Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransmittal - 3/12/2024ERIN MENDENHALL LAURA BRIEFER, DIRECTOR MAYOR ' �� , �,� ,�� +t .1; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rachto(Mar 12,202412:40MDT) Date Received: 03/12/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Counci1:03/12/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 12, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Laura Briefer, Director �V/y Department of Public Utilities SUBJECT: Great Salt Lake State Park Request for Water Service STAFF CONTACT: Laura Briefer, Director, SLCDPU: 801.483.6741, laura.briefer(acgov.com. DOCUMENT TYPE: Informational: The goal of this briefing is to alert Salt Lake City officials to a request by the Utah Department of Natural Resources (UDNR), Division of State Parks to Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) to provide water to the Great Salt Lake State Park (the Park), which is situated significantly outside of Salt Lake City's municipal boundaries and water service area. The Public Utilities Department would like City Council feedback and direction associated with this unique request. RECOMMENDATION: Consider accommodating the UDNR Division of State Parks request that Salt Lake City provide water to the Park via a contract agreement between Salt Lake City and the Division of State Parks that at a minimum specifies: • Water quantity limitations based on historical water usage and reasonable future forecasts for the Park; • All capital, regulatory, financial, and operational obligations associated with water quality and infrastructure are fully assumed by the Division of State Parks; • Infrastructure constructed per Salt Lake City's standards; • Water rates and fees per Salt Lake City's Consolidated Fee Schedule; • No additional or future connections that support other water uses will be allowed; • Compliance with Salt Lake City's drought and water shortage contingency plan requirements; and • The contract is contingent upon favorable legal analysis of Article 11, Section 6 of the Utah Constitution (Municipal water rights and sources of water supply) and Utah Code 10-8-22 (Water rates). BUDGET IMPACT: No budget impact has been identified at this time. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: SLCDPU is responsible for the provision of drinking water to more than 365,000 people within a 141 square mile water service area. This service area has been established by City Code 17.16.005 and includes all of Salt Lake City and portions of Millcreek, Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, Murray, Midvale, and South Salt Lake Cities. SLCDPU is regulated under state and federal laws as a Public Water System, and under state laws as a Public Water Supplier. Under these regulatory paradigms, SLCDPU is responsible and accountable to provide drinking water that is safe for public consumption, pursuant to the Utah Safe Drinking Water Act (Title 19, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code) and the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. SLCDPU is also required to manage Salt Lake City's water resources pursuant to various sections of Utah's Water and Irrigation Code (Title 73 of the Utah Code), including administering Salt Lake City's water rights. UDNR is a state agency tasked with managing and protecting the state's natural resources. UDNR includes eight divisions encompassing Wildlife, Water Resources, Water Rights, Mining, Geologic Survey, Outdoor Recreation, State Parks, and Fire, Forestry, and State Lands. SLCDPU has a longstanding collaborative relationship with many of the divisions of UDNR through our management of water resources, administration of water rights, and watershed restoration work. UDNR's State Parks manages some of the West's most scenic and recreationally diverse parks throughout the state. State Parks is charged with managing the Great Salt Lake State Park and Marina located within Salt Lake County adjacent to Interstate 80 and the Tooele County border. In 2022, State Parks conducted a feasibility study to improve water service to the Park). Water is currently provided to the Park by the Stansbury Park Improvement District (SPID) via one 6-inch and one 10-inch water line installed prior to 1977. In addition, the Great Saltair is supplied water by SPID via a 2-inch water line. While there are two fire hydrants at the ends of the Park's marina, the Utah State Fire Marshal has determined that the Park does not have adequate fire flow. According to State Parks, in the early 1980's, floods resulted in sedimentation on top of the existing pipes causing them to be buried deeply, up to 14 feet. The existing pipes are also now located beneath Interstate 80 and railroad tracks. Maintenance issues and water line breaks have caused State Parks to prioritize replacement of the existing lines as well as to provide adequate fire flow to the park. Fire flow was historically planned to be provided via a water storage tank. In 2022, State Parks published a feasibility study to evaluate various alternatives of providing water supply and fire flow to the Park and Great Saltair. This included improvements to the existing SPID system, as well as evaluating other potential water providers. Other water providers evaluated included Magna Metro Township, Oquirrh Mountain Water Company, and groundwater sources from wells owned by Kennecott. As part of the feasibility study, State Parks contacted SLCDPU to determine whether Salt Lake City would be interested in providing water to the Park. At that time, SLCDPU declined to participate in the feasibility study because the Park is well outside of Salt Lake City's municipal boundaries and water service area, more than eight miles from the closest portion of SLCDPU's water system. Furthermore, it was communicated to State Parks that Salt Lake City's longstanding policy has been to require annexation of areas into Salt Lake City where utilities are served. During the latter part of 2023, State Parks again reached out to SLCDPU to meet about the possibility of providing water to the Park. The alternatives that were evaluated each have engineering and operational complexities, water resource issues, and high cost associated with them due to railroad and highway crossings, private land ownership, water quality, and water quantity. It appears that State Parks' preferred 2 alternative is to connect to SLCDPU's water system with a water line that would run roughly from the Northwest Quadrant along the frontage of Interstate 80 to the Park. SLCDPU identified and communicated potential operational and policy issues to State Parks, including: 1. Salt Lake City's policies regarding extension of its infrastructure outside existing city limits and its designated water service area; 2. The issue of precedence in providing water outside City limits and our designated water service area, and potential pressures from others to do the same; 3. Diminished water quality at the point of use at the Park given the very