070 of 2006 - Budget Amendment No. 1 to FY 2006/07 budget 0 06-1
B 06-8
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 70 of 2006
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year2006-2007)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 32 OF
2006 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, AND
ORDINANCE NO. 57 OF 2006 WHICH RATIFIED AND RE-ADOPTED THE FINAL
BUDGET THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2006 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
2007.
PREAMBLE
On June 15, 2006, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2007, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
On August 8, 2006, the City Council ratified and re-adopted the final budget.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
•
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.32 of 2006 and Ordinance No. 57
of 2006.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2007, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 3rd day of
October , 2006.
(Z1
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
,f CITE',A 's'9$
CHIEF
DEPUTY CI ORDER ;• ,
Transmitted to the Mayor on 10-4-06
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
6Thfl
61°"(6\
MAYOR Atext0 potwat
ATTEST:
CHIEF EP IT(24
ER APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
Date 9— �BY i?•4"
(SEAL)
Bill No. 70 of 2006.
Published: 1014-06
1:\Ordinance 06\Budget\Budget Amendment#1 2006-2007.doc
3
Initiative Name:
Microsoft Office Upgrade
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
Microsoft office is used citywide to support email, word processing, spreadsheets,and
presentations. As a City we standardized on this product to provide consistency, reduce training
and support costs and provide a tool that meets the needs of City Departments. This has been a
great success, city workers are able to communicate and work on documents without major
complications.
Microsoft Office is still the industry standard and continues to maintain the largest market share.
There are other suites available however none of them compete successfully.with Microsoft in
meeting the City needs.. Microsoft Office is the best suite that contains all the features needed in
the City:
Three years:ago when Microsoft first initiated theirSoftware Assurance program we_ purchased.
this licensing agreement program for Microsoft Office This allowed us to receive any upgrades,
patches,etc. for Microsoft Office through October 2006:
It appears that Microsoft is ready to release the new version of Office in the first quarter of 2007.
The City can save by:renewing our current Software Assurance Program currently in place.
We are currently testing the beta version of this product. This testing will take a few months to
complete; however, we suspect that most City users will want to take advantage of.the new
features. These are just a'few of the features we have discovered so far in our testing..
CFY 2007 Budget Amendment# October Q
Microsoft Office Upgrade
I Initiative Name I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-1 I 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Management Services / IMS Administrative
Department Type of Initiative
Mike Freeland 535-6115
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
,General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
•
Total $01 I $0
I Enterprise Fund
Total I $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total 01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total OI I 0
Description
I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-1 IMS Microsoft Upgrade8/22/200610:1 9 AM
Cot FY 2007 Budget Amendment# October Ci
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
�IMS Fund Balance
•
Y
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
65-03100 2328 $ 58,000.00
� I I
•
I I I
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? I NIA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
ilf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?j N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
,eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
!Non-profit sector? N/A
! I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-1 IMS Microsoft Upgrade8/22/200610:19 AM
Initiative Name:
Consolidation of all HR and Civil Service employment processes
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #A-2
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
Prior to 1995, management responsibility for the Human Resource function was decentralized
and many departments had their own human resource office with. staff reporting directly to
Department Administration. In November of 1995 the City made a :policy decision to
centralize administration of the human-resource function. Employees working in individual
departments were transferred ,to City Human Resource, currently in the Department of
Management Services. The decision was based on the need for consistency"in employment
and selection processes across the City:- '
The Police Department is currently managing their own entry level recruitment and testing
processes::.This is inconsistent with the policy decision for centralized human resource
support. The Civil:Service Commission has the responsibility to oversee and approve"
processes related to entry level testing and recruuitment._ City Human Resource staff are
responsible to provide this: administrative support to the Civil Service Commission.
The division of human resources is.requesting to establish centralized human resource
administration which will allow for consolidation of all HR and Civil Services employment
processes.
The Police Chief is supportive of this initiative and has agreed to transfer one FTE from the
Police Department budget to Human Resources Mgmt Serv. Department. The HR Division
will use the FTE to hire a Human Resources Associate.
The position the Police Department is giving up is a 309 Police employment coordinator and
the new position in HR will be a 603 Human Resource Associate. The salary and benefits for
the 9 months in 2006-07 is $49,500, and the salary and benefits for 2007-08 is $66,000.
I I I I
Consolidation of all HR and Civil
Service employment processes
1 1 Initiative Name I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-2 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mqmt Serv. HR Division New
Department Type of Initiative
_ Jamey Knighton 535-6307
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total I $01 I $01
1 Internal Service Fund
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total I $01 1 $0
Other Fund 1
Total 01 1 $0
1 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 01 1 0
Description I
309 Police Employment -1 FTE
Coordinator Position
1603 Human Resource Associate 1 FTE
Position
C
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number I Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
02-00075 2111-01 $ (49,500.00)
16-00070 2111-01 $ 49,500.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
C
WOW
Initiative Name:
Garfield School Revenue
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #A-3
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
The Garfield School property was recently purchased by the City. This property has two
existing tenants which pay approximately $3,000 per month in rents.
Property Management expects to received approximately $36,000 of rental revenue over the
next year. These funds will be used for one time improvement costs to include repair of
concrete steps, add security system, recore outside locks, restore A/C units, boiler and
ventilation systems, and renovation of irrigation system.
This request will provide $36,000 of budget to receive the expected revenue.
C 0
Garfield School Revenue
I I Initiative Name I I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-3 2006-07
Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year I
Community Development- HAND New
I Department I J Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
I
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
I
Total I $01 I $01
Enterprise Fund
I
Total r $01 I $0
Other Fund
83-07097 Rental Income $ 36,000.00
Total I $ 36,000.00 I I $0
I I I 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's I 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 1 0
Total 0.001 I 0
Description
_Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-07097 1807 $ 36,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
'83-07097 2700 $ 36,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
C;)
Initiative Name:
Impact Fee Waivers
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
During FY 05-06, the Community Development Department has processed five (5) requests
for impact fee exemptions, totaling $152,190 for 171 housing units.
Community Development Corporation of Utah received two exemptions for 2 units at 922 and
952 W. Cannon Oaks; Neighborhood Housing Service received exemptions for 4 units at
163 and 165 So. 1000 West, and 1001 and 1007 Euclid; the Housing Authority of Salt Lake
received an exemption for 100 unitsforthe Sunrise Apartments at 600 So. 500 West;
Cowboy Partners received=an exethptidmfor,65 units for the Liberty Midtown Apartments at
231 So. 300 East.
As outlined in the current City Ordinance, a one hundred (100)percent exemption shall be
granted for non-rental/rental housing, for which the annualized mortgage/rental payment does
not exceed thirty(30)percent of the annual income of a family whose annual income equals
eighty(80) percent of the median income for Salt Lake City as determined by HUD.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate action to increase the non-
departmental budget from fund balance to facilitate the necessary payment of the Impact Fee
exemptions.
