Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransmittal - 6/20/2023ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Lis fi' (J u n 20, 202311:56 M DT) Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date Received: 06/20/2023 Date sent to Council: 06/20/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: June 20, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Historic Carriage House Text Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Kelsey Lindquist, Planning Manager, 385-226-7227 DOCUMENT TYPE: Information Only RECOMMENDATION: The City Council follow the recommendation of both the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission and deny the requested zoning text amendment for the reconstruction of historic carriage houses for the purposes of creating an additional dwelling unit. Since the Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation on this proposed text amendment, an ordinance has not been provided for this transmittal. If the City Council wishes to approve the proposal, the applicant will be required to draft adoptable language so that an ordinance can be drafted for City Council approval. BUDGET IMPACT: The budget impact is unknown because the applicant has yet to identity an application process for a carriage house reconstruction. It is unknown if a future identified application would off -set staff time associated with a review of a carriage house reconstruction. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Stephen Pace, the property owner of the Beer Estate, is requesting to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, in order to reconstruct or restore the remains of a historic carriage house on his property. Through working with Planning on potential options to create an additional dwelling unit in a reconstructed version of the historic carriage house, several zoning barriers were identified. The barriers are described in detail within the staff report. In order to address the goals and desires of reconstructing a historic carriage house at 222 E. 41h Ave, the applicant submitted a zoning text amendment application. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Aerial of Subject Property Photograph of Subject Carriage House, 2017 The submitted text amendment language specifies the eligibility criteria for a potential carriage house reconstruction as a property listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site, also located in the following zoning districts: • SR -IA (Special Development Pattern Residential) • RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential) • RO (Residential Office) • I (Institutional) This specific criteria language limits the applicability to 5 properties citywide, which include the following: 222 E. 4th Avenue, 259 E. 71h Avenue, 529 E. South Temple, 603 E. South Temple and 1206 W. 200 S. The applicant didn't specify a clear process for review or an application. The language does allude to a review by the Historic Landmark Commission but isn't clear on the process. The standards and criteria provided by the applicant require evidence of the carriage house, parking requirements, prohibition of any future subdivision of the property, no requirement for an owner occupancy, and flexibility of zoning regulations of accessory structures and density limitations in the applicable base zoning restrictions. The provided text amendment language is missing key sections that lack clarification on authority, review process, applicable standards and an identified application. Staff attempted to address the concerns with the proposed language with the applicant several times. Staff ultimately forwarded the language to the Historic Landmark Commission for input and direction. The Historic Landmark Commission discussed the proposal during a hearing on July 16, 2020, and unanimously decided to forward a negative recommendation to Planning Commission. After the Historic Landmark Commission, the applicant did not address the identified issues identified by staff or the items discussed during the Historic Landmark Commission hearing. The applicant requested to continue the text amendment to Planning Commission. Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed text amendment on February 23, 2022. The Planning Commission unanimously forwarded a negative recommendation on the proposal. As discussed in the Planning Commission staff report, staff acknowledges that there are several adopted master plans and documents that provide guidance for historic preservation, many of which express general support for the concept of creating and adopting flexible zoning regulations that create economic incentives for contributing structures and landmark sites. Policy statements and goals in the Community Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Avenues Master Plan and Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan, include encouraging and supportive statements for increasing housing stock in already developed sections of the city, as well as creating tools to further historic preservation goals. With this in mind, staff attempted to work with the applicant prior to the submission of the language, as well as after the application was accepted and assigned. The applicant has not been amenable to Staff recommendations or direction. Additionally, the applicant has not been amenable to the Historic Landmark Commission's concerns, comments and the specific reasoning for the negative recommendation. The idea behind providing flexibility to landmark sites and eligible properties within local historic districts is generally in line with the adopted plans and policies within several planning documents. However, the proposed language provided by the applicant does not provide a framework in which to administer approvals or review requests. PUBLIC PROCESS: • The application was submitted on February 6, 2020. • The application assigned to Kelsey Lindquist on February 7, 2020. • An Online Open House was held during April 1, 2020 through May 15, 2020. • Staff received public comments via email and comments provided direction to the applicant. Staff included these comments within the staff report for both the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission. • On July 16, 2020, the Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and unanimously forwarded a negative recommendation to the Planning Commission to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council. • On February 23, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and unanimously forwarded a negative recommendation to the City Council. Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) Records a) HLC Agenda of July 16, 2020 (Click to Access) b) HLC Minutes of July 16, 2020 (Click to Access) c) HLC Staff Report of July 16, 2020 (Click to Access Report) Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of February 23, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of February 23, 2022 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 23, 2022 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1)CHRONOLOGY 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3) PLANNING COMMISSION — February 12, 2020 a) Mailed and Posted Notice b) Staff Report c) Agenda/Minutes 4) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION —July 16, 2020 a) Staff Report b) Agenda/Minutes 5) ORIGINAL APPLICANT PETITIONS 6) MAILING LIST TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) CHRONOLOGY 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3) PLANNING COMMISSION — FEBRUARY 23, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING a) MAILED NOTICE b) STAFF REPORT c) AGENDA/MINUTES 4) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION — JULY 16, 2020 PUBLIC HEARING a) STAFF REPORT b) AGENDA/MINUTES 5) ORIGINAL APPLICANT PETITIONS 6) MAILING LIST 1) CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petitions: PLNPCM2020-00106 February 6, 2020 Stephen Pace, property owner of 222 E. 4' Avenue submits text amendment application. February 7, 2020 Petition assigned to Kelsey Lindquist, Planning Manager, for staff analysis and processing. March 9, 2020 Petition reviewed internally, staff provided comments to applicant. April 8, 2020 Notice mailed to properties within 300 feet of identified properties April 1, 2020 Application posted for online open house. May 15, 2020 End of online open house. July 2, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission agenda posted to website and emailed to list serve recipients. July 9, 2020 Staff report posted to Planning's website. July 16, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission Public Hearing. February 11, 2022 Planning Commission agenda posted to website and emailed to list serve recipients. February 11, 2022 Notice of public hearing provided to the 5 eligible properties. February 23, 2022 Planning Commission Public Hearing. 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2020-00106 Carriage House Reconstruction — On behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner of 222 E. 4th Avenue, is requesting a text amendment to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to permit the reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit, located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house, would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, setbacks of the applicable base zoning district, or the accessory structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed language requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and list as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR- 1A (Special Development Pattern Residential). As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in -person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.2ov/council/virtual-meetin2s. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(&slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226-7227 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday throughFriday, or via e-mail at kelse..l�quistkslcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https:Hcitizepportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the "planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM200-00106. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council. commentsAslcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3) PLANNING COMMISSION a) Mailing Notice February 11, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 23, 2022 at 5:30 p.rn. n "t� The meeting will he held as an electronic nwefing wftlrput an an- " + '' chop lacation- A public hearing will be held on the following matter. Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment — Stephen Pace, the applicant, is requesting a zoning text amendment to permit the restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit, located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house, Would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, setbacks of the applicable base zoning district, or the accessary structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed fanguage requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and listed as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one cf the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential), (Staff contact: Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226-7227 or kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-OD106 This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County building. Commission members will connect remotely. The Planning Commission meeting will be available on the following platturms: WebEx; httosJlbit Wslo-pc-01262022 (comments accepted) YouTube: www�lZtube_cQntlsictiyemeetinas tunable to comment) SLCty Channel 17 Live: www.slay.cemllivestream/SLCtu-Liyel2 (unable to comment) Providing Comments: If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or provide general comments, email: planning.cornments@slegov.com or connect with us on WebEx. For instructions on how to use WebEx visit www.glc.00vinlanninglloublic- me For Planning Cnnrmmion agendas, staff reports, and minates, visit 1he planning UitnsionIs website at slegou/ntunning/publ, nw-Unu. Staff -Reports to{11 be pouted the Friday prior to the rheeting and minutes will be posted ttua days ❑ftLr they are ratified, which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Comniiss[rm. FIRST CLASS 3) PLANNING COMMISSION b) Staff Report February 23, 2022 a• ••. ••,,C, 0,taff ort "'Or41810.10 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNH Y and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Kelsey Lindquist (8ol) 535-7930 Date: February i7, 2022 Re: PLNPCM2020-0olo6 Historic Carriage House Zoning Teat Amendment Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: Citywide MASTER PLAN: Community Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Avenues Master Plan and The Growing Salt Lake City Housing Plan ZONING DISTRICT: RMF-35, RO, I, SR-iA REQUEST: The Salt Lake City Planning Division has received a zoning text amendment petition from Stephen Pace, to permit the restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, setbacks of the applicable base zoning district or the accessory structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed language requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and listed as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential). RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report and the factors to consider for zoning text amendment, Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council regarding this proposal. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Proposed Code C. Applicant's Narrative D. Eligible Properties E. City Plan Considerations F. Analysis of Zoning Amendment Standards G. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 WWW.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-5357757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLNPCM2020-00106 1 February 16, 2022 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HEARING Staff briefed the Historic Landmark Commission on July 16, 2020 to gain feedback and direction on the proposed language. To watch the full discussion, the Historic Landmark Commission meeting can be viewed via the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk7jQ8fSOc&t=1is. Ultimately, the briefing resulted in the HLC forwarding a negative recommendation to the Planning Commission with the following motion (language pulled from HLC minutes): Commissioner Svendsen made a motion that the Historic Landmark Commission Move that the HLC forward the following recommendation to the Planning Commission: 1. The Commission is generally very supportive of the applicant's goals of increasing density on the property and making the property more economically sensible. 2. The Commission also suggests that there are significant shortcoming both procedural and substantive with the current zoning ordinance that are preventing reasonable development on properties like this. 3. This seems like an end around of the existing City's ordinance regarding Accessory Dwelling Units and also the RMF-35 4. Because of the application is so limited it is like spot zoning and that can have unforeseen consequences with respect to future neighbors and a variety of circumstances. In summary, the HLC forwards a negative recommendation to this particular proposal but urges the Planning Commission to consider other changes to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance or RMF-35 Ordinance that would permit the applicant to move forward with what he is proposing and applies to the City more broadly as a whole. BACKGROUND OF THE REQUESTED TEXT AMENDMENT: Stephen Pace, the property owner of the Beer Estate located at 222 E. 4a' Avenue and 181 N. B Street, is requesting to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance to provide an incentive to reconstruct or restore the remains of a historic carriage house on his property. The applicant has been working with Planning on a solution to reconstruct a carriage house that is located on the southern portion of 222 E. 4a' Avenue. This historic carriage house is associated with the Beer Estate Landmark Site, which was constructed by Richard Kletting. Additional information on the specific carriage house reconstruction proposal can be found in Attachment C. PLNPCM2020-00106 2 February 16, 2022 Aerial of Proposal on 222 4th Avenue Photo of Subject Carriage House, 2018 PLNPCM2020-00106 3 February 16, 2022 The applicant has approached the City with the intent of rebuilding the remains of a carriage house on the property located at 222 E. e Avenue, in order to add another dwelling unit on his property. Salt Lake City zoning regulations do not allow the reconstruction due to building location regulations, minimum lot width and minimum lot areas for the applicable zoning district. The Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations would also prohibit the applicant's proposal to reconstruct a carriage house as a dwelling unit on the property. The following provides a summary of these barriers: 1. The dwelling unit located within a restored or reconstructed carriage house would be considered a single-family detached dwelling. Adding another single-family dwelling to this property at the proposed location would not be allowed because: a. All principal structures required to have frontage on a public street (21A.36.olo.B) must be located along a street. The home (carriage house) would be located in back of the existing principal structure on the property. b. The zoning district where the property is located requires a minimum of 5,000 square feet per single-family dwelling (21A.24.130.C), so 10,00o square feet would be required for two single-family dwellings. The subject property is 8,184 square feet which does not meet the minimum size requirement. c. The home (carriage house) would not meet building setback regulations (21A.24.130) due to its close proximity to the side and rear property lines. 2. The accessory dwelling unit ordinance would permit an additional unit to the rear of the property located at 222 4th Avenue; however, there are several conflicts with the reconstructed carriage house as an ADU. The accessory dwelling unit ordinance (ADU) poses a conflict with the requirement that the owner of the property reside onsite. While Stephen Pace owns the subject property located at 222 4th Avenue, he resides at 181 B Street. This standard could not be satisfied. Additionally, the size limitation of ADUs would not accommodate the traditional size of a historic carriage house. Staff acknowledges that the barriers to achieving the goals of restoring the carriage house prohibit the applicant from introducing an additional dwelling unit on the property. The proposed text amendment is essentially site specific in order to permit the construction of an additional single-family dwelling on the property. The proposed language will not offer or introduce an overall solution to other contributing structures within a local or national historic district. PROPOSED LANGUAGE: The applicant provided a list of "conditions" that should be met in order to add a dwelling unit in a reconstructed/restored carriage house; however, the applicant has not provided actual ordinance language. Staff anticipates that the proposed regulations, if they addressed staffs recommendations, could be incorporated into the Historic Preservation Overlay chapter of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant's proposal is in Attachment B. To better organize and summarize the proposal, Staff attempted to categorize the provided language into the standard ordinance format (see below). Purpose Statement: No purpose statement provided by the applicant. Definitions • CARRIAGE HOUSE: A carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or uses to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, secondary story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. Applicability • For a property to be considered eligible, the property must be listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and a National Register Site on the National Register of Historic Places. PLNPCM2020-00106 4 February 16, 2022 The property must be located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), SR-iA (Special Development Pattern Residential), RO (Residential Office) and the I (Institutional). There must be substantial evidence that a carriage house exists or existed on the subject property. The burden of proof would be strictly on the applicant. The applicant must provide evidence through at least two of the following methods: o Historic photographs o Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps o Planning, zoning or building permit records. o Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basement, etc. Review Process The applicant has not specified a review process; however, the proposed language implies that the design, construction and alterations would require a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Landmark Commission. • A restored or reconstructed historic carriage house would be required to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, which is section 21A.34.020.G in the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. Standards1Criteria • A reconstructed or restored carriage house would only be allowed to be used for a single-family residence. • Off street parking is required for the dwelling unit. • The restored or reconstructed carriage house would be limited to the historic footprint and must not exceed the size (historic footprint) of the original structure. • If it is determined that the reconstruction or restoration of the carriage house negatively impacts a neighboring property, additional buffers may be required. • The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally • The two residences could not be subdivided in the future. • The property owner is not required to permanently reside on the property. • Base zoning restrictions, such as: lot coverage, setbacks, height and density can be modified. KEY CONSIDERATIONS: i. City Goals Regarding Historic Preservation Staff acknowledges that there are several adopted master plans and documents that provide guidance for historic preservation, many of which express general support for the concept of creating and adopting flexible zoning regulations that create economic incentives for contributing structures and landmark sites. Policy statements and goals in the Community Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Avenues Master Plan and Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan, include encouraging and supportive statements for increasing housing stock in already developed sections of the city, as well as creating tools to further incentivize historic preservation for many of the historic property owners within the City. With that said, Staff was originally supportive of the concept of introducing zoning flexibility into historic districts with the goal of restoring existing structures and introducing additional housing stock. With this in mind, staff attempted to work with the applicant prior to the submission of the language, as well as after the application was accepted and assigned. The applicant has not been amenable to Staff recommendations or direction. Additionally, the applicant has not been amenable to the Historic Landmark Commission's concerns, comments and the specific reasoning for the negative recommendation. The idea behind providing flexibility to landmark sites and eligible properties within local historic districts is generally in line with the adopted plans and policies within several planning documents (see Attachment E). However, the proposed language provided by the applicant does not provide a framework in which to administer approvals or review requests. Additionally, the language is essentially site -specific. 2. Rational for Negative Recommendation Planning Staff has identified the following specific issues regarding the proposed language: PLNPCM2020-00106 5 February 16, 2022 1. As proposed, the language would affect only one property by providing some allowance for the applicant to construct a second single-family dwelling on the site. However, as an amendment to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, Staff takes into consideration the limiting impact the proposal would have on incentivizing historic preservation in Salt Lake City. Staff acknowledges that the applicant wishes to limit the proposed language to be primarily site specific for the subject property located at 222 4th Avenue. Even though the applicant indicates that there are 5 properties that could potentially qualify for the allowance, many of those properties already have secondary dwelling units or are owned by entities uninterested in pursuing this allowance. 2. As is, the language is unenforceable. This means that without clear language and a framework to review proposals for a reconstruction of a historic carriage house, there could be very few limitations. While the applicant provides a suggestion to have the Historic Landmark Commission review the proposed reconstruction, it doesn't provide clear framework for such review. 3. The proposed language doesn't provide a way to administer the allowance of how an applicant would apply to reconstruct a historic carriage house. 4. The language does not account for how any potential impacts to abutting and adjacent properties would be mitigated. 5. Overall, the proposed amendment is missing crucial language for Staff, Planning Commission and City Council to take the proposal under consideration. NEXT STEPS: The Historic Landmark Commission provided a negative recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council on the proposed zoning text amendment. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council, due to the noted negative recommendation by the Historic Landmark Commission and the issues noted with the proposed language. Once a recommendation is provided by the Planning Commission, the recommendation will be transmitted to the City Council. The Planning Commission's recommendation is not a final decision; thus, it is not appealable by the applicant. The City Council will make the final decision on the proposed zoning amendment. PLNPCM2020-00106 6 February 16, 2022 ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP OF POTENTIAL SITES The applicant provided a list of 5 properties that are potentially eligible for a reconstructed or restored carriage house. The map on the following page highlights the subject properties. PLNPCM2020-00106 7 February 16, 2022 6. : ,. .. ..,.,. ti..... .. w".. .. .,.. Duun .. Duun 560 p iwq 50r V yi,. .+. :,r, pr:n u.n -•nn nn w-yrn �rav 3 c v ' u �, Ave °� nvr Rre Ave Ave =Ave Awe QLf�' Atli! ~9 = .. �ishvp Plm Spy,c n +". * h.7 Sr�' -&11 "' Slh 8Thzz 8Sh _ c r ��' A m '•� OAVeW 0. Au!' Arc= Arc 400IN 404 Ndopi n4ho Nc' 4L`DN Ao .I �•J Ina lv'a 400N anaN 40DN ^' � j � It h ?[I. yTTh 7;h� yll tihh 71h Trh S, Gwim,ll pl �' AVe*A;- ave Ave- AY Ave Ave AYe iMandi' t c $ Slrndntli C. y a 3 jArdmore PI ^� 3O84rreel Rvt r Ave ? c a+ Ave Bth s yl h ? Gth 5t 41 h Gih w 6t1 e ❑ t O 90 N 30a N�nn N 3an N e l ^ 9a0 1 Ave x Awr a A a 9y Ave Ave F Awr Sao N 00 9p0 N '..J r.,;N a Soo N 300 N 300 N gpq k30fl ti L ^ 3tlr� +, - Gary- N l•A ` G 5fh m Seh'_� Sth Sth- Sth� 5lh_ (1 xj N; - $ c ., ?� „Ave Hfll5Ide r a Arc _ Ave "' RVr AY-0 Ave" Are H PI a g ,.,,.,. w ^' C r A. e A Ve A th'" '^ v ❑ Alh r-dl "d[h 4lh _ Ail4i9r Av .. 790$ or'a l5 .. a 200� 2943 3 200 GREATERR` nA m „ n Ave KAw `Ave Ave A - C eN N 20a H 200 N 200 N 20a N Al T 200 N N 203 N N 200 h i] P! ' AVENUE• F' IRPARK $ 3 rdAYCa Jerk: ^n Ave TI, .,2n ..Ind o Kcr d 2DC'^2nd-� - m NORTH TEMPLE ST NORTH TEMPLE ST A _ _ 2ntl Ave Are yr V Ave Ayr Ave ^ Ave=Avr lsim _ "' iq�. Ist'^ 15t `^1st F I,, r Learned Avr m CAPITOL -- 1si Ave r awe" Ave Aver' Ave `Ave Ave- E nrrril Avr p I south saltk�. h so lh SVJtn _i ,qh T HILL L N _ _ SOUTH TEMPLE ST GREATEI!ly TrnPIr5t7ern I '&[ Temple 5t 7ern le Si Temale 51 i_[ yralsarn .— AVENUE Halt g Alarncda $ - _ w 100 s b ioo s #q s 109 5 i09 S 3,00 s 11:10 s' 100 s 100 s 00 s lolls $ wv S xv9 s x 100 s xoa s 1a9 s o r Euuld °n E ud,d Are^ Ave r• r _ o c io I"t" r'""• '^ a c E ' = ArFmid PI ❑ c 200200 ra• 2G9 'r 209 m a 20a S 200 S 200 S 200 52a0 S. 200 S 200 S c ~ 2110 5 „200 S 200 S !� 5 S 20a S �• sr 5 200S 200S 200 S S 280 5 t 4 E N e 3 a `o _Peer ant a - g' Avc w 3 ''e i AVJe Ave - t o G G W " hiar6ea 304 M ` 300 ?00 v N 900$ 130P S^ So. 5-� 3C05 �60i 5 9005'^ 34G5�•�9[g5 sn 3�D53a0i 9005 a CEWTRAL S S 94P5 Tani 3Cll ?S san 5300 V, c INarkct St � CITY r Verner P13 Y' = .t L• p PLNPCM2020-00106 9 FebrudlgoB, 2020 ATTACHMENT B: APPLICANT'S PROPOSED LANGUAGE PLNPCM2020-00106 190 Februdoo8, 2020 zfaZoning Amendment 4} WWI a y n y K N,Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map iteceived By - OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Project #: ivame Or section/5 of Zoning Amendment: TEASE PROVIDE THE FOLL()WlNa INFORMATION Address of Subject Property (or Area): i-i h^ ltiarne of A plicant' — Address a App€icac�t: E-mail of Applicant:, C?wner ❑ Contractor El' Architect Other: Narne of Property Owner (if different frurn applicant): E-mail of Property Owner: CeIVF ax: Phone: 760 t Please note that additional information may be required by the }project planner to ensure adequate I nformation is provided for staff anAVSis_ Ail information required for staff: analysis will be copied and made pudic, including profsslanat architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of pubic review by any interested party. AVPJLABLE CONSULTAMON If you have any guestioris regarding the requirements of this alaWication, please contact Salt take City Planning Counter at (801) 535-7700 prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,034, Pleas $121 per acre in excess of one acre Tent Amendment: filing fee of $1,035, Plus $100 for newspaper notice. 1 Plus additional fee for mailed public notices. SIGNATURE applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required, Signature of Owner or Agent: J Date: -2u updated 711119 PLNPCM2020-00106 10 FebrudlgoB, 2020 SUBMI77AL REQUIREMENTS x I. project Description (please attach additional sheets.) -,7 A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. S`` A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.�� List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the aseakl�w.Y<< Is the request amending the Zoning Map? Zec- oc"Xv'-�i\� C if so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? if so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Mailing Address: Planning Counter F�7--n Person: Planning Counter PO Box 145471 451 South State Street, boom 215 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Telephone: t801j 535-7.00 INCOMPLETE APPUCATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED 1 acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed• i understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following €terns are included in the submittal package. Updated 711119 PLNPCM2020-00106 12 Februdoo8, 2020 Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment April 9, 2020 The reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site. 2) The property and address are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, an identifiable carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations of a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. PLNPCM2020-00106 13 Februdoo8, 2020 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. PLNPCM2020-00106 1s Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Stephen C. Pace Zoning Text Amendment Proposal for Historic Carriage House Structures UPDATED APPLICATION AND NARRATIVE April 3, 2020 TO: Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, Salt Lake City Planning Division FROM: Kirk Huffaker, Principal/Consultant, Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies CC: Stephen Pace, Applicant and Property Owner As of April 2, 2020, the city has chosen not to provide an advance copy of draft language or alternatives for their proposal, so we are not yet in a position to comment on the pros and cons or details of whatever the city's position may be. We are therefore requesting through this updated application to proceed with this application without further additions by the city. We have not attempted to draft our suggestions in terms of the specific sections of the city code that will satisfy final location of the amendment within the zoning code. In the event that our proposal is carried forward to city council, we believe that this will need to be done under supervision of the city attorney at a later date. Instead we have presented a synopsis below of what we believe provisions in the zoning code should allow for in the reconstruction/rehabilitation/restoration of documented historic carriage houses associated with current or potential National Register of Historic Places -listed sites and located in areas with current multi -family zoning. The narrative highlights reasons why the city should support this measure and what we believe the limited impacts on development could be. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT Stephen C. Pace, the applicant, is the owner of 222 4th Ave., Salt Lake City, and desires to rebuild a carriage house associated with the historic William F. Beer Estate. Four structures, including the carriage house, of the estate are listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The following text amendment is submitted to the Planning Division for review and comment. The applicant desires Administrative and/or Planning Commission consideration to resolve a property size issue in the Avenues historic district. The current property is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood. There are three primary issues that kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 15 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 2 are not satisfied by any section in the current Zoning Ordinance, including all of the following: Two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. To address these shortcomings, the following draft language is proposed as a text amendment to Chapter 21 A.34 Overlay Districts under 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission. Utilizing this process will give the public an opportunity for input before one public commission. In the H Historic Preservation Overlay District as defined under Chapter 21A.34.020, reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site as defined within Chapter 21 A.34.020. 2) The property and address are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, either individually or as a Contributing structure in a National Register -listed Historic District. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, a carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically - detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 16 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 3 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 16 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 4 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. 3) Meeting off -site parking standards. Submitted on February 4, 2020 This application and accompanying narrative for zoning text amendment is submitted on behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner for 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. The applicant desires Administrative, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration of and prompt action on the application to resolve multiple zoning issues with the subject property that prevents the owner from achieving his goal of adaptive use/reconstruction of a historic carriage house. This former carriage house was one of the four primary structures of the historic William F. Beer Estate, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1977 and is an individual landmark site in the Salt Lake City Cultural Register. According to historic research, the Beer Estate residence and carriage house date to circa 1899. Both were constructed according to design by architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting also served as architect for a house and carriage house with similar details for Albert Fisher (Fisher Mansion and Carriage House) at 1206 West 200 South in 1893. The Beer Estate carriage house is described in the NRHP nomination as follows: Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structures with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War 1, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. Since 1977 when the paragraph was written, the carriage house has continued to deteriorate. Current site conditions exhibit severe structural deficiency but original brick and stone foundations, wood floors, and wood framing and walls are present. The owner desires to rebuild the carriage house within the original footprint and according to the original design. Use of the carriage house is proposed to be single-family residential with a single -car garage. Due to the cost of material salvage, architectural PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 19 Februdoo ®, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 5 replication, and construction, and given that the project is entirely privately funded, the housing unit is not proposed to be affordable housing. Some original materials have already been salvaged for reuse, and the owner desires to reuse as much of the existing material and structure as possible in the reconstruction. The proposed design for reconstruction of the carriage house has been completed and initially submitted for discussion with the city. The property at 222 4th Ave. is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood and Avenues Historic District. There are three primary issues that are obstacles to adaptive use and reconstruction and not satisfied by any section in the current zoning ordinance, including: Allowance for two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. In addition, we believe that these issues will not be resolved by the Adaptive Reuse Ordinance (in process), revisions to the RMF-30 zoning classification (in process), and are not addressed through the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance. Therefore, to address the shortcomings, the following supportive documentation and zoning text amendment draft language are proposed for Chapter 21 A.34 Overlay Districts under 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. As a point of application process, it is acceptable to the applicant to utilize the city's existing process for Conditional Use to obtain approval for use of the property. We believe that utilizing the Conditional Use process along with Historic Landmarks Commission review for design will adequately give the public two opportunities for input before two separate commissions. However, if the Planning Division can determine another acceptable application and review process that would only involve review before one commission and administrative review, the applicant would be open to receiving information about this possibility. The applicant reserves the right to approve or deny any proposed process change. The goals of this application to address the three current deficiencies and well supported by the city's wide range of plans and guiding documents, including those that are kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 18 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 6 neighborhood -specific, for historic preservation, and for housing. The following is a summary list of those plans and supportive statements from each. Avenues Master Plan Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Planning Goal: Continue to encourage private restoration and rehabilitation efforts in the Avenues Community through financial assistance and supportive zoning and building code enforcement. (pg. 3) Historic Preservation Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic Districts. (pg. 4) Future land use map indicates Medium -Density 8-20 Unites per Gross Acre (pg. 7) Property is situated between an urban trail (A Street) and within one block of two Collector streets (B Street and Second Avenue), as well as a half -mile from the Central Business District, therefore meeting this plan's and many other plan's goals of proximity to transportation and for walkability. Urban Design Planning Goal: Design public facilities to enhance the established residential character of the Avenues, and encourage private property improvements that are visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (pg. 10) Residential Design Guidelines The applicant's overall goal is most closely defined as Rehabilitation in the Salt Lake City Design Guidelines, but could also be viewed as a combination of strategies, including Reconstruction. Rehabilitation is defined in Part I, page 3:5: "Rehabilitation is the process of returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive reuse of the building, and major or minor additions may also occur. Most good preservation projects in Salt Lake City may be considered rehabilitation projects." A definition for Reconstruction is provided in the Appendix, pg. C:3, and states that Reconstruction is: PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 29 Februdoo ®, 2020 Page 7 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies "The act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, as if [sic] appeared at a specific period of time." Accessory Structures (Part 119:1) This application follows the guidelines in Chapter 9: Accessory Structures, including the Context & Character, Design Objective, Preserving or Rehabilitating Historic Accessory Structures, and subsections with the headings: Preserve a historic accessory building when feasible. New accessory buildings should be constructed to be compatible with the primary structure. • Attaching garages and carports to the primary structure should be avoided. The Avenues (Part 111 13:1-14) This application complies with the stipulations on page 13:12 under the heading Accessory Structures within the specific chapter for The Avenues: • Most secondary structures were built along the rear of the lot, accessed by the alley, if one existed. This should be continued. • Garages, as well as driveways, should not dominate the streetscape; therefore, they should be detached from the main house and located to the rear of the house, if possible. • Historically, garages and carriage houses in the Avenues were simple wood structures covered with a gabled or hipped roof. • A new secondary structure should follow historic precedent, in terms of material and form. Community Historic Preservation Plan "The need to preserve the unique character of the City's urban neighborhoods, while allowing for modifications to existing homes to meet today's current living standards for space and convenience are important City policies." (pg. 1-8) The CHPP references the city's Community Housing Plan (11-7,8), and while those references are supportive of this application, they are not from the city's most current housing plan. The city adopted the Growing SLC Housing Plan in 2018 and references PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 20 Februdoo ®, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 8 from that plan are included in a later section. However, the CHPP does reference goals of the city's Strategic Plan and Futures Report on pages II-10 and II-11. Those that are also supportive of this application include: - Enforce preservation strategies for buildings and neighborhoods. - Our historical heritage, including historic buildings and neighborhoods, is recognized as a vital component of an exciting, livable city. Preserve historic structures, streets, and other landmarks in all new development strategies. - Assist property owners with solving the challenges of adaptive reuse. Policies and Actions Relating to Regulations 3.31 Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. 3.3k Support modifications of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Regulatory Incentives Two sections that support this application are Flexibility in Zoning Regulations (III-31), and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings (III-32). These are further supported by: 3.4a Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. 3.4c Modification to lot, bulk and signage standards should be allowed in local historic districts and to Landmark Sites where the modification would allow for better compliance with the historic preservation standards than the underlying zoning standard would allow. 3.4d Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 22 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 9 Economic Development 6.4c Historic preservation is identified as an important means of providing employment opportunities for local crafts persons and skilled workers which keep money in the local economy. Housing 6.5a Ensure zoning supports the retention and reuse of existing historic apartment and non-residential buildings. 6.5b Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. 6.5e Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Goal 1: Increase Housing Options Objective 1: Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.1 Develop flexible zoning tools and regulations, with a focus along significant transportation routes. 1.1.2 Develop in -fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development. Goal 3: Equitable & Fair Housing Objective 2: Align resources and invest in strategic expansion of opportunity throughout all neighborhoods of the city and access to existing areas of opportunity. Objective 3: Implement Life cycle Housing principles in neighborhoods throughout the city. 3.3.1 Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 23 Februdoo ®, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 10 The SLC Comprehensive Housing Policy (2016) also includes supportive statements for this proposal: 1. Foster and celebrate the urban residential tradition; 2. Respect the character and charm of predominantly residential districts, including those with historic character and qualities, while also providing opportunities for the provision of local goods and services easily accessed by neighborhoods; 4. Develop new housing opportunities throughout the City; 7. Recognize that residents, business owners, and local government all have a role to play in creating and sustaining healthy neighborhoods. Plan Salt Lake Under Sustainable Growth & Development on page 9, the paragraphs on Placemaking and Density, and those that reference Compatibility and Green Building on page 10, are supportive of this application. On page 14, supportive Guiding Principles of Plan Salt Lake include the following: 2) Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. 3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 8) A beautiful city that is people focused. 9) Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. 10) Vibrant, diverse, and accessible artistic and cultural resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. Under Chapter 1 - Neighborhoods, the supportive Initiatives on page 17 include: 1. Maintain neighborhood stability and character. 4. Support neighborhood identity and diversity. 6. Incorporate artistic elements and support cultural events on a neighborhood scale to reinforce neighborhood character and identity. Under Chapter 2 - Growth, the supportive Initiatives on page 19 include: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. 6. Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 28 Februdoo8, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 11 Under Chapter 3 - Housing, the supportive Initiatives on page 21 include: 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Under Chapter 6 - Natural Environment, the supportive Initiatives on page 27 include: 3. Practice responsible waste management by: reusing and repurposing materials, including promoting the reuse of existing buildings over demolition. Under Chapter 8 - Beautiful City, the supportive Initiatives on page 31 include: 5. Support and encourage architecture, development, and infrastructure that: reflects our diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious heritage. 7. Reinforce and preserve neighborhood district character and a strong sense of place. Under Chapter 9 - Preservation, the supportive Initiatives on page 33 include: 1.Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas of structures of historic and architectural value. 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Under Chapter 13 - Government, the supportive Initiatives on page 41 include: 2. Provide opportunities for public participation, input, and engagement throughout the decision -making process. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 25 Februdoo8, 2020 ATTACHMENT C: APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE Links included in applicant's narrative: https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards.htm http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/HLC/2020/07%20July%202O2O/00lo6StaffReport.pdf http:// utahcfa.org/architect/richard—karl—kletting PLNPCM2020-00106 26 Februdoo8, 2020 COMMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN C. PACE DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2022 RE: HISTORIC CARRIAGE HOUSE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Introduction My name is Stephen Pace, and I would like to offer the following context for the zoning text amendment that is to be considered by this body. This story starts with Dr. William F. Beer, M.D. and famed architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting, one of the most important architects to ever lend his talents to Utah,' was the architect for the William F. Beer historical buildings located at 181 B. Street and 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. Located at 181 B. Street, the Beer Main House is a 26-room, 4-four level residence built in 1898-99, which I meticulously restored to its circa 1900 status. The Beer Mansion appears as an exemplar in Salt Lake City's guidelines on appropriate methods for historic preservation. On the same lot is an approximately 600 square foot "Workshop" that I remodeled. ' For more information on Kletting, see http://utahcfa.org/architect/richard_karl_kletting. Below is a picture of the restored Beer Mansion today: Adjoining the rear of the 181 B. Street property is a separate lot that faces 222 4th Avenue, and historically featured two structures. The first is a smaller structure known as the Harness Shop House built, according to Salt Lake County, in 1867. I restored this structure in the 1980s. Also on the same roughly 8,400 square foot lot are the remains of the historic Carriage House that served the Beer Estate. The 1905 photo on the following page has been annotated to show the "Harness Shop House" outlined in red, and the carriage house outlined in blue: 2 PW M 1905 PHOTO 7. DETAIL of 222 4TH AVE "Harness Shop House" in Foreground. E'ra Net ing Carriage House in Rear Nt 4- r,- Today, the Harness Shop House has been restored, as shown below: Despite their presence on the same lot, it should be noted that in no sense was the Carriage House ever an "accessory" building to the Harness Shop House. The harness building was a commercial structure that predates the harness shop by 30+ years. The footprint of the Harness Shop House is only slightly over 500 square feet. It was occupied, according to the Beer Family, by an inactive physician who assisted Dr. Beer in his OB/GYN medical practice. The Carriage House was always and exclusively used for the Beer family and medical practice, i.e., the Beer Mansion, shown in the photograph on the previous page. 3 In 1977, the Carriage House was photographed for purposes of its listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and as seen in the below photograph, sometime around World War 1, when horses lost favor as a mode of urban transport, the carriage house had the front half of the structure removed for it to function as a garage. Today, the Carriage House continues to deteriorate as 1 continue my efforts to obtain city permission to restore it: 4 Below is a rendering of the northern elevation of the Carriage House as I have proposed to restore it,' which notably includes meticulous adherence to the historic roof lines and gable, which are calculable with a high degree of accuracy (+/- one inch) from the pictorial evidence shown above and from surviving portions of the 1899 building: .^ r �-.W-- - The proposal before the Planning Commission is about giving more than lip service to the importance of historic preservation. It is an opportunity to show that our community values our heritage, and that preserving the past continues to matter to the city and to posterity. This concept is not new: in 1977 the Beer Estate, and its Carriage House, were individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and in 1979, the Salt Lake City Council enacted an ordinance expressly directing that these very buildings be "fostered, enhanced, and preserved." A copy of the ordinance is attached hereto for reference. Indeed, this issue was of such significant public concern for the overall preservation of the Avenues that it brought the citizens out in droves to offer support in four nights of hearings. Nothing about that has changed —no act has repealed that ordinance in over 40 years. The Problem The status of the Beer Estate today is that three of the four structures have been restored, but the final piece of the set, the Carriage House, is in a deteriorated state. I have been ready and willing for many years to invest my own resources to return this piece of history to its former state (modernized, appropriately, to make the most beneficial use of the property, but identical in its physical appearance). I have been working with Salt Lake City planning staff to try to bring this project to life. Currently, staff s view is that there are impediments to my restoration of the Carriage House, despite the clear language of the 1979 Ordinance. For example, one of the perceived impediments is a density requirement —according to staff, having two primary dwelling structures (the Harness Shop House and the Carriage House) on a roughly 8,000 square foot lot z For more detail about and renderings of my proposed restoration, see Attachment C to the July 9, 2020 Landmark Commission Staff Report (especially pages numbered 45-76), available here. 5 is not permitted. Notably, staff s approach does not even attempt to reconcile its position with the language of the 1979 Ordinance, and the specific provision that these very structures are to "be fostered, enhanced, and preserved." Also notably, post restoration, the combined population of 222 4t' Avenue (i.e., the Harness Shop House together with the Carriage House), as measured by bedrooms on site, will be identical to the population that inhabited the space in 1900. No increase in historic population density is proposed. The Staff -Proposed Solution To avoid disagreement about the 1979 Ordinance, staff suggested another approach: that I propose a zoning text amendment that would more expressly enable the rehabilitation or reconstruction of the historic Beer Carriage House, despite any arguably applicable limitations, like density, in the more generalized zoning code. That proposal was presented to the Historic Landmarks Commission ("HLC") for review in July of 2020. In connection with that proposal, staff prepared a 170+ page staff report (the "HLC Staff Report"), a%, a[lab le here, almost all of which extolls the virtues of the proposal. In particular, as discussed in more detail below, the HLC Staff Report concluded that all applicable factors that are relevant under the law called for a favorable recommendation. What anyone would have reasonably expected following the HLC meeting was that that body would have agreed with staff, myself, and the only public eommentors to remark on the proposal, and to forward a favorable recommendation to this body. The Elephant in the Room So one must ask: why is this proposal before the Planning Commission under a negative recommendation from HLC? Upon further review, members of this body will see that the HLC's recommendation, though technically a "negative" one, actually joins staff, positive commenters, and me in recognizing the many virtues, including much -desired historic preservation, that will be fulfilled by the proposed text amendment. Indeed, many on the HLC voiced enthusiastic support for the principles embodied in this proposal. The Proposed ZoninText Amendment The legislative intent of the 1979 Ordinance is clear in its desire to "foster, enhance, and preserve" the Beer Estate and its four historic structures. Nothing in that Ordinance suggests that any generalized zoning requirements should prevent "individual structures within the Neighborhood [that] have individually been placed on federal, state or city historical registers" (i.e., the Beer Estate) from being fostered, enhanced, and preserved. This body should recapture the essence of the 1979 Ordinance by favorably recommending to the City Council a laser -focused exception to more generalized zoning laws that will even more expressly allow the Beer Carriage House to be rehabilitated and restored, despite the presence of any arguably applicable zoning specifications that are not satisfied. This was the route proposed by staff, and to my knowledge staff has never suggested any reason why its proposal is not a good one for the City. The proposed text amendment is described in detail at pages 3-7 of the July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report. In sum, the amendment will carry forward the 1979 Ordinance by more expressly authorizing the reconstruction or restoration of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The proposed amendment specifically defines "carriage house" as "a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles 0 and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property." (HLC Staff Report, p. 3). The proposed amendment further requires that the carriage house be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. (HLC Staff Report, p. 4). These requirements serve to significantly limit the applicability of the proposed amendment,3 while allowing the preservation of important Salt Lake City historical structures. As described further below, this body should recognize the virtues (there are many) of the proposed zoning text amendment, and balance those against the asserted downsides (of which there are remarkably few, and none that merit any serious concern), and favorably recommend the text amendment to the City Council. The Virtues of The Proposed Text Amendment Are Numerous. • First, it bears heavy emphasis that Staff concluded that the proposed text amendment is consistent with and/or furthers all city plans and policies. a See July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report Attachment E (pages 165-167). o Staff concluded that "[T]he proposed zoning changes are generally supported by the associated adopted City policies." (HLC Staff Report, p. 7). These include: the Community Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Avenues Master Plan, and Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan. In staff s words: "The policies and guidelines encourage the creation of additional housing through flexibility and incentives within the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The proposed language also promotes ... sustainability through the restoration or recreation of a historic carriage house." (HLC Staff Report, p. 167). • Second, it bears additional heavy emphasis that staff reached a finding that each factor under Salt Lake City Code 21A.50.050 favors this text amendment. o See July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report Attachment F (pages 168-170). o No member of the HLC could disagree that the proposal furthers the City's established goals. For one, the proposal will indisputably allow for a much more beneficial use of property than its current state, something that all HLC commissioners acknowledged as a desirable goal. It will also increase housing availability, and avoid needlessly wasting useable, viable space, in furtherance of Salt Lake City's goals. As stated in the minutes of the HLC meeting, everyone involved recognized the need for "reasonable development" of this property, and this amendment allows exactly that. • Third, the proposal enjoys the support of all neighboring property owners. o Notably, no member of the public spoke out against the proposal. The HLC inexplicably failed to discuss the significant —indeed, unanimous —public support in favor of this proposal, found at Attachment G to the July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report. I am also aware that in other instances, staff has s As noted in the HLC Staff Report, it is likely that no more than a handful of properties could qualify. See July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report, at p. 38-44, 77. 7 specifically tabulated and presented information regarding neighborhood opinion, so that such data could be analyzed by decisionmakers; here, staff inexplicably did not tabulate this data, despite my specific request that it be done. Perhaps even more notable is the omission of a favorable email submission by an HLC Commissioner, David Richardson, who was unable to attend the HLC meeting, which is attached here but was inexplicably not included in the HLC Staff Report. • Finally, this modest proposal will not have broad reach or unintended consequences. It is a narrow but important step for putting a new scalpel in the City's preservation tool kit. Without it, an important piece of history stands to be lost. The Asserted Downsides Are Speculative and Insubstantial. The concerns some have raised come nowhere close to outweighing the benefits of the proposed text amendment. These criticisms simply do not hold water upon close review. Each is raised and rebutted below. • Some on the HLC expressed concern that there could be a proliferation of individuals attempting to take advantage of the proposed text amendment, even in the absence of evidence of a carriage house ever existing on the property. o Response: There is no rational basis to fear that anyone will suddenly claim there was a historic carriage house on their property that never existed. Contrary to the concerns expressed by some, this proposal will not burden the HLC with sorting out Iegitimate carriage house claims from spurious ones, The reality is that the text amendment requires national register status —a process of sufficient vetting as to leave no real concern that anyone will try to falsely claim that their property once housed a historic carriage house.' o Moreover, the Department of the Interior makes no secret of the fact that the Internal Revenue Service closely advises the Secretary on matters involving the integrity of National Register listings, because certain listings can enjoy federal tax benefits. This hawkish monitoring of the National Registry listings thus provides all the more reason to doubt that anyone could successfully palm off a fake carriage house. • Some on the HLC expressed the concern that the desired restoration of the Carriage House would result in an "inappropriate reconstruction" or "faux replica" of the original. o Response: As Planning Director Norris explained to the HLC, the type of work sought to be done here is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for historic preservation, Although the HLC may not have been aware of it, reconstruction is a legitimate preservation technique in situations like this one. The 4 In the HLC Staff Report, it is noted that "[t]he Historic Landmark Commission does not have the authority to review alterations to properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places." See July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report Attachment F (page 5). To be clear, this does not mean that the HLC is prohibited from reviewing alterations to properties on that register. Rather, this statement simply recognizes that the grant of HLC's authority is defined in terms of Salt Lake City Landmarks, not national ones. N. HLC Staff Report likewise acknowledged that, under the amendment: "A restored or reconstructed historic carriage house would be required to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, which is section 21A.34.020.G in the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance." July 9, 2020 HLC Staff Report Attachment F (page 4). A copy of the Secretary of the Interior's detailed standards, which will guide the restoration process, are available here: htps://wwNv.nps.gov/tps/standards.litm o It also bears noting that pictorial evidence, along with significant portions of the historic structure and its footprint, still exist for this property, so concerns about "faux" replicas are particularly misplaced here. Indeed, other structures on the Seer Estate serve as exemplars in Salt Lake City's publications for how to properly pursue historic preservation. There is no reason to think the Carriage House will differ. • Some on the HLC expressed the concern that neighbors might be upset that the footprint of the historic Carriage House does not adhere to modern setback spacing. o Response: This concern fails to account for the views of current neighbors, 100% of whom approve of the proposal. To the extent the HLC was expressing concerns that some hypothetical future neighbors might someday raise, those individuals will have the choice of whether to purchase neighboring property or not with full knowledge of what is in store for the restoration of the Carriage House. • Some on the HLC suggested that this problem was better solved through amending the ADU ordinance or the RMF-35 Zoning ordinance. o Response: Those approaches are overbroad, clumsy, and unsuited to the solving the narrow but important problem of allowing the rehabilitation of historic carriage houses. The narrow, focused approach presented by the text amendment solves the problem without opening larger cans of worms. The ADU ordinance and the RMF- 35 Zoning Ordinance can continue to operate elsewhere, but they should not prevent the rehabilitation or reconstruction of important pieces of Salt Lake City history. • Some on the HLC suggested that the zoning text amendment could be considered inappropriate "spot zoning." o Response: Utah courts define spot zoning as the "singling out one particular parcel for different and less favorable treatment." Tolman v. Logan City, 2007 UT App 260, ¶ 16,167 P.3d 489 (emphasis added) (quoting Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York, 366 N.E.2d 1271, 1275 (N.Y. 1977), aff'd, 438 U.S. 104 (1978). Conclusion In the 1970s, the City Council made clear its intent that the Beer Estate structures be "fostered, enhanced, and preserved." This body is now presented the opportunity to honor those words and show the City's commitment to historic preservation and the reasonable development of properties housing historic structures. 