long distance between the closest point of water treatment and the point of water use at the park, requiring additional treatment to meet drinking water requirements; 4. The increased liability and responsibility that would be required of SLCDPU to maintain an eight - mile water line to drinking water standards; and 5. Additional demand for Salt Lake City's water resources. In response to items 1 and 2, State Parks indicated an understanding of the need to evaluate the policy and precedential nature of the request. They also indicated that connecting to Salt Lake City's water system is the most feasible option of the alternatives that were evaluated. In response to items 3 and 4, above, State Parks indicated that they would a) take responsibility for additional needed water treatment; b) take responsibility for meeting safe drinking water requirements of the system; and c) assume responsibility for the ownership, maintenance, and operations of the water line and all parts of the water system serving the Park. State Parks further indicated that they have adequate funding to construct and maintain all parts of the water system that would serve the Park. In response to item 5 concerning additional water demand, State Parks provided an estimate of average annual water usage of 23.94 acre-feet. The average daily water demand is nearly 23,000 gallons, and the peak day demand is over 52,000 gallons. Based on this estimate, Salt Lake City has adequate water supply to meet the demands of the park. This water usage is similar to Hogle Zoo, Solitude Ski Resort, and some multi -family residential developments. For context, the overall annual use of Salt Lake City's water resources ranges between about 81,000-92,000 acre-feet, and the peak day demand can range from about 150 to 200 million gallons. EXIIIBIT: Great Salt Lake State Park Water Line Replacement Feasibility Study prepared for the Utah Division of State Parks by Ensign Engineering February 2022 GREAT SALT LAKE STATE PARK WATER LINE REPLACEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY ��L 'p 7585569-2_ � ROBERTLL 37�31202 i '2 3I L2 Project. - Great Salt Lake State Park Water Line Replacement Feasibility Study Magna, Utah Ensign Project Number: 10906 Prepared for: Utah State Parks 1594 W North Temple, Suite 116 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Date: February 2022 Prepared By: Conor Dunkel, P.E. Joey Krueger, P.E. Reviewed By: Robert Rousselle, P.E. Ensign Engineering 45 West 10000 South, Suite 500 Sandy, Utah 84070 P: (801) 255-0529 F: (801) 255-4449 ensigneng.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 — INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................3 1.1 BACKGROUND...............................................................................................................................3 1.2 PURPOSE........................................................................................................................................6 SECTION 2.0 — PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................6 2.1 SCOPE............................................................................................................................................6 2.2 METHOD..........................................................................................................................................7 SECTION 3.0 — ALTERNATIVES................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 STANSBURY (PWS 23003)............................................................................................................ 7 3.2 STORAGE TANK............................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP (MMT) (PWS 18014).......................................................................8 3.4 SALT LAKE CITY (SLC) (PWS 18026)............................................................................................ 9 3.5 OQUIRRH MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY (OMWC) (PWS 23076)...........................................10 3.6 KENNECOTT (PWS UNKNOWN).................................................................................................10 3.7 ONSITE TANK AND BOOSTER PUMP........................................................................................10 SECTION 4.0 — CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................11 4.1 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................11 APPENDIX A: FIGURES OF ALTERNATIVES..........................................................................................12 APPENDIX B: COMMUNICATIONS...........................................................................................................13 APPENDIX C: COST ESTIMATES.............................................................................................................17 APPENDIX D: METER DATA.....................................................................................................................18 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: GSL State Park and Great Saltair Water Meter Data..................................................................... 6 Table 2: Summary Cost Estimates.............................................................................................................11 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Current GSL State Park Water Line..............................................................................................3 Figure 2: GSL State Park Existing Structures...............................................................................................4 Figure 3: Original Storage Tank and Water Line Concept............................................................................5 Figure 4: Magna Water 12-inch Connection Point........................................................................................9 2 Section 1.0 — INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The Great Salt Lake (GSL) State Park is located between Interstate 80 (1-80) and the Great Salt Lake near the northwestern edge of Salt Lake County. The GSL State Park marina currently has a drinking water system supplied by Stansbury Park Improvement District (SPID). The water line servicing the marina is owned by State Parks and maintained by SPID. It begins with a 6-inch transmission water line segment that connects to a 4-inch meter along Clinton Landing Road in front of the TA Truckstop in Tooele County. The 6-inch water line goes north to the end of Clinton Landing Road where it crosses to the north side of 1-80 and parallels a Kennecott concrete pipeline generally following the 1-80 corridor. Near the intersection where SR-201 connects into 1-80 the 6-inch line transitions to 10-inch before crossing the Union Pacific Railroad and continuing to the Great Saltair along the frontage road. The GSL State Park marina is supplied by a 6-inch line and the Great Saltair is supplied by a 2- inch line. An overview of the current layout is shown in Figure 1 with the estimated flows to the GSL State Park and to the Great Saltair. Figure 1: Current GSL State Park Water Line ai Existing est.: 337 gpm @ 20 Re uired: 1.800 pm 20 residual si for 90 r 10-inch - . 