084 of 2005 - Budget Amendment No. 3 for FY 2005/2006 0 05-1
B 05-10
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 84 of 2005
(Amending the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2005-2006)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 26 OF
2005 WHICH ADOPTED THE FINAL BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, AND
ORDINANCE NO. 48 OF 2005 WHICH RATIFIED AND RE-ADOPTED THE FINAL
BUDGET THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2005 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
2006.
PREAMBLE
On June 21, 2005, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt
Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including
the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
On August 23, 2005, the City Council ratified and re-adopted the final budget.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 26 of 2005 and Ordinance No. 48
of 2005.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting
as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said
budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with
the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 8th day of
December 2005.
' a
C AIRPE ON
ATTEST:Cet/waih.t..4,CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RE ORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on 12-13-05
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
O
ATTEST:
3,t
CHI F DEPUTY RE ORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. 84 of 2005. '
Published: -- at �y'i2 QS n �.
T rat?I! ,ar tl: T
1:Ordinance 05\Budget\Budget Amendment#3 200542006.doc
3
FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment#3—December
FY 2006 FY 2006
Gen.Fund
Initiative Name Initiative Gen.Fund FTE Fund
Amount Impact Balance
Impact
Section A New Items
1. Salgado Exhibit in Old $18,000.00 S18,000.00
Library Structure
2. CIP Unity Center S300,000.00
3. CIP Sports Complex S350,000.00 12,6/0pAdnmt added $is to come
request for emir°.
Schematic&Cost Est. res;en for.1.R.trail from original
Pk including trailnaf request of
section bet Redwood
Rd&Rose Pk Golf $350K
Course Bridge
4. CIP SID Sidewalk S100,000.00
Replacement
5. CIP SID Sidewalk S700,000.00
Replacement
6. CIP SID Strong Court S80,000.00
7. CIP SID Fenway Ave. S80,000.00
Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources
1. Dept of Health&Human S100,000.00
Serv.Drug Free Comm.
2. US Dept of Justice Weed S225,000.00
and Seed
Section C Grants For New Staff Resources
Section D Housekeeping
1. Recapture CIP,and $92,195.13 original request aas
to CDBG CIP Programs city oide ADA
g de,ignieit,sside parks
by 5106.2n°request
ssas to reduce bs
S66,849.75 for
potential billing from
Union Pacific.
2. Water Fund CIP $1,975,579.00
Carryover
3. Sewer Find CIP S5,002,144.00
Carryover
4. Stormwater Fund CIP S2,720,403.00
Carryover
Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
1. State of Utah Dept of $276,417.00
Public Safety Buffer Zone
2. US Dept of Justice COP's S493,322.00
Technology
3. State of Utah CC M, $6,625.00
CNOA Training
FY 2006 Initiatives in Budget Amendment#3-December
FY 2006 FY 2006
Gen.Fund
Initiative Name Initiative Gen.Fund FTE Fund
Amount Impact Balance
Impact
4. US Dept of Energy Solar $40,000.00
Roof
5. HUD Grant Pioneer Park $496,000.00 \EO ITFII
tDDED.NIGHT
OF THE
E
BRIEFING RN
IIN.
Section F Donations
Initiative Name:
Salgado Exhibit in Old Library Structure
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-1
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
Salt Lake City Corporation will enter into a lease agreement with the Center for Documentary
Arts (CDA) in October 2005.
The lease term will be from 1st of Aug. 2005 to 15th of Jan. 2006. In the agreement, the
Center for Documentary Arts agrees to pay Salt Lake City Corporation $3,000 per month for
the lease rights for space to present the Salgado Exhibit.
Total base lease payments are anticipated to be $18,000 ($3,000 X 6 months).
CDA is contractually obligated to pay for the utility costs which Salt Lake City incurs in excess
of the $3,000 per month lease payments.
Salgado Exhibit in Old Library
Structure
— - —� Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 _ 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year i^
Public Services New Item
Department j Type of Initiative
Greg Davis __ 535-6397 _
Prepared By ! Telephone Contact
!General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
'General Fund $ 18,000.00 0
I ; i
Total $ 18,000.00 $0
;Internal Service Fund
I '
Total: $0 i $0'
Enterprise Fund
' I I
Total! $0'' $0
Other Fund
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
INew Number of FTE's _ 0, O
;Existing Number of FTE's 0; 0
;Total 01 OI,
Description
- I I
I I
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 Salgado Exhibit in old Libraryl0/31/20052:38 PM
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
07-00927 1802 ' $ 18,000.00
— j
I �
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
07-00927 2331 $ 9,000.00 F
07-00927 2332-01 $ 9,000.00
i I
Additional Accounting Details:
_Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A 7
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
!Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? ! N/A -
(Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are N/A
'eliminated? I N/A
;Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-1 Salgado Exhibit in old Libraryl0/31/20052:38 PM
Initiative Name:
CIP - Unity Center
Initiative Number:
BA#3 Fy2006 Initiative #A-2
Type of Initiative
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Department is requesting a $300,000 increase of budget in the CIP cost
center 83-04020 to facilitate transfer of funds from the Unity Center special revenue donation
fund to the CIP.
