027 of 2008 - Budget Amendment No 4 for FY 2007-2008 0 08-1
B 08-7
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 27 of 2008
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2007-2008)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 24 OF
2007 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, THE
FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2008.
PREAMBLE
On June 12, 2007, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2007 and ending June 30, 2008, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.24 of 2007.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2007 and ending June 30, 2008, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 10 day of
.Tiinp , 2008.
JL
. j
U
C'
utC___
.,AIRPER C, SON
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CI Y C RDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on 6-10-08
Mayor's Action: X Approved Vetoed
• • r6V•-
MAYOR
ATTEST:
C[IyJT
i
6L/3--- - k .. ) i' 11 " !$
7
CHIEF DE U TY RE RDER #\;
'°N(:)RPORA,j "..
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Bill No. 27 of 2008. Salt Lake City Affoome s Office
Published: June 17, 2008 Daly !!
HB_ATTY-#2169-v1-Budget_amendment 1 2007-2008.DOC BY
3
Revenue Forecast
Salt Lake City Corporation
As of February 29, 2008
FY07/08
Variance FY 07/08 FY 07/08 Variance
Eight Months Eight Months Favorable Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Actuals (Unfavorable) Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Total General Fund 146,637,860 147,877,133 1,239,273 200,674,169 200,390,227 (283,942)
Selected Discussion Items
Total Property Taxes 59,488,691 60,984,801 1,496,110 63,946,017 65,406,449 1,460,432
Discussion:
The final settlement numbers from the County came in much better than
expected.
Total Sales and Use Tax 30,447,067 30,334,075 (112,992) 52,857,326 52,887,210 29,884
Discussion:
I
The sales tax number are$500,000 down for the first eight months of
the year, but we have seen a better forecast for March than we
expected. This category is showing better than expected because of i
the Questar Muni Energy Tax is showing$600,000 better than budget. }
Total Franchise Tax 16,808,564 17,533,147 724,583 25,206,972 26,282,823 1,075,851
Discussion:
Due to a colder winter and hot summer Questar and Pacific Corp. are
showing an increase over budget.
Total PILOT 1,020,795 1,020,795 0 1,025,447 1,025,447 0
Discussion:
License and Permits: 13,098,363 11,362,249 (1,736,114) 19,973,169 17,210,728 (2,762,441)
Discussion:
The City's permits are showing a general overall small decrease and we
are still projecting a lower amount than expected from the City Creek
Project in the amount of$2.2 Million this fiscal year.Also Parking tax is
showing a decrease one reason is due to an increase in free parking
from 30 min to one hour at the City Library which results in a$200,000
decrease. The ground transportation is collecting$200,000 less than
expected because of the delay in implementation of the taxi cab
budging and inspections.
Total Intergovernmental 3,207,303 3,586,450 379,147 4,757,678 4,862,976 105,298
Discussion:
Charges and Services 2,282,044 2,517,904 235,860 3,084,798 3,364,798 280,000
Discussion:
FY07/08
Variance FY 07/08 FY 07/08 Variance
Eight Months Eight Months Favorable Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Actuals (Unfavorable) Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Total Fines&Forfeiture 5,908,420 6,104,569 196,149 8,614,657 8,848,423 233,766
Discussion:
Year end projections for fines and forfeitures indicate that these
revenue will be slightly better than budget primarily due to Justices
Court Fines.
Parking Meters 1,075,328 1,101,209 25,881 1,464,000 1,489,881 25,881
Discussion:
Year end projections for parking meter revenue indicates that these
revenues will come in slightly higher due to the bagging of meters in the
down town construction areas.
Interest income 3,660,006 2,871,505 (788,501) 5,300,000 4,511,499 (788,501)
Discussion:
This decrease is due to adjustment in the federal reserve rate and the
prime rate. The prime rate had drop from a high of 8.25%to the current
rate of 5.25%with future decreases expected. The federal rate is at
2.25%.
Miscellaneous Revenue 2,084,384 2,325,393 241,009 2443679 2,498,544 54,865
Discussion:
•
Total Interfund 6,387,394 6,849,485 462,091 9,950,440 9,952,698 2,258
Discussion:
Total Transfers 1,169,501 1,285,551 116,050 2,049,986 2,048,751 (1,235)
Discussion:
Budgeted fund balance running total for the General Fund
For FY08
Beginning fund balance as of June 30, 2007 $32,560,382
Budget book:
Total budgeted revenue 199,030,640
Total budgeted expenses (201.911 052)
Total budget book sources/(uses)of fund balance ($2,880,412)
Budget amendment#1 changes:
Initiative#A-3 Transportation-Engineer IV Position (72,281)
Initiative#A-1 Leonardo Seismic Retrofit (1.493.396)
Initiative#A-4 Land Use Attorney (89,229)
Initiative#A-9 Local Lobbyist (68,500)
Initiative#A-5 Impact fee waiver (22,100)
Initiative#A-11 Election costs (155,000)
Initiative#D-1 Encumbrance carry forward budgets (3,587,310)
Initiative#I-1 Rocky Mountain Power's bid to bury 800 South Transmission Lines (8,000)
Initiative#I-2 Additional staffing for Council office (112,000)
Total budget amendment#1 changes ($5,607,816)
Budget amendment#2 changes:
Initiative#A-4 1300 East Safety Study (100.000)
Initiative#A-11 Ground Transportation Inspection (234,981)
Initiative#A-2 CBD Recycling (61,821)
Initiative#A-1 State Road Transfer 1,504,149
Initiative#A-8 Engineering Manager-Airport TRAX extension (50,000)
Initiative#A-15 Prosecutors office additional staff (205,584)
Initiative#I-1 Legal Defenders Association (15.295)
Total budget amendment#2 changes $836,468
Budget amendment#3 changes:
Initiative#A-1 Downtown Alliance Parking Token Subsidy (21,000)
