Loading...
Entity Staff Report - 9/8/2021COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: September 7, 2021 RE: Rezone: 554 and 560 South 300 East from RO to R-MU PLNPCM2020-00604 & 00712 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: September 7, 2021 Set Date: September 7, 2021 Public Hearing: Oct 5, 2021 Potential Action: Oct 19, 2021 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of property at 554 and 560 South 300 East from RO (Residential/Office District) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use District) and would amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The applicant is proposing to amend the Central Community Master Plan to designate the subject sites as High Mixed Use land use designation. The applicant is not proposing to alter the site in anyway at this time According to the Planning Commission Staff report, the existing buildings are used for offices and medical offices. Earlier this year a business license application for retail services was submitted. The application was denied because the RO district does not permit retail services. The proposed amendments are intended to allow retail service uses on the property, in addition to office use. Page | 2 Vicinity and Zoning Map (pages 2-3 of the Planning Commission Staff report) Page | 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pages 4-9 of the Planning Commission staff reports includes a discussion about three key issues identified by the Planning Staff. A short summary of those is provided below. See the planning commission staff report to view the full analysis. 1. RO and R-MU Zoning District Comparison Allowed Use Comparison The majority of land uses between the RO and R-MU zoning districts are very similar. The few notable exceptions are included in the table below Permitted / Conditional Land Use Table Comparison Zone Office Clinic (Medical dental) Tavern, Bar, Brewpub Mobile Food Business Reception Center Retail Goods Retail Service Assisted Living (large/Small) RO P P R-MU P P C P P P P P Building height for non-residential uses actually reduces the maximum building height allowed if the amendments are approved. Height and Yard Requirements Zone Building Height Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Non-residential RO 60’25’15’/25’25% lot depth Max 30’ R-MU 45’0’0’25% lot depth Max 30’ Residential RO 60’25’15’/25’25% lot depth Max 30’ RM-U 75’0’0’25% lot depth Max 30’ Page | 4 2. Compatibility with Master Plan Policies Planning Staff found the proposed amendments meet many of the initiatives identified in the Central Community Master plan and Plan Salt Lake such as: supporting commerce in Salt Lake City by encouraging a diversity of land uses, locating retail and other uses closers to residences which reduce energy consumption through making a wider range of uses accessible, and by reducing the number of vehicle trips thereby reducing the production of vehicle emissions. 3. Zoning Compatibility with Adjacent Properties The applicant is not proposing to alter the site in anyway at this time. However, the proposed amendments would allow for the future redevelopment of the site that would be considered denser and more urban oriented. The differences between the RO and R-MU center around the walkability and density allowed in the R-MU as well as an increase in the number of uses allowed, and that any potential development which will become available if the amendments are approved have been found compatible with the surrounding existing neighborhood. (Planning Commission staff report, page 9) PUBLIC PROCESS The public process is outlined on page three of the transmittal letter. It met the standard requirements of noticing surrounding property owners, informing the Community Council and a public hearing at the Planning Commission. This item had to go back to the Planning Commission for a new public hearing due to a noticing error at the first public hearing.