The URL can be used to link to this page

032 of 2010 - Budget Amendment No. 4 for FY 2009/2010 B 10-5 0 10-1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 32 of 2010 (Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2009-2010) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 17 of 2009 Which Adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2009 and Ending June 30, 2010. PREAMBLE On June 16, 2009, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.17 of 2009. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 1st day of June , 2010. CITY G� 4 ' "�'; AIRPE ON ii ,.`'�i i '" _ i ATTEST: 0\ ' „ ��RAORA"�'S� D Y ER Transmitted to the Mayor on 6-1-2010 Mayor's Action: y Approved Vetoed fri •' 4 / di •Niti MAYOR ATTEST: CHIEF D U Y Y RDER `::'` c,,.. v ,,, `'?i!ce - io /`;, dam= --- — ,v (SEAL) ;\..41 itiliAia.iiti-'----,. — *) Bill No. 32 of 2010. \;n7 ,q*rti,% Published: 6-11-2010 . �9RATtiCap / HB_ATTY-#9683-V 1-Budget_Amendment_FY09-10.DOC 3 Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Amendment #4 —June General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance # Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative Section A New Items 1. Deputy Chief Positions in $.00 Police Department 2. Police Service Overtime $105,000.00 $105,000.00 Reimbursement 3. Donation Fund Receipts $300,000.00 and Interest 4. E-911 Increase Charges $108,000.00 from Qwest 5. Central Business Improv $53,903.00 Area Revenue and Expense 6. Mayor's Office change $.00 Admin Assist to Policy Assist 7. Public Electrical Vehicle $.00 Charging Stations Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources 1. Ut State Violence Against $42,764.03 Women Grant 2. SLC School District $81,930.00 Youth City Artways Grant 3. Ut State SLC Bicycle $12,876.00 Safety Project Grant 4. Ut State Violence Against $45,315.42 - Women Grant General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative 5. Ut State Homeland $148,486.00 Security Terrorism Prevention Grant Section C Grants For New Staff Resources 1. FEMA Fire Staffing $969,638.00 SAFER Grant Section D Housekeeping 1. Fire Communication $800,000.00 Trucks Funded from UASI Grant 2. CIP CDBG Recaptures $189,000.00 3. PULLED - CDBG Recapture 4. PULLED - CDBG Program Income 5. Library Parking Garage -$153,000.00 -$153,000.00 Operations 6. Interest Earnings on $281,815.00 Sales Tax and General Obligation Bonds 7. Budget Adjustment for $78,750.00 UASI Grant 8. Barnes Bank Bldg -$939,076.35 Reconciliation to Bond Proceeds 9. Golf Fund Capital $767,000.00 Leasing Budget Increase General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative 10. Transfer EECBG Grant $400,000.00 Funding from Revolving Loans to LED Street Lighting Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1. Ut State Police In Car $40,000.00 Technology Grant 2. Ut State Homeland $321,221.00 Security Metropolitan Medical Response System Grant 3. Police Department $5,000.00 Nation Crime Victims' Right Week Community Awareness Project Grant 4. Ut State Homeland $3,200.00 Security Local Emerg Planning Committee Hazardous Material Grant 5. Ut State Environmental $150,000.00 Quality digester Covers Grant 6. Ut State Natural $92,307.69 Resource Land and Water Conservation Grant General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact AmountImpact (If Different) Positive Negative 7. Ut State Intensive Level $40,700.00 Survey Historic Preservation Grant 8. FEMA Fire Assistance to $133,000.00 Firefighter Grant Section F Donations 1. Utah Hospital $93,000.00 Association Section I Council Added Items 1. Replace Sound System in $45,000.00 -$45,000.00 -$45,000.00 Council Chambers • Initiative Name: Creation of the Deputy Chief Positions in the Police Department Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-1 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The Administration is proposing the reorganization of several administrative level positions within the Police Department. This reorganization will entail the reclassification of eight (8) positions to the newly created Deputy Chief position, located in the Office of the Police Chief with an appointed pay grade of 004. Their responsibilities are listed below. The positions that will be reclassified are currently reflected on the Staffing Document as follows: three (3) Assistants to the Chief, located in the Office of the Police Chief with an appointed pay grade 004; four (4) Captains located in the Office of the Police Chief, the Administrative Bureau and the Investigative Bureau with pay grades of 830; and one (1) Lieutenant located in the Office of the Police Chief with a pay grade of 822. There will be pay increases linked to some of these position changes, but the overall reorganization will result in near term savings in this fiscal year of approximately $14,000 due to the elimination of one (1) Sargeant. In addition, there will be over$300,000 savings in future years as two (2) Captain positions are eliminated through attrition. These changes will result in improved efficiency and effectiveness within the Police Department, as well as enhanced accountability within the command structure. There will be more opportunities for upward mobility, and there will also be increased opportunities for those performing their duties to work more closely with the people within the department who are making leadership decisions. The eight (8) Duputy Chiefs responsibilities will be: Facilities Development-Deputy Chief Tim Doubt Administration - Deputy Chief Lee Dobrowolski Communication and Records-Deputy Chief Jim Coleman Fusion - Deputy Chief Mike Brown Investigations - Deputy Chief Scott Atkinson Management Services - Deputy Chief Rick Findlay Patrol - Deputy Chief Ken Pearce Special Operations - Deputy Chief Terry Fritz Initiative#A-1 Creation of the Deputy Chief Positions in the Police Department Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-1 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Police Department New Item Department Type of Initiative Gina Chamness 535-7766 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Reveni a Impact By Fund- Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0! $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0! 0 Position Title: Creation of the Deputy Chief Positions in the Police Department Initiative#A-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount - - I 111 I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount { i I Additional Accounting Details: 1 Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? j (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#A-1-b Initiative Name: Police Service Overtime Reimbursement Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-2 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The Police Department estimates at the beginning of the fiscal year what the revenues will be for reimbursable police overtime. The actuals vary from that estimate . This budget request is matching the revenues received/anticipated from reimbursing agencies with Police Department overtime expenses. Initiative#A-2 Police Service Overtime Reimbursement I f BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Police Department New Item Department I Type of Initiative Jerry Burton 799-3824 Prepared By I Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Imp•ct By Fund: fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund $ 105,000.00 Total $ 105,000.00 I $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 1 i Total $07 $0 Staffing mpact: Requested Number of None None Position Title: None None Initiative#A-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 02-00083 1441 $ 4,000.00 02-00047 1446-04 $ 12,000.00 02-00045 1446-05 $ 2,000.00 02-00047 1446-09 $ 25,000.00 02-00045 1446-12 ' $ 29,000.00 02-00013 1446-13 $ 33,000.00 $ 105,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 02-00083 2133 $ 4,000.00 02-00047 2133 $ 12,000.00 02-00045 2133 ' $ 2,000.00 02-00047 2133 $ 25,000.00 02-00045 2133 $ 29,000.00 02-00013 2133 $ 33,000.00 $ 105,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A • Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A Doesgrant duplicate servicesprovided p by private or Non-profit sector? N/A Initiative#A-2-b Initiative Name: Donations Fund receipts and interest Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #A-3 New Item Initiative Discussion: In FY 2010 budget amendment #2 the Council replenished the $100,000 for allocation for Interest on existing donations funds and for new donations. The additional appropriation has already been allocated to individual funds. An additional 26,000 could have been allocated had it been available. This request replenishes the the $100,000 and adds an additional $200,000 to ensure adequate budget until fiscal year end. See below for the use of the $100,000 that was appropriated in the budget amendment#2. 