Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Provided Information - 11/7/2023COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: November 7, 2023 RE: 1518 South 300 West Alley Vacation PLNPCM2023-000408 BRIEFING UPDATE CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY Item Schedule: Briefing: October 17, 2023 Set Date: October 17, 2023 Public Hearing: November 7, 2023 Potential Action: November 14, 2023 During the October 17, 2023 briefing, Council Members discussed the proposed walkway through a future development on the site. Adding vehicular access to the walkway was mentioned to help alleviate difficulties driving in this area due to 400 West being closed, and a nearby abandoned rail line. A Council Member stated their preference for keeping the walkway as proposed for pedestrians and bicycles only and remarked that not allowing vehicles to access the walkway would make the area quieter for residents. The petitioner felt strongly that pedestrian access better meets the City's midblock walkway goals than adding vehicular access to the walkway. Council Members also discussed street activation. A desire was expressed for the majority of the 300 West fagade's ground floor to be retail and restaurant space with no parking access on that street. Apartment and parking access, lobbies, and amenities would be provided on Andrew and Van Buren Avenues. After the briefing, the petitioner followed up with staff indicating that including additional width to allow vehicular access would make it unfeasible to develop the project. Their preference is to keep the proposal as is with an approximately 2o-foot-wide walkway through the development. A second option would provide vehicle access for the public through the western building's parking garage between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues from 7 am to 8 pm seven days a week. This would result in the loss of some amenity space and parking. The proposal would maintain this access until a potential future development connects Andrew and Van Buren Avenues via a road. The image below shows the proposed vehicle access through the parking garage. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Option ?- Add Dil a Through access Building B. Remove Amenides and Parking. P�oposed�rress The following information was provided for the October 17, 2023 Council briefing and public hearing. It is included again for background purposes. ISSUE AT -A -GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate two City -owned alleys near the above address, west Of 300 West and between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues in Council District Five as shown in the image below provided by the Planning Division. One alley (referred to from this point as "Alley A') runs north/south between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues. It is approximately 16.5 feet wide and 149 feet long. The other alley (referred to from this point as "Alley B") runs east/west between 300 West and the east property line of 352 West Van Buren Avenue. It is approximately 16.5 feet wide and 300 feet long. The petitioner owns all seven parcels that abut the subject alleys. Alley B previously continued to 400 West before that street and a portion of the alley were vacated in 1974. Another segment of the alley was closed in 1997, resulting in the current alley configuration. Alley A is paved and appears to be used as parking for a towing yard and auto body shop at 325 West Andrew Avenue. It is fenced off and obstructs access to the western portion of Alley B. Alley B is gravel and passable to the point where it intersects with Alley A. West of the alley intersection, Alley B Page 12 is fenced off, restricting public access. The portion of Alley B west of the fence has deteriorated pavement, making it no longer passable. The petitioner proposes demolition of buildings abutting the subject alleys and incorporating the alley property into a multi -family development. That potential development is not part of the alley vacation petition before the Council and will not come to the Council as there is not a request to rezone the property. Applications for design review and planned development have been submitted to the Planning Division and will be reviewed by the Planning Commission in the future. Image showing abutting parcels owned by the petitioner's client outlined in yellow. Area zoning is CG (General Commercial). Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division The Planning Commission reviewed this petition during its August 23, 2023 meeting and held a public hearing at which the petitioner was the only person who spoke. The Commission followed Planning staffs recommendation and voted 7-0 to forward a positive recommendation to the Council for the proposed alley vacations, with the following conditions: The property owner enters into a development agreement with the City that requires creation of a public access midblock walkway between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues where the midblock walkway is between buildings on both the east and west sides that are in common ownership. No portion of the alleys shall purport to be conveyed until at least 6o days after a final decision by the City Council. During City department and division review of the alley vacation petition, no responding department or division objected to the proposed alley vacation. Public Utilities noted that there is a water meter on 300 West near Alley B, and it must remain in the public right-of-way. Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed alley closure, address questions Council Members may have and prepare for a public hearing. POLICY QUESTION Page 13 1. Does the Council support the Planning Commission's recommended conditions relating to the mid - block walkway for the alley closures? ADDITONAL INFORMATION Alley vacation requests receive three phases of review, as outlined in section 14.52.030 Salt Lake City Code (see pages 6-7 below). Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council. Quiet Title Claim The alleys proposed to be vacated were the subject of a 2022 quiet title lawsuit to confirm ownership of the alley property. A judgement granted title to the alley property to the applicant, but the City was not named or served as part of the lawsuit, so the judgement is not binding on the City. The judgement was recorded by Salt Lake County and the alley property was mistakenly identified by the County as belonging to the applicant. To clarify that the alley property is still owned by Salt Lake City, a notice of public alleys (found in Attachment D (pages 27-30 of the Planning Commission staff report)) was required of the applicant. It is being held in escrow by the City Attorney's Office pending the City Council's decision on the proposed alley vacation request. Key Considerations Planning staff identified five key considerations connected to this alley vacation. A short description of each issue is provided below for reference. Please see pages 5-6 of the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis of these issues. Consideration is Property Owner Consent Section 14.52.03o.A.1 Salt Lake City Code requires a minimum of 75% of abutting property owners sign a petition to vacate a City owned alley. As noted above, all seven abutting parcels are owned by the petitioner's client. Consideration 2: Policy Considerations Planning staff found the fenced off portion of Alley B satisfies policy consideration C-Urban Design as outlined in Section 14.52.020 Salt Lake City Code. Alley A and the eastern portion of Alley B could satisfy policy consideration B-Public Safety, based on comments received from the Police Department and Sustainability, though the petitioner did not raise this as a concern. Consideration 3: Master Plan Considerations Planning staff noted that the Central Community Master Plan does not address alley vacations within the People's Freeway area where the alleys are located. However, the master plan and Plan Salt Lake both recommend midblock walkways for pedestrian connections. It is Planning staff s opinion that a midblock private right-of-way connecting Andrew and Van Buren Avenues could break up the block. They also suggested that Alley A property could be vacated in exchange for this midblock connection. Consideration 4: Nature of the Alley As discussed above, Planning staff found that Alley A is fenced off and used as parking for an adjacent business, so not accessible to the public. Alley B is mostly gravel, and partially accessible to the public. Page 14 Beyond the fence, it is used for outdoor storage and parking. The surface is deteriorated and likely not passable. That section is not currently publicly accessible. Consideration 5: Future Public Use of the Alley Alley vacation proposals generally include considering potential beneficial future uses of the alley for trails, ADU or garage access, and to retain access for utilities and services. If the gate blocking Alley A was removed and vehicles and other items stored there were cleared out, this alley could provide access from Andrew Avenue to the interior of the block, but it does not extend through to Van Buren Avenue. An option to consider is a development agreement requiring replacing the alley with a private right-of-way that provides a mid -block connection between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues. This would break up the large block and provide access beyond what the alley could. Planning staff determined preserving Alley B would not implement good urban design. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment E (pages 35-39 of the Planning Commission staff report) is an analysis of factors City Code requires the Planning Commission to consider for alley vacations (Sections 14.52.020/.030.B Salt Lake City Code). In addition to the information above, other factors are summarized below. 14-52.020 - The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A - Lack of Use- The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on -site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way. B - Public Safety- The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity or unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area. C - Urban Design- The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element. D - Community Purpose- The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. Planning staff found the requested Alley A vacation complies with policy considerations C-Urban Design, with a condition that a mid -block connection between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues is constructed. Planning found the requested Alley B vacation also complies with policy consideration C-Urban Design. 14.52.o3o.B - A positive recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council should include an analysis of the following factors: Factor Planning Staff Finding The City Police Department, Fire Complies Department, Transportation Division, and all other relevant City Departments and Divisions have no objection to the proposed disposition of the property; The petition meets at least one of the Alley A: Complies, with policy considerations stated above; conditions discussed above. Alley B: Complies Page 15 The petition must not deny sole Complies access or required off-street parking to any adjacent property; The petition will not result in any Complies property being landlocked; The disposition of the alley property Alley A: Complies, with will not result in a use which is conditions discussed above. otherwise contrary to the policies of Alley B: Complies the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid -block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses; No opposing abutting property Complies owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit; The petition furthers the City's Complies preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and The alley is not necessary for actual Complies or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses. PUBLIC PROCESS May 26, 2023 - Petition received by Planning Division. May 31, 2023 — Petition assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner. June 9, 2023 - Planning staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. June 14, 2023 - Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Ballpark Community Council to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. July 31, 2023 - The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No formal comments have been submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. August 9, 2023 - Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of June 28, 2023. Public hearing notice mailed. August 13, 2023 - Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Page 16 August 23, 2023 - Planning Commission review and public hearing. The Commission voted 7-0 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed alley vacations, with conditions. August 24, 2023 - Ordinance requested from the Attorney's Office. September 14, 2023 - Signed ordinance sent to Planning Division from Attorney's Office. October 9, 2023 - Transmittal received in City Council Office The process for closing or vacating a City -owned alley is outlined in Section 14.52 Salt Lake City Code. 14.52.oio: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS: The city supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part, with regard to city owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth herein. 