Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransmittal - 3/30/2012I ~· r: /'·- -, '•~~· ;'\ 13 /2- f] ""- -;: I ~' -~.-----~ ,..,,,, RALPH BECKER MAYOR OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL TO: Salt Lake City Council Soren Simonsen, Chair DATE: March 30, 2012 FROM: David Everitt, Chief of Staff SUBJECT: Streetcar Greenway and Parley's Trail Project STAFF CONTACTS: D.J. Baxter: (801) 535-7735 or.baxter@slcgov.com Gina Chamness: (801) 535-7766 or.chamness@slcgov.com ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of Resolution Regarding Local Construction Funding DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing and Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Toe Administration recommends that the City Council set the date for a public hearing for Budget Amendment #7 of FY 2011-2012, and subsequently approve funding necessary to fund the Sugar House Streetcar Greenway and Parley's Trail project ("Greenway'') from 500 East to McClelland Street. BUDGET IMPACT: In order to finalize design and commence construction on the Greenway, the Administration requests the Council approve an ordinance amending the FY 2011-2012 Salt Lake City Budget. This amendment creates a budget in the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund of $6,864,549. Toe Administration is proposing to issue sales tax bonds, payable over 20 years, to cover this amount, in addition to previously-approved amounts needed for the baseline project. Uses of Funds: 500 E. -McClelland St.: · SH Greenway & Parley's Trail Improvements: Issuance Costs: Total: Sources of Funds: Baseline Project Cost Savings: Remainder of FY 2012 CIP CAM Placeholder Sales Tax Revenue Bond: Total: $6,800,731 $63,818 $6,864,549 $TBD $2,408,223 $4,456,326 $6,864,549 'I - ... _, ,, • ~ I 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 P.O. BOX 145474, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5474 TELEPHONE: 801-535-7704 FAX: 801-535-6331 www.slcgov.com SCANNED TO:~«- SCANNED BY:(;/!£4ft:.e DATE: (A?;..?··n/ ·1cy;0<_ @ RECYCLED PAPER DISCUSSION: Issue Origin: I. Introduction In October 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation awarded $26,000,000 in federal grant funds to the Sugar House Streetcar project. Sponsored by Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake City, and the Utah Transit Authority as partners, the grant application described the proposed project as a 2-mile modern streetcar line running from the Central Pointe TRAX Station at 2100 South, along the old freight rail corridor at approximately 2200 South, east to the intersection with McClelland Street in the Sugar House Business District. In December 2011, the City Council approved, and the City executed, an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with South Salt Lake and UTA to define the funding obligations of each of the three project partners for the Baseline Streetcar Project. The City Council also adopted FY 2011- 2012 Budget Amendment #4 to authorize the use ofup to $8,021,000 to cover Salt Lake City's commitments under the ILA, which total included the potential of a loan to South Salt Lake of up to $2,500,000. South Salt Lake has not yet indicated whether or not it will need the loan; it has until June 1, 2012 to make that decision and notify Salt Lake City. The construction contractor has been selected, and is scheduled to begin construction on the baseline project in April 2012. In briefing materials provided for the Interlocal Agreement and Budget Amendment, we provided the Council with additional information regarding the community desire for constructing a greenway and trail alongside the streetcar line, and indicated that we would provide further detail and cost estimates in April 2012. We also stated that debt for the Baseline project would likely not be issued until after the Council had an opportunity to make decisions on funding for the greenway, thereby enabling all debt for the project to be issued at once. This memorandum discusses the development of the Greenway based on community input, and the estimated costs of installing and maintaining those improvements. II. Development of the Greenway Concept In conjunction with the baseline project of the Sugar House Streetcar, Citiventure Associates, LLC was hired in May 2011 by RDA and South Salt Lake to serve as a consultant for the project. As part of its work scope, Citiventure managed the community visioning effort encompassing the Sugar House Rail Corridor between 200 West Street in South Salt Lake City and McClelland Street in Salt Lake City. Citiventure's efforts were intended to complement the design of Phase 1 of the Sugar House Streetcar line, as well as the alternatives analysis, Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page2 of 12 circulation, trail study, streetscape, and housing plan work being conducted by Fehr and Peers for the Sugar House business district. Citiventure coordinated with representatives from Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake City, and UT A to develop a collective vision and agreement on the preferred type, character, and scale of development within and immediately adjacent to the Sugar House Rail Corridor. Throughout the visioning process, the community overwhelmingly supported the creation of a greenway to parallel both sides of the streetcar line that would include plazas, the Parley's Trail, and extensive landscaping. For this reason, Citiventure dedicated a significant portion of its final report, Sugar House Streetcar: Land Use and Urban Design Recommendations, to addressing this desire, albeit in general terms. By January 2012, it was apparent that the success of the Sugar House streetcar line as a neighborhood asset and development catalyst would depend heavily upon constructing a series of high-quality public spaces along the corridor adjacent to the streetcar. While the streetcar's baseline project can function as a stand-alone project, the baseline scope of work does not include any improvements to the corridor beyond those needed for operation of the streetcar. Therefore, under the baseline project (whose scope and budget the City Council approved in December 2011 ), the contractor will construct a single-track streetcar line, 7 stops with basic amenities, and overhead electrification. The remainder of the 66-foot wide corridor, owned by UTA, would remain unimproved, and would continue to look much as it does today. Based on the large amount of public feedback supporting construction of trails, plazas, and landscaping in the corridor, the RDA engaged CRSA to develop a design and cost estimate for the Streetcar Greenway and Parley's Trail Project ("Greenway Project"). If adequate funds can be committed by April 2012, the Greenway Project can be constructed in conjunction with the Baseline Streetcar project, and completed by the end of 2013. The work requested of CRSA was to further define, through a comprehensive public involvement process, which improvements should be implemented into the Greenway Project and at what cost, thereby providing valuable planning and budgeting information to the RDA Board, City Administration, and City Council. CRSA was tasked to provide 60% design drawings and a 60% design cost estimate by March 30, 2012. It was determined this level of detail could feasibly be achieved within the time allowed, while also providing enough information to move forward with budget discussions in April 2012. Furthermore, CRSA's work thus far on the Greenway Project has been intended to augment design work that has been done for the corridor by Citiventure Associates, LLC and HDR as well as design work done for the Sugar House business district by Fehr and Peers. This prior work has been essential to the design of the Greenway Project and has provided the appropriate context under which CRSA has been able to progress the project to the 60% design level. UT A, South Salt Lake, and Salt Lake City have worked together to select the Contractor for construction of the Sugar House Streetcar Baseline Project, and construction begins April 2, 2012, and is scheduled to be complete by August 2013. Construction will be followed by several months of testing and training before the streetcar opens to the public. The Greenway Project is a Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page] of 12 separate project from the design and construction of Phase I and will, therefore, be funded separately. The intent now is to bring the design drawings and cost estimate of the Greenway Project to the 100% level in order to construct the improvements concurrently with those in the Baseline Streetcar Project. In order to create a seamless, fully integrated project, South Salt Lake City continues to be a valued partner with Salt Lake City and UTA on the design of the Sugar House Rail Corridor and Greenway Project. However, for a variety of reasons, South Salt Lake City has elected to only participate through conceptual design on the Greenway Project, and will not initially pursue detailed design or construction of improvements. III. Greenway Project Components The 60% design completed by CRSA is best described by the attached illustrations, also provided as support for the presentation at the March 20, 2012 RDA Board meeting. The key components of the design are described below. 