Transmittal - 8/15/2022ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 15, 2022
Dan Dugan, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPC2020-00335/00334 Capitol Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master
Plan Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner, Planning Division,
daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com or 801-535-7165
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the proposed ordinance with conditions as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The property owner, Ivory Development, represented by Peter
Gamvroulas, is requesting to amend the zoning of the property
located at 675 N F Street from the FR-3/12,000 "Foothills
Residential District" to the SR-1 "Special Development
Pattern" zoning district. The owner is also requesting to amend
the corresponding “Future Land Use Map” designation for the
property in the Avenues Community Master Plan (1987) from
“Very Low Density” to “Low Density” so that the master plan
will correspond with their requested low-density zone.
The applicant is requesting the amendments in order to
accommodate additional homes on the site. Under the current
zone, the maximum number of homes allowed is 11 homes. The subject property at 675 N F Street
is outlined in yellow on the above map.
8/15/2022
8/15/2022
Under the proposed zone the maximum number of homes allowed would be 27. Under each
scenario the homes could include ADUs. Realistically, through the normal City subdivision
process and without additional special approvals, such as a Planned Development, the site can
likely only accommodate around 9 homes under the current zone and 18 homes under the proposed
zoning. The development potential of the site under the current and proposed zoning is further
discussed on page 4 of the Staff Report.
The applicant has formally submitted Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision plat
plans to the City for consideration. Those plans propose 19 lots and include requests for
modifications to dimensional regulations to accommodate the number of lots. At least 14 of the
homes would include an ADU. Those plans are located in Attachment C and C.2 of the Staff Report
linked below. These plans are still pending consideration by the Planning Commission and require
some revisions before they can be considered by the Commission.
The key differences between the existing and proposed zones are the lot size requirements for
single-family homes, which are 12,000 square feet per lot with the current FR-3/12,000 zone and
5,000 square feet per lot for the proposed SR-1 zone. The zones otherwise have similar regulations
for setbacks and building coverage. Each zone allows development up to 28' in height. A
comparison of the zones is included on page 6 of the Staff Report.
The Commission considered a number of factors in their positive recommendation for the rezone
and those are detailed in the Staff Report linked below. These include the minimal impact the
additional homes would have on the neighborhood, surrounding similar zoning, lack of
displacement, current housing market conditions, and adopted City policies supporting additional
housing where it can be compatible with neighborhoods in both the Plan Salt Lake and Growing
SLC plans.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
The applicant submitted the amendment requests in May 2020. The Planning Division started an
early notification public process at that time, sending notices to the local community council and
nearby property owners and residents. The proposal went through multiple iterations with multiple
rounds of public notice and public input since that time. The applicant also met with the Greater
Avenues Community Council multiple times.
The Greater Avenues Community Council provided multiple letters in opposition to the proposal.
A new recognized organization, the Preserve Our Avenues Zoning Coalition (POAZC), which was
organized in response to the zoning proposal, also submitted formal input in opposition to the
proposal. Virtually all the public input received was opposed to the request, with over 600 letters
provided in opposition and less than 20 letters provided in support. Many of these letters were
provided by the same individuals over the course of multiple versions of the proposal. A petition
opposed to the first iteration of the zoning amendment was circulated by the POAZC in 2020 which
received over 2,000 signatures from across the Avenues.
A detailed overview of the two-year public process is in the Staff Report under “Community Input
and Public Process” on page 8 of the Staff Report. Responses to recurring concerns received about
the proposal are located in Consideration 6 on page 19 of the Staff Report. A slide highlighting
only immediately adjacent property owner concerns is located on slide 19 of Exhibit 3a.
Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on June 22, 2022. Notice of the
public hearing was sent via e-mail to the Planning listserv and to 406 e-mail addresses, including
all persons and organizations who had contacted City Staff about the proposal over the course of
the public process. Notices were also mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of
the proposal.
At the public hearing, 51 people provided comments, including two persons representing the
GACC and POAZ. Four people spoke in favor with the remainder speaking in opposition. Speakers
and comments are summarized in the minutes linked below. Generally, commenters expressed
concerns related to impacts of the proposed density, such as compatibility with the neighborhood,
traffic, and parking. Comments were also provided related to concerns with the associated
development plans.
Following the hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the public input, adverse impacts,
ownership, use of potential accessory dwelling units, neighborhood context and compatibility, the
level of density change, traffic, site conditions, the proposed development plans, the need for
additional housing, current housing conditions, and changes to City plan policies. A more detailed
summary of the discussion is located in the minutes. Following discussion, the Commission voted
to recommend approval of the amendments with conditions, with eight commissioners voting for
the amendments and two against.
Recommended Conditions
The Commission included two recommended conditions of approval. These conditions are:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most property
line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of any
homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from the
corresponding rear or side property line.
The conditions are intended to ensure compatibility of any development on the subject property
with the 35' rear yards of the adjacent west properties and were recommended by Planning Staff.
For context, the FR-3 has a 35' rear yard requirement and does not allow buildings in the rear yard,
whereas the SR-1 zone has a percentage rear yard requirement, which can go as low as 15', and
allows accessory buildings in rear yards.
Planning Commission (PC) Records for June 22, 2022 Meeting
a) Agenda (Click to Access)
b) Minutes (Click to Access)
c) Staff Report, see below for additional attachments (Click to Access)
a. Attachment B: Applicant Materials/Narrative
b. Attachment C.2: Full Size Landscape Concept Plan
c. Attachment K.1 & K.2: Public Comments Part 1
d. Attachment K.3 & K.4: Public Comments Part 2
e. Attachment K.5: Public Comments Part 3
EXHIBITS:
1) Ordinance
2) Chronology
3) Planning Commission Public Hearing Additional Materials
a) Planning Staff Presentation Slides
b) Applicant Presentation Slides
c) Additional Public Comments Received After Report Publication
d) Postmarked Public Notice
4) Notice of City Council Hearing
5) Original Petition
6) Mailing List
1. ORDINANCE
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2022
(Amending the zoning of property located at 675 North F Street
from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to
SR-1 Special Development Pattern Residential District, and amending
the Avenues Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 675 North F
Street from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special Development Pattern
Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00335 and amending the Avenues
Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00334.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 22,
2022 on an application submitted by Peter Gamvroulas (“Applicant”) to rezone property located
at 675 North F Street (Tax ID No. 09-30-455-021-0000) (the “Property”) from FR-3/12,000
Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special Development Pattern Residential District pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00335, and to amend the Avenues Community Master Plan Future
Land Use Map with respect to the Property from Very Low Density to Low Density pursuant to
Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00334; and
WHEREAS, at its June 22, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said applications, subject
to conditions to prohibit accessory buildings in rear yards along the west most property line and
require a minimum 30' setback for second levels of homes along the west most property line; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby is rezoned from FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District to SR-1 Special
Development Pattern Residential District, subject to the condition identified in Section 3 herein.
SECTION 2. Amending the Avenues Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use
Map of the Avenues Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the
future land use designation of the Property identified in Exhibit “A” from Very Low Density to
Low Density, subject to the conditions identified in Section 3 herein.