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS: The city will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right of way; B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; or D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS: There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of city owned alleys under this section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council. A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The city administration will determine whether or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements: 1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property; 2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition; 3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located; Page 17 4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.6o of this code; and 5. The appropriate city processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has been paid. B. Public Hearing and Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a complete petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the planning commission to consider the proposed disposition of the city owned alley property. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the planning commission shall make a report and recommendation to the city council on the proposed disposition of the subject alley property. A positive recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors: 1. The city police department, fire department, transportation division, and all other relevant city departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the property; 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; 3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property adjacent to the alley; 4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked; 5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies of the city, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid -block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses; 6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit; 7. The petition furthers the city preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and 8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses. C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from the planning commission, the city council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of the subject alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the city council will make a decision on the proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 58-13, 2013: Ord. 24-11, 2011) 14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION: If the city council grants the petition, the city owned alley property will be disposed of as follows: A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low density residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low density residential use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin home residential uses. Page 18 B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the alley will be closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of that alley property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties. C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density residential properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold for fair market value. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW: Any party aggrieved by the decision of the city council as to the disposition of city owned alley property may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (3o) days after the city council's decision becomes final, in the 3rd district court. Page 19 J J • •• • L mom 000 0 0 `•, 0° 000°04 0�_ ° ••° 0 f •® •0•0•• 00 •••••••• LL °•°••°•••°r` di'vPldpt . II limmimm u1' Is\ _ I+ 1 � I.� r = zn-o' v 1n m ao <:M1owtly�tlivel<pl.pom p:8p1-88p-O<85 SITE PLAN ,.,..� A.010 a N n LEVEL 1 PLAN -Unit Mix w 0 iB 2tl 9tl • a••• L W o il yEy .. LJ_ p •i• ••ir M di'delapt U) P: 801reo� 4p w.tw.divekptoam 7 PROPERTYIDlJ0120231:06:29 PM n Nane1103,449 A1v Aces Z TOTAL BITE 103.dd95F 2.3] ZONING ANALYSIS ZONING JURISDICTION: SALT LAKE CITY ZONE: GO- GENERAL COMMERCNL DISTRICT $ETBACKS: FRONT YARD 5'-V CDRNERSIDEYARD I— INTERIORSIDEYARD NONE REAR YARD I— RED PROPOSED MA% BUILDING HEIGHT BO-0' 88'-0' (99 Wl DESIGN REVIEW) PARKING PROVIDED TYPEI COUNT BLDG A B'-0'x18'-0'ADA 8 'x18'-0-ELECTRIC VEHICLE 10 9'-0'x 16'U' 2d1 BLDG A: 211 BLDG B A-0'x18'-0'PDA 6 9'-0'x18'-0 RA—URICVEHICLE 8 9'-0'x 18'-0' 148 BLDG B: 182 Grand to 1421 PARKING REQUIRED DTA UNIT PRKG REOD PARIONG UWTTYPE COUNT PERUNIT REOD BLDG A par 21A 44.050.8 Here when erelw0 shared uses paddng cen he retlucetl by BLDG A 275 275 291 dwid, by 1.2 BLDGB R-O BED 8 1 8 Tolal parkirg regWmd R-1 BED 13r 1 134 d50]5112= 3]6(3]5.6)spoh R-2SED 20 24]5 requiretl BLDG B: 160 Greedb 160 435 164.]5 456T5 LOADING SPACES... TYPE COUNT BLDG A 10'-0"0 O'LOADING 2 BLDG B 10-0'x35'-0'LOADING 3 BUILDING AREA -... LEVELI NANE AREA BLDG A ®� LEVEL4 LEVEL4 APARTMENTS 40,404 SF LEVELS APARTMENTS d0A4]SF LEVELS APARTMENTS d0A4T SF LEVEL] JAPARTMENTS 40,M]SF LEVELS JAPARTMENTS 40,M]SF 2D2,192 SF EXTERIOR LEVELd ISMS GARDEN 1],969 SF 11,969 SF ME LEVELI-GND FL AMENIDES LEVELIGND FL APARTMENTS LEVELI-GRID FL PARKING LEVEL2 APARTMENTS W:F LEVEL2 PARKING LEVEL3 APARTMENTS LEVEL3 —ING LEVEL4 APARTMENTS 28,454 SF LEVELS APARTMENTS 2S454 SF LEVELS APARTMENTS 26A54 SF LEVEL] APARTMENTS 26AMBF LEVELS JAPARTMENTB 26AM SF EXTERIOR iu,ere ar ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor rach tto (Oct 9, 2023 11:20 MDT) Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff "ri IT DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 10/09/2023 Date sent to Council: 10/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 6, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00408 1518 S 300 W Alley Vacation Request STAFF CONTACT: Michael McNamee, Principal Planner (801) 535-7226 or michael.mcnameegslcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the Alley Vacation request, with conditions. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Jarod Hall, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for the vacation of two alleys located south and west of the above -stated address. One is approximately 16.5 feet by 148.6 feet, starting at a point 133.5 ft west of 300 West on Andrew Avenue and running north to south. The other is approximately 16.5 feet by 298.7 feet, starting at a point 56.1 ft north of Van Buren Avenue on 300 West and running east to west. The petitioner owns all the property surrounding the two alleys, and the purpose of the alley vacation request is to redevelop the surrounding property which would include the right-of-way within the proposed development. The proposed vacation will not impose access concerns because all of the subject properties that abut the alleys also have frontage on a public street. Only one property, a tow yard and auto body shop at 325 W Andrew Avenue, currently utilizes the north -south alley to access surface parking. The north -south alley and a portion of the east - SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 west alley have been fenced off by neighboring property owners. The portion of the east -west alley that has been fenced off is being used for outdoor storage and parking. Alley Vacation requests must fulfill one of four policy considerations in section 14.52.020 of the City Code: Lack of Use, Public Safety, Urban Design, or Community Purpose. Requests are also reviewed against the factors found in 14.52.030.B. Staff s analysis of the policy considerations determined that the standards are met by vacating this portion of the alleyway, which would not create detrimental impacts on abutting properties, with the condition that the north -south alley is replaced by a midblock connection that fully links Andrew and Van Buren Avenues. This condition ensures the proposed vacation complies with the Urban Design policy consideration. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification — o Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on June 9, 2023. o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Ballpark Community Council on June 14, 2023. No formal comments have submitted by the Community Council to date. • Planning Commission Meeting — On August 23, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed alley vacation. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for decision, with conditions. PLANNING RECORDS: a) PC Agenda of August 23, 2023 (Click to access) b) PC Minutes of August 23, 2023 (Click to access) c) PC Staff Report of August 23, 2023 (Click to access) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00408 —1518 S 300 W Alley Vacation Request May 26, 2023 Petition for the alley vacation application received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. May 31, 2023 Petition assigned to Michael McNamee, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. June 9, 2023 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. June 14, 2023 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Ballpark Community Council to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. July 31, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. N o f ormal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date related to this proposal. August 9, 2023 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting of June 28, 2023. Public hearing notice mailed. August 13, 2023 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. August 23, 2023 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 23, 2023. By a vote of 7-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a favorable recommendation to City Council for the proposed alley vacation, with conditions. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-004o8 — Jarod Hall, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for the vacation of two alleys located south and west of the above -stated address. One is approximately 16.5 feet by 148.6 feet, starting at a point 133.5 ft west of 300 West on Andrew Avenue and running north to south. The other is approximately 16.5 feet by 298.7 feet, starting at a point 56.1 ft north of Van Buren Avenue on 300 West and running east to west. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in -person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (8oi) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michael McNamee, Principal Planner at 8o1-535-7226 between the hours of 8:oo a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at michael.mcnamee(&slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the "planning" tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-004o8. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include aids and services. Please make requests at least advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council. comments( a�slcgov.com, 8o1-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3.ORIGINAL PETITION PLANNING PROCESS ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE ABOUT THE APPLICATION Thank you for your interest in submitting an Alley Vacation or Closure application. The following packet will provide general information to get started on your project and guide you through the application process from start to finish. The package is broken down into three sections: Information about the application, a visual diagram of the application process, and the application form. We highly encourage you to work with our Planning staff prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding any of the information listed in this packet or to set up a pre -submittal meeting please contact us at zoning(Ltslcgov.com or give us a call at 801.535.7757. 