Transmittal - 9/1/2021ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Utah Transit
Authority (UTA), Addendum No. 4 and Addendum No. 5 – Continuation of FTN (Frequent Transit
Network) Routes on 200 S, 900 S, and 2100 S and mobilization for a 2022 route on 1000 N
STAFF CONTACT: Julianne Sabula, Transit Program Manager, julianne.sabula@slcgov.com or
801-535-6678
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution (Exhibit 1) authorizing the
Mayor to enter into the proposed addenda Nos. 4 and 5 to the ILA with UTA (Exhibit 2).
Addendum No. 4 (Exhibit 3) would continue FTN service on Routes 2, 9 and 21, and Addendum
No. 5 (Exhibit 4), which would initiate mobilization for Route 1.
BUDGET IMPACT: The budget impacts are twofold. The budget impact of Addendum No. 4
is $4,475,416.63 for the FTN service to be provided during FY 21-22 along Routes 2, 9 and 21,
which is currently funded to run until August Change Day 2021. This covers the cost of labor,
fuel, paratransit service, vehicles, and maintenance. The budget impact of Addendum No. 5 is
$949,322 and covers the cost of recruitment, hiring and training of operators and mechanics, as
well as vehicle procurement, for the future Route 1 that will begin operation in 2022 and which
will operate on 1000 North from Redwood Road to 300 West and then along South Temple
Street to the University of Utah. These are included in the Mayor’s recommended budget, and
cost details appear in Exhibit 5.
June 9, 2021
Lisa Shaffer June 17, 2021
June 17, 2021
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The ILA is a twenty-year agreement that has the goal of full
implementation of the Frequent Transit Network as described in Salt Lake City’s Transit Master
Plan. Council adopted the Plan in 2017 with the intent that six corridors would be included in the
implementation of phase one. These corridors are 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South, 1000
North, 600 North and 400 South.
Council has since approved Addendum No. 1, along with a corresponding $2,047,473 budget
appropriation, to mobilize for service on the Routes 2 (200 South), 9 (900 South) and 21 (2100
South/2100 East), which began operations in August 2019. Addendum No. 2 and the
corresponding $4,308,021 budget, sponsored additional frequency and hours of operations on
these routes. UTA does periodic “true-ups” to determine whether actual costs came in at, above
or below projections. This yielded an amendment to Addendum No. 2, which was approved in
January 2021 and resulted in a credit to Salt Lake City in the amount of $467,540. This amount
was applied to the initial invoices for sponsored service in 2020. Addendum No. 3, along with a
corresponding $4,565,380.45 budget appropriation, also approved in January, extended service
on the 2, 9 and 21 from August 2020 to August 2021. If approved, Addendum No. 4, along with
a corresponding $4,475,416.63 budget appropriation will continue that service until August
2022, and Addendum No. 5, along with a corresponding $949,322 budget appropriation, will
prepare for the launch of Route 1 next year.
During Funding Our Future discussions, Council expressed the intent to allocate $8-12 million
annually to a comprehensive transit program with frequent service as its foundation. While that
level of funding has yet to be realized, it is anticipated that as ridership on sponsored routes
grows, resources can be reinvested in additional FTN routes. This occurred last year during the
first “true-up”, when Route 2 met UTA productivity thresholds during some of the service miles
that were previously City-sponsored. Addendum No. 4 reflects this cost decrease to the City, and
Addendum No. 5 anticipates the City’s ability to shift resources toward the launch of Route 1
(1000 North/South Temple St) in 2022, particularly since UTA anticipates launching service on
600 North in 2022, independent of City sponsorship and supported by Trips to Transit service.
Exhibit 6 summarizes the timeline related to implementation of the Transit Master Plan.
PUBLIC PROCESS: The Transit Master Plan public process was very robust and included 16
stakeholder interviews, 18 mobile events, and over 2000 unique online comments. The
Transportation Advisory Board and Bicycle Advisory Committee provided guidance on both the
Master Plan and the guiding principles for the ILA. Specific to the ILA, addenda, and
corresponding City budget appropriations, the process included City-hosted public hearings on
the ILA and prior addenda. This year’s budget process, including public hearings, will provide
for additional public comment on the transit service and mobilization line items. In addition,
UTA holds a public hearing process for each “change day”, of which there are three per year for
the purpose of making service changes. That process will occur in advance of the August 2021
change day during which continuation of service levels would be confirmed.
EXHIBITS:
1) Resolution
2) Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation
Interlocal Agreement
3) Addendum No. 4
a) Description of the 2021-22 FTN Routes
b) 2021-22 Baseline Services
c) Funding for 2021-22 Transit Service
4) Addendum No. 5
a) Description of the 2022-23 FTN Routes
b) Funding for Mobilization
5) 2021 Cost Calculator
a) 2017 National Transit Database (NTD)
b) 2018 NTD
c) 2019 NTD
d) 2017 Paratransit
e) 2018 Paratransit
f) 2019 Paratransit
g) Baseline Methodology
h) 2019 Baseline Service
i) 2020 Baseline Service
j) 2021 Baseline Service
k) Addendum 1 2019-20 Mobilization
l) Addendum 2 2019-20 Sponsored Service
m) Amendment 1 to Addendum 2, True-Up
n) Addendum 3 2020-21 Sponsored Service
o) Addendum 4 2021-22 Sponsored Service
p) Addendum 5 2022-23 Mobilization
6) Transit Timeline
EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION ________ OF 2021
Authorizing approval of Addenda Nos. 4 and 5 to an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority providing for transfer of
City funds for implementation of the Transit Master Plan.
WHEREAS, Utah Code Title 11, Chapter 13 allows public entities to enter into cooperative
agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and
WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, Salt Lake City Council authorized that the City enter
into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit
Authority providing for transfer of City funds for implementation of the Transit Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement contemplated that the parties would enter into an
annual addendum to provide funding for the frequent transit network routes and other transit
improvements; and
WHEREAS, a draft agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah as
follows:
1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following:
THE FOURTH AND FIFTH ADDENDA TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
PROVIDING FOR THE TRANSFER OF CITY FUNDS FOR THE THIRD YEAR OF
CITY-SPONSORED SERVICE PURSUANT TO THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH
TRANSIT AUTHORITY PROVIDING FOR THE TRANSFER OF CITY FUNDS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSIT MASTER PLAN.
2. Erin Mendenhall, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah or her designee is hereby authorized to
approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, in
substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto, subject to
such minor changes that do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City
thereunder and as shall be approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute
conclusive evidence of such approval.
PASSED by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 2021.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
___________________________________
CHAIR
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
________________________
CITY RECORDER
Approved as to form:
__________________________
Rusty Vetter
City Attorney’s Office
Date: June 8, 2021
EXHIBIT2
C'r:1-y /r1q tk..r//t'j AJu .
00-3-19 -!J-'-f'-I
RECORDED
MAR 1 3 2019
CITY RECORDER SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
TRANSIT MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS TRANSIT MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENT A TlON INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this Ce±k_day of ,t1a--t.d, 2019, by and between UTAH
TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a public transit district organized under the laws of the State of
Utah ("UTA"), and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation
("City").
RECITALS
A. Utah Code § 11-13-202 provides that any two or more public agencies may enter
into an agreement with one another for joint or cooperative action; and
B. UTA and the City are public agencies as contemplated in the referenced section
of the Utah Code (more specifically referred to as Utah Code § 11-13-101, t::l st::q., known as the
"Interlocal Cooperation Act"); and
C. The City and UTA both serve the transit-riding public in Salt Lake City; and
D. UTA is responsible for the equitable distribution of transit service in the region ,
of which Salt Lake City is a major travel market; and
E. UTA currently provides transit services to , from and within Salt Lake City at
levels that reflect this equitable distribution of service; and
F. The City adopted a Transit Master Plan ("Plan") on the 5th day of December,
2017;and
G. This Plan was jointly developt::d by UTA and tht:: City and it is the Parties'
shared intent to implement the Plan over the next twenty years; and
H. The Plan recommends a suite of transit improvem e nts (the "Transit
Improvements"), including the expansion of UT A 's current service level within the City to
include higher frequencies, expanded serv ice hours, and adjustments to alignments that UTA is
ab le to provide with current financial resources; and
I. The Transit Improvements also in clude alternative transportation programs
enhancing first-mil e/last-mile connections, capita l improvements, and oth er improv ements
de sc ribed in the Plan ; and
sa l
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTA H TRA NSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMP LEi\d ENTA TION AG REEM ENT
Page I of 11
J. UTA and the City agree the Transit Improvements are complementary to UTA's
current transit service and enhance each Party's goal of having attractive and effective transit
service for people working, studying and living in and around Salt Lake City;
K. The City desires to fund the incremental costs associated with the addition of the
Transit Improvements for building out infrastructure on Citywsponsored routes to increase
coverage and ridership, particularly in the City's downtown core for underwserved areas,
specifically the West side and other underwserved areas of the City;
L. The City desires initially to prioritize funding the incremental costs associated
with increased frequency of routes on 1000 North, 600 North, 200 South, 900 South, 2100
South, with routes on 400 South likely being the last routes initially implemented; and
M. This Agreement is intended to form the framework of how the Transit
Improvements (including, without limitation, the currently p lanned and future potential
frequent transit network service routes in the City) will be planned and coordinated by UTA
and the City.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. UTA and the City share a desire to grow and
improve the transit system in which efficiencies are reinvested. UTA and the City recognize
that the Plan's success is interdependent with the Wasatch Front Regional Council Regional
Transportation Plan ("RTP") and that local and regional investments should be complementary
to maximize the benefits of each. The coordinated planning of the Pinn und the RTP should
consider additional revenue sources that become available to fund the RTP during the term of
this Agreement. UTA and the City desire to enable people and businesses to rely on transit and
encourage permanence and stability in services. UTA and the City recognize the value of
establishing a process for decision making and a methodology for calculating the cost of Cityw
funded service enhancements. UTA and the City are implementing a plan driven by data
analysis and public engagement, and transparency and accountability should shape the
execution of the program. As such, it is the intent of the Parties to continue to work together to
suppo1t the implementation of the Transit Improvements identified in the Plan. Both Parties
have sustainability goals and agree to consider clean technologies (such as electric vehicles)
and infrastructure in the implementation of the Plan, where feasible.
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTA H TRANSIT A UTHORJTY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 2 of 11
2. COOPERATION. The City and UTA shall each designate a primary
representative responsible for the implementation of this Agreement and shall each also provide
additional subject matter experts to comprise a technical working group who will aid the
primary representative. City and UTA staff will confer in good faith and regularly exchange
relevant information to report progress to their respective organizations.
3. FREQUENT TRANSIT NRTWORK ROUTES.
(a) As of the date this Agreement is executed, the term "Baseline Service" shall
mean the level of transit service that UTA provides on the UT A change day immediately
preceding the commencement of the initial City-sponsored service, "Baseline Service" will be
re-evaluated on an annual basis based on then-current UTA service design guidelines, including
propensity and productivity factors. The routes/fre quency of routes identified by the City, in
cooperation with UTA, to be sponsored by the City shall be identified as the frequent transit
network routes ("FTN Routes") and shall further depicted and described in addenda to this
Agreement. Typical addendum content is shown in Exhibit "A." UTA and the City shall
coordinate the implementation of the FTN Routes with the RTP.
(b) No service shall be funded using the City funds provided pursuant to thi s
Agreement except as described and depicted in an addendum issued in accordance with this
Agreement. For each year that money is appropriated by the City to fund the FTN Routes, the
Parties shall execute an addendum that identifies the City-sponsored FIN Routes and describes
the City's payment obligations (including the calculation of the Annual Service Mileage Cost
as described in -Section 5 of this Agreement). The Parties may, upon mutual agreement in
writing, further modify the addendum from time-to-time as necessary to implement this
Agreement.
4. UTA'S OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO FTN ROUTES.
(a) UTA shall continue to manage and operate the FTN Routes. UTA shall be
solely responsible for operations, management, ad mini stration, and service delivery functions,
including provision of vehicles, vehicle maintenance, insurance, and accounting for the FTN
Routes. Except as specifically provided herein, the City shall have no responsibility for the
operations and management of the FTN Routes. The City shall have no responsibility for, nor
autho rity or control with respect to, the supervision and management of any employees , third-
party consultants, or UTA agents of any kind.
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 3 of 11
(b) UT A shall accommodate specially branded bus stop signs at all UT A s ign post
and shelter locations that are located along the FTN Routes. UTA shall cause the production
and, installation of the specially branded bus stop signs. The design and cost responsibility for
such specially branded bus stop signs shall be negotiate d and memorialized in an addendum
subsequently executed between UT A and the City.
(c) UT A's obligations with respect to the FTN Routes are subject to UTA's receipt
of the City Funding (as defined by and as provided in Section 6 of this Agreement).
(d) Nothing in this Agreement prohibits UTA from using other (non-City) funding
sources to provide services in addition to, or complementary with, the FTN Routes. As
additional revenue sources that become available to fond the RTP during the term of this
Agreement, UTA shall, in cooperation with the City and other regional stakeholders, work to
program additional funding to coordinate with and enhance the FTN Routes and other Transit
Improvements.
( e) UTA shall annually calculate an annual cost (the "Annual Service Mileage
Cost") for the FTN Routes in accordance with Section 5 below.
5. CALCULATION OF ANNUAL SERVICE MILEAGE COST. The Annual
Service Mileage Cost shall be calculated annually and memorialized in the addend um executed
by the City and UTA for the applicable period.
(a) The Annual Service Mileage Cost shall be derived from UTA's then most
recently reported total bus operating expenses (the "Total BOE Amount"), as published in the
National Transil Database ("NTD"), and as adjusted by the following methodology.
(b) The reported Total BOE Amount will first be adjusted to: (i) deduct total fuel
expenses allocated to bus operations in the NTD reporting year as identified in UT A's financial
statements for such year or as certified by UT A's Comptroller; and (ii) add the capital
maintenance expenses allocated to bus operations in the NTD reporting year as identified in
UTA's financial statements for such year or as certified by UTA's Comptroller. The resulting
amount (after applying the deduction in item (i) above and the addition in item (ii) above) shall
then be escalated at a rate equal to two and two-tenths percent (2.2%), per year, from the NTD
reporting year to the upcoming service year. The adjusted and escalated number will be known
as the "Adjusted BOE Amount."
( c) The Adjusted BOE Amount shall then be divided by the total annual bus miles
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORJTY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page4 of 11
most recently reported in the NTD to determine an "Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate."
(d) The Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate includes administrative and overhead costs.
The Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate shall be discounted by twenty percent (20%) to reflect the
administrative and overhead expenses that would be incurred by UTA regardless of the
sponsored service. For the purposes of this Agreement, administrative and overhead expenses
for bus operational support are listed in the table attached as Exhibit "B." Because the Parties
are estimating the administrative and overhead expenses that are attributable to the City-
sponsored service, the Parties agree to review the actual costs incurred by UTA every two
years, and adjust the administrative discount based on any actual increases or decreases directly
attributable to the City-sponsored service relative to the transit system as a whole. To facilitate
the Parties' review, UTA agrees to provide a breakdown of bus administration, bus operational
support, and administration for all modes agency-wide (and supporting information showing ,
how the cost information is calculated into the reported NTD data) every year by September 30
of the year after the service is provided, in a reporting format substantially similar to the format
attached as Exhibit "D." UTA further agrees to cooperate with the City in the review and
provide further information in a timely manner if requested by the City.
(e) After application of the administrative and overhead discount set forth in Section
5(d), the Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate shall be multiplied by the total sponsored revenue miles
to arrive at the "Service Mileage Cost, Without Fuel or Paratransit Costs."
(1) A charge for paratransit service shall then be added. The charge for paratransit
services shall be a sum equal to a fixed percentage of the Service Mileage Cost; Without Fuel
or Paratransit Costs. The percentage factor applied to determine the paratransit service charge
shall be determined by dividing the most recently reported NTD Annual Vehicle Revenue
Service Hours for Demand Response services by the most recently reported NTD Annual
Vehicle Revenue Service Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail transportation modes.
(g) The estimated fuel costs for the total sponsored revenue miles shall then be
added to determine the "Annual 8ervice Mileage Cost."
(h) The methodology for calculating the Annual Service Mileage Cost is set forth in
Exhibit "C."
6. CITY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO FfN ROUTES.
(a) The City shall contribute funding (the "City Funding") to UTA to support the
Sil l
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
llvf PLEMENTA110N AGREEMENT
Page 5 of 11
operation of the FTN Routes. The City Funding shall consist of: (i) a mobilization charge (as
applicable) to be set forth in the annual addendum, which mobilization charge s hall reflect one-
time costs to be incurred by UTA with respect to FTN Routes; (ii) capital lease charges for the
new buses necessary to support the FTN Routes; (iii) the Annual Service Mileage Cost; and (iv)
other costs, as may be agreed between the City and UTA. The total amount of City Funding
during any year shall not exceed the amount set forth in the applicable addendum.
(b) All City Funding is subject to the annual appropriation b y the City's legislative
body. The City shall notify UTA of the appropriated funding for each upcoming year, as soon
as such information is publicly available.
(c) The City s hall have the right to-construct new bus stops with respect to the FTN
Routes. Any bus stops constructed by the City must comply with the siting requirements and
minimum standards set forth in UTA's Bus Stop Master Plan. The City may include additional
functional and ai1istic amenities with respect to the bus stops. Howc:v er, any incremental
maintenance costs associated with additional amenities wHl be: (i) d e te rmined thro ugh
negotiation prior to the construction of the bus stops; and (ii) funded by the City pursuant to
subsequent addenda through the remaining term of this Agreement.
7. INVOICING AND PAYMENT. UTA shall submit invoices for m obilization
charges in accordance with each addendum. UTA shall submit invo ices for the monthly capital
lease charge for buses supporting the FTN routes thirty (30) days prior to the date that UTA is
required to pay such monthly lease charges. UTA s hall also submit monthly invoices to the
City for Annual Service Mileage Cost in u m o nthly amount equal to one-twelfth (1 /1 2) of the
total Annual Service Mileage Cost. Monthly charges for each component of the City Funding
may be combined on invoices, as appropriate. The City shall pay all approved invoices within
thirty (30) days of receipt. If the City does not approve an invoice, a written explanation of
disputed items will be sent within ten (10) business days of the City's receipt of the invoice.
The City agrees not to withhold approval of any invoice amounts unreasonably, and further
agrees to cooperate with UT A in good faith to resolve di sputes concerning invoices in an
expeditious manner. Undisputed amounts will be paid within thirty (3 0) days of receipt. Any
undisputed amounts which are not paid within thirty (30) days ofreceipt shall accrue interest at
a rate equal to the higher of two percent (2%) or the daily Public Treasurer's Investment Fund
interest rate.
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRA NSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 6 of 11
..
8. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN FUEL COSTS. Fuel is included in the Annual
Service Mileage Cost. As described in Section 5, the Annual Service Mileage Cost will be
calculated by UTA, and paid by the City, based on UTA's budgeted fuel costs for the period
covered by the applicable addendum. Except as provided below, the Annual Service Mileage
Cost shall be based on budgeted, and not actual, fuel costs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Annual Service Mileage Cost shall be subject to a semi-annual "true-up" payment/credit in the
event that the average daily fuel costs for any six-month period covered by an addendum varies
from the budgeted cost by more than thirty percent (30%).
9. ADDITIONAL TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS. The City and UTA may use
this Agreement, and the addenda contemplated hereunder, to address commitments with respect
to other elements of the Transit Improvements (beyond the FTN Routes), as mutually agreed.
10. ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING. Nothing in this Agreement shall
prevent either Party from collecting contributions, fees, or other funding to help defray the cost
of the Transit Improvements. UTA shall not be a party to the assessment or collection of such
special contributions, fees, or funding and shall not receive any direct allocation of or credit for
such special fees or contributions collected by the City. The City Funding and any additional
funding provided by the City shall be used solely to supplement UTA funding of the Transit
Improvements and will not be used to supplant any funding for the Baseline Service.
11. RECORDS. UTA will maintain full and complete financial records and
detailed operations information regarding the FTN Routes and any other Transit Improvements
-funded-by the City pursuant to thi s Agreement. City shall have access to alJ financial
information regarding the FTN Routes upon request.
12. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. The Transit Improvements performance
will be monitored during the term of this Agreement based upon the metrics derived from the
goals set forth in the Plan including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Improve Air Quality.
(b) Increase Transit Riders hip.
(c) Provide a Safe and Comfortable Transit Access and Waiting Experience.
(d) Provide Access and Opportunity to Vulnerable Populations.
(e) Create Economically Vibrant, Livable Places the Support Use of Transit.
Representatives from the Parties shall meet regularly to exchange relevant information and
Sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSJT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 7 of 11
discuss performance related issues.