Initiative#A-2 November 2007 GO Bond Election Costs (42,280)
Initiative#A-5 New Administrative Position in Mayor's office (19,915)
Initiative#A-6 Utah Museum of Fine Arts (50,000)
Initiative#A-7 Salt Lake Solutions (26.000)
Initiative#A-8 Buzz Center (34,050)
Initiative#I-1 Convert seasonal employee to full-time (14,156)
Initiative#I-3 Electronic Plan Submission and Review Software (357,000)
Total budget amendment#3 changes ($564,401)
Budget amendment#4 changes:
Initiative#A-2 Police Officers 501-C-9 Contribution (175,000)
Initiative#A-4 Snow Fighting Costs (315,302)
Initiative#A-9 Police Additional Retirement Costs (50,000)
Initiative#A-10 Additional Fuel Costs (264.563)
Total budget amendment#4 changes ($804,865)
Estimated Fund balance as of June 30, 2008 $23,539,356
Estimated percentage of Revenues 11.83%
Fiscal Year 2008 Budget Amendment #4 — June
General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
Initiative Name Impact Amount FTB General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
Section A New Items
1. Earnest Money for $500,000.00
Purchase of Public Safety
Property
2. Police Officers 501-C-9 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 -$175,000.00
Contribution
3. Police Overtime $90,000.00 $90,000.00
Reimbursement
4. Snow Fighting Costs $315,302.00 $315,302.00 -$315,302.00
5. Fire Station #15 Land $175,000.00
Purchase—Impact Fees
6. E-911 Police Dispatch $106,000.00
Overtime
7. Video Sewer Line Review $200,000.00
and Repairs
8. Purchase of Additional $1,500,000.00
Water
9. Police Additional $50,000.00 $50,000.00 -$50,000.00
Retirement Costs
10. Additional Fuel Costs $264,563.00 $264,563.00 -$264,563.00
(General Fund)
10. Additional Fuel Costs $574,570.00
(Fleet Fund)
11. Police Dispatch Training $2,875.00 $2,875.00
Reimbursement
32 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
12. Police—Sale of Service $3,089.00 $3,089.00
Weapons to Retired
Officers
Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources 1
r
1. State Dept of Health $10,080.00
Operation Crosswalk
Grant
2. State Off of Crime Victim $18,963.83
VAWA Grant
3. State Crisis Intervention $75,000.00
Grant
Section C Grants For New Staff Resources
Section D Housekeeping
1. Recapture CIP, Class $54,017.76
"C" and Impact Fee
Projects
2. Parks ADA Accessibility $-0-
Imp—Scope Change- s
3. Re-establish Budget for $26,220.69
Special Assessment Area
4. American Dream Down $17,125.00
payment Initiative—
Carryover
5. Grant Tower & TRAX $240,858.00
Extension Interest
Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
33 General Fund Impact
Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance
# Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact
Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative
1. National Trust for $5,000.00
Historic Preservation
Grant—Land mark
Training
2. State Certified $20,000.00
Government Grant
fi
3. National Trust for $5,000.00
Historic Preservation
Grant—29th Ward House
4. State Dept of Natural $15,000.00
Resources— Sorenson
Energy Conservation
Grant
5. State Dept of Natural $15,000.00
Resources —C & C Bldg
Energy Conservation
Grant
Section F Donations
1. Daniels Fund- Youth $50,000.00
City After School Grant
2. Adobe Youth Voices $5,000.00
Grant—Sorenson
Computer Clubhouse
Section I Council Added Items
Initiative Name:
Earnest Money Purchase Property for Public Safety Bldg
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-1
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
$500,000 from the Surplus Land Account for earnest money in support of a purchase agreement for
property to support the Public Safety Building.
Initiative#A-1
Earnest Money Purchase Property for
Public Safety Bldg
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-1 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
CAO New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Lyn Creswell/John Spencer 535-6391/535-6398
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
1General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
•
Total
$0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
1
Initiative#A-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
� a
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-81000 2700 $ 500,000.00I
Additional Accounting Details:
I !
I ,
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
I i
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
� I
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
it
Initiative#A-1-b
. _
Initiative Name:
Police Officers 501-C-9 Contribution
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-2
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The 500 series (sworn police officers) added the option to transfer to Plan B for the city which
allows the transfer of accrued personal leave to the Post Retirement medical benefit plan
offered to officers. This additional expense was not budgeted
Initiative#A-2
Police Officers 501-C-9 Contribution
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-2 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund -Fund Balance- $ (175,000.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
'Other Fund
Total $0 $0;
Staffing Impact:
•Requested Number of 01 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
102-Various Cost Centers 2191 175,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
•
•
Grant Information:
IGrant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-2-b
Initiative Name:
Police Overtime Reimbursement
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The police Department receives reimbursement for overtime expenses related to task force
participation and secondary employment paid through the payroll system. Initial budgets are
only estimates as the overtime reimbursement varies greatly from month to month.
Request to increase budgets for revenues and expenditures for overtime reimbursements.