SECTION 3. Condition. The zoning map amendment and master plan amendment that
are the subject of Petition Nos. PLNPCM2020-00335 and PLNPCM2020-00334 described
herein are conditioned upon Applicant restricting the use of the property by means of an
appropriate instrument recorded against the property in favor of Salt Lake City Corporation that
does the following:
1. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located along the west-most
property line of the subject property.
2. Where the west-most property line is a rear or side property line, the second levels of
any homes located along that rear or side property line shall be setback at least 30' from
the corresponding rear or side property line.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The city recorder is
instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until the condition identified above has been
met as acknowledged by the director of the Salt Lake City Planning Division.
SECTION 5. Time. If the condition identified above has not been met within one year
after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause
shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the condition identified above.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2022.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2022.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance amending zoning and MP 675 N F Street
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
August 4, 2022
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned
and Subject to Avenues Master Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment:
675 North F Street
Tax ID No. 09-30-455-021-0000
LOT 1, CAPITOL PARK AVENUE EXTENSION SUBDIVISION.
2. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Capitol Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment
May 1, 2020 Petition submitted by applicant requesting to rezone the property to FB-
UN1 and amend the future land use map of the Avenues master plan to a
corresponding designation.
May 11, 2020 Application assigned to City Staff.
May 27, 2020 Proposal posted to City Open House webpage. Minimum 45-day notice
period starts. Public notices were sent to recognized community
organizations, listserv, and nearby property owners/residents.
July 1, 2020 Applicant attended Greater Avenues Community Council meeting and
presented their proposal. Staff also attended meeting and presented on the
process and standards.
August 5, 2020 Applicant attended the GACC for a second time to present their proposal.
GACC holds vote on the proposal with 688 opposed and 4 in favor.
February 1,
2021
Applicant submitted revised concept plan. City Staff sent an e-mail update
to all persons who had contacted City Staff, providing 45 days for additional
public comments.
March 3, 2021 Applicant attends GACC meeting and presented revised proposal. Staff
attended to answer any questions.
March 22, 2021 Applicant revised requested zone to SR-1, Special Development Pattern
Residential. Staff sent an e-mail update to all persons who had contacted
City staff, providing additional time for public input.
April 7, 2021 GACC held a vote on the proposal at their meeting, with 1244 opposed and
25 in favor.
November 29,
2021
Applicant submitted associated Planned Development and Subdivision
applications to the City. Minimum 45-day notice period starts. Public
notices were sent to recognized community organizations, listserv, and
nearby property owners/residents. E-mail notice also sent to all persons
who had contacted City Staff regarding the rezone/master plan amendment
proposal.
January 5,
2022
Applicant attended GACC meeting to discuss Planned
Development/Subdivision applications. Staff also presented on the process
and standards and answered questions.
June 9, 2022 Public notices provided for Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments.
Public notices sent to property owners/residents within 300 feet, posted on
City webpage, sent to City listserv, and posted on State public notice
website. E-mailed notice also sent to all persons who had contacted staff
regarding the proposal for the property.
June 17, 2022 Staff report published recommending a positive recommendation for the
zoning map and master plan amendment with conditions.
June 22, 2022 Planning Commission holds a hybrid in-person and virtual public hearing
on the zoning map/master plan amendments and passes a motion to send a
positive recommendation to the City Council with conditions. Motion
passed with 8 Commissioners in favor and 2 opposed.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
a. Planning Staff Presentation Slides
PLANNING COMMISSION // JUNE 22, 2022
CAPITOL PARK COTTAGESZONING MAP AND MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT
675 N F STREET
PLNPCM2020-00335/00334
•Two requests:
•Zoning Map Amendment
•From FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential
District
•To SR-1 Special Development Pattern
Residential
•Master Plan Amendment
•From “Very Low Density” to “Low
Density”
•Intended to accommodate 19-lot single-family
development plans (Planned Development and
Preliminary Subdivision)
Recommendation: Staff is recommending a favorable
recommendation to the City Council with conditions
REQUEST
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONTEXT
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Salt Lake City // Planning Division *Development agreement limited these RMF-35 properties to “low-density,” a lower number of units than otherwise allowed
ZONE INFORMATION
•FR-3 vs SR-1
•Lot size/density -min. 12,000 vs 5,000 sq ft
•3.6 (7.3) vs 8.7 (17.6) dwelling units per acre (w/ADU)
•Theoretical limits:
•FR-3: 11 lots
•SR-1: 27 lots
•Practical limit (estimate):
•Impacted by min. lot size, width, public street requirements,
private street access limits
•FR-3: 9 lots, 18 total dwelling units (5.6 du/ac)
•SR-1: 18 lots, 36 total dwelling units (11.2 du/ac)
•Higher lot counts would require discretionary modifications
to lot dimensions through Planned Development
•Applicant concept plans are 19 lots with ADUs on 14 lots
(33 total units)
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
DENSITY COMPARISON
Maximum 16-lot single-family development potential for typical
Avenues block due to min. 50' lot width. Theoretical limit-21 lots.
Major Differences:
•Lot size/density -min. 12,000 vs 5,000 sq ft
•3.63 (7.3) vs 8.7 (17.6) dwelling units per acre (w/ADU)
•Rear setbacks -min. 35' vs. min. 25%, as low as 15’
•Buildings not allowed in FR-3 rear
Similar:
•Heights:Both 28'
•Building coverage: Max. 35% vs 40%
•Effectively 5% more open space required in FR-3
•Front setbacks: Both 20'
•Side setbacks: 10’/10’ vs 10’/4’
•ADUs: Attached ADUs allowed by right in both zones
•Parking: 2 stalls per home + 1 per ADU
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
FR-3 VS SR-1 ZONES
Standard FR-3 SR-1
Min. Lot Size 12,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft
Min. Lot Width 80 ft 50 ft
Min. Front Setback 20' or average 20' or average
Min. Rear Setback 35'25%, min. 15' to max 30'
Max. Building Coverage 35%40%
FR-3
SR-1
•Consistency with adopted City plans and policies
•Consistency with zoning ordinance purposes
•Effects on adjacent properties
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONSIDERATION STANDARDS
•Consistency with any applicable overlays
•Adequacy of public facilities and services
Ultimately up to City Council discretion
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Effects of zone on adjacent properties is a consideration
Rear Setback Difference:
•FR-3 -35' and no buildings allowed
•SR-1 -25%, min. 15', up to 30' (ex: 25' for 100' deep lot)
•May be as close as 15’
•May impact privacy of rear yards and sense of openness
Recommendation:
•Min. 30' rear setback for second story
•No accessory buildings in west rear yards
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
SETBACK DIFFERENCES
Northpoint Drive
F
St
r
e
e
t
Private Yards
Private Street
•More units bring more traffic
•How much traffic?
•Applicant provided traffic study showing low impact to
neighborhood.
