Loading...
029 of 1984 - Equalized Assessment Rolls and Levying a Tax Providing for the Assessment of Property in Salt Lake C 0gq- 1 O-B 19 9 Salt Lake City, Utah May 1, 1984 A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah was held on Tuesday, the 1st day of May, 1984, at the hour of 6 : 00 p.m. , at the regular meeting place of said City Council at which meeting there were present and answering roll call the following members who constituted a quorum: Ronald J. Whitehead Chairperson Grant Mabey Councilmember Sydney Reed Fonnesbeck Councilmember Alice Shearer Councilmember Ione M. Davis Councilmember Edward W. Parker Councilmember Earl F. Hardwick Councilmember Also present : Ted L. Wilson Mayor Albert E. Haines Chief Administrative Officer Roger Cutler City Attorney Kathryn Marshall City Recorder Absent : i Thereupon the following proceedings , among others , were duly had and taken: The Board of Equalization and Review (the "Board") for Curb and Gutter Extension No. . 38-700 (the "District") as appointed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, held hearings (the "Hearings") on March 27 and 28 , 1984 commencing at 4:00 p.m. and on March 29 , commencing at 6 :00 p.m. in Room 301, City and County Building. The Board at the Hearings reviewed statements and heard comments and complaints of property owners in the District . A summary of the proceedings of the hearings identifying each property owner by address and nature of the comment or complaint for each days Hearing is attached hereto: -2- THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FOR SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #38-700 MET ON March 2.7, IgA4 AT 4:nO P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY A COUNTY BUILnING. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: CITYENGINEER ..................... Max Peterson ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY .............. Gunn B. McKay CITY RECORDER ..................... Kathryn Marshall ALSO PRESENT: Project Engineers .. ............ ... John Naser, Sam McAllister, Jim Bollwinkel Special Assessment Coordinator ..... Tula Gamvroulas Recorder Technician .. ............. Margaret Miller 3 property owners were present. MARIE JnSLIN 583-2161 1032 South 2100 East Ms. Joslin said that she and her husband had recently bought this property. She felt that the assessment of $4,120 was very high. She was not sure if the title company had advised them about a pending lien. The Board said she may want to review her title report and possibly request payment by the title company if it was not on the report. She also felt that the design of the project had left her with too much property and the road too narrow causing traffic problems. Mr. Naser said that this was an old, wide right of way which had keen narrowed from 7n feet to 40 feet in order to control traffic. Mrs. Joslin said that she would he unable to maintain the extremely large parkway since she and her husband are in their seventies and he has muscular dystrophy. The Board will look into the situation to determine the benefit and the possibility of the city's maintaining the parkway. It was noted that the engineering plat showed a corner exemption of 50 feet, however, it should be 75 feet. The Board will make an appointment with Mrs. Joslin to view the improvements. PAUL A ARDENE BOUCK 1572 West 50n North The Board explained the assessment, interest, and payment plans to Mr. Bouck. He said that the storm drain had to be put in three times. He felt most of the people in the neighborhood did not want the curb and gutter. Mr. Peterson explained that the percentage of protests was low and therefore his street was kept in the district. Mr. Bouck said that he was unhappy that the street was so narrow now. The design plan was explained and the fact that the city tries to make residential streets narrower so that traffic is diverted to major routes. Mr. Bouck said that his driveway was unusable for one month and that the con- tractor cracked the driveway with a front loader. Mr. Peterson said that the contractor would be notified to fix the driveway. ROARS N EQUALIZATION 438-700 March 27, 1984 page two VERA HOLT 2205 King Street Ms. Holt said that the sidewalk had to be done twice and she wanted to make sure that she was not charged twice. She also asked if she had to pay for the retaining wall . It was explained that property owners do not have to pay for retaining walls and that she was only assessed once for the sidewalk. She also received a corner lot exemption. THE BOARD OF EOUALIZATION FOR SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT nISTRICT 438-700 MET ON March 28, 1984 AT 4:00 P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY & COUNTY RUILDING. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: CITYEN9INEER ..................... Max Peterson ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY .............. Gunn B. McKay CITYRECORDER ..................... Kathryn Marshall ALSO PRESENT: Project Engineers ................. John Naser, Sam McAllister, Jim Bollwinkel Special Assessment Coordinator ..... Tula Gamvroulas Recorder Technician ............... Margaret Miller 3 property owners were present. RANDALL R ARDELLE REYNOLDS 1602 & 1610 West 500 North Mr. Reynolds indicated that the improvements were done well . He said that there was some sidewalk that needed to be replaced, however, the contractor did not replace it. The engineering staff explained the design and that the sidewalk replacement was not included in the contract therefore the contractor could not replace it as part of the district. The sidewalk replacement districts were also explained to the Reynolds ' . Mr. Reynolds said that he also owned a piece of property at llth North and Redwood Road and wanted to know if there were any plans for curb and gutter districts in that area. Mr. Reynolds was told that he should contact the Utah Department of Transportation since Redwood Road is a state road. JOHN & DARLENE BRAND 485-5851 2207 Texas Street Mrs. Brand said that she felt the footage they were being assessed for was not correct (the property is triangular). She said that she had talked to Jerry Lyons, Public Works and that he indicated that the corner piece (17'x13' ) belongs to the City. She also felt that this was their back lot and they should not be assessed for the back. Mr. Naser explained the situation, stating that the corner piece was owned by the city. He said that it would be up to the Board to decide on the corner exemption and back lot issues. This was discussed at length and determined that there were several ways the board could decide. They could split the length for half back and half side lot; they could call it all side lot and give a corner exemption beginning at the Brand's property line; or they could measure from the house to determine how much could be considered side or back lot. Mrs. Brand indicated that there were some homes on Lynnwood that, in the same situation, had not been assessed because their property was determined to be back lot. Mr. McKay indicated that whatever the Board decided, it would he a determining factor for future districts and they could not go by an apparent oversight on Lynnwood The Board will make an appointment with Mrs. Brand to inspect the property and then make their decision. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 438-700 March 28, 1984 page two CLYDE DAVIES 484-5027 2233 King Street Mr. Davies indicated that he had the same problem as the Brand's. He also said that when the curb and gutter was installed on the front of his property he paid to have it extended 25 feet around the corner and that he should not have to pay again. It was determined that the 75 foot exemption should begin at the end of the 25 foot sidewalk. Mr. Davies also said that the driveway he had put in was torn out and that he was unsatisfied with the new drive. He asked if others were charged for retaining walls. He did not get a retaining wall . Mr. Peterson indicated that the city does not charge for retaining walls. THE BOARD OF EOUALIZATION FOR SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A38-700 MET ON March 29, 1984 AT 6:00 P.M. IN ROOM 301 CITY A 'COUNTY BUILDING. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: CITYENGINEER ..................... Max Peterson ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY .............. Gunn B. McKay CITY RECORDER ..................... Kathryn Marshall ALSO PRESENT: Project Engineers ................. John Naser, Sam McAllister, Jim Bollwinkel Special Assessment Coordinator ..... Tula Gamvroulas Recorder Technician ............... Margaret Miller 4 property owners were present. HENRY B X MARY M PARRY 1550 West 500 North Mr. Parry felt that the job was not finished. He said that they had sealed the asphalt west of his property, but not east and he felt that the asphalt was coming apart. Mr. Bollwinkel said that the asphalt had met requirements. He also said that the seal was done at the expense of the contractor. Mr. Peterson said that the problem is probably the amount of ground water and the asphalt will be repaired where it has come apart. Mr. Parry complained that the con- tractor had pulled out his water line and almost pulled out the gas line, and felt that the city should hire different contractors. Mr. Rollwinkel said that this sometimes happens and this is one of the better contractors. ARLIENE HALLInAY BETH TUTTLE 2031 Michigan h 965-969 Foothill Ms. Halliday asked if she had been given a corner lot exemption, and was informed that she had been given the exemption. Ms. Tuttle said that she was unhappy because her driveway was so wide and would mean a lot to shovel in the winter. Both ladies felt that the road is too narrow. They said that this block was the only one that was made so narrow; there is no room for parking on this block. Ms. Halliday said that she was unhappy that the properties on the east side of the street had been given so much property to upkeep and water. She asked if property owners with large parking strips were given exemptions on water bills. Mr. Naser said that six to ten feet had been added on this block. Ms. Tuttle asked about trees being planted in the parking strip. She said that the park does stop traffic and people in the area do enjoy it. BOARD OF EOUALIZATION 038-700 March 2.9, 1984 page two BILL EVANS President/Owners Association A. TRIPP past president/Owners Association TOWNES CONDOMINIUMS 2062 to 2090 Michigan Mr. Evans said that they thought the street would be narrowed from both sides. He also said that they understood they would not be assessed because they had existing curb and gutter. They were informed that they were assessed only 60 feet for new curb and qutter and the remainder of footage for pavement and driveways only. They were also informed that the assessment had been divided and assessed ($318.01) to each individual owner. Mr. Tripp said that they had received a letter from the City regarding the installation of sod in parking strip. He indicated that they would install the sod. On April 5, 1984 the Board took a field trip to examine certain improvements made in the District . The Board reconvened later the same day to review findings and discuss the complaints and comments raised at the Hearings . Modifications to the assessment rolls were considered and the Board adopted findings , recommendations and reached a decision all of which are set out hereafter. The following memo summarizes action taken by or recommendations of the Board: t -3- SALT LAKE CfTY PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEERING PALMER DEPAULIS 401 City d County Building 84111 TED L.WILSON MC woks OMEM Tel:(801)535-7872 *AM# MEMO TO: Mayor Ted Wilson FROM: Palmer DePaulis, Public Works Director DATE: April 11 , 1984 SUBJECT: Report of Board of Equalization for Special Improvement District, Project No. 38-700 on Noncontiguous Streets The Board of Equalization and Review for the subject project was held March 27, 28 and 29, 1984, as required by City Council . The Board was comprised of the following members: Max G. Peterson - City Engineer Kathryn Marshal - City Recorder Gunn 4cKay - Asst. City Attorney Attached are copies of the minutes of the Board of Equalization meetings. The following are the coonnents of the property owners involved in the district and the action taken on their concerns. MARCH 27, 1984 1 . Marie Joslin, 1032 South 2100 East, reported to the board she felt the assessment of $4,120.00 was very high and that the new construction had left them with an excessively large parking strip they would be unable to maintain because of their ages and her husbands poor health. Mrs. Joslin felt the parking strip was left poorly graded by the contractor and no sidewalks for street crossing were installed. RESPONSE: The Board met with Mrs. Joslin at her property on April 5, 1984 to review the park strip and assessment. The Board found the parking strip needed some work and informed Mrs. Joslin the Public Works Department would clean-up the parking strip and install an additional section of sidewalk for better pedestrian crossing. She was told she would still be responsible for landscaping and maintaining the park strip. A review of the assessment indicated an error had been made in adminis- tering the corner lot exemption and in determining the actual property frontage. The assessment will be for 109.43 feet at rate 2, or $2,444.67. The original assessment was for $4,120.17, the difference will be added to the City's portion of the District. 2. Paul and Ardene Bouck, 1572 West 500 North, said he felt the improvements were not needed or wanted by the property owners. He was also unhappy the street was narrowed from its previous condition. Mr. Bouck also indicated the contractor cracked their driveway with his equipment. RESPONSE: Mr. Peterson explained the percentage of protest on 500 North a in icated it was below 50% of the total property owners frontage and the street was left in the district. Also the contractor will be notified by the City to fix the crack in the driveway. 3. Vera Hoh, 2205 King Street, said her sidewalk had been installed twice and that a retaining wall was installed on her property. She was concerned she would have to pay for sidewalk twice and the retaining wall . RESPONSE: Mr. Peterson explained the contractor had installed the sidewalk mpproperly and was required to replace it so it would conform to the plans and specifications. She was informed she would pay only for the sidewalk once and the City would bear all cost of installing the retaining wall . MARCH 28. 1984 4. Randall and Ardelle Reynolds 1602 & 1610 West 500 North, said the improvements were done well but some sidewalk on 500 North was not replaced by the contractor. RESPONSE: Mr. Reynolds was told the design of the project did not include rep acing all the sidewalk along the street and the contractor was not required to replace it. The walk was in good condition and did not need to be replaced. 5. John & Darlene Brand, 2707 Texas Street, said they felt they were not being assessed correctly because the property is triangular shaped and therefore should be considered as back lot and have an exemption for this as well as a corner lot exemption. The Brands did feel however, they should pay something for the improvements. Also, they indicated the triangular corner of their property, approximately 17' X 20' , was owned by the City and they should not be assessed for the -2- improvement in that portion. RESPONSE: The Board met with the Brand's at their property to review the assessments on April 5, 1984. At that time the corner and back lot exemption was discussed. The Board ruled the assessed frontage was the side of the property and only entitled to the 75 foot corner lot exemption. A review of the property at the corner indicated it was owned by the City and the Board ruled the City would pay for these improvements and would start the exemption at the property corner, not the street corner. With this adjustment, the Brand's will be assessed for 40.70 feet at rate 2, or $909.24, for the improvements. All other costs would be paid by the City. Also, Mr. Brand indicated the City would grade the park strip 4" below the sidewalk for topsoil and sod as part of the project construction. This was not done by the contractor and Mr. Peterson told them the City would grade it as required. 