Transmittal - 12/13/2021
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 245
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114
TEL 801-535-6403
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: ___________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ______________
_____________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 13, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer___________________________________
SUBJECT: Chart of Accounts Update
STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson
Chief Finance Officer
Marybeth.thompson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Informational Item
RECOMMENDATION: None
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Workday ERP project is not just about implementing new
Finance and HR software but also improving how Salt Lake City does business. That is why the City
was deliberate in examining its current finance, human resources and payroll business processes
to consider needed improvements to meet best practices. It is also why the City has contracted
with the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) to revise the current Chart of
Accounts.
The Chart of Accounts is the collection of cost centers and object codes staff uses to track expenses. This
is a critical component for the Workday ERP project because the Chart of Accounts serves as the
foundation for the financial system and all financial transactions. A revised Chart of Accounts can not only
better track city expenses, it also helps budgeting and increased public transparency, all goals of the
Workday ERP project.
The Chart of Accounts revisions are not only critical to the Workday ERP project but are also vital as the
City moves into program and priority based budgeting. A revised Chart of Accounts will allow staff to
easily report out on leadership priorities with a cleaner, simpler structure.
Lisa Shaffer (Dec 15, 2021 15:29 MST)12/15/2021
12/15/2021
Chart of Accounts Update
Transmittal to City Council
December 13, 2021
Page 2 of 3
Chart of Accounts
The City is updating its business processes, policies, and procedures in accordance with industry
standards, along with the Workday ERP software implementation. GFOA has been contracted to support
the modernization and development of improved and consistent financial and human capital
management policies and procedures.
A core team of City finance staff and program managers have been meeting with GFOA since August to
review different aspects of the current Chart of Accounts. So far the team has met with every department
and is now reviewing different fund classes with department finance managers. During these meetings
the GFOA representative, Rob Roque, learns the City’s current structure and can share best practices for
the future structure. It is important that the new Chart of Accounts works for every department and
finance activity. It is also important that the new Chart of Accounts follows best practices to ease time
and confusion. The City team and GFOA are developing Chart of Account concepts and a base structure
that will be refined during the Workday design process that begins later this month.
Workday – ERP Software
Salt Lake City has chosen Workday as its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software vendor. Workday
will replace most of the City’s financial and human capital management systems, including OneSolution,
iCIMS, Kronos, CAMP, and more. Workday is being implemented in two phases. The first phase focuses on
HR and officially started in August 2021; “go live” for HR is planned for July 1, 2022. The second phase will
focus on Finance and Payroll which will begin in February 2022 with a “go live” tentatively scheduled
for January 1, 2023. For the Workday implementation to be successful, all employees need to be
comfortable using the new system in whatever role they fill. Workday training has been fully funded and
will be provided to all staff as the system is rolled out.
Part of the Workday ERP project is to create a common definition guide of financial terms commonly used
within the City. Two terms that will become a key part of the City’s lexicon moving forward will be
Program and Project. As existing efforts are assessed or possible new efforts are reviewed, it will need to
be determined if they are one of the two options: Program or Project. The current draft definitions are:
Program - Activities, operations, or organizational units directed to the attainment of specific
purposes or objectives. Example: Homelessness Services, YouthCity After School Program, Water
Conservation Program. Each program should have a service outcome (result produced). Typically,
programs are ongoing and not limited to a specific organizational unit. Programs help to create
transparency by showing what you do and what it costs, start discussions on trade-offs when
budgeting, provide comparisons, plan for changes in the workforce, and clarify the context of
performance and metrics. Programs are action-oriented, they are not a department, division, line
item, cost center or task.
Project - A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service or result. A project is
temporary in that it has a defined beginning and end in time. Projects are often used to track
activities with defined start and end dates or other events that would require additional detail
beyond the chart of accounts. Project costs would be summarized in this segment but broken out in
more detail in the project ledger. This allows for detailed tracking department by department.