13. DISPUTE RESOLUTION, Th t.! Pnt·ti e~ will use th e Pinn as th e basis for their
go al s nnd dec isio ns. ospednll y where th en! is n lack of co nse nsus betwe en the Pn t'ti es. Whcl'e
appli cabl e, th e Pinn in clud es n,etri cs Lhnt mn y pro v id e objective. dnta-dl'iv en guid ance in
deci sion *mnkin g. Withdrawal fr om this Agree ment should be n lnst resOl't fo ll ow in g a good •
faith dTort to ward resolution nt both the prnj ect level.
14 . TERM. The term of this Agreement is intended to run con current ly with the
Plan, w hi ch has a 20-year horizon , and shall be deemed to have begun on the Effective Date
and sha ll remain in effect until June 30, 2039, unless terminated earlier by either Party. I f the
Parties decide to continu e to provide funding and service for some but not all of the Transi t
Improvements, this Agreement shal l remain in effect on ly as to t hose roules specifica ll y
funded , as provided specifica ll y in the exhibits.
15. TERMINATION. E ither Patty may terminate this Agreeme nt on twe lve (12)
months written notice to the other Patty , which enables appropriate changes in service to be
made w ith the UT A change day process.
16. STATUS OF PARTIES.
(a) Ind ependent Contractors . The Patties agree that the status of each Patty s hall be
that of a n independent contractor to the other, and it is not intended, nor shall it be construed ,
that one Party or any officer, employee, agent or contractor of s uch Party is an employee,
officer, agent, o r representative of the oth er Parly. Nothing contained in the Agreement or
documents in corporated by reference herein or othe rw ise c reates any pattnership, joint ventur e,
or other assoc iation or relationsh ip between UTA and the City. Any approval, revi ew,
inspection, direction or instruction by UTA or any party on behalf of UTA sha ll in no way
affect either Party 's independent contractor status or obli gation to perform in accordance w ith
this Agreement. Neith er Party ha s authorization, express or implied, to bind the other to any
agreements, liability, nor un derstanding except as expressly set fo1th in thi s Agreement.
(b) Insurance. As b etween the Parties, llTA sha ll be responsible for a ll appl icab le
federal and state taxes and contributions for Social Security, unemployment insurance, income
withholding tax, and other taxes measured by wages paid to employees, as well as any
subcontractor or vendor. UTA shall be solely respons ible for its own actions, its employees
a nd agents.
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CO RPORATIO N AND UTAH TRA NSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLA N
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 8 o f 11
(c) Legal Advice. As independent parties, UTA and the City shall be responsible
for each obtaining its own legal services/advice.
17. GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY. Each of the Parties is a governmental
entity for purposes of the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, Utah Code Ann. Section 63G,
Chapter 7. Consistent with the terms of this Act, it is mutually agreed that each party is
responsible and liable for its own wrongful or negligent acts which it commits or which are
committed by its agents, officials, or employees. No party waives any defenses otherwise
available under the Governmental Immunity Act.
18. NO THIRD-PARTY R:RNEFICIARIES.The Parties expressly agree that
enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to
such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the Patties, and nothing contained in this
Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any other or third person on
such Agreements, including but not limited to subcontractors, subconsultants, and suppliers.
The Parties expressly intend that any person other than the Parties who receives services or
benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed to be an incidental beneficiary only.
19. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATIONS. This
Agreement does not contain any multiple-fiscal year financial obligations by either party that
extend beyond its current fiscal year, that are not subject to annual appropriation of sufficient
funds by its governing body. Nothing herein obligates either Pa1ty to budget, authorize or
appropriate funds for any future fiscal year.
20. LEGAL AUTHORITY. The City and UTA represent and warrant to each other
that they have all necessary authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform their
obligations hereunder and that this Agreement does not conflict with any other agreement that
each Party is subject or to which it may be bound. The person signing and executing this
Agreement on behalf of either Party represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute
this Agreement and to validly and legally bind a Party to all the terms, performances and
provisions herein set forth.
21. NO ASSIGNMENT. Except as otherwise provided in the Agreement, neither
party may assign the Agreement and/or any of its rights and obligations hereunder without the
written consent of the other Party.
22. WRITTEN AM.1!:NJJM.ENTS. This Agreement may be modified or amended
~c1I
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 9 of 1 I
only by a written document duly t:xecuted by both Parties.
23. NOTICES. Correspondence regarding this Agreement shall be sent to:
lfto UTA:
Utah Transit Authority
A ttn:
669 West 200 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
If to City:
Department of Community and Neighborhoods
Transportation Division
349 South 200 East, Suite 450
P.O. Box 145502
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5502
With a copy to:
Managing Attorney
Utah Transit Authority
669 West 200 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
With a copy t o:
City Attorney's Office
451 South State Street, Rm SOSA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
The addresses or contacts may be changed by the Parties by written notice.
24. EXHIBITS. The exhibits attached hereto and specifically incorporated h er ein
by reference are as follows.
(a) Exhibit "A" Typical Addendum Template
(b) Exhihit "B" Table of Administrative Costs for Bus Operations
(c) Exhibit "C" Methodology for Calculating Annual Service Mileage Cost
(d) Exhibit "D" Form of Annual Administrative Cost Report
25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The terms and provision s of this Agreement,
including but not limited to the Recitals above and the Exhibit(s) incorporated by reference
herein, represent the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement, and merge, incorporate and supersede all prior communications between the City
and UTA concerning that subject. No representations or warranties are made by the City or
UT A except as set forth here in.
26. W AIYER AND BREACH. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall
not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon a subsequent breach.
27. GOVERNING LAW; VENUE. Each and every term, provision, condition, of
this Agreement is subject to the provisions of Utah law. This Agreement is subject to such
modifications as may be required by changes in Utah or federal law, or their implementing
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 10 of 11
regulations. Any such required modification shall automatically be incorporated into and be
part of this Agreement on the effective date of such change as if fully set forth herein. Venue
for any action arising hereunder shall be in the Salt Lake City District Courts for the State of
Utah.
28. SEVERABILITY. The Parties expressly agree that if any part, term, or
provision of this Agreement is by the courts held to he illegal or in conflict with any law of the
State of Utah, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the
rights and obligations of the Parties shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not
contain the particular part, term, or provision held to be invalid.
29. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement shall be executed in two counterpa11s
eac;h of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which shall
together constitute one and the same instrument.
30. INTERLOCAL ACT REQUIREMENTS.
(a) This Agreement shall be approved by each party pursuant to § 11-13-202.5 of the
Interlocal Act;
(b) This Agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with
applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each party, pursuant to§ 11-13-202.5
of the Interlocal Act;
(c) A duly executed original counterpart of this Agreement shall be filed with the
keeper of records of each pa11y, pursuant to § 11-13-209 of the lnterlocal Act;
(d) Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, each party shall be responsible
for its own costs of a:ny action done pursuant to this Agreement, and for any financing of such
costs.
( e) No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this Agreement. To the extent
that this Agreement requires administration other than as set forth herein, it shall be
administered by the UTA Board of Trustees and Salt Lake City. No real or personal prope1iy
shall be acquired jointly by the Parties as a result of this Agreement. To the extent that a party
acquires, holds, or disposes of any real or personal property for use in the joint or cooperative
undertaking contemplated by this Agreement, such pa1ty shall do so in the same manner that it
deals with other property of such party.
(f) Either party may withdraw from the joint or cooperative undertaking described
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT A UTHOIUTY TRAN!:J'JT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 11 of 11
in this Agreement only upon the termination of this Agreement.
(g) Voting of each Party shall be based on one vote per Party.
(h) The functions to be performed by the joint or cooperative undertaking are those
described in this Agreement.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Page 12 of 11
WHEREFORE, the Parties have entered into this Agreement as of the date executed and
approved by each of the Party's governing body.
CITY:
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ,
a Utah municipal corporation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lak ttorney ' ffi
B
Senior City All m y
1 Date: v] l l / 5"
ATTEST & COUNTERS IG N:
Salt Lake C ity Recorder's Office
, By «~
~it y Recorder
UTA:
APP
RECORDED
MAR 13 2019
CITY RECORDER
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Utah
public transit district organized under the la ws
By: ---~----\------
1 ts:
13
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~~-un_s_e_l -------
Date s igned: 3 -/ -z.o 19
Exhibit A
Typical Addendum Template
ANNUAL ADDENDUM No.
To Interlocal Agreement Between Utah Transit Authority
and Salt Lake City Corporation
THIS ANNUAL ADDENDUM No._ to that certain Salt Lake City Corporation and
Utah Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement ("[LA") is
made this __ day of ____ , 20_, by and between UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a
public transit district organized under the laws of the State of Utah ("UTA"), and Salt Lake City
Corporation, a Utah municipal corporation ("City"). UTA, and City arc hereinafter collectively
referred to as "Parties" and each may be referred to individually as "Party," all as governed by
the context in which such words are used.
RECITALS
A. On -, 2018, the Parties entered into the ILA, whereby the parties
agreed to participate jointly in planning and funding for public transportation improvements in
and around the City; and
B. The Parties desire to specifically identify certain components of the Salt Lake
City Transit Master Plan to be governed by this Addendum No._, pursuant lo the terms of the
ILA (the "Addendum No._").
NOW, THEREFORE , the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Pursuant to Section 22 of the ILA written changes may be made to the ILA upon
the mutual consent of the Parties.
2. Pursuant to Section 3 of the ILA, the City, in cooperation with UT A, identified as
the City-sponsored frequent transit network routes ("FTN Routes ") to be provided by UTA from
change day of August of20_until change day of August 20_.
3. The description of Transit Services for the Addendum No._ is set forth and
outlined on Attachment 1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
4. The description of the Baseline Services is set forth as outlined in Attachment 2 .
5. The calculation of the cost per service mile of the City-sponsored F1N Routes
and detailed description thereof is outlined in Attachment 3.
6. This Addendum No._ may be executed in one or more counterparts, t::mch uf
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
7. This Addendum is limited to the terms expressly provided herein and except as set
forth herein, the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its
terms. If there is a conflict between this Addendum and the ILA, the terms of this Addendum shall
prevail and control.
8. This Addendum No. will be effective _____ , 20_
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Addendum effective the date
first set forth herein.
[Signature pages t o follow]
[Signature pages to Addendum No._ to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
UTAH T RANS IT AUTHORJTY
By _______________ _
Its ----------------
By _______________ _
It s ----------------
Approved as to Form
UTA Legal Counsel
3
[Signature pages to Addendum No._ to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Mastt:r Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
By: ___________ _
Senior City Attorney
Date: ------------
ATTEST & COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder's Office
By:------------
City Recorder
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By _______________ _
Its ----------------
[Attach Salt Lake City Council Resolution Approving Addendum]
4
ATTACHMENT 1
Description of Transit Services
For This Addendum No.
5
ATTACHMENT 2
Description of Baseline Services
For This Addendum No.
6
ATTACHMENT 3
Funding for Transit Services
For This Addendum No.
7
ATTACHMENT4
Funding for Transit Services
For This Addendum No.
8
Exhibit B
Table of Administrative Cos ts for Bus Operations
Motor Bus (less FLEX) NTD Administration Cost Centers
2017
Cost Category Ops Support Admini stration
ACCOUNTING 737,110.99
APPLI CATION DEVELOPMENT !,246,608.34
ASSET MANAGEMENT 11,264.4 5
BOARD COORDINATI ON 153,595.51
CHIEF COMMUNICIATIONS OFFICER 396,216.78
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFF ICER 279,921.65
CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER 160,487.28
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER 399,621.16
CIVI L RIGHTS 204,762 .3 3
CORPORATE & BOARD SUPPORT 129,367.41
CORPORATE SUPPORT 399,282.54
CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,395,613.69
DATA QUAI LI TY & RIDERSH IP 147,378.30
FACILITIES 6,854,609.52
FARE STRATEGY & OPERATIONS 417,903.87
FED ~UNDS 8.3 1
FINANCIAL SERVICES 4 16,364.11
GENERAL COUNSEL 1,396,792.90
GENERAL MANAGER 793,591.89
HUMAN SERVICES 1,288,48 2.41
INTERNAL AUDIT 206,113.25
MAJOR INVESTEM ENT STUDIES 5,UU.Ul
MAJOR PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 1,490,541.69
MATERIALS 204,000.39
NETWORK SUPPOR T 1,892.080. 72
ORGAN IZATIONA L EFFECTIVENESS 817,445.48
PLANNING & PROGRAMMING 887,7 11.67
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & SA LES 295,611.85
PUBLIC HELATIONS & MARKETING 1,433,703 .71
PURCHASING & CONTRACTS 583,080.28
QUALITY ASSURANCE 64,370.02
QUALITY ASSURANCE & STATS 47,640 .82
REA L ESTATE 479,169.27
RIDESHARE/VANPOOL 9,541.73
RISK MANAGEMENT 641,489.42
RIVERSIDE PARATRANSIT OPERATIONS 95,116.71
SAFETY 1,092,196.86
SALT LAKE INTERMOOAL EXPENSES 828.28
SECURITY 3,646,238.62
STRATEGIC THINK TANK 150,365.08
SUPPLY CHA IN AOMIN 161,775.98
T ECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT 326,861 .77
TECHN OLOGY DEVELOPMENT 31,237.84
T ECHNOLOGY SUPPORT S67,448.40
TE CHNOLOGY SU PPORT FACI LITY 284,603.%
TE LECOMMUNICATIONS 257,649.57
TRAINING 485,898.48
TRANSIT COMMUNICAT ION CENTER 411,902.61
TRANS IT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT 154,744.Sl
VEH ICLE DISPOSAL 7 ,336.37
VP OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL 281 ,382.32
WAREHOUSING 1,381,380.90
WORKFORCE SYSTEMS 335,183.27
973 (grant) (44,218.95)
9075 (grant) (30,705.90)
100-15 {grant) 1,056.49
Granil Tota l 17,100,656.00 18,385,331.92
Notes: Highlighted categories are bus operationa l support costs. Base year is defined
as the year or the most c urrent NTP data
Exhibit C
Methodology for Calculating Annual Service Mileag e Cost
Http,//WP!M rn;le,J!3 QOm(
669 'Nest 200 Sou tt,
Salt Lake C ty, UT B4101
Utah Transit Authority
2017 Annual Agency Profile
~ Arna Staotistics-2010 Census
Salt Lake City-West Valley City, UT
278 Square Miles
1,021 ,243 Population
42 Pop. Rank out of 498 UZAs
Otha-UZAs SeNed
General Information
s.,,,,;c., cons .... plion
364,859,219 Annual Passenger MIies (PMT)
45,078.919 Annual Unlinked Trips (UPT)
155,437 Average Weekday Unlinked Trips
78,690 Average Saturday Unlinked Trips
29,651 Average Sunday Uninked Trips
77 Ogden-Layton, UT, 82 Provo-Orem, UT, 0 Utah Non-UZA
So,n;ice"""' Statistics
737 Square Miles
1,683.504 Population
Sema, Suppried
38.713,261 Annual Vehicle Revenue MIies (VRM)
2,11 0,811 Annual Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH)
Vehicles Operated
1,086 Vehicles Operated In Maximum Service (VOMS)
1.387 Vehicles Av ailable for Maximum Service (VAMS)
Modal Oliaracteristics
Database Information
NTOID: 800:J1
Reporter Type: Full Reporter
Financial lnfonnatlon
Sources of O perating Funds Expended Oper1Ung funding Sources
Fare Revenues $52,159,202
Local Funds $0
State Funds S270,e47,394
Federal Assistance $42.~2.677
Other Funds $9,195,344
l otal Opcraung F~mcfs Upended $37 ◄,734,$17
13.9%1
0.0%
72.3%
11.4%
2.5 %
100.0%
Sources of Capital Funds Expended 12,,,.
Fare Revenues SO 0.0%
Local funds S2,S-50,116 1.9 %
State Funds $75,7 10 ,373 49.7%
Federal Assistance $73,741.341 48.4%
11.4% :..2.5%
n .•"I
Other Funds $0 0.0 % Capital Fundi ng Soim;.es
Total Capit.'41 Funds Expended $152.301.830 100.0%
illoda!Ovm-riew In II-um Service Uses of Capital Funds Summary of Operating Expenses (OE) -48.◄%
1.9%
Directly Pu1<:hased Revenue Systems and
Mode Operated Transportation Vehicles Guide ways
Commuter Bus 43 so S84.027
Commuter Rall 45 $475,980 S13,278,303
Demand R.esp:>nse 65 43 $4,267,530 $923,304
Light Rail 91 $7,756,217 $6,381 ,1 60
Bus 388 6 S27 ,549, 172 $1,740,977
Vanpool 405 $1,365,433 S162,618
T""'I u,31 411 $,dl 41,SJ.J' H'1.570.l89
~ Cbar.lcleri$tics
Operating Use.s o f Annual
Mode Expenses Fare Revenues Capital Funds Passenger Miles
Commuter Bus S7,749,445 S501,682 $235,786 12,565.005
Ccmmuter Rail $34,438,729 $7,212,605 S15,161.569 122,257.990
De-mand Respons.e S17.851 ,347 5591.545 $6,917,367 4,230,640
Light Rail S64,680,283 S17,968,710 S15,671.687 92,586,564
Bus $129,545,459 $21,155,730 S34,780.,152 86,462,342
Vanpool $3,469,358 $4,728,930 $1,559,917 46,756,678
l<"1:tl SHT'34,sn SS2.1i;~ . .?ft-! ~74.326.472 364,,8.5~.219
Facilities and
Stations Other Total
$31,594 $120,165 $,35,786
$774,663 $632,623 S15,161,569
S1.103,067 $623.466 $6,917,367
$737,892 $796.418 $15,071,687
S3.563.409 $1,926.~94 $34,780,152
$5,244 S26,622 $1,559,917
'f.6.215.86! S4.125.~88 $74,326.-478
Annual Annual Vehicle Annual Vehicle
Unlinked Trips Revenue Miles Revenue Hours·
553,595 1,017,334 41 ,678
4,854,099 5,349,524 154,744
396,977 2,727,127 162,198
18,823,578 6,732,768 358,645
19,196,260 16.437,069 1,216,770
1,264,410 6.449,<39 176,776
•s.o;s,919 38.713,,61 2110.81'
Salary, Wages, Benefits
Materials and Supplies
Purchased T ransportalion
OU-er Operating Expenses
Total Ope:rat.mg Expenses
Reronciling OE Cash Expenditures
P urchased Transportation
(Repcrted Separately)
Fixed Guideway
Direction.al
Route Miles
0 .0
174,5
0.0
93.9
2.1
0.0
270 5
Vehicles Available
for Maximum
Service
63
69
142
1 14
51 1
488
1,387
$188,208,688
$31,966,376
$4,165,973
$33,393,584
S257,734.6Z1
$1 16 ,999,996
$0
Vehic les Operated
in Maximum Service
43
45
108
91
394
405
1,086
73,0%
12..4%
1.6%
13.0%,
100,0% ":'
Percent
Spare Vehlc les
3' ,8%
34.8%
23.9%
2 0.2%
22.9%
17.0%
21.7%
-48.7"'
Average
Fleet Age In
Years•
1 2,1
15.9
3.6
10.4
8.0
5.4
f'erfonnance Measures Service Efficiency Service Effectiveness
Operating Expenses per Operating Expenses per Operating Expenses per Operating Expenses pe1 Unlinked Trips per Unlinked Trips per
Mode
Commuter 8us
Commuter Rail
Demand Response
Light Rail
Bus
Vanpool
Tot.al
O~ratlng Expense per Vehicle
Revonue Mi.le· Bus
Vehicle Revenue Mlle
$7,62
$6.44
$6,55
$9,6'
$7,88
S0.54
SH!'
Operating Expense per Passenger
Mile.:Bus
"'"'· ""'~ ~;:' I a r: • a • e • !'.:
~,}J ========================t!.e.t\ SH.~------------\(••~ R~J ~~
Vehicle Revenue H:>ur
S18: 94
S222 55
$11 0.06
$18C.35
$10€.47
SHL63
$1'22..lO
Mode
Commuter Bus
Comm1,Jler Rall
Demand Response
Light Rall
Bus
Van pool
Toi.al
Passenger Mile
S0.62
$0.28
S4.22
$0.70
$1 .50
$0,07
$0.71
Unlinked Passenger Trip Vehicle Revenue Mile
S 14 .00 0,5
$7 .09 0,9
$46.13 0.1
$3.44 2 8
S6,75 1.2
S2,74 0 ,2
UJ2 1i
Vehicle Revenue Hour
13,3
31,4
2.4
52.5
15,8
7.2
21.4
l.kllinked Passertli; er Trip per Vehicle
Revenue Mile: Bas :~I'•. I • I •
~1>1'1 . -:-:::,.. ... ------~==-
at" EXPense P9" Vet:iicle • oo ~ ~ -":.. ""''"'"·, .. I ,..... ..