77-00875 Youth City Programs $25,446.34; 77-77121 Rainy Day Gallivan Donations 37,005.75; 77-77123 Salt Lake City Foundation $16,112.48; 77-77130 Imagination Celebration $3,554.09; 77-77132 SLC Tree Replacement $1,998.16; 77-77136 Police Equipment Endowment $542.14; 77-77150 Memorial House Maintenance $4,811.34; 77- 77151 Equipment Purchase Donation (Fire Department) $5,026.96; 77-77159 CIT Scholarship (Police department) $5,502.74 Initiative#A-3 1 1 Donations Fund receipts and interest Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-3 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Administrative Services New Item Department Type of Initiative Elwin Hellmann 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund- Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fungi Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 i $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Donations Fund $ 300,000.00 Total $ 300,000.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#A-3-a I � Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount '77-77001 1895 i $ 300,000.00 I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77-77001 2590 • $ 300,000.00 i Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _be eliminated at the end of the grant? ! NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA ,Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#A-3-b Initiative Name: E 911 Increased Charges from Qwest Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-4 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The E 911 system charges from Qwest went through an audit or "true up" review by Qwest and found that the monthly expenses need to be increased from $23,000 to $32,000 per month. The $108,000 request will be funded by the E-911 fund balance. This "true up" was to be performed annually by Qwest but it has been three years since their last review of the costs to maintain the E 9-1-1 system. Those cost are allocated to the subscribers in the area effected by the Public Safety Answering Point(PSAP). The ongoing increased cost will be included in the FY 2011 expense budget as well. Initiative#A-4 • E 911 Increased Charges from Owest Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-4 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year POLICE New Item Department Type of Initiative JERRY BURTON 801-799-3824 Prepared By I Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 ',Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $01 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of None 0 Position Title: • • Initiative#A-4-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount • Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 60-00620 2352-02 $ 108,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Appropriate fund balance Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Not applicable (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) • If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will • be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#A-4-b Initiative Name: Central Business Improvement Area Fiscal Year 2010 Revenue and Expense Budgets Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #A-5 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Estimates for revenue and expense budgets were posted to the Central Business Improvement Area fiscal year 2010 cost center during the creation of the FY10 budgets. As the new district is being created, (estimated to start 4/15/10), those budgets need to be revised to reflect current expenditure estimates. Specifically, budget needs to be increased to cover the first quarterly payment to the Downtown Alliance and to cover a portion of the CED Management piece. We currently have $157,127 in budget for the Downtown Alliance and we estimate that the payment will be $205,425. CED Management piece will require $5,605 in expense budget. Revenue budgets need to be increased accordingly to ensure we do not run a negative budget position within the cost center. Initiative#A-5 Central Business Improvement Area Fiscal Year 2010 Revenue and Expense Budgets Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-5 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year CED,Treasurers, Engineering New Item Department Type of Initiative Brent Beck 535-7107 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- $ - $Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 46-46010 $ 53,903.00 Total $ 53,903.00 ' $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of Position Title: Initiative#A-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 46-46010 1125 $ 53,903.00 • i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 46-46010 2590 $ 48,298.00 46-46010 2199 $ 5,605.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA I I 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA I � .Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#A-5-b Initiative Name: Change in Mayor's Office Administrative Assistant Position to Policy Assistant to the Mayor Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #A-6 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The Administration proposes changing an existing appointed 015 position, the Administrative Assistant position located in the Mayor's Office, to a newly created position Policy Assistant to the Mayor. This position change will entail no change in pay grade, or pay. This proposed change is the result of a change in the position's responsibilities within the Mayor's Office and more accurately reflect the needs of the Mayor's Office. Initiative#A-6 i I Change in Mayor's Office Administrative Assistant Position to Policy Assistant to the Mayor Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#A-6 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Mayor's Office New Item Department Type of Initiative Gina Chamness 535-7766 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund 1 Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0- I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0! 0 Position Title: • Change in Mayor's Office Administrative Assistant Position to Policy Assistant to the Mayor • . I 1 Initiative#A-6-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#A-6-b • Initiative Name: State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations, Courts Violence Against Women Formula Grant (VAWA) Initiative Number: _ BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #B-1 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The City's Justice Court received a $42,764.03 grant from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations for the continuation of their VAWA funded domestic violence court clerk position. The full amount of$42,764.03 will be used to pay the salary and benefits of the FTE who provides data entry services and is the point of contact between the DV Court, treatment providers, law enforcement, victim advocates and victim service agencies. The DV Court provides services to adult women, ages 18 and older, who are victims of domestic violence, harassment and/or stalking, that are involved in cases filed in SLC and/or are involved with the Court to secure a no-contact order or an arrest warrant for an offender. An average of 1,100 misdemeanor domestic violence cases are filed each year and 65 percent involve abuse to female victims. This position was VAWA grant funded as an hourly/part time position during the previous year. The increase to a full time position is based on the volume of case management needed. There are currently 1,038 domestic violence cases that are on probation. By increasing the position to an FTE, the court clerk will be able to devote a portion of time each week to facilitating a 24-hour turn around on the issuance of high priority service warrants and non-compliance warrants as well as cross- checking no-contact orders posted to the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification state-wide system. This position will be fully grant funded. The grant requires a $14,374 cash match which will be satisfied with 265 hours of the DV Court Judge, the Criminal Section Manager and the Justice Court Directors time and is budgeted for within the Courts general fund budget. I Initiative#B-1 State of Utah,Office of Crime Victim Reparations,Courts Violence Against Women Formula Grant(VAWA) Initiative Name _ BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-1 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Justice Court Resources Department I Type of Initiative 'diary Johnston/Sherrie Collins 535-71731535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By_Funsl Fiscal `Lear Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total - $0 $0 Other Fund _ _ 72- $ 42,764.03 Total $ 42,764.03 , $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: 1 FTE $ 32,177.60 FICA/Medicare/Benefits $ 10,586.43 $ 42,764.03 Initiative#B-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 09-VAWA-21-16.588 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 42,764.03 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2111-01 $ 32,177.60 72-New Cost Center 2111-01 $ 10,586.43 I $ 42,764.03 Additional Accounting Details: Pass through funding from the US Department of Justice Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#B-1-b Initiative Name: Salt Lake City School District, US Department of Education, 21st Century Community Learning Center-YouthCity Artways Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #B-2 Initiative Type: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Salt Lake City YouthCity Division in collaboration with the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) applied jointly for a US Department of Education, 21st Century Community Learning Center grant. The SLCSD received