0 Important Process Information PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 IF Process Timeline Application Form SLCGOV/PLANNING ZONINC0SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7757 ALLEYVACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS 1 PLANNING DIVISION //v2.15.23 IMPORTANT PROCESS INFORMATION 14.52 WHAT IS AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE? As part ofthe subdivision process, early developers were required to create alleys which were then deeded to the City. They were used for coal delivery, garbage pickup and other services. They also allowed access to garages. Today, when an alley is shown on a plat as a public right ofway, it means the City is the owner. In situations where it can be demonstrated that there O is an over-riding public purpose for vacating the alley, the City may relinquish its property interest in the alley. When an alley is next to or abuts a single family or duplex residential property, the City vacates the alley, divides it in half, and the property is conveyed to the abutting property owners. If an alley is next to or abuts a non-residential, or multifamily residential (3 or more dwelling units) property, the City may close the alley and then sell the land at fair market value to the abutting property owners. WHAT THE CITY CONSIDERS BEFORE AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The Citywill not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one ofthe following policy considerations: A. Lack Of Use: The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, �— unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; �— C. Urban Design: The continuation ofthe alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. 14.52.030: FACTORS CONSIDERED: 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal; 2. The petition meets at least one ofthe policy considerations stated above; 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property; 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked; 5. The vacation will not result in a use ofthe alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City; 6. No abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the alley; 7. The petition is for an entire alley, ratherthan a small segment of it; and 8. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences orfor accessory use. CONSULTATION 0 If you have questions regarding the Alley Vacation or Closure regulations or process, please contact the Salt Lake City Planning Counter staffat zoning@slcgov.com or give us a call at 801-535-7757. Ifyou would like to discuss your development plan in more detail, you can request a pre -submittal meeting with Planning staff by contacting the Planning Counter. Pre -submittal meetings are held on Thursdays in 30 minute slots between 1:30 and 3:30 pm. ALLEYVACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS 2 PLANNING DIVISION //v2.15.23 PROCESS TIMELINE 6 - 12 MONTHS • APPLICANT • STAFF r I� � j'--i`ul�',i--It................................ ©® • • � 14 days •. APPLICATION RECEIVED PLANNER ASSIGNED ; Application submitted and pre-screened to ensure Application reviewed by Planner to ensure complete submittal requirements are met and fees are paid. documentation (if incomplete, the applicant will be provided a list of missing info to submit). .......... ` l�J ................... 45 days .. © ............. APPLICATION MODIFICATIONS Modifications based on public input & City Department review comments (if needed, applicant must submit updates). Minor issues will be conditions of approval. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notices sent to nearby neighbors, property owners and Community Councils (when required by ordinance). Application routed to Citv Departments for review. •••. 000 , ' • .......... © n^� E 21 days ................... O 0 21 days O PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL OF COMMUNITY Public hearing scheduled and held, notices AND NEIGHBORHOODS (CAN) sent, staff report produced and commission Commission minute approval and public record recommendation made. are assembled by staff. After review, the package is transmitted to City Council. ..................................... CITY COUNCIL PROCESS City Council holds a briefing with staff during work session. Public hearing and action follows. Timeline determined by City Council office. www.slc gov/council ........................................................................................... DISCLAIMER: APPLICATION TIME FRAMES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON CURRENT WORKLOAD AND COMPLEXITY OF APPLICATIONS. INCOMPLETE OR MISSING INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS AND APPLICATION FORMS WILL DELAY THE PROCESS. ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE 40 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. Fd� SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. o, REQUIRED FEES $285 filing fee. Additional required notice fees will be assessed after application Is received. PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) Van Buren Alley Vacation LOCATION OF ALLEY Running south from Andrew ave to center of the block connecting to another alley runnin east to 300 W REQUEST To vacate the alley areas NAME OF APPLICANT PHONE Jonah Hornsby MAILING ADDRESS EMAIL APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner's consent required) IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST Owner Architect* Contractor* 11`9� Other* Authorized Agent NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) PHONE The Salt lake Property Trust MAILING ADDRESS EMAIL CASE NUMBER RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAYBE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BYANY INTERESTED PARTY. ........................................................................................... ALLEYVACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS 4 PLANNING DIVISION //v2.15.23 1. This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3. 1 understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned plannerfrom the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all ofthe required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements forthe specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility ofthe applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed ofthe deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4. 