1 - 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police Department Donation
' Department 1 Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Contact Number
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact , , ---
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
'General Fund
•
Total, $0 $0
Internal Service Fund 1
Total SO $01
Enterprise Fund 1
1 1 j
I
Total $0 $01
Other Fund 1
77 Trust Fund 1 $ 10,000.00 ,
i Total'i $ 10.000.00 $01 _
Staffing.Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's
_Total 0 01
Description
1
Officer OT 2 Officers @ $32 x 6hrs x7 $2,688 00
_events
Firefighters OT 2 Firefighters @ $40 x $3,360.00
6hrs x 7 events I --
$6.048.00 -
I 1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number r Object Code Number Amount
•
77- New Cost Center 1890 S 10,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77- New Cost Center 2590 10,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
- ;
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? _ NO
Officer & Firefighter OT
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
•
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
Constitutional Rights Foundation - Youth City - Martin Luther King Day
Initiative Number:
BA#A FY2005 Initiative #F-2
Initiative Type:
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
Youth City Government under the Salt Lake City Foundation umbrella applied for and
received $500 from the Constitutional Rights Foundation. The funds were awarded to the
Salt Lake City Foundation to be used for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Project.
This project is an annual community event to address issues of generational, ethnic, and
economic diversity by delivering food boxes and hygiene kits to 300 low-income older adults
and by documenting the lived experiences of people of color in Salt Lake City through 30 oral
histories.
Youth City government will use the funds for film development, display frames, printing event
flyers, oral story display sheets and cassette tapes. Food items and hygiene kits will be
donated to Youth City Government.
This request will provide a budget for the $500 so that the cash which the Foundation has
received can be moved from the Salt Lake City Foundation, to the Youth City budget for
programming.
It is recommended that the City Council accept the funds from the Salt Lake City Foundation
on behalf of the City.
• FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Constitutional Rights Foundation -
YouthCity Government - Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative# 2004-05
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services YouthCity Grant With No New Staff
Department i iType of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7712/535-6150 -
Prepared By r Contact Number
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-0S FY 2005-06
(General Fund I
i
Total SO $0
!Internal Service Fund
Totals $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund 1
i
Total' $0 $01_
Other Fund i - 1
177 Trust Fund $ 500.00 - —
Total) $ 500 00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
!New Number of FTE's I 0' 01
'Existing, Number of FTE's 1 0 I 0
Total I 0 0'
Description 1 __
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
-------- -- -
-------- ------------
7;- 00875 1890 500.00
Youth City Program
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number a Object Code Number Amount
•
77- 00875 ] 2590 500.00 '
Youth City Program
� � — ---_-- - -- - — ' ---
AddWonaf Accounting Details:-
Grant Information: _
Grant funds employee positions? NO
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA —
1
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?! NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are -_--
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Ncn-profit sector? NA -
Initiative Name:
Police Department Service Dog
Initiative Number:
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #F-3
Initiative Type:
Donation
initiative Discussion:
A donation from Wal Mart was offered as part of a company program. The amount of $2,500 will
fund the purchase of a Bloodhound to replace the Police Department's existing dog when it retires.
I 1 •
;
I �
Police Department Service Dog
Initiative Name
BA#6 FY2005 Initiative #F-3 2004-05
Initiative Number i
Fiscal Year
Police Donation
Department j Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 1 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact i •
Revenue Impact By Fund:: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005 06
General Fund 0 1 0
I
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total SO' $0
'Enterprise Fund
Total S01 I $0,
Other Fund 0
� I
.77 Trust Fund $ 2,500.00
Total $ 2,500.00 $01
Staffing Impact.
New Number of FTE's 01 0
Existing Number of FTE's 01 01
Total
p' 01
Description
(None
, I
II
Y 4
Accounting Detail Grant#and.CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:- -
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount
77- New Cost Center 1897 $ 2,500.00
I J
1
i 1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77- New Cost Center 2257 $ 2,500.00
I '
I !
Additional Accounting Details:
' I
I -
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NO
!Is there a potential for grant to continue? j N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? j N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
� I I
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A