4 miles tota (�1.11 to Marina -1.43 to GS f r `O Potential Tank 6-inch Location -3.47 miles h 6-inch to 10-inch transition and 10-inch I tee to future tank A -inch Meter across from TA Concept route Truckstop �� 6 to future tank There are two fire hydrants at the ends of the marina but there is not adequate fire flow from SPID which was estimated to provide a maximum of 337 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 20 pounds per square inch 3 (psi) using the empirical Hazen -Williams head loss formula as shown in the inset table in Figure 1 (above) for head loss calculations (Amax is maximum flow delivered, CH-w is the roughness factor used in the Hazen -Williams equation, and hL is head loss). There are three structures identified at the GSL State Park marina to be considered for fire flow (Figure 2), with the administration and maintenance building being the most significant and valuable with approximately 3500 square feet of equipment storage. Through correspondence with Coy Porter (Appendix B), the Utah State Fire Marshal, it has been determined that the fire flow required is 1,800 gpm for a duration of 90 minutes for the GSL State Park marina. Coy Porter has since retired so these fire flow requirements may need to be reconfirmed with the current State Fire Marshal. Figure 2: GSL State Park Existin Visitor Center -1800 SF Hydrant Structures GSL STATE PARK WATER LINE REPLACEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY j Yacht Club-,__ � I , (Multi Purpose 2800 S 1000 gal fuel tank ^� Hydrant ---- Concept future expansion. Replace visitor center with larger event facility and campground near restrooms Restrooms -1300 SF Admin/Maintenance. �-3500 SF _ U_s ---- / NOTE- J/ EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, DIMENSIONS. AND DETAILS INCLUDING FLOW RATES ARE ESTIMATES AND APPROXIMATIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSE. The 6-inch and 10-inch lines that deliver water to the GSL State Park were installed during or before 1977 and were intended to be the initial phase of providing water to the GSL State Park marina and the Great Saltair event 4 center. A subsequent phase was planned to provide a fire flow storage tank on the south side of 1-80 on Kennecott land within parcel 13-20-200-001-0000 and section 20 at an elevation of approximately 4460 feet, that would provide adequate pressure. There is an existing 10-inch tee that is capped that would have facilitated connection to the planned future water tank. The conceptual layout of this proposed tank and water line is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Original S1 LEGEND L- 11_gw�U_ waw„a� Fk.dPUa JLengthFEW'warn Rnada RrlroWf AR ROW (Appoa 50R) Railroad 6..,r p Tank and Water Line Concept lie /0 f L 4270 C 19 o - - ati4° • tip; � `• _ 4250 20 42gg - 4290 4300 4310 ' 4300 4330 IS\t } 4340 I q9 4350 4360 4370 1gS0 IQ ` A380 A590 �30 oA Ao°p 4400 _ O ge 0 750 1�500 ft °. �y4�Aeti° y 00 o 0 o In the early 1980s, floods resulted in sedimentation on top of the existing pipe causing it to be buried to a depth of up to 14 feet. Periodic maintenance, including water line breaks due to seismic activity has brought to the forefront the need to replace the existing line as well as to fulfill the original intent to provide adequate fire flow. Meter data for the GSL State Park and the Great Saltair provided by SPID was analyzed to extract the average day demand of 22,704 gallons, the peak day demand of 52,345 gallons, and the annual average usage of 23.94 acre-feet. The annual usage varies from 20.25 acre-feet during 2021 to 29.64 acre-feet during 2020, indicating that the average annual usage is subject to variability depending on both available data and differences in water needs from year to year. The processed water meter data from 2018-2021 is presented in Table 1. 5 Table 1: GSL State Park and Great Saltair Water Meter Data Great Salt Lake State Park Marina and Saltair Water Meter Summary July 2018 to July 2021 Year Avg. Month Peak Month (acft) (acft) 2018 1.86 2.96 Analysis by: Ensign Engineering 12/23/2021 Total System Annual Avg. Day (gal) Peak Day (gal) Average (Avg. Month=30 days) (Peak Month=30 days) 22.34 20,218 32,167 2019 1.96 4.04 23.54 21,309 43,881 2020 2.57 4.82 29.64 27,962 52,345 2021 1.96 3.10 20.25 21,329 33,615 Avg 2.09 23.94 22,704 52,345 MARINA (GSL STATE PARK) 4-inch + 3/4-inch Meters Avg. Month Peak Month Annual Avg. Day (gal) Peak Day (gal) Year (acft) (acft) Average (Avg. Month=30 days) (Peak Month-30 days) 2018 1.58 2.28 18.96 17,160 24,777 2019 1.76 3.51 21.13 19,123 38,111 2020 2.34 4.00 28.05 25,386 43,425 2021 1.68 2.49 20.13 18,218 26,999 Avg 1.84 22.07 19,972 SALTAIR. 2-inch Meter Avg. Month Peak Month Annual Avg. Day (gal) Peak Day (gal) Year (acft) (acft) Average (Avq. Month+30 days) (Peak Month+30 days) 2018 0.28 0.68 3.38 3,058 7,390 2019 0.20 0.53 2.42 2,187 5,770 2020 0.24 0.82 2.85 2,575 8,920 2021 0.29 0.61 3.44 3,111 6,617 Avg 0.25 3.02 2,733 1.2 PURPOSE The GSL State Park marina water line was designed to adequately supply the peak day flows from SPID, but is not capable of delivering required fire flow. Since the previously planned water storage tank was never built, State Parks is gathering information to analyze and evaluate potential alternatives to remedy current deficiencies in the system. Potential alternatives that are considered take into account factors including necessary water line size to convey adequate flow, potential water purveyors, and the potential construction of a local storage tank to provide required fire flow in addition to meeting peak day flow requirements. Currently, the system is unable to provide adequate fire flow primarily due to the 6-inch dead end water line that runs from the meter at the TA Truck Stop to the transition to the 10-inch line near the intersection of SR-201 and 1-80. Section 2.0 - PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.1 SCOPE Alternatives that provide the marina with adequate fire flow and volume are evaluated based on the approximate pipeline route and associated cost. The water purveyor in each alternative will also need to have source capacity for the annual volume of water, as shown in Table 1. The geographical data gathered and used in this evaluation is open source and the details specific to individual water systems is gathered from system -specific personnel. Ce The fire flow requirements and associated costs for the Great Saltair were not accounted for with the exception of the manufacturer's budget price for glass -fused to steel bolted storage tanks. With any of the alternatives there would be an overall increase in fire flow delivered to the Great Saltair but may not meet the minimum and will be evaluated separately. As an estimate for the Great Saltair with approximately 44,000 square feet, the values from the 2018 International Fire Code Type, IV building with fire suppression sprinklers were used to determine the fire flow of 3,750x25%=937.5 gpm at a minimum of 1,000 gpm for 3 hours. This results in the fire water storage volume of 180,000 gallons and will be assumed to proportionally increase the cost of the project to be negotiated separately. 