the grant, and is the lead agency of the the three year grant. The SLCSD sub- awarded a total of$122,895. to the City. In year one of the grant, $40,965 of the grant funding was brought into the City's budget during BA #3 FY08-09. This request is to establish budget for the remainder or$81,930 for the 2nd and 3rd year of the grant. This program is a collaborative effort with other local agencies, youth program providers and educational institutes. Some partners include Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah, Boy Scouts of America, the American Red Cross, Salt Lake County and the University of Utah. The purpose of this grant is to create community learning centers that provide academic enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children, particularly students, who attend high-poverty and low-performing schools. The SLCSD has identified two Title 1 schools, Washington Elementary and Bryant Middle School. The YouthCity Division will provide arts education, employment, civic and teen programs as a compliment to school-based programs in support of student/family success and connection to school. YouthCity Artways will provide visual arts, music, dance, video film and employment/life skills classes at Bryant Middle School and visual arts, music, dance and video film classes at Washington Elementary. Of the $40,965 grant award, $31,845 will be used to pay hourly wage and FICA of seasonal employees including teachers, a program coordinator, and life skills instructor; $6,120 will be used to purchase supplies that include video camera, tripod, computer, video tape and assorted supplies; and $3,000 will be spent on a program evaluation. Note: All equipment will become the property of the Salt Lake City School District when program is complete. The grant requires an $11,509 match which will be satisfied with the YouthCity Program Manager and Employment Coordinators time and benefits which is budgeted for within the YouthCity Divisions general fund budget. Initiative#B-2 A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 5%of the YouthCity Artways Director and Assistants time; facility rental donation, student busing and teachers time by SLC School District; and facility rental donation of the City Library. Initiative#B-2 • Salt Lake City School District, US Department of Education,21st Century Community Learning Center- YouthCity Artways Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Public Services Resources Department Type of Initiative Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0' $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0. $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72-30906 $ 81,930.00 Total $ 81,930.00 $0 SSaffing Impact Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Initiative#B-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 84.287 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-30906 1895 $ 81,930.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-30906 2590 $ 81,930.00 Additional Accounting Details: Pass through funding from the US Department of Education Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#B-2-b Initiative Name: State of Utah Department of Public Safety - SLC Bicycle Safety Project Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-3 Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received a $12,876 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety under their federally funded National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Bicycle Safety Program. The SLCPD will administer a public bicycle safety awareness and enforcement campaign that will educate youth and adults through"Bike Rodeos". A minimum of six rodeos will be held in May at local schools to educate students and six rodeos will be held during the summer months at local community events that will target both youth and adults. The program will be a joint effort with community partners in distributing helmets to children and safety lights to adult cyclists. A press release and educational materials will be developed to announce the program. The purpose of this program is to decrease accidents and fatalities by educating both cyclists and motorists of bicycle safety measures and laws governing both. Of these funds, $9,600 will be used to pay officer over time to conduct the twelve Bike Rodeos and $3,276 will be used to develop and print educational outreach materials and pamphlets and youth give always. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the Utah Department of Public Safety. Initiative#B-3 State of Utah Department of Public Safety-SLC Bicycle Safety Project Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-3 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No Police Department New Staff Resources _ Department Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265 1535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Funs, Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 12,876.00 Total $ 12,876.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#B-3-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: PS100703-20.600 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 12,876.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 12,876.00 Additional Accounting Details: State pass through grant from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? j No Initiative#6-3-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations, Violence Against Women Formula Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-4 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a $45,315.42 grant to be used to continue to pay the salary and benefits of the Court Victim Assistant position. This position aids victims of domestic violence with accessing community support resources in addition to providing court advocacy that assists victims through the difficult, complex and intimidating court process when prosecuting their abusers. A 25% or $11,328 match is required and will be satisfied with time spent on grant related responsibilities by the Program Coordinator, the Financial Monitor and a paralegal whose salary and benefits are budgeted for within their perspective departments/divisions general fund budget. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, Violence Against Women Formula Grant award and to sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of the initial grant. Initiative#B-4 • State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations,Violence Against Women Formula Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-4 2008-09 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Prosecutors Office Resources Department I Type of Initiative Padma Collings/Sherrie Collins 535-7762/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0- Other Fund 72- $ 45,315.42 Total $ 45,315.42 , $0- Staffing Impnt: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#B-4-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 16.588 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 45,315.42 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 45,315.42 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#B-4-b • Initiative Name: State of Utah, 2009-Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSP) and Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP) Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-5 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: • The Emergency Management Services Division receives this annual grant from the Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security. It is awarded to local jurisdictions to purchase equipment and provide training opportunities as necessary to prepare in the event of a terrorist or weapons of mass destruction attack. The County is the lead agency and will reimburse SLC for eligible expenses as outlined in the grant award. The City will receive $148,417 of grant funding which was allocated for the following purposes: $24,855 was allocated to SLC PD to conduct a Law Enforcement NIMS training and an additional $12,418 to pay officer OT for participation in a county wide drill; $18,000 was awarded to the Fire Department to purchase level A hazmat suits; and $93,143 ($50.979.60 through county-wide program and $42,164 to SLC) awarded to the Emergency Management Division to purchase 72 hour preparedness supplies for emergency responders and essential personnel. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#B-5 State of Utah 2009 Homeland Security Grant Program and Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#B-5 2009-2010 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Admin Services Resources Department I Type of Initiative Cory Lyman/Sherrie Collins 535-1901 /535-6150 _ Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund- Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact B_y_Eurith Fcal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0' Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72- $ 148,486.00 Total $ 148,486.00 I $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#B-5-a Accounting Detail Srant#and CFDA#If Applicable: I ES-2009-SHSP-002-97.067 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 148,486.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2590 $ 148,486.