The URL can be used to link to this page

027 of 2006 - Budget Amendment No. 5 for Fiscal Year 2005/06 0 06-1 B 06-6 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 27 of 2006 (Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2005-2006) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 26 OF 2005 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, AND ORDINANCE NO. 48 OF 2005 WHICH RATIFIED AND RE-ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2005 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2006. PREAMBLE On June 21, 2005,the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006,in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document,was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City,Utah. On August 23, 2005, the City Council ratified and re-adopted the final budget. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document,have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing document,as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.26 of 2005 and Ordinance No.48 of 2005. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments,including amendments to the employment staffing document,attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be,and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City,Utah,including the employment staffing document,for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2005 and ending June 30,2006,in accordance with the requirements of Section 128,Chapter 6,Title 10,of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director,acting as the City's Budget Officer,is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,including amendments to the employment staffing document,with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document,in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,this 6th day of June ,2006. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: EPUTY CI Y RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on 6/7/06 Mayor's Action: X Approved Vetoed Ate'"`S MAYOR 961 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM EF EPUT TY REC RDER Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date V-Zr-, By , �^^'\. (SEAL) Bill No. 27 of 2006. r�'• Published: Ca/IGl Ida ' .-� I:\Ordinance 06\Budget\Budget Amendment#5 2005-2006.doc rktip.r. t 3 FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment#5—June FY 2006 FY 2006 Gen.Fund Initiative Name Initiative Gen.Fund FTE Fund Amount Impact Balance Impact Section A New Items 1. CIP - Redwood Road $66,000.00 Sidewalk-Calif.Ave 2. CIP-700 S Jordan River $400,000.00 Bridge Replacement 3. EPA Water Efficiency $530,000.00 Benchmarking 4. Local First Campaign $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 5. Street Light Operation $182,203.79 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 and Maintenance 6. Street Light $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Extraordinary Maintenance 7. Strong/Fenway SID $42,000.00 Construction $32,000.00 8. Leonardo At Library $10,200,000.00 Square Bonding 9. Open Space,Parks and $5,400,000.00 Recreational Lands Bonding Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources 1. Police Dept Metro $145,800.00 Narcotics/Drug Enforcement Grant 2. State of Utah Emergency $24,000.00 Management Grant 3. WVC Pass Through $20,000.00 Project Safe Neighborhood Grant Section C Grants For New Staff Resources Section D Housekeeping 1. Risk Fund Workers $257,000.00 Comp and Unemployment 2. Bond Construction $207,199.00 Interest 3. Housing Loans Program $6,607,793.03 Income 4. CIP Fund Recapture $75,440.51 FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #5 — June FY 2006 FY 2006 Gen.Fund Initiative Gen.Fund FTE Fund Initiative Name Amount Impact Balance Impact 5. FEMA Disaster Response $364,425.00 Reimbursement 6. IMS Computer Rental $41,430.00 Income 7. Police Services Overtime $32,500.00 Reimbursement 8. IMS PROMIS Grant $36,000.00 9. Move CDBG From 83 $761,219.41 Fund CIP to 71 CDBG Fund Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1. State of Utah Survey $10,000.00 Grant for Yalecrest Neighborhood 2. FEMA Grant for Fire $108,719 Dept Personal Protective Equipment Section , F Donations 1. Library Square Pavers $173,200.00 2. Prevent Underage $1,000.00 Drinking Scholarship 2 Initiative Name: Redwood Road Sidewalk-Job 102132 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#A-1 Initiative Type: _ New Initiative Discussion:, In Budget Amendment#1 of this fiscal year, the Engineering Division requested a $25,000 match to a Utah Department of Transportation(UDOT)grant of$75,000 which was brought into Budget Amendment#1 also. This project consists of the installation of sidewalk on the east side of Redwood Road,from Califomia Ave.to Indiana Ave. The current estimated cost of construction for the Redwood Road safer sidewalk UDOT grant is$166,000. This $66,000 increase is due to additional curb and gutter needed to facilitate drainage; additional drive approaches; increases in asphalt thickness for pavement tie-ins; and the recent escalation of construction costs. This request is to increase the CIP budget/match by$16,500 and reduce the CIP cost over- run account by the same amount,and increase the UDOT grant budget by$49,500. This action will leave a balance of$238,654 in the Fiscal Year 03-04 CIP cost over run account. UDOT has agreed to cover it's portion of the increased costs. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate this project. 1 I Redwood Road Sidewalk-Job 0102132 I 1 1 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Community Development- HAND New Department Type of Initiative I LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund 1 Total $01 1 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 I $0 Other Fund 183-06050 UDOT Grant $ 49,500.00 Total $ 49,500.001 1 $0 1 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 'Existing Number of FTE's I 0 Total 0.001 0 Description 1 I I I 1 I I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: ' Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 1 83-06050 1370 I $ 49,500.00 1 1 I 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 183-06049 2700 16,500.00 183-06050 2700 49,500.00 83-04099 2700 I (16,500.00) Additional Accounting Details: I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA I 'Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? � NA f Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are (eliminated? NA 1 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative Name: 700 South Jordan River Bridge Replacement- Job 107088 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative #A-2 • Initiative Type: New Initiative Discussion: The 700 South Jordan River Bridge replacement was awarded $900,000 of Federal Highway funding during FY03-04. The required Match of$200,000 was also awarded during the FY03- 04 CIP Process from the Class "C" fund. This project was recently bid and the Engineering Division received two (2) bids. The low bid came in $360,000 over the Engineers estimate. The escalating construction costs currently being experienced is even greater for bridge construction projects. The City attempted to secure additional federal funds for the increase, but recent reallocation of federal bridge replacement funds has resulted in a significant dollar decrease to the program and funds were denied. Although the revised cost to replace this bridge is approaching the point of being cost prohibitive, Engineering recommends approval of the cost increase as it will allow the City to utilize the $900,000 of federal funds already approved for this project. The project will be re-bid in September, with some minor changes in design and schedule requirements in an effort to receive better bids. This request is to move $400,000 of Class "C" funds allocated from the 900 South, Main Street to 900 West project to the 700 So. Jordan River Bridge project. The 900 So. project is substantially complete. Excess project funds are available in the 900 So. project due to good bids received and an excellent design resulting in minimal change orders and material quantity overruns. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate this project. m ..� w 700 South Jordan River Bridge Replacement-Job 107008 I Initiative Name BA#5FY2006 Initiative#A-2 I 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Community Development- HAND New Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins — 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By I Telephone Contact i I !General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $01 I $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0i, I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 I $0 Other Fund Total 01 $0 Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's 0 0 'Existing Number of FTE's I 0 Total 0.00! 0 'Description I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number— _ Object Code Number _] Amount ------------- _t- Expenditure: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number I Amount 83-04035 T 2700 $ _ (400,000.0±q) 83-04038 2700 $ 400,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA .---potentialgrant Is there a for to continue? NA — -- If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will We eliminated at the end of the gran _ NA 1 Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? t NA --j T — Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or __ L Non-profit sector? NA Initiative Name: United States Environmental Protection Agency Water Efficiency Benchmarking Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-3 Initiative Type: New Initiative Discussion: The Public Utilities Department applied for and received this US Environmental Protection Agency grant in the amount of$350,000 to participate in a water efficiency benchmarking of single family homes. In addition, Salt Lake City Public Utilities will partner with nine (9) other nationwide water departments who will provide $20,000 each ($180,000) to Salt Lake City, to participate in the water efficiency benchmarking study. Other water departments include Roseville CA., Las Vegas NV., Clearwater FL., Phoenix AZ., Aurora CO., Eugene OR., Daytona Beach FL., Denver Co., and Cary NC. Acting as the lead agency, Salt Lake City will contract with Aqua craft Inc, to serve as the principal investigator and to provide the data collection and analysis for the research study. The intent of the project is to collect data from several large water utilities across the US that will provide information and answers pertaining to water usage in new and existing homes, in an effort to demonstrate how the use of advanced technologies can reduce water use. Fund will be used for payment to consultant and grant monitor for grant oversight and management. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and sign the grant agreement and to appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. US EPA-Water Efficiency • Benchmarkinq j Initiative Name j BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-3 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Public Utilities I New Department Type of Initiative Stephanie Duer/Sherrie Collins 483-6860/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact I --- 'General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 (General Fund I I i I I Total $0' I $0 'Internal Service Fund I Total $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund I Total $01 I $0 'Other Fund I 172 Fund Fed EPA Grant $ 350,000.00 172 Fund Other Cities $ 180,000.00 I Total ' $ 530,000.00 I I $0 i j II I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0' 0 'Existing Number of FTE's 0; 0 ,Total 0 I 0 Description I (Grant Monitoring $ 12,375.00 I Benefits $ 4,409.00 I I 1 I I I I I I I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I I Amount 72-New Cost Center T 1370 1 $ =350000.00 41 -� 72-New Cost Center 1890 i $ 180 000.00 — — $— 530,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 530,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: L— — —__1_ 1 — i ---------- -7+- - --+ Grant Information: __ Grant funds employee positions? j Is there a potential for grant to continue? ' No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will ------ be eliminated at the end of the grant?' rt NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? 71 - No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I _ —1 Non-profit sector? I T I No Initiative Name: Local First Campaign Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-4 Initiative Type: New Salt Lake City granted$20,000 seed money in 2004 to the Vest Pocket Business Coalition to initiate a Local First Campaign. The Local First directory now has over 500 participating businesses. Website,brochure,window decals and media campaign have been produced for the Local First. The campaign is a grass roots support of local businesses to encourage consumers to Buy Local First since local businesses help to create a sense of place in our community, contribute economic vitality,and bolster the local economy by dollars spent in the community being distributed to other local businesses in support services such as advertising, accounting,and local service vendors.The Local First Campaign's request for 501(c)6 status has been delayed, and in order to keep the campaign momentum, has requested an additional $20,000 from Salt Lake City Corporation to continue the campaign efforts and momentum. Local First Campaign I I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-4 2005-06 Initiative Number i Fiscal Year Mayor's Office New Department Type of Initiative Alison McFarlane 535-7704 Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) ($20,000), Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund • Total $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund I Total $01 1 $0 Other Fund Total 01 $0 1 1 I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 0 'Description I I I I _Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: _ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount General Fund i Fund Balance $ 20,000.00 I J -- - - - --- -- � - -- -----it i - ----- � Expenditure: Cost Center Number —_ Object Code Number Amount _i09-New Cost Center 2328 I$ 20,000.00 r Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A 1Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are — — eliminated? N/A --——�-- - --- -- (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: Street Lighting Operation and Maintenance Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #A-5 Initiative Type: New Initiative Discussion: There has been an increase in the costs for operation and maintenance of City street lights. The operation and maintenance costs include costs for supplying electricity to the street lights as well as the basic maintenance services such as replacement of bulbs and other basic fixture components. The budget does not include services for non-basic repairs such as pole knock-downs and deteriorating infrastructure (poles, wiring, etc.). The increase in costs is due to increasing power rates (electricity), increasing maintenance costs (materials, fuel and labor) and an increase in the number of lights operated by the City. The City operates and maintains over 14,000 street lights. The operation and maintenance of street lights is essential to the safety and security of the public right-of-way. A private contractor is scheduled to begin providing maintenance service April 1st at less cost than UP&L, but the savings will not offset the other cost increases. UP&L has announced another significant power rate increase proposal. This will be taken into account in the budget proposal for next fiscal year. This request is asking for $150,000 from the General Fund Fund Balance. In addition in the SID maintenance account there is a surplus of$32,203.79. This account contains funds collected for street lighting power and maintenance, but were not used in a previous fiscal years. jE — — Street Lighting Operation and Maintenance 1 I Initiative Name I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-5 _ _ __ 2005-06 , Initiative Number _--_—_ —— __ J Fiscal Year r_ Comm Dev-Transportation New Department 7 -- —.— ---_1 Type of Initiative r— Michael Barry ' 535-7147 T__ __ Prepared I,, *1 Telephone Contact y General Fund (Fund Balance) I_—_ — ($150,000), I _ _-- IT.. _Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Non Dept Transfer from SID $ -- _-- 32,203.79 I — — —, Totall _I$ 32,203.79 I $0 F.Internal Service Fund 1. - ----- T- - -- -T— - 1 Totall $01 $0__- !Enterprise Fund 1 — Totall $01 $6 Other Fund --------- - I Total! -I- 7 $01 I $0 Staffing Impact: _ New Number of FTE's 01 _ 0 Existing_Number of FTE's Total _ 01 01 Description j T- , - - --- I r T — — — — — +- T 1 1 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount I09-00800 1974-06 $ 32,203.79 i 1 I � II � Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount 09-00800 2331 $ 182,203.79 30-02331 2910-08 $ 32,203.79 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: IGrant funds employee positions? NIA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NIA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? NIA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NIA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are !eliminated? NIA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? NIA Initiative Name: Street Light Extraordinary Maintenance Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #A-6 Initiative Type: New Initiative Discussion: There has been a trend of increasing expenditures to the street lighting extraordinary maintenance. This maintenance covers fees for repairs to the street lighting system to keep it operational. Typical repairs include fixing damaged wiring systems (both above and below ground), replacing downed street lighting poles, and making safe (for the public)the locations where damage has occurred. There are many factors that have increased the costs for this maintenance with the foremost being increases to fuel costs and the cost of steel products. Other factors are the continual aging of our overall system, more use of underground power service, and an increase in knockdowns of decorative style poles. Without this increase it will not be possible to do the needed repairs. The areas with non-functioning lights will remain dark at night. --- 1 Street Light Extraordinary 1 Maintenance I 1 Name of Initiative I I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-6 2005-06 JI Initiative Number I Fiscal Year r -_ Corn Dev-Transportation New Department I rJ Type of Initiative