• a I Ir .,,., .,., .... . . ''"
••'1111
Operating Expense per Passenger
Mile: Ligrl Rall
Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle
R.evenue M ile: Light Rail
~ ---
O.~ JI!! 11> n 12 IJ U t~ !I\-1t ,S ~•MHl&1~1At',t,,1 ~-,;1 lll !I If' \ I II " I~ 11
I 1-· a -.. ft "" t==========;=;~~~=;=~~=~ [)OQ ot (II ltl II 12 t.1
"'" ~ .... . .,., . " ,; ,. "
~•.,-~ L ___ -::---;::-;:~;;---;;---;;--;;--... ('(• I" .. 'M u, lt ,1 •l ,. 1, ,~ 11
Ol II.fl 10 I\ I~ I) 1• ,§: I~ 17
Notes·
-Oemand Response-Taxi (DT) and non-dedicated fleets do not report Oeet age data,
EXAMPLE AGENCY PROFILE
Source: https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit -agency-profiles
So urces:
Utah Transit Authority
Operating Cost pe r Mile by Mode
20_ Federa l Transit Administ ration's Nati onal Transit Database (NTD ), Agency Profile, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit-agency-profiles
20_ Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/About-UTA/UTA-Reports-and-Documents
Bus Service
Commuter Bus
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Pa ratra nsit Service
Other Service
NTD To tals
Fuel Costs
NTD Plus Fuel
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2017 NTD
OQerating
ExQenses b~
Mode
--.
CAFR plus $0.00 (Capital Maintenance)
Difference
Less Fue l Cos t s
(Diesel, CNG Add Cap ital
and Gasoline) Maintenance
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ -$ $
$ -$ $
20
Debt Service
$
$
-$
-$
-$
-$
$
DeQreciation
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Costs
Cost Per Vehi cle
Revenue Mile
Without Fuel
Annual Vehicle excluding Vehicle
Revenue Miles DeQreciation
-#D IV/0!
-/.ID IV/0!
#DIV/0!
-#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
-#DIV/0!
Bus Service
Commuter Bus
Commuter Rai l
Light Rail
Paratransit Service
Other Service
SPONSORED SERVICE PARATRANSIT COST -Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan
---------
#DIV/0!
Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (Most recent NTD)
Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (Most recent NTD)
Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (Most recent NTD)
Tot a I Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT
Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (Most recent NTD)
Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours
SPONSORED SERVICE COST CALCULATOR -SLC TMP Implementation
VARIABLE VALUES
I I
Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue M ile, Bus Service (1 )
1-. ----------1.Annual escalator rate (2)
.__ ______ ___.N umber of Years since NTD report
I !Admini strative Discount (3)
~==============~Spo nsored Revenue Miles: 200 South, 900 South and 2100 South
..__ ______ ___. Sponsored Paratransit Service rate (3)
I I Fu el Cost per Gallon (Service Year Budgeted Cost)
===============Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon {adjust per vehicle type)
I !
Sp onsored Vehicle Lease Costs
_ Sponsored Vehicles ..__ ______ __.
(1) NTD Cost per Revenue M ile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does
include approxi mately 2% for capital maintenance (e.g. eng ine replacement, etc).
(2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the PCE CP I over a twenty year
period.
(3) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported
total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue
hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail.
SPONSORED SERVICE COST
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Most recent NTD Cost Per M ile -Bus Service
NDT rate Adj usted t o Se rvi ce Yea r Costs
Discoun t ed NTD Adjusted to Serv ice Ye ar Cost s
0 Sponsored Revenue Miles
Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual
Add Paratransit Service
Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel
Fuel Cost per Ga llon
0.0 Bus M iles per Gallon
0 Sponso red Revenue Miles
Total Fuel Cost
Per Vehicle Principal+ 4 % Interest Ra t e, Annua l
0 Vehicles needed for spo nso red service
Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service
TOTAL
ExhibitD
Form of Annual Administrative Cost Report
2015 2016 2017 I
Motor Bus (less FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex) Motor Bus (les s FLEX) I All Modes (i nclud ing Flex) Motor Bus (les, FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex) I
Cost Category Ops Support Administration Oos Suooort Administration ~Ort Administration OesSupport Admi ni stratio n Ops Support Administration Op~port AdministratLon_
ACCOUNTING 577,081.27 1,164,328.01 666,909.3·2 1,314,805.28 737,110.99 1,419,810.26
APPLICATIO N DEVELOPMENT --1,030,426.48 -2,079,004.26 1,133,030.39 -2,332,332.99 1,246,608.34 2,401,195.12
ASSET MANAGEM ENT -11,264.4S 821,605 00
eoARD COORDI NATION 82,699.67 166,856.12 36,773 .69 171,013.50 153,595.51 295,852.98
CHIEF COMMUNICIATIO~S OFFI CER 186,786.52 376,863,35 201,183.0 1 396,630.37 396,216.78 763,185.82
CHI EF FINANCIAL OFFICER 233,436.31 470,984.68 237,494.S3 468,2.18.17 279,921.65 535,763.18
CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER 182,461.62 368 ,137.37 103,309.l O 203,672.90 160,487.18 309,127.79
CH IE F TECHNOLOGY OFFIC ER 141,536.56 2S5,566.33 138,519.79 273,090.4 2 399,622.16 767,399.37
CIVIL RIGHTS 147,136.38 296,864.62 153,964.53 303,539.s·g 204,762.33 394,409.60
CORPORATE & BOARD S,UPPORT -669,348.50 1,350,487.79 477,947.25 941,968.39 528,649.95 1,018,276.26
CUSTOMER SERVICE -1,071,5 19.44 2,161,914.06 1,169,413.90 2,305~488.22 1,395,613.69 2.6~.206 6 2
DATA °'UAILITY & RIDERSHIP ~-----147,378.30 413,730.76
FACILITIES 6,064,326.54 12.235,478_22 6 ,698,321.39 13,205,675.97 6,854,609.52 13,203,228.63
FARE STRATEGY ~ OPERATIONS --357,889.94 72~,084.24 390,610.36 770,084.56 417,903.87 804,959.1 0
FED FUNDS 8.31
FINANCIAL SER VICES 363,784.58 733,977.34 391,850.85 772,5;0.)7 416,364.11 801,993.LS
GE NERAL COUNSEL 1,180,592.01 '2,381,980.54 1,271,4 54.65 2,506,660.57 1,396,792.90 2,6904477 .98
~ENERALMANAGER 1,397,4 50.51 2,819,517.58 1,087,954.38 2,144,891.56 793,59).89 1,528,602.77
HUMA N >ERVICES 1,049,176.56 2,116,834,72 l,149,286,11 2,265,806.48 1,288,482 .41 2,481,852.L2
INTERNAl AUD[T 152,678 .46 30ll,046.40 187,564.37 369,761.35 206,113 .25 397,011.73
MAJOR PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT --1,173,627.69 2,367,929.22 1,598,408.03 3,151,2.46.00 l..1495,761.70 1,942,151.31
MATERIALS --174,665.82 352,408.44 178,74.S.97 352,40 1.86 204,000 39 39i,94! 97
NETWOR K SUPPORT 1,546,281.00 3,119,800.26 1,676,987.06 3.10G.1e3.a1 1,89 2,080.72 3,644,492, 70
ORGANIZATIONA L EFFECTIVENESS 467,582.39 943,401.39 500,31 1.15 986,358,60 817,445.48 2,185,345.52
PLANNING & PROGRAMMING 746,397.16 1,505,942,36 649.436 .. 68 :,280,358.14 887,711.67 1,709,894.65
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & SALES 63),281.36 628,336.07 295,611.85 569,402.37
PUBLIC RELATIDr!S & MARKETIN G 1,419,355.89 2,863,714,.20 1,204,454.3) 2,374,570.05 1,433,703.71 2,761,574.94
PURCHAS ING & CONTRACTS -500,184.57 1,009,180.0S 528,276,<2 1,041,491.87 583,080.28 1,123,119,00
IRADIO CONTROL --833,131.42 1,274,034.71 911,887.54 1,363,883.37
CUALITY ASSURANCE 64,370.02 197,775.48
CUALITY ASSURANCE & STATS 47,640.82 .91 ,764,92
RfAL ESTATE 294,302.97 593,790.18 643,445.15 1,268,54 5.90 4 79,169.27 922,967.45
RIDESHME/VAN ?OOL 188,001.73 2,796,086.27 9,541.73 2,982,175.05
RJSK MArMGEMENT 1,334,281,29 2,692,066 40 1,782,278_96 3,513,745.76 64),489.42 1,262,704.53
RIVERSIDE PARATRANSIT OPERATIONS -12,617,157,02 I 3,280,748.59 96,:16 .71 13,993,787.71
SAFffi 724,357 15
~ ---1,461.474 )9 970,522.13 1,913,37 5.02 1,092,196.86 2,10 3,770.43
SALT LAKE INTERMODAL EXPENSES -81,l Sl.28 81,214.43 ~28.28 98,086.37
s ,cuR1n· -3,070,18).92 ~4.446.1_!-3,14613 72.21 6,203,042.45 3,646,238.6 2 7,018,159.59
STRATEGIC THIN(TANK 149,609.50 301,8'54.42 164,105.49 323,532.38 150,365.08 269,630.58
SJPPLY CHAIN AOM IN --115,212.20 232,453.90 131,738.C4 259,7'/fJ.27 161,775.98 311,610.06
TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT --148,216.61 Z99,044 10 194,037.77 382,543.60 __ 3_26,861~ 6 29,595.4 1
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT -888,9C9.92 1,793,478.28 1,052,346.28 2,0741691.71 31,237.84 59,619.78
TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 220.720.32 445,328 .70 265,26• 18 522,965.78 567,448.40 2,101,819.07
T~CflNOLOGY SUPPORT FAClllT) -42 5,164.4 5 857,818.32 --974,013.82 284,603 96 999,665.9 3
T:LECOMMU NICATIONS -481,0~6.36 9)0,647.22 -1__;067,755.90 257,649.57 1,211,818.55
T'IANSIT :OMMUNICATION CENTER -411,902.61 l ,463,666.14
nANSIT :lRIENTED DEVELOPMENT -43s,an,oG 879,432.24 142,805.7 5 281,540.lS 154,/44.51 311,306.05
!TRAINING
~
663,882.11 1,339,458.73 1,986,983.77 485,898.48 1,812,74 8.77
VEHICLE DISPOS;.L 7,336.37 14i'l31.00
VP OPERATIO NS AND CAPITAL -~ 281,382.32 545,579.00
WAREHOUSI NG 507 ,666.93 1,024,276.58 1,019,706.04 2,010,340.62 1,381,380.9 0 2,660,791.67
WORKfORCE SYSTEMS 466,000.16 940,209.06 702,725.91 1,385,417 35 335,183 27 675,667 63
973 (grant) {44,218.95)
9075 (cram ) (30,705.90)
100·15 (grant) 1,056.49
Gra nd Total 14 727 722.82 16 947 303.42 29,307,975.36 47,716130.62 15 647,610.41 17,411,835.87 33,376,216.39 52,181,107.64 17,415,106.79 18,070,811.13 37,376,825.96 _2b!~,626.ll
t,fote,; Highlighted rnogones ,ro bus oper,Tnal suppon cosis Fare Ops 10 be excluded when r,rcs gencra1cd ,re.rcwmcd bJ LIA Ba« i•c,r is der,ned as 1hcye,r of the moSI c1,rrcnl NT D d"1o,
2018
Motor Bus (less FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex)
Cost Category
ACCOUNTING
APPLICATION DEVELO
ASSET MANAGEMENT
BOARD COORDINATIO
CHIEF COMMUNICIAT
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFF
CHIEF PEOPLE OFFl~E
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY 0
CIVIL RIGHTS
CORPORATE & BOARD
CUSTOMER SERVICE
DA-A QUAIUTV & P.IO
FACILITIES
-_ Ops Support Administration ~~ Ad mi~tra~
MENT ---I
INS OFFICER
ER
FICER
iUPPORT -
~
~SHIP --
IATIONS ~-
ElOPMENT --
CTIV'E NESS
1MING
NT & SALES
IARKETING
ACTS ---
I STATS
FARE STRA-EGY & OP
FED FUNDS
FINANCIALSERVICTS
GEr.ERAL COUNSEL
GEl.,ERAL MANAGER
HU\1AN SERVI CES
INTERNAL AUDIT
MAJOR PROGRAM DE
MATERIALS
NtWORK SUPPORT
ORGANIZATIONAL EF
PLANN ING & PROGRA
PRODUCT DEVELOPM
PUBLICRHATIONS &
PURCHASltlG & CONT• I RADIO CONTROL
QUALITY ASSURANCE
QUALITY ASSURANCE
REALEST ATE
RIDESHARE/VANPOO
RISK MANAGEME'l
RIVE.ASIDE PARATRAN IT OPERATIDNS
SAFETY
SALT LAKE INTERMO
SECURITY
1l E)(PENSES
<
~EIIT
>MENT
r
T FACILITY
IS
STRATEGIC THINK TA
SUPPLY CHAIN ADM I
TECH NOLCGY DEPLO
TECH.,.NOl◊GY DEVEL
TECHNOLOGY SUPPO
TECHNOLOGY SUPPO
TELECOMMUNICATIO
TR ANSIT COMMUr'1CA
TRANSIT ORIENTED D
!TRAINING
TION CENTER
VE-ilCLE D SPOSAL
VP OPERArlONS AND
WAREHOUSING
WORKFORCE SYSTEM
973 (grant!
9075 (grant)
1oa-1s (grant)
Grand Total
VELOPMENT
:APITAL
--
--
-----
-
~
-
--
--
.:i1egones .:ire ous opernf Not~• ll1fhlightcd c
--------
--
NTD Administra1
2019 2020 I
Motor Bus (less FLE X) I All Modes (including Flex) Motor Bus ( less FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex) I
Ops Support Administration Ops Support Administration Ops Support Administration Ops Support . Administration
I
I
.I
J
I
7
l
J
-------------~ ----
:ion Cost Centers ----------
2021 2022 2023 I
Motor Bus (less FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex) Motor Bus (less FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex) Motor Bus (less FLEX) I All Modes (including Fle x) I
Cost .f!!.4_"!'£....__ .Q~ssue(!!!rt Administration Oes Suee2!!_ Administration .QJ>s Sueeort Administration O~p,.!!i:t_ ~c!_mini.stratLo!!.__ Ops Sueeort Administration OpsSu~".1 Administration
ACCOUNTING
APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ---------ASSET M ANAGEM ENT ------i BOARD COO RO I riA TION
CHIEF COMMUNICIATIO'IS OFFl~ER
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
CIVIL RIGHTS
CORPORATE & a,ARD S.UPPORT --
CUSTOMER SJRVICE --I
OATA QUAIUTY & RIDERSHIP --FACILITIES I FARE STRATEGY!. OPERATIONS ~-
FED FUNDS
FINAN CIAL SERViCES
GENERAL COUNSEL
GENERAL M ANA:iER
l-4UMAN SERVICES
INTERNAL AUDIT
MAJOR PROGR~ '1 DEV.ELOPME NT -
MATERIALS -I
NETWORK SUPPORT
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
PlANNING & PROGRAMMING
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & SALES
PUBLIC RElATIONS & MARKETING
PURCHASING & CONTRACTS -I RADIO CONTROL -
QUALITY ASSURANCE
QUALiTY ASSURANCE & STATS
REAL ESTATE
RlDESHA~E/VANPOOL
RISK MANAGEMENT
RIVERSIDE PARATRANSIT OPERATIONS
SAFETY
SALT lAKE INTERMODAL EXPENSES
J -SECURITY -I
STRATEGIC THINK TANK
~UPPLY CHAIN AOM IN --
TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT --I
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT -·TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT I TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FACILITY .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TRANSIT COMM~Nl ~TION CENTE!\-_ I
TRANSIT OR IENT :0 DEVELOPMENT .
!TRAINING I -
VEHICLE JISPOSAL
VP OPERATIONS ANO CAPITAL --\oiAREHOUSING I WORKFORCE SYSTEMS --
973 (grartl
9)75 (grant )
ll)Q.15 (grant)
Grand Total
Notes 1-HghHght~d co 1cgories are bus op,mll
Co>t Ca tegory
ACCOUNTltiG -
2024
Motor Bus (les s FLEX) I All Modes (including Flex)
OpsSu_ll~'!_ Administratio~ps ~po~inistr~
Motor Bus (less FLE X)
Ops Support Administration
APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT
ASSET MANAGEMENT
BOARD COORDINATION
------------
CHIEF COMMUNICIATIONS Of:
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CHIEF PEOFLE OFFICER
CHIEF TECHNOLOGV OFFICER
CIV L RIGHTS
CORPORAE& BOARD SUPPO
CUSTOMER SERVIC[
DATA QUAllTY & ~IDERSHIP
FACILITIES
FICER
n
IS FARE STRATEGY & OPE RAT ON
FEO FUNOS
f lNANCIAl SERVICES
GHIERAL COUNSEl
GEJJERAL MANAGER
HUMAN SERVICES
INTERNAL AUDIT
MAJOR PROGRAM DEVELOPM
MATERIALS
ENT
lfSS
NElWORK SUPPORT
ORGANIZATIONAL =FFECTl'o/E
PLANNING&. PROGRAM MING
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & S,
PUBLIC RELATIONS & MAR<ET
PURCHASING & CONTRACTS
IRADIO CONTROL
QUALITY ASSURANCE
QUALITY ASSURANCE & STAT
REAL ESTATE
RIDESHARE/VANPOOL
\l£S
ING
-
-
-
--
-~
--
---
RISK MANAGEMENT
RIVERSIDE PARATRANSIT OPE ~ATIDNS
SAFETY
SALT LAKE INTERMODAL EKP: NSES --
-----
ITY -
SECURITY
STRATEGICTH INKTANK
SUPPLY CHAIN AOMIN
TECHNOLO GV DfP_OYMENT
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
TECIINOLCGY SUP?ORT
TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FhCI
T£LECOMMUNl CATIONS
(TRANSIT COMMUIJICATIO~ C
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOP
ENTER -
!TRAIN ING
VEHICLE DISPOSAL
VP OPERATIONS AND CAPITA
WARfHOUSI NG
WORKFOR:E SYST,MS
973 (grant;
9075 (grant)
100-15 (g,ant)
Grand Total
Notes· H1£l1l1ghleo cn1egor1es
-~ENT --
--
---
arc biis opcc;u
----------------------~
I
2025 2026 I
I All Modes (including Flex) M otor Bus (Jess FLEX ) I All Modes (including Flex) I
. Ops Support Administration Ops Support Administration Ops Support Administration
----l
J
I
I
J
J
j
I
I
l
------~--~~ ~---
EXHIBIT3
ADDENDUM NO. 4
TO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UT AH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
TRANSIT MASTER PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
(2021-22 FTN Routes)
This Addendum No. 4 ("Addendum") to that certain Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah
Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement ("ILA") is made this
__ day of_~ 2021, by and between Utah Transit Authority, a public transit district organized
under the laws of the State of Utah ("UT A"), and Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal
corporation ("City"). UTA and City are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Parties" and each
may be referred to individually as "Party," all as governed by the context in which such words are
used.
RECITALS
A. On the 6th day of March, 2019, the Parties entered into the ILA, whereby the parties
agreed to participate jointly in planning and funding for public transportation improvements in and
around the City; and
B. Pursuant to the terms of the ILA, the Parties desire to specifically identify certain
components of the Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan to be governed by this Addendum.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Pursuant to Section 3 of the ILA, the City, in cooperation with UT A, identified as
the City-sponsored frequent transit network routes for the 2021-22 ("FTN Routes") to be provided
by UTA for a one-year period from the August 2021 change day until the next succeeding August
change day.
2. The description of those 2021-22 FTN Routes is set forth in Attachment 1.
3. The description of the 2021-22 Baseline Services is set forth in Attachment 2.
4. The calculation of the Annual Service Mile Charge for the City-sponsored 2021-
22 FTN Routes is set forth in in Attachment 3.
5. The final routing and implementation of the FTN Routes shall be determined in
accordance with all applicable laws, regulations and policies regarding transit service planning
(including, without limitation, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act) and operational considerations
shall be addressed in consultation with the City.
6. Invoicing for implementation of the FTN Routes will be according to Section 7 of
the ILA.
7. This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
8. This Addendum is limited to the terms expressly provided herein and except as set
forth herein, the ILA shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there
is a conflict between this Addendum and the ILA, the terms of this Addendum shall prevail and
control.
9. Any capitalized terms that are not specifically defined in this Addendum shall have
1
the meanings set forth in the ILA.
