The URL can be used to link to this page

Transmittal - 8/26/2021 MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _________________________ Date Received: __________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: ______________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 20, 2021 Amy Fowler, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer ________________________________ SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B STAFF CONTACT: Marina Scott, City Treasurer 801-535-6565 DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the City Council hold a discussion on June 15, 2021 in anticipation of adopting a Bond Resolution for the aforementioned bond issue; 2) That the City Council consider adopting a Bond Resolution on July 13, 2021 approving the issuance and sale of up to $58,000,000 principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B (the “Bonds”), and give authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of and confirm the sale of the Bonds within certain parameters set forth in the attached Bond Resolution. BUDGET IMPACT: Tax- Exempt Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2021A – $22,490,000: Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to finance the cost of the various capital improvement projects. The list of the capital improvement projects to be financed by this bond issue is attached. The City’s Bond Counsel has reviewed the attached list of projects and provided their recommendations to the tax status of the bonds. The list is color-coded to reflect their responses. Responses highlighted in green are for projects that are eligible for tax-exempt financing. Responses highlighted in yellow are for projects that are eligible for tax-exempt financing but have potential private business use. rachel otto (May 21, 2021 13:58 MDT) 05/21/2021 05/21/2021 Salt Lake City Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021A and 2021B Transmittal to City Council May 11, 2021 Page 2 of 2 Responses highlighted in red are projects that either have or are likely to have private business use. The Administration proposes to issue tax-exempt bonds for the projects highlighted in green for the total of $22,490,000. Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs would average $1,307,595 per year for 21 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules. Taxable Sales Tax and Excise Tax Revenue Bond, Series 2021B - $34,600,000: The Administration proposes to issue taxable bonds for the projects highlighted in yellow and red for the total of $34,600,000. Based on preliminary estimates and the current interest rate environment, annual debt service costs would average $2,111,765 per year for 21 years. Attached are preliminary numbers including estimated sources and uses of funds as well as debt amortization schedules. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The table below summarizes the proposed bond issue: NEW MONEY New Money Project List $57,090,000 Tax-Exempt (green highlight) $22,490,000 Taxable (red & yellow highlights) $34,600,000 The current plan calls for the Bonds to be sold on August 25, 2021. An estimated debt service, a draft copy of the authorizing resolution of the City are included for your review. Please keep in mind that these are preliminary drafts and are subject to change. The Certificate of Determination will need to be signed by the Mayor and Council Chair or their respective designees on the afternoon of the date of pricing and sale of the bonds, which is currently scheduled for August 25, 2021. Attachments cc: Mary Beth Thompson, Boyd Ferguson, Steven Bagley, Lisa Shaffer, Mathew Cassel, Lorna Vogt, Cory Rushton, Blake Thomas. Department Project Dollar Amount Description Facilities CCB Transformer 2,500,000$ CCB Transformer Need square footage of all buildings served by the transformer. May have private business use of the portion serving the Leonardo. Depending on private payments and other private business use, consider financing portion relating to Leonardo on a taxable basis. CAN Warm Springs historic structure stabilization 3,000,000$ Full roof, flashing, drain replacement. Chimney stabilization. Lateral force tier 3 seismic upgrade. Stucco and window treatment. Since the City is treating the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as a capital expenditure, entire project is eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL Urban Wood Reutilization Equipment and Storage Additions 1,700,000$ Storage Building, Equipment Awning, Fencing, Lighting, Utilities to develop a fully functional Urban Wood Reutilization facility $1,700,000. Horizontal Grinder: Primary piece of equipment, will produce landscape mulch and EWF playground surface $1,100,000. Wood Mill: Mill will produce lumber products from urban trees $200,000. Base on project as described, including usage of wood, entire project is eligible for tax-exempt financing. Wood sales, if any, should be to general public. PL Public Lands Multilingual Wayfinding Signage 1,200,000$ This proposal is for Wayfinding signage throughout the City for the Parks, trails and natural lands system. Eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL Jordan River Paddle Share improvements at Exchange Club Marina 1700 S 7 JR 440,000$ Bond-funded infrastructure includes paddle share lockers (2 locations) with functional life of 20+ years, reconstruction of Paddle Share/River Access parking with improved entryway, signage & crosswalk/RRFB pedestrian crossing to existing restroom at 17th South River Park. Funding for additional paddle-share stations that would compliment this project is currently being requested from other sources (grants). Eligible for tax-exempt financing. CAN Fisher Mansion improvements and 1,500,000$ Concrete, masonry and seismic, thermal and moisture protection. Since the City is treating the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as a capital expenditure, entire project is eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL Allen Park Activation Historic Structures 1,300,000$ Adaptive re-use/restoration of historic residences in Allen Park to allow them to serve as artist studio spaces similar to Balboa Park Spanish Village model, with more frequent rotation of artists & art residencies. Improvements to Allen Park site to accommodate frequent gallery strolls, art & music festivals, etc. Will it include power source to allow food trucks, events, etc.? Will full utility upgrades be needed as the structures are now on septic systems. Based on currently described project and the City's intention to treat the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures, the project is eligible for tax-exempt financing; however, there could be private business use and payments. The City will need to actively monitor to ensure compliance with short term exceptions and potentially management contracts (see prior email and memo). Trans 600 North Complete Street Transformation 4,000,000$ A low-cost phase 1 is already funded. Our latest cost estimate shows that we only need $8.7M, but construction prices keep going up, so that doesn't give much wiggle room. Any construction that impacts PU? Yes. We have been and will continue to coordinate with them. Eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL West Side Neighborhood Parks 3,400,000$ Early stages of planning. Should be able to finance with tax-exempt financing; however, repairs could count against 5% working capital limit and there could be private business use. The City will likely need to actively monitor to ensure compliance with short term exceptions. CAN Fisher Mansion restoration 7,500,000$ The full restoration would allow for end uses including community gathering space, venue for music/art & special events, and potentially a commercial kitchen for food & beverage service and/or leasable office space. Leasable office space would create private business use and private payments. Consider financing office space portion with taxable financing. Other portions of the project could be financed on a tax-exempt basis since the City will treat the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures. The City would need to monitored to ensure compliance with short term exceptions. PL Cemetery Road Repairs 1,000,000$ Eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL Foothills Trails System, Phase II, III, Trailheads & Signage 5,250,000$ See Foothills Trails System Plan for Trails Plan Phase II Scope. Major trailhead project locations = Victory Road: 670 North Victory Road, Popperton Park: 1375 East Popperton Park Way, Bonneville Blvd: 675 North Bonneville Boulevard, I Street: 925 Hilltop Road Emigration: 2755 East Sunnyside. Bathrooms included at Bonneville Blvd, Popperton Park and Victory Road. No Bathrooms included at Emigration or I Street. Phase III Trails probably not feasible for construction within 3-year window so are excluded from this budget and planned for future phase, and very possibly funded through external sources including grants and private donations. Eligible for tax-exempt financing. Ballpark 3,000,000$ 1M-Security & Fencing 1M-Stadium Seating/Stairs Railings 1M Interiors Restrooms & Elevator Still under evaluation and need additional information, but private business use is probable as are private payments. Depending on determinations made with other projects may want to consider taxable financing to provide flexibility. Quiet Zones 6,100,000$ Eligible for tax-exempt financing. PL Pioneer Park 5,200,000$ Pioneer Park has impact fee funding to develop new components in the park. This funding would be utilized to rebuild comfort stations (restrooms), take out existing and build new playground, tennis/pickleball reconstruction and to rebuild the event power for farmers market and larger scale events. PL has a consultant preparing to start public engagement in summer of 2021. This project can easily fit in the 3 year time line. Based on currently described project and the City's intention to treat the direct and indirect costs of the improvements as capital expenditures, the project is eligible for tax-exempt financing; however, there could be private business use and payments. The City will need to actively monitor to ensure compliance with short term exceptions and any management contract for the concession stand would need to be reviewed for compliance. May want to consider taxable financing for the concession stand portion to provide flexibility. PL Glendale Water Park 10,000,000$ The community's initial requests include a water feature (splash pad, indoor/outdoor pool etc.) as well as options for open space use including increasing tree canopy, create natural buffer zones for the river, community open spaces using the site's hills for viewing sheds and outdoor classrooms. nostalgia-related public art installations to reflect the site’s original water park use, a food truck court with eating areas, water sports rentals (in coordination with the Jordan River), and a variety of meeting and seating areas around the park. The community also has suggested nostalgia-related public art installations to reflect the sites original water park use, foot truck court, water sports rentals and meeting / seating areas around the park, sports courts, recreation fields, perimeter walking/running trails and an ADA-accessible playground. Lastly the community sees a connected regional park, similar in scope to Liberty Park or Sugarhouse, connecting the existing Glendale Park, 1700 South Park, Glendale Golf Course and the former Raging waters site. Early stages of planning. Should be able to finance with tax-exempt financing; however, there could be private business use. The City needs to actively monitor to ensure compliance with short term exceptions and management contract guidelines, if applicable. Total 57,090,000$ Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $53,640,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021 A&B (September 16, 2021 ) ($57.09M Projects) Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 09/16/2021 | Delivered 09/16/2021 2021A TAX- EXEMPT 2021B TAXABLE Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $18,840,000.00 $34,800,000.00 $53,640,000.00 Reoffering Premium 3,759,835.65 -3,759,835.65 Total Sources $22,599,835.65 $34,800,000.00 $57,399,835.65 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0.275%)51,810.00 95,700.00 147,510.00 Costs of Issuance 56,520.00 104,400.00 160,920.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 22,490,000.00 34,600,000.00 57,090,000.00 Rounding Amount 1,505.65 (100.00)1,405.65 Total Uses $22,599,835.65 $34,800,000.00 $57,399,835.65 2021AB Comb New Money | Issue Summary | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 1 Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $53,640,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021 A&B (September 16, 2021 ) ($57.09M Projects) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 09/16/2021 ----- 04/01/2022 --803,666.50 803,666.50 - 06/30/2022 ----803,666.50 10/01/2022 2,080,000.00 1.593%741,846.00 2,821,846.00 - 04/01/2023 --725,277.50 725,277.50 - 06/30/2023 ----3,547,123.50 10/01/2023 2,115,000.00 1.674%725,277.50 2,840,277.50 - 04/01/2024 --707,577.50 707,577.50 - 06/30/2024 ----3,547,855.00 10/01/2024 2,155,000.00 1.899%707,577.50 2,862,577.50 - 04/01/2025 --687,113.50 687,113.50 - 06/30/2025 ----3,549,691.00 10/01/2025 2,200,000.00 2.202%687,113.50 2,887,113.50 - 04/01/2026 --662,893.50 662,893.50 - 06/30/2026 ----3,550,007.00 10/01/2026 2,250,000.00 2.408%662,893.50 2,912,893.50 - 04/01/2027 --635,808.50 635,808.50 - 06/30/2027 ----3,548,702.00 10/01/2027 2,310,000.00 2.644%635,808.50 2,945,808.50 - 04/01/2028 --605,271.00 605,271.00 - 06/30/2028 ----3,551,079.50 10/01/2028 2,370,000.00 2.800%605,271.00 2,975,271.00 - 04/01/2029 --572,091.00 572,091.00 - 06/30/2029 ----3,547,362.00 10/01/2029 2,445,000.00 2.939%572,091.00 3,017,091.00 - 04/01/2030 --536,162.50 536,162.50 - 06/30/2030 ----3,553,253.50 10/01/2030 2,515,000.00 3.024%536,162.50 3,051,162.50 - 04/01/2031 --498,133.50 498,133.50 - 06/30/2031 ----3,549,296.00 10/01/2031 2,590,000.00 2.752%498,133.50 3,088,133.50 - 04/01/2032 --462,497.25 462,497.25 - 06/30/2032 ----3,550,630.75 10/01/2032 2,665,000.00 2.826%462,497.25 3,127,497.25 - 04/01/2033 --424,843.75 424,843.75 - 06/30/2033 ----3,552,341.00 10/01/2033 2,740,000.00 2.895%424,843.75 3,164,843.75 - 04/01/2034 --385,181.25 385,181.25 - 06/30/2034 ----3,550,025.00 10/01/2034 2,820,000.00 2.965%385,181.25 3,205,181.25 - 04/01/2035 --343,369.75 343,369.75 - 06/30/2035 ----3,548,551.00 10/01/2035 2,910,000.00 3.035%343,369.75 3,253,369.75 - 04/01/2036 --299,207.50 299,207.50 - 06/30/2036 ----3,552,577.25 10/01/2036 3,000,000.00 3.104%299,207.50 3,299,207.50 - 04/01/2037 --252,649.50 252,649.50 - 06/30/2037 ----3,551,857.00 10/01/2037 3,095,000.00 3.171%252,649.50 3,347,649.50 - 04/01/2038 --203,584.00 203,584.00 - 06/30/2038 ----3,551,233.50 10/01/2038 3,195,000.00 3.236%203,584.00 3,398,584.00 - 04/01/2039 --151,891.75 151,891.75 - 06/30/2039 ----3,550,475.75 10/01/2039 3,295,000.00 2.920%151,891.75 3,446,891.75 - 04/01/2040 --103,792.75 103,792.75 - 06/30/2040 ----3,550,684.50 10/01/2040 3,395,000.00 2.981%103,792.75 3,498,792.75 - 04/01/2041 --53,182.75 53,182.75 - 06/30/2041 ----3,551,975.50 10/01/2041 3,495,000.00 3.043%53,182.75 3,548,182.75 - 06/30/2042 ----3,548,182.75 Total $53,640,000.00 -$18,166,570.00 $71,806,570.00 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $615,750.00 Average Life 11.479 Years Average Coupon 2.9503159% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.3636613% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.2524970% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.1028374% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.2817455% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.1873941% Weighted Average Maturity 11.474 Years 2021AB Comb New Money | Issue Summary | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 2 Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $18,840,000 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021A (September 16, 2021 ) ($22.49M New Money, 20-Years Level) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 09/16/2021 ----- 04/01/2022 --422,391.67 422,391.67 - 06/30/2022 ----422,391.67 10/01/2022 585,000.00 5.000%389,900.00 974,900.00 - 04/01/2023 --375,275.00 375,275.00 - 06/30/2023 ----1,350,175.00 10/01/2023 615,000.00 5.000%375,275.00 990,275.00 - 04/01/2024 --359,900.00 359,900.00 - 06/30/2024 ----1,350,175.00 10/01/2024 650,000.00 5.000%359,900.00 1,009,900.00 - 04/01/2025 --343,650.00 343,650.00 - 06/30/2025 ----1,353,550.00 10/01/2025 680,000.00 5.000%343,650.00 1,023,650.00 - 04/01/2026 --326,650.00 326,650.00 - 06/30/2026 ----1,350,300.00 10/01/2026 715,000.00 5.000%326,650.00 1,041,650.00 - 04/01/2027 --308,775.00 308,775.00 - 06/30/2027 ----1,350,425.00 10/01/2027 755,000.00 5.000%308,775.00 1,063,775.00 - 04/01/2028 --289,900.00 289,900.00 - 06/30/2028 ----1,353,675.00 10/01/2028 790,000.00 5.000%289,900.00 1,079,900.00 - 04/01/2029 --270,150.00 270,150.00 - 06/30/2029 ----1,350,050.00 10/01/2029 835,000.00 5.000%270,150.00 1,105,150.00 - 04/01/2030 --249,275.00 249,275.00 - 06/30/2030 ----1,354,425.00 10/01/2030 875,000.00 5.000%249,275.00 1,124,275.00 - 04/01/2031 --227,400.00 227,400.00 - 06/30/2031 ----1,351,675.00 10/01/2031 915,000.00 4.000%227,400.00 1,142,400.00 - 04/01/2032 --209,100.00 209,100.00 - 06/30/2032 ----1,351,500.00 10/01/2032 955,000.00 4.000%209,100.00 1,164,100.00 - 04/01/2033 --190,000.00 190,000.00 - 06/30/2033 ----1,354,100.00 10/01/2033 990,000.00 4.000%190,000.00 1,180,000.00 - 04/01/2034 --170,200.00 170,200.00 - 06/30/2034 ----1,350,200.00 10/01/2034 1,030,000.00 4.000%170,200.00 1,200,200.00 - 04/01/2035 --149,600.00 149,600.00 - 06/30/2035 ----1,349,800.00 10/01/2035 1,075,000.00 4.000%149,600.00 1,224,600.00 - 04/01/2036 --128,100.00 128,100.00 - 06/30/2036 ----1,352,700.00 10/01/2036 1,120,000.00 4.000%128,100.00 1,248,100.00 - 04/01/2037 --105,700.00 105,700.00 - 06/30/2037 ----1,353,800.00 10/01/2037 1,165,000.00 4.000%105,700.00 1,270,700.00 - 04/01/2038 --82,400.00 82,400.00 - 06/30/2038 ----1,353,100.00 10/01/2038 1,210,000.00 4.000%82,400.00 1,292,400.00 - 04/01/2039 --58,200.00 58,200.00 - 06/30/2039 ----1,350,600.00 10/01/2039 1,255,000.00 3.000%58,200.00 1,313,200.00 - 04/01/2040 --39,375.00 39,375.00 - 06/30/2040 ----1,352,575.00 10/01/2040 1,295,000.00 3.000%39,375.00 1,334,375.00 - 04/01/2041 --19,950.00 19,950.00 - 06/30/2041 ----1,354,325.00 10/01/2041 1,330,000.00 3.000%19,950.00 1,349,950.00 - 06/30/2042 ----1,349,950.00 Total $18,840,000.00 -$8,619,491.67 $27,459,491.67 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $225,240.00 Average Life 11.955 Years Average Coupon 3.8268033% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.1805479% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.9544659% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.4430546% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9803279% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.8125237% Weighted Average Maturity 11.864 Years 2021AB Comb New Money | 2021A TAX-EXEMPT | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 4 Preliminary; subject to change. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH $34,800,000 TAXABLE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2021B (September 16, 2021 ) ($34.6M New Money, 20-Years Level) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 09/16/2021 ----- 04/01/2022 --381,274.83 381,274.83 - 06/30/2022 ----381,274.83 10/01/2022 1,495,000.00 0.260%351,946.00 1,846,946.00 - 04/01/2023 --350,002.50 350,002.50 - 06/30/2023 ----2,196,948.50 10/01/2023 1,500,000.00 0.310%350,002.50 1,850,002.50 - 04/01/2024 --347,677.50 347,677.50 - 06/30/2024 ----2,197,680.00 10/01/2024 1,505,000.00 0.560%347,677.50 1,852,677.50 - 04/01/2025 --343,463.50 343,463.50 - 06/30/2025 ----2,196,141.00 10/01/2025 1,520,000.00 0.950%343,463.50 1,863,463.50 - 04/01/2026 --336,243.50 336,243.50 - 06/30/2026 ----2,199,707.00 10/01/2026 1,535,000.00 1.200%336,243.50 1,871,243.50 - 04/01/2027 --327,033.50 327,033.50 - 06/30/2027 ----2,198,277.00 10/01/2027 1,555,000.00 1.500%327,033.50 1,882,033.50 - 04/01/2028 --315,371.00 315,371.00 - 06/30/2028 ----2,197,404.50 10/01/2028 1,580,000.00 1.700%315,371.00 1,895,371.00 - 04/01/2029 --301,941.00 301,941.00 - 06/30/2029 ----2,197,312.00 10/01/2029 1,610,000.00 1.870%301,941.00 1,911,941.00 - 04/01/2030 --286,887.50 286,887.50 - 06/30/2030 ----2,198,828.50 10/01/2030 1,640,000.00 1.970%286,887.50 1,926,887.50 - 04/01/2031 --270,733.50 270,733.50 - 06/30/2031 ----2,197,621.00 10/01/2031 1,675,000.00 2.070%270,733.50 1,945,733.50 - 04/01/2032 --253,397.25 253,397.25 - 06/30/2032 ----2,199,130.75 10/01/2032 1,710,000.00 2.170%253,397.25 1,963,397.25 - 04/01/2033 --234,843.75 234,843.75 - 06/30/2033 ----2,198,241.00 10/01/2033 1,750,000.00 2.270%234,843.75 1,984,843.75 - 04/01/2034 --214,981.25 214,981.25 - 06/30/2034 ----2,199,825.00 10/01/2034 1,790,000.00 2.370%214,981.25 2,004,981.25 - 04/01/2035 --193,769.75 193,769.75 - 06/30/2035 ----2,198,751.00 10/01/2035 1,835,000.00 2.470%193,769.75 2,028,769.75 - 04/01/2036 --171,107.50 171,107.50 - 06/30/2036 ----2,199,877.25 10/01/2036 1,880,000.00 2.570%171,107.50 2,051,107.50 - 04/01/2037 --146,949.50 146,949.50 - 06/30/2037 ----2,198,057.00 10/01/2037 1,930,000.00 2.670%146,949.50 2,076,949.50 - 04/01/2038 --121,184.00 121,184.00 - 06/30/2038 ----2,198,133.50 10/01/2038 1,985,000.00 2.770%121,184.00 2,106,184.00 - 04/01/2039 --93,691.75 93,691.75 - 06/30/2039 ----2,199,875.75 10/01/2039 2,040,000.00 2.870%93,691.75 2,133,691.75 - 04/01/2040 --64,417.75 64,417.75 - 06/30/2040 ----2,198,109.50 10/01/2040 2,100,000.00 2.970%64,417.75 2,164,417.75 - 04/01/2041 --33,232.75 33,232.75 - 06/30/2041 ----2,197,650.50 10/01/2041 2,165,000.00 3.070%33,232.75 2,198,232.75 - 06/30/2042 ----2,198,232.75 Total $34,800,000.00 -$9,547,078.33 $44,347,078.33 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $390,510.00 Average Life 11.222 Years Average Coupon 2.4447718% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.4692782% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.4424344% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.4136979% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.4739105% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.4447718% Weighted Average Maturity 11.222 Years 2021AB Comb New Money | 2021B TAXABLE | 5/20/2021 | 10:12 AM Stifel Prepared by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (EJR)Page 7 Draft of 5/20/21 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) v3 8709966/RDB/mo RESOLUTION NO. __ OF 2021 A Resolution authorizing the issuance and the sale of not to exceed $58,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, for the purpose of financing various City capital improvement projects; authorizing the execution and delivery of one or more supplemental trust indentures to secure said bonds; giving authority to certain officials and officers to approve the final terms and provisions of the bonds within the parameters set forth herein; authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary for the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this resolution; and related matters. *** *** *** WHEREAS, Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), is a duly organized and existing city of the first class, operating under the general laws of the State of Utah (the “State”); WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City to issue its sales and excise tax revenue bonds, in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, as hereinafter provided for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of (i) acquiring, constructing and improving [various City parks, trails, historic structures, roads, streets, intersections and electrical facilities], as further described in the below defined Supplemental Indenture, and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Series 2021 Project”); (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Series 2021 Bonds (defined below) and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law pursuant to authority contained in the the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11 (the “Act”), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Utah Code”), and other applicable provisions of law; WHEREAS, for the purposes set forth above, the City has determined (a) to issue its Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in one or more series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $58,000,000 (the “Series 2021 Bonds”) (subject to the further limitations outlined herein) pursuant to the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture”), a copy of which is attached here as Exhibit A and one or more Supplemental Trust Indentures (the “Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) (the Master Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture are sometimes collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Indenture”), and (b) to cause the proceeds of the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds to be applied in accordance with the Indenture; WHEREAS, the City is authorized by the Act to finance the Series 2021 Project, to enter into the Supplemental Indenture, and to issue the Series 2021 Bonds to finance all or a portion of the costs of financing the Series 2021 Project, to fund any necessary reserves, and to pay all related costs authorized by law; - 2 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) WHEREAS, Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code provides for the publication of a Notice of Bonds to be Issued (the “Notice of Bonds”) and the running of a 30-day contest period, and the City desires to cause the publication of such Notice of Bonds at this time in compliance with said section with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds; WHEREAS, Section 11-14-318 of the Utah Code requires that a public hearing be held to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Series 2021 Project will have on the private sector and that notice of such public hearing be given as provided by law and, in satisfaction of such requirement, the City desires to publish a Notice of Public Hearing and Intent to Issue Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds (the “Notice of Public Hearing”) pursuant to such Section; WHEREAS, Section 11-14-307(7) of the Utah Code requires the City to submit the question of whether or not to issue the Series 2021 Bonds to voters for their approval or rejection if, within 30 calendar days after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, a written petition requesting an election and signed by at least 20% of the registered voters in the City is filed with the City; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the City, it is in the best interests of the City that (a) the Designated Officers (defined below) be authorized to approve the final terms and provisions relating to the Series 2021 Bonds and to execute the Certificate of Determination (defined below) containing such terms and provisions and to accept the offer of the underwriter for the Series 2021 Bonds (the “Underwriter”) for the purchase of the Series 2021 Bonds; and (b) the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor or the Mayor’s designee (the “Mayor”), be authorized to execute the Official Statement with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds, all as provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. Issuance of Bonds. (a) For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized and directed the execution, issuance, sale and delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds in one or more series (with such adjustments to the series designation as are necessary), on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $58,000,000. The Series 2021 Bonds shall be dated as of the date of the initial delivery thereof. The Series 2021 Bonds shall be in authorized denominations, shall be payable, and shall be executed and delivered all as provided in the Indenture. The Series 2021 Bonds shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity as provided in the Indenture. (b) The form of the Series 2021 Bonds set forth in the form Supplemental Indenture, subject to appropriate insertions and revisions in order to comply with the provisions of the Indenture, is hereby approved. (c) The Series 2021 Bonds shall be special obligations of the City, payable from and secured by a pledge and assignment of the Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) received by the City and of certain other moneys held under the Indenture on a parity with any other Bonds (as defined in the Indenture) issued from time to time under the Master Indenture, including but not limited to the City’s (i) Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, (ii) Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, - 3 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) Series 2013B, (iii) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2014A, (iv) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, (v) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, (vi) Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A and (vii) Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B. The Series 2021 Bonds shall not be obligations of the State or any other political subdivision thereof, other than the City, and neither the faith and credit nor the ad valorem taxing or appropriation power of the State or any political subdivision thereof, including the City, is pledged to the payment of the Series 2021 Bonds. The Series 2021 Bonds shall not constitute general obligations of the City or any other entity or body, municipal, state or otherwise. Section 2. Series 2021 Bond Details; Delegation of Authority. (a) The Series 2021 Bonds shall mature on October 1 (or such other dates as specified in the Certificate of Determination) of the years and in the principal amounts, and shall bear interest (calculated on the basis of a year of 360 days consisting of twelve 30-day months) from the Closing Date, payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 (or such other dates as specified in the Certificate of Determination) of each year, and at the rates per annum and commencing on the dates, all as provided in that certain Certificate of Determination, a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C, of the Designated Officers (defined below) delivered pursuant to this Section 2, setting forth certain terms and provisions of the Series 2021 Bonds (the “Certificate of Determination”). (b) There is hereby delegated to the Designated Officers, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the power to determine and effectuate the following with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds and the Designated Officers are hereby authorized to make such determinations and effectuations: (i) the principal amount of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds necessary to accomplish the purpose of the Series 2021 Bonds set forth in the recitals hereto and the aggregate principal amount of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds to be executed and delivered pursuant to the Indenture; provided that the aggregate principal amount of the Series 2021 Bonds shall not exceed Fifty-eight Million Dollars ($58,000,000); (ii) the maturity date or dates and principal amount of each maturity of the Series 2021 Bonds to be issued; provided, however, that the Series 2021 Bonds mature over a period of not to exceed twenty-two (22) years from their date or dates; (iii) the interest rate or rates, which may be taxable or tax-exempt rates, of the Series 2021 Bonds and the date on which payment of such interest commences, provided, however, that the interest rate or rates to be borne by any Series 2021 Bond shall not exceed __________ percent (____%) per annum; (iv) the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds and the purchase price to be paid by the Underwriter of such Series 2021 Bonds; provided, however, that the discount from par of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds shall not exceed two percent (2.00%) (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount); - 4 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) (v) the Series 2021 Bonds, if any, to be retired from mandatory sinking fund redemption payments and the dates and the amounts thereof; (vi) the time and redemption price, if any, at which the Series 2021 Bonds may be called for redemption prior to their maturity at the option of the City; provided, however, the first optional redemption date shall not be later than ten and a half years from the date of delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds; (vii) the amount of reserves necessary to be maintained in connection with each series of the Series 2021 Bonds, if any; (viii) the use and deposit of the proceeds of the Series 2021 Bonds; and (ix) any other provisions deemed advisable by the Designated Officers not materially in conflict with the provisions of this resolution. For purposes of this resolution and the Series 2021 Bonds, “Designated Officers” means (a) the (i) Mayor of the City; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Mayor and the Mayor’s Chief of Staff, the City Treasurer; or (iv) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff and the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City and (b) (i) the Chair of the City Council; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Chair of the City Council, the Vice Chair of the City Council; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Chair and Vice Chair of the City Council, any other member of the City Council. Following the sale of the Series 2021 Bonds, the Designated Officers shall obtain such information as they deem necessary to make such determinations as provided above and shall make such determinations as provided above and shall execute the Certificate of Determination containing such terms and provisions of such series of the Series 2021 Bonds, which execution shall be conclusive evidence of the action or determination of the Designated Officers as to the matters stated therein. The provisions of the Certificate of Determination shall be deemed to be incorporated into this Section 2. Section 3. Approval and Execution of the Supplemental Indenture. One or more Supplemental Indentures, in substantially the form of the Thirteenth Supplemental Trust Indenture attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby authorized and approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver each Supplemental Indenture on behalf of the City, and the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to affix to each Supplemental Indenture the seal of the City and to attest such seal and countersign each such Supplemental Indenture, with such changes to each Supplemental Indenture from the form attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. The provisions of each Supplemental Indenture, as executed and delivered, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. The Master Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture shall constitute a “system of registration” for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act of Utah. - 5 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) Section 4. Final Official Statement. A final Official Statement of the City in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement presented at this meeting and in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, is hereby authorized with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, including the completion thereof with the information established at the time of the sale of any Series 2021 Bonds by the Designated Officers and set forth in the Certificate of Determination. The Mayor shall sign and deliver a final Official Statement for distribution to prospective purchasers of each series of the Series 2021 Bonds and other interested persons. The approval of the Mayor of any such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions shall be conclusively established by the Mayor’s execution of such final Official Statement. Section 5. Preliminary Official Statement to be Deemed Final. The use and distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement, in substantially the form presented at this meeting and in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, is hereby authorized and approved, with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor and the City Treasurer, or the Deputy Treasurer of the City (the “City Treasurer”), shall deem advisable. The Mayor and the City Treasurer are, and each of them is, hereby authorized to do or perform all such acts and to execute all such certificates, documents and other instruments as may be necessary or advisable to provide for the issuance, sale and delivery of any Series 2021 Bonds and to deem final each Preliminary Official Statement within the meaning and for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, subject to completion thereof with the information established at the time of the sale of any Series 2021 Bonds. Section 6. Other Certificates and Documents Required to Evidence Compliance with Federal Tax and Securities Laws. Each of the Mayor, the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder and the City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to execute (a) such certificates and documents as are required to evidence compliance with the federal laws relating to the tax- exempt status of interest on any Series 2021 Bonds and (b) a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, and such other certificates and documents as shall be necessary to comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable federal securities laws. Section 7. Other Actions With Respect to the Series 2021 Bonds. The officers and employees of the City shall take all action necessary or reasonably required to carry out, give effect to, and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and shall take all action necessary in conformity with the Act to carry out the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds, including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of any closing and other documents required to be delivered in connection with the sale and delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds. If (a) the Mayor, (b) the City Recorder or (c) the City Treasurer shall be unavailable or unable to execute or attest and countersign, respectively, the Series 2021 Bonds or the other documents that they are hereby authorized to execute, attest and countersign, the same may be executed, or attested and countersigned, respectively, (i) by the Chief of Staff, (ii) by any Deputy City Recorder or (iii) by the Deputy Treasurer of the City. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the officers and employees of the City are authorized and directed to take such action as shall be necessary and appropriate to issue the Series 2021 Bonds. - 6 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) Section 8. Notice of Bonds to be Issued; Contest Period. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-14-316 of the Utah Code, the City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder shall cause the Notice of Bonds, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F, to be published one time in The Salt Lake Tribune, a newspaper published and of general circulation within the City. For a period of thirty (30) days from and after publication of the Notice of Bonds, any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of this resolution (including the Supplemental Indenture attached hereto) or the Series 2021 Bonds hereby authorized or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Series 2021 Bonds. After such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality or legality of this resolution (including the Supplemental Indenture) or the Series 2021 Bonds or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Series 2021 Bonds for any cause. Section 9. Public Hearing. In satisfaction of the requirements of Section 11-14-318 of the Act, a public hearing shall be held by the Council on Tuesday, August 17, 2021, during the Council meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m., which, as determined by the Council Chair, shall be held either virtually, at the regular meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room 315 in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any combination thereof, to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance by the City of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Series 2021 Project will have on the private sector. Section 10. Publication of Notice of Public Hearing. The City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder (the “City Recorder”) shall publish or cause to be published the Notice of Public Hearing on the Utah Public Notice Website, created under Section 63F-1-701 of the Utah Code, no less than 14 days before the public hearing. The Notice of Public Hearing shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit H. Section 11. Form of Petition. The form of the petition to be used by registered voters in requesting that an election be called to authorize the Series 2021 Bonds shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit I. Section 12. Issuance of Bonds After Thirty-Day Period. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-14-307(7) of the Act, if within thirty days after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, a petition or petitions, in the form specified by Section 11 hereof, are filed with the City Recorder, signed by not less than twenty percent (20%) of the registered voters of the City (as certified by the County Clerk of Salt Lake County) requesting that an election be called to authorize the Series 2021 Bonds, then the Council shall proceed to call and hold an election on the Series 2021 Bonds. If such election is held and a majority of the registered voters of the City voting thereon approve the Series 2021 Bonds, then, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the City shall thereupon be authorized to issue the Series 2021 Bonds. If no petition is filed within the thirty-day period after the date of the final publication of such notice, or if it is determined that the number of signatures on the petitions filed within the thirty-day period after the date of the final publication of such notice is less than the required number, the City shall proceed to issue the the Series 2021 Bonds. - 7 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) Section 13. Sale of the Series 2021 Bonds; Purchase Contract. The Series 2021 Bonds authorized to be issued herein are hereby authorized to be sold and delivered to the Underwriter, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Contract. The Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver the Purchase Contract on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit G, with such changes therein from the form attached hereto as are approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. The City Recorder or any Deputy City Recorder is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to affix to the Purchase Contract the seal of the City and to attest such seal and countersign the Purchase Contract. Section 14. City Recorder to Perform Certain Acts. The City Recorder is hereby directed to maintain a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto), a copy of the Master Indenture and the form of the Supplemental Indenture on file in the City Recorder’s office (or the City Recorder’s temporary office, as applicable) during regular business hours 1 for public examination by registered voters of the City and other interested persons until at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of publication of the Notice of Bonds and upon request to supply copies of the form of petition specified in Section 11 hereof. Section 15. Prior Acts Ratified, Approved and Confirmed. All acts of the officers and employees of the City in connection with the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 16. Resolution Irrepealable. Following the execution and delivery of a Supplemental Indenture, this resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until all of the Series 2021 Bonds and the interest thereon shall have been fully paid, cancelled, and discharged. Section 17. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this resolution shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. Section 18. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval and adoption. (Signature page follows.) 1 Appointments are encouraged as the temporary office is not occupied during business hours due to the COVID-19 pandemic. - 8 - Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 13th day of July 2021. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH _______________________________________ Chair Salt Lake City Council ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] APPROVED: By ____________________________________ Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ____________________________________ Senior City Attorney A-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT A [ATTACH COPY OF MASTER TRUST INDENTURE] B-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT B [ATTACH FORM OF THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE] C-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT C [ATTACH FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION] D-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT D [ATTACH FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT] E-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT E [ATTACH FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT] F-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT F NOTICE OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-14-316, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, that on July 13, 2021, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized and approved the issuance of its sales and excise tax revenue bonds in one or more series, on a taxable or tax-exempt basis (collectively, the “Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $58,000,000, to bear interest at a rate or rates of not to exceed ____% per annum and to mature not later than 22 years from their date or dates and to be sold at a discount from par not to exceed 2.00%. The Bonds shall be subject to such optional and mandatory redemption and other provisions as are contained in the Master Trust Indenture, described below, and the final form of the Bonds and a Supplemental Trust Indenture, described below. Pursuant to the Resolution, the Bonds are to be issued for the purpose of paying all or part of the cost of (a) (i) acquiring, constructing and improving [various City parks, trails, historic structures, roads, streets, intersections and electrical facilities] and (ii) acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects; (b) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds and (c) paying all related costs authorized by law. The Bonds are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Resolution, including as part of the Resolution a draft, in substantially final form, of a Supplemental Trust Indenture, and a copy of the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2004, as heretofor amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and Zions Bancorporation, National Association, a trustee, that were before the Council and attached to the Resolution at the time of the adoption of the Resolution. The City will cause one or more Supplemental Trust Indentures to be executed and delivered in such form and with such changes thereto as certain designated officers of the City shall approve, provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity and discount, if any, will not exceed the respective maximums described above. The repayment of the Bonds will be secured by a pledge of the legally available revenues from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake City Code); (b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt Lake City Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of Salt Lake City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); and (f) the franchise fees associated with cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20 (collectively, the “Pledged Taxes”). F-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) The City currently has $102,490,000 par amount of bonds or notes currently outstanding that are secured by the Pledged Taxes. More detailed information relating to the City’s outstanding bonds can be found in the City’s most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that is available on the Office of the Utah State Auditor’s website (www.sao.state.ut.us). Assuming a final maturity for the Bonds of approximately 21 years from the date hereof and that the Bonds are issued in an aggregate principal amount of $__________ and are held until maturity, based on the City’s currently expected financing structure and interest rates in effect around the time of publication of this notice, the estimated total cost to the City of the proposed Bonds is $__________. A copy of the Resolution (including the draft of the Supplemental Trust Indenture and a copy of the Master Indenture attached to the Resolution) may be examined by appointment at the temporary office of the City Recorder located at Plaza 349, 349 South 200 East in Salt Lake City, Utah, during regular business hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. To schedule an appointment please call (801) 535-7671. Additionally, a protected, pdf copy of the Resolution may be requested by sending an email to the City Recorder at SLCRecorder@slcgov.com. The Resolution shall be so available for inspection for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to law for a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice, any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of the Resolution (including the Supplemental Trust Indenture attached thereto) of the City or the Bonds authorized thereby or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Bonds. After such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality or legality of the Resolution, the Bonds or the provisions for their security or payment for any cause. DATED this 13th day of July, 2021. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ City Recorder [SEAL] G-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT G [ATTACH FORM OF PURCHASE CONTRACT] H-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT H SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND INTENT TO ISSUE SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on July 13, 2021, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”), calling for a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of its Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds (the “Bonds”) to finance all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving [various City parks, trails, historic structures, roads, streets, intersections and electrical facilities] and acquiring, constructing, improving and remodeling various other capital improvement program projects (collectively, the “Project”) and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector, pursuant to the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”). PURPOSE FOR ISSUING BONDS The City intends to issue the Bonds for the purpose of (1) financing all or a portion of the costs of the Project, (2) funding any necessary reserves and contingencies in connection with the Bonds, and (3) paying the costs incurred in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds. MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS The City intends to issue the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding Fifty- eight Million Dollars ($58,000,000) to finance the Project. The Bonds may be issued with other Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds being issued for other purposes so the principal amount may exceed the amount listed above to finance the costs of the Project. SALES TAXES PROPOSED TO BE PLEDGED The City proposes to pledge to the payment of the Bonds all of the legally available revenues from: (a) Local Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 2, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.04 of the Salt Lake City Code); (b) Municipal Energy Sales and Use Taxes received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of the Salt Lake City Code); (c) the franchise fees for energy and utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.06 of Salt Lake City Code); (d) the Municipal Telecommunications License Tax revenues received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 4, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 3.10 of Salt Lake City Code); (e) the franchise fees associated with public utilities received by the City pursuant to Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 3, Utah Code (currently levied and collected pursuant to Chapter 17.16.070 of Salt Lake City Code); and (f) the franchise fees associated with cable television received by the City pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Chapter 5.20. H-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The City will hold a public hearing during its City Council meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m. on August 17, 2021. The public hearing will be held either virtually, at the regular meeting place of the Council in the Council Chambers, Room 315 in the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah, or any combination thereof, as determined by the Chair of the City Council. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate in the public hearing in the manner that will be described in the agenda for the meeting. Written comments may be submitted to the City, to the attention of the City Recorder, prior to the public hearing. PURPOSE FOR HEARING The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the potential economic impact that the Project will have on the private sector. NOTICE OF RIGHT TO FILE PETITION TO HOLD AN ELECTION NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code, if within 30 calendar days of the publication of this notice on July __, 2021, by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, a written petition requesting an election and signed by at least twenty percent (20%) of the registered voters of the City is filed with the City, then the City shall submit the question of whether or not to issue the Bonds to the voters of the City for their approval or rejection. If no written petition is filed or if fewer than 20% of the registered voters of the City sign a written petition, in either case, within 30 calendar days of the posting of this notice on July __, 2021, the City may proceed to issue the Bonds without an election. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By ____________________________________ City Recorder I-1 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) EXHIBIT I PETITION To: City Recorder Salt Lake City, Utah We, the undersigned citizens and registered voters of Salt Lake City, Utah, respectfully request that an election be called by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-14-307(7), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, to authorize the issuance by Salt Lake City, Utah, of its Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, in a maximum principal amount not exceeding $58,000,000, as to which notice of intention to issue was published on July __, 2021, by posting on the Utah Public Notice Website, pursuant to the provisions of a resolution passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on July 13, 2021, and each for himself or herself says: I have personally signed this petition; I am a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Utah; my residence and post office address are correctly written after my name: I-2 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) WARNING It is a felony for any one to sign any initiative or referendum petition with any other name than one’s own, or knowingly to sign one’s name more than once for the same measure, or to sign such petition when one knows that he or she is not a registered voter. REGISTERED VOTER’S PRINTED NAME (MUST BE LEGIBLE TO BE COUNTED) SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED VOTER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE [The following certification shall appear on the reverse side of each page [attached to the Petition containing the signature of voters] I-3 Delegating Bond Resolution (new money multiple projects) STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, _________________________, of _____________________, hereby certify that I am a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, that all the names which appear on this sheet were signed by persons who professed to be the persons whose names appear thereon, and each of them signed his or her name thereto in my presence, I believe that each has printed and signed his or her name, and written his or her post office address and residence correctly, and that each signer is a registered voter of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____ day of __________, 2021. Notary Public (or other official title) Signature: Email:Garrett.Danielson@slcgov.com 2021‐22 Capital Improvement Program [Grand Totals Only (anonymous)] Division (Priority) / App Ref Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Committee Score 72 displayed 2 not included (Duplicates)60,584,684.35 T7 Division of Transportation / 400 South Viaduct Trail (1/4 Cent)900,000.00 6 to 0 18.17 T13 Division of Transportation / 1700 South Corridor Transformation (Redwood to 300 W)363,150.00 7 to 0 18.14 P2 Public Lands / A Place For Everyone: The Emerald Ribbon Master Plan 420,000.00 6 to 0 17.57 P1 Public Lands / Glendale Water Park Development Phase 1 3,200,000.00 7 to 0 17.07 E5 Engineering / Bridge Preservation 2021/2022 300,000.00 7 to 017 T12 Division of Transportation / Transportation Safety Improvements 500,000.00 7 to 017 E3 Engineering / Public Way Concrete 2021/2022 750,000.00 6 to 0 16.8 C20 Sugar House Community Council / Highland High Crosswalk Enhancements 85,000.00 6 to 0 16.31 T11 Division of Transportation / Street Multi‐Modal Maintenance (1/4 Cent)200,000.00 6 to 0 16.29 F1 Fire / Fire Training Tower Fire Prop Upgrade 318,278.75 7 to 0 16.26 C5 Public Lands / Three Creeks West Park Planning and Design 150,736.00 7 to 0 16.2 T2 Division of Transportation / 900 South & 9‐Line Trail Railroad Crossing (1/4 Cent)200,000.00 6 to 016 E2 Engineering / Pavement Condition Survey 175,000.00 7 to 0 15.85 T3 Division of Transportation / Trail Maintenance (1/4 Cent)200,000.00 6 to 0 15.83 F4 Fire / Fire Training Ground Site Improvements 694,784.80 6 to 0 15.79 P10 Public Lands / Replace Poplar Grove Tennis with new Sportcourt 440,000.00 6 to 0 15.79 T10 Division of Transportation / Urban Trails & Connections (1/4 Cent)1,045,000.00 6 to 0 15.74 C4 Public Lands / Three Creeks West (Jordan River Trail and Bank Stabilization)490,074.00 5 to 0 15.7 T6 Division of Transportation / Area Circulation Studies / Design (1/4 Cent)215,000.00 6 to 0 15.67 F2 Fire / Single‐Family/Fire‐Behavior Prop 374,863.94 6 to 0 15.57 T1 Division of Transportation / 200 South Transit Transformation (Funding Our Future Transit, 1/4 Cent)3,261,900.00 6 to 0 15.33 T4 Division of Transportation / Local Link Construction Fund / Sugar House (1/4 Cent)500,000.00 6 to 0 15.33 C6 Sugar House Park Authority / Sugar House Park Fabian Lake Pavilion ‐ Remove and Replace 183,834.00 6 to 0 15.31 P5 Public Lands / Liberty Park Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report 475,000.00 6 to 0 15.29 F3 Fire / Mixed‐Use Three‐Story Fire Training Prop 815,894.86 5 to 0 15.29 C12 Public Lands / SOS Liberty Park Basketball Courts 99,680.00 6 to 0 15.21 T8 Division of Transportation / Neighborhood Byway Design & Construction (1/4 Cent)1,045,000.00 5 to 0 15.17 E6 Engineering / Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2021/2022 70,000.00 5 to 1 14.8 T9 Division of Transportation / 900 South Signal Improvements (900 South Reconstruction & 9‐Line Trail Project, 2021‐2023 500,000.00 6 to 0 14.67 C17 Poplar Grove Community Member / 700 S Westside Road Reconfiguration 514,450.00 5 to 0 14.67 T14 Division of Transportation / Multi‐Modal Intersection / Traffic Signal Upgrades 1,050,000.00 6 to 0 14.33 T5 Division of Transportation / Corridor Transformations (1/4 Cent)856,042.00 5 to 1 14.29 P13 Public Lands / Jordan Park Looped Pathways 510,000.00 7 to 0 14.14 P12 Public Lands / Foothills Natural Area ‐ Open Space Acquisition 425,000.00 6 to 1 14.14 P11 Public Lands / Foothills Trailhead Development 1,304,682.00 7 to 0 14.07 C14 Odyssey House ‐ Inc, Utah / Odyssey House’s Annex Facility Renovation 500,000.00 4 to 2 14.03 E8 Engineering / Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South and 650 North over the Jordan River)3,000,000.00 6 to 014 C22 Ballpark Community Council / Kensington Avenue Neighborhood Byway Capital Improvement Program Constituent Requ 500,000.00 4 to 114 E7 Engineering / Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River)3,500,000.00 6 to 0 13.87 FA3 Public Services Facilities Division / Streets Steam Bay 363,495.00 6 to 0 13.87 P3 Public Lands / Downtown Green Loop, Phase 1 610,000.00 6 to 1 13.86 C15 Engineering / CR ‐ 3000 South Sidewalk and Curb 449,315.00 5 to 1 13.85 T15 Division of Transportation / Sunnyside / 9‐Line Trail Missing Piece (1850 East)350,000.00 5 to 1 13.6 E1 Engineering / Street Improvements 2021/2022 3,500,000.00 6 to 0 13.4 C1 Tracy Aviary / Renovations to Historic Structures: east gate and bath house.156,078.00 5 to 1 13.31 C21 Public / Liberty Wells Traffic Calming 400,000.00 3 to 2 13.2 P6 Public Lands / Preparing for Historic Structure Renovation & Activation at Allen Park 420,000.00 5 to 1 13.07 C18 Capitol Hill Neighborhood Council / Capitol Hill Traffic Calming 595,194.00 4 to 2 12.9 P14 Public Lands / Richmond Park Playground and Pavilion Replacement 690,000.00 6 to 0 12.86 C11 Wingate Village Townhomes / Wingate Walkway 286,750.00 5 to 1 12.86 C7 Liberty Hills Tennis / Outdoor Lighting Upgrade at Liberty Park Tennis Center 202,100.00 3 to 3 12.83 P9 Public Lands / 9Line and Rosepark Asphalt Pump tracks 1,393,600.00 6 to 0 12.79 C23 N/A / Stratford Bike Crossing ‐ 17th E and Stratford 200,000.00 4 to 2 12.71 C9 Wasatch Community Gardens / Harrison Ave & 700 E. Community Garden 103,500.00 4 to 2 12.43 C24 Citizen / Sugar House Safe Side Streets 500,000.00 5 to 1 12.31 P15 Public Lands / Library Square feasibility study, civic engagement, and design development 225,000.00 3 to 2 12.29 C16 David B. Troester / Three Creeks West 1 – Roadways 1,158,422.00 4 to 1 12.17 C8 Liberty Hills Tennis / Re‐surfacing of all existing tennis courts at Liberty Park & Wasatch Hills Tennis Centers 300,000.00 4 to 2 12.14 C13 Public Lands / 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, New Irrigation, New Tree Planting 500,000.00 4 to 1 12.1 FA1 Public Services Facilities Division / Facilities Capital Asset Replacement Program (6M investment) (Deferred Capital Repla 5,860,449.00 4 to 1 11.83 C3 Liberty Hills Tennis / "Winner on Wasatch" A Four‐Court Total Re‐Construction Project Preparatory to a New Tennis Air D 500,000.00 2 to 3 11.77 P8 Public Lands / Cemetery Multi‐Use Roadway Repair (Phase 1)3,838,000.00 5 to 1 11.62 C2 Dept of Veterans Affairs / Sunnyside Park Sidewalk 72,739.00 4 to 1 11.43 P17 Public Lands / Donner and Rotary Glen Park Landscape Improvements 650,000.00 4 to 2 11.29 P16 Public Lands / Regional Athletic Complex Playground 450,000.00 5 to 1 11.17 E4 Engineering / Logan Avenue Reconstruction 1,405,000.00 4 to 211 E9 Engineering / Wingpointe Levee Design 800,000.00 5 to 1 10.55 FA2 Public Services Facilities Division / Delong Salt Storage Facility 1,504,427.00 5 to 1 9.43 C19 Streets and Sanitation / Harvard Heights Residential Concrete Street Reconstruction 1,311,920.00 2 to 4 8.43 C10 Ballpark Community Council / 1300 South Camping Resistant Landscaping 100,000.00 1 to 5 7.67 P7 Public Lands / Cemetery Enhancement for Visitor Research and Knowledge 790,000.00 4 to 2 7.43 P4 Public Lands / Parleys Historic Nature Park Structure Preservation 765,325.00 3 to 3 6.86 Attachment 5A FY22 CDCIP Board Project Scores from Highest to Lowest #Division Priority Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Committee Score 3 C14 Odyssey House ‐ Inc, Utah / Odyssey House’s Annex Facility Renovation $ 500,000 4 to 2 14.03 4 E1 Engineering / Street Improvements 2021/2022 $ 3,500,000 6 to 0 13.4 5 E2 Engineering / Pavement Condition Survey $ 175,000 7 to 0 15.85 6 E3 Engineering / Public Way Concrete 2021/2022 $ 750,000 6 to 0 16.8 7 E5 Engineering / Bridge Preservation 2021/2022 $ 300,000 7 to 0 17 8 E6 Engineering / Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2021/2022 $ 70,000 5 to 1 14.8 9 FA1 Public Services Facilities Division / Facilities Capital Asset Replacement Program (6M investment) (Deferred Capital Repla $ 5,860,449 4 to 1 11.83 10 F1 Fire / Fire Training Tower Fire Prop Upgrade $ 318,279 7 to 0 16.26 11 F2 Fire / Single‐Family/Fire‐Behavior Prop $ 374,864 6 to 0 15.57 12 C1 Tracy Aviary / Renovations to Historic Structures: east gate and bath house. $ 156,078 5 to 1 13.31 13 C4 Public Lands / Three Creeks West (Jordan River Trail and Bank Stabilization) $ 490,074 5 to 0 15.7 14 C5 Public Lands / Three Creeks West Park Planning and Design $ 150,736 7 to 0 16.2 15 C6 Sugar House Park Authority / Sugar House Park Fabian Lake Pavilion ‐ Remove and Replace $ 183,834 6 to 0 15.31 16 C12 Public Lands / SOS Liberty Park Basketball Courts $ 99,680 6 to 0 15.21 17 P1 Public Lands / Glendale Water Park Development Phase 1 $ 3,200,000 7 to 0 17.07 18 P2 Public Lands / A Place For Everyone: The Emerald Ribbon Master Plan $ 420,000 6 to 0 17.57 19 P3 Public Lands / Downtown Green Loop, Phase 1 $ 610,000 6 to 1 13.86 20 P5 Public Lands / Liberty Park Master Plan and Cultural Landscape Report $ 475,000 6 to 0 15.29 21 P6 Public Lands / Preparing for Historic Structure Renovation & Activation at Allen Park $ 420,000 5 to 1 13.07 22 P10 Public Lands / Replace Poplar Grove Tennis with new Sportcourt $ 440,000 6 to 0 15.79 23 P11 Public Lands / Foothills Trailhead Development $ 1,304,682 7 to 0 14.07 24 P12 Public Lands / Foothills Natural Area ‐ Open Space Acquisition $ 425,000 6 to 1 14.14 25 P13 Public Lands / Jordan Park Looped Pathways $ 510,000 7 to 0 14.14 26 P16 Public Lands / Regional Athletic Complex Playground $ 450,000 5 to 1 11.17 27 C17 Poplar Grove Community Member / 700 S Westside Road Reconfiguration $ 514,450 5 to 0 14.67 28 C20 Sugar House Community Council / Highland High Crosswalk Enhancements $ 85,000 6 to 0 16.31 29 T1 Division of Transportation / 200 South Transit Transformation (Funding Our Future Transit, 1/4 Cent) $ 3,261,900 6 to 0 15.33 30 T2 Division of Transportation / 900 South & 9‐Line Trail Railroad Crossing (1/4 Cent) $ 200,000 6 to 0 16 31 T3 Division of Transportation / Trail Maintenance (1/4 Cent) $ 200,000 6 to 0 15.83 32 T4 Division of Transportation / Local Link Construction Fund / Sugar House (1/4 Cent) $ 500,000 6 to 0 15.33 33 T5 Division of Transportation / Corridor Transformations (1/4 Cent) $ 856,042 5 to 1 14.29 34 T6 Division of Transportation / Area Circulation Studies / Design (1/4 Cent) $ 215,000 6 to 0 15.67 35 T7 Division of Transportation / 400 South Viaduct Trail (1/4 Cent) $ 900,000 6 to 0 18.17 36 T8 Division of Transportation / Neighborhood Byway Design & Construction (1/4 Cent) $ 1,045,000 5 to 0 15.17 37 T9 Division of Transportation / 900 South Signal Improvements (900 South Reconstruction & 9‐Line Trail Project, 2021‐2023 $ 500,000 6 to 0 14.67 38 T10 Division of Transportation / Urban Trails & Connections (1/4 Cent) $ 1,045,000 6 to 0 15.74 39 T11 Division of Transportation / Street Multi‐Modal Maintenance (1/4 Cent) $ 200,000 6 to 0 16.29 2021‐22 Capital Improvement Program Grand Totals Sorted by Funding Log Project # #Division Priority Organization Name / Application Title Requested Amount Votes Committee Score 2021‐22 Capital Improvement Program Grand Totals Sorted by Funding Log Project # 40 T12 Division of Transportation / Transportation Safety Improvements $ 500,000 7 to 0 17 41 T13 Division of Transportation / 1700 South Corridor Transformation (Redwood to 300 W) $ 363,150 7 to 0 18.14 42 C22 Ballpark Community Council / Kensington Avenue Neighborhood Byway Capital Improvement Program Constituent Requ $ 500,000 4 to 1 14 43 C15 Engineering / CR ‐ 3000 South Sidewalk and Curb $ 449,315 5 to 1 13.85 44 E4 Engineering / Logan Avenue Reconstruction $ 1,405,000 4 to 2 11 45 E7 Engineering / Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River) $ 3,500,000 6 to 0 13.87 46 E8 Engineering / Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South and 650 North over the Jordan River) $ 3,000,000 6 to 0 14 47 E9 Engineering / Wingpointe Levee Design $ 800,000 5 to 1 10.55 48 C16 David B. Troester / Three Creeks West 1 – Roadways $ 1,158,422 4 to 1 12.17 49 FA2 Public Services Facilities Division / Delong Salt Storage Facility $ 1,504,427 5 to 1 9.43 50 FA3 Public Services Facilities Division / Streets Steam Bay $ 363,495 6 to 0 13.87 51 F3 Fire / Mixed‐Use Three‐Story Fire Training Prop $ 815,895 5 to 0 15.29 52 F4 Fire / Fire Training Ground Site Improvements $ 694,785 6 to 0 15.79 53 C2 Dept of Veterans Affairs / Sunnyside Park Sidewalk $ 72,739 4 to 1 11.43 54 C3 Liberty Hills Tennis / "Winner on Wasatch" A Four‐Court Total Re‐Construction Project Preparatory to a New Tennis Air D $ 500,000 2 to 3 11.77 55 C7 Liberty Hills Tennis / Outdoor Lighting Upgrade at Liberty Park Tennis Center $ 202,100 3 to 3 12.83 56 C8 Liberty Hills Tennis / Re‐surfacing of all existing tennis courts at Liberty Park & Wasatch Hills Tennis Centers $ 300,000 4 to 2 12.14 57 C9 Wasatch Community Gardens / Harrison Ave & 700 E. Community Garden $ 103,500 4 to 2 12.43 58 C10 Ballpark Community Council / 1300 South Camping Resistant Landscaping $ 100,000 1 to 5 7.67 59 C11 Wingate Village Townhomes / Wingate Walkway $ 286,750 5 to 1 12.86 60 C13 Public Lands / 1200 East Median, Raise Curb, New Irrigation, New Tree Planting $ 500,000 4 to 1 12.1 61 P4 Public Lands / Parleys Historic Nature Park Structure Preservation $ 765,325 3 to 3 6.86 62 P7 Public Lands / Cemetery Enhancement for Visitor Research and Knowledge $ 790,000 4 to 2 7.43 63 P8 Public Lands / Cemetery Multi‐Use Roadway Repair (Phase 1) $ 3,838,000 5 to 1 11.62 64 P9 Public Lands / 9Line and Rosepark Asphalt Pump tracks $ 1,393,600 6 to 0 12.79 65 P14 Public Lands / Richmond Park Playground and Pavilion Replacement $ 690,000 6 to 0 12.86 66 P15 Public Lands / Library Square feasibility study, civic engagement, and design development $ 225,000 3 to 2 12.29 67 P17 Public Lands / Donner and Rotary Glen Park Landscape Improvements $ 650,000 4 to 2 11.29 68 C18 Capitol Hill Neighborhood Council / Capitol Hill Traffic Calming $ 595,194 4 to 2 12.9 69 C19 Streets and Sanitation / Harvard Heights Residential Concrete Street Reconstruction $ 1,311,920 2 to 4 8.43 70 C21 Public / Liberty Wells Traffic Calming $ 400,000 3 to 2 13.2 71 C23 N/A / Stratford Bike Crossing ‐ 17th E and Stratford $ 200,000 4 to 2 12.71 72 C24 Citizen / Sugar House Safe Side Streets $ 500,000 5 to 1 12.31 73 T15 Division of Transportation / Sunnyside / 9‐Line Trail Missing Piece (1850 East) $ 350,000 5 to 1 13.6 74 T14 Division of Transportation / Multi‐Modal Intersection / Traffic Signal Upgrades $ 1,050,000 6 to 0 14.33 1 8 8 0 3 ATTACHMENT 6 – Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Council Requests from January 2019 1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council consideration. Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-level Cost Estimate Bring all facilities out of deferred maintenance Appropriations vs. funding need identified in Public Services’ Facilities Dashboard that tracks each asset $6.8 million annually or $68 million over ten years Expand the City's urban trail network with an emphasis on East-West connections Total paved/unpaved network miles; number and funding for improved trail features; percentage of 9-Line completed $21 million for 9- Line implementation Increase the overall condition index of the City's street network from poor to fair Overall Condition Index (OCI); pavement condition survey every five years $133 million cost estimate (in addition to existing funding level) Implement the Foothill Trails Master Plan Distance of improved trails completed; number and funding for improved trailheads $TBD Advance the City's sustainability goals through building energy efficiency upgrades Energy savings; carbon emission reductions $TBD Focus on renewal and maintenance projects over creating new assets Number, funding level and ratio of renewed assets vs. new assets $TBD 2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CFP projects. The idea of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5 million, and over $5 million. 