1 appreciate the Commission's time and attention to these matters and welcome the chance to have these issues considered at the hearing. 9 Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment AMENDED APPLICATION NARRATIVE April 9, 2020 TO: Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, Salt Lake City Planning Division FROM: Kirk Huffaker, Principal/Consultant, Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies CC: Stephen Pace, Applicant and Property Owner NOTE Because, as we understand it, the purpose of the "open house" is to seek broad public input on our proposal, we have not attempted to draft our suggestions in terms of the specific sections of the city code that will satisfy final location of the amendment within the zoning code. In the event that our proposal is carried forward to city council, we believe that this will need to be done under supervision of the city attorney at a later date. Instead we have presented a synopsis below of what we believe provisions in the zoning code should allow for in the reconstruction/rehabilitation/restoration of documented historic carriage houses associated with current National Register of Historic Places -listed residential sites and located in areas that already have multi- family zoning. The narrative highlights reasons why the city should support this measure and what we believe the limited impacts on development could be. Stephen C. Pace, the applicant, is the owner of 222 4th Ave., Salt Lake City, and desires to rebuild a carriage house associated with the historic William F. Beer Estate. Four structures, including the carriage house, of the estate are listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places. The following text amendment is submitted to the Planning Division for review and comment. The applicant desires Administrative and/or Planning Commission consideration to resolve a property size issue in the Avenues historic district. The current property is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood. There are three primary issues that are not satisfied by any section in the current Zoning Ordinance, including all of the following: • Two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. PLNPCM2020-00106 26 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 2 As it is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission, we believe this language should probably be included in Chapter 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. Utilizing this process will streamline the process for the applicant, for city review, and provide the public an opportunity for input. APPLICABILITY The proposed text amendment will be applicable citywide to residences listed individually as Salt Lake City Landmark Sites and where the residence and historic carriage house (as defined below) are both listed on the National Register of Historic Places as an individual listing (not simply in a National Register -listed historic district). The applicant believes that at least four (4) residence/historic carriage house complexes currently could meet this qualifying test. This is based on best information available to the applicant, which in part, is included as an attachment. In the event the city grants future Landmark Site designations, and National Register landmark status is sought and granted by the U.S. Department of Interior, the number of qualifying sites may increase in the future. TEXT AMENDMENT The reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site. 2) The property and address are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, an identifiable carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse- drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. PLNPCM2020-00106 29 FebrualgoO, 2020 Page 3 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations of a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. PLNPCM2020-00106 28 FebrualOOO, 2020 Page 4 The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. Submitted February 4, 2020 / Amended April 6 and 8, 2020 This application and accompanying narrative for zoning text amendment is submitted on behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner for 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. The applicant desires Administrative, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration of and prompt action on the application to resolve multiple zoning issues with the subject property that prevents the owner from achieving his goal of reconstruction of a historic carriage house. This former carriage house was one of the four primary structures of the historic William F. Beer Estate, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1977 and is an individual landmark site in the Salt Lake City Cultural Register. According to historic research, the Beer Estate residence and carriage house date to circa 1899. Both were constructed according to design by architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting also served as architect for a house and carriage house with similar details for Albert Fisher (Fisher Mansion and Carriage House) at 1206 West 200 South in 1893. The Beer Estate carriage house is described in the NRHP nomination as follows: Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structures with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War 1, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. Since 1977 when the paragraph was written, the carriage house has continued to deteriorate. Current site conditions exhibit severe structural deficiency but original brick and stone foundations, wood floors, and wood framing and walls are present. The owner desires to rebuild the carriage house within the original footprint and according to the original design. Use of the carriage house is proposed to be single- family residential with a single -car garage. Due to the cost of material salvage, architectural replication, and construction, and given that the project is entirely privately funded, the housing unit is not proposed to be affordable housing. Some PLNPCM2020-00106 29 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 5 original materials have already been salvaged for reuse, and the owner desires to reuse as much of the existing material and structure as possible in the reconstruction. The proposed design for reconstruction of the carriage house has been completed and initially submitted for discussion with the city. The property at 222 4th Ave. is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood and Avenues Historic District. There are three primary issues that are obstacles to adaptive use and reconstruction and not satisfied by any section in the current zoning ordinance, including: • Allowance for two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. In addition, we believe that these issues will not be resolved by the proposed Adaptive Reuse Ordinance (in process), proposed revisions to the RMF-30 zoning classification (in process), and are not addressed through the current Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance. Therefore, to address the shortcomings, the following supportive documentation and zoning text amendment draft language are proposed for Chapter 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. As stated above, it is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission. Utilizing this process will streamline the process for the applicant, for city review, and provide the public an opportunity for input. The goals of this application to address the three current deficiencies and well supported by the city's wide range of plans and guiding documents, including those that are neighborhood -specific, for historic preservation, and for housing. The following is a summary list of those plans and supportive statements from each. Avenues Master Plan Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Planning Goal: Continue to encourage private restoration and rehabilitation efforts in the Avenues Community through financial assistance and supportive zoning and building code enforcement. (pg. 3) Historic Preservation Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic Districts. (pg. 4) PLNPCM2020-00106 30 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 6 Future land use map indicates Medium -Density 8-20 Unites per Gross Acre (pg. 7) Property is situated between an urban trail (A Street) and within one block of two Collector streets (B Street and Second Avenue), as well as a half -mile from the Central Business District, therefore meeting this plan's and many other plan's goals of proximity to transportation and for walkability. Urban Design Planning Goal: Design public facilities to enhance the established residential character of the Avenues, and encourage private property improvements that are visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (pg. 10) Residential Design Guidelines The applicant's overall goal is most closely defined as Rehabilitation in the Salt Lake City Design Guidelines, but could also be viewed as a combination of strategies, including Reconstruction. Rehabilitation is defined in Part I, page 3:5: "Rehabilitation is the process of returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive reuse of the building, and major or minor additions may also occur. Most good preservation projects in Salt Lake City may be considered rehabilitation projects." A definition for Reconstruction is provided in the Appendix, pg. C:3, and states that Reconstruction is: "The act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, as if [sic] appeared at a specific period of time." Accessory Structures (Part 119:1) This application is consistent with the guidelines in Chapter 9: Accessory Structures, including the Context & Character, Design Objective, Preserving or Rehabilitating Historic Accessory Structures, and subsections with the headings: • Preserve a historic accessory building when feasible. • New accessory buildings should be constructed to be compatible with the primary structure. • Attaching garages and carports to the primary structure should be avoided. PLNPCM2020-00106 32 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 7 The Avenues (Part 111 13:1-14) This application complies with the stipulations on page 13:12 under the heading Accessory Structures within the specific chapter for The Avenues: • Most secondary structures were built along the rear of the lot, accessed by the alley, if one existed. This should be continued. • Garages, as well as driveways, should not dominate the streetscape; therefore, they should be detached from the main house and located to the rear of the house, if possible. • Historically, garages and carriage houses in the Avenues were simple wood structures covered with a gabled or hipped roof. • A new secondary structure should follow historic precedent, in terms of material and form. Community Historic Preservation Plan "The need to preserve the unique character of the City's urban neighborhoods, while allowing for modifications to existing homes to meet today's current living standards for space and convenience are important City policies." (pg. 1-8) The CHPP references the city's Community Housing Plan (11-7,8), and while those references are supportive of this application, they are not from the city's most current housing plan. The city adopted the Growing SLC Housing Plan in 2018 and references from that plan are included in a later section. However, the CHPP does reference goals of the city's Strategic Plan and Futures Report on pages II-10 and II-11. Those that are also supportive of this application include: - Enforce preservation strategies for buildings and neighborhoods. - Our historical heritage, including historic buildings and neighborhoods, is recognized as a vital component of an exciting, livable city. Preserve historic structures, streets, and other landmarks in all new development strategies. - Assist property owners with solving the challenges of adaptive reuse. Policies and Actions Relating to Regulations 3.31 Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. PLNPCM2020-00106 33 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 8 3.3k Support modifications of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Regulatory Incentives Two sections that support this application are Flexibility in Zoning Regulations (III-31), and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings (III-32). These are further supported by: 3.4a Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. 3.4c Modification to lot, bulk and signage standards should be allowed in local historic districts and to Landmark Sites where the modification would allow for better compliance with the historic preservation standards than the underlying zoning standard would allow. 3.4d Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Economic Development 6.4c Historic preservation is identified as an important means of providing employment opportunities for local crafts persons and skilled workers which keep money in the local economy. Housing 6.5a Ensure zoning supports the retention and reuse of existing historic apartment and non-residential buildings. 6.5b Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. 6.5e Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. PLNPCM2020-00106 33 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 9 Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Goal 1: Increase Housing Options Objective 1: Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.1 Develop flexible zoning tools and regulations, with a focus along significant transportation routes. 1.1.2 Develop in -fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development. Goal 3: Equitable & Fair Housing Objective 2: Align resources and invest in strategic expansion of opportunity throughout all neighborhoods of the city and access to existing areas of opportunity. Objective 3: Implement Life cycle Housing principles in neighborhoods throughout the city. 3.3.1 Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. The SLC Comprehensive Housing Policy (2016) also includes supportive statements for this proposal: 1. Foster and celebrate the urban residential tradition; 2. Respect the character and charm of predominantly residential districts, including those with historic character and qualities, while also providing opportunities for the provision of local goods and services easily accessed by neighborhoods; 4. Develop new housing opportunities throughout the City; 7. Recognize that residents, business owners, and local government all have a role to play in creating and sustaining healthy neighborhoods. Plan Salt Lake Under Sustainable Growth & Development on page 9, the paragraphs on Placemaking and Density, and those that reference Compatibility and Green Building on page 10, are supportive of this application. PLNPCM2020-00106 35 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 10 On page 14, supportive Guiding Principles of Plan Salt Lake include the following: 2) Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. 3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 8) A beautiful city that is people focused. 9) Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. 10) Vibrant, diverse, and accessible artistic and cultural resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. Under Chapter 1 - Neighborhoods, the supportive Initiatives on page 17 include: 1. Maintain neighborhood stability and character. 4. Support neighborhood identity and diversity. 6. Incorporate artistic elements and support cultural events on a neighborhood scale to reinforce neighborhood character and identity. Under Chapter 2 - Growth, the supportive Initiatives on page 19 include: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. 6. Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. Under Chapter 3 - Housing, the supportive Initiatives on page 21 include: 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Under Chapter 6 - Natural Environment, the supportive Initiatives on page 27 include: 3. Practice responsible waste management by: reusing and repurposing materials, including promoting the reuse of existing buildings over demolition. Under Chapter 8 - Beautiful City, the supportive Initiatives on page 31 include: 5. Support and encourage architecture, development, and infrastructure that: reflects our diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious heritage. 7. Reinforce and preserve neighborhood district character and a strong sense of place. Under Chapter 9 - Preservation, the supportive Initiatives on page 33 include: 1.Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas of structures of historic and architectural value. PLNPCM2020-00106 36 Februdoo8, 2020 Page 11 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Under Chapter 13 - Government, the supportive Initiatives on page 41 include: 2. Provide opportunities for public participation, input, and engagement throughout the decision -making process. PLNPCM2020-00106 36 Februdoo8, 2020 ='&Q02a Neww f0e?prer eF Ifevc PneK gtivF it S* La Guy •VymgO .u--1 K-1 Rog1w1w OF Hk� Fuy 1 it Saar Lake rmv- Wio�fA �rVihTrCT1[A •,1 Mar" -M. anayi oxtilAltArd'f Lo EM- H.1ghovr4.ad oeampa.n Rvgh ark+ National Register of Historic Places listings in MOUM 1976 188 W. 5w 9?i S'7ard Salt Lake City hraaeSO-lyand 1• ,ten Na AVN H, RorpF Sorely Natl awrgcWri+�rl0at ¢p'4gsgfi aLHwS1lGW14207r t11 `5S'd2w uanuary 27, 20f0 This is a iixt of the National Reglstes of Historic Pla<ors lig[luyg in $u!c lakc zo1 3to a 300 Eas[ City, llfah. s A]It7lne Aparla+vnrs ,yy� u�p01 pip.a DW +4•dyAs'n cerrorat C;y �,•33SSA'•�gr•gm•'wsNLw ,H'Sx'Sevf Tnis is intended Lo be a eompfete list of the properties and dIstriets oa the National Register of Historic Places in Salt lake City, Utah, United States. T.atiwde and _ - Fanunalp �selmo'27' 1979 Teo s- 900 East 99 longitude coordinates are provided for many National Register pwpudt and - Hovae 7► A , .p,•q.�•.­tt;M jj1 Sj5j central Gly dislriLts; these locations may he seen tngetherin an online map.hl- Thnre nm. more than q,So pmpcptias and districts listed on the National RegiateR in ��,' t FQA*ry 12, 1992 747 E, 1700 Salt lake Cu unty, iacluding 6 National Historic landmarks- spa. of throe milLi, `-J1 urc C1ti a1a o_ ¢ "w mwGw. VIWlewr+Mre Sum SegaF lio incImbog 4 National Hismrk Landmarks, arc lemted in Salt Iakr City; nad ore 'u`"""e'"o .ae+w$WW � ++ l• w iistcd brae; the remaining site, including 2 National Historic Landmarks, am, list d separately. Another 17 rites in the city were once listed, but hors since been PC pdpper 201989 566E 100 mmoved. . Ar4lislaApar6nan1s iNa9001'eerf'f"w s°`a^ central oily This Nalfmd PaAk Sarvice AW is coffOiede through NFS reran! 4fvmgs jAllpSyAvayv rtps-gc77oha+9l'ectsiMatlo +0�� nekggisladweslk7y-Asr.Mm} pasted P,pP 2=111 rlrpl 1ye20Ew Current listings L►Wky.% C �rM AAay 23, 5980 fi57 E 196 _ { { _],,, L _ -_- i FrenrlsAmrsrrona -1=7 teaoeaa9l¢(almraica B4ueh 4.wwalC 1 Clt�i.\ 1�R "O`"/SL ,�'e �iTr.. L.\�Y• ►L.►,se r.,,n,g�..a>eamx w•.em,t urvnlsrttma3m.p tf •57r6'yJ l F vnennrxr t8, 2me 4S6 E. 100 �Oltiy` CQ►�`�[ L.�A�C�[ f [�� �{E� 3 -77 7 AWl V Apann,eru% taeop,oe7 pa nnp scum cennn city abryrpsgna lx d0'4e'.fT. .lnarariesaeIM7)0fOs7p r11sz4nw L�St owe+» +__ .'�./� AVM 27- 1980 6r 1a1 �i L �Li1 N foV^L eor ___' bw B R 6n» mismft YE 06�r5y.�elMpp 8M SmAi d AvINR! J iSW memr woom,, 4o•gm S tL �a U►q.UL. ALFaP+w116vr10.1976 2[a3.400Eav1 0 v 8t*ai lerael rempte p•+s+e++ CMM14 citySec- g►�r ewc w l3 t ! 500 Wkvtn� dr/hBrl9Rt 1 111'e712w /� L-r V�r �C k-�- i`T' { r ir! 4[[�� 'Zni�L.VA j{ d11 C7� 3 Pa a y 1r, roar 224 S-12o6 •` Charles I�P+?YvoY Ea& uNrarelty an'a47s'n . atlrwLVdeW41a1➢ 'e,mw `T�►f` \ e o iAtv�% 4S © `i 3 l map ,28 AlSlN2T N94ons1 ft-Fi ur trig PW .at w0 Sea Lalu City• vmkn i dra"WO R RHo rot mw. P% aAsG mSak L>W!04Y-N?.ow Est etalrM nn the Horn. an 01v �ghie�41 tingly GaN IIi 1 Let4g411 HNgtlaPfM4d O4.afp}lan Pi1mda. Dsm Rvrvdlq Lmxt o moign"h*04 D"Cripdm rAay 9, 2012 1864 S. ON 1. Mal' W. 1976 828 E. 1 W �a1wn T2 BHwd.Pareors Ir A. 1 4 E891 vQ Sigar Nauss smon Ber.neyer E' - [orsp.1e14 p4lglrrpy scum 11 11DLL34 are fripegpxpuemee an•4av¢•N CMArN Ry xss gb�m�r a[ � wuae8Hae0m12u „1'stssw `� a1MWSRYgfB1.]1 111'eXig'W llreh 1917-:92r. Y DOO&Tk w 31.2018 BolAeverd GeNan. plmoo3xe 1n�4-imp C1•lsr Affy 7, 1963 656 E. 2W MmBM ]S Hrs[orie DesNd ein W. Balfyark ,leretnlah BCaItW I%e311n,421 Ovo.!W S-th T plc Sta. tx ilwsv �L Me�ry.po..l area d0•e9 C.'" oy eYlelro3^oJm3x68n � �F - s•.sa..x,u FaEnia,y Z8, 1874 B7 E. Scum A09W 17. 190i 222 w- 3W is Beahlre Fk.- fbnOQX26"Vrve%4 Tk"31• Downu p x4 Brmd.lay Om _ ' O-nn Iiy 5(10A&29O) 4R4611i! LHie51J00d1�}1 93f'SYtaYY YMU$/02M4+d2ry 11t's3'4B•w 0er�lriher 27,19a2 Rear, 687 W QecernbeF6, 1477 181 6 SL ami . BWding a R-e 537 0mv mw(w"oga 2W Sttah Cenir& �,1Y691 t4 SYAWm F. Beer Irtrr4olvt P� kga = WAW AVemn Wear Zoo swh w•Ai Estate MxWW.VcAlAa L 4p4 WW triRY4,ApW/PiBn 111'e m �1� aiMP1Y117ea19mJ1 i1f•Sx`s='W �' 60 w- 700 r+orm 1e EEeeeT.er pygst9y i►P•*Pa 4o•4g35rr Ceplld Hit OeA�rN.[27. 1982 581 w-200 Fiouav M M )) ,f 1.51'91w 00 of 657 weer AYpcn)>dy�✓Afe4gee 10.457NTa CUnlral �ify Vfey! Lr4zo..4telrslOw SOAK d.Tt11SATM.4.4flj7 nr'SnT4W lh May S, 2012 29 & Slate 9L SaPo Lake at, 14 Apanni.r118 111W17w el 'rgs dlr46r17T. D.11'nww WhpUQfbpely SOrrv&.iw e1RYwsr19c.1rR71]p -hly 18-1983 720E-A5FAm GaNge M-Can [Y&7 1941 WjM1W Ave. � maaz� 3 ar:rwse Av9.Lt 27,2013 21n E, . rr4aaiSr¢tlne4lajf 1•sz 17 Fk-va nM d mwtm [AI.?'Ni(WO Pape!,h" Huebmd Avg. Fo0a4# Benwm N[ elery.ipf.gbdArdnnel 4e•4d3 .1Tl61fr1d00564011 1h-4Sr4TW Opober 11. 1W8 Capin!H4i m Cepild &demg iergpQlap7 Q,C..:ur4p a0.46']6'N Cap:.d Ndl BenWdlh-Chapman WL O.o.mEer 30. 2004 2Z73-400 EeH I�aa1d17 (1+npAkgg 1a Apartmer8serid aod55,u Canlr.f (Sy C'Jmpman Conwtes d.�1CeF 11152 w ha"un kd y 6 D.bk. Main ann Wee $%., --�Qn _ TOM. Yi[ypry i sePWWA.a 2%1978 143K W.2L0 AUgnW Z. 19M Sound Sal of 19 BYrWiN 0100k So1.h Dowrvonn Ceplli Hit rilgWriC IP7eLw13s peysA'rcg iF1 Capma HIU twKKm3aFlt� �nv^Pc9o•�r�+s.laN Ap'+557P1 O'rtici M Y.npa.ov.Aecalnx bovndod by 3W represen¢ e x�i \ .dmw�.rree.192111 11,'sa'df�7. drtrwsrtlxA1a371 Nmh, 400 .oulRerr imrease Weal, am NOM, Wad $a, .nd 200 Vkv p.-toper 5. 1980 1148 5. 900 i0'w•s"^ f+�>A"a4. (r.yKA.1y Fast ril `S7S4'YV :a �4C PO1� Merc.roedcdA+s.mer AP14'APT! 9w a"e am - +y� .1MPISTiIX.l�1611 111.51 �2"Iv MflnYr r1, 197T 931CoffiedrE, 3nrltlr m6ddmFal.rar. S11:CtlOP45lNms1'rp➢ We rmL F ,•;. .... Oapv.ber 30, 2110{ lA9ddblrle Me�c�ps.pwAv.iner ,n'46'rr71 f4PrW1ite 4rArVrr•YY �53-4n0 E83x y aLHRISlIrC064tl1V f1'SSS�"'Ai mono- t� 38 Februal00 ®, 2020 z�6 N 7 4r NH�aT20 tlatiord Fug- & Hrcpnc Cacae uwY Q, N Solry co,y lrii{rarda R, R I61orMl imnQ Pat. tw*dl L-albn 11vIp11-1140-ar 0aswlp0on SLptC.ber 7. 2rW 7 Ini95L 3! %eelennbJ ltO,na _ Ieo1B�BPA {Yapeihpq Ql, b•.sf Avenues l .r��Paae7D[I fi eLTlW3910BA9601i ,rf^siaw August 11, 1962 Wo W. 2DP 93 Cvnlral Vi ohousp [a427on361m1pfIM1'PP Sodh AbiknpepsJyvdemet d0'IH56'H Centrd Cdy Waal dRtl11y42(plsa9J} SSf'S5R0w Jadba+y 20, 199P 9T7 S. 900 33 Chapyngn [fear+di jf8f616]B1S peq *e W pt i0(,18f("f,OYB �.aary �wsaYaAi%+:'.-�"....� �Cis24•re _ M1Po9+HOOW31BJ] 1rsd59y1 .hne 15. 1970 LSerty Park a1 Isaac Cbaga MBI 1+7t�s'Ms9 60P East L"rty Yy6As dk�%'••!da610dr 4e•AA76'tl nd eLNWSRW00e2ij1 f19'62•L'W B-md by rayon >Jarpi 12. 1980 (sB000P9i91rm G % N-rp6t4 Dlatrrct Hi% lro)tF ZM St, 4th A" �dry-.npc�pn•Ai19mc/ and � Ca Cahyan e4NpF9moo0.9B19j1 10'Igd9N n1•szsvw Jonwry 11. 2002 }a E. Federal . Isaac C- a Dornmy •. i6Blomleay Fwati" He m S. Ctark Hou1:e 2 �'%9 4C�dee5'N aNtliltJot 93u,J1} 113057'N August 17, 1982 272 S. Ntm B1. - aiRBsikbrlp - w•ssx7•P r ❑aa , rota 11!'Sa2]W aiMSI3rd20o{109}] October 2% t 12D E. 3B GuffApanmetlls dk 9.111 A".-P-9 ♦na-00 Z90 Swh o++r3%o unl+eraay UNFAGL 1114sem aanJNg..09Gb171931 111'srltw „ 13M E August 5. 1996 M Henry A. oad Tile S. L. (pp9)p�fi (Nlpl:r" AV r 8 House C4Va1 H0u59 a. AO•A9YBT1 fn'5,w%v Jurre 27, 1905 3ryr S. 3D0 East Aa 61on1e6are' 0'1541�V Central dry 5] 1 awil995[k}1395)r '6z5aw 4MQM � Rcq dN4Mc PLWM IlsLw*1 SeY1 cw-W&Ipsaa PI Name on m6 itegiftHrdl DAN Iw"R I.anPen HOlghberh00y P96uipdan AP1 18. 074 No,r I- Em'd Q>!me/ 0p0t 39 C SL H6an Cm.a vl` f1 tWA09+aa A?Am-w Avamias the Roriw_¢n 4C "FVW4MM59 111^52'd3'W Cat11ILakieCity or Sal! Lake City Dstobw $1 t9$3 938 F- 1700 6Y Byron C> irgs vemoaga9 Ntp.rbpy Smith pmbUm P+dmb. Hoses rery.rpl.gadAw.eamer 14'AAv dMA1HPpp 9'p 11'61uM Cen.A- & $aplembm 9, 2019 11.Yy.. ". akr SS Plarander Curbs (I1P3W130 Vmwmal A". Eager House HolueY}1Fk1FCop07epyr 10'ASY6Tl It1S,t171v 1 May 25. 1970 128 S. Malin SL SA ➢al[Bbok r iafem1623llepiisr4g 4aVs74'!1 DI>,-%mh � _ _ lamznw.wlrn+.ems! 1.4�yy 6YNR18'100016791! JarBrary 24, 1995 347 S. 400 Ema s6 �o�Deacanees w'4r4, �1 Cemml Gly 111'S2'FW LHItlSOlfeB166,9}i aM Rlo SopMrlber25,1975 30P South and 56 G Grande Ratmad Staaah IFISCOw5. piupc/hgg iLp GreMe ale<WSF9v+!Ni bt 611 Central Ciry Wee[ 1 firm afaiklaesaalass}} n1•sl•slw a Maroh 11. 1971 334 W. South 57 Dnycroaun House irlmeB57 R""vo; T-ww st Mery.roegvn'Aae,lfl A�A9'18N Doaltwwn _J'r� r fIRlibFlI10006d7H 1t'SIaYy/ T'PPYM Odwba 13. 1@83 925 E. Logan Flarprx J. pe ra,y RwP- , f VmP*J+rF9 A-- 'd dl^%rpagvAa AG4apx PuWm Additlon J*2a, 1974 411 E. 1t70 sa Henry Dirmnrw]ay Souls Cnlrtrol City House dferFA39NLM la'A6W'H 1Ytgl$Irelppf80Btl 111'62'A2w 5aPI2.b. 30, 201E 404 S Nfaat 66 Eages DuPC++S ntoaooueo pagw.ly TemF1e Sa- aw�rrni.w+�>�aro da•Isml Dontdoym rstrlyrewl00009leop r6laew PLNPCM2020-00106 NB7t020 rlo'Ard r{9ry.5Wr or"wo Aet7n kuww In 50 Laae G -wii icom, 191 Hama en Ne kegi{tend] 1n1We DaN iiabM's� Lvcotiv, IiNgh6orhena ownirwa- Juror 27, 7983 833 S. 200 Ear. 11conft�;%IJOM5mmy lidBglol396 (Fr�axM1ryy dC dSpaM CenVd Cn� T-dek SlpADg gue alw+A7e.9atir✓•da+filer 1.5]G3v: � _ Ottarrlee+27. 1w 2W 8. Ma�15t. t 4! q'65xTH D.-b- aleu99Rma1&011 }11'bE71W Apn 20, 1976 164B $. 130 The oldest Outldirg 41 Cxtymae Nei Ir l M1ypa eai! Sr rG& Fk r [ Wesbn;nsier !lrF,R^aywrFadflOdr d0'4YSC7! Cotege I dLHtls+7$Oo2b%H H1'61Y45Y Ormber 20. 19BB 101 S. BOP Eaf1 H Corry ApmtMmM IMM041 QLWArym w'16ar•rl CenCa1 Ciry 1t1•Sta26w �c Dd.ber20. iM 3355-209 Pa da Corona Apartrrrenn Ife9Wi}SITWs�P'aa 1"0." Cmm City ,` A� 111-mveY! eLHSISR%OOV742)1 May 74. 1871 CePltol Hill at r' [�1 6R•aw M1fSq nea:f ol51sle A¢ C 1HaR C.p,mf Im aIR1aLVr1Wad66}1 A0•IfiS3•h 030ber S. 190P 1211 E. too 11 RAh -C y 1686P7�^0. tp4p> R" 550-M uwa,ehy �aryros9vca•Aaelu.t da'd00TH wrfrilswnpo-sxoH In•stzlw Ocober 3, 1980 1229 E.100 NynaP T. oowr gyaoP6392t Pat�ma 40VIOl �, House dl-tkam lggd :eb Ur&Mi Joel- Apguet 17, 1962 241 Fha! SL N C Jr House lFaPa1M[w Q�I�almpp w,4y.,O,11 Central Clry dh'FMA9�':A S11'S3'fsW Y J cLavwae2on9+wn Civxn_ fpoanu,g and J�1' is. T111Q.3 19S9 s. 1100 D1,�C IwsLno659 pi1¢a.R+pp �st� SLw Hvuso auYd�ng �%rWiio^1AvAi M ia rdnJfns7g 11'0131Nr aA5/30ai 14mw lRepel of iGaY rc P,ares Iff of rn Sat LMe City-WipeEa P! Narrio an ma Imfyf DimtoT tad51 Ln Mmn hbwt"4 Reglcmrl^I �9 � August 10. TV$ Eww4go phew 61 E>:p1enPIaW I.,-j1ANnlAyp end 5-IAeIn SL Dbrrr11p1yYr liw{ak D(�Ac[ dsF�ysq. 'l�eRm[ AO•AS'f!'[i +W*IO iSnaeaY6 PH Ap,1 26.1984 1226 Bryan 62 J. Lao FmleaNnbd Ave. S Hones House dMF'We.9w+wae Drt �P'an98'[+ agar iflW aH6IX019B)1 151'S1•f 9M1y August 17. 1962 165 S. BVsM N Fen pecAesc tfa7HW141 tmnalrt(g SL Do_a_ Aupa� da•dyS" .L.anawwnnfy n1•ra-mw Pace nbera,1978 PVI S. S00 atl, l" Ir746o2a7n BIWa'°i'v9 Waft el raeelirgflcuse afay.ryaqur+l4dnePel N1'I5111 CantrBl Ciry west . Wlp)3l669t6i0}) 111"SIT,a'Y! " J* 26. IA43 Z5e S- 13DO Buil[ in iON It, AS Rras1a11onN.8 � trsxcw2$tNlq:flA®g East Uni- serve 0,e essr eL.rf�cR9o'^'/,.+aia+ d0'A9'4911 nl' plslr]1 arras rK.w a p4NPk�tl6.�]W473g 111'S1'13W r[rslauran[. Jory M. 1976 352 E. 300 Pw Cl00 or tneua]es4 {h,bf•hY6q soup, s6 t Cenha[ City CMkt, sd-ni fiery. `0o^'A�pIPa 5'k n-sz eN91g+6epn7iap 1.6rdsw Jmniery2�, i995-S.200Ea61 6i Ew Mpal Chu [f6AWI5Y7 tregslA'(.q IPd55.9'H CAntlai C?ly Epi9ovpel Ch h '�°':"P'9"H�"� Itt'6]176'N ayilgl$IJ{[y11591]i _ May 26, 197E 16$ S. IMua $t. eE F1rs1 Neboiul Bat k �' tR&Po $lfm] e11 D. muralSM&D,Mq i. 111 `SSRAW $e*mber2B.2DD5 d06S, 81a1n S1. nor first on,Firnl 5-wy Bank {ffo5001,R1 I.vgq �,6 ,N Do'waorm lmonaa11w1a[ St11r< Budd,rg wnynr.9p yws..tow t,i i�z err buM-!r mUmh 38 Februalgo ®, 2020 BR6 1+26 4raRaP-9 N.*..Y RMWk of Hislmc Places hblr tr 9 t - Cpy • W*0.4. R Nil Wtft R"011ep ima09 Dfft.Ihtedlsl L.44W. Mwolsorhow Oe 4pdon Abel ROW Ocmner 8, 20M 1206 W-- 290 pl89DD9915InR"4,w Savin . GrovO Ca++iege House a�'r.•9>�+AeSHUN W'3sss+t eN7Rr3'89"A197511 1,5'S553'1Y J* —gjr7a A NwB r2, 20W 2805-400 n (ra000,9a2irrya;nhag weal Cenuel 9lan SoMiA e0dingpany 5eruir:a ®ujdirg y �q%TUC�9rfuaemn PISYTN e4asnsocm,xaJi 1sr•9splw ddh9tl 6y 700 Agri 23. 20D9 Eas[, ln[ fiats T2 FM,9 Dale hlMMa[tea Di triYspy 4.1w, I tt"''', �,aA�-„u,i 5 ar Haase .O xNYi4"99110TF1N Ave. an6900 FIW '0'l( N 11r•529519 _- .nAta l5, 197a FOA Ddgba Yd KM ElarrgiPf Akf� iteeervryalfon Froeml �� --- Nr•bttsaN+ lily 30, 1976 158 E. 2D0 74 J. A. FMW.h BWI0 t[+e00iaTa {M1lq'^� s '& mNms7M'r-Ml Ww`w Cenrrnt Cip, ll iMRL4l5Wi8]6]] m•ssntw WY- RA. Pahl SePlenger 15, 20M 404 W- 400 7a Company Gedcaand kYMehd,ae j fw,6aP,na7PigpAtpg SaM �«x�al.9wr+w.m91 40'aere•N Cannel CSly west e4HMRMS301o37N 111:Itl8V1 Jdy 7, 2A1S Z074 F-d 91tt 7! Georpe and Elea t4lmraV99i+v—w C7. Fargz � �nm+-9>rrrawmal 49' 5WN 1rtaRI5n5(v0.38i1I 11f'49'1]1Y - .rasuary21.1980 159 W-Pit p a General Cmglnaerirg }: t*WD93$+201ONW Are. 0TfA4aNh co nparry BUILpg dWry 9:xmisetlDa 40'4S ^ eieiRISHCC08922jt ti1'SEwCN Jrly 12, 190 4 137 N- WW 7• G�➢t>a•Thomea tla1on22ci21�=[rva T—* SL CBPpd }Q Nousa alsy.+po-grv.'nq�ppi P+SYY,i � aidIRI5l8a0]LGijl Fi1'S596w 4f8rt020 R.Lwi lR g d His ftm llaGmaa li Salt l>Bx C-)• R] Haeae en the A9glrte>lal 9e Dd. lw",d l.aeelon H49ho-ftmd August 18, 1977 125 S. 200 as Lew s 5- Hls H4nao - , Im lw Weal W�-Aow,GW •eY5W+, OPl n /� li Aug-13,1990 425 E- 100 HI Leria B. HAs House 4Nme1 i4s {hKycveyp Wu Cenaai Gty eNIPI°l9W91141 ]] i11.52'4TV Apra 7, ,994 Z36 E- 100 W H tNugorx9uih,Waf+nw South [xnlra4 Giy Allarmwtg 40.4811,b oLkR651ylno6lR]Y 5n'sm> July e. 1915 279 5- 200 Holyjraaty C-sk [A79A,9,6 {ImI9rfT{,e 1Ai Dowxkoan Dmweooi Crluruf epafyn9xgWOulnalel 40.45w9'N eewwsnsoo14,e7} ,,, •aa'adw J—ary 3.1978 SDLrkh TlmCle 93 HM U*h irl&A2a7Sl,r4/ M and MOOR SL Downb7en dl^�y^.^N9ar+e�MGM P'ea'f1N ata+lsrrakozan4t ,n•sszsw A4uS117, 1982 155 W. 200 94 F40WVktor reNd14s GR�. y9 Safes D—t— a�ayre=9vx'•,.ear4 H L^uby�of,e]71 11 :93'47'YY 111"w4 Daoerrnec 12. t971 4vi E 200 Imma Apaplisl �N#p1 ILra9ak5Cw99�I:r0'hFw S h Va ML{pn'JbeNpr 40'45 Centrd CiIY IRIP,5rt8002569}] llv 45W NeveMW 7, 1977 39 W. Market Frdrp/ndanl 016M Of Imwi3m Rl'++.h,v St Dorn Odd Pebv+s Has WI p�14nM7e1 WOMIN, ,apl@90 M305D ill' OV PLNPCM 020-00106 NN mL Nelend RegN dfasAx1e Pleats W kr Sap Lake CW- W— R Nit re on tm karalN Gat9li wp LO Mlan HakphP.MO*d Da&Crippw itagtet o Roughs eow4m m Mardi 28. 19M 1100 East. 9O. 7y Gtn— Pam "19MC {a990W]i4{rapy/npg 4'QW. T50ti Ell Celzre Dlankt east arc aLM+199e WSHxi 71.7rrerd Av+.. iPH'4gN s1i•stzlw Vooernbor27, 1912 35W. 3D0 16 n_ �.FufrAan [f82L'04ea1 4I'Pa Sowh Doa k— W7 �.r%�pl.W�'fA[alKat W'.AS45+i �eaapAaakvaelxi n,•ss�w MEN0CraEm 3. seew 134aaw rwe. 91 Nd60. lei Hlfalp �e lh 'N 45'4a', 9'++ Fcd.1 i "hh .,a9rn��+�J ,n^saww December 9, 1999 1747 S. 1400 hNVl J-Hansen f-1se29aW,'+ Pa91 � HCwae eaory�gsAa'1�w�L`!l W'A 3311Y sa4a+110Us@ MMRRJ9a0a,532)j fll^5, n(Nr 3epten'd¢r 24- 1991 fi36 S- 500 East 8? HarrV Apmmmn% l+'a,0v1,ae5lMG 'rypp 4o•45Di'N Cenk3t City uery.npLgnnAm.ernx ,Il•`..231w n2MRIS51Q3,4i5Jf Dawmper24, 197e 453 N. 5W ei Wtlliam M..k Caen Stars XV, Rapurpg WNP CaoBd HN swx�oWsw+�anem9e o•+a34m eirtaasnaoo7arsp ,xrsaastiv Janaary30.1978 375 W. 200 16 HMd�SM i3i0Ck faeih"+rsPSouth Canlydl Cny We! aWW.Qb TN eanitls++lua2s72p ns5osw AM 21.20M 72$ W- 200 Tha,vs e+,d R4sry j = Y IaDPPP M i714s'ai'f9 NMh Fyn Hepv 1h 11%,o a ler}npe.per/AnelDe! IPiBPSY1 acMWsi09onMW]J 1rf•54wm July 30. 111713 165A69 S. ex He+4t4 g,ddin9 +� PMD111l7 P� Afar SL D—nk— �eK.plg 9easnpci .0•.gSaYa .tM1a&rllUnlaiTp !„^a3'p'w y navnden ny AFd 23, 1988 Parkw4y Ara.. !a H449n4 Park 6l99a0of03 Mp-wo ISM CUM. 2700 S g+hld h%w DwWd Yn}L OLgarlAmen Seul1, and WMW59a9C0r930 Effia6clrl 5t. a•4 w 11t•a,Um S] illy M N96+rN Ftwl dH� CAcee*MkR. ii Sdi like Coy• Wiq�. pescnpeon 13i rf m an the gla Itet9ill 1m g. aamaOwloq Lxat➢en 19eighborlmad Da WAW 22, 1974 1179I- MO OR inkv Junar High S�"Ci {47aG9la741"ATllmpe So1M alw/+9,•90'+IAsaKP11 49'493a1L Stgar Hpua9 wnaa.9,zaxae74Ji 11131Z5'W O&b6er 20. 1989 417E 300 la FvanRM Ayl,lrt,OhW [ae0palTSed'/rra9 Sash P'+Y+7'tl Ae/llsrae0o,7]9]} ,H •srllw AUol,17,11 2$RW 1n6 oa JaPanea9 Cfivdtof - us2 w(hft my so�m 4awrdoWn Chns1 alerynPLpv.oWdoct 4d'4"Tm C BMII2dd114411 iri•PUE 040her 1a,1019 91 B E- Ln6an tea John W. Judd Floutte 1 7 P°va+law A— eaer>,roy,wrneaem.l 4m44n37, PeMW4 AWAM taaas�aa,9ss71 rii^si3ow DerArr6er20, 1979 8E-3003au1h 1% Jygge i3'rinirsg p+m[Q5M PMRAW m•4•i4 Doxnwxn ~° IAIW 111"SaW2 •A*IMw$Q02 W0 Nmrfie'k-0 Jury 21. 19T7 678 E- Soulh Smhh MemortN Kam p77an,� Temple 5< 09yda�] 1a2 H Cen78t 4iiy eaNl9F,llrtpt309}l 111s2•r5w Juntl 15. 197e 236 &!lain SL 1w N-ick Bk c i 1 We6-r�n bawmown t + r1f'=.T34W e3a4RL97+B0atlTlSj1 August 17, t912 T32 S. Alain SL tW iLearns 8ulding i ¢0L57CN DPvauown a3amoga^3aw lases lvla17w avnsy ales w MwM! St. mpred IR A,M-n 2M Nay the Mnivveary Inn bedand breakfast Thanes Nearns F.M-y 2S, 5970 803E. Sash SN el NO tm Mansion tmu S41dw 1IMWelhgi, 7enyse St. Aararnne Utah Ga,nlnon �9 c elrtu9s cakes"t 11fFebruagg @, 2020 t0 4'd.1f20 NellonJNgetw aHaa,', Par '"s h SA � CAY- 7 Apki. nMl1p(p f:owid knotar of Hk Nils hare, ei S¢e i Ch -wir .- FI Reglete� 1 Imapa amt{sUdl$ Lmatlom HolghbofhoCd OrnvlppOO E11 Tlsma on Ine kn¢g• oak IFwwd51 L*oitum Nolghb*tt w Dieto of ralik. i MaY 14, 1971 529E. smkh t. ,ep aavid ICenh Marrim Ie1,uoLale Rsy%ar'P9 T•'.p6 St Roux" ntl Carriage House W efl'+tx A4i� ecember 11, T@SC banded hr 5C. D ¢Md'<19f/1lgpp49]] tt 1'Sr!30W �.� East. 70ba] 1,9 Liberty Perk ti:= NA4aet[� 900 SaeNh- and Libesry Wes' akaFI5.4¢W35C611 180045N I:. +4rg•g13Fi, 1877 2d2-25. 1PId'15N rN aumiirO•&ien >>' ly-ripplsi0 (MIpe1Ap� Melds[, f11'6rd8't1' Buildeig 1O'15Y9Ti aeRYWSr170a13fO}j 1,139'21W RD4hy houalled by 7O0 odglnefylFJfedet Past, Slaw U. weft Hiswc key 20. 1983 dT8 S 200 1300 8ouef, erd diwicr: Fero* i toe Nbert H. Kelly Ftpu%a { pAwaxhe w4 5 "IMn9 oovAloYrn Liberty wNe Fiisx s Inmmn0P47c'+Re 2ika berylegd Et, LibeltylM1Ol9k r•P m the eua7swaoowtGll -sraq O;06it1 ai• FVay¢.PAa[ttt111 Slate SL, maLiberty Webs ►� Ne1Pl&rldkW/Op SaIln,5O0 wattrio Dgbdct EaK and 1300 b� increase 9-th of W401N Ja...y27, 2012 Aiy 2O, 1983 200 ,Pt, J4hh&>tqiy FlomaeISNSM91]2 Q�¢paAFrg well rtl i-b'anW'NM1 �¢r%'We•gm''AaaelDel a0'4536N aHlRisl8i00717Zy1 iH'��Fe'W DelarhIew S. Vg" 941E-5W 17e1013ee 20, 190 242 E. 10O 110 Keyse C1AM HWY4 I>KJrA0,5fl1 [ry0te•frrpJ South G-� �, 721 FIJOW/Y3 dOL6P,•H south [.enlral cityI�keryR .yatiATeemer 10'a932'H �� 4&>Ner+1131jF ,'5259'w +��,,//ta elAIRI,^✓Se001aa111 111'61•44W Sel%eraLet rAakdm Fn6 12 2008 3E1 E. llih Ave. IIIIX�L`aU+K+yse E ' "wimml ljta 1 Avenues 4_ edTIIISNiicomtlp 1,15P11^N August 18, 1977 238 S. Mein St. 111 LAIDB__. {¢71mf9r1 {Wp Nrpp a0'WSp'H 1buTrwD OCMK 11, 1978 ME -South y°`fr�`9O'`s's"r Ny3'27W 112 -yc a, IF+ammis T *St. C�� aLNwlsRlee1311p GIUhh­Y�rva•r yt� cay aer/dd'dte0rrye75fy 111'51� OckCeT 13. 19V33 $21 E- s 700 in Hee¢y Luce Fi- $Qw PBdpne AdAllO!� Janwery M. 2Q75 SBH-,/groin ;O 9m,A ." +0'M9tN 153 '�1C-��Y 1�3100i56i pit�cAmp➢ SL e�311 i1t31S03Y F4d4lfi Fnn.leinm-14 u �err^Y9�A'.L 1 •a'�6'1a',/ a. _ LMPoS'D150156Yy1 I l"5111TY/ kterm 9, r-O Nd5 E. sL 5TE Ndler C. Lyre {IlaOw'g961h!'ncfklq 417 y q SL O No'ran�het 10. 11382 @48 E- 100 F1oua• eNnr.Ml.7+r'•'+la*etuee ;P'4eT1'N p'v•a na 3asna "Swan SotAn evuIt 95)) 711m� Langein Hb Atrv.'bs9� IPdelllx Canlai city dTJRts1920M9fiejj fn•�'r9'w OdDW 13,1983 WE. 17W 124 fde Y"Peb If830o9�1(NipxlmpJ s-qh Addd.. Maed129. 2O18 Me som 9W � � �j pl"Im�1P"d--wiOar M'Go0'H 115 Flat41d D-enld Fml yetooAo227Q4 i" wee! OLNP73R3PP3aa+i1 1 i^5 'alw ;0'M Laa Hwse eaf5ry�npwavRA,1e9 ]4'N I;aenrma IeLRCe&'1O09P721ap r'65a1'W Jijy 7, 19E3 233 8, 4O0 Ea 1r5 NIN d F' F6e" )ae'a163173 P'fP11'N"? Wa Isiw CBnhal Qi r December 17, 1932 S5 jh IMR1&to In)I 11f'SSi9Nt 116 i'eeer•wO°��• 11�05feeT VA-flb I SuuM 9M and 9lh w "_,a9 derY Isw 4¢ )) t"'51 oTl oocsmber 17. 1962 rdarc Isgawrca7ll 1nslss r+ 1t4 JN*r9• G Flcifida Ituiraa,Tal lmmI.Ypy ISIae 51. Ipnnerglly 29. 2Qr11 1Wettrtv"11t t 11r Dfl Dam and Aeod 1¢ptmrY63 p'lye'Id+mO . _ _ anHRiS/e200,Ys11f LeMe Olcriae yerf�9a,',� Ave- 5•Agr Horse ANPj I'V14a3A IC4]'IS'H fn'31 biw 11LVlOZF Na:cnd Pa7a^orof.gWl Pl¢.-d- 5a Lake Citr-1Y?ipxdva N D hNbo.11 A,,eaat d M6 AVtecfk ,pn 5M Lake Gw-wy ¢xn Nerve is mh Image Date If 141j Locatlon Nel9pha1h l Docliptl 0 Pl fault, on Fhv Ft.&M 4] R•9k14�`I 44"0 Data Ihlk*dl< Laemlon Medghb-heed Ow"Ip414a1 Ntgu#24, 1977 10 W. 100 YlAiemA Nelden A-Ic6af $9, 1976 1772E 1 W IV McCormick Bukii 7 I.i E312 ilt'�+v.'rpg h a 1]6 F� � �'�17e �� llnreratly �cYn%.gawaxsaFt>a W's6'U3'FY lipase aY N!¢1$rtnda2a7a]r ��� ��r M elf✓f/op13,2i1 11'S3ZdW hne 13, 1974 iwl•2O. 198O 5331lth Ave. M. Ndspn-6eetl4Y [�0llma.4f Ip•,e Avmuee lie kim W-i.1CL1pFe L¢740P19BT t7mP-'%e99 ��RN1ern Cepifd Hl ,� House " eaeryryugbdP wee Ist'Srnw Alepslpn � Ylryrp_gox.4rtDd 111'S8'21w '� WiliR1990D]3931H .IAufosrfmolrpryl 1 GL M.Dcnalo Mmrch29, 197$ ISG-lag W, 3w D 3' low 1268 E. t0O 12a Chpcdele c:-Phy SwAh Damlam 140 Cad AL NwKauten wom]a4 pm -*" Soue, F1mr`CBIy' supollg d y¢dy,eme, pm'45/9T1 House die }ycw'a4"om'e 4a4flal u a3eA9fRe0RZk7a]! 1'S7.Ww +LAiLSleo003YfPl1 1n •m3sw Jdp 78,1977 EB-72 S. ktaln "�_ - Ma" 10, r98O 42 Pod Odce 17POIYIa yiyrpr�p g!. I¢eoo03e..3@Ittw 4➢ P` 11e MtlMy1t 9u41h10 SSV%+Y�a00v1AnnOR dtraeap7l DWadoMT 141 HHr York FlpEM � ryrpLq +A-115ur 4Cd3'[yH Ooenlo'em Amid9misl7Jj 1113 w a41Rd9f4dt�Yi3Rs911 i11'S331W scuff 1pm 0-t 7�' ..,f`"e " DocenCaf27- r982 Ol l W IXtl Clods M2gNs p`920P17521itye/.kpq SwM aM Mabl Jut, 17. 197$ FVt[ HaLalFal Benll ' n '7 ec �C so Do-aNwvn 1✓' IeiA0pY 1t M71hAVe- u, kagln[yre HWSc i.' . f..-� �7+44o4wAeee,vn W'4L39'TL Avemiee WFRLLSasdwiizkl �•Se,27W �t � eLNF9 7@D&M7?J] 111323/W December 20.2002 452 E 500 1� md4ae kouferlo H. (W�2W1y55[..9FM $nrkih Cienutli �, >7[0]Uu 75, 1974 4W Boud1 entl ''`} 9°dAA' DM � to IXd PFwleer Fort site D-0i° mow" Der,.I e7RttESRk0of53611 '62'3aw >�MysnC4eotmj 3+f % wL�_+ etbtlsnawsrpalF s11•ua1M' i J�Jy7, 1983 avma SE.2W 111 Fredmrpr JLE-hleypt f .31141tay 09 South .V are Hdery.nxg¢wdy¢Nlpl 10'+9551t cay chip tf31741F 111'61NM O•pen16er 4, 2008 3505. 4110E gu mSo" ifae0aHe6 {le�ellnpp 10-AS'feTe CeMrA City flp636er 13, 198.3 1820$-lam y,A�d 1"'1 r1f^s7•Jpye tS1 Afeaander hlilGnJ E¢sl r.'IOu90 "Mis9ur'Rjl 111sl 'H laark%16 Add'y]n aLNRiWS3aW965j} 111'S1 i9W Rail ShOfIFnF lai pplltl�,l{/dp fry 'P-ieipOM Mee. 14p F�aN Company d¢ry,Ay�ph IMIE64'ti DOrlYanell .lauas7doofalg}f +1s'a17yw A"ii 29, 19e0 314 Clmir a St. 131 fticFwd Vaughan t4'4om7p2' qrq h3pg 40•iae431 cum enenit Horse rl.r!"Pe w''+a°•BF�BF 11l•SSww Hif Auguea5,1M3 Yt4 S. 1200 y elaiHy�y, Q�yy1F Fry *K Ortio e6 Ho •saxu115l mc+Mw Eael LOH�yI ee..r.es..9c',raanoi Ie'4s/see Monlsp> m.1N 9ed7bw 17, 1999 205 N. 4O0 - �w r3's F-1°r'berC�nMgS' lNeem/sal we# Capps Hidt Cfl- - r" eAd d+7+Pitm+ F ib•It'�+t Sepwrm- 30- I= 4s W 200 Warpquae Lwa&Rt9ca,sun 1,`dltl]'w lwn (he jy� stuth In ormk>„7� 7heeve . _. fin,,►�r• �ov +annwea'rAa..m. e>�•H D°""w""" Mwxrtaln Srak4 FJeymEet 24, 19ea 1075 E. .a. aYxtwa=tsl)l 1r'STd21v 171 Tdbpfrone and t iV' !'svN Fkliiyw7od Ave. S� Haase P T.I.grmh co, 4m FebruJ00 ®, 2020 1sRs -0lBlNiv Ns-nd Roebwr d HYal: Place, Mags ur Sd1 tAkv Ulbf • Wi qV �l NlT9anThe R laterlll i111gv Da[. Iisud5) Location "bohhmd De CYiph- Apol 16. 071 Z33 Canyon Rd- 14a 01D•F]M F4P rife '}i {IilfnoB51 INICa�A4yy pfli3Tk GCreG� �aiM(tll,r,Wee511} 11,'W1}}w Caer)on Jamie" 24.2011 315 E- 2D0 ,hl Pa. hY,r{hht i (110001f99 (1pn-'+nkg Sgnh Cwti'ld City Plpdne 4umm Isex..5syprinolepeP a 4sWra MMRr5e1oa01f59ll 111'S2SP1V October 19, 2019 701 N `SL tee aW "rthEn�yY �� ps�M A,.-- Poon[� maalpreU 111sresve Sepb.t-12, 2008 445 E. 300 7a1 Ppler P✓m Cow A.d-lae r2rnro A.+t�M 14-iH-h a[rtaRL'.'atlODgaaV)P t11'srftw Dacera6er 17. 1992 422-432 W" 300 151 PHotel SM"alk itl 1ila169p IkrT.'1�*F9 3a Ah e6r Ctrel Ckry Wes[ rd •x^W9.r'�,4ar�OW �a'4941T1 aL7wrlsv'Nple9oj! 1'al'rir W 77doben 13. 799$ 950E. Logan 153 ai■om p" peareag i1R3flowe Ilhwp9D A, Perkfre Additiwl HWGe ppy�ga.,ieae� �Mpg•N a�R19,A3a0 -Ifl isys • Sepiamoer 12, 2006 300Eaai s5i PraC *Rpartr+reraa e16S. leoeooae7s p' P18nD1r Central Clry WWSM 220-766S. Fehruary 17, 197E MM hn 0% 1a6 Peel kip[¢[ Iv9aOa5790ei, 102-120 W.3W Oo,_ aAe7rpygev+/�eE1+1 C Ah taaStsnem�rsr91P 4Q45'I7TI t.y7sew August 25. t972 704 CNNro. M. 1tr7Toa r299I�'L1V9 IN John Raps kkeu5e • 4pd614'P1 caand !-M eaJ1ARIS7l2[aJV6¢]I JaMWy 7, a015 2091 E, St. t,17 Jahn and Margaral {. W01110 Pd2s:'KW M.Y. Y1ay F.." W_ House �leanpe.9a' =0's131'11 eNlra3'1�00 kIwJ] +1eayw [.crento anO emma Atgual 8 12i15 E. 1900 va PnkCA Npu� and I� rDMei.A 19 m J1pp Fail Central 9.nnk mica wm yK'FT poWWMRH ip+131'N dmwsrsawlptap 11[ssarve L3R{f2D NOW Reghlw of RWd1CP li fl q m WLW QY • Wn 119 R lsl. M. W g. bah Phuscpt LaCallpn kWlgrborhoed __- - - GP EI M@v 2.1999 128 & 17_' 13s Lewis A. Ramsey 11 a fAPB000mt {hrgo:lapg EBE- dyrS^pc9o'/rbntt/al 40'499ie eP Ear It aulaki5sea0082,11 I,t'S1'Al„ Sul in 1958 in tn[amabonal St o, July 11, 2003 1019 E. 2100 .t v4in Via SB1l 19a Riclrargcn�ower Ie09mma8 purr,[ p9 S"ll, sager kt0Y5e Lake C11y PutLc auhon9 Mn •tlRfrOe9aw�.enxae ipf.43JT1 awdy Building 6. ( 9A3000a By 111.5111w Imm t 979 W 20". Jdy 26. 197g 16r RGNdand HA -St 205 aA PYNppJ9pi Velra'A,gg 24'5] -111 " A1wueS W.A. Schad eMr%R�fA'rreA>all[IM e121wsns3oraarp 11 -stew _ JvnlA y 3, 1903 05 E, r00 1p2 Jonathan C"and Sogh Caalral Chy aiM K. R�ykl Hawn dfsynpcg.xWylprc 491+ "N sSxSH9ai[vs17a11 t1•sz21w Judy 7.1963 RumW fl95R Mina i,,, 350S Ease ,sa GmY t500 Ck,C�, �. � msrasw .uerasrtrmstnp SWl-"r22, 1970 231 E" 100 ,el 3L Llan�s F-7ravapal tllrAaOa?A pnlp M South Control C Cd7h0aral Ab r46.9.�'+AwctOi 60',9111"N .L `EW`0a0DMN 111.53T ]una 75, 187Q d514geahingWg ,as �t lake C1ly and f7al']a4e S4 r,b.Cily Ca v 9Wd`rt9 Y•ap 'H?Narl /P1533H •1RIW5 WDDa2B]I 11r'S]tl9 X . bou ided by South Tmapla August22,1996 1toDEnf 400 lea Sett Lake Ciry East (aSeaooll0 VuT.+1N Sauer, CAn1rd[Cib 51deH Diahiet )! Wrµev.9eNn.nfiDfl LNi.erAYAve., IralRlSfa900041o]t 9W SwM,a,ka 50o Eaet 4ff¢53,T1 111^5 sm 1m MI Lake Cty Pvblic �•• August T, 1979 15 & Sh" lit. tf+sooaws L-I-NIft L,bmty �^x +fi t 1n'S9't9'W weaarATno7A75}) duty7,2015 2325SauMW lee Sae Lake Geary East 3 Flou.a Oueand GOHCaaae Axror9�Aa*sW 49'4"TN Jar aTikl5er50pP1p311 111.513 r7'zs 14tr th0 MadeleUm Chok Sd1ool Calgmapyene C*f"I city t -t t-k wide sole Gem Scum YemyBe W 900 Sarah: boundQe9 yreeay h¢neaied In 2Ml and 2M3, ma LW of WAWW House¢ mo P1anet.lk-1965- 2003, 0.C" T ner Ja dry siMc 2D09 4MRWQ Na WPLq"rW lWtaSC PlAevfIn S* kekc C+ly• WIkpP them NA6dtlk iteg'slor.f HM. P iNkg nSak l..k. M-Wes. IA klanw aslhe RA911rt,[41 Mktg. Dais IMMF Loeal[on N6ighhuhaed Descalptlaa I$ flameaema R.gt.I.rNI kw. Dabs t}atedtsP LOCOWO 111igh11G1laad Dwedom sol-Me En� intl Works- August 14, M 24T W. 400 tMT30pakwyheprJ." S" Cer6rd Cly'rwagt ,79 Snnb ApertrneNs Odober 20, 1909 =41 S, 300 East [f89'1al7do{MWa:rmrg 1a'AW'N GMbef City' CaR}V tySOYSng •1�'f'roQs A—Io.t .n4SarR a1MRI6V]CG0imJ j t11^Sa•AM �I r.�eo•'an+cn m•ersew n1MHLS'8906174%1 1i Celt Na rthoe CO -Mr, H`m�'+= Octob&4.2001 155 N. 400 (ept0np- yMynAlpg Was1 Wrxr�tloa'•'AmNq Capin[ Nd lap Gerx{3ee i.lbert 3trG1n G-qD 4-9 march 12, 7093 UO2 E" Yale UeapaD0e81tryff6/R 40` 10'Haa'PI Yaiacres[ Mr, apag, .I,M¢$g1aa,gm7 1-v' vgw 9••'%fseIDvl A.taNiSg30aMee61P ,17•51•nw aq ewr 171 Salt Lake rmrmwew N41bc OLsm ,ou" al by W" 29, 2001 1100 Yleu, MO IWID0 M(44 elrya North. 500 SYON,aM elgq Feapark tat ➢ - Nlglrar IT. 19E2 12f W. 2110 laeemtllsl .-W-5 l7oa+klDWO a..x.saa. yr W1rR15,a1ryJp37ajP Ten�ge WY�87J N �II .CrrYrri.W+a.Mlj ilw4 NMa°1tAea116p 111 `33'a5w P51'S135w A 17y Sad Lake $tamp CampaTy Building OZ nsber22, ISM 33D W. 200 i.e2gos7sd VA4'unktt smm dAr%gaVaeeMDet dp;536T1 Central Ciry Ykal lye Scum Temple 100 E.Io1350 July 1a, 1982 G032aOkuT E $aura 7enple VA( At4➢ St ex7lfssrs�a1rs39 t11^sanew H�mria [zelixs � n+'ax1lm' 1Ts $ah Lok9 51Dck andaJuly' MiniN Exdh"itieoe183] 30, 1976 99 plglangg (eNmkla,pp Place Do-nbWl IN Pa Sell Lake C � ry Judy i1, 200j 2131- IIa3WD¢i7V"'M N KAW Or'. Sr9ar Pieces 13W,N b e1AsalLYr 4ry "'H Mro�Iemly3OH 11 Public Library g'ax^�°'d'r'ae°I� �� . y371w eiRlvl&060MB3TH I,1'b1'S.7'W /7. Sal[ Lake urom Papka Rairoad JetY9, 1975 Sddh TMnpleat DRSODi3tB {rapflypp 4M West C9nkW G7ty Weal Tel 5reinor Anrerkt�a SepkambA 10, 20t9 %5E. Sous illal'Uar3v MIFIAV Tlo" DOnb- - - Stetion diT r 7Oora elajl •s.tirkl'I Big P" elN.Ql t,Q -tI Ao-4fft w �~ Daeanilw Z7, 1982 175E.200 - January 27, 2MO 216 E" 300 lea Stradord Hovel 1�tT54 -," i�enbal CNy na Sampsan npamnanty f1O�01�`[ TAi� +r South 4J C"WaCEr �� NFOl7siyj 11illnofiN .aMSv129ZII jtllmww - --- S- 1200 1ae 54g& Hdc LDS Isoa 11 P'�'tP] East mNausa ward 0dlding Ww1•.rpygvn'Asi.10p alraavma September 12, 2002 737 S. IMU aYNP1SRa000B31]I 11,'Sis4w T7. Sarah QaR Flogle far 11-A90 [e7 Iwl p,la4i+lnpp F-aal ILa r�pse'A9si0.t W4g11Tr Celled G ity a1MF1^aeq+yalvl,]1 Y1'12W - Sokonarday February& 2')07 16e0S-a00 r •n '9dl-U klaeWghatr89 Ond - IaaFtinawp l East dbrxrgsyo'+AvwWr AfeY3'�'nr Sugarll Noup July 11. 2003 11fl0 EaeIeed IwcmoUs9s{kiwi. 2t00 savm 5ehad .r.7lRebt6yoas9pii 111'S2Mw IVk1wnW-R �ax.rm-sw'nsteDp WUWW a Name _ gs+tAP.yaya06,'1a)l 1r,`5$NW $J„ 9rWh w Iron k% 29,19" 550 W. 700 in YA:rka o164A -d IA99oaa6'S Ttm r.+xv 5"a'ar cenad at, pyeer WarWkw.ee _ I!e-y. .gn'FefeYbr 141,54 eLHAo12]1 111'S/'?rTY! PLNPCM2020-00106 42 Februa0019, 2020 ,9Rs 4MQQ0 IhLl Fs9isierd Hamrcw ar rhftngz in Salt t Ciq -W&ip m: Raplderi'1 f.11a54 Paw fiat d5l Lotao- ]Jorghbernepp Peaa Ow SwW Car+dy Cbcmnbar 26, 20W 22A S- 200 [VOWalee4 yF.fb+Ifmv W*M fee �++panY DdkkW i�+a11nn0¢1 P45•• i -- dnNtl�pyY/]15g4]] n1.5r4c^x Omber 15, 19W $pYafe I W PM17e'1llgg 140 Ta111pW Square 404614Tr ao 11t a py Bo-n fl Mww r3ap eurm3eavwr3a]l NOYambel 11. 1977 40 South ¢nd INTenth VAM square �,'�t^Pz.9e'e'A1aY7eT prrioo19fa 4bWPlhVY E90 Eaai 40'4557'M Ca MCity a1eJ6PJ✓7NaT]idjj 111•ex V Sar ThiN May 19, 2mo low E. Blaine cmw � Sugar Yieilae Churh par %% 4rsrRr&ruaeeasZ9)j 111'SI%V Tracy Lawn am Tn2gt 0,14 ar 10, 1978 151 & Man SL f+�auL+.'ge1 inpprlrryp 197 C.-r.ny .:nlearpll wf'6]245Y DDWRID �ery.r{u rtxRl5ne007aa511 Jelly S0, 291E 10 Trbu Su"1 137 S. MAW SL 1ne [M�� ea'OS"i&'F1 Oa W_n 4*v4sf' i11'G3L1'Y1 iH♦r4a' i]C4t03]f JWY 30. 79T6 7m E. so 1a4 TFkft R.M-E.Chtrdr fVwa*a3l yrayerre0 S �err.M1 �A+'AaerRr 1n•d6'bYV CenYd crty O4Mrp8rlBOalfl9f)1 fls•gblw 1a5 RWxe+ty.tJMln 1YaN Apra 6, 2015 1102 W. 400 f4`1a00ela2pw(wAitaa North Faaparle LDS Nk b h- n9 4+rrtMW.9a'rAT+� etr4aua'N v r1T�l&r158001'.�I 111'Wl: Y+' uxar6a2o.2WE 14508.13011 11� Frank M. and Swan yfOtl. dT4s6 p'W mp Ee,t it LWnWCf HcYr9a �eMMW�rAxW[MI -rwd• SuwHoum .irt>Prsmeoots56jj 1+r^Sr+tw R-" L'mveratY r7.cent6er 13, 1995 Spell. Seto 1q7 4mirfapv TemjJa, 3100 Unnr¢raYy HiA-oDkv H-x�nc CaL4ct .9�np q dn%�r..9o'e'Aa1?4ar1 Feu erd wTlnr&p9]a141p]i I1nlWpgl�r r1L /CIgg77r 111.512QW � 20. 1878 unwed ty or 1aa un'ryey' 9y d Ureh __- pieoaxeax lkmn(kgi Utah tempos Clyda W.S5 T4 Llnhet^y{y pDleRl$RappEeg]i} f1+'SaSfyi emrd02a NVA.9 R.Ol wiwTnew nmW' n $a&Li�v Gy•WAAc�+e kemo en me Re01.16rill 4nq p Data 8a1P LO-W. Nerghbwh"d OMOW 1'J, 19S3 935 E. Lugar p7 Cs4wies ri. Waeks 1�"ao3R:a R4'.sW lnag Ave. PerWm AdtluWn }t(etse WNe^L"O''aaaaMlra OO.44P.1M xiAiWel89003959]I 1's1-+aw Saptember29,2015 700E, eSo 6 196 Wgglam General Iny40em MmwiMpy Temple Si Can7d Ager.y BWlding encry..y,e-ger.•Awnta W'4603'Mi i,vrns,tea9awe]] r+1.57naw Wbararn Macaror,lApFi 7. 20T5 & F00 ewaaectl.rr<g fsfs00oes1 pnrorsav 16 V% CYal Gty West cn �'P�'Y FM1Gay w +ae�%npr'Aw"/�ae1[Mt eo'ksh9Ti tlRJ6W15rJOe133]j 1/1'Se'2rRv +� Sepm tnr 7, 2001 7733 5- 73m "o W-1-lnslw C.*- rW1o8aGtl yF�cMry Fast PreJQen1'g hiansn d.r•+�P+a�'�am11011 4a'4yy9Tr Sugar l'hwse eVrtlt1Sp10a09itj} t1'S19YtV S b-1011 h Ape 2i, 2011 1300 Ewd. x1t Plar r><rl0odi31 Pa�'mn4 Eed. F M Mstoric D}Bfd Fiielofic Diuticl Sb aen,na.ava'A+ito.T 511er+rWan Ara. d o aYTrle&n10a&xU]r 1000 Eas13ta. 4a'"4 - 111'64'4EW Sepemner25. i979 564 W. 400 rz NaLeOrF YYhaeler - - t47900P`J Ptk.Aw North Fakparr A March 30.1978 975(3ar6p1E au John PA W LWW r rRBo6aW fta R x Are. $u?afk� H A-F^p.9 WA-" 4 43- . adWIW?yppaali) 111'51.41 .Rdy 14, 19M IMS. S00 214 WOed" ViIA IeaYau11S6 dNpfilrty �� wn,.rpsq +.m.lc.t Po-sn.- ! tMM vvgr aurrtasranlolt ea}l 1rran4w Bay 4. 598E 16365-500 x+s Aesfid Han wo9arulf ErR3� Llbeyy WaAs neata ��4O�Nmin �A+Fx+erowusy nrsrrsaw JJy 14,198E 160C S- $00 310 Wdema Weedred rest Fenn Nauss %^p.q'dAaae1011 4a'M�aiH Liberty Wout MRr9rSWme4lujr 11e•etd4'W J+Iy 26, 1979 2251R Stem &L p 1 07 Woodruff-PAw House �• 10'4a27•M .aPlyl Mq PLNPCM2020-00106 E1R 42 4 JN2fl kstaiel RbpW d 1,a plq;¢1y kstn,, n S Ls4o Cih- fydcxf Natr. on VW ReAIHf'1°, Imopo Bela lInw! L..Yd- N9tgr"rhood Ofna Fob- 18.1994 2151-: 11q� as v 1ofi� Sugar �. x iG9.aooa4o9 {aiws�ap9 L.. �ro+s�rw�wtva .o•iezi+ swot Moue - �i� Ff 1.519'Ty umh Cymmenya a11d dum 18, 19TS 22 E- T09 Seulb i0a Ua'mSCa,ik Jo {oidddrel9 FipcAyp i74fNITr Barnaolm 8.j2uw a47A WWO191Dn 11}•eYt2'ty '000 wftCk wd January T7, 1951 t4&th Te9a11e m1 LReh Stale Fafr will, 6TN'M1W+pp s" Fakpeh Gas ��nlcgvrlR Dn is xrtrrnsefooesx:H Rk' 1 n•59i0w July it, 2003 19M S. tloo xox t1Wah Slate Llq- la43w"Oft�rryg rv� Super Fpee This bukirg is no Agar+ N.-22 w'4M'N 1W.J.rrrere- W.aa+13�1NaaH]i ITI-SI51W vetelans Jrme 16. 19gG 401E 1281 m1 Rtlminetre'mn Irbeo[tF909iAnr."� Ave. AYenuea Nogp3:q aM•xnPa9e'+NetelBel av-47W34'fr arrtmo>vvmomaaA ur'n•¢aw Oetober A' 2m6 175 5- Wd. St 7Yr Walker Bank Budding ftr% 4o'¢yagrl D- WnbNvn 4; e[RAPL4 WW924ji 1t t•aarra•w 2W .dAand F-terpwrL A- let- Sao *Ird ego W'aet; 4 0 Saatl sal Of AlgcrsF 17, 190E *ISO ongNy eddmsses Yo5 Warehoueg Dism leatoae+edl ./•1P3 bck W by 1- GaMml CWty Weal repesem a svry.avepv+rPm 15• us 5o S.,beundery iepq•,�e - MeeL3HxoMfM)i W-Tempts Sl- 300 W4+19 orM0rth72,2016 i %o smtn ¢o'4y47*r fit •54rypw M.y 15. Q80 SAON- V* Ho05he ad t Ze6 Wasektr 3 p'lnps 1�89de ogpw ss y+w Cmd-es Fi-gO Wrp.rge.pewaeaemat 49'41E1Tr �' Hid Nlusawa&Ubh _ .. .�1 T, I'SSS7•V1 198 -7pp9 4tl Margin/ p4Qnw or Mlsavc P6tac 1-9, h S* LWW City, 7YIro+ PI Via° Ynepe om mmefM Lat@Wn NWghbwh-d Re+ryb 8eunded by Ave. r1oVelnber 8.2W7 (840$side i840 Sam] to z1a a[ Wterona L s/,'eap 1-'W SettN. a1W Y56trasl MA, kt Bislia mh,nglq- elery.rge.gvn'AeaaDn 1'�E26t 10 a1MPo3,f10( lmd ) 18W East 4C4a•4M ltr•w4 DeMbai 13,1983 956 E. Lagen na l-hemuz Yan.y t•Iw" :a1MW�vy Ave. .cWxno,,yylaaeallal W-Tim Pe.WcnW4nn ./ aaAt18wA1699c11i W-51'1e'W Oiobw 1S, 1N6 6$-U E. 3Wh eta 81.1t m YN' gr (MxAa m m"ft a Tempra SL DD V C-0ex ylerYrvppu'.Wrdoet ¢PW't1Tt nn .(n l ,: cca�� 11 LY 11 eNfd8�050aa�11 m`5s, f4embN 22, 7970 563-NeIn 3L x2r Z.C.MA Cast Iron Front IrmOCpe;E 1Ayq DOwYaalYn i1.53E4w Pecan[ rr' 26. 2005 230 5- No 2CMI General Warelnuse trv,5p91.1&ionwe +pg WWeef eNxw*7a'rnm•[la 404618'N Cm+oel atyWpse aeTn MW 145711 11e'e41M Former listings Februalgo ®, 2020 rseeerlpeen Nwpart of the rawde Bribe City Creek Center. 4ra+3112D rt W R,,NW ,9 HkfoAc PNeef leMg� . S.A Ly Ay- Wko� Nm1w erL 111a IM.p. Om Iralad D.W--d LOC91*0 Netftbort-W S,trrprNry K*WA .r } Amus '. J dry Jum 3,1976 ApN 17. 19W 02S. W.I. [;Gwnlcwn itRppOsd¢+) 3C DakY-`d in 1975 nnc.+ e n was a Yargmmem May 14, 1971 W, ,29, 1975 732 AWAM e�w NaL relora[ea FarmA-,t5e M IODW54 Ara, 10 Ms rY 1I1e Pis- Her6age Perk Lar9efY Aem&kU 7 Brooke AJdtl k A guel 17, 1W July3,2M4 sotBL 9 f0'.W N ptmde ar 11'33"rr'W 21?01 AII A Bidding al U-981Neef ALgLrbt i7, F952 sww"14er 3, 2000 592-gaw. C We CIty WOW 2W Swru f.aaeoil3q 200 sotffi Pert of m 3e0s, umrersity e Carlsrn HA{rrsat.+laJ Apt 12, 199e .funs 15, 201$ $I. unl,mraly S�- Aa'Asa 1'H a:mnuy 111'bt�l'W CoDege of Lew a Ctby" J-11, 1952 OaC'em6m 28. 199a 214 S. Po1'.n0aM1 Buicin9 I.�b Im) Sufa SL 7 Ca.muam 38p v"w 29, 1976 Ap iI 17, 18t58 $d $. Ms.17nwnwa Ouldelg L•C5 IW ) at s Ferry Nay OMOig.13t 3, low MartA S. 1968 $yterllpoge I300 Ea C+ itff 11>Bb E. 6 UwLbor �nY ]Ldy 11, 2oD3 [.iCLeL679IJune l15, 2015 2100 4^ AM1391 v+ cp., HouSA Budd6n 11f'51'dSW 123 $ to Fleml Rlhcve e'ra '"r•_ August 17, %R2 J&Wmy 17. 2017 V" Tmmla sL Donnlawvt raaxg101 Ad Ma ba'issa, r -0$ Firm Warn Fe6nrary r5, 199fi M. D ' am Cafih-a1 at,'mebngt u .Ibe�) iatluien Van Z , 1= - Stma9e JLdy 11, 2dbd FeoPk7ty t1, 2007 124o E auger Hausa Cn'=Q BWdiag MWODDe3'+i 2100 $rnw 13 Allen smim July 7, 59$3 rK ba,2& 1994 319 9- 200 oavnlvpn Hausa 0A'-07IM ww 169 Regent 14 rt .+rtR wl bw lam] 9Q Fpi r t I.lost" Al .s`+s'rr Down+awn fft 7" GYm2ff NggfW Rpgrae.d iCtorlc Places W..Ug mWLL ❑ry- Hama cn PI q10 Inrape DAt. IW" Da1.r.mor.d Lac — H.lyl.barhovd summ.ry R.9lasw Teshnlca) s3 Hlgh Sd an Feb—19, t9M �3AI klay 15, 2001 241 N. 300 w.st casr^.d HJI ui a sarilgc ra Am Tn I Do�1wa'ir N1ay 22. 1e7S Woow6w) DCaealla a, tsei 239 S- u.le$L LYnYN— Duyd.lg No Iwger Ufa 370w. 100 mm; Vi•M Smat 17 $laughter C.any 'rR AupW l7, 1932 Jerre is, 2o13 som L'erWOl Y!a!1 � Abrehpuee Isasaut119) a0'aeW'H fif'&IDSW Arars. lglldi pry A -pedy See also • List of National Hlstwic Landmarks in utah • Nationai Register of Msloric Places lls5nes Jn Ugh Aleferenms 1, the WILL IdJ - ansl rpngIlude lnrarni alp n Af6w[100 in IiIn "National Register Informallon Sy51am" (wips:flopgali lade waL cluved orVi-mily ftML 1tle N:.rlorral ery.nps•GOV)NRHP). wiwal Reaghater orh6.storlc RDg-wrer Ird(rfinetion SystorR. which nag beets fn,tlul Places. National Park Sumice. April N 2piiL. fa to 12rr1y e<;aA kc for abmtl 99%of Itslins. Scn.' Hi hl-(fi it n:rl•-�hL•r I,:- ' . g NUN each daf9 % kilt, tOCHtr0115 rR iM1IS tablit 11tay I1iVE 17E6t1 COmedf2d TU ,rr•1bu 2ssq led 1ri cosh ralten 1n Il* Nodonal currant GPS Simnanrile- ROq Warklfafineltcn $yBpem cialab&%. whw h r 11 :,v �'Nationat R091sigr of Hiebft Places' Weekly Lie 1rF ,w by C"ng the tarnrlter Actions'{nkps:Ilwwve.nps,9ovleuhjeGWnatlonalreyisi0 J. Karp; (ceplembcr 19, 2002.1.'Nalional rlwee"ist. htm). "le tienai Perk S••r;i�=r!. Unked ROOT" of Fllatorlc Places Np frtBVan, Sa11 Lake CIty $19tas Department of the InWfdeF Rel`4 Uj 01) Iklrtl East Side Hjgtprlc Dls&icV (hppslenpgayery.nps.go 1 3•`(=I NRHPIGetAm3@VNRMPM2M-J739 text] :.. . S Numt,r ryrasant an orde"ng by s+grllhcant vrwlds. iiaf •-., ,.. - ... . 4ariol is a kl gs, 7Wimed . JiffaronfiaW %oflorlal ",)I - HisKuiClalld irtt and lllttafic dl bkft frorl-•Ir,:;, 1. hUpAv ,sEcdac .cam'Pr2rninrgiH LCd20 J 4ff3wok5-PC MRHP bmldrnq!5. At]VCw-r . 9ide5 or objwl - RealM,ed fioln'IIL1p8'71en.111tlpedki.pr�LL,y,p.k, pqY cra•NenaLa_Rey� �k Galinga_In_s�ri 1�xe_ciryaowln=9zauatazi- This m9• wa. ket edIi ar In Ha..nd1.r 201%.1 M3= fdlTCj feat—Wd, ft Vy ff VIWIrvO( ]N 5AIUO.1mn3n—A,ke lj�- P161~mK4 0, -Ml , ih5e,ls, V. Goren 4r ll� lb —'A ilsa� Pry ry f'dq, WWIDII� ix T regis Pre6 Md-7141t, M InatAA,Wleng F9y.ytdIl ,, Ia d omnn o ge utcLn e 2wN PLNPCM2020-00106 44 FebrudlgoO, 2020 WILLIAM F. BEER ESTATE CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION PROJECT Submitted by: Stephen C. Pace (owner) 181 B Street, SLC UT, 84103 step hencpaceoua I u Ri. m it.ed u 881 363 8190 This document is submitted on May 2, 2019 for formal consideration by SLC planning staff and the Historic Landmarks Commission. It builds upon a proposal originally informally submitted on March 15, 2019 and discussed with staff on March 21, 2019. It consists of *** The PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (pages 1-31 ) provides for an exact restoration of the 1899 Kletting Carriage House and liveryman quarters in its historic footprint using building materials that survive on site. It leaves the Landmark 1867 "Harness Shop House" that Pace restored almost 40 years ago intact at the northern extreme of the 222 4th Avenue lot and completes the restoration of the four building Beer Estate. Please note that the applicant would prefer and support an alternative that would allow the exact restoration of the Carriage House I will welcome a Landmarks hearing on this matter. I resp ctufully await the municipality's decision. ace PLNPCM2020-00106 45 FebrudlgoO, 2020 WILLIAM F. BEER ESTATE CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION PROJECT (Location: 222 4"' Avenue, current zoning RMF 35. Site size: 224th lot C. 8400 feet; adjoining 181 B Street Lot c. 6300 feet.) Stephen C. Pace, Owner 901-363-8190 March 15, 2019 Introduction/Chronoiogy of Events 1. br. William F. Beer, MQ, (Salt lake City's "Gentile" 0B/GYN) assembled the property in the late 1890s, and retained architect Richard K. A. Kletting to design a residential compound. Construction corn pleted in 1899. The estate consisted of four (4) buildings, three (3) of them residential: ■ 181 B Street Mansion. Housed Beer family and one house servant. ■ 181 B Street Workshop. Extensively rehabbed by Pace, 2004. • 222 4"' Avenue "Harness Shop House." An 1867 firebrick commercial shop (rehabbed in 1899 to a residence with three (3) very small bedrooms), a Was said by Beer Family to be occupied by defrocked physician who served as the "town abortionist," a Extensively remodeled by Pace in 1930-82 into a one -bedroom house. ■ 222 4F`' Avenue Carriage House. Firebrick -arid -frame structure built in 1899 to house livery and vehicles, feed, and provide housing for Beer's liveryman and spouse (who was also a Beer house servant). With the coming of automobiles, the north facade was removed and the building was used for garage and storage space. 2. Summer 1975. William F, Beer, Jr., died while a resident of the mansion. Pace negotiated a private sale with the Beer Family heirs for the entire estate and took residence there in April 1976. 3. June 1977. The four (4) structures on the two (2) lots were nominated by the state of Utah to the National Register of Historic Places. Pace was notified that the buildings were placed on the Register in December 1977 (Code 77001306), Apparently contemporaneously, the buildings were also automatically individually placed on City and State registers, but no notice was given. 4. Ja n u a ry 1_979. Salt Lake City changed zoning code to "faster, enhance, and preserve" historic structures in the "Lower West Avenues Neighborhood," specifically citing "a number of structures within the neighborhood that have individually been placed on federal, state, or city historical PLNPCM2020-00106 46 FebrudlgoO, 2020 4 registers." Pare researched this citation and determined that the only neighborhood structures s❑ designated were the four Beer Estate buildings. 5. 1977 > forward., On -going preservation/rehab/improvements at 181 B Street mansion. 157 1; Rehab of 222 4sh 9MAvenue "Harness Shop House." Awarded Utah Heritage Foundation "Award of Merit," 1982. 2004: Rehab of 181 B Street Workshop into Kletting-style garage/workshop. (Pictured as an exemplar in the Saft Lake City Part l! design Guidelines 9.4 of how "accessory building should be constructed to be compatible with primary structures" ... "designed to complement the house.") 1984, 1995, 2004, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018: Pace or representatives approach Salt Lake City Ptanning to discuss rehab of Carriage House into a Kletting-Chemed dwelling unit, identical to what was built there in 1899. Responses that were uniformly given —along with a profusion of sympathy —that this would not be possible, along with statements that "zoning laws could change in the future." 6. 2019—Current Situation: As measured by the ratio of percentage of property built upon, the ratio of assessed building value to assessed property value, the ratio of dwelling units or bedrooms per acre, the assessed value of the building, and the square footage of the building, the 222 41h Avenue roperty re presents Derha ps the least sensible use of land in the entire Avenues area. The only suggested options by SLC Pia nning to add residential space to the lot —either "overbuilding" the 550' footprint of the Pioneer -era Harness Shop House, by having it devoured by a modern structure or by connecting the Harness Shop to another structure with a glass tube to a separate building — either of which would unquestionably destroy the historical integrity of the site. The aptions would also leave the 5000-or-so square feet at the south end of the lot, now occupied by the remains of the Carriage House, as economically useless open space, largely hidden from view, in an otherwise fully inhabited part of the city. My request, therefore, is that the city approve this project for a Certificate of Appropriateness that allows me to complete the meticulous restoration of the Beer Estate that I have been engaged with for many years, and permits me to rehab the Carriage House to its 1899 appearance. I further request that any revisions to this proposal be delegated to staff for subsequent review and approval. PLNPCM2020-00106 46 Februdgll 8, 2020 . _ PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE CONTENTS A. 1905 PHOTO of the property showing the 1899 structure proposed for rebuiid/repIicatian. PANORAMA (from Prospect Hill Tower, near 61h Avenue and A Street). DETAIL of 222 4`h Avenue "Harness Shop House" in foreground, Kletting Carriage House in rear. R. 2017 SITE SURVEY showing the current footprints of both surviving buildings, surrounding structures, and ground elevations (which are unchanged from 1899.) C. 1911 SANBORN ARE MAP showing (per the LISPS) that both structures had street addresses and thus were likely residences with mail service. Note that the shed roofed structure on the west side of the Carriage House extended well south of the main brick building to near the property line. D. 1977 and CURRENT PERIOD PHOTOS showing the pre -renovation condition of the structures on the 222 lot in the context of the neighborhood and the post -rehab condition of the 181 6 garage and the 222 Harness Shop House. E. ELEVATION DRAWINGS, FLOOR PLANS, AND DIMENSIONS of the proposed restored Carriage House. For the portion of the structure that is obscured by the Harness Shop House in the 1905 photo and that was removed in the c. WWI remodeling, we have patterned the restoration drawings on the front entrance of the Albert Fisher Carriage House that survives near the Jordan River and was designed by the same architect (Kletting) in 1893 at a similar size and using similar materials (see attached). A photograph of the 181 6 Street Garage on the adjoining part of the estate shows the design continuity of the Carriage House proposal with the previous restoration work about 75 feet away, APPROXIMATE BRICK INVENTORY. We plan to reuse the existing Carriage House Frick walls (pending engineering approval) or dismantle and clean the bricks to be re-laid on new foundations for the restored structure. A schedule shows that the salvageable bricks onsite are sufficient to rebuild the walls. G. S€TE PLAN proposing, as was the case historically, that a Carriage House driveway run to 4`" Avenue. The plan adds 2 off-street, out -of -driveway uncovered parking stalls (largely out of view of the street) and one garage stall in the location where carriages were historically parked in the Carriage House. I propose razing the one -bedroom "Harness Shop" house and replacing it with xeriscaping and low -water -use foliage. H. NARRATIVE/RATiONALE for project POST DEMOLITION SITE PLAN PLNPCM2020-00106 49 FebrudlgoO, 2020 - - _ .