These funds will be used for programming, design and development of construction
documents and the bidding phase of the project. The special revenue donation funds are
drawn and/or transferred from the donation fund as needed. Prior to this request, $300,000
was transferred to the CIP for the purchase of the land. Funding for the construction phase of
the project will be brought forward in a future budget opening. The special revenue donation
fund currently has an approximate cash balance of$4.3 million.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget increase to
facilitate the transfer of funds from the special revenue donation fund for the Unity Center
Project.
FY 2006 Budget Amendment#2 December
CIP - Unity Center
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 initiative#A-2 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Dept. New Item
Department Type of Initiative _
Rick Graham/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By L Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
— FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
'General Fund
Total $0 $0,
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $01
,Enterprise Fund
Totals, $0 $01
Other Fund _ ! 1
83-04020 CIP Unity Center j $ _ 300,000.00 0I
'Transfer from Special revenue
donation fund 01
Total' $ 300,000.00 $0
Staffing'Impact:
New Number of FTE's - 0, I. O
Existing Number of FTE's I 0 0,
Total 0 01
Description
I �
FY 2006 Budget Amendment#2 December
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
83-04020 1974-77 300,000.001
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
77-77141 2910-83 300,000.00
83-04020 2700 300,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
To reallocate 300,000 of cash and budget
from 77-77141 to 83-04020 cost center for
Unity Center
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? I NA
1 _41
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant?, NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
1Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
CIP - Sports Complex Schematic and Cost Estimate
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-3
Type of Initiative
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
The Public Services Department is requesting a reallocation of $350,000 from the North
Rosewood Park CIP project for the schematic design, environmental analysis, and cost
estimates of the Regional Sports Complex. This information will be used by the City and the
community to provide more tangible information to potential partners who will be asked to
donate funds for the complex and to promote community awareness and support.
The North Rosewood Park project has current budget and cash of $838,400 for park
expansion, additional land purchase and other improvements to the park. With the advent of
the Regional Sports Complex, Rosewood Park could convert to a more neighborhood friendly
park, as current adult sports leagues shift to the complex. The additional purchase of land
would not be needed for park expansion as proposed in the original funding request. The
remaining balance of $488,400, would be used for Phase I improvements to North Rosewood
as identified in the master Dian for the Dark.
This request will reallocate $350,000 of the $838,400 to provide cash and budget for the
sports complex project. Funds are being requested now to allow for immediate progress of
the sports complex, demonstrating the City's commitment to this initiative.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget adjustment to
facilitate the Sports Complex Project.
CIP -Sports Complex Schematic and
Cost Estimate
- - ---- - --- - --------I I Initiative Name — -- -- �
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-3 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Services Dept. New Item
Department r _ _ Type of Initiative _
Rick Graham/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year. 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 _-
General Fund
Total $0 $0' _
'Internal Service Fund i
Total $0' $01
;Enterprise Fund
Total. $0 $01
;Other Fund
01
01
Total 0' $0L
I I
Staffing Impact:
'New Number of FTE's 0 _ 0 _
Existing Number of FTE's j 0 01
'Total —__- � 0'; 01 --
Description J j
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
Expenditur :
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
83-98070 North Rosewood Park 2700 (350,000.00)
,83- New Cost Center 2328 350,000.00
Sport Complex
Additional Accounting Details:
,To reallocate 350,000 of cash and budget
!from 83-98070 to new 83 cost center for'
S_ports Complex
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame'? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector?
NA
Initiative Name:
CIP - SID - Sidewalk Replacement - Job No. 102112
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-4
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This CIP project was funded $400,000 of CIP monies in the 03-04 CIP Process and is
proposed to be partially funded from property owner assessments. The SID area includes
900 So. to 1300 So., from 1100 East to 1500 East. This request will increase the current SID
budget by $100,000, to receive and expend property owners portion of the SID.
Considerable interest has been expressed by the property owners to have their deteriorated
curbs and driveways replaced as optional improvements during the process of the
construction, as well as additional sidewalk in front of their properties. The property owners
will pay 100% of the additional replacement costs. To date approximately 160 of 1,100
properties involved, have requested the additional optional work be done.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the increased budget to facilitate the
neighborhood portion of the SID.
CIP- SID-Sidewalk Replacement Job
No.102112
Initiative Name
BA#2 FY2006 Initiative#A-4 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development _ New Item
_
Department Type of Initiative _
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By j Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund I
Total' I $0.00. $0i_
'Internal Service Fund I
Total $0 $01
!Enterprise Fund
i I I
Total $0 $01
!Other Fund
CIP 83-04048 Property Owners j $ 100,000.00
Total) $ 100,000.00 ! $01 _
Staffing Impact: _ • •
New Number of FTE's I 0 01
Existing Number of FTE's 0 01
Total 0 0j
!Description
•
I I
Accounting Detail Grant*and CFDA#If Applicable: NA I
-
- Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
CIP 83-04048 j 1125 $ 100,000.00
--- i i I
, I I
Expenditure:Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
CIP 83-04048 2700 $ 100,000.00
---- --- i — - it Additional Accounting Details:
T _
I !
Grant Information:
;Grant funds employee positions? NA
!Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
I !
