Proposed Ordinance - 7/22/20211
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2021
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 810 East 800 South
Street to rezone the parcel from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential to CB Community
Business District and amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 810
East 800 South Street to rezone the parcel from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District
to CB Community Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2020-00740 and
amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map pursuant to petition number
PLNPCM2020-00741.
WHEREAS, Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group submitted an application to
rezone a parcel of property located at 810 East 800 South Street to rezone the parcel from R-2
Single- and Two-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District pursuant to
petition number PLNPCM2020-00740 and amending the Central Community Future Land Use
Map with respect to the property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial
pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2020-00741; and
WHEREAS, at its January 13, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt
Lake City Council on said applications; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the parcel located at 810 East 800 South Street (Tax ID No. 16-
2
08-176-024-0000), which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is
rezoned from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District to CB Community Business
District.
SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use
Map of the Central Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future
land use designation of the property identified in Exhibit “A” from Low Density Residential to
Community Commercial.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
April 20, 2021
3
Exhibit “A”
Legal description of the property parcel
Tax ID No. 16-08-176-024-0000
BEG 5 RDS E FR NW COR LOT 5, BLK 2, PLAT B, SLC SUR; E 5 RDS; S 5 RDS; W 5 RDS;
N 5 RDS TO BEG.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Planning Commission – January 13, 2021 Public Hearing
A. Mailing Notice
B. Staff Report
C. Agenda/Minutes/Newspaper Notice
4. Public Comment
5. Original Petition
6. Mailing List
1. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petitions: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
September 23, 2020 Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group submits application for
rezone and master plan amendment of the property at 810 East 800
South.
October 8, 2020 Petitions PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
assigned to Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and
processing.
October 14, 2020 Email sent to Recognized Community Organizations (East Central
and East Liberty Park Community Councils) informing them of the
petition.
October 22, 2020 Proposal discussed at East Liberty Park Community Council Zoom
meeting
December 29, 2020 Sign posted on property.
December 29, 2020 Planning Commission hearing notices posted on City and State
websites and Planning Division listserv. Notices also mailed out to
property owners/residents. A newspaper notice was also requested
to be printed as required for master plan amendments.
January 13, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and held a public
hearing. The commission voted unanimously to send a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
January 15, 2021 Ordinance review requested from City Attorney’s office.
2. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2020-00740 Zoning Map
Amendment and PLNPCM2020-00741 Master Plan Amendment, requests by Stanford Bell of
Altus Development Group, on behalf of the property owner, to amend the zoning map for the
property located at approximately 810 East 800 South. The proposal would rezone the property
from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) pursuant to petition
PLNPCM2020-00740 and amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map with respect to
the property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial pursuant to petition
number PLNCPM2020-00741. The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a two-
story building that would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second
floor, and parking located to the rear. The property is in Council District 5, represented by Darin
Mano.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received
through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal, please call Sara Javoronok at 385-226-4448
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com. You may review the file online at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/citizen, by selecting the Planning tab, and entering the petition
numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
A. Mailing Notice
December 29, 2020
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
B. Staff Report
January 13, 2021
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
Staff Report
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, 801-535-7625
Date: January 13, 2021
Re: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741 – 810 East 800 South
Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 810 East 800 South
PARCEL ID: 16-08-176-024-0000
MASTER PLAN: Central Community
ZONING DISTRICT: R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential)
REQUEST: The applicant, Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group, on behalf of the property
owner, 810 E Holdings LLC, is requesting Master Plan and Zoning Map amendments for
an approximately 0.15 acre (6,850 sq. ft.) property located at approximately 810 East 800
South. The applicant is requesting a Master Plan amendment to change the Central
Community Future Land Use Map designation from Low Density Residential to
Community Commercial. The applicant is also requesting a Zoning Map amendment to
change the zoning of the parcel from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB
(Community Business). The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a
two-story building that would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units
on the second floor, and parking located to the rear.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report, Planning Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for
the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments.
ATTACHMENTS:
A.Vicinity Map
B.Site Photographs
C.Additional Applicant Information
D.Existing Conditions & Development Standards
E.Analysis of Standards
F.Public Process & Comments
G.Department Review Comments
1
BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The property is approximately 0.15 acres (6,850 sq. ft.) and is zoned R-2. The applicant is requesting a
Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning of the parcel to CB. The Central Community Master
Plan was adopted in 2005 and the Future Land Use Map designates this area as Low Density
Residential. The zoning map amendment to CB requires a change in the land use designation to
Community Commercial. The property is currently vacant. The city’s permit card files show that a
single-family home was demolished in 1989. Per the applicant, this was due to a fire. The residence is
shown on the 1898 Sanborn maps, the first to cover this area, and is shown as two stories with brick on
the first floor. The 1950 Sanborn maps also show the residence on the site (and approximately 19
residences and an 11-unit apartment building on the Smith’s site).
Map showing the area proposed for rezoning outlined in yellow with
existing adjacent zoning identified
2
KEY ISSUES:
The key issues listed below have been identified through the analysis of the project, community input,
and department review comments.
Issue 1: Compatibility with adopted planning documents
The proposal is consistent with the Central Community Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake. The Central
Community Master Plan identifies this property as Low Density Residential (5-10 dwelling
units/acre). The property is currently vacant and located to the west of a Smith’s grocery store and is
to the east of a duplex zoned R-2. Slightly further to the east on the corner of 800 East and 800 South
is a Small Neighborhood Business (SNB) zoned parcel. Residential properties are located to the north.
The preliminary plans for a mixed-use development require the zoning map and master plan
amendments. The CB zoning district and Community Commercial land use designation are consistent
with the proposed development. They are also consistent with the zoning and land use on the adjacent
Smith’s property. While a change from the existing designations, it is appropriate for the site and the
neighborhood. The property has been vacant since 1989. There is a commercial use on the adjacent
Smith’s property and on the corner of 800 East and 800 South (Vis). As such, the proposed
amendments are appropriate for the context and the neighborhood.
Several goals and criteria in the Central Community Master Plan are applicable to this project. The
plan’s Vision for the Future identifies several applicable criteria among four goals:
Livable communities and neighborhoods
• A variety of residential land use supports all types of housing and the affordability of the housing
stock.
• The appropriate transition of multi-family housing with mixed land uses in designated areas
supports sustainable development within the community.
Vital and sustainable commerce
• Increased pedestrian accessibility and cultural activities encourage more housing that supports
the employment center of the downtown area.
• An enhanced built environment encourages employees to work and live in the Central
Community and supports the creation of smaller locally owned businesses.
Unique and active places
• New places where people can gather, meet, socialize, and recreate are created using design
excellence and shared resources.
• Existing destination centers and gathering places are enhanced through urban design
recommendations.
Pedestrian mobility and accessibility
• Children, senior adults, and those with disabilities can access destination points without being
threatened by vehicular movement.
• Improved pedestrian movement along arterials and collectors ensures pedestrian safety.
The proposed rezoning and master plan amendment would allow for a future development that could
include commercial and residential uses, including the development proposed in the preliminary plans
for a building with a first-floor commercial use and second floor residential. The property is in a
location that is accessible to pedestrians and near other commercial and residential uses.