10. This Addendum will become effective upon Salt Lake City Council's adoption of
a resolution authorizing the Mayor or her designee to enter into this Addendum; and appropriation
of funding to meet the City's financial obligations under this Addendum (the "Effective Date").
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE JS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Addendum as of the Effective
Date.
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
UT AH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
By _______________ _
Its ----------------
By _____________ _
Its ----------------
Approved as to Form
UT A Legal Counsel
3
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By _______________ _
Its ----------------
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
By: ___________ _
Senior City Attorney
Date: -----------
ATTEST & COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder's Office
By: ___________ _
City Recorder
[ Attach Salt Lake City Council Resolution Approving Addendum]
4
ATTACHMENT A
Description of the 2021-22 FTN Routes
For This Addendum No. 4
5
ATTACHMENT B
2021-22 Baseline Services
For This Addendum No. 4
6
ATTACHMENT C
Funding for 2021-22 Transit Service
For This Addendum No. 4
7
N
A Phase I SLCTMP Implementation
LEGEND
Already Implemented
-2
1000NORTH
Future North
Temple/ Redwood
600NORTH
Mobility Hub -NORTH TEMPLE
Location TBD
POPLAR GROVE BLVD
Cl
"~ ~ ~ a::
Cl V)
0 Q ~ §
fa <(
a:: <= I 1--
~ ~
0
0
"'
-
1--
~
0
0
CY)
1--
~
0
0
CY)
400SOUTH ....,
~ "' ~ 0
0
1--s;;! 1--
~ v,
-i =!:
V,
i!
;;j
V,
:.I
:::i
--i
SOUTH TEMPLE
200SOUTH
UNIVERSITY BLVD
900SOUTH
-9
-21
To Be Implemented
-1
Unfunded
-4
Future
University of Utah
Mobility Hub
C,
§;;
I
)>
<:
-------------------· i
7300SOUTH
c:l '° 0
0 0
~ ~
V, V,
--i --i
2100SOUTH
0
w
0
0
~
V,
--i
0.5
-<
1
Miles
2
~
<(
~
~ :::,
(/)
w > ~ :::, u w
X w
z
<(
..I
D.
c,: w
Iii
<(
:I: ..
iii z g
~ u
!:!
<(
..I
!::; ;,;
"j
SALT LAKE CITY'S
Frequent Transit
Network
The Transit Master Plan provides a vision for
an expanded Frequent Transit Network (FTN);
it is a long-term, 20-year vision that identifies
the corridors where high-frequency service
should be provided in Salt Lake City. Building
off the existing grid network, the FTN is a
set of designated transit corridors that offers
frequent and reliable service connecting major
destinations and neighborhood centers seven
days a week throughout the day and evening.
The lines on the FTN map (following page) do
not represent individual routes, but are corridors
where frequent service would be provided
by a combination of bus or rail technologies.
Defining an FTN vision allows Salt Lake City to
work closely with Utah Transit Authority (UTA)
to set priorities for service provision now and
in the future.
Why a Grid Network?
Salt Lake City's existing, centralized hub model
is effective for regional connections but is
inefficient for some local trips. Currently, many of
UTA's routes terminate at Central Station, which
provides good connectivity to commuter rail
service, but creates challenges for people who
need to travel to other destinations throughout
the city, necessitating multiple transfers and/or
indirect trips. The FTN builds on Salt Lake City's
strong street network grid.
FTN Frequency and Span
Frequency
■15 minutes
(or better)
■30 minutes
Monday • Friday
Saturday
Sunday
4 6 8 W U 2 4 6 8 W U
AM PM AM
Hours of Service
Radial vs. Grid Network
Radial
(Hub and Spoke)
I --~-............... ---.................... -
Grid
1000 N
~
w
0
0 .....
w
0
0
O'I
w
0
0
M ....
Legend
0
-Funded
Unfunded
UTA Rail
0.5 1 Mile
8
Draft for Spring 2021 Approval Addendum 4: 2021 Baseline Service Please refer to the UTA Five-Year Service Plan adopted on 2/24/2021 for UTA's baseline service. www.rideuta.com/serviceplan Summary: • The Five-Year Service Plan includes FTN level service on Route 2 on weekdays as part of UTA's baseline service level. • UTA made improvements to the span of service on Routes 2, 9, and 21 in August 2020, which are now included in the baseline at not additional cost to SLC. • While Route 21 also meets UTA's Service Design Guidlines on Weekdays, it was not inclued in UTA's baseline service in the current Five-Vear Service Plan due to other needs taking priority. Annual August 2020 2021 Baseline Miles Total Miles Miles 2 213,344 173,704 9 476,251 120,704 21 374,658 278,290 Total 1,064,254 572,697 Annual August 2020 2021 Hours Total Hours Baseline Hours 2 24,712.33 18,271.60 9 45,458.27 2,042.00 21 34,891.40 25,192.87 Total 105,062.00 45,506.47 2021 Sponsored Miles 39,641 355,547 96,369 491,557 2021 Sponsored Hours 6,440.73 43,416.27 9,698.53 59,555.53 Route 2 9 21 LEGEND People-Based TPI WKD Pass/Hr SAT Pass/Hr exceeds standards (under served) meets standards partially meets standards does not meet standards (over served) SUN Pass/Hr
htto· 1/wy(,N rideuta com/ 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Utah Transit Authority 2019 Annual Agency Profile Executive Director: Ms. Carolyn Gonot (801) 262-5626 Urbanized Area Statistics• 2010 Census Salt Lake City-West Valley City, UT 278 Square Miles 1,021,243 Population 42 Pop. Rank out of 498 UZAs Other UZAs Served 77 Ogden-Layton, UT, 82 Provo-Orem, UT, O Utah Non-UZA Service Area Statistics 737 Square Miles 1,883,504 Population General Information Service Consumption 355,283,691 Annual Passenger Miles (PMT) 44,578,161 Annual Unlinked Trips (UPT) 152,903 Average Weekday Unlinked Trips 77,094 Average Saturday Unlinked Trips 29,486 Average Sunday Unlinked Trips Service Supplied 39,461,217 Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) 2,236,481 Annual Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH) 1, 141 Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service {VOMS) 1,475 Vehicles Available for Maximum Service (VAMS) Modal Characteristics Database Information NTDID: 80001 Reporter Type: Full Reporter Financial Information Sources of Operating Funds Expended Fares and Directly Generated $63,441,106 Local Funds $265,436,369 State Funds $0 Federal Assistance $69,746,231 Total Operating Funds Expended $398,623,706 Sources of Capital Funds Expended Fares and Directly Generated $0 Local Funds $33,768,058 State Funds $7,286,829 Federal Assistance $16,395,069 15.9%■ 66.6%■ 0.0% 17.5% 100.0% 0.0% 58.8%■ 12.7%-28.5% Total Capital Funds Expended $57,449,956 100.0% Operating Funding Sources 17.5% II.I% Capital Funding Sources 21.5% Modal Overview Mode Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Uses of CaE!ilal Funds Summary of Operating Expenses (OE) Commuter Bus Commuter Rail Demand Response Light Rail Bus Vanpool Total Operation Characteristics Mode Commuter Bus Commuter Rail Demand Response Light Rail Bus Vanpool Total Performance Measures Mode Commuter Bus Commuter Rail Demand Response Light Rail Bus Vanpool Total Directly Purchased Revenue Systems and Operated Transportation Vehicles Guideways 41 $0 $0 50 $0 $6,668,392 64 46 $142,702 $50,668 89 $0 $18,486,994 416 5 $11,494,983 $8,750,091 430 $3,118,109 $47,753 1,090 51 $14,755,794 $34,003,898 Operating Uses of Annual Expenses Fare Revenues Capital Funds Passenger Miles $8,448,535 $522,214 $0 12,128,093 $44,291,302 $7,084,619 $8,932,406 133,685,517 $20,257,462 $349,801 $285,378 4,423,804 $71,152,658 $17,630,129 $19,630,942 83,098,538 $150,988,092 $18,988,821 $25,424,825 84,921,158 $15,911,105 $3,927,899 $3,176,407 37,026,581 $311,049,152 $48,503,483 $57,449,956 355,283,691 Service Efficiency Operating Expanses par Vehicle Revenue Mile $9.34 $620 $7.03 $10.83 $8.75 $2.47 $7.88 Operating Expanses par Vehicle Revenue Hour $239.23 $265.75 $111.46 $194.60 $116.93 $81.22 $139.08 Facilities and Stations $0 $2,237,066 $92,006 $1,077,775 $5,138,773 $0 $8,545,620 Annual Unlinked Trips 549,661 5,193,879 388,285 17,128,008 20,249,984 1,068,364 44,578,161 Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Operating Expanse par Passenger Mila: Mile: Bus Bus Unlnked Passenger Trip per Vehicle Revenue Mile: Bus $10.00 ,;=~;;;;;;;;;:;:~.::;;::;.;;;;;..:: $2,60 $8JIO I I I •• ..,... $2.00 ,-----<~.._-----~-~ $UICI : ........ ._ -$1.10 . I~ ~ $4JI0'-------------'1.00 .... ::'-------------=:c--=--------•ooE ,.. ... ,.oo .... .... Other $0 $26,948 $0 $66,173 $40,978 $10,545 $144,644 Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles 904,101 5,401,987 2,881,355 6,569,208 17,252,754 6,451,812 39,461,217 Mode Commuter Bus Commuter Rail Demand Response Light Rail Bus Vanpool Total Total Labor $214,935,053 69.1% $0 Materials and Supplies $57,731,526 18.6% $8,932,406 Purchased Transportation $4,681,383 1.5% $285,376 Other Operating Expenses $33,701,190 10.8% $19,630,942 Total Operating Expenses $311,049,152 100.0% $25,424,825 Reconciling OE Cash Expenditures $87,574,554 $3,176,407 Purchased Transportation $57,449,956 (Reported Separately) $0 Fixed Guideway Vehicles Available Annual Vehicle Directional for Maximum Vehicles Operated in Revenue Hours Route Miles Service Maximum Service 35,315 0.0 45 41 166,668 174.5 69 50 181,749 0.0 165 110 365,639 93.9 117 89 1,291,215 9.4 535 421 195,895 0.0 544 430 2,236,481 277.8 1,475 1,141 Service Effectiveness Operating Expanses par Passenger Mile $0.70 $0.33 $4.58 $0.86 $1.78 $0.43 $0.88 Operating Expanses par Unlinked Passenger Trip $15.37 $8.53 $52.17 $4.15 $7.46 $14.89 $6.98 Unlinked Trips par Vehicle Revenue Mile 0.6 1.0 0.1 2.6 1.2 0.2 1.1 Percent Average Fleet Spare Vehicles Age in Years• 8.9% 14.4 27.5% 17.5 33.3% 4.1 23.9% 12.3 21.3% 6.7 21.0% 5.6 22.&o/. Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Hour 15.6 31.2 2.1 46.8 15.7 5.5 19.9 Operating Expense per Ve hide Revenue Mile: Light Rail Operating Expense per Passenger Mile: Light Rail Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle Revenue Mile: Light Rail $16.00 I $1.00 ,--------~-... -----LOO µ1-------------$::: r.-..... _____ •~-■--r-"-• __ •_-__ ~~ >-•--•----•--~------~~ ~ e e I I I e $0JIO L. -------------$0.00 .~------------<OO L. -------------10 11 12 13 U 11 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 ,. 17 18 ,, 10 11 12 13 14 15 ,. 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 ,. 17 18 19 ~ •Demand Response -Taxi (OT) and non-dedicated fleets do not report fleet age data.
Sources: Utah Transit Authority Operating Cost per Mile by Mode 2019 Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database (NTD), Agency Profile, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit-agency-profiles 2019 Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/ About-UTA/UTA-Reports-and-Documents 2019 NTD 012erating Ex12enses b~ Mode Bus Service $ 150,988,092 Commuter Bus $ 8,448,535 Commuter Rail $ 44,291,302 Light Rail $ 71,152,656 Paratransit Service $ 20,257,462 Other Service NTDTotals Fuel Costs NTD Plus Fuel $ 15,911,105 $ 311,049,152 Less Fuel Costs {Diesel, CNG and Gasoline) $ (8,534,028) $ $ (507,673) $ (5,613,091) $ $ $ (961,710) $ $ (905,831) $ $ (16,522,333) $ CAFR less revenue amortization (Capital Maintenance) Difference 2018 COST PER MILE De12reciation 25,412,263 57,000,066 57,000,066 4,171,785 2,527,944 146,112,123 Total Costs $ 167,866,327 $ 7,940,862 $ 95,678,277 $ 128,152,722 $ 23,467,537 $ 17,533,218 $ 440,638,942 $ 16,522,333 $ 457,161,275 $ 457,161,275 $ Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles 17,252,754 904,101 5,401,987 6,569,208 2,881,355 6,451,812 39,461,217 Cost Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Without Fuel excluding Vehicle De12reciation $ 8.26 Bus Service --$ 8.78 Commuter Bus $ 7.16 Commuter Rail $ 10.83 Light Rail $ 6.70 Paratransit Service $ 2.33 Other Service $ 7.46
DRAFT for Spring 2020 Approval Addendum 4: Paratransit Costs 2020-2021 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South 35,315 Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 365,639 Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 1,291,215 Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) ---------1,692,169 Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT 181,749 Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 11% Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and Light Rail
May 2021 Approval Addendum4 2021-2022 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, and 2100 South VARIABLE VALUES $ 8.26 2.2% 2 Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue Mile, Bus Service (1) Annual escalator rate (2) Number of Years since NTD report I 20%1Administrative Discount off the 35% built into NTD (3) 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles: 200 S weekends, 900 S, and 2100 S I 11%ISponsored Paratransit Service rate (4) I $ 2.251 Fuel Cost per Gallon (Service Year Budgeted Cost) 5 Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon (adjust per vehicle type) I $ 493,061 I Annual Sponsored Vehicle Lease Costs 10 Sponsored Vehicles .__ ______ _. (1) NTD Cost per Revenue Mile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does include approximately 2% for capital maintenance (e.g. engine replacement, etc). (2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the PCE CPI over a twenty year period. (3) UTA will discount the administrative charges in proportion to the scale of the service increase in revenue miles. (4) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail. SPONSORED SERVICE COST $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8.26 Most recent NTD Cost Per Mile -Bus Service 8.62 NDT rate Adjusted to Service Year Costs 6.90 Discounted NTD Adjusted to Service Year Costs 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles 3,389,849.87 Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual 371,304.87 Add Paratransit Service 3,761,154.74 Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel 2.25 Fuel Cost per Gallon 5.0 Bus Miles per Gallon 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles 221,200.49 Total Fuel Cost 49,306.14 Per Vehicle Principal+ Interest Rate 10 Vehicles needed for sponsored service 493,061.40 Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service 4,475,416.63 TOTAL
ADDENDUM NO. 5
TO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UT AH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
TRANSIT MASTER PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
(Mobilization Funding for 1000 North)
This Addendum No. 5 ("Addendum") to that certain Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah
Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement ("ILA") is made this
__ day of June, 2021, by and between Utah Transit Authority, a public transit district organized
under the laws of the State of Utah ("UT A"), and Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal
corporation ("City") is made and entered into as of the date the Addendum is stamped by the Salt
Lake City Recorder's Office ("Effective Date"). UTA and City are hereinafter collectively
referred to as "Parties" and each may be referred to individually as "Party," all as governed by the
context in which such words are used.
RECITALS
A. On the fX th day of June, 2021, the Parties entered into the ILA, whereby the parties
agreed to participate jointly in planning and funding for public transportation improvements in and
around the City; and
B. Pursuant to the terms of the ILA, the Parties desire to specifically identify certain
components of the Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan public transportation improvements to be
governed by this Addendum.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. As contemplated in Section 3 of the ILA, the City, in cooperation with UTA, has
identified and funded a total of four corridors for City-sponsored frequent transit network routes
("FTN Routes") to be provided by UT A for a one-year period from the August 2021 change day
until the next succeeding August change day. The corridors are depicted in Attachment A to this
Addendum. hree of the corridors began service in August of 2019, and are subject to other
addenda. These are 200 South, 900 South, and 2100 South. One additional corridor, 1000 North,
is proP.osed for mobilization in January of 2022, and is the subject of this Addendum. The service
characteristics of the FTN Routes, the additional vehicles necessary to support the FTN Routes,
and the Annual Service Mile Charge (as such term is defined in the ILA) applicable to the FTN
Routes shall all be memorialized pursuant to an additional addendum to be subsequently executed
by the parties.
2. The term of this Agreement is from the Effective Date until August _, 2022
("Term").
3. Pursuant to Section 6 of the ILA, UTA has identified a mobilization charge
reflecting the costs to be incurred by UTA to prepare for the sponsored FTN Routes (the
"Mobilization Funding"). The Mobilization Funding shall be utilized solely for implementation of
the FTN Routes according to the itemized description in Attachment B to this Addendum.
4. UTA shall submit invoices for the Mobilization Funding in accordance with the
milestone payment schedule included as Attachment B. To the extent that the hiring of additional
headcount contemplated in Attachment B does not match the proposed schedule identified in
Attachment B, then UT A shall adjust the invoices for milestone payments to reflect hiring of
1
additional headcount during the Tenn; provided, however, that any adjustment of amounts
invoiced shall not exceed $x during the Tenn of this Agreement. The City shall pay all approved
invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt. If the City does not approve an invoice, a written
explanation of disputed items will be sent within ten (10) business days of the City's receipt of the
mv01ce.
5. This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
be an original , with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
6. This Addendum is limited to the terms expressly provided herein and except as set
forth herein, the ILA shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there
is a conflict between this Addendum and the ILA, the terms of this Addendum shall prevail and
control.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Addendum effective the date
first set forth herein.
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
By _______________ _
Executive Director
By _____________ _
Chief Planning and Engagement Officer
Approved as to Form
UTA Legal Counsel
3
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By _______________ _
Its ----------------
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
By: ___________ _
Senior City Attorney
Date: -----------
ATTEST & COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder's Office
By: ___________ _
City Recorder
[Attach Salt Lake City Council Resolution Approving Addendum]
4
ATTACHMENT A
Description of FTN Routes
For This Addendum No. 5
5
ATTACHMENT B
Funding for Mobilization
For This Addendum No. 5
6
N
A Phase I SLCTMP Implementation
LEGEND
Already Implemented
-2
1000NORTH
Future North
Temple/ Redwood
600NORTH
Mobility Hub -NORTH TEMPLE
Location TBD
POPLAR GROVE BLVD
Cl
"~ ~ ~ a::
Cl V)
0 Q ~ §
fa <(
a:: <= I 1--
~ ~
0
0
"'
-
1--
~
0
0
CY)
1--
~
0
0
CY)
400SOUTH ....,
~ "' ~ 0
0
1--s;;! 1--
~ v,
-i =!:
V,
i!
;;j
V,
:.I
:::i
--i
SOUTH TEMPLE
200SOUTH
UNIVERSITY BLVD
900SOUTH
-9
-21
To Be Implemented
-1
Unfunded
-4
Future
University of Utah
Mobility Hub
C,
§;;
I
)>
<:
-------------------· i
7300SOUTH
c:l '° 0
0 0
~ ~
V, V,
--i --i
2100SOUTH
0
w
0
0
~
V,
--i
0.5
-<
1
Miles
2
Addendum 5 1000 North Mobilization (122,274 miles, 22,918 hours) Monthly Cost Mobilization FTE/Unit Position/Item per FTE/unit January February March April May June July Total 2 Mechanics $ 7,192 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 100,688 1 Fixed Supervisors $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 52,500 1 TCC Dispatch $ 5,234 $ -$ -$ -$ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 20,936 0 Para Supervisors $ 7,200 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -15 Operator Recruitment one time $ 3,000 $ 2,400 $ 1,800 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ -$ 9,000 15 Operator Training one time $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 275,500 15 Operator Service $ 5,964 $ 14,910 $ 47,712 $ 59,640 $ 89,460 $ 89,460 $ 301,182 4 Vehicle Procurement $ 3,912 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,648 $ 15,648 $ 31,296 Sub Total $ 24,884 $ 70,201 $ 84,511 $ 121,347 $133,275 $178,743 $178,143 $ 791,102 20% Administration $ 4,977 $ 14,040 $ 16,902 $ 24,269 $ 26,655 $ 35,749 $ 35,629 $ 158,220 TOTAL $ 29,861 $ 84,241 $101,413 $ 145,616 $159,930 $214,491 $213,771 $ 949,322 Mobilization Milestone Invoices Month Expense* Admin Total 1/1/2022 $ 24,884 $ 4,977 $ 29,861 2/1/2022 $ 70,201 $ 14,040 $ 84,241 3/1/2022 $ 84,511 $ 16,902 $ 101,413 4/1/2022 $ 121,347 $ 24,269 $ 145,616 5/1/2022 $ 133,275 $ 26,655 $ 159,930 6/1/2022 $ 178,743 $ 35,749 $ 214,491 7/1/2022 $ 178,143 $ 35,629 $ 213,771 Subtotal $ 791,102 $158,220 $ 949,322 * Expense costs represent a not-to-exceed amount, invoices will be based on actual FTE hires.