Chart of Accounts Update
Transmittal to City Council
December 13, 2021
Page 3 of 3
Program and Priority Based Budgeting
Program based budgeting is a form of budgeting where budgetary information is organized around the
City’s programs and services. It shows the cost of a program, the revenue the program may generate, and
performance metrics to evaluate the program’s effectiveness. Organizing the information in this way,
rather than at the department and division level, provides a clearer picture of how much money is being
spent on each program, the services that program delivers to Salt Lake City constituents, and how well
the program is performing. Program Based Budgeting also allows staff to better track how the City is
meeting Mayor and City Council priorities and goals.
The new Chart of Accounts helps in the effort of modernizing the City’s budget process. Having common
cost centers, reduction of fund classes will allow staff to better report spending. The new structure will
also include program and project tags. If a program includes multiple departments or projects, program
costs can easily be reported.
The City is currently exploring priority based budgeting in relation to program based budgeting. Priority
based budgeting focuses resources into programs based upon community impact assessments and
engagements. Currently the City is working with a consultant, Resource X, to help it establish the
framework for priority based budgeting. An additional briefing specific to this effort may be requested.
To support this priority based budgeting framework, Salt Lake City commissioned Y2 Analytics to conduct
a survey of Salt Lake City residents to identify their budget priorities. The survey was in follow up to the
2021 spring resident survey and based questions on the Mayor’s 2021 Plan. Some key takeaways from
the survey are:
Quality of life remains stable with slight improvement in perceived value of tax dollar spending.
Of the three broad goal areas in the City’s budget plan, environment and sustainability is seen as the
most important among respondents.
Regarding growth and development projects, respondents say providing services and recreation is
most important and needs the most focus.
Water and air quality are top of mind for residents in thinking about environment and sustainability
projects.
General access to housing and helping the unhoused are top concerns for people regarding
community/neighborhood goals.
Many municipalities that use priority based budgeting include a public engagement element to their
budgeting process. Using Y2 Analytics allowed the City to know it identified budget priorities from a true
representation of Salt Lake City residents.
Notes:
Mary Beth Thompson and Rob Roque with GFOA plan on being at the table at the work session.
Attachments – Fall 2021 Budget Survey Report, Workday ERP Implementation Timeline
OFFICIAL FALL 2021 SALT LAKE CITY RESIDENT BUDGETARY PRIORITIES SURVEY
BUDGET SURVEYSALT LAKE CITY
SURVEY OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH GOALS
§Track health of the City and quality of life metrics
§Evaluate resident perceptions with regards to the following budget areas:
§Growth and Development
§Environment and Sustainability
§Neighborhoods and Communities
§Identify specific initiatives and projects with resident support
§Analyze specific trends and attitudes with respect to various demographic factors
such as
§Men vs. Women
§Whites vs. BIPOC (Black/Indigenous/People of Color)
§Income levels
§Time lived in Salt Lake City
§652 residents within the
boundaries of Salt Lake City
participated in this survey
§Data have been weighted to
reflect population statistics
from the U.S. Census’
American Community
Survey to ensure that the
sample is representative of
the City as a whole,
specifically regarding age,
city council district, race,
gender, and home
ownership.
§Margin of error +-3.8
percentage points
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
SAMPLING, MODE, & MARGIN OF ERROR
The raw frequencies and geographical distribution of our sample with regards to Salt
Lake City Council District are shown below. While certain City Council Districts appear to
be overrepresented in the sample, the responses were weighted to reflect observed
proportions of district residence in the publicly-available Utah Voter File.
N size
Weighted
Sample %
Census
Estimate %
47 10%10%
37 7 9
135 17 17
90 16 17
117 17 15
110 17 16
114 15 16
51.Quality of life remains stable with slight improvement in perceived value of tax
dollar spending.
When comparing quality of life benchmarks over time, key metrics have remained relatively stable,
with an average quality of life score of 75 out of 100. However, residents’ perceived value for tax
dollar spending increased slightly since April, indicating a positive trajectory for budget planning.
2.Of the three broad goal areas in the City’s budget plan, environment and
sustainability is seen as the most important among respondents.
Compared to other broad goal areas such as Growth and Community, Environment stands out as
both the most important to quality of life and in most need of the most improvement from the City.
3.Regarding growth and development projects, respondents say providing services
and recreation is most important and needs the most focus.
