065 of 2004 - Budget Amendment No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 . 0 04-1
•
' B 04-12
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 65 of 2004
(Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004
which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2004-2005)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 63 OF
2004 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT
LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2004 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2005.
PREAMBLE
On August. 24 , 2004, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and
finalized the budget of Salt Lake City,Utah, including the employment staffing
document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in
accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code
Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved
by the Mayor of Salt Lake City,Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and
finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.63 of 2004.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document,with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah, this 24 day of
August , 2004.
wt./we_
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
• , l'}`' •• ` _'/►.v�1`fi i
IEF DEPUT ITY RDER {,-,'j `r t• '',4' 1..
Transmitted to the Mayor on August 76, 2004
Mayor's Action: X Approved Vetoed
AYOR
ATTEST:
.4L Ail' . ‘Mg.S.,(2.-----•
WHIEF DEPUTCORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Sail Lake City Attorno s
(SEAL) Date - (v- QV
By net--
Bill No. 65 of 2004.
Published: September 4, 1004
G:\Ordinance 04\Amending budget 2005
3
• •
FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #1 —August
FY 2005 FY 2006
Initiative Gen. Fund Gen.
Initiative Name FTE Fund FTE
Amount Impact Impact
New Items
Grants Requiring Existing Staff Resources
Grants Requiring No Staff Resources
1. UDOT Traffic Mgmt Center $14,000 -0- -0-
2. National Endowment for the $25,000 -0- -0-
Arts
3. HOPWA Housing $100,000 -0- -0-
4. Modesto Park $50,000 -0- -0-
Improvements
5. Workforce Service World $2,107 -0- -0-
Refugee Day
Housekeeping Items
Salt Lake City Corporation •
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Salt Lake City Police Department 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Utah Department of Transportation BA#1 Initiative#1
Traffic Management Center
Initiative Name 799-3265/535-6150
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins Phone Number
Prepared By
Grant for no Existing Staff Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Contract#03-8461
Federal High Way Pass through Funds
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total _ $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund-72-20401 14,000.00
Total $14,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 _ $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund-72-20401 14,000.00
Total $14,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1.Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5.Capital Outlay 14,000.00
6.Other(Specify)
Total $14,000.00 $0 $0
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#1 #604 PD UDOT7/20/20043:51 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
enagement and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
NA
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#1 #604 PD UDOT7/20/20043:51 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Workteet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it maybe an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so,it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
In Budget Amendment #1 of 2003-2004, the Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) received
$45,000 of Federal Highway Administration funds from the Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT), for the purchase and installation of a Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system. The CAD is
an information sharing system allowing communication and dispatch between organizations and
jurisdictions, valley wide to provide enhancement of public safety operations. These funds are a
supplement to the original grant awarded to the Police Department.
Because UDOT had remaining funds to disburse, an amendment to the original agreement was sent
to SLCPD extending the time frame of the agreement to May 31, 2005 and increasing the amount of
the award by $14,000.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the budget in cost center 72-20401, by $14,000 to
accept the supplemental funds. A Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the original
grant agreement and any additional agreements pertaining to the grant was adopted during Budget
Opening #1 of 2003-2004.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Ma agement and Fiscal Note Work/Peet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No, funds are for equipment. What programs
are funded with this grant and what are the performance measures of each program? NA.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA -
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ?NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation
tnagement and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services-Global Artways 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
National Endowment for the Arts-Arts in Education BA#1 Initiative#2
Dance, Learn,Celebrate!
Initiative Name 972-2424/535-6150
Dan Gerhart/Sherrie Collins Phone Number
Prepared By
Grant for no Existing Staff Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Initiative Type CFDA 45.024
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
•
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund 25,000.00
Total $25,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund 25,000.00
Total $25,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services 25,000.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $25,000.00 $0 $0
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#2#604 NEA Grant7/20/20043:52 PM
• • Salt Lake City Corporation •
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
Grant Administration 1.27% $ 580.00
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#2#604 NEA Grant7/20/20043:52 PM
di Salt Lake City Corporation
Man gement and Fiscal Note Works et
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases,it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases,it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so,it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
Global Artways applied for and received this grant from the National Endowment for the Arts - Arts in
Education Program for YouthCity's Dance, Learn, Celebrate! program. This is a school and
community based arts education program for elementary-age students and youth, teachers and artist
that uses African geography, culture, and language to explore family values, social responsibility, and
cultural heritage through the medium of dance. This program is a collaborative effort with Utah based
professional dance companies, Global Artways and the Salt Lake City School District. The project is a
Children's Dance Festival to demonstrate the results of arts education through dance.