2.2 METHOD Alternatives were evaluated on the level of service provided and the ability to meet the demand requirements. Given that any potential purveyors are a substantial distance from GSL State Park, it may be impractical to size the water line for fire flow. The baseline solution is a local storage tank like the original design that can provide the fire flow to the GSL State Park where the larger fire flow pipe can be shorter and thereby limit the head loss. Alternatives were also evaluated on the estimated cost, which accounts for assumed engineering complexity including environmental impacts, permitting, land acquisition, utility and roadway crossings, and other constraints. The system administrator of each alternative considered was engaged to determine willingness to participate as a source solution and ability to fulfill the demands established. Generally, two alternatives were considered for the alternatives where a larger pipe would provide fire flow from the water purveyor to be compared to a local storage tank supplied by a smaller transmission water line with some exceptions including Stansbury that declined providing the storage volume. The tank location and size for each alternative is as described in Section 3.2. SECTION 3.0 - ALTERNATIVES 3.1 STANSBURY (PWS 23003) SPID is the current water provider to the GSL State Park and the Great Saltair and are amenable to continuing to provide water. Representatives of SPID presented two potential solutions that both include local fire water storage that would have to be agreed to by the District's board. 1. Fulfill the original contract by installing a drinking water storage tank on the Kennecott Property. This would include entering into a new contract where the State would take over maintenance of the 6-inch water transmission line after the meter. 2. Fulfill the original contract by installing a drinking water storage tank on the Kennecott Property and enter into a new contract with the State. The District would continue to maintain the 6-inch water transmission line to the new tank if the State reconstructed portions of the water transmission line, so they could be accessible for maintenance. As described in Section 1.1, the majority of the existing transmission water line from Stansbury to the GSL State Park and the Great Saltair is 6-inch. This water line is deep in places due to significant sedimentation, but the alignment could potentially be salvaged via a process such as pipe bursting and slip -lining to replace or upsize 7 the entire line as needed, depending on whether option 1 or 2 above are chosen. See Section 2.2 for a discussion of the system's capability to meet fire flow requirements from SPID. Either option would connect to a proposed tank on Kennecott property or a tank and booster pump system onsite, details for which are described in Section 3.2. From a constructability standpoint, both the current transmission line and reconstructed transmission line options would follow the existing pipeline alignment and would result in one railroad crossing, one crossing of 1-80, and would cross and parallel a large concrete pipe owned by Kennecott. A detailed figure of the Stansbury connection (including replacement of the existing transmission line) with the Kennecott storage tank is shown in Appendix A. See cost estimates for both options in Appendix C. 3.2 STORAGE TANK As discussed in Section 1.1, a future phase was planned that would have included a gravity storage tank capable of providing the required fire flow to the GSL State Park and to the Great Saltair. The local tank allows for the shortest 10-inch pipe capable of providing the fire flow at approximately 2,269 feet in length from the existing 10- inch tee to the tank on Kennecott property and fed into the 10-inch line that runs to the GSL State Park. The storage tank would need to be sized to store the 162,000 gallons of fire water storage in addition to the average day system flows of nearly 28,000 gallons for a total of 190,000 gallons. The potential downsides to this approach are obtaining necessary easements and access to build the tank and water line on Kennecott property and the fact that average daily and peak daily demand flows would still be supplied by the existing connection with Stansbury. Given the depth of bury and limitations with the existing 6-inch line, further upgrades to the system may be warranted at a future date. Furthermore, the 10-inch line from the proposed tank location would cross two railroads, SR-201, and 1-80. It is worth noting that the proposed tank location is in a rocky area, which could increase excavation costs associated with construction. See Appendix A for a figure of this proposed alternative and Appendix C for associated cost estimates. 3.3 MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP (MMT) (PWS 18014) Per discussion with Trevor Andra at Magna Water District (MWD), Magna Metro Township is willing to participate in this feasibility study and be considered for providing water to the GSL State Park. Per correspondence with MWD, to provide service there would need to be board approval and an interlocal agreement to provide water drafted by the State and reviewed by the attorney for MWD. The likely route for a water line includes the crossing of two railroad tracks, Interstate 80, State Route 201, and two major Kennecott concrete pipelines. An extension from the Magna Water District system would be approximately 7.5 miles of 16-inch pipe. The proposed route is shown in Figure 3. Again, if the storage tank were constructed on Kennecott property, then the connecting pipeline from the MWD system could be reduced to 8-inches. See Appendix A for figures of these proposed alternatives and Appendix C for associated cost estimates. In a video conference call with MWD on October 8, 2021, it was determined that MWD would own and maintain the water line to the meter, after which the water line would be the State's responsibility. It was suggested that the meter would be located at or near the water district's boundary which would be around 9180 West before going west along SR-201. Impact fees would be based on demand, and construction would go through a review process R similar to that for developments, including the requirement of inspection fees, review fees, and bonds. MWD is capable of providing 76 psi minimum pressure to the proposed connection point near 9180 West and 2600 South about Station 17+24 in Figure 4. Figure 4: Magna Water 12-inch Connection Point V 4 ,A - �' , F. xistinq LINE STUB IS jQ Fence pO 117 112 FT A_ STA. 11 c m $TA. 7+24.21 FROM VALVE 14 REPLACE LATERAL LA RAL - PLUG�_ C LINE ONE ,lp; ;OI; TH 918D WEST 266 1c, '•' PIPE SECTION NORTH OF TEE yy r 'SAT' i FOR FUTURE CONNECTION `� p_ r PROTECT Exlifj Y\ GNeSt Buritd FEt1-E 230.9180 WE�A 17+06.71 �- -1 IT Zb O OU S A: 10+00 Cables (3) ♦ <!fc 10' MJ TEE W/ T.B. - . �3_ 1 k I'd _uWert 266 1Q` MJ GAj�_ FL W T B I `f �P TYP_: VALVE W T t It af17=0 W i. 10" FL x M. ADAPT^ + V V n 2600 S ' 1 $ 206 R I A .STA: +4 14 �' s x MJ GA W// I" LATERAL Me SOUTH 9130 WEST 847 8` WATERLINE PER .. 