3.Measure CFP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the CFP and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CFP. A high alignment would indicate the CFP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs. 4.Council Adoption of CFP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CFP each year with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding. Does the Administration have a preference? Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 4/20/2021 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 421,062$ A Impact fee - Fire 8484002 1,002,114$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 8,435,142$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 5,125,188$ D 14,983,506$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202007 (Jul2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202008 (Aug2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202009 (Sep2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202010 (Oct2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202011 (Nov2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202012 (Dec2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202101 (Jan2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202102 (Feb2021)2021Q3 16,273$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,273$ 202103 (Mar2021)2021Q3 16,105$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,105$ Current Month 202104 (Apr2021)2021Q4 1,718$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 1,718$ 202105 (May2021)2021Q4 14,542$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 14,542$ 202106 (Jun2021)2021Q4 30,017$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 30,017$ 202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 10,107$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 10,107$ 202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 6,804$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 6,804$ 202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 5,554$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 5,554$ 202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 3,106$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 3,106$ 202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 118$ -$ -$ -$ 118$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 469$ -$ -$ -$ 469$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 276$ -$ -$ -$ 276$ Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 78,656$ -$ -$ -$ 78,656$ Notes ^1 FY 2023Calendar Month 1/26/21: We are currently in a refund situation. We will refund $104k in the next 9 months without offsetting expendituresFiscal Year 2021FY 2022Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 4/20/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation ValuespSum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation p Sum of Police AllocationCrime lab rent 8417001 -$ 118$ -$ (118)$ Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$ Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$ Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$ A Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 5,520$ 3,507$ 1,955$ 58$ Police Refunds 8418013 539,687$ -$ 69,291$ 470,396$ Police impact fee refunds 8417006 510,828$ -$ -$ 510,828$ PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 1,410,243$ 239,836$ -$ 1,170,407$ Grand Total 2,512,316$ 289,499$ 71,246$ 2,151,572$ Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,831$ Fire Station #14 8415001 6,650$ 6,083$ 567$ -$ Fire Station #14 8416006 52,040$ -$ 7,428$ 44,612$ Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568$ Fire Station #3 8416009 1,050$ 96$ 485$ 469$ Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$ Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$ B Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$ FireTrainingCenter 8419012 46,550$ -$ 46,550$ -$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 10,965$ 6,966$ 3,941$ 58$ FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 66,546$ -$ 10,516$ 56,031$ Fire Station #3 Debt Service 8421200 541,106$ -$ 541,106$ -$ Grand Total 1,164,177$ 13,145$ 949,764$ 201,268$ Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Three Creeks Confluence 8419101 173,017$ 39,697$ 133,320$ -$ Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$ Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 7,643$ 6,388$ 1,213$ 42$ 337 Community Garden, 337 S 40 8416002 277$ -$ -$ 277$ Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 766$ -$ 470$ 296$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 24,056$ 23,000$ 270$ 786$ C Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 16,087$ -$ 14,977$ 1,110$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 11,856$ -$ 10,287$ 1,570$ 9line park 8416005 86,322$ 19,702$ 64,364$ 2,256$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 50,356$ 43,597$ 605$ 6,155$ Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ -$ 7,500$ FY Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 27,478$ 4,328$ 14,683$ 8,467$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 15,939$ -$ 6,589$ 9,350$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$ Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796$ Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 27,000$ -$ 6,589$ 20,411$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 125,605$ 16,546$ 50,034$ 59,025$ Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 515,245$ 407,516$ 37,648$ 70,081$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 350,000$ -$ 257,265$ 92,736$ Parks Impact Fees 8418015 102,256$ -$ 875$ 101,381$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 200,000$ 35,506$ 51,934$ 112,560$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 727,000$ 574,709$ 4,080$ 148,211$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ -$ -$ 195,045$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 225,000$ -$ -$ 225,000$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 350,250$ 10,285$ 57,026$ 282,939$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ 979$ -$ 326,699$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 400,000$ 9,165$ 2,088$ 388,747$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 490,830$ -$ -$ 490,830$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 540,732$ -$ -$ 540,732$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,145,394$ 46,474$ 33,569$ 1,065,351$ Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ -$ -$ 1,098,764$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,442,199$ 274,321$ 46,898$ 3,120,981$ Grand Total 11,415,868$ 1,512,215$ 794,781$ 9,108,873$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$ IF Roundabout 2000 E Parleys 8420122 455,000$ -$ 455,000$ -$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 575,000$ 96,637$ 478,363$ -$ LifeOnState Imp Fee 8419009 124,605$ -$ 124,605$ -$ Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ -$ Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 41,027$ 32,718$ 8,309$ -$ D 700 South Reconstruction 8414001 310,032$ -$ 310,032$ -$ 700 South Reconstruction 8415004 1,157,506$ 2,449$ 1,155,057$ -$ Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 22,360$ -$ 20,821$ 1,539$ Gladiola Street 8406001 16,544$ 13,865$ 435$ 2,244$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 39,176$ 17,442$ 9,360$ 12,374$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 250,000$ 142,326$ 69,591$ 38,083$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 125,000$ 6,020$ 61,182$ 57,798$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 210,752$ 69,002$ 56,815$ 84,935$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Transportation Safety Imp 8418007 147,912$ 1,264$ 8,990$ 137,658$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ -$ -$ 152,500$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 375,000$ 72,947$ -$ 302,053$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 251,316$ -$ 15,688$ 235,628$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ -$ -$ 875,000$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,858,090$ 213,551$ 607,870$ 2,036,669$ Grand Total 9,292,247$ 681,222$ 3,382,117$ 5,228,908$ Total 24,384,609$ 2,496,081$ 5,197,908$ 16,690,620$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8,435,142$ 5,125,188$ 14,983,506$ 8484002 8484003 8484005 421,062$ $1,002,114 8484001 UnAllocated Budget Amount Parks 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Trailside Pit Toilet $150,000 $168,000 Portland Loo (each) Existing Sewer Line $200,000 $224,000 4 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $350,000 $450,000 8 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $550K - $600K $700,000 Site Master Plan $50K - $75K $75,000-$100,000 Cultural Landscape Report $75,000-$150,000 City-wide Comprehensive Study $150K - $250K $200,000-$300-000 Installed with sewer connection $15K - $30,000 $35000- $50,000 Playground Replacement $150K - $250K $450,000-$550,000 Native soil field $150,000 $400,000-$500,000 Sand-based field $400,000 $1,000,000 Softball/Baseball Field Improvements (Each Field)$200,000 $250,000 Fencing (6 ft. vinyl coated chain link)$45.00-$55.00/LF Patch, repair and paint $150,000 $168,000 New post tension court $250,000 $300,000 Hand-built natural surface single track trail (40" width)$6-12/LF $25.00-$30.00/LF Machine-built natural-surface trail (40" width)$20-25/LF $10.00-$15.00/LF Asphalt Trail $3.50/SF $5.00/SF Concrete Trail (6" thick)$4.50/SF $8.00/SF Soft Surface - Crushed stone $2.50/SF $6.00-$10.00/ SF Off-leash Dog Parks $250K - $350K $ 280,000-$392,000 Irrigation Systems Per Acre $52,000+$75,000 + Tree Replacements (Each 2-inch caliper)$350 $750 Natural Area Restoration Per Acre $100K - $200K $ 112,000- $224,000 Transportation 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Bike - One Mile Cycle Track/Lane Mile (3 lane miles = 1.5 actual miles)500,000+$600,000+ Bike - One Lane Mile (2 lane miles = 1 mile actual mile) 2,000+$2,500+ Bike - Protected Lane Mile (200 West 2015)$400,000 $500,000-1,000,000 Traffic Signals - New 250,000$ 350,000.00$ Traffic Signals - Upgrades 250,000$ 350,000.00$ HAWK Signals 130,000$ 150,000.00$ Crosswalk - Flashing 60,000$ $75,000 Crosswalk - School Crossing Lights 25,000$ $30,000 Crosswalk - Colored/Stamped varies based on width of road $15K - $25K $18,000-$27,000 Driver Feedback Sign 8,000$ $9,500 Speed Table / Raised Crosswalk 25,000$ $30,000 Pedestrian Refuge Island 10,000$ $12,000 Curb Extension at Intersection 20,000$ $25,000 Crosswalk 1,600$ $1,800 Streets 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate Asphalt Overlay (Lane Mile)280,000$ 335,000$ Crack Seal (Lane Mile)5,000$ 6,000$ Road Reconstruction - Asphalt (Lane Mile)500,000$ 600,000$ Road Reconstruction - Asphalt to Concrete (Lane Mile) $700k - $1.2 M $840,000 - $1,440,000 Sidewalk slab jacking (per square foot)4$ $5 Sidewalk replacement (per square foot)$ 7 - $10 $8 - $12 Note: Last updated July 2021 Studies Restrooms (dependent on site and utility work) Regular CIP Project Costs General Rules of Thumb NOTE: Costs are estimates based on most recent information available (which may be out of date), vary by project, and do not include on-going maintenance. Drinking Fountains Multi-purpose Field Improvements Tennis Court Improvements (2 Courts) Path/ Trail Improvements Attachment 8 Funding Source Cost Center Description Remaining Appropriation Complete?If Not Complete, Status? 8317057 Deteriorated Sidewalk 2,237.00$ 8318061 900 West Neighborhood nodes an 46,728.00$ 8318062 Deteriorated or Missing Concre 5,987.00$ 8318063 Jordan River Parkway 181,571.00$ 8317359 Gladiola to Indiana 900S Seq C 112,658.00$ 8317361 Street Reconstruction Improv 49.00$ 8314031 Driver Feedback Signs 86,320.00$ 8314033 SugarHouse Circulation 96,736.00$ 8317030 Sugar House Park Roadway Maint 24,836.00$ 8317032 Bridge Maintenance Program 20,841.00$ 8317033 Paver Crosswalks Reconstructio 33,392.00$ 8317036 Street Improvements: Reconstru 14,522.00$ 8318023 Gladiola 900 S Imp 38,047.00$ 8318154 1300 E Class C 443,879.00$ 8310077 Regional Sports Complex Donati 3,154.00$ 8314094 West Salt Lake Master Plan Imp 8,598.00$ 8314100 900 S Oxbow 619.00$ 8314103 Warm Springs Park Master Plan 223.00$ 8314104 Genesee Trailhead Acquistion 229,927.00$ 8314105 Fisher Mansion Carriage House 102,751.00$ 8315083 Wakara Way/Arapeen Dr Donation 35,566.00$ 8317064 Jordan River Trail - Union P 500,000.00$ 8315027 Bikeway - Close the gap 6,989.00$ 8315073 City Cemetery Master Plan 25,740.00$ 8316026 Six Traffic Signal Upgrades, 9 1,452.00$ 8316031 Fairmont Park Pond Restoration 3,097.00$ 8316041 PPL Deferred Maintenance, City 2,309.00$ 8316046 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 104,210.00$ 8316070 Warm Springs Park, 840 N 300 W 13,195.00$ 8316085 Contingency 100,000.00$ 8317017 Recreation/Open Space GO Bond (16,584.00)$ Why is this negative? 8317024 Sorenson Multicultural Center 27,452.00$ 8317025 500/700 S Reconstruction 455,159.00$ 8317029 Bus Stop Enhancements 17,269.00$ 8317043 Parks and Public Lands Compreh 128,823.00$ 8317049 UTA TIGER GRANT MATCH 79,995.00$ 8317055 Capital Facilities Plan 4,928.00$ 8317096 Fire Station #3 2,200.00$ General Fund Dontions Class C CDBG 8318027 Public Way Concrete Restoratio 40,413.00$ 8318028 Bridge Maintenance 77,132.00$ 8318033 Concrete Rehab 3,431.00$ 8318045 Bikeways Urban Trails 109,235.00$ 8318046 Warm Springs Restrooms 12,993.00$ 8318047 Rose Park Pedestrian Byway 272,091.00$ 8318048 Miller Park ADA access 371,369.00$ 8318049 Jordan R. Flood Control 7,023.00$ 8318050 Artesian Well Park Redevelopme 1,332.00$ 8318054 Fairmond Salt Storage 7,111.00$ 8318055 9 Line Central Ninth 152,500.00$ 8318084 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - CIP 110,104.00$ 8318085 Computer Rm Cooling Units 40,787.00$ 8318087 Ball Field Lights 2,979.00$ 8318097 Percent for Art 98,161.00$ 4,251,536.00$ General Fund TOTAL of ALL SOURCES 600/700 North 26 Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ I-215 to Redwood Road In this western segment, 700 North will maintain two vehicle travel lanes in each direction with left turn lanes. The redesign includes numerous changes to balance vehicle mobility with the needs of pedestrians and cyclists. Protected bike lanes A curb-separated bike lane is recommended for the street design. Narrowing the vehicle travel lanes frees up space for upgrades to the bike facilities. The relatively limited number of driveways and lack of on-street parking makes this configuration ideal. Landscaped medians Landscaped medians are placed strategically in the center turn lane on this segment of 700 North to support pedestrian crossings, reduce the scale of the street, add greenery, slow traffic, and provide a neighborhood gateway. Morton pedestrian-activated crossing This segment of 700 North lacks frequent pedestrian crossings. This pedestrian activated crossing at Morton Drive can provide a place to cross and help slow traffic as it enters the neighborhood.MORTON DR.I - 215DOROTHEA WY.2200 West through I-215 Interchange The segment of 700 North from 2200 West through the I-215 interchange, while included in this corridor study, is not shown in this illustrative diagram. The lane configuration for this segment is recommended to stay the same as existing, with improvements focused on visibility, protection, and conflict mitigation of active transportation facilities. 600 - 700 North Illustrative Concept LEGEND Roadway lanes and parking New landscaped areas New pedestrian space Bike lane Bus stop DRAFT 27600/700 North Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ Star Crest Drive crossing Star Crest Drive is planned as a Neighborhood Byway. These Byways formalize quiet streets into a network of corridors that offer comfortable routes for pedestrians and bicyclists. The key strategy to a Neighborhood Byway is to provide safe signalized crossings at major barrier streets. Trade on-street parking for a protected bike lane Complete streets inevitably involve trade-offs and compromises. The south side of 700 North between Morton Drive and east of Sir Anthony Drive (2.5 blocks) is the only place with on- street parking between 2200 West and Redwood Road. This plan recommends removing this small amount of residential-oriented on-street parking to allow for a continuous protected bike lane. This trade-off creates a safe bike environment and maintains current vehicle capacity. Sidewalk-level bikeway This plan recommends a bike path raised to sidewalk-level between Redwood Road and approximately 1500 West. This will connect the protected bike lanes to the west with high-comfort bike infrastructure that accesses the Jordan River Parkway, Riverside Park, and Backman Elementary. Sir Anthony pedestrian- activated crossing This segment of 700 North lacks frequent pedestrian crossings. This pedestrian activated crossing at Sir Anthony Drive can provide a place to cross and help slow traffic as it enters the neighborhood. Redwood Road crossing improvements While the recommended street configuration does not create major opportunities for shortening the Redwood Road/700 North pedestrian crossings, look for opportunities to increase visibility, improve corner environment, or optimize crossing time. Redwood Road intersection area transit stops The commercial node here is an important destination for basic daily needs. In anticipation of the new transit service on 600 North (Rt 205) and 1000 North (Rt 1) - part of the Frequent Transit Network plan - Salt Lake City and UTA are planning new stops and upgrades to existing stops. Transition to one through lane each way East of Redwood Road, the corridor transitions to a configuration with one vehicle lane in each direction. This change is necessary to create space in the narrowest section of the corridor to provide high-quality streetscape features and multi-modal environment.STAR CREST DR.SIR ANTHONY DR.REDWOODRD.DRAFT 600/700 North 28 Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ Improve on-street parking Existing on-street parking remains - it is especially important for Riverside Park use. However, pedestrian crossings and traffic calming will improve access and safety to parking areas. Manage driveway access Ensure commercial driveway conflicts are treated properly, with bike markings and driveway cuts do not interrupt sidewalk grade. Access management using raised medians is appropriate for closely spaced driveways near Redwood Road. New park edge Reconfiguring 600/700 North to expand the pedestrian and bicycle environments also is a major opportunity to transform the edge of Riverside Park to become more permeable and active with more shade, pathways into the park, and amenities such as benches or even picnic pavilions. Improved crossing at Jordan River The Jordan River Parkway crossing is shortened and made more visible by the addition of curb bulb- outs and a median refuge. Improved mid-park crossing The existing pedestrian crossing at Backman School and Riverside Park is shortened and made more visible by the addition of curb bulb-outs and a median refuge. Realign 1500 West to create gateway and crossing for park, school and neighborhood A major move recommended by this plan is a realignment of 1500 West and the Riverside Park parking lot driveway to create a four-way intersection. This four-way intersection accomplishes several things: It reduces the awkwardness of this area; it creates a place for a pedestrian crossing at Backman School’s front door and the entry to the park; it calms traffic; and it creates the opportunity for entry plazas for the park, school, and neighborhoods to the east.Raised bike lane along park and school High demand for access to Riverside Park and Backman School, on-street parking, and few driveways mean an ideal opportunity for raised bike lanes at the sidewalk grade providing a safe bike environment for the full range of bike and micromobility users riding along 600/700 North. The intersection reconfiguration also creates public green space benefits - an active use of the current landscaped triangle, a terminus and quality access point for the wide landscaped median and pathway extending Riverside Park to the east, and perhaps even an extension of Backman School outdoor classroom space into these plazas. RIVER-SIDE DR.JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY1500 WESTRiverside Park Backman Elementary School Keep center turn lane The plan recommends including the two-way center turn lane to allow more flexibility with on-street parking and turning around. DRAFT 29600/700 North Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ Begin landscaped median parkway with path The reconfigured 1500 West/Riverside Park driveway intersection is the starting point for the wide landscaped median that runs eastward to 900 West. The median has a pathway running down it, flanked by trees; users at this west end access the path via the 1500 West crossing. This west end of the median parkway can also include neighborhood gateway elements such as plantings, monuments, or public art. 1300 West Neighborhood Byway treatment A Neighborhood Byway is planned for 1300 West through Rose Park and Fairpark. Where 1300 West crosses 600 North, the median parkway can extend across the intersection, creating a highly safe crossing and neighborhood open space node. While this design restricts left turns into and from 1300 East, the trade-off with the Byway crossing and public green space created is worthy. Protected bike lane In this segment of 600 North, the raised bike lane along the Backman School/Riverside park segment transitions to a bike lane in the roadway, protected by a curb and likely vertical delineators. This is an opportunity created by the lack of on- street parking for this segment. Having the bike lane in the roadway allows existing curb locations to remain. Median intersection treatments Where the median parkway crosses an intersection that runs through the median area, a special treatment will be needed. Left turn lanes will be preserved, but the crossing median path will need high-visibility markings, and median noses should be placed as close together as possible. A raised crossing could be considered. Pedestrian realm largely remains as-is in this segment The sidewalk and park strip will largely remain in its existing condition for this segment of the corridor (Catherine Street to 1200 West). Exceptions are reconfigured corners and new bus stop areas. Bus stops in a constrained environment The lack of an on-street parking lane and only one through lane means that room will need to be made for a bus pullout at the bus stops planned for this segment - likely by routing the bike lane up onto the curb into the pedestrian realm, behind the bus stop pad. CATHERINEST.1400 WESTCOLORADO ST.1300 WESTOAKLEY ST.Potential signal Consider a full traffic signal retrofit at 1400 West intersection. DRAFT 600/700 North 30 Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ Narrower median east of 1200 West The inclusion of on- street parking along 600 North east of 1200 West means that the center planted median will need to be narrower - in the range of 20 to 25 feet. 1200 West bulbout/plaza/crossing The wide Fairpark streets (in contrast to the narrow Rose Park streets) create the opportunity for large bulb-outs extending into the corridor’s cross streets on the south side. These can be designed as public plazas, especially in conjunction with new bus stops. Perhaps the best such opportunity is at 1200 West, where a demonstration project along these lines was built in 2020. Pedestrian realm largely remains as-is in this segment The sidewalk and park strip will largely remain in its existing condition for this segment of the corridor. Exceptions are bulb-outs at intersection crossings and new bus stop areas. New bus stops Bus stops along 600 North between 800 West and 1200 West will be located in this segment’s wide existing park strips at 900 West, 1000 West, and 1200 West. Bus stops can be catalysts for landscape, streetscape and public space improvements that celebrate neighborhood identity and provide rider comfort. Some on-street parking will be displaced to accommodate the bus stop activity. Buffered bike lanes Buffered bikes lanes are an appropriate design for this segment given the changes to vehicle travel lanes and center median, which is expected to reduce vehicle speeds. Buffered bike lanes also are compatible with other priorities like on street parking and driveway access. Rambler Dr. intersection Rambler Drive’s wide parking lane on the south side of its intersection with 600 North provides the opportunity for bulb-out curb extensions to shorten the pedestrian crossing, calm traffic and create public open space.1200 WESTRAMBLER DR.MARION ST.More pedestrian crossings In this diagram, marked pedestrian crossings are shown at every “city block” street - i.e. 1200 West, 1300 West) - however, with the slowed design speed of the corridor and median refuge, it may make sense to consider additional crossings at the interim streets (i.e. Marion St., Chicago St.), which would also provide access to the median space. DRAFT 31600/700 North Mobility, Safety, and Transit Improvement Study 1000 West Intersection At the 1000 West intersection the plan recommends bulb-out curb extensions, a median refuge, and bus stops, transforming this intersection into a more walkable, rideable neighborhood node. Transition to 2 through lanes each way east of 900 West 900 West is a key transition point. East of this point, 600 North transitions back to a configuration of two through lanes each way (the street cross section is generally unchanged from existing conditions). 