•Will account for 5% of traffic at nearby F Street intersections
•Adding less than a second to wait times at intersections
•Accidents
•Very low number of serious accidents on or near F Street over
time
•Given relative low increase in traffic, Staff would not
anticipate substantive impact
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
F
St
r
e
e
t
•Sister zone (SR-1A) mapped across adjacent blocks to
the east and nearby blocks to the south
•Difference is lower max. height (23' in SR-1A vs 28')
•Density/lot requirements are the same
•Compatibly interfaces with FR-3 along 11th, 12th, and
13th Aves
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
ZONE CONTEXT
•Proposed plan density is ~10 du/ac
•Practical limit (~11 du/ac)
•Similar to density of many blocks in Lower Avenues
•Other nearby blocks would meet or exceed if ADUs were built
in existing homes
•Examples of low scale, single-and
two-family dwellings on nearby
blocks with similar existing density
•Compatible with surrounding
properties.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
DENSITY CONTEXT
❶F Street & 10th
❶
❷F Street & 9th
❷❸
❸D Street & 9th
•Avenues Master Plan (1987)
•Future Land Use map –“very low density”
•Supports larger lots in foothill areas
•“Low Density” on former BYU property (incl. subject site)
•Citywide Plans
•Housing Plan (Growing SLC, 2018)
•Policies intended to ensure low-and moderate-
income housing is in the City
•Supports aging in place with diverse housing choices
•Identifies large lot sizes as a barrier
•City General Plan (Plan Salt Lake, 2015)
•Supports finding ways to accommodate new housing
growth and new housing types where it can be
compatible throughout the City
•Housing market has changed significantly
•Amendments warranted given level of zone change,
changed conditions, and changed citywide policies
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CITY MASTER PLANS
•Concerns with many rezones:
•Displacement
•Gentrification
•Loss of neighborhood character defining buildings
•Large, vacant lot without these potentials
•High opportunity area with good access to jobs,
schools, parks, services
•Good location for additional families
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
VACANT LOT INFILL DEVELOPMENT
•Applicant has submitted formal Planned
Development and Subdivision plans
•Not for formal consideration tonight
•Provided for context
•Building height compliance issues due to
slope, may require revisions
•Height can’t be modified in a PD
•Requesting modifications to setbacks, lot
frontage (private street), grade change limits,
retaining wall height limits
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
•Considerable amount of public input
•Proposal has changed over time, with multiple rounds of comments
•Originally FBUN1 -> Changes to concept plans -> Change to SR-1 -> Formal Planned Development plans
•Vast majority opposed (~637 comments), less than 20 comments in support
•Opposition petition estimated at >2,000 signatures opposed
•Recognized Community Organizations:
•Greater Avenues Community Council provided multiple letters opposed
•Preserve Our Avenues Zoning Coalition also provided opposition letters and petitions
•Variety of concerns related to increased density of zone
•Support development with existing zoning
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
PUBLIC INPUT
Zoning Specific Comments from Adjacent Properties
•West Homes*: Preference for 35' rear setback from 1 owner
•East Homes*:
•Concerns with density, traffic, vehicle access from 2 owners
•Concern with original FB-UN-1 zone from 1 owner
•South -Meridian Condos HOA -Concerns with density, vehicles,
character, use of their private road
•Capitol Park HOA –(Homes on Capitol Park Ave) –Similar
concerns
•North -Northpointe Condos HOA –Similar concerns, also with
north adjacent reduced setback, traffic, fire access/safety related
to F Street and off-site parking
Planned Development Comments
•Concerns with reduced setbacks, grade changes, open space,
vehicles, parking, service logistics, and loss of trees
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
PUBLIC INPUT
RECOMMENDATIONS
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Staff recommends a positive recommendation to the City
Council on the zoning map and master plan amendment request
with conditions:
1.Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in rear yards located
along the west-most property line of the subject property
2.Where the west-most property line is a rear property line, the
second levels of any homes located along that rear property
line shall be setback at least 30' from the corresponding rear
property line.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
RECOMMENDATION
QUESTIONS
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
Daniel Echeverria // Senior Planner
daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
b. Applicant Presentation Slides
Capitol Park Avenue Rezone
675 North F Street
1977 Current
The current zone is outdated and no longer
reflects the current site conditions or values of
Salt Lake City
At Current Zone, the
physical constraints of
the property would
limit development to
nine 1/3 acre lots.
“Density and compact development are
important principles of sustainable growth,
allowing for more affordable transportation
options and creating vibrant and diverse
places” (pg. 9)
“Barriers such as density limitations,
prohibitions on different types of housing,
and other development regulations, have
contributed in part to a general supply
deficit and economic segregation” (pg.11)
The current zone is
outdated and no
longer reflects the site
conditions or values of
Salt Lake City
The requested rezone is
modest while creating
an opportunity to
remove density barriers
and promote a more
diverse housing stock
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
c. Additional Public Comments Received After
Report Publication
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) DO NOT allow Capitol Park Catastrophe
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 8:06:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:William LiLg
To:Planning Public Comments
This is markeOng. This is not like any part of The Avenues, paSerned, repeOOve housing, red
brick. This a cheap Disneyesque unimaginaOve package of BULL SHIT. We have small streets,
impacted by hospitals, canyons, and we have reached capacity. This property could support real
architecture, new, not hermaphrodite history, Please do NOT support this latest packaging. They
are hoping you and this community will Ore and roll over. When they bring quality we will know
and support it, second or third best is not good enough.
Some one got Ored and allowed “The Hardison” to be built on Historic South Temple and it will
forever be an eyesore. DO YOUR BEST for the city.
William liLg
121 D Street
SLC, Ut 84103
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 2 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) NO! Support for Capitol Park POS
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 7:46:56 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:William LiLg
To:Planning Public Comments
MarkeOng! This is a sales job, clear and simple. Simple? Where in the Historic Avenues could you find
paSerned small houses in mass? Red brick? This is another insult to my community not part of us! It is them
trying to bring Daybreak’s Disneyesque housing to a small piece of land. Maximum density and more. We
have small narrow streets, trees and need to encourage families. NIMBY I wouldn’t wish this at Mar-a-lago!
They
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 5 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 675 N F Street Zoning Plan and Master Plan amendment request - Deny
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:07:52 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Russ Norvell
To:Planning Public Comments
To: Salt Lake Planning Commission
From: Russ Norvell
As a nearby homeowner and full-Ome resident, I oppose Ivory Homer’s proposal to rezone the 675 N F Street
property in order to develop it far beyond that which is already allowed under FR-3 zoning. I encourage the Planning
Commission to do the same and not give a favorable recommendaOon to City Council for three reasons:
1) The two Staff recommendaOons do not begin to address the long list of issues- legal, transportaOon, strategic
planning, and cultural character - that have been idenOfied and documented;
2) Amendments to the Strategic Plan and to zoning rules can and should be made - when they meet the intent of the
amendment guidelines. This proposal does not, and giving a favorable recommendaOon sets precedent that will
erode the Commission’s ability to execute its mission in the future;
3) Too big and too many is too much. Ivory’s design is a fat man in a bad suit.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 6 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Ivory Homes Development
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 8:20:57 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Adrienne
To:Planning Public Comments
Planning commission:
As a neighbor of the proposed ivory home planned development, I want to share my concerns as follows:
1. I believe that neighbors in the area have bought property based on existing zoning laws and to that end, a change in these
laws deserves much scrutiny. From my perspective, the developers have not made the case that this change is warranted
and thus the city’s agreement with current residents (existing zoning) should not be broken. As proposed, not a single unit
meets the zoning requirements.