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _ be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA _ Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ Non-profit sector? No Initiative#B-5-b Initiative Name: US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#C-1 Grant For New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department received a $969,638 grant from the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, under the SAFER grant program. This grant is awarded to hire new firefighters and/or rehire laid off firefighters and will pay the salary and benefits of the positions for a two year period. The Fire Department is proposing to use the SAFER funds to hire eleven (9) new firefighters at an average cost of$484,819 per year. These jobs will replace the unfilled positions that were lost during budget cuts. Although the grant pays the salary and benefits for the two year period, the City is required to retain the firefighters for a three year period. The cost for the third year salary and benefits of the 9 positions would be approximately $500,620 and would be the City's responsibility. In addition the City must certify that no additional firefighter lay offs will occur within the three year period. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Federal Emergency Management Agency grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#C-1 US Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER)Grant Initiative Name $A#4 FY2010 Initiative#C-1 2009-10 Initiative Number I �_ Fiscal Year Grant For New Staff Fire Department Resources Department I Type of Initiative John Vuyk/Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 969,638.00 Total $ 969,638.00 $0 Staffing Impact Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#C-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1360 $ 969,638.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 969,638.00 Additional Accounting Details: Federal Grant- Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiaative#C-1-b • Initiative Name: Fire Communications Truck Funded from UASI Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-1 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: Establish revenue and expense budget in the Fleet Fund to record purchase of two Fire apparatus vehicles funded from the City's UASI Grant Fund (7210906). The UASI Grant was awarded to the Emergency Management Division of Administrative Services Department. $800,000 of the grant was allocated to purchase Stocked Mobile Interoperable Tactical Solutions vehicles. This request will allow the equipment to be accounted for in the Capital Asset inventory. Initiative#D-1 Fire Communications Truck Funded from UASI Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-1 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Public Services _ Housekeeping Department I Type of Initiative Greg Davis 535-6123 (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue impact By Fund: Fiscal_Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund _ Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund $ 800,000.00 Total $ 800,000.00 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 Total $0 $0 Staffingimpact: Requested Number of 0 0 Position Title: Initiative#D-1 -a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 61-00020 Fleet Replacement 1974-72 Transfer from Misc Grants Fund $ 800,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-10906 2590 $ (800,000.00) 72-10906 2910-04 $ 800,000.00 61-00020 Fleet Replacement 2750-01 Equipment New Acquisition $ 800,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: 7210906 UASI Grant(FY08 UASI Grant—Interoperable Communications Project) _EXISTING BUDGET> _ 2590 Other Expenses $ 1,380,847.00 WILL BE USED> 291004 Transfer to Fleet Replacement $ 800,000.00 Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in giant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-1-b Initiative Name: CIP CDBG- Recaptures Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #D-2 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: CDBG R funds were awarded for construction of Burbank Avenue, Glendale Drive to Redwood Drive, and Bell Avenue, Glendale Drive to Redwood Road during the FY 2010 CDBG process. Engineering received excellent bids on both projects resulting in savings of $109,000 on the Burbank Avenue project and an $80,000 savings on the Bell Avenue project, totaling $189,000 of project funds that can be re-allocated. Minimal construction was completed on both projects in the fall of 2009 and it is anticipated that work will resume April 1, 2010. This request will recapture the $189,000 excess CDBG-R funds for re-allocation during the FY-2011 CDBG process. These funds will be reviewed by the Mayor and his proposals will be presented to the Council for finalization at a later date. • Initiative#D-2 CIP CDBG-Recaptures Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year LED Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collin 535-6136/535-6150 (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By und: Fis_c_alYear Anneal Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund r Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 I—Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staff i n gimp act Requested Number of 0 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#D-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-10072 Burbank Ave 2700 $ (109,000.00) 83-10071 Bell Avenue 2700 $ (80,000.00) 83-ARRA CDBG-R Cost overrun 2700 $ 189,000.00 (New Cost Center) Additional Accounting Details: Create new CDBG R Cost Over-run Cost Center-ARRA funds can not be mixed with other funding sources Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-2-b • Initiative Name: Library Parking Garage Operations Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-5 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: When the FY09-10 budget was first prepared, the Library was operating and managing the parking garage. The City was scheduled to assume operations of the parking garage on July 1, 2009, however, the City had not yet determined if the City would operate and manage the parking garage or have a contractor operate it. The original budgeted revenue and expense was based on the City managing and operating the garage, with all revenue and expense recorded on the City's books. However, it was later decided that the City would contract out the operations. In accordance with the contract, on a monthly basis the revenue the contractor collects is netted against the contractor's operational expenses and the net is paid. If revenue is more than expense, the contractor issues a check to the City. If expenses exceed revenue, the City issues a check to the contractor. Because of this, the department is requesting a budget amendment to reflect what is actually occurring. Initiative#D-5 Library Parking Garage Operations Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-5 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Public Services Housekeeping Department I Type of Initiative Greg Davis 535-6123 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fungi Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund 07-00092 1754 Auto Parking $ (153,000.00) Total $ (153,000.00) $0 Internal Service Fund • Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 0 Position Title: Initiative#D-5-a Accounting Detail 3rant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 07-00092 Library Parking Structure 1754 $ (153,000.00) Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 07-00092 Library Parking Structure 2350 $ (153,000.00) _ Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#D-5-b LIBRARY PARKING GARAGE OPERATIONS AND DEFERRED MAINTENANCE FY09-10 FY09-10 Budget Projected No Netting Netting SUMMARY Assumed Methodology Change Revenue 163,000 10,000 (153,000) Operating expense 182,040 8,040 (174,000) Mid-year budget modification (30,000) 30,000 Operating expense 152,040 8,040 (144,000) Net from operations 10,960 1,960 (9,000) Deferred Maintenance paid by City 40,000 31,000 (9,000) Net Revenue-Expense (29,040) (29,040) - EXPENSE BUDGET Total expense-original adopted 222,040 Mid-year amendment (30,000) Budget amendment#3 (153,000) After all amendments 39,040 39,040 • Initiative Name: Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Budget Adjustment Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-7 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: The Emergency Management Division received a $1,476,000 grant from the State of Utah Division of Homeland Security under the UASI program, and was brought into the budget during budget amendment#3 In the budget amendment #3 paperwork, an incorrect object code, 011121, was used which resulted in $78,750 of the allocation to be coded to cash. This caused a budget deficit of $78,750, which should have been coded to object code 211101 for salary. This action will move the $78,750 from the cash object code and create the budget needed to expend the cash. Initiative#D-7 Urban Area Security Initiative(UASI) Grant Budget Adjustment Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-7 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year CEO Housekeeping Department I _ Type of Initiative Sherrie Collins 535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $0 Staffing Impact. 