Funding will be used to contract with Chuck Davis and the African American Dance Ensemble, Ballet
West, Children's Dance Theater, Repertory Dance Theater, Ririe Woodbury Dance Company, an
external evaluator, Salt Lake City School District and grant admin, for facilitation of this program, as
funding permits. A match of $46,590 is required for this grant which will be met with donated space,
transportation of youth and classroom teachers participation by the School District, a $10,000
contribution from the Kennedy Center Imagination Celebration of Salt Lake City, various dance
companies contributions and the Visual Documentation Coordinators time.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution and budget to facilitate this
grant.
di Salt Lake City Corporation
Ma gement and Fiscal Note Works et
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2- Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3 - Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? Yes. $580. will be allocated for grant
administration and over site. What programs are funded with this grant and what are the
performance measures of each program? These funds will be used for the Global Artways
Dance, Learn Celebrate! program, which expects to serve approximately 900 students and
community youth. The anticipated outcome is for participating youths to demonstrate
proficiency in 90 percent of the State's Elementary Fine Arts Core Dance Curriculum goals.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? Possible, if funding
is available for this type of program the City will apply again next year.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ? No.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
• • Salt Lake City Corporation •
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development-HAND 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
State of Utah BA#1 Initiative#3
Department of Community&Economic Development
Housing Opportunity for People With AIDS
HOPWA
Initiative Name 535-6136/535-6150
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins Phone Number
Prepared By
Grant for no Existing Staff Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Initiative Type 14.241
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Account 100,000.00
Total $100,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Account 100,000.00
Total $100,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3.Operating and Maintenance
4.Charges and Services 100,000.00
5. Capital Outlay
6.Other(Specify)
Total $100,000.00 $0 $0
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#3#604 HOPWA Grant7/20/20043:52 PM
•
• + Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Works hee
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTC' Grade/Step' Amount
NA
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#3#604 HOPWA Grant7/20/20043:52 PM
di Salt Lake City Corporation
Ma gement and Fiscal Note Works eet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The State of Utah, Department of Community and Economic Development, has committed to award
$100,000 in supplemental HOPWA funds to the City, to be awarded to specific HOPWA programs that
the State has identified in fiscal year 2005. These funds will be combined with the City's funds and
awarded to providers to meet the needs of clientele they are currently serving.
The agencies and amounts that the State has determined to receive funds include: Salt Lake County
Housing Authority, $20,665; Salt Lake Community Action Program, $29,326; and Housing Authority of
Salt Lake City, $50,009. These Funds were awarded to Salt Lake City to avoid two agencies
monitoring the same program.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the appropriate budget to accept the supplemental
funds. A Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the original grant agreement and any
additional agreements pertaining to the grant was adopted during the normal
CDBG/HOPWA/ESG/HOME/ADDI process.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Magement and Fiscal Note Worksset
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No. What programs are funded with this grant
and what are the performance measures of each program? These funds will be disbursed to State
identified HOPWA providers who are also receiving Salt Lake City HOPWA funds in order for
the providers to meet clientele needs.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ?No.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
• • Salt Lake City Corporation •
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Community Development 2005
Department For Fiscal Year
General Fund Impact Fee Study Update Analyst Use Only
Initiative Name Initiative Number
David Dobbins 535-7236
Prepared By Phone Number
Analyst Use Only CFDA#(If Applicable)in this Cell
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
CIP-prior year funding 125,000 0 0
Total $125,000 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
CIP-Prior year funding 125,000 0 0
Total $125,000 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $0 $0 $0
Impact Fee Study Update7/20/20044:05 PM
• Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Workshee
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
No Impact
Impact Fee Study Update7/20/20044:05 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
•
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization, or plans.