800 West bike crossing improvements Where 600 North crosses 800 West, the existing pedestrian activated crossing is enhanced. This crossing will move westbound cyclists coming off the two-way path over the viaduct into the westbound buffered bike lane on the north side of the street, and improve north-south crossing. 6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\6RXUFH(VUL0D[DU*HR(\H(DUWKVWDU*HRJUDSKLFV&1(6$LUEXV'686'$86*6$HUR*5,',*1DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\ Eastern end of center planted median: neighborhood gateway The 900 West intersection marks the eastern end of the center planted median that runs westward from Riverside Park; the median could have features creating a gateway to Fairpark and Rose Park.1000 WEST900 WESTCHICAGO ST.800 WESTDEXTER ST.AMERICAN BEAUTY DR.DRAFT 1 DRAFT July 14, 2021 DRAFT 600/700 North Preferred Concept Introduction The purpose of this document is to summarize recommendations for 600/700 North corridor, and to provide some context about the process and rational behind the recommendations. In late 2019 the Study began without any funding commitments; since then several significant funding sources have been cobbled together from various Federal, State, and local sources. The Preferred Concept presented in this document reflects a transformative vision for the corridor, and it should be emphasized that additional refinement and engineering is necessary to clearly understand how much additional funding is needed. It is also noted that implementation is expected to occur in phases, with roadway reconstruction activities preceded by spot improvements to crosswalks and bus stops. Project Goals The 600/700 North Corridor Stakeholder Committee established a set of 10 Corridor Goals: 1) Maintain and enhance the link among 600/700 North corridor neighborhoods and the rest of Salt Lake City 2) Link people and neighborhoods across 600/700 North 3) Maintain the corridor’s regional connections 4) Calm traffic to create a safe corridor 5) Create a beautiful street with great places reflecting neighborhood pride 6) Improve access to and leverage Jordan River Parkway, Riverside Park, and the surrounding corridor parks and open space network 7) Support and shape corridor commercial nodes with walkable character and neighborhood-oriented services 8) Implement and support Salt Lake City’s Frequent Transit Network and other transit connections 9) Improve the safety, consistency, and comfort of east-west bicycle travel in the project area. 10) Create a comprehensive and integrated set of solutions for the entire corridor Working closely with the Committee, the project team developed three alternative concepts for the corridor that achieve these goals in different ways: Concept 1: Baseline with Improvements - The current roadway layout with five lanes generally remains. Improvements are added for walking, biking, and transit. Concept 2: Green Boulevard - A wide landscaped median is added to the center of the street in addition to walking, biking, and transit improvements. Concept 3: Streetside Park - A portion of the street space is repurposed as a linear park extending from Riverside Park to provide a variety of amenities and public space. 2 DRAFT July 14, 2021 In addition to these core ideas, each concept included options for the Backman School/Riverside Park area and the I-15 interchange area. The team presented these options to the public through an online story map, which included a short survey. The survey received nearly 500 responses that provided both quantitative and qualitative feedback. This feedback conveyed a series of clear – sometimes complementary, sometimes conflicting - messages: • Desire for green space and community open space as well as overall investment in the Westside neighborhoods, serving the purposes of creating a beautiful community and providing usable community space – embodying Goal 5. • Desire for safe bike travel along the corridor, embodying Goal 9. • Desire to slow traffic and create an overall safe environment for all street users – embodying Goal 4. • Desire for 600/700 North to retain its function of moving people through Westside neighborhoods and to regional destinations, embodying Goal 1; and concern that one lane each way could not sufficiently move motor vehicle traffic now and in the future. • Concern about the viability, sustainability and safety of open space and the fit of open space within the neighborhood context. In addition, although it was less emphasized by the public, one key goal of the project from the outset is to integrate the new frequent transit network service into the corridor with high quality transit stops and waiting environment. The team also considered the results of detailed traffic modeling on the corridor that concluded that one lane each direction from 900 West to Redwood Road can handle the existing traffic volumes as long as left and right turns lanes are provided at key intersections. The team received guidance from the Stakeholder Committee in interpreting these results. In speaking with committee members, the team gleaned some key insights – that the area deeply desires a quality investment, though many in the community fear the change such an investment would bring. At the end of the day, many committee members expressed that a smaller, non-transformative project would not create the type of traffic calming, connections, and public spaces that they feel the corridor needs, embodied in the Corridor Goals. Based on this feedback and these considerations, the team developed a Preferred Concept for the 600/700 North Corridor. The preferred concept is a mix of the three alternative concepts presented, taking on the strengths of each. This preferred concept combines and applies the alternatives in ways appropriate for the context of different segments of the corridor. It may be useful to think of the overall shape of the preferred concept as an “hourglass,” with more traffic demand and corresponding traffic capacity at either end of the corridor, serving the two freeway 3 DRAFT July 14, 2021 interchanges and 900 West and Redwood Road corridors, while the neighborhood core of the corridor, between Redwood Road and 900 West, has less traffic demand and more desire for slow traffic and neighborhood activity associated with homes, Backman School, Riverside Park and Jordan River Parkway, and neighborhood commercial uses. Correspondingly, the two ends of the corridor would retain two lanes each way, while this “neighborhood core” of the corridor would be reconfigured to one lane each way – with the space gained used to create a mutually reinforcing “ecosystem” of slower vehicle speeds, better active transportation conditions, community space, and beautification. Draft Preferred Concept diagram The diagram above shows how these pieces fit together at a high level. Here is a breakdown: • One part of the “neighborhood core” of the corridor, from 900 West to 1500 West, is a version of Concept 2 with lanes reconfigured to one through lane each way and turn pockets at intersections. This concept has the central feature of the landscaped median proposed in Concept 2 but incorporates the usable open space popular with Concept 3’s linear park by 4 DRAFT July 14, 2021 including a pathway down the center of the median between two rows of trees, from 1200 West to 1500 West. This median would be a modern version of the planted medians found throughout Salt Lake’s streets such as 200 West and 600 East – with more useable space and having sustainable landscaping. The segment of the median with the pathway would have marked crossings across the minor side streets in the medians. Typical cross section, 600 North from 900 West to 1500 West, showing two different approaches to bike facility. Median path would only run from 1200 West to 1500 West. • In addition to the popularity of the median concept with the public (it received the highest rating of the three concepts), there are several practical arguments for a landscaped median configuration: o Having this space and pathway in the median is appropriate for the single-family residential context of the corridor, creating the community open space desired by the community, but separating it from people’s front yards. o It is easier to plant larger trees in the median, where there would be no power lines along it, unlike along the park strip. 5 DRAFT July 14, 2021 o Putting the open space in the center allows the curbs to remain where they are and keeps flexibility as to just how active the median can be. o The median’s width from 1200 West to 1500 West would be about 30 feet, allowing for an 8-to-10-foot path with plenty of room on either side for buffer and trees/landscaping, as well as the ability to continue the path into the median nose alongside a narrow turn pocket. For reference, the 600 and 800 East medians are about 24 feet; the 300 South median in downtown, which has a pathway to access the median parking, is about 30 feet. o The minor nature of the cross streets (and their narrow width on the Rose Park side) also make well-marked median crossings feasible at Oakley Street, Colorado Street, 1400 West and Catherine Street/Circle. The median would extend across the 1300 West intersection to enhance the crossing 1300 West Neighborhood Byway. o The median is one big move that, if done well, could make a major contribution to creating a slower, human scale environment – reducing the traffic to one lane each way and adding landscaping makes a wide median a more hospitable place to be. Examples of planted medians and median crossings in (clockwise from top left) Bogota, Colombia; New York City; Downtown Salt Lake City; and Oakland, California. • The other part of the neighborhood core segment, alongside Backman School and Riverside Park, will be a blend of Concepts 2 and 3, with an alignment of 1500 West and the park drive to create a crossable 4-way intersection serving as a gateway to the neighborhood, transition between the two neighborhood core cross sections, and more navigable entry to the park. 6 DRAFT July 14, 2021 600/700 North through this segment west of 1500 West will have three lanes (short medians at pedestrian crossings), on-street parking, and raised bike lanes behind the curb alongside enhanced sidewalks, improving the safety and accessibility of this segment and its community destinations. Typical cross section, 600/700 North at Riverside Park 7 DRAFT July 14, 2021 An example of a recently constructed street in Sommerville, Massachusetts with a similar raised bike lane configuration as to that envisioned on 600-700 North in the Riverside Park segment. • For the corridor from 800 West to I-215, we believe we can cover over 80 percent of the east- west distance with protected bike facilities, whether through a bike lane raised on the curb (Backman School/Riverside Park segment), a pathway shared with pedestrians (between Jordan River and Redwood Road), a curb/delineator-protected lane (1200 West to 1500 West and Redwood to I-215), or in rare circumstances, a parking-protected lane (potentially some limited places between 900 West and 1200 West and between Redwood and I-215). • The transitional segments on either end of this neighborhood core – the “wide” part of the hourglass, from 800 to 900 West and from Redwood Road to 2200 West - have more demand for traffic coming on and off the freeways to Redwood Road and 900 West and so will adopt Concept 1’s 5-lane cross section with multi-modal improvements such as a buffered bike lane, curb extension “bulb-outs,” pedestrian refuges, and streetscape. • The viaduct/I-15 interchange segment of the corridor will adopt the Concept 2 approach, with a widened path, improved freeway ramp crossings and buffers, as well as an improved active transportation crossing at 800 West, although the Concept 3 north side path could be considered as a future phase. We believe this corridor concept best balances and achieves the Corridor Goals established by the Stakeholder Committee and creates a transportation and public space investment worthy of the communities it will serve. The following discusses these segments in more detail. 8 DRAFT July 14, 2021 900 West to 1500 West • Reconfigured lanes to one through lane each direction • Median with turn pockets at intersections - but with center path (1200 West to 1500 West) and two rows of trees, street furniture and pedestrian scale lighting, with pedestrian refuge and crossing at path, making median occupiable/usable space. • Where the median meets intersections, consider raising the intersection between the median segments halfway to the curb to create a calmer area to mitigate potential conflicts. • A goal to protect the bike lane as much as feasible, and in balance with the residential driveways and on-street parking, where currently existing. This can be a block-by-block solution that can be largely protected by a vertical curb element from 1200 West to 1500 West, where no parking exists, and potentially protected for some blocks from 900 West to 1200 West, particularly at the 1100-1200 West block with civic/commercial frontage and some blocks on the south side of 600 North with side on residential and few driveways. For the remaining blocks, a buffered bike lane (on traffic side and parking side) would be employed, similar to some segments of the 300 South protected bike lane. • Bus stops in park strips at 900 West, 1000 West, 1200 West, 1300 West and 1400 West. • For stops slated for 1300 West and 1400 West, we propose a bike bypass – a ramp from the bike lane up to the sidewalk, which would become a short shared pathway going behind or in front of the bus passenger waiting area and back down on the far side of the stop, giving the bus a place to pull out. When there is no bus occupying the pull out, a cyclist can make the choice to keep riding through the pull out. • Preserve parking where existing, for the most part, the exception potentially being some stretches where residences side-on to the roadway and a protected bike lane could be implemented. • Bulb-outs into the parking lane where they exist on both 600/700 North and cross streets. • 1300 West is a planned Neighborhood Byway – here, the median could continue across the intersection, reducing through traffic on this street and making it easter for active travelers to cross 600 North. 1500 West to Redwood Road (Backman School/Riverside Park segment) • Reconfigure 1500 West and Riverside Park Drives to align, with plazas on all four corners and crossings of 600/700 North, creating a gateway to the neighborhoods, the park, and school. • Center turn lane, though can consider medians at pedestrian crossings. 9 DRAFT July 14, 2021 • Parallel parking on both sides. • Raised bike lanes behind parking alongside sidewalk to west side of bridge. • Between the Jordan bridge and Redwood Road, we propose either a raised bike lane alongside the sidewalk or a shared pathway on both sides for cyclists and pedestrians to share – due to the need to protect cyclists within the limited right-of-way, and as the roadway transitions back to a 5-lane section. • Consider new, more permeable park edge along 600/700 North, replacing chain link fence. • Consider new system of connected drives in the park offering on-street parking spaces. Redwood Road to I-215/2200 West A modified version of Concept 1 with: • 5 lanes (two lanes each way and a center turn lane) • Curb-protected bike lanes on north side (where no parking and very few driveways); curb- protected bike lanes replacing parking on south side. • New pedestrian crossings at Morton and Sir Anthony Drives. • Intermittent medians breaking up the wide pavement and providing pedestrian refuges for the new crossings. • Curb extension bulb-outs where there is a parking lane. Viaduct/I-15 interchange Continue working with UDOT to make modifications include: • Widened path/sidewalk with upgraded curb ramps and crosswalk signals. • Painted on-street bike lanes. • Modify eastbound right turn lane to interchange with more abrupt turn angle. • Reduce NB-to-EB curve to manage high vehicle speed. • Consider Alternative Concept 3’s north side pathway as a future phase Attachment 12 – Administration’s Responses to the Council’s Policy Questions POLICY QUESTIONS: 1. $300+ Million Unfunded Capital Needs and $58 Million Bond Proposal – The Council may wish to discuss if the proposed bond funding by category (listed below) aligns with the Council’s policy priorities. The Council may also wish to discuss how to balance the City’s $300+ Million unfunded capital needs including deferred maintenance for existing assets with funding construction of new assets. The Council is scheduled to review the bond projects in detail over the summer when also reviewing individual CIP projects.  $19.2 Million for Facilities Projects (34% of bond total)  $11.1 Million for Transportation and Streets Projects (19% of bond total)  $26.54 Million for Parks and Natural Lands Projects (47% of bond total) 2. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding for CIP – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to review all CIP applications for FY22 to determine which, if any project, are eligible for ARPA funding. The U.S. Treasury release eligibility guidance after the advisory board and Mayor provided project funding recommendations to the Council. A review for ARPA feasibility could be completed in time for the Council’s July and August project-specific funding deliberations. ARPA Funding • CIP FY21 o The general purpose appropriation for street reconstructions o Rehabilitation of bridges over the Jordan River at 400 S and 650 N • CIP FY22 o The general purpose appropriation for street reconstructions o 200 South transit complete street • Projects with Drainage and Stormwater Improvement Expenses o 100 South o 300 West o 900 East o 900 South o Local Streets #1 o Local Streets #2 o 200 South (FY22) o 900 South (FY22) o Local Streets Projects (FY22) • Bridges o 650 North  Damaged by earthquake and application submitted to UDOT for $5.6M o 400 South  Rehabilitation cost estimated at $2.8M 3. Policy Guidance for When to Disqualify an Application – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if it would be helpful for the Council to provide policy guidance on disqualifying an application such as if it violates a stated City position in an adopted master plan or other policy document, if the primary beneficiary would not be the public, if the City should no longer allow constituent street reconstruction applications because the City’s chosen strategy is reconstructing the worst first based on a data-driven process, etc. The Administration would greatly appreciate policy guidance from Council that establishes an agreeable allowance for CIP staff to disqualify applications that are not within the required funding amounts, are in Attachment 12 – Administration’s Responses to the Council’s Policy Questions violation of a City code, or if an application violates a stated City position in an adopted master plan or other policy document. The Administration would also request Council allowance to phase out constituent applications for street reconstructions as City staff have developed an equitable and data-driven approach to these improvements. 4. Resources to Support Constituent Applications – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the need to address geographic equity issues with additional targeted City resources for neighborhoods that submit few or no constituent applicants. Some Council Members expressed interest in being proactive to support constituent applications from neighborhoods with higher poverty rates. Some constituents and CDCIP Board Members commented at public meetings that they felt like some projects get more support from departments than others. The CIP team is in the process of uploading all projects to a centralized database. We anticipate this will be completed within the next 60 days. We request the opportunity to provide an analysis to Council of the funding allocated by various Council districts, zip codes, neighborhoods, or other relevant demographic information. Following this analysis, CIP staff would like to hold community meetings in areas with the least funding awarded to provide hands-on, pre-submission workshops in multiple languages. The CIP Team is proposing a new “CIP Collaborative” that will offer high level assistance with division staff and education about the CIP and its application process. This initiative would include engagement components such as: o CIP Handouts/Brochures (English & Spanish) available at the City’s libraries and other public buildings and distributed to Community Councils (Liaisons) that provide the CIP details and appropriate contact information for inquiries o “CIP Collaborative” meeting(s) held sometime in July or August of each year that give constituents an opportunity for facetime with the appropriate City division for a Q&A session and to educate and develop a feasible project scope for their application prior to submission deadlines o Broadening of the Constituent application timeline to allow more time for collaboration and submission o Regular communication with all Community Council Liaisons to ensure transparency of the CIP process and any updates o Staff attendance at Community Council Meetings (as requested) to educate and inform Constituents on CIP criteria and the process to apply Note: The intention in broadening the constituent timeline and adding an engagement element is to give staff more time to assist the applicants, not to discourage submissions but rather, encourage complete and feasible project scopes that meet the CIP eligibility criteria. 5. Move $200,000 Ongoing Property Maintenance Expenses Out of Surplus Land Fund – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how to advance this legislative intent. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration what challenges exist to provide an accounting of vacant building maintenance costs and whether a property management contract approach could be more efficient. See Additional Info section for more on the Surplus Land Fund. In Budget Amendment #1 of FY20 the Council adopted the following legislative intent: The Council expresses the intent to fund ongoing property maintenance expenses out of the Public Services Department and/or Community and Neighborhoods Departments’ (CAN) budget rather than Attachment 12 – Administration’s Responses to the Council’s Policy Questions continuing to use one-time revenues from the Surplus Land Fund. The Council requests the Administration include this approach based on actual expenses in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2021. This approach builds upon the Council’s FY19 decision to shift funding for a CIP-related FTE away from the Surplus Land Fund and into CAN’s base budget. Full building maintenance costs are different than basic measures taken to preserve a vacant building in its current condition until it can be developed, improved, or disposed of. Public Services has performed basic measures only, and these costs are difficult to quantify because they comprise call-back, overtime, and lost productivity time in addition to materials and supplies. Facilities bills CAN for some of its expenses, but personnel costs cannot be billed. Most of the expense paid by CAN for FY21 was for security services to patrol and respond to break-ins. Public Services is preparing asset stabilization plans for each vacant property (Warm Springs, Fisher Mansion, Fleet Block, Old PSB, Glendale Water Park). Plans will include immediate measures Facilities can take to mitigate and repair damages. Some funding for stabilization is included in the proposed bond that will hopefully prevent further asset degradation. We are also continuing to investigate contracted property management companies that will perform the basic work currently done by Facilities and respond to after-hours calls from the alarm systems if they are workable. When final plans are prepared, they will include recommendations for funding and possible outsourcing. If the long- term management of these buildings is shifted to the Facilities portfolio, FTE’s will be required. CAN has also recently kicked off a Community Land Trust study that will contemplate the structure and governance of a third-party entity that provides profession asset and portfolio management over agreed upon City properties. 6. CIP Project Status Reports – The Council may wish to ask the Administration about mechanisms to facilitate the up-to-date sharing of information on current CIP projects. In the past, there were a variety of mechanisms to share information, ranging from topic by topic email requests to consolidated monthly Page | 6 reports. Council Members could then quickly provide accurate/timely information to interested constituents. The CIP team is in the process of uploading all projects to a centralized database. We anticipate this will be completed within the next 60 days. 7. Additional 0.20% County Sales Tax for Transit Option (not currently collected/levied) – The State Legislature authorized this optional county sales tax for transit capital improvements and services. The Council may wish to ask the Administration about any discussions with the County or plans regarding this potential funding source. For example, could partnering with the County help implement the City’s Transit Master Plan, downtown TRAX loop and/or undergrounding railway lines that divide the City? Under current state law, the option to enact the additional sales tax expires at the end of FY23. Transportation coordinates regularly with the County on funding opportunities. So far, we haven’t heard much interest from the County on levying this tax. The Division will continue to push Salt Lake City projects forward with both UTA and the County so that they are well positioned for potential new revenue sources like this one. 8. Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for a status update on the CFP (10-Year Comprehensive CIP Plan). It’s envisioned as a living document that prioritizes capital needs across City plans and departments within funding constraints. The Council held a briefing in January 2019 about a draft of the plan. See Attachment 6 for the Council’s potential policy goals, metrics, and requests. Attachment 12 – Administration’s Responses to the Council’s Policy Questions 9. Balancing Funding for Streets and Transportation – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how to balance funding for streets and transportation in coming years between Class C funds which goes to street reconstructions and overlays with the new County 1/4¢ sales tax which goes to transportation. Both of those funding sources are eligible for streets and transportation uses but are only going to one of the two uses. There may be a need for greater ongoing streets funding when the voter-approved 2018 Streets Reconstruction Bond funds are all spent. The needs for both street reconstruction and multi-modal transportation projects far exceed the funding available from these two sources. While it may appear that these two funding sources are spent independently, they are often blended on projects to ensure that reconstruction projects include the full suite of complete streets elements. Transportation will continue to collaborate to ensure further integration in future years. Engineering ran an analysis using Cartegraph that determined we would need an additional $20 million per year just to get back to an overall average OCI score of fair condition. The Division is currently working to refine this analysis so it can be presented to Council/Administration in the next 6 months. Attachment 13 - Qualified Census Tracts for 2021 from HUD American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) BUDGET UPDATE Learn more about funds spent at www.tinyurl.com/SLCBudgetFY21 AUGUST 17, 2021 Balancing Our Priorities Funds Spent by Department DEADLINE TO SPEND ONE-TIME ARPA FUNDS: DECEMBER 2024 Some ARPA-Eligible Spending Options As suggested/asked by Council Members 1 Policy Questions How much should we reserve for FY23? Should we use ARPA for CIP/Bond to preserve bond capacity/fund balance? How do we balance one-time projects with ongoing people and program expenses? What are our unmet community needs? What have we heard from the community? *When will we revisit the $1.5 million holding account from 10 ARPA-ineligible administration funding requests? 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 FY23 Estimated Funding Needs $36 million Ongoing expenses on employees & programs (e.g. police salaries, YouthCity, 10 new FTEs) and larger revenue loss replacement **Could be funded using other sources; ﬁnal amount TBD 2 General Fund Balance Reimbursement $3 million $1 million for small business loans $2 million for low-income senior and veteran housing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) $6+ million Improve outdoor spaces $500,000 to repair the Annex Building (Odyssey House application #3) Improve drainage on streets 4 Sales Tax Bond $5.2 million Improve outdoor spaces Holding account* (1.9%) $1,583,500 FY23 estimated funding needs** (42.1%) $36,000,000 Financial Overview $85,411,572 $22,555,258 Total funds Funds spent (26.4%)Funds remaining (71.7%) 50.7% Revenue Replacement (General Fund) 37.7% Police (Ocer existing salaries) Apprenticeship Program (Multiple Departments) Community & Neighborhoods Economic Development Finance Fire 4.4% 4% 1.5% 0.9% 0.8% $61,272,814 Remainder (29.6%) $25,272,814 Revenue Replacement for the General Fund Police Ocer Salary Increases Apprenticeship Program Youth & Family COVID-19 Programming Continuation Economic Development Sta (2 New FTEs) Medical Response Team Expansion (4 New FTEs funded for 6 Months) ARPA Grant Administrator (1 New FTE Sunsets with ARPA Funding) ARPA Grant Manager (1 New FTE Sunsets with ARPA Funding) Community & Neighborhoods Special Projects Assistant (1 New FTE) Youth & Family Community & Program Manager (1 New FTE) Economic Development Strategic Plan Medical Response Team Equipment for Expansion Total ARPA Funds Spent 98.7% spent on ongoing expenses 4% spent on 10 New FTEs $11,432,646 $8,507,318 $1,000,000 $711,350 $290,000 $136,762 $101,020 $95,000 $93,829 $90,633 $50,000 $46,700 $22,555,258 $22,262,538 $807,244 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Arts Council Sta (3 FTEs), Operational Costs TBD Associate Planners (3 FTEs) Forest Preservation & Growth (1 FTE), Operational Costs TBD Small Business Construction Mitigation Pilot Program Transportation Right of Way Utilization Manager (1 FTE) Business & Cultural Districts (1 FTE) Forest Preservation & Growth Program Equipment & Supplies (one-time) Business Analyst (1 FTE) Tech Lake City American Express Card Merchant Fees Holding Account 78% of holding account proposed for 10 FTEs and merchant fees (ongoing expenses) $350,000 $235,000 $219,000 $200,000 $160,000 $150,000 $95,000 $89,500 $45,000 $40,000 $1,583,500 $1,243,500 ARPA-Funded Projects Holding Account Proposals 650 North Bridge Replacement (partially ARPA eligible) Damaged from March 2020 earthquake. The Administration applied to UDOT for replacement funding. 200 South Reconstruction and Transit Complete Streets (15% eligible) For drainage, curb, and gutter. 9-Line Asphalt Pump Track Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathways (100% eligible) Odyssey House (100% eligible) Three Creeks West Bank Trailway (100% eligible) Street Improvements (15% eligible) For drainage, curb, and gutter. Total estimated cost - $3 million. Poplar Grove Sportcourt (100% eligible) 900 South Reconstruction and Signal Improvements For drainage, curb, and gutter. Three Creeks West Bank New Park (100% eligible) Downtown Green Loop (partially eligible) All of project may not be entirely eligible in a qualiﬁed census tract West Side Neighborhood Parks (partially eligible) TBD until more details are available. Public Lands Multilingual Wayﬁnding Signage (partially eligible) TBD until more details are available. ARPA-Eligible CIP & Bond Projects CIP Bond $5,600,000 $1,800,000 $615,777 $510,000 $500,000 $484,146 $450,000 $433,333 $375,000 $150,736 $4,000,000 $1,200,000 $16,118,992 $10,918,992 $5,200,000 ARPA-Eligible CIP & Bond Projects = ongoing expense CIPBond SURVIVING ROAD & UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION A Planning & Resource Guide for Salt Lake City Businesses MARCH2021 ii LETTER FROM THE MAYOR & SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DEAR SALT LAKE CITY BUSINESS OWNER: Salt Lake City is growing, and public utility and road improvement projects are critical to meet the demand from new residential and commercial development. The city’s goal is to not only use local taxpayer dollars, but state, county and federal grants to build safer, more accessible, and more welcoming streets that accommodate all ages and abilities. These transformative projects will allow for future growth and changes in transportation while focusing on moving people – not just cars. With input from the community at every stage, city projects are designed to not only solve transportation problems, but also beautify the communities they serve, promote public health, and create a more sustainable environment. We know that road and utility construction projects will temporarily impact area businesses and that the final improvements will benefit all aspects of the community for decades to come. We also know that we can work together to reduce the impacts of construction on area businesses by engaging you early in the project lifecycle, providing you with the right information, and coordinating together with the project team. While the inconveniences and impacts of construction are unavoidable, our goal is to help you plan ahead to reduce the impact on your business and your customers. This Surviving Road and Utilities Construction Planning and Resource Guide was created to provide you with additional ideas and information to assist you before, during, and after construction begins. For projects in areas with many impacted businesses, the city will designate a project liaison to coordinate with you throughout construction. The liaison will keep you informed about the project and work with you to minimize impacts to your business and customers. Check out the rest of this guide for more information on the engagement process. On behalf of my office and the City Council, thank you for the contributions you make to the vibrancy of our city. We look forward to continued partnership with you. Mayor Erin Mendenhall & Salt Lake City Council Members: James Rogers–District 1, Andrew Johnston–District 2, Chris Wharton–District 3, Ana Valdemoros–District 4, Darin Mano–District 5, Dan Dugan, District 6, Amy Fowler– District 7 our city. We look forward to continued partnership with you. Mayor Erin Mendenhall & Salt Lake City Council Members: James Rogers–District 1, Andrew Johnston– iii CONTENTS: How to Use This Guide 1 Construction Project Lifecycle 2 What to Expect – Impacts from Construction 3 From Roads to Public Utilities 5 Planning is Key – Be Prepared and Stay Resilient 7 Communication is Critical – Stay In Touch 10 Advice from Contractors 12 Time to Celebrate – Post Construction 13 Resources for Business Owners 14 iv Road construction projects often include upgrading or replacing curb and gutter, which reduces ponding and improves storm water runo΍ for neighEoring properties. 1 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE WORKING TOGETHER At Salt Lake City, we believe that communities work best when residents, businesses, and institutions are engaged and working together. We value diverse perspectives and encourage community members to be informed and involved in shaping how decisions are made. This guide helps explain how public street and utility projects move from planning to completion, how construction activities often impact businesses, and how you can get involved and plan ahead to reduce the impacts of those activities on your business. Each section provides information about a different aspect of the project lifecycle, what you can expect, how we can help you, and offers ideas to help reduce impacts to your business. Understanding where the project is in this cycle and how your input can influence the process will help you make the best decisions for your business whether you have already participated in a phase of a project affecting you, or are learning about a project for the first time. BUSINESSES COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS RESIDENTS 2 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LIFECYCLE PROJECTS MOVE THROUGH A DELIVERY PROCESS The process begins when we prioritize areas of need as part of our planning process. Funding is then allocated and projects move to environmental clearance, concept development and design. The process of prioritization to selecting a designer can take anywhere from 1-5 years. During the design phase, business owners are contacted and invited to participate in meetings to share their ideas. This is the most important time for you to be involved and when your comments have the most impact on the project design. The design phase is also the time to work with your neighborhood association or council representatives and local chamber(s) of commerce to make connections and stay informed. Once the design is finalized, the project features and planned improvements are set. Participating in the design phase gives you a voice and your input helps us to determine project improvements. Once public input is incorporated into the project design, the project is advertised to the contracting community. Once a contractor is hired, we’ll share the schedule, project phasing, and anticipated impacts via a combination of workshops, fliers, email newsletters, and more. Public feedback is accepted at any time throughout a project, however once a project reaches construction changes or additions are unlikely. Often, construction of city projects is phased to complete utility relocation and upgrades to clear the way for roadway construction. This means your business could be impacted over more than one construction season. The city phases projects this way to help reduce costs and impacts to traffic as well as provide a higher quality end product. PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLICENGAGEMENT PRIORITIZATION FUNDING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTUALDEVELOPMENT 3 WHAT TO EXPECT - IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION IS NECESSARY Construction is necessary to maintain or enhance existing city infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, utilities, signals and more. Projects also create opportunities to improve travel safety for everyone by adding, replacing or upgrading sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and even new features like bike lanes. Park strips, trees, lighting and landscaping can also be added to support our goals and beautify our city. Depending on the size of the project, construction can last anywhere from a few months to a year or more. However, once finished, roads will likely be construction-free for years, if not decades. Your business will benefit directly from the improvements as travel to your location is safer, more comfortable, and accessible for your customers. If your business is located in or near a road construction area, you will be impacted by construction and may also experience financial impacts during the project. While this is not an all- inclusive list, these are the most common impacts from construction. Knowing what to expect can help you plan ahead to reduce those impacts wherever you can to mitigate how the inconveniences of construction affect you, your business and your customers. WORK AT OR NEAR YOUR PROPERTY • Noise, dust, and vibration will be daily occurrences when work is at or near you. • Construction activities occur linearly, meaning one activity may pass by your location at a time. They also occur concurrently with multiple active work zones at the same time. This means your location could be impacted multiple times throughout the project. • Crews only work inside the city’s property or easements except when they connect the new infrastructure to your property. This is called a “tie-in” and the project team will coordinate with you before crews come onto your property to perform this work. Safety is important to Salt Lake City. Reconstructing streets gives the city an opportunity to add new sidewalks to areas that don’t currently have them, which improves safety for pedestrians and those using mobility devices. 4 WHAT TO EXPECT - IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION (continued) TRAVEL IMPACTS • Travel lanes, shoulders, side streets and intersections may close during construction and paving operations. These temporary closures are required to provide safe work and travel conditions for everyone. • During these instances detour routes will be necessary and appropriate access and signage will be provided to maintain customer access. UTILITY SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS • Intermittent utility service interruptions may happen if sewer, water, gas, power, internet, or phone services are being upgraded or replaced. These are critical services and crews will limit service interruptions to minimize impacts as much as possible. • Utility service interruptions may happen if unidentified or misidentified underground utilities are damaged by equipment. UNFORESEEN ISSUES • Heavy rainfall or other extreme weather events may cause delays. • Schedules can change for several reasons including weather, equipment, material, or scarcity of resources. UNFORESEEN ISSUES CAN HAPPEN AND WE WILL WORK WITH YOU TO MITIGATE THE INCONVENIENCE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE CITY ASKS OUR CONTRACTORS TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING GOALS: • Always maintain a way for customers to get to businesses. • Keep one lane of travel in each direction open the majority of the time. • Communicate additional closures to businesses and the public ahead of time. • Maintain at least one business access at all times. • Provide business access with signage to guide traffic when possible. • Restore landscape elements damaged by the project. • Minimize work around major holidays as much as possible. • Provide advance notice of lane closures, night work, and access impacts. • Construction workers should not park on your property without your permission. • If assigned, a project liaison will work closely with you on issues. 5 FROM ROADS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES YOUR BUSINESS MAY BE IMPACTED Before or during road projects, your business may also be impacted by utility work. Salt Lake City’s Department of Public Utilities is responsible for building and maintaining water, sewer, and storm drain utilities. Other utilities like power, gas, and communications lines (like phone and internet) are owned by other parties. Salt Lake City and project teams coordinate closely to ensure that utility work can be phased to happen before road work, or that the two projects can occur simultaneously. This is handled on a project- by-project basis because each project impacts utilities differently. The impacts from utility work are similar to those listed previously. However, there are some differences and knowing what to expect from utility work will help you prepare for the impacts and help your staff and customers navigate the work at your location. During water line maintenance or replacement you can expect temporary water service interruptions. You will be notified up to 48 hours in advance of planned service interruptions. Occasionally, emergency service interruptions happen and the project team will notify you as quickly as possible. When a new water line is installed, it will undergo bacteria, pressure, and other testing for upwards of a week to ensure health, safety and water quality standards are met. During testing it may look as if no progress is being made because crews are not actively working on the site. As soon as testing concludes, crews will connect your business to the new line and finish construction. Not all water service interruptions are for new line installation. Sometimes the water service is interrupted so that other adjacent utilities can be looped around water lines, or vice versa. Utility work is often done during major roadway reconstruction to improve those services while the road is already torn up. Here, Public Utility crews reconstruct a storm drain line along 1300 East. FROM ROADS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES (continued) During sewer line work you may be asked to temporarily stop using your water and sewer systems to allow crews to perform their work. When crews drain these lines you may notice an odor for a short period of time. Storm drain work, like road construction, may impact accesses to your business, create noise, dust, and vibration, and require detouring travelers. No matter the type of utility work being performed, you can expect to have utilities restored by the end of the day. We will also restore disturbed landscaping to its condition prior to construction. Crews working on public utilities build reliability and redundancy into the utility system to ensure that utilities at your business function the way they should. If you have questions about utility work call 801-483-6900 or visit www.slc.gov/utilities. If one of your other utility services appears to have been interrupted, please contact the project liaison to help expedite service restoration. You may notice that your water is cloudy, white or even rusty looking. This is normal when a service is stopped and then reinstated and will resolve quickly. To flush the line: • Remove all aerators, screens, and filters from your faucets. • Check to see if you have a water softener; if you do, be sure to bypass it prior to flushing. • Locate your water heater and close the inlet valve if possible. • Then run the cold water until the water returns to normal. Crews prepare to install a sewer line. Underground utility upgrades are done in partnership with Salt Lake City Public Utilities and other city departments as well as other entities. 