0 Initiative#D-7-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: DES-2008-UASI-001 97.067 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number 72-10906 011121 $ (78,750.00) 72-10906 211101 $ 78,750.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _ be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-7-b Initiative Name: Barnes Bank Reduction I Reconciliation to Bond Proceeds Initiative Number: BA#4 FY 2010 Initiative #D-8 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: On February 19, 2009 the City issued the series 2009 A Sales Tax Revenues bond to purchase land and construct a maintenance facility complex and purchase a bank building for conversion to additional office space. Prior to bonds issuance budget was approved for $8,200,000 for the purchase and renovation of the Barnes Bank Building. During the period between the initial budget approval and the bond issuance the purchase of part of the property was budgeted and paid for from Surplus land in the amount of $939,076.35. Using the Surplus land account enabled the City to comply with bond restrictions and covenants associated with bond issuance. When the bonds were sold, only $7,260,923.65 was allocated to the Barnes Bank account. The budget needs to be reduced from the $8,200,000 to $7,260,923.65 (a difference of $939,076.35) so that expenditures can not be made in excess of the the $8,200,000 between the two accounts. Initiative#D-8 I Barnes Bank Reduction/ Reconciliation to Bond Proceeds _BA#4 FY 2010 Initiative#D-8 2009-2010 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Admin Services Housekeeping Dept Type of Initiative Gina Chamness 535-7766 Prepared By Contact Number (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- Impact Revenuelmpaeti3y Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 83-09071 $ (939,076.35) n/a Total $ (939,076.35) $0 Staffing Impact. Requested Number of 0 0 Position Title: Initiative#D-8-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-09071 1980 $ (939,076.35) Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-09071 2799-01 $ (939,076.35) Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? _ (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I (Yes or NO) Initiative#D-8-b Initiative Name: Golf Fund Capital Leasing Expenditure Increase Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #D-9 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: This amendment request will establish both revenue and expense budgets in the Golf Fund for the financing proceeds and use of$767,000 for equipment purchases. The proceeds will be placed in an escrow account and subsequently used to purchase 25 golf carts and approximately 25 pieces of maintenance equipment. The debt service for this lease-purchase agreement won't begin until next fiscal year. Initiative#D-9 i I Golf Fund Capital Leasing Expenditure Increase Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-9 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Public Services _ Housekeeping Department I Type of Initiative Greg Davis _ 535-6123 Prepared By J Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue I •act By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Golf Fund $ 767,000.00 Total $ 767,000.00 $0 Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 0 Position Title: Initiative#D-9-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#if Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 59-01000 1895 $ 767,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 59-01000 2785 $ 767,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#D-9-b d‘ q`3 r� SL1' In 'ative Name: ' / I erest Earnings on Sales Tax Revenue Bonds and General Obligarbn Bonds i Initiative Nu ber: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-10 ,./ Initiative Type: / Housekeeping�,/ / , Initiative Discussion: / Sales Tax Revenue Bonds eries 2007A, were issued in June 2007 for the purpose of funding Salt Lake City's portion o he Grant ower rail reconfiguration project, and the TRAX Extension project from Energy Solu'ons na to the Intermodal Hub. Bond proceeds held by the Trustee earn interest. This amen. t is to appropriate interest earned during the last quarter of fiscal year 2009 and the firs ree quarters of fiscal year 2010. A total of$8,197 for the Grant Tower e roject and $4,579 for the TRAX Extension project has accumulated in each respectiv fund ce the last budget amendment was passed for this purpose. Sales Tax Revenue Bon s Series 2009A, ere issued in February 2009 to fund Salt Lake City's Public Services Main nance Facility proje and the Office Building construction project. At the time the bonds we issued the proceeds re deposited with the Trustee. Since then, the proceeds have bee earning interest. This am dment is to appropriate interest earned during the last quater fiscal year 2009 and the first t ee quaters of fiscal year 2010. Totals of$178,01 for the Public Services Maintenan•- Facility project and $38,750 for the were issued. General Obligation Bonds Series 2009B, were issued in ne 2009 to fund Salt Lake City's cost of,renovating, improving and preserving the old main rary building and providing Jtirelated faciIit es located approximately 5th South Street and 2nd st Street to establish a science, cl,flture and art education center known as The Leonardo. \t the time the bonds were issued aye proceeds were deposited with the Paying Agent. Since th , the unspent proceeds have been earning interest. This amendment is to appropriate interest amed during the last quateYof fiscal year 2009 and the first three quaters of fiscal year 2010. A/-total of$52,274 for The Leonardo Project have accumulated since the bonds were issued. I Initiative#D-10 Initiative Name: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Budget Adjustment Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #D-10 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: The Sustainability Department received a $2,116,500 EECBG from the Department of Energy which was brought into the 72 grant fund during FY10 Budget Amendment #2, Initiative #E-10. This request is to make two budget adjustments within the grant and does not require any additional allocation of funds. At the time of the budget opening, Sustainability proposed to allocate $400,000 to the Energy Efficient Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) that would provide approximately 80 loans between $5,000 and $100,000 to for-profit businesses to upgrade the energy efficiency of their buildings and $79,372 to hire a coordinator to manage the RLF. The E2-RLF was to be administered through the City's Economic Development Division who currently manages the City's small business RLF. Since then, the DOE has discouraged Cities from initiating the RLF program with the grant funds because of the federal reporting requirements which are extremely labor intensive and would continue for the life of the RLF program. The grant funded RLF would generate program income from the payments received on the loans. The program income received would trigger all of the federal reporting requirements including, Davis Bacon wage reporting, environmental reviews, Buy America, number of jobs created or retained per project and fiscal reporting long after the grant ends. The City could end this program by switching the funds to another established project that was approved in the original application or by repaying the funds to the DOE. In addition, time constraints of when the funds need to be spent or allocated to projects is not conducive to the actual time frame feasible for the grant related RLF. The City would lose the funds if not spent or loaned within the existing time frame of the grant. The DOE will allow the City to move these funds without triggering a prior DOE approval to another project that the City was approved to do in the grant award. The involved parties agree that the funds would be better utilized by being allocated to the Transportation Divisions LED street light project which was initially awarded $415,000. Initiative#D-10 • In addition and because the RLF is such a popular incentive within the business community, the Economic Development Division is proposing to allocate $250,000 from their existing revolving loan fund to develop and establish an E2-RLF program. Utilizing their funding source would not require following federal regulations attached to grants. The grant award also budgeted $25,000 for Downtown Alliance to purchase 5,000 strands of three watt LED holiday lights, however, Downtown Alliance purchased the lights before the grant was awarded by the DOE and the lights were made in China which is in violation of the Buy America regulation attached to this grant. This made Downtown Alliance ineligible to receive the grant funds freeing the $25,000 to be used for another project. The solar hot water project for Fire Station #8 was allocated $32,370, with approximately $10,000 spent on design. The Engineering estimate for the project is approximately $70,000 which includes options. Since it is unknown at this time what the final bid will be, Sustainability is recommending allocating the $25,000 for the Fire Station #8. Any additional increases in costs for the fire station project will be handled with remaining grant funds from other projects that are completed. Initiative#D-10 i Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant(EECBG) Budget Adjustment Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#D-10 _ _ 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year CED _ _ Housekeeping _ Department _ _ _ _ Type of Initiative Vicki Bennett/Sherrie Collins _ _ _ 535-535-6150 Prepared By { Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual _ Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund _ Total _ $0 $0 Enterprise Fund $Total - $0 0 --- Other Fund Total $0 Staffing Impact: 0 Initt'adve#D-10-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: DES-2008-UASI-001 97.067 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number _ Amount 7261042 2590 $ _ (400,000.00) 7261048 2590 $ 400,000.00 - Additional Accounting Details: Please change nam a of cost center 7261049 to Fire Station#8 Please change name of cost center 7261042 to LED Traffic Lights - - - - - - Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?, NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? - - NA - - Initiative#D-1 0-b Initiative Name: State of Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), JAG ARRA- SLC Police In-Car Technology Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-1 Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received a $40,000 grant from the State of Utah, CCJJ, under their Department of Justice,Justice Assistance Grant-ARRA Federal Stimulus Block Grant Program. These funds were awarded to purchase an additional 13 Eticketing program upgrades for the Police Department's Versaterm Computer Aided Dispatch System (CAD) and Records Management System. The City recently received Department of Justice JAG grants to initiate the Eticketing program. This $40,000 grant received will purchase an additional 13 programs providing the program to 285 first responders. The program will enable SLC officers to electronically fill and submit citations from their vehicles and print a copy of the citation for the motorist. The submission of the citation will be electronically submitted to the Records Division, where it will be processed and submitted to the court in a method that is completed in minutes. The automated process is estimated to provide employee savings of 6,100 hours annually. Initiative#E-1 State of Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice(CCJJ).JAG ARRA- SLC Police in Car Technology Grant ► Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-1 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No Police Department New Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund• Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 40,000.00 Total $ 40,000.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 9AR59-16.04 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 40,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 _ $ 40,000.00 r - Additional Accounting Details: Pass through grant from the Department of Justice Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _ eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I No Initiative#E-1-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security - Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-2 Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department applied for and received $321,221 from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, under the FEMA Homeland Security Metropolitan Medical Response (MMRS) grant program. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions across the County to plan and implement a medical response mechanism in the event of a mass casualty or a weapons of mass destruction terrorist attack. The SLC Fire Department is the lead agency partnering with local health, police, fire, hospitals, ambulance and other agencies who make up the MMRS team. $169,200 of these funds will be used to purchase equipment. Equipment includes $96,000 to purchase software licenses, barcode readers and computers for the Emergency Patient! Tracking System (EPTS) for the Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Operation Centers and hospitals; $35,000 to purchase additional full face air purifier respirators, N-95 masks, and CBRNE detectors/dosimeters for first responder agencies; and $15,000 to purchase license and equipment for amateur radio emergency services (ARES) ham radio upgrades at hospitals and EOCs. $10,000 will be used for required travel to regional and national training and workshops by MMRS Steering Committee and coordinators. $92,021 will be used to pay for the Doctor contracted by the Fire Department who provides pharmaceutical oversight as is State regulated in order for the Fire Department to disburse pharmaceuticals and for clerical duties of personnel assigned to the Emergency Management Division to provide grant related management. $50,000 of the grant funding will be used to plan and coordinate MMRS activities, drills and grant preparation as is required by the grant regulations. No match is required. Initiative#E-2 State of Utah,Department of Public Safety. Division of Homeland Security- Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS)Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-2 _ 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grant Requiring No New Fire Department _ Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative John Vuyk I Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- _ Impact RevenuelmpactByfunsi: FiscaLYear Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 321,221.00 Total $ 321,221.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: '9-SHSP-MMRS-001-97.067 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 321,221.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 321,221.00 Additional Accounting Details: US Department of Homeland Security Pass through Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _ be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes _Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-2-b Initiative Name: National Association of VOCA Assistance Administrators Grant- PD Nation Crime Victims' Right Week Community Awareness Project Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #E-3 Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received a $5,000 grant from the National Association of VOCA Assistance Administrators, under their Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. The SLCPD Public Relations Unit and the Victim Advocate Program will coordinate a week of public awareness activities during National Crime Victims Rights Week, with a different event held each day of that week. Events include an interfaith candlelight event to raise awareness of the spiritual, physical and emotional impact that crime leaves on community members; a proclamation will be jointly issued by the Mayor's Office and the PD Chief and new informational brochures regarding the Utah Victims' Bill of Rights and the Utah Constitutional Amendment for Victims Rights will be introduced; survivors, staff from Victim Advocate Programs and the Public Relations Unit with others will participate in a radio program to discuss the rights of victims of crime. Information will also be provided regarding statewide resources available to victims; survivors quilts will be unveiled at various public locations to include victim service providers offices, government buildings, offender treatment facilitates, etc.; a tree ceremony will be held and members will be invited to tie on a ribbon to represent the impact crime had on their lives; primary crime victims and secondary survivors will be invited to join victim advocates from various community and government programs to participate in a Honk and Wave event; and a keynote speaker will address participants at a community event to discuss victims' rights. Promotional items and brochures will be provided to the community during each event. The funding will be used to purchase materials for quilts, printed signs, brochure printing costs, T- shirts for the honk and wave event, promotional give away items such as lip balm, water bottles, keychains, etc., snacks and beverages and supplies. Initiative#E-3 National Association of VOCA Assitance Administrators-PD National Crime Victims Rights Week Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-3 2009-10 Initiative Number 11.1 Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No Police Department New Staff Resources _ Department I Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 535-3265/535-6150 Prepared B Telephone Contact Ne!ative Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact B_y_fund• Eiacal_Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 5,000.00 Total $ 5,000.