11= fi4T� YA �Q� YIP �„+$, BID ALTERNATE 3 ,'. SEE NO TW ,N FiRtL�HYDRANT its FL TEE Existing T 9130 WEST (BID ALTERNATE Woter Service - (TYP.) (SEE SHEET6•/\ o r.. I �, n I< W K N o } - _ (MAARTT CER KHAN iLw)TERAL SIZE Owest BLried i + Coble i E, A STA 14+48 W - 14 L ER LATERAL � i W/ t`VLATERAL 2 51 SOUTH 9180 NEST i I Cqp ' NOTE: ALL WATER SERVICES ON 1 . I THIS BLOCK AT ASSUMED LOCATIONS IN REAR OF LOTS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION W/ PROPERTY OWNER'S CONSENT Given these parameters and MWD's willingness to participate in potential solutions, constructability may present the primary challenge to this particular alternative. 3.4 SALT LAKE CITY (SLC) (PWS 18026) Salt Lake City considered the request to participate in the feasibility study and declined participation via an email from Laura Briefer, Director of the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. The reason SLC was unwilling to consider potential water line extensions is that the GSL State Park is outside the SLC municipal boundary and there are concerns with the length of pipe required. Furthermore, SLC typically would require annexation of the area to be serviced to provide water, which is unlikely given the GSL State Park's remoteness from the SLC system. This correspondence is included in Appendix B. Despite the reluctance from SLC to participate in the feasibility study, Ensign developed an exhibit showing a potential connection point to the SLC system. The proposed route would connect to a 24-inch water line near the southwest corner of the new State Prison at 1400 North and 8000 West in SLC and continue in a 16-inch pipeline 9 south along 8000 West to the 1-80 north frontage road. From this point, the proposed water line would follow the frontage road to GSL State Park. Benefits of this proposed route include the large connection point to the SLC system and a proposed route that is not anticipated to cross any major utilities with less permitting anticipated. In total, the proposed 16-inch diameter extension would be approximately 9 miles in length. As noted in other sections, if the proposed storage tank were constructed on Kennecott property in conjunction with the SLC tie-in, then the pipeline from the SLC system could be reduced to a 8-inch line. Each SLC option is shown in Appendix A. See associated cost estimates in Appendix C. 3.5 OQUIRRH MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY (OMWC) (PWS 23076) In feasibility discussions, Chris Robinson with Oquirrh Mountain Water Company expressed concerns with water quantity in Tooele County as a whole and did not participate in this study with regard to providing water. It was discussed that Oquirrh Mountain Water Company would be interested in an aqueduct connecting Salt Lake County to Tooele County via Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District to bring more water into that region, but that type of project is beyond the scope of this study and would likely involve the State Engineer with potential legislative action required. Cost estimates were not developed for this alternative due to its low probability of construction but it is comparable to SPID. 3.6 KENNECOTT (PWS UNKNOWN) Kennecott has wells in township sections 21 and 17 that are the closest in proximity to the GSL State Park. However, the available water is known to have arsenic and perchlorate, among other water quality issues, and there would likely be inconsistencies in the quantity of water provided due to well maintenance cycles. The Section 17 water is the closest water connection location in relation to GSL State Park of the alternatives considered. However, based on these water quality and quantity concerns, Kennecott would be hesitant to be the supplier. Additionally, any potential future well that might be considered would likely have similar contaminants and require construction of a water treatment facility which would likely make the project infeasible due to cost. 3.7 ONSITE TANK AND BOOSTER PUMP With the option to locate a tank on Kennecott property being so high, the option of a tank on State Parks property was considered. The tank would have to be above ground due to the high ground water and floodplain elevation so a steel tank was considered, and a booster pump would be necessary to supply the fire flow water. With the proximity to the Great Salt Lake the steel tank would need to be protected from the elements with the option of a glass -fused to steel bolted tank being considered. There is limited space available on site for a tank and booster pump system, and it would need to be determined if any wetlands can be relocated to accommodate the increase in space inside the compound. These factors contribute to the overall cost and complexity of this alternative. A budgetary costs for glass -fused to steel bolted tanks were solicited from CTS (Shearer Tanks). 10 APPENDIX A: FIGURES FOR ALTERNATIVES 12 I 0. '\\1 Finch ~3.47 miles r] w SPI O (n co 0MwC Required: 1,800 GSL SP Marina Existing est.: 337 gpm @ 20 psi im @ 20 residual psi for 90 min. M 1111- 10-inch -2.54 i -1.11 to Marina -1. Q6 SON 43 to GS) Potential Tank / Location —4-inch Meter across from TA Truckstop e ARV n . dr r' Copt 1 � • SR 2O ,. 00 O 6-inch to 10-inch transition and 10-inch tee to future tank 61111"1 w a Irk /ids. - - - -- — leis'; J�w AAA,& ENSIGN THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTO N Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM .r FOR: 1 UTAH STATE PARKS 'm 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 CONTACT: I PHONE: Concept route to future tank aZ �W W< � LU ~ate Cn J Q W a. cn � J� J a � W m w � a J LL cn W W W Qa LU CD EXISTING WATER LINE PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2/10/22 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER FIG NOTE: SP d epiace :), 0 Replace 13,119 feet of 8-inch to 10-inch tee/tank connection UP 6 OMWC Great Saltair �l r GSL SP Marina Replace 2,843 feet q - � of 10-inch onsite � ► Q • o� feet of 10-inch J� ESL SP Marina —4-inch Meter across from TA Truckstop ---70 - - — cn _ o � O -2 2,181 feet of 10-inch to tank 00 , Cb J iar!• • r r <", , f •t'9',�) ��. .41y J', * Y` ���' / mil(// C . 1-4. � 0 --1 C otentia 101IN Location e © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 TornTom r, , ' .. 