1. Greenway, Plazas, and Trail Improvements: $5,149,256 a. Parley's Trail 1. The Greenway Project would include installation of the Parley's Trail alongside the streetcar track from 500 East to McClelland Street. 11. In most segments, the trail will be 12 feet wide, and will run on the north portion of the corridor from McClelland Street to 500 East. m. The non-profit organization known as Parley's Rails, Trails & Tunnels Coalition (PRATT), was founded to "assist city, county, state and federal agencies and other public and private partners in completing a multi-use trail along 1-80 via Parley's Creek Corridor and the Sugar House Rail Spur to connect the Bonneville Shoreline Trail with the Provo/Jordan River Parkway." It's efforts have been largely successful in raising funds to complete various segments of the trail, including the intricate system of bridges over the I-80/I-215 interchange, and The Draw - a National Endowment for the Arts-funded design competition that resulted in the plans for a trail connection beneath 1300 East to connect Hidden Hollow and the Sugar House Business District with Sugar House Park. b. Crushed Gravel Walking Path 1. Along the south edge of the corridor, from McClelland Street to 500 East, the project will include a narrower walking path, roughly 4 feet wide, formed with decomposed granite. c. Paved Plazas at Major Street Intersections. 1. At each location where the streetcar corridor intersects a primary street (500 E, 700 East, 900 East) the Greenway Project will include large paved plazas, measuring approximately 80-100 feet ( east to west) by 45-66 feet, using the full width of the corridor. These areas will serve as gathering Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 4 of 12 spaces, enabling adjacent businesses to benefit from the presence of a streetcar stop, and providing the opportunity for residents to gather and access the corridor. 11. These plazas are designed to utilize stamped concrete to provide an aesthetically appealing, durable surface to accommodate street furniture, bike racks, and heavy foot and bicycle traffic. They also provide a welcoming entry point to the corridor. d. Landscaping between Plazas, along the Parley's Trail. 1. Landscaping is critical to creating places people want to use. The Greenway Project will install native and/or adapted plant material that has interesting color and form during all seasons. 1. Landscape Buff er: a. Where possible, a landscape buff er will be installed between the corridor and adjacent properties. Columnar tree (8'-12' spread) varieties that are tall enough to provide an attractive shade canopy but narrow enough so as to not overly extend into either the Parley's Trail or the adjacent properties. b. Low-growing shrubs will also be integrated into the landscape buffer. The non-continuous landscape buffer will be dense enough to provide some visual separation between adjacent properties and to filter noise from the corridor, yet not so dense so as to block the view of the corridor. 2. Spatial Definition: In combination with other site amenities, non- continuous landscaping areas will be used to distinguish the track bed area from the balance of the space within the corridor. 3. Irrigation: The landscaped areas will be irrigated by a combination of pop-up spray heads and drip irrigation. The irrigation system will be centrally controlled. e. Lighting 1. The objective of installing lighting within the corridor is to create a safe user experience both during the day and at night. Overhead lighting, with downlight fixtures, will be installed at each intersection and plaza area, and possibly mid-block at each block. Bollard lighting or other pedestrian-scale lighting (12'-15' pole height), will be installed between plaza areas. The bollard lighting or other pedestrian-scale lighting is intended to help delineate the track bed area from the balance of the corridor, therefore enabling the user to sense where he or she is at all times within the space. In addition to providing visual cues for safety throughout the corridor, the strategic placement of bollard lighting or other pedestrian-scale lighting will encourage user permeability to both sides of the track bed. Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 5 of 12 f. Street Furniture 1. Benches will be installed at all plaza areas and other strategic locations throughout the corridor in order for users to rest and socialize. Bike racks will be provided at all plaza areas to encourage bicyclists to take advantage of the regional transit system. Garbage cans will be located at all plaza areas and other strategic locations throughout the corridor as a means to help keep the corridor clean. All site furniture will have a unified look in terms of materials and style. Drinking fountains will not be provided within the corridor. 2. Street Intersection Improvements: $586,475 a. To enhance user safety on both the Parley's Trail on the north of the corridor and the strolling path on the south, the Greenway Project will install stamped, colored concrete crosswalks at each intersection, including the alleys between 700 East and 800 East. 3. Public Art & Neighborhood Identity Features at Plazas: $300,000 a. Community members have expressed a desire to be able to "brand" the plaza and station areas in ways that are unique to and reflective of their adjoining neighborhoods. The plazas also provide an ideal opportunity for public art that will enhance the identity and aesthetics of those spaces. An allowance of $300,000 could be used to fund such efforts at each of the main street intersections: 500 East, 700 East, and 900 East. 4. Embedded Track: $265,000 a. The Baseline Streetcar project scope and budget provided only for the most basic functional treatment of the streetcar track, a ballasted track treatment that mounts the tracks on a base of gravel ballast, which must, in turn be contained by barrier curbs on both sides of the track. To provide more horizontal space for trail and plazas, as well as to make the corridor as inviting and permeable as possible, the project team asked the contractors to bid an upgrade to concrete embedded track. b. Because the embedded track section is much shallower, far less excavation is needed than would be the case for a ballasted approach. The ballasted track would have required a much deeper excavation, causing increased conflicts with underground utilities and contaminated soils. c. Based on the costs of upgrading to embedded track on the North Temple light rail project, we expected the upgrade to concrete embedded track to cost as much as $2.1 million from 500 East to McClelland. Because of the shallower section and the need to avoid underground conflicts, the incremental cost of embedded track over ballasted is only $530,000 for the entire corridor, or $265,000 per city. 5. Final Design & Engineering: $500,000 Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 6 of 12 a. Pursuant to its contract with the RDA, CRSA has completed 60% design of the corridor improvements. If the Council approves the Greenway Project, CRSA's drawings will need to be refined to 100% Construction Drawings, at a cost of approximately $500,000. The cost of completing design and constructing all of the components described above is estimated at $6,800,731. The scope of work accomplished with this amount of funding would provide the corridor with the clean, finished look of a high-quality public space. At its most basic level, the improvements will create a series of public plazas connected by landscaped trail segments. The trail will continue through each of the public plazas, but will be less-defined at those locations, allowing all users to mingle and gather in the plaza spaces. IV. Greenway Components Considered, But Not Recommended During the development of the project, several options were carefully evaluated by the project team. Those options are described here, but are not recommended by the Administration for inclusion in the project. 1. Grass Track & Irrigation: $2.13 million a. This option would entail installing turf grass between and around the streetcar tracks. A grass track design option requires divergence from the typical embedded track cross-section, to a design which much more closely resembles a ballasted design. The ballasted design has a much deeper cross-section than the embedded approach, increasing costs associated with excavation of contaminated soils and conflicts with underground utilities. The ballast is then covered with topsoil, which must be contained by barrier curbs on both sides of the track section. The required irrigation system would most likely be installed outside of the track bed and not between the tracks. b. The project team has concerns about incorporating a grass track design, including: 1. Added cost to install and maintain; 11. Severe impact on schedule for design and construction, making it extremely difficult and more expensive to comply with PTA-required time line for the project. m. Test sections on Airport LRT line have not been in place long enough to evaluate. 2. Live Roof Lanscaping & Irrigation System: costs unknown a. CRSA has proposed that a planting system currently used on "living rooftops" could be inserted in trays between the tracks in an embedded configuration. This avoids some of the issues triggered by a pure grass track approach, but is completely untested. Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 7 of 12 b. The project team has concerns regarding this approach, including: 1. Added cost to install and maintain; 11. UT A is not aware of any system that has incorporated this approach. As a completely untested approach, a great deal of time would need to be devoted to design of the embedded track bed, to ensure structural stability and drainage are adequately addressed. 111. The trays would need to be custom-designed and fabricated for this project, causing schedule delays that would make it extremely difficult and more expensive to comply with FTA-required time line for the project. iv. Maintenance also raises safety concerns. Analysis: In examples across the nation, high-quality public spaces-especially well designed green spaces-show time and again their ability to improve communities through increased property values, community gathering spaces, foot traffic and retail activity, and dramatic increases in private investment. Particularly in urban areas, green infrastructure provides a refuge and gathering place that promotes social interaction and recreational activity. The Sugar House rail corridor, which will be only partly consumed by the streetcar tracks, provides a unique opportunity to enhance the Salt Lake City and South Salt Lake City neighborhoods through which it passes. The proposed Sugar House Greenway and Parley's Trail improvements (Greenway Project) will provide a high-quality recreational amenity that will serve surrounding neighborhoods and the region, will complete one of the final segments of a regionally-significant trail system, and will dramatically enhance business opportunities and property values in the Sugar House area. The Administration proposes to fund the Greenway Project with the remainder of the CIP CAM placeholder as well as a sales tax revenue bond. In the FY 2011-12 budget, the Mayor recommended and the Council approved the set-aside of $2,700,000 in the CIP budget ($2,500,000 in future years) for funding for major projects. To date, $291,777 has been spent from the FY 2011-12 placeholder amount, leaving $2,403,223 available for use in this fiscal year. The Administration recommends using this remaining amount for the Greenway project. The Administration further recommends that the City issue a sales tax revenue bond for the remaining design and construction costs, plus issuance costs, totaling approximately $4,456,326. Assuming a 20-year bond for this project, which would be combined with the baseline project for issuance, annual debt service for the Greenway portion of the bond would be approximately $306,000. The Administration proposes to use a portion of the CAM set aside in the CIP Fund, beginning in FY 2013, for this project. Attachment 8 provides a list of the proposed uses of the set aside that have been discussed to date. Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 8 of 12 In addition, there are several additional funding sources that could be used at a future date. While these sources are not all certain to materialize, the Administration offers them for the Council's information and consideration. Potential Additional Funding Sources: 1. Baseline Project Cost Savings There is the possibility that any savings to the construction budget of the Baseline Project may be reallocated to the project pursuant to FTA approval. If the savings are significant enough, and if FTA approves the use of grant funds on the proposed improvements, some portion of the local funds invested may be matched by federal dollars. 2. Salt Lake County The Salt Lake County Council is considering a Parks Bond to pay for open space, trails, and other public space improvements throughout the County. The Council will vote this June on whether to put the Parks Bond on the November 2012 ballot. The County Administration is recommending $2 million of the Parks Bond allocations to construct the portion of the Parley's trail from 1 700 East to 500 East. The County Council may change the dollar amounts as recommended by the Administration, and the bond would need to secure voter approval in November. If the bond is successful, the portion allocated for Parley's Trail could offset some of the proposed Greenway Project costs, thereby reducing Salt Lake City's investment in the Greenway. 3. Park Impact Fees Recent City Council discussions have included an approach whereby the Greenway Project would be funded to some degree with an increased Parks Impact Fee. If the Council chooses to include this project in the Parks Impact Fee calculation, these funds could be used to service the debt for this project in the future. Operations and Maintenance Funds: 1. Salt Lake City Parks and Open Lands Budget Allocation Salt Lake City Public Services division estimates the annual maintenance cost for the greenway improvements of $208,817. These cost estimates include concrete/paver repairs, electrical inspections and repairs, mowing, edging, fertilizing, herbicide spraying, trash cans ( empty and replace liners), litter clean up, irrigation inspection and repair, sidewalk sweeping and pressure washing, snow removal, weeding, leaf clean up, graffiti removal, and administration. In addition, the Public Services Department would need to purchase additional equipment in the first year at an estimated cost of $75,900. These costs will need to be funded in the City's Operating budget beginning in FY 2014. 2. Special Assessment Area (SAA) Funds Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 9 of 12 RDA staff has conducted numerous discussions with adjoining commercial property owners regarding the creation of a Special Assessment District to support the Greenway Project. Between 500 East and McClelland Street, the largest concentration of commercial properties adjacent to the corridor is on between 600 East and Lake Street. Most other segments of the corridor are adjoined primarily by residential uses. The majority of commercial properties between 600 East and Lake Street are supportive of creating an SAA. However, preliminary calculations indicate that a reasonable assessment rate that could be supported by the property owners is likely insufficient to fully cover annual maintenance costs for the whole corridor. They could, however, make a meaningful contribution to their portion of the corridor's maintenance needs, and we will continue those discussions in hopes of securing support for an SAA to support maintenance of a portion of the corridor. 3. Salt Lake County Salt Lake County currently manages the Parley's Trail as part of its regional trail system and acts as the construction manager and oversees the maintenance of the trail. The County maintains the section of the Parley's trail in Tanner Park and Parley's Historic Nature Park. The County has also agreed to maintain the sections of the Parley Trail under construction in Hidden Hollow and The Draw at Sugar House. The County has provided a verbal commitment to maintain the Parley's trail section in the rail corridor. PUBLIC PROCESS: The public process for Phase I was a collaboration of the RDA, City of South Salt Lake, Citiventure (Consultant), and UTA. The public process for the Greenway Project was also conducted jointly with South Salt Lake City and consisted of two stakeholder meetings, two public open houses, four block-by-block meetings, monthly updates to the Community Advisory Committee and Sugar House Merchants Association, and periodic updates to the Sugar House Community Council. See Attachment I-Greenway Project Timeline and Project Flow and Attachment 3-Concept Workbook. Stakeholder Meetings The stakeholder group consisted of approximately 40 individuals ( e.g., property owners, business owners, developers, Sugar House Community Council members, Sugar House Merchants Association, PRATT, Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective) representing various interests along the Sugar House rail corridor. To build on prior visioning work, CRSA presented a visual preference survey and a brainstorming/mind mapping exercise at Stakeholder Meeting #1. Between the two stakeholder meetings, CRSA refined the design concepts and drawings to reflect the input received at Stakeholder Meeting #1. Stakeholder Meeting #2 served as a venue for the group to provide additional feedback pursuant to the revised design materials that were presented by CRSA. See Attachment I-Greenway Project Timeline and Project Flow and Attachment 2-Concept Workbook. Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page JO of 12 Open Houses Both open houses were very well attended and highly productive. At Open House #1, which was held Kimball Distributing in South Salt Lake, CRSA presented design concepts to the group that were conceived during the Phase I visioning process and Stakeholder Meeting # 1. At Open House #2, which was held at the former Deseret Industries property in Sugar House, CRSA presented 50% design drawings to the group for comment. See Attachment I-Greenway Project Timeline and Project Flow and Attachment 2-Concept Workbook. Block-by-Block Meetings See Attachment 3-Summary of Block-by-Block Meetings. Community Advisory Committee Updates RDA Staff has updated the CAC since January by presenting information on the Greenway Project, providing updates on upcoming open houses and outreach events, and collecting public comment. Sugar House Community Council Updates RDA staff has updated the Sugar House Community Council meetings since January by presenting information on the Greenway Project, providing updates on upcoming open houses and outreach events, and collecting public comment. Public Process Timeline December 2011 • 14th-RDA Staff Introduced Greenway Project to CAC January 2012 • 11th-RDA Staff Updated CAC on Greenway Project • 11th-Held Stakeholder Meeting #1 • 26th-Held Open House #1 February 2012 • 8th-RDA Staff Updated CAC on Greenway Project • 15th-Held Stakeholder Meeting #2 • 15th-Held 500 East to 600 East Block-by-Block Meeting • 15th-Held 600 East to 700 East Block-by-Block Meeting • 16th-Held 700 East to 900 East Block-by-Block Meeting • 16th-Held 900 East to McClelland Street Block-by-Block Meeting Publication of this Transmittal: On April 10, 2012, this transmittal was posted to Open City Hall for public review and comment. Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page II of 12 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Greenway Project Timeline and Project Flow 2. Concept Workbook 3. Summary of Block-by-Block Meetings 4. 60% Design Drawings 5. FY 2012 GF Revenue Projections 6. Budget Amendment Ordinance 7. Budget Amendment #7 Narrative detail 8. Budget Amendment #7 Summary 9. CAM Placeholder Spreadsheet 10. Debt Service Estimates for Sales Tax Bond Issue Sugar House Streetcar Greenway & Parley's Trail - City Council Transmittal Page 12 of 12 D .. lgn Ch.rettes w/ Stakeholders Publlc Open Houses City & Councll Revl- Schematic Drawings & Design Development Refinement LEGEND t ~ PROJECT ~ KICKOFF .., GREENWAY PROJECTTIMELINE AND PROJECT FLOW ~- - ~ - . -- - - ... - -·· ·- - -~ ..-. - - ~ ~- ...... ~ ... - _ ... 2012 201~ IO ~ Cl: Cl: ('j >- >- Ill ..,a: >-$er: - ... mffim~ ~ - "' :c :i: 111:im:E :e :, ~~Vu ..1 111 =>1110111111 2 ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ z~gtt~lrl ~ u. u.. :it :lE < :Ii ~~<~OZO ~ ~ z c( ...., 2014 PROJECT COMPLETION 4 'Schematic Design Submittal I I : 'Design Developmenit :submittal I = Presentation & Listening Events for Stakeholders & Public I #1 I #2 I #3 I #4 I Slakeholder Kick off Meeting. Initial Concepts ••• t • -,_, \ •' ~ • ~ ... ; ,. ...... ' ~- .. ~ .,_J l ,7 I -· :~ ' ·. ,,... ... rill· ',I ~~~ ' ; ' J., '~ ' -,.,r .. Public Open House - Presentation of initial concepts & Public feedback Stakeholder Meeting - Review of refined conceptual designs = Major milestone A = Property Owners & City Council Review Ll. I #s I #6 Public Open House - Final concept design presentation & Public feedback Block by Block meetings with property owners City Council Review i::J iit!t+i Previous Studies 700 EAST AUGUST 2011 OPEN HOUSE CONCEPTS BASELINE PROPOSAL CORRIDOR OCTOBER 2011 OPEN HOUSE CONCEPTS PROPOSED FINAL BUILD OUT UTA PHASE I: GRANT PROPOSAL UTA PHASE+: PRIVATE & PUBLIC INVESTMENT UTA+ PRIVATE & PUBLIC INVESTMENT: FINAL BUILD OUT EXISTING CONDITIONS@ 500 EAST POTENTIAL FINAL BUILD OUT 900 EAST AUGUST 2011 OPEN HOUSE CONCEPTS BASELINE PROPOSAL STOPS OCTOBER 2011 OPEN HOUSE CONCEPTS PROPOSED FINAL BUILD OUT UTA PHASE I: GRANT PROPOSAL UTA PHASE +: PRIVATE & PUBLIC INVESTMENT ·- I SLC!!!!~ ·~ UTA=@: SOUTHrul CITYONTHE MOVE 114-tti Visual Preference Survey STREETCAR The results of the visual preference survey concerning the streetcar clearly indicated a preference for embedded track, both with soft and hardscapes. Moreover. the most preferred im- ages, generally included multiple modes of transportation comfort- ably interacting with one another. for safety and convenience. CORRIDOR _;<:~; · .. ··11·.,."i~· .,>;'> ',.,·.··. '· ,,,,--- ·-; . . ~ ,; .. _; ;:.~ \~f~,. - - .. --. 5*· ._ ........ ~ 4 4 I 4 5 The results of the survey in- dicated a strong preference for programmed leisure spaces; some were active spaces, while others are intended for pause and reflection, including public art. Overall, the general consen- sus was to utilize a variety of free actlvines to bring together users of all ages and abilities. 5 6 I 6 [\'' ~l11:1~~-- 1.:1,., 1j~" - . .w ' ,,,.~ /1 • ..h '"~:-.: I )•._,.,_ , ....... --...--- . On January 11, stakeholders from Salt Lake City, the City of South Salt Lake and UTA convened to participate in a visual preference survey. The stakeholders were shown a series of images depicting streetcar lines, trail systems, civic spaces, public activity, recreation spaces and greenways. They were asked to appraise the Images concerning the Streetcar Greenway project. These images are the overall results of that survey, and they have been used to generate Initial concepts and schemes for the Streetcar Greenway. GREENWAY 2 4 2 Common themes included en- hancing the pedestrian experience along the Sugar House Streetcar Greenway. People were drawn to spaces that gave them multiple reasons to use this corndor Prefer- ences included landscaping along pathways, spaces for pausing, and clearly delineated paths by means of lighting and legible hardscapes. 4 ·- isle~ I~ UTA@: SOUTH~ CITY ON THE MOVE lilff 200 West - State Street - Design Concept - - CRQSSROAD 100' 300' 500' (!) w ·- isLC~ l:;J UTA SOUTHllil CITY ON THE MOVE ·- ....., C. Q) u C 0 u C 0) I V, Q) 0 I +-' V, ro UJ 0 0 ~ I +-' QJ QJ ~ +-' V) QJ +-' ro +-' V) 14%1 400 East - 700 East - Design Concept 100' 300' 500' ~ vllJl, ·- I SLC!!M l:;J UTA SOUTHWI CITYONTHE MOVE NiM 700 East - McClelland St. - Design Concept ..... "' timti•t;m ...... ~ It: "' , "'I ~"' z "' "' o c( w lUJ ...J LLl •-,r oz 0 w O. 0 0 0 z 0 I ' I H lil 11119MrYtfEALTHAVE :;: o s .:w.. ~ -- ~ ~ E= L-j I I I I I I I ~ ~ ·- :· : -' - , ~ :i: ...J ---.4- w . --..:.,l " :i: 100' 300' 500' C) ·- jsLC!!M ·~ ...... SOUTHtm UTA~ Move lt!M Conceptual Greenway Plan - soo East to 600 East I ·- ••• ._ SLC~ 1:1 \cl), c/>JJ ~ \ (> '4. I u T A • SOUTH .. " ~ ... !._ 1 ••• ? Mcrrv oN THE OVE Nitti Conceptual Greenway Plan - 600 East to 700 East I ·- \ ••• _. SLC!L~ l:J !fl, ~/!JI \ (> ~ I u T A • SOUTH"'T -.:; ..,1 1 _. .?' CITY ON TH: ·-· MOVE 114%1 Conceptual Rendering - State Street Proposed Mar1<et Station Development Streetcar Stop Columnar Trees Proposed Mar1<et Station Development ,.r ,.r Track Bike/Pedestrian Crossing ·- :jt, Gl I SLC!!~ 1!1 \t ~~I u T A -'iiiali. ~~T~ ,c.J_'f ••. , -eJii MOVE tJl, It-,"'·,,, .. ,-- .. ,, ,,:, .: ;;t,:';;1r.:10• ..... ,...,,. , .. ,.-. ·'!)~ ~· ... 4-s:~ ~! ~ .. ,.;;,..,hr._ ~J;,1 . •l;r ..... 1,; .,.. .. c,~1--~---~J< •... ~., 14fti Conceptual Rendering 500 East 500 East Bike/Pedestrian Path Townhomes Wasatch Plaza Building Columnar Tree Row ~/ Sedum v/Jil ·- isle~ I~ lllllllliiiill. SOUTH!fil UTA~ Movi 14M Conceptual Rendering 700 East Bike/Pedestrian Path Sugar House Bart>ecue Streetcar Station/ Plaza 700 East Bike Shop -~ Colu1Mar Tree Row Fitness Center Track v/ld ·- isLC!!~ ·~ llllll&iiiillii SOUTHl:.tl UTA~ Move Nitti .....,.._ r .... u I attractspeopla 11111111111 'ii branding access - " , .......... 1con1. ~ I w.=1 ......... trottay / historic lntagratian ri1..,buo 1r1_~~ r1ons fanGB.-... passve design competitions for slops m = leisurely Cl- ' ..,, . J UHL'Dl\'ttf"11UR< .......... "OJltMfjl en dallberato Em- u., Wordle >- <( (/) C QJ tJ L g ~ z ·- C ~ - ro JI Q) u ·- .µ :::n-· b recreation ·- ·-- en I U ·-M- l/) maintenance slgnage ~ L. events t "I ..J-- -- 1 .I,;; ......... 5 UQ.) furnished ra1 s E~ w en, t; (/) , 2 i'J ;:_, ..=l.~1 ~~ a.>~1o1 ~ml safety ~ E~ ill. f ~destination -c ::n C I Q.) cc ~.,_I!! I a ~d ·-·- -- . ~ :;; g> :'l J l sustalnablllty i~i2~2 f;~:ot,.,~roo'J-~Cap1ng;:o;:U1 water.~ µ~t,ijcspace i lh·~'Cveger-at· tlu !:.><· I .!Iii lltn~a~~ u~cu C JQr.\i ~i\Uil Q. history ...,.,_ .. _ I f I E ·=-connectivity '"""'"""~lll tV - - children ·- strolling movement re-orient tiuslness t7;"'greenway Q) amenities benches Q) cpen space L.. µ(!) a: 0 C { linear! f t!,a:a:&! .. pedestrian plaza i S O :B e a, § C) visibl GI waymding pratiti tirail O I ;§, I a, ·'= l ~ .t. intiersect;ion of space ·m j~ 11nv1t;1ng a<jjacent; properties slow bl<lng cg :n a. ~ef Jjconriecbiviby ~=rk; i ~~espine p > business efficienCIJ m I o~ cc < c.J E-- ·- I~ I SLC~!!~ UTA=@: SOUTHllil CITYONTHE MOVE ATTACHMENT 2 Concept Workbook STREETCAR GREENWAY & TRAIL: SALT LAKE CITY CONCEPTUAL WORKBOOK FEBRUARY 2012 -- ----~---~---------------~ CRSA [n! ~ib ·- u TA 2 3 ~-) L~ WISLC~~ ..,_._. MOVE CIRCULATION The design concept for the Streetcar Greenway is based on the metaphor of a river, because the corridor - like a river - supports flow- via streetcar, bicycle, foot and other means. The creation of an integrated, multimodal greenway and trail will connect neighborhoods and communities for work and play. The careful selection of materials and placement is important to safely and attractively provide for the wide variety of user ability and intentions which the greenway will support. l ~w· -~ - -- ---- ---~--- u TA~ r:1 .. " ~), i~ ~ ·~· ';' IOUnC: J J AR t 1~ un•0n1Ht. L ~-~ MOVE 900 EAST LOOKING EAST 700 EAST LOOKING EAST Words we heard which led to this concept: CONNECTIVITTYERSECTION OF SPACE IN SAFETY RECREATWfLKABILITY CRS/.\ SLCRDA u.J V, V, l.!:J ::::> I ~ :z V, Cl :::i :z u.J 3: ....J 0 ex: :c 0 :c r,,...j !;;: < ~ ex: ~ < :c I-- ....J I-- V, Cl... V, Cl... Cl... V, FURNISHINGS t: 900 EAST LOOKING EAST 700 EAST LOOKING EAST Furnishings such as bike racks, benches and lights are the elements which allow the user to interact with the place. Appropriate placement of these fixed elements add value to the community by enhancing the user experience beyond its basic function of East - West travel between two points and create a sense of place. Public/private cooperation can elevate the corridor beyond this basic purpose to a leisure experience available to all members of the communty. - - - - ~ -~ ----------~----- : -'LI UTA l--.