2. I see that part of the planning commission’s justification for recommending this change is that SLC has a tremendous
housing problem - especially lacking low-income housing. If the described change were for low income families, this would
offset some of my issues personally (e.g., increased traffic). Given that the majority of the proposed houses are 3350 sq ft,
with three-car garages, the idea that this model fits in with the type of housing needed in SLC is ridiculous.
3. The design that includes 17ft retaining walls is an aesthetic disaster as is removing trees that include active raptor nests.
Thank you,
Adrienne Cachelin
510 E 14th Ave
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 7 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:50 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Holly
To:Planning Public Comments
My greatest concern for this change in zoning is the traffic increase. We have already had bus service reduced
significantly and constant traffic specifically in this area is noOceable and a problem. Roads are in disrepair
with only bandaid maintenance over recent years Water use is another concern and hopefully restricOons
and restraint would be designed into the landscaping.
Sent from my iPad
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 8 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 8:37:36 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:pamellagl
To:Planning Public Comments
Dear Members of the Planning Commission. Please deny the request for Capitol Park CoSages. I live in the Avenues
and request that you deny the rezone! NO to REZONE!
Pam LiLg
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 9 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 7:11:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Bonnie Bowman
To:Planning Public Comments
Please, DO NOT APPROVE! A disaster.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 10 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) I strongly appose Ivory Home plan in the upper Avenues.
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 6:30:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:PaSy Philpot-Stewart
To:Planning Public Comments
The Penny Lane development was a mistake. Traffic in the Avenues is already unmanageable.
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 11 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) No Support for Capitol Park CoSages' latest proposal
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 5:31:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Carol Moss
To:Planning Public Comments
I wish to state that the plan being presented is not good for the neighborhood. It will put
extreme demands on the resources of the neighborhood, namely with traffic, parking,
busing, fire fighting when needed, privacy matters, and will not truly address the city's
need for more housing. The prices of these homes will be very much out of the price
range that middle class homeowners can afford.
The zoning requirements that are in place at this time are part of a well planned
neighbor that was built with this specific zoning in place. It's a beautiful neighborhood
that I suggest your members visit and assess before making a decision on the upcoming
request for change in zoning, which will overpopulate the property in question.
Our wish is that the proposed building company of Ivory be satisfied with the current
zoning laws and you allow the laws to remain in place.
Thank you.
Warmest regards,
Carol Brennan Moss
Brian H. Moss
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:43:02 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 12 of 12
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park CoSages
Date:Monday, June 20, 2022 at 5:05:28 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:HELEN HODGDON
To:Planning Public Comments
I don’t support this project. I own a coSage on D Street. Keep the Avenues historical please. I think this
project is really just about greed. Thank you.
Helen Hodgdon
230 D Street
Slc, Utah. 84103
Sent from my iPhone
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 13:00:23 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 1
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for today's Ivory Homes proposed rezoning hearing
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 8:52:42 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Beth Chardack
To:Echeverria, Daniel, Wharton, Chris
I am in strong opposition to the proposed zoning and masterplan changes in the upper
Avenues by Ivory Homes.
According to the City’s zoning code, “The purpose of the FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential
District is to promote environmentally sensitive and visually compatible development.” This
means that high density urban zoning does not belong on the Ivory parcel. Our masterplan
exists to uphold that continuity and preservation of the neighborhood. The proposed zoning
would set dangerous precedent for future building and would invite others to disregard the
integrity of the zoning code and masterplan. These documents exist to preserve our
neighborhoods and must be kept intact.
In addition, building ADUs onto proposed new higher density construction just adds fuel to
the fire. It is my belief that Ivory Homes is bastardizing the intent of the ADU, by calling the
extra units they are hoping to build ‘ADUs’, instead of simply calling it what it is: higher
density housing. This change in nomenclature is merely a guise so Ivory Homes can
maximize profit without regard to the consideration of carefully thought-out plans and
regulations put in place years ago by professional urban planners, meant to protect
homeowners and neighborhoods from this very situation. Let’s allow these documents to
preserve our neighborhoods and natural areas.
The protection offered by the Foothills preservation zoning must mean something, and failure
to enforce the current zoning deems the very work of the Planning Commission irrelevant.
Ivory’s proposal would have a serious negative impact, without providing benefit to the
neighborhood or consideration to preserving the natural area around it. Ivory has failed to
prove that their project deserves deviation to the planning and zoning goals of the City and
the Avenues. This site is zoned for eleven homes (plus allowable ADUs), which is the
maximum that should be allowed on this site. The request to change the zoning code and
masterplan by Ivory Homes is misguided and should be denied.
Thank you.
Beth Chardack
BA, Political Science, University of Michigan
MA, Urban and Regional Planning, George Washington University
MA, Public Administration, University of Utah
563 Cambridge Cir
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Dear Planning Commission:
My husband and I are long-time residents of the Avenues. We strongly object to Ivory Homes’ current
request for rezoning at the property located at 675 N ‘F’ Street. Ivory is requesting a rezone from FR-3
to SR-1. This will reduce the minimum lot size to only 5000 sq ft. They are also requesting an increase
from 11 to 19 homes. Moreover, Ivory plans to include 14 or so ADUs. That’s a total of 33 new living
units. That’s not suitable for the Avenues. The intent of allowing ADUs to exist was to provide help for
individual homeowners who felt the need. The intent was NOT to help a developer make more money
on less land. Ivory’s rezone request is altogether too dense for this location.
As you are well aware, zoning regulations exist for a reason. If zoning regulations can be changed
whenever a developer wants to change them, what good are they? If the proposed changes were for the
good of the community, maybe that would be a reason to approve a rezone. Well, in this case, the
rezone is definitely not for the good of the community. This is totally obvious if you look at the results
of past votes taken by the Greater Avenues Community Council (GACC) [1244 to 25 against rezoning].
The rezone would only be for the good of Ivory Homes, so they could squeeze more money out of their
intended project.
We are concerned about growing traffic on our Avenues streets. These streets were designed and built
many years ago. They were not built for heavy usage. They already present risks at 4-way corners.
So much additional traffic from the proposed over-populated cottages would exacerbate the dangers.
Then, because we are at a higher elevation than most parts of Salt Lake City, the risks get even worse
on snowy or icy days. In addition, we are an active neighborhood, with many walkers and cyclists.
Please notice our attempts at “traffic calming.” We don’t need more traffic to add more danger for
pedestrians!!!!!
Ivory’s request is not compatible with the ambiance of our neighborhood. Two of the aspects we most
love about the Avenues are the relative quiet of the neighborhoods and the presence of older,
individually-built homes, each with their own unique characteristics. These proposed homes do not
align with that vision. According to Ivory’s plans, there will be minimal setback and minimal
greenspace. There are even a number of lovely mature trees that would be removed. That’s bad for
wildlife, bad for aesthetics, bad for our quality of life, and not suitable for the Avenues.
In summary, Ivory Homes’ request for a rezone at 675 N ‘F’ Street lacks a logical basis for approval.
Please do the right thing and do not approve the request.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn Clark
929 N Terrace Hills Dr
SLC UT 84103
1
Clark, Aubrey
From:Courtney Henley <courtney.henley@icloud.com>
Sent:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:24 PM
To:Planning Public Comments
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Opposed to Rezone of 675 N F Street
I am strongly opposed from the depths of my body and spirit to the application to amend the zoning of the property at 675 N F
Street from the FR‐3/12,000 (Foothills Residential) zone to the SR‐1 (Special Development Pattern Residential) zone to allow three
times the number of lots to be developed.