Initiative#A-3
Police Overtime Reimbursement
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
1General Fund
$ 90,000.00
Total $ 90,000.00 $0
Internal Service Fund
1
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 01
Position Title:
Initiative#A-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02-00083 1441 $ (19,000.00)
02-00045 1446-02 $ (1,000.00)
02-00013 1446-03 $ 5,000.00
02-00047 1446-04 $ 72,000.00
'02-00045 1446-05 $ (1,000.00)
02-00055 1446-07 $ (1,000.00)
02-00045 1446-08 $ 9,000.00
02-00047 1446-09 $ 11,000.00
02-00045 1446-10 $ 15,000.00
1 $ 90,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
i 02-00083 2133 $ (19,000.00)I
'02-00045 2133 $ (1,000.00),
02-00013 2133 $ 5,000.00
i 02-00047 2133 $ 72,000.00
02-00045 2133 $ (1,000.00)
02-00055 2133 $ (1,000.00)
02-00045 2133 $ 9,000.00
02-00047 2133 $ 11,000.00
02-00045 2133 $ 15,000.00
$ 90,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-3-b
Initiative Name:
Snow - Fighting Costs
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This year's snowfighting costs have already exceeded the budget for the entire snow season.
The Public Services Department requests additional budget for salt purchases ($245,115),
seasonal snow plow driver wages ($13,187), overtime ($19,000), and fleet maintenance costs
($38,000).
As an indication of the extent of snow removal this season, the average for Streets Division
purchases of salt in the five most-recent years was $177,000. The projection for this year's
needs is $462,000.
Initiative#A-4
Snow-Fighting Costs
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-4 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By Telephone Contact
I '
(Negative) Positive
(General Fund -Fund Balance- $ (315,302.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total( $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
I �
Total $0' $0
Enterprise Fund
Total! $0' $0
Other Fund
•
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0' 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-4-a
rrt
I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
I !
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount
03-11100 2285 $ 245,115.00
03-11100 2161 $ 13,187.00
103-11100 2143 $ 19,000.00
03-11100 2390 $ 38,000.00
Total ' $ 315,302.00
1
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? NA
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position Is it expected the position will
Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
I �
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
!Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
;Does grant duplicate services provided by private or •
I Non-profit sector? No
I
Initiative#A-4-b
Initiative Name:
Fire Station #15 Property Purchase Budget Increase- Impact Fees
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-5
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department was awarded $750,000 of Impact Fee funds during the FY2007-2008 CIP
Process to purchase property for future site of Fire Station#15.
The Fire Department has identified IDI Land Lot 3 as the Fire Departments first choice for the location
of Fire Station #15. This property is located at 1730 South 5070 West and consists of 3.85 acres.
The cost is approximately$925,000.
This request is to increase the current Impact Fee Fire Station #15 budget by $175,000, in order to
negotiate the cost and purchase the property.
1
Initiative#A-5
Fire Station#15 Property Purchase
Budget Increase-Impact Fees
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-5 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Property Mqmt-Mqmt Sery New Item
Department Type of Initiative
John Spencer/Sherrie Collins 535-6398/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
. :General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
I General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
! j
Total l $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of ! 0 0
!Position Title:
� I
Initiative#A-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
84-08001 2700 175,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? NA
,Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-5-b
Initiative Name:
E-911 Police Dispatch Overtime
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Police Dispatch hiring challenges created demand for higher than expected overtime. Current
practice is for the General Fund and E-911 fund to share the overtime costs at 50% each.
This request is for the E-911 fund for a budget increase to cover the overtime costs.
Initiative#A-6
•
E-911 Police Dispatch Overtime
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-6 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
1
Total', $0 $01
Internal Service Fund
li I
Total $0: $0i
Enterprise Fund
I f
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
I �
Initiative#A-6-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number F Object Code Number Amount
60-00620 I 2153 106,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
i If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated?
NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-6-b
Initiative Name:
Video Sewer Line Review and Repairs
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Sewer Utility is requesting to amend the 2007-2008 budget for $200,000 as the cost of
sewer cleaning and televising (video inspecting sewer lines) by an outside contractor will put
us over our budget in Collection System operations. The additional amount will assist the
department in reducing sewer system backups and allow us to continue this program.
Cost of outside consultant repairs and video line inspections $ 200,000
The sewer collection maintenance crews are expected to televise or video sewer lines (about
5% annually) to anticipate and fix problems before they cause major damage to our
customers.
To increase the number of feet cleaned and televised the department hired a consultant to
catch up on sewer line maintenance. This was not included in the original budget due to the
fact that the decision to expand the program was not made until after budget submittal. The
decision was to eliminate or reduce sewer backups which were occurring due to tree roots
clogging sewer lines during the recent drought conditions.
The major impact of this amendment is to minimize damage to customers that has resulted in
past large claims and damages. Although expected to help the Sewer Utility to become
current on sewer line conditions, the cost to the budget is mitigated by the reduced claims and
damages to customers.
maintenance to the sewer lines. In the past several years damages to lines and sewer
backups in residential and commercial property have caused damage claims from $200,000
to $300,000.
Initiative#A-7
Video Sewer Line Review and Repairs
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-7 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Sewer Utility New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund - Fund Balance-
; Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
Total I $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
'Other Fund
Total $0 $0'
Staffing Impact:
I Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-7-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
52-10600 2329 $ 200,000.00
' � 1
II
I II
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? f NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
•
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
- j
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-7-b
Initiative Name:
Purchase of Additional Water
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-8
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Water Utility is requesting to amend the 2007-2008 budget for $1,500,000 for additional
water purchases from the Metropolitan Water District that provides a portion of our water
supply:
Purchase of water from Metropolitan Water District $ 1,500,000
The Water Utility buys treated water annually from Metropolitan Water District as needed to
supply our customers. The cost is $188 per acre foot and we expect to need 8,000 acre feet
additional this year.