���M /-�� '-• � 'JAM:.: �°�•-� '.. .`wry l�"•1�,.. _` �.r Nam' .� � .. �s' M � b. -tom r .r a a .. .. :. 14 -� ` err � �� �•:. �_L- :�-x .?* Awl.: yid'. � {• �Y .•,�, -•ice. ��• �r:'� .'� R^� •" c =,-: :R.. Yam, Y. �rP_- •h. i - - R B 2017 SITE SURVEY OURTH AVENUE EAST 49.50' -� ` EAST 115.50 �! - F-. I qg-3F..-338-Uda a t: PACE. StEPNEv t ro a a.• •a w ' } d 9.rB7 SQ. FT, 2 ,. Y a tl==Y z 0.87'ACRES _ NORTH SN; �' �.R SOUTH f_.`�.- • ,- 54 75• h - PARCEL i 39-31--33L "6 PACE. STCP�iEN I I• .' �• k 4,-4. 5+3.75• ' - OJ 4S ACRES- ui F •.. T 1 5. ry :� LLJ W U} ._ PLNPCM2020-00106 50 Februdoo8, 2020 P C 1911 SANBORN FIRE MAP 7T A.w m -o ft mom o, 9 4 90 s+ttft+ J 1 -62 z R/ I")/ iky "W/ ZJ 6,le rl""Wo �o -A ;111 iL 41. F, 7j nJ x ut PLNPCM2020-00106 52 FebruJ008, 2020 SAIT LAKI: COvNTy NFL— _ D 1977 and CURRENT PHOT+ � � :L Zoom to Results Clear Graphic Export Results 3 3 - Oa 1 - .:k -LI #%., Ave 13 $ _ 00 PLNPCM2020-00106 52 FebruJgg 8, 2020 g 1. PLNPCM2020-00106 58 f FebrualgoO, 2020 W's Y PLNPCM2020-00106 4.1 IL ,.L rwr�. V ;L;M1I F'� f f A• �` �•� ��.� - 'Y. -�ii f ,�� �'firr J� �i S - �I PLNPCM2020-00106 59 Februagg @, 20213 /l// E ELEVATION DRAWINGS, FLOOR PLANS, AND DIMENSIONS --- ''4 3-D Digital Rendering of 1905 Photo Per GPS, the camera used to take the 1905 photo was located 1,110 feet away from the NW corner of the Carriage House and 154 feet in elevation above it. Based on surviving walls and the Sanborn maps, the Carriage House was a square building; - feet on a side. The top course of bricks and the apex of the roof eave was 10 feet above grade. The 1899 grade is assumed to be a surviving concrete Boor and drain system on the NW corner of the building. The factors listed above remove all degrees of freedom in the basic shape of the building. When input to CAD software, the basic building essentially draws itself. PLNPCM2020-00106 69 FebrudlgoO, 2020 albeit fisher carriage house Sign Out T vt vc' S M L ^.D Photo GiF Face Portrait Ciipart Line Drawing Modern photograph of 5LC-owned Albert Fisher Carriage House, a similarly configured structure designed by Kletting in 1893, We propose to design the north elevation of the Beer Carriage House based on the first floor facade shown in this photo. f- - u S . IA - -h- Pr-. _•_ PLNPCM2020-00106 60 Februdoo8, 2020 IL HA$S UTAH.I 8-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 4 of 9) -Albert Fisher Carriage Hous... Page I of l Library of Congress Prints & Photographs online Catalog . � ,i . ,..., _ir-�r,ianH l�i[;1 ii+ir✓U�r-= i _-ens<, r,,,,urw-: . r SearcTr Lut,noU bibs oc ouhic to wma:ion HAB5 UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 4 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Second South Street, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT • OigiMl ID: (None) hhti ut0042.sheet_00000 hRp;{/hdi.Loc.gvv/lac.pnp/hhhL;t0442/sheet.00004a • Reprodudion NumhEr F+,4$S UTAli, 1 B-SALCI, i 4A- (sheet 4 of 9) Repository: Libndry of tw9ress Prints and Photographs DivisFar• Washington, D.C. 205,10 USA t.tt<o�{,vhtll.lee.goufio[.pnp/pp.pr.ri About Mac stem REG (IaWl I EEQIZIW 17FFF f126k4S CI fh -n G Vi ;u ;K m ­� n -, • _CD CD 0 CU - C ill !i iA {D 0 {p � � � +� � G � G w im ._� O ti = m O' MtD tip cu O U3 Q. C y 3 rr aa���yq om - rt r .� -nr3Cw 1g q w 6 v+ 4 tflw 0 CD M m =m M m 10 i2m C a+m3a0�=030.o�so� :34.�,ouair-=so`e3 7 O ED O � C f1! m ...,• ST 'C lei a o �D 4n e Q 0 0 dC: 7 a rD u m z M L g 0 (D 3=v`romm°nm»°°w ,c L� o csQ ho = CD O�00 5•nNso0 r°7isu m;'�0=r w Nm�aih7 3 vv '_0w3 m (Dm iu w dCL� IS 0 C a rn m PLNPCM2020-00106 62 Februagg @, 2029 NABS UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 5 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Second South Street, Salt Lake City, Sa... Page 2 of 2 Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Online Catalog 1 K R A KY 1 ] I ASK A LIBRARIAN DI GMAL C.OLLECTrms LIBRARY CATALOGS yea _r. Search Loc.gov (,A)'NAI R I SS HAGS UTAH,18-SALCI,14A- (sheet 5 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Second South Street, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT • Digital 1D: (None) hhh u:0042.sheet.00005a iittp://hcl.loc,govfloc.pnp/hhh.vt0042/sheet-00005a • Reproduction Nwnber: HAGS UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 5 of 9) • Repository: Library of Congress Pdrts and Photographs Division Washington, O.C. 20540 USA http;J{hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print About This Itern JPEG (39kb) I JPEG i81kb1 I TIFF (478kb) 4 rw C"wATM -.._-.-...--..- ----- P&SEet FRMUN sou I+eux PLNPCM2020-00106 http:llu+-�xrw.loc. gov. /picture s/itenVut0042. sh.. . 62 Februa140 ® 2020 June � , 2015 Proposed north elevation of the Seer Carriage House using "bootstrap" design. t� PLNPCM2020-00106 64 FebrualgoO, 2020 14 I Al, dr Photograph of restored 181 B Street works hoplgarage, located adjacent to the 222 Carriage House (To show design continuity.) PLNPCM2020-00106 66 Februalgy @, 20213 :R I m FIRST FLOOR PLAN 118" 15'-4" 10'-23W 5'-1 2'-01 12'-W 2'-V Y-r 0 open to skylights abovi up- r►; I 44-W IIII 1 II 35-M 1^ New retaining wail PLNPCM2020-00106 60 FebruaoA8, 2(� FLOOR PLAN AT LOFT 118" PLNPCM2020-00106 69 FebrualOA0, 2 ROOF PLAN 118" mm - Masonry Chimney PLNPCM2020-00106 68 Februagg 8, 2020 0, ? New brick wail to match existing brick NORTH ELEVATION Roof 4502' - S" -,'Fiber cement siding First Floor Foeundat'0n 4489' - 9" PLNPCM2020-00106 69 Februalgl @, 20202's East Elevation Shed structure — -.- - == beyond ting "``` Alew brick wall r Exis— Ra0'f 4502' - B" `W match =1 Sandstone == existing -- .:_' _ - First Floor 449I' - 0„ Foundation AU� 4489' - 9" 41 PLNPCM2020-00106 70 Februalgy @, 202•Z r WEST ELEVATION 11$" Shed roof —. -- — — — — — _ Roof — — — — — — — 4502' - 6" — — Fiber cement siding New retaining wall 1 First Floor T — — — — — — — 4491' - 0" . f T Foundation 4489' - 9" u PLNPCM2020-00106 72 Februdgg @, 202' 7 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/81, RPPLAI�� 4562'- 6" First Floor mL� 4491'- 0" '-W Foundation 4489'- 9" PLNPCM2020-00106 72 FebruJq@, 2021� Pi F APPROXIMATE BRICK INVENTORY The firebricks used to originally construct the Carriage House in 1899, have apparently remained on site ever since. When the structure was modified c. WWI for automobile use, the bricks on the northeast and northwest walls of the square 1899 structure were cleaned and relayed to create shed walls on the southeast and the far southwest sides of the remodeled building. The 1899 chimneys were probably used similarly. This recycling approach can be established by close examination of existing bricks and mortar lines. Our proposal is to clean and "re -re -cycle" these bricks for the rehabilitation of the Carriage House. Approx. square feet of brick needed for WALL REBUILDING: North 140' East 170' South None West 96' Total 406' Approx. square feet of otherwise UNNEEDED BRICKS AVAILABLE ON SITE: North None East 51' South None Far West 221' Interior 170' Total 442' Other recycling notes: Available on site are several thousand running feet of historically dimensioned 2x4, 2x6, and 2x8 structural lumber. Most of this has been covered and out of the elements for the past century. We will reclaim and re -use this as necessary for the project. All barn doors, pedestrian doors, and widows are too deteriorated for re -use and will be replaced. PLNPCM2020-00106 74 Februaq¢ 8, 2020 G SITE PLAN FOURTH A I I I E7TAMEG = HOUSE � _n I I I I 2 I a � E]CISTIHG I i GARAGE i W 3 1EMSTING L BEER 9EFF v' . ao $ MANSION � � 1 Repair exdsgng i fences - typical Where _ ocwrs Pali 1 7] Parking SITE PLAN f p Renovated Shed 1 Garage Retto'rated Caniage House Mruo� oa 88.50' Fiecansft r: concrete retaining PLNPCM2020-00106 75 Februdoo8, 2020 30 H NARRATIVEIRATIONALE Please note that 1 have no interest in any construction on the site except for a full rehab. Any discussion of alternatives to a complete rehab to the 1899 appearance, e.g., a garage, an artist studio, a tiny ADU, or a "community vegetable patch," etc., are a waste of my time and resources and are not something I would want in my backyard. Some reasons why it might be in the City's interest to allow the project to proceed might include: 1. A demonstration of the City's commitment to the actual preservation of historic structures. could provide the City with an almost exact and meticulous restoration of a building that the City has long recognized as historically significant, largely making use of the historic building materials that survive on the site. (I note, with a little amusement, that three pictures of my properties are used as exemplars in the City's published "Design Guidelines.") I don't think the quality of the work we have done so far on the Beer Estate can be seriously questioned, 2. The p romotion of in -fill housin g. The 222 01 Avenue property represents what is apparently the largest and least densely used piece of level residential ground in close proximity to the CBD. There is currently a one -bedroom structure on a property of almost 8500 square feet. There seems to be n❑ reasonable economic use for c. two-thirds of the lot occupied by the Carriage House remains, other than its original one as housing. The Carriage House footprint is neighbored by garages and a parking lot that is approximately fifteen -feet below grade, so no one's view or enjoyment of backyard space would be compromised by rehab. My proposal would increase housing availability back to its 1899 level at no cost to the neighborhood. 3. No im act on neighborhood i2arking or congestion. My proposal would add a net of two or potentially three parking spaces located at a minimum of 70-feet off of 4"' Avenue and largely invisible from the street. 4. To demonstrate a "no surprise" neigh borhood-suorted develp ment. As one example, the City has damaged its credibility through its homeless shelter siting process —in large part because of the City's failure to "sell" the prospect of moving large populations perceived as alien into neighborhoods and in part because of fear of the impact of the City's intentions on local property values. I have heard exactly the opposite in my neighborhood regarding the Carriage House. People have told me they would welcome some investment in the mid -block area and would view it as a barrier to the crowding that would inevitably come from more multi -unit housing. This was, not coincidentally, exactly the same rationale used by the City Commission in its 1979 zoning changes and professions of the need to protect the historic buildings in the same area. Stephen C. Pace 801-353-8190 PLNPCM2020-00106 76 FebruagA8, 20203 1 ATTACHMENT D: ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES The applicant provided the following list of eligible properties: 1. Fisher Mansion and Carriage House (1206 W. 200 S.) 2. Kearns Mansion (603 E. South Temple) 3. Keith Mansion (529 E. South Temple) 4. William F. Beer Estate (222 4th Avenue) 5. McIntyre House (259 7th Avenue) The following attachments include the applicable nominations and photographs. PLNPCM2020-00106 76 Februdoo8, 2020 Form No.10-300 lRe� ti01p 4DV ! 1✓2-1 `1 DATA �q ETUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE I=OT1[?5 R3L NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC l WILLIAM F. BEER 'ESTATE AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET& NUMBER 181 B Street/222 4th Avenue _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Salt Lake City —VICINITY OF 02 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Utah n49 Salt Lake 035 IMCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT _PUBLIC X OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE -_MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) XPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED XCOMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH X WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT .—SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Stephen C. Pace/M. E. Sloan STREET & NUMBER 181 B Street CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City VICINITY OF Utah LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS;ETC. Salt Lake County Recorders Office STREET & NUMBER Salt Lake City and County Building CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE Utah Historic Sites Survey July 16, 1975 —FEDERAL X-STATE _COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Utah State Historical Society CI - STAT e ru Salt Lake City Utah a DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT (2&3) X_DETERIORATED _UNALTERED XORIGINALSITE (1)XGOOD —RUINS X_ALTERED —MOVED DATE (4)-XFAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Property consists of four structures on adjoining lots in the "Avenues" proposed historic district of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. 181 B Street, Main House is a 26 room, four level, sandstone and brick residence built in 1898 1899. Structural integrity is excellent due to extensive foundation engineering. Original architectural package --including floor/utility plans, cut -away views, and exterior sketches --is in the possession of the current owners. Exterior details include: a. Complex roof geometry --consisting of 45 plus roof planes, multiple dormers, metal ornamentation, and a "fish scale" dome atop a curved sandstone turret. b. Exterior metal detailing includes "sun burst" designs on each of four chimneys (thought to be unique in area), "barber pole" downspouts and ornamentation, filagree chimney supports, etc. c. A large sandstone medallion set in chimney with the legend (1899) carved in relief. d. Extensior glasswork including twelve mostly large panes of colored/etched leaded artglass (including one curved pane and two 4' x 8' leaded, colored skylights originally from the Hotel Utah, Salt Lake City, built 1911.) Much additional artglass was planned in architect sketches but is not now present. Ten clear -glass windows have geometric detailing. e. Sandstone block wall and steps fronting B Street. Significant exterior changes include: a. Most woodwork --carved porch railings, balusters, etc. have been removed (redwood pilars supporting front porch remain). b. Five small porches have been created/enclosed. 2. 181 B Street Workshop is a small (400-500 sq. ft.) frame structure in deteriorated condition. It was probably built in 1899. 3. 222 Fourth Avenue Carriage House/Livery was built in 1899 to serve the main house. Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structure with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War I, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. 4. 222 Fourth Avenue "Small" House is a two level, seven room "pioneer" structure built of firedbrick on a san stone rubble foundation. Age of the structure is uncertain but was probably built before 1880. The structure is probably one of the oldest surviving buildings in the Avenues district. The structure was used as a barn/storage facility until the early Twentieth Century when a block addition was constructed and use was converted to residential. (A mid 1890's photo at the Utah Historical Society shows non-residential use.) Exterior condition/structural integrity is fir to good. Foundation appears solid, bricks show only slight deterioration, and the second level floor supports (beams held by exterior belts and large grommets on the bricks) appear good. All woodwork and the entire interior, however, are ruined through neglect. PLNPCM2020-00106 78 FebruJOA0, 2020 SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW —PREHISTORIC—ARCH EULUGY-PREHISTORIC —COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _.RELIGION —1400-1499 —ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC —1500-1599 —AGRICULTURE —1600-1699 XARCHITECTURE _1700-1799 —ART .X1800-1899 —COMMERCE —1900- —COMMUNICATIONS SPECIFIC DATES 1898-1899 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE _CONSERVATION —ECONOMICS _EDUCATION _ENGINEERING 2 EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _INDUSTRY —INVENTION —LAW _LITERATURE —MILITARY —MUSIC —PHILOSOPHY —POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _SCIENCE —SCULPTURE —SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN —THEATER _TRANSPORTATION XOTHER (SPECIFY) (See Description 4, Ownership/Age) BUILDER/ARCHITECT Richard K. A. Kletting Richard K. A. Kletting was the architect for the William F. Beer House. He was born July 1, 1858 at Unterborhingen, Wue.ttenburg, Germany, and was one of the most influential and important architects ever to live and work in Salt Lake City. He came to America after serving in the German army for one year. Worked in the East before coming to Salt Lake where he acquired a job working for John Burton, under whom he drew plans for the old University of Utah. Later he went into business for himself. Among his best works are: Utah State Capitol Building (won a competition of 40), Bon Marche in Paris, Sacred. Coeur at Montmartre, First Salt Air Beach pavilion (1893) which boasted the world's largest unobstructed dance floor (burned in 1925), and the Old Salt Palace. Along with these works, Kletting did many commercial buildings as well as schools in the immediate Salt Lake vicinity as well as in neighboring states. Richard Kletting oepned and conducted the first school in Salt Lake to give instruction in geometry, algebra, languages and science. He cataloged the Salt Lake Public Library, and was much noted for his extensive civic as well as professional work. Kletting died in Salt Lake on September 25, 1943, near the Kletting House at the age of 75 years. Surviving him were his wife, Mary Elizabeth Saaner Kletting, and their four children; Richard, Mary, Walter, and Helen. Dr. William Francis Beer (1870-1949) was a prominent Salt Lake City physician who was also actively involved in mining. Dr. Beer was a graduate of George Washington Medical School (1892) and a charter member and honorary president of the Utah Medical Society. According to his surviving children, during the early years of the Century many international medical figures were house guests at 181 B Street. During World War I, Dr. Beer was in charge of P.O.W. medical care for German prisoners at Fort Douglas, Utah. In recognition of his efforts in bringing the prisoners through the influenza epidemic without a fatality, he was awarded the Iron Cross by Paul von-Hindenberg in the early 1930's. PLNPCM2020-00106 99 FebrualOA8, 2029 MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Salt Lake County Recorder's Office, Grantor -Grantee Inces and Engineering Division. Persons contacted (relation to Wm. F. Beer): Beverly Beer Bullock (granddaughter), 1259 East So. Temple, SLC, UT 84103; Jean R. Kirkpatrick (granddaughter) Boise Idaho; Vivian Beer DeNeuf (daughter) Bullhead City, Arizona; Kenneth Beer (son); Robert Barnes (long-time resident of home), 161 B Street, SLC. GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY less han one re. UTM REFERENCES A11,21 1412,51614,01 14,5[1r3116101 B 1LJ I I 1 I 1 y, 1 1 v l� C ZONE_ FASTING NORTHING I I I D.Z_ ONE FASTING INORiHIN 1 1 1 t ✓ERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION i W I LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE CODE COUNTY CODE STATE CODE COUNTY CODE ®FORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE Wilson G. Martin, Preservation Planner ORGANIZATION DATE Utah State Historical Society April 6, 1977 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE 603 East South Temple (801) 533-5755 CITY OR TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah ®STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER CERTIFICATION THE EVALUATED SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE STATE IS: NATIONAL_ STATE X LOCAL As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic. Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National. Park Service.. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER SIGNATURE TITIF Michael T. Miller, nATF A--; l l 7 1077 Rom_ � ���� ���� . • - -.+ • } a irr PLNPCM2020-00106 �.T � ,w � 7 _ � w r � r f � i i . f 82 r FebrudooB, 2020 tyWM.F.BEER HOUSE, Salt Lake, Ut. ' Taken by Steven Pace, Feb. i977 Negative filed at Ut.St.Hist.Soc view of east side. JUN 7197 7 ,. 19r1 �C'7G "c- - PLNPCM2020-00106 '� � yl8, 2020 L 41 r. Ilk . • TY. i All r • ti may'+` �1�4 � ,�! r� �• ; * f . n ��� � 9 ; ��r7 mlwlp all- MAO `S�r =�� � tit ����Y ♦Fx��� �j� � ,r �1 � � . 1 , PLNPCM2020 00106 _` r�� 'rebru�` �— ( WM.F.BEER i, Salt Lake, Ut. Taken by S. Pace, 2/77 d a Negative file t Ut.St.His.Sac. View of southeast side. JUN 7 197" DEC 6 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 85 f f „r t!`'!'�l�r.� fiFeptu�liglyl®, 2020 Tf r41��,+�i {Y y yi r v •:— I. Oft dolor PLNPCM2020-00106 1 WM. F.BEER HOUSF , Salt Lake, Utah 1) � 1977 Taken by W.G.Mart mn Ap Negative at Ut.St.Hist.Society View of south side of "Small„ House. JUN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 89 Il,k"i it Of THE IMM 0IEG619 I 4L % 0 tic ���� t� JA t-loo— Awl# AA —jk-- VPW Z7_ xv. 46 jr 31 40 IL so AVP WM.F.BEER HOUSE, Salt Lake, Ut. Taken by W.G.Maxtin, Apr. 1977 Negative at Ut.St.Hist.Society View of east side of "Small„ House. SIJN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 tin>Salt Lake, (fit- WK.F.BEEP, i�� Apr. 1977 Taken by W.G.Max:Y' Negative at ut.st.Hist.society ide of View of north.iL� 1977 ave house/livery. PLNPCM2020-00106 r"l ERTY OF THE PONTAMIEM ►1 or Amp. AIM -,-Now, WM.F.BEER HQUSE,Salt Lake, Ut. OLC B Taken by W.G.Martin, Apr. 1977 Negative filed at Ut.St.Hist.Soc View looking southeast at corner of workshop. U UN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 r "AdIP 4 r1 OF THE I WOREGMT3 14L AP, log IJt 141M. F . BEER �E f Salt Lake, 7Ih Taken by W•G.Martin, Apr. ty Negative filed � s�deSt carriage View of n house/ livery - ,SUN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 7a 'M 11INKIMSTER lk i �le "Monk ..... ..... ow IL 1. � WM.F.BEER HOVE, Salt Lake, Ut. DEC Taken by W.G.Martin, Apx. 1977 Negative filed Ut.St-Hist.Sac. View of east side of worksho a UN 4 197 � PLNPCM2020-00106 96 {'r-a1) ;;' United States Department of the Interior E 112 1 —6 1194 National Park Service For Nt�s i pit National Register of Historic Places received Inventory ---Nomination Form dateentere� See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms ""'�`�"'#��' Type all entries —complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Fisher, Albert, Mansion and Carriage House and/or common 2. Location street & number 1206 West 200 South —not for publication city, town Salt Lake City _ vicinity of state iltah code 049 county Salt Lake code 035 3. Classification Category Ownership status Present Us* district — public X occupied agriculture museums X building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure — both —work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible ____ entertainment religious object VT/,a in process yes' restric.10 — government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted — industrial transportation no _ military X other- home for mcn 4. Owner of (Property name Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake Cit street & number 331 East South Temple cit/, town Salt Lake City " vicinity of state Utab 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Salt Lake City and County Building street & number 400 South State Street coy, town Salt Lake City state Utah Representation in Existing Surveys Hist:oxic American Buildings Survey title nophas this property been determined eligible? — yes no date lggg X federal —state —county — local depository for survey_recards Utah Heritage Foundation PLNPCM2020-00106 99 Februdgrc 0, 2020 city, tovm Salt Take City state Utah 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent — deteriorated _— unaltered X original site good — ruins X altered — moved date fair __ unexposed Deacrib* the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Albert Fisher Mansion is a two-and-one-nalf story brick and stone house designed in the Victorian Eclectic style. Its large scale, integrity, and overall stylistic and decorative qualities make it one of the best examples in the city of the more elaborate Victorian Eclectic residences that were built in the late 188Os and 189Os. The house, designed by architect Richard Kletti ng, is located on a large, one -acre parcel of land bordering the Jordan River. Behind the house is a two-story brick carriage house, also designed by Kletti ng, which imitates the styling of the house. The facade and other elevations of the house, though asymmetrically composed, incorporate symmetry in the alignment of first and second story openings. The massing of the house itself hints at symmetry with its block -like shape, centered dormer window and curved two-story bays at the front corners,, which, though different, balance the facade... The bay on the east half of the facade forms a ci rcular .corner,tower, wi th a 1 ow -pi tched conical. roof, while the bay on the west.half is confined to the front wall surface, leaving the square corner intact. GI as s i n the A ndows of the curved bays i s al so curved. The house features a wealth of Victorian design elements, although the low-pitched hipped roof with wide eaves is atypical of Victorian architecture in Utah, except in the Ital i anate style. The wide eaves follow the contour of the various bays and are decorated with long, thin modi l l i ons with notched ends. The broad, stamped metal frieze beneath the eaves is highlighted with elaborate cast foliation above each of the projecting bays. Hip -roofed donners on the front and west side roof pitches have flared cheeks sided in wood shingles and simple modi lli ons on the eaves. The large projecting corner porch curves around the southeast corner of the facade, reinforcing the lines of the semici rcul ar'bay at that corner. The porch features squared, rough -faced sandstone columns, smooth sandstone railing and balusters, notched -end moth ill ons on the eaves, and round -arched openings between the columns formed by spindle brackets connected by a semicircular frame. The sandstone porch base has gently arched openings which provide ventilation under the porch. Sandstone is also used in the retaining wall in front of the house, in the wide front sidewalk, and in the railing wall framing the steps. The brick exterior walls are accented by the use of rough -faced sandstone in the wide belt courses girding the house at the lintel level of both first and second story openings, and in the narrower window sills. Smoothed and rounded sandstone cal onette s form the mullions of the three-part windows in the curved bay on the west half of the facade. These mullions are decoratively carved on their upper portions which coincide with the transoms above each window. Transoms are -located above each door and window, on.the house, and elaborate leaded -glass transoms are used above the first -story windows of the rounded corner nay. Transcnn bars are made of smooth, square -cornered sandstone. Gut, rough -faced sandstone forms the foundation of the house. Other important . features of the house include the two-story, three -sided bay on the" east si de with overlapping brick at the corners, four corbeled chimneys, the sandstone plaque bearing Albert Fisher's initials on the upper facade, and a similar plaque on the west facade bearing the construction date of the house, "1393." PLNPCM2020-00106 98 Februdoo8, 2020 NPS Farm %D-900•a 018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use dn, :.; National Register of Historic Places Inventory --Nomination Form rfateentered:{: Continuation sheet 3 Item number 8 Page 3 for a desired aesthetic ettect. In the vernacular tradition, Eclecticism surfaces as the inventive decorative treatment found on the eaves, openings, and porches of a standardized set of house plans. On larger, more prestigious dwellings, the Eclectic architect fashioned a unique design by juxtaposing and bl endi ng various ideas from competing historical styles. Kletti ng' s Fisher Mans? on is Electicism at perhaps its best, with the architect here successfully employing a wide range of stylistic elements. The rectilinear massing of the house suggests the resurgent symmetry of the Box Style, a design scheme which is betrayed by the subdued tower and projecting bay on the facade. These features harken back to the Queen Anne, as does the sweeping wrap -around porch. The stylized classicalism of the cornice and modi l l i on s is played off against the stamped metal freize foliation, Eastlake porch spindling, and the heavy, almost Romanesque, rusticated parch posts and balustrade. The competing elements provide the Fisher Mansion design with an internal tension which allows the various styles to work together here as a functioning whole. PLNPCM2020-00106 10H) FebrualOAO, 2020 Flr;; '- m 1(�9011a f -e 31 n United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory —Nomination Form Continuation sheet L Item number 8 For NP date enieFed Page Sweden, May 17, 1861 to Andreas S. and 01 i vi a Youngberg. Mrs. Fisher, too, was active in business affairs, particularly real estate, as owner of Alma Fisher Properties, holders of much real estate in Salt Lake City. Five chi 1 dre n were born to Albert and Alma: Alice Edwina (1882) , Frank Alma (1885) , Otto Albert (1888) , Albert Bernhart (1895) , and Carl Alvin (1897) . The Fishers lived in this house after the time it was built until their deaths. Albert died on June 28, 1917 in Hot Lake, Oregon, where he had gone for treatment of his rheumatism. His funeral was held at the family home in Salt Lake City. Alma Fisher continued to live in this house after her husband' s death, and beginning around 1918 her daughter and son-in-law, Alice E. and Frederic B. Davidson, moved in with her. Alma died on May 2[, 1940 in this house. The Davi dsons continued to live there until 1944, then moved into an apartment at 63 S. 400 East. Frederic Davidson was a druggist. After Alma's death, title to the property was transferred to Alice Fisher Davidson, who retained it until 1973, when she sold the house to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City. The Catholic Church had apparently been leasing the property since 1945, operating the house under the name of Our Lady Queen of Peace Covenant and Our Lady of Victory Missionary Sisters. In 1970 the house became St. Mary's Home, a hone for single men, which it has continued to be to the present. Richard K. A. K1 etti ng, architect of this house and carriage house, was probably the most prominent architect in Utah' s history. Born in Germany in 1855, he received architectural and engineering training and experience in both Germany and France Detare coming to the United States in 1883. He settled first in Denver, Colorado, but, unable to find work there, continued on the Salt Lake City after nearing reports of growing business activity there. He was employed by architect John Burton soon after arriving in Salt L.aKe Gi ty, but several montns later opened his own otri ce. tie remained in Salt Lake City until his death in 1943. Kletti ng is best known for his designs of numerous commercial and institutional buildings throughout the state, including the Sal tai r Beach Pavilion, the University of Utah campus and buildings, and the Utah State Capitol. He designed residential buildings as well, although far fewer in numoer than his commercial and institutional bui l4i ngs, many of which were homes for businessmen who had hired him to design their commercial buildings also. Notable examples of his residential design's, in addition the the Fisher House, include the Henry Di nwoodey House, 411 E. 100 South, listed in the National Register in 1974, and the Enos A. Wall Mansion, 411 E. South Temple Street, listed in the National Register in 1980 as part of the South Temple Historic District. Kletting's houses all display a stylistic eclecticism. which is characteristic of much of late 19th Century architecture in Utah. AS an architectural style, Victorian Eclecticism remains a poorly defined and often misunderstood phenomenon. Generally it connotes the mixing of stylistic elements within a single design. Such a fusion is neither random nor T-,)i sPrffdgo(buet draws its legitimacy frmm the blending of di SSiMi l arFefe0& ,9G20 8, Significance Period Areas of Significance —Check and justify below prehistoric — archeology -prehistoric community planning _ landscape architecture religion _.1400-1499 archeology -historic __ conservation law science 1500-1599 agriculture _ economics _ _ literature sculpture 1600-1699 X architecture education military social/ 1700-1799 art engineering music humanitarian x 1800-1899 commerce — exploration.'settiement — philosophy T theater 190D _ communications _Y__ industry _ poiiticslgovernmen.t — transportation invention — outer (specify) Specific dates 1893 BuilderfArchitect lJnknown /Richard K. A. Kletting Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Albert Fisher Mansion, built in 1893, is architecturally significant as an excellent example of the Victorian Eclectic style in Utah and as one of the relatively few residential designs by Richard K. A. Kletting. Kletting was one of Utah's most prominent architects and is best known for his design of the Utah State Capitol Building (1912-15) . The Fisher Mansion exhibits the large scale and Victorian detailing common to the Victorian Eclectic style, but also incorporates into its design same unusual- features such ,as a box -like, shape, stamped metal frieze folli ati on, and '.a Queen 'Anne' inspired wrap.: -around porch with Eastlake and Romanesque appoi ntxnents�, which colmbi ne to 'create a distinctively unique example of the style. The two-story brick carriage, house located behind the mansion is also significant, reflecting the massing and styling of the house. The Fisher Mansion is also historically significant as the only house associated with Albert Fisher, a pioneer in the brewing ' industry in Salt lake City. Fisher was founder of Fi sher Brewi ng Company, the most enduring of the several, breweries established in Utah in the late 1800s, and the only one of those to return to operation after the repeal of Prohi bi ti on, The Albert Fisher Mansion was built in 1893 for Albert Fisher, president of the Fisher Brewing Company. The two-story, twelve -room house was designed by Richard Kletting and Was built at an estimated cost of $13,000. Fisher, who had been living nearby at the brewery (138 S. 1100 West), apparently wished to live near his brewery, although the .site the house was built on was attractive in its own right, located on the banks of the Jordan River, away- fronr the crowds of the city, and commanding an excellent view of the Wasatch Mountai ns to the east. Albert Fisher was born in Seebach, Baden, Germany on October 30, 1852. He emigrated to the United States as a young marl, settling first in Springfield, Illinois. He moved from there to San Francisco before corli ng to Salt lake Ci ty around 1831, a i whi ch time he changed the spel 1 i ng of hi s 1 ast name from Fi scher to Fi sher. Soon after hi s arri val , he apgare ntly worked for a time as foreman of the Salt Lake Bre-ring Company located at 1000 East and 500 South. He established Fisher Brewing Company in 1884 in the northwest section of town on 1100 West between 100 South and 200 South!. In addition to his brewery i nterests, Al bert Fi she was. heavi I i nvol ved i n real e state and other business enterprises, including the Orem Rail road,14utual Creamery, and Baden Investments Company. Fisher Brewery continued to operate under the direction of the Fisher' family up until 1972. During the Prohibition years the brewery closed down ccmpletely and the Fishers confined themselves to business and investment activities. On JP NP'� 2 09 1882 Al inert lmarri ed Alma Younger, a Swedish e:,li grant who r ��y�®, 202� co�-ge o` a��t a�Ce City i n 1811 with her p1�nts. She was born i n . s�8,, N?5•: vrm 10-9Aa� _ {7.811 United States (Department of the Interior Nalional Park Service ForNPS"wonf �. ,.-. `-fir°- ,�t'w+�-z'�`e �•- . - Hational Register of Historic Places Inventory —Domination Farm date er�tQr�d°y Continuation sheet Item number 7 Page 2 A one-story, screened -in frame porch with paired square columns is located on the rear, northeast corner of the house. A few mi nor al terati ons and addi ti ons have been made on the house, i ncl udi rig the addition of exterior fire escapes from upper story windows on the rear and sides, and a small frame enclosed porch at the northwest corner, built on c. 1920, The interior of the house has remained basically intact on the main floor but the basement and upper floors have been altered to accommodate the thirty -to -forty men living i ri the house. The carriage house is a two-story brick structure with a pyramidal roof over the main block capped with a hip -roofed cupola. Projecting from the front of the building is a large, two-story, three -sided bay. The eyebrow curve in the roofline on the facade echoes the curved head of the hayloft door that projects above the standard level of the ronfline. The wide eaves of the carriage house, like those on the house, are decorated with 1 cng, thin modi l 1 i ons with notched ends. Hip -roofed dormers are centered on the front and side roof pitches. The foundation is brick and the lintels and sills are rough -faced sandstone. Spanning the carriage openings are metal I -beams decorated with rosettes. All windows are multi -pane and double hung_ Only minor alterations have been made to the carriage house such as the covering over of some windows with plywood. 'Water damage is evident in some sections of the eaves. Measured drawings of the carriage house were made by the Historic American Buildings Survey in 1968. PLNPCM2020-00106 102 FebruagA8, 2022 So Major Bibliographical References Obituary Index, Utah State Historical Society Letter from James W. Fisher, great-grandson of Albert Fisher, July 4, 1976, Utah State Historical Society 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated rop-erty 1.03 Quadrangle name S aft Lake City Quadrangle scale I ' 24000 UMT References ii } A 11 2 1 14 12 1 9 2 14 15 11,218 19 101 B Ei LJ LL i Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing C" I I I I I I I I i I I Ii J 1 _ aLLJ E LW I I LJ -1 j I l l lF W III L I GW HLLI._ tIII11+t1� Verbal boundary description and justification Commencing 262 feet West of the Southwest corner of Block 43; Plat C, Salt Lake City Survey, East 1.63 feet, forth 247.5 feet, West to the Jordan River, southerly along the river to beginning. List all states and counties for propwriies overlapping state or county boundaries state N/A code county NIA code state NIA code county N/A code 11. Form PrePared By rsameltitle Roger V. Roper/Historian _ organization Utah State Historical Society bats 5 rin 1963 street& number 300 Rio Grande telephone (801) 533-6017 city or town Salt: Lake City state Utah 12. State Historic Preservation Officer certification The evaluated signiftcance of this property within the state Is: national - state local As the desJgnated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public taw 89- 665), 1 hereby norninate this property far inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by thelati na! ark � i is State Historic Preservation Officer signature title A. Rent Powell, Deputy State -Historic Preservation Officer date .L _ l 1 —6- �.,. For NPS use only J hereby certify that this property is included in the National Register = Hate Keew of the National Register Attest: date Chief 0 eg+s rat+Dn a ru ;`fisher. Albert. Masson and Carriage House Name of Property T 10. Geographical Data HcreaOe of Property 1 aCre(S) UTM References i Piace additional boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) A V2 41211191210 4151112181910 cone Eastinc Nonhtnc Gr 11111 111111 Lone Eastinc Northtnc Sall Lake City -Salt Lake County._Utah City. County and State B I1111 11111! tone E aslinc North inc ❑ 1l111 111111 Lonc Eastinc Northinc Verbal Boundary Description Describe the boundaries of the pro perty.y Commencing 262 feet West of the Southwest corner of Block 43. Plat C. Salt Lake City Survey, East 163 feet, North 247.5 feet. West to the Jordan River, southerly along the river to the beginning Properly Tax No, 15-02-152-001 Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) The boundaries are the same as those that were associated with the building when it was determined eligible in 1983, and a portion of those historically associated with the property. [ISee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 10 11. Form Prepared By name/title J. Cory Jensen organization Utah State Historic Preservation Office street & number 300 Rio Grande city or town Salt Lake Additional Documentation Submit the lollowng items with the completed lorm: date 28 August 2008 telephone 801/533-3559 state UT zip code 84101 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs: Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items: {Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner name/title Salt Lake City Corporation street S number 451 S State Street city or town Salt Lake C telephone 801-535-7280 state UT zip code 84111 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This intormat+on is being collecled for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing. to list properties. and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended (16 U_S.C. 470 of seq.). Estimated burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form Is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including lime for revieunnc instructions, gathering and maintaining data. and completing and reviewing the farm. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this torn to the Chief, Administrative Services Division. National Park Service. P.O. Box 37127. Washnoton. DC 20013-7127: and the Office of Management and 6uoget- Paperwork Reductions Projects ( 1024.0018). Was hinglon, DC 2050? PLNPCM2020-00106 105 FebruaNWO, 2020 Fisher. Aloert. Masion and Carnage House Name of Properq Salt Lake City- Salt Lake County. l.itar. City, County and State 8. Description Applicable National Register Criteria i ((ark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria cualifyino the propert% for National Register listing.) ❑ A Property is associated with events that have madE a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [I B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ❑ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. [I D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield. information Important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark Y rn all the boxes that apply.) Property is� ❑ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. CJ Fs removed from its original Location. ❑ C a birthplace or grave. ❑ D a cemetery. ❑ E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. ❑ F a commemorative property. [I G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative 'Statement of Significance {Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets. } Areas of Significance (enter cafeoories from rnstructians) ARCHITECTURE INDUSTRY Period of Significance '1893-191 Significant Dates Significant Persons I Complete it Criterion B is marked above) Albert Fisher Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder Richard Kletting ZISee continuation sheet(S) for Section No 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Crle the books, anic*5, ano 01ner sources usee in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets Previous documentation on file (NPS): ❑ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested ❑ previously listed in the National Register ❑ previously determined eligible by the National Register ❑ designated a National Historic Landmark ❑ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey [J recorded by historic American Engineering Record ## Primary location of additional data: ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Other State agency ❑ Federal agency ❑ Local government ❑ University ❑ Other Name of repository: [] See continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 9 PLNPCM2020-00106 106 FebrualOA8, 2020 Fisher - Albert. Masion and Carriage House Name of Froperty Salt Lake Cites Sall Lake County- Utah City, County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property (check as many boxes as apply ❑ private FI public -local ❑ public-StatE ❑ public -Federal Category of Property (check only one box. ❑ building(s) ❑I district ❑ site ❑ structure ❑ abject Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing. 6. Function or Use Historic Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: single dwellinc 7. Description Architectural Classification tEnter categories from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN: Victorian Eclectic Number of Resources within Property iDo not induce previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing 2 2 I buildings S ite� structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register Current Function tEnter categories from instructions) WORT{ IN PROGRESS Materials (Enter categories trorn instructions) foundation S70NE:Sandstone:_WOOD=shing_te walls BRICK roof ASPHALT shingle other Sandstone details Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more Continuation sheets.) CISee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 7 PLNPCM2020-00106 109 Februa1008, 2020 NP5 Form 10-901 tOcl. 11901 OMB No. 10024-00le United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ��a�31dS 7his farm is for use in nominating or requesting determtna(ions for individual properties and disimts. See instructions in How to Complete the Nalrunaf Register of Historic Praces Aeaistralion Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each ilem by marking "x' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property heing docrimentea. enter WA' for "nor applicable." For functions, archilectural classification. materials. and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcareaorieS from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NIPS Form 10.900a). Use a tyaewriter. wora processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property hisloric name Fisher, Albert, Mansion and Carriage House (amen4dment) other namelsile number 2. Location street name 1206 West 200 South city or town Salt Lake City state Utah cone L] 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification ❑ not fcr publication ❑ vicinity county Salt Lake code 049 zip Cade 84104 As the designated authority under the Noicnal Historic Preservation Act. as amended, I hereby certify that this I2� nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. in my opinion, the property E meets ❑ does not meet the National Re ster criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [I nationally OT ie'wvide ® locally, ee :Ttion sheet for additional comments.] • ' Signature of certifying Utah Division of State History,Office f Historw Preservation 5tate or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the properly ❑ meets [I does not meet the Nstional Register critena, (❑ See continuation sheet for additional comments-) Signature of certifying off icialMIle State or Federal agency and bureau 4- National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the dropeny is CJ entered in the National Register. ❑ See continuation sheet. ❑ determined elioible for the National Register ❑ See continuation sheet. ❑ determined nol eligible for the National Register_ removed from the Nahonal Reo ister ❑ other, (explain:) Date Signature of the Keeper Date of Action PLNPCM2020-00106 109 Februaloyl®, 2020 A4 .- .. •'- 'f •Ana.. ♦ ` `� yam. ` � - f � s ' yam, •` .. r- r` _ '•'� r�� •_ •� �iJ_ Avg �. � �� • . —.. �._, 7 «ice-. � : Y"' � r �+� ��► r M }'ef ++�� } � :cb i �r:T. - '?�:t"�� ���� �i �• r•r✓"� r -'•=7ti„r'p.r. ,� r ems. tp •�. � ter .� � . u g 4ir .• T _gyp i •] ' p" �► me "'� �y ,� � - • yid 4' �'� '�.; 416 lo Albert Fisher Carriage House Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah Southeast Corner Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg. Utah State Historical Society G of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 112 Februalgg O, 2020 mom Albert Fisher Carriage House Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah South Facade Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg. Utah State historical Society 3 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 115 FebruJOA8, 2020 x7 i lb PLNPCM2020-00106 116 Februalglyl ®, 20213 Albert Fisher Mansion Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah South Facade Photo by Roger Raper, April 1983 Neg. Utah Stare Historical Society 1 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 113 FebrualOAO, 2029 `7�; Albert Fisher Mansion Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah East Facade Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg, Utah State Historical Society 2 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 118 FebruJOA8, 2020 - = •T . it s'•`k' � �� _ .-r 3h i : _ `� rt-_ u'r .. r.. . f ,et ■ik ��iNL�ii3?...' "� •�f!!• WN, �� � *f ,, •- 3 �P .,.. err. �!>!L-•#i `•:�y1V. ° Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) COMMON: UTAH STATE AND/OR HISTORIC: STATE: Utah COUNTY! Salt Lake FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER I DATE 0 CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC ❑ District ® Building E� Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: ❑ Site ❑ Structure ❑ Private ❑ In Process ❑ Unoccupied Q Restricted ❑ Object ❑ Both ❑ Being Considered [� Preservation work Unrestricted ❑ in progress ❑ No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) - ❑ Agricultural Government ❑ Park [] Transportation ❑ Comments ❑ Commercial Q Industrial ❑ Private Residence [� Other (Specify) ® Educational ❑ Military ❑ Religious Present home _6f ❑ Entertainment JjC Museum ❑ Scientific Utah H i stor i cal Soc i ety . COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Secretary of State STREET AND NUMBER! Utah State Caoitol Buildi CITY OR TOWN: Salt Lake City TITLE OF SURVEY: Utah State Historic Sites Sur DATE OF SURVEY: DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: Utah State_Historical Society STREET AND NUMBER: 603 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: Sa I t Lake C PLNPCM2020-00106 STATE Utah C rt o� CODE tah 43 N n 0 C Z -I C d CODE 43 m Z -I A Federal State ❑ County ❑ Local M Z C z K D V1 m C M 0 z STATE: CODE i { Utah 41 v n 120 FebrudgAB, 2020 m (Check One) ❑ Excellent [ Good ❑ Fair ❑ Deteriorated ❑ Ruins ❑ Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) - (Check One) ❑ Altered [ Unaltered J Moved ® Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if knbwn) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Kearns Mansion has a stone exterior richly detailed with round towe r-s..a_t, three of its four- corners. At the time of the building, the mansion contained 28 rooms: 6 baths, ten fireplaces (of which nine remain), an all -marble kitchen and bathroom, a bowling alley, ballroom, billiard room, two parlors, two dining rooms, and three vaults (one for silver, one for wine, and one for jewelry). Cost of construction was approximately $250,000.00. The main entrance on the south leads into a hallway with a floor of handset ceramic tile, one of the few in Utah. The wood -panelled walls and the floating staircase are made of French oak, hand carved by artisans im- ported from Europe. In the main hallway are two columns carved with alle- gorical scenes: "The Rape of the Sabines" and "Botticelli's Graces". At the end of the main hall (south) are the massive iron and glass doors. The foyer is of African and Roman marble. Above the main hall is a graceful oval ceiling well. To the west of the front hall is the state drawing room, converted early in the history of the mansion from two parlors: the Louis XVI and the Moorish parlors. The first room east of the front hall is the den. The flemish oak paneling is stained black. North of the den is the state dining room of red stained mahogany. Reportedly all the wood in this room came from the mahogany trees in the Ural Mountains of Russia. Dominating the room, above the table, is a large bronze chandelier. The figures on the newel posts at the foot of the stairs were done by the French sculptor Moreau and were brought from the Paris Exposition of 1900 by Senator Kearns. Off the main hall of the second floor were the bedrooms and guest rooms of the Kearns family and later the governors. The former bedrooms of the Kearns family and the governors were in .the southeast corner of the second- f-loor," now the' 1 ibrary. Across the hall were other`bedhooms now housing the picture collections, and the librarian's office. The director'-. office was formerly the nursery. The marble bathroom is in the northeast portion of this floor. At the south end of the hallway on the second floor doors open`to a marble loggia. The third floor contains the bal_1-room or gymnasium and the billiard room. These rooms now serve as gallfLries. Overlooking the circular hall- way on this floor is the beautiful ceiling well which crowns this stately mansion. In the basement was a two-lane bowling alley and wine is now used to house the library's extensive collections. terations have been made to the building; both the grandeur of Its builder and owner remain. Outside and to the rear of the mansion (north) is the also of ool i to marble, which now ►oases the Utah- .J_ta_ti tut This exterior has not been modified however, the inter major alterations. vault. This ar Only slight al - and affluence F1 ne ,Arts., as !in Ogone Vl> e p L� a t^ M M PLNPCM2020-00106 122 2020 w L°J PERIOD (Check One or More as Appropriate) ❑ Pre -Columbian j ❑ 16th Century ❑ 15th Century ❑ 17th Century SPECIFIC DATE(S) (tt Applicable and Known) AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE Aboriginal ❑ Prehistoric Historic ❑ Agriculture ® Architecture ❑ Art ❑ Commerce ❑ Communications ❑ Conservation (Check One or More as Appropriate) ] Education ❑ Engineering Industry ❑ Invention ❑ Landscape Architecture ❑ Literature STATEMENT OF SIGNIIFICANCE ❑ Military ❑ Music ❑ 18th Century ❑ 19th Century R] Political ❑ Religion/Phi- losophy ❑ Science ❑ Sculpture Socioi/Human- itarion ❑ Theater ❑ Transportation iR 20th Century ❑ Urban Planning I �Oo The Kearns Mansion was designed by Architect Carl M. Nauhausen for millionaire mining magnate Thomas Kearns. It is a part of the national culture that shows up in th"is"area:- The foundation was laid in the spring of 1900 and the building completed in 1902. Thomas Kearns came to Utah in 1883 as a young man working on the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad. He gravitated to the mines in Park City where he soon became part owner of the Silver King Coalition Silver Mines. His partner was David Keith. With his newly acquired wealth, Kearns built his lovely mansion on Brigham Street (later South Temple Street) in 1902. The building itself is a work of art, made of oolite marble, and richly furnished interiors of wood, tile and marble. It reflects the quality that affluence could demand in the new twentieth century. Thomas Kearns became a millionaire before he was 28 years old and a Uni_.ted._States Senator from Utah by the age of 40 (1901-1905) He ,also was a noted-ph'i"l�anthropist, erecting the Kearns St. Ann's Orphanage, now St. Anq's_,,School. He became the publisher of the Salt Lake Tribune. Today the Kearns Building, Kearns Corporation, and Kearns, Utah, perpetuate his name. The Kearns family lived in the mansion for over thirty-five years. In it many distinguished guests were entertained, including two presidents: Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. President Roosevelt watched a parade on South Temple from the marble loggia on the second floor. Thomas Kearns died in 1918, but',the home remained in the possession of the family until 1937, when Mrs. Jennie Kearns donated it to the state to be used as a governor's mansion. Three Utah governors lived in the mansion; Henry H. Blood, Herbert B. Maw, and J,'Bracken Lee. In 1957 the mansion became the home of the Utah State Historical Society. It is the intention of the Society that this lovely building be preserved and kept open to the public to provide a show place depicting the genteel life that Utah's mineral resources produced for one of the state's foremost families. PL 106 122 Februalq� 0, 2020 Margery Ward, Historical Society Brochure (Salt Lake City, Utah State Historical Society, 1969). Paul Goeldner, Utah Catalog: Historic American Building Survey (Salt Lake City, 1969), p.—W.- ORDINATE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES t DEFINING A RECTANGLE LOCATING THE PROPE T Y DEFINING THE CENTER POINT OF A PROPERTY R OF LESS THAN TEN ACRES CORNER LATITUDE LONGITUDE LATITUDE I LONGITUDE Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Secon\S Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds NW 0 0 4o 0 46 , o 8 11 1 a52 25 NE 0 0 SE 10 0 Sw 0 V APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: 11 IL15T ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR Cut STATE: CODE COUNTY CODE M Utah Salt- I alep/"�y '5\ M STATE: CODE COUNTY: Z--j cobE STATE: CODE COUNTY: t--j < 11.1 ODE 7— Lx: STATE: CODE COUNTY: -7 CODE irl As the designated State Liaison Officer for the Na 1. - tional Historic Preservation Act of 1()66 (Public Law I hereby certify that this property is included in the 89-66S), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion National Registerl in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria' and procedures set forth by the National Park Service. The recommended level of significance of this nomination is: Chief, Office of Archeology and Historic Preset ration National State ❑ JLocal ❑ P 2;6 -1970 Date TE1 Name AAj 4 44 id ".0% wZZIL wq ATTEST: Milton L. Wellenmann Director, Department of Title neVelopMent qanvir a S Keeper of Ve National Regikter DatePl- �P- I- M i /776 1 a-t, ruJOA8, 2029 I PLN =-I 020-00106 124 4MAMR020 CITY*SALT LAKE STREET • Freeways (FJ controlled .},. ;t;;•) - •' acc.a; no crosungs al grad..) Not 11. Interstate Highways g ;r1 •.k• - :E• z,,. - '�t.,,a.._. U.S. Highways Abbreviations indicate: ALT.=Allanofs d State Highways r i�h� ..}�,�'. T +. _ '" - • .'t, :7A NT N AVE City Limits Y`+ Y� ':+' 1Y L7YN N. "T •", 7TN X ST. ` Rr LA SAVE. Scale: One inch equals approximately t).66miles . 15 Z; x.si: A%o _ INCH ✓sI "` � _. �>% 1 . P•grlr,;r' n ,,t OE ST. r I V AVE [?e Copyright ©1969 by Rand MSNally & Co. Lithographed in U.S.A. All rights reserved. Prse•„�?� M1s•Pok:.`-<Pi"¢ <";;:;: ::,' : s w � � "I � '\� . .y,=:;" .":•'•r •"'r�GOIto-CWns;:: EYE ETT j „ Al ` -E1r,�i�i1 •^ DUPUNI -•0.VE � AJ / r . � � y iq IYTN X. ST. F ti o o ¢ .�\\ .. } ` `I E � � r `~^ TALLYHO St �, ,fr �/� 1 •l'y�, E OWN A E, z : w �0� $ � "�,-�`O•_(.�..�..L�EV IOTx S N. N _ 'w" q '\ IDLH n, S 3 : ST. �\ 1I;cAo fC1115f WAY I j �9i GeEEe ON N 54Yepya IC R[8[RVO/RRw/M STEALIXGz WHY CA O ST. SAN f RNAN DEAONAI DR = ST. -: �, A4xFs LR oa SnnwMOWt IBTH + FODN•N' `'3 ISM N: i TA ISM N N C, Dfl DA. % NOCCXIOw w-- 4 AD QA. lO�yLAR l7TN PF :'n� '' CENTENNIAL MI[FARI D z A\ ''- rxq• 10fi Px�- biX WAs AR w C S y LT. •:::: ;lP: ;::.' :.� e�w°r ° 'YAf � ''• a ~ PRO PERITY . 17N ST Da 2 PM (. f$ AEFQ OYI LE ` PI UQE M. BLFR SN 1•`n '.� AV . ''. - -9_ .i : Aso 'fa' t OR. 4? ?t 6TN N - q E.V "' W •1 y "fAf NQRTMCR 5 AV �i 14FA E T AU VAIN AVE, •° x, a2 - AYE. 000 CL HTO BRIA I F :.CLINTD z AV . IT( AVE. x"' rx6 A w ST. AV mORIAL .DkM..'x 7 S e N m AVE4 a•, S vEe EI H usoLE UAr c[ Ewv i 'a i i GIRARD w`w w F •• •,.� F r V LL IGIRAR OI i `_ IO7N All i CNA IT o N, Sr 1 G w :- ITN ^ z X. '+r :! $ �Y CIP. r WHAT GURAY lE ft: OURAYN9SN V� 7 Is AVE. 1-9 1e S7. �u ;iBISNOP PL. ~� I.r...�7..�:.4. SIN AVE. r I -'GAMES AROMOR aPRIC07 VE. ¢!':�' •s .. 4 7-N A E. ~ SMONDIxo = SIMON01 O/Tv aP ST. ND n ,t n LI AV. ST. i 8 N AVE. CEM[T[wY 'OATH. COL ON PL. i "4NOTO O rP`.VE, X i •dA. ' HOYT RAVE.PL. X ADAMSP is At tint 16 RU iICrA SUMNER o AYE.::::::,:: _ t lACN50N AVE.' z Y I xu lACN50N �z 40 PINYW' t_ s-- LAG 1i 71 CPEENt WN - SG ,C..- - _ 2 _• ,. _ a-.._ _ ,_;�j�. sl -u�u 9T. I(J`,_�_ PL., vi oucT •-', �;~ � N TEMPLE ST. -N f• 2X0 VIE N ? • RAN AVC. L /f L LGGXfO' ETT PI.gG ':..j�FZ 1ST - s o W M� c Al Y v+ A AI C MET .�MIMrj-E u o•, rc N r Pi S. i' TEMPLE �.*/, 57 1 V' FL. !!6"•^-S�TEMPLE+ $T PERRY �• ANOVE ~ LA EOA$," .1 i�OL�py� a� TRISIfR-' FSERFt FO S�OM �VY.)i` s e •�t AVAMEO1 .'1'!i}'.7 Y? M :.•¢ ••. i-•,• -y,ZTL ,, V. - 6 VL. CLAWOON PI.'1 .I4 ... ` i 3t ST S - u 'ems u °1' ST tl I.�_ 5. 1. ,... _ - u GEMMIIt aBu ` OCN AND XE N ec Av. f%':°�w'..- •.'N w n. N N N � > r z m t::w„I.r.,-,. •: w[av .�- AA SuN ER ;^ G =Y g 5 N ._. S. ST' F ... :ffi IERPON EwL <Q AV:y AUN4_-., oFQ SLADf x DO An Pt _1fNN -' JgOR li y N r ° s RPDX up '9-' w�lCk a' W G 'zo"" N M.... AVf FL. c 1 > G $ s Pam. EAP • o PVE.+_ y �TIIIFNEA LE 1 3R0 J' ST. n NR A a 's -E+ 3AD AYE, S. T. I AVE _ 10LLAp w YERH fk z A EY LINDEN VOYLES AV[. - x,l " OFFICC PL M AYLA Dp u r- IINOE 1� uz BADDLFY V yA ;.� tiv[a9 LN�ANG ^ WENw'_ I PL.iC"�`n `f' 1_Ar 1..., - yiA-- 4>±> - M• , S .a' PL. L aTNf «rs.,318.>`v.� •'vlAl4CT� I I`� WA(NCR - u >� I MARLET '., =' PACIFIC Y AVE. "' LIF C� PA IfIL W u PACIF C ,n s FULL R u =:' iULR AUSTIN TV S. 3 . u AVE. SrN� - $ S. 'ST 4g W ,.-- `�' r"' D CPLY •� Y Pt V. 1, i S W A T. = _ YaSiX S. Pt Ir T. �1 z •x`e. ..d_ 7T��EE 1NORCHa DVISSIM1CN IANTPL x ONAt0 l.N It PI N V N 3 i i NILLo $ Pl PL u=u ...NH R E N AV .w 'E i xAWTHOANE yr C;n' Q.4P tELELGGJIJ�E g b T. : 1 ST. S. c 5T. _ i -SP" _ _ AVE. E u` L ON l.$ AV . y 6TH 4v AVE. N DRE`' �•' w i r r w-�N = - RECOyYyPll i o COT GE AVE. r W WIL NIRF Pl, i i W x OE '^ '^ " V . : �PDPTBIa z " C LFR% AV .N ` 4 F{Y�' u .Y..:. F[NWAY ; q A LEY'- SANIDB RG a i "' GAl i UAL' S A < a ITX N,nz S. u ST. .LL "! °�' i - S NN i y'^ii. avE g`" PL. 'moo o _N8 A l..i N'/5 S. W iik'i'. ASATC PL iRIN10A0 Pl. ,- r • f1W000 m Y Y iL AY' O ,- _ o N w ^� MO�RS�E aV `u - LOWELL " Q O Pi' [LA ` r' i g" PL x LOWELL AVE 3 3tl \ aa !I- Lz l MOX R 6, AVE. it - 44LOW Ll ✓ W e _ - - F r 8IN'^ -9 5. ST 18ALL._ Pl. y 4[NESEf AVE. ;' �r m i i c i- XD [RD PBS 2 r CHA E u�i3 NXYSIDE'" ' 3 < 3 Fb ST, w `a PTo�x�, _ k 11 VA ST. MONTAG E AVE. :! UABAR qyEAVMEA ��;, :�fAYETTE AVf. .AVE. C 4S cBFL ON AV BEL OXTAVE.AJE. ` w It E FAME y7 AVC. NA;ffi' AVE. 'g D0.'YON AVE. \ f, zI xERBERT 'XCRBERT AVFffjiREMONTAYE. \ 4,,, GOITT AV. V L AV YA C AVf M YAL N YALE' 0' i GAF A4,' z ../ N > W F [M ''' •' j « REMONT AVE XARVARO` 'MITI XARVARO AVE. —C,x e *r'F IL INO S AYlGOLO 1 OTON WAY ` x\' PAXiOH , MELSEV AYE. O ` c PRINCETON AVE. i t4 P '- PA TON PAXTON PAXTON'AY. pyF e: �- AVE. 31uun Pond 118 RTY z S P'P' O^ LU Y AYC AVE. ITf 01 FH 6 E" avE. i IAIFQ AVE. ♦ O P N LULY - 1 O AYE. ,^ � R LE: ON A [. ,g 111 iJT O. O. sT N fit Vl•1• STN �- i S N _ -• F x � l3iM S. W: LAIN R IA AVE. CA IFD IA AVE.-`z• NEAfAA rry:;. AVC z £ $XfRMAN N AVE N:...:.. AIBERM LE H R IS N '^ NARRISO N L.: ,:;::':. PVE. " HAROMON "ITN S. v N BNOWNINC ,= �• Ii TN S a ST. i x" I 1 / 117H 5 Si.MENR AC „ RILEYf I WHITNEY; c IN u AVE. 7 p D�E O AV[. J� woc� ; = CIA. I I 1 ,� HIGN Al.VAN m { I gNAMOUNT VpN BUREN a :2 _ I 1 VAN BUREN ypN BU EN my- y .E 1� O 1/+ E/� t Rt1 V - 3 WEN;0 DR. STER ST. 1 ' 'NARP15 AYE. AV. Latitude r YO 'TV OV WEBr ( NHa.A,_Ny.,S_OLN..>,AVE WOf Lon itude : 1110 52 t 251E E. in S. __-ST-�.