Michael Barry 1 535-7147 Prepared By —_ I-7 Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance)1 _; ($40,000)1 —__— _ Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 �I. L Total $0 $0f Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund 1 Total $01 $01 Other Fund I--L Total! I 0 $0 I I —__i New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 I 0! Description -- ----- — --- - Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount - - -- -1_L j Expenditure: — Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount 03-12300 2358-03 $ 40,000.00 — Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? I N/A _ f grant is funding a position is iexpected the position will ;be eliminated at the end of the nt?T L _ N/A (Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A I 1— t- Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are F eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provid ed by private or T _ Non-profit sector? T T I N/A T I — — Initiative Name: StronglFenway SID Construction Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#A-7 Initiative Type: New Initiative Discussion: The Strong Court/Fenway Avenue SID projects were awarded CDBG funds in the 04-05 CDBG process for design, and CIP funds in 05-06 for the City's portion of the SID for construction. These projects were recently bid and the Engineering Division received one(1)bid which exceeded the engineer's estimate. The bid is higher due to the increased costs for street lighting,concrete pavement,excavation and road base. Due to increasing costs,re-bidding the project at a later date may not result in lower bid prices. Discussions are currently underway with the Strong Court and Fenway Avenue property owners to receive their input on a proposed SID assessment increase. Further discussions are being held with the property owners on Strong Court to determine if they want to include the construction of the street lights or proceed without the lights. This request would increase the City's portion of the SID for Strong Court by $15,000 and Fenway Avenue for $17,000. This request is to reduce the 04-05 CIP fund balance by $32,000 and increase the budgets in the Strong Court and Fenway Avenue projects. In addition,this request proposes the increase of the property owners SID budgets. The budget increase for Strong Court including the lights would be$25,000 and for Fenway Avenue$17,000. This request assumes property owners are in agreement with proceeding based on higher assessments. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustments to facilitate this project. —L-_-- -- Strong/Fenway SID Construction I I Initiative Name BA#5FY2006 Initiative#A-7 ___ I 2005-06 Initiative Number r Fiscal Year Community Development-HAND New J Department 1_j Type of Initiative _ - LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins I 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By l I Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact 1 I 1— Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 (General Fund - ----- - Total $01 $01 Internal Service Fund r I Total —1 $01 $01 Enterprise Fund 1 I ------ — — Totall I $01 $0 'Other Fund CIP 83 Fund SID i$ 42,000.00 1 _ I — --- j T Total $ 42,000.001 $01_ I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's T i j 01 Total 0.001 0I TDescription 1— —--- ——1- �-------— - ' - 1 I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: I Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 183-06071 rt 1 1890 ,$ 25,000.00 83 06072 1890 $ 17,000.00 I — L ------------------ - - _i t — i- - ---a L ------ ----------- -�— --I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 83-05023 __ 2700 1 I$ 32,000.00 83-04099 2700 I $ (32,000.00) 83-06071 T 2700 $ 25,000.00 83-06072 _-- 2700 I $ 17,000.00 L , — — I -- — Additional Accounting Details: I i - ----- _.— — -1- I I ------ I- --- -- T L Grant Information: j Grant funds employee positions? T N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? _ N/A L T If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?! N/A 4 Will grant program be complete irn grant funding time frame? I __N/A 1 - - -- ------- L I i - Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are T eliminated? I L N/A LL -1 1 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I� — Non-profit sector? I N/A Initiative Name: The Leonardo at Library Square Building Remodel Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#A-8 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: In 2003 the public approved the issuance by the City of general obligation bonds to finance the retrofitting and renovation of the Main Salt Lake City Library located at 200 East 500 South into an art,cultural and science center. The issuance of the bonds is contingent on the Leonardo Foundation raising a matching $10,200,000. The Leonardo Foundation has matching funds in the amount of$10,213,000 but the City has not certified those funds yet. The matching funds the City has certified are as follows: Cash received $ 2,065,935 Pledges 5,646,967 Stocks 1,496,597 In-Kind Donations 838,057 Total match $10,047,556 The additional$150,000 that needs to be certified will be done before the amendment is passed. The$10 million will be used to retrofit and renovate the existing building. The extent of the renovation will depend upon the value the$10 million will purchase with today's construction costs. Those dollars will be approximately$8 million when the construction begin later this year. The funding is being requested at this time to fund the design work. Retrofitting for earthquake will be the first priority of the renovation. Any additional construction cost above the$10 million will be funded by additional donation, contributions or grants the foundation might obtain. The Engineering Division of the Public Service Department will be responsible for the construction and renovation of the building. The foundation will be responsible for all of the interior design and remodeling. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project. The Leonardo at Library Square Building Remodel Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-8 + 2005-06 _, Initiative Number Fiscal Year I, Community Development __ New Item _,I Department ._.IJ Type of Initiative (_ LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 1 535-6136/535-6150 -- ----— --------- Prepared By _—I __ 7 j Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund I— II - - --j Tota1 $01 $0_—_ Internal Service Fund I __ Totali - $01 $01, Enterprise Fund I I -1 r— Total I $01 I $0 Ot er Fund I �83hCIP Bond Proceeds + i$ 10,200,000.00T —_Totall $ 10,200,000.00 1 $0 Staffinq Impact: New Number of FTE's 0! 0 Existing Number of FTE's 1 0 — Total 0.00i 0 Description -T — —r -� — — — T i —i — - _I I-1- -- - I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number ( Object Code Number Amount 83- New Cost Center 1980 $ 10,200,000.00 � I � I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 Amount 183- New Cost Center 2700 $ 10,200,000.00 1 I � Additional Accounting Details: H I � Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will jbe eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? N/A 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: Open Space,Park and Recreational Lands Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#A-9 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: On November 4,2003,Salt Lake City residents voted to approve the allocation of$5.4 million in bonds funds for the purpose of acquiring and preserving open space, parks,and recreation lands and amenities within Salt Lake City or its environs. In November, 2004 the Salt Lake City Council created a Salt Lake City ordinance enacting Chapter 2.88 of the Salt lake City Code creating the Salt lake City Open Space Lands Program, and the Salt Lake City Open Space Lands Fund. The purpose of the Program is to provide an administrative structure for the protection, acquisition management and compatible of open space lands in Salt Lake City,and to implement the bond measure passed on November 4,2003. The Fund is created as a designated account within the accounting fund structure of the City that shall be used exclusively to acquire,preserve,protect and maintain open space lands. No expenditure can be made from the Fund without prior approval of the City Council It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project. 