Purchases of treated and raw water from Metropolitan Water District have run higher than we
expected in our budget amount.
There should be little effect, because the cost if needed will be more than made up in the
increased revenue from the additional purchase. This is actually good for the Water Utility as
it will mean more revenue than costs, if the water is actually purchased as expected.
The Water Utility is requesting the budget be amended to adjust for a very dry summer and
fall season which has impacted our water purchase budget for Metropolitan which is based on
an average water year. Although it is possible that we may not spend up to this amount, the
likelihood of a dryer spring and early summer make this need probable.
Initiative#A-8
Purchase of Additional Water
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-8 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Water Utility New Item
Department I Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
• Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
IGeneral Fund
Total $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund
51-51101 1,500,000.00
Total 1,500,000.00 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-8-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
51-51101 1601 $ 1,500,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
'51-01100 2541 $ 1,500,000.00
I �
I I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
•
!Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-8-b
Initiative Name:
Police Additional Retirement Costs
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-9
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The city wide retirement account in non-departmental has a balance of $ 26,000 as of April 21
and the Police Department has Additional payments they have made that exceed $40,000.
In addition, it is unknown if there are other potential retirement payments that will be required
prior to year end. The $ 50,000 requested is only an estimate for the Police Department.
Initiative#A-9
Police Additional Retirement Costs
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-9 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
•
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance- $ (50,000.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0 $01
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
!Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
!Other Fund
Total $0 $0ll
Staffing Impact:
i Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
ICI _
Initiative#A-9-a
.
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
I li
! I I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number i Object Code Number Amount
09-00440 2191-50 $ 50,000.00
I �
Additional Accounting Details:
•
Grant Information:
•
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
i be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
i Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-9-b
Initiative Name:
Additional Fuel Costs
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-10
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
/\I, I\ I 11\111111 ._111 II /1
The market conditions on fuel prices has rising beyond current budgets.
For FY07-08, Fleet budgeted fuel at the per gallon purchase price of $2.00 for unleaded and
$2.35 for diesel. In comparison the average price for March 2008 is $2.61 for unleaded and
$3.29 for diesel. Price increases show no end in sight and Fleet Management is projecting a
10% increase through the end of FY07-08. An April bill from Fleet's fuel supplier is $2.66 for
unleaded and $3.61 for diesel.
This budget amendment requests additional expense budget for Fleet for the purchase of fuel,
and also requests budget adjustments to Fleet's revenue and General Fund expense for the
increase in billings to two General Fund departments - Police and Public Services.
Initiative#A-1 0
1
Additional Fuel Costs
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-10 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Fleet/Police/Pub Sery New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Greq Davis 535-3697
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund -Fund Balance- $ (264,563.00)
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0
$0
Enterprise Fund
I � I
Total I $0 $0
Other Fund
1
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
I ,
I I �
Initiative#A-10-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
61-00008 1953-20 $ 574,570.00
I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
102-Various Cost Centers 2390-01 $ 140,112.00
103-Various Cost Centers 2390-01 $ 124,451.00
Total $ 264,563.00
1 1
16100008 2231-04 $ 278,395.00
161-00008 2231-01 $ 296,175.00
Total $ 574,570.00 1
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? • NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
l eliminated? NA
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-1 0-b
Initiative Name:
Police Dispatch Training Reimbursement
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-11
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department dispatch receives reimbursement for related expenses for dispatch
training.
Request to budget the revenue and corresponding expenditures.
Initiative*A-11
Police Dispatch Training
Reimbursement
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-11 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
02-00082 $ 2,875.00
Total $ 2,875.00 $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total, $0 $0,
I � I
Staffing Impact:
I Requested Number of 0. 0'
'Position Title:
Initiative#A-11 -a
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
102-00082 1447 $ 2,875.00
1 1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
102-00082 2590 $ 2,875.00
1
Additional Accounting Details:
1
Grant Information:
,Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
� I �
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
!Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
i eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#A-11-b
Initiative Name:
Police - Sale of Service Weapons to Retired Officers
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-12
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department sells retiring officers their service weapon.
Request to budget the revenue and corresponding expenditures.
Initiative#A-12
Police-Sale of Service Weapons to
Retired Officers
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-12 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Police New Item
Department j Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund •
02-00069 I $ 3,089.00
Total I $ 3,089.00 $0
'Internal Service Fund '
T r 1
otal $0 I $0,
'Enterprise Fund
Total r $0 $01
'Other Fund
Totali $0 $01
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0, 0
Position Title:
Initiative#A-12-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02-00069 1843 $ 3,089.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02-00069 2254 $ 3,089.00
Additional Accounting Details:
I i
I �
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
1
Initiative#A-12-b
Initiative Name:
Fire Station #15 Property Purchase Budget Increase- Impact Fees
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #A-13
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department was awarded $750,000 of Impact Fee funds during the FY2007-2008 CIP
Process to purchase property for future site of Fire Station#15.
The Fire Department has identified IDI Land Lot 3 as the Fire Departments first choice for the location
of Fire Station #15. This property is located at 1730 South 5070 West and consists of 3.85 acres.
The cost is approximately$925,000.
This request is to increase the current Impact Fee Fire Station #15 budget by $175,000, in order to
negotiate the cost and purchase the property.