An overwhelming majority of residents (75%) consider supporting small businesses to be a high
priority project initiative. Residents also support projects that involve services and recreation such as
creating arts programs for youth and developing trails and trailheads.
4.Water and air quality are top of mind for residents in thinking about environment and
sustainability projects.
The vast majority of residents, around 75%, consider projects involving air quality and water
conservation to be high priorities. While air and water rise to the top of the list in terms of priority,
residents express majority support for most sustainability-related initiatives proposed by the City.
5.General access to housing and helping the unhoused are top concerns for people
regarding community/neighborhood goals.
While housing affordability is rated as the most important to quality of life, homelessness is
considered most in need of improvement. When considering specific project initiatives, preventing
homelessness and connecting the unhoused to shelters and resources are consistently ranked as
high priorities.
5 KEY FINDINGS TO REMEMBER
CITY HEALTH &
PRIORITIES
OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE AROUND 75/100
Respondents in Districts 6 and 7 rated their quality of life the highest (80.2 and 76.8, respectively), while individuals in District 5 reported their quality of life as the lowest,
right around 70. The average quality of life for the City overall was just under 75.
Overall Average: 74.6
Average: 73.1
Average: 73.0
Average: 74.6
Average: 73.2
Average: 69.9
Average: 80.2
Average: 76.8
Q: All things considered, on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 being very low and 100 being very high, how would you rate your overall quality of life in Salt Lake City? (n = 651)
MOST RESIDENTS GETTING GOOD VALUE FOR TAX DOLLAR
The majority of residents (64%) feel like they are getting at least a good value of service for their tax dollar. Only a small percentage (6%) feel as though they are getting
poor service. The percentage of residents who say they are getting a “good” or “excellent” value for their tax dollar is up 7 points since April of this year.
Value for City tax dollar
Year Excellent +
Good
2015:66%
2017:70%
2019:60%
2021 (Spr.):57%
2021 (Fall):64%
Excellent Good Fair Poor
64% Total Excellent + Good
+ 7 points since Spring 2021
Q: In general, how do you rate the service you receive from Salt Lake City for your tax dollar? (n = 651)
WASTE CLEANUP & GREEN SPACE IMPORTANT SERVICES
When asked to describe the city services that have the greatest impact on their quality of life, residents have positive things to say about the City’s efforts to conduct waste
cleanup, develop green space, and maintain good road conditions (among other services). Areas in which residents express the greatest frustration crime, road safety and
the City’s approach to dealing with homelessness.
“Green space designation/maintenance/development, city
planning and urban development, governance over social
spaces, sanitation and public health, road maintenance.”
“Basic services… have the greatest impact,
[such as] composting (sic), recycling and garbage.
Quality of water and service is excellent. Road
maintenance is also great. Appreciate the new
curbs and sidewalks in our neighborhood. We also
use the foothills almost daily.”
“Control of the homeless
population, crime prevention,
traffic, air quality, noise and
light pollution, parking.”
“I am grateful for the
high quality of schools,
libraries, parks, fire
departments, public
health, and law
enforcement services!”
“Crime prevention is of course the
utmost importance, from policing on
the streets and through out the
community to the prosecution of those
crimes which have been committed.”
*Word cloud only contains words repeated 5 or more times
Q: Thinking generally about the responsibilities of city government, what things does the City do that impact you, personally, the most? Please briefly describe your
thoughts about the services or amenities that have the greatest impact on your overall quality of life in Salt Lake City. (n = 612)
ENVIRONMENT MOST IMPORTANT TO QUALITY OF LIFE
When comparing broad city priority areas, a plurality of respondents (42%) said that environment was the “most important” to their quality of life. Growth was broadly seen
as the least important priority area. Community was considered roughly equally important and unimportant by respondents.
17
-18
2
Net score
Q: Of the following city priorities, which is the most important to your quality of life? Which is the least? (n = 651)
Q: Of the following broad city priorities, which do you think the city needs to improve most? Which do you think the city does best? (n = 651)
17
-18
2
Net score
MOST/LEAST important to
quality of life
Net score6
3
-9
City does BEST /Needs MOST
improvement
CITY INFRASTRUCTURE MOST PRIORITIZED
City infrastructure, homeless services, and public safety were the top goals/priorities for respondents, with these areas receiving the most allocated” funds. Digital
accessibility, economic development, and equity and inclusion were the least prioritized areas.