The City's General Fund Impact Study will be update.
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria, condition, effect, cause and
recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which analysis cannot be effective. The criteria
varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from
another city. •
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a service level impact. If an effect cannot be
identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition varies from the criteria. Sometimes the
answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
The City completed a General Fund Impact Fee Study in 2000. The study needs to be updated to reflect the revised 20-year Capital Facilities Plan,
which will change the impact fee schedule. The Northwest Quadrant will be excluded from this study because the area is not ready to be developed
yet, and once it is, the fee schedule would need to be revised to reflect the approved development patterns in that area. The city will select a
consultant to revise the study through a competitive bid process. The funding for the study will come from prior year impact fee revenues. The cost•
of the study will be broken out among the Infill and Westside service areas as follows:
Infill Police Facilities: $6,732 (5%)
Infill Fire Facilities: $7,406 (6%)
Infill Parks: $19,973 (16%)
Westside Police Facilities: $6,732 (5%)
Westside Fire Facilities $7,406 (6%)
Westside Streets:$76,750 (62%)
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for •
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
di Salt Lake City Corporation
Maargement and Fiscal Note Works et
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3 - Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? What programs are funded with this grant and
what are the performance measures of each program?
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position?
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame?
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable?
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity?
Amount to
be .,
Transferred
Cost Centers Type of Impact Fee Balance from Each %of Total
83-83761 Impact Fee/ Infill Police Facilities 3.0%
83-83762 Impact Fee/ Infill Fire Facilities 3.3%
83-83763 Impact Fee/ Infill Parks 8.9%
83-83764 Impact Fee/ Infill Streets 0.0%
83-83765 Impact Fee/Westside Police Facilities 3.0%
83-83766 Impact Fee/Westside Fire Facilities 3.3%
83-83767 Impact Fee/Westside Parks 0.0%
83-83768 Impact Fee/Westside Streets 34.2%
55.7%
83-83769 Impact Fee/ Northwest Quadrant Police Facilities 3.0%
83-83770 Impact Fee/Northwest Quadrant Fire Facilities 3.3%
83-83771 Impact Fee/Northwest Quadrant Parks 8.3%
83-83772 Impact Fee/Northwest Quadrant Streets 29.7%
• •
Study
Portion Portion Study
5.4% $ 6,732 125000
5.9% $ 7,406 125000
16.0% $ 19,973 125000
0.0% $ - 125000
5.4% $ 6,732 125000
5.9% $ 7,406 125000
0.0% $ - 125000
61.4% $ 76,750 125000
100.0% 125000
Salt Lake City Corporation
tanagement and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development-HAND 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Bank One-Modesto Park Contribution BA#1 Initiative#4
Initiative Name 535-6136/535-6150
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins Phone Number
Prepared By
Grant for no Existing Staff
Initiative Type
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0'
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-04087-Modesto Park Imp. -Private Donation 50,000.00
Total $50,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1.General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-04087-Modesto Park Imp. 50,000.00
Total $50,000.00 $0 $0
C.Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4.Charges and Services
5.Capital Outlay 50,000.00
6.Other(Specify)
Total $50,000.00 $0 $0
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#4#604 Modesto Park7/20/20043:52 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
tanagement and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
NA
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#4#604 Modesto Park7/20/20043:52 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Ma agement and Fiscal Note Work feet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Salt Lake City Foundation received this contribution from Bank-One for the Modesto Park Project
located at 1000 West and 1000 South. These funds will be used in conjunction with CDBG funds
awarded in 01-02 and 03-04 totaling $175,000, for construction improvements to the park that include
demonstration gardens, classroom pavilion, trail markers, shade trellis and other improvements.
The Salt Lake City Foundation has received the cash. This action will create the budget and move the
cash to the CIP so that project can be bid and awarded.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution and budget to facilitate this
donation.