Initiative#A-1 3
Fire Station#15 Property Purchase
Budqet Increase-Impact Fees
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#A-13 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Property Mqmt-Mqmt Sery New Item
Department Type of Initiative
John Spencer/Sherrie Collins 535-6398/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
Total $0 $01
lInternal Service Fund
Total 1 $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total • $0 $0
Other Fund
Totall $0 $0J
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0; 0
Position Title:
i I
I I
Initiative#A-13-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
L •
•
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ' Amount
84-08001 2700 $ 175,000.00
1
Additional Accounting Details:
it
f �
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? NA
•
•
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? • NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
iDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#A-13-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Health Community & Family Health Services Operation
Crosswalk Enforcement
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #B-1
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department received a $10,080 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Health
Community & Family Health Services for costs associated with Operation Crosswalk Enforcement.
Operation Crosswalk Enforcement is a police operation which involves a pedestrian decoy crossing
back and forth in the crosswalk, when safe to do so. All motorists who violate the decoy pedestrian's
safety by failing to yield the right-of-way, either by not stopping or stopping in the crosswalk, are
stopped by a chase vehicle, issued a citation or a warning, and are given educational materials
pertaining to pedestrian right-of-way. The media is also asked to participate and be present as an
additional educational tool.
The Police Department will use these funds to pay overtime to 5 officers who participate in the
operation.
There is no required match.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah,
Department of Health Community& Family Health Services Agreements and to receive any other
donations or grants that stem from the original Agreement.
Initiative#B-1
•
State of Utah, Department of Health
Community&Family Health Services
Operation Crosswalk Enforcement
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#B-1 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Police Department Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
I
Total I $0 $01
'Internal Service Fund
Total; $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund
I i
Total 1 $0 $0'
'Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 10,080.00
Total' $ 10,080.00 $0'
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0 0,
Position Title:
5 Officers @ 36.00 per hour x $10,080
56 hours
Initiative#B-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and oFoA#If Applicable: AG39'
nrvenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount �
�
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 10.08000
|
| '
�
�
| �
| |
�
! �
�
| |
Expenditure:
| Cost Center Number ! | Object Code Number Amount �
!��NowCou Center | | 25SO � 1O.O8OOO !
� � |
| �
|
i
� |
|
| '
/
/
i
Additional Accounting Details: �
|
i
!
Grant Information:
|Grant funds employee positions? No �
i !
|e there m potential for grant tocontinue? � N# �
|If grant ia funding m position hoit expected the position will �
ibm eliminated mt the end of the grant? NA i
Will grant program bm complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? � NA
i
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
|Non-profit sector? | No �
|
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations - PD VAWA Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #B-2
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department received a $18,963.83 grant from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim
Reparations for the continuation of their VAWA funded Victim Advocate Program. Of these funds,
$18,763.83 will be used to pay for the partial salary and benefits of (.50) FTE victim advocate who
provides on scene crisis counseling and resource services to victims of domestic violence. The
remaining $200 will be used for emergency victim assistance needs such as food, clothing,
transportation, etc. The Police Department receives this grant on an annual basis.
The grant requires a $6,341.25 cash match which will be satisfied with 285 hours of the Program
Coordinators time which is budgeted for within the Police Departments general fund budget.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, Office
of Crime Victim Reparations VAWA Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that
stem from the original Agreement.
Initiative#B-2
State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim
Reparations-PD VAWA Grant
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#B-2 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Police Department Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265 1535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
Total $0 $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
!Other Fund
172- New Cost Center $ 18,963.83
Total F $ 18,963.83 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0
Position Title:
I i
1 Hrly Advocate Position x $17,430.40
1040 hrs x $16.76 per hr. I
Benefits 1,333.43
Total $18,763.83
Initiative#B-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 07-VAWA-25 16.588
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 18,963.83
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 211101 18,763.83
72-New Cost Center 2590 200.00
Additional Accounting Details:
•
•
Grant Information:
i Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I No
Initiative#B-2-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah Crisis Intervention Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #B-3
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department received a $75,000 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Human
Services for continuation and expansion of the statewide Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training to
administer, coordinate, and promote CIT training efforts throughout the State. This grant will provide
adequate funding to cover costs of 18 CIT Academies throughout Utah, 4 recertification classes,
program administration costs and continued training for the City's Program Director, Coordinator and
15 Regional Coordinators. The CIT program was initiated to assist Law Enforcement Officers in
effectively dealing with persons experiencing mental health crisis as well as every day interaction with
mental health persons.
These funds will be used as follows: $19,840 will be used to pay overtime costs of the Program
Director and CIT Coordinator while conducting CIT Academies, making presentations throughout the
State and representing the interest of the CIT Program on numerous councils and committees;
$11,050 will be used for travel and lodging of the Program Director and CIT Coordinator to conduct
out of town CIT presentations, Academies, and planning and development conferences to market the
program throughout the State; $13,360 will be used for supplies, materials, manuals, certification pins,
handouts, etc., used at the Academies; $26,100 will be used for travel by the Program Director and
CIT Coordinator to attend local and national CIT educational trainings; and $4,650 for contractual
presenters at the Academies.
There is no required match.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, Crisis
Intervention Grant Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the
original Agreement.
Initiative#B-3
State of Utah Crisis Intervention Grant
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#B-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Police Department Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
!General Fund - Fund Balance- None
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
1
Total' $0 $0
!Internal Service Fund
I I
Total4 $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total1 I $0 $01,1
!Other Fund
172- New Cost Center $ 75,000.00
Total $ 75,000.00 1 $01
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0
!Position Title:
! I
2 Officers x 275.5 OT hrs x $19,840.00.
$36.00 per hr.
I j
Initiative#B-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and oFDA# If Applicable: 93.958
Revenue:
| Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount �
i72'New Cost Center 1370 $ 75.000.00 |
| � !