!If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are _
!eliminated? NA _
I _ I
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? NA
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#2 December
Initiative Name:
CIP - SID - Sidewalk Replacement - Job No. 102136
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-5
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This CIP project was funded $599,823 of CIP monies in the 05-06 CIP Process and is
proposed to be partially funded from property owner assessments. The SID areas include
700 East to 1100 East, 1300So. to 1700 So.; 900 East, 1700 South to 2100 South; and 1100
East, 1700 So. to 2100 So. This request will provide the $700,000 budget to receive and
expend the property owners portion of the SID.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate the
neighborhood portion of the SID.
I
CIP-SID-Sidewalk Replacement Job
No.102136 _ j
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-5 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development New Item
Department Type of Initiative _
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
I_
• Total $0.00 $01
Internal Service Fund
Total, 1 $0 I $0'
Enterprise Fund ! I
1
Totall, ! $0' $01
'Other Fund
,CIP 83-New Cost Center - SID $ 700,000.00
Total I $ 700,000.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
'New Number of FTE's — Oi Oj_
Existing Number of FTE's IIf 0 01
!Total 0 0I
Description
•
I 1
•
I I
--- I -
i I I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
_ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
'GIP 83-New Cost Center - SID 1125 $ 700,000.00
I _
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
!CIP 83-New Cost Center - SID 2700 $ 700,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
� I
I i
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
;Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
� I
IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
'Non-profit sector? I NA
Initiative Name:
CIP - SID - Strong Court - Job No. 102109
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-6
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This CIP project was funded with both CDBG and CIP monies and is proposed to be partially
funded from property owner assessments. The City Council appropriated $20,000 of CDBG
and an additional $220,000 of CIP monies for both Strong and Fenway, after both streets
submitted the paperwork establishing the SID. This request will provide the $80,000 budget
to receive and expend the Strong Court property owners portion of the SID.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate the
neighborhood portion of the SID.
CIP-SID-Strong Court Job
No.102109 -_
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-6 2005-06
Initiative Number j Fiscal Year [ _
Community Development New Item
Department __ Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By _ _ Telephone Contact
1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
!General Fund
! I ,
Total, $0.00 $0r
Internal Service Fund _
Totall $0 $0f
;Enterprise Fund _
•
� I I
Total l $0 $0
Other Fund ' !
CIP 83-New Cost Center -SID $ 80,000.00 ••
Total I $ 80,000.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
!New Number of FTE's ! 0 0!
Existing Number of FTE's 0' 0'
Total 0 01
;Description _
- i I
i �
I i
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
CIP 83-New Cost Center -SID ! j 1125 - $ 80,000.00
- I
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ; Amount
CIP 83-New Cost Center -SID 2700 _ $ 80,000.00
Additional Accounting Details: j
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? i NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? j NA
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ _-
1Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
CIP - SID - Fenway Ave. - Job No. 102129
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #A-7
Initiative Type:
New Item
Initiative Discussion:
This CIP project was funded with CIP monies and is proposed to be partially funded from
property owner assessments. The City Council appropriated $220,000 of CIP fund monies for
both Fenway and Strong, after both streets submitted the paperwork establishing the SID.
This request will provide the $80,000 budget to receive and expend the Fenway Ave. property
owners portion of the SID.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate the
neighborhood portion of the SID.
1 1 1
I CIP-SID- Fenwav Ave.
i Job No.102129
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#A-7 2005-06
Initiative Number I i J Fiscal Year
Community Development New Item
. Department I I Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
I Prepared By Telephone Contact
I
I
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
(General Fund ! I
1
Total $0.00, $0
IInternal Service Fund
I
1
Total $0' $0
'Enterprise Fund 1
Total $01 $0!
'Other Fund
1
ICIP 83-New Cost Center-SID $ 80,000.00 I
Total $ 80,000.00 F $0.
Staffing Impact:
I New Number of FTE's 01 0
;Existing Number of FTE's 0' 0
(Total 0: I 01
I Description
•
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
ICIP 83-New Cost Center-SID 1125 $ 80,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
CIP 83-New Cost Center-SID 2700 _ i $ 80,000.00
i I
Additional Accounting Details:
I I
Grant Information:
IGrant funds employee positions? NA
I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
I I
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
(eliminated? NA
I j
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
,Non-profit sector? I NA
I '
Initiative Name:
Department of Health and Human Services Drug Free Communities
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #B-1
Initiative Type:
Grant for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office applied for and received $100,000 of grant funding from the Department
of Health and Human Services for continuation of the Mayor's Drug Free Communities
program. This program supports the Mayor's Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs
in the reduction and prevention of substance abuse in Salt Lake City. This is year 3 of this
funding.
Of these funds, $55,273 will be used for the salary and benefits of the Coalition Coordinator,
who coordinates and supports the coalition strategy in implementation and activities that
include training, data collection, dissemination of findings, and liaising between the Coalition,
the Mayor's Office and the community. $4,404 will fund 8°/0 of the Grant Monitors time for the
fiscal monitoring of the grant. $4,112 will be used for travel and training at mandatory
conferences; $1,261 will be used for printing or brochures pamphlets and other media
packets; $1,000 will be used for other costs such as memberships and conference
registration; and $33,950 will be used for other contractual components to include
continuation of program evaluation, three $5,000 mini grants to local service providers to
further drug abuse prevention, Salt Lake IMS for Website domain; a consultant to assist in the
facilitation in the annual strategic planning process and graphic design of Coalition logo.