$16
$14
$14
$15
$7
$9
$6
$5
$5
$4
$2
$3
Average $ amount allocated % of people who allocated >$0
Q: Imagine you were managing $100 from the Salt Lake City budget. If you could distribute that $100 toward any of the following potential goal areas or priorities, how
would you divide your $100? (n = 651)
GROWTH &
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES & RECREATION MOST IMPORTANT TO GROWTH
When asked about various growth initiatives, residents said that providing services and recreation was both most important to their quality of life and needed the most
improvement from the city. The initiatives supporting economic development and emphasizing arts and culture were seen as both less important to them and less in need
of attention from the city.
Q: Of the following aspects of growth and development, which is the most important to your quality of life? Which is the least important? (n = 568)
Q: Of the following aspects of growth and development, which do you think the city needs to improve most? Which do you think the city does best? (n = 564)
MOST/LEAST important to
quality of life
41
-18
-23
20
-14
-6
Net score Net score
City does BEST/Needs MOST
improvement
SUPPORTING SMALL BUSINESS HIGH PRIORITY FOR RESIDENTS
When asked about relative priorities regarding growth and development in Salt Lake City, 3 in 4 respondents said helping small businesses is a high priority. Other popular
projects had only narrow majority enthusiasm, such as developing and supporting arts programs; developing trails; helping cultivate community pride; and increasing
opportunities for participation in arts, culture, and recreation.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to growth and development in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this should be a
high priority, or a lower priority as the City works to expand culture and commercial opportunities for all residents. (n = 563))
Category:
Economic Growth
Arts and Culture
Services and Recreation
Innovation
% Who say project is a high priority
(top 10 initiatives)
GROWTH PRIORITIES DIFFER BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
There are some noticeable differences in development project priorities across different demographic groups.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to growth and development in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this should be a
high priority, or a lower priority as the City works to expand culture and commercial opportunities for all residents. (n = 563))
•Women are more likely
than men on average to
rate all projects asked
about as high priorities
across the board
•73% of women think art
programs for youth is a
high priority, compared
to only 53% of men
•71% of women think
community pride is a
high priority, compared
to only 53% of men
•65% of white
respondents think
developing trails and
trailheads is a high
priority, compared to
56% of BIPOC
•64% of BIPOC say
developing
infrastructure for online
learning is a high
priority, compared to
only 49% of white
residents
•71% of respondents
making less than
$75,000/year say art
programs for youth is a
high priority, compared
with 59% of those
making between
$75,000 and $150,000,
and only 47% of those
making $150,000 or
more
•Only 49% of long-time
residents (20 years or
more)say developing
trails is a high priority,
compared with around
70% of the rest of the
respondents
•Similarly, only 38% of
long-time residents say
making Library Square
a civic and cultural hub
is a high priority,
whereas about 60% of
all other residents say
the same
RESIDENTS SEEK TO BUILD COMMUNITY & CONNECT THE CITY
Only about 70% of respondents had suggestions beyond the projects already proposed by the City. Among those respondents, the most common issues mentioned
included building permitting, cultural events, city walkability, and further development of arts and culture events in the city.
Q: Are there other aspects of growth and development in Salt Lake City that you think the City should focus on to expand culture and commercial opportunities for all residents? (n = 509)
“City-sponsored
community events like
cleanups.”
“The city could do more to make
the city more walk-able and bike-
friendly.”
“Make cultural events more
affordable. Most things are
not feasible for my family
“I am not in favor of expanding growth and development within
the city. More development results in more congestion and
more pollution.”
“Infrastructure for
roads and
transportation should
be a focus as we grow.”
ENVIRONMENT &
SUSTAINABILITY
AIR, WATER QUALITY AFFECT MAJORITY OF RESPONDENTS
When asked about various environment and sustainability measures, a majority of residents said the most important aspect is air quality and efficiency, which is also
considered to be the most improvement by the city. Water conservation was also seen as important and in need of improvement. Sustainable infrastructure, emergency
preparedness, and re-using and recycling opportunities were seen as far less important.