Sources: Utah Transit Authority Operating Cost per Mile by Mode 2017 Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database (NTD), Agency Profile, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit-agency-profiles 2017 Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/About-UTA/UTA-Reports-and-Documents 2017 NTD Operating Expenses by Mode Bus Service $ 129,545,466 Commuter Bus $ 7,749,445 Commuter Rail $ 34,438,729 Light Rail $ 64,680,283 Paratransit Service $ 17,851,347 Other Service NTD Totals Fuel Costs NTD Plus Fuel $ 3,469,358 $ 257,734,628 Less Fuel Costs {Diesel, CNG and Gasoline} $ {6,613,860) $ $ (4,740,099) $ $ $ {682,671) $ $ (751,355) $ $ {12,787,985) $ CAFR plus $20,602,• (capital maintenance) Difference Add Capital Maintenance 2,373,470 3,033,791 $ 12,963,472 $ 1,564,585 667,112 20,602,430 $ 2017 COST PER MILE Debt Service Depreciation $ 20,842,359 44,095,481 $ 51,793,725 44,095,481 $ 67,516,834 $ 5,678,317 $ 3,609,652 88,190,962 $ 149,440,887 Total Costs $ 146,147,435 $ 7,749,445 $ 128,621,627 $ 189,256,070 $ 24,411,578 $ 6,994,767 $ 503,180,922 $ 12,787,985 $ 515,968,907 $ 515,968,907 $ Cost Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Without Fuel Annual Vehicle excluding Vehicle Revenue Miles Depreciation 16,437,069 $ 7.62 Bus Service 1,017,334 $ 7.62 Commuter Bus 5,349,524 $ 14.36 Commuter Rail 6,732,768 $ 18.08 Light Rail 2,727,127 $ 6.87 Paratransit Service 6,449,439 $ 0.52 Other Service 38,713,261 $ 9.14
l·tfn ... 0(·J~AM,• t df:·C:: t' ]d
tJ ~•-:. v'Ja-iit 2Cl03omt,
·~olt Lt .ce ct~. UT i!<:'IUI
Utah Transit Au1lhority
201·1'Annual Ag~ncy Profile·
Urbanized Area 51:i,;is!ICS"-:pfo census
$sit ..,-J~~ Cil:~-West)/i:ll=lVety,U-
278 S quar•Mlln
l ,02'.243 !'l)puluUoo
General Information
S""'1ce Consu1T4Jtlon
3&4,859,218 Annual P u sen911tr ,.H (PMT)
~5 018 9 ~8 Annual UnHnhd Trip• (~T)
42 Pop. Rank CIIJtOf 498 i..iz.-.s
Other UZAs Se,ved
;; CJden..L~IOn,t.r. l2 ">i:OVD-O=lil, J1, 6uta~k6/\-IJ!A
155 437 Av1r1ge Wu k:day Unlink eel Tripi
78,iaJ: Avarqe·Saturday U"linlc e4 -Trfps
29 651 Avuage Sunday Unthk•d Tri pt
Sentce Area statistic•
7'37 S·quare Mll n
l .89.S,SQd. Population
Stll'Vlte Supplied
38 7 13 231 Annual V•hicl11ReY l!flue."MIH IVRM'
2 110,a1t Annual Vahicl11ReYeiluotHours fVRH)
1.000 V.t!JcluOpented in M~ic imum Serv fi:e ~OMS)
t ,337 Vehlclu lwa,11 ,bl■ r~r ~xl111 u m S ■rvice fl~MS}1
Modal Charaa:eristlcs
V'8hlcles Openled
Datsbue lntarm~Qn
NTCID, so,jo I
R•pcr1tr1~>•: 'FUl Re~-:irt=l'
Financial Information
Sources or OperatinR Funds. E>:~ended ---_-o-,-.,.-~-•-g_f _u_nd-fr"t,g Sc,urces
Fare.N',e,,.,enues $5<,l:5~.~IY,2 13S%
wocal F Urteli $0 0 O'¼
SlateFun<Js $27 l",t'~;'.,'94 723%
Fe.Gera.l As$st·ance: ~'.l:.t~l.l:71 11 4%
-Otne.'Fun11S: if ,1i:;i,::-04 25%
if:111 Ope~ting Fund, Expend•d $.l)'.,734,Gtt 100 f),t.
Sources ot Capital Funds Expended
Fare. Re.-@nue!S $0
!.OC'al Minds i :::,CtJ,t Iii
State FUl'tds $1t ., u.~ 13
Feoeral A.s:SstallCe $1:: 7 ,1· .::.;~
Olk F\lll<ls 10
Total C;apl\al Funcb El:pencl,w .c,52,:,01 .sso
Dill<,
I -91<
,s 1%
484~
00¼
IO0 0J.
11,4¼ ;i,_lj._
•13.!Ji..
72.ft
Cnlt1t Funding ~).16('.it
Modal Ovetvlew _1,1-Maxl~ Setylce _ ~ ------___ u"!!'i ,r_C~I FJmd•,_ ____ ----SUmmaryofOper,.ting E,q,81'l$QS (OEf "·"~
, ...
Mod_,
c J iJ'ilOler &Js
'C :i1nru1e.rFi1nl
r. =! n 1nd Resporse
I irt-t RaA
□us
\,~;i nrool
Tot.I.I
OJ>eralton Ch111ct"'1otlcs
Mode
C J ·f ffiiUerBJ~
(':',"l"lTfUter fii:1
L'_•~1~nd ReSp.ot'IS!'
Lit;t"t Ra~
Rur.
\'An:-Ool
1 ... 1
Performance Me.asires
~dt
C..1·(1T111te:r8..l:i
CYnnurerRatl
r.=! n 1r,a Re$po~
LV t Ra!
Ru~.
\':J11!;J}(!I
lt,ta/
Dirtcdy Purchuld RtY•nu• S'yswrns and Fi.clllt)!-5 and
Operattd Ttanspcrtuton V•hlcltl Guld■w:,1s $'1alians
43 i n ssa10 ~~ $~ 1 04
$13,278,3 (: $7R EJj 45
35
91
388
40,
1-m
Op·o!:rlting
Ex:-pulsH
~· '.i49,445
C~ 4,<SS,729
~-1 i ,8t.i ).3l7
GE4,600,21/J
£1:--,:::_:11s,.;se-
~~.:=.--ria.3.se
1267.131~21
43
Fin Ra\l■nu■s
S501,B!t!
$7'.li25!ii
S591 545
S 17 968 71C
si1 155 730
S4 '28.933
"~-15t.202
$<:75)ljll
14,267.SSO
$1.158.2"1
Sll.~2.1?2
1-1.365-.433
~1"H-332
Utts of
Capita l Furtds
$2:35,7~6
S>S,181,56&
$6.917.3$7
s~::ien,en
-S:l4,780,l!.1
$1,55li.9'l
$14..3t6.419
$923.3.f,•l -$1 ,l fl ;'=f:~I ;;'
S6'.J8t,l f-f-m 1,r~1:,
$1 740.9 71 $3,f:6 [!1)~
$f 61J,1.F f.f. ✓-1-1
:2 570~~ 16.216,.!lff9
Annu:111 Af'lnUAI
Pus11ng.,-&.1 es llnlll"lk" ~rlpt
12585,0lt f~•!..: t.Jb
121257.llff .Q}=Stir:l-=I
~ 2J0,64L :2.IH:!.:/t nsae.;,4 1u.e2: :57 )
e6482,9d' 18 ;Htf ,'::='il
46"75ft,67F 1:~ti:1-r 1
Z&,,I ~crQ.2tS 44,,0,ei,11t
_S8f\'ice Efflclet1c_l(
Opera.ting ::a;·p•rtus P.•r
V4hlcl• R11wnut hllt
$/ ll2
$6.44
SM6 n ~,
$7 36
$0,54
16.8!1
Optn,t)11g E)(p•ns-, pe,-
Vehl~I• Revenue Ho ur
$185 f cl
$222 ,·,
$f!Q rr
$)SO.:,
$10ti ~P
$1!1 t~
•12:..10
Ol'ltr
:t 1~0 i65
tE:.2 1i73
$C,S,l68
t'rn lul
•t· .S~G $0.4
,~::ri m
l<!.1~~-
•■..""1..al Vl!h Clt
R.evienue M In ·
',L·1'1 ,84
s::i1!'l ,'"2'"
'1,('.:: 1 t27
6,7 '.2-'68
·r.:·l::"':'.s9
n;-H~-l31, ,-,,1; ;ie·
Metde
::\n·1(11'.:· 3 p:
~Crr.-tUt9' ~~i
-JFl"\S nr. RF~r~n s-1:
_;;ihtRa
~IJO:
Y\n :iuul
TAUi
Total
·~23C ,<.E~
·flt:,61 ,:;;·i::;
t.r,fll7 }T 1
:"t1f:,Ri'l ,r-n
J::J--1,70(, I:;;:,.
$ l,:i1•,:::,r,1 ;
$],i,,321!1 ... 78
~".nu:.tl V~llii::I•
Rev enue Houn
41,t ':!:
. ~!I,' !I~
'::'.::,1!.:~ J,C,,4 ,
1.,?lf7'i
'7f,7'l1,
2 .110.~1 ,
'Sa1ary. Wig~s; Beoeli:tS
Matenais ~nd SUpphes
r urct"las:ed Transpart-ation
:-:ttier Opetab"'=I EJIPertses-
Tot.il o ,.nthg Er;an,~
Rtc:J'l:::-lir90E Ca.sh &:t1ei,d«uru .
.$l &l .~L~.t-88
$;l l ,[Ci,:::16
£4.U:5.0 J
.~:=,:=v:i,r.94
i~7.7U.6:Z1
$U E,SS~.[9&
Pwchsed Transportation
("t{)Of!f!O Sepaf3t!ly) $0
Fh:.ed Guhleway
□1Nctl6 nal
R,ut• MIIH ·
n.o
174,5
0 .0
23,2
2.1
o.n
27f) &
Ve hltles Awa!l:a,ble
rar MulntiL1n1 \il~l11el,u o~~~d.tlia
S■rvl et In Mulm1.1n1 StrVlc•
::LI i,2,
R!'I 4,5.
1 42 1~
I I< ii
5 · . ,!!<
4 M
J.)87
-1[)5
1,0L-4:
i30l>
12.4¼
19%
i3 0l>
IO0 0'<
Pll'Urwt
Sp:a.r. Vthlcltt
31.8!f
3• ,e,;
1:?.9%
20,2%
22.9%
17 .0%
21N
t,!l~,
A YE1'.31S i!,
Ftut:A.g~lt1
'r'u.n~
f '.,!_'
:=;.,.1
;:l .::l
0.4
" :i-1
Ope'ratin9 Ei,;penses p«
SelVI ce Jli;lfe<.tlveness
--U.nlink•dTrips~ Op■ra;ttns Expi•nsll!I p er
Unlinked Puseng•r Tril#
$1! 00
$1-09
$.48 1~
$3.~c
Unllnhd Trip-s; per
P.nsenger Mile
$0.82
io-10
$/" ;"?
f..0 .. 70
$1 ,,o
$U.U'
$0.71
$6 ,,,
$1,/0
S5.1'!1:
V ehicle ReY'tnue l'AI•
0.5
0,9
o l
a
1.2
0.2
u
Vtlilcl• Rewnue Hour
. 3.J
J f .4
-:'-1
51.5
. :~ =:
i .1,.
:!1.4
-ooe.a~ng El r:,: e(lSe r:,:.ar w:i':fe
;;ieven...=l ',1.e:au~
c;,qt ta.!fi\£1 E,¢1!!ns! o_@r Pa~l!l'\9:!I'
Mue:eu~
Uni~ F ss~,n~i'" lriJJ J;·er•/ehlcle
R:.ver.;et,tltfr 8~ ~~-::~u~)t~1.~-~U:1~:~cle 0~!13111g"1:i:~~~FJ·;~~.1¥!f~• Ur\l!Ni:::=,s,;~:::~~t'. _.
,m -1 ,.~ .,,, I .... ,.A._ •"
~-J .~ ----11.,; -,-........... • ,.
~~ -::; 7 ►• 09 "" '-----------,.),2! ■JI ---• 0-QI It I~ II•, •a ~ •f f 119 ~ : 11 ·:2 t: • _, UC O »· :a •
....... -
, • ..., iU ,,
t1Mc:. UL» _,.,,,,,,,,.... ~-
•:: h-■ -.:,...,_~ ~=I" I I :··-·,:I' I....._ 0. I I •
,(1(111 I= --_.,,. ~-___________ ,_ .. ~. ---------
• -I( -11 ~:-'-. M ltl-•If 'f' CE !» 1D tj "' 11 "'-15" 8 ii Ni Cl!! ,:,
~
~:.=lmmt: Ql!'JIIJ,~S!-~:t,cl ([ffl "M.a 1'11").C=ldlczlBnll!et!l ~'r\OCffTK>!'l r-eeJ~!U8t3
Sources: Utah Transit Authority Operating Cost per Mile by Mode 2018 Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database (NTD), Agency Profile, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit-agency-profiles 2018 Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/About-UTA/UTA-Reports-and-Documents 2018 NTD Operating Expenses by Mode Bus Service $ 140,001,661 Commuter Bus $ 8,635,671 Commuter Rail $ 43,421,951 Light Rail $ 71,414,293 Paratransit Service $ 18,695,571 Other Service NTD Totals Fuel Costs NTD Plus Fuel $ 18,784,904 $ 300,954,051 Less Fuel Costs {Diesel, CNG and Gasoline} $ {10,183,098) $ $ {635,588) $ $ (7,002,733) $ $ $ (1,367,502) $ $ (963,770) $ $ {20,152,691) $ CAFR plus $38,654, (capital maintenance) Difference Add Capital Maintenance 5,973,050 382,833 1,287,135 $ 11,146,472 $ 672,761 180,162 19,642,413 $ 2018 COST PER MILE Debt Service Depreciation $ 17,144,993 45,500,194 $ 28,412,725 45,500,194 $ 28,412,725 $ 4,290,318 $ 2,304,317 91,000,388 $ 80,565,077 Total Costs $ 152,936,606 $ 8,382,916 $ 111,619,272 $ 156,473,684 $ 22,291,148 $ 20,305,613 $ 472,009,238 $ 20,152,691 $ 492,161,929 $ 492,161,929 $ Cost Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Without Fuel Annual Vehicle excluding Vehicle Revenue Miles Depreciation 16,845,223 $ 8.06 Bus Service 1,066,181 $ 7.86 Commuter Bus 5,429,232 $ 15.33 Commuter Rail 6,655,535 $ 19.24 Light Rail 2,798,928 $ 6.43 Paratransit Service 6,354,828 $ 2.83 Other Service 39,149,927 $ 10.00
hito f~ '1dE'1. ~ co,,..
669 Y\1eil 200 S: .rth
Satla,lllc;r,, UI .'.'1101
llt~h Transit Authority
20111 Aril):Liat it:.g@llcy Prffia
Urtanlzed ArH stul&llcs-2010 CfrlU!I
:!~.llke.01',:\'v\:d.\h'f!,JOty UT
'..:: ,~1:1 Sq1.11r1 MIIM
l ,flJ l/:,1;1 Pop11ladon
4'..: Pop. Rllnk outof.488 lZAs
Otht rUZAs Sened
nc.Q'1eo-La:-t:in, ~T,82PrOV0-0::m. UT OUtah l\cWZ4
ser,lee Ar~n, St3tlsllcs
•Sf Squ1.r1Mil•
l al:l::.t_i.:. Pop1,1ladon
General tnronnatJon
s~nl cei Consumption
;3:1E t.i8.B81 Annual Pass.,,9w Mllu fPMTj
.:.4 116 331 Annual lx'ltlnhd Tripi tU>T)
15,\,S()l .-,.,,.,.1,g1WMkday Unllr!ktid Tri!)!;
15,207 AWl'.a.1111 Saturcl~ Unllnke,Trip!i
29'91 t Avier.a;1 SUndiy Unllnkff Trip!i,
service Supplll1d
;:I!.: t,<9 ~2'l Annual V.t,lcl• RiWlf'IIH t.tt~tvRM)
'..:: l6!J,5in Arwl'al al-Vet,lcJ,e Rwe,1L1 .. H:io1,m; (VRH}
' l 13 Vffllcle5 Operated il1 Mldn um Seli'ic,e ('f0MS)
l 386 Vehtcltt AvalllbleforMaxlmum Seivic,e,(VAMS)
Modal Characterlsttc~s~---
Database l'lfotma,tlan
NTDID: EJ:00.l
Rc,pcinE-r Type: ~ .JJ R~oro.•J
Financial lnfonnatlon
Sou,-.::11. of :rptntllnt F unds £)!pended Open.ting F~g-Sources
t.1esanc.Oir!i::Dij =~~n-r..tetl' ~.2ll8,427
LL-"<-11-.~ S-A3;41B,83J
'Stl'ltl" r·rnts. so
IGJI\I
66:D11
'0.0!1
F!!.de:ra1 4.•;.,fd,•ce S:&1,75_8,422 14.4',\
'tr_. Op•flllny Furrdt hl>CHi Id ~,30◄ 712 I00,011
Scurcu ofCapltaf Funds E>;pended
~ esaoc~:-~_-r._•1<.tea SO
l.J..:.<.11-.~ $'6,753,477
.SUtte FJ \IIS ST.<15,678
f edera ,:,.,~:.:,·•~L,«:t Sll ,Bfli)~6
Tot.I O•laJ (undlll E~ 11, "'6,03>.JO,
Q.n!I
54,:r,.
B.711
.37,01,
IOOD\I
'M ,G
1-i'u .. .,..
Capital Funding soureots
Mocfat Overview
MoJa
Gcr-m,JterElu·~
Veh ~le,s Opo&r~
In Maxim um Service
Olncu., ------Pu-cii"iid
OplnWCI Tru,1i,or:atlon
•2
--Re\let!~
Vthlc-lfl
to
$0
$3;$34$40
Sf~m s i~!e:' 0~:di!~!n~"~~ Sumtliary tf Op&rating Ex p1nsesc (OEJ ,, ...
Co . .-fTIJter"ail
{le,-a11tl'Re1,:µv11,:...:
Ugr1 R all
Eus
¥JrT.ioDI r .. ~
Op!ra,tlon Chzi~ct«fstic.s
Mo•
Corrruter Su~
·corm.aer F.:'3il
{)er 8P~ P.e•tµL 'f'J~'
U)ir1 Rail
~us
V.,-µool
To,!lt
Pedorman ce Measures
Mode
('o.r-m.,ler Elus
CGr ·mJter h ~ilt
Oer-~rt!S Rl!r,pr ,r:=!
l.J91"1RSII
oUS
~.,--p~•J
Totlf
Gl.lld.v,ayt S2ilon1
t14 r•: i:f.l.~E.t
50 59 ~0:::J s=3 2aa,S73
67 45 t:.: .' §::. :::i ::'b"S,574
91 -~D
-519,615.9;1!
$1,149~9
12A.oi9.120
.$i2,0C21:i $C!6,6~9
417 6 -'1., IC; 043 lo,Qli3.81fl
$.>•>'L4 i,30.(lel
f,)60 o, $Z,,3Zo,:,:;2 '1,t811J.
Op.n.tltig Uses af Amn..r~I i\nni,gl
EXFNISN FtnR.of'HnUN Cl.pltal Funds P1H11n11•r MIIN Unlnked Trips
$~.6,5,6)1 m 1,ern f41,S14 1_:r.3(S!Jt) ~S3.56~
$4:i,41'.95' f'a15.985 $9,2()7~5 129,6')6() 5,032,U:'J
$16,B95",57J 140D ,461i $8.6SD)76 .:.,01:: ,' ti ~:::i ,34.816
i:1i,414.m $1Cl0&9,935-i 1;1,71/2,j7J 09,'1'125t) H ,0391,7)6,
Sl40.001.61i1 -~,, ,71!8.256 128,22313.l 7A.J11I .-;:_:i 1S:.fl61.~J2
$iU!4.M4 $C,§,S1% si.1'7 res -rn:op :•F=t 1.17➔,M~
53009~1 ~1>122.~ ~-"46 .j5e,1.tG.68l ~lfi .'f'JIL Z3:
_ _ S~ry~e !_flf.!£l!f!t't _ _
Operating Etpi:!:uts-pw OpW11tlngExpmse1>per
V•hid• R...--,u• Mt• Vffllcl•Rtv.nu•Ho1.1r
-$8,10 i:::JLfi
$8.00 $:£«~,
$6 .. 6E Hlc r,
110 .. 11 $()(.\4
$8,at $1 ··:.r.d nee H·,.,4
$1~ $'1~.2!1:
Othtr
tumt:
f.£:J.251:
$4J :Ul::
11EJ.1J4
l3~J 38(.
f.1'1.::11'14
$112.~
Annt1.:,I Vetiicle
~\'tf"I.IIMl!H
·,o_U :-81
~ . ..:.::::)2:3:;;
1Jt:5 J:.C:I:
l.s=s-s::i=
11.R-1-)J':';:
:, ::l:'::·1 i::'F ,~:•!$.t:17
Modi
Comm..-:er[;s
Comm..J..1 H~I
Oumr n F.P.;.:-rn1·fr-
UQ/1':R,·.