/4440
41.0
Impact Fee Waivers
1 1 Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-4 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Community Development (HAND) New
Department I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp, ($152,190),
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
'General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund I
Total $01 1 $0
Other Fund
Fund 84 Transfer from GF $ 152,190.00
Total $ 152,190.00 I ( $01
f I 1
_Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0, I 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 I 01
Description
0 3
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
84-84001 1974-01 $ 35,910.00
84-84002 1974-01 $ 40,185.00
84-84003 1974-01 $ 76,095.00
I $ 152,190.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ' Amount
09-00700 2910-01 $ 152,190.00
1 84-84001 2700 $ 35,910.00
,84-84002 2700 $ 40,185.00
184-84003 I 2700 $ 76,095.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Community Development Corp of Utah 890.00
922 W. Cannon Oaks
1 Units @ 890.00 per unit
Community Development Corp of Utah 890.00
952 W. Cannon Oaks
1 Units @ 890.00 per unit
Neighborhood Housing Services 3,560.00
163 & 165 So. 1000 W. & 1001-1007 Euclid
4 Units @ 890.00 per unit
Housing Authority of Salt Lake City 89,000.00
Sunrise Apartments
100 Units @ 890.00 per unit
Cowboy Partners, LC 57,850.00
Liberty Midtown Apartments
65 Units • 890.00 tier unit
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
(Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
laminated? I N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
® 0
Initiative Name:
Jordan River Trail, 1000 North to Rose Park Golf Course
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
The Jordan River Trail, Rose Park Golf Course Bridge to Redwood Rd. project was awarded
$100,000 during the, FYO5106 CIP Process. Funds were allocated for the design and
construction improvements to this section of the trail. However, this section of the trail was
recently included in the scope of work to be funded with a Federal Highway Enhancement
Grant. For this reason, Engineering is proposing to use the remaining balance of$71,220.14
in this project for the section of trail from 100 ' lorth to Rose Park Golf Course.
The trail section from 1000 Nortlfto Roie-ParicOolf,Course was awarded $200,000 of Impact
Fee Funds during the FY2004-2005 CIP process for design and construction improvements.
There is a current balance of$152,917.33 remaining for this project. The estimated project
costs including design is $300,000, due in part to the necessity of designing several sections
of retaining walls to constrain the Jordan River from' nroaching into and destroying the trail
right-of-way.
The $300,00(Yorigiinally allocated to_.these'twor2)projects can also be used to meet the
match requirement of the Federal Highway;Enhancement Grant. Including funds that have
been expensed for the design portion of the two sections of trail.
Because of the federal grant Engineering wants to add the remaining budget from the Rose
Park:Golf come, to.Redwood.yd t e,11orth to Rose Park Golf. Course Project.
In addition, Engineering has received the final construction estimate and because of the
increase in construction cost of this portion of the trail, an additional $40,000 will be needed to
bid and construct the project. Engineering IS-proposing that the additional $40,000 be
allocated to the project from the CIP cost over-run account.,
I 1
Jordan River Trail, 1000 North to Rose
Park Golf Course
Initiative Name I I
BA#1FY2007 Initiative#A-5 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND New
Department I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund • I I
_ Total I $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total I $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total Ol I $0
I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 I 0
Description
i �
era wrr�rr
C
I l
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ; I Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-05099 2700 $ (40,000.00)_
83-06024 2700 $ 40,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
General Fund CIP
Impact Fees must be tracked separately from GF projects. Do not combine cost centers.
Name change and $40,000 budget increase to cost center 83-06024
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? I N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
iNon-profit sector? N/A
C
Initiative Name:
Lowes Property Purchase
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #A-6
Initiative Type:
New
Initiative Discussion:
•
The Lowes Store on 300 West and 1300 South is now complete and open. The
Transportation Division has determined that a right hand turn lane at the. intersection of 300
West and 1300 South will be necessary in the near future, to accommodate the excess traffic
and allow for a more even traffic flow in the intersection.
The City originally sold the property to Lowes at $15.00 per sq. ft., and has negotiated a buy
back at the same amount to facilitate constructing the right hand turn lane. The right hand
turn lane will be north bound on 300 West, turning east bound onto 1300 So:
The purchase price of the property with closing costs is approximately .$40,000. Property
Management has adequate cash in the Surplus Land Sales fund to purchase the property,
but does not have adequate budget to spend the cash. This request is to create an additional
$40,000 of budget in the Surplus .Land Sales fund to purchase the property from Lowes and
facilitate the purchase.
Lowes Property Purchase
Initiative Name I
BA#1FY2007 Initiative#A-6 I _ 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development-HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund I
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund I I
II
Total I $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund I I
I I
Total I $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total I $01 I $0
II
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
;Total 0.001 0
Description
C
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-81100 Fund Balance
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-81100 2700 I $ 40,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? I N/A
C
Initiative Name:
Utah Clean Cities Coalition - SLC Clean Cities Program
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #B-1
Initiative Type:
Grants For Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office received this $30,000 from the Utah Clean Cities Coalition and will be
used for half of the costs associated with the salary, benefits, supplies and travel of the Clean
Cities Coordinator.
Funds were awarded for the continuation of the coordination assistance in promoting the use
of alternative fuel vehicles (AFV) and the ultimate development of. a refueling and vehicle
maintenance infrastructure, to educate the public of AFV's and collect and distribute
information.regarding AFV performance, costs and technology. '
It is recommended that the City Council accept the grant and appropriate the necessary
budget to facilitate this grant. The Council previously passed the Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the original grant and to accept and sign any additional contracts
and awards related to this grant.
•
Utah Clean Cities Coalition -SLC
Clean Cities Program
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative# I 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office Grant For Existing Staff Resource
Department ( Type of Initiative
Bev Miller)/Sherrie Collins I 535-7736/535-6150
Prepared By _ l Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0I I $01
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 $0
Other Fund
72 State Grant $ 30,000.00
Total $ 30,000.00I I $0
I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 1 0
Description I
� 1
I
I I I I
C
I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 New Cost Center 1890 $ 30,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72 New Cost Center 2590 $ 30,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Please combine Utah Clean Cities Coalition award
and Utah State Clean Cities grant for a total budget of $60,000
for both allocations in one cost center
Grant Information:
jGrant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
IOW el.404
Initiative Name:
State, Department of Natural Resources - Clean Cities Program
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-2
Initiative Type:
Grant For Existing Staff Resource
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office applies for and receives this grant annually from the State of Utah,
Department of Natural Resources Energy Office.. These funds will be used for half of the
costs associated with the salary, benefits, supplies and travel of the Clean Cities.Coordinator.
Funds are awarded for the continued coordination of promoting the use of alternative fuel
vehicles (AFV) and the ultimate development of a refueling and vehicle maintenance
infrastructure, to educate the public of AFV's and collect and distribute information regarding
AFV performance, costs and technology.
Typically the City receives approximately $60,000 per year from the State. .Although this
year's allocation has been reduced to $30,000, the Clean Cities Coordinator has obtained an.
agreement with the Utah Clean Cities Coalition to reimburse SLC $30,000 for the other half of
the costs associated with the salary, benefits, supplies etc., of the Coordinator position.
The State grant requires a $45,000 match which is met with the $30,000 agreement between
SLC and Utah Clean Cities Coalition and a $15,000 in-kind match which is met within the
Mayor's Office general fund budget for supplies, phones, etc. .
It is recommended that the City Council accept the grant and appropriate the necessary
budget to facilitate this grant. The Council previously passed the Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the original grant and to accept and sign any additional contracts
and awards related to this grant. .
Istek el**
State, Dept of Natural Resources,
Clean Cities Program
Initiative Name I 1
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#B-2 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office Grant For Existing Staff Resource
Department Type of Initiative
_ Bev Miller//Sherrie Collins 535-7736/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
(General Fund
Total $01 I $0
'Internal Service Fund
Total $01 1 $0'
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 1 $0
,Other Fund
72-State Grant $ 30,000.00
Total $ 30,000.001 1 $0
1 I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 _ 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
'Total I 01 I 0
'Description
I �
� 1
0
I I I I I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 I $ 30,000.00
1
I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
,72- New Cost Center 2590 1 $ 30,000.00
I I
Additional Accounting Details:
Please combine Utah Clean Cities Coalition award
and Utah State Clean Cities grant for a total budget of $60,000
for both allocations in one cost center
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
j eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
C
Initiative Name:
US Depart of Ed - Supplemental Congressional Appropriation - Year 4
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-3
Initiative Type:
Grant for Existing Staff Resource
Initiative Discussion:
Public Services, YouthCity Program was awarded an additional Congressional Appropriation in the
amount of $894,150 from the US Department of Education in FY 2003-2004. This award is for a five
year period from FY 2004 to 2008. The funding was allocated for continuation and expansion of the
current programs YouthCity provides. This request is to create budget in the amount of $264,180 for
year 4 of the 5 year award.