MOST/LEAST important to
quality of life
City does BEST/Needs MOST
improvement
49
23
-11
-25
-35
48
15
-10
-23
-29
Q: Of the following aspects of the environment and sustainability, which is the most important to your quality of life? Which is the least important? (n = 578)
Q: Of the following aspects of the environment and sustainability, which do you think the city needs to improve most? Which do you think the city does best? (n = 575)
Net score Net score
RESIDENTS FAVOR WATER AND AIR INITIATIVES
When asked about environment and sustainability priorities, 3 in 4 respondents said that protecting water and air and implementing water conservation programs was a
high priority. In fact, of the top 5 priorities selected by respondents, 4 of them had to do with water and air. Relatively speaking, most infrastructure and emergency
preparedness initiatives were seen as low priorities by a majority of respondents more generally.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to the environment and sustainability in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this
should be a high priority, or a lower priority as the City works to protect our natural resources, advance development, and address climate change. (n = 574)
Category:
Infrastructure
Water
Air and Energy
Re-use and Recycling
Emergency Preparedness
% Who say project is a high priority
(top 10 initiatives)
ENVIRONMENT PRIORITIES DIFFER BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
There are some noticeable differences in environment project priorities across different demographic groups.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to the environment and sustainability in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this
should be a high priority, or a lower priority as the City works to protect our natural resources, advance development, and address climate change. (n = 574)
•Women and men are
about equally likely to
see the various
environment projects as
high priorities.
•80% of women think
enforcing commercial
waste ordinances is a
high priority, compared
to 69% of men
•74% of women think
resilience to extreme
weather events is a high
priority, compared to
65% of men
•White respondents are
more likely to see water
conservation and
enforcing commercial
waste ordinances as
priorities (91% and 77%)
than BIPOC (79% and
66%)
•77% of BIPOC
respondents say
improving resilience to
extreme weather events
is a high priority,
compared to only 66%
of white residents
•Both lower-and higher-
income respondents
were more likely to say
renewable energy
incentives for new
buildings is a high
priority (76% and 84%)
than middle-income
respondents (66%)
•83% of those making
less than $75,000 call
enforcing commercial
waste ordinances a high
priority, compared with
65-70% of those who
make more
•Only 73% of recent
move-ins (5 years or
less) say water
conservation is a high
priority, compared to
about 90% of all other
residents
•Only 55% of recent
move-ins say improving
resilience to extreme
weather events is a high
priority, compared to
around 70 to 75% of all
other residents
XERISCAPING, RENEWABLE ENERGY ADDITIONAL CONCERNS
Only about 72% of respondents had suggestions beyond the projects already proposed by the City. Among those respondents, the most common issues mentioned were
water conservation, air quality, electric vehicle incentives, xeriscaping, and renewable energy alternatives.
Q: Are there other aspects of environment and sustainability policy in Salt Lake City that you think the City should focus on to protect our natural resources, advance development, and address
climate change? (n = 525)
“Decreasing food
waste.”
“I think water conservation is
very important and the worst
waste of water is landscaping.”
“Electric vehicle
[incentives].”
“Offer to help citizens that want to add solar and/or
other environmentally impactful upgrades to their
homes.”
“Air quality and water
conservation are the very
most important things the
city needs to work on.”
“Options
for xeriscaping”
NEIGHBORHOODS
& COMMUNITIES
HOUSING & HOMELESSNESS NEED IMPROVEMENT
When asked about the relative importances of community and neighborhood development areas, housing affordability, public safety, and homelessness were selected as
most important to peoples’ quality of life. While housing affordability was likewise identified as an area where the city needs to improve, homelessness has the highest net
score, indicating that residents widely agree that the city needs to improve in this area.