Specific to the East Central North Neighborhood Planning Area, the following issues apply:
• Ensure that commercial development is compatible with any adjacent residential land uses
• Reduce excessive density potential, stabilize the neighborhood, and conserve the neighborhood’s
residential character.
• Improve zoning enforcement, including illegal conversion to apartments, yard cleanup, “slum
lords,” etc.
3
The current zoning and small size of the parcel limits the property to a single-family residence. This is
likely why it remains vacant. While a single-family residence was its historic use, the previous residence
on the property was demolished 30 years ago and it has not been redeveloped in the past 30 years. In
addition, while not recent, the construction of the Smith’s and the change to the character of the
neighborhood with its development makes the proposed commercial zoning, change in the land use
designation, and the preliminary proposal for a mixed-use development appropriate for the site.
The proposed master plan amendment and zoning map amendment are also compatible with the
citywide Plan Salt Lake. Consistent with Plan Salt Lake, the proposal will provide a mix of uses,
redevelopment of a vacant property, and additional commercial space and residential units in the
central area of the city. The plan identifies several initiatives that the proposed rezoning helps to
implement. In the Growth Chapter, the following apply:
1.Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and
transportation corridors.
2.Encourage a mix of land uses.
3.Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land.
The proposed rezoning is located on 800 South, one block north of the 900 South “Funding our Future”
frequent service transit route and one block west of the 900 East Route 209. As stated above, the site
is currently vacant, and the proposed rezoning and master plan amendment are consistent with the use
to the east and, given the small nature of the property, would serve as a transition to the residential and
small neighborhood business uses to the west.
While a residential use would not be required, the applicant submitted a preliminary proposal that
included housing units. In this case, two initiatives in the Housing Chapter apply as well:
2.Increase the number of medium density housing types and options.
4.Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the
potential to be people-oriented.
5.Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate.
The site is located in close proximity to existing infrastructure, including frequent service transit routes.
The preliminary proposal for commercial and residential would provide additional space for small
businesses and additional residential units in the neighborhood.
Issue 2: Zoning compatibility with adjacent properties
As detailed in Attachment A – Vicinity Maps and Attachment D – Existing Conditions and
Development Standards, the surrounding properties are zoned CB and R-2. The R-2 zone generally
permits single- and two-family residential properties. The CB zone, consistent with the Smith’s
property to the east, allows for a variety of commercial uses and multifamily development. Given these
standards, the anticipated use of the site with commercial on the first floor and residential on the
second floor would serve as a transition from adjacent higher intensity uses and would be compatible
with the commercial development to the east and the mix of small scale commercial and residential
development to the west.
Issue 3: Existing zoning limitations and proposed zone
The subject property is currently zoned R-2, which allows for single-family and two-family dwellings.
However, two-family dwellings require a minimum of 8,000 square feet, which is approximately 1,200
square feet larger than this parcel. With this requirement, the property is generally limited to single-
family uses. It has been vacant since the previous residence was demolished in 1989, so this reuse
seems unlikely. This is detailed in Attachment D – Existing Conditions and Development Standards.
As previously stated, the proposed CB zoning district is consistent with the zoning of the Smith’s
property to the east. Grocery stores are frequently zoned CB, which is intended to provide for the close
4
integration of moderately sized commercial areas with adjacent residential neighborhoods. It allows
for an additional 5’ of building height compared to the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and SNB
zoning districts, which could allow for a taller first floor ceiling height that often benefits commercial
uses and is consistent with the zoning to the east. The maximum height in CB at 30’ is 2’ greater than
the 28’ permitted for a single-family home with a pitched roof in the R-2 zoning district. CB allows for
a wider variety of uses compared to SNB. The uses in CB are similar to CN and many of the additional
uses permitted in CB, such as an assisted living facility, gas station, or hotel are likely to be developed
on larger parcels. This property is adjacent to an existing CB zoned property and the uses, height, and
design standards related to glass and blank wall length as well as the maximum 30’ height are
appropriate for the site.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed master plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial and
the proposed zoning map amendment from R-2 to CB would allow for a variety of commercial uses and
multifamily residential on the site. Currently, the property is vacant since a historically single-family
residence was demolished in 1989. Generally, due to the small size of the site, development of a greater
intensity than a single-family residence is not permitted due to lot area restrictions. The proposed CB
zoning district is located on the Smith’s property to the east and a rezoning of this small parcel to CB
would serve as a transition to the R-2 and SNB zoned properties near the subject property.
The East Liberty Park Community Council discussed the proposed rezoning at their October meeting
and submitted a letter in support of the proposal. At the meeting, there were questions about the
proposed use, including whether a restaurant or bar would be permitted and a potential development
agreement with a restriction on these uses. In addition, staff has received three emails in support of
the proposal (Attachment F).
NEXT STEPS:
The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their
consideration as part of the final decision on this petition. If ultimately approved, the applicant may
proceed with the submission of plans to redevelop the site. If ultimately denied, the applicant would be
able to construct a single-family home on the property.
ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP
6
Noble Pl
800 E900 S
Chase Ave
800 S
900 S
800 S
Mendon Ct800 S
900 S800 E800 EWindsor St731
758 764 768 718
726
732
738
742
764
717 816 826 840
721
725
729
739
747
749
753
757
761
765
724
726
730
736
744
750
754
760
762
785 819
823
831 833
719 854 856
723
725
729
733
737
743
751
753
755
759
761
763
845 851 861
726
732
746
750
760
768
772
780
752
756
764
768
774 802
839
847
851
853855857859
863
814
818
824
828
832
836
844
848
854
751
753
763
765 775 777
859
801
809
813
817
823
829
847
832
829
825
825
810
835
833
834
834
819 841 865 870859
876 800 ELincoln StLowell Ave
Belmont AveEgli CtWindsor StLake StSego Ave
700 S
900 S 900 E800 S
700 E¯Salt Lake City Planning Division, 10/12/2020
Legend
Subject Property
Parcels
Vicinity Map
0 80 160 240 32040
Feet7
ATTACHMENT B: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of the property.
View of the property, the accessory structure on the property to the west, and the back of the commercial
building on the corner of 800 S and 800 E.
8
View of Smith’s property to the east.
View of east/front façade of commercial property at 800 S and 800 E.
9
View of adjacent duplex to the east – 800 E/front facade.
View of the front/west façade (800 E) of the property to the south of the subject property.
10
View from the site looking across 800 S
11
ATTACHMENT C: ADDITIONAL APPLICANT
INFORMATION
12
Updated 7/1/
Master Plan Amendment
Amend the text of the Master Plan Amend the Land Use Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Name of Master Plan Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
Planners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please call (801) 535-7700 if
you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application.
REQUIRED FEE
Filing fee of $ plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre.
$100 for newspaper notice.
Plus additional fee for mailed public notices.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
13
Updated 7/1/Staff ReviewSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Project Description (please attach additional sheets.)
Describe the proposed master plan amendment.
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
Declare why the present master plan requires amending.
Is the request amending the Land Use Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the master plan?