- Words we heard which led to this concept: DESTINATION SAFETY AMENITIES PLANTS SIGNAGE 15,.~ i~:~ ~ - G)--~RDA -C R S-A-1 ,,,. _, ~ W«f,~.COR ~ \ r y,/ U!YOM1Kt .....,_'f.,. MOVE . - FURNISHINGS ALTERNATIVES -· -~ . - :- ·· LIGHT~------~--- BENCH.~E~S _ BOLLARDS & LIGHT~--------- BIKE RACKS PLANT'-=ER=--S~~~ IJ~9 ~---- ~ UTA The Streetcar Greenway and Trail goes beyond movement of people between Salt Lake City and The City of South Salt Lake. It will bring together neighborhoods and communities with a carefully planned and beautifully designed series of activities including public art, education, recreation, performance, and gathering spaces. Words we heard which led to this concept: INVITING BIKES/CYCLING PARKS RUNNING MULTI-USE ... --- ._, i ·- / ' l:t Ice ~I :.I \,J: "'' IOUTH::i: ' ..,_-r.,,,.. ' M"OvE SLCRDA CRS/.\ .,.-,.wwali,i.wA" PLAY __ -----, EXERCISE --- MARK~ET _ GARDENING RELAX,___~~_.. VEGETATION 900 EAST LOOKING EAST 700 EAST LOOKING EAST Water is a scarce resource in the arid West, and should be used wisely to populate the greenway with native plants. Vegetation will enhance the investment of the streetcar line by creating a healthy, safe, efficient and beautiful experience for users of all ages. In essence, the vegetation will create and define the greenway, an oasis within the city. Words we heard which led to this concept: NATURE TREES COMMUNITY GARDENS TRAILS LANDSCAPING r t_M _______________________________ , _ UTA ,,;h ,,. ~"Y\ I-<' 7'-1 ,,,., '"'' \~.,J_t..,.'),' ·- ·~ SLCRDA WWW.Kta'il.t:err CRS/.\ ~ MOVE VEGETATION ALTERNATIVES COLUMNAR TREES m>·ba- ROUND TREES SHRUB~S~~~~~~~~~~~____!!!'!!" FLOWERS& FORB~~~~~ GRASSES & TURFS ---- WATER MANAGEMENT Suga,mont Or. I 900 EAST LOOKING EAST 700 EAST LOOKING EAST Water conservation has been the key driver in the design process and will be featured as bio-retention swales, permeable softscapes, fountains and its display as a natural feature of the greenway The intention is to celebrate the precious nature of water and its vital role as it flows through the greenway. Words we heard which led to this concept: WATER-WISE CONSERVATION EFFICIENT SUSTAINABILITY [~ - --- UTA ,(1~ ~}, ,~ ~, ,.,.. ,.,, '~ .... : .... ""' ·- ·~ SLCRDA ~ Cl1H)l'ITI*; MOVE W'l\'W.~~.l:00" V, = 6 u.J ....I ....I 8 PUBLIC ART TEMPORARY PERMANENT ti! INTERACTIVE HISTORICAL UTA I ·- " ' ·~ '" y\ • I"'! fl \·.t, "'' sounc:.; ' .J_"r.,..·-,/ MOvE SLCRDA CRS/.\ WWW&ltr.14'"'1 I- V'\ <C u.J ~t Ill C1J VI :::, ..c ·.6 ~ ---+-... :5 Q.. E \~e3 006 :z 0 t- a_ 0 <C N <C _J c... :z 0 !:;: t- V"'I t- V"'I <C LU 0 0 °' SMALL AREA PLAN 800 EAST CONCEPTUAL VIGNETTE multi-use path plaza strolling path public art activity 800 EAST LOOKING EAST bollard embedded bike rack ~~~ track Int - U_!A. ti}, ·- I WISLC~Q~ l«c .... , ,,,.\ ~. \ ..J:'<t..,.....,, MOVE CRS/.\ 00 0 0 rT'1 ::t> V'\ --1 '""C r+' ::t> N ::t> C> ""'C --1 - C> ::z: 8 - C: ;; 3 --- n, :::, .,.. ~ C -I )> SMALL AREA PLAN 700 EAST CONCEPTUAL PLAN embedded track embedded track Bicycle Center Sugar House BBQ plaza station i shared plaza t::: n:, LU 0 0 ........ alleyway 0 NORTii 700 EAST (EAST & WEST)PLAZA OPTION 10 18 I l . ---- 0 0 1 ~--·- ...i:,. •• I • e lo ~ 1 l< I~ I ni I (J) I -{ ·---·- C -I )>- ~11~r 1 I I ·--t l!f- 'r. C: -I )> ;i:s~-•' ~IH.!1.1 j I 66'-0" .... ..- . Ji!'ITI 1'-6" s·-0.l· 2 12'-3" 10'-0" 13'-0" 10'-0" 4'-0" VARIES VARIES TYP. SECTION THROUGH MIDBLOCK 111 Ii "' 0 ---' ~ ::c i I ~ w ~ w z ::::; ::c u !;.; :,a ®lYP l! ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ § § § ~ CONCRETE PATH 11111:l EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK • CONCRETE (D 12'WIDE CONCRETE PATH (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPE © TREE CD EXISTING POWER POLE © LANDSCAPE, VARIES ii ~ GRASS ~ EXISTING POWER POLE l3 © EMBEDDED TRACK, 9' WIDE . 1<<:.:::::j CRUSHED GRAVEL 0 © RILL -··-··- UTARIGHTOfWAY z (D BENCH ~RILL II 11 CANOPY © LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD D.D. DRAFT I .,., ., 60% ,-e;. ;,:t u TA ~ \.t. "'' \ :J"_T.,,. I HR G)isLCRDA UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY ... , - I -- I -- @ STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK I CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK I BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 3CY @) CANOPY STREETCAR GREENWAY 600 EAST TO 700 EAST - .. 6CY a NORTH """ AS SHOWN _,,.,.... L1020.dw, -- 2J/12./J2_ _ ... L1020 ATTACHMENT 3 Summary of Block-by-Block Meetings Block: Date: Time: Location: 500 East to 600 East February 15, 2012 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. IHI Environmental, 640 East Wilmington Avenue • Townhomes-13C will add gate. • Townhomes-unit 126, like gate. • Safety and security when thinking vegetation. • I don't want people to use the trees to climb into my backyard. • (UTA) please change bus stop [on 500 East) from east to west • [UTA] please provide garbage cans and sheltered waiting area [at existing bus stop on 500 East]. Block: Date: Time: Location: 600 Eastto 700 East February 15, 2012 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. IHI Environmental, 640 East Wilmington Avenue • Use large stones in areas that may be hidden to prevent people from sleeping. • Do not move Lil' Scholars fence to the south because this would conflict with the fall zone of its playgrounds. Block: Date: Time: Location: 700 East to 900 East February 16, 2012 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. HawkWatch International, 2240 South 900 East • Keep irrigation ditch from 9th East on south side or corridor. It runs from 9th, my house is 841 Simpson. Please consider putting a uniform fence along people's backyards along corridor. All backyard fences along the corridor are in various states of disrepair and all different The uniform fence would add a 'cleanliness' to the corridor. We have a dog and she lives in the backyard with access to our house ad lib: plus we would like to have backyard privacy. Daphne Perry 801.694.1714 Water Master, Darren Bradshaw? 801.347.9022 • Design a stop here! [East side of Lake Street]. • Want call button stations for emergencies. Utah State University Old Main Hill as example. • Put shields on lights to cause light to reflect back into corridor and alley. • How does this typically affect property values? Ray Fairbanks, 801.466.1343. • This area is amongst the most visible of the streetcar rightway. Treat it as a gateway and plaza and continue it on both sides [ of 700 East)) • Mirror plazas on both sides of the corridor [ at east side of 700 East). • There should be no grade change barrier at easement edge [at east side of 700 East]. • Need to be concrete. Be inviting for people to cross. [Pedestrian crosswalk at 700 East] • As the property owner here I would NQI.want to see a future station here. [Between 700 East and Lake Street] Al Cairo, 801.503.4544. This property owner accesses a garage from the Circulation 800 East Looking East: 900 East Looking East: Circulation Shared-use Pathways: Strolling Path Fencing: Furnjshin2s 900 East Looking East: Furnishin2s Lighting: Benches: Bike Racks: Planters: Like this fencing [in the graphic]. Very nice, lots of paths for movement OFF street 1) The walking path would be nice with bark like Liberty Park. 2) Like. 3) Yes. Like. 3) 5) Like. No. 1) Want fencing you can cross over-gate? Like people on 1000 East cross over to Fairmont Park. No Fences-No Flow. Ok. Like. Fencing impedes permeability, creates dark corners. 2) 5) Is there this much room here or will you move the road? Keep community garden, enhance it! Want lighting along whole path. Emergency call stations along path. Okay but make directional [lighting] to shine on tracks but not into house windows. Rebuild/redo tennis court Make court with destination, if not tennis maybe pickleball and basketball, move garden. 1) Select lighting that won't shine into backyards and windows. Ditto. What about some motion lights mixed in? We are a historic district! May determine type of lighting allowed. Tum of the century in SLC style?? Yes. Like this. 4) 1) Yes. Yes. 2) Yes. 5) Yes. 2) Yes. 5) Yes. Nice! 2) Yes. 3) Yes. paving pattern. ATTACHMENT 4 60% Design Drawings SLC RDA STREETCAR GREENWAY ~ """ D.D. DRAFT I 'it STREETCAR GREENWAY AS SHOWN SO% lllt!ff 1.; ... UTA~ COVER SHEET "' ,., \ I 4_ ~- Gi)lsLC!.!.OA UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY "" ,._ .. "" GI001 ..,I "" I - ........ DRAWING INDEX NO. SHEET NAME GENERAL 61001 COVERSHEET 61002 SHEET INDEX 61003 KEY PLAN LANDSCAPE L1017 500 EAST TO 600 EAST - L1018 500 EAST TO 600 EAST ~ L1019 600 EAST TO 700 EAST u L1020 600 EAST TO 700 EAST Ill L1021 700 EAST TO 800 EAST lll: L1022 700 EAST TO 800 EAST =5 L1023 800 EAST TO 900 EAST !:i L1024 800 EAST TO 900 EAST ~ L1025 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET L1026 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET L1027 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET L3020 700 EAST PLATFORM SECTIONS L3025 900 EAST PLATFORM SECTIONS L3027 MCCLELLAND PLATFORM SECTIONS L3028 SECTIONS L3029 SECTIONS L3030 SECTIONS L3040 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L3041 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L3042 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L3043 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND SCHEDULES L3044 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND SCHEDULES -~· """ D.D. DRAFT lit+ 'i' STREETCAR GREENWAY AS SHOWN """'- 60% '"'' "" UTA~ -~· SHEET INDEX Gi002.d"a '"' Iii-I ._...n1iLo,i,,n: \ I .!