The grant requires a $100,000 in-kind match which will be met with the Mayor's Office staff
and Coalition volunteer time, IMS Brown Bag Lunch taping, volunteer Brown Bag speakers
and mini-grant Subgrantee's who will match the $5,000 mini-grants.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
grant. The Council previously adopted the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and
sign the original grant agreement and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to
the original grant.
1
I
Department of Health&Human Services
-Drug Free Communities
Initiative Name 1
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-1 2005-06
Initiative Number 1
1 Fiscal Year '
Grant for Existing Staff
_ Mayor's Office • Resources
Department j Type of Initiative P
Abby Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-7936/535-6150
_
Prepared By Telephone Contact __
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
'General Fund I _
I Total j $0' $0'
Internal Service Fund
------1 ,
I '
Total) $0 $01
!Enterprise Fund I
I
I Total j $0! $0'
!Other Fund I
72 Misc. Grant Fund $ 100,000.00
Totalr—1 $ 100,000.00 1 $01
I i
Staffing Impact:
I New Number of FTE's 01
Existing Number of FTE's 1' 01
!Total Lj 1 0;
Description
100%Coalition Coordinator Salary 2111-01 1 $ 39,140.00
Benefits j i ! $ - 16,133.00
8%Grant Monitor I 2111-01 : $ 3,812.00
Benefits j ; $ 592.00
$ 59,677.00
8%of Grant Monitor's time is now allowable
in this grant 1
-1 I
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-1 Mayors Drug Free Communitiesl0/31/20054:44 PM
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2H79SP12433-03/93.276 i
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1360 $ 100,000.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2700 $ 100,000.00
-- r — I —
I - — I .
I
Additional Accounting Details:
100%Coalition Coordinator Salary 2111-01 $ 39,140
Benefits ' $ 16,133
8%Grant Monitor 2111-01 $ 3,812
Benefits $ 592
$ 59,677
Grant Information:
(Grant funds employee positions? Yes
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
j � I
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? ! Yes
I
,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? ' Yes
(Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are Yes
eliminated?
1
•Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? j 11 No
I
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-1 Mayors Drug Free Communitiesl0/31/20054:44 PM
Initiative Name:
US Department of Justice - Weed and Seed
Initiative Number:
BA#2 FY2006 Initiative #B-2
Initiative Type:
Grant for Existing Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Housing and Neighborhood Development Division applied for and received $225,000 of
grant funding from the US Department of Justice, under the Weed and Seed grant program.
These funds will be used to continue and complete the 5 year grant for FY- 05-06.
Salt Lake City has received Weed and Seed funding for the targeted area, Glendale, Poplar
Grove and State Fairpark, for the past 5 years. The overall Weed and Seed strategy is to
provide funding assistance to reduce crime (Weed), and implement (Seed) programs that
provide alternate choices for residents and youth living within the targeted area.
These funds will be used to fund the four core elements of the Weed and Seed strategy, Law
Enforcement, Community Policing, Prevention/Intervention and Neighborhood Restoration, by
contracting with the Boy' & Girl's Lied and Capitol West Clubs, the Sorenson Multi-Cultural
Center, the Housing Authority of Salt Lake, Peer Court, and the SL County Therapeutic
Justice Court for a total amount of$75,000. In addition, $138,499 of these funds will pay
100% of the Weed and Seed Coordinators salary and benefits, a portion of the grant monitors
time, and as required by the US Department of Justice, Police OT for tactical operations that
include narcotics, vice, gangs, Pioneer Patrol and officer back up within the Therapeutic
Justice Program. Remaining funds will be used as follows: Travel-$2,772; Supplies-$4,705
and other $4,024. This is the last year of funding for this site. Currently no other sites have
been recognized or established.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
grant. The Council previously adopted the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and
sign the original grant agreement and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to
the original grant.
I US Department of Justice
Weed and Seed
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-2 ! 2005-06
1 Initiative Number Fiscal Year
I Grant For Existing Staff
Community Development _ Resources
Department I1 Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
I By Prepared 1 Telephone Contact
P _ ,
l
1
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund j
j
I
Total $0 I $0
Internal Service Fund I
I
I
Total $01 $01
,Enterprise Fund
I
Total $0', $01
Other Fund
1 I
72 Fund Grant $ 225,000.00 1
Total $ 225,000.00I $01
1 !
Staffing Impact:
INew Number of FTE's (1 I 01
Existing Number of FTE's 11 ! 0
!Total 01 0
(Description-Salary&Benefits
•1 FTE Weed and Seed Coordinator Position $ 75,446.00 I.
13.04%Grant Monitor $ 7,862.00 j
Sorenson Center 2 PTE 1I $ 15,001.00 !