The proposal by for profit Ivory Homes out of southern Salt Lake County is an insult to our local community in Salt Lake City. Ivory
Development currently has no stake in the future prosperity of the local community and seeks to maximize profit by negating
decades old community master plans. For more than 40 years the Avenues community has been committed to honoring and
preserving it’s low density urban/rural character. For 20 years my family has dedicated our lives and livelihood to cultivation of low
density nature loving development on our property at 13th Ave and J Street. It would be a betrayal for city planners to throw away
all of my family’s and neighbors' hard work.
Every aspect of the 1987 Avenues Community Master Plan would be violated by the applicant's proposed development: it is
incompatible with the historic district nature of the community, it includes multiple‐family dwellings out of character with the
neighborhood, it will cause dramatic increases in traffic congestion where there is none, it will destroy the ultimate parks and
recreation spirit of the rural/urban Avenues by developing precious avian nesting habitat, it would violate the proposals for
streetscape improvements that are less concrete and steel and more trees and open space.
For 40 years the community has supported the City Acquisition of Foothill Properties via agreements with Salt Lake County, the State
of Utah, and appropriate agencies of the Federal Government to ensure that public properties in the foothills are not sold to private
interests without giving the community an opportunity to purchase the property. This is a precedent that should apply to a deep
pocketed community organization like the most recent owner of the property ‐ the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ‐ a tax
exempt organization as beholden to the welfare and spiritual nourishment of citizens as a county, state, or federal agency. When a
tax exempt church sold the property to a private interest for profit development it violated a sacred trust with the community. How
to restore this trust? The property in question should be zoned Open Space, Foothills Protection, or Public Lands. These are the
only master plan amendments that would honor the vision of the Avenues Community Master Plan.
Courtney Henley
635 J Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
801-502-9523
courtney.henley@icloud.com
1
Clark, Aubrey
From:Smith Douglas <swimdocdoug@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:41 PM
To:Planning Public Comments
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Capitol Park Cottages
As a long time Avenues resident and property owner, I am totally AGAINST the proposed rezoning to allow the
development of the misleadingly named Capitol Park Cottages. This would add density and traffic to the neighborhood
in ways that would be detrimental to the local quality of life. Thank you for allowing me to share my views. Doug Smith,
MD
From: Tyler Jack
Date: Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:21 PM
To: Echeverria, Daniel
Subject: RE: (EXTERNAL) setbacks question
I wanted to shoot you one last note to remind you why I am against the re-zone. If you don’t remember
I live on the west side of the subject property and I do not want the re-zone simply because I’d like the
set-backs to stay at 35 ft. I think the project will be nice but I just don’t want another home less than 35
feet from my property line.
Thanks again for your consideration,
Tyler Jack
Manager - NMLS 132155
P: F:
www.frontlinefinancial.com
[Secure Upload]
This message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or
proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or believe that
you have received this correspondence in error, please delete this email.
June 21, 2022
To:
Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner, Planning Division
Chris Wharton, District 3 Council Member and City Council Chair
Opposition to Ivory Homes Amended & Supplemented Rezoning Application
for 675 North F Street
Petition Number: PLNPCM2020-00334/00335/0034, PLNPCM2021-00656,
PLNSUB2021-01175, etc.
I am still very adamantly opposed the rezoning of 675 N. F Street property from FR-3/12,000
to SR-1 or any other zone other than the existing zoning.
I have lived at 790 Northpoint Drive for 21 years.
My home is directly across from the 675 North F Street Rezoning application.
I recommend Ivory Homes develop their “new-build, in-fill, planned community that
incorporates Accessory Dwelling Units” under the current foothills zoning goals.
Any zoning change will result in an overly dense and possibly a high elevation development.
Reduced setbacks to the north will impinge on the Northpoint Estates community.
Development will not help in providing affordable housing to those in need; the cost will be too
high, public transport is not available & amenities are not in walking distance.
No zoning change is needed to develop . The existing zoning adequately allows for ADUs while
also limiting over-dense construction.
This additional amended concept does not represent a substantial difference in creating a
development consistent with the existing foothills neighborhood density; nor does it commit to
a specific build density.
As a resident and very concerned citizen, I urge you to oppose the Ivory Homes rezoning
proposal for 675 North F Street. It is deleterious to my home and community.
Please support this community and represent the needs to the SLC Counsel to deny the
zoning change.
M Lisa Larriva, directly adjacent resident
790 Northpoint Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:12:40 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 1
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Rezoning 675 North F Street
Date:Friday, June 17, 2022 at 4:47:23 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:Julie Mackie
To:Echeverria, Daniel
Dear Mr. Echeverria,
I am wriPng to oppose the rezoning of the property at 675 North F Street. If the city and neighborhood feels the
need to rezone, it should be done through changing Master Plan with the coordinaPon of the city government and
neighborhood. Changing zoning for the whim of a developer cannot be good city planning. I understand the desire
for higher density, but, this should be done on a Master Plan level and not piecemeal where a developer feels the
profit.
Please do not consider this. It is not in anyone's interest but the developer. Reasons to deny this amendment have
been put forth to you many Pmes and I only want reiterate my support to deny Ivory Development a zoning change.
Thank you,
Julie Mackie
685 G Street
June 18, 2022
Dear Mr. Echeverria, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Commission,
It has come to my attention that on or about June 15th, a letter was transmitted to you by
Peter Wright of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition. That letter was accompanied by a
PowerPoint-style PDF that laid out their arguments. In that document, there was a claim made on
page 5 that “Every resident of F Street adjacent to Ivory’s property is strongly opposed.”
This statement is false, and was or should have been known to be false at the time of its
writing.
I purchased the property on the corner of F Street and 13th Avenue, directly opposite the lot
in question, on January 13th, 2022. A member of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition
identified me by name while speaking to my neighbors in April, and therefore knew that the house
was under new ownership. At no time have I expressed any opinion regarding this matter, publicly
or privately. At no time prior to June 15th had anyone spoken to me about this planned rezone,
representing either side.
I reserve the ability to formulate an opinion. Should I choose to do so, I will base that
opinion on a considered understanding of both sides’ arguments.
I feel that this must be brought to your attention, as a known false statement may affect the
credibility of the representatives of the Preserve our Avenues Zoning Coalition in the upcoming
hearing on June 22nd.
Regards,
Andrew Steiner
461 E. 13th Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
I write in support of the request to change the zoning map and the SLC master plan to
accommodate the Capitol Park Cottages proposal. I live in the Avenues myself, just below Sixth Avenue,
and prize the neighborhood for its diversity of housing types, mix of owners and renters, access to a
grocery store and public library, and economic diversity. The area surrounding the North F Street
property already has a variety of housing—town homes, large single-family homes, condos, and small
single-family homes. The “cottage” development envisioned (not yet officially under review) is not so
dense that it would appreciably increase traffic in the area. The larger homes proposed will be big
enough to accommodate families, which will help support the declining enrollment of Ensign
Elementary. The yards are small, but from looking around the Avenues, there are plenty of people who
wish to purchase a home and not have to do a lot of yard upkeep.