If so, please include exact language to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Mailing Address: Planning Counter
PO Box 145471
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
In Person: Planning Counter
451 South State Street, Room 215
Telephone: (801) 535-7700
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
14
Updated 7/1/
Zoning Amendment
Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City
Planning Counter at (801) 535-7700 prior to submitting the application.
REQUIRED FEE
iling fee of $plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre
for newspaper notice.
Plus additional fee for mailed public notices.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
15
Updated 7/1/Staff ReviewSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Project Description (please attach additional sheets.)
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.
List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area.
Is the request amending the Zoning Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance ?
If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Mailing Address: Planning Counter
PO Box 145471
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
In Person: Planning Counter
451 South State Street, Room 215
Telephone: (801) 535-7700
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
16
September 22, 2020
Salt Lake City Planning Commission
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Re: Description of Master Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 810 E 800 S
Planning Commission,
We are seeking to develop and construct a mixed commercial / residential building at 810 E 800
S, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake County Parcel Number 16-08-176-024-0000 (the “Property”).
We are submitting two applications in conjunction with each other to begin this process: 1) an
amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan, changing the
Property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial, and 2) a zoning map
amendment changing the Property from R-2 to CB (Community Business).
The Property is subject to the Central Community Master Plan, East Central North
Neighborhood, which has the Property listed as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use
Map. Additionally, the property is currently zoned as R-2. The Property is an empty lot and has
been that way for well over twenty-five years. It currently attracts the transient population and
has been not beneficially used for a significant period of time.
The corner of 800 S 800 E has turned into a small commercial hub, with several businesses
located immediately to the west of the Property and zoned as Small Neighborhood Business.1
Smith’s grocery store is located immediately to the east of the Property, which is zoned CB.
With the Property sandwiched between commercial uses, it is not a desirable location for a single
family or two-family dwelling. Additionally, the market value of the Property, given its
excellent commercial location, makes it cost prohibitive to build a single-family dwelling or two-
family dwelling under the current zoning. The Property will most likely continue to sit vacant
unless it is allowed to be used for commercial or mixed-use purposes.
We intend to build a two-story mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor. We have included a proposed site plan and a rough
rendering of the elevation of the building as seen from 800 South. This use meets the purposes
of the Master Plan by locating “community level retail sales and services on appropriate
arterials,” in an area that is already surrounded by commercial uses. See Central Community
Master Plan, CLU-1.2, page 11. There is also a heavy emphasis in the Central Community
Master Plan on providing mixed use commercial / residential properties with “ground level
1 There is a garage immediately to the west of the Property that is zoned R-2. However, that garage juts
out from a parcel further to the south that has a duplex with in home business operating out of the
property. The block face surrounding the Property appears to be all commercial. The only property that
adjoins the Property and is used solely as a residential home is immediately to the south.
17
commercial space [and] apartment or condominium units above the first floor,” especially in the
9th and 9th area just to the south of the Property. See Central Community Master Plan, page 11.
This development meets these objectives and will add to the community.
We respectfully request that the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map be
amended so that the Property is designated at Community Commercial and that the Property be
rezoned to from R-2 to CB.
We’re excited to move forward with this project. Please reach out to me if you have any
questions.
Best,
Stanford Bell
801-884-9044
18
EXISTINGBUILDING(1442 SF)EXISTINGBUILDING800 SOUTH810 E 800 S (0.16 ACRES - 6850 SF)2600 SF (LOWER)DRIVEWAYEXISTING POWER POLEADA2900 SF (UPPER)ARTISTSTUDIOARTISTSTUDIODUMPSTER17'-6"21'-6"EXISTINGBUILDINGSCALE:A1A1-01SITE PLAN - 081820810 E 800 S1/16"=1'-0"19
COFFEE BOUTIQUE GALLERY
810 EAST CONCEPT SKETCH 8/24/20BOUTIQUE COMMERCIAL GROUND FLOORRESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE
810
20
ATTACHMENT D: EXISTING CONDITIONS &
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CURRENT USES OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS AND THOSE WITHIN THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY
Abutting property to the north:
The properties to the north and across 800 South are single-family residences that are zoned R-2
(Single and Two-Family Residential).
Abutting property to the south:
The property to the south is zoned R-2 and there is a single-family home on the property.
Abutting property to the east:
The property to the east is zoned CB (Community Business) and there is a Smith’s grocery store on
the site.
Abutting property to the west:
The property to the west is zoned R-2 and there is a duplex on the property. The property to the west
of it has a commercial building and is zoned SNB (Small Neighborhood Business).
CURRENT AND PROPOSED ZONING STANDARDS (21A.24.110 and 21A.26.030)
The subject property is zoned R-2 and the proposal is for CB. The following table provides the
general yard and bulk requirements for development within the zoning districts.
R-2 Zoning District (Existing)
Minimum Lot Area (single-family detached dwellings) Minimum Lot Width
5,000 sq. ft. 50 ft.
CB Zoning District (Proposed)
Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width
None None
21
R-2 Zoning District (Single-family)
Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side
Yards
Maximum
Building
Coverage
Height
Average of
block face or
20 ft.
25% of lot depth not less
than 15 ft., need not be
more than 25’
4 ft. on one or
10 ft. on the
other
40% 28 ft. to the ridge or the
average of the block face;
20 ft. for flat roofs
CB Zoning District
Front Yard Rear
Yard
Interior
Side Yards
Height Maximum Building
Coverage
Landscape Yards Buffer Yards
None
required
10 ft. None
required
30 ft. NA Front yard, if
provided
7 ft. next to
residential
Allowed uses in each zone:
Land use tables for each zone are below for reference.
Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
Use R-2 CB
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C8 P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Animal: Veterinary office P
Antenna, communication tower P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone C
Art gallery P
Artisan food production (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) P24
Bed and breakfast P
Bed and breakfast inn P
Bed and breakfast manor C3
Clinic (medical, dental) P
Commercial food preparation P
Community garden C P
22
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child C22 P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare or preschool P22 P22
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P22 P22
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P
Assisted living facility (small) P
Dwelling, accessory unit P
Dwelling, assisted living facility (limited capacity) C
Dwelling, group home (small)15 P
Dwelling, manufactured home P
Dwelling, single-family (detached) P
Dwelling, twin home and two-family P2
Group home (large)17 P
Group home (small) when located above or below first story office, retail, or
commercial use, or on the first story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage18
P
Living quarter for caretaker or security guard P
Multi-family P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Eleemosynary facility C P
Financial institution P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P9
Gas station C
Government facility C C
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P
Home occupation P24 P23
Hotel/motel C
Large wind energy system P
Library P
Limousine service (small) C
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P
Municipal service uses, including City utility uses and police and fire stations C C
Museum P
Nursing care facility P
Office P
Open space P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P
Park P P
Parking:
23
Off site P
Park and ride lot C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P
Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size C P
Reception center P
Recreation (indoor) P
Recycling collection station P
Restaurant P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P9
Retail goods establishment P
Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area P
With drive-through facility P9
Retail service establishment P
Furniture repair shop P
With drive-through facility P9
Reverse vending machine P
Sales and display (outdoor) P
School:
College or university P
Music conservatory P
Professional and vocational P
Seminary and religious institute C P
Seasonal farm stand P
Studio, art P
Theater, live performance P12
Theater, movie C
Urban farm P P
Utility, building or structure P5 P2
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P5 P2
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P
Qualifying provisions for CB:
2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations.