:310 hrs Sorenson Tech Center Coordinator $ 5,006.00
IPD OT Task Forces,Gangs,Narcs,Vice,PSN $ 35,184.00
&Patrol
$ 138,499.00
1
I I I 1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2005-WS-Q5-0262116.595
Revenue:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
72 New Cost Center1I 1360 ; $ 225,000.00 I
I
Expenditure:
I Cost Center Number I i Object Code Number ! 1 Amount
72-New Cost Center I 211101 ! $ 114,358.00 —
72-New Cost Center
I 2191 . $ 24,141.00
72-New Cost Center 2525 $ 2,772.00
72-New Cost Center
2299 $ 4,705.00
72-New Cost Center 2399 ! $ 75,000.00
72-New Cost Center • 2590 1 $ 4,024.00
Additional Accounting Details: Total , $ 225,000.00
i I 1
Grant Information: L--
Grant funds employee positions? Yes
I
Its there a potential for grant to continue? I I No
iIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I
,be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes
I
,Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
1
i
;Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
,eliminated?
Yes
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
iNon-profit sector? No
I
Initiative Name:
Recapture Completed Projects in the CIP and CDBG CIP Funds
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#D-1
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
This action decreases the remaining budgets and/or cash balances of completed and or
closed CIP Funded Projects and increases the cash and budget of the CIP fund balance
account in year 2006. This involves closing eight(8)projects totaling$159,044.88.
This request also decreases the remaining budget and/or cash of three(3)completed
Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Fund CIP Projects,totaling$30,756.43 and
increases the cash and budget of the same years CDBG fund balance account.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate action to decrease the
remaining budgets and/or cash of completed CIP Fund Projects and increase the 06 CIP
Fund Balance account;and decrease the remaining budgets and/or cash in the completed
CDBG CIP projects and increase the budgets and/or cash of the same years CDBG Fund
Balance Accounts.
**On 12/6/05,the Administration requested that the Council reduce the recap-
ture amount by an additional$66,849.75,which brings the total recapture
amount to$92,195.13 According to the Administration,there may be out-
standing bills needing to be paid to Union Pacific Railroad(quiet zone).
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#3 December
Recapture Completed Projects in the
CIP and CDBG CIP Funds
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#D-1 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Community Development Housekeeping
Department Type of Initiative
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0
Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0
Other Fund
Total $0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0 0
Existing Number of FTE's 0 0
Total 0 0
Description
FY 2005 Budget Amendment#3 December
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
•
1312=
Cost Center Number bject Code Number Amount
83-06099 CIP Fund Balance 2700 $ 92,195.13
Miscellaneous CIP Fund Projects(See detail
below) 2700 $ (92,195.13)
83-04098 2003-2004 CDBG Fund Balance 2700 $ 30,756.43
Miscellaneous CIP CDBG Fund Projects (See
detail below) 2700 $ (30,756.43)
Additional Accounting Details: $
CIP Fund Budget 8 Cash Debit Credit
83-03008 ADA Transition Plan Citywide Parks $ (9,106.82)
83-03076 Legacy Project District 6 $ (3,161.61)
83-05034 Utahna 8 1300 South Conduit $ (1,926.25)
83-04024 Steenblik Park $ (43,178.47)
83-04049-Quiet-Zone $--- {66,849.76)
83-00092 Gateway Infrastructure SID I $ (34,821.98)
$ 92,195.13
83-06099 CIP Fund Balance
•
CIP Fund Budget Only
83-02032 East Liberty Park SID $ (5,434.47)
83-04046 Sugarhouse Lighting SID $ (145,942.14) _
CDBG CIP Budget
83-04051Utahna Street Design S (2,305.03)
83-04055 1300 South $ _ (26,100.39)
71-29039 Tenth East Senior Center S (2.351.01)
83-04098 CDBG Fund Balance $ 30,756.43
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NA
Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? NA
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _
Non-profit sector? NA
Initiative Name:
Water Fund CIP Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #D-2
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Water Utility is asking to amend the 2005-2006 budget for carryover projects
and equipment purchases. The funding comes from Utility reserves of the prior years.
The Water Utility will require this amendment to complete projects that have been delayed or
started but not completed at year end,which require on-going funding in this fiscal year.
The fiscal year ends on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of a normal summer construction period.
Projects are started in one budget period and usually completed in the next depending on the size and complexity
of the project. The Utility tries to anticipate and stagger the budget for projects that may carryover into the next
year, however projects and timing always change since the budget is prepared 6 months before the actual budget
begins. Equipment is similar, having been ordered or encumbered but not received or paid for in the last fiscal
year.
Shops and office Conversion $100,000
Walker Lane Well 44,000
Water Main Replacements (15)* 1,187,000
Dump Trucks & Pickups 430,563
Various tools and small equipment 109.516
Total Amendment $ 1,975,579
*$50,000 2400 So. Above Lakeline Drive(new water line not previously budgeted)
I 1 i
i
Water Department CIP Carryover
1 Initiative Name I
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#D-2 2005-06
Initiative Number li
Fiscal Year
Public Utilities-Water Fund Housekeeping
Department j I Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis _ 483-6773
Prepared By Telephone Contact
General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
General Fund
Total $01 I $0
,Intl Service Fund
1 Internal I
i 1 I_
Total I $01 $0
,Enterprise Fund i
i
i
I Total $0' i $0
IOther Fund I 1 —
i
Total 0'' I $0
I
Staffing Impact:
1 0
!New Number of FTE's O,�
!Existing Number of FTE's 0; 0
(Total 0, 0
;Description
No impact on staffing levels for this
initiative
� I
� I
_I
II I � I
I 1
I i
-J
I I I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
!
i
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
51-02201 2720-10 I $ 200,000.00 j .