6. Clyde Davies, 2233 King Street, indicated he had a similar shape lot to the Brand's and that before the improvements were installed he had paid to have the curb extended 25 feet around the corner of his property. He felt he should not have to pay for this curbing again and requested the assessment be adjusted to exclude the 25 feet as well as the 75 foot corner lot exemption. RESPONSE: The Board reviewed the situation and agreed with Mr. Davies' request. TFe-Foard felt the corner lot exemption applied and the 25 foot section of curb should not be assessed. Mr. Davies' assessment will be adjusted to meet the Board's recommendation. Mr. Davies adjusted assessment will be $681 .95 with the balance to be paid by the City. MARCH 29, 1984 7. Henry and Mary Parry, 1550 West 500 North, said the job was not finished and that the asphalt was coming apart. He indicated the asphalt had been sealed west of his property but was not sealed east of his property. RESPONSE: Mr. Parry was told the asphalt pavement west of his property did not meet the contract specifications and because of that the contractor was required at his expense, to seal the pavement before it would be accepted. the pavement east of the property met specifications and was not sealed. Also Mr. Parry was informed the problem of the road coming apart was probably due to the amount of ground water present and that any area needing repairs would be done by the contractor. -3- 8. Arliene Halliday and Beth Tuttle, 2031 Michigan and 965-969 Foothill , stated the new roadway was too narrow. Because of the new width it was difficult to park along the street. They were concerned about the increased size of their parking strips and wonder if they could be given an exemption on their water bill . RESPONSE: Mr. Peterson indicated the street width was reduced and the new park at Foothill and Michigan was installed to reduce the amount of traffic using their street. The problem in the past was that traffic was using the street as a collector road and not as a residential street as intended. Ms. Halliday and Ms. Tuttle indicated traffic was reduced on the street and that they enjoyed the Park. Ms. Halliday was informed it would not be possible to exempt or reduce her water bill because of the improvements. 9. Bill Evans and A. Tripp, President and past President of Owners Association, Towne's Condominiums, 2062 to 2090 Michigan, said they were informed they would not be assessed for the curb and gutter because it existed before the work was done. They were concerned this was not considered in the final assessments. RESPONSE: Mr. Evans and Mr. Tripp's understanding of the assessment was correct. The condominiums will only be assessed for the pavement abutting the property and also for a 60 foot section of curb which did not exist prior to the improvements. They agreed the 60-feet had not been previously installed and should be assessed. They were told the assessment would be divided and billed equally among the 24 individual owners. ADDITIONAL BOARD ACTION J. Leon and Helen P. Anderson, 2550 E. Parley's Way, did not appear before the Board but contacted the City on March 26, 1984 concerning the assessment for the improvement at their property which they felt was incorrect. -4- A review of the assessment roles and as built drawing indicated an error was made. The original assessment was for 38.63 feet at rate 3 but should have been 22.00 feet at rate 3. The correction has been made and will be reflected in the final assessment. The additional 16.63 feet or $299.89 will be charge to the City's portion of the District costs. Max G. Peterson City Engineer Kathryn Marshall City Recorder Gunn McKay,,-*" Assistant Assistant City Attorney -5- After considering all available information, and having reviewed the foregoing complaints and the report of responses and action taken after the Hearings , the Board, at the conclusion of its meeting on April 5, 1984 made the following Findings , Recommendation and Decision as to the assessments : FINDINGS The assessment rolls as equalized should be modified as follows : (1) The assessment of Marie Joslin, 1032 South 2100 East , for a corner lot exemption and actual property frontage should be changed to 109 .43 feet at Rate 2 equalling $2 ,444. 67 . (2) The assessment of John and Darlene Brand, 2707 Texas Street , should be adjusted to 40. 70 feet at Rate 2, or $909 .24 and that all other costs would be paid by the City. (3) The assessment of Clyde Davies , 2233 King Street , would be adjusted to exclude 25 feet of curbing around the corner of his property which he has already paid for once so his assessment will be $681. 95 . (4) The assessment of Leon and Helen Anderson, 2550 East Parley' s Way, should be reduced by $299 .89 . Each piece of property within the District will be benefitted in an amount not less than the assessment , as modified, to be levied against said property. No piece of property listed in the assessment list will bear more than its proportionate share of the costs of such improvements. -4- RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION It is the decision of the Board that the proposed assessments , as contained on the assessment rolls , if modified and equalized as proposed in the "Findings", are equitable and that the improvements being financed thereby, constitute a benefit to the properties to be assessed. The assessment rolls are approved without further modification. The Board recommended that the City Council of Salt Lake City approve and confirm the assessment rolls as modified, and adopt an ordinance levying the assessments set out in the equalized assessment rolls . The City Council reviewed the Report , Findings , Recommendation and Decision of the Board of Equalization and Review for Curb & Gutter Extension No. 38-700. It noted the reported responses to complaints and inquiries concerning construction aspects of improvements within the District . The Council further considered the Recommendation and Decision of the Board of Equalization and Review that the assessment rolls should be adopted and confirmed as modified and equalized. The following ordinance was then introduced in writing, read by title, and pursuant to motion duly made by Councilmember Shearer, and seconded by Councilmember Parker adopted by the following vote: -5- YEA: Ronald J. Whitehead Grant Mabey Sydney Reed Fonnesbeck Alice Shearer Ione M. Davis Edward W. Parker Earl F. Hardwick NAY: None The ordinance was then signed by the Chairperson in open meeting and recorded by the City Recorder in the official records of Salt Lake City, Utah. The ordinance is as follows : ORDINANCE NO. 29 of 1984 AN ORDINANCE confirming the equalized assessment rolls and levying a tax providing for the assessment of property in Salt Lake City, Utah Curb & Gutter Extension No. 38-700 for the purpose of paying the costs of constructing improvements on certain streets within the Municipality consisting of the removal and reconstruction of street paving, construction of curb and gutter, sidewalks and driveways and installation of drainage facilities and other utility improvements and modifications; and all other miscellaneous work, necessary to complete the improvements in a proper and workmanlike manner; reaffirming the establishment of a special improvement guaranty fund; and establishing the effective date of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH: Section 1. The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, hereby confirms the assessment roll as modified, equalized -6- and approved by the Board of Equalization and Review for Salt Lake City, Utah Curb & Gutter Extension No. 38-700 (the "District") , and hereby confirms the findings of ;the Board of Equalization and Review that the proposed list of assessments as modified and equalized by the Board of Equalization and Review for the District is just and equitable; that each piece of property within the District will be benefited in an amount not less than the assessment to be levied against said property; and that no piece of property listed in the assessment list will bear more than its proportionate share of the cost of such improvements . Section 2. The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah does hereby levy a tax to be assessed upon the real property described in the assessment list for the District . The assessments levied upon each block, lot , part of block or lot , tract or parcel of property therein described shall be in the amount set forth in the assessment list , which is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. The assessments hereby levied are for the purpose of paying the cost of constructing improvements on certain streets within the District consisting of the removal and reconstruction of street paving, construction of curb and gutter, sidewalks and driveways and installation of drainage facilities and other utility improvements and modifications ; and the completion of any other miscellaneous work necessary to complete the improvements in a proper and workmanlike -7- manner. Said improvements are more particularly described in the assessment list for the District which list has been incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Said assessments are hereby levied and assessed upon each of the blocks , lots , parts of block and lots , tracts or parcels of real property described in the assessment list according to the extent that they are specially benefited by the improvements thereon. Said assessments are levied upon the land and lots in the District at equal and uniform rates . The total cost of the improvements in the District is $791,523 . 