$255,680 of these. funds will continue. to- fund the salary and benefits of the manager, site
coordinators, and hourly PTE teacher positions during this fiscal year. No new positions are required.
In addition, $3,000 has been awarded for travel, $4,000 for supplies and $2,500 for other. YouthCity
sites include, Fairmont, Liberty, Central City, Ottinger Hall, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center and
Glendale Middle School.
No match is required.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A
Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any -
additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
US Department of Education
Supplemental Congressional
Appropriation -Year 4
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#B-3 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant for Existing Staff
Public Services Youth Services Resource
Department 1 Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7002/535-6150
Prepared By •
Telephone Contact
I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
� I
Total $01 I $0
(Internal Service Fund I I
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
72- Federal Funds $ 265,180.00
Total $ 265,180.001 1 $0
Staffing Impact:
INew Number of FTE's 0 0
_Existing Number of FTE's '4 $ 255,680.00 I 0
Total $ 255,680.00 I 0
Description
Salary and benefits for 3 FTE Site
Coordinators & 1 FTE Program
Manager& several seasonal
teacher positions. No new
I I
_Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 84-215K
Revenue:
Cost Center Number ( Object Code Number Amount
� t
'72- New Cost Center 1360 I $ 265,180.00
� I
i
H
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2111-01 $ 255,680.00
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 9,500.00
$ 265,180.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Possible
_If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
•
Initiative Name:
State Department of Workforce Services Grant -YouthCity at Fairmont Park
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-4
Initiative Type:
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,000 grant from the
Utah State Department of Work Force Services under the Youth Connections Grant Program.
These funds were received to pay the salary and benefits of seasonal positions at the
Fairmont Park site which include the Program Assistant and two Program Facilitators. These
positions were previously paid for through the Department of Education.Grant.
The Program Assistant position assists the site .Coordinator with programming and daily
operation of the YouthCity Fairmont Park facility and are required to be on site in the absence
of the Coordinator, The other two positions help with programming. This grant is renewable
on an annual basis for a 3 year. period. YouthCity will continue to apply as funds are
available.
A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Director's salary
and benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing
and postage which are budgeted, for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund
budget. .
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to sign and accept the Utah State Department of Work Force Services grant and to
sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of this grant, and to appropriate the
necessary budget to facilitate the grant award.
C
I
State Department of Workforce Grant
-Youth City at Fairmont Park
1 I Initiative Name I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#B-4 2006-07
Initiative Number I I Fiscal Year
•
Grants for Existing Staff
Public Services , Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7002/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total I $01 $0
(Internal Service Fund
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 $0
Other Fund
72- State Grant $ 30,000.00
Total $ 30,000.001 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of PTE's 0
Existing Number of seasonal 0
Total i 0
Description
1
.. .. " 'M 1 w, 17'�° ./!1.®...E m. '_ °�t'YS 1.,6 •t _ _ .. .5 - .. ,
I I I I I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 93-575
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 30,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
172- New Cost Center 2111-11 $ 30,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? I Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
,Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
,0446,
Initiative Name:
State Department of Workforce Services -Youth City at Ottinger Park
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-5
Initiative Type:
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $23,540 grant from the
Utah State Department of Work Force Services under the Youth Connections Grant Program.
These funds were received to pay the salary and benefits of seasonal positions at the
Ottinger Hall site which include the Program Assistant and two Program Facilitators. These
positions were previously paid for through the Department of Education Grant.
The Program Assistant .position assists the site :Coordinator with :programming and daily
operation of the YouthCity Ottinger Park facility and are required to. be.on site in the.absence
of the Coordinator.. The other two positions help;with programming. This-grant is renewable
on an annual basis for.a 3 year period. YouthCity will. continue to apply as funds are
available.
A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Director's salary
and benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing
and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund
budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to sign and accept the Utah State Department of Work Force Services grant and to
sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of this grant, and to appropriate the
necessary budget to facilitate the grant award.
9_,AAMiK�.!rail-r.._t_rIVYN►»_lWi....tl_.p_1.d,,,flak....,14,.N+1....,..istl.W.`i.$i 1i,—.IG.,I...AXNM.kb,.ibt ww.wrrrer u - ,a„w,«,+i, p ..6i' .. "•• .,'•". ®•,.°..".. a
I I I I
State Department of Workforce
Services Grant-Youth City at
Ottinger Park
I I Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#B-5 2006-07
Initiative Number J Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Public Services Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7002/535-6150
Prepared By ; Telephone Contact
I 1
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
' I
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total I $01 $0
Enterprise Fund I
Total $01 $0
Other Fund
72- State Grant $ 23,540.00
Total $ 23,540.00 I I $0
I
Staffing Impact:
1New 0
Existing 0
1Total ( I 0
—Description
1
Jf)'`►. .. o.... '� �` .awY' W Y,�v. `...,".." A. .. ..,...._- J. `iiM>" N M"" ....,. .. . _. A i . ♦.,.. _. F w..,.. "`{ yy,., u .. „ ..
,001
I I
_Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 93-575
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 j $ 23,540.00
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 2111-11 $ 23,540.00
1
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue?. j Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? i Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? I Yes
(Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
,eliminated? ' Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
INon-profit sector? No
Cowl
Initiative Name:
State Department of Workforce Services -YouthCity at Liberty Park
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-6
Initiative Type:
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Division of YouthCity applied for and received a $30,000 grant from the
Utah State Department of Work Force Services under the Youth Connections Grant Program.
These funds were received to pay the salary and benefits of seasonal positions at the Liberty
Park site which include the Program Assistant and two Program Facilitators. These positions
were previously paid for through the Department of Education Grant.
The. Program Assistant position assists the site Coordinator with programming and daily
operation of the YouthCity Liberty Park facility and are required to be on site in the absence of
the Coordinator. The other two positions help with programming. This grant is renewable on
an annual basis for a 3 year period. YouthCity will continue to apply as funds are available.
A 100% match is required which will be satisfied with 10% of the YouthCity Director's salary
and benefits and other associated costs including facility maintenance, utilities, travel, printing
and postage which are budgeted for within YouthCity's and Public Services general fund
budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to sign and accept the Utah State Department of Work Force Services grant and to
sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of this grant, and to appropriate the
necessary budget to facilitate the grant award.
I I I L
State Department of Workforce
Services -Youth City at Liberty Park
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#B-6 I 2006-07
Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Public Services Resources
Department I I Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7002/535-6150
Prepared By I I Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
1General Fund
Total I $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
I 1
Total 1 $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
1 I
Total 1 $0I I $0
Other Fund
72- State Grant $ 30,000.00
Total $ 30,000.00 I $0
I I I
Staffing Impact:
New 0
Existing 0
Total I I 0
Description
•
I i
m ,�.•w �,�,, � �,� a ,.w �. , ,
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 93-575
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ( Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 30,000.00
� I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
172- New Cost Center 2111-11 $ 30,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? I Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? Yes
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? ( No
I � �
Initiative Name:
Utah State University - Interagency Outreach Training Initiative (IOTI)
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #B-7
Initiative Type:
Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applies for and receives these funds from the Utah State.University on
an annual basis. Funding is awarded to continue and further Officer Crisis Intervention Team
Training/Certification. This training deals with crisis mediation and intervention as it pertains
to law enforcement issues and persons who have serious mental illness or developmental
disabilities.