1 I --- I -1- Open Space,Parks and Recreational I Lands I Initiative Name I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#A-9 I 2005-06 _ ___I Initiative Number L _____—_ _ I_i Fiscal Year IT Community Development 7 New Item Department i I j Type of Initiative L_ LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared ----�_ Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund _ Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund Total I $01 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $0 Other Fund 83 CIP Bond Proceeds $ 5,400,000.0041 Total; $ 5,400,000.00I I $051 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's J 01 -__ _ 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 7 I 0 (Total 0.001 I 0 Description H. ----— - r I - - 1 - - - I I i Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 Amount 83- New Cost Center 1980 I $ 5,400,000.00 L rt _._ Expenditure: L Cost Center Number - Object Code Number I Amount 183- New Cost Center L —�_- 2700 $ 5,400,000.00 — - -- — _ -- Grant Information: T Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A L-I— — --- Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? I N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ Non-profit sector? N/A -rt Initiative Name: Executive Office of the President,Office of National Drug Control-Rocky Mountain HIDTA Grant Initiative_Number: BA#5FY 2006 Initiative#B-1 Initiative Type: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Police Department applied for and has received confirmation that the City will be receiving a grant in the amount of$145,800 from the Executive Office of the President,Office of National Drug Control. The grant will continue to fund three(3)Officers assigned to the Metro Narcotics/Drug Enforcement, of which one(1)Officer is assigned to the Airport working with a drug detection dog. Although the grant caps benefits at 35%of base salary,the remaining funds needed are budgeted for within the Police Department's general fund budget. There is no required match. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. 1 I 1 Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control - I Rocky Mountain HIDTA Grant I 1 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#B-1 1 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Police Department Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins I 799-32651535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact 7General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 'General Fund 1 Total $01 $0 ;Internal Service Fund Total I $01 1 $0 Enterprise Fund 1 Total $01 $0 Other Fund 172 Fund Fed Grant $ 145,800.00 Total 1 $ 145,800.00 I 1 $0 Staffing Impact: ;New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 3 0 Total 31 1 0� I Description 1 I I I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: I Cost Center Number - l Object Code Number L Amount I 172- New Cost Center I �—-_ 1370 $ 145,800.00+ — -- — I ---- -----_ ---A-1 -- - ----- 1 I — — 1 1 _Expenditure: Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number _L 1 Amount i L_ 0� 72- New Cost Center t - 2111-01 $ 108,000.0 i 2191-10 I$ 37,800.00 — — I — -'$- 145,800.00 ----- --- -I— T— -- Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: r Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes — — u-- - If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant'ir _ T Yes I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Na Does grant duplicate services providedby private _ I 1— i or i, Non-profit sector? , -- _ No I Initiative Name: State of Utah,Department of Public Safety,Emergency Management Performance Grant(EMPG) Initiative Number: BA#5FY 2006 Initiative#B-2 Initiative Type: Grant for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Management Services receives this grant annually from the State of Utah, Division of Emergency Services and Homeland Security. It is awarded to Salt Lake City to defray some of the costs associated with the Emergency Managers salary and benefits. The$24,000 awarded will be used to defray salary expenses of the Emergency Managers Position. This position is responsible to design,implement and apply the Emergency Operating Procedure manual and to educate Salt Lake City Corporation,community groups and local businesses of emergency procedures and policies in the event of a natural disaster, or terrorist attack. The grant requires a 100%or$24,000 match which is met within Management Services general fund budget. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Aoki State of Utah, Department Of Public Safety, Emergency Management Performance Grant(EMPG) I I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#B-2 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year —� • I Grant for Existing Staff Management Services Resources Department I I Type of Initiative I Mike Stever/Sherrie Collins 535-6030/535-6150 Prepared By I Telephone Contact 1 I 'General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I (Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund I 1 II i Total $01 I $01 'Internal Service Fund I II Total I $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund I II I • Total $01 I $0 'Other Fund 72 Fund- State of Utah Grant $ 24,000.00 1 1 Total $ 24,000.00I I $0 I I Staffing Impact: 1New Number of FTE's 0 I 0 Existing Number of FTE's 1 I 0 Total 1 I 0 Description I 1 i I I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 97.042 EMPG-2006-DHLS-CTY17_ Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount -72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 24,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number_ Object Code Number I Amount 72-New Cost Center — 2590 $ 24,000.00 _ Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? —_ Yes 1- L_- Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes — ----- If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?I J NA Willgrant program be complete in grant fundingtime frame? I Yes P 9_.— P —_I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? — No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? _ _ No Initiative Name: State of Utah West Valley City Pass Through - Project Safe Neighborhood Initiative.Number: BA#5FY 2006 Initiative #B-3 Initiative Type: Grant for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Housing and Neighborhood Development applied for and received this $20,000 pass through funding from West Valley City. It is a State pass through grant to West Valley with SLC being a Sub recipient of West Valley. This is the third year that the City has received these funds. This grant is awarded to deter gun violence in the Weed and Seed area through the adult and juvenile violent offender re-entry pilot program, gun violence prevention education for at-risk youths and integrating new crime -mapping software to facility cross -jurisdictional data sharing. These funds will be used to continue to support an hourly Paralegal/Executive Assistant to work with the Salt Lake City Prosecutors Division in identifying and filing appropriate cases involving domestic violence, gang and juvenile incidences with firearms that are coming from the City's Weed and Seed targeted area. This is an hourly position being paid approximately $16.00 per hour for providing approximately 624 hours of service. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. I I West Valley City Pass Through- ' Project Safe Neighborhood Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#B-3 I 2005-06 Initiative Number L Fiscal Year Grant for Existing Staff Community Development Resources Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150, Prepared By Telephone Contact !General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 !General Fund Total $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0I I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 I $0 Other Fund 72 Fund State of Utah Grant $ 20,000.00 Total $ 20,000.00 $0 I I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 Total 0 I 0 I Description 1 PTE Hrly Position • -aA1olM�li+lw �r t�F a wriMMlrM�lYMlll�" -. .. .. Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 172- New Cost Center 1890 $ 20,000.00 I � Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number h Amount 72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 20,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes II Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes Ilf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes (Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative Name: Risk Fund Workers Comp & Unemployment Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #D-1 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: The Risk Fund collects the workers compensation and unemployment premiums from the various City departments. The Risk Fund then makes the payments to the third party vendors. This request will increase the Risk Fund revenue and expenditure budgets for higher than expected Workers Compensation and Unemployment activity during the current fiscal year. I I Risk Fund Workers Comp & Unemployment I Initiative Name I I BA#5 Initiative#D-1 2005-06 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Mqmt Sery- Finance_ Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative Jeffrey Hill 535-6478 Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 (General Fund Total $0I I $0 Internal Service Fund Risk Fund $ 257,000.00 Total $ 257,000.00 I I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $0 Other Fund Total I 0 I $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 0 I 0 Description I I I I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number — Object Code Number Amount 87-40080 I 1860-60 7 $ 6,000.00 87-40120 1860-60 $ 6,000.00 87-40150 1860-60 $ 5,000.00 87-30030 1860 $ 3,000.00 87-30030 1860-65 $ _ 68,000.00 87-30540 I 1860 $ 4,000.00 _ ---------------- 87-30540 1860-65 $ 138,000.00 87-30190---- I_ 1860 $ 1,000.00 87-30190 1860-65 ! $ 17,000.00 ----- --------------- 87-30120 _-- 1860 1—$, ____ 5,000.00 I 87-30120 -�- —I _ 1860-65 I $ 4,000.00 T - ---- --- -- 1 $ 257,000.00 I- Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount I87-40080 2196 $ 6,000.00 87-40120 2196 $ 6,000.00 87-40150 2196 $ 5,000.00 ,87-30030 2197-02 $ 71,000.00 87-30190 2565 $ 1,000.00 87-30190 --_-- 2197-02 $ 17,000.00 87-30540 _ 2197-01 __ r $ 12,000.00 87-30540 -- __— -h 2197-02 $ 94,000.00 87-30540 _—_7 2197-03 1 $ 21,000.00 87-30540 -_ - 2565 — _ $ 15,000.00 87-30120 2197-02 $ 9,000.00 $ 257,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: 1— Grant funds funds employee positions? _ I' N/A NIA I 7 I --- - L Its there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? j N/A L I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are __ eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I I N/A I-- • Initiative Name: Bond Construction Funds Interest Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #D-2 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: In April of 2004, General Obligation Bond Series 2004, was issued to fund the construction of new facilities at the Tracy Aviary and the Hogle Zoo. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee contracted for the issue. Since then the proceeds have been earning interest. In June of 2005 an amendment was passed to appropriate the interest earned from the time the series of bonds was issued until the end of the 3rd quarter, or the end of March, 2005. This amendment is to appropriate the interest earned during the last quarter of FY 2005 and the first three quarters of FY 2006. A total of $12,064 for the Aviary and $195,135 for the Zoo has accumulated in each respective fund since the last budget amendment was passed for this purpose. These amounts reflect interest earned during the last quarter of fiscal year 2005 and the first three quarters of fiscal year 2006. - 1 I 1 ` 1 — 1 Bond Construction Funds Interest I _ Initiative Name I BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#D-2 I 2005-06 Initiative Number _ - _I Fiscal Year I L. Mqmt Sell/-Treasurer _ I — Housekeeping Department L —_—__ — +7 Type of Initiative L Dan Mule!Randy Hillier __ j 535-6411/535-6641 Prepared By I_ Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact _—_ i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund - I ___ _.__ - _�_ Total I $0'i I $01 Internal Service Fund I - - 1- - Total I $01 $01 Enterprise Fund I —_ I T 1 Totalli $01 $0I Other Fund —1 I CIP 83-04073 Tracy Aviary Con 1$ 12,064.00 Fund CIP 83-04073 Hogle Zoo Const I$,195,135.00 Fund-- -- -Total [$ 207,199.00 I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's JI 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's I 0 0 Total I 0 I 0 Description -------- - - I -I t- 1 I 1 1 I I 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CEDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-04073 1830 $ 12,064.00 1 83-04074 1830 $ 195,135.00 1 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 183-04073 2700 $ 12,064.00 183-04074 2700 $ 195,135.00 I Additional Description: 1 The 83-04073 CC is the Tracy Aviary Construction Fund IThe 83-04074 CC is the Hogle Zoo Construction Fund Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA ,If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will !be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA llWill grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA ,Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA I Initiative Name: Housing Loans Program Income Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative # D-3 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: Earlier this fiscal year, the Council approved a transfer of cash from the Grants Operating Fund to the Housing Loans Fund so that all housing activities could be better accounted for in one fund, the Housing Loans Fund. This request is to transfer the loans receivable and the inventory of houses held for resale to the Housing Loans Fund. It is recommended that the Council appropriate the necessary adjustments to these budgets to complete the needed transfer of all assets to the Housing Loans Fund. I I I L L _ Housing Loans Program Income I —1 I Initiative Name i I 1 BM X FY2006 Initiative#D-3 2005-06 __, Initiative Number r I-_� Fiscal Year �_ Magmt Sery-Finance __TTI�j Housekeeping _J Department I j __—._ — — __1 Type of Initiative L_ Elwin Hellmann i 535-6424 Prepared By � — _ _ Telephone Contact j _— General Fund (Fund BalanceLimpact J i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 _ General Fund ---.--� Total 0 $0 Internal Service Fund — .Total 01 $0 Enterprise Fund Totter 01, $0 Other Fund 1---72 Fund fund balance —1$ 6,607,793.03 I Total I$ 6,607,793.03 I $0 I I � Staffinq Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 _[ 0 ,Existing Number ofFTE's + 0 0 Total 0, 0 Description I I --- 1 I I I I I I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 178-78903 1974-72 $ 3,080,888.06 178-78905 1974-72 $ 2,597,330.94 78-78906 1974-72 $ 929,574.03 I I I I 6,607,793.03 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-17004 2910-15 $ 3,080,888.06 72-60011 2910-15 2,597,330.94 72-72906 2910-15 929,574.03 I 6,607,793.03 Additional Description: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA 1 1Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA I Initiative Name: Recapture CIP Funds-Completed Projects Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#D-4 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: This request decreases the remaining cash and budget in one(1)completed,closed CIP project and increases the cash and budget of the FY05 cost over-run account. In addition, this request decreases the remaining budget in one(1)project. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate this project. Recapture CIP Funds-Completed I Projects I Initiative Name I 7 BA#5FY2006 Initiative#D-4 2005-06 Initiative Number I L---_ —__—__--_I_J Fiscal Year Community Development-HAND __ Housekeeping ] Department L _ _ _i Type of Initiative L LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By �.-_ —1- _ _ — —._ __ Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact L-I_ Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 I General Fund I ----- ---- — _ Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 I $0_ (Enterprise Fund Tota11 I so so Other Fund Total 01 $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 _ 0 Existing Number of FTE's T 0 Total 0.001 I 0 Description I — —------ -- - --I— I I I I I _Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA _Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I 1 I Expenditure: I Cost Center Number Object Code Number j Amount 1 I 183-05099 GF Cost over-run 2700 $ 63,391.00 '83-04019 Quiet Zone 2700 $ (63,391.00) 83-02048 Guardsman Way 2700 $ (12,049.51) (Reduce Budget Only) Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: I Grant funds employee positions? NA .Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA ,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA ;Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA I Initiative Name: Fire Department I Urban Search and Rescue(USAR)Disaster Response Reimbursement Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#D-5 Initiative Type: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: As a participating member of the national Urban Search and Rescue program the Fire Department sent some of its members to help with disaster relief for Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. As per the policies set forth by FEMA for all USAR Teams the Fire Department paid those individuals for the time spent assisting in the disaster recovery. FEMA will then reimburse the Fire Department for all costs associated with the deployment. The Fire Department has received a portion of the reimbursement and is doing all it can to insure it receives the full reimbursement prior to the end of the fiscal year. The Fire Department does expect to receive full reimbursement from FEMA. «.111Y1s '` ..�.. ....�.. F_ "R,..`..S M APo' `.(A° ak"•IBiI s+' ... . ,,.,. �. Fire Department/Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) Disaster Response Reimbursement Initiative Name I I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-5 I 2005-06 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Fire Department Housekeeping Department I I Type of Initiative John Vuvk 799-4210 Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund 12-00005 FEMA Reimbursement $ 41,825.00 12-00120 FEMA Reimbursement $ 311,000.00 I12-01160 FEMA Reimbursement I $ 11,600.00 Total $ 364,425.00I I $0 Internal Service Fund l Total I $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 I $0 Other Fund Total I OI I $0 I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 ,Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 0 Description 1 1 1 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: EMW-2005-FG-16772 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 12-00005 1956 $ 41,825.00 112-00120 1956 $ 311,000.00 12-01160 1956 $ 11,600.00 I 1 I 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 Amount 12-00005 2199 $ 41,825.00 12-00120 2199 $ 311,000.00 12-01160 2199 $ 11,600.00 1 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are leliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: IMS Computer Rental Income Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #D-6 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: 1) The IMS rental program was created in 2000, and has been very successful in helping city departments control their desktop computers and monitor their costs. The program has helped to bring about standardization of operating systems and equipment, which assists IMS in reducing costs and maintaining a stable citywide network. 