The URL can be used to link to this page

052 of 2009 - Budget Amendment No. 1 for FY 2009/2010 0 09-1 B 09-11 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 52 of 2009 (Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2009-2010) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 17 of 2009 Which Adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2009 and Ending June 30, 2010. PREAMBLE On June 16, 2009, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.17 of 2009. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 29th day of September , 2009. ERS ATTEST: z‘ • CHIE DEP TY IT CORDER tt* Transmitted to the Mayor on September 30, 2009. Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed 1., MAY ' ATTEST: • CHIEF DEPUTY TY ORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's ttice Date (SEAL) •=.-1 By Bill No. 52 Published: October HB_ATTY-#9683-V1-Budget_Amendine -10.DOC 3 Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Amendment#1—September General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative Section A New Items 1. CIP Impact Fee Update $25,000.00 2. Regional Sport Complex $2,500,000.00 Land purchase 3. Rose Park Golf Course $800,000.00 land purchase 4. Full Funding of CIP $63,075.00 After Sugarhouse Street Car project 5. Public Safety Building $125,000.00 Land Purchase—Impact Fees 6. 2010 Census Hourly $7,800.00 $7,800.00 -$7,800.00 Position Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources 1. St of Utah Office of $40,279.65 Crime Victim Reparations Grant 2. Executive Office of $100,000.00 President Rocky Mtn HIDTA Grant 52 General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance # Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative Section C Grants For New Staff Resources 1. US Dept of Justice COPS $2,014,480.00 Hiring Recovery Section D Housekeeping 1. Impact Fee Revenues $3,003,022.41 2. Recapture CIP $67,001.98 Completed and Closed Projects 3. Property Owners $1,050,000.00 Sidewalk Replacement SAA District 4. Jordan River Trail $150,000.00 Security Lighting 5. General Fund $1,954,013.00 $1,954,013.00 -$1,954,013.00 Encumbrance Carryover 6. Recapture Remaining $141,262.21 HUD Program Budget 7. Energy Refuse Fund S28,608.00 Encumbrance Carryover 8. Donation Fund $1,617,396.77 Carryover 9. Grants and Other Spec $15,770,475.12 Rev Carryover Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 53 General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance General Fund Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE Impact Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Positive Negative 1. US Dept of Interior $300,000.00 Reclamation of Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Water Project 2. US Dept of Housing HUD $1,680,347.00 Homeless Prevention Program Grant 3. US Dept of Justice $4,050,814.00 Recovery JAG Grant 4. US Dept of Energy DOE $2,116,500.00 Recovery Conservation Grant 5. Utah Dept of Pub Safety $190,184.00 Homeland Security Buffer Zone Grant Section F Donations Section G Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards 1. National Trust for $4,037.50 Historic Preservation— Fisher Mansion 2. St of Ut Comm on $3,810.00 Criminal&Juvenile Justice 3. Utah State Div Forestry $5,000.00 Fire&Land Pervious Pavement 54 General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative 4. St of Ut Dept of $30,500.00 Workforce Sery Youth Grant -Fairmont 5. St of Ut Dept of $30,500.00 Workforce Sery Youth Grant—Central City 6. Utah State Univ $25,000.00 Outreach Training Grant 7. St of lit Dept of $30,500.00 Workforce Sery Youth Grant—Ottinger Hall 8. St of Ut Dept of $30,500.00 Workforce Sery Youth Grant—Liberty Park 9. St of Ut Dept of Human $75,000.00 Sery Crisis Intervention Grant 10. St of Ut Comm on $20,000.00 Criminal&Juvenile Justice Asset forfeiture Grant 11. Executive Off of $63,450.00 President Rocky Mtn HIDTA Grant 12. Art Works for Kids $5,000.00 Youth City Artways Grant 13. Ut Dept of Pub Safety $11,791.00 Emerg Mgmt Grant 55 General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative 14. St of Ut Dept of Health $10,440.00 Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol Grant 15. St of Ut Dept of S577,500.00 Environmental Quality Jordan River Restore Section I Council Added Items 1. Census 2010 Complete Count Program $15,000 $15,000 ($15,000) Initiative Name: 10 Year CIP Plan and Impact Fee Update Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #A-1 New Item Initiative Discussion: In FY 04/05, CED hired a consultant to revise and update the General Fund Impact Fee Study and 10 Year CIP Plan. The 10 Year CIP Plan needs to be updated again to reflect changes to the City's goals and direction and the current construction costs of those changes. These revisions to the plan will also change the Impact Fee schedule. This request will increase the current project balance of $75,880.60 allocated for the FY04/05 update to $100,880.60, an increase of $25,000. The $25,000 will come from the City's Police, Fire, Parks and Streets Impact Fee's collected. An RFP for the Plan revision will be completed and a consultant selected. • Initiative#A-1 • 10 Year CIP Plan and Impact Fee Update Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#A-1 2009-10 Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year Management Services New Item Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins I 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount •General Fund • Total $0; $0 'Internal Service Fund I Total $0' $0 Enterprise Fund T Total $0' $0I Other Fund I I Total $0; $01 ' I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 • IFTE's: 'Position Title: ' 1 ICI I , I I Initiative#A-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I � ' � I 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 84-84001 Police 2590 $ (6,250.00) 184-84002 Fire $ (6,250.00) ;84-84003 Parks I $ (6,250.00) 84-84005 Streets $ (6,250.00)j 1 $ (25,000.00) '84-05006 2324 $ 25,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: I I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA ' Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? 1 NA 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? I NA !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are i eliminated? I NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#A-1-b Initiative Name: Regional Sport Complex Land Purchase Initiative Number: BA#1 Initiative #A-2 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Proposition #5 of the 2003 Bond Initiative calls for the development of a City owned sports complex that would include athletic fields, support structures and amenities to support soccer, baseball, softball, football rugby and other athletic fields sports. The City plans to construct the Complex on property currently owned and managed as public recreation space by the State Division of Parks and Recreation. Under an existing Memorandum of Understanding the State is willing to deed title to 150 acres of property adjacent to the Jordan River and 1- 215 between 2300 North and the Davis County line. The City and the State plan to close the property transfer by the end of August 2009 under a Cooperative Agreement. The Agreement places a not-to-exceed value of the property at $500,000. The Agreement allows the City to offset the value of the.property through in-kind improvements that are a part of the complex and that benefit the State OHV facility located to the north of the Complex. The City will have a five (5) year period to compensate the State for the value of the property. If in- kind contributions made by the City do not add up to $500,000 at the end of the five year term, the City will be obligated to pay the difference in cash. At the present time the City has realistically identified $254,000 in in-kind improvements that will benefit the State. Adjacent to the State property are three (3) privately owned parcels of land that the City is interested in acquiring. The acquisition of these parcels will enlarge the footprint of the site and allow the City to build a larger more viable complex of fields. Additionally, the parcels will strengthen the economic position of the project. The three parcels have an estimated cost of $2.3 million. The City has one parcel under a purchase contract with a closing no later than December 2009. The other two parcels are subject to availability by a willing seller, appraisal and negotiation. At the current time the Administration has identified $2.5 million in the Surplus Land Account that can be used for the Sports Complex. The purpose of this budget amendment is to authorize the future expenditure of Surplus Land Account funds for the purchase of property if and when it comes available. Initiative#A-2 I I Regional Sport Complex Land Purchase Initiative Name BA#1 Initiative#A-2 2009-10 Initiative Number I , Fiscal Year Public Services New Item Department j Type of Initiative Greg Davis 535-6123 Prepared By ! Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund � II Total $01 $01 'Internal Service Fund Total $0 $01 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund • Total i $0 $0 I I I Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0; . 0 Position Title: none • I j Initiative#A-2-a i I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount • • ', II Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount '83-81100 i I 2710 $ 2,500,000 Additional Accounting Details: The fund has$5.4M in cash ' l I Grant Information: NOT APPLICABLE Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will !be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#A-2-b Initiative Name: Rose Park Golf Course Land Purchase Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #A-3 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The Golf Course Enterprise Fund has approximately $20.0 million in deferred capital improvement projects that cannot be funded from operational revenues. One project, critical to the financial success of the course, is the Rose Park driving range. This driving range is undersized, requires the use of restricted flight golf balls, and for years has been a poor neighbor to private property owners west of the range fence. Last year five (5) residential building lots fronting Redwood Road and whose property lines share common borders with the Rose Park driving range and the Jordan River Golf Course, were leveled by the owner and the land put on the market for sale. The City Golf Manager and the City's Property Division have had an on-off-and-on again discussion with the owner. Purchasing this 2.64 acre parcel would greatly benefit the golf course and solve several operational problems. The City Property Division had an appraisal completed. The property was appraised at $585,000 in late 2008. The property owner disputed the appraisal by the City and is now completing his own appraisal. • The Golf Fund does not have reserves available to purchase the property. The Administration has identified $800,000 in the Surplus Land Account for the acquisition of this property. The Golf Division must move relatively quickly on this project. The property owner has an appetite to develop or sell the property. The purpose of this amendment is to authorize the funds so that the City has the financial tool and flexibility to negotiate a deal. Initiative#A-3 I I Rose Park Golf Course Land Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#A-3 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Public Services Dept. New Item Department Type of Initiative Greg Davis 801-535-6123 Prepared By ! Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive 1 General Fund - Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total) $0 $01 i Internal Service Fund Total $0, $01 Enterprise Fund 1 i Total $0 $0 !Other Fund � I Total $0 $01 ; I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 01 1 Position Title: 1 none it I i I I I Initiative#A-3-a i I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number j Object Code Number Amount I � I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount '83-81000 2710 ! $ 800,000.00 I 1 I Additional Accounting Details: I i I i i — Grant Information: NOT APPLICABLE Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) i Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) • If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?' (Yes or No) —� II Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) i Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are Ieliminated? (Yes or No) i Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? (Yes or NO) Initiative#A-3-b Initiative Name: Full Funding of the CIP After Sugarhouse Street Car Project Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #A-4 New Item Initiative Discussion: During the 09/10 CIP Process, the Mayor and Council delayed funding a portion of a project in order to allocate $63,075 of CIP to the Sugar House Streetcar project. This request will appropriate the $63,075 from the CIP cost over-run account and will bring the CIP funding for fiscal year 2010 to the full amount. Initiative#A-4 Full Funding of the CIP After Suqarhouse Street Car Project Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#A-4 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year CED/HAND New Item Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- I None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total C $0 $0, Internal Service Fund I � Total $0 $01 Enterprise Fund • Total $0 $01 Other Fund Total $0' $0 i 1 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0' FTE's: Position Title: I L . 1 � I i I Initiative#A-4-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number - Object Code Number --Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number - Amount 83-09099 _ _ 2700 _ $ (63,075.00) 83-Delayed Project _ 2700 $ _ 63,075.0.0 Use Local Street Reconstruction Line Item Additional Accounting Details: -- Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? -- NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA -- Initiative#A-4-b Initiative Name: Public Safety Building Land Acquisition - Impact Fee Allocation Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #A-5 New Item Initiative Discussion: The Property Management/Capital Asset Management Department is requesting an additional $125,000 from the Fire Impact Fee fund for expenses related to land acquisition for the proposed Public Safety Building (PSB.) . The PSB is included in the City's 10 Year GIP Plan and Impact Fees have been identified as an eligible use for this purpose. During budget amendment #3 of FY-08/09 the Council awarded $125,000 of Police Impact Fee funds for expenses related to land acquisition for the proposed PSB. At that time, Property Management was pursuing negotiations with four (4) property owners and requested funds to be used as earnest monies and for additional expenses related to the negotiations. Property Management has negotiated an agreement with one (1) property owner and is in the process of negotiating agreements for additional properties. The City has agreed to pay additional earnest monies at the end of January to hold the properties until the Bond funds can be obtained and finalization of the acquisition is complete. This request will pay the additional earnest monies and additional expenses needed to purchase the properties. Should the Bond fail, all earnest money is refundable if the agreements are cancelled within a certain time frame after the Bond election. This request is to establish budget in the amount of $125,000 to facilitate the agreements between the City and the property owners. These expenses are Impact Fee eligible. Initiative#A-5 1 I Public Safety Building Land Acquisition - Impact Fee Allocation Initiative Name • BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#A-5 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Property Management New Item Department Type of Initiative John Spencer/Sherrie Collins 535-6398/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount I General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total' $0, $01 Enterprise Fund I I Total $01 $01 Other Fund • Total $0 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: 1 Position Title: I I I ' l � Initiative#A-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I j I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number 184-8d002 2700 $ (125,000.00)! 84-New Cost Center 2700 $ 125,000.00 i I i I I r fr Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I r 'be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are .eliminated? NA I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or • Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#A-5-b Initiative Name: Mayor's Office - 2010 Census - Hourly Employee Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #A-6 New Item Initiative Discussion: The Administration is requesting tohire a 2010 `Census hourly employee for 20 hours per week at $15.00 per hour plus FICA for a period of six months at a total cost of $7,800. This position would be responsible for coordinating information with the City Census Co-Chairs as well as with the federal partnership specialist for the Denver Regional Census Center. In addition., the position would work with assigned City staff and designated sub-committee chairs for the Census 2010 Complete Count Committee. Duties would include record keeping of the minutes of all meetings, scheduling meetings and facilities, updating the e-mail data base and website for Census information sent and received from the Complete Count Committee, and assisting the collaborative media campaign. This position would begin October 2009 and continue until April 2010. The Administration requests that the $7,800 come from the general fund, fund balance. Initiative#A-6 Mayor's Office -2010 Census - Hourly Employee Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#A-6 2009-10 Initiative Number j Fiscal Year Mayor's Office New Item Department I ] Type of Initiative David Everitt/Sherrie Collins 535-7704/535-6150 I Prepared By , Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (7,800.00) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount !General Fund Total $0 $0I Internal Service Fund Total $01 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $01 Other Fund Total r $0 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: 'Position Title: Hourly employee $ . 7,800.00 ,$15.00 per hr x 20 hrs. x 24 wks plus FICA 1 I I I I I Initiative#A-6-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount i � I i 1 I , i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number ' Object Code Number 108-00100 2324 $ 7,800.00 l i I I • • Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? I NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#A-6-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations - PD VOCA Grant Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #B-1 Grant for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Police Department applied for and received $40,279.65 from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victims Reparations, Victim of Crime Act (VOCA), for continuation of the Mobile Response Team program. These funds will be used to pay salaries and benefits for 1040 hours of two (2) victim advocate positions who provide on scene crisis counseling and resource services to victims of domestic violence. The PD receives this grant on an annual basis. Of these funds, $37,527.65 is allocated for twelve (12) months of salary and benefits of the two victim advocate positions, $1,252 will be used to pay registration fees for victim advocates to attend the Advanced Victim Assistance Academy and Crime Victims Conference, hotel and per diem and $1,500 will be used as emergency funds to assist victims with immediate needs. A 25% or $10,085.56 match is required which will be satisfied by payment of salary and benefits of another advocate position. These funds are budgeted for within the Police Departments general fund budget. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#tR_1 I I State of Utah, Office of Crime Victim Reparations - PD VOCA Grant Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#B-1 2009-10 Initiative Number j Fiscal Year Grant for Existing Staff SLCPD - HAND Resources Department Type of Initiative Wendy Isom /Sherrie Collins 799-3810/ 535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive !General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $01 ! $0 Internal Service Fund I — ' � I Total! $0 $01 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 'Other Fund 172 $ 40,279.65 Total $ 40,279.65 $0 ! I Staffing Impact: !Requested Number of 0 FTE's: ,Position Title: 2 Hrly Advocate Positions x $34,860.80 1040 hrs x $16.76 per hr. I Benefits 2,666.85, Total $37,527.65 i ! I � I Initiative#B-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 09-VOCA-44 Revenue: Cost Center Number + Object Code Number Amount 72 New Cost Center 1370 $ 40,279.65 � i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I ' I 172-New Cost Center 2162 $ 34,860.80 219110 $ 2,666.85 2525 $ 1,252.00 2590 $ 1,500.00 f $ 40,279.65 1 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: i Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? Yes 1 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 'Non-profit sector? No Initiative#B-1-b Initiative Name: Exe Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control - Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #B-2 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Police Department applied for and received a $100,000 Rocky Mountain HIDTA grant from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control. These funds will be used for the following: $20,000 will be used to provide ten regional community outreach events in HIDA Taskforce and local substance abuse authority areas of Utah and $12,000 will be used to send six representatives to national conferences or training onpharmaceutical drug crime scene issues; $10,000 will be used to contract fo evaluation services; $14,000 will be used for printing and binding of best practice guidelines, train the trainers documents, educational materials for trainers, community members and general public; $12,000 will be used for postage of mailings; $15,000 will be used for posters distributed to businesses and $17,000 will be used for community flyers. There is no required match. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#B-2 I i I I Exe Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control -Rocky • Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#B-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff SLCPD -HAND Resources Department i Type of Initiative Wendy Isom/Sherrie Collins 799-3810/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund Total $0 $0 j Internal Service Fund Total $0, $0 !Enterprise Fund I f ' Total I $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 100,000.00 Total $ 100,000.00 ! $0 ! II Staffing Impact: !Requested Number of ' 0 FTE's: 1 Position Title: i - I � 1 1 Initiative#B-2-a 1 Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 09-VOCA-44 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1360 $ 100,000.00 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 172- New Cost Center L 2590 ! $ 100,000.00 • ' I � I � I ' I 1 i Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will 1 I be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are !eliminated? Yes { 7 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No • Initiative#B-2-b Initiative Name: US Dept of Justice, Comm Oriented Policing Services (COPS), COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #C-1 Grants For New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received a $2,014,480 Recovery Act grant under the Department of Justice, COPS, CHRP. It is designed to provide funding directly to law enforcement agencies having primary law enforcement authority to create and preserve jobs and to increase their community policing capacity and crime-prevention efforts. The CHRP funds must be used to hire or rehire full-time career law enforcement officers. The $2,014,480 will provide for the salary and benefits costs of hiring or rehiring (10) community policing law enforcement officers, for a three year period. Of this amount, $1,180,830 will be expensed for salary, which equates to approximately $18.55 per hour the first year, with an additional 2.0% increase the following 2 years. The remainder of $833,650, will be expensed for the benefits of the 10 Officers for the full three years. The grant does not require a match, however, the Officers hired must be retained for a 12 month period at the end of the three year grant period. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept Department of Justice, COPS related grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#C-1 Oriented Policing Services (COPS), COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) ' I Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#C-1 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants For New Staff SLC Police Department _ Resources • • Department Type of Initiative Krista Dunn /Sherrie Collins 799-32651535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund • Total j $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total l $0 $0! 'Enterprise Fund Total $0 $01! IOther Fund 72 $ 2,014,480.00 Total $ 2,014,480.00 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of j 0 FTE's: Position Title: 10 Entry Level Full Time Police Officers • Salary for 3 yr. Period $1,180,830.00 Benefits for 3 yr. Period 833,650.00 $2,014,480.00 ' I Initiative#C-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2009RJWX0084-16.710 Revenue: Cost Center Number J Object Code Number Amount 72 1360 $ 2,014,480.00 I � II I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 2100 $1,180,830.00 2100 833,650.001 • $2,014,480.00 i Additional Accounting Details: 1 Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? 1, 1 Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#C-1-b Initiative Name: Impact Fee Revenue Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-1 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: During the last fiscal year, the City has collected Impact Fees and accrued interest income on the Impact Fee Revenue totaling $3,003,022.41. This action will increase the budgets of the Impact Fee revenue accounts to match the actual cash as of June 30, 2009. Initiative#D-1 Impact Fee Revenue Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-1 2008-09 Initiative Number Fiscal Year ' CED Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 'Internal Service Fund • Total $0 i $01 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund '84 $ 3,003,022.41 • • Total $ , 3,003,022.41 $0 I I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: i I � � I Initiative#D-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 84-84001 Police 2700 $ 609,305.81 84-84002 Fire 2700 $ 712,791.52 84-84003 Parks 2700 ' $ 165,194.17 84-84005 Streets ( 2700 $ 1,515,730.91 $ 3,003,022.41 I I Additional Accounting Details: Ir Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? NA I I I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA • 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA _ Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA � � I • Initiative#D-1-b Initiative Name: Recapture CIP Completed and Closed Projects Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-2 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: This request decreases the remaining budgets of nine (9) completed and closed general fund, CDBG and Class "C" completed and closed CIP projects totaling $67,001.98, and increases the cost over run accounts of the respective programs for future reprogramming. It also reduces the budget of $58,371.80 in an account with no cash. Of these projects, five (5) are general fund CIP projects totaling $48,946.55; two (2) are CDBG CIP projects totaling $10,115.40; and two (2) are Class "C" CIP projects totaling $7,940.03. In addition, one (1) project is included in this paperwork to reduce the budget only. There is no cash or funds to recapture in this project. • Initiative#D-2 • • Recapture General Fund, Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)and Class "C" CIP Completed and Closed Projects Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year CED -HAND _ Housekeeping Department j Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136!535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) j Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0, $01 'Internal Service Fund Total $0' $01 Enterprise Fund • Total l j $0 $01 :Other Fund j I Total $01 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: • • Initiative D-2-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount General Fund CIP 83-06049 Redwood Road Sidewalk 2700 $ (31,908.90 83-07055 1300 So.Viaduct 2700 $ (17.20) '83-08040 Plaza 349 Energy 2700 $ (287.06) 83-08042 Westside Sr. Center Energy ! 2700 $ (15,933.08) i 83-09045 Plaza 349 Em to ee Showers 2700 $ (800.31) 83-08099 GF CIP Cost Overrun 2700 $ 48,946.55 1Community Development Block Grant 83-08054 ADA Ramps 2700 $ (9,468.97) 83-08057 Sidewalk Replacement I 2700 $ (646.43) 83-08098 CDBG Cost Overrun I 2700 $ 10,115.40 Class"C" 83-01040 2100 So.,-900 W.to Redwood 2700 $ (7,532.31) 83-06035 1300 So.Viaduct 2700 $ (407.72) 83-04097 2700 $ 7,940.03 I Reduce Budgets Only-No Funds 83-04072 2100 So., 900 W.to Redwood 2700 $ (58,371.80)• ! I Additional Accounting Details: ! C i � I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? • NA I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are , eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? I NA ' I Initiative#D-2-b Initiative Name: Property Owners Sidewalk Replacement Special Assessment Area (SAA), 1500 to 2100 East, 1300 to 1700 South Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-3 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: During the FY 09/10 CIP process of time sensitive projects, the Council awarded $765,356 for a Sidewalk Replacement SAA at 1500 to 2100 East, 1300 to 1700 South. These funds were awarded to design, construct and create the SAA for sidewalk improvements in the proposed area as funding permits. The City's portion of the budget was established during the Council's consideration of time sensitive CIP projects. The $1,050,000 of budget for the property owners portion of the SAA was identified but not budgeted for at that time. The creation of this budget will allow the special assessment area process to begin and will provide a mechanism to accept the property owners funds. Initiative#D-3 Property Owners Sidewalk Replacement Special Assessment Area (SAA), 1500 to 2100 East, 1300 to 1700 South Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-3 2009-10 Initiative Number _ Fiscal Year CED - HAND Housekeeping Department L Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount IGeneral Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total l $0 $0 Enterprise Fund I j I Total $0' $0 Other Fund 183- $ 1,050,000.00 Total l $ 1,050,000.00 $01 I I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: � 1 l � � I I Initiative D-3-a l I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number ! Object Code Number Amount 83-Property Owners Cost Center 1125 $ 1,050,000.00 I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-Property Owners Cost Center 2700 $ 1,050,000.00 I II i I Additional Accounting Details: i I • Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA I i I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? ! NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? j NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA � i 1 Initiative#D-3-b Initiative Name: Jordan River Parkway Trail Security Lighting Scope Revision Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-4 Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: During the FY 08/09 CDBG Process, $150,000 was awarded for Jordan River Park Security Lighting, Cottonwood Park (300 North) to Redwood Road (State Agricultural Building - 400 North). A general fund CIP of$289,000 was allocated during the FY 07/08 CIP Process for the same purpose. The general fund portion of the CIP has been bid and security lighting can be completed to 1000 North. Engineering is requesting to revise the CDBG project description to expand the scope of services from 1000 North to Rose Park Golf Course Bridge (1400 North). This scope revision would allow for continued security lighting along the trail to the bridge. No additional funding is required. This is a project scope revision only. Initiative en-4 Jordan River Parkway Trail Security Lighting Scope Revision Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-4 2009-10 Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year CED -HAND Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins I 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 1 General Fund Total $0. $0 'Internal Service Fund Total $0 $01 !Enterprise Fund Total $0! $01 Other Fund '.83- j Totali $ - $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of j 0 FTE's: 1 Position Title: I � Initiative D-4-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I i • Additional Accounting Details: I i 83-09061 -Project scope change only. I I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? I NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA ;If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA I i Initiative#D-4-b Initiative Name: General Fund Encumbrance Carryover Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-5 House Keeping Initiative Discussion: General Fund departments comparison to budget includes encumbrances that are outstanding at fiscal year end. Historically, the Council has appropriated fund balance to provide a means to "hold harmless" the General Fund departments' prior year encumbrances. Without Council action, the General Fund departments' Fiscal 2008 appropriation will be forced to fund encumbrances outstanding at fiscal year end. It is recommended that the Council approve the budget for the outstanding encumbrances in the General Fund. 4n_� I i General Fund Encumbrance Carryover Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-5 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Administrative Services House Keeping Department Type of Initiative Elwin Heilmann 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- 1 $ (1,954,013.00) Impact • Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount ;General Fund 0 0 Total l $0 $01 l Internal Service Fund Total $0: ! $01 Enterprise Fund • Total $0! $01 Other Fund • • Total $01 $0 I j Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: I ! i • • j I ' ! 1 Initiative#D-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number { Object Code Number Amount I • • � I ' I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Administrative Services various $ 173,563.00 Attorney various I $ 1,821.00 Community& Econ. Development various $ 588,649.00 Council various $ 103,895.00 Fire various $ 16,657.00 Mayor various ! $ 20,709.00I Non Departmental various $ 423,101.00 Police various $ 27,584.00 Public Services various $ 598,034.00 1 $ 1,954,013.00 l � Additional Accounting Details: !All Cost center and object code details are in Administrative Services i 1 Grant Information: I Grant funds employee positions? I NA • Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA { I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA ~� 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? • NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-5-b Initiative Name: Recapture Remaining HUD Program Budgets Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative # D-6 • Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: This request decreases the remaining budgets of twenty five (25) completed and/or closed US Department of.Housing and Urban Development (HUD) projects including CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA totaling $141,262.21, and increases the cost over run accounts of the respective programs for future reprogramming as per HUD Federal guidelines. 1t also reduces the remaining.budgets (NO CASH) of five (5) closed projects totaling $291,068.41. Initiative#D-6 Recapture Remaining HUD Program Budgets Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative# D-6 ! 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year CED -HAND I Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Jennifer Schumann 535-6136/535-7276 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund I I 1 I Total T so' I $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 !Other Fund Total $0 I $ - I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: • Initiative#D-6-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number " Object Code Number Amount I Expenditure: Cost Center Number 1 Object Code Number Amount 1 Community Development Block Grant 71-32062 Housing Condition Survey 2590 $ (20,947.54) 171-32099 CDBG Cost Overrun 1 2590 $ 20,947.54 ' 1 1 71-33041 Sara Daft Home 2590 $ (13,500.00) 171-33043 Neighborhood House Day Cart 2590 $ (3,106.00) ,71-33099 CDBG Cost Overrun 2590 1 $ 16,606.00 171-34011 Assist 2590 I $ (16,031.88) 71-34013.Fourth Street Clinic 2590 $ (3,512.60) i 71-34014 Community Development Corp 2590 i $ (0.02); 71-34024 Services for Seniors 2590 ' $ (6,231.95) '71-34026 Rape Recovery Center 2590 $ • • (20.31) ;71-34036 Multicultural Leal Center 2590 $ (10.00y :71-34046 Utah Health and Human Right. 