1. AAA6, ENSIGN THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTON Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM FOR: UTAH STATE PARKS 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 CONTACT: PHONE: az � W W � Q W cn W co � Y W � � Q � J Z J W m t9 aJ Wcn W W Qa UU c� SPID {I, REPLACE WITH 8 & 10-INCH AND TANK ALTERNATIVE I CONNECTION: PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2110/22 6-INCH DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CLINTON LANDING R D PROJECT MANAGER FIG 2 © 2022 Microsoft Corporltion © 202A, Maxar ©CNES (24),Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 TomTom I SP d ep ace eet of 8-inch to�GSL SP Marina .1 r7- UP Vim. OMWC JJ —4-inch Meter across from TA Truckstop Great Saltair GSL SP Marina eplace 2,843 of 10-inch onsite .� \ \ \ _ o �n- `v O C 8111 j 811 j out IK"N. Potential Tank Location i r c0 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 TomTom N J ' y� � • , � •'� � � ti ram•' - r .S AAAJ& ENSIGN THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTON Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM FOR: UTAH STATE PARKS 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 CONTACT. PHONE: W W _ Q W � V � cn J LU c W � .. J J z W m t� � v� Q � f • r cn W W QQ W w CD .,t SPID {I, REPLACE WITH 8-INCH AND ONSITE TANK ALTERNATIVE I CONNECTION: PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2/10/22 6-INCH DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CLINTON LA N D I N G R D PROJECT MANAGER -�� FIG 3 r ' © 2022 Microsoft Corpoiltion © 202A, Maxar ©CNES (24),Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 TomTom 1 t F Great Saltair IP 7,540 feet to GSL SP Marina GSL SP Marina Replace 2,f4"3 feet onsite ,20 %e* z� NO �u Lj Ii J %7e E N S I G N 4 _� THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING �: �;:' _ •.` jot - `fie _ SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 A ` ; �.. Sandy, UT 84070 A. w ; 4 Phone: 801.255.0529 4 LAYTON AX Phone: 801.547.1100 T* r z� c +.."' + ' ++r►► ` (';' .7 TOO E LE pin Phone: 435.843.3590 Y ,v�.. CEDAR CITY ,' • .;, , r►.� , ,h. Phone: 435.865.1453 .-r�• ��. r. ,� f, r�r`. iC `,' f.p .art rer .s rr-.� 7� . — �;,EE�p�}ry . ,.jk A#, ►� �, ` ' RICHFIELD r- ► -: • . S- _ y, < , , - +r - ~ i . Phone. 435.896.2983 tvftn:y" ` Al Z" F �' •� '' ' a WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM 16 ',� a-► •E,' • •, ' ` ° )"•a ''�ii ,-t FOR: •- ,$ UTAH STATE PARKS 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 CONNECTIO N SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 ' F ,+ • ' A �.� CONTACT. 12—INCH �� . s., ,�� .. � �-_ - �. I `+• T,'! s Jy� `" `' �'yr,ry r �[ .�"�L" PHONE: 2600 S 9180 W I a !,¢�{' � q `'b - rJF rt .•W - � �. ' pis d:, �y �,- ' vp _.. - vim--e _ . . f _-•, ,•,_ r soft LU i -;• sice•- ��'" Uj cnUj >- Q U-1 co >- 30,035 feet to Great Saltair. ,et . I • •u j� a*114, 17�! vmvi_-� bratt6r?..v ' ePMES (CVL_) Distr bution Airbus US U LUZZ I omTffin J m Q W W W IIAA1 MAGNA 16-INCH ALTERNATIVE NO TANK \ PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2/10/22 • DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER FIG 4a 1 n�a�rf.•r Great Saltair ,540 feet to GSL SP Marina GSL SP Marina eplace 2,8�� feet onsite \ ••-_,�o 5,867 feet of 1 -inch to Tank .0 ' W'd� ,269 feet of 10-inch t, Potential Tank Location ,J 2022 Microsok Corporation 9 2022 Ma , ®CNES (2022) D,,tbbutl Airbus IDS 0 2�'%TOn1T1,1, ,...�.•�.-,.4�:--__ E N S I G N THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING 00 SALT LAKE CITY s �• e 45 W. 10000 S. Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 �i �, :M • t Phone: 801.255.0529 ' I ► k..' LAYTON I' I''•=` 4 Wit"'. ~!�'• Phone:801.547.1100 TOOELE 5 f, r•' y , Phone:435.843.3590 00 . CEDAR CITY VI ' .0., IJ'►�; j_,� • �►"" `' it �* � �• �;. Phone: 435.865.1453 ' Tyµ r 'IL .,t, RICHFIELD F• �+� ,• ,_r .` ''�„-`,�jT`=i1z` Phone: 435.896.2983 W. Ir�,. ► • ,�c WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM FOR: UTAH STATE PARKS A' "F 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 ryIV�1 '..,' '_�►f"•. . ,: . •- ; _ SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 •. ` J, dog - +♦ nab t " it tom• ' -.low I�' CONTACT. I� r• r-v. ` �' "�{ "., .Be A R ,�. .: PHONE: I �� �`• ,r �'• �' •� �:: � .r� ZIP, .� 9f• ,. - may.} ��!! �. �'' - Jlii '''�+�" "r' `'S` •�. IL all BI P006-101 v- I �- LU F A Lu I 1. r�_�• I �„ •.31 pCn � V � ul •;� __:;fix � .__ ;._� .- r � J � _ co rpm 1w ��' Ar., Oratfo(, Q. 2622 , �o t202 Distr bution Hirbws us U Z03�omTq 30,035 feet to Great Saltair 0% �. AV , CONNECTION: 12-INCH 2600 S 9180 W . � LAO i It .1, %0"Lvl�r � � A f m J Uj a � Q Q / W 2� �IL MAGNA 8-INCH ALTERNATIVE WITH TANK PROJECT NUMBER 10906 DRAWN BY PRINT DATE 2/10/22 CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER FIG 4b 41,973 feet to Great Saltair s CONNECTION: 24-WCFI� NW CORNER SECTION 28j,,__ T1 NR2VY�� i is t or l 1 R. 1 LL 10 Aj&i& ENSIGN THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTO N Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM FOR: UTAH STATE PARKS 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 CONTACT: PHONE: a � Z W W � ~ W � Q >. cn W N H LU >- =D Q 1= t= J Q J � W m aZW� J ILIL W W Qa LU c� SLC 16-INCH ALTERNATIVE NO TANK PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2/10/22 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER FIG 5a 7.540 feet to GSL SP Marina Replace 2,843 feet onsite� 5,867 feet of • to Tank 4 -1, r jh r� Great Saltair Na�'TH i +r / 41,973 feet to Great Saltair r] CONNECTION: 24-INCH NW CORNER SECTION 28 T1 NR2W r r 111A/ 011%A1 �� .-1 .40 10� --I v� r PP 71 2,269 feet of 0-inc Ito tank Potential Tank Location AAA,& ENSIGN THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING SALT LAKE CITY 45 W. 10000 S., Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTON Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM FOR: UTAH STATE PARKS 1594 W NORTH TEMPLE SUITE 116 SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116 CONTACT. PHONE: aZ � W W � Q W cn W Y W � � Q � Z J J W m t9 a Jco ILIL Wcn W W Qa LU SLC 8-INCH ALTERNATIVE WITH TANK PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE 10906 2/10/22 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER FIG 5b © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 TomTom APPENDIX B: COMMUNICATIONS State Fire Marshal July 21, 2021 , Fire Flow for the GSL State Park Line Replacement Feasibility Study Attendees: Coy Porter, David Shearer, Doug Lukes, Jamie Harsh, Jamie Harsh, Lucas Davis, Robert Rousselle, Thomas Peterson Stansbury Park Improvement District Google Meets October 20, 2021 Attendees: Brett Palmer, Jacob Clegg, Robert Rousselle, Conor Dunkel Magna Water District Google Meets October 7, 2021 Attendees: Trevor Andra, Robert Rousselle, Conor Dunkel Salt Lake City Multiple emails and voicemails, final correspondence from Laura Briefer July 28, 2021 Oquirrh Mountain Water Company August 5, 2021 Zoom meeting Attendees: Christopher Robinson, J Lawrence@binghamnet.com, kfryer@lpid.us, nthomas@omwc.us, sdoust@omwc.us, Robert Rousselle Conor Dunkel 13 Conor Dunkel From: Briefer, Laura <Laura.Briefer@slcgov.com> on behalf of Briefer, Laura Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 12:05 PM To: Icdunkel@ensignutah.com' Cc: Brown, Jason; Stewart, Jesse; Rice, Marian; Bullough, Randy Subject FW: (EXTERNAL) GSL State Park Water Line Replacement Feasibility Study Dear Conor, Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities has considered this request, and respectfully declines the invitation to be considered as a water provider for this project. The location is outside our municipal boundaries and quite far (over eight miles) from the extents of our water system. Typically Salt Lake City would require annexation of the area in order to provide water as well. We wish you the best on completing this project. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you, Laura Briefer, MPA DIRECTOR SALT LAKE CRY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Office: 801.483.6741 Cell: 385.252.9379 www.slc.gov/utilities 14 jkrueger@ensignutah.com From: Conor Dunkel cdunkel@enSIgnutah.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:12 AM To: Coy Porter Cc: Robert Rousselle; Ted Black Subject: Re: GSL State Park Water Line Replacement Feasibility Study - Fire Flow Coy, I wanted to follow up with a question on the fire flow requirements for the Great Salt Lake State Park marina. If the future storage tank was to be installed south up the hill on Kennecott Property, what would be the desired flow rate and duration so that I can determine the volume of the tank for the marina and Saltair? Thank you. Conor Dunkel I Design Engineer Main 801.255.0529 1 Cell 2406.223.5553 cdunkelAensionena.com I ensianena.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE TM -MeM n7 this ..mail is-"deotuY aril p aphm.ry p—leged If yn we nnl the intended recipient pl.ase d-t-y it On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:36 PM Conor Dunkel <cdunkel anensienutah.com> wrote: Coy, Thank you for this information, this helps develop the scope. I did not intend to limit the option to a 10 inch line although it will be considered if it meets the flow requirements. The 6 inch line makes up the majority of the length to the Marina and if it were replaced then the 10 inch would also be considered for upgrade. Magna Water's preliminary analysis shows that they would be able to provide approximately 1200 gpm at 20 psi through a 12 inch line and 1800 gpm through a 16 inch. The 12 inch is comparable to the -1227 gpm that I estimated through the 10 inch from Stansbury. With both of these if I subtract the peak instantaneous of approximately 150 gpm this leaves 1077 gpm from Stansbury and 1050 gpm from Magna's estimate for fire flow. Would you be comfortable with making 1050 gpm the minimum fire flow requirement or 1200 gpm? This would be in combination with the hydrant locations and future sprinkler systems. Thank you. Conor Dunkel, PE I Design Engineer Main 801.255.0529 1 Cell 406.223.5553 cdunkel(c ensigneng.com I ensianeng.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. The —1-1 of This email is w fidenlial and penpne!&Y privileged It y— a., not the intended —p-1, please d-Ir.y it. On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:22 AM Coy Porter <coyporter@utah.gov> wrote: Conor, 15 Sorry for the delay, we had a public safety summit last week and were out of the office. In reviewing your drawings, we feel that if the lines were all 10" and the metering was placed at or near the individual buildings (rather than metering at the distant beginning which apparently even includes metering of the hydrants); and if the future Visitor's center were, say built as a Type II building and had fire sprinklers as part of that future design, that would allow for some fire flow trade-offs in this case. The GPM estimates you provided would then be acceptable. Please let me know if this is sufficient information for you to continue with your study. Thanks, Coy On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:35 AM Conor Dunkel <cdunkeI@ensianutah.com> wrote: Coy, Attached is an exhibit describing the existing conditions of the Great Salt Lake Marina. I have estimated the peak flows at 20 psi that could be expected with the combination of 6 inch and 10 inch that we know are inadequate. Once we establish the fire flow criteria for the existing and concept facilities we will continue with the feasibility study to determine the supplier and sizes of lines / storage. If you need additional information or have comments please let me know. Thank you. Conor Dunkel, FIE I Design Engineer Main 801.255.0529 1 Cell 406.223.5553 cdunke0ensionena.com I ensioneno.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. The content of Ihra email is confidential and proprietary privileged If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy it Coy D. Porter State Fire Marshal Utah Department of Public Safety 410 West 9800 South, 3rd Floor Sandy, Utah 84070 (801) 256-2390 office (801) 718-6268 cell 16 APPENDIX D: METER DATA `.] STANSBURY PARK IMPRVMENT DIST Customer History Page: 1 Report Dates: 07/01/2018 - 07/31/2021 Jul 14, 2021 03:02PM Report Criteria: Customer.Customer number = 5031110,5030710,5043112 50307.10 STATE OF UTAH PARKS& REC-CMP PARK & RECREATION AREA-CMP 4 in. Metered Services: WATER Current Rate: 188 State Park - Out district - 4 Period Date Read Date Meter ID Begin Read End Read Usage Multiplier Amount 07/30/2018 07/10/2018 0070147937 1 1,955,796 328,760 10.0000 471.68 08/31/2018 08/10/2018 0070147937 1,955,796 1,988,300 325,040 10.0000 467.96 09/30/2018 09/10/2018 0070147937 1,988,300 2,014,507 262,070 10.0000 404.99 10/31/2018 10/10/2018 0070147937 2,014,507 2,029,840 153,330 10.0000 296.25 11/30/2018 11/09/2018 0070147937 2,029,840 2,037,514 76,740 10.0000 219.66 12/31/2018 12/10/2018 0070147937 2,037,514 2,037,628 1,140 10.0000 144.06 01/31/2019 01/10/2019 0070147937 2,037,628 2,038,777 11,490 10.0000 154.41 02/28/2019 02/11/2019 0070147937 2,038,777 2,040,902 21,250 10.0000 164.17 03/31/2019 03/11/2019 0070147937 2,040,902 2,042,968 20,660 10.0000 163.58 04/30/2019 04/10/2019 0070147937 2,042,968 2,043,344 3,760 10.0000 146.68 05/31/2019 05/10/2019 0070147937 2,043,344 2,046,373 30,290 10.0000 173.21 06/30/2019 06/10/2019 0070147937 2,046,373 2,063,238 168,650 10.0000 311.57 07/31/2019 07/11/2019 0070147937 2,063,238 2,104,596 413,580 10.0000 556.50 08/30/2019 08/12/2019 0070147937 2,104,596 2,150,950 463,540 10.0000 606.46 09/30/2019 09/10/2019 0070147937 2,150,950 2,187,302 363,520 10.0000 506.44 10/31/2019 10/10/2019 0070147937 2,187,302 2,202,575 96,830 10.0000 239.75 11/30/2019 11/19/2019 0070147937 2,202,575 2,208,852 62,770 10.0000 205.69 12/31/2019 12/06/2019 0070147937 2,208,852 2,210,348 14,960 10.0000 157.88 01/31/2020 01/13/2020 0070147937 2,210,348 2,227,324 169,760 10.0000 312.68 02/29/2020 02/11/2020 0070147937 2,227,324 2,253,316 259,920 10.0000 402.84 03/31/2020 03/10/2020 0070147937 2,253,316 2,299,497 461,810 10.0000 604.73 04/30/2020 04/08/2020 0070147937 2,299,497 2,313,635 141,380 10.0000 284.30 05/31/2020 05/11/2020 0070147937 2,313,635 2,313,635 0 10.0000 142.92 06/30/2020 06/09/2020 0070147937 