95, of which total cost, the City's portion is $638 ,934. 11. The balance to be assessed to the owners of property affected or benefited by the improvements in the District is $152 ,589 .84, which is the total amount of the assessment hereby levied for the District and which does not exceed in the aggregate the sum of: (a) the total contract price for the improvements under contract duly let to the lowest and best responsible bidders therefor; (b) the reasonable cost of utility services , maintenance, labor, materials , or equipment , if any; (c) the property price, if any; (d) connection fees , if any; (e) the interest on any interim warrants issued against the District ; and (f) overhead costs not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of (a) , (b) , (c) and (d) . -8- The interim warrants issued to finance the cost of construction were purchased by the City from the District in the form of advances from pooled cash of the City paid as construction progress installments became payable. The amount of the advances were determined by the negative cash balance of the District . The interest which has been included in the amount to be assessed has accrued on the negative cash balance. The rate of interest charged for this interim warrant financing has been the City' s investment rate which has been significantly less than the market rate for interim warrants sold on the open market . Section 3 . The assessment list made by the City Treasurer for the property in the District as corrected, approved, equalized and completed by the Board of Equalization and Review, is hereby confirmed and the assessments made and returned in said completed list and the report , recommendation and decision of the Board of Equalization and Review to the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 4. This tax is levied and assessed at equal and uniform rates on such property. Section 5. The whole or any part of the assessments for the District may be paid without interest within fifteen (15) days after this ordinance becomes effective. Any part of the assessment not paid within such fifteen (15) day period shall be payable over a period not to exceed ten (10) years from the effective date of this Ordinance in ten (10) -9- substantially equal annual installments with interest on the unpaid balance of the assessment at the rate of the net effective rate of the assessment bonds to be issued. Interest from the effective date of this Ordinance shall be paid in addition to the amount of each such installment annually at the time each installment becomes due. After said fifteen (15) day period, all unpaid installments of an assessment levied against any piece of property (but only in their entirety) may be paid prior to the dates on which they become due, but any such prepayment must include an additional amount equal to the interest which would accrue on the assessment to the next succeeding date on which interest is payable on any special assessment bonds issued in anticipation of the collection of the assessments plus such additional amount as , in the opinion of the City Treasurer, is necessary to assure the availability of money to pay interest on the special assessment bonds as interest becomes due and any premiums which may become payable on redeemable bonds which may be called in order to utilize the assessments thus paid in advance. Default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when due shall cause the whole of the unpaid principal and interest to become due and payable immediately, and the whole amount of the unpaid principal shall thereafter draw interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum until paid, but at any time prior to the date of sale or foreclosure the owner may pay the amount -10- Y of all unpaid installments past due, with interest at the rate of 18% per annum to date of payment on the delinquent installments , and all approved costs, and shall th6reupon be restored to the right thereafter to pay in installments in the same manner as if default had not occurred. Section 6. The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah does hereby reaffirm the creation of a special improvement guaranty fund and shall at the time of each annual appropri- ation ordinance, so long as any special assessment bonds of Salt Lake: City remain outstanding, transfer to said fund each year such amount as a tax levy of one mill will pro- duce, either through a levy of a tax of not to exceed one mill in any one year or by the issuance of general obligation bonds or by appropriation from other available sources , for the purpose of guaranteeing to the extent of such fund the payment of special assessment bonds and interest !thereon issued against local improvement districts for the payment of local improvements therein, all in the manner and to the extent provided by the laws of the State of Utah. Section 7 . The officials of Salt Lake City, Utah, are hereby authorized and directed to take all action necessary and appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this ordinance . Section 8 . All ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. -11- Section 9 . An emergency is hereby declared, the preservation of peace, health and safety of Salt Lake City and the inhabitants thereof so requiring. Immediately after its adoption, this ordinance shall be signed by the Chairperson and City Recorder and shall be recorded in the ordinance book kept for that purpose. Said ordinance shall be published once in the Deseret News, a newspaper published and having general circulation in Salt Lake City, Utah, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval and publication as required by law. Section 10. The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of the assessment ordinance and final assessment list within five (5) days from the date hereof in the Salt Lake County Recorder's office. If the assessment ordinance incorporates the assessment list by reference, the City Recorder is further directed to file a copy of the final assessment list with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Section 11. The City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of assessment by mail to the property owners in the District . Said notice shall, among other things , state the amount of the assessment , the terms of payment and shall be substantially in the form of the Notice attached to these proceedings. -12- TAR NOTICE -13- PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 1st day of May, 1984. upairperson ATTEST-' J ty Recor er _J ( S E A L ) t -14- After the transaction of other business not pertinent to the foregoing matter, the meeting was on motion duly made, seconded and carried, adjourned. Cha rperson ATT S qkt�\ y Recorder L_ , ( S E A L ) -15- STATE OF UTAH ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the record of proceedings had by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at its meeting held on the lst day of May, 1984, insofar as the same relates to or concerns Curb and Gutter Extension No. 38-700 as the same appears of record in my office. I further certify that the Ordinance levying the special assessments was recorded by me in the official records of said City on the 1st day of May, 1984. I further certify that said Ordinance was published one time in the Deseret News , the publication affidavit of which is attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said City this day of May, 1984. C ty Recorder ( S E A L ) -16- STATE OF UTAH ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ss . NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Cheryl D. Cook, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Treasurer of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify that on the day of 1984, I caused to be mailed a Notice of Assessment t&/each property owner in Salt Lake City, Utah Curb and Gutter Extension No. 38-700 by United States Mail, postage prepaid, at the last known address of such owner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said City this dayof ( l 1984. G Q �, C itty Treasfurer ( S E A L ) -17- PROOF OF PUBLICATION Attached to this page is the Proof