•
Salt Lake City Corporation
M agement and Fiscal Note Work•eet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No. What programs are funded with this grant
and what are the performance measures of each program? These funds will be used for
construction improvements to Modesto Park.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ?No.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation •�
nagement and Fiscal Note ee aWorksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Mayor's Office 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Utah Department of Workforce Services BA#1 Initiative#5
Initiative Name 535-6902/535-6150
Sabina Zanguze/Sherrie Collins Phone Number
Prepared By
Grant for no Existing Staff Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Initiative Type CFDA 93.566
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary _
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund 2,107.00
Total $2,107.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Miscellaneous 72 Grant Fund 2,107.00
Total $2,107.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance 2,107.00
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $2,107.00 $0 $0
r
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#5#604 Workforce Services7/20/20043:37 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
NA
•
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#5#604 Workforce Services7/20/20043:37 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
M iagement and Fiscal Note Work Meet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases,it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases,it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so,it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Mayor's Office, Refugee Consortium Coordinator received this grant from the Utah Department of
Workforce Services to help off set the costs associated with the World Refugee Day. The World
Refugee Day was a joint sponsored effort between SLC, Workforce Services, the State Department of
Health, Asian Association, Utah Refugee Employment & Community Center, International Rescue
Committee, Jewish Family Services, Catholic Community Services, Utah Peace Institute and SLCC
Sudanese Student Association; and was held on June 19, 2004, in Riverside Park. The period of this
agreement is for one month and is to provide for the costs of Riverside Park facility rental, City Event
Permit, sports equipment, trophies/plaques and Tee-shirts for participating youth.
This event is held annually in an effort to promote outreach to the refugee community, and community
at large, promote community awareness of refugee issues, connect refugees to local services
available, and to connect refugees to the communities they live in.
!t is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution and budget to facilitate this
grant.
•
Salt Lake City Corporation
Alltagement and Fiscal Note Work 1ieet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2- Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3 - Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No. What programs are funded with this grant
and what are the performance measures of each program? These funds will support the Salt Lake
City World Refugee Day.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ?No.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services Department 2003-04
Department For Fiscal Year
Amendment#1 DRAFT
700 East Median Landscape Initiative#9
Initiative Name
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By
• Analyst Use Only Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
New CIP Project NA
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
83-03075-CIP District 5 Legacy Project 0.00
83-04094-CIP Contingency 20,000.00
77-03040 East Central Neighborhood Trust 20,000.00
Total $40,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
83-03075-CIP District 5 Legacy Project 0
83-04094-CIP Contingency 20,000.00
77-03040 East Central Neighborhood Trust 20,000.00
Total $40,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay 40,000.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $40,000.00 $0 $0
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#9 ECNeighborhood.xls8/30/20044:23 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion:A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
DRAFT
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary. .
The East Central Neighborhood in a joint funded effort with Salt Lake City and the Utah Department of
Transportation (UDOT) has committed to refurbish the 700 East'Median,Islands, 900 to1300 South.
UDOT has agreed and committed to contribute and manage approximately $400,000.of grant funds
associated with this project which requires an $80',000 Match. The East Central Community Council
(BECK) agreed to raise $40,000 of donated cash and/or services and the City budgeted'$40,000 for
trees in FY 01-02. UDOT funds are currently available and ready to move forward with the project,
however, 'the. ECCC has not been able to secure the remaining $20,000 of cash and/or donated
materials required. •
•
•
The Neighborhood has received a commitment letter from the east Central.Community Council to
provide a loan not to exceed $20,000 from their trust fund. Since the 700 East•Median Project does
not meet the criteria for using Olympic Legacy Project funds, the Council decided to use an additional
$10,000 Of CIP Contingency.
It is recommended that the Council establish the necessary budget of$40,000, to accept the $20,000
loan from the ECCC and appropriate $20,000 from CIP Contingency to facilitate this project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
NA
BA#1 FY2005 Initiative#9 ECNeighborhood.xls8/30/20044:23 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General Fund
or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4- None of the above.
DRAFT
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No, funds are for equipment. What
programs are funded with this grant and what are the performance measures of each program? NA.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are unavailable?
NA -
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable?NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector? Is
there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.