9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations.
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title.
11. In CN and CB Zoning Districts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total.
Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square
feet in an outdoor patio area.
22. Subject to section 21A.36.130 of this title.
23. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to section 21A.36.030
of this title.
24
24. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
Qualifying provisions for R-2:
2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings
are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995).
5. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations.
8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of subsection 21A.24.010S of this title.
22. Subject to section 21A.36.130 of this title.
24. Subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title.
25
ATTACHMENT E: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENTS
State Law, Utah Code Annotated, Title 10 Chapter 9a, requires that all municipalities have a master
plan. However, there is no specific criteria relating to master plan amendments. The City does not
have specific criteria relating to master plan amendments. However, City Code Section 21A.02.040 –
Effect of Adopted Master Plans or General Plans addresses this issue in the following way:
All master plans or general plans adopted by the planning commission and city council
for the city, or for an area of the city, shall serve as an advisory guide for land use
decisions. Amendments to the text of this title or zoning map should be consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the applicable adopted master plan or
general plan of Salt Lake City. (Ord. 26-95 § 2(1-4), 1995)
In this case, the master plan is being amended in order to provide consistency between the Central
Community Master Plan and the proposed zoning designation of the subject property. In this case,
the master plan identifies the property as low density residential. The zoning map and master plan
requests facilitate a rezoning of the property to the Community Business district, consistent with the
adjacent property to the east. This district allows for a much wider variety of uses. The small size of
the parcel limits the practicality of many of these permitted uses on the site. The applicant’s
preliminary proposal for two-story mixed-use building with commercial on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor would be compatible with the neighborhood and serve as a
transition between the more intensive use of the Smith’s property to the east and the duplex and small
commercial building to the west. State Law does include a required process in relation to a public
hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission for a master plan amendment. The
required process and noticing requirements have been met. Should the Planning Commission make a
positive recommendation for the zoning map amendment, an amendment to the master plan is also
appropriate.
ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a
matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one
standard. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the
following:
Factor Finding Rationale
1.Whether a proposed
map amendment is
consistent with the
purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through
its various adopted
planning documents;
Complies As discussed in Issue 1, the proposed
zoning amendment is consistent
with Plan Salt Lake and policies
within the Central Community
Master Plan. The master plan
amendment will provide consistency
with the land use map in the Central
Community Master Plan. This
proposal would provide a transition
from the more intensive commercial
development to the east with the
residential and small commercial
development to the west.
2.Whether a proposed
map amendment furthers
the specific purpose
statements of the zoning
ordinance.
Complies Section 21A.02.030 of the Salt Lake
City Code provides the purpose and
intent of the overall Zoning
Ordinance stating that it is to,
“promote the health, safety, morals,
convenience, order, prosperity and
26
welfare of the present and future
inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to
implement the adopted plans of the
city, and to carry out the purposes of
the municipal land use development
and management act…and other
relevant statutes.” Additionally, it is
to address the following:
A. Lessen congestion in the streets
or roads;
B. Secure safety from fire and other
dangers;
C. Provide adequate light and air;
D. Classify land uses and distribute
land development and utilization;
E. Protect the tax base;
F. Secure economy in governmental
expenditures;
G. Foster the city's industrial,
business and residential
development; and
H. Protect the environment.
The proposed master plan and map
amendment would foster the city’s
development with additional
commercial space and residential
units on a parcel that has been
vacant for 30 years. It would protect,
and likely increase, the tax base and
possibly lessen congestion in the
streets by placing more residences
and neighborhood scale commercial
space in the neighborhood.
3. The extent to which a
proposed map
amendment will affect
adjacent properties;
Complies As discussed in Issue 2 and
Attachment D, the proposed map
amendment will have an effect on
the adjacent properties since a use
more intensive than a single-family
home could be constructed.
However, the parcel has been vacant
for 30 years and has not
redeveloped. The proposed zone is
consistent with the property to the
east and, given its size, would likely
provide a transition to the less
intensively developed properties to
the west.
4. Whether a proposed
map amendment is
consistent with the
purposes and provisions
of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may
impose additional
standards
The zone is
consistent
with
any other
applicable
overlays.
The site is located within the
Groundwater Source Protection
Overlay and is within the boundaries
of a National Historic District. It
would be required to comply with
the requirements of the
Groundwater Source Protection
overlay. City historic preservation
requirements do not apply to
properties within National Historic
Districts.
27
5. The adequacy of public
facilities and services
intended to serve the
subject property,
including, but not limited
to, roadways, parks and
recreational facilities,
police and fire protection,
schools, stormwater
drainage systems, water
supplies, and wastewater
and refuse collection.
City services
can be
provided
to the
site.
The subject property is located
within a built environment where
public facilities and services already
exist. Redevelopment on this
property may require upgrading or
installation of utilities and drainage
systems.
No concerns were received from
other City departments regarding
the zoning amendment or the
potential for development on these
properties as long as normal
development requirements are met.
28
ATTACHMENT F: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS
Public Notice, Meetings, Comments
The following is a list of public meetings and other public input opportunities related to the proposed
project:
Notice of Application to Recognized Community Organization:
A notice of application was sent to the East Central and East Liberty Park Community Councils on
October 14, 2020. The community council was given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to
request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment.
The East Liberty Park Community Council held a Zoom meeting on October 22, 2020 that the
applicant, developer, and staff attended. Phil Winston presented the project and also stated the
applicant was willing to enter into a development agreement prohibiting a restaurant or bar.
Comments were generally supportive of the proposal and neighbors have indicated that they were
against a restaurant or bar.
The Community Council submitted a letter of support (attached) for the project with a development
agreement.
Open House:
An online open house was posted on October 19, 2020.
Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included:
Early notification sent to property owners within 300’ on October 15, 2020.
Public hearing notice posted on December 29, 2020.
Public notice posted on City and State website and Planning Division list serve on December 29,
2020.
Public hearing notice sent to property owners within 300’ on December 29, 2020.
Public Input:
Staff has received three emails in support of the proposal that are attached.
29
ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO
January 6, 2021
Dear SLC Planning Commission:
The board of ELPCO, the East Liberty Park Community Organization, is writing in support of the request by
Stanford Bell and Phil Winston of Altus Development Group to amend the Central Community Master Plan and
the zoning map for a development project at 810 East 800 South [Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 &
PLNPCM2020-00741].
Our positive recommendation results from a careful examination of this proposal, a comprehensive
presentation by the developers, and feedback from residents who live near the project area.