This $25,000 award will be used to continue the City's program in providing training to
Officers statewide and will be spent as follows: $19,760 Officer OT. This amount reflects
. approximately 580 hours @ $34.00 per hour, for Officers to attend, train and promote this
program. These funds will continue to provide the resources necessary for the PD to plan,
implement and attend a training program in 'which Officers gain knowledge pertaining to
mental illnesses, specific types of diagnoses, and procedures for carrying out their law
enforcement responsibility with safety and sensitivity. The remaining $5,240 will be used for
supplies to include manuals, pins and travel/training. . . .
The grant does not require a match, however, a $9,859 cash match has been included in the
grant budget and will be met by registration fees collected from participating outside agencies
and a grant received for these purposes from the State of Utah.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A
Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any
additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
1 I 1
Utah State University- Interagency
Outreach Training Initiative
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #B-7 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Grants for Existing Staff
Police Department Resources
Department I 1 Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 1 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
,General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
•
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 ( $0
1Internal Service Fund
I �
Total $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
72-State Grant $ 25,000.00
Total I $ 25,000.00 I I $0
II
Staffing Impact:
!New Number of FTE's 01 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 1 0
Description
Officer OT Only
C
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1890I $ 25,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I I Amount
72- New Cost Center 2133 $ 19,760.00
2590 $ 5,240.00
$ 25,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Establish one cost center for total budget
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? I No
Officer OT Only
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
_If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
;Non-profit sector? No
I I
Initiative Name:
E- 911 Encumbrance Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
FY 07 E -911 encumbrance fund carry over
Qwest Communications # 99-5566 $ 8,295, Wright.Line C60616 $ 273,103, Vectra Solutions
037135 $ 6,415
�,..,. ..
C
•
1 1 1 1
E-911 Encumbrance Carry Over
1 1 Initiative Name I
BA#1 FY2007.Initiative#D-1 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year •
Police Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Jerry Burton 799-3824
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
!,General Fund
1
Total 1 $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund 1 1
1
Total 1 $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
(
_ I
Total $01 $0
;Other Fund 1 1
1
Total) $01 1 $01
1 1 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's I 01 0
Existing Number of FTE's 01 0
Total 1 01 1 0
_Description 1
None
� I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
60-00620 Fund Balance
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
60-00620 2700 $ 287,813.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? — N/A
ils there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
l
'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
iWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? N/A
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
_Non-profit sector? ; N/A
Initiative Name:
Special Revenue Budget Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
City Council has in the past approved carryover budgets in these funds in order to complete
the started projects.
After June 30, 2006, the spending authority of any remaining amounts held by these funds
lapsed.
Without Council action, the City cannot finish the started projects.
Budgets in special revenue funds by state statute lapse at fiscal year end:
It is recommended that the Council approve the carryover budgets for these special revenue
funds
Note that the Unity Center (Glendale Community Center#77-77141) is not included in this
carryover request.
C 0
1 1 I
1
Special Revenue Budget Carryover
I I Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-2 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year I
Mgmt Serv. - Finance Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 1 535-6424
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
'General Fund I I
Totall $01 1 $0
Internal Service Fund
1
Total I $01 I $01
Enterprise Fund
1
Total $01 I $01
Other Fund 1 I
1
I 1 1
Total I $01 I $0
I I I I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 0
_Existing Number of FTE's 01 0
Total 01 0
Description (
1
1 1 1 1
! I I I
_Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
I �
I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
71 Fund CDBG Operating See detailed in Finance $ 2,010,895.74
72 Fund Grants Operating I See detailed in Finance $ 6,545,037.58
73 Fund Misc. Sp. Revenue I See detailed in Finance $ 1,399,973.55
78 Fund Housing See detailed in Finance $ 5,828,443.99
77 Fund Donations See detailed in Finance $ 1,254,270.45
$ 17,038,621.31
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
IGrant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? ; _ N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? j N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? ! N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
_Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
IMS PROMIS Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The purpose of the grant is to create the Protective / Restraining Order Management Information
System (PROMIS). This is a secure, web-based inter-agency information sharing network for
criminal and civil domestic violence case data to identify and track protection orders and
violations of protection orders. The grant was originally funded on 09/01/03 for $500,000, of
which the IMS portion of the funding for programming was $75,000 for programming services
and $10,000 for capital expenditure.
Anextension was granted from 01/01/06 to 07/31/06. The total grant will remain at the funded
$500,000, however, the categories for funding have been modified resulting in $58,000 of
additional monies awarded to IMS for completion of the programming. FY06 Budget amendment
for $36,000 approved May 2006. FY07 Budget amendment for $22,000. Additional funding was
also allocated for the work done on the Prosecutors section of this grant for$37,980. -
The modification will specifically extend the capacities of the Domestic Violence case filing..
system. Enhancements will be made that will make delivering the discoverable documents for
the defense attorney quicker and recording these results. The system will provide these case
filings by either of three methods: .
1. Prosecutors printing a packet of discoverable documents that can be delivered to the defense
2. Prosecutors e-mail a secured packet of discoverable documents to the defense
3. Prosecutors providing a secured web based system for the defense to retrieve the
discoverable documents
The system will record each of these steps so there is an audit of when the documents were
delivered. Thereby speeding up the deliverable process of these documents. This will assist in
fewer instances of where cases are delayed due to the defense not having these documents.
This will result in a speedier process for the injured parties with fewer courts visits. In addition
this will greatly reduce the time required for the prosecutor to create the discoverable document
packet.
The IMS portion of the grant modifications total $59,980 as awarded to Salt Lake City for the
PROMIS project requiring software programming and computer support through IMS.
C `rr/
I I I I
IMS PROMIS Grant
I I Initiative Name ! I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-3 2006-07
Initiative Number I [I Fiscal Year I
Management Services /IMS I Housekeeping
Department 1 Type of Initiative
Dave Abbott 535-6343
Prepared By 1 Telephone Contact
II
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
'General Fund
I II
Totall I $01 I $0
'Internal Service Fund I J
65 Fund PROMIS Grant for $ 22,000.00
i(Police)
165 Fund PROMIS Grant for 7 I $ 37,980.00
I(Prosecutor's Office)
Total I $ 59,980.00 I I $01
Enterprise Fund I I
I
I
Total I $0I I $01
(Other Fund
1
I Total I 01 1 $0
1 1 I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's I 01 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 01 I 0
!Description I
_ I �
1
I I
7
I I I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
65-03200 1954-02 I $ 22,000.00
165-03200 1954-15 I $ 37,980.00
I �
1
I I I I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
65-03200 2163 I $ 59,980.00
1 , I
II
Additional Description:
I I
Grant Information:
I 1
!Grant funds employee positions? No
,Is there a potential for grant to continue? Until 08/31/06
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I
Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
1Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? i Yes
I I
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
I 1 �
1 Novo'
Initiative Name:
Zoo and Aviary Bond Proceeds
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The General Obligation (GO) Series 2004A, Zoo and Aviary Bonds were issued in April of
2004. Prior to the bonds being issued it was estimated that the bond proceeds generated
would be approximately $1,100,000 for the Aviary and. $10,200,000 for the Zoo. These
amounts were incorporated into the budget. However, in addition to the par amounts
indicated above, the bonds. were sold at a premium thus realizing a total $1,109,626 in
proceeds for the Aviary and a total of $10,289,330 in proceeds for the Zoo. As such, there is
$9,626 for the Aviary and $89,330 for the Zoo that still must be appropriated as revenue and
for expenditure.