�.I E�'S)TN S. O ST, (� r 4 'n° OuprlA av[. I t � ty � wcN sr I _ I r M RG AREr rI ,-,� � I •^ 0.YC.N „COL eE AVE. LaYTOM w 1 i_�', s AYl0•� - GAATIfL py GARiIELD pVC, r w A-•+'�+"'_D��I I M <ARTNUq WESTMIN TER AV •- - WFS ifW Ll'I AVE. AY[, i ,G t GRDVE AVE. GARII I NAPE. IN IN TER � N AVE. v 1 . _.._... „�„ RAMOna ; .. AAMONM1 AVE, 3 R0.MONi r + / NA TWEL AVE. NAATWELt AVE. RgMDhA AVE. r PVE 4: PLNPCM2020-00106 126 Februdq8, 2020 NP3 Humber ^ I 0 Title: YYL6L� Lvi, PLNPCM2020-00106 129 Februagg @, 20213 k&w PLNPCM2020-00106 128 FebrualqB, 2020 -tt4e: LzL,2 --Kf�4�t2LO (kLaA Loc. PLNPCM2020-00106 120 Februali*l @, 20213 NP3 Humber ^ I 0 Title: YYL6L� Lvi, PLNPCM2020-00106 132 Februagg @, 20213 k&w PLNPCM2020-00106 133 FebrualqB, 2020 -tt4e: LzL,2 --Kf�4�t2LO (kLaA Loc. PLNPCM2020-00106 133 Februali*l @, 20213 Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Utah COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Salt Lake INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMB DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) A _J ...... ....... . . .................... ...... ... ... ............ COMMON: Keith -Brown Mansion and Carriage House'� 4A I AND/OR HISTORIC! ml AL STREET AND NUMBER: 529 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: Salt Lake City STATE COUNTY? CODE Utah L!9� Salt Lake R35 LA .1� 14: .®r . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC z ❑ District Building ❑ Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: ❑Site F-1 Structure JR Private ❑0 In Process Unoccupied Restricted F-1 Object E] Both E] Being Considered Preservation work Ej Unrestricted ❑0 I I in progress ❑ No I U PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) 7 Agricultural ❑ Government Ej Park El Transportation El Comments MKCommercial ❑ Industrial 0 Private Residence ❑ Other (Specify) F1 Educational ❑ Military 7 Religious El Entertainment ❑ Museum F-1 Scientific OWNER'S NAME: to H. Ross and Norinne Thompson Brown W STREET AND NUMBER: LU 777 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: CODE rt a) =r Salt Lake City JSTATE: Utah 4 ;T '09 717 ION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: 0 City and County Building C STREET AND NUMBER: z -I 451 Washington Square r_� CITY OR TOWN: STATE CODE M Salt Lake City Utah 49 A T, :x TITLE OF SURVEY: Z Historic Sites Survey 'N ' X -n DATE OF SURVEY: 1969 ] Federal State E] County E] Local -< Z 0 ;0 DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: C K Z -U Utah State Historical Society ca M 0 STREET AND N`UMBER! c: M 603 East South Temple 0 z CITY OR TOWN. CODE r— �STATE: Salt Lake City Utah 49 %* PLNPCM2020-00106 139 Febru@1408, 2029 Z (Check One) ® CONDITION Excellent ❑ Good ❑ Fair ❑ Deteriorated ❑ Ruins ❑ Unexposed (Check One) (Check One) G�k Altered ❑ Unaltered [] Moved Rk Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (t[known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Keith -Brown Mansion is one of the more architecturally and artis- tically beautiful homes in Salt Lake City, Utah. Its basic pattern is renaissance architecture, yet its exterior reflects rather eccletic tastes. The carriage house is less pretentious. On the mansion, the front steps are flanked by f9ur G-. uscan.columns, 24 feet high and three feet in diameter. One enters the home through heavy wrought -iron and glass doors, added by its second owner, Mr. Ezra Thompson. Through the lobby one enters an octagonal --shaped room which extends two stories high and is capped -by a..gently-domed stained glass window. This area is now used as a reception center by Terracor Corporation. By day a sky light in the roof sheds light through the dome, while electric lights provide night lighting. Solid cherry wood has been used in the octagon. On the second floor the open well is surrounded by columns, arches and railings, all of the same wood. Opposite the main entrance on the first floor is a huge fireplace and mirror. To the left is an entry way from the side door on 'IF" Street and to the right is the staircase, added by Terracor Corporation. At the first landing is a beautiful stained glass window. The other four sides of the octagon on the main floor open onto two front -parlors, a large oval dining room and the kitchen, now extensively remodeled into offices. Second floor rooms, although used as offices, still retain their fireplaces, chandeliers and carved woodwork. The ballroom on the third floor was remodeled into an apartment, but now serves'as-a9conference room. In the basement, the plaster has been re- moved and the brick sandblasted. The area is also used for offices. The home has two bathrooms. The carriage house has undergone major remodeling. The interior now houses offices`,_ drawing tables and work rooms. However, the, exterior is unaltered. Inside beams have been exposed to reveal the original construc- tion. All furnishings have been done with an attempt to retain the historic and aesthetic quality of the home. A sunken garden is being added on the east side of the mansion, between it and the carriage house. The restoration and limited remodeling have been done with care. The beautiful structure retains its architectural quality. It illustrates an excellent use of an historic building for modern needs. The mansion, not the carriage house, is thTNUbject of this nomination. However, as the carriage house and the property on which it sits affects very definitely the mansion's historic and aesthetic setting, it is included within the boundary lines. q^ M rn 0 z N PLNPCM2020-00106 136 F ual401 2� W1 Z 0 U M Z uj Uj LIM PL P5RI0O (Check One or More as Appropriate) E] Pre-Colurn6ion ❑ 16th Century ❑ 18th Century 20th Century ❑ 15th Century ❑ 17th Century 19th Century SPECIFIC DATEW (IfApplicable and Known) Built 1900 AREAS OF SIGNtFbCANCE. (Check One or dare as Appropriate) Aboriginal Education ❑ Political L] Urban Plonnrng 0 Prehistoric C] Engineering El Religion/Phi- ;a Other (S ify) ­,%F, Historic ❑ Industry losophy _71r" k_ _i� E] Agriculture ❑E] ❑Invention Science Architecture 0 Landscape Ej Sculpture E] Art Architecture ❑ Social/Humon- F1 Commerce 0 Literature itarion 6 1.; E] Communications E] Military ❑ Theater ❑Conservation El Music E] Transportation STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Built of San�pe -'limestone in 1898-1900, this three-story mansion was designed by Frederick Alb-ert' Hate, who was also ar6filitie'-cf'for tile Alta Club, the Salisbury Mansion, the Salt Lake Public Library (Hansen Planetarium), the Continental Bank Building, and the Administration Building for the University of Wyoming. With wealth obtained from his interests in the Silver King Coalition Mines at Park City, Mr. David Keith built his lovely mansion on Bri':gham Street in Salt Lake City, where he lived with his wife and son until 1916. The property was then sold to Ezra Thompson, whose family lived in 'the home until 1939, The Thompson's daughter, Norinne, then wife of H. Ross Brown, ',lived in the home between 1939 and 1968 when Terracor Corporation received f'rom them a twenty-five year * r lease on the property.- The company has since spent over $250,000 in restoration and renovation. The company now uses it for busi- ness purposes. This mansion and carriage house reflect the quality living in early twentieth century Utah, made possible because of the wealth of Park,City's mines. I David Keith, the youngest of fourteen children, was bor n In Nova Scotia in 1841.-- Twenty years later he set sail for California to seek his,fortune. His mining know-how and business acumen produced limited rewards there and in Virginia City, Nevada. Because he was an authority on water sumps, he was later employed at Park City, Utah in 1883. There, in - cooperation with Thomas Kearns and others, he,helped build the Silver King Coalition Mines C_qTpany, which extracted some ten and one -quarter million dollars worth of mineral between 1892 and 1907. With this affluence, Keith and Kearns became influential in Utah, financing and publi.s.hing the new Sa-It Lake Tribune, building lovely homes, developing businesses, and making charitable contributions. Both men were nembers of Utah's Constitutional Convention. Keith died in 1918. His wife followed in death soon after,leaving the business empire to their son, David The home is important because of its quality architecture, because it tells much of the mining wealth's story in Utah, and because David Keith was himself a prominent figure in the American West's history. N PCM2020-00106 130 February 16, 2020 NPS Form 10-900-a Utah WordPerfect 5.1 Format (Rev. 2193) MAY 2 3 1995 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 1 thru 10 Page 5 David Keith Mansion, salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT A review of the listing of this building (5/14/71, NRIS 71000849) reveals that the historic name assigned to it at the time of its listing (Keith -Brown Mansion) incorporated the original owner's name with the third owner's name. It is more accurate for the historic name to be that of the individual associated with its significance. This building is significant for its architectural qualities and for its association with an influential figure in Utah, David Keith. Keith accumulated his wealth from mining and helped to build the Silver King Coalition Mines Company in Park City. In addition to his influence and success within the mining industry, Keith helped develop other businesses such as of the Salt Lake Tribune. Keith, along with his wife and son, lived here until 1916. The property was then sold to Ezra Thompson, whose family lived in the home until 1939. Between 1939 and 1968 the house was occupied by H. Ross and Norinne Thompson Brown. All references have been changed throughout the nomination to include the correct name, David Keith Mansion. Max J. Evans Date State Historic Preservation Officer PLNPCM2020-00106 138 February 16, 2020 t I t I I I I PF�oF�BRTY: LI NC-. I 1 I t•:-Ic�us�. t I I I I 1 I.itAl�lstaru i I I I I IM-A - BROWN ML�N�ION CL�F�f�I�G� 4-OL�'� m^� T LAKE C.�TY , UTOH TPLNP M2d26t-bhTO--oc REG1�-� 6) LfE c ®aaaaaUlm oo , k QohwfHaaEfFf Eta. LNM-1 - GI ITDI o a o o 00 -; ..CEMETE s° �a00000aoaaaa� i �00000ElF IEl �® 17 a 2ao22aE k�oEaa.aoF.,iaaooL-&®o�c E-1a01-1EEJ �a�ao�a�- mom TM 1'[ aee��a.oaWoaac L3 a.�aN0NU[SU, NB I�s�l �J r�o'�•e� ` i y I ]k I Li CJ . 76t y SDU F ST xy Ot y 60y Its Pg�F - W. L M p55i fl;c' nw OR" R WwW 1�IIIjjI,' � I-, �--�I ICJ ® I N it SB aj ME SS O t IA(�y ae 3a ou SOUT m ' S < W 5 � A'• i t.` H w:9 W ,•cl` IJ_3'al Oz06yN rt .._iz ,--, ny Ffia IN = m a= ,• I(•��IB a L 41 g y 42= fwr7 nE ® ' '[ I a:, Li u m, FIT t`L'^J k tu 1S[ ` rt A IN Y! X R �J E T6�K L ' L VJ7,�-' •'• ,9t..i! 21 lJ iR 2• �µ �y sT �t2 u ' ^ t't Lillll `Q LJ 13 ' �T H L LJ JR RE IC 1�4 I R.',L H A R.-C 5R,.,T k F 21 L LIE ®oo�E 11K I Ll B TY L .24 ; 23 ,[ urt 22 Tel 4•� l �2� •u sn © 17 „«�, (L'Y"e't I Tal MOiv lees i R G Lu ,OID aw �11[.1� V �' )N[6SMN AV nN41.,0 '• • � {,ipt _Mff?-Q VN * IL r 1- CDLJ��E=- P N M2UQsQpIja1= : gd' - 'I� l 1° 140 L�c�T�FebruJCXi6124 71 I Ov 1, =I � hit r 4 � lit r AR .00 i r I AV ow R r n f / 0 r PROPERTY OF Iff NATIakinAL qGiSTER No. cf' 7 01 1 cep NQGI tOILL • IN7r-F[IOFIS GORDON REEKY, PHOTCORAPHER .rpoouc T$ • aRprinr=ss POST ❑FFICE� Sd7L E2z2 • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B4TL36 I TEL"[K]T • 26416SI 14WITH-5.Wt, MANSICPQ A--T LA4-<& Citr,OAH PLNPCM2020-00106 142 February 16, 2020 f 6 No. C" 7 0 1 Co�.oti AFiCMrTECYLIP4AL r ir:TfR i4PFS GORDON FE'-- 'Y, PHOTOGRAPHER sr3F4uoL�r_7'5 POST CIFFICE 3 x fi? 2 salt LAKL- C"Y. LJT4H L:41L:3 TE;, 131 1561 fN R OF THE NATIS'NAL REGUIR 16, 2020 '- �:, �. Zt- � ` �LL� w� , r �� ' .. _..e' .- — .. l � �A• . � S � . i I LSD J r� .t 4 'k` j ' � y � �� f Ii i1 , . l _ `:� � r S �. �1 i �ir \ TT � Jn ��'� _ � � � y �� �i1 �� � 1 J �t �� .� N1 _ ,r,.. �, Sy z � f•' i NP5 Humber r Title Sig Lee._ CJD PLNPCM2020-00106 NO. L7ORE]LJI V PEEPY, RYOTOGRAPHER POST :7F�ICE L:>2t SALT LAKE C4TY. LiTAH Ia9108 ARCHMEC,TUFUkL r INT-RIMRS r ns�pC�ra�sS YEL-501 ' 364-1661 c,-&rxr u<,--M W-Ause LAKe L ITT. L-Tz }, 4 149 February 16, 20213 ti. NPS Title NO. 9.1 0-29 ARCHmECTuRAL ■ 11V ---R)OH5 GORDON PEERY, PHc--)TorRAPHER ■PRODUCTS � Pr'tOGFtESS POET OFFICE BOX 6242 . SALT LAKE GIT'Y LFTAAk E4109 TEL; MI-364-?581 CAQQ 164sc 1-lU�ysE. ELT L�tat IT`S U-tA N PLNPC�RTY Of TI-11 NA I-Fiwif'� �'�L i tMff 20 APS Number r Title ja40 ' J ::_ll _f PROP[PT" Rr NO. AFtC" iECTLNIAL a IN-Epi OF?9 GDRDL7Ri REE"-Y, PHOTC)GF�,4PHER af'RMC)LJC 7S ■nROGRCGS POST O%FICE t3OJC 024-L • SALT LF4tc CITY, LITA11 Lga:uH 7eL Csd1Z51 kMITH- G'+�[�wN #►rf 51C�IJ PLNPCM2020-00106 C::4r-�4 -S F4-'UtFKruaNl 8,2022 T L,&kE G!T Y , U-A-1 Form No. 10-300 lRe� �0-14) F I A/ /J /& & 7 � UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR:,: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DATA 5� NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM NAME SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS HISTORIC Mc=M HOUSE AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 259 Seventh Avenue _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Salt Lake City _ VICINITY OF 02 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Utah 049 Salt Lake 035 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS r, PRESENTUSE —DISTRICT _PUBLIC XOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE -_MUSEUM --gUILDING(S) .XPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH WORK IN PROGRESS X EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS RYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints STREET& NUMBER 50 East North Temple CITY, TOWN ETA, TE Salt Lake City VICINITY OF �Jta�l LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS;ETC. Salt Lake County recorder's Office STREET & NUMBER Salt Lake City and County Building CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah QREPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE Utah Historic Sites Survey April 7, 1971 —FEDERAL XSTATE _COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, Tdj*NF'GM2020-00106 STATEFe5ruarnb, H DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X-EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED _XORIGINAL SITE -GOOD _RUINS _XALTERED _MOVED DATE -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The present physical appearance of the McIntyre House differs little externally from the original building. A small service porch to the rear of the building has been added, and the apse porches have all been enclosed. We are not aware of further external changes. The interior has been modified primarily in its furnishings with only the dining room retaining the original furnishings; the kitchen is now located where the old pantry used to be, and a small elevator was added when the McIntyres resided there. The building now serves as residential institutional housing for LDS Hospital. The house is approximately fifty feet square and sits on an elevated stone platform covered with 1-1/2 inch diameter hexagonal tile, overall porch dimensions sixty by seventy feet. The porch on the east side terminates fifteen feet short of the rear plane of the build- ing. The house is set to the rear of the podium in such a way as to create a ten -foot deep front porch and two ten foot wide side aisles interrupted by the protrusion of the seven foot in radius semi -circular east and west side apses. The house would be best described as a 1-1/2 story structure with living quarters in the attic (originally for servants) and a full utility basement originally containing a coal furnace and laundry facilities. In existence now is an oil heat installation, the freed area converted into a laundry and recreation facilities. The south facing entrance is approached from Seventh Avenue by two flights of stairs. A 20-foot wide by 10-foot deep portico with a monumental pediment covers the entranceway. The portico is supported by four striated columns topped with combination capitols and by two attenuated pilasters. The pilasters and columns extend to the frieze of the building. The double five -panel door is shielded by a slightly projecting por- tico with a plain pediment. This structure is supported by two smaller columns and two attenuated pilasters similar in proportion to the ones supporting the main portico. The doorway is flanked by two double hung sash windows, the upper pane in each is of leaded, bevelled glass.''' A ciit; seifii�ell"iptc'al porch graces the area between the two porticos, theoretically accessible through the center second floor window. The upper and lower double` litu windcfd `6h, ea6 i 1 side of the central porched area bompletes the symmetry of the faq�*.. , The primary materials on the exterior are rough brick and stone, with wood being utilized for columns, pediments, roofing, apses and fenestration framing. The foundation is of squared rubble and the brick structure of the house is of common stretcher bond. The window lugsills are brick and brick is used in the form of radiating voussouirs over the semi -circular windows on the main body of the house as well as over the rectangular double hung sash windows on the rear. The stepped radiating voussoirs over the first story front and side windows are of cut stone. This is the extent to which stone is used in a decorative sense on the exterior. The main window type used throughout is the rectangular double hung sash with one pane on the lower and nine panes on the upper section. The upper panes of the first floor windows on the south and west sides are of leaded, bevelled glass. Leaded, be- velled glass is also used on,;the dining room ribbon window to the north and on the semi - elliptical window over the doorway -_leading from the dining room to the west porch. The overall most important window of the house is located on the north side at the top of the double stair landing up from the central hallway. The window is of much greater importance internally than externally bringing light to the first floor central hallway and the second floor peripheral hallway. The window is rectangular capped by a semi- circle with glass divisions along the periphery and the overall shape emphasized by the unbroken center pane. The window is of leaded, bevelled glass and provides a remarkable PLNPCM2020-00106 154 Februar"13, 2022 CONTINUATION SHEET ITEM NUMBER 7 PAGE 2 play o f light in the evening. Windows extending above and below ground level provide light for the basement. The hipped roof covering the building is pierced on the east, west, and north sides by dormer windows. Three chimneys pierce the roof: 1) west side offset to front and near exterior wall; 2) east side offset to south and located toward the interior; 3) north chimney on the exterior and offset east. The roof trim eaves are of the cor- nice box type and are constructed of wood. The front doorway leading to the interior is of five-foot wide double doors, with a three-foot deep foyer canpleting the entrance. Recessed windows of the same depth flank the foyer, the eastern box now occupied by the added elevator. The central hall- way is sixteen feet wide and thirty feet long from the end of the foyer to the first step of the central axially located staircase. The ceiling covering the first floor hallway and the second floor peripheral hallway is of the coffered type with natural wood beams and white panels. Three types of wood are used in the rooms, although type was undetermined. The staircase and moldings are all finely hand carved. The house is divided axially into three sixteen -foot wide bays. The west (pro- gressing south to north) is a small library, a sitting room, and a dining room --the dining room the only one with the original furniture remaining. The dining room is also the only room with a coffered ceiling as in the hallway. The hand -carved, wood silverware chest on the north wall was imported from England by the Mclntyres. The crystal chandelier is also the original, as are all others in the house save the sit- ting room fixture. Diagonal fireplaces are located in the northwest corner and south- west corner respectively of the first two rooms. To the east (progressing south to north) is the parlor, game mom, and kitchen. A fireplace is located on the east wall of the central hallway and on the west wall of the game room. Double thickness sliding doors with different types of wood on either side separate the central hall- way from the first two rooms as well as separating the rooms themselves, except the kitchen. Chandeliers line the central hallway. A small staircase located in the hallway next to the kitchen provided servant access to the second and third floors. An adjacent stairway leads to the basement. The apses on either side of the house extend to the roofline of the second floor and were originally open, though now glassed in. A separate unaltered carriage house is located in the northeast corner of the property. The structure is of wood with a gambrel roof and southern gable. An iron railing set on a cut stone wall encloses the property on the south and west sides. Iron grillwork railing surrounds the podium .on which the house rests. Trees and bushes on the west side and extending around the southwest corner slightly hide the house and serve to protect it from the strong western sun. The house and property are in excellent condition and have already received recognition as a historic building. PLNPCM2020-00106 155 FebruaryIAG, 2022 IM SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW PREHISTORIC—ARCHEOLUGY-PREHISTORIC—COM M U NITY PLAN NI NG —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION —1400-1499 —ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC —1500-1599 —AGRICULTURE _1600-1699 XARCHITECTURE --1700-1799 _ART X-1800-1899 —COMMERCE —1900- COMMUNICATIONS —CONSERVATION _ECONOMICS _EDUCATION —ENGINEERING _EXPLORATION/SETTLE MENT —INDUSTRY —INVENTION _LAW —LITERATURE —MILITARY _MUSIC —PHILOSOPHY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC DATES 1$98 BUILDER/ARCHITECT Fredrich Hale STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE —SCIENCE —SCULPTURE —SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN —THEATER —TRANSPORTATION —OTHER (SPECIFY) The property on which the McIntyre House sits was registered to C. J. Sandbech on June 27, 1874, as Lot 2, Block 101, Plat D. The lot was purchased by Gill S. Peyton on January 26, 1894, for a price of $2,500.00. The structure was designed by architect Fredrich Hale and was first inhabited in 1898 and was called Payton Hall. The property, house, and carriage house was sold to Henry w. Brown on July 18, 1900, for a price of $15,000.00. William H. McIntyre acquired the house on December 5, 1901 for a price of $19,000.00 and the adjacent lot (Lot #2) for a price of $2,000.00. From this date on the structure has been known as the McIntyre House. Service connections are recorded as being made on April 17, 1906 and additional services and repairs were made August 8, 1910. William H. McIntyre died on August 20, 1926. Mrs. Phoebe McIntyre resided in the house until her death in 1945. William H. McIntyre came to Utah as a boy from Texas and his adventurous life was bound up with the development of the Utah cattle business. In later life Mr. McIntyre developed large holdings in Alberta, Canada, where he estab- lished the McIntyre Ranch but he retained many interests in Utah and spent his last years there;dying in Salt Lake City in 1926 at,the age of -seventy-eight. He was born in Grimes County, Texas about forty miles. north of what is now the city of Houston, -in -the --year 1848, the son of William McIntyre who was of Scotch -Irish descent. William's brother, Samuel, along with William traveled to Texas about 1870 to sell some property owr}ed by their father. After the sell was completed they bought cattle and made the long trek back to Utah. In the spring of the next year, they'sold the cattle for more than five times what they had paid. This gave them enough money to buy more cattle in Omaha and drive them to Utah. This partnership continued.until sometime in the 1880s and gave the two brothers enough money to enter into several ventures, including the Ma=th Mine at Mammoth, Utah which then developed into a successful operation. During the 1880s, William had hard times in the cattle business losing almost an entire herd in the winter of 1886-87. In 1891 to 1894 William began investigating the possibility of purchasing land and in 1894 he purchased a full section of land near Cardston in Alberta, Canada. Ranching began shortly after the purchase. William H. McIntyre was married to Phoebe Ogden. Chase. She was t$e.granddaughter of Isaac Chase, the first flour miller in Utah. Liberty Park .was ozice.the.Isaac Chase ., farm, later passing to Brigham Young. Phoebe Chase was born at the caretaker's house which still stands on Liberty Park. PLNPCM2020-00106 156 February08, 2022 M -MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Paper by Yvonne G. Dehm, May 19, 1969. Utah,_ A Centennial History, Vol. III, personal and Family Records. IDGE.OGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY Taaa than nna acre UTM REFERENCES ZONE EASTING NORTHING Cw I I I I I I I I I, STATE B1.III ILArJl 111111 ZONE EASTING NORTHING DL_L_jIIII_,IIIIIIII LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES CODE COUNTY CODE STATE CODE COUNTY CODE MFORM PREPARED BY NAME / TITLE Wi 1 cnn G Martin PrrPcr_rnrati nn P1 annar ORGANIZATION DATE ST EET&NUMBER T LEPH NE 603 East South Tenwle _ (801) CITY OR TOWN STATE Salt Lake City -Utah MSTATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER CER.TIFI.CATION THE EVALUATED SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE STATE IS: NATIONAL_ STATE LOCAL X As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the-Nationill hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the Nation I Register criteria and procedures set forth by the National Park §drve; STATE HISTORIC PRESERVAtIOWOFFICER SIGNATURE TITLEMlchael D. Gallivan, State Historic that it has been evaluated according to the DATE GPO 892.453 f 5 atlti<wo 1 �� OILIp- s • t ` r`i = �,- . /': ,, '� /r: S• Pik, j I k i. iFIN Y •a ai �; Ensign �i .�' y • "-� i'..�/ ,• _� \ ptpnu�nertt\� • f •+! - �: j.,.:r. P. � � i � •t � �-•. ) y_•^—^i/J, � �'.%.;!'�:/,�.'1 1 I !I—il ; --,\ f�K` "�' • _e iap.' .� `/ t �` n; - ;/, '' c •f'�'�'t' 47'30r. LI tl a\�Y1� ,•'!'• 25 \�� i `• n ` - );•0 `` - > I .�� I I » ■ L. FIOSp ��� \ i '`� �;L`•t �.�'� J /' % i 1 %� r •1 . 'NORT ST43�'�,��:: ,1 g�is N ��7-A \ _ NORP4 ST +` {.o p` ��` Inj`r "T! N` asa+�+-- q - I r JIiiI0� 4d h 9. E; T rT �yty iI •fir 1� . Salt Lake City, Salt Lake J� !+" f- NofzT•. sr i County,Utah � /I/N, � os 'tat UIM Reference. 12-425730- '�74 E IW a1+M T t NTOL Ve 4514220 t, an �35I {y 1 . r� - 4 I .....•I'• ' ...I !', - ` 4s14000'".N. fNiiS 'Iw I� sh, + _I: 1!lf4h I J \ rH AVE oI Jh� ■ e •jalf;i�•I n rIA Mrnn ?f ; �, `;r ""`�+ eM I,,.:� I`� ]rHS (� St r IR"1 160000 FEET �► BM ��n4e' li Il.r'�.=4254 1G•�r 1 ` I 1 sc M �' ti 142�1• ..... , =M wlrnd 1irQJMr th'arlc■' L. a9" 91_I (`I �i■ }�= : Schi S,Sc I—J'�r,�••r� Y � ��Madl�+son`-'� _ S asi 1~ IS All 7'M r 1 ft�; at r� �� M 26 -�ASE ; t p sail_ S H `8 'TEMP E T - LAN E h� 'V��1• y rg 4 1. c tj . 'V+�'•j�� , II I - Jlc. �,I!,,. I t ::d4 1 5 TH -• ST IIST Y J��4■, ■ rgp �( .demo t 'Pon Tess =ii—.-- !� a-, a •Sch-i •. M I I ument 'rT�..'1�._ S i Ls • � Is - 7.: J _n.:. ,} �� �, M . ■ � ' � r . 3D VM SD TM .1' ' ini.Sch �! J )r � ' '% ' i M; , Pioneer ' uerr ¢ ' 4a' Ii65 1 !D 17 tir `M,qh GpJ i"JI �1' Park 4TH BOUT -= +' el'•�II�`�1 >t•• �I 11 � Z w ;�BM 4260 It-; L.�v6 ,; � to ..T l,'' y I�;!� 1 .;' ly ¢. Q ®Cijfand C�jl Ii _ ;IsT!j( �_�'° '1-I /� \, •!<'i; O�IWo1 ' 'J f8J'3 ald��J W11ilU�J W n� 71 � I G.• �•� 1{ STL�I,!• _ • 1(�f!;i 1,�� ��wt", �! {1 6 soft a �^ �.dl ivetei e pt ` @` `. % 1 ;;p ji GranSumner r, �`'^ �j1' urN,L�.Ji sr-I� -- � �'�:'e:•1�-� r0. � -- c cf0•� , !t � �- � �-•t t:3. a� � s ■ - cili -rya In ! i R k t! ,I t ti�_ �_�...... .f ■■ « erH I i 3 . sourf. sr II I T >< 01] 55' 423000^'E. 1890000 FEET (NORTH): • NTEN OF—GEOLOGI LLb.RV9, 1—s.+ GY01 0C-Kto 40°45' R 1 W. R. I i MURRAY 6 Mr. 111 °52'30rr i P.ROVO 4.3 xtr. "ie ROAD CLASSIFICATION °cs-p Heavy-duty ...�•. Light -duty — t— %S'o Medium -duty Unimproved dirt PLNPCM2020- FUOT", 6 InterstIA9 Route 0 U.S. Route 0 State Ro't@bruaNA@, 2022 ml sib no 158 i Februarry OI ®, 2 JUL 17 1979 W-IN YFE HOUSE ffiAQE Salt Lake City, [Tr i Photo by W. Martin 12-77 Neg. at Cat. St. Hi.St. Society Lcoking atp South c � -.don JUL 11 19'18 MCINTYM HOUSE � � 197$ Salk Lake City. LTf �� Photo by W. Martin 12-77 Neg. at Ut. State Hist. Society Looking at South and East Faae ;_ � PC QjM 2022,E W�IQ �..,i#} , w .: at � r + i� MCIN'I'YRE HOUSE F E B 1 01970 Salt Lake City,W Photo by W. Marker 12-77 Neg. at Ut. St. Hist. Society Lcoking at West and South Face ATTACHMENT E: CITY PLAN CONSIDERATIONS Adopted City Plan Policies and Guidance There are several adopted master plans and documents that provide guidance for historic preservation, many of which express general support for the concept of creating and adopting flexible zoning regulations that create economic incentives for contributing structures and landmark sites. Policy statements and goals in the Community Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Avenues Master Plan and Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan, include statements for increasing housing stock in already developed sections of the city, as well as creating tools to further incentivize historic preservation for many of the historic property owners within the City. The master plans that address historic preservation goals and policies include the following: Community Preservation Plan o The comprehensive plan for Historic Preservation, includes many related policies for incentivizing preservation. • Plan Salt Lake o Plan Salt Lake includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outline in this master plan. o Includes guiding policies that preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. o Encourages the retention of areas and structures of historic and architectural value. o Promotes a balance of preservation with flexibility for change and growth. • Avenues Master Plan o The comprehensive plan for the Avenues encourages historic preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites. The master plans that address housing goals and policies include the following: • Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan o The housing plan encourages the creation of the flexible zoning tools and regulations to create additional housing stock. • Plan Salt Lake o Includes guiding policies that encourage housing options that accommodate gaining in place, as well as the promotion of rehabilitation of existing housing stock. o Also includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outline in this master plan. Community Preservation Plan The Community Preservation Plan, adopted in 2012, indicates that the City needs to adopt a "wider ranger of preservation tools." Historic preservation tools are generally identified as incentives, which can include an array of policies that encourage the preservation, restoration or reconstruction of important historic features on historic properties. Policy 2.1a: Ensure the long-term viability of existing local historic districts. Policy 2.1b: Ensure consistency between the Community Preservation Plan and all other adopted City plans. Policy 2.3a: Identify historic preservation as an important component of the City's sustainability efforts based on its important economic, environmental and cultural benefits to the City. PLNPCM2020-00106 164 February 16, 2022 Policy 3.20: Explore a variety of tools to determine the appropriate method for implementing historic preservation policies of a specific historic resource. Policy 3.3a: Align preservation -related City regulations with the goals and policies of this plan. Policy 3.3b: The Historic Preservation Overlay District standards are to be used as the basis for decision making when considering applications and the standards should be applied in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. Policy 3.39: Ensure that underlying zoning is supportive of preservation policies for the area in which historic or character preservation is proposed. Policy 3.3i: Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. Policy 3.3k: Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Policy 3.4a: Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. Policy 3.4b: Develop a wide range of incentives to encourage the protection of historic properties. Policy 3.4d: Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that he negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Policy 6.1a: Historic Preservation is a primary tool to implement the sustainable goals of Salt Lake City. Policy 6.1b: The energy benefits, including life -cycle costs of preserving older buildings, should be understood by property owners, development professionals, decision makers, City Staff and the general public. Policy 6.5b: Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. Policy 6.5e: Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. Plan Salt Lake Guiding Principle: Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. Initiatives: 1. Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas and structures of historic and architectural value. 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. 6. Improve education and outreach about the value of historic preservation. Plan Salt Lake Housing Goals and Policies Guiding Principal/Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the city, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. PLNPCM2020-00106 165 February 16, 2022 1. Ensure access to affordable housing citywide (including rental and very low income). 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 3. Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 5. Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. 7. Promote high density residential in areas served by transit. 8. Support homeless services. Avenues Master Plan Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic District. Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Objective is Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.2 Develop in fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Staff Discussion: The above stated policies and guidelines relate to the proposed language for the historic carriage house reconstruction or restoration for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The policies and guidelines encourage the creation of additional housing through flexibility and incentives within the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. Staff was originally supportive of the concept of introducing zoning flexibility into historic districts with the goal of restoring existing structures and creating additional housing stock. Staff attempted to work with the applicant prior to the submission of the language, as well as after the application was accepted and assigned. The applicant has not been amenable to Staff recommendations or direction. Additionally, the applicant has not been amenable to the Historic Landmark Commission's concerns, comments and the specific reasoning for the negative recommendation. It is impossible to support a text amendment proposal that does not include actual text to be inserted into the zoning code, does not address the process for approval of projects under the proposal, and is therefore not something that can be administered. The applicant could remedy this by drafting actual code language, productively working with staff of the Planning Division to put the proposal into an ordinance format, in recognition that the Planning Commission cannot forward a recommendation to the City Council that is not in an adoptable format. PLNPCM2020-00106 166 February 16, 2022 ATTACHMENT F: ANALYSIS OF ZONING AMENDMENT STANDARDS ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS 21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making a decision concerning a proposed text amendment, the City Council considers the following factors. Although the proposed ordinance is not complete, Staff drafted responses to the factors based on the concepts of the proposed ordinance. FACTOR 1. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents; 2. Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance; 3. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning district which may imposed additional standards; 4. 'The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. FINDING The specific proposal is not in ordinance format and thus, this factor cannot be fully evaluated or analyzed. The specific proposal is not in ordinance format and thus, this factor cannot be fully evaluated or analyzed. The specific proposal is not in ordinance format and thus, this factor cannot be fully evaluated or analyzed. The specific proposal is not in ordinance format and thus, this factor cannot be fully evaluated or analyzed. RATIONALE While the concept may be valid, Staff cannot evaluate the proposed text amendment against this factor because the proposal provided by the applicant is not in an ordinance format. While the concept may be valid, Staff cannot evaluate the proposed text amendment against this factor because the proposal provided by the applicant is not in an ordinance format. While the concept may be valid, Staff cannot evaluate the proposed text amendment against this factor because the proposal provided by the applicant is not in an ordinance format. While the concept may be valid, Statt cannot evaluate the proposed text amendment against this factor because the proposal provided by the applicant is not in an ordinance format. PLNPCM2020-00106 167 February 16, 2022 ATTACHMENT G: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS The zoning text amendment was posted on Salt Lake City Planning Division's website on February 11, 2022, for public engagement and comment purposes. Notice of the post was provided via Listserve. All of the public comments that have been submitted are attached. PLNPCM2020-00106 168 February 16, 2022 May 8, 2020 Kelsey Lindquist Senior Planner Salt Lake City Planning Division Dear Mr. Lindquist, I am writing to you regarding the petition to amend Title 21A-Zoning of the city code to allow for the reconstruction of a documented historic carriage house at 222 4t" Avenue. My wife and I reside in our home in the upper avenues and we own three units in the Carlton Towers at 266 East 4t" Avenue; which is less than a quarter of a block from the subject property. The proposed amendments seem quite reasonable if a process for approval includes safeguards that assures conformity to historic values. With appropriate reviews, the preservation and/or reconstruction of historic landmark sites acknowledged by the National Register of Historic Places would be possible and would serve to enhance the aesthetic of the Avenues Historic District as well as several other unique sites and neighborhoods in our city. I believe that the request to obtain approval for an application under the proposed amendment utilizing the Historic Landmarks Commission's review and public scrutiny process provides the safeguards necessary to maintain historic integrity. I would encourage the City to approve the Zoning Amendment request. Respectfully, Jim Bradley Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 PLNPCM2020-00106 169 FebrualOOO, 2020 From: Barbara Hounsell To: Stephen C Pace Cc: Lindquist, Kelsey; Scott S. Cruze Subject: (EXTERNAL) Stephen C. Pace Carriage House Project Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:44:04 AM Hello Stephen, Barbara and I enjoyed talking with you on Sunday about your Carriage House reconstruction project. Assuming proper engineering and construction practices are followed, we are in full support of this historically important project as described as the Stephen C. Pace Historic Carriage House proposed zoning text amendment, 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah. The proper engineering and construction to which we refer must protect the integrity of the existing retaining wall on the north side of our Peery Apartment property. The project must not compromise our retaining wall with additional loads, including loads that come from structures, dirt or fill, landscape materials, vegetation, or water and water retention. Sincerely, Barbara Hounsell Alex Cross Owners of the Peery Apartments, LLC Cc: Scott Cruze Kelsey Lindquist PLNPCM2020-00106 178 Februaioyl®, 2020 From: Carol Foster To: Lindquist, Kelsey Cc: Paul Foster Subject: (EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2020-00106, 222 4th Ave Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:12:32 AM To whom it may concern: We are writing in support of Stephen Pace's renovation of 222 4th Ave. We are neighbors at 163 B St. We have spoken with Stephen and support his renovation plan. Our primary concerns were regarding keeping the community feeling of our neighborhood, promoting house ownership over renting, against Airbnbs / apartments and for more long-term housing for families or individuals. Stephen explained that his rentals have very little turnover of renters and we have witnessed that, living here since 2002. Another concern was windows overlooking our property (backyard of 163 B Street) and Stephen explained there weren't any. Feel free to reach out to us if you have any questions. Many thanks, Carol and Paul Foster PLNPCM2020-00106 176 FebrualgoB, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment Open House Comments Received by the Applicant Submitted May 18, 2020 From: To:0 Sent: PM Mountain Standard Time Subject: Re: 222 4th Ave The cover letter looks good and I like the idea of including the buildings that will be affected by the new regulations. It's odd to have to create new regulations for so few buildings but if that is what the city planners say you must do I guess you must. Will they actually list the buildings that they new tens will apply to? The only other person that I know with a carriage house is Larry? Have you run the actual regulations by him? I doubt he will ever wasn't to do anything with them but he would have a good idea how they would apply to his structure. Good luck Sydney [Fonnesbeck] [215 A St] From: To: Mountain Standard Time u sect: e: -mai We are in agreement with the proposed project this amendment would allow. It would be a great addition to our neighborhood. We have been waiting for years for the city to approve the improvement of the property. As it stands now, it is not only an eyesore, but it is dangerously close to falling down and so a safety issue as well. Don & Laurie Kocherhans Property owners 215-218 4th Avenue kirk.preserve@gi-nail.com (801 ) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 172 February 16, 2022 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Subject: Re: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comments/Questions are encouraged Hello, again. Both Ted and I have read your proposal with interest. You have found wonderful old photos and drawings. Your plan sounds good. I am pasting below what I have added as a note to accompany your proposal. Best wishes, Tucker Gurney My husband and I have lived at the corner of 4th Avenue and A Street since 1974 and have admired Stephen Pace's loving restoration work on the William F. Beer Estate. We hope he will be able to rebuild the fourth and final structure of the estate as a single family private residence in the style of the original carriage house designed by Richard Kletting. Elizabeth Gurney FNP entEW:M Mountain Standard Time Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comm entsfQuestions are encouraged Stephen, As you know I have a property on the same block as you. Yes it would be very good if you could get approval to clean up and construct a carriage house on your 4th Ave. property. Best wishes in that regard, Alan Y[orgason] [174 A St] kirk.preserve@gi-nail.com (801 ) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 173 February 16, 2022 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies From: Barbara Hounsell [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 q pp��� To: Stephen C Pace IW Cc: Lindquist, Kelseyin PaquisMsgov.com>; Scott S. Cruze en ace Carriage House Project Hello Stephen, Barbara and I enjoyed talking with you on Sunday about your Carriage House reconstruction project. Assuming proper engineering and construction practices are followed, we are in full support of this historically important project as described as the Stephen C. Pace Historic Carriage House proposed zoning text amendment, 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah. The proper engineering and construction to which we refer must protect the integrity of the existing retaining wall on the north side of our Peery Apartment property. The project must not compromise our retaining wall with additional loads, including loads that come from structures, dirt or fill, landscape materials, vegetation, or water and water retention. Sincerely, Barbara Hounsell Alex Cross Owners of the Peery Apartments, LLC cc: Scott Cruze, Kelsey Lindquist , r-IM, 79MAIA1 I LIGRG i 5A I rd ; IL AWL A 0 A-,, -I one I,. Subject: Re: 222 4th Ave Hi Stephen, Sorry for the delayed response on this. My wife and I took a look at your proposal and it looks great. We are in full support of the 222 4th Ave Carriage House restoration project that you have proposed. Just a few weeks before you stopped by the house, we were commenting how that current structure looks like it's about to fall over and is kind of an kirk. preserveO)g mail. corn (801 ) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 174 February 16, 2022 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies eye sore. We were excited to hear that you are planning on rehabbing it. Thanks for sharing the details with us. Best, -Adam Adam & Juliette Stewart 225 3rd Ave 090A 11010M UL oo -I -I -is -a I,. Subject: Re: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comments/Questions are encouraged We are in full support. We'd even support making it a 2 story taller house as well. Making it bigger in sq ft might make it more desirable over time. Of course as long as it looks similar to the original we'd love it. I'll try and get on the website tonight or tomorrow and post our comments. Jenni Thompson 0Grou Realestate LLC. Mr. Wade owns two four-plexes on the corner of 4th Ave and B Street at 228 and 236 4th Ave. He does not live on site. He told me on 4/17/20 that he was in full support of my proposal but indicated that "he doesn't do email." I asked if I could provide his phone number to the city and he said that would be fine. Lloyd Wade (801) 694-4337 I have not been able to reach by phone the heirs/conservators of the estate of Robert Pearson, owners of the duplex at 173 and 175 B Street. Their tenants told me that they pay rents to an entity called B Street LLC via an entity called Black Aspen Management. tried many times to reach Black Aspen but they do not answer and their voicernail is apparently malfunctioning. I am positive of the Pearson support of the project because in 2017 Mr. Pearson personally, verbally agreed to let me purchase for an unstated nominal amount a 5 foot strip of his back yard to allow me to have full control of the Historic Carriage House building footprint prior to rebuilding and then later in 2017, when his kirk. preserveO)g mail. corn (801 ) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 175 February 16, 2022 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies children had taken over his property, they executed a sale of the strip to me in exchange for $10. 1 began paying property taxes on the strip in 2018. A third person, Mr. Thomas Mulcock, 212 4th Ave, (801) 864-3881 owns a four-plex and garages on the southwest corner of the 222 lot. I provided him with the zoning change package in April but did not reach him by phone until May 11. He indicated that he did not carefully read my proposal, that he had no necessary objection to it, but that due to his wife's critical illness he doubted he would get to it in the near future. I told him that under the circumstances I would not bother him again. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 176 February 16, 2022 3) PLANNING COMMISSION c) Agenda/Minutes February 23, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA February 23, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. (The order of the items may change at the Commission's discretion) ATTENTION: This meeting will not have an anchor location at the City & County Building based on the followina determination by the Plannina Commission Chair: 1, Amy Barry, Chair of the Planning Commission, hereby determine that with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic conditions existing in Salt Lake City including, but not limited to, the elevated number of cases, that meeting at an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who would be present. Commission Members will connect remotely. We want to make sure everyone interested in the Planning Commission meetings can still access the meetings how they feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the Planning Commission meetings, they are available on the following platforms: • YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings • SLCty Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCty-Live/2 If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or would like to provide general comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.com or connect with us on Webex at: • https:Hbit.ly/slc-pc-02232022 Instructions for using WebEx are provided on our website at SLC.GOV/Plann PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 PM REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 9, 2022 PUBLIC HEARINGS ADU Conditional Use at Approximately 1532 South Green Street - Dorian Rosen, the property owner, has requested conditional use approval for a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) to be situated in the rear, west side of the property located at the above -stated address. The ADU will be 14'8" tall and 650 square -feet. To meet the requirements to allow the ADU to reach the maximum 650 square feet a 425 square foot addition to the main dwelling will be built. The subject property is zoned R-1 /5,000 (Single -Family Residential) and is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Marino. (Staff contact: Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or grant.amann@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2021-01273 2. Green Street Alley Vacation - Sara Koenig, the property owner at approximately 1343 S Green Street, is requesting Salt Lake City to vacate a "T" shaped alley running between 1300 South and Harrison Avenue and Green Street and 700 East. The alley exists on paper only and the abutting property owners have incorporated the alley into their properties. The property abutting this alley is zoned R-1/5,000 (Single -Family Residential District) and is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Katia Pace at 801-535-6354 or katia.pace@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-00903 3. Dooley Court Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision at approximately 122 S Dooley CT and 126 S Windsor Street - Warren Crummett, the property owner, is requesting planned development and preliminary subdivision approval to divide an existing lot into two lots for a new twin home. The proposal includes retaining the existing single-family home on -site and building a new twin home on the newly created lots. Planned Development approval is requested to modify the required twin home lot area from 1,500 square feet to approximately 1,367 square feet and for an approximate 2-inch reduction to the front yard setback in the southwest area of the lot fronting Dooley Court. The project is located in the SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential) zoning district. a. Planned Development — Planned Development request to waive lot area and setback requirements in the SR-3 zone. Case number PLNPCM2021-00958 b. Preliminary Subdivision — Creation of two new lots to accommodate a twin home. Case number PLNSUB2021-01151 The subject property is within Council District #4, represented by Ana Valdemoros. (Staff contact: Krissy Gilmore at 801-535-7780 or kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com) 4. Glendale Townhomes at approximately 1179 S Navaio Street - Pierre Langue of Axis Architects, representing the property owners, is requesting approval from the City to redevelop the property with 57 townhomes, 24 of which would include a live/work option. The buildings would be three stories tall with internal garages for each unit. Currently, the land is occupied by Tejedas Market and is zoned CB (Community Business). This type of project must be reviewed as a Planned Development as four of the buildings would not have frontage on a public street. The subject property is located within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. (Staff contact: Eric Daems at 801-535-7236 or eric.daems@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2021-00378 5. Pacific Yard Design Review & Planned Development - KTGY Architects, representing Urban Alfandre, are requesting a Planned Development and Design Review approval for a mixed -use multifamily building at approximately 443 W 700 South, 720 S 400 West, and 704 S 400 West. The proposed 7-story building is 88-feet in height and includes 292 units and 202 parking stalls. It has 12,000 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor. The applicant is requesting relief from all required setbacks and landscaping through the Planned Development process and requesting an additional 28 feet of building height through Design Review. The project site is in the General Commercial (CG) zoning district. In the CG zone, new buildings taller than sixty feet (60') but less than ninety feet (90') may be authorized through Design Review. The proposed project incorporates a public mid -block pedestrian walkway along the western property line a. Planned Development — Planned Development request to waive setback and landscaping requirements in the CG zone. Case number PLNPCM2021-00822 b. Design Review — Design Review request for 28 feet of additional height. Case number PLNPCM2021-00835 The property is located within Council District 4, represented by Ana Valdemoros. (Staff Contact: Laura Bandara at 801-535-6188 or laura.bandara@slcgov.com) 6. Hoyt Place Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 858 W & 860 W Hoyt Place - Bert Holland, representing Hoyt Place Development LLC, is requesting a zoning map amendment for the properties located at the above -stated address. The proposal would rezone the properties from R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential to SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District. The two lots are approximately .39 acres or 16,988 square feet. Future development plans were not submitted with this application. The property is located within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. (Staff contact: Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660 or amanda.roman@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2021-01073 7. Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment — Stephen Pace, the applicant, is requesting a zoning text amendment to permit the restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit, located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house, would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, setbacks of the applicable base zoning district, or the accessory structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed language requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and listed as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential). (Staff contact: Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226- 7227 or kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-00106 For Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division's website at slc.pov/planninp/public- meeting s. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified, which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission. 4) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION a) Staff Report July 16, 2020 I Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEP,kRIMEIVT of COMMUNITY and NEIGMOPMOODS To: Salt Iake City Historic Landinark Commission Finm: Kelsey Lindquist (801) S35-7930 Date: July 9, 2020 Re: PLNPCM2020-0o1o6 Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment Text Amendment PROPERTYADDRESS: Citywide MASTER PLAN: Conmumity Preservation Plan, Plan Salt Lake, Aveinies Master Plan and The Grown% Salt Lake City Housing Plan ZONING DISTRICT': RMF-35, RO, I, SR iA REQUEST: The Salt Lake City Planning Division has received a zoning text amendment petition from Kirk Huffaker, the applicant representative, on behalf of Stephen Pace, to permit the restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, or setbacks of the applicable base zoning district, as well as the accessory structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed language requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and listed as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), RC (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR -LA (Special Development Pattern Residential). RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recomnnends that the Historic Landmark Commission review the proposed regulations and make recommendations for the Planning Coma- fission's consideration. ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Proposed Code C. Applicant's Narrative D. Eligible Properties E. City Plan Considerations F. Analysis of Zoning Amendment Standards G. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CrrY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CrrY, UT 841145480 WWW.SLCGOII.COM TEL 8015357757 FAX 801535-6174 PLNPCM2020-00106 1 July 9, 2020 BACKGROUND: Stephen Pace, the properly owner of the Beer Estate located at 222 41h Avenue and 181 N B Street, is requesting to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance in an effort to provide an incentive to reconstruct or restore a historic carriage house on his property. The applicant has been working with Salt Lake City on a solution to reconstruct a carriage house that is located on the southern portion of 222 41h Avenue. This historic carriage house is associated with the Beer Estate Landmark Site, which was constructed by Richard Kletting. Additional information on the site specific carriage house reconstruction proposal can be found in Attachment C. Aerial of Proposal on 222 e Avenue The applicant has approached the City on numerous occasions with the intent of rebuilding the carriage house to add another dwelling unit on his property. Salt Lake City zoning regulations currently do not allow the reconstruction due to building location regulations, as well as lot minimums for the applicable zoning district. Additionally, the applicant's plan does not conform to the regulations pertaining to accessory dwelling units. The following provides a summary of these barriers: 1. The dwelling unit located within a restored or reconstructed carriage house would be considered to be a single-family detached dwelling. Adding another single-family dwelling to this property at the proposed location would not be allowed because: a. All principal structures must be located along a street. The home (carriage house) would be located in back of the existing principal structure on the property. b. The zoning district where the properly is located requires a minimum of 5,000 square feet per single-family dwelling so 1o,000 square feet would be required for two single-family dwellings. The subject property is 8,184 square feet so it does not meet the minimum size requirement. PLNPCM2020-00106 2 July 9, 2020 c. The home (carriage house) would not meet building setback regulations due to its close proximity to the side and rear property lines. 