of Publication, indicating by the affidavit of the publisher that the said Ordinance levying the special assessments which was contained in the Ordinance adopted by the Salt Lake City Council on the 1st day of May, 1984, was published one time in the Deseret News . t -18- STATE OF UTAH ) ss. CERTIFICATE OF FILING COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify that on the 7th day of May, 1982, pursuant to Utah Code Annotated, Section 10-16-7 , (1953) , as amended, a copy of the Notice of Intention and resolution creating Salt Lake City, Utah, Curb and Gutter Extension No. 38-684, as finally approved, was filed in the Salt Lake County Recorder' s Office. I further certify that on the 4th day of May, 1984, pursuant to Utah Code Annotated, Section 10-16-18, (1953) , as amended, a copy of the assessment ordinance was filed in the Salt Lake County Recorder' s Office, and that on May 8 , 1984 a copy of the final assessment list was filed in the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said Municipality this day of May, 1984. ,i'Ci y e order ( S E A L ) -19- L ' STATE OF UTAH ) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ss . WITH OPEN MEETING LAW COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify: (a) that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(1) , Utah Code Annotated (1953) , as amended, public notice of the 1984 Annual Meeting Schedule of the City Council of Salt Lake City (the "Council") was given, specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the Council scheduled to be held during the year, by causing a Notice of Annual Meeting Schedule for the Council to be posted on December 22, 1983, at the principal office of the Council at the City Hall, Salt Lake City, Utah; said Notice of Annual Meeting Schedule having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection during regular office hours at the City Hall until the date hereof; and causing a copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting Schedule to be provided on December 22, 1983 , to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of Salt Lake City or to a local media correspondent ; (b) that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(2) , Utah Code Annotated (1953) , as amended, public notice of the regular meeting of the Council on May 1, 1984, was given by specifying in a Notice of Regular -20- w Meeting the agenda, date, time, and place of the May 1, 1984, Council Meeting and by causing the Notice of Regular Meeting to be posted at the principal office of the Council at the City Hall in Salt Lake City, Utah, on the 27th day of April, 1984, a date not less than 24 hours prior to the date and time of the May 1, 1984, regular meeting; said Notice of Regular Meeting having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection during the regular office hours at the City Hall until the date and time of the May 1, 1984, regular Council meeting; and causing a copy of the Notice of Regular Meeting to be provided on April 27th, 1984, to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of Salt Lake City or to a local media correspondent . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Salt Lake City, / this l ��" day of May, 1984. 7 ity Recorder ( S E A L ) -21- Affidavit of Publication ADM 35A STATE OF UTAH, ss. County of Salt Lake ORDINANCE NO.29 of 1964r'h�. j aiez lQ�`f.............................................................. AN ORDINANCE confirming the equalized assessment rolls and levying a tax providing for the assessment's of property in Salt W9ke Cifv, Utah's Curb & Gutter Extension No. 38-70s'fal'the,purpose of paying the costs of constructing improvements on certain streets within the Municipality consisting of the removal and reconstruction of street paving,construction of curb and gutter,sidewalks and driveways,and installation Being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is of drainage facilities and other, utility Improvements and modification;and,all other miscellaneous work; legal advertising clerk of the DESERET NEWS, a daily nedt5sory to complete the Improvements In a proper MgnfofaspecialI manner;entg guaranty the d;andes- s- newspaper printed in the English language with general :y mqq n{of a special Improvement guaranty fund;and es- BE IT ORDAINED the BY THE CIdote TY is COUNCILOF SALT LAKE circulation in Utah, and published in Salt Lake City, CITY,SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH: C La ke Salt ae ounty, Section t.The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,hereby , in the State of Utah. confirms,the assesssment roll as modified,equalized and ap- pr�vqd by the Board of Equalization and Review for Salt Lake C Utah Curb i Gutter Extension Nhq 38.ar (The"District"), That the legal notice of which a copy is attached hereto a�"fhZreby confirms the ilndlhas of fh!Board of Equdilzaflon ah, Review that the proposed list of ass'S5essmaMs as modified a15ii Tf{jppallzed by the Bobrd of Equalizatlori and Review for the D�1 iticl is lust and equltablq;that each piece of property within Dimes will be benefited In id amount not less than the •..•..ordinanCe..21&)-29..of..198Q.!"..00ZLfirmu 9Ah9..e�utilized o element to be levied apQlnst sold property;and that no piece o or, listed in the assessment list will bear more than Its p?aportfonate Share of the Cost of such Irprovements. Section 2.The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah does assessment rolls and levying a tax providing for hereby?levy a tax to be assessed upon the real property de. ................. scribed In the assessment fist for the Dlst-Ict.The assessments levied upon each black,lot part of block on lot,tract or parcel of pr'�Oper'ty therein described shall be In th6 amount set forth In the assessment of property in Salt Lake City I he assessmentlist which IsherebYIncorporatedbyreference ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,„ and mode a part of this ordinance. ••"•"•'••••......•""'•.••""••"""'•..• The assessments hereby levied are for the purpose of pay. Ing the cost of constructing Improvementb on certain streets wthin file District consisting of the removal and reconstruction ....................................................................................... of street paving construction of curb and GGlitter,sidewalks and ...... driveways and fnstallatlon of drainage facilities and other utility Improvements and m6dlfleatlons;and the,completion of any other miscellaneous work necessary to complete the Improve- ments In a proper and workmanlike manner. Said Improve• ............................................................................................. ments are more particufarly described In the assessment list for the District which list has been incorporated herein by refer- ence and mode a port of this ordinance, Said assessments are hereby levlgd and assessed upon Was published in said newspaper on.................................. each of the blocks lots parts of block and lots tracts or parcels of real property described In the ossessmen4 list according to the extent that they are specldlly benefited by the Improve• ments thereon.Sold assessments are levied upon the land and g e t lots In the District at equal and uniform rates. •••••••••••••••••4Legal ••• dye rk The total cost of the Improvements In the District is $791,523,95 of which total cost,the Clty's portion Is$638,934.11. The balance to be assessed to the owners of property affected or benefited by the Improvements In the District Is$152,589.84. ,.,,,, . ..... ....... ......... ising which is the total amount of the assessment hereby levied for the District and which does not exceed in the aggregate the sum of:(a)the total contract price for the Improvements under con- tract duly let to the lowest and best responsible bidders there- for: (b)the reasonable cost of utility services, maintenance labor,materials,or equipment,it any;(c)the property price If any;(d)connection fees,It any;(e)the Interest on any Interlm warrants Issued against the District;and(f)overhead costs not to exceed fifteen,percent(15%)of the sum of(a)(b),(c)and(d). The Interlm worrrants Issued to finance lU cost of con- structlon were purchased by the City from the District In the form of advances frorn pooled cash of the City paid as construc- tion progress Installments became payable.The amount of the advances were determined by the negative cash balance of the District.The Interest which has been Included in the amount to be assessed has accrued on the negative cash balance.The rate of Interest charged for this Interim warrant financing has re me this ............................3.Q.