0vwd
I 1 1 1
1
Zoo &Aviary Bond Proceeds
I I Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-4 2006-07
1 Initiative Number I I I Fiscal Year
Mgmt Sery/Treasurer's Office 1 Housekeeping
Department 1 I Type of Initiative
Randy Hillier/ Dan Mule 1 535-6641 / 535-6411
By
Prepared Telephone Contact
P
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1
(Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund 1
Total $01 I $01
Internal Service Fund 1
1 II 1
Total $01 $01
1Enterprise Fund
Total 1 $0 I $0
Other Fund
CIP Fund 83-04073 Tracy Aviary $ 9,626.00
CIP Fund 83-04074 Hogle Zoo , $ 89,330.00 I
Total; $ 98,956.00 I I $0
( 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 0
,Existing Number of FTE's 01 0
Total 01 I 0
Description 1
1
1
1
I
1
1I
Ci /AN
I I i
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number I Amount
83-04073 1980 $ 9,626.00
83-04074 1980 $ 89,330.00
(Total $ 98,956.00
I I
' f
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
183-04073 2700 $ 9,626.00 I
83-04074 2700 $ 89,330.00
(Total I I $ 98,956.00
I I
I I
Additional Accounting Details:
I �
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
L I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?I N/A
_ I
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? i N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
I i
Initiative Name:
General Fund Encumbrance Carryovers
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-5
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
General Fund departments comparison to budget includes encumbrances that are
outstanding at fiscal year end June 30, 2006.
Historically, the Council has appropriated fund balance to provide a means to "hold harmless"
the General Fund departments' prior year encumbrances.
Without Council action, the General Fund departments' Fiscal 2007 appropriation will be
forced to fund encumbrances outstanding at fiscal year end.
The encumbering of funds at contract inception or purchase order issuance causes a timing
difference between the "earmarking" of funds for an expenditure and the actual expenditure
It is recommended that the Council approve the budget for the outstanding encumbrances in
the General Fund.
C 0
I I I
General Fund Encumbrance
Carryovers
I I Initiative Name 1 1
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-5 I 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year I
Management Services Housekeeping
7 Department Type of Initiative
Elwin Heilmann 1 535-6424
7 Prepared By i Telephone Contact
I
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp, ($2,818,341.00)1
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund 0 I
I
I
1 Total 01 I $01
Internal Service Fund I I
I 1
Total! I 01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
1
Total 01 $0
Other Fund I
I
Total $ - 1 I $01
I I
Staffing Impact:
'New Number of FTE's 01 0
'Existing Number of FTE's 01 I 0
(Total 01 0
1 Description I
1
II
I
C
I I
_Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost t Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
:Attorney Detail in Finance $ 9,825.00
Community Development Detail in Finance $ 336,010.00
Council ( Detail in Finance I $ 480,926.00 j
;Fire Detail in Finance $ 116,584.00
Management Services I Detail in Finance $ 247,276.00
Mayor Detail in Finance $ 34,019.00
Non Departmental Detail in Finance $ 40,000.00
Police Detail in Finance $ 138,015.00
lPublic Services Detail in Finance $ 1,415,686.00
1 I $ 2,818,341.00
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
iIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
_be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? _ N/A
DDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or _
;Non-profit sector? _ N/A
C
Initiative Name:
Refuse and Fleet Funds Encumbrance Carryovers
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #D-6
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Because the budget from the prior fiscal year lapsed, it is necessary to appropriate funds to
cover the purchase commitments made in the prior year and paid in the current year. The
funding source is from fund balance or funds held in escrow for the lease purchased program
at Duetsche Bank. In the case of the lease purchase program escrows held at Duetsche
Bank, if the purchase has not been made by year end, the money remains in the escrow. As
a result it is available to cover the commitment when the equipment is ready. This request will
appropriate budget in the Refuse Fund of $225,000. .There are adequate lease purchase
program escrow funds being held at Duetsche Bank to cover this request.
This request will also appropriate budget in the Fleet fund of $379,998. There are adequate
lease purchase program escrow funds being held at.Duetsche Bank to cover$41,024 of this
request. The remaining $338,974 will be funded from the Fleet fund balance where there are
adequate funds to cover this request.
Fleet and Refuse
Encumbrance Carryovers
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-6 1 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
•
Public Services Department Housekeeping
Department I Type of Initiative
Greg Davis I 535-6397
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
IGeneral Fund
I I
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund 1
Total I $01 I $0
'Enterprise Fund 1
•
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total 01 I $0
1 1 1 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's ( I 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's I 01 0
Total 01 I 01
Description 1
C 0 .
1 1 1 11 1
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
;Fleet Fund Balance 1 $ 338,974.00
I
Draw from lease purchase program escrows at Duetsche Bank. The revenue was recognized
when the escrows were established in FY0506. Therefore no revenue is being recognized in
FY0607 at the time of the encumbrance roll. In addition, there is no cash flow to Salt Lake City.
!The cash will flow from Duetsche Bank directly to the vendor supplying the product.
1 Fleet $ 41,024.00
Refuse $ 225,000.00
I
_Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 Amount
61-00001 2224 $ 121.00
61-00001 I 2299 $ 19.00
61-00001 2350 $ 258.00
61-00002 2224 I $ 40.00
161-00002 2234 I $ 1,447.00
61-00003 2241-01 $ 732.00
61-00003 2241-06 $ 83.00
61-00003 2275 $ 48.00
61-00004 2241-05 $ 130.00
61-00004 I 2241-06 I $ 848.00
161-00004 2275 $ 92.00
61-00020 2750 $ 335,156.00
61-00020...funds in escrow for lease pui 2780 $ 41,024.00
I $ 379,998.00
I
I57-11600...funds in escrow for lease pui 2780 $ 225,000.00
_Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
1
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
eliminated? N/A
1
(Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I
'Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Yale Avenue Street Lighting District Legal Fees
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-7
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Yale Avenue Street Lighting District was not created due to protests from the property
owners. However public notification costs, engineering fees and legal fees for services
rendered pertaining to public hearings and notice of intent, were assessed and billed to the
Transportation Department.
Typically these fees are charged to the project after the SID is established: Since this SID
failed, Transportation has had to pay 'the costs associated with the legal fees from their
' general fund budget. The first billing was for approximately $6,500 which was paid for during
FY 05-06. Transportation recently recevied a final billing in the amount of $3,249.78_
This request would reduce the cost over-run account in the amount of $3,249.78 and create a
new project from which the legal fees could be paid.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment to facilitate the
project.
C
Yale Avenue Street Lighting District-
Legal Fees
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-7 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $01 I $01
Enterprise Fund I
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total $01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0' 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 I 0
Description
C
_Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
Expenditure:
_ Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
83-04099 2700 $ (389.45)
83-05099 2700 $ (2,860.33)
83- New Cost Center j $ 3,249.78
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
General Fund CIP
Create new cost center
_Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NIA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NIA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Recapture CDBG CIP Funds - Completed Projects
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-8
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets and/or cash of ten (10) completed, closed,
CDBG CIP funded projects totaling $181,911.24, and increases the budget and/or cash of
the same years CDBG cost over-run account to be reprogrammed during the next CDBG
process.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustments to the
CDBG Program.