We support this project for the following reasons:
• The development creates a better use for a vacant property
• The project adds housing units to the neighborhood
• The zoning change to CB (Community Business) is consistent with the proposed design and with the
zoning of adjacent parcels
• The project mixes residential and commercial uses in a scale that this appropriate for the streetscape
• The zoning and master plan changes are supported by nearby residents
In October 2020, Phil Winston from Altus Designs presented about this project for 20 minutes during an online
ELPCO community meeting. He described the purpose of the development and the reason for the zoning
changes and reviewed his team’s community engagement efforts.
You can watch the ELPCO presentation by Phil Winston here: https://youtu.be/lYhdavQ-QlE?t=480
During this presentation, Phil Winston mentioned his decision to not allow a restaurant or bar to occupy the
commercial space based on his conversations with residents. He added he would codify this in a development
agreement attached to the project.
ELPCO supports this development agreement, would recommend that it be expanded to include confirmation
of mixed-use design with residential units and the use of durable building materials consistent with the
surrounding properties. We would also like to see this development agreement attached to the title of the
property. We recommend the SLC City Council work with Altus to complete this development agreement.
Additionally, ELPCO contacted residents of 800 East who live adjacent to the project and have recently been
involved with the Telegraph Exchange Lofts proposal. Here are two comments we received regarding this
project.
We support it completely. First of all, it fits the location and scale very well. They have done a great job
of checking in and clearing the idea with us and other neighbors. We feel it does a great job filling that
eyesore of a space that is not ideal for home or duplex, while also adding housing. The design acts as a
buffer to yards/homes from 800 S and has well thought out design and greenery to blend, while still
creating a structure that will visually enhance the neighborhood.
30
ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO
[…] are in support of the project. While hesitant to set the precedent of spot rezoning, we agree that
this is a different situation than Telegraph Exchange and this lot will never thrive as anything but
commercial. Phil Winston and the Demuris did a good job in engaging the immediate neighborhood for
feedback and the mixed-use design will greatly improve this stretch of 800 South.
In summary, ELPCO supports the master plan and zoning map amendments for the project at 810 East 800
South.
Sincerely,
Jason Stevenson, ELPCO co-chair
Darryl High, ELPCO co-chair
Dave Richards, Land Use advisor
Judi Short, Land Use advisor
About ELPCO
ELPCO is the East Liberty Park Community Organization—a local, city-sanctioned community organization that
represents the residents and businesses in the East Liberty Park area of Salt Lake City. The area covered by
ELPCO is defined by the boundaries of 700 E to 1300 E and 800 S to 1700 S. ELPCO currently meets online on the
fourth Thursday of every month. Learn more at www.facebook.com/ELPCO or by emailing elpcoslc@gmail.com
- Sign up for ELPCO's twice-monthly e-newsletters here: http://eepurl.com/gcOcCL
31
From:John Webster
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 810 East 800 South proposal
Date:Friday, November 20, 2020 12:01:54 PM
Hi Sara,
I'm writing in favor of the development proposal on 800 south and 810 East, just West of the Smith's
grocery store.
I've been a home owner in the area since the early 1990s and watched the surrounding area improve
dramatically. That 800 South area around Smiths has been a bit of a neglected space. Seems that city
and private development has favored the 900 South corridor. We appreciate the amenities that
development afforded and would welcome extending the rejuvenation to 800 South. The mix of
commercial space with residential above is a great combination. We need the tax base business brings
and more residential housing. Win win.
Thank you for your consideration.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Warm regards,
- John Webster
32
From:Tom Brennan
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2020-00740/00741 Public Comment
Date:Friday, October 23, 2020 8:46:48 AM
Sara,
I’m writing in general support of the proposed development at 810 East 800 South. This is an
appropriate use at this location. The general scale of the proposed development is in character with
other neighborhood business in the 9th and 9th neighborhood.
While this is an application for a zoning change and not a design review, I would encourage that the
application to change zoning be tied in some manner to the materials used for the exterior.
Specifically I would encourage that materials be appropriate for the neighborhood – specifically not
Exterior Insulated Insulation (EIFS) more commonly referred to as stucco or Dryvit. While the
rendering is conceptual (and could in fact drastically change), what appears to be proposed is a
traditional brick and industrial sash façade could easily be built using an EIFS system which would be
completely inappropriate for the area.
Thank you,
-- Thomas S. Brennan, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB 1018 S. Lake Street Salt Lake City, UT 84105
33
From:John Ewanowski
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Public Comment - 810 E. 800 South development
Date:Monday, November 30, 2020 1:03:33 PM
Sara,
I am writing as an architect, member of the SLC Historic Landmark Commission, and 9th and
9th resident to register my support for Altus Development Group's proposed project at 810 E.
800 South. The current vacant lot is an eyesore, and the building depicted in the 8/24/20
Concept Sketch is handsome and appropriately scaled. I like how the design references the
past while utilizing contemporary materials. As a result, I support the zoning map amendment
and master plan amendment as depicted by the applicant.
Sincerely,
John
--
John Ewanowski
1022 S. 900 East | Salt Lake City, UT 84105
34
ATTACHMENT G: DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
Public Utilities – Jason Draper, Jason.Draper@slcgov.com
No objections to the zone and master plan amendment. Development will likely require off-site
improvements including and upgrade of the water main.
Zoning, Building, and Fire Code – Greg Mikolash, Gregory.Mikolash@slcgov.com
Building Services finds no zoning, building code, or fire code related issues associated with this
request.
Engineering – Scott Weiler, Scott.Weiler@slcgov.com
No objection.
Transportation – Michael Barry, Michael.Barry@slcgov.com
Transportation has no objections to this Zoning Map and master Plan amendment
35
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
C. Agenda/Minutes/Newspaper Notice
January 13, 2021
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the
Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation
January 13, 2021, at 5:30 p.m.