Salt Lake City (as well as much of Utah) is desperately short of housing of all kinds. Even if this
will not be income-restricted, “affordable” housing, increasing the supply at the likely price point will
ease the pressure on the housing market in general. Developing vacant property is ideal because it does
not displace existing, “naturally affordable” older housing. Yes, it is very important that the proposed
ADU’s not be used for short-term rentals, so I urge all parties to work to increase the enforcement
options available to cities to combat short-term rentals. The state Political Subdivisions Interim
Committee is studying this issue this summer and fall.
Approving the requested amendments would not damage the character of the Avenues. Salt
Lake City needs the additional housing. I urge the Planning Commission to support the requested
changes.
Susan Olson
Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 15:55:28 Mountain Daylight Time
Page 1 of 2
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Support for Ivory Homes Rezoning at 675 North F Street
Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 3:34:01 PM Mountain Daylight Time
From:JulieQe Palmer White
To:Echeverria, Daniel
CC:Wharton, Chris
AFachments:emailsignaturelogonotext_c4fe8a58-60ec-4e55-8f78-be04eY3833d.png
Mr. Echeverria,
Apparently, I'm late to the game and didn't realize that this issue was s]ll being debated in my
community. I became aware today that there is a planning commission mee]ng tonight regarding the
request by Ivory Homes for a rezone to allow higher density housing, ADUs, etc., at the top of F Street.
I cannot aQend this mee]ng, so I am wri]ng to you instead in the hopes that you will receive this
message before the mee]ng tonight and take it into account.
I am wri]ng to express my support. And I am wri]ng to reassure you that residents of the Avenues are
not unified in their opposi]on to this project. I have lived in the Avenues off and on since 1981,
including 15 years living on 18th Avenue and now 20 years living on Virginia Street. I have read many
of the comments / arguments in opposi]on to this project since the beginning and find myself
profoundly disappointed in what I can only describe as an intensely narrow and unyielding mindset
held by individuals that should know beQer.
I am now a parent of a teenager with significant disabili]es. And I have an aging mother. I was, and
remain, thrilled by the prospect of new and innova]ve housing op]ons in this wonderful community
that may allow me to support my child with disabili]es into adulthood, and provide a place for my
mother as she ages, all while providing them some level of independence in a separate ADU. I am
keen to see the City develop more mul]-genera]onal housing op]ons, more innova]ve solu]ons
other than typical apartments/condos or single-family housing. I am one of those Avenues residents
that will seek to add an ADU to their backyard someday if I cannot find another alterna]ve for my son
that will allow him to live in the community where he grew up and that he knows well, with as much
independence and dignity as possible.
And I want the future residents of this proposed development to live in my community and to be a
part of it. Those who object to this project appear to have a very limited view of who they want living
in the Avenues. I will never forget the first leQer I received in the mail from someone who opposed
this project -- the objec]on to "urban" zoning s]ll lingers in my mind. At first it made me laugh,
considering the many bus stops within just a few blocks, the number of condos and apartments nearby
(both above and below), and the grocery store/liquor store/shopping complex within six blocks. But
then the comment hit home, as I fear it is code for some other perceived threat.
I have no doubt that there was, and likely remains, much room for improvement in what Ivory Homes
is trying to do. And I have no love for developers. But I respect everyone who is trying to make this
work and trying to find innova]ve solu]ons for the housing challenges we now face in our City. Please
con]nue to do so.
I embrace a broader perspec]ve. The persistent and unyielding opposi]on to this project makes me
sad. There is no beQer to describe it.
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely yours,
JulieQe White
275 N Virginia Street
Juliette Palmer White • Shareholder
Parsons Behle & Latimer
201 South Main Street, Suite 1800 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Main +1 801.532.1234 • Direct +1 801.536.6804 • Fax +1 801.536.6111
A Professional
Law Corporation parsonsbehle.com • JWhite@parsonsbehle.com • vCard
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attachment(s) are confidential and may also contain privileged
attorney-client information or work product. The message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, distribute, or copy this communication. If you
have received the message in error, please immediately notify us by reply electronic mail or by telephone at +1 801.532.1234, and delete
this original message.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
d. Postmarked Public Notice
4. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2020-00335/00334 – Capitol
Park Cottages Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments – Peter Gamvroulas, representing
the property owner, Ivory Development, is requesting zoning map and master plan amendments
for property located at approximately 675 N F Street. The request includes the following
applications:
A. Zoning Map Amendment (Rezone): The applicant is requesting to amend the zoning of
the property from the FR-3/12,000 "Foothills Residential District" to the SR-1 "Special
Development Pattern" zoning district. Although the applicant has requested that the
property be rezoned to the SR-1 zone, consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Case number
PLNPCM2020-00335
B. Master Plan Amendment: The applicant is requesting to amend the master plan
designation for the property in the Avenues Community Master Plan from "Very Low
Density" to "Low Density." Case number PLNPCM2020-00334
The requests are intended to accommodate two pending Planned Development and Subdivision
requests for a 19-lot single-family dwelling development titled "Capitol Park Cottages." The
property is currently vacant and is zoned FR-3/12,000 "Foothills Residential District." The
property is located in Council District 3, represented by Chris Wharton. (Staff contact: Daniel
Echeverria at 801-535-7165 or daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com)
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Room 315
City & County Building
451 S State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Daniel Echeverria at 801-535-7165 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday or via e-mail at daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com. Petition details can also be found
on the petition webpage here: http://bit.ly/slc-openhouse-01175
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. (P 19-19)
5. ORIGINAL PETITION
Zoning Amendment Questionnaire
Parcel Number 09304550210000
1. A description of the proposed zoning amendment: The property is currently zoned as FR-
3/12000 Foothills Estates Residential. The purpose of the FR-3/12000 foothills residential
district is to promote environmentally sensitive and visually compatible development of lots not
less than twelve thousand (12,000) square feet in size, suitable for foothills locations. The
proposed zoning designation for the property is FB-UN1 this zone allows for small scale
structures, up to two-and-one-half (2.5) stories in height, or relatively small lots with up to four
dwelling units per lot depending on the building type. The master plan amendment would
continue to allow the promotion of environmentally sensitive and visually compatible
development as envisioned in the FR zoning and would further provide the flexibility to enhance
housing type diversity in the neighborhood.
2. A statement declaring the purpose of the zoning amendment: The proposed Master Plan
amendment change is specific to the approximately 3 acer parcel 09304550210000; to be
changed from the residential large lot designation of FR-3 to accommodate a FB-UN 1 zoning
designation. This Master Plan amendment will enable the parcel to support an innovative
development in which diverse Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are integrated into a planned
community development. The Growing SLC: Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 (“5YP”)
acknowledges that “ADUs are the most cost-effective method of new construction for small
housing units” (5YP pg. 20). The proposed development would showcase how a variety of ADU
types can blend into an existing neighborhood and provide housing solutions for diverse
demographics (students, seniors, young families). The development can further materialize the
objectives stated in the Five Year Housing Plan. The first Goal expounded in the Five Year Plan
recognizes the need to “increase the diversity of housing types and opportunities in the
city…Strategic policy decisions that integrate…innovative design and construction methods, can
break down social and economic segregation, thus building a city for everyone” (5YP pg.17).