51-01301 2730-04 $ 44,000.00
.51-01301 j 2730-08 $ 1,187,000.00
51-00101 2750-10 i i $ 325,666.00
51-00201 2750-10 $ 26,330.00
51-01701 2750-10 1 $ 69,900.00
151-02201 2750-10 $ 8,667.00
51-02501 2760-10 1 $ 5,000.00
1 51-00801 2760-20 j $ 22,500.00
'51-02601 2760-90 ' $ 65,000.00
!51-01801 2760-90 ; $ 21,516.00
i Total
1 $ 1,975,579.00
Additional Accounting Details:
i I
INew item-water line at 2400 So i
above Lake Line Dr. I $ 50,000.00
1 I
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? N/A
I
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
I i
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? ! N/A
I i
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? N/A
I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
I Non-profit sector? I N/A
Initiative Name:
Sewer Fund CIP Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #D-3
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Sewer Utility is asking to amend the 2005-2006 budget for carryover projects
and equipment purchases. The funding comes from Utility reserves of the prior years.
The Sewer Utility will require this amendment to complete projects that have been delayed or
started but not completed at year end, which require on-going funding in this fiscal year.
The fiscal year ends on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of a normal summer construction period.
Projects are started in one budget period and usually completed in the next depending on the size and complexity
of the project.The Utility tries to anticipate and stagger the budget for projects that may carryover into the next
year, however projects and timing always change since the budget is prepared 6 months before the actual budget
begins. Equipment is similar, having been ordered or encumbered but not received or paid for in the last fiscal
year.
Treatment Plant Major upgrades* $2,575,000
Dump Truck 105,924
Treatment plant equipment-pumps/air conditioner 178,500
Phone & radio system upgrade 128,220
Sewer Lines/ 37 various locations under construction 2,014,500
Total Amendment $ 5,002,144
*$450,000 boiler for treatment plant(new item not previously budgeted)
I I I
Sewer Fund CIP Carryover
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#D-3 2005-06
Initiative Number I ! Fiscal Year
Public Utilities-Sewer Fund _ Housekeeping
Department r I j Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis _ I 483-6773
Prepared By Telephone Contact
i
General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
!General Fund I
I i I
Total' $0' $0
Internal Service Fund
i
I I i i
Total $0 $0
'Enterprise Fund
Total $0
Other Fund
I I
Total 0 $0
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 0' 0
I Existing Number of FTE's 0; 0
Total I 0 0
Description
No impact on staffing levels for this
initiative
I
! I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount _
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number j Amount
52-11201 ' 2720-30 $ 2,575,000.00
152-10401 2730 ' $ 2,014,500.00
52-11201 2750-10 $ • 105,924.00
52-12201 2760-20 $ 178,500.00
52-12201 2760-90 i $ 128,220.00
- ! i
1
Total $ 5,002,144.00
Additional Accounting Details:
iNew item-treatment plant Boiler $ 450,000.00
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? N/A
� I
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
!If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? N/A
I _
'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
Stormwater Fund CIP Carryover
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #D-4
Initiative Type:
Housekeeping
Initiative Discussion:
The Stormwater Utility is asking to amend the 2005-2006 budget for carryover projects
and equipment purchases. The funding comes from Utility reserves of the prior years.
The Stormwater Utility will require this amendment to complete projects that have been delayed or
started but not completed at year end, which require on-going funding in this fiscal year.
The fiscal year ends on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of a normal summer construction period.
Projects are started in one budget period and usually completed in the next depending on the size and complexity
of the project. The Utility tries to anticipate and stagger the budget for projects that may carryover into the next
year, however projects and timing always change since the budget is prepared 6 months before the actual budget
begins.
Land & lift station upgrade $60,245
Various vehicles 312,374
Equipment-mower, radio & sampler 51,284
Collection lines incl. 900 South 2,296,500
Total Amendment $ 2,720,403
Stormwater Fund CIP Carryover
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#D-4 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year
Public Utilities-Stormwater Fund Housekeeping
1 Department Type of Initiative
Jim Lewis 483-6773
1 Prepared By _ J Telephone Contact
General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
!General Fund
I i -
Total $0 $0
Internal Service Fund _
•
Total, I $01 $0
Enterprise Fund
I '
I _
Total
$0'
Other Fund
Total 01 $O
' I I
Staffing Impact:
INew Number of FTE's 0, 0
!Existing Number of FTE's 0i, 0
!Total 0 0
Description I 1
No impact on staffing levels for this
initiative
I j
1 I -
-1
H
I j
1 I
Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable:
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
_ I �
li
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
53-10301 2720-10 $ 58,745.00
153-10301 2720-05 $ 1,500.00
53-10301 2730-18 1 $ 2,296,500.00
53-10201 2750-10 j $ 312,374.00
1 53-10201 2750-30 j $ 31,605.00
53-10201 2760-90 $ 19,679.00
Total $ 2,720,403.00I
Additional Accounting Details:
_ Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? NIA
I _ I
Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A
� I
,If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
!be eliminated at the end of the grant? i N/A
(Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
'eliminated? ; N/A
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
;Non-profit sector? N/A
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, Department of Public Safety, Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #E-1
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received $276,417 of grant funding from the State of
Utah, Department of Public Safety, under the Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP).