(The order of the items may change at the Commission’s discretion)
This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Building. Commission Members
will connect remotely. We want to make sure everyone interested in the Planning Commission meetings
can still access the meetings how they feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the Planning
Commission meetings, they are available on the following platforms:
• YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
• SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or provide general
comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.com or connect with us on Webex at:
• http://tiny.cc/slc-pc-01132021
Instructions for using Webex will be provided on our website at SLC.GOV/Planning
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 9, 2020
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Maven Lofts Design Review & Planned Development at approximately 156 East 900 South -
Joe Jacoby, representing Jacoby Architects, has submitted applications to the city for Design
Review and a Planned Development to construct an addition that would create 57 new residential
units located at approximately 156 E 900 South. The proposal is for a 4 -story building that will be
located roughly on the same footprint as the existing building. The applicant is requesting Design
Review approval to allow for an additional 15 FT of building height, for a total building height of
approximately 45 FT. Through the Planned Development process, the applicant is requesting to
decrease the front, rear, and corner side yard setbacks for the second, third, and fourth stories of the
building. The exterior wall of the prop osed upper stories is slightly stepped back from the exterior wall
of the existing building, which is located right at the property line. The CC zoning district requires a
front and corner side yard setback of 15’ and a rear yard setback of 10’. In order to utilize the ground
floor of the existing building, the applicant is also requesting to allow the rooftop garden areas to
count toward landscaping requirements. The property is located within the CC (Commercial
Corridor) zoning district in council district 5, represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Amy
Thompson at (385) 226 -9001 or amy.thompson@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00721
& PLNPCM2020-00722
2. Windsor Court Planned Development at approximately 1966 S Windsor Street - Mike
Spainhower, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for a 17 -unit multi-family
dwelling at 1966 S. Windsor Street. The project would be built on an existing vacant lot. The total site
is 0.7 acres. The Planned Development is needed to address a modification to the front yard setback
and landscape buffers. The subject property is located in the RMF -35 zoning district and within
Council District 7, represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Katia Pace at (385) 226 -8499
or katia.pace@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020 -00727
3. Village at North Station Building D Design Review at approximately 1925 W North Temple –
Michael Batt, representing the property owner, is seeking Design Revie w approval to modify a front
setback requirement for a proposed building located at approximately 1925 W North Temple. The
applicant is requesting to modify the maximum 5' front yard setback requirement due to the location
of a high voltage power line alon g Orange Street. They are requesting increased front yard setback
so that the front of the building is a required minimum safe distance from the power line. Modifications
to the front yard setback can be approved through the Design Review process. The subject property
is located within the TSA-MUEC-T (Transit Station Area District - Mixed Use Employment Center
Station – Transition) zoning district. The property is in Council District 1, represented by James
Rogers (Staff contact: Daniel Echeverria at (385) 226-3835 or daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com) Case
Number PLNPCM2020-00730
4. 9th Mixed-Use Multifamily Design Review – Eric Moran, on behalf of the property owner and
management company, RD Management, along with architects Peter Jacobsen and Jeff Byers of
The Richardson Design Group, are seeking Design Review approva l to redevelop the property
located at the southwest corner of the intersection of 400 South and 900 East with residential and
commercial space. The proposal includes 264 residential units and approximately 16,000 square
feet of commercial space. The app licant is requesting Design Review by the Planning Commission
to allow for a façade length greater than 200 feet in the TSA-UN-C zoning district and for modifications
to the design standards in 21A.37. The property is located within Council District 4, re presented by
Ana Valdemoros. (Staff contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com )
Case number PLNPCM2020-00641
5. AT&T Wireless Communication Facility Conditional Use at approximately 1550 South 5600
West – A request by Brian Sieck of Smartlink for a new AT&T wireless communications facility with
an 80’ monopole and unmanned communication site located at approximately 1550 South 5600 West.
The proposed site would be located in the northwest corner of the parcel. The subject property is
located within the M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district and is located within Council District 2,
represented by Andrew Johnston (Staff Contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-00819
6. Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South – Salt Lake City has
received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group representing the property owner
of 810 East 800 South, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The
proposal would rezone the property located at a pproximately 810 East 800 South from R-2 (Single
and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) and the Central Community Master Plan
Future Land Use map designation from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial . The
applicant anticipates developing the site with a two-story building with commercial on the first floor
and residential units on the second floor. The subject property is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family
Residential) and is located within Council District 5 represented by Darin Ma no (Staff contact: Sara
Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020 -00740
& PLNPCM2020-00741
7. Master Plan Amendment and Rezone at approximately 554 & 560 South 300 East - Salt Lake
City has received a request from Mariel Wirthlin, with The Associated Group and representing the
property owner of 554 and 560 South 300 East, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and
the zoning map. The proposal would rezone the properties located at approximately 554 and 560
South 300 East from RO (Residential Office) to RMU (Residential/Mixed Use) and amend the Central
Community Future Land Use Map from Residential/Office Mixed Use to High Mixed Use. The
proposed Master Plan amendment to High Mixed Use and rezone to RMU is intended to allow retail
service uses on the property, in addition to office use. The subject property is zoned RO
(Residential Office) and is located within Council District 4, represented by Ana Valdemoros (Staff
contact: Nannette Larsen at (385) 386-2761 or nannette.larsen@slcgov.com) Case numbers
PLNPCM2020-00604 & PLNPCM2020-00712
8. Fence Height Zoning Ordinance Amendment – A request by the City Council to amend the zoning
ordinance regulations to remove the special exception process that allows for over -height fences
(Chapter 21A.52.030) and to define instances where a taller fence may be appropriate and approved
by right. The proposed amendments would limit fence, wall, and hedge height to four feet (4’) in front
yards and six feet (6’) in the side or rear yards, except for in a few specific instances. Those instances
include when a residential district abuts a nonresidential district, in extraction industries and
manufacturing districts, public facilities and recrea tion facilities where a greater height is necessary
to protect public safety, private game courts, and construction fencing. Additionally, the Planning
Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission would have the authority to grant additional
fence, wall, or hedge height as part of a land use application. The amendments proposed to Chapter
21A.40 will affect all zoning districts throughout Salt Lake City. The changes would apply Citywide.
(Staff contact: Krissy Gilmore at (801) 535 -7780 or kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com) Case number
PLNPCM2020-00511
For Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division’s website at slc.gov/planning/public-
meetings. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified,
which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 1
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
This meeting was held electronically pursuant to the
Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
A roll is being kept of all who attended the Planning Commission Meeting. The meeting was called to
order at 05:30 PM. Audio recordings of the Planning Commission meetings are retained for a period of
time. These minutes are a summary of the meeting. For complete commentary and presentation of the
meeting, please visit https://www.youtube.com/c/SLCLiveMeetings.
Present for the Planning Commission meeting were: Chairperson, Brenda Scheer; Vice Chairperson,
Amy Barry; Commissioners, Adrienne Bell, Carolynn Hoskins, Matt Lyon, Sara Urquhart, and Crystal
Young-Otterstrom. Commissioners Jon Lee, and Andres Paredes were excused.
Planning Staff members present at the meeting were: Michaela Oktay, Planning Deputy Director; Nick
Norris, Planning Director; Paul Nielson, Attorney; Amy Thompson, Senior Planner; Katia Pace, Principal
Planner; Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner; Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner; Nannette Larsen, Principal
Planner; Krissy Gilmore, Principal Planner; and Marlene Rankins, Administrative Secretary.
Chairperson Brenda Scheer, read the emergency proclamation for holding a remote meeting.
APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2020, MEETING MINUTES. 02:31
MOTION 02:46
Commissioner Young-Otterstrom moved to approve the December 9, 2020 meeting minutes.
Commissioner Urquhart seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Lyon,
Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. Commissioner Hoskins abstained from voting as
she was not present for the said meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR 04:24
Chairperson Scheer informed the public of the long agenda and that there will be a break half-way through
the agenda.
Vice Chairperson Barry stated she had nothing to report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR 05:33
Michaela Oktay, Planning Director, stated she had nothing to report.