MOST/LEAST important to
quality of life
29
11
19
-10
-7
-19
-23
Q: Of the following aspects of neighborhood and community development, which is the most important to your quality of life? Which is the least important? (n = 583)
Q: Of the following aspects of neighborhood and community development, which do you think the city needs to improve most? Which do you think the city does best? (n = 583)
29
-13
41
-16
-13
-13
-14
Net score Net score
City does BEST/Needs MOST
improvement
RESIDENTS FAVOR INITIATIVES THAT TACKLE HOMELESSNESS
Of all neighborhood and community initiatives posed to our survey sample, preventing homelessness among low-income families was most-often selected as a high
priority. Projects that deal with homelessness are the top two priority projects selected. Thereafter, respondents also expressed concern about increasing affordable
housing, investing in neighborhoods with high incidence of crime, and effective use of abandoned properties.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to communities and neighborhoods in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this should
be a high priority, or a lower priority as the City works toward safe, affordable, and equitable neighborhoods. (n = 571)
Category:
Homelessness
Housing
Public safety
% Who say project is a high priority
(top 10 initiatives)
DIFFERENT COMMUNITY PRIORITIES FOR DIFFERENT GROUPS
There are some noticeable differences in community project priorities across different demographic groups.
Q: Below is a list of potential projects related to communities and neighborhoods in Salt Lake City. For each project below, please indicate whether you think this should
be a high priority, or a lower priority as the City works toward safe, affordable, and equitable neighborhoods.. (n = 571)
•Women are more likely
than men on average to
rate all projects asked
about as high priorities
across the board
•81% of women think
providing better
continuity in healthcare
for at risk individuals is a
high priority, compared
to 71% of men
•White respondents are
more likely to see
connecting the
unhoused with services
and shelter as a priority
(92%) than BIPOC (81%)
•BIPOC are slightly more
likely to see transitioning
abandoned properties
for community use and
providing better
healthcare continuity for
at risk individuals as
high priorities (84% and
80%) than whites (80%
and 76%)
•Lower-income
respondents (less than
$75,000) are more
likely to see increasing
access to safe, quality
housing, replacing
affordable housing
units, and developing a
rotating winter shelter
program as high
priorities (92%, 83%,
and 81%) than higher-
income earners (about
82%, 72%, and 70%)
•About 93% of recent
move-ins (less than 5
years) say transitioning
abandoned properties
for community use is a
high priority, compared
to about 78% of all
other residents
HOUSING, HOMELESSNESS, & POLICING AMONG TOP CONCERNS
Only about 71% of respondents had suggestions beyond the projects already mentioned. Among those respondents, the broad issues of mental health/social resources,
developing neighborhood-level civil society institutions, and zoning ordinances were top of mind for many respondents.
Q: Are there other aspects of neighborhood and community development in Salt Lake City that you think the City should focus on to create safe, affordable, and equitable neighborhoods? (n = 516)
“More LGBT outreach
programs for youth.”
“Reduce homeless
camping and increase
police presence at public
places and parks.”
“Encourage civil
interactions through
neighborhood councils to
prioritize needs in
neighborhoods.”
“Work on homelessness by addressing root causes.”
“Affordability is key.
…luxury apartments being
built at the detriment to
neighborhoods. Low
income families are being
forced out.”“Mental health services.”
Kyrene Gibb, Scott Riding, & Kelly Patterson, Ph.D.
y2analytics.com | (801) 406-7877
SAMPLE COMPOSITION
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTIONS
Male
47%
Female
46%
Gender Race
Age Range
No
50%Yes
50%
LGBTQIA+
No
76%
Yes
17%
N = 549
N = 548N = 548
N = 549 Non-binary 2%
Prefer not to say 5
Census
Estimate
Men 51%
Women 49
Census
Estimate
White 65%
Hispanic 22
Asian 5
Black 3
Pacific Islander 1.6
Native American 1.5
Other 13
Census
Estimate
18-34 43%
35-44 18%
45-54 13%
55-64 13%
65+14%
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTIONS CONT.
Time lived in SLC
Marital Status
No
50%Yes
50%
Number of Children
N = 549
N = 549N = 549
Religion
N = 549
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTIONS CONT.
Rent/
other
46%
Own
54%
Household Type Educational Attainment
Employment
No
50%Yes
50%
Income
N = 549
N = 549N = 544
N = 549
Census
Estimate
Own 48%
Rent/other 52
Signature:
Email:Garrett.Danielson@slcgov.com