'O.r'
I
Recapture CDBG CIP Funds -
Completed Projects
I I Initiative Name I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-8 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins j 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By j Telephone Contact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund I
1j
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund I
Total 01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 0
Description
C
I I
_Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-03061 Fairmont Pk. Skate Pk $ (2,580.82)
83-03098 02-03 CDBG Cost Over-run 2700 $ 2,580.82
83-04056 Utahna St. Reconstruction _ 2700 $ (19,541.09)
83-04060 Riverside Pk. ADA Playgrounr, 2700 I $ (16,526.39)
83-04062 ADA Playground - Citywide 2700 $ (6,378.93)
_83-04098 03-04 CDBG Cost over-run 2700 $ 42,446.41
83-05051 Utahna St. Reconstruction 2700 ; $ (98,471.72)
183-05053 Traffic Island Landscape 2700 I $ (29,796.95)1
83-05060 Riverside Pk. Parking Lot 2700 $ (3,189.94)
83-05056 Utahna Dr. Phase II 2700 I $ (1,860.84)
83-05063 Glendale Pk. Tennis 2700 $ (269.10)
183-05064 Jordan River Trail Lighting 2700 $ (3,295.46)
83-05098 04-05 CDBG Cost over-run 2700 $ 136,884.01
1
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? I NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
llf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
'be eliminated at the end of the grant? i NA
;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
! I
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
INon-profit sector? NA
pakit
Initiative Name:
Recapture CIP Funds - Completed Projects
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-9
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This request decreases the remaining budgets and/or cash of twelve (12) completed and
closed CIP projects totaling $378,870.18, and increases the budget and/or cash of the 06
cost over-run account.
This request also decreases the remaining cash and/or budget in two (2) Class "C" fund
projects totaling $5,147.16, and increases the budget and cash in the Class "C" cost over-
run account.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
this adjustment to the CIP.
,ftetts,
Recapture CIP Funds -Completed
Projects
Initiative Name
BA#1FY2007 Initiative#D-9 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development-HAND Housekeepinst
Department I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/635-6150
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
1 General Fund
I
Total $01 $0
(Internal Service Fund
Total $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
1
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
1
Total 0 $0
Staffing _Impact:
,New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's I 0
Total 0.00 0
�Description 1
I
1
1
C OM.,
NVIOSi
Accounting Detail G ant# and CFDA # If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-03008 ADA Transition Plan 2700 1 $ (2,793.18)
83-03009 Donner Trail Park Playground 2700 $ (14,155.04)
83-03041 So. Temple Reconstruction 2700 $ (124.79)
83-04023 Stratford Pk ADA Playground 2700 $ (7,070.67)
183-04032 Curtis Park ADA Playground 2700 1 $ (3,972.43)
,83-05024 Galagher Pk Playground 2700 $ (1,562.02)
83-05074 Traffic Calming Holding Acct 2700 $ (47,663.00)
83-06013 Wasatch Hollow 2700 $ (8,083.53)
83-06014 Fenway/Strong Design 2700 $ (40,000.00)
83-06044 1700 East Fence 2700 $ (6,144.24)
83-92009 So. Temple Design 2700 j $ (5,970.00)
83-98075 Pedestrian Traffic Signal 2700 $ (75,706.28)
83-05099 GF cost over-run acct 2700 i $ (213,245.18)
Class "C"
83-01044 1100 So. Jordan River Bridge 2700' $ (494.79)
183-98025 So. Temple-State to Virginia 2700, $ (4,652.37)
83-04097 Class"C"cost over-run acct 2700 $ 5,147.16
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
;Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? j N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? i N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
'Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Impact Fee Revenue
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-10
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
During fiscal year 2005-2006, the City collected Impact Fees, accrued interest income on the
Impact Fee revenue received, and paid Impact Fee refunds where applicable. Due to the
revenue received, it is necessary to increase the budget in each Impact Fee revenue
account.
As of 6/30/06, the following are the transactions that have taken place within each Impact Fee
revenue account during FY05-06
Police- Fees assessed $549,434.76, Interest earned $26,684.59, Refunds $2,140, total
increase of$573,979.35 to the budget for ending balance of cash and budget of
$942,563.94.
Fire - Fees assessed $595,582.46, Interest earned $59,475.65, Refunds $1,830, total
increase of$653,228.11 to the budget for ending balance of cash and budget of
$1,814,163.21.
Parks - Fees assessed $214,668.00, Interest earned $10,181.17, Refunds $890, total
increase of$223,969.17 to the budget for ending balance of cash and budget of $359,032.07.
Streets- Fees assessed $1,291,481.00, Interest earned $74,887.41, Refunds $0, funds
appropriated to projects $450,00, total increase of$916,368.41 to the budget for ending
balance of cash and budget of $2,111,917.27.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary action to increase the budgets of
the Impact Fee revenue accounts to match the cash available.
r a
I I
Impact Fee Revenue
1 1 Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-10 2006-07
Initiative Number I j Fiscal Year
Community Development(HAND) Housekeeping
Department ( Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
!General Fund
Total $0.001 I $0
Internal Service Fund 1 I
Total` 1 $01 $0
Enterprise Fund 1
Total $01 1 $0
Other Fund •
Total 01 I $0
1 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 1 0
Description
•
1
I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
784 Funds Fund Balance
I �
I I it
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
84-84001 2700 $ 573,979.35
84-84002 2700 $ 653,228.11
84-84003 2700 $ 223,969.17
84-84005 2700 $ 916,368.41
i
$ 2,367,545.04
Additional Accounting Details:
Increase budget to match cash available
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Ils there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
(Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
owl1
Initiative Name:
Department of Education Grant
Program Income
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-11
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Youth City programs funded under the US Department of Education grant have received
program income generated from fees received for services provided at Fairmont Cottage,
Ottinger Hall, Liberty Park and Central City Youth City sites. .
This request establishes a budget for those funds and allows the program income to be
reallocated back into the individual programs for continued programming.
Funds were received in fiscal year 2005-06
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary increase for these budgets.
ANN
Sago
Department of Education Grant
Program Income
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-11 j 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Housekeeping
Department I Type of Initiative
Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins 535-7002/535-6150
7 Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total ) $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Totals ( $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund iI
Total 01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 0
Existing Number of FTE's I 0
Total I I 0
Description
C '641\
I I I
_Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 84-215K
Revenue:
Cost Center Number ( Object Code Number I I Amount
72-63006 - Global Artways Fund Balance $ 565.75
172-66001 - Contractual Fund Balance $ 5,033.80
1 72-66002- Ottinger Fund Balance $ 8,492.45
_72-66003- Fairmont Fund Balance I $ 9,002.00
_72-66004 - Liberty Fund Balance $ 11,736.20
72-66005 - YC Admin Fund Balance $ 436.96
I72-66006 - Program Income Fund Balance $ 4,150.80
$ 39,417.96
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number I I Amount
72-66002- Ottinger 2590 $ 8,492.45
72-66003- Fairmont 2590 $ 9,002.00
72-66004- Liberty 2590 I $ 11,736.20
72-66005 -YC Admin 2590 $ 10,187.31
Additional Accounting Details: $ 39,417.96
Take cash from 72-63003 and 72-66006 and distribute to Youth
City Admin
I •
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Property Management - CIP Land Purchase
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-12
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
Property Management currently has cash in.the CIP fund to be used for costs associated with
the purchase of properties. The amount of cash is $66,117.71, however, the budget to
expend the cash is $34,966.36. This request is to increase the budget in cost. center 83-
94083 by $31,080.35 to match the budget to the cash available.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment to facilitate this CIP
project.
Earsi
I
Property Management=CIP Land
Purchase
Initiative Name I I
BA#1FY2007 Initiative#D-12 2006-07
lInitiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND Housekeeping
Department I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total I $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total ) $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total! $O.00I I $01
II
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 I 0
Description
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
83-94083 2700 $ 31,080.35
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
Increase budget to match cash available
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
_If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? 611. N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
C
Initiative Name:
CIP - Garfield School Purchase
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-13
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
During the FY 06-07 CIP, the Council appropriated $2,000,000 of general fund to purchase
the Garfield School property for the future site of the East Side Police/Fire Precinct.