05:55
Maven Lofts Design Review & Planned Development at approximately 156 East 900 South - Joe
Jacoby, representing Jacoby Architects, has submitted applications to the city for Design Review and a
Planned Development to construct an addition that would create 57 new residential units located at
approximately 156 E 900 South. The proposal is for a 4-story building that will be located roughly on the
same footprint as the existing building. The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to allow for
an additional 15 FT of building height, for a total building height of approximately 45 FT. Through the
Planned Development process, the applicant is requesting to decrease the front, rear, and corner side
yard setbacks for the second, third, and fourth stories of the building. The exterior wall of the proposed
upper stories is slightly stepped back from the exterior wall of the existing building, which is located right
at the property line. The CC zoning district requires a front and corner side yard setback of 15’ and a rear
yard setback of 10’. In order to utilize the ground floor of the existing building, the applicant is also
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 6
PUBLIC HEARING 2:28:51
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing; seeing no one wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer
closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION 2:29:15
Commissioner Bachman stated, based on the findings listed in the Staff Report, the information
presented and input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission
approve the Conditional Use for the AT&T communications site with an 80-foot monopole and
associated equipment (Petition PLNPCM2020-00819) subject to the following conditions:
1. Any modifications to the approved plans after the issuance of a building permit must be
specifically requested by the applicant and approved by the Planning Division prior to
execution.
2. Applicant shall comply with all other department/division requirements.
Commissioner Hoskins seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
2:30:50
Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South – Salt Lake City has
received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group representing the property owner of
810 East 800 South, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The proposal
would rezone the property located at approximately 810 East 800 South from R-2 (Single and Two-Family
Residential) to CB (Community Business) and the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use map
designation from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant anticipates
developing the site with a two-story building with commercial on the first floor and residential units on the
second floor. The subject property is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) and is located within
Council District 5 represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226-4448 or
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-00741
Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the case
file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation
to the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Whether it’s in the Commissions purview to require a development agreement
Phillip Winston, applicant, provided a presentation with further details.
The Commission, Staff and Applicant discussed the following:
• Clarification on why the CB zone was chosen
• Setback standards for CB zone
PUBLIC HEARING 2:48:35
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing;
Zachary Dussault – Stated his support of the request.
Cindy Cromer – Stated there is no way that the CB zone with its wide array of allowed uses is appropriate
with at this sensitive location.
Nathan Florence - Provided an email comment stating his support of the request.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 7
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
The Commission discussed the following:
• Possibility of additional condition for a recommendation to the City Council
MOTION 3:01:53
Commissioner Bell stated, based on the findings and analysis in the staff report, testimony, and
discussion at the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, file PLNPCM2020-
00740, proposed zone change from R-2 (Single and Two Family Residential District) to CB
(Community Business) and file PLNPCM2020-00741 proposed master plan amendment from Low
Density Residential to Community Commercial.
Commissioner Bachman seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
3:03:36
Master Plan Amendment and Rezone at approximately 554 & 560 South 300 East - Salt Lake City
has received a request from Mariel Wirthlin, with The Associated Group and representing the property
owner of 554 and 560 South 300 East, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning
map. The proposal would rezone the properties located at approximately 554 and 560 South 300 East
from RO (Residential Office) to RMU (Residential/Mixed Use) and amend the Central Community Future
Land Use Map from Residential/Office Mixed Use to High Mixed Use. The proposed Master Plan
amendment to High Mixed Use and rezone to RMU is intended to allow retail service uses on the
property, in addition to office use. The subject property is zoned RO (Residential Office) and is located
within Council District 4, represented by Ana Valdemoros (Staff contact: Nannette Larsen at (385) 386-
2761 or nannette.larsen@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00604 & PLNPCM2020-00712
Nannette Larsen, Principal Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the
case file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Clarification on how the height difference changes with the RMU zone
• Clarification on what the rezone is allows
Mariel Wirthlin, applicant, provided further information.
PUBLIC HEARING 3:16:38
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing;
Zachary Dussault – Stated his support of the request.
Cindy Cromer – Stated this RO zone is a bad zone and every square inch of it we can get rid of in the
City is a good thing.
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
Notice of Public Hearing
On Wednesday, January 13, 2021, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
will hold a public hearing to consider making recommendations to the City
Council regarding the following petitions:
1. Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South
– Salt Lake City has received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Devel-
opment Group representing the property owner of 810 East 800 South, to
amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The pro-
posal would rezone the property located at approximately 810 East 800
South from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Busi-
ness) and the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use map designa-
tion from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant
anticipates developing the site with a two-story building with commercial
on the first floor and residential units on the second floor. The subject prop-
erty is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) and is located within
Council District 5 represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Sara Javoro-
nok at (385) 226-4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLN-
PCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-007412.
2. Fence Height Zoning Ordinance Amendment – A request by the City
Council to amend the zoning ordinance regulations to remove the special
exception process that allows for over-height fences (Chapter 21A.52.030)
and to define instances where a taller fence may be appropriate and ap-
proved by right. The proposed amendments would limit fence, wall, and
hedge height to four feet (4’) in front yards and six feet (6’) in the side or rear
yards, except for in a few specific instances. Those instances include when
a residential district abuts a nonresidential district, in extraction industries
and manufacturing districts, public facilities and recreation facilities where a
greater height is necessary to protect public safety, private game courts, and
construction fencing. Additionally, the Planning Commission and the Historic
Landmark Commission would have the authority to grant additional fence,
wall, or hedge height as part of a land use application. The amendments
proposed to Chapter 21A.40 will affect all zoning districts throughout Salt
Lake City. The changes would apply Citywide. (Staff contact: Krissy Gilm-
ore at (801) 535-7780 or kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com) Case number PLN-
PCM2020-00511
The public hearing will begin at 5:30 p.m. via Webex. To participate go to:
http://tiny.cc/slc-pc-01132021
This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Build-
ing. Commission Members will connect remotely. If you are interested in
watching the Planning Commission meetings, they are available on the fol-
lowing platforms:
YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.
slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the
meeting or provide general comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.
com.
DN0000000
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
From:cindy cromer
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) comments on proposal for 810 E 800 S
Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 4:24:29 PM
To Members of the Salt Lake Planning Commission
From cindy cromer
Re request for rezoning and master plan amendment at 810 E 800 S
1/13/21
My history with this parcel goes back almost 35 years to the expansion of the Smith's Food
King, certainly one of the worst land use decisions the City has made in the past 40 years. In
addition to wiping out dozens of units of modest housing, the City threw the balance of the
9th and 9th business district out of whack and precipitated the demolition of even more
housing to accommodate the loading dock after the expansion.
It was the inadequate loading dock on 900 S which led to the demise of the house at 810 E
800 S. The owner fled because of the trucks idling outside his bedroom and then the house
burned.
There is no way that the CB zone with its wide array of allowed uses is appropriate at this
sensitive location. And the neighbors and community organization can only be assured of
getting what they are willing to support if the City Council enters into a development
agreement with the owner to specify the mass and materials of the new building as well as
limiting the uses. I am not speaking to the integrity of the owner, only that there are no
guarantees that he will be able to do what the neighbors can support. The CB zone itself will
allow abundant uses, forms, and materials which no one would support.
The appropriate zone is the RMU-35 which would allow the proposed uses without the
encroachment of a more intensive zone into the smaller scale uses to the west. There are
lessons to learn from what the City did decades ago. One of them is that if you make a
mistake in land use, you probably will not be able to fix it. Another one is that the bad
decision will haunt future development. The CB zone was never appropriate here and its
extension into the residential area is a request that I cannot support when there is a new
alternative zone to accomplish what the owner wants to do, the RMU-35.