2590 - $ (5,290,24)1 171-34048 Neighborhood House Adult Da 2590 $ (75.00) 171-34099 CDBG Cost Overrun 1 2590 $ 31,172.00 , 172-60612 HOPWA Admin J 2590 ' $ (28.00) 172-606 New HOPWA Cost Overrun FYI 2590 i ; $ 28.00 i72-60811 SLC CAP Emergency Housing 2590 $ (148.20)1 '72-60819 HOPWA Cost Overrun FY 08 2590 $ 148.20 1 72-60911 SL CAP 2590 ' $ (4,726.60) j72-60913 Robert Willey 2590 ! I $ (4,102.00)1 '72-60914 Utah AIDS Foundation 2590 $ (8,657.38) j 72-60915 West Valley TBRA 2590 I 1 $ (9,708.77)' 72-60918 Salt Lake County HA TBRA 2590 ' $ (18,076.38) ,72-60919 Housing Authority of SLCity 2590 1 $ (16,510.00) 72-609 NEW HOPWA Cost Overrun FY 09 $ 61,781.13 72-60924 Odyssey House 2590 $ (1,750.00) 1 72-60928 YWCA Residential Self Sufficie 2590 $ (0.33) ,72-609 NEW ESG Cost Overrun FY09 2590 1 $ 1,750.33 1 1 i 72-60791 Housing Authority I 2590 ! $ (3,425.00) 172-607 NEW HOME Cost Overrun FY071 2590 I , $ 3,425.00 '72-60904 The Road Home TBRA 2590 $ (3,965.01) 172-609 NEW HOME Cost Overrun FY09 2590 i $ 3,965.01 178-33032 ADDI Neighborhood Housing S! 2590 - $ (1,439.00) 78-330 NEW HOME Cost Overrun 2590 ' $ 1,439.00 I 1 'DELETE REMAINING BUDGET; NO CASH 1 72-60791 Housing Authority 2590 $ (3,425.00) 178-33029 HOME CY funded by City PI ! 2590 i $ (25,000.00) Initiative#D-6-b 71-25055 Multi-Family Housing 2590 $ (201,421.89) 72-60427 HOPWA Holding 2590 $ (61,221.49) 172-60301 NHS CHDO 2590 $ (0.03) 1 $ 291,068.41 Additional Accounting Details: 1 1 Grant Information: ;Grant funds employee positions? NA ;Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA 1 If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? I NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-6-b Initiative Name: Encumbrance Carryover - Operations and Environmental and Energy Refuse Fund Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-7 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: State law requires that all budgets, except the Capital Project Fund, lapse at June 30th of each fiscal year end. Historically, purchase orders encumbered at the end of the fiscal year are re-appropriated in the next fiscal year. Because the budget from the prior fiscal year lapsed, it is necessary to again appropriate funds to cover the purchase commitments made in the prior year and paid in the current year. The funding source for this type of transaction is the fund balance. This amendment request will appropriate budget in the Operations and Environmental and Energy Refuse Fund of$28,608. Initiative#D-7 Encumbrance Carryover-Operations and Environmental and Energy Refuse Fund Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-7 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Administrative Services Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative Teresa Beckstrand 535-6416 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- ] Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: FY 2009-2010 Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total! $0 $01 Internal Service Fund Total $01 $01 'Enterprise Fund I � Total $0 $0 Other Fund i I Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0' 01 !Position Title: 1 Initiative#D-7-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount II I it I� Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 57-11700 2329 $ 4,250.00 57-11700 2336-06 $ 111.00 57-11700 ( 2760-90 I $ 21,209.00 57-11200 2295 I $ 40.00 57-11200 2299 $ 204.00 57-11420 2221 ' $ 91.00 57-11600 j 22275 , $ 514.00 57-11600 239614 $ 2,005.00 57-11600 254970 $ 184.00 Additional Accounting Details: I i Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) ! �I I Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? (Yes or No) I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 'Non-profit sector? I (Yes or NO) I j Initiative#D-7-b Initiative Name: Donation Fund Carryover Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-8 House Keeping Initiative Discussion: City Council has in the past approved carryover budgets in these funds in order to continue the use of funds for which they were donated. After June 30, 2009, by state law, the spending authority of any remaining amounts held by these funds lapsed. Without Council action, the City cannot continue these programs. It is recommended that the Council approve the net cash balance carryover budgets for these donations special revenue funds. initiative#D-8 Donation Fund Carryover Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-8 2009-10 Initiative Number ! _ Fiscal Year Administrative Services • House Keeping Department Type of Initiative Elwin Heilmann 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- j Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount •General Fund Total $0 $01 Internal Service Fund I i � Total! $0 $01 l Enterprise Fund 'I I • Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total $ - $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of ! 0 Position Title: ,II • � I Initiative#D-8-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: • Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount � I t I I � I i Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I77 Donations Fund 2590 $ 1,617,396.77 • I � I � i I I Additional Accounting Details: 'Detail by cost center is at Administrative services. I I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA I Is there a potential for grant to continue? • NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or II Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#D-8-b Initiative Name: Grants and Other Spec Rev Carryover Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative D-9 House Keeping Initiative Discussion: City Council has in the past approved carryover budgets in these funds in order to complete the started projects. After June 30, 2009, the spending authority of any remaining amounts held by these funds lapsed. Without Council action, the City cannot finish the started projects. It is recommended that the Council approve the carryover budgets for these grants and other special revenue funds • Initiative#n-A Grants and Other Spec Rev Carryover Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative D-9 • 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Administrative Services House Keeping Department Type of Initiative Elwin Heilmann 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund • i Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund I Total $0' $0' 'Enterprise Fund • Housing Loans I $ 1,012,037.42 Total l $1,012,037.42 $01 i Other Fund CDBG Operating $ 1,585,687.82 Miscellaneous Grants $ 8,238,634.33 Other Sp. Revenue I $ - I I Total $ 9,824,322.15 ' $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: i Position Title: I I ' I � I ' I I I I II . Initiative#D-9-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 78 Housing Loans Fund various $ 1,012,037.42 171 CDBG Operating j 1310 $ 1,585,687.82 72 Miscellaneous Grants various $ 8,238,634.33 73 Other Special Revenue None $ - I 1 1 $ 10,836,359.57 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 78 Housing Loans Fund 2950 $ 1,940,161.89 '71 CDBG Operating 2590 $ 1,585,687.82 72 Miscellaneous Grants 2590 $ 11,130,433.86 73 Other Special Revenue 2590 $ 1,114,191.55 III I $ 15,770,475.12 I I , Additional Accounting Details: 'Detail amounts by cost center is at Administrative Services 1 Grant Information: •Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA I I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are • eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? ! NA Initiative#D-9-b Initiative Name: US Depart of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Water Conservation & Fireflow Project Initiative Number: • BA#1 FY201O Initiative #E-1 Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Public Utilities applied for and received a $300,000 grant from the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation for infrastructure improvements for Phase 2 of the Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Water Conservation and Fireflow Project. Phase 2 of this project constructs 11,200 ft of water pipeline which allows full conversion of a 1,758 acre area served by open canal irrigation to pressure irrigation. It is a multi jurisdictional collaboration with Murray City, Holladay City, Cottonwood Heights and unincorporated areas of Salt Lake County and is the result of a 2008 cooperative agreement between the City and Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Company (BC Tanner). The agreement with BC Tanner and construction of this project resolves decades old water disputes with BC Tanner; quiets title of over 8,926 acre-feet (af) of water rights to the City; retires over 2,800 af of contractual delivery by open canal thereby eliminating approximately 1,400 af of seepage and evaporation losses; creates over 4,263 marketable water vouchers; converts 1,421 customer accounts from unmetered open ditch flood irrigation to metered pressurized sprinkler irrigation; establishes a "water budget" for each share/voucher holder; and improves public safety by increasing fire flows to meet current code requirement within the collaborated area. The construction project includes design, easement acquisition, final design and construction of the pipeline, including replacement of water service connections, meters, fire hydrants and ancillary facilities. The total project cost is estimated at $1,460,767. The remaining $1,160,767 is budgeted for within Public Utilities enterprise funds. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept Bureau of Reclamation related grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#F-1 US Depart of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Water Conservation & Fireflow Project Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#E-1 2009-10 • Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grant Requiring No New Public Utilities Staff Resources Department Type of Initiative Tom Ward /Sherrie Collins 483-6768/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None • Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund i I Total $0' I $0J Internal Service Fund Total $0; $0 Enterprise Fund i r Total $01 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 300,000.00 Total ! $ 300,000.00 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: I Position Title: • I I • Initiative#E-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 15.507 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 172- 1360 $ 300,000.00 1 I , I ' I i ' Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount .72 2700 $ 300,000.00 • I I 1 Additional Accounting Details: I I i I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA I i I J If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? i NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 'Non-profit sector? NA Initiative#E-1-b Initiative Name: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #E-2 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Housing and Neighborhood Development Division has been notified that an award of $1,680,347 under HUDS, HPRP, Title XII of the American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act") will be appropriated to Salt Lake City. THE HPRP is a three year grant focused on housing for homeless and at-risk households. The funds are intended to target individuals and families who are currently in housing but are at risk of becoming homeless and need temporary rent or utility assistance (prevention); and individuals and families who are homeless and need temporary assistance in order to obtain housing and retain it (rapid re- housing). Of these funds $558,450 will be used for homelessness prevention financial assistance and $206,550 for housing relocation and stabilization services; $594,000 for rapid re-housing financial assistance and $171,000 for housing relocation and stabilization services; $70,000 for data collection and evaluation and $80,347 for administration. RFP's for service providers have been received and the CDCIP Board has made their recommendations to the Mayor. A public hearing has been scheduled for August 11 and the Council will finalize on August 18. Housing and Neighborhood Development is waiting for the notice to proceed from HUD but has been informed of the amount the City can expect to receive. The budget to expend these funds is being requested now in order to move forward once the notice is received, to meet the November requirement of HUD to have the programs up and running. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the HUD related grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#E-2 I Development(HUD), Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Programs (HPRP) Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#E-2 2009-10 Initiative Number • Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Management Services Resources Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund I � Totall, $0 $01 Enterprise Fund Totall $0I $0 I Other Fund $ 1,680,347.00 Total $ 1,680,347.00 ! $0 ! I i Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 I FTE's: I Position Title: Initiative#E-2-a 1 Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 14.257 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 1360 $ 1,680,347.00 � I II I 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 i 2590 $ 1,680,347.00 • I 1 1 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? . Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#E-2-b SALT LAKE CITY RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS RAPID RE-HOUSING HPRP RECOMMENDATIONS - # ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION REQUEST CDCIP MAYOR COUNCIL 1 The Road Home Funds will be used for rental assistance, deposit assistance, 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 210 South Rio Grande case management, data collection and administrative costs. Rapid Re-Housing Program Financial Assistance: 594,000 Housing Relocation&Stabilization Services: 171,000 Data collection and Evaluation: 35,000 Administration Costs: 20,000 2 SLC HAND Funds will be used to administer the HPRP grant and for 20,000 20,173 20,173 20,173 Administration&Training training expenses. TOTAL REQUESTED AMOUNT 840,000 840,173 840,173 840,173 GRANT AMOUNT 840,173 840,173 840,173 840,173 DIFFERENCE 173 0 0 SALT LAKE CITY HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM 1 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION HPRP RECOMMENDATIONS ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION REQUEST CDCIP MAYOR COUNCIL 1 Catholic Community Services Funds will be used to provide rental assistance,help with 136,651 0 0 0 437 West 200 South salary costs for increased capacity building through expanding case management,and data collection. St.Vincent de Paul Emergency Services Financial Assistance: 100,000 Housing Stabilization and Relocation Services: 35,000 Data Collection and Evaluation: 1,651 2 Salt Lake Community Action Program Funds will be used for financial assistance,housing relocation and 837,922 820,000 820,000 820,000 764 South 200 West stabilization assistance,case management,data collection and administrative costs. Prevention Program Financial Assistance: 558,000 Housing Relocation&Stabilization Services: 206,000 Data Collection and Evaluation: 49,797 Administration Costs: 24,125 3 Family Promise-Salt Lake Funds will be used for rental assistance,utility payments,fees and 36,200 0 0 0 814 West 800 South other barriers to housing retention,case management,data collection and administrative costs. Housing Retention Program Financial Assistance. 25,500 Housing Stabilization&Relocation Services: 8,000 Data Collection and Evaluation: 1,000 Administration Costs: 1,700 4 SLC HAND Funds will be used to administer the HPRP grant and for 20,000 20,174 20,174 20,174 Administration 8 and Training subgrantee HPRP training expenses. TOTAL REQUESTED AMOUNT 1,030,773 840,174 840,174 840,174 GRANT AMOUNT 840,174 840,174 840,174 840,174 DIFFERENCE -190,599 0 0 0 Initiative Name: Department of Justice, FY09 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #E-3 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received $4,050,814 under the Department of Justice FY09 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. It was awarded to provide operational support and services to valley wide jurisdictions in the eligible areas of law enforcement, crime prevention and drug courts, The City will act as the lead fiscal agent and will distribute funds to the other local jurisdictions based on the grant application and award. Of the $4,050,814 the PD will retain $1,610,150 to be used as follows: $40,000 sworn personnel training; $20,000 civilian personnel training; $100,000 direct Community Policing overtime of 2222 hours @ $45.00 per hour; contractual components of $50,000 for the Restorative Justice Project with SLCo Criminal Justice and $15,000 for Salt Lake Peer Court; $10,000 for Crime Prevention/Mobile Watch supplies; $140,000 for 12 moth Aircards for 235 @ $49.65 per month; and $1,235,150 for E-Ticketing and traffic accident reporting for 200 officers @ $6,175.75. The remainder of funds will be distributed as follows: $678,627 to the Salt Lake County Sherriffs Office; $595,576 to West Valley City PD; $219,226 to South Salt Lake PD; $205,010 to West Jordan City PD; $185,556 to Murray City PD; $187,801 Sandy City PD; $181,815 to Taylorsville City PD; $118,966 Midvale City PD; $32,921 Draper City PD; and $35,166 to South Jordan City PD. This is a four year grant which requires no match. A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the HUD related grants and any additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant. Initiative#E-3 I Department of Justice, FY09 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Program Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#E-3 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff SLC Police Department Resources Department Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total ! $0 $0 Internal Service Fund • I I � Total $0 $01 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 $ 4,050,814.00 I' 1 Total $ 4,050,814.00 $01 Staffing Impact: I Requested Number of ! 01 FTE's: Position Title: I � i • I i 1 'I 'I 1 li I I �I Initiative#E-3-a ! I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2009-SB-B9-1411 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 1360 $ 4,050,814.00 , 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 ) 2590 $ 4,050,814.00 � ' I I I ; Additional Accounting Details: I i Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No !Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? No ! I Initiative#E-3-b Initiative Name: US Department of Energy (DOE), Recovery Act-Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #E-4 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Management Services Sustainability Division has been notified that a $2,116,500 US DOE, Recovery Act, EECBG will be appropriated to Salt Lake City. The objective of the City's grant is to educate and reduce Salt Lake City's energy use and emissions and increase the quantity of renewable enegy produced in the City. To do this, the Sustainability Division proposes to allocate $263,202 to hire one or more consultants to assist with long-term planning, policy development, education and outreach for energy use, efficiency and conservation; $479,372 to develop and produce an Energy Revolving Loan Fund; $213,435 for traffic signal mangement; $274,647 for construction of the Bicycle Transit Center; $172,052 to complete revisions to building codes and inspections that support an energy efficiency and energy conservation regulatory framework for SLC; $564,575 to purchase and install LED traffic signals, street lights and holiday lights throughout the City; and $37,745 to install a solar hot water system at Fire Station#8. Management Services is waiting for the official loan agreement from but has been informed of the amount the City can expect to receive. The budget to expend these funds is being requested now in order to move forward once the loan agreement is in place to meet the November requirement of the Recovery Act to have contracts awarded or be under construction. Initiative#E-5 US Department of Energy(DOE), Recovery Act-Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG) Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#E-4 _ 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff Management Services Resources Department Type of Initiative Renee Zollinger/Sherrie Collins 535-7215/ 535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount !General Fund I � Total $0 $01 Internal Service Fund Total ! $0' $0 !Enterprise Fund j I � I Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72 j $ 2,116,500.00 Total $ 2,116,500.00 $0 I I ! I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: 'Position Title: I � I I f � I I I i Initiative#E-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 1370 $ 2,116,500.00 i I i l I � I I I � I I I I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount 72 2590 $ 2,116,500.00 I i ii Additional Accounting Details: I I Grant Information: I Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? { Yes I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I I No Initiative#E-5-b Initiative Name: Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security - 2008 Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)Grant Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #E-5 Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received $190,184 under the Utah Department of Public Safety, Homeland Security BZPP Grant. It is awarded on an annual basis to local PD's to purchase equipment for "Buffer Zone Sites" or key local facilities that the PD has been tasked to protect. These are local facilities that could be vulnerable or targeted in the event of a terrorist or weapons of mass destruction attack and have been authorized and approved under the US Department of Homeland Security to be eligible for equipment. These funds will be used to purchase the following equipment: $83,184 for 10 video cameras and $4,000 for installation; $34,000 for 1 hardware, computer server and $2,000 for installation; $13,500 for 3 video display units; $15,000 for 1 video feed management system; $10,000 for 1 target motion cueing system; $2,500 for 1 portable radio; $2,000 for 1 radio base; and $8,000 for 1 video camera; $7,000 for 1 vehicle borne mast for video camera and $9,000 for deep search metal detector. • A Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the HUD related grants and any additional grants or agreements that stern from the original grant. Initiative#F-Ri 1 I Division of Homeland Security -2008 Buffer Zone Protection Program • (BZPP)Grant 1 I Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#E-5 2009-10 Initiative Number j • Fiscal Year Grants for Existing Staff SLC Police Department Resources Department Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150 Prepared By j Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund 1 1 Total $0 $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 I Enterprise Fund 1 1 Total) $0' $01 1 Other Fund 72 $ 190,184.00 Total I $ 190,184.00 $01 I ! I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 01 FTE's: Position Title: • I I I Initiative#E-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 97.078-BZP 8 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I ! Amount 72 1370 $ 190,184.00 . i I I I ' Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 2590 $ 190,184.00 I I I � � I I I I � Additional Accounting Details: I I Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? No I I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA ' I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will • !be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or !Non-profit sector? No I I Initiative#E-5-b Initiative Name: National Trust for Historic Preservation - Fisher Mansion Initiative Number: BA#1 FY201O Initiative #G-1 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The CED Planning Division working with Salt Lake City Solutions, applied for and received a $4,037.50 grant from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. These funds were awarded as match to the $10,000 Zion's donation to hire a consultant to complete an historic structures report for the Fisher Mansion site. The report will be used to guide the historic rehabilitation of the primary dwelling and carriage house and will aid in the decision of an appropriate use of the property. It will include existing conditions, damage, structural problems, materials deterioration, analysis of mechanical units, etc. The report will also include an estimate of bringing the structure up to local code. The grant requires a 100% match which will be satisfied with the $10,000 Zion's donation. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-1 National Trust for Historic Preservation -Fisher Mansion Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-1 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent CED -Planning Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Robin Zeigler-Sherrie Collins 535-7758/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund Total $0! $0I ,Internal Service Fund I I Total l $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0' $01 Other Fund Total $0 $0 I I Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • I I I ' 1 I Initiative#G-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I � � � I i ! I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 4,037.50 I I � I � I Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? ! I Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I ' I be eliminated at the end of the grant?I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes • � I 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-1-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-2 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Mayor's Office applied for and received a $3,810.00 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) from the State of Utah, CCJJ. The Mayor's Office is currently developing a standing, comprehensive program, the "Salt Lake City Gang Reduction Program", with a Steering Committee that will be tasked with developing the program by implementing best practices -in the areas of gang prevention,, intervention and suppression. The purpose of this grant is to send a multi-agency team to the Comprehensive Gang Model Training conducted by the Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency, Prevention (OJJDP). The funding will be used for travel expenses of the City's team to attend the training. The City's five member team consists of representatives from the Mayor's Office, the SLC Gang Unit, Third District Court Juvenile Probation, Colors of Success and NeighborWor-ks Salt lake. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. • Initiative#G-2 ICI State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice(CCJJ) Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-2 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Mayor's Office Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Michael Stott 535-7976 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) ' Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0' $0 Internal Service Fund ' I Total) $0' ! $01 Enterprise Fund � I Total $0 $01 Other Fund - • I i I Total $0, $0� l — 1 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: I I I I II II I Initiative#G-2-a I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 3,810.00 Additional Accounting Details: � I I Grant Information: iGrant funds employee positions? No I �'Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will ,be eliminated at the end of the grant?; i NA I 4 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 'Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-2-b Initiative Name: Utah State Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands - Pervious Pavement Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-3 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The City's Urban Forestry Division received a $5,000 grant from the Utah State Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands for the City's Wasatch Touring Pervious Pavement Demonstration. This project included repavement of the parking lot at 702 E. 100 South ( home of Wasatch Touring) with pervious pavement and involves pass through funding from the State and Private foresty arm of the US Forest Services. Pervious pavement allows water and air to pass through decreasing ground level ozone pollution and fosters diffusion of life-sustaining oxygen into the soil. The project was a joint effort with Psomas, Jack B. Parson's Companies, Bunyan Industries, Morgan Excavating and William Flower of the University of Utah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering who paid all costs associated with the project. The City will reimburse the partners $1,000 each. • Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. • Initiative#G-3 Utah State Division of Forestry, Fire& State Lands - Pervious Pavement Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-3 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Bill Rutherford/Sherrie Collins 535-1901/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) i Positive .General Fund -Fund Balance- j None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund Total $0, • $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 $0! Enterprise Fund • Total $0• $01 Other Fund � I Total $0 $0 I j I i Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • • I I I I I � I I Initiative#G-3-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I I I , I - I i Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 5,000.00 • I � Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? I Yes ,Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-3-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant - Fairmont Park Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-4 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,500 grant from the Utah State Department of Work Force Services, Youth Connections Grant, under the Child Care Development Discretionary Fund program. This grant is year one of a possible three year grant funding period. Of this amount, $22,509 of the funds will be used to pay a portion of the full time site coordinators salary and benefits at the Fairmont Park YouthCity site, $2,794 will be used for phone services, printing, copying, computers and miscellaneous supplies, and $3,090 will be used to purchase snacks that are an essential program expense, and $2,107 will be used to pay for 30 youth to participate in fee based activities. The purpose of this grant is to create, expand, and support out-of-school time programs for at-risk elementary school-age youth, through age 12. A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Managers salary, benefits • and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund budget. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-4 I I ii I State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant- Fairmont Park Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-4 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive ,General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund I I I Total $01 $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0 i $0 I Enterprise Fund I Total ' $0 $0 )Other Fund ! i i - Total) $0' $01 I I Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • I J - I 1 I - i I I I Initiative#G-4-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount II �I I I I 1 i I � I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 ' 2590 $ 30,500.00 I I Additional Accounting Details: - 1 I Grant Information: I Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?1 NA i ,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or ;Non-profit sector? No 1 Initiative#G-4-b • Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant - Central City Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-5 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,500 grant from the Utah State Department of Work Force Services, Youth Connections Grant, under the Child Care Development Discretionary Fund program. This grant is year one of a possible three year grant funding period. Of this amount, $29,000 of the funds will be used to pay a portion of the full time site coordinators salary and benefits and five seasonal positions at the Central City YouthCity site, and $1,500 will be used to purchase snacks that are an essential program expense. The purpose of this grant is to create, expand, and support out-of-school time programs for at-risk elementary school-age youth through age 12. A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Managers salary, benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund budget. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-5 I I I • State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant-Central-City Initiative Name 1 BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-5 I 200940 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services Agenda - Grant Award Department j Type of Initiative Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total J $0 i $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0! $0 Enterprise Fund • Total $0 $0 Other Fund Total ! $0! $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of • 0 FTE's: I i l Initiative#G-5-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount ' � I ' I ' 1 j I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount '72-99999 2590 $ 30,500.00 I J Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: _ !Grant funds employee positions? No r Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will )be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? ; I Yes ' 1 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No I i Initiative#G-5-b Initiative Name: Utah State University, Interagency Outreach Training Initiative (IOTI) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-6 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applies for and receives these funds from the Utah State University on an annual basis. Funding is awarded to continue and further Officer Crisis Intervention Team Training/Certification. This training deals with crisis mediation and intervention as it pertains to law enforcement issues and persons who have serious mental illness or developmental disabilities. statewide and will be spent as follows: $6,080 Officer overtime for two (2) Detectives. This amount reflects approximately 72 hours @ $42.22 per hour-for two (2).Detectives to attend,train and promote this program. The training provides educational information pertaining to mental illnesses, specific This award requires a $6,000 match which is budgeted:for within the Police Departments general fund budget and will be used to pay for supplies, facility costs, and snacks. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-6 Utah State University, Interagency Outreach Training Initiative (IOTI) Initiative Name I BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-6 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Police Department Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Krista DunnlSherrie Collins 799-32651353-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) I Positive 'General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund Total I $0 $0I 'Internal Service Fund • Total $0 $01 'Enterprise Fund Total $0' $0, • Other Fund Total i $0 $0 Staffing Impact: i Requested Number of ! 0 ;FTE's: Initiative#G-6-a I I , Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I I ! Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 172-99999 2590 $ 25,000.00 I � Additional Accounting Details: I i I - L Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No 'Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes _ 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? I Yes (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or , !Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-6-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant - Ottinger Hall Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-7 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,500 grant from the Utah State Department of Work Force Services, Youth Connections Grant, under the Child Care Development Discretionary Fund program. This grant is year one of a possible three year grant funding period. Of this amount, $24,403 of the funds will be used to pay a portion of the full time site coordinators salary and benefits and three seasonal positions at the Ottinger Hall YouthCity site, $3,097 will be used for phone services, printing, copying, computer service and miscellaneous supplies, and $3,000 will be used to purchase snacks that are an essential program expense. The purpose of this grant is to create, expand, and support out-of-school time programs for at-risk elementary school-age youth through age 12. A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Managers salary, benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund budget. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-7 State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant-Ottinger Hall • Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-7 2009-10 Initiative Number j Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services Agenda - Grant Award Department IType of Initiative Kim Thomas/Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) H Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund I L I _ Total $0' $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 i $01 l Enterprise Fund Total I $0 $0 'Other Fund T I I Total $0 $01 Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • Initiative#G-7-a i I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I I ' � I _ I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 30,500.00 Additional Accounting Details: rT I � I - I _ Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No I I i Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? j Yes 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-7-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant - Liberty Park Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-8 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,500 grant from the Utah State Department of. Work Force Services, Youth Connections Grant, under the Child Care Development Discretionary Fund program. This grant is year one of a possible three year grant funding period. Of this amount, $27,723 of the funds will be used to pay a portion of the full time site coordinators salary and benefits and five seasonal positions at the Liberty Park YouthCity site, $1,277 used for phone services, printing, copying, computer service and miscellaneous supplies, and $1,500 will be used to purchase snacks that are an essential program expense. The purpose of this grant is to create, expand, and support out-of-school time programs for at-risk elementary school-age youth through age 12. A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Managers salary, benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund budget. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-8 State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Youth Connections Grant-Liberty Park Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-8 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Kim Thomas J Sherrie Collins 535-6129/535-6150 Prepared By ; Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0' $0 ;Enterprise Fund Total $0' $0' Other Fund Total $0 $0 i I I Staffing Impact: (Requested Number of I 0 'FTE's: Initiative#G-8-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I , r 7 Expenditure: Cost Center Number I j Object Code Number Amount • 72-99999 I 2590 $ 30,500.00 I � Additional Accounting Details: I I C Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA 1 Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? j Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-8-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Human Services, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Program Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-9 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Police Department received .a $75,000 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Human Services for continuation and expansion of the statewide Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training to administer, coordinate, and promote CIT trainingyefforts throughout the State. • This grant will provide funding to cover costs associated with attending and conducting CIT Academies, recertification classes, program administration and continued training for -the City's Program Director, Coordinator and Regional Coordinators. The CIT program was initiated to assist Law Enforcement Officers in effectively dealing with persons experiencing mental health crisis. These funds will be used as follows: $13,200 will be used to pay overtime costs of the Program Director and CIT Coordinator while conducting CIT Academies, making presentations throughout the State and representing the interest of the CIT Program on numerous councils and committees; $6,755 will be used for travel and lodging of the Program Director and CIT Coordinator to conduct out of town CIT presentations, Academies, and planning and development conferences to market the program throughout the State; $5,430 will be used for supplies, materials, manuals, certification pins, handouts, etc., used at the Academies; $31,565 will be used for travel by the Program Director and CIT Coordinator to attend local and national CIT educational trainings; and $18,050 for contractual presenters at the Academies. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-9 State of Utah, Department of Human Services, Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Program Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-9 2009-10 Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year Council Consent Police Department Agenda - Grant Award Department j Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-32651353-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact _ (Negative) Positive (General Fund - Fund Balance- j None Impact • Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount (General Fund ' I � T 1 Total $0' I $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0, ;Enterprise Fund � � I Total $0 $01 Other Fund — I I I � I ' I Total l $0 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: I i • • I _ Initiative#G-9-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount • Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 75,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: � I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No 'Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will • be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA I Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes . I Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? j Yes (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? I No I , Initiative#G-9-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-10 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award initiative Discussion: The SLCPD applied for and received a $20,000 grant award from State of Utah, CCJJ, under the Asset Forfeiture program. Of this amount, $10,000 will be used to purchase one (1) Oculus Recording System to record audio/video drug transactions for court purposes and one (1) transmitter to be worn by an undercover officer during narcotics buys for audio evidence; $4,000 will be to send two (2) Detectives to the California Narcotics Officer's Association (CNOA) Conference in San Francisco, CA.; and $6,000 will be used for narcotics buy money to provide evidence of illegal drug deals. The narcotics unit has developed informants capable of purchasing narcotics from several larger drug organizations within Salt Lake City. These types of investigations can require larger buys than what is routine for the squad. These funds will allow the PD to pursue these larger drug organizations, enabling the department to conduct mid-level buys, that provide evidence of more serious drug crimes. There is no match requirement. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-10 State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice(CCJJ), State Asset Forfeiture Grant Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-10 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Police Department Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/353-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund ! I Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total T $0 $01 'Enterprise Fund Total $0' i $0 Other Fund Total i $0 $0 Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • ' I I Initiative#G-10-a 1 I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount • ' I I I f I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72 99999 2590 $ 20,000.00 • I I I Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No 'Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes !If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? j NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-1 0-b Initiative Name: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control - Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Agency (HIDTA) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-11 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Police Department applied for and received a $63,450 Rocky Mountain HIDTA grant from the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control. The SLCPD receives this grant on annual basis and will continue to fund the salary and benefits of two (2) Investigative Law Enforcement Officers assigned to the Metro Narcotics/Drug Enforcement Task Force to address drug issues throughout the Valley. There is no match requirement. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-11 • Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control - Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Agency(HIDTA) • Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-11 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Police Department Agenda - Grant Award Department ! Type of Initiative Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/353-6150 Prepared By ! Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount 'General Fund ' Total $0 1 $0 (Internal Service Fund ! f Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0' $01 Other Fund Total $0'1 • $0 I I Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0 i FTE's: li Initiative#G-11-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount I ' � I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 63,450.00 I ' • � I Additional Accounting Details: 1 Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? No i Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? ; No Initiative#G-11-b Initiative Name: Art Works for Kids Grant -YouthCity Artways Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-12 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award • Initiative Discussion: YouthCity Artways through the Salt Lake City Foundation applied for and received a $5,000 grant from the artworks for kids! Private Foundation. These funds were awarded to YouthCity Artways to provide visual art Imagination Celebration workshops to teachers, students and their families in schools within the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD). The workshops will include two 1.5 hour professional development workshops for approximately 100 elementary school teachers to be taught during the Utah Education Association (UEA) Conference weekend and will include a hands on art project, discussions of the art making process, a lesson plan book and art supplies to replicate the art project in the classroom; ten professional development workshops for approximately 200 elementary school teachers will be taught as a part of a professional development day or faculty meeting and will include a hands on art project, lesson plan book and art supplies to replicate the art project; and ten art-making workshops for students and their families will be conducted at elementary schools in the SLCSD. The funds will be used to for instructor hourly wages, lesson plan books and art supplies for all workshops. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-12 I 'I Art Works for Kids Grant-YouthCity Artways Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-12 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Public Services • Agenda - Grant Award Department j Type of Initiative Ken Perko/Sherrie Collins 535-65001353-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) i I Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact V Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount j General Fund ' I � � Total $0 $01 (Internal Service Fund Total $0' I $0 'Enterprise Fund Total ! $01 $0 Other Fund Total( E so $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: • ' I 1 , Initiative#G-12-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 5,000.00 • Additional Accounting Details: I i , • Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-12-b Initiative Name: Utah Department of Public Safety - 2009 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-13 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Emergency Management Services Division received a $11,791 project grant from the Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security. This grant is awarded on an annual basis to jurisdictions to help offset costs of planning and updating emergency preparedness plans, conduct emergency preparedness exercises and produce materials and other media for public educational outreach and CERT training pertaining to emergency preparedness. SLC's population increases from 180,000 to an estimated 310,000 each workday. Should a disaster occur during the workday, business employees become a part of the SLC emergency response, but are not trained to assist themselves or others. The CERT program was recently transferred from the Fire Department to Emergency Management Services. These funds will offset costs in providing CERT Training to local businesses. The funds will be used for contracting with trainers, purchase training materials, supplies and equipment including books, brochures, handouts, community giveaways such as pencils to be handed out at community activities and fire departments for school and youth tours and projection screens and equipment as funding permits. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-13 Utah Department of Public Safety- . 2009 Emergency Management . Performance Grant(EMPG) Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-13 2009-10 Initiative Number • Fiscal Year Council Consent Management Services Agenda - Grant Award Department Type of Initiative Cory Lyman/Sherrie Collins 535-1901/353-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) ! I Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund I I I Total I $0 i $0 'Internal Service Fund � I Total $0i $0' Enterprise Fund Total $0; I $0 Other Fund Total $0! $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of • I 0 I FTE's: it • I I I I Initiative#G-13-a I I Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount � � f � � I I I� Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 11,791.00 I ' Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes ,If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA • (Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes � I � Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes I 1 Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? j No Initiative#G-13-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Utah Department of Health - Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-14 Initiative Type: Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs applied for and received a $10,440 grant from the State of Utah, Department of Health under the Tobacco Prevention and Control Mini Grant program. To achieve the purposes of this grant, the Mayor's Coalition will collaborate with the Coalition of Tobacco Free Utah (CTFU), Salt Lake Valley Health Department (SLVHD), Utah Department of Health's Tobacco Prevention & Control Program (T1CP), and Environmental Epidemiology Sanitation Program (ESP), in a smoke-free policy campaign aimed at assisting existing multiple dwelling units (MUD's) within the Rose Park and Glendale areas, to adopt smoke-free policies and for the city to develop planning polices or ordinances that will protect public health. The grant objective is to establish a list of at least 12 low-income MUD's identified through owner/manger telephone and tenant surveys with the greatest likelihood to adopt smoke-free polices with the objective of at least 3 of the 12 MUD's adopting a limited smoke-free building policy and at least 1 going completely smoke free; conduct educational trainings and meetings with City Council and other city policy makers; and develop and air in English and Spanish PSA's on SLC-Channel 17, Telemonund and KRCL. The grant funding will be used to purchase aluminum "No Smoking" signage, Wal-Mart incentive cards for dwelling managers and tenants, educational materials and kits, printing, translation services, stipends for two interns to conduct telephone and tenant survey's and mileage for travel to meetings and trainings. All air time of PSA's.will be donated. Already funded by grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-14 State of Utah, Utah Department of Health -Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-14 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Mayor's Office Agenda - Grant Award • Department I Type of Initiative Abbie Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-7936/353-6150 Prepared By j Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund i Total $0' $0 Internal Service Fund 1 i l i Total T $0 $01 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $01 Other Fund i � 1 Total f $0 $01 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of j 0i i FTE's: • • • ' I ' ; I 1 j Initiative#G-14-a I I i Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2590 $ 10,440.00 ! I i I j Additional Accounting Details: I � I � I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? ! No • Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA ' (Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? Yes 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or .Non-profit sector? No Initiative#G-14-b Initiative Name: State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality -Jordan River Stream Restore Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #G-15 Council Consent Agenda - Grant Award Initiative Discussion: The Management Services Sustainability Division has been notified that a 100% principal forgiveness loan of $577,500 under the State of Utah Division of Water Quality, American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("Recovery Act") Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund will be appropriated to Salt Lake City. The purpose of this funding is to restore and enhance the water quality and stream bank stability along the Jordan River at four sites. The sites include the east bank at 561 So. 1100 W.; the south bank at 1175 So. 1085 W.; the south-west bank at 1552 So. 1200 W.; and the north bank at 2050 So. 1240 W. The project will restore approximately 502 feet of bank along the Jordan River. The City will contract with the County for construction. The Sustainability Division is requesting budget to accommodate the award in order to meet the November 15 requirement of the State Recovery Act, to have the construction contract awarded or be under construction. Already funded by Grant holding account. This request will reimburse the grant holding account. Initiative#G-15 State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality-Jordan River • • Stream Restore Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#G-15 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Council Consent Management Services Agenda-Grant Award • Department Type of Initiative Emy Storheim/Sherrie Collins 535-7730/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) Positive !General Fund -Fund Balance- None Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount !General Fund Total $01 $0 !Internal Service Fund Total $01 $0 !Enterprise Fund I Total l $01 $0! Other Fund Total $0. $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of ; 0 FTE's: Position Title: • Initiative#G-15-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: TBD Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I I I II I 1 I I i • [I I II Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-99999 2700 $ 577,500.00 Additional Accounting Details: I I 1 I 1 I Grant Information: ' Grant funds employee positions? No !Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant?I NA I Will grant program be complete in rant fundin time frame? Yes IWlll grant impact the community once the grant funds are [eliminated? Yes I I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or ' Non-profit sector? No _ i I �I Initiative#G-15-b Initiative Name: Census 2010 Complete Count Program Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #I-1 Council Added Initiative Discussion: Council Member Christensen requests Council support in allocating $15,000 from the fund balance of the City's General Fund to the Non-departmental budget for the Census 2010 Complete Count Program. Council Member Christensen has asked the Administration to help identify criteria as to how the funding will be best used, for example, requiring matching funding or in-kind donations, etc. If approved, the monies will fund Census 2010 outreach efforts, including flyers, advertisement, etc. County personnel have indicated there are funds available to public entities ($2,500 per application) from the Denver Office of the Census 2010. The Council may wish to ask the Administration's Census Committee to assist with coordinating applications for this funding to maximize the amount received and to best utilize the resources which are available. Initiative#I-1 Census 2010 Complete Count Program Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#I-1 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year _ _ Council Council Added Department Type of Initiative Sylvia Richards 535-7656 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) - - - Positive General Fund - Fund Balance- $ (15,000.00) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fiscal Year Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total lI $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total I $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0, Other Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: Requested Number of 0 FTE's: Position Title: Initiative I-1-a Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 09-New Cost Center 2328 -- $15,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant?1 NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? 1 - NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? - 1 - - NA - - Initiative#1-1-b Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Amendment#1 —September Municipal Building Authority General Fund Impact Fiscal Year Annual Impact Fund Balance Fund Balance Initiative Name Impact Amount FTE General Fund Impact Impact Amount (If Different) Impact Positive Negative Section A New Items 1. Appropriation of Fund S1,70U,000.00 Balance to General Fund Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources Section C Grants For New Staff Resources Section D Housekeeping Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section F Donations Section G Council Consent Agenda - Grant Awards Section 1 Council Added Items Initiative Name: Municipal Building Authority -Appropriation of Fund Balance to General Fund Initiative Number: BA#1 FY2010 Initiative #D-1 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: In the Fiscal year 2010 budget $1,700,000 of revenue budget from the Municipal Building. Authority was included and approved by Council. Typically, the Municipal Building Authority budget is addressed separately, but in this year other Municipal Building Authority's budget issues were discussed as part of the overall city budget. As a result the corresponding budget for transferring cash from the Municipal Building Authority to the General fund was overlooked. in order to recognize the revenue budget and move cash to the General Fund art expense budget needs to be approved. This amendment request will appropriate budget from the Municipal Building.Authority-reserve and move it to General Fund. Initiative#D-1 • Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount t i Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 66-00032 2910-08 $ 1,700,000.00 i • I I! it Additional Accounting Details: • • I- • Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? (Yes or No) !Is there a potential for grant to continue? (Yes or No) If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will !be eliminated at the end of the grant? I (Yes or No) i Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? (Yes or No) Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? (Yes or No) I I !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or !Non-profit sector? i (Yes or NO) Initiative#D-1-b • Municipal Building Authority- Appropriation of Fund Balance to General Fund Initiative Name BA#1 FY2010 Initiative#D-1 2009-10 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Administrative Services Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative Teresa Beckstrand 535-6416 Prepared By Telephone Contact (Negative) I Positive !General Fund - Fund Balance- , Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: Fy 2009-2010 Annual Impact Amount Impact Amount General Fund Total $0 $0I 'Internal Service Fund Total! $0 $0 !Enterprise Fund I Total $0 $0 lOther Fund Total $0 $0 Staffing Impact: 'Requested Number of 0 0 i Position Title: Initiative#D-1 -a