This grant is awarded to local Police Departments to purchase equipment for "Buffer Zone
Sites" or key local facilities that the Police Department has been tasked to protect. These are
local facilities that could be vulnerable or targeted in the event of a terrorist or weapons of
mass destruction attack and have been authorized and approved under the US Department
of Homeland Security to eligible for equipment.
The following is a listing of dollar amounts and equipment purchases at each of the six Buffer
Zone Sites: $62,070-Tesoro Oil Refinery-Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA's) to
be used by SWAT, vehicle crash barriers and tire deflation devices, NOMEX jumpsuits for
tactical operations, closed circuit TV system for monitoring and thermal imaging device for
searching capabilities; $2,120-Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, SLC Branch -10
portable water filled barricades placed on outside lane of traffic during heightened terror alerts
and 10 portable barricades to restrict pedestrian and traffic flow around the bank; $41,64-
Gadsby Power Generation Plant -portable water filled traffic barriers, SCBA's and tactical
hearing protection for SWAT; $56,44-Thatcher Chemical Company-24 concrete barriers,
monitoring camera system and SCBA's specifically designed for hazardous materials for
SWAT; $66,000 -Delta Center-2 hydraulic bollard systems for security against vehicle born
attack, outdoor lighting and
fencing for access control into air intakes; and $48,145-LDS Church Campus -2 traffic
cameras, located at North Temple and Main Street and West Temple and South Temple
Streets, an IED remediation tool for bomb squad and 5 sets of helmet mounted night vision
goggles SWAT.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the grant agreement and to appropriate budget to facilitate this
grant.
State of Utah,Department of Public
Safety,Buffer Zone Protection Program
T-
IBZPP) _
Initiative Name 1
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#E-1 2005-06
Initiative Number • Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Staff Resources
Department ! Type of Initiative I
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3640/535-6150
_
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY,2005-06 FY 2006-07 _
General Fund
-- — —Total! $0• $0
Internal Service Fund T
1
•
1
Total $0 i $0,
Enterprise Fund j
I
I !
' Total $0 $01
;Other Fund _ 1
1
72 Misc. Grant Fund $ 276,417.00 I
I Total $ 276,417.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
1New Number of FTE's ! 0 0
'Existing Number of FTE's ! 0 OI
Total T 0! 01
i Description
I
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: BZPP-2005-012/97.078
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 276,417.00
I I
Expenditure:
• Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2760 $ 276,417.00_J
Additional Accounting Details:
' I �
Grant Information: •
'Grant funds employee positions? No
•
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will No
,be eliminated at the end of the grant?
•
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? _ No
!Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? _ No
Initiative Name:
US Department of Justice, COPs Technology Grant
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #E-2
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received $493,322 of grant funding from the US
Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPs) under the
Law Enforcement Technology Grant program. These funds will be used to purchase
equipment for the City's Interoperable Communications Systems.
The Interoperable Communications Systems is a multi-disciplinary/jurisdictional radio
communications system that is interoperable across all SLC departments and statewide. It
allows SLC to have Police, Fire, Public Services, Public Utilities, and the SLC International
Airport on the same radio system for seamless communication during emergency events
while maintaining individual frequencies. This system also allows the City to link to the existing
Utah Communications Agency Network (UCAN). These grant funds will be used to purchase
equipment for the implementation of Phase 3, which will enhance the system to a three-site,
10 channel simulcast system with OMNILINK capabilities to tie in UCAN. The City currently
has 2 sites.
Equipment includes Microwave Link to include an additional 4 lines, installation hardware,
simulcast controller modem and interface, a control site which provides linkage to other
controllers, site repeaters to enhance coverage and signal, GPS tracking system, channel
banks or space on the microwave system, an antenna, and COGNOS Crime Data Analysis
software to upgrade the Versaterm Communications system.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
grant. The Council previously adopted the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and
sign the original grant agreement and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to
the original grant.
US Department of Justice,COPs
Technology
I Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#E-2 2005-06
Initiative Number j -_ Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Staff Resources
Department L ; Type of Initiative r
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins _ 799-3640/535-6150
Prepared By j Telephone Contact
— — — —
•
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 _
!General Fund
Total $O! $0
!Internal Service Fund i
1
Total I $01 $0
-7Enterprise Fund
Total $0 i $0
Other Fund
;72 Misc. Grant Fund $ 493,322.00
Total; $ 493,322.00 $0'
I ! I 1
Staffing Impact:
New Number of FTE's 01 0!