From:Rankins, Marlene
To:Javoronok, Sara
Cc:Oktay, Michaela
Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Rezoning and master plan amendment 810 E 800 S
Date:Tuesday, January 26, 2021 11:57:20 AM
Hi Sara,
Please see the email below.
Thanks,
MARLENE RANKINS
Administrative Secretary
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-6171
Email marlene.rankins@slcgov.com
www.OurNeighborhoods.CAN.com
www.slc.gov/planning/
www.slc.gov/historic-preservation/
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
From: Nathan Florence <nathansflorence@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 5:41 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Rezoning and master plan amendment 810 E 800 S
I’m around the corner from the parcel in question and have dealt with various uses of it for the
almost 20 years we have owned our home at 817 South on 800 East. While we have fought multiple
local projects that we felt overreached or encroached on the street/neighborhood in other locations,
we enthusiastically support this effort for the situation. The location, as it stands now, is not well
suited for its current zoning and the proposed use is creative and fitting. We have been grateful, as
neighbors, for the efforts of the potential developers for engaging with all of the neighbors from the
outset and looking to create a project that really benefits everyone in the neighborhood. It is a great
use for an otherwise problematic property.
We would still like the City to engage in an overall approach to growth that would not be dependent
on this kind of spot re-zone by developers, but in this case we strongly support the application.
Thanks, Nathan and Marian Florence
--
www.nflorencefineart.com
www.artandbelieffilm.com
5. ORIGINAL PETITIONS
PLNPCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-00741
September 22, 2020
Salt Lake City Planning Commission
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Re: Description of Master Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 810 E 800 S
Planning Commission,
We are seeking to develop and construct a mixed commercial / residential building at 810 E 800
S, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake County Parcel Number 16-08-176-024-0000 (the “Property”).
We are submitting two applications in conjunction with each other to begin this process: 1) an
amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan, changing the
Property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial, and 2) a zoning map
amendment changing the Property from R-2 to CB (Community Business).
The Property is subject to the Central Community Master Plan, East Central North
Neighborhood, which has the Property listed as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use
Map. Additionally, the property is currently zoned as R-2. The Property is an empty lot and has
been that way for well over twenty-five years. It currently attracts the transient population and
has been not beneficially used for a significant period of time.
The corner of 800 S 800 E has turned into a small commercial hub, with several businesses
located immediately to the west of the Property and zoned as Small Neighborhood Business.1
Smith’s grocery store is located immediately to the east of the Property, which is zoned CB.
With the Property sandwiched between commercial uses, it is not a desirable location for a single
family or two-family dwelling. Additionally, the market value of the Property, given its
excellent commercial location, makes it cost prohibitive to build a single-family dwelling or two-
family dwelling under the current zoning. The Property will most likely continue to sit vacant
unless it is allowed to be used for commercial or mixed-use purposes.
We intend to build a two-story mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor. We have included a proposed site plan and a rough
rendering of the elevation of the building as seen from 800 South. This use meets the purposes
of the Master Plan by locating “community level retail sales and services on appropriate
arterials,” in an area that is already surrounded by commercial uses. See Central Community
Master Plan, CLU-1.2, page 11. There is also a heavy emphasis in the Central Community
Master Plan on providing mixed use commercial / residential properties with “ground level
1 There is a garage immediately to the west of the Property that is zoned R-2. However, that garage juts
out from a parcel further to the south that has a duplex with in home business operating out of the
property. The block face surrounding the Property appears to be all commercial. The only property that
adjoins the Property and is used solely as a residential home is immediately to the south.
commercial space [and] apartment or condominium units above the first floor,” especially in the
9th and 9th area just to the south of the Property. See Central Community Master Plan, page 11.
This development meets these objectives and will add to the community.
We respectfully request that the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map be
amended so that the Property is designated at Community Commercial and that the Property be
rezoned to from R-2 to CB.
We’re excited to move forward with this project. Please reach out to me if you have any
questions.
Best,
Stanford Bell
801-884-9044
EXISTINGBUILDING(1442 SF)EXISTINGBUILDING800 SOUTH810 E 800 S (0.16 ACRES - 6850 SF)2600 SF (LOWER)DRIVEWAYEXISTING POWER POLEADA2900 SF (UPPER)ARTISTSTUDIOARTISTSTUDIODUMPSTER17'-6"21'-6"EXISTINGBUILDINGSCALE:A1A1-01SITE PLAN - 081820810 E 800 S1/16"=1'-0"
COFFEE BOUTIQUE GALLERY
810 EAST CONCEPT SKETCH 8/24/20BOUTIQUE COMMERCIAL GROUND FLOORRESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE
810
6. MAILING LIST
Name Address City State Zip
SMITH'S FOOD KING PROPERTIES INC 1014 VINE ST 7TH FLOOR CINCINNATI OH 45202
ES 187779 LC 1099 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTOPHER DEMURI; MEREDITH DEMURI (JT)1099 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
IXCHEL, LLC 1192 E DRAPER PKWY # 152 DRAPER UT 84020
PAUL A DOUGLAS 146 STONE MILL RD LOT 24 HUDSON NY 12534
KEVIN W STIGGE; PAMELA CALLAHAN (JT)1965 RIDGEHILL DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010
HAMILTON PLACE HOUSING CORPORATION 223 W 700 S # C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
SLC 84102 LLC 24101 MOUNTAIN CHARLIE RD LOS GATOS CA 95033
JOSH COOK 2461 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CLEARWATER HOMES, LLC 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
800 EAST FOURPLEX LLC 3734 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124
CODY V DERRICK 645 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BARN THAI LLC 758 E 700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CHRISTOS TSOUFAKIS (JT)760 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ILONA ZENNER 761 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 762 S WINDSOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84102
BECKY S ROBERTS 763 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 764 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
JAMES A HARRIS; CATHERINE CARGILL (JT)765 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 774 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
REED L DURFEY; SHANNON N DURFEY (JT)785 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 801 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 802 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 803 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 805 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
BRIAN C MILES 809 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 809 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 810 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
JULIA BJORNSTAD 813 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 814 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
NATHAN S FLORENCE; MARIAN C FLORENCE (JT)817 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ANGELA CARLSON; MICHAEL S JACOBSEN (JT)818 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BRENDA L CHRISTENSEN 819 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
SUZANNE MONTGOMERY 823 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ROBERT S NAK; MARIA L NAK (JT)823 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CATHERINE E LILLY 824 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 825 E CHASE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102
BRADLEY R CAIRNS 828 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 829 E CHASE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 829 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
MELODIE RICHARDSON 831 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 832 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
CHARLES T GRAYSON; MELANIE S GRAYSON (JT)832 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BENJAMIN R KURTIS; ERIKA P KURTIS 833 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 833 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 834 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 836 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 845 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 847 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 850 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 851 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 876 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
TONY MARTINEZ PO BOX 1875 SANDY UT 84091
Altus Development Group 336 W BROADWAY ST, STE 110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
Sara Javoronok, Planning Division PO Box 145480 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114