2. The accessory dwelling unit ordinance would permit an additional unit to the rear of the property located at 222 4th Avenue; however, there are several conflicts with the reconstructed carriage house as an ADU. The accessory dwelling unit ordinance (ADU) poses a conflict with the requirement that the owner of the property reside onsite. While Stephan Pace owns the subject property located at 222 41' Avenue, he resides at 181 B Street. This standard could not be satisfied. Additionally, the size limitation of ADUs would not accommodate the traditional size of a historic carriage house. The proposed text amendment, while it is fairly site specific, proposes solutions to the listed conflicts within the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. PROPOSED LANGUAGE: The applicant provided a list of proposed "conditions" that should be met in order to add a dwelling unit in a reconstructed/restored carriage house; however, the applicant has not provided actual ordinance language. The applicant's proposal is in Attachment B. Staff anticipates that the proposed regulations, when drafted, will be incorporated into the Historic Preservation Overlay chapter of the Zoning Ordinance and will be structured in the following way: 1. Purpose Statement (what are the regulations trying to achieve) 2. Definition of Terms 3. Applicability (what conditions must be met for the regulations to apply) 4. Process (who is the decision maker and what is the decision -making process) 5. Standards/Criteria (what are the specific regulations pertaining to the application) Staff organized the applicant's list of conditions into these categories in an effort to better summarize the proposal for the Historic Landmark Commission and to begin to organize the language into a standard ordinance format (see below). Staff commentary and requested direction from the Historic Landmark Commission are at the end of the ordinance summary. Purpose • The applicant did not provide a specific purpose statement, but Staff believes the following should be considered when developing the legal purpose statement: o To permit the reconstruction or restoration of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. o Incentivize the preservation and restoration of a historic feature on a landmark site. o Add to the housing units within Salt Lake City, while respecting the appearance and scale of single-family residential neighborhoods. o Sustainability objectives are supported by utilizing an existing structure or elements of an existing structure. o Increase the economic viability of historic properties and further the City's historic preservation goals. Definitions • CARRIAGE HOUSE: A carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or uses to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, secondary story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. PLNPCM2020-00106 3 July 9, 2020 Applicability • For a property to be considered eligible, the property must be listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and a National Register Site on the National Register of Historic Places. • The property must be located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi -Family Residential), SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential), RO (Residential Office) and the I (Institutional). • There must be substantial evidence that a carriage house exists or existed on the subject property. The burden of proof would be strictly on the applicant. The applicant must provide evidence through at least two of the following methods: o Historic photographs o Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps o Planning, zoning or building permit records. o Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basement, etc. Review Process The applicant has not specified a review process; however, the proposed language implies that the design, construction and alterations would require a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Landmark Commission. • A restored or reconstructed historic carriage house would be required to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, which is section 21A.34.020.G in the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. Standards/Criteria • A reconstructed or restored carriage house would only be allowed to be used for a single-family residence. • Off street parking is required for the dwelling unit. • The restored or reconstructed carriage house would be limited to the historic footprint and must not exceed the size (historic footprint) of the original structure. • If it is determined that the reconstruction or restoration of the carriage house negatively impacts a neighboring property, additional buffers may be required. • The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally • The two residences could not be subdivided in the future. • The property owner is not required to permanently reside on the property. • Base zoning restrictions, such as: lot coverage, setbacks, height and density can be modified. STAFF COMMENTARYAND QUESTIONS FOR THE HISTORIC LAIVDMARKCOMMISSION Staff is presenting the proposal to the Historic Landmark Commission in order to obtain feedback and direction prior to finalizing draft ordinance language. This section is organized to relate each question or comment to the applicable section within the proposed language above. The following sections provides Staffs concerns and opinions on what the language is missing, potential impacts, as well as needed clarification. Purpose The applicant did not provide a purpose statement for the proposed ordinance. Staff developed some ideas to incorporate into the purpose statement. The ideas and potential language were pulled from the applicant's narrative, the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance and applicable master plans. Point to Discuss • Does the Commission agree with the statements and/or have anything to add? Definitions The applicant provided the definition of Carriage House to Staff. Staff believes that there are additional definitions that will be needed to provide direction and clarity for the proposed language. PLNPCM2020-00106 4 July 9, 2020 Points to Discuss • Should Historic Footprint be defined as part of this proposal? • Are there other needed terms that the Commission can identify? • Other terms may be included in the definition section as the ordinance is developed. Auulicability The Historic Landmark Commission does not have the authority to review alterations to properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places. However, the proposal encompasses properties listed on both the National Register of Historic Places and properties listed as Salt Lake City Landmarks. Points to Discuss • Should the proposal be modified to strictly include properties that are Salt Lake City Landmarks and listed in the applicable zoning districts? • This change would clarify the review authority but would not significantly modify the number of properties eligible for the reconstruction or restoration of a historic carriage house, due to the limiting zoning districts. The applicant provided a list of 4 items that could be used to determine the existence of a carriage house, which include; historic photographs, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, zoning and building permit history and identifiable structural elements. The applicant proposes that only 2 of the 4 would be required to satisfy the burden of proof. Points to Discuss • Staff is concerned that the proposed criteria is too loose. o This concern is directly connected to the potential impact that a reconstructed historic carriage house could have on abutting properties, due to height and setbacks. • Pictorial evidence or information should be required to understand the design, materials and height of the historic structure. o If pictorial evidence is not available, the structure would likely be conjectural. o Does the Commission have concerns that a conjectural structure would impact the status of the landmark site? o Without pictorial evidence, the proposed language would essentially permit the building of a new single-family structure, which is not the purpose or intent of this language. o Without pictorial evidence, how would the design, height and footprint be reviewed and determined? o If pictorial evidence is found to be too difficult to obtain, is there other information that would satisfy the intent and ease the concerns? o What would be the review process for a historic carriage house that does not have any pictorial evidence? • The suggested zoning and building permit history would be difficult to satisfy, since the full records are not available or encompass all of the permit history. • Does the Commission have any additional concerns or recommendations with other provisions in the proposed applicability section? Review Process The applicant has not specified a review process; however, the proposed language implies that the design, construction and alterations would require a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Landmark Commission. Points to discuss • The Landmark Commission does not have the authority to approve projects that increase density beyond what is allowed by ordinance. Staff proposes to draft the ordinance so that an extra dwelling unit would be permitted by right within a restored or reconstructed carriage house. The Landmark Commission would then review the restoration or reconstruction. • Construction in the H Historic Overlay is reviewed in a number of ways. o Minor Alteration Applications are the most commonly submitted applications for the alteration of a site. These applications are also applicable for the construction of a detached garage or a detached accessory dwelling unit. PLNPCM2020-00106 5 July 9, 2020 ■ Since minor alterations are applicable for the ADUs and detached accessory structures, Staff initially considered this the most appropriate application for the proposal. However, this type of reconstruction has potentially more impacts to the abutting and adjacent properties. • The potential impacts include the location, setbacks, height and footprint. o Major Alteration or New Construction Application requires the review and approval of the Historic Landmark Commission. ■ Due to the potential for impacts, would the process for new construction or a major alteration be more appropriate? ■ A new construction or major alteration application would require Historic Landmark Commission review and approval. ■ Depending upon the recommendation regarding the pictorial evidence, the new construction process may provide clearer guidelines and standards for the design of the structure. Does the Commission have a recommendation on the process? Standards/Criteria Points to Discuss • Applicant proposes that it could only be used as a single-family residence. o Are their pitfalls with simply allowing it to be reconstructed for typical accessory uses? • Currently, proposed construction in the Historic Preservation Overlay District that does not conform to dimensional zoning standards, such as setbacks and building coverage requires Special Exception approval by the HLC. The applicant proposes that the HLC should be able to approve dimensional zoning exceptions through the Certificate of Appropriateness. o Staff supports this idea, due to the need for zoning flexibility for reconstructed historic carriage houses. o Staff does have a concern with coupling the review process and any needed special exceptions, due to the potential for impacts to the adjacent and abutting properties. ■ There should likely be a notification process to provide notice to effected property owners and tenants. • The applicant suggests that the reconstructed carriage house be limited to the historic footprint. o The Sanborn Fire Insurance maps are fairly accurate for the historic footprint determination. ■ Is the Landmark Commission comfortable with the utilization of the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for this purpose, if the historic foundation or walls are no longer visible? • The applicant suggests that additional buffers may be required if an impact is determined. o How will the size of an additional buffer be determined? • Are there additional criteria that the Commission has for consideration? KEY CONSIDERATIONS: i. Limitations of the Proposed Language: Staff acknowledges that the applicant wishes to limit the proposed language to be primarily site specific for the subject property located at 222 4th Avenue. Through limiting the language, as proposed, the proposed amendment to the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance would potentially impact 5 properties. While the proposed language is narrow in focus and addresses rather specific issues, the overall goal of the proposal is in line with adopted policies and guidelines. The proposed language incentivizes the preservation or reconstruction of historic features on historic properties. STANDARDS OF REVIEW DISCUSSION: Zoning text amendments are reviewed for compliance with Salt Lake City master plans and adopted policies. There are several documents that provide guidance for historic preservation. The master plans that address historic preservation goals and policies include the following: PLNPCM2020-00106 6 July 9, 2020 Community Preservation Plan o The comprehensive plan for Historic Preservation, includes many related policies for incentivizing preservation. • Plan Salt Lake o Plan Salt Lake includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outlined in this master plan. o Includes guiding policies that preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. o Encourages the retention of areas and structures of historic and architectural value. o Promotes a balance of preservation with flexibility for change and growth. • Avenues Master Plan o The comprehensive plan for the Avenues encourages historic preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites. The master plans that address housing goals and policies include the following: Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan o The housing plan encourages the creation of the flexible zoning tools and regulations to create additional housing stock. • Plan Salt Lake o Includes guiding policies that encourage housing options that accommodate gaining in place, as well as the promotion of rehabilitation of existing housing stock. o Also includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outline in this master plan. The above documents have a variety of policies and guidelines that relate to creating incentives for historic preservation, as well as zoning flexibility to create additional housing units. All of the applicable policies and guidelines are discussed in Attachment E and F. As discussed in those attachments, the proposed zoning changes are generally supported by the associated adopted City policies. NEXT STEPS: One of the duties of the Historic Landmark Commission is to make recommendations on applications for zoning amendments that involve historic preservation overlay districts and landmark sites. After the Historic Landmark Commission reviews and makes recommendations on the concepts of the proposed ordinance, Planning Staff will work with the applicant to develop the actual ordinance language, which will be presented to the Planning Commission for their consideration. The Planning Commission will consider the proposed ordinance in a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will make the final decision on the proposed zoning amendment. PLNPCM2020-00106 7 July 9, 2020 ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP OF POTENTIAL SITES The applicant provided a list of 5 properties that are potentially eligible for a reconstructed or restored carriage house. The map on the following page highlights the subject properties. PLNPCM2020-00106 8 July 9, 2020 6. : ,. .. ..,.,. ti..... .. w".. .. .,.. Duun .. Duun 56fl p iwq 50r V yi,. .+. :,r, pr:n u.rt -•nn nn ryn �rav 3 c v ' u �, Ave °� nvr R re Avr Ave =Are Ayr ❑ �i QLf�''awe ~9 = .. �ishvp Plm Spy,c n +". * h.7 Sr�' -lkrh "' Slh 8Thzz 8Sh _ c r ��' A m '•� OAVeW 0. Au!' Arc= Arc 400IN 404 Ndopi n4ho Nc' 4L`DN Ao .I �•J Ina lv'a 400N anaN 40DN ^' � j � It h ?[I. yTTh 7;h� yll tihh 71h Trh S, GNI'rlrll pl �' AVe*A;- ave Ave- AY Ave Ave AvE iMandi' t c $ Slrndntli C. y a 3 jArdmore PI ^� 3O84rreel Rvt r Ave ? c a+ Ave Bth s yl h ? Gth 5t 61 h 6Lh w 6t1 e ❑ t O 90 N 30a N�nn N 3an N e l ^ 9a0 1 Ave x Arr a A a 9y Ave Ave F Arr Sao N 00 9p0 N '..J r.,;N a Soo N 300 N 300 N 304 k30fl ti L ^ 3tlr� +, - Gary- N l•A ` In 5fh m Seh'_� Sth Sth- Sth� 5lh_ (1 xj N; - $ c ., ?� „Ave Hfll5Ide r a Arc _ Ave "' RVr AY-0 Ave" Are H PI a g ,.,,.,. w ^' C r A. e A Ve A }}'sr th'" '^ v ❑ Alh r-dl "d[h 4lh _ Ail ri9r Av .. 790$ or'a l5 .. a 200� 2943 3 200 GREATERRL` 0.A m „ n Ave KAr 4Ave Ave A -[ eN N 20a N 200 N 200 N 20a N Al T 200 N N 203 N N 200 h i] s M a P! ' AVENUE• F' IRPARK $ 3 rdAYCa Jerk: ^n Ave TI, 3 1 _ .,2n ..Ind o Kcr d 2DC'^2nd-� - m NORTH TEMPLE ST NORTH TEMPLE ST A _ _ 2ntl Ave Are yr V Ave Aye,Ave Ave=Avr lsim _ "' iq�. Ist'^ 15t `^1st F I,, r Learned Avr m CAPITOL -- 1si Ave r are" Ave Aver' Ave `Ave Ave- E nrrril Avr p I south saltk�. h so.+lh Sv[Jtn _i ,qh T HILL L N _ _ SOUTH TEMPLE ST GREATEI!ly TrnPIr5t7ern I '&[ Temple 5t 7ern le Si Temale 51 i_[ yLalsarn .— AVENUE Halt g Alarncda $ - _ w 100 s b ioo s #q s 100 5 i09 S 3,00 s 11:10 s' 100 s 100 s 00 s lolls $ wv S xv9 s x 100 s xoa s 1a9 s E ud,d AreAve r• r _ o c io I"t" r'""• '^ a c E ' = ArFmid PI ❑ c 200200 ra• 2G9 'r 209 m a 20a S 200 S 200 S 200 52a0 S. 200 S 200 S c ~ 2110 5 „20 S 200 S !� 5 S 20a S �• sr 5 200S 200S 200 S S 280 5 t 4 E N e 3 a `o _Peer ant a - g' Avc w 3 ''e i AVJe Ave - N t o G G W " hiar6ea I 304 M 3 ^ 300 ?00 v S00$ 130P S^ So. 5-� 3C05 �60i 5 9005'^ 34G5�•�9[g5 sn 3�D53a0i 9005 a CENTRAL S S 94P5 Tani 3Cll ?S san 5300 `�'e3� � r' ^ o '� 3 ❑ a` � � a V, c INerket St � CITY L Val P13 Y' = "A L• p PLNPCM2020-00106 9 July 9, 2020 ATTACHMENT B: APPLICANT'S PROPOSED LANGUAGE PLNPCM2020-00106 10 July 9, 2020 zfaZoning Amendment 4} WWI a y tll'o a n y K N,Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map iteceived By - OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Project #: ivame Or section/5 of Zoning Amendment: TEASE PROVIDE THE FOLL()WlNa INFORMATION Address of Subject Property (or Area): i-i h^ ltiarne of A plicant' — Address a App€icac�t: E-mail of Applicant:, C?wner ❑ Contractor El' Architect Other: Narne of Property Owner (if different frurn applicant): E-mail of Property Owner: CeIVF ax: Phone: 760 t Please note that additional information may be required by the }project planner to ensure adequate I nformation is provided for staff analysis- Ail information required for staff: analysis will be copied and made pudic, including professlanat architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of pubic review by any interested party. AVPJLABLE CONSULTAMON If you have any guestioris regarding the requirements of this alaWication, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at (801) 535-7700 prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,034, Pleas $121 per acre in excess of one acre Tent Amendment: filing fee of $1,035, Plus $100 for newspaper notice. 1 Plus additional fee for mailed public notices. SIGNATURE applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required, Signature of Owner or Agent: J Date: updated 711119 PLNPCM2020-00106 11 July 9, 2020 SUBMI77AL REQUIREMENTS x I. project Description (please attach additional sheets.) -,7 A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. S`` A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.�� List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the aseakl�w.Y<< Is the request amending the Zoning Map? if so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? if so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Mailing Address: Planning Counter F�7--n Person: Planning Counter PO Box 145471 451 South State Street, boom 215 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Telephone: t801j 535-7.00 INCOMPLETE APPUCATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED 1 acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed• i understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following €terns are included in the submittal package. Updated 711119 PLNPCM2020-00106 12 July 9, 2020 Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment April 9, 2020 The reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site. 2) The property and address are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, an identifiable carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations of a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. PLNPCM2020-00106 13 July 9, 2020 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. PLNPCM2020-00106 14 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Stephen C. Pace Zoning Text Amendment Proposal for Historic Carriage House Structures UPDATED APPLICATION AND NARRATIVE April 3, 2020 TO: Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, Salt Lake City Planning Division FROM: Kirk Huffaker, Principal/Consultant, Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies CC: Stephen Pace, Applicant and Property Owner As of April 2, 2020, the city has chosen not to provide an advance copy of draft language or alternatives for their proposal, so we are not yet in a position to comment on the pros and cons or details of whatever the city's position may be. We are therefore requesting through this updated application to proceed with this application without further additions by the city. We have not attempted to draft our suggestions in terms of the specific sections of the city code that will satisfy final location of the amendment within the zoning code. In the event that our proposal is carried forward to city council, we believe that this will need to be done under supervision of the city attorney at a later date. Instead we have presented a synopsis below of what we believe provisions in the zoning code should allow for in the reconstruction/rehabilitation/restoration of documented historic carriage houses associated with current or potential National Register of Historic Places -listed sites and located in areas with current multi -family zoning. The narrative highlights reasons why the city should support this measure and what we believe the limited impacts on development could be. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT Stephen C. Pace, the applicant, is the owner of 222 4th Ave., Salt Lake City, and desires to rebuild a carriage house associated with the historic William F. Beer Estate. Four structures, including the carriage house, of the estate are listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The following text amendment is submitted to the Planning Division for review and comment. The applicant desires Administrative and/or Planning Commission consideration to resolve a property size issue in the Avenues historic district. The current property is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood. There are three primary issues that kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 15 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 2 are not satisfied by any section in the current Zoning Ordinance, including all of the following: Two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. To address these shortcomings, the following draft language is proposed as a text amendment to Chapter 21 A.34 Overlay Districts under 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. It is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission. Utilizing this process will give the public an opportunity for input before one public commission. In the H Historic Preservation Overlay District as defined under Chapter 21A.34.020, reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site as defined within Chapter 21 A.34.020. 2) The property and address are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, either individually or as a Contributing structure in a National Register -listed Historic District. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, a carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically - detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse-drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 16 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 3 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 17 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 4 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. 3) Meeting off -site parking standards. Submitted on February 4, 2020 This application and accompanying narrative for zoning text amendment is submitted on behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner for 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. The applicant desires Administrative, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration of and prompt action on the application to resolve multiple zoning issues with the subject property that prevents the owner from achieving his goal of adaptive use/reconstruction of a historic carriage house. This former carriage house was one of the four primary structures of the historic William F. Beer Estate, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1977 and is an individual landmark site in the Salt Lake City Cultural Register. According to historic research, the Beer Estate residence and carriage house date to circa 1899. Both were constructed according to design by architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting also served as architect for a house and carriage house with similar details for Albert Fisher (Fisher Mansion and Carriage House) at 1206 West 200 South in 1893. The Beer Estate carriage house is described in the NRHP nomination as follows: Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structures with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War 1, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. Since 1977 when the paragraph was written, the carriage house has continued to deteriorate. Current site conditions exhibit severe structural deficiency but original brick and stone foundations, wood floors, and wood framing and walls are present. The owner desires to rebuild the carriage house within the original footprint and according to the original design. Use of the carriage house is proposed to be single-family residential with a single -car garage. Due to the cost of material salvage, architectural PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 18 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 5 replication, and construction, and given that the project is entirely privately funded, the housing unit is not proposed to be affordable housing. Some original materials have already been salvaged for reuse, and the owner desires to reuse as much of the existing material and structure as possible in the reconstruction. The proposed design for reconstruction of the carriage house has been completed and initially submitted for discussion with the city. The property at 222 4th Ave. is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood and Avenues Historic District. There are three primary issues that are obstacles to adaptive use and reconstruction and not satisfied by any section in the current zoning ordinance, including: Allowance for two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. In addition, we believe that these issues will not be resolved by the Adaptive Reuse Ordinance (in process), revisions to the RMF-30 zoning classification (in process), and are not addressed through the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance. Therefore, to address the shortcomings, the following supportive documentation and zoning text amendment draft language are proposed for Chapter 21 A.34 Overlay Districts under 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. As a point of application process, it is acceptable to the applicant to utilize the city's existing process for Conditional Use to obtain approval for use of the property. We believe that utilizing the Conditional Use process along with Historic Landmarks Commission review for design will adequately give the public two opportunities for input before two separate commissions. However, if the Planning Division can determine another acceptable application and review process that would only involve review before one commission and administrative review, the applicant would be open to receiving information about this possibility. The applicant reserves the right to approve or deny any proposed process change. The goals of this application to address the three current deficiencies and well supported by the city's wide range of plans and guiding documents, including those that are kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 19 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 6 neighborhood -specific, for historic preservation, and for housing. The following is a summary list of those plans and supportive statements from each. Avenues Master Plan Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Planning Goal: Continue to encourage private restoration and rehabilitation efforts in the Avenues Community through financial assistance and supportive zoning and building code enforcement. (pg. 3) Historic Preservation Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic Districts. (pg. 4) Future land use map indicates Medium -Density 8-20 Unites per Gross Acre (pg. 7) Property is situated between an urban trail (A Street) and within one block of two Collector streets (B Street and Second Avenue), as well as a half -mile from the Central Business District, therefore meeting this plan's and many other plan's goals of proximity to transportation and for walkability. Urban Design Planning Goal: Design public facilities to enhance the established residential character of the Avenues, and encourage private property improvements that are visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (pg. 10) Residential Design Guidelines The applicant's overall goal is most closely defined as Rehabilitation in the Salt Lake City Design Guidelines, but could also be viewed as a combination of strategies, including Reconstruction. Rehabilitation is defined in Part I, page 3:5: "Rehabilitation is the process of returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive reuse of the building, and major or minor additions may also occur. Most good preservation projects in Salt Lake City may be considered rehabilitation projects." A definition for Reconstruction is provided in the Appendix, pg. C:3, and states that Reconstruction is: PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 20 July 9, 2020 Page 7 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies "The act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, as if [sic] appeared at a specific period of time." Accessory Structures (Part 119:1) This application follows the guidelines in Chapter 9: Accessory Structures, including the Context & Character, Design Objective, Preserving or Rehabilitating Historic Accessory Structures, and subsections with the headings: Preserve a historic accessory building when feasible. New accessory buildings should be constructed to be compatible with the primary structure. • Attaching garages and carports to the primary structure should be avoided. The Avenues (Part 111 13:1-14) This application complies with the stipulations on page 13:12 under the heading Accessory Structures within the specific chapter for The Avenues: • Most secondary structures were built along the rear of the lot, accessed by the alley, if one existed. This should be continued. • Garages, as well as driveways, should not dominate the streetscape; therefore, they should be detached from the main house and located to the rear of the house, if possible. • Historically, garages and carriage houses in the Avenues were simple wood structures covered with a gabled or hipped roof. • A new secondary structure should follow historic precedent, in terms of material and form. Community Historic Preservation Plan "The need to preserve the unique character of the City's urban neighborhoods, while allowing for modifications to existing homes to meet today's current living standards for space and convenience are important City policies." (pg. 1-8) The CHPP references the city's Community Housing Plan (11-7,8), and while those references are supportive of this application, they are not from the city's most current housing plan. The city adopted the Growing SLC Housing Plan in 2018 and references PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 21 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 8 from that plan are included in a later section. However, the CHPP does reference goals of the city's Strategic Plan and Futures Report on pages II-10 and II-11. Those that are also supportive of this application include: - Enforce preservation strategies for buildings and neighborhoods. - Our historical heritage, including historic buildings and neighborhoods, is recognized as a vital component of an exciting, livable city. Preserve historic structures, streets, and other landmarks in all new development strategies. - Assist property owners with solving the challenges of adaptive reuse. Policies and Actions Relating to Regulations 3.31 Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. 3.3k Support modifications of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Regulatory Incentives Two sections that support this application are Flexibility in Zoning Regulations (III-31), and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings (III-32). These are further supported by: 3.4a Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. 3.4c Modification to lot, bulk and signage standards should be allowed in local historic districts and to Landmark Sites where the modification would allow for better compliance with the historic preservation standards than the underlying zoning standard would allow. 3.4d Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 22 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 9 Economic Development 6.4c Historic preservation is identified as an important means of providing employment opportunities for local crafts persons and skilled workers which keep money in the local economy. Housing 6.5a Ensure zoning supports the retention and reuse of existing historic apartment and non-residential buildings. 6.5b Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. 6.5e Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Goal 1: Increase Housing Options Objective 1: Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.1 Develop flexible zoning tools and regulations, with a focus along significant transportation routes. 1.1.2 Develop in -fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development. Goal 3: Equitable & Fair Housing Objective 2: Align resources and invest in strategic expansion of opportunity throughout all neighborhoods of the city and access to existing areas of opportunity. Objective 3: Implement Life cycle Housing principles in neighborhoods throughout the city. 3.3.1 Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. PLNPCM2020-00106 kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 23 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 10 The SLC Comprehensive Housing Policy (2016) also includes supportive statements for this proposal: 1. Foster and celebrate the urban residential tradition; 2. Respect the character and charm of predominantly residential districts, including those with historic character and qualities, while also providing opportunities for the provision of local goods and services easily accessed by neighborhoods; 4. Develop new housing opportunities throughout the City; 7. Recognize that residents, business owners, and local government all have a role to play in creating and sustaining healthy neighborhoods. Plan Salt Lake Under Sustainable Growth & Development on page 9, the paragraphs on Placemaking and Density, and those that reference Compatibility and Green Building on page 10, are supportive of this application. On page 14, supportive Guiding Principles of Plan Salt Lake include the following: 2) Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. 3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 8) A beautiful city that is people focused. 9) Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. 10) Vibrant, diverse, and accessible artistic and cultural resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. Under Chapter 1 - Neighborhoods, the supportive Initiatives on page 17 include: 1. Maintain neighborhood stability and character. 4. Support neighborhood identity and diversity. 6. Incorporate artistic elements and support cultural events on a neighborhood scale to reinforce neighborhood character and identity. Under Chapter 2 - Growth, the supportive Initiatives on page 19 include: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. 6. Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 24 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 11 Under Chapter 3 - Housing, the supportive Initiatives on page 21 include: 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Under Chapter 6 - Natural Environment, the supportive Initiatives on page 27 include: 3. Practice responsible waste management by: reusing and repurposing materials, including promoting the reuse of existing buildings over demolition. Under Chapter 8 - Beautiful City, the supportive Initiatives on page 31 include: 5. Support and encourage architecture, development, and infrastructure that: reflects our diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious heritage. 7. Reinforce and preserve neighborhood district character and a strong sense of place. Under Chapter 9 - Preservation, the supportive Initiatives on page 33 include: 1.Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas of structures of historic and architectural value. 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Under Chapter 13 - Government, the supportive Initiatives on page 41 include: 2. Provide opportunities for public participation, input, and engagement throughout the decision -making process. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 PLNPCM2020-00106 25 July 9, 2020 ATTACHMENT C: APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE PLNPCM2020-00106 26 July 9, 2020 Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment AMENDED APPLICATION NARRATIVE April 9, 2020 TO: Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, Salt Lake City Planning Division FROM: Kirk Huffaker, Principal/Consultant, Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies CC: Stephen Pace, Applicant and Property Owner NOTE Because, as we understand it, the purpose of the "open house" is to seek broad public input on our proposal, we have not attempted to draft our suggestions in terms of the specific sections of the city code that will satisfy final location of the amendment within the zoning code. In the event that our proposal is carried forward to city council, we believe that this will need to be done under supervision of the city attorney at a later date. Instead we have presented a synopsis below of what we believe provisions in the zoning code should allow for in the reconstruction/rehabilitation/restoration of documented historic carriage houses associated with current National Register of Historic Places -listed residential sites and located in areas that already have multi- family zoning. The narrative highlights reasons why the city should support this measure and what we believe the limited impacts on development could be. Stephen C. Pace, the applicant, is the owner of 222 4th Ave., Salt Lake City, and desires to rebuild a carriage house associated with the historic William F. Beer Estate. Four structures, including the carriage house, of the estate are listed as a Salt Lake City Landmark Site and listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places. The following text amendment is submitted to the Planning Division for review and comment. The applicant desires Administrative and/or Planning Commission consideration to resolve a property size issue in the Avenues historic district. The current property is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood. There are three primary issues that are not satisfied by any section in the current Zoning Ordinance, including all of the following: • Two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. PLNPCM2020-00106 27 July 9, 2020 Page 2 As it is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission, we believe this language should probably be included in Chapter 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. Utilizing this process will streamline the process for the applicant, for city review, and provide the public an opportunity for input. APPLICABILITY The proposed text amendment will be applicable citywide to residences listed individually as Salt Lake City Landmark Sites and where the residence and historic carriage house (as defined below) are both listed on the National Register of Historic Places as an individual listing (not simply in a National Register -listed historic district). The applicant believes that at least four (4) residence/historic carriage house complexes currently could meet this qualifying test. This is based on best information available to the applicant, which in part, is included as an attachment. In the event the city grants future Landmark Site designations, and National Register landmark status is sought and granted by the U.S. Department of Interior, the number of qualifying sites may increase in the future. TEXT AMENDMENT The reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The property and address are a Salt Lake City Landmark Site. 2) The property and address are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 3) The property and address in the application currently have, or historically had, an identifiable carriage house on the property. 4) For the purposes of this text amendment, a carriage house is defined as a physically -detached, secondary structure originally constructed to house horse- drawn vehicles and related equipment, or horses, or used to store grain or shelter animals; all related to serving the private transportation needs of the owner/residents of the primary structure located on the same or adjacent property. Some examples incorporate a hay loft, second story or half -story, or open interior space under a pitched roof in excess of 15 feet from the floor to the roof peak, and may have provided housing for a livery man or house servants. PLNPCM2020-00106 28 July 9, 2020 Page 3 5) Previously existing carriage houses proposed for reconstruction must be proven, with the burden of proof on the application, to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: • Sanborn maps; • Historic photographs; • Planning, zoning or building permit records; • Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 6) The site is located within and possesses a multi -family zoning classification. 7) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 8) Proposed alterations of a carriage house - including rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction - will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and successfully obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Salt Lake City Historic Landmarks Commission. 9) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. If unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 10) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 11) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 12) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process 13) The site has a clean record, such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 14) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. PLNPCM2020-00106 29 July 9, 2020 Page 4 The following conditions are not required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction. 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. Submitted February 4, 2020 / Amended April 6 and 8, 2020 This application and accompanying narrative for zoning text amendment is submitted on behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner for 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. The applicant desires Administrative, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration of and prompt action on the application to resolve multiple zoning issues with the subject property that prevents the owner from achieving his goal of reconstruction of a historic carriage house. This former carriage house was one of the four primary structures of the historic William F. Beer Estate, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1977 and is an individual landmark site in the Salt Lake City Cultural Register. According to historic research, the Beer Estate residence and carriage house date to circa 1899. Both were constructed according to design by architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting also served as architect for a house and carriage house with similar details for Albert Fisher (Fisher Mansion and Carriage House) at 1206 West 200 South in 1893. The Beer Estate carriage house is described in the NRHP nomination as follows: Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structures with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War 1, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. Since 1977 when the paragraph was written, the carriage house has continued to deteriorate. Current site conditions exhibit severe structural deficiency but original brick and stone foundations, wood floors, and wood framing and walls are present. The owner desires to rebuild the carriage house within the original footprint and according to the original design. Use of the carriage house is proposed to be single- family residential with a single -car garage. Due to the cost of material salvage, architectural replication, and construction, and given that the project is entirely privately funded, the housing unit is not proposed to be affordable housing. Some PLNPCM2020-00106 30 July 9, 2020 Page 5 original materials have already been salvaged for reuse, and the owner desires to reuse as much of the existing material and structure as possible in the reconstruction. The proposed design for reconstruction of the carriage house has been completed and initially submitted for discussion with the city. The property at 222 4th Ave. is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood and Avenues Historic District. There are three primary issues that are obstacles to adaptive use and reconstruction and not satisfied by any section in the current zoning ordinance, including: • Allowance for two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; • Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; • Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. In addition, we believe that these issues will not be resolved by the proposed Adaptive Reuse Ordinance (in process), proposed revisions to the RMF-30 zoning classification (in process), and are not addressed through the current Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance. Therefore, to address the shortcomings, the following supportive documentation and zoning text amendment draft language are proposed for Chapter 21 A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. As stated above, it is the desire of the applicant to obtain approval for an application under this text amendment with one review and public process through the Historic Landmarks Commission. Utilizing this process will streamline the process for the applicant, for city review, and provide the public an opportunity for input. The goals of this application to address the three current deficiencies and well supported by the city's wide range of plans and guiding documents, including those that are neighborhood -specific, for historic preservation, and for housing. The following is a summary list of those plans and supportive statements from each. Avenues Master Plan Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Planning Goal: Continue to encourage private restoration and rehabilitation efforts in the Avenues Community through financial assistance and supportive zoning and building code enforcement. (pg. 3) Historic Preservation Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic Districts. (pg. 4) PLNPCM2020-00106 31 July 9, 2020 Page 6 Future land use map indicates Medium -Density 8-20 Unites per Gross Acre (pg. 7) Property is situated between an urban trail (A Street) and within one block of two Collector streets (B Street and Second Avenue), as well as a half -mile from the Central Business District, therefore meeting this plan's and many other plan's goals of proximity to transportation and for walkability. Urban Design Planning Goal: Design public facilities to enhance the established residential character of the Avenues, and encourage private property improvements that are visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (pg. 10) Residential Design Guidelines The applicant's overall goal is most closely defined as Rehabilitation in the Salt Lake City Design Guidelines, but could also be viewed as a combination of strategies, including Reconstruction. Rehabilitation is defined in Part I, page 3:5: "Rehabilitation is the process of returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive reuse of the building, and major or minor additions may also occur. Most good preservation projects in Salt Lake City may be considered rehabilitation projects." A definition for Reconstruction is provided in the Appendix, pg. C:3, and states that Reconstruction is: "The act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, as if [sic] appeared at a specific period of time." Accessory Structures (Part 119:1) This application is consistent with the guidelines in Chapter 9: Accessory Structures, including the Context & Character, Design Objective, Preserving or Rehabilitating Historic Accessory Structures, and subsections with the headings: • Preserve a historic accessory building when feasible. • New accessory buildings should be constructed to be compatible with the primary structure. • Attaching garages and carports to the primary structure should be avoided. PLNPCM2020-00106 32 July 9, 2020 Page 7 The Avenues (Part 111 13:1-14) This application complies with the stipulations on page 13:12 under the heading Accessory Structures within the specific chapter for The Avenues: • Most secondary structures were built along the rear of the lot, accessed by the alley, if one existed. This should be continued. • Garages, as well as driveways, should not dominate the streetscape; therefore, they should be detached from the main house and located to the rear of the house, if possible. • Historically, garages and carriage houses in the Avenues were simple wood structures covered with a gabled or hipped roof. • A new secondary structure should follow historic precedent, in terms of material and form. Community Historic Preservation Plan "The need to preserve the unique character of the City's urban neighborhoods, while allowing for modifications to existing homes to meet today's current living standards for space and convenience are important City policies." (pg. 1-8) The CHPP references the city's Community Housing Plan (11-7,8), and while those references are supportive of this application, they are not from the city's most current housing plan. The city adopted the Growing SLC Housing Plan in 2018 and references from that plan are included in a later section. However, the CHPP does reference goals of the city's Strategic Plan and Futures Report on pages II-10 and II-11. Those that are also supportive of this application include: - Enforce preservation strategies for buildings and neighborhoods. - Our historical heritage, including historic buildings and neighborhoods, is recognized as a vital component of an exciting, livable city. Preserve historic structures, streets, and other landmarks in all new development strategies. - Assist property owners with solving the challenges of adaptive reuse. Policies and Actions Relating to Regulations 3.31 Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. PLNPCM2020-00106 33 July 9, 2020 Page 8 3.3k Support modifications of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Regulatory Incentives Two sections that support this application are Flexibility in Zoning Regulations (III-31), and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings (III-32). These are further supported by: 3.4a Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. 3.4c Modification to lot, bulk and signage standards should be allowed in local historic districts and to Landmark Sites where the modification would allow for better compliance with the historic preservation standards than the underlying zoning standard would allow. 3.4d Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Economic Development 6.4c Historic preservation is identified as an important means of providing employment opportunities for local crafts persons and skilled workers which keep money in the local economy. Housing 6.5a Ensure zoning supports the retention and reuse of existing historic apartment and non-residential buildings. 6.5b Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. 6.5e Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. PLNPCM2020-00106 34 July 9, 2020 Page 9 Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Goal 1: Increase Housing Options Objective 1: Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.1 Develop flexible zoning tools and regulations, with a focus along significant transportation routes. 1.1.2 Develop in -fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development. Goal 3: Equitable & Fair Housing Objective 2: Align resources and invest in strategic expansion of opportunity throughout all neighborhoods of the city and access to existing areas of opportunity. Objective 3: Implement Life cycle Housing principles in neighborhoods throughout the city. 3.3.1 Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. The SLC Comprehensive Housing Policy (2016) also includes supportive statements for this proposal: 1. Foster and celebrate the urban residential tradition; 2. Respect the character and charm of predominantly residential districts, including those with historic character and qualities, while also providing opportunities for the provision of local goods and services easily accessed by neighborhoods; 4. Develop new housing opportunities throughout the City; 7. Recognize that residents, business owners, and local government all have a role to play in creating and sustaining healthy neighborhoods. Plan Salt Lake Under Sustainable Growth & Development on page 9, the paragraphs on Placemaking and Density, and those that reference Compatibility and Green Building on page 10, are supportive of this application. PLNPCM2020-00106 35 July 9, 2020 Page 10 On page 14, supportive Guiding Principles of Plan Salt Lake include the following: 2) Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. 3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 8) A beautiful city that is people focused. 9) Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. 10) Vibrant, diverse, and accessible artistic and cultural resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. Under Chapter 1 - Neighborhoods, the supportive Initiatives on page 17 include: 1. Maintain neighborhood stability and character. 4. Support neighborhood identity and diversity. 6. Incorporate artistic elements and support cultural events on a neighborhood scale to reinforce neighborhood character and identity. Under Chapter 2 - Growth, the supportive Initiatives on page 19 include: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. 6. Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. Under Chapter 3 - Housing, the supportive Initiatives on page 21 include: 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Under Chapter 6 - Natural Environment, the supportive Initiatives on page 27 include: 3. Practice responsible waste management by: reusing and repurposing materials, including promoting the reuse of existing buildings over demolition. Under Chapter 8 - Beautiful City, the supportive Initiatives on page 31 include: 5. Support and encourage architecture, development, and infrastructure that: reflects our diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious heritage. 7. Reinforce and preserve neighborhood district character and a strong sense of place. Under Chapter 9 - Preservation, the supportive Initiatives on page 33 include: 1.Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas of structures of historic and architectural value. PLNPCM2020-00106 36 July 9, 2020 Page 11 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Under Chapter 13 - Government, the supportive Initiatives on page 41 include: 2. Provide opportunities for public participation, input, and engagement throughout the decision -making process. PLNPCM2020-00106 37 July 9, 2020 ='&Q02a Neww f0e?prer eF Ifevc PneK gtivF it S* La Guy •VymgO .u--1 K-1 Rog1w1w OF Hk� Fuy 1 it Saar Lake rmv- Wio�fA �rVihTrCT1[A •,1 Mar" -M. anayi oxtilAltArd'f Lo EM- H.1ghovr4.ad oeampa.n Rvgh ark+ National Register of Historic Places listings in MOUM 1976 188 W. 5w 9?i S'7ard Salt Lake City hraaeSO-lyand 1• ,ten Na AVN H, RorpF Sorely Natl awrgcWri+�rl0at ¢p'4gsgfi aLHwS1lGW14207r t11 `5S'd2w uanuary 27, 20f0 This is a iixt of the National Reglstes of Historic Pla<ors lig[luyg in $u!c lakc zo1 3to a 300 Eas[ City, llfah. s A]It7lne Aparla+vnrs ,yy� u�p01 pip.a DW +4•dyAs'n cerrorat C;y �,•33SSA'•�gr•gm•'wsNLw ,H'Sx'Sevf Tnis is intended Lo be a eompfete list of the properties and dIstriets oa the National Register of Historic Places in Salt lake City, Utah, United States. T.atiwde and _ - Fanunalp �selmo'27' 1979 Teo s- 900 East 99 longitude coordinates are provided for many National Register pwpudt and - Hovae 7► A , .p,•q.�•.­tt;M jj1 Sj5j central Gly dislriLts; these locations may he seen tngetherin an online map.hl- Thnre nm. more than q,So pmpcptias and districts listed on the National RegiateR in ��,' t FQA*ry 12, 1992 747 E, 1700 Salt lake Cu unty, iacluding 6 National Historic landmarks- spa. of throe milLi, `-J1 urc C1ti a1a o_ ¢ "w mwGw. VIWlewr+Mre Sum SegaF lio incImbog 4 National Hismrk Landmarks, arc lemted in Salt Iakr City; nad ore 'u`"""e'"o .ae+w$WW � ++ l• w iistcd be ; the remaining site, including 2 National Historic Landmarks, am, list d separately. Another 17 rites in the city were once listed, but hors since been PC pdpper 201989 566E 100 mmoved. . Ar4lislaApar6nan1s iNa9001'eerf'f"w s°`a^ central oily This Nalfmd PaAk Sarvice AW is coffOiede through NFS reran! 4fvmgs jAllpSyAvayv rtps-gc77oha+9l'ectsiMatlo +0�� nekggisladweslk7y-Asr.Mm} pasted P,pP 2=111 rlrpl 1ye20Ew Current listings L►Wky.% C �rM AAay 23, 5980 fi57 E 196 _ { { _],,, L _ -_- i FrenrlsAmrsrrona -1=7 teaoeaa9l¢(almraica B4ueh 4.wwalC 1 Clt�i.\ 1�R "O`"/SL ,�'e �iTr.. L.\�Y• ►L.►,se r.,,n,g�..a>eamx w•.em,t urvnlsrttma3m.p tf •57r6'yJ l F vnennrxr t8, 2me 4S6 E. 100 �Oltiy` CQ►�`�[ L.�A�C�[ f [�� �{E� 3 -77 7 AWl V Apann,eru% taeop,oe7 pa nnp scum cennn city abryrpsgna lx d0'4e'.fT. .lnarariesaeIM7)0fOs7p r11sz4nw L�St owe+» +__ .'�./� AVM 27- 1980 6r 1a1 �i L �Li1 N foV^L eor ___' bw B R 6n» mismft YE 06�r5y.�elMpp 8M SmAi d AvINR! J iSW memr woom,, 4o•gm S tL �a U►q.UL. ALFaP+w116vr10.1976 2[a3.400Eav1 0 v 8t*ai lerael rempte p•+s+e++ CMM14 citySec- g►�r ewc w l3 t ! 500 Wkvtn� dr/hBrl9Rt 1 111'e712w /� L-r V�r �C k-�- i`T' { r ir! 4[[�� 'Zni�L.VA j{ d11 C7� 3 Pa a y 1r, roar 224 S-12o6 •` Charles I�P+?YvoY Ea& uNrarelty an'a47s'n . atlrwLVdeW41a1➢ 'e,mw `T�►f` \ e o iAtv�% 4S © `i 3 l map ,28 AlSlN2T N94ons1 ft-Fi ur trig PW .at w0 Sea Lalu City• vmkn i dra"WO R RHo rot mw. P% aAsG mSak L>W!04Y-N?.ow Est etalrM nn the Horn. an 01v �ghie�41 tingly GaN IIi 1 Let4g411 HNgtlaPfM4d O4.afp}lan Pi1mda. Dsm Rvrvdlq Lmxt o moign"h*04 D"Cripdm rAay 9, 2012 1864 S. ON 1. Mal' W. 1976 828 E. 1 W �a1wn T2 BHwd.Pareors Ir A. 1 4 E891 vQ Sigar Nauss s4non Ber.neyer E' - [4rsp.1e14 p4lglrrpy scum 11 11DLL34 are fripegpxpuemee an•4av¢•N CMArN Ry xss gb�m�r a[ � wuae8Hae0m12u „1'stssw `� a1MWSRYgfB1.]1 111'eXig'W llreh 1917-:92r. Y DOO&Tk w 31.2018 BolAeverd GeNan. plmoo3xe 1n�4-imp C1•lsr Affy 7, 1963 656 E. 2W MmBM ]S Hrs[orie DesNd ein W. Balfyark ,leretnlah BCaItW I%e311n,421 Ovo.!W S-th T plc Sta. tx ilwsv �L Me�ry.po..l area d0•e9 C.'" oy eYlelro3^oJm3x68n � �F - s•.sa..x,u FaEnia,y Z8, 1874 B7 E. Scum A09W 17. 190i 222 w- 3W is Beahlre Fk.- ritorgX26"Vrve%4 Tk"31• Downu p x4 Brmd4lay Om _ ' O-nn Iiy 5(10A&29O) 4R4611i! LHie51J00d1�}1 93f'SYtaYY YMU$/02M4+d2ry 11t's3'4B•w 0er�lriher 27,19a2 Rear, 687 W QecernbeF6, 1477 181 6 SL ami . BWding a R-e 537 0mv mw(w"oga 2W Sttah Cenir& �,1Y691 t4 SYAWm F. Beer Irtrr4olvt P� kga = WAW AVemn Wear Zoo swh w•Ai Estate MxWW.VcAlAa L 4p4 WW triRY4,ApW/PiBn 111'e m �1� aiMP1Y117ea19mJ1 i1f•Sx`s='W �' 60 w- 700 r+orm 1e EEeeeT.er pygst9y i►P•*Pa 4o•4g35rr Ceplld Hit OeA�rN.[27. 1982 581 w-200 Fiouav M M )) ,f 1.51'91w 00 of 657 weer AYpcn)>dy�✓Afe4gee 10.457NTa CUnlral �ify Vfey! Lr4zo..4telrslOw SOAK d.Tt11SATM.4.4flj7 nr'SnT4W lh May S, 2012 29 & Slate 9L SaPo Lake at, 14 Apanni.r118 111W17w el 'rgs dlr46r17T. D.11'nww WhpUQfbpely SOrrv&.iw e1RYwsr19c.1rR71]p -hly 18-1983 720E-A5FAm GaNge M-Can [Y&7 1941 WjM1W Ave. � maaz� 3 ar:rwse Av9.Lt 27,2013 21n E, . rr4aaiSr¢tlne4lajf 1•sz 17 Fk-va nM d mwtm [AI.?'Ni(WO Pape!,h" Huebmd Avg. Fo0a4# Benwm N[ elery.ipf.gbdArdnnel 4e•4d3 .1Tl61fr1d00564011 1h-4Sr4TW Opober 11. 1W8 Capin!H4i m Cepild &demg iergpQlap7 Q,C..:ur4p a0.46']6'N Cap:.d Ndl BenWdlh-Chapman WL O.o.mEer 30. 2004 2Z73-400 EeH I�aa1d17 (1+npAkgg 1a Apartmer8serid aod55,u Canlr.f (Sy C'Jmpman Conwtes d.�1CeF 11152 w ha"un kd y 6 D.bk. Main ann Wee $%., --�Qn _ TOM. Yi[ypry i sePWWA.a 2%1978 143K W.2L0 AUgnW Z. 19M $mnd Sal of 19 BYrWiN 0100k So1.h Dowrvonn Ceplli Hit rilgWriC IP7eLw13s peysA'rcg iF1 Capma HIU twKKm3aFlt� �nv^Pc9o•�r�+s.laN Ap'+557P1 O'rtici M Y.npa.ov.Aecalnx bovndod by 3W represen¢ e x�i \ .dmw�.rree.192111 11,'sa'df�7. drtrwsrtlxA1a371 Nmh, 400 .oulRerr imrease Weal, am NOM, Wad $a, .nd 200 Vkv p.-toper 5. 1980 1148 5. 900 i0'w•s"^ f+�>A"a4. (r.yKA.1y Fast ril `S7S4'YV :a �4C PO1� Merc.roedcdA+s.mer AP14'APT! 9w a"e am - +y� .1MPISTiIX.l�1611 111.51 �2"Iv MflnYr r1, 197T 931 E, 3nrltlr CoffiedrEd S11:CtlOP45lNms1'rp➢ 7empk 6L Avenb. Oapv.ber 30, 2110{ lA9ddblrle 06 Me�c�ps.pwAv.iner ,n'46'1r71 f4PrW1ite 4rArVrr•YY 226&409 E9;e y ahHAls71rca6su`1V f1'SIb2'W 38 July 9, 2020 •�+aw z�6 N 7 4r NH�aT20 tlatiord Fug- & Hrcpnc Cacae uwY Q, N Solry co,y lrii{rarda R, R I61orMl imnQ Pet. tw*d° L-albn 11vIp11-1140-ar 0aswlp0on SLptC.ber 7. 2rW 7 Ini95L 3! %eelennbJ ltO,na _ Ieo1B�BPA {Yapeihpq Ql, b•.sf Avenues l .r��Paae7D[I fi eLTlW3910BA9601i ,rf^siaw August 11, 1962 Wo W. 2DP 93 Cvnlral Vi ohousp [a427on361m1pfIM1'PP Sodh Abiknp4:psJyvdemet d0'IH56'H Cenintl Cdy Waal dRtl11y42(plsa9J} it1'SSNW Jadba+y 20, 199P 9T7 S. 900 33 Chapyngn [fe4a+di jf8f6]0)B1S peq *e W pt i0(,18f("f,eYe �.aary �wsaYaAi%+:'.-�"....� �C4524•re _ M1Po9+HOOW3SBJ] 1rsd59y1 .hne 15. 1970 LSerty Park a1 Isaac Cbaga MBI 1+7t�s'Ms9 60P East L"rty Yy6As dk�%'••!da610a 4e•AA76'tl nd eLNW5RW00e2ij1 f19'62•L'W B-md by rayon >Jarpi 12. 1980 (sB000P9i91rm G % N-rp6%C Dlatrrct Hi% lro)tF ZM St, 4th A" �dry-.npc�pn•Ai19mc/ and � Ca Cahyan e4NpF9moo0.9B19j1 10'Igd9N n1•szsvw Jonwry 11. 2002 }a E. Federal . Isaac C- a Dornmy •. i6Blomleay Fwati" He m S. Ctark Hou1:e 2 �'%9 4C�dee5'N aNtliltJot 93u,J1} 113057'N August 17, 1982 272 S. Ntm B1. 37 aiRBsikbrlp - w•ssx7•P r ❑aa , rota 11!'Sa2]W aiMSI3rd20o{109}] October 2% t 12D E. 3B GuffApanmetlls dk 9.111 A".-P-9-�a-00 ;nDW40^7 o++r3%o unh+eraay UNFAGL 111�sem aanJNg..09Gb171931 111'srltw „ 13M E August 5. 1996 M Henry A. oad Tile S. L. (pp9)p�fi (No., tpy AV r 8 House C4Va1 Ho1159 a. AO•A9YBT1 fn'5,w%v June 27, 1905 3ryr 8. 3D0 East Aa 61on1e6are' 0'1541�V Central dry 5] 1 awil995[k}1395)r '6zaw 4MQM � Rcq dN4Mc PLWM IlsLw*1 SeY1 cw-W&Ipsaa PI Name on m6 itegiftHrdl DAN Iw"R I.anPen Hnlghberheey P96u1pdan AP1 18. 074 No,r I- Em'd Q>!ma/ 4COt 39 C SL H6an Cm.a vl` f1 tWA09+aa A?Am-w Avamias the Roriw_¢n 4C d FVW4MM5g 111^52'd3'W Cat19ILakieC=CC or Sal!Lake City Dc[cbw $1 t9$3 938 F- 1700 6Y Byron C> irgs vemoaga9 Ntp.rbpy Smith pmbUm P+dmb. Hoses rery.rpl.gadAw.eamer 44'4Av dMA1HPpp 9'p 11'61uM Cen.A- & 5aplembm 9, 2019 11.Yy.. ". akr SS Plarander Curbs (I1P3W130 Vmwmal A". gag. House HolueY}1Fk1FCop07epyr 10'ASY6Tl It1S,t171v 1 May 25. 1970 128 S. Malin SL SA ➢art Bbtk r {af[Dl1623lIepiA4g 4aVs74'!1 D--%mh � _ _ lamznw.wlrn+.ems! 1.4�yy 6YNR18'100016791! JarBrary 24, 1995 347 S. 400 Ems s6 �o�Deacanees w'4r4, �4 Ceetml Gly 111'S2'FW DHaI5Blf00166,9}i aM Rlo SopMrlber25,1975 30P South and 56 Grande Ratmad G Staaaa IFISCOw5. piupc/hgg iLp GreMe ale<WSF9v+!Ni bt '+ Central Ciry Wee[ 1 fermi afaiklaesaalass}} n1•sl•s4w Maroh 11. 1971 334 W. South 57 Dnycroaun House irlmeB57 R""vo; T-ww st Mery.roegvn'Aae,lfl 4�A9'18N Dmv wwn _J'r� r fIRlibFlI10006d7H 1t^51ttYy/ Odwba 13. 1@83 925 E. Logan Flarper J. pe ra,y , f VmP*J+rF9 A-- 'd lWuse vAamLd -"V4ag4"11ne Pcrkir,s Addtlm J*24, 1974 411 E. 100 sa Henry Dirmnrw]ay Souls Cnlrtrol City House 4LerFLpyJA39NLM 4a'46W'N a ml51r4pai53Blf 1t1.6Y42w 5aPI2.b. 30, 2019 404 S waat 66 Eages DuPC++S ntoaooueo pagw.>,v TemF1e Sa- aw�rrni.w+�>�aro da•Isml Dontdown �rxtal000n9leop 1�61aew PLNPCM2020-00106 NB7t020 rlo'Ard r{9ry.5Wr or"wo Aet7n kuww In 50 Laae G -wii icom, 191 Hama enlhe kegi{tend] 1n1We DaN iiabM's� Lvcotiv, IiNgh6orhena ownirwa- Juror 27, 7983 833 S. 200 Ear. 11 conm9phfiam5mroy lidBglol396 it�`dd M1+VS dC dSpaM CenVd Cn� T-dek Bptagvgue alw+A7e.9atir✓•da+filer 1.5]G3v: ,�- - _ _ vrrosresootv6]- � _ Decerr w 27. 1w t 42 q'65xTH D.-b- [ aU"am2booNp }11'5E71W I Iry& Apn 20, 1976 164B $. 130 The oldest Oudding 41 Co:tymae Nei Ie7 l M1ypa eai! Sr rG& Fk r [ Wesbn;nstar !lrF,R^aywrFadflOdr d0'4Y3C7! Cntege I dLHtls+7$Oo2b%H H1'61Y45Y Ormber 20. 19BB 101 S. BOP Eaf1 H Corry ApmtMmM IMM041 QLWArym w'', CenCa1 Ciry 1t1•Stm2 �c Dd.ber20. iM 335 S-2Da Pa da Corona Apartrrrenn Is11gWi}dITWs�P'aa 1"0." Cmm City ��'A�' 111'33713Y! eLHSISA%OOV742)1 May 74. 1871 CePltol Hill at r' [�1 CR•aw M1fSq nea:f ol51sle A¢ C 1HaR C.p,mf Im aIR1aLVi1Wad66}1 A0•IfiS3•N 030ber S. 190P 1211 E. too 41 RAh -C y 1686P7�^0. tp4p> R" 50-M uwa,afty �aryros9vca•Aaelu.t da'd00TH wrxilswnpo-sxoH In•stzlw Ocober 3, 1980 1229 E.100 NynaP T. oowr gyaoP6392t Pat�ma 40VIOl �, House dl-tkam lggd :eb ur&mi Joel- Apguat f 7, 1962 241 Fha! SL N C ij» House lFaPa1M[w Q�I�almpp w,4y.,O,14 Central Clry dh'FMA9�':A S11'S3'fsW Y J cLavwae2on9+wn Civxn_ fpoanu,g and J�1' is. T111Q.3 19S9 s. 1100 D1,�C IwsLno659 pi1¢a.R+pp �� Suiprr Hvuso auYd�ng �%rWiio^1AvAi M East rdnJfns7g 11'd131Nr aA5/30ai 14mw lRepel of iGaY rc P,ares Iff of rn Sat LMe City-WipeEa P! Na+rio an ma Imfyf DimtoT tadsl Ln Mmn Ilbwt"4 Reglcmrl^I �9 � August 10. TV$ Eww4go phew 61 E4psgnPlaW I.,-j1ANnlAyp end 5-IAeIn SL Dbrrr11p1yYr liw{ak D(�Ac[ dsF�ysq. 'l�eRm[ AO•AS'f!'[i +W*IO iSnaeaY6 PH Ap,1 26.1984 1226 Bryan 62 J. Lao FmleaNnbd Ave. S Hones House dMF'We.9w+wae Drt �P'an98'[+ agar iNW aH6IX019B)1 151'S1•f 9M1y August 17. 1962 165 S. BVsM N Fen pecAesc (fa7HW141 tNn alrt,v SL Do_a_ Aupa� d0145S" .L.anawwnnfy n1•ra-mw Pace nbera,1978 PVI S. S00 atl, l" Ir746o2a7n 81Wa'°i'v9 Waft e4 raeelirgflcuse afay.ryaqur+l4dnePel Nl'45111 CantrBl Ciry west . Wlp)3l669t6i0}) 111"SIT,a'Y! " J* 26. IA43 Z5e S- 13DO Buil[ in iON It, As Rras1a11onN.8 � trsxcw2$tNlq:flA®g East Vni- serve 0,e 0 eL.rf�cR9o'^'/,.+ai0+ d0'A9'4911 nl' plslr]1 a+ra: rK.w a p4NPk�tl6.�]W473g 111'S1'13W r[rslauran[. Jots M. 1976 352 E. 300 Pw Cl00 or p7euv1es4 {h,bf•hY6q South s6 t Cenha[ City CMkt, sd-ni fiery. `0o^'A�pIPa 5'k n-sz eN91g+6epn7iap 1.6rdsw Jmniery2�, i995-S.200East Ci Ew MpalC hu [f6AWI5Y7 tregslA'(.q IPd55.9'H CAnLai Csly Epi9ovpel Ch h '�°':"P'9"H�"� Itt'6]176'N ayilgl$IJ{[y11591]i _ May 26, 1976 16$ S. IMua $t. eE F-I Neboiul Bat k �' t R&Po $lfm] e11 D. alalnlSM&D,M7 i. 111 `SSRAW Septambor2a.2PP5 4O&S, 81a1n S1. nor first on,Firnl 5-wy Bank {ffo5001,R1 I.vgq Ia,6 ,N Dof6aawn lmonaa11w1a[ St11r< Budding wnyna.9p yws..tow t,i i�z err buM-!r mUmh M'l.WI&%ou11wj] butt in lM, 39 July 9, 2020 BR6 7f2B 1+26 4raRaP-0 rlea iR9pkwr otMhlmc PM- hblrtr gal -Ce7•YVdpey. N1 Ne Wtft It"01400 1ma99 Dfft.Ihtedisi L.44W. 14wolsorho tl 04pdon ADM ROW Ocmner 8, 20M 1206 W-- 290 � p.89DD9915Inibe:rrTo 3avin. GrovO L,'wliege House a�'r.�•9>�+Ae5H9N W'�sss+t eNrRt3'89"A197511 115'S:53'1Y -y1-'gl� NwB r2, 20W 2805-400 n Pa.dhwwrco.r�any � [eoow+3dzlrrt>::ar�g weal Cenuel 9lan 5eruir:a ®ujdirg y �q%TUC�rfuaemn PISYTN e4esnsocmSxaJl vsr•su[dw ddh9tl 6y 700 Agri 23.20D9 East, m[e,afem T2 FM,9 Dale hlisamic Dienclscry�pega.dsb,-„u,f 51w, s ar Haase .O xNYi4"9eflOTF1H Ave. en61WO F1W d'a34(rrr 15r•520519 _- Jpma l5, 1970 FOA Ddgbe Yd KM ElarrgiPf Reaerry5m,fon F-emal �� --- Nr•bttsdN+ lily 30, 1976 158 E. 2D0 74 J. A. FMW.h BWI( 1[+e00laTa {M1lq'^"'� s '& mNms7-Ml l 4' r-M Cip, ) nw iR4RL4lEOOta25]] m•ssnlw WY- RA. Pelnk seatenmer 15, 20M 404 W- 400 7a Company Gedceaw kYMeh01r9e j fw,6a01na7 {higpAtpg $pllh Mr%r4N8y^'+�aerr091 40'rere•N Cannel Cstyweet e4HMSMS001o37N 111:Itl8V1 Jdy 7, 2A1S Z474 F-d 91tt 14 GeorBe and EAen 141mra�ninm.+rmv C17. Fu{ps �� �nm+-s>rrrawmal sv,•5�•N 1rtrRI5n5[9e98i11 11f'49'1]1Y - .ranuary21.1980 159 W-Rerpard General Cmglnaerirg }: t*WD93ik>2011a!NW Are. BTfA4nNh co np9rry BulLpg dWrF p.:wAse119er 40'4S ^ eieiRISHCC08922jt ti1'SE'4CN Jrlc 12, 1984 137 N- WW 7. G�EI>s.Thamea tM&on22cisl�=[rva T-w* S- rPpd }Q House 4!^sY4aW"'aaxyDet O'/6iYxi � eiatRl5l8r[9LG7jl Fi1'e596w S] 4+N mL Ngand Rne dlesax1a Plaui¢h W kr Sap Lake CW- WBOdw: R N.n ..tm k"1N LL99fi9we LO Ml-n HokphP.Mo*4 De,CnFObw itn9tlt o Roughs eo.mSM m M.rdi 28. 