/ � |
| |
|
| |
� | |
i � |
/ | |
| � .
� !
| � �
|
Expenditure:
i Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount |
/72'New Cost Center 2133 $ 19.840.00 �
T2'New Cost Center 2590 $ 55,160.00 !
|
. $ 75,000.00 |
|
�
|
�
| i
i |
�
Additional Accounting Details: /
|. |
/ ! |
/
|
|
|Grant Information: |
|
'Grant funds employee positions? No
!km there m potential for grant tocontinue? | Yea /
,If grant is funding m position is it expected the position will �
|be eliminated mtthe end ofthe grant? | NA
/Wi||grant program becomplete in grant funding time frame? | Yea
/
�Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are .
|e|inninated? ! Yea |
| i
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or |
Non-profit sector? / No
�
� �
Initiative Name:
Recapture CIP, Class "C" CIP and Impact Fee CIP Completed and Closed Projects
•
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
..,,,
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets of six (6) completed and closed CIP, Class "C"
CIP and Impact Fee C1P Projects, totaling $54,017.76 and increases the CIP Fund Balance of
the respective program for future reprogramming.
Of these projects, four (4) are general CIP totaling $44,516.91; one (1) is Class "C" totaling
$8,700.85; and one (1) is Impact Fees totaling $800.00.
Initiative#D-1
I I
Recapture CIP, Class "C" CIP and
Impact Fee CIP Completed and Closed
• Projects
•
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#D-1 2007-08_ •
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
. Comm Dev--Hand . • Housekeepinq •
•Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund- Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
(General Fund
I I i
� I
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
•
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
•
Total $0, $0
l Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 01 0'
Position Title:
•
I i
Initiative#D-1 -a
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
i
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
.CIP
183-04049 Sidewalk Replacement 2700 $ (11,573.35)
'83-06027 Rotary Glen Park 2700 $ (7,277.56)
83-06076 Jordan Trail Lighting 2700 $ (19,672.00)
'83-05010 Oak Hills Tennis 2700 $ (5,994.00)
183-08099 CIP Fund Balance 2700 $ 44,516.91
!Class"C'
183-04036 2700 j $ (8,700.85)
183-04097 Class"C"Fund Balance 2700 $ 8,700.85
Impact Fee
184-05004 Jordan River Lighting 2700 $ (800.00)
I84-84003 Impact Fee Parks 2700 $ 800.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
!If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
I I
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? j N/A
Initiative#D-1 -b
Initiative Name:
Parks ADA Accessibility Improvements - Scope of Service Change
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
During the 07-08 CIP Process, the Parks Division was awarded $200,000 of CIP funds to
provide ADA improvements at Oak Hills and Reservoir Parks. This request is to revise the
scope of the project to include making ADA Accessibility Improvements at Rosewood and
Reservoir Parks and deleting the Oak Hill Park at this time.
A master plan was recently completed for Oak Hills park and making ADA improvements to
this park now is pre-mature. ADA improvements are currently under construction at
Rosewood. The approval of this request will allow the ADA improvements to continue at
Rosewook and improve the accessibility of all the facilities at the park.
No additional budget is being requested. This is a scope of service change only.
Initiative#D-2
Parks ADA Accessibility Improvements
-Scope of Service Change
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#D-2 2007-08
Initiative Number „ Fiscal Year
Comm Dev-Hand Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0;
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
!Other Fund
Total i $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
!Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#D-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Additional Accounting Details:
i !
II '
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
j
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
!be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-2-b
Initiative Name:
Re-Establish Budgets for Special Assessment Area (SAA) Cost Centers Previously
Recaptured
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
During budget amendment #1 of 2008, remaining budgets were recaptured from three SAA
projects that are complete. However, the bond issuance costs pertaining to these projects
had not been paid at the time the budgets were recaptured. The three SAA projects include
9th and 9th, Strong Court and Fenway Avenue.
This request re-establishes the budgets in the three projects to cover the costs of the bond
issuance payments that have been made. SID's are self funded and do not affect general
fund budget.
Initiative#D-3
Re-Establish Budgets for Special
Assessment Area (SAA) Cost Centers
Previously Recaptured
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#D-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Dev- Hand Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
1 General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
I �
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
i Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0I
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 01
Position Title:
� 1
Initiative#D-3-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
CIP-SIDS
!83-05041 9th and 9th SID 2312 $ 10,594.24
183-05041 2825 $ 4,350.00
183-06071 Strong Court SID 2312 $ 3,713.23
83-06071 2825 $ 1,925.00
83-06072 Fenway Ave. SID 2312 $ 3,713.22
83-06072 2825 $ 1,925.00
$ 26 220.69
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
PGrant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
� I
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-3-b
Initiative Name:
American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
To increase the budget in the American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI), Neighborhood
Housing Services for Community Housing Development Organization (CHODO) by
$17,125.00. This is a carryover budget from the prior year.
Initiative#D-4
American Dream Downpayment
Initiative(ADDI)Carryover
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#D-4 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Comm Dev-Hand Housekeeping
Department j Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
(General Fund
Total $0 $0
IInternal Service Fund
I �
Total $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
'Other Fund
Total $0 $0',
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#D-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-60701 1360 17,125.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-60701 2590 17,125.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-4-b
Initiative Name:
Grant Tower and TRAX Extension Construction Funds Interest
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #D-5
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
In June 2007, Sales Tax Bond Series 2007A was issued to fund Salt Lake City's portion of the
Grant Tower rail reconfiguration project and the TRAX Extension project from Energy Solutions Arena
to the Intermodal Hub. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the
Trustee under contract for the issue. Since then the proceeds have been earning interest. This
amendment is to appropriate the interest earned since the bonds were issued in June, 2007 through
the end of March, 2008.