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-3-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 10-127-16.582 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 5,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 5,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Pass through grant from the Department of Justice, Office of Justice Assistance Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is It expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA I _ Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I No Initiative#E-3-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Public Safety Homeland Security- Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) -2010 LEPC Hazardous Materials Planning Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #E-4 Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Emergency Management Services Division applied for and received a $3,200 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Public Safety under the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) program. It is awarded to local jurisdictions to perform hazard analysis and develop or update local emergency plans, including integrating the SLC LEPC plans and activities into the Region II Hazmat and emergency response planning, create community awareness programs for hazardous materials, integrate local LEPC planning into the community, provide or attend trainings and exercises to support Utah Region II hazardous materials planning, perform needs assessments for early alert and warning systems and integrate the hazardous materials transportation and storage into all hazards emergency management and homeland security activities. The City receives this grant on an annual basis from the State. The SLC LEPC holds monthly meetings which have an educational component to benefit the attendees along with a lessons learned information sharing segment. LEPC attendees include the U of U, Salt Lake Valley Health Department, Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City School District, State Home Land Security, Thather, Tesoro, SLC PD, Fire and other local agencies and companies. The grant requires a $800.00 match which will be satisfied with the Emergency Program Directors time which is budgeted for within the Departments general fund budget. Initiative#E-2 State of Utah,Department of Public Safety Homeland Security-Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC)-2010 LEPC Hazardous Materials Planning Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-4 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Grant Requiring No New Emergency Management Services Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative Cory Lyman/Sherrie Collins 535-71731535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- Impact Revcna_e_lmpact By Fund: Fis c Y_e ar Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0' Other Fund 72 $ 3,200.00 Total $ 3,200.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: HLS 2010-LEPC-SLC-20.703 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 3,200.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 3,200.00 Additional Accounting Details: Pass through from US Department of Transportation to State Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes if grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-2-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality -ARRA, SLC Digester Covers Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-5 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Public Utilities Department has been awarded a 100% principal forgiveness loan of $150,000 under the State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality, American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009("Recovery Act") Nonpoint Source Grant program. This project will replace three buoyant 95 foot diameter anaerobic digester covers with buoyant covers specifically designed for additional storage and complete containment of digester gas at increased pressures. The project will improve the City's ability to conserve energy and natural resources by maximizing its use of digester biogas with modem technologies. It is expected that the project will save an estimated 190,000 kWh power and 800 Million BTU heat per year and will eliminate approximately 600 tons per yr of emissions in CO2 equivalent methane. In April of 2009, The Utah Water Quality Board allocated$6,920,000 to Public Utilities for this project. The$150,000 is an additional amount allocated for the same project scope. Initiative#E-5 State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality-ARRA-SLC Digester Covers Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-5 2009-10 Initiative Number 11. Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Public Utilities Resources 1 Department I Type of Initiative Jeff Neirmeyer/Sherrie Collins 483-6785/535-6150 Prepared B Telephone Contact (Negative Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact_By__Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 150,000.00 Total $ 150,000.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: .,. Initiative#E-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 66.454-State Contract Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 150,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2700 $ 150,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: State Pass Through from Environmental Protection Agency ARRA Funding Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No • Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-5-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources 2009 Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #E-6 Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Transportation Division of CED applied for and received a $100,000. Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) grant from the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources. These funds were awarded for the restoration and completion of approximately 5,400 lineal feet of the Jordan River Parkway Trail between Redwood Road and the Salt Lake City/Davis County boundary. This is the final section of the trail to be completed. The planned project includes grading, constructing a ten foot wide paved pedestrian/bicycle path with a five foot soft trail for equestrian recreation, making improvements to the existing river bridges, new railing and constructing an elevated rail system over wetland areas. Of the $100,000 of grant funds, the City will receive $92,307.69. The State will retain $7,692.31 for their grant administrative fees. The Transpiration Division applied for $322,600 with a commitment of a 50% match of$322,600. A Resolution was passed In February by the City Council which demonstrated the City's commitment to submit the grant application and meet the required match. This request will provide budget within the 72 grant fund for the City to accept the$92,307.69. The required match amount of$100,000 will be met by funds previoulsy allocated to the CIP for trails. Initiative#E-6 State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources 2009 Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-6 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No CED New Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative Dan Bergenthal/Sherrie Collins 535-7106/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact _(Negative) Positive General Fund-Fund Balance- _ Impact Revenue Impact By_Fund: Fisca Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 92,307.69 83 Total $ 92,307.69 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-6-a • Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 92,307.69 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2700 $ 92,307.69 Additional Accounting Details: Pass through from US Department of Transportation to State Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-6-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Certified Local Government(CLG) Program, Intensive Level Survey Historic Preservation Grant Initiative Number: BA#2 FY2010 Initiative#E-7 Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The State of Utah, Department of Community and Culture awarded the Salt Lake City Planning Division a $40,700 Certified Local Government grant to begin the process of a reconnaissance-level survey (RLS), and national register nominations of the Liberty Wells and Westmoreland Neighborhoods and provide an inventory and history of Liberty Park, Memory Grove Park and Fairmont Park and refine the history of Reservoir Park. Of these funds, $18,000 will be used to hire a professional consultant to complete the RLS for the Liberty Wells Neighborhood and expand the National Register for Historic Preservation (NRHP)district within the Liberty Wells Neighborhood; $5,000 will be used to hire a professional consultant to complete an RLS and NHRP district nomination for the Westmoreland Neighborhood; $5,000 will be used to hire a professional consultant to prepare the Liberty Park history, the Memory Grove and Fairmont Parks inventory and history, and refine the history of Reservoir Park; $4,700 will be used for supplies, postage and news announcements pertaining to the nominations; and $8,000 will be used for 3 planning personnel to attend the National Trust Perservation Conference. The grant requires a $40,700 match which will be satisfied with the Preservation Planning Staff time and is budgeted for within the Planning Division's budget. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept Certified Local Government Grant Agreements and to receive any other donations or grants that stem from the original Agreement. Initiative#E-7 State of Utah, Certified Local Government(CLG) Program,Intensive Level Survey Historic Preservation Grant Initiative Name BA#2 FY2010 initiative#E-7 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants Requiring No CFO New Staff Resources Department I Type of Initiative Janice Lew/Sherrie Collins 535-7265/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact 111 (Negative 111. Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 40,700.00 Total $ 40,700.00 $0 Staffing Impact Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-7-a -Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD -Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 47,000.00 -Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 47,000.00 -Additional Accounting Details: -Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes if grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-7-b �J J" / Initia 've Name: , / US Fe ral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fire Prevention Safety Grant \ Initiative Number: ` " \ BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-8 iy rant Requiring No New Stiff Resources \ Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department received a $ 3,000 Ora/ from the US Federal Emergency Management Agency to purchase 19 apparatus mo►nted/direct capture and diesel exhaust extraction systems for the City's 19 front line apparatus. The y4hicle mounted units will provide direct capture of diesel fumes and particulates and replace the ' isting building mounted systems in 14 stations where fire personnel sleep. f� r \ / / \ The current building mounted haust systems are,aging and of the 14 stations, most of the systems fail to operate. Firefighters a fans and open bay\doors to move diesel exhaust out of the building. The cost to replace the ilding mounted exhaust\systems is approximately $350,000 for all 14 stations. The cost of p chasing the apparatus mound exhaust for 19 vehicles is $166,250, or a 47% savings. The Ai 'oft Fire installed vehicle mounted diesel exhaust units on their apparatus in 2005. Fleet Manag ent reports that the units have bap repair free for the past four years with annual filter replac ent. Annual filter replacement would be approximately$200 per unit. The grant required match of$33,250 will be satisfied within the Fire\Departments general fund maintenance budget. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sigh, and accept the US Federal Eergency Management Agency grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the driginal grant. / Initiative#E-8 Initiative Name: US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Assistance to Firefighters Grant Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #E-8 Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department received a $133,000 grant from the US Federal Emergency Management Agency to purchase 19 apparatus mounted direct capture and diesel exhaust extraction systems for the City'$. 19 front line apparatus. The vehicle mounted units will provide direct capture of diesel fumes and particulates and replace the existing building mounted systems in 14 stations where fire personnel sleep. The current building mounted exhaust systems are aging and of the 14 stations, most of the systems fail to operate. Firefighters use fans and open bay doors to move diesel exhaust out of the building. The cost to replace the building mounted exhaust systems is approximately $350,000 for all 14 stations. The cost of purchasing the apparatus mounted exhaust for 19 vehicles is $166;250, or a 47% savings. The Airport Fire installed vehicle mounted diesel exhaust units on their apparatus in 2005. Fleet Management reports that the units have been repair free for the past four years with annual filter replacement. Annual filter replacement would be approximately $200 per unit. The grant required match of$33,250 will be satisfied within the Fire Departments general fund maintenance budget. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Federal Emergency Management Agency grants and any additional grants or agreements that stern from the original grant. Initiative#E-8 US Federal Emeraencv Manaaement Aaencv(FEMA)Assistance to Firefighters Grant Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#E-8 _ _ 2009-10 Initiative Number _ _ _ _ Fiscal Year _ Fire Department Donation Department - - - Type of Initiative John Vuvk/Sherrie Collins _ _ 799-4210/535,6150 Prepared By _ _ Telephone Contact _ (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance Impact - Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total f $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total' $0 $0 Enterprise Fund -- - - - Totals I $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 133,000.00 Total $ 133,000.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#E-8-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 1360 $ 133,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77 2590 - $ 133,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Federal Grant- Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? , NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will _ be eliminated at the end of the grant?[ NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _ eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? - - - - - No - - Initiaative#E-8-b Initiative Name: Utah Hospital Association Donation Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#F-1 Donations Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department received a $93,000 donation from the Utah Hospital Association to purchase eleven, 12-Lead cardiac monitoring devices. These monitors will be used in combination with Fire's current cardiac monitors by the Department's trained paramedics to provide additional life saving opportunities. The cardiac monitors and software will provide pre-hospital screening of heart patients allowing the hospital to minimize time spent providing additional cardiac monitoring when the patient arrives at the hospital. Currently the paramedics verbally transfer patient information to the hospital via phones. The monitors will electronically send the information allowing the hospital to monitor the patient's information from the cardiac monitoring equipment the paramedics use on scene. This will reduce the time required before a patient receives the advanced life saving capabilities the hospital can provide. The hospital association is providing these awards to many local fire departments because it has been proven these monitors improve the quality of treatment provided and saves lives. This request is to provide budget in the Fire Departments Trust so that the donation can be accepted and the equipment purchased. Initiative#F-1 Utah Hospital Association Donation Initiative Name _ BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#F-1 2009-10 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Fire Department Donation Department I Type of Initiative John Vuyk/Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact R-venue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 77 $ 93,000.00 Total $ 93,000.00 $0 Staffing mpact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative#F-1-a Accounting Detail 'Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Private Fundins Source Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77 New Cost Center 1895 $ 93,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77 New Cost Center 2590 $ 93,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiaative#F-1-b Initiative Name: Replacing Microphones/Sound System in the Council Chamber and the Committee of the Whole Room Initiative Number: BA#4 FY2010 Initiative #I-1 Council Added Item The microphones and sound system in the Council Chamber and Committee of the Whole Room are not working properly and need to be replaced and upgraded. The system is over 20 years old and the City is receiving complaints from those in attendance at the meetings, from SLCTV viewers, and from those who are listening to, or watching Council meetings, Planning Commission and other meetings online. The system was installed before it was anticipated that there would be a need for broadcasting and rebroadcasting. The rooms are utilized for the City Council, Historic Landmarks Commission, Planning Commission, and the RDA Advisory Committee. The rooms are also booked regularly by community organizations. IMS has received quotes from a local vendor. The total cost to address the microphones and recording system in both rooms is $45,000. The funding source is the fund balance of the General Fund. Initiative#I-1 • • . . • Replace microphones&sound system in Council Chamber and Committee Room Initiative Name BA#4 FY2010 Initiative#I-1 _ 2009-10 Initiative Number - - Fiscal Year `_ Council Office _ _ Council Added Item Department - - Type of Initiative Sylvia Richards 535-7600 Prepared By - - Telephone Contact (Negative) - Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (45,000.00) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund _ Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund _ Total - ' $0 $0' Other Fund Total $0 $0, Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: - - Initiative I-1-a w Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 65-03100 1974-01 $ 45,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 65-03100 2700 _ _ $ 45,000.00 09-00700 2910-09 $ 45,000.00 Additional AccountingDetails: — - - - - -�Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? - - - _ - NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or - - - -- Non-profit sector? NA Initiative I-1-b