2)The IMS rental program has experienced additional growth during FY06 than anticipated. IMS estimated 304 units, but actually handled 346 units, which is 42 new computers being installed. 3) The IMS rental revenue budget for FY06 is $423,179; actual IMS rental revenue as of 02/28/06 is $466,400. This reflects the increase in rental units. IMS is requesting a budget opening to increase rental revenues and expenses by $41,430. This increase will allow IMS to recover the increased costs of these rentals. IMS Computer Rental Income I I Initiative Name I 1 BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-6 I 2005-06 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Management Services/ IMS HousekeepingI Department I Type of Initiative Dave Abbott 535-6343 Prepared By Telephone Contact 1 General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $O I $0 Internal Service Fund 65 Fund IMS Rental Income $ 41,430.00 Total 1 $ 41,430.00 I I $0 Enterprise Fund I Total $01 I $0 Other Fund Total 01 I $0 _Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 I 0 Description 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 1 65-01000 1954 $ 41,430.00 I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 165-01000 2750 $ 41,430.00 Additional Description: Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? N/A I Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A iWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are Ieliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: Police Department Service Overtime Reimbursment Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-7 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: The Police Department provides services to a variety of law enforcement taskforces and off duty events on an overtime basis. These expenses are processed thru the department's payroll system. Those reimbursements have been larger than what is budgeted for fiscal year 2006 by $32,500. This request is to recoginize those reimbursements by increasing the overtime budget in both the department expense and the general fund revenue by$32,500. Police Department Service Overtime Reimbursement I Initiative Name I I I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-7 _ _ _ J _ 2005-06 Initiative Number r Fiscal Year Police _ Housekeeping _ __1 Department [ _--_ _ I L Type of Initiative [--- Jerry Burton I 799-3824 I Prepared By --- —_-_ 1 Telephone Contact F ---L-l- 1 _L — General Fund Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund - L Off Duty Overtime Reimbursemen i— 32,500.00 Total $ 32,500.00 I $0I Internal Service Fund _ _ L Total $01 $0 Enterprise Fund _— Total $01 I $01 Other Fund _— 1 — — Total�] I 0 1 $0 Staffing Impact: !New Number of FTE's _ 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's I 00 0 Total 01 0 — Description None 1 - _ -- �—T— --- - L I _Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount '02- Police Department 1446 I $ 32,500.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 02- Police Department 2133 $ 32,500.00 Additional Accounting Details: 1 Grant Information: No grant funds Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will jbe eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A (Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: PROMIS Grant Amendment Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-8 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: The purpose of the grant is to create the Protective/Restraining Order Management Information System (PROMIS). This is a secure, web-based inter-agency information sharing network for criminal and civil domestic violence case data to identify and track protection orders and violations of protection orders. The grant was originally funded on 09/01/03 for$500,000, of which the IMS portion of the funding for programming was$75,000 for programming services and $10,000 for capital expenditure. The funding was from 09/01/03 to 08/31/05. The first extension to the grant was to extend the time frame only from 09/01/05 to 12/31/05. The second extension is to extend the time frame from 01/01/06 to 07/31/06.The total grant will remain at the funded $500,000; however, the categories for funding have been modified resulting in $58,000 of additional monies awarded to IMS for completion of the programming. The PROMIS grant modification has been awarded to Salt Lake City for the completion of the project.The approved grant fund modifications is for specific programming that will need to be completed within the time restraints of the grant terms and conditions. This modification will specifically extend the capacities of the Domestic Violence case filing system. Enhancements will be made that will make delivering the discoverable documents for the defense attorney quicker and recording these results. The system will provide these case filings by either of three methods: 1.Prosecutors printing a packet of discoverable documents that can be delivered to the defense 2.Prosecutors e-mail a secured packet of discoverable documents to the defense 3.Prosecutors providing a secured web based system for the defense to retrieve the discoverable documents The system will record each of these steps so there is an audit of when the documents were delivered. Thereby speeding up the deliverable process of these documents.This will assist in fewer instances of where cases are delayed due to the defense not having these documents. This will result in a speedier process for the injured parties with fewer courts visits. In addition this will greatly reduce the time required for the prosecutor to create the discoverable document packet. The grant summary identified the criteria for the project. IMS will follow these requirements. The software engineering design and development will be coordinated and monitored by IMS personnel and performed by qualified IMS/contract labor. The IMS portion of the grant modifications total$58,000 as awarded to Salt Lake City for the PROMIS project requiring software programming and computer support through IMS. Measurability of this project is the actual tracking of identified expenses and the completion of the project. PROMIS Grant Amendment I I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-8 2005-06 Initiative Number 0 Fiscal Year Management Services /IMS I Housekeeping Department I Type of Initiative Dave Abbott � 535-6343 Prepared By Telephone Contact 'General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund 65 Fund IMS PROMIS Grant $ 36,000.00 1 $ 22,000.00 amendment and extension for I FY06 and FY07 Total $ 36,000.001 1 $ 22,000.00 Enterprise Fund Total I $01 1 $0 Other Fund Total 01 I $0 I I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0I 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 I 0 Description • • Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 165-03200 1954-02 $ 36,000.00 I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 65-03200 2163 $ 36,000.00 Additional Description: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Contract Labor Is there a potential for grant to continue? Until 07/31/06 If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A 1Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes ;Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? No Initiative Name: Move CDBG CIP from 83 to 71 Fund Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #D-9 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: In Budget Amendment #4, the CDBG CIP Building Improvement projects were moved from the 71 fund to the 83 fund which includes all capital improvement projects. This was done in an effort to coordinate the cost over-run budgets established for CDBG and to enable HAND to better monitor and track CIP CDBG projects. It has since been determined that this action creates an accounting problem for the Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) project tracking system and the City's Capital Improvement reporting requirements. This request reverses the action taken in Budget Amendment #4. HAND staff will continue to coordinate the cost over-run budgets through the Budget Opening process. It is recommended that the Council approve the necessary adjustments to the budgets to continue facilitation of these projects. j Move CDBG CIP From 83 to 71 Fund I T, I Initiative Name I I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#D-9 _ 1 2005-06 Initiative Number r - -1 Fiscal Year — Community Development I Housekeeping Department s--____ _—_ __ Type of Initiative L__ LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins i 5 3 5161 3615 3 5-61 5 0 r li -- P_repared_By. _ __ __ __--_—_____—__, I Telephone Contact • +General Fund Fund Balance Impact + __ _ T Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 (General Fund L i 1 ----——-- ---- I Total! 