�................................. day of been the Clty's Investment rate which has been significantly less than the market rate for interim warrants sold on the open market. Section 3.The assessment list made by the City Treasurer A.D.for the property In the District as Corrected approved,equal- A 19..R4..... Ized and completed by the Board of Equalization and Review Is hereby confirmed and the assessments made and returned in said completed list and the report,recommendation and decl- Sion of the Board of Equalization and,Revfew to the City Cduncll 1= / of Salt Lake City,Utah,ore hereby rafffied;approved onct con- firmed. ... :.��. .4,.: .........1�..........�......`........ .. ..... GL. -� Notary Public My Commission Expires July..23I.J986...................... Section 9.This tax Is levied and assessed at equal and uniform rates an such property Disnleon S.Te wholect`tim y ben Paid without In Brest witllln fifteen 1 5)br Me do s after thisno,ordiordnance becomes effective.Ar,Part of Me asspeeaass- abletever 0 period..In Ng to eviceed ten een(10)Pay Period shall the flec- Installme"-I"IImerrest on Melunpoid balance ofMelassessl hant M Me rate°t me net effective rate of ands to be Issued.Interest from Me effective ,atmis Or01t shall be gold In addition to the amount of each such Installment annually at Me time each Instillment becomes due. After soldM an levied agol st Only plecie of, lrp Install—oft(lout Only In lhclrsenllrety)may be paid prior to Me dates n which M<v band amount ecuol M in,late eat wh�must would Include ub Mee Tent to me next succeeding dale n which Interest is of Ile coll e cti°%o�lhe°s°sess meMs plus such O ant nalamni tit In arm °,In Me opinin of Me City Treasurer,Is necessary to assure the 1 timM°M Intterest b coPay °sld a and an,lPremium,which uav become pvable n redeenwble bonds which may be sed In order to utilize Me assessments thus paid In advance, sofDesf.when dine:a it cause ine wrioi oiine unpaid onio°cipp°aai Ina Interest to become due and pova0le ImmedlatelY,and 111e wnole amauM of Me unpla prin<lpal shall hereafter draw In. terest of Me rate of eighteen percent(18%)per anum until Paid,but M any time Prior ro Me dote of sale Pr foreclosure Me ownwith°Inter e�°t Me rob OB%p!r nay Me amount of oil nalmsfoltl°M of p Vmden{ an he de 11naueM Ins1a11roents,and all approved costs,and shall thereupon be restared to Me right thereafter ro P4v In Instoll. Tents In the same manner as if default had not occured. .Section 6.The ON Cnncn of Soft LaKe CNy,Ubh tices hereby reaffirm Me creation of a o<c1al Improvement gunpm N fund and shall M Me time M each annual s prorksis oral. I Ike Cltv`eer,wla pu hfaaClrp konsfersb s"Id1rute.;Year such lamount as a tax levy M mill will produce nN through o evly of a bx M not to exceed one mill in pity o�eNew,a byy me Issuance of gan.r.1 obllgalln boo dss or by WProprlMl pit horn etent pl slMle ucch fund Me ppv for m,.°f s—lalose at gaesessmeirt bondsMe and Interest Mereon Issued against local Improvements dls- Mlcts for Me Pay Tent of local Improvements therein,all In Me na to the extent Provided by the lows of he State of Uta r auMorizetl°7.WdThe Ire'tech'tcUs ake dill W IonCnec, le esw"and Wpo Pried,SetionB AI rdinnce ordinances°ports her of thiseof In conflict wih Mls ortllronco or Section 9e An eme'gencv Is Me Preserve. non of peace,health and safety M Sahereby ake City and Me Intl at,thereof he emat�best Iring.ImmemMeiv after m adoptbn,mn and shall be recorded io he ordinanceerebook kept for ty Recorder et poet News,Sa lnew9inance shall bepper published Published ho I a a generalncircculation on its pas ogeeand approval and bubaeMlnePIn 1.1s repulred by low. din d to file'o IcbpV t 1 Me)msessmenr ordinance final Tom t Ilst wlhln flue I51 days from the date hereof in the Solt Lake County Recorder's Office.If Me assessment ordinance Incorporates Me assessment list by reference,Me Cnv Record- e Is further directed to file a copv of the fin°I assessment list with Me Salt lake Count,Recorder. Section 11.The Cltv Treasurer Is hereby authorlzed and directed to give notice of assessment by mall to Me prperty ownerssate the ampuMe n,°,the laid ssessmlent shell{arms M pavmeM other l onE sM1oll be substantlplly In Me fp'm of the Notice attached tomes, p dinys fOCPASSED AND APPROVED by Me CII,Council of$all Lake City,Won,Iris Ist day of Mov,1984, Chairperson ATTEST: Chu Recorder ISEALI Pulah,hod'.May 9,1984 A 95 SHEET 02 FINAL RATE M2 3 $22.34 B3 17.01 N6 30.03 C'6 G EXT. NO. 700 RATE PER FOOT--- NOTICES MAILED-- NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS-- IIRB NAME ADDwE9B AMOUNTBT 11 2274 'r RATE 03 JOSEPH W G THELMA R DUNLOP 1548 W 500 NORTH 84116 NW1/4 NE1/4 SEC 34 T 1N R 1W 58.13 988.79 DR 245.51 11 2275 HENRY B S WIRY M PARRY 1550 W 00 NORTH 8411 NW 1[4 NE IA 7 OR 213.H4 11 2276 -. W FADVII I F AVF Ali]I " 03 1560 W SDO NORTH OR ,213,84 11 2277 03 1560 W 400 NORTH 11 2278 r> AN -, T 1566 W 500 NORTH 80UNTIFUL, UTAH-84010 11 2279 1572 W 500 NORTH y245,51r /,3V,Y.Z L VIDA W BOUCK 1582 W 00 NORTH 8411 MJ1 4 DR 229.60,1 NE IZq 11 2281 DRRDR 211.93 11 2282 DR 11 228 0 1602 W 400 NORTH DR ..245.51 /W OD.-NORTH-R I,11b--..-NWlI DR L435.59; 11 2285 EARL L E LESLIE G BOYER 1618 W 00 NORTH 4 DR 213.84 /ate/q 11 228 M3 NELL R pR 213.84 11 2287 � I ALMA G S ON SHEET q3 FINAL Z:6 G •EXT.NO. 700 RATE PER FOOT--- NOTICES MAILED- NO,ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS— NAME ADDREBB LOT LOC P LATORBUBOIVIBIDN FEET AMOUNT INBTAI FRONTING ON 50 IDE 501 NORTH (WEST OF WALNUT) r7 11 2224 003 DAV4Dt-E--KAREN-t-BHTbER 1525 W 500 NORTH 84116 4 FAIRFIELD ADD 25 250.75 =s'Izd z_9 H rJL G DR FU, ,RATS 86. 11 2270 002 � RATE 11 RONALD E CAROL K6 LILLIAN 832 KENTWOOD DRIVE SW E AFDERSON BRIGWM CITY, UT 84302 20 FEET RAT 2 11 2270 y RONALD E CAROL K d LILLIAN 832 KENTWOOD DRIVE SW NW SEC 34 T 1N R 1W 50 501.50 1553 W 500 NORTH11 226q 7E 2 PATSY H ENGSTROM 1557 W 500 NORTH 84116 SW NE SEC 34 T 1N R 1W 50 1117.00 DR 11 2268 SW NE I50.12 1119.68 ANDERSON DR 240.32 �35 DO /360.a0 11 22 RATE 02 JOFNNY R C CAROL L HERRERA 1573 W 500 NORTH 84116 SW NE 0 1117,00 DR 1 230,91/ DRIVE IAY ONLY2763 ✓b.3 RATE 02 zo3�4_" A� RATE 02 FERBERT J 6 EVA DUO 4 �1>ti J2�03�.94� o?eo,Y3 An 9q 11 2260 02 B4116 sw NE 1 1340.40 DR :203.94 RATE -2 NORTH 84116SW NE 50 1117.00 DR 2233..64.' ..-,If It 2299 ' q2 Ri-B DR /io.zo MAP SHEET wv FINAL —T-1—f —E%T. NO. 7RD RATE PER FOOT----- NOTICES MAILED— NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS— NAME AODREBB LOT BLOOK LAT OR BLIBDIV IBION FEET AMOUNT NBTAL MENT 11 2639 012 RATE 42 AlIlE 11 11 ELKINS 4 —�.NE_ I /ob. 389.n5 FEET RATE 1 2 FRONTING N SO SIDE 5001NORTH 11 2224 002 RATE 06 03_kL500_NORTH$y116- DICKEY DR 1647.96 6 �g JRY. i 61.5 FEET RATE 06 11 2220 RATE w2 DOROTHY LARSEN 4532 E BROCKBANK DRIVE SE NE SEC 3q T IN LL W LARSEN 84117 DR �• 278.19 1475 W 500 NORTH i Go. 11 2219 RATE w2 4 100 5.30 ----- - DR.-- �,3 4. p. /33.95 11 2218 RATE w2 MABEL R B LARSEN 1463 W 00 NO 84116 DR ,..319.94 11 2217 w2 DR 173.131 11 2215 RArE wzIQI3LF -CQNSTRLJCTION CO INC 231t] E CAVALIER DRIVE Is, 1447 'WEST 500 NO CITY 84121 12 2 4 OR RATE w2 N-84 DR #.382.13-.i 10/30 11 2212 RATE w2 M DR _278.19 11 2211 RATE 42 .05 SO rSF IMF SFf 3 T 1N R 11,—, fn $VIOLA T FACKRELL CITY 84117 �_ DR 11 2210 PAUL L 6 PATRICIA A MIARDOCK 1415 W 500_NORTT 84116 _SE_ NE_SEC 34 T 1_. _ _ --N_R IW_„ 0 1117.00 DR -,203,94, 11 22n4 �1--VDU-NORTH-8 L"Vf——SE--- 203.94, —_ — 40,40— DR SHEET 05 FINAL _C E G F:(T.No.700 RATE PER FOOT---- NOTICES MAILEp NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS-- .... AODREBB LOT BLOCK FLATDRSUDDII—N FEET 'MOUNT INSTAL ME 11 2208 ,-•" -- _ L IZZIE 1 E TRYGVE N FLOISApD 1399 W 500 NORTH 84116 1 SE NE SEC 34 T IN R 1W DRIVEWAY 311.26/ .3 1,1-3 ONLY i 01 1 FEET RATE 2 FRONTING ON SW'LY SIDE F THILL FOOTHILL DRIVE _ 10 2331 RATE 02 - 854 So F 0 LL.DRIVE ! 14 D G PA 110 2470.58 850-854 S FOOTHILL DRIVE 84108 DR a ySS7 10 2347 02 870-874 FOOTHILL DRIVE` DR 344,51y 9a 7.Sg 4TL1111 30 1191 RATE 3 ';�S 853 5 FOOTHILL DRIVE_ 3 14 SUNNYSIDE PARK ,G.bO 853-855 S FOOTHILL DRIVE 84108 10 1190 RATE N3 FT Ali. .1 NI 8 861-863 FOOTHILL DR 84108 DR RJI�H /AP Sj 10 1189RATE X3TED L MILLER8 F H867-869 5 FOOTHILL DRIVE 84108 DR /g/7, N3 -81 FOOTHILL DRIVE OR //ys'J' 250.03 FEET RATE N3FRONTING ON,S WESTE LY SID FOOTHILL DRIVE BET HUBBARD E 10 1122 RATE 43 5 30 960 S FOOTHILL DR 84108 q3 /�t,79 C TRS 84108 56•f3 30 0835 RATE N6 12 OF JC OF DS 160 FEET RATE #6 10 1221 4 RA N2 NORMAN M 6 RITA G SHORE 1020 50 FOOTHILL DRIVE 1 3 FAIRWAY TE 60 130.40 84108 DR 389,06 i SH„FET 06 FINAL _C G G "T.NO. 700 RATE PER FOOT NOTICES MAILED NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS- NAME ADDREBB IRBI LOT BLODK PLAT OR BUBDIV IBIDN FEET AMOUNT INBTAI MENI 10 1222 RATE 02 NORMAN M& R T 84108 DR G360.35j /70 0V 1 ' '70 0 9 0 1223 RATE X2 DR 84I08 ' DR r..376.19 /9iG 9 10 1224 v- 0 S-...