The actual purchase price of the property was $2,130,600. Property management had the
cash available, but did not have the budget to expend the funds. Council staff polled the
Council members who agreed to allow the expenditure and transfer of the additional $130,600
of cash needed for the purchase.
$109,236.67 of cash and budget was transferred from the FTZ Warehouse fund and
$21,363.33 was transferred from the Surplus Land Sales fund within the CIP. •
This request is to move cash and budget of $109,236.67 from the Surplus Land Sales fund
back to the.FTZ Warehouse fund. No adjustments are necessary in the Surplus Land Sales
fund.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment to facilitate this CIP
project.
•
CIP -Garfield School Property
Purchase
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#D-13 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
•
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 1 $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
Total $01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's _ 0 0
,Existing Number of FTE's I 0
Total I 0.001 I 0�
Description
sod
1 1 I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-97072 FTZ Warehouse 2700 $ 109,236.67
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
General Fund CIP
To move the cash within the CIP
Note to Accounting: Journal entry needs to Debit 83-81100 1840 for 109,236.67
and Credit 83-97072 1840 for 109,236.67 to move cash.
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? N/A
IDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
1
Initiative Name:
Salt Storage - Steiner Aquatic Center
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #D-14
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
In FY 99/00, funding was allocated for two salt storage facilities, one adjacent to Hogle Zoo
and one on Bonneville Boulevard, also in FY99-00 two neighborhood parks, Memory Grove
and Rotary Glen were funded. After preliminary design was completed, the cost estimates
exceeded available funding. In June of 2001, funding for the two salt storage facilities and
the Memory Grove neighborhood park were combined into one budget for salt storage and
neighborhood park on Bonneville Boulevard: This, facility has been constructed and has a
remaining balance of $380,020.39. Funding for the Rotary Glen neighborhood park remained
in place.
As work proceeded on the master plan.at Rotary Glen Park, it was determined federal funding
was used to purchased the property and salt storage is not an allowable use of property: For
this reason, it is necessary to remove the existing salt storage in Rotary Glen Park by fall of
2007.
Potential sites investigated are Sunnyside Park (north of the tennis courts), and Steiner
Aquatic Center (south east parking lot, east of the outdoor pool). The Sunnyside site has
been determined to be unacceptable. The. University has agreed in concept to the Steiner
location with the requirement that the access road between Guardsman Way through their
parking lot #4 and the storage area be improved and maintained by the City. Engineering
presented the proposal to the Yalecrest Community Council agenda for input and approval on
August 2, 2006. There was no opposition to the proposal.
Engineering is requesting that the remaining $380,020.39 of Salt Dome Bonneville Boulevard
project funds be reprogrammed for the improvements and salt storage at Steiner Aquatic
Center.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment to facilitate this CIP
project.
Salt Storage-Steiner Aquatic Center
Initiative Name
BA#1FY2007 Initiative#D-14 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Community Development- HAND Housekeeping
Department _J Type of Initiative
_ LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By -1 Telephone Contact
_Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund I I
1
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
1
Total $01 1 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I _$0
Other Fund
83-
Total 01 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 I 0
'Description
1
P
I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number 1 Object Code Number I Amount
183-00046
2700 $ (380,020.39)
83- New Cost Center 2700 $ 380,020.39
1
1
Additional Accounting Details: Object Code Number Amount
General Fund CIP
Create new cost center
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? _ N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
.. '..qc h ..,..� a......... _.. ,y, . �.. .w. „....... n ,..� . , � ...A.. .. -,.. ... .. .. u,.y ,....as vMw r e• . �r.,r
Led *irr
Initiative Name:
Utah Department of Health Bureau of Emergency Medical Services
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #E-1
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department receives this grant on an annual basis from the State Department of
Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, to purchase medical equipment and supplies
which includes pharmaceuticals, and .health. and safety supplies such as gloves, masks,
safety glasses, etc., and for paramedic and new recruit training. -
The training portion of the grant requires a 50% match ($4,500) and is budgeted for within the
Fire Departments general fund,budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A
Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any
additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
1 I
Utah Dept of Health, Bureau of
Emergency Services Grants
Initiative Name I I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#E-1 I 2006-07
Initiative Number _J Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No
Fire Department New Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
John Vuvk/Sherrie Collins 799-4210/535-6150
•
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund
Total I $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total I $01 1 $0
Other Fund
72- State Grant $ 80,688.00
Total $ 80,688.001, I $0
I I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 I 0
Description
C 0
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: .
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 80,688.00
I
I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 80,688.00
I
I
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? ' Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
I
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
(eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
1Non-profit sector? No
I I
•
Initiative Name:
Utah Department of Public Safety, Division of
Emergency Services & Homeland Security
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #E-2
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Fire Department received this grant from the State of Utah, Utah Department of Public
Safety, Division of .Emergency Services and Homeland Security in FY 03-04. The Fire
Department was recently notified : that they were awarded an additional $32,084 of
reprogrammed funds.
The Fire Department proposes increasing the current budget to facilitate expenditure of the
additional funds.received.
Grant requires a 50% match which is budgeted for within the Fire Departments general fund:
budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate the additional
funds received.
1 I
Utah Department of Public Safety
Division of Emergency Services &
Homeland Security
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#E-2 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
GrantRequiring No New
Fire Department Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
John Vuyk/Sherrie Collins _ 799-4210/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
1
Total $01 1 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 1 $0
Other Fund
72-70407 State Grant $ 32,084.00
Total $ 32,084.00 1 1 $0
1 1 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 01 I 0
Description
1
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 16.0007
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 $ 32,084.00
1I
II
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 32,084.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
,eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
'Non-profit sector? No
--" w ..,."W"••by�y. ..h .:il a1".. �..,.,X. ,..n"Yn �.r-..m V 1.N'♦ iY' ..�,w/ R ,w
Initiative Name:
State of Utah - CCJJ - Honda Auto Theft Prevention
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #E-3
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The PD applied for and received $7,000 from the State of Utah, Commission on Criminal and
Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), in support of the Honda Auto Theft Prevention program. Of the
funding, $5,000 will be used to contract with a video production company to produce three
Public Service Announcement's (PSA's) to be'aired on local television, and the City's Channel
17. The remaining $2,000 will be used for printing brochures in relation to the PSA's.
Honda Automobiles, within the geographical areas of the 600 North corridor from Beck Street
to 1-215; the 600 South corridor from 800 West to Redwood Road, and the 300 East corridor
from 1300.to 2100 South;, account for more than 30% of all stolen and recovered vehicles
within Salt Lake City.
A $778 match is required and will be met with Officer Over-time hours to implement the
program. The costs associated with the Officer OT is budgeted for within the PD's general
fund budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the.
Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, CCJJ grant and to sign any additional
agreements or awards as a result of this grant, and to appropriate the necessary budget to
facilitate the grant award.
`fir
1 I I I
State of Utah - CCJJ - Honda Auto
Theft Prevention
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#E-3 I 2006-07 _
_1Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No
Police Department New Staff Resources
IDepartment I Type of Initiative
_ Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By I Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
1
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund 1
I
Total $01 1 $0
'Enterprise Fund
Total ) $01 I $0
Other Fund
72- State Grant $ 7,000.00
Total) $ 7,000.00 I $0
j 1 1
Staffinq Impact:
New Number of FTE's I 0 • 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
(Total 01 I 0
IDescription
I
I I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 I $ 7,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I I Object Code Number I Amount
i72- New Cost Center 2590 I $ 7,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NO
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
Initiative Name:
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program - Law Enforcement
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #E-4
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applies for and receives this grant annually. It is awarded to provide
operational support and services in the eligible areas of law enforcement, crime prevention
and drug courts. As in FY06, the City was awarded Salt Lake County's portion of the'grant
funds and will act as the lead agency. The City's amount is $199,722 and the County's is
$120,589.