01 1 $0__ Internal Service Fund --_— Total 01 $0j Enterprise Fund 1 - — --- Total I 01 I $0 Other Fund _483 Fund CDBG Funding $ (761,219.41)I _ 71 Fund CDBG OO_peratines _ T$ 761,219.41 _ Total $ - I $0 I I I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 Total _ 01 I 0 �DescP —-- ri tion I t 7 .1-- --- — --'— — i -j- 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 _Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: 1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 171-31013 1310 $ 107,400.00 171-31018 1310 $ 15,000.00 171-31052 1310 I $ 9,900.00 71-31053 1310 $ 19,600.00 171-31030 1310 1 $ 41,564.00 71-31058 1310 $ 62,982.00 71-31057 1310 I $ 10,000.00 71-31043 1310 1 $ 17,300.00 71-31059 1310 $ 59,400.00 71-31060 1310 $ 60,000.00 71-31044 1310 I $ 8,000.00 71-31055 1310 1 $ 5,500.00 171-31045 1310 $ 27,723.00 '71-31054 1310 $ 3,400.00 71-31056 1310 $ 16,975.00 471-31036 1310 $ 118,000.00 71-30054 1310 $ 15,000.00 1 71-30055 1310 $ 7,500.00 71-30057 1310 $ 10,000.00 171-30059 1310 $ 7,975.41 171-30060 1310 $ 120,000.00 71-30063 1310 $ 18,000.00 $ 761,219.41 1 83-06999 1310 1 $ (761,219.41) 1 Expenditure: 1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 71-31013 2590 $ 107,400.00 171-31018 • 2590 $ 15,000.00 71-31052 2590 $ 9,900.00 171-31053 2590 $ 19,600.00 • 171-31030 2590 $ 41,564.00 71-31058 2590 $ 62,982.00 171-31057 2590 $ 10,000.00 171-31043 2590 $ 17,300.00 71-31059 2590 $ 59,400.00 171-31060 2590 $ 60,000.00 71-31044 2590 $ 8,000.00 71-31055 2590 $ 5,500.00 71-31045 _ 2590 L_L$— —27,723.00 71-31054 L 2590 1$ 3,400.00 71-31056 2590 1 1$ 16,975.00 71-31036 2590 $ 118,000.00 71-30054 2590 1— $ 15,000.00 71-30055 2590 _L$_ __ 7,500.00 71-30057 2590 I $ 10,,000.00 — 71-30059 2590 __ L $_ — — 7,975.414 71-30060 2590 I I $ _ 120,000.00 j 71-30063 - 2590 $ 18,000.00 — — -I , —— r . I$ 761,219.41 83-06999 25901 $ (761,219.41) . -- -- 1 Additional Description: I I i - _ Grant Information: 1 Grant funds employee positions? N/A Its there a potential for grant to continue? 1 I N/A --L-L- - - I-: -1 Jlf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will i I !be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A J_ --- --- - -- 1.4 -I- !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A T - 1 II Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are I eliminated? N/A -- ---------- Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? 1 — — — N/A • Initiative Name: State of Utah,Department of Community&Culture,Division of State History National YaleCrest Nomination Initiative Number: BA#5FY 2006 Initiative#E-1 Initiative Type: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Salt Lake Planning Division applied for and received this$10,000 grant from the State of Utah,Department of Community&Culture,Division of State History,to complete an intensive- level survey of ten(10)properties in the Yalecrest neighborhood. The area,which encompasses 1300 to 1900 East,and Sunnyside Avenue to 1300 South,was surveyed at the reconnaissance-level in 2004-2005. The completion of the intensive-level survey will assist a consultant in preparing a National Register nomination of the Yalecrest neighborhood. Funding will be used hire a professional consultant to complete the survey and provide a published analysis of findings. This grant requires a 100%or$10,000 match which will be met with the in-kind salary of the Historic Planner Position and is budgeted for within the Planning Divisions general fund budget. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. 1 1 1 • State of Utah, Dept of Community& Culture, Division of State History- National Yalecrest Nomination 1 I Initiative Name 1 I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#E-1 2005-06 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No Community Development New Staff Resources Department Type of Initiative Elizabeth Giraud/Sherrie Collins 1 535-7128/535-6150 Prepared By [I Telephone Contact 1it General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I (Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund 1 Total $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund 1 1 Total $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund 1 Total $01 I $0 Other Fund I 72Fund State of Utah Grant $ 10,000.00 I Total $ 10,000.00 I I $0 1 1 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's 1 0 Total 1 01 1 0 Description 1 1 1 I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: e — — Cost Center Number Object Obj ect Codee Number Amount 772-New Cost Center i 1370 T $ 10,000.00 I—— -------- ---- I I --- — ------------ --- — L i 7 i — Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ± Amount -- 72-New Cost Center �_— 2590 T $ _10,000.00 E IT Additional Accounting Details: T - I_ --- + — -- �—I— — - - I — r Grant funds employee positions? No Its there a potential for grant to continue? Yes _L IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will j be eliminated at the end of the grant?' I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes I j Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? T 4 I No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 7 T Non-profit sector? T No or T Initiative Name: US Dept of Homeland Security,Emergency Preparedness and Response-Federal Emergency Management Agency- Assistance to Firefighters Grant Initiative Number: BA#5FY 2006 Initiative#E-2 Initiative Type: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department applied for and received$108,719 from the Department of Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness and Response/FEMA, under the Assistance to Firefighters Grant. They receive this grant on an annual basis. These funds were award to the Fire Department to purchase and replace old obsolete personal protective equipment for the Firefighters. Equipment includes MSA push to connect mask mounted retrofit to a quarter turn docking system,face pieces and eight (8) chemical/biological suits. The grant requires a 20%match or$27,180 which is budgeted for within the Fire Departments general fund budget. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. ----J I I I -- a- US Department of Homeland Security,Emergency Preparedness& Response-Assistance to Firefighters Grants Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#E-2 2005-06 Initiative Number r _—— _1 Fiscal Year r Grants Requiring No Fire Department New Staff Resources Department Ij Type of Initiative I- - John Vuyk/Sherrle Collins t 799-4210/535-6150 Prepared — Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund _ Total, $0 $0, Internal Service Fund --- _ Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund L Total $01 I $0 Other Fund _ 72 Fund Fed Grant T $ 108,719.00 To_tall $ 108,719.00 $0 I � Staffing Impact: __ New Number of FTE's —_ 0 f — 0 Existing Number of FTE's I 0 Total 01 0 Description T—T I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: EMW-2005-FG-16772 Revenue: Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number I L Amount 1/2=New Cost Center _ 1360 I $ 108 719.00 --- -- ---- ------- I ---------- --- Expenditure: Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number I Amount 2-New Cost Center 2750-20 --_I $ 108,719.00 Additional Accounting Details: — — — I 1 ----------- — — --- — -I— Grant Information: 1 Grant funds employee positions? i No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA L1 Will grant program be complete grant funding time frame? I Yes 1 - Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? — No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? + i No Initiative Name: Library Pavers Donations Initiative Number: BA#5 FY20_06Initiative#F-1 Initiative Type: Donations Initiative Discussion: The Library Paver Donations fund currently has a donations budget of$1,000,000. Actual donations received total$1,173,200,with 164,000 from private donations and the remaining 9,200 from public donations. It is recommended that the Council appropriate the additional donations to support the completion of the Library Paver replacement project. I I 1 1 1 Library Paver Donations ] I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#F-1 2005-06 J Initiative Number .L Fiscal Year i Mamt Sery-Finance _ Donations _ iDepartment I I __.____— _ L.-_ Type of Initiative C. Elwin Heilmann I 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact I —. General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact — l L _-- _Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund - j -- — - — — —1 - — Total1 0 $0 Internal Service Fund _ —I Total Oi $0 Enterprise Fund I — -r-- -- Total OI $0 !Other Fund -,IL _ 77 Donations Fund �$ 173,200.00 r — _ Total! $ 173,200.00 $0 Staffing Impact: 1New Number of FTE's _ _ 01 0 _jExisting Number of FTE's _4 1 OI r 0 Total 01 0 Description — — I —H T - T I T-- -- 1 I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount LL 77-77157 - I 1895 $ 164,000.00 77-77157 — — — —_- 1897 $ 9,200.00 1- 1— I I -- — �� — --- -- Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77-77157 _ —_ 2700 $ 173,200.00 — — _ T - - ---i---— —Additional Description: — — i iirESECZEM32111111111111111111_____ ,- -- I Grant funds employee positions? NA — J Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA ._jIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will !be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ NA I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are leliminated? 