Loading...
050 of 1985 - Alley Vacation - Approximately 1200 West 470 North - Petition No. 400-202 of 1984 P 85-15 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 50 of 1985 (Vacating , an alley located at approximately 1200 West -470 North in Salt Lake City, Utah, pursuant to Petition No. 400-202 of 1984 ) AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1200 WEST 470 NORTH IN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-202 OF 1984 AND REQUIRING CERTAIN CONDITIONS. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That that alley located at approximately 1200 West 470 North in Salt Lake City, Utah, be, and the same hereby is, VACATED and declared no longer to be public property for use as a street, avenue, alley or pedestrian way. SECTION 2. Said alley is more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 41 , Block 2, Colorado Subdivision of Block 79, Plat "C" , Salt Lake ` City Survey, and thence South 297 feet more or less to 1� the Southeast corner of Lot 2 ; thence East 15. 0 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 1 ; thence North 297 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of Lot 42 ; thence West 15. 0 feet to the point of beginning . SECTION 3. RESERVATIONS. Said vacation is expressly made: SUBJECT TO all existing rights of way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on, in, under or over the confines of the above described real property. ALSO SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of obtaining , maintaining , altering , replacing , repairing , removing or rerouting said utilities and all of them, including the City' s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is subject to any existing rights of way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 4. CONDITIONS SUBSEQUENT. This ordinance, after passage, shall be published but shall not become effective until Petitioner removes the "No Parking" and "Stop" signs located in the alley and returns such signs to the City at 850 West 300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 9th day of July , 1985. CHAIRMAN ATTEST: RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on July 16, 1985 Mayor's Action: July 16, 1985 MAYOR ATTEST: CIg RECORDER APPROVED A!� TO r C 1 0 Salt lake CRY /A;,omb,A r; -2— Dato(SEAL)iii.... ...of 19 8 s - - ---_ Published: . ALTO I1AI QQ rvT0PVNTI0�'�� ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTIAENT PAUAFR DEPAULIS City Recorder ILAYOR 311 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 (801) 535-7671 June 12, 1936 ("emo to LuAnn Fawcett, Development Services Room 114 City and County Building As you %,;ill recall my office has been notifying you about the expiration dates of the f of 1 oa;i ng ordinances: i 1) Ordinance 24 of 1985 and Ordinance 50 of 1985 were both passed as a result of Petition 400-20_2 ._Qf_,_1984_ by Barry Esham of the Northa,lest Community Council . Ordi nance:���q-�fa-cated the e+as L- r-ti on of the alley located at approximately 1200 best 470 north. This ordinance expired October 9 , 1985. At one time we were told there- --�����_'' would be a replacement ordinance, but my office has never received anything. Ordinance 50 vacated the north/south leg of the alley at 1200 Ilest 470 North. This ordinance was not to publish until the conditions were satisfied, but there was not an expiration date specified in the ordinance. 2) Ordinance 31 of 1985 was passed as a result of Petition 400-263 of 1934 by l4otel , Hotel Sales and 1,1anagement. This ordinance rezoned an area at approximately North Temple and Redwood Road from "R-6" to 11C-111 . This ordinance could not be published until the conditions were satisfied, but it expired May 14, 1986. 3) Ordinance 38 of 1985 ti.as passed as a result of Petition 400-248 by Warner Enterprises. This ordinance vacated the Citys' interest in Trinidad Court (a private right of way) and expired May 14, 1986. iiy office has follor%ed up several times with you on these ordinances and I know that you followed up with the petitioners and have not gotten any replies. My office also followed up with Carole Stokes in the Council Office to inform her about the situation with these ordinances. Our last follow-up was tray 5 at which time you indicated that you had not heard from the petitioners at that time. Carole also indicated that she had not heard from the petitioners either. r Since the ordinances have expired (or a great deal of time has elapsed since they were passed) , and since the petitioners have not responded, I am going to consider that these ordinances are dead. If you follow up with the petitioners or if they have been in contact with you, please let Lynda know by June 20. After that we will assume that these issues are closed and no further action will be taken. Attached are copies of the afore).-:P-nti oned ordinances. Thank you. Kathryn i iarshal l City Recorder Kl,/b j cc: Steven Allred, Attorney' s Office Brian 11i l ki nson, Council Office . ... .._ -_,gy-ice•=.�;'_ ...