19M 1100 Easi. DO.. Iy Gtn-Park HldonC {a9e0W]t4{rapy/npg r'xollh. i30i. EWcff- Dlankt EasL arc a4M+199Bc WSH11 7Hrva+d A-. 4PH'46T/ sit•stzlw Llhparrbor27, 1962 35W. 3D0 10 n_ �.FtdrAlln [f82m4ea1 41'Pa Sown D9. k- W7 �.r%�pl.W3'fA[alKat W'.AS45+i �laapAaakuaeixi n1•ss�w MENOCNEm 3. iBlia 134aaw rwe. e1 Nd60. NON H&M �e lh 'N 45.4',9•M Fodaral "hh a7a9Pov-wyzf)) ,n^saww December 9, 1999 1797 S. 1400 hNVi J-Hansen fa9R7a1sa2 gtl�n'+x Pa91 HCwae eaory�gsAa'1�w�L`!l s4 4'A351W ua+k10bs@ MM6RJ930a,552)j fll^5, n(Nr 3eptend¢r 24- 7991 fi36 S- 5f10 East n HarrV Apaimmn% W9,om4r594ipe'rr4R i0'45Di'N CCnVat Civ uary.npcgnnAa.ernx 115•`..t' 3rw n2MRIS51Qar4i5Jf Dawrn6er24, 1975 458 N. 5W e4 Wtlliam He.k Caen F.MX6r1 PaA.arpg WNP CaoBd HN eArtadsneoosa swx�oa.sawnem9e o•'a rsp txrsaastiv Jauary 30.1978 175 W. 200 M HMd�4 U100 f91en02a h",ftp South Central CHy Wes! aun.�l.imv.elm9at 4.43YCN eanrtls++av2572p ns5osw AM 21.20M 72$ W- 290 Tha,vs e+td R4sry X=Y (ADaapawll 4.Mi NMh Falgak Hepv 1h i{py30 � al.y.npe.per/AnelDe! IPiePSY1 .cMsus�n9vauwb xl'a4uow Ally 30. 111713 IC&AG9 S. 4x Me+dd a-kv'9 +� P MDOM7 P� Ih h SL D-nk- �eK.plg 9.asnpci W .654Yr .t4+oagrllmlciTp !11^a32r'w y bgVnoc bV AFd 23, 1966 P4rke4y Ara.. !e H449n4 Park P99900703 Mftp-wo 1S0 EAe1, 2700 S + h%4 DwWd Yn}npLgn.'Amen Sault, and WMW59l9COs960 EffLabvlrl 5t. av w t 4.' ,Um 4f8rt020 Maw' R 9 dHfi Flaws 119,,M SaltC-)'-V:.iu'+. .+ i1Br202] Na6+n1 Ft wX d FEWne CAcee IWYIps ii SdiI ke Coy•Wiq�. R] A9glrte>t•t k-" 0d. iw",k Loeeuan Helgho-ftmd pe9Cripuoo 13i Nsm0 an the 1m g. Oawadurn LnnrJen 19.4ghbmbeod Deleritz" Reglat9tt�l August 18, 1977 125 S. 200 Decgr W 22. 1974 1179I- 2f00 a9 Lewis 5-Has FkYrao - , Imrntab7 P"Nar' 99 West Dewnro n W u spar Holan ti .ry.rl�,i�'Amra,OM aa•4earn y� .InpO°/lio0fyoy 1,1.53'4]W �T�.`W+aIXQd7-0)i 11731Z9'W Aug-13,1986 425 E- 100 O L76er 20,1 NO 417 E 300 e! Leria B. HAs House INmalfas {heycveyp Sorts Cemrat G 19 [raNnx Ayl,Irt,0hW [aa0001TSad Sokol ren4A CAy �fx�vr,v�^+welw ee r6nr+a H .Aerr.+w.w+'r•-+aemel 10 kol wrllaQravwn•1p m•srdrw AlBUS/ae00573e]} m•srrlw Auy1117,1062 26RW 1[16 ..�•.. 06 japan*" Ctwm of - Ila2a0 w(hft myg SM r7awfdowl Chnsi 4d'4603Ti LMR{f«32pp114li1 f}1.6aE4M1V Apra 7, i994 2:t6 E- 100 W [lwva¢n3 m,waar�w 5h LYnI[a4 Giy 7, Gapyer 1a, 1B65 66 E an 1ta9 Ayernlx+its 4k•Ay.ro.9 fmWh orl 1 i0.4e1],N oLt+R6Jaamn±>nJY m'Sm- 1Aa John W. Judd Fw-o 17 Mi W"M A Pewrfg L4NWn aA+raro.w+'Rea.m.l 4.44n3n taans�ea+95s71 r11^sf7o+n July e. 1915 279 8- NO DerArt6er 20, II.-8 E- 300 -h iN Hoy jr4aty Greek y)79Jvie+spmorvr AYaai Dowxuo.n 1% Jygge i3.rining I 5M Ph p- 9 m•4•i46•N Daxnw.n G+Cr]doXChum �e,Wgow r 4o•45i9'N M�IAIWW 4ewR167rs M a)J 01-swy a �HRr°JIFJGRSo7i1 111"SS'24W h J-ary 3.1978 Saftlr Temple 93 HM tlhh !.1&A MV¢b�M end 6teln SL Downb7- Srrlln M wno M Jury 21. 19TT 678 E- South NWftha• dh-v.-^N9ow.r w a0•e8•,1N EOrme+B1 KAM (tagcJlryy Tlrnple SL atM.ls/I8arN731f 5t1'SS2aw '� 102 House C4n7814iiy Mnivbeary ton omlp.� W411 9'+r Wdandk-kfas[ eWfgsnl 130911 111Y 5w A4uS117, 1982 155 W. 20O W F40WVlctvr Iggaxillu GR.J.'ry9 Safaf Dawn[ June 1E. 101M bls'Yr4%9�'e••elW.n 4v4esrH 109 Kenick Bk C IMF 1 r 236�5 In St bawnlown t^ubyfglgla]71 11 :93'47'YY r11'=•T34w 011�11111 eAR4RL97+90Jt828j1 Daoerrhec 12. t976 -091 E 209 Immanuel paph t iure0@fiCa g,llrahl+pp SOLM _. Central Chomp, eaar.mkf�dnee41D11 da4sss-rs CiIY urwsrreaoxeca}1 nr5rdsw August 17, t902 T3Y S, klain SL iW iLearns B.Rding t OO ¢OL57CN D a3amoga^3aw f4sH 15i'°.,72Tw t40veu" it 7977 39 W. Market avn* nl o w- [rdependMl Order d WI7+0-p V ,A..•Oo Sy 6 Odd Pebv+s Hall .I.q�.rgagae41w0.1 W'45u10 O°a^A- A4arkef SL, mpve0 41R1@9117ao190911 1i1^Sa3oY! Irt An9r*9i 2909 Thanes Meares Feb u 26. 5970 803E. S-061 Strvrx as Ino tm Mansion afd S4ldwaesl IM,yelhgl, 7enyee SL AlranueE UNh G -blots PLNPCM2O2O-00106 40 c�F almm9sym3os3'u lsisrr3w July 9, 2020 Mateo tC rMA 4'd.1fx0 NellonJNgetw aHaa,', Par '"s h SA � CAY- 7 Apki. nMl1p(p f:owid knotar of Hk Nils hare, ei S¢Y i Ch -wir .- FI Reglete� 1 Imapa amt{sUdl$ Lmatlom HolghhofhoCd OrnvlppOO Ell Tlsma on Ine kup oak IFwwd51 L*oitum Nolghb*tt w Dieto of ralik. i MaY 14, 1971 529E. smkh t. ,ep aavid ICenh Marrim Ie1,uoLale Rsy%ar'P9 T.'.p6 St Roux" ntl Carriage House W efl'+tx A4i� ecember 11, T@SC banded hr 5C. D ¢Md'<19f/1lgpp49]] tt 1'Sr!30W �.� East. 71 bal, 1,9 Liberty Perk ti:= NA4aet[� 900 SaeNh- and Lihesry Wes' akaFI5.4¢W35C611 180045N I:. +4rgvg13Fi, 1877 2d2-25. 1PId'15N rN aumiirO•&ien >>' ly-ripplsi0 (MIpe1Ap� Melds[, f11'6rd8'N Buildeig 1O'15Y9Ti aeRYWSr1i0013fO}j 1,139'21W RD4hy 64ualled by 7O0 odglnefylFJfedet Past, Slaw U. weft Hiswc key 20. 1983 dT8 S x0O 1300 s-m. erd diwicr: Fero* i toe N6ert H. Kelly Ftpu%a { pAwaxhe w4 5 "IMn9 oovAloYrn Liberty wNe Fiisx s Inmmn0P47c'+Re 2ika Iperylded Et, LibeltylM1Ol9k "Pt�et�4 the eua7swaoowtGll -sraq O;06it1 ai• FVaye.PAa[ett111 Slate SL, maLihedy Webs ►� Ne1Pl&rldkW/Op SaIln,5O0 wattrio Dgedct EaK and 130D b� aemtase 9-th of W401N Ja...y27, 2012 Aiy 2O, 1983 200 ,Pt, J4hh&>tqiy FlomaeISNSM91]2 Q�¢paAFrg well rtl i-b'anW'NM1 �¢r%'We•gm''AaaelDel a0'4536N aHlRisl8i00717Zy1 iH'��FS'W DelarhIew S. Vg" 941E-5W 17e1013ee 20, 190 242 E. 10O 110 Keyse C1AM HWY4 I>KJrA0,5fl1 [ry0te•flrpJ South G-� �, 721 FIJOW/Y3 dOL6P,•H south [.enlral cityI�keryR .yatiATeemer 10'a932N f11��� 4�&>Nar+1131jF ,'5259'w +ta elAIRI,^✓Se001dd111 '61•deW Sel%eraLet 12 2008 lAakdm Fn6 3E1 E. llih Ave. IIIIX KeYee 1�17 "`wimml ("were" ljta 1 Avenues 4_ edTIIISNiicomtlp 1,15P11^N August 18, 1977 238 S. Mein St. 111 LAIDB__. {¢71mf9r1 {Wp Nrpp a0'WSp'H 1buTrwD OCMK 11, 1978 ME -South y°`fr�`9O'`s's"r Ny3'27W 112 -yc a, IF+ammis T *St. C�� aLNwlsRlee1311p GIUhh­Y�rva•r yt� cay aer/dd'dta0rrye75fy 111'51� OckCeT 13. 19V33 $21 E- s 700 in Hee¢y Luce Fi- $Qw PBdpne AdAllO!� Janwery M. 2Q75 SBH-,/ginm ;O 9m,A ." +0'M9tN 153 '�1C-��Y 1�3100i56i dit�clvp➢ SL e�311 i1t31S03Y F4d4lfi Fnn.leinm-14 u �err^Y9�A'.L 1 •a'�6'1a',/ a. _ LMPoS'D1e0156Yy1 I l"5111TY/ kterm 9, }W0 Nd5E. sL 5TE Ndler C. Lyre {IlaOw'g961h!'ncfklq 417 y q SL No'ran�het 10. 11382 @48 E- 100� eNnr.Ml.7+�'•'+la*etuee ;P'44TI'N PaeM,ea na 3asna "Swan R. prve,,5q ilslpalM1srj SotAn evuIt 95)) 711m� Langein Hb Atrv.'bs9� IPdalllx Canlai city dTJRts1920M9UJjj In•[Q'r9'w OdDW 13,1983 WE. 17W 124 kla6nr"i'el! If830o9&1(NipxlmpJ Scud,Pk-Addd.. Maed129. 2O18 Me som 9W � � �j pl"Im�1P"d--wiOar M'Go0'H 115 Flat41d D-enld Fml yetooAo227Q4 i" wee! OLNP73R3PP3aa+i1 1 i^5 'alw ;0'M Lae Hwse IPfarYn¢a•9e'dA,1e9 ]4'N I;aenrma IeLRCe&'1O09P721ap r'65a1'W Jijy 7. 19E3 233 8, 4O0 Ea 1r5 NIN d F' F6e" )ae'a llj P'fP11'N"? Wa Isiw CBnhal Qi r December 17, 1932 S5 jh IMR1&to In)I 11f'SSi9Nt 116 aaalm od,IHa 11�05feeT VA-flb I SuuM 9M and 9lh w "_,a9 derY Isw �¢1,ptr t"'51 oTl oocsm6er 17. 1962 ¢41rc Isarewrea7ll 1nslss r+ 1t4 .1nm9• G F1ci¢isla ISUSraalTal lmmI.Ypy ISIae 51. Ipnnerglly 29. 2Qt11 1Wettrtv"11t t 11r Dfl Dam and Aeod 1¢ptmrY63 p'lye'Id+mO . _ _ anHRiS/e200,Ys11f LeMe Olceae yerf�9a,',� Ave- 5•Agr Horse ANPj I'V14a3A IC4]'IS'H fn'31 biw 11LVlOZF Na:cnd Pa7a^orof.gWl Pl¢.-d- 5a Lake Citr-1Y?ipxdva N D hNbo.11 A,,eaat d M6 AVtecfk ,pn 5M Lake Gw-wy ¢xn Nerve is mh Image Date If 141j Locatlon Nel9pha1h l Docliptl 0 Pl fault, on Fhv Ft.&M 4] Ra9k14�`I 44"0 Data Ihlk*dl< Laemlon Medghb-heed D46etlD451" Ntgust 24, 1977 10 W. 100 YlAiemA Nelden A-Ic6af $9, 1976 1772E 1 W IV McCormick Bukii 7 I.i E312 ilt'�+v.'rpg h a 1]6 F� � P'�17= �� llnreratly �cYn%.gawaxsaFt>a W's6'U3'FY lipase aY N!¢1$rtnda2aYa]1 ��� ��r M elf✓f/op13,2i1 11'S3ZdW hne 13, 1974 iwlo 2O. 198O 5331lth Ave. M. Ndspn-6eetl4Y [�0llma.4f Ip•,e Avmuee Zia kim W-i.1CL1pFe L¢740P19BT t7mP-'%e99 �fexeRNlOm� Cepifd Hl ,� Houle " eterytyugb�P wee Ist'Srnw Alepslpn � Ylryrp_gox.4autDd 111'S8'21w '� WiliR1990D]3Bd1H .Idufosrfmolrpryl 1 GL M.Dcnalo Mmrch29, 197$ ISG-lag W, 3w D 3' low 1268 E. t0O 12a Chpcdele c:-Phy SwAh Damla 140 Cad AL NwKauten woeaaa.4 pm -*" 8-4h F1m+erely Bupollg d y¢dy,eme, Sp'45/9T1 House die }ycw'a4+ a 4a4flal u a3eA9fR900267a]! 1'S7.Ww +1AiL5leo003YfPl1 1n •m3sw Jdp 78,1977 EB-72 S. ktaln "�_ - Ma" 10, r98O 42 Pod Odce 17POIYIa yiyrpr�p g!. I¢eoo03o..3 PIS/ 4➢ Pi. 11e fAtlMy1� 9u41h10 SSV%+Y�a00v1AnnOoe dtraeap7l DWadoMT 141 HHr York FlpEM � ryrpLq +A-115ur 4Cd3'[yH Ou nbNvn Amid9misl7Jj 11131 w a41Rd9f4dt�Yi3Rs911 i11'S331W scuff 1pm 0-t 7�' ..,f`"e " DocenCaf27- r982 Ol l W IXtl Clods M2gNs p`920P17521itye/.kpq SwM aM Mabl Jut, 17. 197$ FVt[ HaLalFal Benll ' n '7 ec �C so Do-aNwvn 1✓' IeiA0pY 1t M71hAVe- u, kagln[yre HWSc i.' . f..-� �7+deo4wAeee,vw< W'4L39'TL Avemiee WFRLLSasdwiizkl �•Se,27W �t � eLNF9 7@D&M7?J] 111323/W December 20.2002 452 E 500 1� md4ae kouferlo H. (W�2W1y55[..9FM $nikih Cienutli �, >7[0]Uu 75, 1974 4W Boud1 entl ''`} 9°dAA' DM � to IXd PFwleer Fort site D-0i° mow" Der,.I e7RttESRk0of53611 '62'3aw >MysnC4eotmj 3+f % wL�_+ etbtlsnawsrpalF s11•ua1M' i J�Jy7, 1983 SE.2W 111 Fredmtpr JLE-hleypt f .31141tayplkpoSouth avmut Hcv�e dery.nxg¢wdy¢Nlpl 10'+9551t cay chip (f317a1F 111'51NM Deoomher 4, 2008 351 S. 4110 E gu mSo" ifae0aHe6 {le�ellnpp 10-AS'feTe CeMrA City flp636er 13, 198.3 1820$-lam y,A�d 1"'1 r1f^s7•Jpye tS1 Afeaander hlilGnJ E¢sl '.'IOu90 "Mis9urrRjl 111sl 'H laalk%16 Add'y]n aLNRiWS3aW965j} 111'S1 i9W Rail ShOfIFnF lai pplltl�,l{/dp fry 'P-ieipOM Mee. 14p F�aN Company d¢ry,Ay�ph IMIE64'ti DOMYane11 .lauas7doofalg}f +1s'a17yw A"ii 29, 19b0 314 Clmir a St. 131 fticFwd Vaughan t4'4om7p2' qrq h3pg 40•iae431 cum IO enenit Horse Mw!"Pe w�'+e°•BF�BF 11,•ygww H Auguea5,1M3 Y14 S. 1200 y elaiHy�y, Q�yy1F Fry *K Ortio e6 Ho •saxu115l mc+Mw Eael LOH�yI ee..r.es..9c',raanoi Ie'4s/ste Monlsp> m.1N 9ed7bw 17, 1999 205 N. 4O0 - �w r3's F-1°r'berC�nMgS' lNeem/sal we# Capps Hidt Cfl- - r" eAd d+7+Pitm+ F ib•It'�+t Sepwrm- 30- I= 4s W 200 Warpquae Lwa&Rt9ca,sun 1,`dltl]'w lwn (he jy� stuth Mwxrtaln Sfak4 - rapremev x4, 15ae 1075 E. In OrPtwu7i 7heetra R wa=tsl� iw DaxrWan 171 Tdephond ad (� M mi-lh99 [$04-7Pd Ave. S� Flow -- � PL 2" ;;'d1�41 July 9, 2020 +� tMas -0lBlNiv Ns-nd Roebwr d HYal: Place, Mags ur Sd1 tAkv Ulbf • Wi qV �l NlT9anThe R laterlll i111gv Da[. Iisud5) Location "bohhmd De CYiph- Apol 16. 071 Z33 Canyon Rd- 1Aa ��� (,'•'�� q,KDF rife ii {IilfnoB51 INICa�A4yy pfli3Tk G CreG� �aiM(tll,r,Wee511} 11,'W1}}w Caer)on Jamie" 24.2011 315 E- 2D0 ,hl Pa. hY,r{hht i (110001f99 (1pn-'+nkg Sgnh Cwti'ld City PIPdne 4umm Isex..5syprinolepeP a 4sWra MMRr5Noa01f 59ll 111'S2SP1V October 19, 2019 701 N `SL tee aW "rthEn�yY �� ps�M A,.-- Poon[� maalpreU 111sresve Sepb.t-12, 2008 445 E. 300 7a1 Ppler P✓m Cow A.d-lae r2rnro A.+t�M 14-iH-h a[rtaRL'.'atlODpaaV)P t11'srftw Datera6er 17. 1992 422-432 W" 300 151 PHotel SM"alk itl 1ila169p IkrT.'1�*F9 3a Ah e6r Ctrel Ckry Wes[ rd •x^W9.r'r,4ar�OW �a'4941T1 aL7wrlsv'Nple9oj! 1'al'rir W 77doben 13. 799$ 950E. Logan 153 ai■om p" peareag i1R3flowe Ilhwpw A, Perkfre Additiwl HWGe ppy�ga.,ieae� �Mpg•N a�R19,A3a0 -Ifl isys • Sepiamoer 12, 2006 300Eaai s5i PraC *Rpartr+reraa e16S. leoeoope7s p' P18np1r CQWM Clry WWSM 220-766S. Fehruary 17, 197E MM hn 0% 1a6 Peel kip[¢[ Iv9aOa5790ei, 102-120 W.3W Oo,_ aAe7rpygev+/�eE1+1 C Ah taaStsnem�rsr91P 4Q45'I7TI t.y7sew August 25. t972 704 CNNro. M. 1tr7Toa r299I�'L1V9 IN John Raps kk0use • 4pd614'P1 caand !-M eaJ1ARIS7l2[aJV6¢]I ]arlyary 7, a015 2091 E, St. t,17 Jahn and Margaral {. W01110 Pd2s:'KW M.Y. Y1ay F.." W_ House �leanpe.9a' =0's131'11 eNlra3'1�00 kIwJ] +1eayw [.crento anO emma Atgual 8 12i15 E. 1900 va PnkCA Npu� and I� rpMei.A 19 m hlpp Fail Central 9.nnk mica wm yK'FT poWWMRH ip+131'N dmwsrsawlptap 11[ssarve L3R{f2D NOW Reghlw of NWd1CP li fl q m WLW QY • Wn 119 R lsl. M. W g. bah Phuscpt LaCallpn kWlgrborhoed __- - - GP EI M@v 2.1999 128 & 17_' 13s Lewis A. Ramsey 11 a fAPB000mt {hrgo:lapg E8E- dyrS^pc9o'/rbntt/al 40'499ie eP Ear It aulaki5sea0082,11 I,t'S1'Al„ Sutl in 1958 in tn[amabonal St o, July 11, 2003 1019 E. 2100 .t v4in Via SB1l 19p Rictrargcn�ower Ie09mma8 purr,[ p9 S"ll, sager Npyae Lake C11y PutLc auhon9 Mn •tlRfrOe9aw�.enxae ipf.43JT1 awdy Building 6. ( 9A3000a By 111.5111w Imm t 979 W 20". Jdy 26. 197g 16r RGNdand HA -St 205 aA PYNppJ9pi Velra'A,gp 24'5] -111 " A1wueS W.A. Schad eMr%R�fA'rreA>all[IM e121wsns3oraarp 11 -stew _ JvnlA y 3, 1903 05 E, r00 1p2 Jonathan C"and Sogh CWVd Chy ENR K. Reyle Hawn dfsynpcg.xWy(prc 491+ "N sSxSH9ai[vs17a11 t1•sz21w Judy 7.1963 RumW fl9.5R Mina i,,, 350S Ease ,sa GmY t500 Ck,C�, �. � msrasw .uerasrtrmstnp SWl-"r22, 1970 231 E" 100 ,el 3L Llan�s F-7ravapal tllrAaOa?A pnlp M South Control C Cd7h0aral Ab r46.9.�'+AwctOi 60',9111"N .L `EW`0a0DMN 111.53T ]una 75, 187Q d514geahingWg ,as �t lake Ciry and f7al']a4e S4 r,b.0ly Ca v 9Wd`rt9 Y•ap 'H?Narl /P1533H •1RIW5 WDDa2B]I 11r'S]tl9 X . bou ided by South Tmapla August22,1996 1toDEnf 400 lea Sett Law Ciry East [aSeaooll0 VuT.+1N Sauer, CAn1rd[Cib 51deH Diahiet )! Wrµev.9eNn.nfiDfl LNi.erAYAve., IralRlSfa900041o]t 9W SwM,a,ka 50o Eaet 4ff¢53,T1 111^5 sm 1m MI Lake C ty Pvblic �•• August T, 1979 15 & Sh" lit. tf+sooaws L-I-NIft L,bmty �^x +fi t 1n'S9't9'W weaarATno7A75}) duty7,2015 2325SauMW lee Sae Lake Geary East 3 Flou.a Oueand GOHCaaae >.ay.quaae+awmn 49'4"TN Jar aTikl5er500e1pp11 111.513 r7'zs 14tr th0 MadeleUm Chok Sd1ool Calgmapyaee C*f"I City N1114hDck wlda sole Gem Scum YemyBe W 900 Sarah: boundQe9 yreeay h¢neaied In 2Ml and 2M3, ma LW of WAWW House¢ mo P1anet.lk-1965- 2003, 0.C" T ner Ja dry siMc 2D09 4MRWQ Na WPLq"rW lWtaSC PlAevfIn S* kekc C+ly• WIkpP them NaGerd iteg'slor.f HM. P iNkg nSak l..k. M-Wes. IA klanw aslhe RRSLF,[41 Mktg. Dais IMMF Loeal[on N6ighhuhaed Descalptlaa I$ flameaema R.gt.t.rR kw. Dabs t}atedtsP LOCOWO 111401I MOd Dwedom sol-Me En�, roll Works- August 14, M 24T W. 400 tgslOWkwynvW" S" Cer6rd Cly'rwagt ,79 Snnn ApertrneNs Odober 20, 1909 =41 S, 300 East [f89'1al7do{MWa:rmrg 1a'AW'N GMbef City' CaR}V ty�OYSng •1�'f'roQs A—Io.t .n4SarR a1MRI6V]CG0imJ j t11^Sa•AM �I r.Preo•'an+cn m•ersew n1MHLS'8906174%1 1i Celt Na rthouI CO -Mr, H`m�'+= Octob&4.2001 155 N. 400 (ept0np- yMynAlpg Was1 Wrxr�tloa'•'AmNq Capita[ Nd lea Gerx{3ee i.lbert 3rG1n G-gry 4-9 march 12, 7093 UO2 E" Yale UeaoaD0e81tryff6/R 40` 10'Haa'PI Yaiacres[ Mr, apag, .1,M¢$g1aa,gm7 1-v' vgw 9••'%fseIDvl A.taNiSg30aMee61P +ft•51.11v aq ewr 171 Salt Lake rmrmwew N41bc CLsm ,ou" al by W" 29, 2001 1100 VMK MO IWID0 M(44 elrya North. 500 SYON,aM elgq Feapark tat ➢ - ArlgueP IT. 19E2 12f W. 2110 laeemtllsl .-W-5 l7oa+klDWO a..x.saa. yr W1rR15,a1ryJp37pjP Ten�ge WY�87J N �II .CrrYrri.W+a.Mlj ilw4 NMa°1tAea116p 111 `33'a5w P51'S135w A 17y Sad Lake $tamp CampaTy Building OZ nsber22, ISM 33D W. 200 i.e2pos7sd VA4'unktt smm dAr%gaVaeeMDet dp;536T1 Central Ciry Ykal lye Scum Temple 100 E.Io1350 Jkly 1a, 1982 G032aOkuT E $aura 7enple VA( At4➢ St ex7lfssrs�a1rs39 t11^sanew H�mriC [zelixs � n+'ax1lm' 1Ts $ah Lok9 51Dck andaJuly' MiniN Exdh"itieoe183] 30, 1976 99 plpryangg (eNmkla,pp Put- Do-nb Ml IN Pa Sell Lake C � ry Judy i1, 200j 2131- IIa3WD¢i7V"'M N KAW Or'. Sr9ar Pietas 13W,N b e1AsalLYr 4ry "'H Mro�Iemly3OH 11 Public Library g'ax^�°'d'r'ae°I� �� . y371w eiRlvl&060MB3TH I,1'bi'S.7'W /7. Sal[ Lake urom Papkp Rairoad J11TY9, 1975 Sddh 7.m0 DRSOpi3tB {rapflypp 4M West C9nkW Gity Weal Tel 5reinor Anrerkt�a SepkambA 10, 20t9 %5E. Sous illal'Uar3v MIFIAV Tlo" DOnb- - - Stetion diT r 7Oora e1ajI •s.ti�k1'I Big P" elN.Ql t,Q -tI Ao-4fft w �~ Daeanilw 27, 1982 175E.200 - January 27, 2MO 216 E" 300 lea Stradord Hovel 1�tT54 Spurt i�enbal CNy na Sampsan npamnanty f14�01�`[ TAi� +r South 4J C"WaCEr �� NFOl7siyj 11illnofiN .aMSv129ZII jtllmww - --- IQW S- 1200 -W 11'2M 1ae 54g& Hdc LDS Isoa 11 P'�'tP] East Nauss ward Binding Ww1•.rpygvn'Asi.10p alraavma Bar September 12, 2002 737 S. IMU aYNP1SRa000B31]I 11,'Sis4w T7. Sarah QaR Flogle far [ha A90 (A7 Iwl p,la4i+lnpp F-aal ILeatrr�pse'A9si0.t W4g11Tr Celled G ity a1MF1^aeq+yalvl,]1 Y1'12W - Sokonarday Faheuary8.2')07 16e0S-a00 r •n '9dl-U - IaaFtinawp l East Sugarll July 11. 2003 11fl0 EaeIeed klaeWghatr89 Ond dbrxrgsyo'+AvwWr AfeY3'�'nr IVk1X1nW-R Noup IwcmoUs9s{kiwi. 2t00 savm a tipme 5ehad .r.7lRebt6yoas9Oii 111'S2Mw �ax.rm-sw'nsteDp WUWW _ gs+tAP.yaya06,'1a)l 1r,`5$NW 31rpr &WIiAlL' Iron k%29,19" 550 W. 700 in YA:rka ola4e rase IA99oaa6'S Ttm r.+xv 5"a'ar cenad at, pyeer WarWkw.ee I!e-y. .gn'FefeYbr 141,54 PLNPCM2020-00106 42 July 9, 2020 ,9Rs 2DAM 4MQQ0 IhLl Fs9isierd Hamrcw ar rhftngz in Salt t Ciq -W&ip m: Ra8lderi'1 f.11a54 Paw fiat d5l Lotao- ]Jorghbernepp Peaa Ow SwW Car+dy C owft r 26, 20W 22A S- 200 [VOWalee4 yF.fb+Ifmv W*M fee �++panY DdkkW i�+a11nn0¢1 P45•• i -- dnNtl�pyY/]15g4]] n1.5r4c^x Omber 15, 19W $pYafe I W OM1'ag].hpv 140 Ta111pW Square 404614Tr ao 11t a py Bo-n fl Mww r3ap eurm3eavwr3a]l NOYambel 11. 1977 40 South ¢nd INTenth VAM square �,'�t^Pz.9e'e'A1aY7eT prrioo19fa 4bWPlhVY E90 Eaai 40'4557'M Ca MCity a1eJ6PJ✓7NaT]idjj 111•ex V Sar ThiN M.Y 19, 2mo low E. Blaine cmw � Sugar Yieilae Churh par %% 4rsrRr&ruaeeasZ9)j 111'SI%V Tracy Lawn am Tn2gt 0,14 ar 10, 1978 151 & Man SL f+�auL+.'ge1 inpprlrryp 197 C.-r.ny .:nlearpll wf'6]245Y DDWRID �ery.r{u rtxRl5ne007aa511 Jelly S0, 291E 10 Tribupe Su"I 137 S. MAW SL Fne [M�� ea'OS"i&'F1 Oa W_n 4*v4sf' i11'G3L1'Y1 iH♦r4a' i]C4t03]f JWY 30. 79T6 7m E. so 1a4 TFkft A.M-E.Chtrdr fVwa*a3l yrayerre0 S �err.M1 �A+'AaerRr 1n•d6'bYV CenYd crty O4Mrp8rlBOalfl9f)1 fls•gblw 1a5 RWxe+ty.tJMln 1YaN Apra 6, 2015 1102 W. 400 f4`1a00ela2pw(wAitaa North Faapnrle LDS Nk b h- n9 4+rrtMW.9a'rAT+� etr4aua'N v r1T�l&r158001'.�I 111'Wl: Y+' uxar6a2o.2WE 14508.13011 11� Frank M. and Swan yfOtl. dT4s6 p'W mp Ee,t it LWnWCf HcYr9a �eMMW�rAxW[MI -rwd• SuWHOUN .irt>Prsmeoots56jj 1+r^Sr+tw R-" L'mveratY r7.cent6er 13, 1995 Spell. Seto 1q7 4mirfapv TemjJa, 3100 unnr¢raYy H-x�nc CaL4ct HiA-oDkv .9�np q dn%�r..9o'e'Aa1?4arr Feu erd wTlnr&p9]a141p]i I1nlWpgl�r r1L /CIgg77r 111.512QW � 20. 1078 unwed ty or 1aa un'ryey' 9Y d Ureh __- pieo02krx lkmn(kgi Utah tempos Clyda W.S5 T4 Llnhet^y{y pDleRl$RappEeg]i} f1+'SaSfyi emrd02a NVA.9 R.Ol wiwTnew nmW' n $a&Li�v Gy•WAAc�+e kemo en me Re01.16rill 4nq p Data 8a1P LO-W. Neighbwh"d OMOW 1'J, 19S3 935 E. Lugar p7 Cs4wies ri. Waeks 1�"ao3R:a R4'.sW lnag Ave. PerWm AdtluWn }t(etse WNe^L"O''aaaaMlra OO.44P.1M xiAiWel89003959]I 1's1-+aw Saptmber29,2015 700E, eSo 6 196 Wgglam General Iny40em MmwiMpy Temple Si Can7d Ager.y BWlding encry..y,e-ger.•Awnta W'4603'Mi i,vrns,tea9awe]] r+1.57naw Wbararn Macaror,lApFi 7. 20T5 & F00 ewaaectl.rr<g fsfs00oes1 pnrorsav 16 V% cn CYal Gty West �'P�'Y FM1Gay w +ae�%npr'Aw"/�ae1[Mt eo'ksh9Ti tlRJ6W15rJOe133]j 1/1'Se'2rRv +� Sepm tnr7,2001 57335-i3m "o W-1-lnslw C.*- rW1o8aGtl yF�cMry Fast PreJQen1'g hiansn d.r•+�P+a�'�am11011 4a'4yy9Tr Sugar l'hwse eVrtlt1Sp10a09itj} t1'S19YtV S b-1011 h Ape 2i, 2011 13W Ewd. x1t Plar r><rl0odi31 Pa�'mn4 15DO Eed. F M Mstoric D}Bfd Fiielofic Diuticl aen,na.ava'A+ito.T 511er+rWan Ara. d o aYTrle&n10a&xU]r 1Qp0 Eas13ta. 4a'"4 - 111'64'4EW Sepemner25. i979 564 W. 400 rz NaLeOrF YYhaeler - - t47900P`J Ptk.Aw North Fakparr A March 30.1978 975(3ar6p1E au John PA W LWW r rRBo6aW fta R x Are. $u?afk� H A-F^p.9 WA-" 4 43- . adWIW?yppaali) 111'51.41 .Rdy 14, 19M IMS. S00 214 WOed" ViIA IeaYau11S6 dNpfilrty �� wn,.rpsq +.m.lc.t Po-sn.- ! tMM vvgr aurrtasranlolt ea}l 1rrash4w Bay 4. 598E 16365-500 s+s Aesfid Han wo9arulf ErR3� Llbeyy WaAs neata ��4O�Nmin �A+Fx+erowusy nrsrrsaw JJy 14,198E 160C S- $00 310 Wdema Weedred rest Fenn Nauss %^p.q'dAaae1011 4a'M�aiH Liberty Wout MRr9rSWme4lujr 11e•etd4'W .1LOY 26,1 M 2251R Stem &L p 07 Woodruff-PAw House 10 4a27•M +aplyl Mq PLNPCM2020-00106 43 4 JN2fl kstaiel RbpW d 1,a plq;¢1y kstn,, n S Ls4o Cih- fydcxf Natr. on VW ReAIHf'1°, Imoyo Bela lInw! L..Yd- N9tgr"rhood Ofna Fob- 18.1994 2151-: 11q� as v 1ofi� Sugar �. x iG9.aooa4o9 {aiws�ap9 L.. �ro+s�rw�wtva .o•iezi+ swot Moue _ yM♦f3B930PJ(Oij� Ff 1.519'Ty umh Cymmenya a11d dum 18, 19TS 22 E- T09 Seulb i0a Ua'mSCariic Jo {oidddrel9 FipcAyp i74fNITr Barnaolm B.j2hw a47A WWO191Dn 11}•eYt2'ty '000 wftCk wd January T7, 1951 t4&th Te9a11e m1 LReh Stale Fafr will, 6TN'M1W+pp s" Fakpeh Gas ��nlcgvrlR Dn is xrtrrnsefooesx:H Rk' 1 n•59i0w July it, 2003 19M S. tloo xox t1Wah Slate Llq- la43w"Oft�rryg i:� Super Fpee This bukirg is no Agar+ N.-22 w'4M'N 1W.J.'rx W.aa+13�1NaaH]i ITI-SI51W vetelans Jrme 16. 19gG 401E 1281 m1 Rtlminetre'mn Irbeo[tF909iAnr."� Ave. AYenuea y{ogpd:q aM•xnPa9e'+NetelON av-47W34'fr arrtmo>vvmomaaA ur'n•¢aw Oetober A' 2m6 175 5- Wd. St 7Yr Walker Bank Budding ftr% 4o'¢yagrl D- WnbNvn 4; e[RAPL4 WW924ji 1t t•aarra•w 2W .dAand F-terpwrL A- let- Sao *Ird ego W'aet; 4 0 Saatl sal Of AlgcrsF 17, 190E *ISO ongNy eddmsses Yo5 Warehoueg Dism leatoae+edl ./•1P3 bck W by 1- GaMml CWty Weal repesem a svry.avepv+rPm 15• us 5o S.,beundery iepq•,�e - MeeL3HxoMfM)i W-Tempts Sl- 300 W4+19 orM0rth22,2016 i%osmtn ¢o'4y47*r fit •54rypw M.y 15. Q80 SAON- V* Ho05he ad t Ze6 Wasektr 3 pd-p 1�89de ogpw ss y+w Cmd-es Fi-gO Wrp.rge.pewaeaemat 49'41E1Tr �' Hid Nlusawa&Ubh _ .. .�1 T, I'SSS7•V1 198 -7pp9 4tl Margin/ p4Qnw or Mlsavc P6tac 1-9, h S* LWW City, 7YIro+ PI Via° Ynepe om mmefM Lat@Wn NWghbwh-d Re+ryb 8eunded by Ave. r1oVelnber 8.2W7 (840$side i840 Sam] to z1a a[ Wterona L s/,'eap i-'W SettN. a1W Y56trasl MA, kt Bislia mh,nglq- elery.rge.gvn'AeaaDn i'�E26t 10 a1MPo3,f10( lmd ) 18W East 4C4a•4M ltr•w4 DeMbai 13,1983 956 E. Lagen na l-hemuz Yan.y t•Iw" :a1MW�vy Ave. .cWxno,,yylaaeallal W-Tim Pe.WcnW4nn ./ aaAt18wA1699c11i W-51'1e'W Oiobw 1S, 1N6 6$-U E. 3Wh eta 81.1t m YN' gr (MxAa m m"ft ➢ Tempra SL DD V C-0ex ylerYrvppu'.Wrdoet ¢PW't1Tt nn .(n l ,: cca�� 11 LY 11 eNfd8�050aa�11 m`5s, f4embN 22, 7970 563-NeIn 3L x2r Z.C.MA Cast Iron Front IrmOCpe;E 1Ayq DOwYaalYn i1.53E4w Pecan[ rr' 26. 2005 230 5- No 2CMI General Warelnuse trv,5p91.1&ionwe +pg WWeef eNxw*7a'rnm•[la 404618'N Cm+oel atyWpse aeTn MW i45711 11e'e41M Former listings July 9, 2020 rseeerlpeen Nwpart of the rawde Bribe City Creek Center. N 4ra+3112D rl W R,,NW ,9 HkloAc PNeef leMg� . S.A Ly Ay- Wko� Nm1w e1L 111a IM.p. Om Irarad D.W--d LOC91*0 Netftbort-W S,rrrprNry H.ps1.r } Amus '. J dry Jum 3,1976 ApN 17. 19W 02S. W.I. [;Gwnlcwn i.NaOsdD+) 3C DadcY-`d in 1975 nnc.+ e n was a Yargmmem May 14, 1971 W, ,29, 1975 732 AWAM e�w NaL relora[ea FarmA-,15e M IODW54 Ara, 10 Ms rY 1I1e Pis- Her6age Perk Lar9efY Aem&kU 7 Brooke AJdtl k A guee 17, 1W July3,2M4 sotBL 9 f0'.W N pd. ar 11'33'1r'W 21?01 AII A Bidding al U-981Neef ALgLrbl i7, F9t12 sww"14er 3, 2000 592-gaw. C We CItY WOW 2W Swru f.aaeoil3q 200 so1ffi Pe .fr 360s, umrersity e Carlsrn HA{rrsal.+laJ Apt 12, 199e .funs 15, 201$ $I. unl,mraly S�- Aa'Asa 1'p a:mnuy 111'bt�l'W CoDege of Lew a CWytul ,lucre 11, 1952 OaC'em6m 28. 199a 214 S. Po1'.n0aM1 Buicin9 I.�b Im) ^Crifa SL 7 Ca.muam 38p v"w 29, 1976 Ap iI 17, 1868 $a $. Ms.17nwnwa Ouldelg L•C5 IW ) at s Ferry Rai OMO. 13, low Marta S. 1968 $11Ber11pryge I3oo Ea C+ itff 1DAo E. 6 UwLber Y ]Ldy 11, 2oD3 [.eCLe N6 lLVLe 15, 2015 2100 4^ AM13, c p H10 O-Ift 111151'd3Vf 123 $ to Hovel Rlhcve e'ra '•3� August 17, %R2 J&Wmy 17. 2017 V" Tmmla sL Donnlawvt raaxg101 Ad Ma ba'issa, r -05 Firm Warn FeheLwry r5, 199fi EDS. am Cafih-a1 at, 'mebngrlauge .Ibe�) iatluien Van Z , 1= Srma9e JLdy 11, 2dbd FatlPi./y i1' 2p07 124o E auger Hausa Cn'=Q BWdiag MWODDe3'+i 2100 $auln 13 Alaerlsmim July 7, 59$3 rK ba,2& 1994 3199-200 oavnlvpn Hausa 0A'-07IM ww 169 Regent 14 Deowlbw 11.] 9Q Fpi r r I.lost" Al .s`+s'rr Down+awn If 7" GYm2ff N-WWfae?�e•or iCeorlc Places W..U� m WL L O',-iv�k�.�q.:, Hama cn PI q10 Inrape DAt. IW" Da1.r.mor.d Lac — K-Nhbarhovd summ.ry H.91m. Teshnlca) s3 Hlgh Sd an Feb—19, t9M �3AI k1a]' 15, 2001 241 N. 300 w.st HJI ui a sarilgc 18 Aw Tn I co v-y wisi' 2p. le7z Woow6w) Daa a, lsei 239 $- u.le$L DmvN— Bolding No Iwger +Jfae $70w. 100 mm; vwH Smar 17 $laughter cun[rany AupW l7, 1932 Jerre is, 2o13 som L'erWOl Y!a!1 � Abrehpyee IYBWWT19) 40'aeW'H fif'&IDSW Arars. lfalld. pry A -pedy See also • List of National Hlstwic Landmarks in utah • Nationai Register of Msloric Places lls5nes Jn Ugh Aleferenms 1, the WILL IdJ - ansl 1pngIlude lnrarni alp n Af6wC100 in IiIn "National Register Informallon Sy51am" (wips:flopgali lade waL derived orVi-mily ftML the N:.rlorral ery.nps•GOV)NRHP). wibllal Reaghater orh6.storlc RDg-wrer Ird(rfinetion SystorR. which nag been fn,tlul Places. National Park Sumice. April N 2piiL. fa to 12rr1y e<;aA kc for abmtl 99%of Itslinga, Scn.' Hi hl-(fi it n:rl•-�hL•r I,:- ' . g NUN each daf9 % kilt, IDCHtr0115 rR iM1IS tablit 111ay I1iVE h COmedf2d TU ,rr•1bei 2ssq led 1ri cosh ralten 1n Il* Nodonal currant GPS Simnanrile- ROq Warklfafineltcn $yBpem cialab&%. whw h r 11 :,v �'Nationat R091sigr of Hiebft Places' Weekly Lie 1rF ,w by C"ng the tarnrller Actions'{nkps:Ilwwve.nps,9DvleuhjeGWnatlonalreyisi0 i;. glezyr}1ira�ky, harp; (ceplembcr 19, 2002.1.'Nalional rlwee"ist. htm). "le tienai Perk S••r;i�=r!. Unked ROOT" of HMx1c Places Np frlOVan, Sa11 Lake CIty $19tus Department of the IndWfier Rel`4 Uj 01) Iklrtl East Side Hjgtprlc Dls&icV (hppslenpgayery.nps.go 1 3•`(=I NRHPIGetAm3@VNRMP102 -J739 text] :.. . S Numt,r ryrasant an orde"n9 JrY's+9nlhcant vrwlds. iiaf •-., ,.. - ... . Variai is a kl gs, 7Wimed . JiffaronfiaW %oflorlal ",)I - HisKuiCand lllttaficdl bkft frorl-•Ir,:;, 1. hUpAv ,sEcdac .cam'Pr2rninrgiH LCd20 J 4ff3wok5-PC MRHP bmldrnq!5. Atn>pw-r . 9ide5 or objwl - RealM,ed fiorn Td1ps'clan.111tlpedki.pr�LL,y,p.k,pgY clrolwlbrLa_L�ey� �k Galinga_In_s�ri I�xe_ciryaawld=yrisuatazl- This m9• waa ket edIi ar In Ha..nde.r 201%.1 M3= fuTC). feat —Wd, ft Vy ff VIWIrvO P]Ir 5AIUO.1mn3n—A,kelj�- PT61~mK4 0, -Ml ,Mse,ls, year Goren 4rlM lb —'A tJsa� Pry ry PdJq, WWIDII� ix T regis Pre6 Md-7141t, M InatAAIW r4W F9y.yldIl ,, Ia d omnn o ge utcLn e 2wN PLNPCM2020-00106 44 July 9, 2020 WILLIAM F. BEER ESTATE CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION PROJECT Submitted by: Stephen C. Pace (owner) 181 B Street, SLC UT, 84103 Step hencpaceoua I u Ri. m it.ed u 881 363 8190 This document is submitted on May 2, 2019 for formal consideration by SLC planning staff and the Historic Landmarks Commission. It builds upon a proposal originally informally submitted on March 15, 2019 and discussed with staff on March 21, 2019. It consists of *** The PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (pages 1-31 ) provides for an exact restoration of the 1899 Kletting Carriage House and liveryman quarters in its historic footprint using building materials that survive on site. It leaves the Landmark 1867 "Harness Shop House" that Pace restored almost 40 years ago intact at the northern extreme of the 222 4th Avenue lot and completes the restoration of the four building Beer Estate. Please note that the applicant would prefer and support an alternative that would allow the exact restoration of the Carriage House I will welcome a Landmarks hearing on this matter. I resp ctufully await the municipality's decision. ace PLNPCM2020-00106 45 July 9, 2020 WILLIAM F. BEER ESTATE CARRIAGE HOUSE RESTORATION PROJECT [Location: 222 4"' Avenue, current zoning RMF 35. Site size: 224th lot C. 8400 feet; adjoining 181 B Street Lot c. 6300 feet.) Stephen C. Pace, Owner 901-363-8190 March 15, 2019 Introduction/Chronoiogy of Events 1. br. William F. Beer, MQ, (Salt lake City's "Gentile" 0B/GYN) assembled the property in the late 1890s, and retained architect Richard K. A. Kletting to design a residential compound. Construction corn pleted in 1899. The estate consisted of four (4) buildings, three (3) of them residential: ■ 181 B Street Mansion. Housed Beer family and one house servant. ■ 181 B Street Workshop. Extensively rehabbed by Pace, 2004. • 222 4"' Avenue "Harness Shop House." An 1867 firebrick commercial shop (rehabbed in 1899 to a residence with three (3) very small bedrooms), a Was said by Beer Family to be occupied by defrocked physician who served as the "town abortionist," a Extensively remodeled by Pace in 1930-82 into a one -bedroom house. ■ 222 4F`' Avenue Carriage House. Firebrick -arid -frame structure built in 1899 to house livery and vehicles, feed, and provide housing for Beer's liveryman and spouse (who was also a Beer house servant). With the coming of automobiles, the north facade was removed and the building was used for garage and storage space. 2. Summer 1975. William F, Beer, Jr., died while a resident of the mansion. Pace negotiated a private sale with the Beer Family heirs for the entire estate and took residence there in April 1976. 3. June 1977. The four (4) structures on the two (2) lots were nominated by the state of Utah to the National Register of Historic Places. Pace was notified that the buildings were placed on the Register in December 1977 (Code 77001306), Apparently contemporaneously, the buildings were also automatically individually placed on City and State registers, but no notice was given. 4. Ja n u a ry 1_979. Salt Lake City changed zoning code to "faster, enhance, and preserve" historic structures in the "Lower West Avenues Neighborhood," specifically citing "a number of structures within the neighborhood that have individually been placed on federal, state, or city historical PLNPCM2020-00106 46 July 9, 2020 �� registers." Pare researched this citation and determined that the only neighborhood structures s❑ designated were the four Beer Estate buildings. 5. 1977 > forward., On -going preservation/rehab/improvements at 181 B Street mansion. 157 1; Rehab of 222 4sh 9MAvenue "Harness Shop House." Awarded Utah Heritage Foundation "Award of Merit," 1982. 2004: Rehab of 181 B Street Workshop into Kletting-style garage/workshop. (Pictured as an exemplar in the Saft Lake City Part l! design Guidelines 9.4 of how "accessory building should be constructed to be compatible with primary structures" ... "designed to complement the house.") 1984, 1995, 2004, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018: Pace or representatives approach Salt Lake City Ptanning to discuss rehab of Carriage House into a Kletting-Chemed dwelling unit, identical to what was built there in 1899. Responses that were uniformly given —along with a profusion of sympathy —that this would not be possible, along with statements that "zoning laws could change in the future." 6. 2019—Current Situation: As measured by the ratio of percentage of property built upon, the ratio of assessed building value to assessed property value, the ratio of dwelling units or bedrooms per acre, the assessed value of the building, and the square footage of the building, the 222 41h Avenue roperty re presents Derha ps the least sensible use of land in the entire Avenues area. The only suggested options by SLC Pia nning to add residential space to the lot —either "overbuilding" the 550' footprint of the Pioneer -era Harness Shop House, by having it devoured by a modern structure or by connecting the Harness Shop to another structure with a glass tube to a separate building — either of which would unquestionably destroy the historical integrity of the site. The aptions would also leave the 5000-or-so square feet at the south end of the lot, now occupied by the remains of the Carriage House, as economically useless open space, largely hidden from view, in an otherwise fully inhabited part of the city. My request, therefore, is that the city approve this project for a Certificate of Appropriateness that allows me to complete the meticulous restoration of the Beer Estate that I have been engaged with for many years, and permits me to rehab the Carriage House to its 1899 appearance. I further request that any revisions to this proposal be delegated to staff for subsequent review and approval. PLNPCM2020-00106 47 July 9, 2020 . _ PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE CONTENTS A. 1905 PHOTO of the property showing the 1899 structure proposed for rebuiid/repIicatian. PANORAMA (from Prospect Hill Tower, near 61h Avenue and A Street). DETAIL of 222 4`h Avenue "Harness Shop House" in foreground, Kletting Carriage House in rear. R. 2017 SITE SURVEY showing the current footprints of both surviving buildings, surrounding structures, and ground elevations (which are unchanged from 1899.) C. 1911 SANBORN ARE MAP showing (per the LISPS) that both structures had street addresses and thus were likely residences with mail service. Note that the shed roofed structure on the west side of the Carriage House extended well south of the main brick building to near the property line. D. 1977 and CURRENT PERIOD PHOTOS showing the pre -renovation condition of the structures on the 222 lot in the context of the neighborhood and the post -rehab condition of the 181 6 garage and the 222 Harness Shop House. E. ELEVATION DRAWINGS, FLOOR PLANS, AND DIMENSIONS of the proposed restored Carriage House. For the portion of the structure that is obscured by the Harness Shop House in the 1905 photo and that was removed in the c. WWI remodeling, we have patterned the restoration drawings on the front entrance of the Albert Fisher Carriage House that survives near the Jordan River and was designed by the same architect (Kletting) in 1893 at a similar size and using similar materials (see attached). A photograph of the 181 6 Street Garage on the adjoining part of the estate shows the design continuity of the Carriage House proposal with the previous restoration work about 75 feet away, APPROXIMATE BRICK INVENTORY. We plan to reuse the existing Carriage House Frick walls (pending engineering approval) or dismantle and clean the bricks to be re-laid on new foundations for the restored structure. A schedule shows that the salvageable bricks onsite are sufficient to rebuild the walls. G. S€TE PLAN proposing, as was the case historically, that a Carriage House driveway run to 4`" Avenue. The plan adds 2 off-street, out -of -driveway uncovered parking stalls (largely out of view of the street) and one garage stall in the location where carriages were historically parked in the Carriage House. I propose razing the one -bedroom "Harness Shop" house and replacing it with xeriscaping and low -water -use foliage. H. NARRATIVE/RATiONALE for project POST DEMOLITION SITE PLAN PLNPCM2020-00106 48 July 9, 2020 r 4 - - _ .���M /-�� '-• � 'JAM:.: �°�•-� '.. .`wry l�"•1�,.. _` �.r Nam' .� � .. �s' M � b. -tom r .r a a .. .. :. 14 -� ` err � �� �•:. �_L- ���•! :�-x .?* Awl.: yid'. � {• �Y .•,�, -•ice. ��• �r:'� .'� R^� •" c =,-: :R.. Yam, ., � .�. _ A' .mow ��... .. � :^.l� - •. - B 2017 SITE SURVEY OURTH AVENUE EAST 49.50' -� ` EAST 115.50 �! - F-- I qg-3F..-338-Uda a t: PACE. StEPNEv t - ro a a.• •a w ' } d 9.rB7 9Q. FT, 2 ,. Y a tl==Y z 0.87'ACRES _ NORTH I SN; �' �.R SOUTH f_.`�.- • ,- 54 75• h - PARCEL i 39-31--33L "6 PACE. STCP�iEN I I• .' �• k 4,-4. 5+3.75• ' - OJ 4S ACRES- ui F •.. T 1 5. ry p :� W W U} C PLNPCM2020-00106 51 July 9, 2020 P C 1911 SANBORN FIRE MAP 7T A.w m -o ft mom o, 9 4 90 s+ttft+ 1 -62 z R/ I")/ iky "W/ ZJ Oe -A �o ;111 iL 41. F, 7j nJ x Ut PLNPCM2020-00106 52 July 9, 2020 SAIT LAKI: COvNTY D ' 977 and CURRENT PHOT+ W - all&o �EL Y ' AMA to Results mow — Zoom Clear Graphic Export Results 3 - Oa Y _ -A -2 .:k Z.! #%., Ave PLNPCM2020-00106 53 July 9, 2020 9 4� 1. PLNPCM2020-00106 54 f July 9, 2020 1 W's PLNPCM2020-00106 4.1 �.. ti .. 774 NPCM2 r � 1 1 11 1• 571 1 kpk °� !tL 41 PLNPCM2020-00106 59 July 9, 2020 /9 E ELEVATION DRAWINGS, FLOOR PLANS, AND DIMENSIONS --- ''4 3-D Digital Rendering of 1905 Photo Per GPS, the camera used to take the 1905 photo was located 1,110 feet away from the NW corner of the Carriage House and 154 feet in elevation above it. Based on surviving walls and the Sanborn maps, the Carriage House was a square building; - feet on a side. The top course of bricks and the apex of the roof eave was 10 feet above grade. The 1899 grade is assumed to be a surviving concrete Boor and drain system on the NW corner of the building. The factors listed above remove all degrees of freedom in the basic shape of the building. When input to CAD software, the basic building essentially draws itself. PLNPCM2020-00106 60 July 9, 2020 albeit fisher carriage house Sig„ Out T vt vc' S M L ^.D Photo GiF Face Portrait Ciipart Line Drawing Modern photograph of 5LC-owned Albert Fisher Carriage House, a similarly configured structure designed by Kletting in 1893, We propose to design the north elevation of the Beer Carriage House based on the first floor facade shown in this photo. PLNPCM2020-00106 61 July 9, 2020 HA$S UTAH.I 8-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 4 of 9) -Albert Fisher Carriage Hous... Page I of l Library of Congress Prints & Photographs online Catalog . � ,i . ,..., _ir-�r,ianH l�i[;1 ii+ir✓U�r-i _-ens<, r,,,,urw-: . r SearcTr Lut,noU bibs oc ouhic to wma:ion HAB5 UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 4 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Secornd South Street, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT • OigiMl ID: (None) hhti ut0042.sheet_00000 hRp;{/hdi.Loc.gvv/lac.pnp/hhhL;t0442/sheet.00004a • Reprodudion NumhEr F+,4$S UTAli, 1 B-SALCI, i 4A- (sheet 4 of 9) Repository: Libndry of tw9ress Prints and Photographs DivisFar• Washington, D.C. 205,10 USA t.tt<o�{,vhtll.lee.goufio[.pnp/pp.pr.ri About Mac stem REG (IaWl I EEQIZIW 17FFF f126k4S CI fh -n G Vi ;u ;K m ­� n -, • _CD CD (ID IOU - C ill !i iA {D 0 {p � � � +� � O � Q w im ,_� O ti = m O' tb ID tip cu O U3 Q. C m 3 rr aa���yq om - rt r -nr3 Cw 1g q w C v+ 4 tflw 0 CD M a+ m 3 a0 _03o.o � co :34.�ouai=sor- e3 oO EDO�,m 0..SC'C 7i a D 4neQ 0d: 7 a zu CD z M L g 0 (D 3=v`romm°nm»°°w ,c L iv o csQ ho = CD O�00 5•nNso0 r°7isu m;'�0=r w Nm�aih7 3 vv '_0w3 m (Dm iu w dCL� IS 0 C a rn m PLNPCM2020-00106 62 July 9, 2020 NABS UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 5 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Second South Street, Salt Lake City, Sa... Page 2 of 2 Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Online Catalog 1 K R A KY 1 ] I ASK A LIBRARIAN DI GMAL C.OLLECTrms LIBRARY CATALOGS yea _r. Search Loc.gov (,A)'NAI R I SS HAGS UTAH,18-SALCI,14A- (sheet 5 of 9) - Albert Fisher Carriage House, 1206 West Second South Street, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT • Digital 1D: (None) hhh u:0042.sheet.00005a iittp://hcl.loc,govfloc.pnp/hhh.vt0042/sheet-00005a • Reproduction Nwnber: HAGS UTAH,18-SALCI,I4A- (sheet 5 of 9) • Repository: Library of Congress Pdrts and Photographs Division Washington, O.C. 20540 USA http;J{hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print About This Itern JPEG (39kb) I JPEG i81kb1 I TIFF (478kb) 4 rw C"wATM -.._-.-...--..- ----- P&SEet FRMUN sou I+eux PLNPCM2020-00106 ht4)://,w�w.loc.gov/pictures/itenVut0042.sh... 63 July 9 2020 June � , 2015 Proposed north elevation of the Seer Carriage House using "bootstrap" design. t� PLNPCM2020-00106 64 July 9, 2020 17 14 I Al, dr Photograph of restored 181 B Street works hoplgarage, located adjacent t❑ the 222 Carriage House (To show design continuity.) PLNPCM2020-00106 66 July 9, 2020- m FIRST FLOOR PLAN 118" 15'-4" 10'-23W 5'-1 7-01 12'-W 2'-V Y-r 0 open to skylights abovi up- r►; I 44-W IIII 1 II 35-M 1^ New retaining wail PLNPCM2020-00106 67 July 9,2 � FLOOR FLAN AT LOFT 118" PLNPCM2020-00106 68 July 9, 2Z.3 ROOF PLAN 118" mm - Masonry Chimney PLNPCM2020-00106 69 July 9, 2020 New brick wail to match existing brick NORTH ELEVATION Roof 4502' - S" -,'Fiber cement siding First Floor Foeundation 4489' - 9" PLNPCM2020-00106 70 July 9, 20202S East Elevation f' Shed structure — -.- - == beyond ting "``` Alew brick wall r Exis— Ra0'f 4502' - B" �-1 match =1 Sandstone == existing -- .:_' _ - First Floor 449I' - 0„ Foundation AU� 4489' - 9" 41 PLNPCM2020-00106 71 July 9, 202 r WEST ELEVATION 118" Igo _ Shed roof Roof A--� — — — — -- — — - 4502' - 6"� — — i Fiber cement siding New retaining waif Floor .,449 �' 0" - Foundations 4489' - W' U PLNPCM2020-00106 72 July 9, 202M SOUTH ELEVATION 1/81, RPPLAI�� 4562'- 6" First Floor mL� 4491'- 0" '-W Foundation 4489'- 9" PLNPCM2020-00106 73 July 9, 202;2 Pi F APPROXIMATE BRICK INVENTORY The firebricks used to originally construct the Carriage House in 1899, have apparently remained on site ever since. When the structure was modified c. WWI for automobile use, the bricks on the northeast and northwest walls of the square 1899 structure were cleaned and relayed to create shed walls on the southeast and the far southwest sides of the remodeled building. The 1899 chimneys were probably used similarly. This recycling approach can be established by close examination of existing bricks and mortar lines. Our proposal is to clean and "re -re -cycle" these bricks for the rehabilitation of the Carriage House. Approx. square feet of brick needed for WALL REBUILDING: North 140' East 170' South None West 96' Total 406' Approx. square feet of otherwise UNNEEDED BRICKS AVAILABLE ON SITE: North None East 51' South None Far West 221' Interior 170' Total 442' Other recycling notes: Available on site are several thousand running feet of historically dimensioned 2x4, 2x6, and 2x8 structural lumber. Most of this has been covered and out of the elements for the past century. We will reclaim and re -use this as necessary for the project. All barn doors, pedestrian doors, and widows are too deteriorated for re -use and will be replaced. PLNPCM2020-00106 74 July 9, 2020 . a G SITE PLAN FOURTH A I I I E7TAMEG = HOUSE � _n I I I I 2 I a � E]CISTIHG I i GARAGEEMSTING L i W 3 BEER 9EFF v' . ao $ MANSION � � 1 Repair exdsgng i fences - typical Where _ ocwrs Pali 1 7] Parking SITE PLAN f p Renovated Shed 1 Garage Retto'rated Caniage House Mruo� oa 88.50' Fiecansft r: concrete retaining PLNPCM2020-00106 75 July 9, 2020 30 H NARRATIVEIRATIONALE Please note that 1 have no interest in any construction on the site except for a full rehab. Any discussion of alternatives to a complete rehab to the 1899 appearance, e.g., a garage, an artist studio, a tiny ADU, or a "community vegetable patch," etc., are a waste of my time and resources and are not something I would want in my backyard. Some reasons why it might be in the City's interest to allow the project to proceed might include: 1. A demonstration of the City's commitment to the actual preservation of historic structures. could provide the City with an almost exact and meticulous restoration of a building that the City has long recognized as historically significant, largely making use of the historic building materials that survive on the site. (I note, with a little amusement, that three pictures of my properties are used as exemplars in the City's published "Design Guidelines.") I don't think the quality of the work we have done so far on the Beer Estate can be seriously questioned, 2. The p romotion of in -fill housin g. The 222 01 Avenue property represents what is apparently the largest and least densely used piece of level residential ground in close proximity to the CBD. There is currently a one -bedroom structure on a property of almost 8500 square feet. There seems to be n❑ reasonable economic use for c. two-thirds of the lot occupied by the Carriage House remains, other than its original one as housing. The Carriage House footprint is neighbored by garages and a parking lot that is approximately fifteen -feet below grade, so no one's view or enjoyment of backyard space would be compromised by rehab. My proposal would increase housing availability back to its 1899 level at no cost to the neighborhood. 3. No im act on neighborhood i2arking or congestion. My proposal would add a net of two or potentially three parking spaces located at a minimum of 70-feet off of 4"' Avenue and largely invisible from the street. 4. To demonstrate a "no surprise" neigh borhood-suorted develp ment. As one example, the City has damaged its credibility through its homeless shelter siting process —in large part because of the City's failure to "sell" the prospect of moving large populations perceived as alien into neighborhoods and in part because of fear of the impact of the City's intentions on local property values. I have heard exactly the opposite in my neighborhood regarding the Carriage House. People have told me they would welcome some investment in the mid -block area and would view it as a barrier to the crowding that would inevitably come from more multi -unit housing. This was, not coincidentally, exactly the same rationale used by the City Commission in its 1979 zoning changes and professions of the need to protect the historic buildings in the same area. Stephen C. Pace 801-353-8190 PLNPCM2020-00106 76 July 9, 20203 1 ATTACHMENT D: ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES The applicant provided the following list of eligible properties: 1. Fisher Mansion and Carriage House (1206 W. 200 S.) 2. Kearns Mansion (603 E. South Temple) 3. Keith Mansion (529 E. South Temple) 4. William F. Beer Estate (222 4th Avenue) 5. McIntyre House (259 7th Avenue) The following attachments include the applicable nominations and photographs. PLNPCM2020-00106 77 July 9, 2020 Form No.10-300 lRe� ti01p 4DV ! 1✓2-1 `1 DATA �q ETUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE I=OT1[?5 R3L NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC l WILLIAM F. BEER 'ESTATE AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET& NUMBER 181 B Street/222 4th Avenue _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Salt Lake City —VICINITY OF 02 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Utah n49 Salt Lake 035 IMCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT _PUBLIC X OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE -_MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) XPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED XCOMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH X WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT .—SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Stephen C. Pace/M. E. Sloan STREET & NUMBER 181 B Street CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City VICINITY OF Utah LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS;ETC. Salt Lake County Recorders Office STREET & NUMBER Salt Lake City and County Building CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE Utah Historic Sites Survey July 16, 1975 —FEDERAL X-STATE _COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Utah State Historical Society CI STATE JUIy Salt Lake City Utah a DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT (2&3) X_DETERIORATED _UNALTERED XORIGINALSITE (1)XGOOD -RUINS X_ALTERED -MOVED DATE (4)-XFAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Property consists of four structures on adjoining lots in the "Avenues" proposed historic district of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. 181 B Street, Main House is a 26 room, four level, sandstone and brick residence built in 1898 1899. Structural integrity is excellent due to extensive foundation engineering. Original architectural package --including floor/utility plans, cut -away views, and exterior sketches --is in the possession of the current owners. Exterior details include: a. Complex roof geometry --consisting of 45 plus roof planes, multiple dormers, metal ornamentation, and a "fish scale" dome atop a curved sandstone turret. b. Exterior metal detailing includes "sun burst" designs on each of four chimneys (thought to be unique in area), "barber pole" downspouts and ornamentation, filagree chimney supports, etc. c. A large sandstone medallion set in chimney with the legend (1899) carved in relief. d. Extensior glasswork including twelve mostly large panes of colored/etched leaded artglass (including one curved pane and two 4' x 8' leaded, colored skylights originally from the Hotel Utah, Salt Lake City, built 1911.) Much additional artglass was planned in architect sketches but is not now present. Ten clear -glass windows have geometric detailing. e. Sandstone block wall and steps fronting B Street. Significant exterior changes include: a. Most woodwork --carved porch railings, balusters, etc. have been removed (redwood pilars supporting front porch remain). b. Five small porches have been created/enclosed. 2. 181 B Street Workshop is a small (400-500 sq. ft.) frame structure in deteriorated condition. It was probably built in 1899. 3. 222 Fourth Avenue Carriage House/Livery was built in 1899 to serve the main house. Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structure with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War I, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. 4. 222 Fourth Avenue "Small" House is a two level, seven room "pioneer" structure built of firedbrick on a san stone rubble foundation. Age of the structure is uncertain but was probably built before 1880. The structure is probably one of the oldest surviving buildings in the Avenues district. The structure was used as a barn/storage facility until the early Twentieth Century when a block addition was constructed and use was converted to residential. (A mid 1890's photo at the Utah Historical Society shows non-residential use.) Exterior condition/structural integrity is fir to good. Foundation appears solid, bricks show only slight deterioration, and the second level floor supports (beams held by exterior belts and large grommets on the bricks) appear good. All woodwork and the entire interior, however, are ruined through neglect. PLNPCM2020-00106 79 July 9, 2020 SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW -PREHISTORIC-ARCH EULUGY-PREHISTORIC -COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _.RELIGION -1400-1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC -1500-1599 -AGRICULTURE -1600-1699 XARCHITECTURE _1700-1799 -ART .X1800-1899 -COMMERCE -1900- -COMMUNICATIONS SPECIFIC DATES 1898-1899 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE _CONSERVATION -ECONOMICS _EDUCATION _ENGINEERING 2 EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _INDUSTRY -INVENTION -LAW _LITERATURE -MILITARY -MUSIC -PHILOSOPHY -POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _SCIENCE -SCULPTURE -SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN -THEATER _TRANSPORTATION XOTHER (SPECIFY) (See Description 4, Ownership/Age) BUILDER/ARCHITECT Richard K. A. Kletting Richard K. A. Kletting was the architect for the William F. Beer House. He was born July 1, 1858 at Unterborhingen, Wue.ttenburg, Germany, and was one of the most influential and important architects ever to live and work in Salt Lake City. He came to America after serving in the German army for one year. Worked in the East before coming to Salt Lake where he acquired a job working for John Burton, under whom he drew plans for the old University of Utah. Later he went into business for himself. Among his best works are: Utah State Capitol Building (won a competition of 40), Bon Marche in Paris, Sacred. Coeur at Montmartre, First Salt Air Beach pavilion (1893) which boasted the world's largest unobstructed dance floor (burned in 1925), and the Old Salt Palace. Along with these works, Kletting did many commercial buildings as well as schools in the immediate Salt Lake vicinity as well as in neighboring states. Richard Kletting oepned and conducted the first school in Salt Lake to give instruction in geometry, algebra, languages and science. He cataloged the Salt Lake Public Library, and was much noted for his extensive civic as well as professional work. Kletting died in Salt Lake on September 25, 1943, near the Kletting House at the age of 75 years. Surviving him were his wife, Mary Elizabeth Saaner Kletting, and their four children; Richard, Mary, Walter, and Helen. Dr. William Francis Beer (1870-1949) was a prominent Salt Lake City physician who was also actively involved in mining. Dr. Beer was a graduate of George Washington Medical School (1892) and a charter member and honorary president of the Utah Medical Society. According to his surviving children, during the early years of the Century many international medical figures were house guests at 181 B Street. During World War I, Dr. Beer was in charge of P.O.W. medical care for German prisoners at Fort Douglas, Utah. In recognition of his efforts in bringing the prisoners through the influenza epidemic without a fatality, he was awarded the Iron Cross by Paul von-Hindenberg in the early 1930's. PLNPCM2020-00106 80 July 9, 2020 MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Salt Lake County Recorder's Office, Grantor -Grantee Inces and Engineering Division. Persons contacted (relation to Wm. F. Beer): Beverly Beer Bullock (granddaughter), 1259 East So. Temple, SLC, UT 84103; Jean R. Kirkpatrick (granddaughter) Boise Idaho; Vivian Beer DeNeuf (daughter) Bullhead City, Arizona; Kenneth Beer (son); Robert Barnes (long-time resident of home), 161 B Street, SLC. GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY less han one re. UTM REFERENCES A11,21 1412,51614,01 14,5[1r3116101 B 1LJ I I 1 I 1 y, 1 1 v l� C ZONE_ FASTING NORTHING I I I D.Z_ ONE FASTING INORiHIN 1 1 1 t ✓ERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION i W I LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE CODE COUNTY CODE STATE CODE COUNTY CODE ®FORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE Wilson G. Martin, Preservation Planner ORGANIZATION DATE Utah State Historical Society April 6, 1977 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE 603 East South Temple (801) 533-5755 CITY OR TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah ®STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER CERTIFICATION THE EVALUATED SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE STATE IS: NATIONAL_ STATE X LOCAL As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic. Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National. Park Service.. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER SIGNATURE TITIF Michael T. Miller, nATF A--; l l 7 1077 Rom_ � ���� ���� . • - -.+ • } a err Aft. PLNPCM2020-00106 �.T � ,w � 7 _ � w r � r f � i i . f 82 r July 9, 2020 tyWM.F.BEER HOUSE, Salt Lake, Ut. ' Taken by Steven Pace, Feb. i977 Negative filed at Ut.St.Hist.Soc view of east side. juN 7197 7 19r1 �C'G s'rc- PLNPCM2020-00106Oper Teltg A���.���} ti 1'. July 9, 2020 it 11 4A L 41 r. Ilk . • TY. i All r • ti may'+` �1�4 � ,�! r� �• ; * f . n ��� � 9 ; ��r7 mlwlp yyam, � .�. •� J ' -[ ��` ���� ` ly� �� �� ��� �1 C-0 + . ' �! . F . I; et �;`� r ram, �i a r`+. A�•y : k VAN `Sr '� tit ���YY ♦Fx�j� ,r �1 � � . 1 , PLNP020-00106�- ( WM.F.BEER i, Salt Lake, Ut. Taken by S. Pace, 2/77 d a Negative file t Ut.St.His.Sac. View of southeast side. JUN 7 197" DEC 6 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 1171 ni Y�[� July 9, 2020 ? `1 y yi r v •:- �r � PLNPCM2020-00106 f �rr 40 i 4 fo Vf '. a 1 WM. F.BEER HOUSF , Salt Lake, Utah 1) � 1977 Taken by W.G.Mart mn Ap Negative at Ut.St.Hist.Society View of south side of "Small„ House. JUN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 87 !A-4p ) Df THE ��18NA 01 U WM.F.BEER HOUSE, Salt Lake, Ut. Taken by W.G.Maxtin, Apr. 1977 Negative at Ut.St.Hist.Society View of east side of "Small„ House. SIJN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 ►a 89 p'.►0'Pf�n OF iNE NAW4AzU�;S tin>Salt Lake, (fit- WK.F.BEEP, i�� Apr. 1977 Taken by W.G.Max:Y' Negative at ut.st.Hist.society ide of View of north.iL� 1977 ave house/livery. PLNPCM2020-00106 FUMY OF THE NATION R� ►1 or AIM OIL. WM.F.BEER HQUSE,Salt Lake, Ut. OLC B Taken by W.G.Martin, Apr. 1977 Negative filed at Ut.St.Hist.Soc View looking southeast at corner of workshop. U UN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 r PNIGPERT' OF THE HAPOMOREGISTF# IJt 141M. F . BEER �E f Salt Lake, 7Ih Taken by W•G.Martin, Apr. ty Negative filed � s�deSt carriage View of n house/ livery - ,SUN 7 1977 PLNPCM2020-00106 7a 4"Wr�ITY OF In& 6, NAY CEM,7TER lk i �le "Monk ..... ..... ow 1. � WM. F . BEER HOUM, Salt Lake, Ut . DEC $ 177 Taken by W.G.Martin, Apr. 1977 Negative filed Ut.St.Hist.Soc. View of east side of workshy . ; 'er iUN E 1977� PLNPCM2020 00106 97 Gi 9, {'r-a1) ;;' United States Department of the Interior E 112 1 —6 1194 National Park Service For Nt�s i pit National Register of Historic Places received Inventory ---Nomination Form dateentere� See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms ""'�`�"'#��' Type all entries —complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Fisher, Albert, Mansion and Carriage House and/or common 2. Location street & number 1206 West 200 South —not for publication city, town Salt Lake City _ vicinity of state Utah code 049 county Salt Lake code 035 3. Classification Category Ownership status Present Us* district — public X occupied agriculture museums X building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure — both —work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible ____ entertainment religious object VT/,a in process yes' restric.10 — government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted — industrial transportation no _ military X other- home for mcn 4. Owner of (Property name Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake Cit street & number 331 East South Temple cit/, town Salt Lake City " vicinity of state Utab 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Salt Lake City and County Building street & number 400 South State Street coy, town Salt Lake City state Utah Representation in Existing Surveys Hist:oxic American Buildings Survey title nophas this property been determined eligible? — yes no date lggg X federal —state —county —local depository for survey records Utah Heritage Foundation PLNPCM2020-00106 98 July 9, 2020 city, tovm Salt Take City state Utah 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent — deteriorated _— unaltered X original site good — ruins X altered — moved date fair __ unexposed Deacrib* the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Albert Fisher Mansion is a two-and-one-nalf story brick and stone house designed in the Victorian Eclectic style. Its large scale, integrity, and overall stylistic and decorative qualities make it one of the best examples in the city of the more elaborate Victorian Eclectic residences that were built in the late 188Os and 189Os. The house, designed by architect Richard Kletti ng, is located on a large, one -acre parcel of land bordering the Jordan River. Behind the house is a two-story brick carriage house, also designed by Kletti ng, which imitates the styling of the house. The facade and other elevations of the house, though asymmetrically composed, incorporate symmetry in the alignment of first and second story openings. The massing of the house itself hints at symmetry with its block -like shape, centered dormer window and curved two-story bays at the front corners,, which, though different, balance the facade... The bay on the east half of the facade forms a ci rcular .corner,tower, wi th a 1 ow -pi tched conical. roof, while the bay on the west.half is confined to the front wall surface, leaving the square corner intact. GI as s i n the A ndows of the curved bays i s al so curved. The house features a wealth of Victorian design elements, although the low-pitched hipped roof with wide eaves is atypical of Victorian architecture in Utah, except in the Ital i anate style. The wide eaves follow the contour of the various bays and are decorated with long, thin modi l l i ons with notched ends. The broad, stamped metal frieze beneath the eaves is highlighted with elaborate cast foliation above each of the projecting bays. Hip -roofed donners on the front and west side roof pitches have flared cheeks sided in wood shingles and simple modi lli ons on the eaves. The large projecting corner porch curves around the southeast corner of the facade, reinforcing the lines of the semici rcul ar'bay at that corner. The porch features squared, rough -faced sandstone columns, smooth sandstone railing and balusters, notched -end moth ill ons on the eaves, and round -arched openings between the columns formed by spindle brackets connected by a semicircular frame. The sandstone porch base has gently arched openings which provide ventilation under the porch. Sandstone is also used in the retaining wall in front of the house, in the wide front sidewalk, and in the railing wall framing the steps. The brick exterior walls are accented by the use of rough -faced sandstone in the wide belt courses girding the house at the lintel level of both first and second story openings, and in the narrower window sills. Smoothed and rounded sandstone cal onette s form the mullions of the three-part windows in the curved bay on the west half of the facade. These mullions are decoratively carved on their upper portions which coincide with the transoms above each window. Transoms are -located above each door and window, on.the house, and elaborate leaded -glass transoms are used above the first -story windows of the rounded corner nay. Transrhn bars are made of smooth, square -cornered sandstone. Gut, rough -faced sandstone forms the foundation of the house. Other important . features of the house include the two-story, three -sided bay on the" east si de with overlapping brick at the corners, four corbeled chimneys, the sandstone plaque bearing Albert Fisher's initials on the upper facade, and a similar plaque on the west facade bearing the construction date of the house, "1393." PLNPCM2020-00106 99 July 9, 2020 NPS Farm %D-900•a 018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use dn, :.; National Register of Historic Places Inventory --Nomination Form rfateentered:{: Continuation sheet 3 Item number 8 Page 3 for a desired aesthetic ettect. In the vernacular tradition, Eclecticism surfaces as the inventive decorative treatment found on the eaves, openings, and porches of a standardized set of house plans. On larger, more prestigious dwellings, the Eclectic architect fashioned a unique design by juxtaposing and bl endi ng various ideas from competing historical styles. Kletti ng' s Fisher Mans? on is Electicism at perhaps its best, with the architect here successfully employing a wide range of stylistic elements. The rectilinear massing of the house suggests the resurgent symmetry of the Box Style, a design scheme which is betrayed by the subdued tower and projecting bay on the facade. These features harken back to the Queen Anne, as does the sweeping wrap -around porch. The stylized classicalism of the cornice and modi l l i on s is played off against the stamped metal freize foliation, Eastlake porch spindling, and the heavy, almost Romanesque, rusticated parch posts and balustrade. The competing elements provide the Fisher Mansion design with an internal tension which allows the various styles to work together here as a functioning whole. PLNPCM2020-00106 100 July 9, 2020 Flr;; '- m 1(�9011a f -e 31 n United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory —Nomination Form Continuation sheet L Item number 8 For NP date enieFed Page Sweden, May 17, 1861 to Andreas S. and 01 i vi a Youngberg. Mrs. Fisher, too, was active in business affairs, particularly real estate, as owner of Alma Fisher Properties, holders of much real estate in Salt Lake City. Five chi 1 dre n were born to Albert and Alma: Alice Edwina (1882) , Frank Alma (1885) , Otto Albert (1888) , Albert Bernhart (1895) , and Carl Alvin (1897) . The Fishers lived in this house after the time it was built until their deaths. Albert died on June 28, 1917 in Hot Lake, Oregon, where he had gone for treatment of his rheumatism. His funeral was held at the family home in Salt Lake City. Alma Fisher continued to live in this house after her husband' s death, and beginning around 1918 her daughter and son-in-law, Alice E. and Frederic B. Davidson, moved in with her. Alma died on May 2[, 1940 in this house. The Davi dsons continued to live there until 1944, then moved into an apartment at 63 S. 400 East. Frederic Davidson was a druggist. After Alma's death, title to the property was transferred to Alice Fisher Davidson, who retained it until 1973, when she sold the house to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City. The Catholic Church had apparently been leasing the property since 1945, operating the house under the name of Our Lady Queen of Peace Covenant and Our Lady of Victory Missionary Sisters. In 1970 the house became 5t. Mary's Home, a hone for single men, which it has continued to be to the present. Richard K. A. K1 etti ng, architect of this house and carriage house, was probably the most prominent architect in Utah' s history. Born in Germany in 1855, he received architectural and engineering training and experience in both Germany and France Detare coming to the United States in 1883. He settled first in Denver, Colorado, but, unable to find work there, continued on the Salt Lake City after nearing reports of growing business activity there. He was employed by architect John Burton soon after arriving in Salt L.aKe Gi ty, but several montns later opened his own otri ce. tie remained in Salt Lake City until his death in 1943. Kletti ng is best known for his designs of numerous commercial and institutional buildings throughout the state, including the Sal tai r Beach Pavilion, the University of Utah campus and buildings, and the Utah State Capitol. He designed residential buildings as well, although far fewer in numoer than his commercial and institutional bui l4i ngs, many of which were homes for businessmen who had hired him to design their commercial buildings also. Notable examples of his residential design's, in addition the the Fisher House, include the Henry Di nwoodey House, 411 E. 100 South, listed in the National Register in 1974, and the Enos A. Wall Mansion, 411 E. South Temple Street, listed in the National Register in 1980 as part of the South Temple Historic District. Kletting's houses all display a stylistic eclecticism. which is characteristic of much of late 19th Century architecture in Utah. As an architectural style, Victorian Eclecticism remains a poorly defined and often misunderstood phenomenon. Generally it connotes the mixing of stylistic elements within a single design. SuCh a fusion is neither random nor Tni sPrffF(�dgo(but draws i is 1 e g i ti macy frown the b 1 e n d i ng of di s s i m i l a feadtxatgs2o 8, Significance Period Areas of Significance —Check and justify below prehistoric — archeology -prehistoric community planning _ landscape architecture religion _.1400-1499 archeology -historic __ conservation law science 1500-1599 agriculture _ economics _ _ literature sculpture 1600-1699 X architecture education military social/ 1700-1799 art engineering music humanitarian x 1800-1899 commerce — exploration.'settiement — philosophy T theater 190D _ communications _Y__ industry _ poiiticslgovernmen.t — transportation invention — outer (specify) Specific dates 1893 BuilderfArchitect lJnknown /Richard K. A. Kletting Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Albert Fisher Mansion, built in 1893, is architecturally significant as an excellent example of the Victorian Eclectic style in Utah and as one of the relatively few residential designs by Richard K. A. Kletting. Kletting was one of Utah's most prominent architects and is best known for his design of the Utah State Capitol Building (1912-15) . The Fisher Mansion exhibits the large scale and Victorian detailing common to the Victorian Eclectic style, but also incorporates into its design same unusual- features such ,as a box -like, shape, stamped metal frieze folli ati on, and '.a Queen 'Anne' inspired wrap.: -around porch with Eastlake and Romanesque appoi ntxnents�, which colmbi ne to 'create a distinctively unique example of the style. The two-story brick carriage, house located behind the mansion is also significant, reflecting the massing and styling of the house. The Fisher Mansion is also historically significant as the only house associated with Albert Fisher, a pioneer in the brewing ' industry in Salt lake City. Fisher was founder of Fi sher Brewi ng Company, the most enduring of the several, breweries established in Utah in the late 1800s, and the only one of those to return to operation after the repeal of Prohi bi ti on, The Albert Fisher Mansion was built in 1893 for Albert Fisher, president of the Fisher Brewing Company. The two-story, twelve -room house was designed by Richard Kletting and Was built at an estimated cost of $13,000. Fisher, who had been living nearby at the brewery (138 S. 1100 West), apparently wished to live near his brewery, although the .site the house was built on was attractive in its own right, located on the banks of the Jordan River, away- fronr the crowds of the city, and commanding an excellent view of the Wasatch Mountai ns to the east. Albert Fisher was born in Seebach, Baden, Germany on October 30, 1852. He emigrated to the United States as a young marl, settling first in Springfield, Illinois. He moved from there to San Francisco before corli ng to Salt lake Ci ty around 1831, a i whi ch time he changed the spel 1 i ng of hi s 1 ast name from Fi scher to Fi sher. Soon after hi s arri val , he apgare ntly worked for a time as foreman of the Salt Lake Bre-ring Company located at 1000 East and 500 South. He established Fisher Brewing Company in 1884 in the northwest section of town on 1100 West between 100 South and 200 South!. In addition to his brewery i nterests, Al bert Fi she was. heavi I i nvol ved i n real e state and other business enterprises, including the Orem Rail road,14utual Creamery, and Baden Investments Company. Fisher Brewery continued to operate under the direction of the Fisher' family up until 1972. During the Prohibition years the brewery closed down ccmpletely and the Fishers confined themselves to business and investment activities. On JP NP'� 2 9 � 1882 Al inert lmarri ed Alma Younger, a Swedish e:,li grant who had 9 2020 co�-ge o` a��t _ & City in 1811 with her p1�nts. She was Bern i n Malmo, N?5•: vrm 10-9Aa� _ {7.811 United States (Department of the Interior National Park Service ForNPS"wonf �. ,.