Existing Number of FTE's j O! 01
,Total _ 0 01
Description
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 2005CKWX0346/16.710
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
,72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 493,322.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount
72-New w Cost Center ! 2760 $ 493,322.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? ', Yes
I j
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
I be eliminated at the end of the grant? No
!Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
;Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I _
;Non-profit sector? _ No
I I
Initiative Name:
State of Utah, CCJJ, CNOA Training
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #E-3
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Police Department applied for and received $6,625.00 of grant funding from the State of
Utah, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ) for nine (9) Narcotics Detectives
to attend the California Narcotic's Officers' Association (CNOA) training in Reno Nevada.
The CNOA has a national reputation for providing the best training pertaining to narcotic
investigation in the Western United States. CNOA offers a total of 41 classes from which the
detectives can benefit. It is the intent to send 9 Officers so that each can cover the wide
variety of classes offered and cross-train detectives who are unable to attend. Classes
include supervisory, financial oversight of asset forfeiture funds, drug abuse/trafficking and
many others. The objective of the grant is to provide partial funding for the costs associated
with the travel and registration of the nine (9) Officers. This grant requires a $2,208 match
which will be met within the Police Departments general fund budget.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary Resolution authorizing the
Mayor to accept and sign the grant agreement and to appropriate the necessary budget to
facilitate this grant.
1
_ State of Utah,CCJJ-CNOA Training
Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#E-3 2005-06
Initiative Number I_ _ Fiscal Year
Grant Requiring No New
Police Staff Resources
Department Type of Initiative
Krista Dunn/Sherrie Collins 799-3640/535-6150
Prepared By Telephone Contact
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
_General Fund
Total $01 $01
Internal Service Fund
j I I
Total i $0 $01
Enterprise Fund j
Total $0 $0i
Other Fund
i 72 Misc. Grant Fund $ 6,625.00 1
Total $ 6,625.00 $01
1
Staffing Impact:
;New Number of FTE's
;Existing Number of FTE's 0' 01
Total 0 0j
Description
I i
I i i
1
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: 3D521
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 1370 $ 6,625.00
Expenditure:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center 2394 $ 3,325.00
72-New Cost Center 2525 $ 3,300.00-T-
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
1Grant funds employee positions? ! No
'Is there a potential for grant to continue? i Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
Ibe eliminated at the end of the grant? j No
'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are
eliminated? No
Does grant duplicate services provided by private or
Non-profit sector? No
i i '
Initiative Name:
US Department of Energy - Solar Roof- Pollution Prevention & Environmental Action
through Community Education
Initiative Number:
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative #E-4
Initiative Type:
Grant Requiring No New Staff Resources
Initiative Discussion:
The Mayor's Office applied for and received $40,000 of grant funding from the US
Department of Energy for Phase 2 of the Million Solar Roof Partnership.
Of these funds, $37,900 will be used for contractual components with Utah Clean Energy and
local independent contractors for technical assistance, and $2,100 for travel. The purpose of
the grant is to raise public awareness and educate consumers of the resources available for
private installation of solar energy devices. The Phase 2 implementation plan builds upon the
successes of the Phase I partnership, to raise awareness and to further reduce financial
barriers to Photovoltaic (PV). During Phase I of the program, the partnerships successfully
worked to include PV as an allowable resource in Utah Power's Blue Sky green pricing
program tariff and reached a consensus on the value of PV to the utility, Utah Power and rate
payers. Utah Power has committed to including a Pilot PV buy-down program in their
upcoming rate case. It is anticipated that a 500kW program could yield a projected buy-down
of $2.50 per watt.
The grant requires a $10,000 in-kind match which will be met with the Mayor's Office staff
time, and the remaining $3,000 will be in-kind services provided in the contractual
components.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this
grant. The Council previously adopted the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept and
sign the original grant agreement and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to
the original grant.
US Department of Energy- Solar Roof-
Pollution Prevention&Environmental
Action _
I Initiative Name
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#E-4 2005-06
Initiative Number Fiscal Year L_
Grant Requiring No New
Mayor's Office Staff Resources
Department I — Type of Initiative ;
Abby Vianes/Sherrie Collins 535-7936/535-6150
Prepared By 1 _ _ Telephone Contact i
Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year
FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07,
General Fund
Total $0 $0
;Internal Service Fund
I i i
Total) $0 $01
Enterprise Fund •
Total' $0 $01
Other Fund
172 Misc. Grant Fund $ 40,000.00
Total; $ 40,000.00 $01
Staffing Impact:
;New Number of FTE's ! f I OI
;Existing Number of FTE's Oi,
;Total 0 0;
'Description
8%of Grant Monitor's time is now allowable
in this grant
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-3 US Dept of Energy Solar Roofs;l/1/200511:46 AM
Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: DE-FG48-05R810740/66.717
Revenue:
Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount
72-New Cost Center j 1360 : $ 40,000.00 I
Expenditure:. ,
Cost Center Number ( Object Code Number Amount
'72-New Cost Center2590
$ 40,000.00
Additional Accounting Details:
Grant Information:
'Grant funds employee positions? No
Is there a potential for grant to continue? Yes
If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will
be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA
Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes
Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are No
.eliminated?
:Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _
Non-profit sector? No
BA#3 FY2006 Initiative#B-3 US Dept of Energy Solar Roofsl1/1/200511:46 AM