The Police Dept proposes to fund the following projects/programs at the levels indicated:
$15,722 for direct community policing over-time to provide the recourses for the patrol and
investigative divisions to focus on community issues and to direct over-time to work directly
with the community to solve the issues. $91,000 will be used to purchase equipment to
include tasers and a COGNOS Crime Analysis System, $40,000 will be used for civilian and
sworn personnel training, and $53,000 will be used to contract with the Salt Lake County
Criminal Justice system ($30,000), Salt Lake Peer Court ($12,000), the McGruff Program
($9,000) and to print and produce crime prevention pamphlets/brochures($2,000). The City
will also contract with the County who will purchase equipment with the amount of funds they
receive.
No match is required.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A
Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any
additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
igorr
d
I I I I
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant(JAG) Program -
Law Enforcement
Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #E-4 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Department Staff Resources
Department I Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3265/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 1 $01 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total ) $01 I $0
(Other Fund
172- Federal Grant $ 320,311.00
Total $ 320,311.00 I I $0
Staffing Impact:
_New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's . I 0
Total 01 I 0
Description
Officer OT Only-462 hours @
34.00 per hr.
U
sir✓ *lid
I 1 1 1
_Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number 1 Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1360 $ 320,311.00
� I
1
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I 1 Object Code Number I Amount
72- New Cost Center 2133 $ 15,722.00
2590 $ 304,589.00
$ 320,311.00
I
I
I I
Additional Accounting Details: 1 L
1
I Establish one cost center for total budget
I
Grant Information: --
I Grant funds employee positions? I No
Officer OT Only
Its there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
1
—IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
I
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are I
'eliminated? Yes
1 I
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
I I
�itr✓ �t
Initiative Name:
Bureau of Emergency Medical Service, Utah Dept. of Health - Utah Emergency Medical
Services (EMS) Grants
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #E-5
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The PD Emergency Communications Unit applies for and receives these funds annually from
the Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. Funding is awarded
for the costs associated with sending the units dispatchers to required, continuing medical
education (CEM) training for new and/or continued certification. . State law requires
Emergency Dispatchers to be Post Certified and to maintain their certification by receiving a
minimum of 40 hours training over a two year period. -
The Communications Unit provides EMD dispatch operations which includes pre-arrival
instruction, call triage and dispatch of EMD response unit.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. A
Resolution was previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and any
additional grants or agreements that stem from the original grant.
Bureau of EMS, Utah Dept of Health -
Utah Emergency Services Grants
j Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#E-5 I 2006-07
Initiative Number I Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No
Police Department New Staff Resources
Department I I Type of Initiative
_ Chris Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3541/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $01 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $01 I $0
Other Fund
172- State Grant $ 5,488.00
Total $ 5,488.00 I $0
1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 I 0
Existing Number of FTE's 1 0
Total 01 I 0
Description j
1
I
Cd
1 1 l i
_Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
1 Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 I Amount
72- New Cost Center 1370 1 I $ 5,488.00
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number 1 Amount
72- New Cost Center 2590 $ 5,488.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
_If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?1 NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
1
C: 4.4
Initiative Name:
Mayor's Drug Free Communities Donations
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY 2007 Initiative #F-1
Initiative Type:
Donation
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office received three private donations totaling $887.80 for the continued efforts
and support of the Mayor's Drug Free Coalition. $87.80 was donated by private individuals
and $800.00 was donated by MADD to help defray the costs of the Town Meetings held by
the City and the Coalition.
This request increases the budget in the Drug Free Communities Grant so that the donations
can be spent and used for their intent.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate
expenditure of the donations.
Mayor's Druq-Free Communities
Donations
I Initiative Name I I
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#F-1 I 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Mayor's Office I Donation
I Department _ I Type of Initiative I
Abby Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-7936/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund I
Total $01 I $0
Internal Service Fund I
Total 1 $01 I $0
. Enterprise Fund I
Total 1 $01 I $0
Other Fund
72-60620 Private Donations $ 887.80
Total $ 887.80 I 1 $0
1 11
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0
Total 0.001 I 0
Description I
Rom" %‘.41/
I I I I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
_ Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72-60620 1895 i $ 887.80
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount
72-60620 2590 $ 887.80
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
I
Gilmer Park Historic Survey
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative# I-1(A) 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
City Council Added by Council
Department Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared ByTelephone Contact
P P
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp.; $ (131,000.00) $131,000
_Revenue Irn_pactB Eund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund 0
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0- $0�
Enterprise Fund
r j i
Total! 0 $0
Other Fund
it
Total $ - $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's J 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
I li
***s✓ ft/
' I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
� I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number i Amount
106-00801 2328 $ 131,000.00
Additional Description:
� I
� I
I �
I j
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
I i
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Sugar House Business District
Historic Bldg.Survey
Initiative Name i
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative# I-1(B) 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Office Added by the Council
Department j Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp $ (5,125.00)
Revenue Impact ByYund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
0 ,
'RDA $ 46,125.00 0
Total $ 46,125.00 I $0
Internal Service Fund
1 �
Total 0 $01
Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
Other Fund
$0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 i 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
I i
i
SiIS
I � I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
106-00801 1974-92 $ 46,125.00
#REF!
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
06-00801 2328 $ 51,250.00
i I
Additional Description:
� I i
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? 1 N/A
1
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?1 N/A
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Nkomo, 'No '
Donation Request for 2007 Rotary
International Convention
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#1-3 2006-07
Initiative Number j Fiscal Year
Council Office Added by Council
Department Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-6424
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp., $ (50,000.00)
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
j General Fund
0
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0' $01
Enterprise Fund
j
Total 0 $01
Other Fund
$0
I i I
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0,
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
I
I I
,001061
.01rrr
I i �
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
1
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
109- New Cost Center I 2580 $ 50,000.00
I I
Additional Description:
I '
I I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
1
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? a N/A
PON
Initiative Name:
Sugar House Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative # 1-4
Initiative Type:
New Item added by City Council
Initiative Discussion:
Council Member Soren Simonsen has requested the City participate in a transit-corridor
alternatives analysis.
The source would be General Fund fund balance. South Salt Lake and UTA are also
participating.
behind the Granite Furniture Block and south of 2100 South Street to the UTA commuter
rail corridor. UTA obtained the property as part of the agreement with Union Pacific
Railroad to buy the commuter rail corridor.District 7 City Council Member Soren Simonsen
and the Administration have worked with the Transit Authority and the City of South Salt
Lake to prepare an "alternatives analysis" to establish the purpose and need to develop
mass transportation on the Sugar House corridor and determine what transit modes would
best serve Sugar House and South Salt Lake. UTA has indicated that it would pay half of
the estimated $150,000 cost of the analysis and manage the entire process for the
alternatives analysis. South Salt Lake has indicated they would assist in the analysis in the
amount of$30,000, which reduces the City's portion to $45,000.
romik
144010.. 'Ng
Sugar House Transit Corridor
Alternatives Analysis
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#1-4 2006-07
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Council Office Added by Council
Department Type of Initiative
Sylvia Richards 535-7656
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Imp, $ (45,000.00)1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
0
Total 0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total 0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total 0 $0
Other Fund
$0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
*41.001
,Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
06-00801 2328 $ 45,000.00
I
I
II
III Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Additional Description:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? I N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
[Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A