6a.
Von~••I
TotaJ
TC:1Z.I '""' Matt,ialsar:1 ':'.rµr. ies.
°WchsiiedTratsJc•1~0f\'
);herCoe,a~ b:_:..ii..:r _;es-
~!016t7,7'7B
St8A15.:N6
$1,725,168
Sl>,13~.660
y0Jl',1
16.◄II
1,671
12.~
~(~1~
S-3;207 50~
S:3,1:lUU :3~~
$1'2 '92 5".I.)
s:ra'.22.3 -33
S t ,:Ji' ,'th
$5§,3:-J!J,"4·~
rot1l Ops-,.tin!J e:-:,.11.-,
ftfOiOC rtJ Cf:° Dri\ B:1::-r:lit.(eS
P\!rt0aixdTra·1'.;"JL ·L,{or,
{RE,:;..orte-d ~;t:..i.:c· :::ib!fy}
PIO.S$1,Ql·1
S llB,430.711
$0
100JYh
flKN 'iitlld1Way V,e,hicles-.v.ailaQle
Annu:aJ Vehicle arection1.I rorMu imun ·Vehcln 0.:11rated iri
~ver,1.1tH0:ur, Rc1.1t•MilH -S.-vlr• hlaiclm 11r, SW¥1c•
<1 '21 0.0 ,1 OJ
1643JJ 174,5 ea 511.
18U~/.. Jn 1,2 112
362 2-51 6}9 1 ,. 112
I _'.:i;:;-111~l JD &al 418
TfoR-.ifil ')j) 4 Ff 398
t,160.5bl 2f;t!,,,~ 1.31:t< 11,>
Operatitlg°Expen1n p11t
Service Eff'ecti-.i,ness
6p.rat1ngExp..,Sff~.,,--~ UnilnktdTrlpspw
Unll,.ed Pan-,ger Tfl:11 \'thiclt R.IWM'IUt Milt PJ.Hlil'lSWMlfe
.$().70
$0.33
$4.09
$080
$176
l~"" ....
Sf5.::2 0-=
$&.'4 0$
;,4755 0.1
$3.C9 2.1
$7 "' I.I i!o El 02
.u_t, 1~1
.,,.
~~
Perc•nt A vera9,e, fleoet
Sp,,.._ Vtfllcl•s Ag• 111 Years.•
8.514 '2.6
27.5% ·1:1:
21.1% .:..::i
ISS-79, "1.J
21.3% 7A
17.~!1, :~,.
ii.8'%
~llnk•d'Tri ps p_er·
V.tllcl• R.vtnU• H~ur
·::i.7
JU .I:!
4!J . .:.
'o.::I
7.0
2().4
~-,,~11~-?.~fi!rise·p,-VJ!ltf Re\E-~
,;-·~sm O ~i~rat nJ =it~fl\se Oe' ~.a.ne!li~'M~fl ,.,, Jt1··11i~1'.· :i ,r;-_._, -~:-\Jlftu
').•Yt•·'1ul: \' H~ au~ l.1Hr1bR]E,ul !l:'.:i :·V:111 Reveru, Q::ie:f~t_g =.)!OM5'effB"P3Stef1S~Mlle U,rrl!eGPassengerTnpperven.cle
'"" -""''JF~·· __ .,,,~ ui1:...i1 ""' Revowe Mlle:Ug'ltR> """ 'i~;.;i~;~;;~~~~ .. --..... cr .... -,,.___ ... ~ 1------------:~ • ~ b~LL•:::::::::::::::::::::~~ .........
'tl.!.;tl &'.lfL -----------~ * •t l, ~ t• ~ ~ -~ ~ C ~1 t ~ ~. ~ ~ -
e i11-J;!1rn:,Jr ;_•-1'.y :t)Tfa,i.~~feo:'ieel:s: -t. f.!Jl '-'µJ1lfl1.'it,:,agedati,
;~f I ►•
t a) Jo ~ 1--U
-'"'' ~= J --,......~:• "S.oe F 144
'"' ----~------tQ.40' -~a;>
60'.t( -----------= :::::::::::::::::::::::=: ===================--:ie. •'O ... ., 1Y ,i-te ir • 11 .> • 11 I-!iii 4-a It: S · ,r. Ill ~ '!: '"I'-J:I' n ,..,. • ~ •7 ts
Utah Transit Authority Operating Cost per Mile by Mode Sources: 2019 Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database (NTD), Agency Profile, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit-agency-profiles 2019 Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/About-UTA/UTA-Reports-and-Documents 2019 NTD 012erating Ex12enses by Mode Bus Service $ 150,988,092 Commuter Bus $ 8,448,535 Commuter Rail $ 44,291,302 Light Rail $ 71,152,656 Paratransit Service $ 20,257,462 Other Service NTD Totals Fuel Costs NTD Plus Fuel $ 15,911,105 $ 311,049,152 Less Fuel Costs {Diesel, CNG and Gasoline} $ (8,534,028) $ $ (507,673) $ (5,613,091) $ $ $ (961,710) $ $ (905,831) $ $ (16,522,333) $ CAFR less revenue amortization (Capital Maintenance) Difference 2018 COST PER MILE De12reciation 25,412,263 57,000,066 57,000,066 4,171,785 2,527,944 146,112,123 Total Costs $ 167,866,327 $ 7,940,862 $ 95,678,277 $ 128,152,722 $ 23,467,537 $ 17,533,218 $ 440,638,942 $ 16,522,333 $ 457,161,275 $ 457,161,275 $ Cost Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Without Fuel Annual Vehicle excluding Vehicle Revenue Miles De12reciation 17,252,754 $ 8.26 <-plug into cost calculat1 --904,101 $ 8.78 5,401,987 $ 7.16 6,569,208 $ 10.83 2,881,355 $ 6.70 6,451,812 $ 2.33 39,461,217 $ 7.46
d.,1 "IINAV--ld~, _.:, o..-n'
f69 w,,110,J ScJt~
Sfl1u,~ Ct<, VT &110,
Utah Transit Authority
2019 AMual A go,i iv Prefilo Exect..d·~ :Wect:r IAs Cir¥ Gonot
($>• 262,56,6
Urbanized A,.., Statlst1c1 .2010 C~hsus
$W:_ake.Ctfy-Vlilell½lfly 0-tv,lJT ,11 -~•-MIi ..
1 ,U21,243 P•plllltl•n
42 P•p. Rant c.tJtofM UZAs
OU,erUZAa Sernd
71 C \l-l=11-U.U,O, UT ~ PnYvo.0-ffl\ ~ J ULat1 ~!¥1-UV
Se rviceAr'9• Statfstlcs
?il ~41u.,.Miln
1,833,634 Fl'•pwlrt1•11
General lnfor111aaon
S el"flf• CaMutnptlon
-355,2E] BQ i Annual Passenger frJI• (?MT}
44,S'la 161 Annual Unlinkid Tript (UPl)
1~2..9Cl Aflrts• Weekd2y Unlln\itel mp,
11 (64 Avtnge Ss.turclay U nlirlt:M T"p•
3t68 Avtrts• S:ul'lday Un htff Tri,,
Ser,loo SUpplled
.39 .tf;.717 Annual Vehic~ Re..,EIMltMil.u: (VRMJ
Z.T.la~&J Annual Vehicle R'=Vief!UI He.-. (\'RH)
1 141 VtNclec Op•ated ir, Mulnu,1111 SMVice (VtJMSl
t ,15 VtNc:les Avail.lble for Mol11u111 Strvice(VAMS)
Modal Characlerislt cs
Da.tabl!lse Information
NTDID: HL W ]
R4porterT1·po: Full Rerortw
Flnanclal Jnformlltion
Sources of Op1ra.tfno Funds Elll)M1cltd ---0-,1>.-,• flu,1111r,. Sourtes
q"IIWG Ui rectty Ge,e~!t $11]4-Ql t Jti 16 .1:l'fu -~
Loe~ Fune s $l.S 43E ),9 ffi.G%
St.:i:e t--u~
r ~der~IAs:!:i:staoc:e
--... p,,.,.lltlR§I f\md."i e-<p, """
::;·u U.U%
s,H•e,2i · 17.5%
NiJ'kn Ne 100.0%
Source, ol CoP i •I Funds E>cponded
=1'H an£t Orectlv G,e.-ier:;ted tU U.U%
Lpcat Funes $311'SE l 58 58.8%
State Fu ~!K $1286.:12.9 12.1%
F:-d.cm!As:;i:ctonc:1. St !l 395030 28.5%
.... _. C ap'rtal Fund-. fcpanJ 11-s.166 100.0%
,,...,
IUII -
Ca'9:tnl ,u n4irlsi s,wc--Modal Ov tNhW
Vehicles Operated
'" Maximum service
Dlre"ctly P~~h•ecl
Us_g_plCoP1181 Funds Summery~ Op«ltlng Expan•H (OE)
Mede
Cc•rrm l~r R!JS
Ct"l'm.iter Ral
Oe-tanj r-esQC~
ugl• R :~i
8,s
Vilflpcbl
'oul
Ope r2tion Charact•rt•tla
Mede
Cei-nuter e us.
Cm--r miter R3III
Of"Tanj 1-.o;esoc,se
Ugtit R~i
8J>
Vanpcol
1"ot•I
P•rformance Mttsuns
Mede
Ccrrmuter ~JS-
Cc-tmuter llatl
Oetr ard Fit"Spo,ise-
Uglll ~a/
BJ>
Vannrrt
T.:rt.ll
Rf!V.'1U@ s.i·"•n 2nd
OJiented Tr1Mp11rtdo,n Vehio:IH i.uldM2.ys
4 1 $n $n
50
&< •e $0 ff..6Ei.31::2
$142,7(2 S~.6EO ,, $0 Et&,'4c:6,Hi:4
4 '6 $1 1,4J4,0E 3 tl!.7-ltl,0[1
430 $3,118,1[9 W ,7[3
1.090 !.1 $14.756.154 ~4 ..,,,.BS8
Operating \J$,es of Annu;il
Exp•nu,; F'1,.R~ C,.pit~ Funds Plntn1erMil es
$8,£48.c:JG $5,-).214 $0 l~.111!,0t3
$44;'91,301 U ,M.4819 $8,932,.::[6 l.33,E3f:,5 11
$20,:::b I /lb".J $:14300' $'.J::1:),J{O ilJ,4 7J,HL-'1
$"1,152.6£6 $17 ,s:i(J.121 $19,6)0,9-'l 2 63.D.E,5:□
lllll,s,J8,002 $18 ,111!3821 f25,424,8.j5 84,52t ,1E8
$'5,1111,105 $9,11'178£3 :~3,176/(7 3".fllil.m
av t0491G2 ..a,W.J,4J•;J $ST .114~~56 _ 6 20.(91
Service Efficiency
O,entlna&,..,.np., -Operatll'\1Et"1"1ttt Per
Vahle!■ R ..... m,e hlla VehlckR.,_,enu,e Hour
s; 34 s·uti.:.:::i
$!;IQ S:U.75
$7.03 .J• 11,46
I IDH 511!4.tU
$;JS s•h1.f3
'S2C7 161 i ?
f' Gi .__,9C8
F.c:Hlt)H.,11
StdOont
so
$2,231.Cl!I;
SS..wi'
SI ,071,77E
$5,138,77:l
I()
~ !Wt.lV"D
~ ..... ,
I.INlnk• Trip,
649,f!lt
5,I92,&l'A
38t,2o5
11,12uae
20.l<ltJ!iM
l ,W,:1114
&Ori, 1
Qher
$7
$26,913
$J
.SRR1Tl
$40,073
S'O.a4J
1,144.644
Amlual Vli'hitle
Rw•nu• r.'.ilM
91JL 101
5,401,987
-.:.,l:ll:l1,:3t-:>
B 569 20)
1,25:".754
6/151,812
39.451217
.....
CJmm.Jter ~
C~Jter !-ai
Cernarii..:Re::;µur1~
L.,.c!l~ail eu. v.,.,..1
f ord
'ToQ( L,;,,c;• $2149.6053 B0,1% t 2:r&
$0 h'at~'i:~l:-:;.rnf 311:t 11ies S571:!151' IA R%
$E.1il2.ol06 P\..'t.1lasej Trarq:iJrtakl'l $41181 3 33 1.5%
$,95,371 ~erCperetn ~ Cxp~ses Ul101 130 10,0% '\._ ... -$1~,610,9,:? Total Op11ratin11l::•lfl•~~ .. 11·,.oa 152 1m n%
$2E,424,92S =ieconc lrJ C€ :Dsh &:pcncij1 es Si1Sla554
$3,116,407 Pl.f'O"l3se::I Trai-:sp::,1t~IICff"
$07'"9-(Rr;r-on?ct Separat,etyf so
FIKff 'iWcleway Vehicles -'01 111,lti
/lnnualV.,..~11 OiN'C'tlcmAI for lhKimi...n Vlhlcltt: Op~ i n Pen1r1t Awras• f l•
~11•nu•Htun RoU1e Mks s .... 1ot Mul111 UM Strvlee Spa~Vtnlc-lH A.1elnV•rs•
35,;!16 0 .0 '6 4' 9911 l ◄.4
11111.888 174.5 "' 50 ""' 17 5
181.7<9 u.u HIS , ,u 3UI, 4 .1
~.638 UJB 117 JO l l i'i 17!
l.291.21S 9 A 515 ., . ,,~ u
1115,895 ~D rn 4 30 "°" 6-8
,2)1 • "Ill ,,. 11.ti 22
--Open:ina El(p-,s• pit
Ser-vie:• Brectl\1-enus
~xp..,INS:.,-Undnkecl TriPs-pe-,---l.Wlnk.:, Tiipt pw
Pan.,...-Mire
!'l 70
-s,)33
iol!iB
1036
i t 78
IU3 .•.
Unli nked Pc.HtnlW Trip
$15'17
$3 53
$51 17
$4 ,~
Sn! it•,.
'U(.
IJllhicle Revenue t.tfe Veh k leRewnn Hour-
U~ ~S
· .0 31 1
0.1 1 i
"2.1) 4&JI
'.2 ,~ 1
n? s s
~ 1 J S-
-Cpel1~0:,e,sap!rl.1!"t=ieRr.e.."W.le ~:Jllj ~!m!l)(f""PalsergerM~e: U'ttikt'1 Pa:s~e,·gu-·-n-.,?Ef ~t't • J:ierot:ingC~:r::trllper~,!~.J.t Cp~atin9.aq,e,,sie i:er.:im~il"N ·!.. Jrirlcd 7 :oxri:p-,ipw,VcNclr
Mle:&ta ':IH ~eve,ue Jllile'~ r-v .e·tJgT.RI ---l51R:a Re--'011..C Mie:l,V'tG• .. ,., ~~~~ .. ,.. ... .T.., •n I -~ I . ----'-----g 1-4
• •.,.. ~~1 ~ ...... ::I'" 4 0
2 •::I ---=-• a -;~ 4--4 t ~ :~ -::-s__ a
1 11
-
... L. -----------ro:u, L. -----------'yt $CW L. ___________ ,, L. ----,------,----"
--·• --0, 'I Q a ,-. fl' 10, ·1$ • f1 Oil:' l:l ~., •-"J,. .C --• lU 1'1 I.I I !~ • "' ,. It • ... ~ 11 1% d .M, 1!!11 '\'T .. iO t1 12 H ll ... 1f -'Oe.i1.::·rt.1 ~~F-01"'9!!-1.J>d(Of:lf1l rvtMJ!dr:a.u fl cl:±)IJJnJl"!fC'll(e-t!l.• cm..
APPROVEDJune2019 Addendum 2: Paratransit Costs 2019-2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South 41,678 Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2017 NTD) 358,645 Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (2017 NTD) 1,216,779 Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2017 NTD) ---------1,617,102 Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT 162,198 Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (2017 NTD) 10% Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and Light Rail
Approved September 2020 Addendum 3: Paratransit Costs 2020-2021 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South 41,128 Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD) 362,257 Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD) 1,243,058 Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD) ---------1,646,443 Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT 180,342 Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD) 11% Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and Light Rail
DRAFT for Spring 2020 Approval Addendum 4: Paratransit Costs 2020-2021 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South 35,315 Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 365,639 Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 1,291,215 Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) ---------1,692,169 Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT 181,749 Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (2019 NTD) 11% <-plug into cost calculator, cell B16 Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and Light Rail
DRAFT
SALT LAKE CITY ILA ADMINISTRATION PROCESS
For
ANNUAL BASELINE SERVICE REVIEW
1. As part of regular administration of this lnterlocal Cooperation Agreement, UTA and SLC will
annually review UTA's baseline service network:
a. After sponsored service has been operational for at least two full years, and
subsequently yearly thereafter, which is the average time for a new bus route to mature
and travel patterns to establish, and
b. Following a regularly scheduled update to the
on a two-year cycle.
2. Sponsored service will be considered to be fu e services if all the following
3.
arefouild:
a. The service meets UTA's current
i. if both the
ns1 (TPI) metrics
average weekday,
ende for weekdays, Saturdays and
ays of the week to be absorbed
rvice Plan, developed with a budget
ake City, includes the currently sponsored
agency's network.
ces necessary to absorb the cost of the sponsored service,
et resource capacity.
·u be made at the end of each sponsored service term and in
mileage, and leasing cost reconc iliations.
4. While sponsored y be absorbed into UTA's baseline service network, the cost of
vehicle lease payments associated with any sponsored service will remain the responsibility of
Salt Lake City until such time that:
a. UTA and SLC have jointly agreed that at least a portion of the SLC-sponsored service will
be absorbed into UTA's baseline service, and
b. UTA has identified an operational need for the additional vehicles to deliver the
agency's baseline service, or
c. UTA has determined that assuming full responsibility for the lease payments for
sponsored vehicles will offset the need to procure additional vehicles as part of the
agency's fleet replacement program.
Approved June 2019
Addendum 2: 2019 Baseline Service
Please refer to UTA’s August 2018 published schedules for Routes 2, 9 and 21
Route 2
SEE SOMETHING?
SAY SOMETll lNGI
b Q;tnbd UTA poll.it.
CaN: &01·281-DU (80l•2S7-l9'37}
Or fl:t½UtATtP'a nd yma-r .. tG '21463:7
INTERPRETER
K01 ·Rl 0HJTA
cal (801"7"4:3~3882)
Toll-r .. •(88&-,CJ-3882 ) _CIIS_..,..., ,, ~~
""''" OOlm&tlctWlt ....
HOW 10 USUM!l SOUi!Wll
b.1lffl'IM..,_\l~bDldanwiWll~WJ1111 t•
......... ',li,ll'l'linll 1'91"1--.1l•li ■P"lll•illfJaMI'
....... ~iD!l-i ...... 11t,,.,.,._wwil@.e!l ... -1 1,...i,
A Hlil h ,_p 11 l""!'Wilild I m ilt,.,I~ --,ll■t• 11 IM
!I~•~ ~1'1~Wi~~~
4 · .... r~N~Mr.
UT.-.:Mh'ICIDIUC'IOn
.._Gl-allril-11:ii\~ l,_"1.~■nd
~,_...~,,,,,IIIOl'.•Ul'/ttl011itl.JIU)
•Dlihi4"Sl'l !■i..c;-.ni,-•UfllltJJii\(9LVlo-,.~ .....
•fo:arl,1 .................. -.t.-'"iet-b,_.~ ~
~tQpllM1,HNiiMoplNll'llllfrMdl~~fl
~~Clorl)(lll.....r.t.,\WJ,.&Jlll,
•·~llyl;llll~1hlf-pi..~~
-•f a,~l')'rllef!IIIWOffl'llli~al-'4!11
l\!llfl.ffe'n/10.,,f'J~t/
••T"'1tllirllllllr,eSUl ·ltN2'5
WSTMOF°""°
w.bw/Soullt~I a::Jt-67t,,VO)llflll111t:J
ut,'li c-.r,i Mni1n-~n
Wt1Jlllll~y"3f.)JN.,_.
t,.-.JlltPflJ5»5
, ....
f.lbci l11r1i.~r-.. ~i.m.,p.