Totals of $138,182 for the Grant Tower project and $102,676 for the TRAX Extension project have
accumulated in each respective fund since the bonds were issued. These amounts reflect interest
earned during the last quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the first three quarters of fiscal year 2008.
Initiative#D-5
Grant Tower and TRAX Extension
Construction Funds interest
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#D-5 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mgmt Sery-Treasurer Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Dan Mule'/Randy Hillier 535-6411 /535-6641
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
IGeneral Fund - Fund Balance- I
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Tote( $0 $0'
Internal Service Fund
i
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
CIP Grant Tower 83-08009 i $ 138,182.00
CIP TRAX Extension 83-08010 102,676.00
Total is 240,858.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#D-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-08009 1830 138,182.00
83-08010 1830 102,676.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-08009 I 2700 138,182.00
83-08010 2700 102,676.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#D-5-b
Initiative Name:
National Trust for Historic Preservation Grant - Landmark Commission Training
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #E-1
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The National Trust for Historic Preservation awarded the Salt Lake City Planning Division a $5,000
grant to be used for expenses related to a one day training for the Historic Landmark Commission,
staff, city officials and other interested parties.
Planning will use these funds to contract with the National Alliance of Preservation Commission to
bring their educational program, Commission Assistance and Mentoring Program (CAMP), to Salt
Lake City for a day long training. CAMP is a program designed specifically for design review
commissions and includes legal framework for local preservation, identifying and protecting historic
resources, the commission's role and responsibility, and public support and outreach. The anticipated
training cost is approximately $11,000.
The grant requires a 100% match which will be satisfied with a State of Utah, Certified Local
Government grant which is included in this budget amendment.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept National Trust for
Historic Preservation Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the
original Agreement.
Initiative#E-1
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Grant-Landmark Commission
Training
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#E-1 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
CED -Planning New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Robin Ziegler/Sherrie Collins 535-7758/535-6150
Prepared By ! Telephone Contact
(Negative) ! Positive
'General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
'General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0!
Enterprise Fund
i I
Total, $0 $0
:Other Fund
'72- New Cost Center $ 5,000.00
Total $ 5,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
Initiative#E-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA-Private Trust
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1895 $ 5,000.00
I I
I I
I I
I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 5,000.00
III
Additional Accounting Details:
II
i I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Possible
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-1-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - Certified Local Government Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #E-2
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah, Department of Community Culture awarded the Salt Lake City Planning Division a
$20,000 Certified Local Government grant to be used to continue a reconnaissance level historic
resource survey in the Liberty Wells area and expenses related to training for the Historic Landmark
Commission, staff, city officials and other interested parties.
•
Planning will contract with a professional consultant who will choose a representative collection of 50
properties out of the approximately 2,855 buildings in the Liberty Wells area for an intensive level
research. A direct mailing will be sent to all properties that have recently been added to the National
Register of Historic Places to inform them about the designation and the potential of tax credits. In
addition $5,000 will be used as match for the National Trust for Historic Preservation Grant for the
National Alliance of Preservation Commission to bring their educational program, Commission
Assistance and Mentoring Program (CAMP), to Salt Lake City for a day long conference.
The grant requires a $20,500 match which will be satisfied with the $5,000 National Trust for Historic
Preservation Grant, which is included in this budget amendment, and $15,500 of general fund
budgeted for within the Planning Division's budget.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept Certified Local
Government Grant Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the
original Agreement.
Initiative#E-2
State of Utah -Certified Local
Government Grant
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#E-2 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
CED -Planning New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Robin Ziegler/Sherrie Collins 535-7758/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total ! $0 $0I
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
!Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
!Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 20,000.00
Total $ 20,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0 0
Position Title:
I �
I I
� I
Initiative#E-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: SLC-CLG Grant-15.904
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 20,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 20,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
PGrant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Possible
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-2-b
Initiative Name:
National Trust for Historic Preservation Grant - 29th Ward Meeting House Historic
Structures Report
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #E-3
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The National Trust for Historic Preservation awarded the Salt Lake City Planning Division a $5,000
grant to be used to conduct a portion of a Historic Structures Report for the 29th Ward Meeting House
in an effort to find new building use and obtain funding for rehabilitation.
Planning will use these funds to contract with a licensed engineer or architect firm with working
knowledge of the Secretary of Interior's Standards as they relate to historic preservation. The
consultant will perform the survey and provide a report of its findings. The anticipated cost of this
survey will be approximately$35,000.
The grant requires a 100% match which will be met with the general funds budgeted for within the
Planning Division's budget.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept Certified Local
Government Grant Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the
original Agreement.
Initiative#E-3
National Trust for Historic Preservation
II
Grant-29th Ward Meeting House
Historic Structures Report
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#E-3 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
CED-Planning New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Robin Ziegler/Sherrie Collins 535-7758/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
_ I General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
Total $0 $0
!Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
!Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 5,000.00
i I
Total I $ 5,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 0
;Position Title:
•
Initiative#E-3-a
i I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA-Private Trust
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1895 $ 5,000.00
i
1
' I
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 5,000.00
I i
I
Additional Accounting Details:
1
Grant Information:
IGrant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Possible
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative#E-3-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Sorenson Energy Conservation Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #E-4
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources awarded the Public Services Facilities
Division a $15,000 grant to off set costs associated with a facility wide efficiency retrofit and is
specifically tied to the pool heat recovery system at the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center.