3. List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area the present
master plan for this property was done in 1987 and new and innovative opportunities exist that
will allow for more current housing outcomes. The Five Year Housing Plan recognizes that “each
generation has different ideas and behaviors that influence their decisions at each stage of life,
and in the aggregate create the demand for housing” (5YP pg. 10). The current zone restricts
the property to rigid lot sizing that limits opportunities for diversity in housing and exacerbates
the housing affordability crisis. Furthermore, the Five Year Housing Plan acknowledges
“barriers, such as density limitations, prohibitions on different types of housing, and other
development regulations, have contributed in part to a general supply deficit and economic
segregation” (5YP pg. 11).
4. Is the request amending the zoning map? The request is amending the Zoning Map. The parcel
number to be changed is 09304550210000.
5. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? There is no request to amend the
text.
6. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME own_address_andUNIT OWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIP
JOSEPH FLANAGAN; AIRA FLANAGAN (JT)1326 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
WRIGHT PROJECT, LLC 1589 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
HAMILTON FAMILY 1998 TRUST 07/10/1998 171 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NANCY H HALVERSON 1914 E 9400 S SANDY UT 84093
PETER WRIGHT; JANET WRIGHT (JT)20012 OAK FAIRWAY CT ESTERO FL 33928
JENI INDRESANO; MATTHEW A STELLA (JT)22 OLIVER STREET SALEM MA 01970
KELLEE W BURTON 22 S EAGLEWOOD DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054
MUFFY FERRO 2250 N STATELINE RD ALTA WY 83414
RICHARD WENDELL NIELSEN TRUST 05/04/2020 2321 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
LEO SOTIRIOU; CYNTHIA G SOTIRIOU (JT)250 E BROADWAY ST # 330 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
BENJAMIN ADAM STEINBERG; LAURA L STEINBERG (JT)290 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 298 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HUGH J SHARP; ANIKA N SHARP (JT)3 ROBINHOOD RD CAPE ELIZABETH ME 04107
JENNIFER L AZZI 307 LOWELL AVE MILL VALLEY CA 94941
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 3075 RED SPRINGS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89135
678 F STREET CONDOMINIUMS UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION 308 W 300 S # LL2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
REED TOPHAM; ANNA TOPHAM (JT)310 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DANIEL H PAYNE; VANESSA I PAYNE (JT)315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SFY TR; CBM TR 322 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DIANE B LANZL 329 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HENRY L LEVINE 340 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 343 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROBERT RYAN RICHARDS; MARTINA WRIGHT RICHARDS (JT)343 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD SCHMIDT; NANCY SCHMIDT (JT)344 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WILL S TENNEY 346 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FREEMAN FAMILY TRUST 03/08/2000 348 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JACOB H COPINGA; FRANCES R COPINGA (JT)349 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 351 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 353 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MATTHEW TYLER; JUDITH TYLER (JT)354 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TINA B RUGA 357 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID M GRANT 357 S 1840 W CEDAR CITY UT 84720
P&B PROPERTIES III LC 3581 E WARR RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
HERBERT H JR POLLOCK; DANA D POLLOCK (JT)363 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 3650 TYLER AVE OGDEN UT 84403
ANIQUE J MONFROOY 368 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 369 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CORY M SHIPP; BOBBI L MORGAN (JT)374 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BENJAMIN LANOHA 377 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DONALD R MORRIS; MAISA MORRIS (JT)381 E ELEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RAH LIV TR 385 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAS REV LIV TRUST 386 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JMT TRUST 01/04/2019 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HAASTR 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #201 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID L MAHER; MARILYN J MAHER (JT)400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MJM REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #204 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TODD A JENSEN; CARMELLE JENSEN (JT)400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #301 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KBB FAM TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #401 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MLVV FIVR TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #406 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CJC REV TRUST; GLC REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GLC REV TRUST 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NT MARITAL TRUST NO 1 400 CAPITOL PARK AVE #502 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMBER SKOLNICK; JOSHUA SKOLNICK (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #503 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMBER SKOLNICK; JOSHUA SKOLNICK (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GEORGE B HOKE; G&EHFT 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #305 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JANET K MANCINI; VINCENT P MANCINI (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LINDA PEARLINE DEAN REVOCABLE TRUST 7/18/2013 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #303 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LINDA PEARLINE DEAN REVOCABLE TRUST 7/18/2013 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S30 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MERIDIEN AT CAPITOL PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAOMA TATE; NTM #1 TRUST 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #504 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NAOMA TATE; NTM #1 TRUST 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA A DAVIS; JOHN L DAVIS 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #403 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA A DAVIS; JOHN L DAVIS 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL & JANICE MCKINNON JOINT TRUST 01/09/2020 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #302 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL & JANICE MCKINNON JOINT TRUST 01/09/2020 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #402 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL D MCKINNON; JANICE W MCKINNON (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PAUL MCKINNON; JAN MCKINNON (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER BILLINGS; MARGARET BILLINGS (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #304 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHOLLY KAGAN; CYNTHIA KAGAN (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S16 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
VICTORIA OWEN KLEIN 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #105 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
VINCENT P MANCINI; JANET K MANCINI (JT)400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #404 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GAYLE PERKINS TRUST 03/14/2019 405 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
OBLC 4066 BITHYNIA RD SANTA BARBARA CA 93110
WALTER R JONES; HELEN W JONES (JT)412 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
THOMAS W KEEN 415 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TERRY HALL; DREW HALL (TC)416 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 420 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BEDELL IRREVOCABLE TRUST 04/01/2015 423 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LEILA BROWN ARMKNECHT 433 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN & PAMELA LAKOMSKI TRUST 08/05/2013 440 N VIRGINIA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 453 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN E CRAWFORD 456 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KODY M POWELL; ELISABETH C POWELL (JT)459 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HANNAH DUFFEY; DAN FRAME (JT)460 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KINNEY FAMILY TRUST 03/17/2020 461 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ANDREW STEINER 461 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RANDAL W KOZIATEK; GINA M KOZIATEK (JT)463 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NIRUPAMA RAMKUMAR; SANDEEP C MANYAM (JT)466 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ERIC C HANSEN 468 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETER SUMMERILL 472 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 473 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SHARON RAMMELL 4732 S 4300 W REXBURG ID 83440
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 474 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAD TRUST 475 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICIA E KING 480 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
FREDRICK W REIMHERR; KATHLEEN R REIMHERR (JT)482 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KUBOTA REVOCABLE TRUST 03/09/2021 483 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTOPHER BURCH; SEUL YE PARK (JT)4885 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
JEFFERY K SCOTT; SHEPARD SCOTT, SARAH P SCOTT (TC)489 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HOFFMANN LIVING TRUST 02/19/2019 504 E THIRTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LAVERNE S JR ERICKSON 505 E FOURTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RUSSELL E NORVELL (JT)510 E FOURTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GARR SMITH; CATHY STUTZ-SMITH (JT)571 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RYAN J KIER; DARCI TAYLOR (JT)572 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HENRY MITCHELL STEINMAN 573 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
STEPHANIE CAUMET 574 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTINE PACKARD 577 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KENT M MILES; LINDA H MILES (JT)578 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ZACHARY DRAPKIN & ZOE RALEIGH FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 05/12/2020 584 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID B YOUNG 585 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RONALD B WILKINS; SUSAN P WILKINS (JT)586 N E ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN Y YOON; KATHERINE A YOON (JT)601 N D ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICK MARTIN BURKE LIVING TRUST 11/12/2018 604 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN B YORGASON; JANNETTE J YORGASON (JT)604 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROBIN & JANE KIM FAMILY TRUST 10/09/2020 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MICHAEL P FILBEN; DIANE HILL (JT)618 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MAX D HUNSAKER 620 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOHN NISSON 623 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