1 understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. NAME OF APPLICANT EMAIL Jonah Hornsby _ MAILING ADDRESS PHONE APPLICATION TYPE SIGNATURE DATE Alley Vacation If the applicant is not the legal owner ofthe property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner ofthe below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY See attached full legal description NAME OF OWNER EMAIL The Salt Lake Property Trust _ MAILING ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE I 1. If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy ofthe resolution ofthe Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2. If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3. If a Home Owner's Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners ofthe proposed application. A vote should be taken priorto the submittal and a statement ofthe outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PARTS. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANTS INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OFTHIS APPLICATION. ALLEYVACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS 5 PLANNING DIVISION //V2.15.23 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please provide the following information with your application. Confirm that you have included each ofthe requirements listed below by adding a check mark for each item. CHECK STAFF REQUIREMENTS (14.52.030.A) 0 O A letter explaining why you are requesting this alley vacation or closure. • The letter must include a discussion about the policy considerations and factors outlined in page 2. OThe name, address and signatures of all abutting property owners who support the petition. • Petition must include the signatures of no less than 75% of the abutting property owners. • Signatures should be from the property owners and not from the property renters. • You may use the form attached to this application or provide your own form with signatures. RECOMMENDED OA Parcel map showing the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure: • Highlight the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure. • Indicate with colored dot the property owners who support the petition. • Submit a digital (PDF) copy of the map. OA written description with measurements of the proposed alley vacation or closure. • A final legal description prepared by a licensed engineer will be required later. INITIALS DISCLAIMER: I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SALT LAKE CITY REQU I RES THE ITEMS ABOVE TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE MY APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED. I UNDERSTAND THAT PLANNING WILL NOT ACCEPT MY APPLICATION UNLESS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. ........................................................................................... ALLEYVACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS 6 PLANNING DIVISION //V2.15.23 PETITION FOR ALLEY VACATION C-4r, OR CLOSURE APPLICANT INFORMATION DATE NAME OF APPLICANT 5/24/2023 ADDRESS OF APPLICANT DISCLAIMER: AS AN OWNER OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY, I AGREE TO THE PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSURE. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF MY PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OR A RENTAL PROPERTY WITH MORE THAN THREE (3) DWELLING UNITS, I WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR MY HALF OFTHE ALLEY. ........................................................................................... The Salt Lake 1518 S 300 W, Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE The Salt Lake 1528 S 300 W, Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE The Salt Lake 1546 S 300 W, Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE The Salt Lake 325 W Andrew Ave Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE The Salt Lake 333 W Andrew Ave Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE The Salt Lake 352-370 W Van Buren Ave, Property Trust Salt Lake City UT PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE Alley Closure Application Alley Closure Letter RE: 1518, 1528, 1546 S 300 W 325,333 W Andrew Ave 352-370 W Van Buren Salt Lake City, UT Parcel Numbers: 15-13-251-003-0000 15-13-251-004-0000 15-13-251-009-0000 15-13-251-006-0000 15-13-251-008-0000 15-13-178-010-0000 To Whom it may concern; On behalf of the Salt Lake Property Trust dated 3/3/2022 1 am submitting this application to vacate the alleyway outlined in this application. The alleyway area abuts several parcels all owned by the same entity. A quite title action was completed on or around and the county updated the plat maps on or around 12/30/2022 reflecting the new property boundaries. It was brought to our attention that the city desires that we take this through an alley vacation process to formalize. The intent of the property owner us to redevelop the properties into a multifamily building. Thank you aorns�by Salt Lake City, UT Demonstration of appropriateness of vacating alley way 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 1. Lack Of Use: The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; Response: the alley areas have been fenced and used by the adjacent property owners for many years. The alleyways do not provide access to another property or road that cannot be accessed easier by utilizing public roads. 2. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; Response: The alleyways and neighboring parcels have been recently occupied by people experiencing homelessness and have had to be cleaned several times. Human waste, needles, trash and other items that are a threat to human health and safety have been found on numerous occasions. The civil enforcement division has previously threatened fines against the property owner for the presence of encampments and the current owner has been forced to employed a security company to police the areas. 3. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; Response: This is apparent based on the existing conditions of the buildings and the alley ways. 4. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. N/A The petition for vacation complies will items 2-8 below. The applicant has not obtained approvals from other relevant city departments as of yet. 14.52.030: FACTORS CONSIDERED: 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal; 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property; 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked; S. The vacation will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City; 6. No abutting property owner intenIds to build agarage requiring access from the alley; 7. The petition is for an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and S. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. In referenceto item 2 of the application: Map and legal description Subject Parcels Legal Descriptions PARCEL 1: LOT 35, STENARTS ADDITION, ACCCR➢NG TO THE CFFIEIAL PLAT THEREOF CH flLE AND OF RECORD IN THE SALT LAHDE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE PARCEL 2: L615 37 ANO M, tM.AkT9 AMre.. A65!M1NG TO THE L .6- ALAT WRW CN n1 aM W RECWYJS IN THE OMOE OF THE U0 L-K W^N WO-PEA- LE5S AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FHRLOWNC C£5CREIED fWKIEL' BEGNNING AT THE NCRl1EA5T CORNER OF LOT 37, STEWART' MDITHON, A SU501NSCM OF PART OF BLOM 9, TILE ACRE PLAT W. BIG FIELD SURVEY, AM RUNNING THENCE SOUTH OV1W EAST 99.0 FEET; THANE WDST 1ELD FEET; THEMM NO" OT11'DE' NEST 99.0 FEET; THEAKE EAST 15.0 FEET TO THE PONT OF BECHNIG_ PARCEL k BEAINNINQ AT THE SOUl1EA9T UANER OF LOT 1, tXYLARYS AppITON. A a11tWt6N OF LCT TIN, IN BLOOK 9, AVE ACRE ALAT 'A', Bb FIEL.O hXY�Y, AND AUNMWN THENT£ "TH f&1 FEET, THEN( NHEST 326 FE€T: 1HENCE WJtH WI FEET; THENCE EAST 320 FEEL 10 THE M{E C'F BEGINNING LE5Z AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, STEWARYS ADDITION. A SUDDIPASHON CF PWT OF SLUR 9. FINE ACRE PLAT "A", BIG FIELD SURVEY, AND RUNNING THE71C£ 'EST 15.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH COT W 11E5T M. FEET: THENCE EAST 1&0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH COVI'CB" EAST 5&1 FEET TO THE PCINT OF BEGINNING PARER 4: L07S 36 ATE M. VTWARTS AUDITION, A SJRDIMSION OF L07 18, FiflOc A ALE Am PLAT x.. aM Fco SURVEY. AO:MDNC TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THOOKOF. RECCROFD N 1 E OFFICE OF THE 5ALT LJ E COUNT' R9971DIM LESS THE FCLLOIANG PCR11CM BEGWRC AT THE NORTHEAST CUWIER OF LOT 3% STEIFART3 ACEH11M A SURDMSI N OF PART OF BLOCK B, FILE ACTS: PLAT 'A,, BIG MILE, SURVEY. ARB RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 01WO •EAST FB.S FEET, THENCE 'EST 15.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH OV1W %EST;B_5 FEET, TH0110E EAST 15.0 FEET Nl THE POINT OF BE{14INaN11 In reference to item 3 of the application: Description of the alleyway BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 37, STEWART'S ADDITION, ON FILE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK C, PAGE 51 OF PLATS, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 00°01'00" WEST 148.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 39 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'26" EAST 148.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 39; THENCE SOUTH 00°01'02" WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 300 WEST STREET A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89°53'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 31 A DISTANCE OF 313.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'54" EAST 16.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 34 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'26" EAST 148.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00°01'00" EAST 148.57 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 36; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'29" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ANDREW AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 7627 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. In reference to item 4 of the application: Adjacent property owners. The Salt Lake Property Trust is the only adjacent property owner. OWNERS AFFIDAVIT 1(We), am(are) the rightful owner(s) of property located at 325 W & 333 W Andrew Ave, 1518 S, 1528 S & 1546 S 300 W and 352-370 W Van Buren Ave, Salt Lake City UT involved in the application to vacate the alleyways. I(we) agree to Jonah Hornsby acting as my agent in the submittal of the application on my(our) behalf and I(we) acknowledge my(our) understanding that I(we) will be bound by all conditions specified in any approval of this Planning & Zoning application that is before the City of Salt Lake. The foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the statements and answers contained in the attached plans and exhibits, to the best of my(our) knowledge and belief are true and correct. The Salt Lake Property Trust (signature of property owner) Dated this day of ALA 1Z Z, -23 State of Utah ) County of Salt Lake) On the _ day of MLt-r Z , personally appeared before me 1 the signer(s) of the above instrument, who duly subFribed a wore before me that they executed the same. i NOTARY PUBLIC Residing in Salt Lake County, Utah Commission expires: ToL i -2- 3 Zoe 7L CHRISTIAN CARMiCHEAL Notary Public - State 0( Utah Comm. No. 72$950 f My Commission Expires on Jan 23. 2027 N SCALE 1" = 60' ALLEYWAY VACATION EXHIBIT ANDREW AVENUE S89'53'29"E 16.50' P.O.B. I � � w � LOT 37 LOT 34 LOT 35 LOT 36 0 o LOT 38 0 0 o O 0 z V) b LOT 39 D S89'53'26"E 148.59' S89'53'26"E 148.59' w O 0 z — L W W ~' L7 o � 07 3 O N O O CO o 0 LOT 1 VAN BUREN AVENUE N89'53'26"W 313.68' TA\22110 Renovate 15465 300W\dwg\22110 22111 ROS.dwg DATE: Mar 31, 2022 WILD NC ENGINEERING ��� �W °r�nw e� unw roes ww• W W W.wILDINQ[NDIN[[ W Na.QOM 4. MAILING LIST geometry OWN —FULL —NAME OWN _ADDR own —unit OWN_ CITY OWN _STA- OWN _ZIP Geocortex. ROERS SALT LAKE CITY APARTMENTS BORROWER LLC 110 CHESHIRE LN MINNETOP MN 55305 Geocortex. JLF ENTERPRISES 5159 S COMMERCE DR MURRAY UT 84107 Geocortex. BRET W CLARK 2120 E 6200 S HOLLADAY UT 84121 Geocortex. PRINCE NOAH, LLC 329 W 1500 S SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. LP EVERGEN EQUITY 7 3500 JEFFERSON ST AUSTIN TX 78731 Geocortex. DALE STERLING PARKS; TRACEY K WIGHT PARKS (JT) 440 W 1700 S SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. MAC BEATH HARDWOOD COMPANY 320 N KYLE ST EDINBURG IN 46124 Geocortex. NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES LP 222 E 5TH ST TUCSON AZ 85705 Geocortex. THOM-BOWY, LLC 3644 S 1100 E SALT LAKE UT 84106 Geocortex. LIMA ECHO ECHO, LLC 625 S STATE ST # D SALT LAKE UT 84111 Geocortex. RAINBOW HOLDINGS, LLC 1485 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. AMERIKAL PROPERTIES, INC 2115 NORTHWESTETN AVE WAUKEGAI IL 60087 Geocortex. S&A STEPHENS, LLC 1525 