_ ........ OJ/12/12 - .. HR G) SLC!!_D_!l UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Gl002 __,,.., ..... ..., ., .... - CURRENT CONTRACT CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE SALT LAKE CITY ~ ti, w l1008 I~ 11 1 L1019 L1018 L1007 C 11 D.D. DRAFT I = """' ,~1t STREETCAR GREENWAY AS SHOWN .......... SO% 1:rt1• ,~ ,,., UTA~ KEY PLAN GIOOJ.dw ,,,., ·"111 '.f' .... ,_t,.. I 5'.NTTAL IVJE OJ 12/1i !ill~ G>lsLC~ UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY . ...... , GIOOJ ""I "" I - I I I I I 1 l 1~ I w z :J I (.) ~ ~ I t- en i'.5 I 8~ a.o I ! 1; ~ CONCRETE I UNIT PAVERS (;a;) EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK !Bl TINTED CONCRETE ~TREES G) 12' WIDE CONCRETE PATH (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM 00® SHRUBS G) EXISTING POWER POLE ~ GRASS ~ BRICK PAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES ii ~ EXISTING POWER POLE ~ © EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.I.C.) . !Jill CRUSHED GRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY H-i¥f! BENCH ~ @ RILL (j) BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK © LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD 00 ..... c:> ..... ....J I I I I I I I IJl I I I I I I I I I I ~ll--++H-++++---1-+i W w Cf) I -·J J • I u •i, ::: 1- """I<( ...... ~ SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 30' 60' r., NORTH @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK I CURB @) FENCING ® PLANTER, (RAISED) @) BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK I BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @ CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @) CONCRETE PATH WI THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING -- L1017.dw fiiiiii,iii"lff. D.D. DRAFT I ~,, UTA~ ,.., . ,.., letrmtT: {! 'i' 60% '..(:_i_ UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1/lffllO'IUllf' G)isLCROA ,._,.,. ,..,, .. ~ I STREETCAR GREENWAY 500 EAST TO 600 EAST """' AS SHOWN OJ/12/12 ........... L1017 r-- ...- 0 ...- _J w z ~!::::::::::::::::~ u ~ 1- l ~ <( • ~I - 0) ...- 0 ..- _J w w en SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 30' 60' r., NORTH @ CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETE PATH W/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING mm CONCRETE/ UNIT PAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK I :['.;::;;,1¥,1 TINTED CONCRETE ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM II ~ GRASS 0 EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICK PAVERS . I:·;~.<;.:-:>.] CRUSHED GRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY H==·=--- H BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK ~TREES 00® SHRUBS (j) 12' WIDE CONCRETE PATH 0 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH @ EXISTING POWER POLE © LANDSCAPING VARIES 811 @ EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.I.C.) ~ @ RILL CD BENCH @ LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @ PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) "" ........ L1016.dw 0·0·s~~FT I irft+ ;I UTA~ Iv :,\ 1"1, :: jCHtCKEOrr: '\.(J_.,... I UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY IN"l'IIIMDW: HR G)isLC~p~ ==- I I ........... ..,, OOK I STREETCAR GREENWAY 500 EAST TO 600 EAST ""-L AS SHOWN ~rt.li.0,1,Tt OJ/12/12 ...., ... L1016 ©TYP @TYP ©TYP eo ii 1' ...- C) ...- ......J I w z ::::i I (_) I- ~ I I- ~ w C) C) (0 :,~ i Ii! ~ CONCRETE/ UNIT PAYERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK 1 m~~1~ 1 TINTED CONCRETE ~TREES (D 12' WIDE CONCRETE PA TH (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM 00@ SHRUBS @ EXISTING POWER POLE ~ GRASS ~ BRICK PAYERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES ii @ EXISTING POWER POLE [B © EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.I.C.) . k;'. <.'<::!) CRUSHED GRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY o---~ 11 BENCH § © RILL (D BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK @ LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD C) N C) ...- =F. ......J ~w w Cf) SCALE: 1" = 30'.Q" 30' 60' r., NORTH @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @) WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PLATFORM AREA (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.1.C.) @) CONCRETEPATHW/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING """"""" L1019.dw 'I' ,.., . ·-,, 1-c, "'' V n:I \t,J_,,,. I D.D. DRAFT 60% UTA.;). UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY G)jsLC~ STREETCAR GREENWAY 600 EAST TO 700 EAST ""-' AS SHOWN S81rTM..0-I[ Q,W__U)_z L1019 111 Iii I I i I i ~ IN I~ w w Cf) I w z ::J I (_) ~ ~ ~ I i'.5 0 112 a, ...- 0 ...- _J I w z ::J :i:•·~~·~ ~~--- ~ ~ I ~ I l I ~ ~ ~ ® TYP SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 30' r., NORTH 60' @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK I CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK I BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETE PATH WI TliEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING ~ CONCRETEIUNITPAVERS ellll:) EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK ~TREES (D 12'WIDECONCRETE PATH [Bl TINTED CONCRETE (D 4' WIDEGRAVELPAT!i ~ LANDSCAPING !2'.2ZI PLATFORM T 00© SHRUBS CD EXISTING POWER POLE ~ GRASS ~ BRICK PAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES II ~ EXISTING POWER POLE SJ © EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.1.C.) . k<:<n CRUSHEDGRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY h="II BENCH ~ © RILL (D BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK @ LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD ""' AS SHOWN D.D. DRAFT I•• Ji UTA~ Iv :r\ so% ZZftlf {! !: jet«ai:mlT: '..(:_i_..,,. I UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1~m HR (»jsLC~ --~ ,,_,.., STREETCAR GREENWAY 600 EAST TO 700 EAST """""""· L1020.dw SIJlllilnM.. °"'11: !JJ/12/_12 L1020 :li rn 1,11 ~I ~ ...- -;I I w z :J ::r: (.) I- <( ~ I- U) <( w 81 ...... :11 ~ I i I ~ I ~ ~ ~ SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 30' I- w w a:::: I- U) ~~ I i i i1 § ~ I I 60' ,.,- NORTH mm CONCRETE/UNITPAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK I ~t~· I TINTED CONCRETE ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM 01 ~ GRASS (I) EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICK PAVERS z ...... ~ 1-::~<:<n CRUSHEDGRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY U=-1 BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK ~TREES 00@ SHRUBS (j) 12'WIDECONCRETEPATH 0 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH (D EXISTING POWER POLE © LANDSCAPING VARIES [lll @ EMBEDDEDTRACK,(N.I.C.) § © RILL (D BENCH © LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @ ART SCULPTURE @) WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @ CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @) CONCRETE PATH W/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING -- L1021.dw 0·0·s~~FT I iriiti ,~1t UTA~ ,~ ,,., jatCCl(O)ff '"' /Oll \..(°,J_t,.. I G)jsLCf:lM UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY !ffi_ .._. ... ""I "n I STREETCAR GREENWAY 700 EAST TO 800 EAST ""'- AS SHOWN Q_UJ_UJ_J_ ........ L1021 I 1; D ...- ....J ©TYP =:i I (.) i ~ w er:: I- en ~I ::SI t F =---------- - LJ w z =:i I (.) ~ D ~ I- I~ I~ 0 I co I I 1 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 30' 60' g NORTH ~ CONCRETE/UNITPAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK ~TREES (D 12'WIDECONCRETEPATH la] TINTED CONCRETE @ 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPING rzz:z::I PLATFORM . 00© SHRUBS CD EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICKPAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES 01 ~ GRASS (I) EXISTING POWER POLE ff] ® EMBEDDED TRACK. (N.I.C.) z ...... § 1-~:~<:;,;:~q CRUSHED GRAVEL ~ @ RILL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY d =a=- D BENCH (D BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK @ LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD @ STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @ PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @) WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETE PATH W/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING D.D. DRAFT I ,~1t UTA~ 60% ::rt- D :} '.t:_i-:3_. ~ G)lsLC!!_OA UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY HR --~ MVI IMrt I """""" """"""'- L1022.dw STREETCAR GREENWAY 700 EAST TO 800 EAST """' AS SHOWN 5'8iTIM.. ~11: OJ/12/11 ....., ... L1022 ID~ . \ ;:;_Jr r + -; -ii --t , , i Ii D i----- ::J :::c '1":fi!l' (( "J-b.~ (.) i I- ~ w ~I ---------- "'<t" N 11111111111111 ii~ __. w w U) I w z ::J :::c ................ (_) hhhhhhh!~ SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 30' 60' r., NORTH ~ CONCRETE/UNITPAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK ~TREES (D 12' WIDE CONCRETE PATH R TINTED CONCRETE @ 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM . 00® SHRUBS G) EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICK PAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES 01 ~ GRASS (ft) EXISTING POWER POLE [ll © EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.J.C.) z ........ w (!) ~ © RILL w . . ~ I:'.' <..-<~~.1 CRUSHED GRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY ne:~~-·-cn BENCH (D BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK © LIGHT BOLLARD © BOLLARD @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @ ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @ CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @) CONCRETE PATH W/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING """,.._, L102l.dw jDIIIMIIT 0·0·s~~FT I Nri+i ,~,/ UTA~ I-.;, 1'·1 ~ ,.,, ,'111 '.,t;J_.._. I UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY ,__,. .. !fl\ G)lsLCRDA ---- ..,. ··- STREETCAR GREENWAY 800 EAST TO 900 EAST ""' AS SHOWN .... TTALDi'II !!JL1U11. L102l ©TYP ~ I Ii LO N C> I ,, += f= + I I ' I I I ~il:t-W I I I I I I I lt1 I I I I I liillj+I I I I I I I I I I I I l+-H-J-+H± ...- _J I w z :::::i I (.) ~ ~ w z f>"'l:::::i I n:'I(.) ~ ~~ I-- en I~ C> I~ I I SCALE: 1" = 30'--0" 30' 60' ~ NORTH mm CONCRETE/ UNIT PAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK ~ ~TREES (D 12' WIDE CONCRETE PA TH 0 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH TINTED CONCRETE ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM 00® SHRUBS @ EXISTING POWER POLE ~ GRASS ~ BRICK PAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES II ~ EXISTING POWER POLE <fl © EMBEDDED TRACK. (N.I.C.) . w t- @ RILL l.:·>:.:<,iJ CRUSHEDGRAVEL 0 -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY II - ---"~- H BENCH z (D BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK © LIGHT BOLLARD © BOLLARD @) STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @) WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.1.C.) @ CONCRETEPATHW/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING """"'""" L1024.dw, r---sr: D.D.6~~FT I lit+ ,,, UTA~ ~ :} IOtCCatD1tr. \ . I ,.J_..,,. UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY !ffi_ GllSLCf!DA - ... 1 .. ~ I STREETCAR GREENWAY 800 EAST TO 900 EAST """' AS SHOWN 98,ITlM. D,l,T( QJ/12/11 _,.,. L1024 s r ii I 0wD ©TYP w·· z It :J . :r: -·~~· . (.) !;;i: ~ I-~ ~ ~I C) 0)1 I I "" TIWF< TIWF< © z _J 0 u z :J "" rr 11 n ~ SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 30' 60' r., NORTH Imm CONCRETE/ UNIT PAVERS l::fjifj EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK r~:.'°t::· I TINTED CONCRETE ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PLATFORM ii ~ GRASS (Ii EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICK PAVER$ . J.:.>;;·! ;'.(1 CRUSHED GRAVEL ------- UTARIGHTOFWAY H=H BENCH ~RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK (D 12' WIDE CONCRETE PATH (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH @ EXISTING POWER POLE © LANDSCAPING VARIES fill © EMBEDDEDTRACK,(N.I.C.) § @ RILL (D BENCH @ LIGHT BOLLARD @ BOLLARD ~TREES 00® SHRUBS @ STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @) ART SCULPTURE @) WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETE PATH W/ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING -...-. L1025.dw, , .... lh': D.D. DRAFT I•• ,,~ UTA~ &O% nttTf ~ ';' jO«DltDIJI', ~.J_,..,. UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY I.IIPl'fltMOIJ'f: HR G)'SLC!!!J~ --- -- "'I °'K STREETCAR GREENWAY 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET .,... AS SHOWN 03/12/12 ,.._ ... L1025 J t- en <( w C> C> C> ..-- D ...- _J w w w en z I ~ w I Z u _J ~ _..,o;,:.;;-d"-t' .. ~?··;:.; ... .:..~ I < u ~ ~ -c t-----------------------'-"---------'-"'------------'-;_:___--------------------;~ ~ CONCRETE I UNIT PAVERS ~ EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK ~TREES (D 12"MDE CONCRETE PATH ~ TINTED CONCRETE (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH ~ LANDSCAPING l22Zl PLATFORM 1 00® SHRUBS @ EXISTING POWER POLE ~ GRASS I ;,::,~91 BRICK PAVERS © LANDSCAPING VARIES II • EXISTING POWER POLE if! © EMBEDDED TRACK, (N.I.C.) . k~ <·<n CRUSHED GRAVEL -··-··- UTARIGHTOFWAY I~"~ - H BENCH ~ © RILL (D BENCH ~ RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK @ LIGHT BOLLARD © BOLLARD SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 30' 60' L1 NORTH @ STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK I CURB @ FENCING @ PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @ ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK I BOULDER @ PLATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) @) CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETE PATH WI _ THEROMOPLASTIC STRIPING 1--1'1': D.D. DRAFT 1. ,(at UTA~ SO% nrtlf ::, :: I aco;m .,., \t:_i_t.,. I UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY ~-~ HR G) SLC!lDA --~ - STREETCAR GREENWAY 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET UJ z ~ ::i::: u ~ - < ~ > I 11WF1' l1WF1' ... ~ ~TREES 00© SHRUBS (D 12' WIDE CONCRETE PA TH (D 4' WIDE GRAVEL PATH CD EXISTING POWER POLE © LANDSCAPING VARIES ~, © EMBEOOEDTRACK,(N.I.C.) ~ @RU (z) BENCH © LIGHT BOUARD @ BOUARD ~ CCJNCRETE/UNITPAVERS I ~!f3".'; I EMBEDDED RAIL TRACK I ?;a'~ I TINTED CONCRETE ~ LANDSCAPING ~ PlATFORM ii ~ GRASS e EXISTING POWER POLE ~ BRICK PAVERS . k'<;·:~;}.'.j CRUSHED GRAVEL ------- UTARIGHTOFWAY I-=- -=H BENCH ~ RILL --- EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT -- BIKE RACK t-= en Cl z <( _. _. w _. (..) (.) ~ SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 30' @ STREET LIGHT @ EXISTING SIDEWALK/ CURB @ FENCING @) PLANTER, (RAISED) @ BIKERACK @ ART SCULPTURE @ WATER FEATURE @ ROCK/ BOULDER @) PlATFORM AREA, (N.I.C.) 60' r., NORTH @ CANOPY, (N.I.C.) @ CONCRETEPATHW/ ~ THEROMOPIASTIC STRIPING r-•.-l'l'l 0.0. DRAFT lf-f+ 'i UTA~ ,.... .,., ,~ "' fciiDcm-11"1 \,r, "'' 60% ffl" \,1..J_1_ I UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY jllf'PflllM:Off; Im G) SLC!!DA --- - ... I "" I STREETCAR GREENWAY 900 EAST TO McCLELLAND STREET t ,~ I I ,~ i ll'-o' 1 f l'-0~ ~ Fl I I I I I I OIS1IG aoo. I ~ j ii ~ 0 700. EAST PLATFORM SECTION - LOOKING EAST 1---+----+---------------i D.D. DRAFT 60% irit+ HR ·- I~ G)JSLCR~ ~1 ,~,:i~, ·~ ~, \-1> l'fll '":.J- I STREETCAR GREENWAY L.3020 tut ,,t I •~ I ,,t i l - l - ~·11-4"~ u l ,,. .... l L ,·...- L WMS 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I ~ I c::::+::=::±,,! I I I I I I I I I j ~ I I I 11 I ~ I I ··-,r Ii ·" 'I ;1 I L_J;10P:L~2%\ i I I I I I .... r,I I 11 SCALE. 1/8"•1'-0" 900 EAST PLATFORM SECTION- LOOKING EAST 0 900 EAST GREENWAY SECTION - LOOKING EAST D.D. DRAFT 60% 14M HR ·- I~ ""I SLCRDA ~'~ W - · MOVE ,~,~}, 11';/ ,.., ,.,. :.:1 '"...,_ ... ~ STREETCAR GREENWAY """ AS SHOWN ! lucp 1'-f( I 11-o" I 1'-f( ~·-o-1 I I I ! I I I ii i I ! I i i ~I I i I I i i I• i I i i !!ii ai I i i i I_ 51~'~ftl~ i 5)-J..,t" i 11 ! 1 I I ljJ ~I ~ 4 ,,t ~ ~ •d i I i IZ'-o" I ilj ,..,. !'I 0 ~~S-~~.~LAND STREET PLATFORM SECTION _ LOOKING EAST STREETCAR GREENWAY 1-1---1----------------j D.D. DRAFT 60% ii+i !11\ ,~,].}, I.; ,r.\ \1> /11:I '..f'..J_ I ·- I~ ""I SLCRDA ~.';// W - MOVE L.J027 .. .,. VAAES 174' ..... 114' ..... . ... VAAES 0 TYP. SECTION THROUGH PLAZA D.D. DRAFT I ''It ·- k...,. I STREETCAR GREENWAY SO% llftltl ·~ ~, I~ '"' :t:I \{'..J_T_ / ICHtCKmsr: HR Gil SOUTHl:II --- I SLCROA C<TVONT ... I #WOifJ).,. ""' I - I - MOVE VARES mr ., ... ,, ... . .... . ... VARES 0 TYP. SECTION THROUGH PLAZA (B) - LOOKING EAST D.D. DRAFT 60% 'i?, ,...,,, .,, f"IC1 ~, ,.,, ,,,, '..t,J_..,. J ·- I~ STREETCAR GREENWAY """ AS SHOWN L.l029 MV I D,1,ll Gl SOUTHl.tll 1, SLCRDA CIT'iONYril - MOVE ,.,,. VARES 11-0' ..... ,, ... 10-0' .... VARES 0 TYP. SECTION THROUGH GREENWAY D.D. DRAFT I ,~,t ·- ~ I STREETCAR GREENWAY SO% llrtltl {' :: I~ \.('J_.,,,, I l~u I !ill~ Gll SOUYHtt;1 ILJOJO SLCRDA CITYONTHf -~ .. ~ ' -- -- MOVE D£PTH Of ROOTBAU. ROCK lllA.CH J' Pt..cr ROOT&IU 1' N!lNf. GRADE CRfATE J' HIGH BASIN Al() PRO'lf>E 24' CM. 500-FREE CIRCLE AT BASE Of TREE. DEPTH Of ROOTBAU. EVERGREEN PUNTS PRUNC ONLY CWl,IGIJl Oft Bft()l(EN LIIBS. NEVER PRUNE l.fAOER. f'INISH CRAil[ PRUNE ONLY DAMAGED OR BROKEN LIMBS. NEVER PRUNE LEADER. PREVAILING WIND R[ll(M BURl,IP fROII All ROOTBAU. Al() COIIPI.ETELY ROl<M: WR£ BASKET. GUY WIRES GUYING PLAN VIEW REMCM: IIURlN' fROII All ROOTBAI.J. Al() COIIPl.£TELY REIIOYE WIRE BASKET. (2) 2• OIi, B'f 12 n. LOOCEPOtE PINE STAKES WITH HYON TREE STRAPS !'LICE ROOTBAU. 1 • ND/£. GRADE ROCK IIJLCH J' CRfATE J' HIGH BASIN ANO PfiO'IIOE 24' CM. S00-fREE CIRCLE AT BASE Of TREE. UHOISTURSED SU8CRAOE SOIL BACKFU IIIJI. SET ROOTBAU. ON UND!STUR1lED SOIL :. NOTE! WRAP TREE TRUNI( DURING FAI.L ANO WINTER MONTHS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEPTH Of ROOTBAI.J. MRCREEN NNTS PRtJN£ ONLY DAIIACED Oft Bft()l(EN LIMBS. NMR PRUNE LEADER. REllllYE IIURlN' fROII All ROOTBAU. ANO CDIIPLETEL Y REM<M WIRE BASKET. • CtJY Oft STAKE TREES PER DETAI.S I 1 ANO 2 DEPENOING ON TREE TYPE ROCK/BARK IIJLCH J" RNISH GRAD£ AND CURB ooooox + ~ 0 0 0 0 0 2H:IV SI.OPE ROCK IIULCH J' J' HIGH BASIN Pl.ICE BOULDCR WITH MIN. Of 5Dll Of IICXA.DER BELOW GRADE. CONTRACTOR MAY USE ON-SITE EXCAVATED BOULDERS. mo FABRIC ROOT&IU ROCK IIJI.CH IN TRENGH TO SCARfY Sl>ES ANCHOR WEED FABRIC Of PIT "-• BACKFU- 111.tt ·" 111 L~2 SEE SPCClflCAOONS srnu WITH '!,,</ '> - , WATER UNlltSTUREIED SUllGRAOC _/ Pl,INTINC PIT 2X OIi, Of ROOTBAU. fOf! DIIENSIONS Of X SEE PINff MATERIAL KEYS. All Pl,INTINCS WU 8£ SPACED TIMNGl.URLY AT THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PIANS. UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. SPACE INONOOAL TREES AS SHOWN ON 11£ PlANS. UNOISTUREIED SU8GRADE SOIL BACKFR.L IIIJI_ SET ROOTBAU. ON UND1STURB£D SOIL D.D. DRAFT I ;I ·- ~ STREETCAR GREENWAY ,..., .,,, 60% llftl9 1..:t ~, I~ ENLARGED PLANTING AREAS '" .