The total estimated cost of this energy retrofit project is $513,454 and consists of replacing
the existing heating and cooling systems with energy efficient units, and upgrading the
exterior lighting to energy efficient lighting.
The Facilities Division proposes two options in funding the balance or $498,454 of funds
needed to complete this project. Option one includes energy performance contracting.
Facilities has solicited bids and are currently reviewing proposals received from contractors.
The contractor chosen would be responsible to finance and implement the energy efficiency
measures as outlined in the State grant application. Option 2 would be to submit a CIP
Application in the 09-10 CIP Process.
The required match is $498,454.00
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources, State Energy Program Grant Agreements and to receive
any other donations or grants that stem from the original Agreement.
1
Initiative#E-4
State of Utah, Department of Natural
Resources,Sorenson Energy
Conservation Grant
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#E-4 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Public Services-Facilities New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Alden Breinholt/Sherrie Collins 535-6163/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund - Fund Balance- I
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
i I I
' I
Total $0 $01
'Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0'1
(Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 15,000.00
Total $ 15,000.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
'Requested Number of 0, 0
'Position Title:
Initiative#E-4-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: DOE NT43206-
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
172-New Cost Center 1370 $ 15,000.00
' I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2700 $ 15,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
I I
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?I NA
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
I I
!Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
!eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#E-4-b
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, City & County Building Lighting
Energy Conservation Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #E-5
•
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources awarded the Public Services Facilities
Division a $15,000 grant to off set costs associated with the City and County Lighting Energy
Conversation Project. This project would include lighting retrofit to the exterior lights on the
clock tower and conference room and display cases throughout the City and County Building.
The total estimated cost of this energy retrofit project is $35,000. The Facilities Division
proposes to fund the difference or $20,000, within the Facilities maintenance budget which is
budgeted for within Facilities general fund budget.
The required match is $20,000.00.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources, State Energy Program Grant Agreements and to receive
any other donations or grants that stem from the original Agreement.
Initiative#E-5
•
State of Utah, Department of Natural
Resources, City&County Building
Lighting Energy Conservation Grant
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#E-5 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants Requiring No
Public Services -Facilities New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Alden Breinhott/Sherrie Collins 535-6163/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
'General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
!General Fund
I i
Total $0 $01
(Internal Service Fund
Total; $0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 15,000.00
Total $ 15,000.00 $0
Staffing Impact:
Requested Number of 0 Oj
Position Title:
j I
Initiative#E-5-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: DOE NT43206-
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 15,000.00
I ,
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number • Amount
;72-New Cost Center 2700 $ 15,000.00
� I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information: •
(Grant funds employee positions? NA
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
•
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
i I
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? i I NA
Initiative#E-5-b
Initiative Name:
Daniels Fund - YouthCity After School Programs
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #F-1
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
The Daniels Fund awarded Salt Lake City a $50,000 grant for YouthCity After School Programs. The
Daniels Fund is a private foundation which offers various grants to communities who provide services
in the areas of education, youth development, aging, alcohol and substance abuse, amateur sports,
disabilities and homeless/disadvantaged.
Of the $50,000, $13,000 will pay for the salary and benefits of the part time assistant coordinator at
the Central City YouthCity site, $5,000 will be used for the cost of living allowances paid to youth
participants of the YouthCity Employment program and $32,000 will be used for the part time teacher
positions for all YouthCity sites.
There is no required match.
A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the Daniels Fund
Donation Agreement and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the original
Agreement.
Initiative#F-1
Daniels Fund -YouthCity After School
Programs
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative#F-1 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services-YouthCity Donation
Department • j Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7712/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
;General Fund - Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
;General Fund
Total $0 $01
!Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $01
Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 50,000.00
Total $ 50,000.00 $01
I j
Staffing Impact:
;Requested Number of 0 ! 0
;Position Title:
Initiative#F-1 -a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA-Private Foundation
Revenue:
Cost Center Number J Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1895 $ 50,000.00
• I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 50,000.00
I j
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
!Grant funds employee positions? Hrly Employees
Ifs there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
i I i
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? No
! I
Initiative#F-1-b
Initiative Name:
Adobe Youth Voices Grant- Sorenson Computer Clubhouse
Initiative Number:
BA#4 FY2008 Initiative #F-2
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
The Adobe Youth Voices (AYV) Grants Program, awarded the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center (SMCC)
Computer Clubhouse, through the Salt Lake City Foundation, software valued at $10,000 to create
and produce a multi-media program, using video, audio, digital photography, animation, and web
design for teens and $2,500 cash to be used to offset costs associated with equipment necessary to
create the multi-media program at the Computer Clubhouse.
The SMCC Clubhouse will use the $2,500 grant to purchase lighting, video and other
necessary equipment for the program.
There is no required match.
Initiative#F-2
Adobe Youth Voices Grant-Sorenson
Computer Club House
Initiative Name
BA#4 FY2008 initiative#F-2 2007-08
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
CED-Hand Donation
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
(Negative) Positive
General Fund -Fund Balance-
Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual
Impact Amount Impact Amount
General Fund
Total $0 $0
;Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
I I I
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
72- New Cost Center $ 2,500.00
77-77123 $ 2,500.00
Total $ 5,000.00 $0!
Staffing Impact:
I Requested Number of 0 0'
Position Title:
I �
Initiative#F-2-a
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA-Private Foundation
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
;72-New Cost Center 1895 $ 2,500.00
1 77-77123 1895 $ 2,500.00
i I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 2,500.00
77-77123 2590 $ 2,500.00
I I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
!eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative#F-2-b