-. `-fir°- ,�t'w,=�-z'#`e �•� . - Hational Register of Historic Places Inventory —Domination Farm date er�tQr�d°y Continuation sheet Item number 7 Page 2 A one-story, screened -in frame porch with paired square columns is located on the rear, northeast corner of the house. A few mi nor al terati ons and addi ti ons have been made on the house, i ncl udi hg the addition of exterior fire escapes from upper story windows on the rear and sides, and a small frame enclosed porch at the northwest corner, built on c. 1920, The interior of the house has remained basically intact on the main floor but the basement and upper floors have been altered to accommodate the thirty -to -forty men living i ri the house. The carriage house is a two-story brick structure with a pyramidal roof over the main block capped with a hip -roofed cupola. Projecting from the front of the building is a large, two-story, three -sided bay. The eyebrow curve in the roofline on the facade echoes the curved head of the hayloft door that projects above the standard level of the ronfline. The wide eaves of the carriage house, like those on the house, are decorated with long, thin modi l 1 i ons with notched ends. Hip -roofed dormers are centered on the front and side roof pitches. The foundation is brick and the lintels and sills are rough -faced sandstone. Spanning the carriage openings are metal I -beams decorated with rosettes. All windows are multi -pane and double hung_ Only minor alterations have been made to the carriage house such as the covering over of some windows with plywood. 'Water darnage is evident in some sections of the eaves. Measured drawings of the carriage house were made by the Historic American Buildings Survey in 1968. PLNPCM2020-00106 103 July 9, 2020 So Major Bibliographical References Obituary Index, Utah State Historical Society Letter from James W. Fisher, great-grandson of Albert Fisher, July 4, 1976, Utah State Historical Society 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated rop-erty 1.03 Quadrangle name S aft Lake City Quadrangle scale I ' 24000 UMT References A 11 2 1 14 12 1 9 2 14 15 11,218 19 101 B Li__J LL il i l it Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing CW I I I I I I I I I I I I iII _aLLJ E IL_i_II I I LJ -1 I I I i ,J F W III L I GH LL I._ t i i 1 I i I _i t Verbal boundary description and justification Commencing 262 feet West of the Southwest corner of Block 43; Plat C, Salt Lake C1ty Survey, East 1.63 feet, forth 247.5 feet, West to the Jordan River, southerly along the river to beginning. List all states and counties for propwriies overlapping state or county boundaries state N/A code county NIA code state NIA code county N/A code 11. Form PrePared By rsameltitle Roger V. Roper/Historian _ organization Utah State Historical Society bats 5 rin 1963 street& number 300 Rio Grande telephone (801) 533-6017 city or town Salt: Lake City state Utah 12. State Historic Preservation Officer certification The evaluated signiftcance of this property within the state Is: national - state local As the desJgnated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public taw 89- 665), 1 hereby norninate this property far inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by thelati na! ark � i is State Historic Preservation Officer signature title A. Rent Powell, Deputy State -Historic Preservation Officer date .L _ l 1 —6- �.,. For NPS use only J hereby certify that this property is included in the National Register = Hate Keelaer of the National Register Attest : date Chief 0 eg+s rat+on July 9, ;`fisher. Albert. Masson and Carriage House Name of Property T 10. Geographical Data HcreaOe of Property 1 aCre(S) UTM References i Piace additional boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) A V2 41211191210 4151112181910 cone Eastinc Nonhtnc Gr 11111 111111 Lone Eastinc Northtnc Sall Lake City -Salt Lake County._Utah City. County and State B I1111 11111! tone E aslinc North inc ❑ 1l111 111111 Lonc Eastinc Northinc Verbal Boundary Description Describe the boundaries of the pro perty.y Commencing 262 feet West of the Southwest corner of Block 43. Plat C. Salt Lake City Survey, East 163 feet, North 247.5 feet. West to the Jordan River, southerly along the river to the beginning Properly Tax No, 15-02-152-001 Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) The boundaries are the same as those that were associated with the building when it was determined eligible in 1983, and a portion of those historically associated with the property. [ISee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 10 11. Form Prepared By name/title J. Cory Jensen organization Utah State Historic Preservation Office street & number 300 Rio Grande city or town Salt Lake Additional Documentation Submit the lollowng items with the completed lorm: date 28 August 2008 telephone 801/533-3559 state UT zip code 84101 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs: Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items: {Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner name/title Salt Lake City Corporation street S number 451 S State Street city or town Salt Lake C telephone 801-535-7280 state UT zip code 84111 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This intormat+on is being collecled for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing. to list properties. and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended (16 U_S.C. 470 of seq.). Estimated burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form Is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including lime for revieunnc instructions, gathering and maintaining data. and completing and reviewing the farm. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this torn to the Chief, Administrative Services Division. National Park Service. P.O. Box 37127. Washnoton. DC 20013-7127: and the office of Management and 6uoget- Paperwork Reductions Projects ( 1024.0018). Was hinglon, DC 2050? PLNPCM2020-00106 105 July 9, 2020 Fisher. Aloert. Masion and Carnage House Name of Properq Salt Lake City- Salt Lake County. l.itar. City, County and State 8. Description Applicable National Register Criteria i ((ark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria cualifyino the propert% for National Register listing.) ❑ A Property is associated with events that have madE a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [I B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ❑ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. [I D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield. information Important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark Y rn all the boxes that apply.) Property is� ❑ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. CJ Fs removed from its original Location. ❑ C a birthplace or grave. ❑ D a cemetery. ❑ E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. ❑ F a commemorative property. [I G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative 'Statement of Significance {Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets. } Areas of Significance (enter cafeoories from rnstructians) ARCHITECTURE INDUSTRY Period of Significance '1893-19t Significant Dates Significant Persons I Complete it Criterion B is marked above) Albert Fisher Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder Richard Kletting ZISee continuation sheet(S) for Section No 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Crle the books, anic*5, ano 01ner sources usee in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets Previous documentation on file (NPS): ❑ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested ❑ previously listed in the National Register ❑ previously determined eligible by the National Register ❑ designated a National Historic Landmark ❑ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey [J recorded by historic American Engineering Record ## Primary location of additional data: ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Other State agency ❑ Federal agency ❑ Local government ❑ University ❑ Other Name of repository: [] See continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 9 PLNPCM2020-00106 106 July 9, 2020 Fisher - Albert. Masion and Carriage House Name of Froperty Salt Lake Cites Sall Lake County- Utah City, County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property (check as many boxes as apply ❑ private FI public -local ❑ public-StatE ❑ public -Federal Category of Property (check only one box. ❑ building(s) ❑I district ❑ site ❑ structure ❑ abject Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing. 6. Function or Use Historic Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: single dwehinc 7. Description Architectural Classification tEnter categories from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN: Victorian Eclectic Number of Resources within Property iDo not induce previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing 2 2 I buildings S ite� structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register Current Function tEnter categories from instructions) WORT{ IN PROGRESS Materials (Enter categories trorn instructions) foundation S70NE:Sandstone:_WOOD=shing_te walls BRICK roof ASPHALT shingle other Sandstone details Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current Condition of the properly on one or more continuation sheets.) CISee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 7 PLNPCM2020-00106 107 July 9, 2020 NP5 Form 10-901 tOcl. 11901 OMB No. 10024-00le United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ��a�31dS 7his farm is for use in nominating or requesting determtna(ions for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the Nalrunaf Register of Historic Praces Aeaistralion Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each ilem by marking "x' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property heing docrimentea. enter WA' for "nor applicable." For functions, archilectural classification. materials. and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcaleaorieS from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NIPS Form 10.900a). Use a tyaewriter. wora processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property hisloric name Fisher, Albert, Mansion and Carriage House (amen4dment) other namelsile number 2. Location street name 1206 West 200 South city or town Salt Lake City state Utah cone U 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification ❑ not fcr publication ❑ vicinity county Salt Lake code 049 zip Cade 84104 As the designated authority under the Noicnal Historic Preservation Act. as amended, I hereby certify that this I2� nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. in my opinion, the property E meets ❑ does not meet the National Re ster criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [I nationally OT ie'wvide ® locally, ee :Ttion sheet for additional comments.] • ' Signature of certifying Utah Division of State History,Office f Historw Preservation 5tate or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the properly ❑ meets [I does not meet the Nstional Register crilena, (❑ See continuation sheet for additional comments-) Signature of certifying off icialMIle Slate or Federal agency and bureau 4- National Park Service Certification I hereby certify thal the dropeny is CJ entered in the National Register. ❑ See continuation sheet. ❑ determined elioible for the National Register ❑ See continuation sheet. ❑ determined nol eligible for the National Register_ removed from the Nahonal Reo ister ❑ other, (explain:) Date Signature of the Keeper Date of Action PLNPCM2020-00106 108 July 9, 2020 A4 ♦ `~ `� yam. ` � - 1 y�� r � ' -fir• _ �� Ali �V,�n•. f � s ' yam, •` .. r- r` _ '•'� r�� •_ •� �iJ_ Avg �. � �� • . —.. �._, 7 «ice-. � : Y"' � r �+� ��► r M }'ef ++�� } � :cb i �r:T. - '?�:t"�� ���� �i �• r•r✓"� r -'•=7ti„r'p.r. ,� r ems. tp •�. � ter .� � . u g 4ir .• T _gyp i •] ' p" �► me "'� �y ,� � - • yid 4' �'� '�.; 416 lo Albert Fisher Carriage House Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah Southeast Corner Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg. Utah State Historical Society G of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 113 July 9, 2020 Y Z-1 14 Albert Fisher Carriage House Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah South Facade Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg. Utah State historical Society 3 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 115 July 9, 2020 x7 i lb uly 9, 2020 Albert Fisher Mansion Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah South Facade Photo by Roger Raper, April 1983 Neg. Utah Stare Historical Society 1 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 117 July 9, 2020 Albert Fisher Mansion Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah East Facade Photo by Roger Roper, April 1983 Neg, Utah State Historical Society 2 of 4 photos PLNPCM2020-00106 119 July 9, 2020 - = •T . it s'•`k' � �� _ .-r 3h i : _ `� rt-_ u'r .. r.. . f ,et ■ik ��iNL�ii3?...' "� •�f!!• WN, �� � *f ,, •- 3 �P .,.. err. �!>!L-•#i `•:�y1V. ° Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) COMMON: UTAH STATE AND/OR HISTORIC: STATE: Utah COUNTY! Salt Lake FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER I DATE 0 CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC ❑ District ® Building E� Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: ❑ Site ❑ Structure ❑ Private ❑ In Process ❑ Unoccupied Q Restricted ❑ Object ❑ Both ❑ Being Considered [� Preservation work Unrestricted ❑ in progress ❑ No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) - ❑ Agricultural Government ❑ Park [] Transportation ❑ Comments ❑ Commercial Q Industrial ❑ Private Residence [� Other (Specify) ® Educational ❑ Military ❑ Religious Present home _6f ❑ Entertainment JjC Museum ❑ Scientific Utah H i stor i cal Soc i ety . COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Secretary of State STREET AND NUMBER! Utah State Caoitol Buildi CITY OR TOWN: Salt Lake City TITLE OF SURVEY: Utah State Historic Sites Sur DATE OF SURVEY: DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: Utah State_Historical Society STREET AND NUMBER: 603 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: Sa I t Lake C PLNPCM2020-00106 STATE Utah C rt o� CODE tah 43 N n 0 C Z -I C d CODE 43 m Z -I A Federal State ❑ County ❑ Local M Z C z K D V1 m C M 0 z STATE: CODE i { Utah 41 v n 121 July 9, 2020 m (Check One) ❑ Excellent [j� Good ❑ fair ❑ Deteriorated ❑ Ruins ❑ Unexposed CONDITION (Cheek One) (Check One) ❑ Altered Q Unaltered [] Moved ® Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if knbWn) PHYSICAL. APPEARANCE The Kearns Mansion has a stone exterior richly detailed with round towers at, three of i ts; our --corners. At the time of the building, the mansion contained 28 rooms: 6 baths, ten fireplaces (of which nine remain), an all -marble kitchen and bathroom, a bowling alley, ballroom, billiard room, two parlors, two dining rooms, and three vaults (one for silver, one for wine, and one for jewelry). Cost of construction was approximately $250,000.00. The main entrance on the south leads into a hallway with a floor of handset ceramic tile, one of the few in Utah. The wood -panelled walls and the floating staircase are made of French oak, hand carved by artisans im- ported from Europe. In the main hallway are two columns carved with alle- gorical scenes: "The Rape of the Sabines" and "Botticelli's Graces". At the end of the main hall (south) are the massive iron and glass doors. Then foyer is of African and Roman marble. Above the main hall is a graceful oval ceiling well. To the west of the front hall is the state drawing room; converted early in the history of the mansion from two parlors: the Louis XVI and the Moorish parlors. The first room east of the front hall is the den. The flemish oak paneling is stained black. North of the den is the state dining room of red stained mahogany. Reportedly all the wood in this room came from the mahogany trees in the Ural Mountains of Russia. Dominating the room, above the table, is a large bronze chandelier. The figures on the newel posts at the foot of the stairs were done by the French sculptor Moreau and were brought from the Paris Exposition of 1900 by Senator Kearns. Off the main hall of the second floor were the bedrooms and guest rooms of the Kearns family and Eater the governors. The former bedrooms of the Kearns family and the governors were in .the southeast corner of the second- f']oor,' how the' library. Across the hall were other bedrooms now housing the picture collections, and the librarian's office. The director'- office was formerly the nursery. The marble bathroom is in the northeast portion of this floor. At the south end of the hallway on the second floor doors open'to a marble loggia. The third floor contains the ballroom or gymnasium and the billiard room. These rooms now serve as gallgries.4i Overlooking the circular hall - way'on this floor is the beautiful ceiling well which coowns this stately mansion. In the basement was a two-lane bowling alley and wine vault. This arei; is now used to house the library's extensive collections. Only slight al- terations have been made to the building; both the grandeur and affluence of its builder and owner remain. �I , Outside and to the rear of the mansion (north) Is the 1u also of oolito marble, which now bouses the Utah_An titut Fine ,Arts:< This exterior has not been modified; however, the interi � l=iasG�nd�gene major alterations.,- ►n V1 M rn 1i PLNPCM2020-00106 122 TuTy 9, 2020 w L°J PERIOD (Check One or More as Appropriate) ❑ Pre -Columbian j ❑ 16th Century ❑ 15th Century ❑ 17th Century SPECIFIC DATE(S) (tt Applicable and Known) AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE Aboriginal ❑ Prehistoric Historic ❑ Agriculture ® Architecture ❑ Art ❑ Commerce ❑ Communications ❑ Conservation (Check One or More as Appropriate) ] Education ❑ Engineering Industry ❑ Invention ❑ Landscape Architecture ❑ Literature STATEMENT OF SIGNIIFICANCE ❑ Military ❑ Music ❑ 18th Century ❑ 19th Century R] Political ❑ Religion/Phi- losophy ❑ Science ❑ Sculpture Socioi/Human- itarion ❑ Theater ❑ Transportation iR 20th Century ❑ Urban Planning I �Oo The Kearns Mansion was designed by Architect Carl M. Nauhausen for millionaire mining magnate Thomas Kearns. It is a part of the national culture that shows up in th"is"area:- The foundation was laid in the spring of 1900 and the building completed in 1902. Thomas Kearns came to Utah in 1883 as a young man working on the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad. He gravitated to the mines in Park City where he soon became part owner of the Silver King Coalition Silver Mines. His partner was David Keith. With his newly acquired wealth, Kearns built his lovely mansion on Brigham Street (later South Temple Street) in 1902. The building itself is a work of art, made of oolite marble, and richly furnished interiors of wood, tile and marble. It reflects the quality that affluence could demand in the new twentieth century. Thomas Kearns became a millionaire before he was 28 years old and a Uni_.ted._States Senator from Utah by the age of 40 (1901-1905) He ,also was a noted-ph'i"l�anthropist, erecting the Kearns St. Ann's Orphanage, now St. Anq's_,,School. He became the publisher of the Salt Lake Tribune. Today the Kearns Building, Kearns Corporation, and Kearns, Utah, perpetuate his name. The Kearns family lived in the mansion for over thirty-five years. In it many distinguished guests were entertained, including two presidents: Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. President Roosevelt watched a parade on South Temple from the marble loggia on the second floor. Thomas Kearns died in 1918, but',the home remained in the possession of the family until 1937, when Mrs. Jennie Kearns donated it to the state to be used as a governor's mansion. Three Utah governors lived in the mansion; Henry H. Blood, Herbert B. Maw, and J,'Bracken Lee. In 1957 the mansion became the home of the Utah State Historical Society. It is the intention of the Society that this lovely building be preserved and kept open to the public to provide a show place depicting the genteel life that Utah's mineral resources produced for one of the state's foremost families. PL 020-00106 123 July 9, 2020 Margery Ward, Historical Society Brochure (Salt Lake City, Utah State Historical Society, 1969). Paul Goeldner, Utah Catalog: Historic American Building Survey (Salt Lake City, 1969), p.—W.- ORDINATE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES t DEFINING A RECTANGLE LOCATING THE PROPE T Y DEFINING THE CENTER POINT OF A PROPERTY R OF LESS THAN TEN ACRES CORNER LATITUDE LONGITUDE LATITUDE I LONGITUDE Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Secon\S Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds NW 0 0 4o 0 46 , o 8 11 1 a52 25 NE 0 0 SE 10 0 Sw 0 V APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: 11 IL15T ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR Cut STATE: CODE COUNTY CODE M Utah Salt- I alep/"�y '5\ M STATE: CODE COUNTY: Z--j cobE STATE: CODE COUNTY: t--j < 11.1 ODE 7— Lx: STATE: CODE COUNTY: -7 CODE irl As the designated State Liaison Officer for the Na 1. - tional Historic Preservation Act of 1()66 (Public Law I hereby certify that this property is included in the 89-66S), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion National Registerl in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria' and procedures set forth by the National Park Service. The recommended level of significance of this nomination is: Chief, Office of Archeology and Historic Preset ration National State ❑ JLocal ❑ Date TEP 2;6 -19701 Name AAj 4 44 id ".0% wZZIL wq ATTEST: Milton L. Wellenmann Director, Department of Title neVelopMent qanvir a S Keeper of jhe National Regi ter DatePl- �P. kO�M 776 12Jate July 9,2020 I PLN =-I 020-00106 125 "JTyF�020 CITY*SALT LAKE STREET MAP Freeways (FJ controlled .},. ;t;;•) - •' acc.a; no crosungs al grad..) Not 11. Interstate Highways g e;r1 •.k• - :E• z,,. - ',t.,,a.._. U.S. Highways Abbreviations indicate: ALT.=Allanofs d _._.< State Highways r iIt h. T +..}I`'. _ � '" - • .'t, :7A NT N AVE City Limits Y` Y� ':+' 1Y L7YN N. "T •", 7TN X ST. ` Rr LA SAVE. Scale: One inch equals approximately t).66miles . 15 Z; x.si: A%o _ INCH ✓sI "` � _. �>% 1 . P•grlr,;r' n •,\ OE ST. r I V AVE [re Copyright ©1969 by Rand MSNally & Co. Lithographed in U.S.A. All rights reserved. Prse•„�?� M1s•Pok:.`-<Pi"¢ <";;:;: ::,' : s w � � "I % '\� . .y,=:;" .":•'•r •"'r�GOIto-CWns;:: EYE ETT j „ Al ` -E1r,�i�i1 •^ ,ht UpSET AYE.Dfl ,AS,_r<y„l.nr e.. �!, T,\ DUPUNI -•0.VE � AJ / r . � � y iq IYTN X. ST. F ti o o ¢ .�\\ .. } ` `I E � � r `~^ TALLYHO St �, ,fr �/� 1 •l'y�, E OWN A E, z : w �0� $ � "�„�`O•_(.�..�..L�EV IOTx S N. N _ 'w" q '\ IDLH n, S 3 : ST. �\ 1I;cAo fC1115f WAY I j �9i GeECe ON N 54Yepya IC R[8[RVO/RRw/M STEALIXGz WHY CA O ST. SAN f RNAN DEAONAI DR = ST. -: �, A4xFs LR oa SnnwMOWt IBTH + FODN•N' `'3 ISM N: i TA ISM N N Dfl DA. % NOCCXIOw w-- 4 AD QA. lO�yLAR l7TN PF :'n� '' CENTENNIAL MI[FARI D z A\ ''- rxq• 10fi Px�- biX WAs AR w C S y LT. •:::: ;lP: ;::.' :.� e�w°r ° 'YAf � ''• a ~ PRO PERITY . 17N ST Da 2 TM (. f$ AEFQ OYI LE ` PI U0.f M, BLFR SN 1•`n '.� AV . ''. - -9_ .i : Aso 'ff t OR. 4? ?t 6TN N - q E.V "' W •1 y "fAf NQRTMCR 5 AV �i 14FA E T AU VAIN AVE, •° x, a2 - AYE. 000 CL HTO BRIA I F :.CLINTD z AV . IT( AVE. x"' rx6 A w ST. AV mORIAL .DkM..'x 7 S e N m AVE4 a•, S vEe EI H usoLE UAr c[ Ewv i 'a i i GIRARD w`w w F •• •,.� F r V LL IGIRAR OI i `_ IO7N All i CNA IT o N, Sr 1 G w :- ITN a z X. '+ r :! $ �Y CIP. r WHAT GURAY lE ft: OURAYN9SN V� 7 Is AVE. 1-9 1e S7. �u ;iBISNOP PL. ~� I.r...�7..e1.4. SIN AVE. r I -'GAMES AROMOR aPRIC07 VE. ¢!':�' •s .. 4 7-N A E. ~ SMONDIxo = SIMON01 O/Tv aP ST. ND n ,t n LI AV. ST. i 8 N AVE. CEM[T[wY 'OATH. COL ON PL. i '.4NOTO O rP`.VE, X i •dA. ' HOYT RAVE.PL. X ADAMSP is At tint 16 RU iICrA SUMNER o AYE.::::::,:: _ t lACN50N AVE.' z Y I xu lACN50N �z 40 PINYW' t_ s-- LAG 1i 71 G CPEENt WN - SG ,C..- - _ 2 _• ,. _ a-.._ _ ,_;�j�. sl -u�u 9T. I(J`,_�_ PL., vi oucT •-', �;~ � N TEMPLE ST. -N f• 2X0 VIE N ? • RAN AVC. L /f L LGGXfO' ETT PI.gG ':..j�FZ 1ST - s o W M� c Al Y v+ A AI C MET .�MIMrt-E u o•, rc N r Pi S. i' TEMPLE �.*/, 57 1 V' FL. !!6"•^-S�TEMPLE+ $T PERRY �• ANOVE ~ LA EOA$," .1 i�OL�py� ' ` i a� TRISIfR-' FSERFt FO S�OM �VY.)i` s e •�t AVAMEO1 .'1"i}'.7 r? Ir :.• ••. i-•,• y,ZTL ,, 'vn V. - 6 VL. CLAWOON PI.'1 .14 ... ` i 3t ST S - u 'ems u °1' ST tl I.�_ 5. 1. ,... _ - �I a GEMMIIt aBu ` OCN AND XE N ec Av. - f _I %': °�w` ..- •.' N w n. N N N � > r z m . t:`w„I.r.,-,, •: w[av .�_ AA SuN ER ;^ 1 nD W sr"f+lfG aY g 5 N ._. S. ST' F... :ffi IERPON EwL <Q AV:y AUN4_-., oFQ SLADf x DO An Pt J qOR li y N r ° s RPDX up '9-' w�lCk a' W G 'zo"" N M.... AVf FL. c 1 > G $ s Pam. EAP • o PVE.+_ y :TIIIFNEA LE 1 3R0 J' ST. n NR A a 's -E+ 3AD AYE, S. T. I AVE _ 10LLAp w YERH fk z A EY LINDEN VOYLES AV[. - x,l " OFFICC PL M AYLA Dp u r- IINOE 1� uz BADDLFY V yA ;.� tiv[a9 LN�ANG ^ WENw'_ I PL.iC"�`n `f' 1_Ar 1..., - yiA-- 4>±> - M• , S .a' PL. L aTNI 318.>`v.� •'vlAl4CT� I I`� WA(NCR - u >� I MARLET 'n =' PACIFIC Y AVE. "' LIF C� PA IfIL W u PACIF C ,n s FULL R u =:' iULR AUSTIN TV S. 3 . u AVE. SrN� - $ S. 'ST 3rc_'w° ..-- `�' r"' D CPLY 7 Y Pt V. 1, i S W A T. = "kaSiX S. Pt. T. �1 z •x`e. ..d_ 7T��EE 1NORCHa DVISSIM1CN IANTPL x ONAt0 l.N It PI N V N 3 N'lo `u Pl PL u=u ...NH R E N AV .w 'E i xAWTHOANE yr E;n' Q.4P tELELGGJIJ�E g b T. : 1 ST. S. c 5T. _ i -SP" _ _ AVE. E u` L ON l.$ AV . y 6TH 4v AVE. N DRE`' �•' w i r r w-�N = - RECOyYyPIL i o COT GE AVE. r W WIL NIRF Pl, i i W x OE '^ '^ " V . : �PDPTBIa z " C LFR% AV .N ` 4 F{Y�' u .Y..:. F[NWAY ; q A LEY'- SANIDB RG a i "' GAl i UAL' S A < a ITX N,nz S. u ST..LL "! °�' i - S NN i n v' ii. avE g`" PL. 'moo c _ N 8 A l.. i N �1 S. W iik'i'. ASATC PL iRIN10A0 Pl. ,- r • f1W000 m Y Y iL AY' O ,- _ o N w ^� MO�RS�E aV `u - LOWELL " Q O Pi' [LA ` r' i g" PL x LOWELL AVE 3 3tl \ aa !I- Lz l MOX R 6, AVE. it - 44LOW Ll ✓ W e _ - - F r 8IN'^ -9 5. ST 18ALL._ Pl. y 4[NESEf AVE. ;' �r m i i c i- XD [RD PBS 2 r CHA E u�i3 NXYSIDE'" ' 3 < 3 Fb ST, w `a PTo�x�, _ k 11 VA ST. MONTAG E AVE. :! UABAR qyEAVMEA ��;, :�fAYETTE AVf. .AVE. C 4S cBFL ON AV BEL OXTAVE.AJE. ` w It E FAME y7 AVC. NA;ffi' AVE. 'g D0.'YON AVE. \ f, zI xERBERT 'XCRBERT AVFffjiREMONTAYE. \ 4,,: GOITT AV. V L AV YA C AVf M YAL N YALE' 0' i GAF A4,' z ../ N > W F [M ''' •' j « REMONT AVE XARVARO` 'MITI XARVARO AVE. —C,x e *r'F IL INO S AYlGOLO 1 OTON WAY ` x\' PAXiOH , MELSEV AYE. O ` c PRINCETON AVE. i t4 P '- PA TON PAXTON PAXTON 'AV . pVf e: �- AVE. 31uun Pond 118 RTY z S P'P' O^ LUY AYC AVE. ITf 01 FH 6 E'avE. i IAIFQ AVE. ♦ O P N LULY - 1 O AYE. ,^ � R LE: ON A [. ,g 111 iJT O. O. 5T _ N fit Vl•1• STN �- i S N _ -• F x � l3iN S. W: LAIN R IA AVE. CA IFD IA AVE.-`z• NEAfAA rh;. AVC z £ $XfRMAN N AVE N:...:.. AIBERM LE H R IS N '^ NARRISO N L.: ,:;::':. PVE. " HAROMON "ITN S. v N BNOWNINC ,= �• Ii TN S a ST. i x" I 1 / 117H 5 Si.MENR AC „ RILEYf I WHITNEY; c IN u AVE. 7 p D�E O AV[. J� woc� ; = CIA. I I 1 ,� HIGN Al.VAN m { I gNAMOUNT VpN BUREN a :2 _ I 1 VAN BUREN ypN BU EN my- y .E 1� O 1/+ E/� t Rt1 V - 3 WEN;0 DR. STER ST. 1 ' 'NARP15 AYE. AV. Latitude r YO 'TV OV WEBr ( NHa.A,_Ny.,S_OLN..>,AVE WOf Lon itude : 1110 52 t 2511 E. in S. _ _-ST. �. _I E�' i, S. O ST, (� r 4 'n° OuprlA av[. I t � ty � wcN sr I _ I r M RG AREr rI ,-,� � I •^ 0.YC.N „COL eE AVE. LaYTOM w 1 i_�', s AYl0•� - GAATIfL py GARiIELD pVC, r w A-•+'�+"'_D��I I M <ARTNUq WESTMIN TER AV •- - WFS ifW Ll'I AVE. AY[, i ,G t GRDVE AVE. GARII I NAPE. IN IN TER � N AVE. v 1 . _.._... „�„ RAMOna ; .. AAMONM1 AVE, 3 R0.MONi r + / NA TWEL AVE. NAATWELt AVE. RgMDhA AVE. r PVE 4: PLNPCM2O2O-00106 126 July 9, 2020 NP3 Humber ^ I 0 Title: YYL6L� Lvi, PLNPCM2020-00106 128 July 9, 2020 PLNPCM2020-00106 129 ' -Ju'Iy g,-=O -tt4e: LzL,2 --Kf�4�t2LO (kLaA Loc. PLNPCM2020-00106 130 July 9, 2020 NP3 Humber ^ I 0 Title: YYL6L� Lvi, PLNPCM2020-00106 132 July 9, 2020 PLNPCM2020-00106 133 ' -Ju'Iy g,-=O -tt4e: LzL,2 --Kf�4�t2LO (kLaA Loc. PLNPCM2020-00106 134 July 9, 2020 Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Utah COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Salt Lake INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMB DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) A _J ...... ....... . . .................... ...... ... ... ............ COMMON: Keith -Brown Mansion and Carriage House'� 4A I AND/OR HISTORIC! ml AL STREET AND NUMBER: 529 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: Salt Lake City STATE COUNTY? CODE Utah L!9� Salt Lake R35 LA .1� 14: .®r . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC z ❑ District Building ❑ Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: ❑Site F-1 Structure JR Private ❑0 In Process Unoccupied Restricted F-1 Object E] Both E] Being Considered Preservation work Ej Unrestricted ❑0 I I in progress ❑ No I U PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) 7 Agricultural ❑ Government Ej Park El Transportation El Comments MKCommercial ❑ Industrial 0 Private Residence ❑ Other (Specify) F1 Educational ❑ Military 7 Religious El Entertainment ❑ Museum F-1 Scientific OWNER'S NAME: to H. Ross and Norinne Thompson Brown W STREET AND NUMBER: LU 777 East South Temple CITY OR TOWN: CODE rt a) =r Salt Lake City JSTATE: Utah 4 ;T '09 717 ION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: 0 City and County Building C STREET AND NUMBER: z -I 451 Washington Square r_� CITY OR TOWN: STATE CODE M Salt Lake City Utah 49 A T, :x TITLE OF SURVEY: Z Historic Sites Survey 'N ' X -n DATE OF SURVEY: 1969 ] Federal State E] County E] Local -< Z 0 ;0 DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: C K Z -U Utah State Historical Society ca M 0 STREET AND N`UMBER! c: M 603 East South Temple 0 z CITY OR TOWN. CODE r— �STATE: Salt Lake City Utah 49 %* PLNPCM2020-00106 135 July 9, 2'020 Z (Check One) ® CONDITION Excellent ❑ Good ❑ Fair ❑ Deteriorated ❑ Ruins ElUnexposed (Check One) (Check One) G�k Altered ❑ Unaltered [] Moved Rk Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (t[known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Keith -Brown Mansion is one of the more architecturally and artis- tically beautiful homes in Salt Lake City, Utah. Its basic pattern is renaissance architecture, yet its exterior reflects rather eccletic tastes. The carriage house is less pretentious. On the mansion, the front steps are flanked by f9ur G-. uscan.columns, 24 feet high and three feet in diameter. One enters the home through heavy wrought -iron and glass doors, added by its second owner, Mr. Ezra Thompson. Through the lobby one enters an octagonal --shaped room which extends two stories high and is capped -by a..gently-domed stained glass window. This area is now used as a reception center by Terracor Corporation. By day a sky light in the roof sheds light through the dome, while electric lights provide night lighting. Solid cherry wood has been used in the octagon. On the second floor the open well is surrounded by columns, arches and railings, all of the same wood. Opposite the main entrance on the first floor is a huge fireplace and mirror. To the left is an entry way from the side door on 'IF" Street and to the right is the staircase, added by Terracor Corporation. At the first landing is a beautiful stained glass window. The other four sides of the octagon on the main floor open onto two front -parlors, a large oval dining room and the kitchen, now extensively remodeled into offices. Second floor rooms, although used as offices, still retain their fireplaces, chandeliers and carved woodwork. The ballroom on the third floor was remodeled into an apartment, but now serves'as-a9conference room. In the basement, the plaster has been re- moved and the brick sandblasted. The area is also used for offices. The home has two bathrooms. The carriage house has undergone major remodeling. The interior now houses offices`,_ drawing tables and work rooms. However, the, exterior is unaltered. Inside beams have been exposed to reveal the original construc- tion. All furnishings have been done with an attempt to retain the historic and aesthetic quality of the home. A sunken garden is being added on the east side of the mansion, between it and the carriage house. The restoration and limited remodeling have been done with care. The beautiful structure retains its architectural quality. It illustrates an excellent use of an historic building for modern needs. The mansion, not the carriage house, is thTNUbject of this nomination. However, as the carriage house and the property on which it sits affects very definitely the mansion's historic and aesthetic setting, it is included within the boundary lines. q^ M rn 0 z N PLNPCM2020-00106 136 July 9, 2� W1 Z 0 U M Z uj Uj LIM PL P5RI0O (Check One or More as Appropriate) E] Pre-Colurn6ion ❑ 16th Century ❑ 18th Century 20th Century ❑ 15th Century ❑ 17th Century 19th Century SPECIFIC DATEW (IfApplicable and Known) Built 1900 AREAS OF SIGNtFbCANCE. (Check One or dare as Appropriate) Aboriginal Education ❑ Political L] Urban Plonnrng 0 Prehistoric C] Engineering El Religion/Phi- ;a Other (S ify) ­,%F, Historic ❑ Industry losophy _71r" k_ _i� E] Agriculture ❑E] ❑Invention Science Architecture 0 Landscape Ej Sculpture E] Art Architecture ❑ Social/Humon- F1 Commerce 0 Literature itarion 6 1.; E] Communications E] Military ❑ Theater ❑Conservation El Music E] Transportation STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Built of San�pe -'limestone in 1898-1900, this three-story mansion was designed by Frederick Alb-ert' Hate, who was also ar6filitie'-cf'for tile Alta Club, the Salisbury Mansion, the Salt Lake Public Library (Hansen Planetarium), the Continental Bank Building, and the Administration Building for the University of Wyoming. With wealth obtained from his interests in the Silver King Coalition Mines at Park City, Mr. David Keith built his lovely mansion on Bri':gham Street in Salt Lake City, where he lived with his wife and son until 1916. The property was then sold to Ezra Thompson, whose family lived in 'the home until 1939, The Thompson's daughter, Norinne, then wife of H. Ross Brown, ',lived in the home between 1939 and 1968 when Terracor Corporation received f'rom them a twenty-five year * r lease on the property.- The company has since spent over $250,000 in restoration and renovation. The company now uses it for busi- ness purposes. This mansion and carriage house reflect the quality living in early twentieth century Utah, made possible because of the wealth of Park,City's mines. I David Keith, the youngest of fourteen children, was bor n In Nova Scotia in 1841.-- Twenty years later he set sail for California to seek his,fortune. His mining know-how and business acumen produced limited rewards there and in Virginia City, Nevada. Because he was an authority on water sumps, he was later employed at Park City, Utah in 1883. There, in - cooperation with Thomas Kearns and others, he,helped build the Silver King Coalition Mines C_qTpany, which extracted some ten and one -quarter million dollars worth of mineral between 1892 and 1907. With this affluence, Keith and Kearns became influential in Utah, financing and publi.s.hing the new Sa-It Lake Tribune, building lovely homes, developing businesses, and making charitable contributions. Both men were nembers of Utah's Constitutional Convention. Keith died in 1918. His wife followed in death soon after,leaving the business empire to their son, David The home is important because of its quality architecture, because it tells much of the mining wealth's story in Utah, and because David Keith was himself a prominent figure in the American West's history. N PCM2020-00106 137 020 NPS Form 10-900-a Utah WordPerfect 5.1 Format (Rev. 2193) MAY 2 3 1995 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 1 thru 10 Page 5 David Keith Mansion, salt lake City, Salt lake County, UT A review of the listing of this building (5/14/71, NRIS 71000849) reveals that the historic name assigned to it at the time of its listing (Keith -Brown Mansion) incorporated the original owner's name with the third owner's name. It is more accurate for the historic name to be that of the individual associated with its significance. This building is significant for its architectural qualities and for its association with an influential figure in Utah, David Keith. Keith accumulated his wealth from mining and helped to build the Silver King Coalition Mines Company in Park City. In addition to his influence and success within the mining industry, Keith helped develop other businesses such as of the Salt Lake Tribune. Keith, along with his wife and son, lived here until 1916. The property was then sold to Ezra Thompson, whose family lived in the home until 1939. Between 1939 and 1968 the house was occupied by H. Ross and Norinne Thompson Brown. All references have been changed throughout the nomination to include the correct name, David Keith Mansion. Max J. Evans Date State Historic Preservation Officer CM2020 00106 139 020 t I t I I I I PF�oF�BRTY: LI NC-. I 1 I t•:-Ic�us�. t I I I I I I.itAl�lstaru I I I I I IM-A - BROWN ML�N�ION CL�F�f�I�G� 4-OL�'� m^� T LAKE C.�TY , UTOH M2d2ft--bqTO-'oc : moo' - -4e' - I " 140 �4T� :Jolt t�l REG1�-� 6) LfE c ®aaaaaUlm oo , k QohwfHaaEfFf Eta. LNM-1 - GI B-; ITDI o a o o 00 -; ..CEMETE s° �a00000aoaaaa� i �00000ElF IEl �® 17 a 2ao22aE k�oEaa.aoF.,iaaooL-&®o�c E-1a01-1EEJ �a�ao�a�- mom TM 1'[ aee��a.oaWoaac L3 a.�aN0NU[SU, NB I�s�l �J r�o'�•e� ` i y I ]k I Li CJ . 76t y SDU F ST xy Ot y 60y Its Pg�F - W. L M p55i fl;c' nw OR" R WwW 1�IIIjjI,' � I-, �--�I ICJ ® I N ie SB aj ME SS O t IA(�y ae 3a ou SOUT m ' S < W 5 � A'• i t.` H w:9 W ,•cl` IJ_3'al Oz06yN rt .._iz ,--, ny Ffia IN = m a= ,• I(•��IB a L 41 g y 42= fwr7 nE ® ' '[ I a:, Li u m, FIT t`L'^J k tu 1S[ ` rt A IN Y! X R �J E T6�K L ' L VJ7,�-' •'• ,9t..i! 21 lJ iR 2• �µ �y sT �t2 u ' ^ t'1 Lillll `Q LJ 13 ' �T H L LJ JR RE IC 1�4 I R.',L H A R.-C 5R,.,T k F 21 L LIE ®oo�E 11K I Ll B TY L .24 ; 23 ,[ urt 22 Tel 4•� l �2� •u sn © 17 „«�, (L'Y"e't I Tal MOiv lees i R G Lu ,OID aw �a �m UMnN41.,0 '• • U {,ipt LI KF-` iTl-1 - MR��_gN * r 1- CDLJ��E=- weeee�.e�r�ee 141 L�oTl= .1aN R�71 I Ov 1, =I � hit r 4 � lit r AR .00 i r I AV ow R r f / 0 r PROPERTY OF Iff NATIakinAL qGiSTER No. cf' 7 01 1 cep NQGI A► t►u. ■ Irv�ctlogs GORDON REEKY, PHOTCORAPHER . pFa[ G�+Ess POST ❑FFICS Sd7L E2z2 • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B4TLIL9 I TES L3r.31 • �16416SI 14WITH-5.Wt. MANSICPQ A--T LA4-<& Citr,OAH CM2020 00106 143 020 f 6 No. C" 7 0 1 Co�.oti AFiCMITEGTuPAL r ir:TfR i4PFS GORDON FE'-- 'Y, PHOTOGRAPHER sr3F4uoL�r_7'5 POST CIFFICE 3 x fi? 2 salt LAKL- C"Y. LJT4H L:41L:3 TE;, 131 1561 0 #� 7lNAREGISTER 020 RAPER OF THE NATIS'L IL 'SSW, "Ar !IF �, SY z � f•' i NP5 Humber ' '- . rl-1 r Title Sig Lee._ NO. 70-124 ' AACHI?'M=LJFapL ■ IND-FRiCIRS GORIDON PEERY, PYOTOORAPHER .�r�ouCrs ■ pii4G1R�SS POST 17FFICE E30X 9L�42 . SALE' LAKE G41Y: L1TAM T94108 TEL-H011 364-1651 iq W-A�se ITT L r�l•--4 CM2020 00106 148 020 ti. NPS Title NO. 9.1 0-29 ARCHmECTuRAL ■ 11V ---R)OH5 GORDON PEERY, PHc--)TorRAPHER ■PRODUCTS � Pr'tOGFtESS POET OFFICE BOX 6242 . SALT LAKE GIT'Y LFTAAk E4109 TEL; MI-364-?581 CAQQ 164sc 1-lUt sue. ELT L kF- C IT`S L)JA 4•-1 c"MRTY Of TI-11"" tj,4T 131 "LGISTE V20 APS Number r Title ja40 ' J ::_ll _f PROP[PT" Rr NO. AFtC" iECTLNaAL a IN-Epi OF?9 GDRDL7Ri REE"-Y, PHOTC)GF�,4PHER af'RMC)LJC 7S ■nROGRCGS POST O%FICE t3OJC 024L • SALT LF4tc CITY. UTAH 641: ja I 7eL WI , 364IeM k MITH - C�QOWN #►rf 51C�IJ NPCM2020-00106 C::AAF- ly 9, T L,&kE C17 Y , U-fA4-1 Form No. 10-300 lRe� �0-14) F I A/ /J /& & 7 � UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR:,: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DATA 5� NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM NAME SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS HISTORIC Mc=M HOUSE AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 259 Seventh Avenue _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Salt Lake City _ VICINITY OF 02 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Utah 049 Salt Lake 035 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS r, PRESENTUSE —DISTRICT _PUBLIC XOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE -_MUSEUM --gUILDING(S) .XPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH WORK IN PROGRESS X EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS RYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints STREET& NUMBER 50 East North Temple CITY, TOWN ETA, TE Salt Lake City VICINITY OF �Jta�l LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS;ETC. Salt Lake County recorder's Office STREET & NUMBER Salt Lake City and County Building CITY, TOWN STATE Salt Lake City Utah QREPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE Utah Historic Sites Survey April 7, 1971 —FEDERAL XSTATE _COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOW STATE ly 9, H DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X-EXCELLENT -DETERIORATED -UNALTERED _XORIGINAL SITE -GOOD _RUINS _XALTERED _MOVED DATE -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The present physical appearance of the McIntyre House differs little externally from the original building. A small service porch to the rear of the building has been added, and the apse porches have all been enclosed. We are not aware of further external changes. The interior has been modified primarily in its furnishings with only the dining room retaining the original furnishings; the kitchen is now located where the old pantry used to be, and a small elevator was added when the McIntyres resided there. The building now serves as residential institutional housing for LDS Hospital. The house is approximately fifty feet square and sits on an elevated stone platform covered with 1-1/2 inch diameter hexagonal tile, overall porch dimensions sixty by seventy feet. The porch on the east side terminates fifteen feet short of the rear plane of the build- ing. The house is set to the rear of the podium in such a way as to create a ten -foot deep front porch and two ten foot wide side aisles interrupted by the protrusion of the seven foot in radius semi -circular east and west side apses. The house would be best described as a 1-1/2 story structure with living quarters in the attic (originally for servants) and a full utility basement originally containing a coal furnace and laundry facilities. In existence now is an oil heat installation, the freed area converted into a laundry and recreation facilities. The south facing entrance is approached from Seventh Avenue by two flights of stairs. A 20-foot wide by 10-foot deep portico with a monumental pediment covers the entranceway. The portico is supported by four striated columns topped with combination capitols and by two attenuated pilasters. The pilasters and columns extend to the frieze of the building. The double five -panel door is shielded by a slightly projecting por- tico with a plain pediment. This structure is supported by two smaller columns and two attenuated pilasters similar in proportion to the ones supporting the main portico. The doorway is flanked by two double hung sash windows, the upper pane in each is of leaded, bevelled glass.''' A ciit; seifii�ell"iptc'al porch graces the area between the two porticos, theoretically accessible through the center second floor window. The upper and lower double` litu windcfd `6h, ea6 i 1 side of the central porched area bompletes the symmetry of the faq�*.. , The primary materials on the exterior are rough brick and stone, with wood being utilized for columns, pediments, roofing, apses and fenestration framing. The foundation is of squared rubble and the brick structure of the house is of common stretcher bond. The window lugsills are brick and brick is used in the form of radiating voussouirs over the semi -circular windows on the main body of the house as well as over the rectangular double hung sash windows on the rear. The stepped radiating voussoirs over the first story front and side windows are of cut stone. This is the extent to which stone is used in a decorative sense on the exterior. The main window type used throughout is the rectangular double hung sash with one pane on the lower and nine panes on the upper section. The upper panes of the first floor windows on the south and west sides are of leaded, bevelled glass. Leaded, be- velled glass is also used on,;the dining room ribbon window to the north and on the semi - elliptical window over the doorway -_leading from the dining room to the west porch. The overall most important window of the house is located on the north side at the top of the double stair landing up from the central hallway. The window is of much greater importance internally than externally bringing light to the first floor central hallway and the second floor peripheral hallway. The window is rectangular capped by a semi- circle with glass divisions along the periphery and the overall shape emphasized by the unbroken center pane. The window is of leaded, bevelled glass and provides a remarkable NPCM2020-00106 154 ly 9, CONTINUATION SHEET ITEM NUMBER 7 PAGE 2 play o f light in the evening. Windows extending above and below ground level provide light for the basement. The hipped roof covering the building is pierced on the east, west, and north sides by dormer windows. Three chimneys pierce the roof: 1) west side offset to front and near exterior wall; 2) east side offset to south and located toward the interior; 3) north chimney on the exterior and offset east. The roof trim eaves are of the cor- nice box type and are constructed of wood. The front doorway leading to the interior is of five-foot wide double doors, with a three-foot deep foyer canpleting the entrance. Recessed windows of the same depth flank the foyer, the eastern box now occupied by the added elevator. The central hall- way is sixteen feet wide and thirty feet long from the end of the foyer to the first step of the central axially located staircase. The ceiling covering the first floor hallway and the second floor peripheral hallway is of the coffered type with natural wood beams and white panels. Three types of wood are used in the rooms, although type was undetermined. The staircase and moldings are all finely hand carved. The house is divided axially into three sixteen -foot wide bays. The west (pro- gressing south to north) is a small library, a sitting room, and a dining room --the dining room the only one with the original furniture remaining. The dining room is also the only room with a coffered ceiling as in the hallway. The hand -carved, wood silverware chest on the north wall was imported from England by the Mclntyres. The crystal chandelier is also the original, as are all others in the house save the sit- ting room fixture. Diagonal fireplaces are located in the northwest corner and south- west corner respectively of the first two rooms. To the east (progressing south to north) is the parlor, game mom, and kitchen. A fireplace is located on the east wall of the central hallway and on the west wall of the game room. Double thickness sliding doors with different types of wood on either side separate the central hall- way from the first two rooms as well as separating the rooms themselves, except the kitchen. Chandeliers line the central hallway. A small staircase located in the hallway next to the kitchen provided servant access to the second and third floors. An adjacent stairway leads to the basement. The apses on either side of the house extend to the roofline of the second floor and were originally open, though now glassed in. A separate unaltered carriage house is located in the northeast corner of the property. The structure is of wood with a gambrel roof and southern gable. An iron railing set on a cut stone wall encloses the property on the south and west sides. Iron grillwork railing surrounds the podium .on which the house rests. Trees and bushes on the west side and extending around the southwest corner slightly hide the house and serve to protect it from the strong western sun. The house and property are in excellent condition and have already received recognition as a historic building. NPCM2020-00106 155 ly 9, IM SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW PREHISTORIC—ARCHEOLUGY-PREHISTORIC—COM M U NITY PLAN NI NG —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION —1400-1499 —ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC —1500-1599 —AGRICULTURE _1600-1699 XARCHITECTURE --1700-1799 _ART X-1800-1899 —COMMERCE —1900- COMMUNICATIONS —CONSERVATION _ECONOMICS _EDUCATION —ENGINEERING _EXPLORATION/SETTLE MENT —INDUSTRY —INVENTION _LAW —LITERATURE —MILITARY _MUSIC —PHILOSOPHY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC DATES 1$98 BUILDER/ARCHITECT Fredrich Hale STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE —SCIENCE —SCULPTURE —SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN —THEATER —TRANSPORTATION —OTHER (SPECIFY) The property on which the McIntyre House sits was registered to C. J. Sandbech on June 27, 1874, as Lot 2, Block 101, Plat D. The lot was purchased by Gill S. Peyton on January 26, 1894, for a price of $2,500.00. The structure was designed by architect Fredrich Hale and was first inhabited in 1898 and was called Payton Hall. The property, house, and carriage house was sold to Henry w. Brown on July 18, 1900, for a price of $15,000.00. William H. McIntyre acquired the house on December 5, 1901 for a price of $19,000.00 and the adjacent lot (Lot #2) for a price of $2,000.00. From this date on the structure has been known as the McIntyre House. Service connections are recorded as being made on April 17, 1906 and additional services and repairs were made August 8, 1910. William H. McIntyre died on August 20, 1926. Mrs. Phoebe McIntyre resided in the house until her death in 1945. William H. McIntyre came to Utah as a boy from Texas and his adventurous life was bound up with the development of the Utah cattle business. In later life Mr. McIntyre developed large holdings in Alberta, Canada, where he estab- lished the McIntyre Ranch but he retained many interests in Utah and spent his last years there;dying in Salt Lake City in 1926 at,the age of -seventy-eight. He was born in Grimes County, Texas about forty miles. north of what is now the city of Houston, -in -the --year 1848, the son of William McIntyre who was of Scotch -Irish descent. William's brother, Samuel, along with William traveled to Texas about 1870 to sell some property owr}ed by their father. After the sell was completed they bought cattle and made the long trek back to Utah. In the spring of the next year, they'sold the cattle for more than five times what they had paid. This gave them enough money to buy more cattle in Omaha and drive them to Utah. This partnership continued.until sometime in the 1880s and gave the two brothers enough money to enter into several ventures, including the Ma=th Mine at Mammoth, Utah which then developed into a successful operation. During the 1880s, William had hard times in the cattle business losing almost an entire herd in the winter of 1886-87. In 1891 to 1894 William began investigating the possibility of purchasing land and in 1894 he purchased a full section of land near Cardston in Alberta, Canada. Ranching began shortly after the purchase. William H. McIntyre was married to Phoebe Ogden. Chase. She was t$e.granddaughter of Isaac Chase, the first flour miller in Utah. Liberty Park .was ozice.the.Isaac Chase ., farm, later passing to Brigham Young. Phoebe Chase was born at the caretaker's house which still stands on Liberty Park. NPCM2020-00106 156 ly 9, M -MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Paper by Yvonne G. Dehm, May 19, 1969. Utah,_ A Centennial History, Vol. III, personal and Family Records. IDGE.OGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY Taaa than nna acre UTM REFERENCES ZONE EASTING NORTHING Cw I I I I I I I I I, STATE B1.III ILArJl 111111 ZONE EASTING NORTHING DL_L_jIIII_,IIIIIIII LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES CODE COUNTY CODE STATE CODE COUNTY CODE MFORM PREPARED BY NAME / TITLE Wi 1 cnn G Martin PrrPcr_rnrati nn P1 annar ORGANIZATION DATE ST EET&NUMBER T LEPH NE 603 East South Tenwle _ (801) CITY OR TOWN STATE Salt Lake City -Utah MSTATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER CER.TIFI.CATION THE EVALUATED SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE STATE IS: NATIONAL_ STATE LOCAL X As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the-Nationill hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the Nation I Register criteria and procedures set forth by the National Park §drve; STATE HISTORIC PRESERVAtIOWOFFICER SIGNATURE TITLEMlchael D. Gallivan, State Historic that it has been evaluated according to the DATE GPO 892.453 f 5 atlti<wo 1 �� OILIp- s • t ` r`i = �,- . /': ,, '� /r: S• Pik, j I k i. iFIN Y •a ai �; Ensign �i .�' y • "-� i'..�/ ,• _� \ ptpnu�nertt\� • f •+! - �: j.,.:r. P. � � i � •t � �-•. ) y_•^—^i/J, � �'.%.;!'�:/,�.'1 1 I !I—il ; --,\ f�K` "�' • _e iap.' .� `/ t �` n; - ;/, '' c •f'�'�'t' 47'30r. LI tl a\�Y1� ,•'!'• 25 \�� i `• n ` - );•D `` - > I .�� I I » ■ L. FIOSp ��� \ i '`� �;L`•t �.�'� J /' % i 1 %� r •1 . 'NORT ST43�'�,��:: ,1 g�is N ��7-A \ _ NORP4 ST +` {.o p` ��` Inj`r "T! N` asa+�+-- q - I r JIiiI0� 4d h 9. E; T rT �yty iI •fir 1� . Salt Lake City, Salt Lake J� !+" f- NofzT•. sr i County,Utah � /I/N, � os 'tat UIM Reference. 12-425730- '�74 E IW a1+M T t NTOL Ve 4514220 t, an �35I {y 1 . r� - 4 I .....•I'• ' ...I !', - ` 4s14000'".N. fNiiS 'Iw I� sh, + _I: 1!lf4h I J \ rH AVE oI Jh� ■ e •jalf;i�•I n rIA Mrnn ?f ; �, `;r ""`�+ eM I,,.:� I`� ]rHS (� St r IR"1 160000 FEET �► BM ��n4e' li Il.r'�.=4254 1G•�r 1 ` I 1 sc M �' ti 142�1• ..... , =M wlrnd 1irQJMr th'arlc■' L. a9" 91_I (`I �i■ }�= : Schi S,Sc I—J'�r,�••r� Y � ��Madl�+son`-'� _ S asi 1~ IS All 7'M r 1 ft�; at r� �� M 26 -�ASE ; t p sail_ S H `8 'TEMP E T - LAN E h� 'V��1• y rg 4 1. c tj . 'V+�'•j�� , II I - Jlc. �,I!,,. I t ::d4 1 5 TH -• ST IIST Y J��4■, ■ rgp �( .demo t 'Pon Tess =ii—.-- !� a-, a •Sch-i •. M I I ument 'rT�..'1�._ S i Ls • � Is - 7.: J _n.:. ,} �� �, M . ■ � ' � r . 3D VM SD TM .1' ' ini.Sch �! J )r � ' '% ' i M; , Pioneer ' uerr ¢ ' 4a' Ii65 1 !D 17 tir `M,qh GpJ i"JI �1' Park 4TH BOUT -= +' el'•�II�`�1 >t•• �I 11 � Z w ;�BM 4260 It-; L.�v6 ,; � to ..T l,'' y I�;!� 1 .;' ly ¢. Q ®Cijfand C�jl Ii _ ;IsT!j( �_�'° '1-I /� \, •!<'i; O�IWo1 ' 'J f8J'3 ald��J W11ilU�J W n� 71 � I G.• �•� 1{ STL�I,!• _ • 1(�f!;i 1,�� ��wt", �! {1 6 soft a �^ �.dl ivetei e pt ` @` `. % 1 ;;p ji GranSumner r, �`'^ �j1' urN,L�.Ji sr-I� -- � �'�:'e:•1�-� r0. � -- c cf0•� , !t � �- � �-•t t:3. a� � s ■ - cili -rya In ! i R k t! ,I t ti�_ �_�...... .f ■■ « erH I i 3 . sourf. sr II I T >< 01] 55' 423000^'E. 1890000 FEET (NORTH): • NTEN OF—GEOLOGI LLb.RV9, 1—s.+ GY01 0C-Kto 40°45' R 1 W. R. I i MURRAY 6 Mr. 111 °52'30rr i P.ROVO 4.3 xtr. "ie ROAD CLASSIFICATION °cs-p Heavy-duty ...�•. Light -duty — t— %S'o Medium -duty Unimproved dirt NPCM2020- 0106 InterstIAE Route 0 U.S. Route 0 State Route iy 9, FuT"—] ml sib 159 JUL 17 1979 W-IN YFE HOUSE ffiAQE Salt Lake City, [Tr i Photo by W. Martin 12-77 Neg. at Cat. St. Hi.St. Society Looking at NPcnnG%T06 �, -.don JUL 11 19'18 MCINTYM HOUSE � � 197$ Salk Lake City. LTf �� Photo by W. Martin 12-77 Neg. at Ut. State Hist. Society Looking at South and East Faae W�IQ �..,i#} , w C. a F� r + ' i� MCINTYRE HOUSE F E B 101978 Salt Lake City,W Photo by W. Marker 12-77 Neg. at Ut. St. Hist. Society Lcoking at West and South Face ATTACHMENT E: CITY PLAN CONSIDERATIONS Adopted City Plan Policies and Guidance Zoning text amendments are reviewed for compliance with Salt Lake City master plans and adopted policies. There are several documents that provide guidance for historic preservation and housing. The master plans that address historic preservation goals and policies include the following: • Community Preservation Plan o The comprehensive plan for Historic Preservation, includes many related policies for incentivizing preservation. Plan Salt Lake o Plan Salt Lake includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outline in this master plan. o Includes guiding policies that preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. o Encourages the retention of areas and structures of historic and architectural value. o Promotes a balance of preservation with flexibility for change and growth. • Avenues Master Plan o The comprehensive plan for the Avenues encourages historic preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites. The master plans that address housing goals and policies include the following: • Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan o The housing plan encourages the creation of the flexible zoning tools and regulations to create additional housing stock. Plan Salt Lake o Includes guiding policies that encourage housing options that accommodate gaining in place, as well as the promotion of rehabilitation of existing housing stock. o Also includes guiding policies that address sustainable growth and development. Utilizing the embodied energy of an existing carriage to create an additional housing unit would be in line with the policies outline in this master plan. Community Preservation Plan The Community Preservation Plan, adopted in 2012, indicates that the City needs to adopt a "wider ranger of preservation tools." Historic preservation tools are generally identified as incentives, which can include an array of policies that encourage the preservation, restoration or reconstruction of important historic features on historic properties. Policy 2.1a: Ensure the long-term viability of existing local historic districts. Policy 2.1b: Ensure consistency between the Community Preservation Plan and all other adopted City plans. Policy 2.3a: Identify historic preservation as an important component of the City's sustainability efforts based on its important economic, environmental and cultural benefits to the City. Policy 3.20: Explore a variety of tools to determine the appropriate method for implementing historic preservation policies of a specific historic resource. Policy 3.3a: Align preservation -related City regulations with the goals and policies of this plan. PLNPCM2020-00106 165 July 9, 2020 Policy 3.3b: The Historic Preservation Overlay District standards are to be used as the basis for decision making when considering applications and the standards should be applied in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. Policy 3.39: Ensure that underlying zoning is supportive of preservation policies for the area in which historic or character preservation is proposed. Policy 3.3i: Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. Policy 3.3k: Support modification of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Policy 3.4a: Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. Policy 3.4b: Develop a wide range of incentives to encourage the protection of historic properties. Policy 3.4d: Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that he negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. Policy 6.1a: Historic Preservation is a primary tool to implement the sustainable goals of Salt Lake City. Policy 6.1b: The energy benefits, including life -cycle costs of preserving older buildings, should be understood by property owners, development professionals, decision makers, City Staff and the general public. Policy 6.5b: Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. Policy 6.5e: Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. Plan Salt Lake Guiding Principle: Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. Initiatives: 1. Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas and structures of historic and architectural value. 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with -flexibility -for change and growth. 