6 7 PLANNING IS KEY - BE PREPARED AND STAY RESILIENT CONSTRUCTION & IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPACT YOU, YOUR BUSINESS AND CUSTOMERS The overall project schedule and anticipated impacts should be shared with you at least two weeks before construction begins, with more specific details provided regularly. Once you’ve received this information, you can further prepare and help your employees and customers cope with construction. The following tips and ideas have been shared with the city from past projects and can help minimize surprise and frustration for your customers before construction Eegins. Start by including a note about the project and start date on your website, social media pages, and in any newsletter or business communication you have with customers • Include messages that emphasize: – There will always be a way to get to your business – Customers can sign up for the project newsletter to receive timely information and to help them understand the best way to reach you • If you don’t collect contact information already, now is a good time to start so you can help keep clients/customers informed. • Support your customers’ buying habits by sending regular emails with route information and promotions. WORK WITH YOUR EMPLOYEES ON A PLAN TO MAINTAIN REGULAR OPERATIONS • Talk to your employees about ways to stay prosperous during construction and allow them to share any concerns they have. • Create or strengthen your marketing plan so it is in place before construction begins. • Make sure your employees are signed up for project updates and that they know available routes to get to work during construction. • Ensure your employees have a plan to communicate any messages that might come from the construction team outside of project updates. Sidewalk closures are common during reconstruction. If the sidewalk on one side of the street is closed, the other side will be open with detour signage. There will always be pedestrian access through construction. 88 PLANNING IS KEY - BE PREPARED AND STAY RESILIENT (continued) CONNECT WITH A NETWORK OF SUPPORT • Join your local chamber(s) of commerce and make use of their resources, including marketing support. • Connect with neighboring businesses, community and neighborhood associations to share your business information and promotions with the surrounding community. See our reference list on page 14. ASK FOR WHAT YOU NEED • Work with city staff in the pre-bid stage to request that contracts include business friendly requirements such as: – cleaning up the project site and suspending construction activities during critical business days – ensuring accesses to business is available at all times – putting up “all businesses are open” signage – requesting meetings with the project team and contractor to stay in the loop on the project schedule and share concerns THINK THROUGH YOUR OPERATIONS • Talk to your lender about the upcoming project and whether existing debt can be restructured or if lines of credit might be needed prior to construction and in light of potentially diminished revenue. • Secure a line of credit while your sales are good so it is in place in an emergency. • Consider your staffing needs. A decrease in customers may happen during construction. Keeping an open position vacant, job sharing, and reducing hours are all strategies to keep your staff lean if there is a loss of revenue. • Reducing inventory is another strategy to respond to slower times during construction. • Consider adding more money for cleaning in your budgets during heavy construction to keep your business as dust-free as possible. Crews work to keep dust down, but it is a reality during construction. • Don’t relocate because of construction. A new location may still be impacted by future construction. Once road construction is finished in your area it will be many years, if not decades, before it is necessary again. For any kind of crisis, have a STRONG BUSINESS PLAN in place. The stronger the plan, THE BETTER OFF your Eusiness will Ee. 9 Road reconstruction aims to improve accessibility and create more welcoming streets by designing them to remove obstacles that previously oEstructed travel and Eeautifying the area with landscaping and trees. Salt Lake City uses its Master Plans, studies, and other guiding design documents to develop and prioritize roadway design and improvements. To learn more visit https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/ 10 COMMUNICATION IS CRITICAL – STAY IN TOUCH ONCE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS Once construction begins, work will occur in front of your business multiple times and for varying periods of time depending on the activities taking place. For instance, underground excavation and utility upgrades may take longer, while asphalt paving is usually a very short operation. Often, utility relocation and upgrade work occurs before roadway construction. This means your business could be impacted over more than one construction season. Construction is phased to finish as quickly as possible. The convenience of a shorter project is usually offset by more frequent or intense impacts. Impacts like dust, noise and vibration are inevitable during construction. Others, such as traffic delays and blocked travel routes and accesses, often arise. The following ideas can help you cope if/when they happen. MAINTAIN OPEN COMMUNICATION WITH THE PROJECT TEAM • The project liaison’s job is to help you during construction. Call them if you have a question, concern or issue. • Report problems as they happen and whenever they happen. Don’t wait for a situation to get worse before alerting the team. • If damage occurs to your property from the project, contact the project liaison right away. Do not repair it on your own. • Keep this project guide handy for questions. You can find it online at https://www.slc.gov/ed/businessresources • Save the project hotline number in your phone, ask your store managers to do the same, and make it visible for your staff. • Talk to the project liaison if you are planning property improvements during construction such as landscaping, parking lot maintenance, etc., to coordinate and avoid delays, extra work or future damage to your new improvements. • Talk to the project team in advance if you are planning any special events at your location. • Be sure to read all correspondence about the project. The most important thing you can do is MAINTAIN COMMUNICATION with the project team. The sooner we know about your needs the better we can A&&2002'A7( <28. 11 KEEP YOUR CUSTOMERS COMING BACK • We will put up signs to direct traffic. Take a look at these signs and make sure they make sense to you and your customers. If not, let the project liaison know what your concerns are. • Remain positive when talking about construction to your customers. Having a negative attitude can make customers less likely to return. • Keep a script with information next to the phone that explains the best way to get to your business if customers call. • Put this information on your website and social media feeds. The project liaison can often provide route maps for you to use. • Look at options like signs or flags on your property to increase business visibility. • Consider offering discounts and promotions during the most difficult construction periods as additional incentives for customers. • If you have alternate entrances, consider adding extra signage to help customers reach you more easily. • Extend or shift business hours so you’re open after construction wraps up for the day. • Consider using a delivery service to get your products to customers. • If your location has minimal onsite parking, consider asking employees to carpool or park on side streets to free up spaces for customers. KEEP YOUR SUPPLIERS INFORMED • Talk to your suppliers, delivery drivers, maintenance and landscape providers in advance so they aware the project is coming. • Ask them to sign up for project updates to get the most recent information about project schedule, impacts, and available routes. • Coordinate with the project liaison if your deliveries are impacted by construction. BE CREATIVE AND FLEXIBLE TO SOLVE PROBLEMS • If you’ve been considering a remodel or repairs to your business, make the construction work for you by performing this work during a slower time. • Consider pooling advertising resources or joining marketing campaigns with surrounding businesses in the construction zone. • Use creative promotions and do something above and beyond what you might normally do to attract new customers. • Consider offering customers a promotional item or discount if they post photos on their social media pages of them in your business with a note about construction not keeping them away. A reconstructed roadway with the first “lift” or layer of new asphalt is shown. Asphalt paving is a significant milestone and signals the end of major road construction. 12 ADVICE FROM CONTRACTORS WHAT CONTRACTORS THINK YOU SHOULD KNOW In addition to sharing advice from business owners who have been resilient through construction, we asked construction contractors about what they think you should know. • Construction phasing may not seem logical to you, but there is a method to the madness. Check in with the project liaison to understand the order of work and associated impacts so you have a full picture of what is planned in your area. • We want to help reduce impacts where we can, but contract documents guide the work. Sometimes we can easily address your concerns, other times we may need to work together to brainstorm solutions. • Often there are crews from more than one construction company on a project. While our team wants to help you and reduce impacts, talking to the workers may not resolve an issue or get the information to the right person. It might seem counterintuitive to call the project liaison when there are workers right outside your door, but the liaison is the best person to help resolve issues quickly and at the lowest level possible. • Direct questions about schedule, timing and phasing to the project liaison, website or email updates. ȏ &onstruction is messy. The city will monitor the contractor to make sure they keep it cleaned up. &rews construct a new corner and sidewalN. If you have questions about work at your location call the project liaison for details. 7ry to Neep the Eig picture in mind. /iNe remodeling your home, construction is 0(66< A1' Ζ1&219(1Ζ(17. In the end, you’ll have a %5A1' 1(: 52A'. 13 TIME TO CELEBRATE - POST CONSTRUCTION CELEBRATE WITH EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS As construction ends, take the opportunity to celebrate with your employees and customers. The new road will be more convenient, accessible, and welcoming. • Work with your neighborhood association or council, and project team on a ribbon cutting ceremony or other project-completion event. • Post a message on your website, social media pages, and in emails to customers announcing the end of construction and the benefits of the project. • Consider an end of construction sale or promotion to bring back customers and/ or thank customers for hanging in there. • If needed, partner with other businesses to take turns at sharing driveways or parking stalls. • Support other businesses in areas with road construction. Share your experience and advice with them. &rews finish worN on a new layer of asphalt. 'epending on the depth of reconstruction, most projects will receive two to three layers of new asphalt. 14 RESOURCES FOR BUSINESS OWNERS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Salt Lake City’s Department of Economic Development is the best place to learn about resources available to support your business before, during, and after construction. We know that construction can be challenging, but that the improvements will benefit your business by improving customer access, increasing customer visits, and improving your property value. Our team of experts can connect you with available loan programs offered by the city and other organizations. Our number one tip for businesses about to be impacted by construction is to contact the Suazo Business Center, the Small Business Development Corporation (SBDC) and the Women’s Business Center of Utah. These organizations offer free consulting to help you with your business and marketing plans. Other available resources include: Pacific Islander Business Alliance https://pik2ar.org/piba/ Salt Lake Chamber https://slchamber.com/ Small Business Development Corporation - Utah https://utahsbdc.org/ Suazo Business Center https://suazocenter.org/ Taiwanese Chamber of Commerce Greater Salt Lake https://www.facebook.com/ TCCGSL/ Utah Asia Chamber of Commerce http://www.utahasiancc.org/ Utah Black Chamber https://utahblackchamber.com/ Utah Gay & Lesbian Chamber https://www.utahlgbtqchamber.org/ Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce https://www.facebook.com/utahhcc/ Women’s Business Center https://wbcutah.org/ 15 QUESTIONS Questions for Salt Lake City’s Civic Engagement, Economic Development, Engineering, and Public Utilities teams can be directed to the contacts below. SALT LAKE CITY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT CivicEngagementTeam@slcgov.com www.slc.gov/civic-engagement SALT LAKE CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 801-535-7200 ed@slcgov.com www.slc.gov/ed @SLCEconDev SALT LAKE CITY ENGINEERING 801-535-7961 engineeringinfo@slcgov.com www.slc.gov/engineering @SLCMoves SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES 801-483-6900 www.slc.gov/utilities @SLCPu ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Salt Lake City wishes to thank the local business and construction contracting community that provided advice and recommendations. Additional acknowledgment and gratitude are offered to the cities of Madison, Wisconsin, Fort Collins, Colorado, and the Minnesota and Utah Departments of Transportation for their development of similar resource guides, which were used as references. Approved As To Form Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date ______________________________ Sign ______________________________ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO._________OF 2021 (Adopting Capital Improvement Program Allocations for fiscal year 2021-2022.) A resolution adopting the attached Capital Improvement Program Allocations for the fiscal year 2021-2022. WHEREAS, in June the City Council adopted a final budget for the City fiscal year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, the budget adopted by the City included a budget for the capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to formalize the appropriations for the capital improvement program. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt the capital improvement allocations for the City for fiscal year 2021-2022. SECTION 2. Adoption of Capital Improvement Allocations. The capital improvement allocations for fiscal year 2021-2022, which were included within the 2021-2022 budget, shall be and hereby are adopted according to the specific terms and conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. Public Inspection. The City budget officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file copies of these capital improvement program allocations in the office of said budget officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which allocations shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of _____________, 2021. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL _______________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS FY 2021-22 PROJECTS OVERVIEW A-1 FY 2021-22 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY A-2 DEBT SERVICE CIP DEBT SERVICE CIP B-1 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND B-4 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM OTHER FUNDS B-5 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS C-1 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-1 ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-1 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-17 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-21 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS E-41 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 TABLE OF CONTENTS This page has been intentionally left blank Capital Improvement Program Overview Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed to replace or expand the City’s public infrastructure. Two elements guide the City in determining the annual schedule of infrastructure improvements and budgets. This includes the current fiscal year's capital budget. Salt Lake City’s FY 2021-22 budget appropriates $703,068,753 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class “C” Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other public and private funds. The Salt Lake City Council considers their input in determining which projects will be recommended for funding in this budget. The Enterprise Fund recommendations are consistent with each respective business plan. These plans were developed in cooperation with the respective advisory boards and endorsed by the Administration. The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City fund recommendations are consistent with Board policy. All grant-related CIP recommendations are consistent with applicable federal guidelines and endorsed by the Administration. Capital Improvement Program Book (CIP Book) Salt Lake City’s FY2021-22 budget presents all CIP projects in its own document, the CIP book. By creating and providing City Council a CIP book the City believes it will provide more clarity and transparency regarding the recommended capital improvement projects. Major General Fund projects Transportation Infrastructure, Local Street Reconstruction, ADA Improvements and Sidewalk Rehabilitation for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, and capital improvement of deteriorated streets city-wide, total appropriation of $11,090,091 is proposed. Of this amount the budget appropriates $3,653,052 general fund, $2,046,329 of Class “C” fund, $4,900,000 transportation tax, and 491,520 of Impact Fee funds. Projects include traffic signal upgrades, transportation safety improvements, and pedestrian and neighborhood byway enhancements. Parks, Trails and Open Space Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement proposed budget includes a total appropriation of $7,786,889 from various funding sources. Projects include various improvements in Jordan Park, Pioneer Park, RAC, Poplar Park, Three Creeks, Sugar House, Glendale Water park, Foothills trails, and Allen Park. Liberty Park, Pioneer Park, Warm Springs Park, Memory Grove Park, Poplar Park, Taufer Park, Cottonwood Park, Foothills trails, and Allen Park. Public Facilities Public Facilities' capital improvement proposed budget includes a total appropriation of $1,252,230 is for improvements a Facilities Capital Asset Replacement Program to retire deferred capital replacement projects that are long overdue. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-1 Debt ServiceDebt Service Projects Sales Tax Series 2012A Bond 333,514 333,514 Sales Tax Series 2013B Bond 530,801 530,801 Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond 744,951 744,951 Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond 2,009,296 2,009,296 Sales Tax Series 2019 A Bond 366,151 366,151 Sales Tax Series 2022 Bond 3,657,667 3,657,667 B & C Roads Series 2014 975,377 975,377 ESCO Debt Service to Bond 896,500 896,500 ESCO Steiner Debt Service 0 ESCO Parks Debt Service 0 Fire Station #3 483,233 483,233 Fire Station #14 500,900 500,900 Debt Service Projects Total 8,538,880 0 975,377 984,133 0 0 10,498,390 OngoingOngoing Projects Crime Lab 560,869 560,869 Facilities Maintenance 350,000 350,000 Parks Maintenance 250,000 250,000 Ongoing Projects Total 1,160,869 0 0 0 0 0 1,160,869 Other OngoingOther Ongoing Community and Neighborhoods - Surplus Land RES 200,000 200,000 Public Services- Smiths Ballfield 154,000 154,000 Public Services- ESCO County Steiner 148,505 148,505 Public Services - Memorial House 68,554 68,554 Other Ongoing 0 0 0 0 0 571,059 571,059 Maintenance Funded Projects MaintenanceMultimodal Street Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Bridge Preservation 2021/2022 21,429 278,571 300,000 Trails Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Maintenance Funded Projects Total 21,429 278,571 0 0 400,000 0 700,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-2 New CIPNew/Maintenance Projects Total Kensington Byway Ballpark 500,000 500,000 400 South Viaduct Trail 310,000 90,000 500,000 900,000 1700 South Corridor Transformation 317,792 35,300 353,092 A Place for Everyone: Emerald Ribbon Master Plan 416,667 416,667 Glendale Waterpark Master Plan & Landscape Rehabilitation & Active Recreation Component 3,200,000 3,200,000 Transportation Safety Improvements 44,400 400,000 444,400 Public Way Concrete 2021/2022 75,000 675,000 750,000 Highland High Crosswalk Enhancements 85,000 85,000 Training Tower Fire Prop Upgrade 6,223 312,056 318,279 Three Creeks West Bank New Park 150,736 150,736 900 South 9Line RR Crossing 28,000 172,000 200,000 Pavement Conditions Survey 3,571 171,429 175,000 Replace Poplar Grove Tennis with new Sportcourt 349,026 84,307 433,333 Urban Trails 6,500 1,038,500 1,045,000 Three Creeks West Bank Trailway 484,146 484,146 Area Studies 201,000 201,000 Single Family/Fire Behavior Prop 374,864 374,864 200 South Transit Complete Street Supplement 37,422 415,800 453,222 Local Link Construction 50,000 450,000 500,000 Sugar House Park Fabian Lake Pavilion Remove and Replace 183,834 183,834 Liberty Park Cultural Landscape Report and Master Plan 354,167 354,167 Liberty Park Basketball Court 99,680 99,680 Neighborhood Byways 104,500 940,500 1,045,000 Rail Adjacent Pavement Improvements 2021/2022 70,000 70,000 700 South Westside Road Configuration 223,450 291,000 514,450 900 South Signal Improvements 96,500 233,500 70,000 100,000 500,000 Corridor Transformations 25,398 282,200 307,598 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-3 New Projects (Continued)SLC Foothills Land Acquisitions 425,000 425,000 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathways 510,000 510,000 SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 1,304,682 1,304,682 Odyssey House Annex Facility Renovation 300,000 300,000 Downtown Green Loop Implementation: Design for 200 East linear Park 610,000 610,000 Street Improvements 2021/2022 2,046,329 2,046,329 Tracy Aviary Historic Structure Renovations 51,700 104,378 156,078 Historic Structure Renovation & Activation at Allen Park 420,000 420,000 Capital Asset Replacement Program 1,252,230 1,252,230 RAC Playground with Shade Sails 180,032 180,032 New Projects Total 4,249,391 3,176,129 2,046,329 7,291,970 4,500,000 0 21,263,819 Cost Overrun 88,514 71,600 160,114 Percent for Art 66,386 53,700 120,086 Total General Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/CDBG Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects. 14,125,469 3,580,000 3,021,706 8,276,103 4,900,000 571,059 34,474,337 Other Capital Improvement Programs CDBGCity Infrastructure Projects ( CIP Engineering/Transportation) SLC Transportation-route 4 Frequent Transit Route 322,000 322,000 Total CDBG 322,000 322,000 AirportAirport CIP Projects Pump House #5 Renovations 928,000 928,000 Pump Station & Diversion Valve 1,300,000 1,300,000 Gate 39 Reconstruction 165,000 165,000 North Cargo Apron Development 25,605,000 25,605,000 Taxiway F Reconstruction 580,000 580,000 Taxiway P, N, & H3 Pavement 1,620,000 1,620,000 Taxiway Q Pavement Rehabilitation 1,646,000 1,646,000 Bureau of Land Management Access Road 1,660,000 1,660,000 Bureau of Land Management Apron 2,731,000 2,731,000 Landside Lighting Wire Replacement 1,566,000 1,566,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-4 Airport (Continued)Electric Vehicle Charging Stations 219,500 219,500 Roadway Entrance feature and Landscape 250,000 250,000 GA Zone 3 Corporate Hangar Site Develop 1,205,000 1,205,000 Terminal Redevelopment Program 164,849,000 164,849,000 North Concourse Program 186,614,000 186,614,000 Total Airport CIP Projects 390,938,500 390,938,500 GolfGolf CIP Projects Maintenance Equipment 257,575 257,575 Range Improvements 177,836 177,836 Tee Box Leveling 60,000 60,000 Total Golf CIP Projects 495,411 495,411 Public UtilitiesPublic Utilities CIP Projects Water Main Replacements 18,019,000 18,019,000 Treatment Plant Improvements 7,350,000 7,350,000 Deep Pump Wells 1,630,000 1,630,000 Meter Chang-Out Programs 2,500,000 2,500,000 Water Service Connections 2,950,000 2,950,000 Reservoirs 1,650,000 1,650,000 Pumping Plants and Pump Houses 1,550,000 1,550,000 Culverts, Flumes & Bridges 1,533,000 1,533,000 Distribution Reservoirs 2,350,000 2,350,000 Landscaping 68,000 68,000 Treatment Plants 191,045,826 191,045,826 Collection Lines 32,405,000 32,405,000 Lift Stations 2,685,000 2,685,000 Storm Drain Lines 7,362,500 7,362,500 Riparian Corridor Improvements 250,000 250,000 Detention Basins 50,000 50,000 Landscaping 168,000 168,000 Storm Water Lift Stations 700,000 700,000 Street Lighting Projects 2,240,000 2,240,000 Total Public Utilities CIP Projects 276,506,326 276,506,326 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-5 RDARedevelopment Agency (RDA) CIP Projects Station Center Infrastructure 332,179 332,179 Total RDA CIP Projects 332,179 332,179 SustainabilityTotal Sustainability CIP Projects No Projects 0 Total Sustainability CIP Projects 0 0 Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP 668,594,416 668,272,416 GRAND TOTAL 14,125,469 3,580,000 3,021,706 8,276,103 4,900,000 669,165,475 703,068,753 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-6 Salt Lake City Impact Fee Summary Fiscal Year 2022 PROJECT Parks Impact Fee Streets Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Fire Impact Fee TOTAL Impact FeesImpact Fee Projects Fire Station #3 483,233 483,233 Fire Station #14 500,900 500,900 400 South Viaduct Trail 90000 90,000 1700 South Corridor Transformation 35,300 35,300 Glendale Waterpark Master Plan & Landscape Rehabilitation & Active Recreation Component 3,200,000 3,200,000 Transportation Safety Improvements 44,400 44,400 Three Creeks West Bank New Park 150,736 150,736 900 South 9Line RR Crossing 28,000 28,000 Urban Trails 6,500 6,500 200 South Transit Complete Street Supplement 37,422 37,422 Local Link Construction 50,000 50,000 Neighborhood Byways 104,500 104,500 900 South Signal Improvements 70,000 70,000 Corridor Transformations 25,398 25,398 SLC Foothills Land Acquisitions 425,000 425,000 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathways 510,000 510,000 SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 1,304,682 1,304,682 Downtown Green Loop Implementation: Design for 200 East linear Park 610,000 610,000 Historic Structure Renovation & Activation at Allen Park 420,000 420,000 RAC Playground with Shade Sails 180,032 180,032 Total Impact Fee by Type 6,800,450 491,520 — 984,133 8,276,103 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-7 Salt Lake City Unfunded Projects FY 2022 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Fund Impact Fee Total Unfunded ProjectsConstituent 3000 South Sidewalk and Curb 3000 S Highland Dr to 1500 E 449,315 449,315 Engineering Logan Ave Reconstruction Logan Avenue from 1700 East to 2000 East and 2000 East from 1700 South to Bryan Avenue 1,405,000 1,405,000 Engineering Bridge Replacement (200 South over Jordan River)200 South over Jordan River (Approx. 