080 of 2006 - Budget Amendment for FY 2006/2007 for Sorenson Unity Center construction costs B 06-1
�- • • - B 0 6-8
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 80 of 2006
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2006-2007)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 32 OF
2006 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, AND
ORDINANCE NO. 57 OF 2006 WHICH RATIFIED AND RE-ADOPTED THE FINAL
BUDGET THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2006 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
2007.
PREAMBLE
On June 15, 2006, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2007, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City,Utah.
On August 8, 2006, the City Council ratified and re-adopted the final budget.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No.32 of 2006 and Ordinance No. 57
of 2006.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2007, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah, this 14th day of
November , 2006.
CHA1RPER ON
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY Y RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on 11-16-06
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
YOR
ATTEST:
11
CHIEF EPUTY Y RE RDER ; � - 3/'
•
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake Ciiv AttOorney's ' e
Bill No. 80 of 2006.
Date t— 7—
Published: 12-7-06 By
I:\Ordinance 06\Budget\Budget Amendment#3 2006-2007.doc
3
Initiative Name: .
Unity Center Construction - Bidding Stage to Construction Completion
Initiative Number:
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Funds for the Unity enter project were received, rom the Alliance for Unity, private donations,.and
interest earnings. Budget is needed to carry the.0 ity,:Center project through construction: Funds are
drawn / transferred.#fro4` ,.th U 1 ` e r ; ed. Two transfers of r 0O 0 a ch:.ha*
lrea be d c ry } h t
iy erg o �te; v��� � ` � h.� :�,,�, ` �� �a t wastated �� a ur�ds��r=� �rt
would be requested i NN budget:ame ;dr `
t the present time, project lids, .have bee 'fre+ ived and the fillet Contract negotiations ..are
proceeding-;:.The low bid'was{appro that l $704 0,hi her,than expected and it included:the,two
110, itIonal classrooms.that wi 0—. t,. 9t r abhous and moult . .-op. r`: ace. An
Pr dak; fin'e ob p ►ttQacons c
0„ ? o �t`_ ; ce € eneft ofthe f � =*: t
rem The f n Fiat insti `V j .Milli : l er th
. tb'i.�,.,�.A ' R1,00,3_tt2 into the p jei s. `lii :v ll" v ,.
er. e
st of the higher° , the:-ne ,000 ,f d.in the_project and n of era 00l
expenses Constrit `will..begin to December.`lit;: appropriation of ,7 ,055 from the City*
Special Revenue maountis necessary in the Budget O ning.
.., �- v o as�..n.+ 'm`' Ks.NY 'W 3 mow, e►_"^ew+ r^s« - , r -" '�.• .,-tee_r r a ,. w .,.�.. ..
Unity Center Construction -
Bidding Stage to
Construetlon Completion
Initiative Name
BA#1 FY2007 Initiative#A-7 406-07
Initiative Number j Fiscal Year
Public Services Department New Item
Department j Type of Initiative
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By ! Telephone Contact
General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 I $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0f 1 $0
Other Fund
77 Donation Fund $ 12,000.00
Total $ 12,000.00 I $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
I
a ., .. «,. o .... o I Y ` i,. m . .. e.e ... ., .>, �. ., „Yiu'nne`.rr...ru•,w.nrw '�� .>.e.a .a ..r..,...a r a _. ..s M
I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA # If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77123 1895 $ 12,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77141 2955 $ 12,000.00
,77-77141 2950 $ 4,721,055.00
77-77123 2580 $ 12,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
' I
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
Is there a potential for grant to continue? I N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? j N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
n
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A