1 —I NA I I L Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? I — I NA KWTYYMlbllfNeMiYb. - 6.Y 11' Initiative Name: Prevent Underage Drinking Scholarship Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2006 Initiative #F-2 Initiative Type: Donation Initiative Discussion: The SLC Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs received a $1,000 scholarship from CRP Incorporated for participation in the SAMHSA's Underage Drinking Prevention Campaign. This campaign is geared toward prevention of underage drinking by hosting town hall meetings and providing "Reach Out Now" educational information at local schools. The Drug Free Grant Coordinator is currently working with the Mayor's Coalition to determine dates and times of town hall meetings and school presentations. This request is to increase the current budget in the Drug Free Communities grant by $1,000 to facilitate the check received. This is a private donation and requires no match. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this donation. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. 1 j1 Prevent Underage Drinking Scholarship Initiative Name 1 I BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#F-2 I 2005-06 I Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Mayor's Office Donation • Department I I Type of Initiative Abby Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-6030/535-6150 1 Prepared By I Telephone Contact _ iGeneral Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 'General Fund 1 i Total $01 I $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 $0_ 'Enterprise Fund l_ I Total $01 I $0 Other Fund 1 72 Fund Donation $ 1,000.00 I I Total $ 1,000.00 I $0 7 I 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 'Existing Number of FTE's 0 (Total 01 1 0 Description fI I I 1 I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: None-NA Revenue: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount 72-60519 I 1895 I$ 1,000.00 rt. --- - -- -- .L ! — — — — — — — �— L _ Expenditure: Cost Center Number 1 Object Code Number 1 Amount 72-60519 2590 $ 1,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Increase existing Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? _—— NA _-- If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? j NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are T eliminated? P __ NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ Non-profit sector? NA Initiative Name: Downtown Construction Mitigation Contract Coordinator Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#G-1 Initiative Type: Added by City Council Initiative Discussion: The proposed annual budget for fiscal year 2006-07 included the services of a downtown renovation coordinator whose fee will be split evenly with the Salt Lake Chamber. The Council's approval of this item in the budget amendment makes the funds available right away. Downtown Construction Mitigation 111 Contract Coordinator 1 1 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2006 Initiative#G-1 Z005-06 JInitiative Number I L . Fiscal Year - Community Development Added bythe Council 1 Department 1 t . Type of Initiative - Gary Mumford 535-6165 Prepared By . Telephone Contact IN 11111 General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact II $30,000 - MI Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year III FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 - General Fund 611 30,000 . 111 1111 Total $30,000 $0 Internal Service Fund . MNIIIINEMII Total.. $0. $0' Enterprise Fund NI IN = III III IIII Total $0. 0 111 Other Fund . 111111.11 Total- 0111 $0' 111 III MI Staffing Impact: 11111 New Number of FTE's MINI 0 0 Existin• Number of FTE's 0uni Total 0.00111 0. Description 1111 T MEMIIII El 1111 I 111 Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 06-00100 1897 $ 30,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 06-00100 2329 $ 60,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _ be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NIA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? — NIA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative Name: Real Estate Professionals for Economic Growth Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative#G-2 Initiative Type: Added by City Council Initiative Discussion: A group of real estate professionals engaged in Utah commercial brokerage, development and related real estate activities is working in conjunction with persons in governmental or quasi-governmental functions to attract favorable industries to Utah. This group requested funding to expand its organized economic development effort. The Council approved an appropriation of$10,000 subject to subject to a public benefit study and hearing. I (- Real Estate Professionals for Economic Growth Initiative Name BA#4 FY2006 Initiative#G-2; gOO5-O6 Initiative Number I _ Fiscal Year Mayor's Office Added by Council Department I Type of Initiative I Gary Mumford 535y6165 Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact $10,000 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 Total 0.00 0 Description •Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA II Revenue: 111 Cost Center Number 1. Object Code Number • Amount all II ill IIIII "MEI mi- . - I. - --wim. - - .1 - - . - Expenditure: IIIII Cost Center Number IN Object Code Number • Amount III 09-00500 2580 • $ 10,000.00 III IIII 1 IIIII MIIMIIIII.1111 IN IIIII III Ell MI M MO III III IIII Additional Accounting Details: miiiir MI I- .- •_______NI 111 III 1 MIN Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? IIMIltEllilli= El Is there a potential for grant to continue? III N/A MI IM If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? II N/A 11111 IIII Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are Lieliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A taewe wwz».a...,..a,»,.......•....�,+.�....+Wr A19lJri''M " C .. vy — .,e.....a ... .. n Initiative Name: Reimburse General Fund for operating costs of Foreign Trade Zone Warehouse Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative #G-3 Initiative Type: Added by City Council Initiative Discussion: The City owns a warehouse formerly known as the Foreign Trade Zone. The warehouse, located in the Industrial Center, is mostly vacant. The Department of Public Services stores the Liberty Park tennis bubble, the nylon mesh that protected the grass around the City=& County Building during the Olympics, and a few otheritems. The Police Department Stores motorcycles and some K-9 training items. A very small portion of the warehouse is being used. None of the space is currently leased out. The Property Mangement unit of the Department of Management Services pays for utilities, grounds maintenance, waste disposal, and security. Some years ago when a portion of the warehouse was leased, the lease proceeds offset the expense to the general fund A CIP fund exists to fund major capital improvements to the warehouse. This CIP funds has a cash balance of$334,000. Council Member Carlton Christensen suggested that the Administration considerF selling the warehouse. Until that time, Council Member Christensen desires that the CIP account be used to reimburse the general fund for utiliites and other costs. The Council supported this re( ::: :Reimburse:General Fund:for :• ` • '` :operatingco tsoForeign Trade ::... :.:::Zone Ware di se > ,. 7 1 Initiative Name ::::BA#5:I 006<Initiative:: :::'.:..:::::'::: :::::2005-06:":' :::::. Initiative NumberI Fiscal Year :: Management:Servit ee. :::::. ::: Added:bV C Council:: Department 1 Type of Initiative Garv.Mumfo:rd .. :: .;535 1:65 ' ;,::::: : Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund $36,000 $35,015 Total $36,000 $35,015 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund - Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 Total 0.00 0 Description Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA # If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 01-50052 1974-05 $ 36,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-97072 2910-08 $ 36,000.00 A dditional Accounting Details: rant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NIA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NIA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NIA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NIA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NIA Initiative Name: Police Radio/Laptop Modems Initiative Number: BA#5 FY 2006 Initiative #G-4 Initiative Type: Added by City Council Initiative Discussion: The Mayor's Recommended Budget for fiscal year 2006-07 included $36,000 of one-time costs to replace 12 police radio/laptop modems. The Council decided to fund this in Budget Amendment#5 rather than in FY07 annual budget.The funding source will be a transfer from GIP Foreign Trade Zone account to reimburse the general fund for warehouse utilities, grounds maintenance, waste disposal and security(see item G-3). PIce:ltadiclop` I;adems> Initiative Name <> »: O Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year Police:D p :rtment.:::.:. Added by:O :O ui:l> tt Department Type of Initiative Prepared By Telephone Contact General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact $36,000 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 Total 0.00 0 Description Accounting Detail Grant # and CFDA# If Applicab e: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 02-00083 2750 $ 36,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A