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. SHELTER THE HOMELESS, INC 242 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. DRP3, LLC 281 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE UT 84115 Geocortex. ALLEN F BATH; KAREN C BATH (JT) 9447 S MORYWOOD CIR SOUTH JOF UT 84095 Geocortex. DRP2, LC 1743 S DOUGLASS RD STE D ANAHEIM CA 92806 Geocortex. UTAH STATE OWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE ST# 4110 SALT LAKE UT 84114 Geocortex. HALE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 865 W ALAN POINT DR DRAPER UT 84020 geometry Occupant PARCEL_ADDR Geocortex. Current Oc 376 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 340 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 395 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 377 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 363 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 355 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 371 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 350 W ANDREW AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 340 W ANDREW AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 431 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 399 W ANDREW AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 385 W VAN BUREN AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 382 W VAN BUREN AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 1552 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 329 W WHITNEY AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 1480 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 320 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 1494 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 337 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 1512 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 327 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 309 W 1500 S Geocortex. Current Oc 1503 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 268 W PARAMOUNT AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 261 W PARAMOUNT AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 1531 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 1541 S 300 W Geocortex. Current Oc 280 W HARRIS AVE Geocortex. Current Oc 1549 S 300 W NEW_UNITCITY ZIPCODE STATE Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 Salt Lake Ci 84115 UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT 5. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Vacating city -owned alleys situated adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1528, 1540, and 1546 South 300 West, 325 and 333 West Andrew Avenue, and 352 West Van Buren Avenue) An ordinance vacating two unnamed, city -owned alleys adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1528, 1540, and 1546 South 300 West, 325 and 333 West Andrew Avenue, and 352 West Van Buren Avenue, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00408. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on August 23, 2023 to consider a request made by Jarod Hall ("Applicant") to vacate two unnamed, city -owned alleys adjacent to properties located at 1518, 1528, 1540, and 1546 South 300 West, 325 and 333 West Andrew Avenue, and 352 West Van Buren Avenue (collectively, the "Property"); and WHEREAS, at its August 23, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council"); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that there is good cause for the vacation of the alleys and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating City -Owned Alleys. That two unnamed, city -owned alleys adjacent to the Property, which are the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00408, and which are more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, hereby are, vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights -of -way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city's water and sewer facilities. Said closure is also subject to any existing rights -of -way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Conditions. The alley vacation set forth herein is conditioned upon (1) no portion of the alleys shall purport to be conveyed until at least 60 days after a final decision by the City Council on Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00408; (2) the owner of the Property shall enter into a development agreement with Salt Lake City that requires the creation of a public access midblock walkway between Andrew and Van Buren Avenues where the midblock walkway is between buildings on both the east and west sides that are in common ownership. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 5. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 3 have not been met within one year after adoption of this ordinance, then this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the above conditions by resolution. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023 Published: Ordinance vacating alley adjacent 1515-1550 S 300 W MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: September 14, 2023 By: 4✓1. Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Legal description of two unnamed, city -owned alleys to be vacated: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 37, STEWART'S ADDITION, ON FILE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK C, PAGE 51 OF PLATS, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 00-01'00" WEST 148.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 39 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'26" EAST 148.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 39; THENCE SOUTH 00001'02" WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 300 WEST STREET A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89°53'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 31 A DISTANCE OF 313.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'54" EAST 16.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 34 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89053'26" EAST 148.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00001'00" EAST 148.57 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 36; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'29" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ANDREW AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 7627 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.