ACCH$1M.IJIJIVta WIM-l.~~'-""-....aitil••" .......
N1.-iw;11:I~~'"-~-,..,._
,:.-~~11111 r•GN(ihN1111L""",.i
... ll:'9h flt~ 111
tltAM'llltS ~P'J'l"ll!:l'll.,,11,...,""'"'-1.t•~rn
.....,lllndlM..'llllklllnt:,allftl l,i,,.,e1 r.a(l) JIii/nii
..... ,.,..~ lti.~il~l ....... 4Vf"llinb •lttt II"!• ,.,... N"""' W"f• • Int-,..Jl/ik altfl f.,.._
11tlr.10NIVS:ll
,~111:n-.. ._....,i~i..,ni..~ ,._., -....11.n,,.~ ........
fW•dlliO.,lda.,u,-CQm fWW.,l~ll!faronll_,.
,oo .....
Sa fi Ll lce CfnV'.111 St11kln
DoNnt.owns.tub
\lo!UC.,,,,,U,
Uol'IJNll!ldlal CMl llll'
UTAl(II
111!'11'?1
'/.I.I
BUS
WEEKOAYS
To Ce nt ral Point
S t a tio n
i ~ .i
~
2
1 I 1-= I "' 12. ,~ ~8 ~~ ~1 s~ ll !l ~~ ~~ ~~ Qa u~
---···------
539a
609
639
709
743
813
843
913
940
1010
1040
mo
1140
121cii,
1240
110
140
210
242
:m
342
◄12
444
514
544
614
~40_
S53a
623
6S3
n4
758
828
8511
928
9!i5
1025
1055
1125
TI55
ITT5r
12S5.
125
155
226
2S8
328
358
428 soo
530
600
629
~
559•
1529
659
729
803
833
903
933
1000
1030
1100
Jl30n
1200jl
1230
100
130
200
232
304
334
404
434
506
536
606
63-1
;l,09.
604• 61l7a 614•
~ 637 64~
704 1Cfl 714
733 739 i46
1109 813 820
1139 843 850
909 913 920
939 943 950
ll)(Mj 1010 1017
1036 1040 104?
n0o 1110 1111
1)36 1145) 1147
1206f: 1710p 1217p
1236 1240 1247
106 110 TI7
136 1'10 147
206 210 217
m 2•2 249
309 314 321
339 3'14 351
.-09 414 421
439 444 451
511 516-523
S41 546 553
611 616 623
6J<J 642 649
105 zoa ,11
To U o f U
t .,: J
.. I "' I -= 1 · I"' 1 .. -~j g~ lj ~~ •i tf !~ Q~ ~~ §~ §~ 3~
-----------
"621•
061
721
751
821
851
921
951
1021
1051
1121
1151
1221p
1251
121
151
221
251
321
351
421
451
521
ss:i
621
627•
657
m
757
827
857
927
957
1027
1057
1127
l15L
1227J,
1257
127
1?]
227
258
327
357
427
457
si,
557
617_
630• 636,
700 7<Mi
730 736
800 806
H30 836
900 -930 936
1000 1006
1030 1036
noo 1\06
mo 1136
1200i, 1206p
1230 12:Wi
100 106
130 136
200 "206
230 236
301 3 08
331 337
401 407
437 437
501 507
531 537
601 6/J1
631 fJ7
6431
713
70
813
643
913
943
1013
IOC
1113
1143
1213~
1243
113
143
213
243
313
3~2
412
442
512
S4'2
612
6~2
6;93 n,
759
829
659
929
959
1029
1059
1129
11S9
1229p
1259
1:19
1!59
229
2S9
!31
358
4Z8
08
528
5!8
lull
658
Fe, .....,...ttan C•UOl-Rlllf.\J IA (801-l'O· 311112)
..,--,lde S.h Lob ~""'I' 888•R 01:.\Jl ._ (81!8·1"!-1882)
w..w.rtdeuta.com
H OWTO USETMISSOIEDULE
Da:t.nrlrte )'Ollr ·drropo6nt hued on, wti-eri Y°" w.-nt to
feaw Of whet1 •f0U wan1 toilf1N'r..R•ad •·cross Nlr yout
du"t1t1~1on iiWlO ckMn fur-~ttrrr. and dfr11ctlon tf'tfiln~
.\ roui•f'l•P 11 prcw&deo to N!lp you ttla,e to tht-
1ft11e~:i ,t()Wf\, WIN!l-d.ay. 5"-'\UP'd.'?j & 51,mday t.thedules
dfffier lrol"'I one flnOther.
UTA S[IIVICE D IAECTIIRV
• Gmcnl lnto~~!lon, Sdle::Mn., Trfp pt-,,n1n,: and
CvstOfT'lff F•K1bacta B01•RIOC·UTA (.80'M~3·38Bl)
• Ou!slte S1H Lau Cou"'l'c,tl 886-~IDMJ1A (881-743 -
)88~
• for24 hout automat@d-sM--riat iot'rtllt bus available;
use optio,, L H.wt stop rti"'be, ilnd l df11t rot.rte
ne.mbto, (1,,u Oor-00 tf "-Mhr Is r,1)1 3 dltits.J
• P.;ss BY MaO fnfOf'r".UOO 8<Jl•262•.s626
• t-w Employmfflt Information pl•n• 'f'lstt
ht'co://WWW.tlc:tu.~lc,r11e,t,/
• , .... , ........ 801-287-22)5
LOST A~D FO~D
W.bovSouth a'"'" 801-626-1201 <>p11011 l
Utah C....myt 801-22)4923
sa1r1 .. o .. eo.....,,eo1-21!7-'IE~
F·"""1e: 801-281-5355
FARES
[>ea« Fare Is rtc~r•d, Farws iH 1,1,1e:.,c: lo ch.vi re, ..
ACCUSil~( SERVICI
W~eeldl.llt accesslble buses are tlVlllll*e. a,1 all route,
~'1ffl\ate-'ormilt sdlttc'ules a1e available upoo request
Telephar!e: corrm11nlcotfon foe deat/tin"'11 lmpeii'ec
..,....., lo .. .iloblo by dlaHn~ 711
111ANSF£11S
Upan paymertt~ 11 fM"O. au1n1•tt ls,ood fot u·wtt ll'l.,V
dlten1ort1 li'ldtldln& ,m.rn trlp1 for 1wo (2)fiours.vntfl ttte
ilmt «.L 1hit 11alue of a transfM 1o--afds • t~ or a "-Pf*
~xp tnslve: u rvlc.e Is UM re&Ut.-cash fare.
IIKES ON ausu
The Bliin on &LIH:I qr\'ice ls..avall.bt1 an Al bU$eS.
e-xcept P••m1nstt
H DLIDAfl
Plt6M (tied( t1debt.l.eot"' ~ ~~ldty .HnitC. l!'ffON1'3tlt'ir
9
'/.I.II
900 SoutlT
University Medical Center Station
University of Utah
East High School
Liberty Park
900SStatlon
Central Pointe Station
UTA @ BUS
lmt'll ........
D•U!-IN201'
Route21 2100 South/2 100 East
SUNDAY
Ta Crnt r•I Poin leSta1ion To Unl ••nity of Uhh
~11-1~ 1~ 1 ◄ 11 i ;!;1 .. .. 11 -ii-i~ i~ Jj H !i --~ALN~~ .. ~!.,, ii !!
w. .. ,. .... -.... -.... .... .., .., -"" .,, .,. ...
"'" ~ ""' .,,. ,.,. l0C
"" 11"' n .... ..MJ ,, ... ~.,. ..... Q35o u~ •1oi1p
OIi ..... ,.. ,., tll D5 UI ,., , .. ,,. lOt ~-"' rn .,. ,., ..,. "' ,Gt ... ·~ ... ,,. )'14 ,,. .., 500 ,.,. ,.. ... ·~ .,, 43!1 ... .,. "' 000 ... .... .,, .,. ffl .,. ,..
i:l: ii ,.. ... "" ~ 'ii' ii .,. ...
.. ~I
!i H .... 901, ... l-00/ .,.. "'I'
JtlS ,,.,,.
"""' IOI ,.. ,., , .. .. , ... ..,. ... '°" ,.. -m ...
II
~-c-u~~l C:.-Str.ion
111,9,P,lll
471 9111.
Roatla
SEE SOMETHING?
sAYSOMETHING!
1l> OOll!><t VTA polot:
C>it 80~l8MYES(601,281-39'37)
0, Tot UTAT\P a,nd ,OU,bp la lJ4fJ1
M°"'""'5
"' g
!
Rl2l8 Aid ___ ......,,
QOOS
17001
KOW''JOUH lMIIIOtlDUll
D.-...... ,..,.,,.,.,..._.,,.._,.."'_..,,_,~,•
t.w ...... .,.. ...... ,.w'1.wt,..,c,9q .......
c1a•1uu,.1,-,~bfrci--....,..••~QI.,.,.,.. ,,....,._,1.a,.,.,,.. .... ,. ;.i,,,..,""" ... t. .... ., ..... fll.li.._... ~S.IWW¥&~ ....... -dl...,..,_ __ ,__
UTA MIMU OUIICTOn . ,__. .... ......r""~ .. 'Mc,~ ......
o..-..,....*•u:icutA.(tOl'4lltt2'
• ll.Jl'16t'lil la.C.....ydllM9tlOfUTAffl8&,.JO' ...,,
• ....,t,.......,•WIOl'Nl'tfs~Wwt iut-,d11ll• _.,.,._., 11,-.t,lW..,-M3*"..._,
IHIJCIW t...O IWOO ,, Nl'OW It, ... I dlJ!lO,
• ,_ Ir ~1111 ~• &m-2'-I-SQt.
... ,~ ...................... 11
•u-wrfdMt~
•f...t~&cn-111»))1
LOn ANDfDWID
~ p,. J ... (ol111JU7 .,..--; '---" c.., so, 11.) ,,z,
aJ1 • .i,c,,,,,,,y,so,.;tt,. ....
,...,,.._lm-'lC7-SEi
rAMs
t.cl,_eb.ff'IUM,.._,,_ua,e11rv--.
ll~CZ.M~RVIU
~· ___,. .. ~ ....... ltMI-.... ~.
,..~.,.,.. ...... MW,i1 .. .,...,...a114illllll",..._
l....,.. ........... ,., .. v,i.,,.,1111111 ... _,.. ,..._i. .......... ..,, ...... rit
..,..., ...
~ .. ~ .......... ,..,.,. .. •&fl0'1l4o.,...,.,, ..
ntd""ttt-M. 'll'!Jd"\lf'et;fl"llt'";,,b-""9M1'ort"•r
tlwL-call U111._.-.. ,tni'lllilw1-191Mra.,_,
~ ~,.,.. ~• ;, 1\,"'1:,J1, c,lh •"'
■IC.SOHIUKJ ?\o.U.._.,...._~• ...... .Jflf•e'l °:..I~
-..,pt'-tr9~)
MOUDA'ts
,. .. »CMcM~CIMlorMlill'fwwl'dJMotwf-M
INTERPRETER
SOH!IDHJTA
c,j1 (80H43• l882)
11>11 f1M<U8'4.l J882l
-CII Nnodich'""' ... ,~ .. --,(;,'l tV VOolmelschlf" .. ,-
"l100 S..-111/2100 lllt
Centnl,alnraStaum 5-..,....,~
urww111:y or uUlh
'/Ill
U T A~ BU S ---
Route2
WEEKDAYS SATURDAYS
T0S1lt l.llkt To University To Salt Lake
Ce ntral Station Medical Center Central Station
'II/I
~ '5 s l ~ C e ~ 1 I ; f
V a ] V <
1 I 'I· 1·~1J ~!1:~1~~12U'j ,-1~1 1~~1~~1t .f ':I.,, -... ... • l I s.,;lUUU ):I ~di u ; ! .u ~ .. u u .a .. ,. .... -· ""' --.,.. "" -.... -.... .... .... ..,, . ., .. , ... ... lOO 610 "' .. .., 625 611 .,. .. , ,oo /0, ,,. ... .., .... .... '" m no '" 9N .. ,
n, ,., ru ns ,.. ... ... ... 1Q] nJ '°'' 10,C ,.,. ,.,. ,..,
111 Ml ,., '" ... ... !<RS Ill m m J\16 IJlG "l' 113' .. ,
7$1 ID m I07 "° 115 72, ,,, 7.17 ,., ,,,., WOp ~ 1ll'1p ,mp
I07 .,, ... 1%) 1)6 m ,,. , .. rn IOI 12" DO ... 13' ..,
l?1 12i .,. .,, ... ... 156 Oil! .. , .,, ll• llO ll4 2l9 "' .., .. , "" ISJ -,.. .,, "' 121 111 J26 ])O "' ... .. , .., ... ... "1Q ... .,. ... .., ... , .,. '30 ... ... •<7
!OIi .,, 916 tll 9>6 829 ffl .. , .,, t/11 .,. <JC ... 5l9 567
911 .,. 9JO ... ♦.lO .., .,. .., 101 .,, .,. 630 .,. 6)9 6'7 .,. .., ... ... -... ... .,,. ..,, '" 7l6 1lO ,.. ,,. 747 .., ... IOOO 100I .,,. .,. .,. ,,. . .. ...
11101 IOU I016 -IOl+ 929 931 •.i ••• .....
1022 '°'' .... 1CBI .... ... ... ... -,.,.
101II ,.., .... '""' -... -'"" ,.,. -To Unlvcr.s.ity --1IOO TIOI 1120 ,.,. .... 1029 1034 -Medical Center , ... 1111 ,,,. 112' !06 mt -,.., .... -'JI// 1122 TT26 11lO 11ll •;g_ 104i -.... 1104 m•
""' nu n .. -,, ... 10,i 11llll m, ml 112'
l!SJ-1!?• I uoo,. ,,.,.,. '"" '"' .,.. -""' "" J j I llOJo ,101r "" '"" "'' 1119 '"' ""' ,,.. ,, ... ,,,, "" m, UD ,,.. lW ~ 12CMO mC-
17.U 12'1 ,,., ,,.. "" .... _,,.,.,.,,., ,,,. 1221 ~j .. ~ .. !l jg 1m 12'1 ""' ,., ,,. '1210p 1719 1U4 mt ,,,. ii ii 102 107 m 119 01 122A 033 12.18 11,1 12SJ u
'" "' ,,,. '" Ma l)«J .... .... ~ .. ""' "" 111 '" "' ,., -,., ... nJ 1ZI 757• 80•• 8011 81•• 1:n, , .. "' ~ >OJ "' 110 "' ,,. "' ,,. 1>7 ... 101 ... ,m
,112 101 m ,,, "' '1lA U'.J UI .., ... 9S1 1006 I00II ,.,,. IO:!I
:nt DI ru m ... , .. ,., ,s; ,,. "" 1051 1,0, ~1• 12J..
a, n, iM1 ... ... 1,, ,.. ""' ,,. :DJ 115? 1204, U08o 111 .. Wlo ,.. ,., 15& JO] !1~ 110 ,,. lli m %19 1l51p ... IOI ,,. "' JOO ,.,, 310 "' "' m m "2311 , .. 1'3 "'' -'208 a,. z:n ... Jlt ... :m ... 240 "' ... 159 -lS1 30; :IOI ,,, 121
DO ... "° ,.. ... ,.. .., lol m m ]57 .... .... ... '71 -... ... .... .,. l10 11' 12• n, -. ., '°" IOI .,, "" 400 ,.,. ... ... ... 1" m 3111 Kl ... .., .... .... ... .,, ... .... .,, .., ... ,.,, ,.. .,. -l,E;1 -,.,. .,, . 721
4lO . ,., ... ... ,., b4 403 401 <ti 4ll ... ... ... 50.l ... ... ... .,. . .. ...
MIO so, ~· "' .., .,. ,(J3 .,. .... All
'" '" ,.. SD '" .... ... ... . .. -""' >1' ..., ... .., ... SW -;u SU ... ... ... .., ... 5111 .,. ,,. 5lU .. .,
""' ..,. ... .. . .., ., . ... ... ... ...
614 619 .,. 6D 145 540 .... ~ ;61 60II
t,,o 6"' ... ... IOI 0)4 "" o,n .,, ~ ... ... 164 103 ,,, '10 ... "' ., . ...
1W ,.. ,u r,u ,,, 6,6 ... ... .., ...
m 722 m ,,., , .. .... ... ... ... ,..
"' "' l<ll f>O .., to, 104 IOI nl m
"" ,., ,., .... ... 710 711 m m ...
1115 "" m .,. Ill ,,. 7l3 1l1 142 ,.,
................... ., ........ ...
Route 9 900 South
Medical Center
1 ' 1
1 \ ,-~
+ I ~ ,--L~~_,_ . . ~~ ·~1-~
j :~T
1
. 223. 228.313. _· 2~.3;-2
...W.--'-..da-a:J"~ ,-. -;--,-..,.1---. 455, 473 L c -rter r-cb ~-~~--~=::i;::::=:::J::::::C=:';::;r:~1b, ·_...,A__;,~~ Station
1--r-r-,....--t-r ;1 tid/ '1s1:ar ,....... ...... _ , , Rts. 17. 21. 213
. _ ~J ,nsfeqioioL rum , ion 473,902 0 South Station I I -. .I =>--"" .g Red Line
~ Red, Green lines ,--+ A'~ . + -~ i%" -!ii g>
+ ,.,__: ~'2. i:!s~ ""! fo7 -~µ !i a. _.I "Z ;L :.r.--'.""', ~ ;:; fl 9 > ~ ~ I o --t ~_., "-' ~o O--!:,l· r-'::-11:l ;§ o =>
0 900 s V, I O s w 1 II w -----.=-·-~----'
Station ~-~ -g) -LL == -~ ~.,;~---1'i:n e-
~ ~ TT1 r c...::r---"'~~a=f=r ~ .rl ,-., JL "' --1J!i1:_
---l-s:J
T f'~
I
Central Poilte Station , ,-,-,--, ]I'
uto Rts.1 7. 21 . / -1
~r-=~-an~d~S lines ,,J:::::;:;;;~:;b.c pZ]>-~~ . --~ 1-,,__
liNpOfflUJO•--ond ..., .. ,y .. loroodondtraflkcoowltioo,s
~,,, SEE SOMETHING?
SAY SOMETHING!
To contact UTA police:
Call: 801-287-EYES (801-287-3937)
Or Text UTATIP and your tip t o 274637
,unsiwAr(\\
INTERPRETER
801-RIDE-UTA
call (801-743-3882)
Toll-Free (888-743-3882)
~
lnlerprele □!.t lhoog dich Vien
$fl ~1 ;(l tumal! nepeBOll'-tlllK
,(:, I/ -,r I) 11 Oolmetscher .,..>a
WEEKDAYS
To Cl!fltr a l Poi nt• Station
.... .,,
i
H -711 ...
""
1Dl7l17f177071J
mn:Rl1'~KI
UJ ~ "Ml 1~ "l30 756
'117\1l'MM)~ttt
N1JOl!ll'U•tft20D
1!01!1 BD Q ffl ffl Ml .., "" "' JU l 't ♦,U
91' HJ '5f. w ,. ,u
,.,
"' .,, -,,, "" ...
,oe '" m ... ... ♦U t)8 ~ ..,
w,
$1
tJ8 ,..,, 958 ""' ..,. b! ()Of' IQ!)
,aoe W2J r.1Z1 IDJ2 JDJ5. lCMII
a,10..~'°'"''°'11(),0~
ID!! 'ml KM nm t1D5 nu
a.J noa mo m.
11mffl.lmlfll2.M5'1,ilt
ru.,-~ 1,,1.1 lHO mtt
16! roll Jl"'-,JIQlo_>t..,
':h':J?w :.,~ = '::.
12J-1: 12,t! Qill t»o \h ..
1U.t 124, lZ5" ns, IOI 107
u., ~ 1oit tn e» m , .. .. ,,. ... ....
2M
,Ult)'IH.1b1"1
l77k:M7'5015'
e,l'S7Xb10S~
~ 2U: 10 2Z> 22,
222127..il:UJ;lq
?J71'1201SOZW.
~Z,JIOOJOJlptl
~'i,llnW,t,~~
Joi m :s11 m !Jj "' ... )U ~)I, U) 141 ~ 1.11-., .... .aoi~-411
Ml £0' "" "" .UO ,111 -,n, .tu 4JO ~1 o,
.tl.~-$..WOM!t .... ~
u,, •• 4M'!,Q1IQl~t
MS',O,LS•SD S)OPI
fflSlll'-'2~~
»4 .S.I SG' 510 5'JI
t.JO~ ~M),1~ •n
Ht'7&201ll
""' 6.~ ,~ ,..,
~16'1td0b6
HA~1M1M
...... ""' , .. "' .,. l,.H ,..,
703 ,., ™ ,.,, m
,., ... 14'
anqsum "' ... .... ... .. ,
ll!l!&1ts!!~,«.ffl
kllt22t2tffltllMI
To Un1vtrslly of Utah
'Ol.,~S.'tl~!if'II\.U.