1220 West 200 South) 3,500,000 3,500,000 Engineering Bridge Rehabilitation (400 South and 650 North over Jordan River) 400 South & 650 North over Jordan River 3,000,000 3,000,000 Engineering Wingpointe Levee Design Jordan River Surplus Canal between 3700 West North Temple Drive and Terminal Drive 800,000 800,000 Constituent Three Creeks West Bank Roadways 1300 S. 1000 W.1,158,422 1,158,422 Facilities Delong Salt Storage 719 S Delong St 1,504,427 1,504,427 Facilities Steam Bay 1910 West 500 South 363,495 363,495 Fire Mixed-Use Three Story Prop 1600 South Industrial Rd.815,895 815,895 Fire Training Ground Site Improvements 1600 South Industrial Rd.694,785 694,785 Constituent Sunnyside Park Sidewalk Valdez Drive 72,740 72,740 Constituent Winner on Wasatch Dee Glan Tennis Court Construction 1216 S. Wasatch Drive 500,000 500,000 Constituent Lighting Upgrade at Liberty Park Tennis Center 1105 S Constitution Dr.202,100 202,100 Constituent Liberty Park & Wasatch Hills Tennis Court Resurfacing 1105 S Constitution Dr.300,000 300,000 Constituent Harrison Ave and 700 E Community Garden 1300 S. 700 E.103,500 103,500 Constituent 1300 South Camping Resistant Landscaping 1300 South between Main and West Temple 100,000 100,000 Constituent Wingate Walkway 475 N. Redwood Road 286,750 286,750 Constituent 1200 East Median 1200 East bet. So. Temple & 200 S. and 300 S & 500 S.500,000 500,000 Parks & Public Lands Parleys Historic Nature Park Structure Preservation 2740 South 2700 East 765,325 765,325 Parks & Public Lands Enhancement of the Cemetery for Visitor Research and Knowledge 200 N Street 790,000 790,000 Parks & Public Lands Cemetery Roadway Improvements, Phase 1 200 N Street 3,838,000 3,838,000 Parks & Public Lands 9Line and Rose Park Asphalt Pump Tracks 700 West 900 South & 900 North Cornell Avenue 1,393,600 1,393,600 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-8 Unfunded Projects (Continued)Parks & Public Lands Richmond Park Playground and Park improvements 440 East 600 South 690,000 690,000 Parks & Public Lands Library Square Feasibility, Civic Engagement and Design Development Block 37, bounded by 400 South, 300 East, 500 South and 200 East 225,000 225,000 Parks & Public Lands Donner & Rotary Glen Park Community Park Irrigation & Landscape Design and Construction 2850 East Sunnyside & 2903 E Kennedy Drive 650,000 650,000 Constituent Capitol Hill Traffic Calming Various 595,194 595,194 Constituent Harvard Heights Residential Concrete Street Reconstruction Harvard Ave bet. 1300 & 1500 East 1,311,920 1,311,920 Constituent Liberty Wells Traffic Calming Kensington, Bryan, and Milton Avenues (600 East to 700 East) and 600 East (Kensington Ave to 1700 South) 400,000 400,000 Constituent Stratford Bike Crossing 1700 E. Stratford 200,000 200,000 Constituent Sugar House Safe Side Streets 900 East on the west, 2100 South on the south, 1100 East on the east, and Garfield Avenue on the north 500,000 500,000 Transportation Sunnyside 9Line Trail Missing Piece 1805 to 1851 East Sunnyside Avenue.350,000 350,000 Transportation Multimodal Intersections & Signals Various 945,000 105,000 1,050,000 Total Unfunded CIP Projects 27,016,868 1,498,600 28,515,468 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-9 This page has been intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS A-10 This page has been intentionally left blank Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $333,514 Sales Tax Rev Bonds June 2012 10/1/2032 RDA Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, were issued in June 2012 for the purpose of constructing and improving various City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. The bonds were issued with a par amount of $15,855,000. As of June 30, 2021, $10,845,000 in principal remains outstanding. The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the RDA. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt service. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The Series 2012A bonds mature on October 1, 2032. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $530,801 Sales Tax Rev Bonds November 2013 10-01-2033 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar, and to pay for a portion of various improvements to create a “greenway” within the corridor. The total par amount of bonds issued was $7,315,000. As of June 30, 2021, $5,470,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2033. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $744,951 Sales Tax Rev Bonds September 2014 10-01-2034 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property and roads. The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of $10,935,000. As of June 30, 2021, $8,430,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2034. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-1 Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $2,009,296 Sales Tax Rev Bonds June 2016 10-01-2028 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the Series 2009A Bonds. The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition, construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City offices and other capital improvements within the City. Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $21,715,000. The refunding resulted in a net present value savings of $2,363,890.47 for the City. As of June 30 2021, $17,910,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2028. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $366,151 Sales Tax Rev Bonds December 2019 04-01-2027 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown. The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of $2,620,000. The refunding resulted in a net present value savings of $299,661 for the City. As of June 30, 2021, $2,095,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April 1, 2027. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $975,377 Sales Tax Rev Bonds August 2014 04-01-2024 Class C The Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, were issued in August 2014 for the purpose of constructing and repairing 13th South Street from State Street to 4th West, and from State Street to 5th West, and 17th South Street from State Street to 700 East. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-2 The Series 2014 bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,800,000. As of June 30, 2021, $2,820,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on April 1, 2024. ESCO Lease Debt Service 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $82,850 Capital Lease December 2019 March 2026 General Fund This lease provides energy efficient equipment to Public Services Facilities Division. ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $148,505 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County $148,505 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 General Fund This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of this facility is shared 50% with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment. ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $517,200 Capital Lease August 2012 March 2026 General Fund This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for city parks. Crime Lab Improvements Capital Lease Debt 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $118,300 Capital Lease March 2015 September 2021 General Fund This capital lease provided the funding for the improvements to the leased space for the Crime Evidence Lab. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $500,900 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds March 2016 04-15-2037 Impact Fees The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March 2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $6,755,000. As of June 30, 2021, $5,755,000 in principal remains outstanding. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-3 Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on April 15, 2037. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 2022 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $483,233 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds April 2017 04-15-2038 Impact Fees The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April 2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project. The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,115,000. As of June 30, 2021, $7,555,000 in principal remains outstanding. ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND Crime Lab Rental Payments 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $560,869 General Fund Yearly Rental payments for Crime Evidence Lab Facilities Maintenance 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $350,000 General Fund The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City’s building stock. Parks Maintenance 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $250,000 General Fund The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger failures in the City’s park stock. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-4 Percent for Art 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $120,086 General Fund To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures and other works of art. (1% of CIP) Cost overrun 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $160,114 General Fund ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM OTHER SOURCES Smith Ballfield Naming Rights 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $156,000 Other -Donations Two parts to this request - to establish budget within the 83 fund to accept the revenue received for the naming rights pertaining to Smith Baseball Field and to establish an expense within the 83 fund to continue addressing the deferred maintenance backlog in this facility. This building was completed in 1990 and is now 27 yrs. old. CIP Memorial House 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $68,554 Other - Rental A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation. Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use of the funding is to be determined. Real Estate Services – Surplus Land 2022 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $200,000 Other – Surplus Land MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-5 Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B 2021 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source Don’t need for CIP Sales Tax Rev Bonds October 2019 04-01-20 RDA Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, were issued in October 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping a performing arts center and related improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B. The RDA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the RDA is unable to pay any of the debt service, the City’s General Fund would be responsible for it. The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000. The refunding resulted in a net present value savings of $6,396,905. As of June 30, 2021, $57,740,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1 beginning in 2020. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on April 1, 2038. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 DEBT SERVICE CIP B-6 This page has been intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS C-1 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS C-2 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS C-3 This page has been intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS C-4 This page intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-1 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-2 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-3 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-4 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-5 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-6 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-7 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-8 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-9 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-10 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-11 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-12 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-13 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-14 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-15 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-16 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-17 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-18 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-19 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-20 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-21 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-22 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-23 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-24 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-25 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-26 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-27 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-28 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-29 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-30 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-31 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-32 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-33 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-34 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-35 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-36 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-37 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-38 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-39 This page has been intentionally left blank MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS D-40 This page has been intentionally left blank The Department of Airports The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports has 610.8 full-time employee positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The Fiscal Year 2022 budget continues to show financial impacts due to COVID-19. The Salt Lake City International Airport, along with all other airports in the U.S. and abroad, has been acutely impacted by the broad-based economic shutdown resulting from efforts to stop the spread of COVID-19, including reductions in flights and declines in passenger volumes. The Airport continues to look for ways to control costs and provide airline and concession relief through the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) grant as well as the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriation ACT (CRRSAA) grant. These grants will offset operating and maintenance expenses that will lower the landing fee and terminal rents charged in FY22. While the American Rescue Plan has been passed, no allocations or awards have been made at this time and are not reflected in the Airports FY22 budget. While passenger demand continues to increase on a monthly basis, the Department of Airports will act prudently in managing the FY22 budget and look for ways to continue to save operating and capital expenses where feasible and look for ways to strengthen our revenues. The developed FY22 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits while facing challenges of decreased passengers and revenues. The Department of Airports will continue to fund important capital projects while deferring non-critical projects to preserve cash and liquidity. These projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRP) and the North Concourse Program (NCP), which will improve ongoing operations, create jobs, and provide economic stimulus to the City’s and State’s economy. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-1 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-2 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-3 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-4 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-5 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-6 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-7 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-8 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-9 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-10 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-11 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-12 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-13 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-14 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-15 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS E-16 The Salt Lake City Golf Division The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have limited Golf’s ability to self-fund most if not all non-emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund was established that allocates $1 per every 9 holes played and 9% from all annual pass sales toward building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital Projects. Until FY 2019, these funds have not been released for use as the fund balance has been needed to provide a fund balance offset against a fund deficit. As part of the FY22 budget proposal, the Golf Division has proposed increasing the Golf CIP Fund from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. The projected increase for the final six months of FY22 from the proposed increase is $124,800. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $257,575 in FY 2022 to purchase additional, mostly used equipment (lease-return equipment from high-end private courses). The Golf Division will be focusing on making improvements to the driving ranges and practice areas located at five of our six locations and have allocated $177,866 from the Golf CIP Fund for solid-surface hitting stations with artificial turf hitting mats along with new dispensers/washers. The Golf Division will be undergoing a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling a number of tee boxes at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY22 from the Golf CIP Fund for materials and equipment rentals. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-17 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-18 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-19 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-20 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not used to fund these activities. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant. The department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure intensive and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning. The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year 2022, the department has over 150 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects. Some planned capital improvement projects initially anticipated for FY2021 were deferred and reprioritized to FY2022 and beyond. The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Alternatives from a recently completed condition assessment for all three plants are being evaluated. A unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange agreement obligations. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2020-21 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS E-21 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-22 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-23 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-24 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-25 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-26 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-27 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-28 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-29 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-30 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-31 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-32 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-33 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-34 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-35 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-36 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-37 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-38 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-39 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS E-40 Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) works to revitalize neighborhoods and commercial districts that experience disinvestment. The RDA utilizes a powerful set of financial, planning, and revitalization tools to support redevelopment projects that encourage economic investment, assist in the housing for low-and moderate-income households, and help implement Salt Lake City’s Master Plan. The RDA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The RDA fiscal year 2022 budget proposes only one potential City public infrastructure project. The Station Center infrastructure project is an allocation for the construction and upgrading of utilities and infrastructure surrounding the Agency’s properties in the Depot District. This project is currently being designed in conjunction with the City’s Transportation and Engineering Departments. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS E-41 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED CIP BUDGET Fiscal Year 2021-22 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS E-42