~, \(.,J _ _. I HR G> I SLCRDA ~T~ . - ILJO•o "'' - I - -- MOVE PLANTING GENERAL NOTES: PLANT SCHEDULE -- Rome ?.iiliii ~ 1. SPACING FOR All PlANTINCS SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. MASS PLANTINGS OF PERENNIALS AND GROUND COVERS SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED WITHIN DESIGNATED PlANTING AREA. 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL QUANTITY TAKE-OFFS. J. GROUNDCOVER MATERIALS SHALL BE Pl.ACED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF ADJACENT PAVING TO ALLOW ADEQUATE ROOM FOR GROWTH. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE SITE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. IF CONDITIONS ARE UNSATISFACTORY CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING. DO NOT PROCEED UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY. 5. BEFORE EXCAVATING, DIGGING, OR DISTIJRBING SITE FOR ANY REASON, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AREA "BLUE STAKED" IN ORDER TO LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTUTIES. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTE LOCATION OF NEW AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AND WORK IN SUCH A MANNER TO PROTECT EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE. 6. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE SITE AND WORK IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID DAMAGING ANY PORTION OF THE SITE OR STRUCTURE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE, AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER, THAT IS INCURRED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISH GRADE ELEVATIONS IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. ALLOW FOR 6" (DEPTH) OF ROCK MULCH IN SHRUB/GROUND COVER BEDS AND AT BASE OF TREES. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO LAYOUT PLANTS PRIOR TO PLANTING. ADJUSTMENT MAY BE REQUIRED. PLANT MATERIAi. LOCATED IN GROUPINGS OR ROWS SHALL BE MATCHED IN SIZE, FORM, AND APPEARANCE. NOTIFY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE PROCEEDING. 9. All PLANT MATERIALS MUST MEET SIZES INDICATED IN SCHEDULES, AND SHALL MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL CODES.. THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFLISE PLANT MATERIALS WHICH DO NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS, OR DO NOT MEET THE OUALJTY STANDARDS OF THE OWNER. ALL PLANT MATERIAi.. SHALL HAVE WELL D£VEL0PED FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEM THAT ARE FREE OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE, DISEASE, ANO INSECT INFESTATION. 10. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ROCK MULCH IN ALL PLANTER AREAS, EXCLUDING SEEDED AREAS. DO NOT BURY GROUND COVERS WITH MULCH. 11. ANY PLANT DMAACED DURING ANY STACE OF THE INSTALLATION PROCESS SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 12. ANY PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES REQUIRED AND PROVIDE THE PLANTS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PLANTINGS. PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES INDICATED FOR BEDS/PLANTERS ARE ESTIMATES. VERIFY QUANTITY TO MATCH DETAILED DESIGN INTENT. PlANT QUANTITIES ARE FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTS ONLY, AND DO NOT APPLY TO MIXES. 0 • ~ D.D. DRAFT I -1 ·- STREETCAR GREENWAY '" ,.,, . SO% llftltl J1=; ,.., I~ ENLARGED PLANTING AREAS '"' 1'1# '.,( I .,J_ ' !fl\ Gil SOUTHWI SLCRDA cm'ONT"' ' ""' "" I """"""' I - MOVE -- NATURALIZED PLANTING SCHEME (TYP. SCALE: r • 10'-0" 50'-0" © FORMAL PLANTING SCHEME (TYP.) STATION/ PLAZA PLANTING SCHEME (TYP. SCALE· 1" == 10'-0" 50'-0" D FUTURE TRACK PLANTING SCHEME (TYP. D.D. DRAFT 60% Mifti HR SCALE. 1",.10'-0" ,,,i~, ,., ,.., ,~ .-.i, '-l;,,1_., J ·- I~ Q I SOUIHWI SLCRDA OTYONTa1 -~ MOVE STREETCAR GREENWAY ENLARGED PLANTING AREAS Ll042 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW r-fih-y1 JC,~! 1 i t ~rr'-' 5CONDUITFORLINEFEFOINTO METER PANEL C0~1BO EXTEND INTO UP&l TRANSFOR~TER 6 PVC LONG SWEEP Ell U<;EONE SWEEP Ell PER CONTROLLER 7 DIRECTBURIALCONTROLWIRES TO CONTROL VALVES 8 AUTOMATICCONTROLLER METER/CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE I U"'E er-tx BRANO G\JARDSHACK MODEL GS X WITH FOREST GREEN POWDER COATIN(l IN"'TALL TO ~!ANIIFACTURERS RECO~IMENDATION ? L<;f8FD18R\N0 ENCPAD EPX PLASTIC BASE WITH PADLOK ANCHOR HARDWARE INqALL t() ~IANlJFA( IIJRFR<; RfCO~l~IENDATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE PVCPIPESLEEVEWISNUC!CAP SIZEANOLENGTHASNEEDED 1 USEMUELLERORISEALMODfLH to2-t!8VALVEWITHTHREADEOTOP HARDPIPETOSURFACEW1THP1PEAN0FITTINGSASNEEDE0 2 U5EUSEPACKJOINTTEE SADOlE ORPACKJOINTf A TOCONNECTONTOSUPPLVLINE USE MINIMUM e BRASS NIPPLES ON EITHER SIDE OF STOP & WASTE VALVE STOP AND WASTE VALVE WILKINS PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE BRASS UNIONS AS SHOWN TWO REQUIRED ~----WILKINS WYE STRAINER BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SECTION VIEW ANO WIRING SAME TRENCH WIRING ONLY IN CONDUIT ~ PLAN VIEW -····' '-!_, ~ AND BESIDE MAINLINE PLASTIC PIPING TO ALLWIRINGATCl-!ANGES TAPE A;~ 1~~~~0;.t; TRENC~E A~N;i':;~~N OF OIR~;r~~~c~~~: :~~E!6LEL ;"MINIMUMPVCS/40ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FITTINOSANOSWEEPELL 1 ~'fi!f :~!~~1 ;~5csT!~iAPL Ell I SLEEVESSHALLBETWICETHEDIAMETEROFTHEPIPEWITHIN 2 SLEEV1NOS12ES2 Tl-lROU0H4.SHAllBES140SOLVENTWEl0 C"ANOAB0VESHALLBECL2000ASKETED 3PIPEAN0WIRESHALLBEP1.ACED1NSEPARATESLEEVES 4 MAIN LINE SHALL HAVE re- MIN COVER LATERAL LINE Sl-!ALL I-JAVE \2"MIN COVER 5 COVER MAY DEVIATE FROM MINIMUM REQUIRED WHEN A MAXIMUM OF SIX INCHES WHEN MOREOURABLEPROOUCTS(VSP\/C)AREINSTALLED PEDESTAL MOUNT CONTROLLER PIPE & WIRE IN TRENCH PVCPIPESLEEVEW~RRICAP S12EAN0LEN0THASNEEDED 314· WASHEOORAVEl MINIMUMOFe"OEPTH CONBRACOWELOTOPDRAINVALVE M0DEL#?8164--01 P===========:J-;==-PVCCAP (TYPICAL) NOTES 1 SLEEVES UNDER ROADS TO 8~ DUCTILE IRON IF CODE DIRECTS OTHERWISE PVC OR HOPE ~ D~L~{~~:~~\~Jr~i{t~;~1~1;rE~~ ~~-;;t;H~~l~!~~~~L~:;~~~~T 4 MECl-!ANICALL V TAMP 10 1111% MODIFIED PROCTOR MANUAL DRAIN VALVE SLEEVING D.D. DRAFT 14iti ,.,., .1!1!11!1!!1 STREETCAR GREENWAY AS SHOWN I, r\ ORAWNBY C~DO Fll[N,l,,1,1£ 60% l,¥ :r,i I~ ENLARGED PLANTING AREAS IR3041.dwg \r ..,, \-1 .• J _t.. "},I SLIBl.llrT,llllATE CHEC~ED er 03 12 12 HR OR~WmC Ne r ii-; ROA ~~~~}1:1 ----·--- IR3041 MOVE FY11-12 Variance Annual Revised Favorable Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable) Total General Fund 195,270,061 198,185,794 2,915,733 Selected Discussion Items Total Property Taxes 63,175,537 63,213,782 38,245 Discussion: Property Taxes for FY 2012 is up slightly due to prior year tax coming in Total Sales and Use Tax 45,622,655 48,926,014 3,303,359 Discussion: Sales Tax is coming in about 6% above budget and Questar is coming in $800,000 above budget. Total Franchise Tax 28,434,888 28,701,930 267,042 Discussion: Questar is coming in above budget. License and Permits: 18,452,058 18,345,849 (106,209) Discussion: Licensing is coming in below budget due to more landlords participating in Landlord Tenant initiative than was anticipated in the budget. Budget assumed 20% non-participation rate, with higher disproportionate fee. Total Intergovernmental 5,426,994 5,314,150 (112,844) Discussion: Intergovernmental is below budget due to the Library reimbursements coming in lower for Utilities Interest income 935,208 876,406 (58,802) Discussion: Total Fines & Forfeiture 10,988,815 10,466,263 (522,552) Discussion: Justic Courts fines are seeing a decrease in revenue, as well as a decline in traffic school. Parking Meters 1,651,000 1,666,000 15,000 Discussion: Charges and Services 4,118,852 4,421,029 302,177 Discussion: Total Rental and Concessions are up due to a slight increase in facility rental and admission sales. Miscellaneous Revenue 3,020,641 3,157,283 136,642 Discussion: Other reimbursements have resulted in an increase in revenue. Total lnterfund 9,907,993 9,657,993 (250,000) Discussion: Transfers 3,535,420 3,439,095 (96,325) Discussion: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL r7: ,:[ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at~ p.m. a public hearing will be held in Room 315, Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State, Salt Lake City, Utah, before the Salt Lake City Council to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance regarding Budget Amendment No. 7. This budget amendment includes a proposal to create a budget in the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund of $6,864,549 to fund the Sugar House/South Salt Lake Streetcar Greenway and Parley's Trail project. All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter. Assisted listening devices or interpreting services are available for all public meetings. Salt Lake City Corporation complies with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) . For further information, contact the TDD Number 535-6021. By order of the Salt Lake City Council this 10th day of April, 2012. (B 12-7) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Publish: April 17, 2012 (Deseret News only) 9001367929 Sent to NAC 4-11-12