POVEY SKYE O 623 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ELIZABETH OWENS 623 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MS LIV TRUST 624 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BENJAMIN E FARR; ERICA J FARR (JT)626 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 633 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 655 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHERI DAILY; MICHAEL STEVENS (JT)668 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PETAR GERMANOV; DIANA GERMANOV (JT)671 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JEP REV TRUST 672 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LANGHEINRICH, FRANK A; JT LANGHEINRICH 674 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DG LIV TR; IS LIV TR 674 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KAYALENE M SPATAFORE 678 N F ST # 678E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JARED J YOUNG; PAMELA BROWN (JT)678 N F ST # W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TYLER A JACK & ANN MARIE LEONE FAMILY TRUST 06/04/2019 684 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 685 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LYNN M KEENAN; MARJORIE J MATHIS (JT)688 N F ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GAC REV TR 689 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JASON R PAUL 690 N CARING CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CHRISTOPHER C KOLB; HEATHER M KOLB (JT)695 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ADAM H HIRSCHEL; ALICE D HIRSCHEL (JT)701 N G ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ELYCE B MOUSKONDIS; EBMT 7212 HELSEM BLVD DALLAS TX 75230
LON A JEKINS; RICHARD M MAXFIELD (JT)786 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 787 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ROLAND K BARBERO & CASSANDRA E BARBERO LIVING TRUST 01/26/2016 789 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MLL LIV TRUST 790 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DJB LIV TRUST 791 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALAN B HAYES & SUSAN E MACNAMARA REVOCABLE TRUST 04/16/2020 793 N NORTHPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRIAN H MOSS; CAROL B MOSS (JT)796 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
NORTHPOINT ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 798 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
P KENT FAIRBANKS; MARY P FAIRBANKS (JT)799 N NORTHPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LORI ELIZABETH PASSEY; MARK PASSEY (JT)800 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KEVIN L HAVLIK TRUST 05/17/2021; CAROL A BALLOU TRUST 05/17/2021 801 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRIAN RUGGLES; JANICE RUGGLES (JT)803 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
BRENDAN BUCKNER 806 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HUGO ROSSI; JULIA ROSSI (JT)807 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MHN FAM TRUST 809 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GENESIS INVESTMENT CORPORATION 810 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
CAROLE D NELSON REVOCABLE TRUST 7/1/1998 811 N GRANDRIDGE DR #29E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JUDY A DALY; JOEL L DEATON (JT)813 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAMES H VIRDEN; ELIZABETH H VIRDEN (JT)814 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DJN LIV TRUST; JBN LIV TRUST 815 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LORETTA C RICE REVOCABLE TRUST 02/05/1996 817 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JOSEPH FOURNIER 819 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 820 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
GENESIS INVESTMENT CORP 821 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 822 N GRANDRIDGE DR #49C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WILLIAM CRAIG STERN LIVING TRUST 12/23/2013 823 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
KSCS LIVING TRUST 12/11/2020 824 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MICHAEL S ZAVELL; CHRISTINA B ZAVELL (JT)825 N JUNIPERPOINT CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST #1900 PORTLAND OR 97232
JOHN T HOPKIN REVOCABLE TRUST 01/28/2002 826 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
WARMBIER FAMILY TRUST 08/13/1999 827 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
EUGENE MISHCHENKO; GALINA POLEI (JT)828 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
ALEX TREHARNE; ERIKA TREHARNE (JT)829 N GRANDRIDGE DR #41B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TAMMY DEE BERKHOUDT 830 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
HEATHER HAMBY 834 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
COLIN ROBINSON; JEANETTA ROBINSON (JT)835 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
JAT FAMILY TRUST 07/10/2002 839 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
D&CLVK TR 843 N GRANDRIDGE CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
MARK S LEVITT; KATHLEEN ANNE LUNG (JT)847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
DAVID HOPKINS; WENDY HOPKINS (JT)851 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PATRICK G AKERS; TERI L AKERS (JT)853 N JUNIPERPOINT DR #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
LIVING TRUST OF DAVID RICHARD GULLING 06/16/2021; DAVID RICHARD G 8718 REDONDO DR DALLAS TX 75218
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 88 E EDGECOMBE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PEMBROKE CAPITOL PARK LLC 940 N 1250 W CENTERVILLE UT 84014
IVORY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 978 E WOODOAK LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
SKAAR PROPERTIES LLC 9846 E EMERALD DR SUN LAKES AZ 85248
KATHLEEN M HOLDING PO BOX 1083 DAYTON WY 82836
WILLIAM I HIGUCHI LEGACY TRUST 12/23/2020 PO BOX 1223 PARK CITY UT 84060
SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED PO BOX 3181 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110
ASSOCIATED PROPERTIES, LC PO BOX 478 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110
MOUNTAIN SEAS DEVELOPMENT LTD PO BOX 680844 PARK CITY UT 84068
MOUNTAIN SEAS DEVELOPMENT LTD; NTM TRUST PO BOX 680844 PARK CITY UT 84068
CRAIG N PACINI; JULIE M PACINI (JT)PO BOX 708682 SANDY UT 84070
SPINAZZOLA JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST 06/03/2014 PO BOX 8891 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
CAPITOL PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 9375 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
Current Occupant 794 N NORTHPOINT DR #3A Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 795 N NORTHPOINT CT Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 804 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 855 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 853 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 841 N JUNIPERPOINT DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR #42D Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 837 N JUNIPERPOINT CT Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 341 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 673 N CARING CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 685 N CARING CV Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 675 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 705 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 505 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 535 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 669 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 461 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 473 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 475 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 483 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 510 E 14TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 503 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST #W Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST #E Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 678 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 320 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 342 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 610 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 590 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 317 E PENNY PARADE DR Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 375 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 589 N CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 588 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 584 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 574 N D ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 368 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 374 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 380 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 386 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 381 E 11TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 353 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 363 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 369 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 377 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 385 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 395 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 405 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 415 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 358 E CAPITOL PARK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 617 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 433 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 423 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #101 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #102 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #103 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #201 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #202 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #203 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #204 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #205 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #301 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #306 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #401 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #405 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #406 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #501 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #502 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-1 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-2 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-6 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-7 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S-8 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S10 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S12 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S13 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S14 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S15 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S18 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S20 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S21 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S22 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S23 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S24 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S25 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S27 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 400 E CAPITOL PARK AVE #S29 Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 456 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 468 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 472 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 480 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 615 N G ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 453 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 459 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 463 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 473 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 489 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 504 E 13TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 412 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 416 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 420 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 430 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 580 N F ST Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 460 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 466 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 474 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 482 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
Current Occupant 488 E 12TH AVE Salt Lake City UT 84103
DANIEL ECHEVERRIA
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5480