6. Improve education and outreach about the value of historic preservation. Plan Salt Lake Housing Goals and Policies Guiding Principal/Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the city, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 1. Ensure access to affordable housing citywide (including rental and very low income). 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 3. Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. PLNPCM2020-00106 166 July 9, 2020 5. Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. 7. Promote high density residential in areas served by transit. 8. Support homeless services. Avenues Master Plan Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic District. Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Objective i s Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.2 Develop in fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Staff Discussion: The above stated policies and guidelines relate to the proposed language for the historic carriage house reconstruction or restoration for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The policies and guidelines encourage the creation of additional housing through flexibility and incentives within the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The proposed language also promotes the sustainability through the restoration or recreation of a historic carriage house. PLNPCM2020-00106 167 July 9, 2020 ATTACHMENT F: ANALYSIS OF ZONING AMENDMENT STANDARDS ZONING I=AMENDMENT'S 21A.f;o.o5o: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making a decision concerning a proposed text amendment, the City Council considers the following factors. Although the proposed ordinance is not complete, Staff drafted responses to the factors based on the concepts of the proposed ordinance. FACTOR FINDING RATiaN LE 1. Whether a proposed The proposal is generally The proposed text amendment text amendment is consistent with the policies of is in -line with the policies and consistent with the the applicable adopted guidelines found in the purposes, goals, planning documents for the applicable master plans, objectives and policies city related to historic expressed through Plan Salt of the city as stated preservation, housing and Lake, The Community Master through its various growth. Plan, The Five Year Housing adopted planning Plan and The Avenues Master documents; Plan. See the discussion of related policies in Attachment E. 2. Whether a proposed The proposal generally The purpose of the zoning text amendment furthers the purpose ordinance is the following: furthers the specific statement of the zoning purpose statements of ordinance. The purpose of this title is to the zoning ordinance; promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and weyare of the present and futu re inhabitants of Salt Lake city, to implerrient the adopted plans of the Cite, and to carr°Mj out the purposes of the Municipal hand Use Development and inanagernentAct, title zo, chapter g of the Utah Code Annotated or its successor, and other, relevant statutes. This turtle is, in addition, intended to: A. Lessen congestion in the streets or roads,- B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers, PLNPCM2020-00106 168 July 9, 2020 C. Provide adequate. light and air; D. Classifii land uses and distribute land developmentand utilization; E. Protect the tax base,- F. Secure econonky in governmental ea-penditures; G. Foster the City's industrial, business and msidential development; and H. Protect the environment. The proposal complies with the purposes of the zoning ordinance in a number of ways. The proposal provides additional protection for the environment through promoting sustainable development. Through adaptive reuse, restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house fosters the City's residential development. Additionally, the adaptive reuse or restoration of existing carriage houses preserves the embodied energy of the structure, thus reducing additional unpact to landfills and air quality. 3. Whether a proposed Staff finds that the proposal is The proposed text amendment text amendment is generally consistent with the is applicable to approximately consistent with the purposes and provisions of the 5 properties located within the purposes and H Historic Preservation H Historic Overlay, provisions of any Overlay District. 21A-34.020. The proposed applicable overlay language would likely be zoning district which located in 21A.34.020. The may imposed standards for alterations to additional standards-, contributing buildings and landmark sites would be a licaUle to the restoration or PLNPCM2020-00106 169 July 9, 2020 reconstruction of a historic carriage house. 4. The extent to which a The proposal provides an The proposed text amendment proposed text nimn'tive to preserve, restore promotes the creation of amendinent or reconstruct a historic additional dwelling units implements best feature associated with through the restoration or current, professional landmark sites. This reconstruction of historic practices of urban implements the intent of the features on historic properties. planning and design. regulations found in The proposed language 21A34.020. The proposal also implements not only the best implements best current, historic preservation practices, professional practices of urban but also the best planning plainiing and design. practices. PLNPCM2020-00106 170 July 9, 2020 ATTACHMENT G: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS The zoning text amendment was posted on Salt Lake City Planning Division's website on April 6, 2020, for public engagement and comment purposes. Notice of the post was provided via Listserve. All of the public comments that have been submitted are attached. PLNPCM2020-00106 171 July 9, 2020 May 8, 2020 Kelsey Lindquist Senior Planner Salt Lake City Planning Division Dear Mr. Lindquist, I am writing to you regarding the petition to amend Title 21A-Zoning of the city code to allow for the reconstruction of a documented historic carriage house at 222 4t" Avenue. My wife and I reside in our home in the upper avenues and we own three units in the Carlton Towers at 266 East 4t" Avenue; which is less than a quarter of a block from the subject property. The proposed amendments seem quite reasonable if a process for approval includes safeguards that assures conformity to historic values. With appropriate reviews, the preservation and/or reconstruction of historic landmark sites acknowledged by the National Register of Historic Places would be possible and would serve to enhance the aesthetic of the Avenues Historic District as well as several other unique sites and neighborhoods in our city. I believe that the request to obtain approval for an application under the proposed amendment utilizing the Historic Landmarks Commission's review and public scrutiny process provides the safeguards necessary to maintain historic integrity. I would encourage the City to approve the Zoning Amendment request. Respectfully, Jim Bradley Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 PLNPCM2020-00106 174 July 9, 2020 From: Barbara Hounsell To: Stephen C Pace Cc: Lindquist, Kelsey; Scott S. Cruze Subject: (EXTERNAL) Stephen C. Pace Carriage House Project Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:44:04 AM Hello Stephen, Barbara and I enjoyed talking with you on Sunday about your Carriage House reconstruction project. Assuming proper engineering and construction practices are followed, we are in full support of this historically important project as described as the Stephen C. Pace Historic Carriage House proposed zoning text amendment, 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah. The proper engineering and construction to which we refer must protect the integrity of the existing retaining wall on the north side of our Peery Apartment property. The project must not compromise our retaining wall with additional loads, including loads that come from structures, dirt or fill, landscape materials, vegetation, or water and water retention. Sincerely, Barbara Hounsell Alex Cross Owners of the Peery Apartments, LLC Cc: Scott Cruze Kelsey Lindquist PLNPCM2020-00106 175 July 9, 2020 From: Carol Foster To: Lindquist, Kelsey Cc: Paul Foster Subject: (EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2020-00106, 222 4th Ave Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:12:32 AM To whom it may concern: We are writing in support of Stephen Pace's renovation of 222 4th Ave. We are neighbors at 163 B St. We have spoken with Stephen and support his renovation plan. Our primary concerns were regarding keeping the community feeling of our neighborhood, promoting house ownership over renting, against Airbnbs / apartments and for more long-term housing for families or individuals. Stephen explained that his rentals have very little turnover of renters and we have witnessed that, living here since 2002. Another concern was windows overlooking our property (backyard of 163 B Street) and Stephen explained there weren't any. Feel free to reach out to us if you have any questions. Many thanks, Carol and Paul Foster PLNPCM2020-00106 176 July 9, 2020 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment Open House Comments Received by the Applicant Submitted May 18, 2020 From: To: Sent: WPM Mountain Standard Time Subject: Re: 222 4th Ave The cover letter looks good and I like the idea of including the buildings that will be affected by the new regulations. It's odd to have to create new regulations for so few buildings but if that is what the city planners say you must do I guess you must. Will they actually list the buildings that they new tens will apply to? The only other person that I know with a carriage house is Larry? Have you run the actual regulations by him? I doubt he will ever wasn't to do anything with them but he would have a good idea how they would apply to his structure. Good luck Sydney [Fonnesbeck] [215 A St] Oujiect:: Mountain Standard Time e: -mai We are in agreement with the proposed project this amendment would allow. It would be a great addition to our neighborhood. We have been waiting for years for the city to approve the improvement of the property. As it stands now, it is not only an eyesore, but it is dangerously close to falling down and so a safety issue as well. Don & Laurie Kocherhans Property owners 216-218 4th Avenue kirk.preserve@gi-nail.com (801 ) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Subject: Re: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comments/Questions are encouraged Hello, again. Both Ted and I have read your proposal with interest. You have found wonderful old photos and drawings. Your plan sounds good. I am pasting below what I have added as a note to accompany your proposal. Best wishes, Tucker Gurney My husband and I have lived at the corner of 4th Avenue and A Street since 1974 and have admired Stephen Pace's loving restoration work on the William F. Beer Estate. We hope he will be able to rebuild the fourth and final structure of the estate as a single family private residence in the style of the original carriage house designed by Richard Kletting. Elizabeth Gurney FFF entEW:M Mountain Standard Time Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comm entsfQuestions are encouraged Stephen, As you know I have a property on the same block as you. Yes it would be very good if you could get approval to clean up and construct a carriage house on your 4th Ave. property. Best wishes in that regard, Alan Y[orgason] [174 A St] kirk.preserve@gi-nail.com (801 ) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies From: Barbara Hounsell [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:44 AM To: Stephen C Pace < Cc: Lindquist. Kelsev < e sev. in au s s ccov.com>: Scott S. Cruze House Project Hello Stephen, Barbara and I enjoyed talking with you on Sunday about your Carriage House reconstruction project. Assuming proper engineering and construction practices are followed, we are in full support of this historically important project as described as the Stephen C. Pace Historic Carriage House proposed zoning text amendment, 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah. The proper engineering and construction to which we refer must protect the integrity of the existing retaining wall on the north side of our Peery Apartment property. The project must not compromise our retaining wall with additional loads, including loads that come from structures, dirt or fill, landscape materials, vegetation, or water and water retention. Sincerely, Barbara Hounsell Alex Cross Owners of the Peery Apartments, LLC cc: Scott Cruze, Kelsey Lindquist From: To: Sen : Mountain Standard Time Subject: Re: 222 4th Ave Hi Stephen, Sorry for the delayed response on this. My wife and I took a look at your proposal and it looks great. We are in full support of the 222 4th Ave Carriage House restoration project that you have proposed. Just a few weeks before you stopped by the house, we were commenting how that current structure looks like it's about to fall over and is kind of an kirk.lxrserve@grnail.com (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies eye sore. We were excited to hear that you are planning on rehabbing it. Thanks for sharing the details with us. Best, -Adam Adam & Juliette Stewart 225 3rd Ave From: To: Sen : Mountain Standard Time Subject: Re: Proposed Historic Carriage zoning text amendment Public Comments/Questions are encouraged We are in full support. We'd even support making it a 2 story taller house as well. Making it bigger in sq ft might make it more desirable over time. Of course as long as it looks similar to the original we'd love it. I'll try and get on the website tonight or tomorrow and post our comments. Jenni Thompson Theh G Wa lestate LLC. Mr. Wade owns two four-plexes on the corner of 4th Ave and B Street at 228 and 236 4th Ave. He does not live on site. He told me on 4/17/20 that he was in full support of my proposal but indicated that "he doesn't do email." I asked if I could provide his phone number to the city and he said that would be fine. Lloyd Wade (801) 694-4337 I have not been able to reach by phone the heirs/conservators of the estate of Robert Pearson, owners of the duplex at 173 and 175 B Street. Their tenants told me that they pay rents to an entity called B Street LLC via an entity called Black Aspen Management. I tried many times to reach Black Aspen but they do not answer and their voicemail is apparently malfunctioning. I am positive of the Pearson support of the project because in 2017 Mr. Pearson personally, verbally agreed to let me purchase for an unstated nominal amount a 5 foot strip of his back yard to allow me to have full control of the Historic Carriage House building footprint prior to rebuilding and then later in 2017, when his kjrk.lproserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies children had taken over his property, they executed a sale of the strip to me in exchange for $10. 1 began paying property taxes on the strip in 2018. A third person, Mr. Thomas Mulcock, 212 4th Ave, (801) 864-3881 owns a four-plex and garages on the southwest corner of the 222 lot. I provided him with the zoning change package in April but did not reach him by phone until May 11. He indicated that he did not carefully read my proposal, that he had no necessary objection to it, but that due to his wife's critical illness he doubted he would get to it in the near future. I told him that under the circumstances I would not bother him again. kirk.preserve@gmail.com (801) 949-4040 4) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION b) Agenda/Minutes July 16, 2020 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING July 16, 2020 at 5:30 PM � x vz" t7 This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation n�uNo. 2 Of 2020 (2)(b). C� T� IMPORTANT MEETING INFORMATION This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Building. Commission Members will connect remotely. We want to make sure everyone interested in the Historic Landmark Commission meetings can still access the meetings how they feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the Historic Landmark Commission meetings, they are available on the following platforms: • YouTube: www.voutube.com/slclivemeetinas • SLCty Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCty-Live/2 If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or provide general comments, email; historiclandmarks.comments@slcgov.com or connect with us on WebEx at: http://tiny.cc/sic-hlc-07-16-2020 Instructions for using WebEx are provided on our website at SLC.GOV/Planning. It is recommended to login 10 minutes prior to the start of the meeting. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 PM Approval of Minutes for June 4, 2020 Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Director's Report PUBLIC COMMENTS The Commission will hear public comments not pertaining to items listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment The Salt Lake City Planning Division has received a zoning text amendment petition from Kirk Huffaker, on behalf of Stephen Pace, to permit the reconstruction of historic carriage houses associated with Salt Lake City Landmark Sites and National Register sites located within the RMF-35 (Moderate Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), SR-1A (Special Development Residential) and I (Institutional) zoning districts. The reconstructed or restored historic carriage house would be utilized as a dwelling unit. The proposed text amendment is City wide. Related provisions of Title 21A Zoning may be amended as part of this petition. (Staff contact Kelsey Lindquist (801) 434-7930 or kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com). Case number PLNPCM2020-00106 NEXT MEETING The next regular meeting of the Commission is scheduled for Thursday, August 6, 2020, unless a special meeting is scheduled prior to that date. For Historic Landmark Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division's website at slc.gov/planning/public-meetings. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified, which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING July 16, 2020 at 5:30 PM � x vz" t7 This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation n�uNo. 2 Of 2020 (2)(b). C� T� APPEAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DECISION Anyone who is an "adversely affected party" as defined by Utah Code Section 10-9a-103, may appeal a decision of the Historic Landmark Commission by filing a written appeal with the appeals hearing officer within ten (10) calendar days following the date on which a record of decision is issued. The applicant may object to the decision of the Historic Landmark Commission by filing a written appeal with the appeals hearing officer within thirty (30) calendar days following the date on which a record of decision is issued For Historic Landmark Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division's website at slc.gov/planning/public-meetings. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified, which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING This meeting was held electronically pursuant to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No. 2 of 2020 (2)(b) Thursday, July 16, 2020 A roll is being kept of all who attended the Historic Landmark Commission Meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:30:00 PM . Audio recordings of the Historic Landmark Commission meetings are retained for a period of time. Present for the Historic Landmark Commission meeting were: Chairperson Kenton Peters, Commissioners Rocio Torres Mora, Victoria Petro- Eschler, Michael Vela and Paul Svendsen. Vice Chairperson Robert Hyde and David Richardson were excused. Planning Staff members present at the meeting were: Nick Norris, Planning Director; Paul Nielson, Attorney; Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner and Rosie Jimenez, Administrative Secretary. Chairperson Peters provided participation options and instructions to the public. APPROVAL OF THE June 4, 2020, MEETING MINUTES. MOTION Commissioner Petro- Eschler moved to approve the June 4, 2020, meeting minutes. Commissioner Svendsen seconded the motion. Commissioners Vela, Maw, Petro-Eschler, Svendsen, and Torres Mora, "Aye". The motion passed unanimously. REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Chairperson Peters reported, Commissioner Esther Stowell has stepped down from the Historic Landmark Commission. We appreciate her service and wish her well on her next steps. We are working on filling her seat. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR Commissioner Adams will not be reappointed he has chosen to step down. There are now two vacancies. There have been several people who have applied. We will update as we find out new information. 5:30:36 PM Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment The Salt Lake City Planning Division has received a zoning text amendment petition from Kirk Huffaker, on behalf of Stephen Pace, to permit the reconstruction of historic carriage houses associated with Salt Lake City Landmark Sites and National Register sites located within the RMF-35 (Moderate Multi -Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), SR-1A (Special Development Residential) and I (Institutional) zoning districts. The reconstructed or restored historic carriage house would be utilized as a dwelling unit. The proposed text amendment is City wide. Related provisions of Title 21A Zoning may be amended as part of this petition. (Staff contact Kelsey Lindquist (801) 434- 7930 or kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com). Case number PLNPCM2020-00106 Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposal and recommended that the Historic Landmark Commission review the proposed regulations and make recommendations to the Planning Commission. The Commission and Staff discussed the following: • Reasoning behind approving demolishing and reconstructing versus creating and ADU • Clarification on owner occupancy on an ADU Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission July 16, 2020 Page 1 • Clarification on Staff Report in reviewing alterations • Questions on zoning codes • Restoration or Reconstruction of the existing structure Kirk Huffaker and Stephen Pace were available for questions. The Commission and Applicant discussed the following: • How does the Proposal benefit the City as a whole • Total of Carriage Houses and explanation • Clarification of proposed qualifying zones • Clarification of the request and building renovation • More clarification on the existing structure • Preservation clarification • Definition of Carriage House • Lot line adjustment or consolidation PUBLIC HEARING 6:30:46 PM Chairperson Peters opened the Public Hearing; Cindy Cromer — In support of proposal and asks city and commissioner to approve Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Peters closed the Public Hearing. MOTION 6:54:18 PM Commissioner Svendsen made a motion that the Historic Landmark Commission Move that the HLC forward the following recommendation to the Planning Commission: 1. The Commission is generally very supportive of the applicant's goals of increasing density on the property and making the property more economically sensible. 2. The Commission also suggests that there are significant shortcoming both procedural and substantive with the current zoning ordinance that are preventing reasonable development on properties like this. 3. This seems like an end around of the existing City's ordinance regarding Accessory Dwelling Units and also the RMF-35 4. Because of the application is so limited it is like spot zoning and that can have unforeseen consequences with respect to future neighbors and a variety of circumstances. In summary, the HLC forwards a negative recommendation to this particular proposal but urges the Planning Commission to consider other changes to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance or RMF-35 Ordinance that would permit the applicant to move forward with what he is proposing and applies to the City more broadly as a whole. Commissioner Torres -Mora seconded the motion Commissioners Vela, Svendsen, Petro- Eschler. Maw, Torres -Mora, voted "Aye". The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:07:58 PM Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission July 16, 2020 Page 2 SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING This meeting was held electronically Wednesday, February 23, 2022 A roll is being kept of all who attended the Planning Commission Meeting. The meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30 pm. Audio recordings of the Planning Commission meetings are retained for a period of time. These minutes are a summary of the meeting. For complete commentary and presentation of the meeting, please visit https://www.youtube.com/c/SLCLiveMeetings. Present for the Planning Commission meeting were: Vice -Chairperson Maurine Bachman, Commissioners Andra Ghent, Jon Lee, Andres Paredes, Mike Christensen, Brenda Scheer, Adrienne Bell, and Aimee Burrows. Chairperson Amy Barry was excused. Planning Staff members present at the meeting were: Planning Manager John Anderson, Planning Manager Kelsey Lindquist, Senior City Attorney Hannah Vickery, Associate Planner Grant Amann, Principal Planner Katia Pace, Senior Planner Kristina Gilmore, Senior Planner Eric Daems, Urban Designer Laura Bandara, Principal Planner Amanda Roman, Administrative Secretary David Schupick, and Administrative Secretary Aubrey Clark. REPORT OF THE CHAIR & VICE -CHAIR REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 9, 2022 Brenda abstained. All other Commissioners voted "yes". The motion passed. PUBLIC HEARINGS ADU Conditional Use at Approximately 1532 South Green Street - Dorian Rosen, the property owner, has requested conditional use approval for a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) to be situated in the rear, west side of the property located at the above -stated address. The ADU will be 14'8" tall and 650 square -feet. To meet the requirements to allow the ADU to reach the maximum 650 square feet a 425 square foot addition to the main dwelling will be built. The subject property is zoned R-1 /5,000 (Single -Family Residential) and is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or grant.amann@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2021- 01273 Associate Planning Grant Amann reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff report. He stated that Staff recommends approval with conditions listed in the staff report. He reviewed the ADU size, parking location, ADU access, and neighborhood compatibility. Commissioner Aimee Burrows shared concern about condition number 3 being added in. She felt that it should not be added into the conditions because it is already part of City code. The Commissioners discussed how it was handled on previous cases. Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 1 The Applicant Dorian Rosen stated that he was available for any questions but did not have a presentation. Commissioner Ghent asked the applicant if he was aware of the City not permitting rentals under 30 days. The applicant stated that he was aware. PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Bachman opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one wished to speak, Commissioner Bachman closed the public hearing. MOTION Commissioner Brenda Scheer stated, Motion to Approve with Modifications Recommended by the Planning Commission: Based on the findings listed in the staff report, the information presented, and input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use petition (PLNPCM2021-01273) as proposed, with the conditions listed in the staff report, with the following modifications: removal of condition 3. Commissioner Andra Ghent seconded the motion. Commissioners Andres Paredes, Mike Christensen, Adrienne Bell, Jon Lee, Andra Ghent, Aimee Burrows, and Brenda Scheer voted "yes". The motion passed unanimously. Green Street Alley Vacation - Sara Koenig, the property owner at approximately 1343 S Green Street, is requesting Salt Lake City to vacate a "T" shaped alley running between 1300 South and Harrison Avenue and Green Street and 700 East. The alley exists on paper only and the abutting property owners have incorporated the alley into their properties. The property abutting this alley is zoned R-1/5,000 (Single -Family Residential District) and is located within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Katia Pace at 801-535-6354 or katia.pace@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020- 00903 Principal Planner Katia Pace reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report. She stated that Staff recommends a positive recommendation to City Council. Commissioner Aimee Burrows asked for clarification on if the property owners will have to buy the land or if it will be deeded to them. Katia Pace stated that it will be deeded to them, based on single family residential zoning. Commissioner Burrows stated that she remembers another case in which the property owners had to purchase the land. Katia Pace stated that is the case for multifamily zoning districts or commercial properties. Commissioner Burrows asked if encroachment is a reason for vacant use of the alley. Katia Pace stated that in the past it functioned as an alley but since the demolition of the properties on the east side for the expansion of 700 East, it no longer functioned as an alley. Commissioner Burrows asked for clarification that the lack of use then caused the encroachment. Katia Pace stated that was correct. Commissioner Burrows asked if all the property owners have signed onto the project. Katia Pace stated that the applicant was looking for a building permit on top of the alley, and at that moment found the property was not theirs but the city's property. She also stated that the five property owners have signed the form and the approval of the church for this application. Nicholas Lumby stated that he did apply for the application when he found out the land was not part of his property. He stated that one of his neighbors had tried to get the alley vacated before in the past. Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 2 Principal Planner Amanda Roman reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report. She stated that Staff recommends a positive recommendation to City Council. Commissioner Aimee Burrows asked if this rezone would prevent demolition of homes. Amanda Roman clarified that when it is brought to City Council, the applicant will enter into a development agreement with the city that will require them to maintain at least the same number of housing units. Amanda Roman also stated that she is not sure if that agreement will state that they cannot demolish and then rebuild the existing structures, but the applicant will be tied into their "replacement" housing choice as outlined in their housing mitigation plan. Aimee Burrows asked for clarification on if they will not necessarily be required to keep the two old existing houses. Amanda Roman stated that she doesn't believe so. John Anderson stated that it is hard to require that outside of the historic districts. Bert Holland stated that he has already begun renovation and has families eager to move in. He also stated that he has already attracted a high number of diverse buyers seeking single-family workforce housing. PUBLIC HEARING Vice -Chair Maurine Bachman opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one wished to speak, Vice -Chair Maurine Bachman closed the public hearing. MOTION Commissioner Brenda Scheer stated, Based on the information in the staff report, the information presented, and the input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to approve PLNPCM2021-01073. Commissioner Mike Christensen seconded the motion. Commissioners Andra Ghent, Jon Lee, Andres Paredes, Mike Christensen, Brenda Scheer, Adrienne Bell, and Aimee Burrows all voted "yes". The motion passed unanimously. Historic Carriage House Zoning Text Amendment — Stephen Pace, the applicant, is requesting a zoning text amendment to permit the restoration or reconstruction of a historic carriage house for the purposes of creating a dwelling unit. The dwelling unit, located within the reconstructed or restored historic carriage house, would not be required to meet density, lot coverage, setbacks of the applicable base zoning district, or the accessory structure footprint or height limitations. The proposed language requires eligible properties to be both a Salt Lake City Landmark and listed as a National Register Site of Historic Places and located in one of the following zoning districts: RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi - Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), I (Institutional) or SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential). (Staff contact: Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226-7227 or kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-00106 Planning Manager Kelsey Lindquist reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report. She stated that Staff recommends denial of the proposal because it does not meet the standards. She reviewed the text amendment background stating that the proposal originally went before the Historic Landmark Commission and received a negative recommendation. She shared some of the conflicts including the existing ADU ordinance which requires an owner occupancy requirement, but the applicant does not live on site. She listed other compliance issues as all principal structures require street frontage, lot minimums, and lot and bulk requirements. She stated that Staff has tried to work with the applicant on language solutions but was ultimately unsuccessful. Staff forwarded the amendment to the Historic Landmark Commission for review to receive direction for the applicant on the proposed language, but Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 9 the Commission forwarded a negative recommendation against the proposal. She stated that the HLC did not discuss potential solutions to improve the language. She said that the applicant, since going before the HLC in July of 2020, has yet to put the proposed language in an ordinance format, address Staff concerns about enforceability and administration, and requested to continue to the planning commission for recommendation to the City Council. She reviewed the criteria that included in the ordinance format as: purpose statement, definition of terms, applicability, process, and standards/criteria. She noted that the existing language does not include much of the criteria which is crucial for Staff and City Council. She reviewed the purpose of the text amendment and incentive to the text amendment. She reviewed the other eligible properties that the text amendment could affect. The applicant Stephen Pace shared a photo slide of the Beer estate. He stated, "Just above the left center of the photograph is the white topped buildings or carriage house and a 30-year-old older building referred to as the harness shop from 1867 you can see from the photograph that there I guess were no drones or aerial photographs being taken in salt lake but you can date it you know very securely. The city and county building is finished on the upper left-hand corner The catholic cathedral is under construction in the upper middle of the picture and so on so. If we could go one more okay this is working this is the block that's under this is the block that's under consideration we heard our stuff earlier in the evening that about the problems with people misunderstanding alleyways in the avenues this block is an excellent example if you look down on the lower right hand corner at property 225 of third avenue you can see that there's about six feet of that house that is on the neighbor's property and then if you look at 223 fourth avenue there's about a similar six feet of that house but or that apartment building that is on 225's property and the same thing with 217 and so on now these are not maps are not absolutely accurate but I had the properties surveyed and I know they're darn close if you go up to 222 which is the carriage house address you can see that there's a white roof building almost dead center in the photograph that I guess I own about six feet of that neighbor's garage and the whopper is if you go up to the northwest corner 4th avenue and a street you can see a under some trees there is a fake looking anyway carriage house built in 1990 with the Salt Lake City building permit where Salt Lake City gave the builder permission to just take the city land so about two-thirds of the garage there on the corner of that lot does not belong to the belongs to Salt Lake City and it was given away. I raised that issue with the city saying well if you're willing to part with that ground I'd like to get a few hundred feet can I do that oh no and the city the chief of staff then decided that they were going to start sending out bills to the people that owned that carriage house for a couple thousand dollars that take carriage house a couple of thousand dollars a year and I said you don't want to do that that's a hornet's nest and they sent out the first set of bills and then they chickened out they did not have the they just canceled the bills and decided that well we'll go we'll just give away the property because of our mistake so on the next page then this is the beer mansion the photograph that you were shown earlier by Miss Lindquist is about a 500 foot footprint of image of the carriage house or I'm sorry of the harness shop house which has nothing to do with the you know pretty imposing structure you can see there the cladding designed to serve the or cladding designed together with the carriage house to serve the William Beer family next slide these two buildings then the one in front outlined in red is the harness shop house about just about exactly 500 square feet of footprint and behind it outlined in blue is the carriage house as it was built in and this is the 1905 photo next one please so to give you a feeling for what that looks like if you take the 222 fourth avenue this is just about dead center in the photograph or in the map the Sanborn Fire Map you can see a square darkish building yeah that has if well an analogy would be that if you were looking if you were taking god's view of the Washington monument looking down on the Washington monument you would see almost exactly that same profile a pyramid top that the only way you can get a building shaped like that fire like the fire map shows is for a ride a pyramid but instead of sitting on a 500 foot limestone base I believe it is for the Washington monument it's only on a 10-foot brick base so then we scanned that into the go ahead from the tower on 8th street and 6th avenue and so here is what the carriage house behind once again behind the harness shop house looks like in you know to within probably an inch maybe an inch and a half of resolution there's enough photographic evidence of remaining materials on site that we basically know Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 10 that what the building looked like was a 10 foot brick or a 10 foot high 35 foot wide brick cube with a pyramid on top of it and it's a right angle pyramid with all the faces looking to look the same now for some context most of what we talked about with the historic landmarks commission I had assumed an error that they were people a little closer to their high school geometry than they evidently were and that they would understand what we were proposing it's the Washington monument with a pyramid and a drip edge on it and that's what we're proposing to build or to rebuild and it's a design that is I believe about 4 500 years old it ain't new Greeks had it the Egyptians have it it's been around for a long time we got a lot of pushback from the landmarks commission with people saying that your design is speculative it's conjectural you don't know what the building looked like that was probably the biggest single thing we talked about in the landmarks commission hearing it turns out though that with the stuff that miss Lindquist has published last week the mention of concept of improper design conjectural design and so on that's all banished that's all gone someplace else so the city doesn't so what the main thing the city believed or that the landmark commission believed just was not true and it's disappeared from the record." Vice -Chair Bachman interject to let the applicant know that he had one minute of presentation time remaining. The applicant stated "Okay well let's see is there um we're looking here if I just let me summarize it let's go to the last page okay let's look at this one I looked at four almost 400 dwelling units that have gone through landmark sites since January 2019 actually they went back a year past that so that's four years worth of data that produced 111 applications for dwelling unit review the pages of text that generated was just under eight thousand now the champion in terms of pages that were submitted to the landmarks commission is the beer carriage house which has 179 pages of stuff to go through the winner and still champion based on the planning commission submission is that it's now grown to 187." Vice -Chair Bachman asked Mr. Pace to wrap up his presentation. Mr. Pace stated, "well yeah what I'd like to do would be to come back and talk since I've got 187 pages that I've got a report on here and we only talked about three pages three of those pages at the landmarks mission hearing I would like to be rescheduled to give to do justice to this and talk about what we've proposed what we haven't proposed and what the city has the planning staff has substituted for it's ill-considered and withdrawn older proposals." Vice -Chair Bachman asked Mr. Pace if he would like to withdraw his application. Mr. Pace said no. Vice -Chair Bachman asked if the Commissioners had any questions for Mr. Pace. Commissioner Scheer asked if Mr. Pace understood that the text amendment that he was proposing would only affect him and a few other properties. The applicant stated yes it would affect 4 other properties. Commissioner Scheer stated that the text amendment which he has submitted has some deficiencies. She stated that the slides of the property that Mr. Pace shared had nothing to do with the text amendment he was requesting. PUBLIC HEARING Vice -Chair Bachman opened the public hearing. Seeing that no one wished to speak, Vice -Chair Bachman closed the public hearing. Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 11 Commissioner Burrows asked if City Council voted on the text amendment after it was forwarded with a negative recommendation from the Historic Landmark Commission. Planning Manager Kelsey Lindquist said that it had not been voted on, HLC being the first step in the process and Planning Commission being the second step. MOTION Commissioner Andra Ghent stated, Based on the information in the staff report, the information presented, and the input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the requested zoning text amendment for carriage house reconstruction. Commissioner Aimee Burrows seconded the motion. Commissioners Brenda Scheer, Aimee Burrows, Andra Ghent, Jon Lee, Adrienne Bell, Mike Christensen, Andres Paredes voted "yes". The motion passed with a negative recommendation forwarded to the City Council. The meeting adjourned at 9:31 PM. Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 23, 2022 Page 12 5) ORIGINAL APPLICANT PETITION y r Zoning Amendment [] Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance ❑ Amend the Zoning Map OFFICE USE ONLY Received By: krK Date Received: I Project #: VWpG +11Zzz.0- wtd6 w Ia4. Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Address of Subject Property (or 71/6. ): 2/. Z, q� SQ (f LA G� Xf,1� 9,W_119-9 Name of Applicant: Aone: ' Stephen Pace (801) 363-8190 Address of Applicant: ��r 1 13 a 14- �a(4-e- G< E-mail of Applicant: Ce I/Fax: User03ll47@aol.com Applicant's Interest in Subject Property: 0 Owner ❑ Contractor ❑ Architect ❑ Other: Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant): E-mail of Property Owner: Phone: User03ll47@aol.com (801) 363-8190 Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at (801) 535-7700 prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: filing fee of $1,034, plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre Text Amendment: filing fee of $1,035, plus $100 for newspaper notice. Plus additional fee for mailed public notices. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Signature of O ner or Agent: Date: Updated 7/1/19 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Y 1. Project Description (please attach additional sheets.) A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned. EUList the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate forth e area 0 1-1 Is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Mailing Address: Planning Counter in Person: Planning Counter PO Box 145471 451 South State Street, Room 215 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Telephone: (801) 535-7700 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED V I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package. Updated 7/1/19 Kirk Huffaker Presenlaboi i Strategies APPLICATION FOR ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NARRATIVE February 4, 2020 TO: Kelsey Lindquist, Senior Planner, Salt Lake City Planning Division FROM: Kirk Huffaker, Principal/Consultant, Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies This application and accompanying narrative for zoning text amendment is submitted on behalf of Stephen Pace, property owner for 222 4th Avenue, Salt Lake City. The applicant desires Administrative, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration of and prompt action on the application to resolve multiple zoning issues with the subject property that prevents the owner from achieving his goal of adaptive use/reconstruction of a historic carriage house. This former carriage house was one of the four primary structures of the historic William F. Beer Estate, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1977 and is an individual landmark site in the Salt Lake City Cultural Register. According to historic research, the Beer Estate residence dates to 1899 and the carriage house dates to c. 1899. Both were constructed according to design by architect Richard K.A. Kletting. Kletting also served as architect for a house and carriage house with similar details for Albert Fisher (Fisher Mansion and Carriage House) at 1206 West 200 South in 1893. The Beer Estate carriage house is described in the NRHP nomination as follows: Area residents describe it as originally a two-story brick structures with a "steeple" top. Dimensions were approximately 47' x 40' and it was used to shelter (at least) nine draft/riding horses, cattle, chickens, rabbits, etc., two buggies, and as a residence for the caretakers. The structure was cut in half about World War 1, for use as a garage. Current condition is deteriorated. Since 1977 when the paragraph was written, the carriage house has continued to deteriorate. Current site conditions exhibit severe structural deficiency but original brick and stone foundations, wood floors, and wood framing and walls are present. The owner desires to rebuild the carriage house within the original footprint and according to the original design. Use of the carriage house is proposed to be single-family residential with a single -car garage. Due to the cost of material salvage, architectural replication, and construction, and given that the project is entirely privately funded, the housing unit is not proposed to be affordable housing. Some original materials have already been salvaged for reuse, and the owner desires to reuse as much of the existing Kirk.presei veCgmail.com (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 2 material and structure as possible in the reconstruction. The proposed design for reconstruction of the carriage house has been completed and initially submitted for discussion with the city, The property at 222 4th Ave. is zoned RMF-35 and is located in the Lower (West) Avenues neighborhood and Avenues Historic District. There are three primary issues that are obstacles to adaptive use and reconstruction and not satisfied by any section in the current zoning ordinance, including: Allowance for two residentially -used structures on the same property where the property owner does not keep a permanent address; Allowance for reconstruction of a previously existing structure; Allowance to reconstruct without meeting the minimum lot size within the zoning district. In addition, we believe that these issues will not be resolved by the Adaptive Reuse Ordinance (in process), revisions to the RMF-30 zoning classification (in process), and are not addressed through the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance. Therefore, to address the shortcomings, the following supportive documentation and zoning text amendment draft language are proposed for Chapter 21 A.34 Overlay Districts under 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District. As a point of application process, it is acceptable to the applicant to utilize the city's existing process for Conditional Use to obtain approval for use of the property. We believe that utilizing the Conditional Use process along with Historic Landmarks Commission review for design will adequately give the public two opportunities for input before two separate commissions. However, if the Planning Division can determine another acceptable application and review process that would only involve review before one commission and administrative review, the applicant would be open to receiving information about this possibility. The applicant reserves the right to approve or deny any proposed process change. The goals of this application to address the three current deficiencies and well supported by the city's wide range of plans and guiding documents, including those that are neighborhood -specific, for historic preservation, and for housing, The following is a summary list of those plans and supportive statements from each. kJr-k.preserve@gmail_com (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 3 Avenues Master Plan Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Planning Goal: Continue to encourage private restoration and rehabilitation efforts in the Avenues Community through financial assistance and supportive zoning and building code enforcement. (pg. 3) Historic Preservation Planning Goal: Encourage preservation of historically and architecturally significant sites and the established character of the Avenues and South Temple Historic Districts. (pg. 4) Future land use map indicates Medium -Density 8-20 Unites per Gross Acre (pg. 7) Property is situated between an urban trail (A Street) and within one block of two Collector streets (B Street and Second Avenue), as well as a half -mile from the Central Business District, therefore meeting this plan's and many other plan's goals of proximity to transportation and for walkability. Urban Design Planning Goal: Design public facilities to enhance the established residential character of the Avenues, and encourage private property improvements that are visually compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (pg. 10) Residential Design Guidelines The applicant's overall goal is most closely is defined as Rehabilitation in the Design Guidelines, but could also be viewed as a combination of strategies, including Reconstruction. Rehabilitation is defined in Part 1, page 3:5: "Rehabilitation is the process of returning a property to a state which makes a contemporary use possible, while still preserving those portions or features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. Rehabilitation may include the adaptive reuse of the building, and major or minor additions may also occur. Most good preservation projects in Salt Lake City may be considered rehabilitation projects." A definition for Reconstruction is provided in the Appendix, pg. C:3, and states that Reconstruction is: kirk.preserveddgmad ce)n i (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Page 4 Preservation Strategies "The act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, as if [sic] appeared at a specific period of time." Accessory Structures (Part II 9:1) This application follows the guidelines in Chapter 9: Accessory Structures, including the Context & Character, Design Objective, Preserving or Rehabilitating Historic Accessory Structures, and subsections with the headings: Preserve a historic accessory building when feasible. New accessory buildings should be constructed to be compatible with the primary structure. Attaching garages and carports to the primary structure should be avoided. The Avenues (Part III 13:1-14) This application complies with the stipulations on page 13:12 under the heading Accessory Structures within the specific chapter for The Avenues: - Most secondary structures were built along the rear of the lot, accessed by the alley, if one existed. This should be continued. - Garages, as well as driveways, should not dominate the streetscape; therefore, they should be detached from the main house and located to the rear of the house, if possible. - Historically, garages and carriage houses in the Avenues were simple wood structures covered with a gabled or hipped roof. - A new secondary structure should follow historic precedent, in terms of material and form. Community Historic Preservation Plan "The need to preserve the unique character of the City's urban neighborhoods, while allowing for modifications to existing homes to meet today's current living standards for space and convenience are important City policies." (pg. 1-8) The CHPP references the city's Community Housing Plan (II-7,8), and while those references are supportive of this application, they are not from the city's most current housing plan. The city adopted the Growing SLC Housing Plan in 2018 and references E�; iri: Fir e5erve«�-fir i �clil.CU�rI (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservafion Strategies Page 5 from that plan are included in a later section. However, the CHPP does reference goals of the city's Strategic Plan and Futures Report on pages II-10 and II-11. Those that are also supportive of this application include: - Enforce preservation strategies for buildings and neighborhoods. - Our historical heritage, including historic buildings and neighborhoods, is recognized as a vital component of an exciting, livable city. Preserve historic structures, streets, and other landmarks in all new development strategies. - Assist property owners with solving the challenges of adaptive reuse. Policies and Actions Relating to Regulations 3.31 Encourage amendment of the building development code to clearly enable appropriate historic renovation and remodels as well as adaptive reuse of historic structures. 3.3k Support modifications of existing historic resources to allow for changes in use that will encourage the use of the structure for housing or other appropriate uses in historic districts in an effort to ensure preservation of the structure. Regulatory Incentives Two sections that support this application are Flexibility in Zoning Regulations (I11-31), and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings (III-32). These are further supported by: 3.4a Continue to broaden the range of regulatory tools available to encourage the preservation of historic properties. 3.4c Modification to lot, bulk and signage standards should be allowed in local historic districts and to Landmark Sites where the modification would allow for better compliance with the historic preservation standards than the underlying zoning standard would allow. 3.4d Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures should be allowed for a variety of uses in appropriate locations where it is found that the negative impacts can be mitigated and where the uses do not require significant alterations to the historic integrity of the interior of the structure. �Ii1�-AIl_C ���i (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 6 Economic Development 6.4c Historic preservation is identified as an important means of providing employment opportunities for local crafts persons and skilled workers which beep money in the local economy. Housing 6.5a Ensure zoning supports the retention and reuse of existing historic apartment and non-residential buildings. 6.5b Support the renovation and use of historic apartment buildings and the adaptive reuse of historic non-residential buildings for residential units. 6.5e Allow the development of additional dwelling units as an incentive for preservation of historic structures. Growing Salt Lake Housing Plan Goal 1: Increase Housing Options Objective 1: Review and modify land -use and zoning regulations to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering city. 1.1.1 Develop flexible zoning tools and regulations, with a focus along significant transportation routes. 1.1.2 Develop in -fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock, increase housing options, create redevelopment opportunities, and allow additional units within existing structures, while minimizing neighborhood impacts. Objective 2: Remove impediments in City processes to encourage housing development. Goal 3: Equitable & Fair Housing Objective 2: Align resources and invest in strategic expansion of opportunity throughout all neighborhoods of the city and access to existing areas of opportunity. Objective 3. Implement Life cycle Housing principles in neighborhoods throughout the city. 3.3.1 Support diverse and vibrant neighborhoods by aligning land use policies that promote a housing market capable of accommodating residents throughout all stages of life. (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation SO-ategies Page 7 The SLC Comprehensive Housing Policy (2016) also includes supportive statements for this proposal: 1. Foster and celebrate the urban residential tradition; 2. Respect the character and charm of predominantly residential districts, including those with historic character and qualities, while also providing opportunities for the provision of local goods and services easily accessed by neighborhoods; 4. Develop new housing opportunities throughout the City; 7. Recognize that residents, business owners, and local government all have a role to play in creating and sustaining healthy neighborhoods. Plan Salt Lake Under Sustainable Growth & Development on page 9, the paragraphs on Placemaking and Density, and those that reference Compatibility and Green Building on page 10, are supportive of this application. On page 14, supportive Guiding Principles of Plan Salt Lake include the following: 2) Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and how they get around. 3) Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City, providing the basic human need for safety and responding to changing demographics. 8) A beautiful city that is people focused. 9) Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past. 10) Vibrant, diverse, and accessible artistic and cultural resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. Under Chapter 1 - Neighborhoods, the supportive Initiatives on page 17 include: 1. Maintain neighborhood stability and character. 4. Support neighborhood identity and diversity. 6. Incorporate artistic elements and support cultural events on a neighborhood scale to reinforce neighborhood character and identity. Under Chapter 2 - Growth, the supportive Initiatives on page 19 include: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. 6. Accommodate and promote an increase in the city's population. (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 8 Under Chapter 3 - Housing, the supportive Initiatives on page 21 include: 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people -oriented. 6. Promote energy efficient housing and rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Under Chapter 6 - Natural Environment, the supportive Initiatives on page 27 include: 3. Practice responsible waste management by: reusing and repurposing materials, including promoting the reuse of existing buildings over demolition. Under Chapter 8 - Beautiful City, the supportive Initiatives on page 31 include: 5. Support and encourage architecture, development, and infrastructure that: reflects our diverse cultural, ethnic, and religious heritage. 7. Reinforce and preserve neighborhood district character and a strong sense of place. Under Chapter 9 - Preservation, the supportive Initiatives on page 33 include: 1.Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. 2. Encourage the incorporation of historic elements into buildings, landscapes, public spaces, streetscapes, neighborhoods, and districts where appropriate. 3. Retain areas of structures of historic and architectural value. 4. Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. 5. Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. Under Chapter 13 - Government, the supportive Initiatives on page 41 include: 2. Provide opportunities for public participation, input, and engagement throughout the decision -making process. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT In the H Historic Preservation Overlay District as defined under Chapter 21A.34.020, reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed if the following conditions are met: 1) The resource is a Salt Lake City Landmark Site as defined within Chapter 21A.34.020. 2) The site is located within and holds a multi -family zoning classification. 3) Previously existing buildings proposed for reconstruction must be proven to have previously existed through at least two of the following methods: lrk pl esel�2e" z�'gn all , ;r-'l I i (801) 949-4040 Kirk Huffaker Preservation Strategies Page 9 - Sanborn maps; - Historic photographs; - Planning, zoning or building permit records; Identifiable surviving structural elements such as foundations, walls, basements, etc. 4) The reconstruction will not exceed the size of the original structure (i.e. built within the historic footprint). 5) If no adjacent neighbor impacts are determined, the reconstruction will follow original/ historic setbacks and thus not be required to meet modern setback standards. if unintended neighbor impacts are determined to be present for adjacent properties, additional buffers may be required. 6) The reconstructed carriage house will result in a maximum of one new dwelling unit on the property. 7) The reconstruction will only be for residential use. 8) The design of the reconstruction and will meet all applicable design review standards and criteria through the Historic Landmarks Commission review process. 9) The site has a clean record such that buildings on the property were not built or subdivided illegally. 10) The site will be restricted from further subdivision at any time in the future. The following conditions are NOT required by this text amendment to allow for reconstruction: 1) That the property owner be required to keep a permanent address at the site of the reconstruction; 2) Meeting the current minimum lot size. 3) Meeting off -site parking standards. kirl;.preserve(d-)g�-nail.com (801) 949-4040 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Buzz Center 451 South State Street, Room 215 Phone: (801) 535-7700 P.O. Box 145471 Fax : (801) 535-7750 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Date: Feb 06, 2020 181 B STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103 Project Name: Project Address: Detailed Description: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 222 E 4TH AVE PLANNING COMMISSION �I�111111flI�IIIIIIIIIIIIRIUVAVIIIVII�IIIIII�N1YUlU Amount Description Qtv Dept C Ctr Obj Invoice Paid Due Invoice Number: 1677043 Filing Fee 1 P6 P0900 125111 $1, 034.00 $ 0 . CC $1, 034.00 Newspaper Notice 1 6 0900 1890 $10 C. 0 $ 0. 0 C $100.00 Postage 111 6 0900 1890 $54.3a0.00 $54.39 Total for invoice1677043 $1,188.3 $0.0 $1,188.3 Total for PLNPCNI2020-00106 $1,188.31 $0.oq $1,188.3 OFFICE USE ONLY Intake By: MM5746 CAP ID # PLNPCM2020-00106 Total Due: $1,188.39 VIIRIBIIIVII�IINIBVIIIIIIVIIIIlYI111�IIINlllllll ❑0 d a R1 lip] www.slcpermits.com _..� t, Please Keep This Box Clear 6) MAILING LIST OWN —FULL —NAME OWN _ADD OWN _CITY TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 181 N 'B' S' SALT LAKE CITY AIC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 49 JACKSON Current Occupant 529 E SOU- Salt Lake City STATE OF UTAH 450 N STAI SALT LAKE CITY Current Occupant 603 E SOU- Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 14 SALT LAKE CITY JUSTIN R PADAWER; SALLY G PADAWER (J' 259 E SEVE SALT LAKE CITY OWN ZIP OWN STATE 84103 UT WY 83001 UT 84102 UT 84114 UT 84102 UT 84114 UT 84103