� .., m6✓-�.e.-/S"o:.e.��. RATE X2 4 3 FAIR 1046 S FOOTHILL DRIVE 841-08' DR (,J86.09,.' naL�w •.��D /71 G,✓Y 240 FEET RATE X2 10 1225 51✓) RATE 06 Z A F R ChiA2CH 84108 10 0838 "'1 46 II /So,YS CHURCH 84108 30 0839 RATE X6 /L 03 Zi R F R1V COCH 84108 FRONTING ON N FASTER Y SIDE'FOOTHI LL DRIVE RATE 02 84108 DR 1625.66) a 70 RATE 16 252.33 FT 2530.87 360 Jp }.n`%o u�.c,.f.�,.. UNIT BLDG IVEWAY 2306.63 D_T ?.rll. s PO SON 2088 E MICHIGAN AVE 10 0873 DOB 1 51 INT 318.01 .?� 84106 10 0873 01A F,I.) DELBER7 W JR& FAYF A ATWOOD 2086 E MICHIGAN AVE 84108 10 0873 018 3/.d0 84108 10 0873 02A y ANJE D TRIPP ��� 2082 E MICHIGAN AVE q3-A 3-A � 3 ! " " " 5$ 318.01 I 10 0873 028 f e� -B HIG 84108 EL SHEET N7 ss"" FINAL —.L&G—;lkT.NO.,7aa RATE PER FOOT -- NOTICES MAILED NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS HAM[ AOOR[e6 LOT BLOCK PLAT OR 6U601VI810N FEET AMOUNT INBTALL MENT 10 0873 03A .ICJ —_-- UNIT BLDG Ao EDWARD I VETTER 2078 E MICHIGAN AVE 4-A 4-A 4 THE TOWNES. CQNO 118 111 84108 10 0873 03B KENT S OVIATT ET AL 1 2076 E MICHIGAN AVE 4-B 4-B 4 119 111 10 10 0873 04A { PARTNERSHIP NO. ONE 1•I'1 499 E NORTHMON1 WAY -A q 318.01 /.p 0 $JOFN SCHJMANJ 84103 e 7.Z UNIT 5-B BLDG 5 THE TOWNES VE 84108 10 0873 05B WI LLIAM 7 EVANS C''L 1032 S DOUGLAS ST 84105 5-B 6 5% 318.01 /, MIT - HE OWNES CONDO 10 0873 06A JOYCE C SAFFORD : l 2066 E MICHIGAN AVE 17A 7-A 7 " " " 5$ 318.01 ,3/,d O 1 30 0873 06B JOYCE C SAFFDRD -t-ts� I.'-_) 2066 E MICHIGAN AVE 7-B 7-8 i 7 5$ E 0 10 0873 07A 84108 in 0973 BRA a.'' r117 _ $JPME5 W MCCONKIE 10 0873 08A DEAN H 6 ANTOINETTE M BRADSF04 2058 E MICHIGAN AVE 9-A 9 5% 318.01 b,f 10 0173 O88 ANGELA CAMPBELL 20 6 E MICHIGAN AVE 9-B 9 5$ 318.01 84108 30 0873 09A R BANK TRUST CO TRS 20 4 E MICHIGAN AVE l0A l0A ]0 $ 18.01 84106 10 0373 09B HENRY W 6 GABRIELLE M FRANZ 2052 E MICHIGAN AVE 010E 10B 10 5$ 318.01 ..i/•b'�' _ 4Y0 /o r 10 0836 / .LS..r. _ I-w['tx� Pr'3z so. ..'��ou Eh1 TE 2 PIONS FIRST NATIONAL-B/WK, TR P-0 BO%-30880--84139_ _ 15 27 FIVE AC PLAT 'C' 184.43 4,120.17 1032 SO 2100 EAST �I FOLP-NkUPIWAY 8 FINAL LRATE PER FOOT---- NOTICES MAILED- NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENT19—ADDRESS LOT LOCK LAT OR eU9DIVIOION FEET AMOUNT N9TAl FRONTING N 5'WE TLY SI E PARLEYS WAY RATE q31 --30 510.30P O BO% 016 4 A EYS WAY CITY 84142 DR 158.84;1 03 12 3261 58�� RATE 82 /.39.7.P JCHJ b DARLENE S BRAN) 2207 5 TEXAS ST 84109 3-6 4 COUNTRY CLUBG T` 12 49A7 412 F FCIUNTAIU1 4-2 2222 SO KII•G STREET CIRCLE 84107 125.14 12 3256 RATE q2; 29.6' 661.26 7Jy Of 9 II 12 3533 RALPH W JR b NORENE P STREEP R 2450 E PARLEYS WAY 41 COl1NTRY CLUB HEIGHT 86.55 ,Z, 120.60 FT RATE B3 WAY 12 3045 001 ;l7' RATE N31 RICHARD C 8 ELAINE 0 WOOD 2016 S LAURELHURST DR 15 BRENTWOOD SUB 108.58 1846.95 ,709•S/ 2486-88 E PARLEYS WAY 84108 OR l2, 1 n Si 108.58 FEET RATE W3 ._ Cl � TE MICHAEL D b MELODIE M WILLI S 2002 50 IMPERIAL ST 1 BRENTWOOD SUB 45 765.45 ET AL 84105 12 3033 4 U GARY T E F OYD A RSON 251E E PARLEYS WAY 2 BRENTWOOD SUB 45 765.45 r7e �f 12 3035 (1! 4 -'���-38.6�3 IT 657. I 6S,7/ 22n9 WII MIN:Tf1N 9 ¢ RS�&p EYh WAY 84109 3118. RATE 11 12 3021 G REED b GAYLE C PETERSEN 2605 E MAYWOOD DRIVE 12 HAYES SUB 195 4356.30 ET 64109 RATE q2 CFMLES Wb CAROLE M AKERLOW 2643 E MAYWOOD DRIVE 11 DR 286,15, 84109 :7i oG 271.21��T�TE�2 I� FRONTIW,ON STERL SIDE IARLEYS WAY 12 3537 002 _ HUSKY OIL CO OF DELAWARE P 0 BOX 380 SE4 NE L/ SEC 22 1S R IE 66.95 1495.66 WY PARLEYS WAY CODY, OW% 2 1 SHEET p9 r1NAL C 6 G ,XT.NO.700 RATE PER FOOT-- NOTICES MAILED NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS- NAME AOORE66 LOT OLOCK PLAT OR BUBOIVIBION rEET AMOUNT INSTIAI 12 3537 001 , cl RATE 02 d3/,HS' _ESTER H S MN2Y F JOMISON 2124 E 1700 SO 84108 SE4 NE4 SEC 22 T 1S R IE 81 82 . 2 / 12 2994 002 9q RATE 02 ROBERT 6 DIXtWE pf KEEN 2120 SO 1300 E qSU 302 5E4 NE4 E INVESTMENTS yIrOb DR 2645 E PARLEYS WAY ,06 68 .zj- 12 2982 ROBERT D KENT .r.. 1942 5 LAURELHJRST DR SE4 NE4 242.05 5407.40 3'93.99 2U6, E P"LEY, W Y 10 DR .112.46 5939.J 2445 SO 2500 EAST 84109 SE4 NE4 RATE 1 llq.83 2677.00t70P,3/ 2685 E PARLEYS WAY DR 6406.11i 793.92 FEET RATE 02 i FRONTING ON E STERLY SIDE 0 PARLEYS WAY 12 3204 _,.� RATE 12 I l3q7 Al CnVF 94 3Rnl HIC tNqaN 2160 50 TEXAS STREET 84106 DR +215..84. 6/3. 2. 7 11 3239 E DAN R 6 BARBARA L PROXY '9�3 2186 S KING ST 84109 51 2 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHT 143.19 3198.86 0%/•72 RATE 02 I W EASTER Y SIDE 700THIL 10 1123 ` RATE 02 1 f J H 6 MARY U JACKS 1 R 10 1119 001 RATE 112 .i MOB DR 1.392.03, 1 39.16 A74.8 /'2/,9� VERNEE G G ARLIENE H4L 84108 LIDAY 2031 E MICHIGAN AVE 5 9 DR '344Al /^/ Fy 1 RATE 112 701.48 82,691.06 RATE 43 2335.97 39,734.84 RATE 46 921.37 9,241,34 DRIVEWAYS 23,927.48 TOTAL 155 594.72 SHEET 01 ._ FINAL W.IE I,, 542.34 RATE 03 17.01 —4, RATE 96 10.03 f r C 'EXT. NO—7DD— RATE PER FOOT---- NOTICES MAILED— -- NO.ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS— NAME AOpgE66 LOT ILAT Oq 6 U6DIVI6ION FEET AMOUNT MEN 500 NORTH FRONTING ON NO SIDE TH NO (WEST OF 1400 WEST 11 0872 RATE 03 CARL 6 BONNIEJ CALL[ T R 1b12ILZQQIRTH_.l - Y STIR_ 55 - 935.55 501 N 1300 WEST DR t 396_g8 T 55 FEET RATE R3 11 0886 BOYD B G JILL M WHITE 1422 W 400 NORTH 84116 -1 1_ RATE 83 1105.65 DR 2p3 4 65 FEET RATE #3 11 2311 _ 1450 W 500 NO 84116 I NE4 NE4 SEC 34 T 1N R 1W 61.61 1047.99 11 2312 JAMES R& B VER Y B TRIPTOW460 W 500 WJ 8411L, "I DR o, 11 9314 RATE €3 — � NEL DR /S/;�� s , 11 2315 R,il�p3 WAYNE A 8 KIYOKO 5 JACKSON 01 1462 W 400 NO 84116 ' NE4 NE4 50 850.50 OR 245�5y„ /O O 112 20 _ � RATE 03 A y�I DR 223.54_ _ -� zx RATE #3 1232.84/ /�v.c_ 11 2322 _ RATE q3 JOHN C C ELAINE A DR 11 2323 RATE N3 l� 6 ROGER 11 DEAN 84117 DR a.357.9y7 11 2324 CARL R 6 BONNIE J CALLISTER 1632 W 700 NORTH 94116 NE4 NE4 RATE R3 60.32 -I .1026.04 /w `r 1NG-ON_49_S1DE 11 2273 RATE N3 HEOWIG P D A y Rjfi$4 jjy_ NWj/g. I SEC 34 T 1N R IW8 13, .9118-L9— DR //! 2 Affidavit of Publication ADM 35A STATE OF UTAH, ss. County of Salt Lake ORDINANCE No.sv of t9a4 Cheryl Gierlof f �'A''N ORDINANCE confirming the equalized assessment •`•"`•••` ••••• •• •••••• •• ••• ••••• t rolls and levying a tax providing for the assessment's of property In Salt Lake City, Utah's Curb & Gutter Extension No. 38.700 for the purpose of paying the costs of constructing Improvements on certain streets within the'Municipallty consisting of the removal and reconstruction of street paving,construction of curb and gutter,sidewalks and driveways,and Installation Beingfirst dui sworn deposes and says that he/she is of.drainage facilities and other utility Improvements y P y and necessary and all other miscellaneous work; legal advertising clerk of the DESERET NEWS, a daily necebbary to complete the Improvements In a proper and workmanlike manner;reaffirming the establish. menfofa special Improvement guaranty fund;and es. newspaper printed in the English language with genera tobIISh(hQ the effective date of this ordinance. BE IT.ORDAINEb BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE circulation in Utah, and published in Salt Lake City, CITY,SALT LAKE COUNTY,UTAH: Salt Lake County, in the State of Utah. Section t.The City Cauncll of Salt Lake City,Utah,hereby confirms the assesssment roll as modified,equalized and ap- proved by the Board of Equalization and Review for Salt Lake City,Utah Curb&Gutter Extension No.38-700(the"District"), and hereby confirms the findings of the Board of Equalization That the legal notice of which a copy is attached hereto and Review that the proposed list of assessments as modified and equalized by the Board of Equalization and Review for the District is lust and equitable;that each piece of property within •1 tt, A the District will be benefited In an amount not less than the .'Ca,lI1d,11Ce,NO q„29„O „d- ! ;..u:�a+.+.� ..Cl�K'�,.aLL(�.,,,,.... assessment to be levied against sold property;and that no piece ••••••• of property listed In the assessment list will bear more than Its proportionate share of the cost of such Improvements. Section 2.The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah does d �x �� P11.. Q�•.��-�.