.st'~UJ'17H>._.,@
,,..VtO\.SJ~IOCt•1•
&0t O MIi "1 ,~ Ul
1116 120
"' ... ...... 6D ...
"''
611 610 M! ..., ... .,,.
'" IIIO "' JfflJD510971'ffl!J•
'""Q7~nt7Ul'!\.
m "' m "° m 1AJ • '" 1SJ JSI IOJ lll-
m .a t:os $1, ?t$ t,af
$'1♦t20WU1:t.Htit
IJI BliiDC.IJilft,18911
!A• ~ ,w Ui 1(1.! ~-
IOI '°' -9' .. W11 t,,,I
ll1 9l!i "Jl9 ......... -.... ""' ..,. mo ""
'iQ:11 10? ~ --..,.. "" nm noa
"'' nzCI ra.t 11'1 Mli nJI
llid mo 1"1
,io. '10,P 110IJ
u" U20 WJ
in, 11~ 1»1'1
~, mo taJ , ..... .. .,. ...
12] "' ,,, ...
!,U; l'..(I I~
,;g• KIOJ ~
IOU _,,. IMl
1023 ,an l>5f.
'9<' 1048 nn
,~ 1W).! m.,
ffll me ,,..,
n,z,. nu 11M
nu JW fl11p
Hit I~ WIii
nu, un 124,
ua WJ uw
""-' 12,&& lll
WA IOJ Ill
tGt 205 1os m ne '1'1
)1•»on1ntmM
l:1'Z112ltW)lt~
7i&' 1!'!0 ,._, 1" 1.CH u,
10IIO\.IOtt1(J1tW :n, 32'0 )2J )2t P4 1',1 u, 111 ........ lJt ¥4 )4' 41J
,~, .u, "°" ''"
iMn 4CII 401
•• 420 .. u
Cl1 Gl4"oMt~2
<Ml 450 <t6l
... \(IS ..,. * :.l.O !t2J
<i,)1 ~Ir; W'J:
... l&O ~
'" ~o ,11
M6 fM> 61
459 5,04 5l1
..... \19 W1
~, !t.S.& ~'
~ ~ ,.,
1,4, '°" 611
Ut f.-\4. 6'7
tM m. m
ffl735738J43'N6!G,1,
IG1tolQIU:Not.M
lllfRfflfflM6?2'
-.. -.. .., ......... --
SAnlRDAY
To Con tr.ii Po inte St a Uo n
.... ,,,
"' .,, . .,
"' .. ,
6':J/1 ,,, ,., .. ,,
.,,. ,., ,., .. ,
""' '"' '" m '"' ..,, 1011 "(127 lQJJ
10-ll Vbf llOJ
m, ,m nl]
-~t1SJ-1101p
1lTIJI: lUl,:i ll.lZ
., ..
136 I'll
lll'l,,.,.
1'5
m .... ...
IMS
-... ... -ffi --.... -"" ,... ""
ltt)(« 110h ,, .. -"'" .... ,.. ,, ..
'""' ,,.,
lN7 1;157 101 10,. lOf ...
kS
l1S , .. ,Ot ti. 111 1U tit
t)I 151, 2D'\ ~ 209
l!Ol:a.wn.m
J15 m 156 »'I ln6 :ii!
JMDS\J1l»lltUS
"" ...
<)I .,.
$34 ..,.
,,. .. ,
ifb 4J1i ... ...,
SD <>O
S!il "'°
.;, ""'
Q 1 09 f1i
... 4)f 4-'6 ....... ...... ...... ,,. ...
615 ... ..,
tY, Ill. /13 ffi (.16 ,~
To Uolvcn lty ofUt;ih
'/Ill
'Ill
,...
""' ,., -... . .. IJIS" 14.h ... .,, ..... ,
,... '"'
n "" ... .,,
"" .,, "" '" ,oos
•OIi ,,. .,, .... .., ... ...
,nn
1091 ...,
""' _,,,, ·~ .. 1ffl
""
!Oli
nos
~
"°"' ,, .. ,,,.
"' u,
-,m
noa
108
'""" ,,. ...
ll8
,., 105 ""
11' 1JS JJIJ
10U
'°" "" N.l
vu, ,,.,
tu
)43
m ,.,
301 m J OI J14
.I.A .U> :Ui 3,44
"'" -m•
"'" '""" ,,., ,., ,., ,,. , .. .,, ...,
,.,, .,,.
.JliL
~ ,,., ,,,
;,n
"' ••• ,m . ..,
•O'I .tOS •Ot .. ,. lt,lQ "' .. ,
'" -~ """ '" ·~ "' .., ~ ~ SOI 51 4
53'1 ~ ~ Su
eO, 605 6¢1 .-14
~6JS6.Jli-44
n1
ffl
... ... ... ... '" ,-u
1ll ... "' ... '13'
Approved September 2019
Addendum 3: 2020 Baseline Service
2020 Assessment of Sponsored Routes
Meets Meets Meets
Population Weekday Saturday Meets
Route BasedTPI PPH PPH Sunday PPH Baseline Service Adjustment
2
9
21
Weekday Miles
Route
2
yes yes
yes no
yes no
April 2019 August 2019
525 .23 603.81
Baseline Service Cost Adjustment
no
no
no
Delta
78.58
$ 4,446,268 original costs of sponsored service
no
no
no
*252 WKD
19,802.16
$ 4,290,092 new cost after baseline adjustment (-19,802 .1 miles)
$ 156,175 value of service being added to UTA baseline
UTA to absorb weekday route 2 miles into baseline service
Full city sponsorship still required
Full city sponsorship still required
August 2019 to August 2020 Comprehensive System Analysis
LEGEND
exceeds standards (under served)
meets standards
partially meets standards
does not meet standards (over served)
All-Day Service -Routes Serving Salt Lake City
Route Current Tier
2
9
21
33
1
3
1
1
People-WKD
Based TPI Pass/Hr
SAT
Pass/Hr
SUN
Pass/Hr
Draft for Spring 2021 Approval Addendum 4: 2021 Baseline Service Please refer to the UTA 2021-2025 Service Plan adopted on 2/24/2021 for UTA's baseline service. www.rideuta.com/serviceplan Summary: • The Five-Year Service Plan includes FTN level service on Route 2 on weekdays as part of UTA's baseline service level. • UTA made improvements to the span of service on Routes 2, 9, and 21 in August 2020, which are now included in the baseline at no additional cost to SLC. • Please visit this link to access route performance data on UT A's Open Data Portal. Annual August 2020 2021 2021 Baseline Sponsored Miles Total Miles Miles Miles 2 213,344 173,704 39,641 9 476,251 120,704 355,547 21 374,658 278,290 96,369 Total 1,064,254 572,697 491,557 <-plug into cost calculator, cell B13 Annual 2021 August 2020 2021 Sponsored Hours Total Hours Baseline Hours Hours 2 24,712.33 18,271.60 6,440.73 9 45,458.27 2,042.00 43,416.27 21 34,891.40 25,192.87 9,698.53 Total 105,062.00 45,506.47 59,555.53
APPROVED March 2019 Addendum 1: Mobilization 2019-2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South Feb Mar Apr May 4Mechanics $ 24,584 $ 24,584 $ 24,584 $ 24,584 2 Fixed Supervisors $ 13,832 $ 13,832 $ 13,832 $ 13,832 Operator Recruitment $ 30,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 TCC Dispatch 2 FTE $ 10,468 $ 10,468 $ 10,468 Operator Training $ 83,333 $ 83,333 $ 83,333 Operator Service $ 252,720 2 Para Supervisors Fuel/Parts/Ma int Vehicle Procurement Administration $ 17,104 $ 40,554 $ 33,304 $ 96,484 Total2019 $ 68,416 $ 133,217 $133,217 $ 385,937 Start-Up Start-Up Start-Up June Jul Sub-Total Admin TOTAL $ 24,584 $ 24,584 $ 147,504 $ $ 147,504.00 $ 13,832 $ 13,832 $ 82,992 $ $ 82,992.00 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 35,000 $ $ 35,000.00 $ 10,468 $ 10,468 $ 52,340 $ $ 52,340.00 $ 83,333 $ 83,333 $ 416,665 $ $ 416,665.00 $ 252,720 $ 252,720 $ 758,160 $ $ 758,160.00 $ 13,832 $ 13,832 $ 27,664 $ $ 27,664.00 $ $ 44,167 $ 44,167 $ 88,334 $ $ 88,334.00 $ 110,984 $ 110,984 $ 409,414 $ 409,414.00 $ 554,920 $ 443,936 $ 1,608,659 $ 409,414 $ 2,018,073.00 Operational Start-up-Expenses (Jan 2019 -Aug 2019) $ SLC Budget FYlS-19 $ Difference $ 2,018,073 2,863,000 844,927
VARIABLE VALUES $ 7.62 2.2% 2 Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue Mile, Bus Service (1) Annual escalator rate (2) Number of Years since NTD report I 20%1Administrative Discount (3) 503,359 Sponsored Revenue Miles: 200 South, 900 South and 2100 South ----------I 10%ISponsored Paratransit Service rate (4) I $ 2.50 I Fuel Cost per Gallon {Service Year Budgeted Cost) 5 Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon {adjust per vehicle type) I $ 53,000 !Sponsored Vehicle Lease Costs 10 Sponsored Vehicles ...._ ______ .... (1) NTD Cost per Revenue Mile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does include approximately 2% for capital maintenance {e.g. engine replacement, etc). (2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the PCE CPI over a twenty year period. (3) UTA will discount the administrative charges in proportion to the scale of the service increase in revenue miles. (4) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail. SPONSORED SERVICE COST $ $ $ 7.62 Most recent NTD Cost Per Mile -Bus Service 7.96 NDT rate Adjusted to Service Year Costs 6.37 Discounted NTD Adjusted to Service Year Costs 503,359 Sponsored Revenue Miles $ 3,204,886.18 Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 321,455.37 Add Paratransit Service 3,526,341.55 Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel 2.50 Fuel Cost per Gallon 5.0 Bus Miles per Gallon 503,359 Sponsored Revenue Miles 251,679.50 Total Fuel Cost 53,000.00 Per Vehicle Principal+ 4% Interest Rate, Annual 10 Vehicles needed for sponsored service 530,000.00 Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service 4,308,021 TOTAL
Approved September 2020 -COVID true-up Addendum 2, Amendment 1 Attachment B 2019-2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South Fuel True-Up Addendum Annual Fuel COVID-19 Addendum 2, Amendment 2 true-up Reduction 1 Cost per gallon $2.50 $1.59 $1.59 Fuel efficiency (mpg) s 4.82 4.82 Miles 503,359 511,664 288,760 Total Annual Cost $251,679.50 $168,785.43 $95,254.85 Total Monthly Cost $20,973.29 $14,065.45 $7,937.90 8 months (August-March) $167,786.33 $112,523.62 $112,523.62 4 months (April-July) $31,751.62 $31,751.62 Total Cost to City $144,275.24 Original Annual Cost $ 251,680 Reduced Annual Cost $ 144,275 Discount Amount $ 107,404 Fuel True-Up Detail Cost Per Gallon Vehicle Efficiency Diesel CNG Diesel 19-Jun 1.86 0.93 19-Jun 4.79 19-Jul 2.02 0.91 19-Jul 4.53 19-Aug 2.04 0.9 19-Aug 4.58 19-5ep 2.12 0.91 19-Sep 4.8 19-0ct 2.24 0.91 19-0ct 5.01 19-Nov 2.63 0.91 19-Nov 4.98 19-Dec 1.91 1.14 19-Dec 4.92 20-Jan 1.87 1.12 20-Jan 4.92 20-Feb 1.85 0.95 20-Feb 4.79 20-Mar 1.59 0.9 20-Mar 5.18 20-Apr 1.11 0.9 20-Apr 5.49 20-May 1.11 0.9 20-May 5.32 Avg Cost Gal $ 1.86 $ 0.95 Avg MPG 4.94 Weighted Cost per Gallon $ 1.59 Weighted Fuel Efficiency Diesel 70% CNG 30% TOTAL DISCOUNT $ 4,308,021.05 Original Addendum2 $ 569,637.63 Fuel+ mileage True-up $ 3,738,383.42 Adjusted Addendum 2 CNG Addendum 2, Amendment 1 Attachment A 2019-2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South Service True-Up Addendum Annual mileage COVID-19 Addendum 2, Amendment 2 true-up Reduction 1 Cost per mile $ 7.62 $ 7.62 $ 7.62 Annual escalator 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% number years since NDT 2 2 2 Administrative Discount 20% 20% 20% Miles 503,359 511,664 288,760 Total mileage cost $ 3,204,975 $ 3,257,852 $ 1,838,584 Paratransit rate 10% 10% 10% Total Paratransit Cost $ 320,497 $ 325,785 $ 183,858 Number Vehicles 10 10 10 Lease Cost $ 41,088 $ 41,088 $ 41,088 Total Vehicle cost $ 410,885 410,885 410,885 Total annual cost w/o fuel $ 3,936,357 $ 3,994,521 $ 2,433,327 Total monthly cost w/o fuel $ 328,030 $ 332,877 $ 202,777 8 months (August -March $ 2,663,014.22 $ 2,663,014 4 months (April -July) $ 811,109 $ 811,109 4.55 Total Cost to City without Fuel $ 3,474,123 4.12 5.18 4.2 Original Annual Cost $ 3,936,357 4.45 Reduced Annual Cost $ 3,474,123 4.33 Discount Amount $ 462,233 4.5 4.29 4.17 4.46 4.9 Service True-Up Detail (in miles) March 2020 Reduced Miles Miles 5.08 WKD 2 627.13 333.29 4.52 21 1123.52 593.59 9 1396.21 734.67 4.82 Weekday Daily Total 3146.86 1661.55 Annualized 793,008.72 418,710.60 SAT 2 658.53 388.97 21 1120.19 606.59 9 1414.01 762.67 Saturday Daily Total 3192.73 1758.23 Annualized 166,021.96 91,427.96 SUN 2 289.08 312.48 21 450.69 450.69 9 592.00 586.40 Sunday Daily Total 1331.77 1349.57 Annualized 69,252.04 70,177.64 Annualized Total 1,028,283 580,316 56.44% Sponsored miles 503,359 284,073 56.44%
Addendum 3 2020-2021 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South VARIABLE VALUES $ 8.06 2.2% 2 Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue Mile, Bus Service (1) Annual escalator rate (2) Number of Years since NTD report I 20%1Administrative Discount (3) 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles: 200 S weekends, 900 Sand 2100 S I 11%1Sponsored Paratransit Service rate (4) I $ 2.00 I Fuel Cost per Gallon {Service Year Budgeted Cost) 4.8 Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon (adjust per vehicle type) I $ 41,088 ISponsored Vehicle Lease Costs 10 Sponsored Vehicles .__ ______ .... (1) NTD Cost per Revenue Mile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does include approximately 2% for capital maintenance (e.g. engine replacement, etc). (2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the CPI-U over a twenty year period. (3) UTA will discount the administrative charges in proportion to the scale of the service increase in revenue miles. (4) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail. SPONSORED SERVICE COST $ $ $ 8.06 Most recent NTD Cost Per Mile -Bus Service 8.42 NDT rate Adjusted to Service Year Costs 6.73 Discounted NTD Adjusted to Service Year Costs 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles $ 3,309,486.04 Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 362,502.27 Add Paratransit Service 3,671,988.31 Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel 2.00 Fuel Cost per Gallon 4.8 Bus Miles per Gallon 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles 204,815.42 Total Fuel Cost 41,088.45 Per Vehicle Principal+ 4% Interest Rate, Annual 10 Vehicles needed for sponsored service 410,884.50 Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service 4,287,688.23 TOTAL
Draft for Spring 2021 Approval Addendum 4 2021-2022 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, and 2100 South VARIABLE VALUES $ 8.26 2.2% 2 Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue Mile, Bus Service (1) Annual escalator rate (2) Number of Years since NTD report I 20%1Administrative Discount off the 35% built into NTD (3) 491,557Sponsored Revenue Miles: 200 S weekends, 900 S, and 2100 S I 11%1Sponsored Paratransit Service rate (4) I $ 2.25 IFuel Cost per Gallon (Service Year Budgeted Cost) 5 Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon (adjust per vehicle type) I $ 493,061 !Annual Sponsored Vehicle Lease Costs 10 Sponsored Vehicles ..._ ______ _, (1) NTD Cost per Revenue Mile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does include approximately 2% for capital maintenance (e.g. engine replacement, etc). (2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the PCE CPI over a twenty year nprinrl (3) UTA will discount the administrative charges in proportion to the scale of the service increase in revenue miles. (4) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail. SPONSORED SERVICE COST $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8.26 Most recent NTD Cost Per Mile -Bus Service 8.62 NDT rate Adjusted to Service Year Costs 6.90 Discounted NTD Adjusted to Service Year Costs 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles 3,389,849.87 Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual 371,304.87 Add Paratransit Service 3,761,154.74 Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel 2.25 Fuel Cost per Gallon 5.0 Bus Miles per Gallon 491,557 Sponsored Revenue Miles 221,200.49 Total Fuel Cost 49,306.14 Per Vehicle Principal + Interest Rate 10 Vehicles needed for sponsored service 493,061.40 Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service 4,475,416.63 TOTAL
Addendum 5 1000 North Mobilization (122,274 miles, 22,918 hours) Monthly Cost Mobilization FTE/Unit Position/Item per FTE/unit January February March April May June July Total 2 Mechanics $ 7,192 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 14,384 $ 100,688 1 Fixed Supervisors $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 52,500 1 TCC Dispatch $ 5,234 $ -$ -$ -$ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 20,936 0 Para Supervisors $ 7,200 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -15 Operator Recruitment one time $ 3,000 $ 2,400 $ 1,800 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ -$ 9,000 15 Operator Training one time $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 45,917 $ 275,500 15 Operator Service $ 5,964 $ 14,910 $ 47,712 $ 59,640 $ 89,460 $ 89,460 $ 301,182 4 Vehicle Procurement $ 3,912 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,648 $ 15,648 $ 31,296 Sub Total $ 24,884 $ 70,201 $ 84,511 $ 121,347 $133,275 $178,743 $178,143 $ 791,102 20% Administration $ 4,977 $ 14,040 $ 16,902 $ 24,269 $ 26,655 $ 35,749 $ 35,629 $ 158,220 TOTAL $ 29,861 $ 84,241 $101,413 $ 145,616 $159,930 $214,491 $213,771 $ 949,322 Mobilization Milestone Invoices Month Expense* Admin Total 1/1/2022 $ 24,884 $ 4,977 $ 29,861 2/1/2022 $ 70,201 $ 14,040 $ 84,241 3/1/2022 $ 84,511 $ 16,902 $ 101,413 4/1/2022 $ 121,347 $ 24,269 $ 145,616 5/1/2022 $ 133,275 $ 26,655 $ 159,930 6/1/2022 $ 178,743 $ 35,749 $ 214,491 7/1/2022 $ 178,143 $ 35,629 $ 213,771 Subtotal $ 791,102 $158,220 $ 949,322 * Expense costs represent a not-to-exceed amount, invoices will be based on actual FTE hires.
EXHIBIT6
Timeline of Transit Programs
2017-2022
Why a Transit
Master Plan
::-::=.~::....:.:..-:-... .... ~-----'"" ho---------··--.. ---,.,___...,..__.,. .......... __ E:.::=::-..::..-=: -~ __, ________ _ ·--· -~----1-·-------~·· ~-
approves
Funding Our
Future sales tax
Top 4 Priorities of 2017 Transit Master Plan
1) Implement a Frequent Transit Network (FTNJ: Council's direction at the time was
phase 1 priority (Bus routes 2, 9, 21) & new routes on 600 North, 1000 North, and
400 South
2) Develop pilot programs for employer shuttles & on-demand ride services
3) Implement capital investments along FTN corridors
4) Implement a variety of transit-supportive programs and transit access
improvements that overcome barriers to using transit
FUNDING
OUR FUTURE @
UTA
Ongoing Implementation of 2017 Transit Master Plan
-FTN Routes & Marketing/Branding: Bus routes 2, 9, 21 plus additional routes
-Transit Improvements: Signal upgrades, ADA. bus stop improvements,
first/last mile enhancements, etc
-Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) & Trips to Transit (T2T):
Managing transportation to major employment centers & on-demand
microtransit pilot in Westside SLC neighborhood(s)
-Transit Staff: Positions supporting transit programs & public outreach