2,313,635 2,313,735 1,000 10.0000 143.92 07/31/2020 07/13/2020 0070147937 2,313,735 2,325,372 116,370 10.0000 259.29 08/31/2020 08/10/2020 0070147937 2,325,372 2,361,611 362,390 10.0000 505.31 09/30/2020 09/10/2020 0070147937 2,361,611 2,389,125 275,140 10.0000 418.06 10/31/2020 10/14/2020 0070147937 2,389,125 2,397,571 84,460 10.0000 227.38 11/30/2020 11/12/2020 0070147937 2,397,571 2,402,974 54,030 10.0000 196.95 12/31/2020 12/09/2020 0070147937 2,402,974 2,403,659 6,850 10.0000 149.77 01/31/2021 01/13/2021 0070147937 2,403,659 2,427,423 237,640 10.0000 380.56 02/28/2021 02/10/2021 0070147937 2,427,423 2,427,423 0 10.0000 142.92 03/31/2021 03/10/2021 0070147937 2,427,423 2,427,423 0 10.0000 142.92 04/30/2021 04/12/2021 0070147937 2,427,423 2,429,482 20,590 10.0000 163.51 05/31/2021 05/12/2021 0070147937 2,429,482 2,439,463 99,810 10.0000 242.73 06/30/2021 06/14/2021 0070147937 2,439,463 2,477,401 379,380 10.0000 522.30 07/31/2021 07/12/2021 0070147937 2,477,401 2,514,423 370,220 10.0000 513.14 Totals: 5,859,130 11,147.17 Status STANSBURY PARK IMPRVMENT DIST Customer History Page: 2 Report Dates: 07/01/2018 - 07/31/2021 Jul 14, 2021 03:02PM 50311.10 STATE OF UTAH PARKS& REC-CMP PARK&REC AREA-CMP 3/4 Metered Services: WATER Current Rate: 189 State Park - Out dist - 3/4 Period Date Read Date Meter ID Begin Read End Read 07/30/2018 07/10/2018 0000147937 1 8,552,99 08/31/2018 08/13/2018 0000147937 8,552,997 9,058,02 09/30/2018 09/13/2018 0000147937 9,058,020 9,524,82 10/31/2018 10/15/2018 0000147937 9,524,822 9,943,98 11/30/2018 11/13/2018 0000147937 9,943,982 285,93 12/31/2018 12/11/2018 0000147937 285,936 545,98 01/31/2019 01/18/2019 0000147937 545,985 904,78 02/28/2019 02/20/2019 0000147937 904,783 1,305,44 03/31/2019 03/12/2019 0000147937 1,305,449 1,707,78 04/30/2019 04/12/2019 0000147937 1,707,780 2,151,00 05/31 /2019 05/14/2019 0000147937 2,151,007 2,608,13 06/30/2019 06/11/2019 0000147937 2,608,131 3,126,92 07/31/2019 07/12/2019 0000147937 3,126,925 3,726,03 08/30/2019 08/15/2019 0000147937 3,726,031 4,352,48 09/30/2019 09/12/2019 0000147937 4,352,487 4,909,97 10/31/2019 10/09/2019 0000147937 4,909,975 5,421,32 11/30/2019 11/21/2019 0000147937 5,421,326 6,143,31 12/31/2019 12/09/2019 0000147937 6,143,314 6,490,19 01/31/2020 01/15/2020 0000147937 6,490,194 7,339,02 02/29/2020 02/12/2020 0000147937 7,339,025 8,001,75 03/31/2020 03/11/2020 0000147937 8,001,753 8,664.76 04/30/2020 04/09/2020 0000147937 8,664,768 9,173,65 05/31/2020 05/11/2020 0000147937 9,173,656 9,780,80 06/30/2020 06/10/2020 0000147937 9,780,805 325,90 07/31/2020 07/13/2020 0000147937 325,902 1,042,29 08/31/2020 08/11/2020 0000147937 1,042,297 1,646,61 09/30/2020 09/14/2020 0000147937 1,646,616 2,278,22 10/31/2020 10/14/2020 0000147937 2,278,223 2,938,04 11/30/2020 11/12/2020 0000147937 2,938,044 3,488,17 12/31/2020 12/09/2020 0000147937 3,488,178 3,980,77 01/31/2021 01/13/2021 0000147937 3,980,777 4,377,94 02/28/2021 02/10/2021 0000147937 4,377,948 4,568,51 03/31/2021 03/10/2021 0000147937 4,568,518 4,805,64 04/30/2021 04/13/2021 0000147937 4,805,641 5,108,03 05/31/2021 05/12/2021 0000147937 5,108,031 5,575,34 06/30/2021 06/10/2021 0000147937 5,575,342 6,182,31 07/31/2021 07/13/2021 0000147937 6,182,318 6,722,45 Totals Usage Multiplier Amount Status 277,507 326,123 356,802 414,560 306,754 259,949 342,098 370,566 373,631 439,627 442,024 415,494 426,006 460,356 415,288 511,351 679,788 336,580 840,931 653,528 630,015 506,988 607,149 542,897 716,395 336,719 511,407 641,521 550,134 492,599 397,171 190,570 236,123 285,590 393,411 430,576 341,634 ,c ncn ocn 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 269.21 317.82 348.50 406.26 298.45 251.65 333.80 362.27 365.33 431.33 433.72 407.19 417.71 452.06 406.99 503.05 671.49 328.28 832.63 645.23 621.72 498.69 598.85 534.60 708.10 328.42 503.11 633.22 541.83 484.30 388.87 182.27 227.82 277.29 385.11 422.28 333.33 STANSBURY PARK IMPRVMENT DIST Customer History Page: 3 Report Dates: 07/01/2018 - 07/31/2021 Jul 14, 2021 03:02PM 50431.12 FORSTRY, FIRE, & STATE LAND SALTAIR Metered Services: WATER Current Rate: 183 Com - Out District - 2in Period Date Read Date Meter ID Begin Read End Read Usage Multiplier Amount Status 07/30/2018 07/10/2018 009303624 2,511 174,314 221,700 100.0000 365.74 08/31/2018 08/10/2018 009303624 174,314 176,103 178,900 100.0000 301.54 09/30/2018 09/10/2018 009303624 176,103 177,203 110,000 100.0000 198.19 10/31/2018 10/10/2018 009303624 177,203 177,249 4,600 100.0000 45.64 11/30/2018 11/09/2018 009303624 177,249 177,601 35,200 100.0000 85.99 12/31/2018 12/10/2018 009303624 177,601 177,602 100 100.0000 45.64 01/31/2019 01/10/2019 009303624 177,602 177,769 16,700 100.0000 58.24 02/28/2019 02/11/2019 009303624 177,769 178,070 30,100 100.0000 78.34 03/31/2019 03/11/2019 009303624 178,070 178,357 28,700 100.0000 76.24 04/30/2019 04/10/2019 009303624 178,357 178,393 3,600 100.0000 45.64 05/31/2019 05/10/2019 009303624 178,393 178,544 15,100 100.0000 55.84 06/30/2019 06/10/2019 009303624 178,544 179,577 103,300 100.0000 188.14 07/31/2019 07/11/2019 009303624 179,577 181,308 173,100 100.0000 292.84 08/30/2019 08/12/2019 009303624 181,308 182,969 166,100 100.0000 282.34 09/30/2019 09/10/2019 009303624 182,969 184,391 142,200 100.0000 246.49 10/31/2019 10/09/2019 009303624 184,391 184,950 55,900 100.0000 117.04 11/30/2019 11/20/2019 009303624 184,950 185,372 42,200 100.0000 96.49 12/31/2019 12/06/2019 009303624 185,372 185,475 10,300 100.0000 48.64 01/31/2020 01/13/2020 009303624 185,475 185,554 7,900 100.0000 45.64 02/29/2020 02/11/2020 009303624 185,554 185,646 9,200 100.0000 46.99 03/31/2020 03/10/2020 009303624 185,646 185,976 33,000 100.0000 82.69 04/30/2020 04/08/2020 009303624 185,976 185,995 1,900 100.0000 45.64 05/31/2020 05/11/2020 009303624 185,995 185,995 0 100.0000 45.64 06/30/2020 06/09/2020 009303624 185,995 186,017 2,200 100.0000 45.64 07/31/2020 07/13/2020 009303624 186,017 188,367 235,000 100.0000 385.69 08/31/2020 08/10/2020 009303624 188,367 191,043 267,600 100.0000 434.59 09/30/2020 09/10/2020 009303624 191,043 192,245 120,200 100.0000 213.49 10/31/2020 10/14/2020 009303624 192,245 192,428 18,300 100.0000 60.64 11/30/2020 11/12/2020 009303624 192,428 192,428 0 100.0000 45.64 12/31/2020 12/09/2020 009303624 192,428 192,428 0 100.0000 45.64 01/31/2021 01/13/2021 009303624 192,428 192,428 0 100.0000 45.64 02/28/2021 02/10/2021 009303624 192,428 192,428 0 100.0000 45.64 03/31/2021 03/10/2021 009303624 192,428 192,438 1,000 100.0000 45.64 04/30/2021 04/12/2021 009303624 192,438 192,606 16,800 100.0000 58.39 05/31/2021 05/12/2021 009303624 192,606 193,345 73,900 100.0000 144.04 06/30/2021 06/14/2021 009303624 193,345 195,109 176,400 100.0000 297.79 07/31/2021 07/12/2021 009303624 195,109 197,094 198,500 100.0000 330.94 Totals: 2.499.700 5.095.03 STANSBURY PARK IMPRVMENT DIST Customer History Page: 4 Report Dates: 07/01/2018 - 07/31/2021 Jul 14, 2021 03:02PM 50431.12 FORSTRY, FIRE, & STATE LAND SALTAIR ( C o n t i n u e d) Report Criteria: Customer. Customer number = 5031110,5030710,5043112