�•Q. hereby levy a tax t0 be assessed upon the real property e- ................................... scribed in the assessment list for the District.The assessments levied upon each block,lot part of block or lot,tract or parcel of property therein described shall be in the amount set forth In the assessment list which is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part 0E this ordinance. ••••••............'•"......"•"•""`•"" The rssessments hereby levied-ore for the purpose of pay ing,the cost of constructing Improvements on certain streets within the District consist g of the removal and reconstruction ofstreetpoving construction of curb and Futter,sidewalks and ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••......••........•••"""......•• drlyeways and�nstollotion of drainage facilities and other utility Improvements and modifications;and the completion of any other rnisceiianeous work necessary'to complete the Improve. ments In. .a proper ro r and work manlik described In manner. Sold Improve- •. •..•.•...`•.•.....•........•............................ ent list for the District which list has been Incorporated herein by refer- ence and made a part of this ordinance, each of thassessments blocks lots parts of re block and lots tracts ord and e parcon els was published in said newspaper on.................................. of real property described in the assessment list according to the extent that they are specially benefited by the Improve- ments thereon.Said assessments are levied upon the land and �uta 184 lots In the District at equal and uniform rates. 'f. ....t........................*Leg ......... The total cost of the Improvements in the District is $791'523.95 of which total cost,the City's portion Is$638,934.11. The balance to be assessed to the owners of property affected or benefited by the Improvements In the District Is$152,589.84, .......... ........................................... which Is the total amount of the assessment hereby levied for A ertisin rk the District and which does not exceed in the aggregate the sum of:(a)the total contract price for the improvements under con. tract duly let to the lowest and best responsible bidders there. for:(b)the reasonable cost of utility services, maintenance labor materials or equipment,if any;(c)the property price If any;(d)connec Ion tees,If any;(e).the Interest on any Interim warrants Issued against the District;and if)overhead costs not to exceed fifteen percent(15%)of the sum of(a) (b),(c)and(d). The interim warrrants Issued to finance lAe cos tf of con. struction were purchased by the City from the District In the form of advances from pooled cash of the City paid as construc- tion progress installments became payable.The amount of the advances were determined by the negative cash balance of the District.The Interest which has been Included In the amount to be assessed has accrued on the negative cash balance.The day of rate of interest charged for this Interim warrant financing has s .....been the Clty's investment rate which has been significantly •••••••••fore me this 27,S:t...................................... less than the market rate for Interim warrants sold on the open market. section 3.The assessment list made by the City Treasurer nn for the property In the District as corrected approved,equal. „•, A.D. 17.$.4...... Ized and completed by the Board of Equalization and Review,Is hereby confirmed and the assessments made and returned In said completed list and the report,recommendation and deci. sion of the Board of Equalization and Review tothe City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,are hereby ratified,approved and can- firmed. ........................................................................ Notary Public My Commission Expires ........�aW.... 1, 1988...................... Section 4. This tax Is levied and assessed at equal and uniform rates on such property. Section S.The whole or any part of the assessments for the District may be paid without interest within fifteen(15)days after this ordinance becomes effective.Any part of the assess- ment not paid within such fifteen(15)day period shall be pay. able over a period not to exceed ten(10)years from the effec- tive date of this Ordinance in ten(10)substantially equal annual Installments with Interest on the unpaid balance of the assess- ment of the rate of the net effective rate of the assessment bonds to be Issued.Interest from the effective date of this Ordl- nonce shall be paid in addition to the amount of each such Installment annually at the time each Installment becomes due. After said fifteen(15)day period,all unpaid installments of an assessment levied against any piece of property(but only in their entirety)may be paid prior to the dates on which they become due,but any such prepayment must Include an addl- tlonal amount equal to the interest which would accrue on the assessment to the next succeeding date on which Interest is payable on any special assessment bonds Issued in anticipation of the collection of the assessments plus such additional amount as,In the opinion of the City Treasurer,Is necessary to assure the availability of money to pay Interest on the special assess- ment bonds as Interest becomes due and any premiums which may become payable on redeemable bonds which may be called In order to utilize the assessments thus paid in advance. Default in the payment of any installment of principal or Interest when due shall cause the whole of the unpaid principal and interest to become due and payable Immediately,and the whole amount of the unpaid principal shall thereafter draw In- terest at the rate of eighteen percent(18%)per annum until paid,but at any time prior to the date of sale or foreclosure the owner may pay the amount of all unpaid installments post due with Interest at the rate of 18%per annum to date of payment on the delinquent Installments,and all approved costs,and shall thereupon be restored to the right thereafter to pay in install- ments in the some manner as if default had not occured. Section 6.The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah does hereby reaffirm the creation of a special Improvement guaran- ty fund and shall at the time of each annual appropriation ordi- nance,so long as any special assessment bonds of Salt Lake City remain outstanding,transfer to sold fund each year such amount as a tax levy of one mill will produce,either through a levy of a tax of notto exceed one mill In any one year,or by the Issuance of general obligation bonds or by appropriation frgm other available sources,for the purpose of guaranteeing to the extent of such fund the payment of special assessment bonds and Interest'thereon Issued against local Improvements dis- tricts for the payment of local Improvements therein,all in the manner and to the extent provided by the laws of the State of Utah. Section 7.The officials of Salt Lake City,Utah,are hereby authorized and directed to take all action necessary and appro- priate to effectuate the provisions of this ordinance. Section 8.All ordinances or parts thereof In conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 9.An emergency Is hereby declared,the preserva- tion of peace,health and safety of Salt Lake City and the Inhabit- ants thereof so requiring.Immediately after its adoption,this ordinance shall be signed by the Chairperson and City Recorder and shall be recorded in the ordinance book kept for that pur- pose.Said ordinance shall be published once in the Deseret News,a newspaper published and having a general circulation in Salt Lake City,Utah,and shall take effect Immediately upon Its passage and approval and publication as required by law. Section 10.The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of the assessment ordinance and final assessment list within five(5)days from the date hereof in the Salt Lake County Recorder's office.if the assessment ordinance Incorporates the assessment list by reference,the City Record- er Is further directed to file a copy of the final assessment list with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Section 11.The City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of assessment by mail to the property owners In the District.Said notice shall among other things, I state the amount of the assessment,the ferms of payment and shall be substantially In the form of the Notice attached to these proceedings. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,this 1st day of May,1984. Chairperson ATTEST: City Recorder (SEAL) Published:May 9,1984 A-95 J-7 Q 82-12 ORDINANCE 29 OF 1984 Approving the assessment rolls and levying the tax for SID 38-700.