HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Provided Information - 8/19/2025CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.SLC.GOV/COUNCIL
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY26CIP
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Kate Werrett, Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:August 19, 2025
RE:FY2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
CIP BUDGET BOOK PAGES:
-5-13: Proposed projects summary table &
funding sources
-14-15: Lists projects not recommended for funding
-19-24: Identifies existing bonds paid from CIP & other ongoing obligations
-27-58: Recommended General Fund CIP projects details
-61-128: Enterprise fund (Airport, Golf, Public Utilities, and CRA) capital project details
NEW INFORMATION
At the July 1 and July 8 briefings, the Council continued reviewing projects in the CIP Funding Log (Attachment
2) and raised project-specific questions. The Administration’s responses are included as Attachment 7.
Additionally, on July 8th, the Council approved corrections to the CIP Funding Log for CPTED lighting and
removing the debt service for a not-yet-issued Public Lands Bond.
At the August 12th briefing, the Council may wish to identify any priority projects without funding
recommendations or where additional funding is proposed, and any final project-specific questions. A fifth
briefing is scheduled for August 19th during the Council Work Session. August 19th is the last scheduled Formal
Meeting for the Council to adopt the CIP budget before the September 1 deadline under state law.
Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings
At the July 1 and July 8 briefings, the Council may wish to identify any priority projects that do not have funding
recommendations or where additional funding is proposed, and any project-specific questions. Responsive
information and funding options may be gathered so the Council could balance the CIP project-specific budgets
on August 12 or 19. As part of the annual budget adoption vote on June 10, the Council made this change to the
Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2026 CIP:
- Increased the recaptured funds from completed projects and unfinished projects older than
three years by an additional $704,490. The Administration suggested using half of the additional
recapture ($352,245) for Public Lands capital maintenance in addition to the already recommended
$195,573 and applying the remaining $352,245 towards CIP Project #5, Street Reconstruction 2026,
which increases the total funding recommendation to $4,742,921. By a straw poll at the June 5th work
session, the Council agreed to the Public Lands capital maintenance increase and expressed tentative
agreement with applying the remaining $352,245 towards CIP Project #5.
Project Timeline:
Budget Hearings: May 20 & June 3, 2025
CIP Public Hearing: July 8, 2025
1st Briefing: June 5, 2025
2nd Briefing: July 1, 2025
3rd Briefing: July 8, 2025
4th Briefing: August 12, 2025
Potential Adoption Vote: August 19, 2025
Note: The Council approves debt service and overall
CIP funding in June with the annual budget. Project
specific funding is approved later (by September 1).
Page | 2
Two Additional changes are proposed to the FY2026 CIP. To allow the Administration to move forward with
their projects and reflect corrected Funding Log details, the Administration proposes that the Council adopt
these two corrections at the July 8th meeting. All other CIP funding will be discussed at the briefings as
scheduled and approved at the August 19th Council Meeting.
CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) Lighting Transfer: Within the Non-
Departmental section of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget, a proposed $300,000 transfer to CIP was
included for CPTED lighting to add lighting along the Jordan River trail. This transfer was not included in
the Key Changes document or the CIP Funding Log. While the Key Changes document will need to be
updated with a budget amendment, Council may approve the $300,000 CEPTED funding request at their
July 8 Council Meeting.
Removal of Debt Service Funding for 2 nd Tranche of Public Lands Bond: The Administration
found that the debt service amount for the not yet issued 2nd Public Lands bond tranche was included in the
FY2026 Key Changes as a revenue source, although it should not have been included because the Council
has not yet approved moving ahead with the second issuance. Due to this error, the funding was also added
to the CIP book. To amend, the CIP General Fund transfer and debt service payments will need to be
reduced by $2,827,645. The CIP log and the CIP book need this debt service removed before CIP adoption.
NOTE: GO bonds are not paid from CIP because they are funded through a separate, dedicated voter-
approved property tax, and are therefore tracked/accounted for in a separate fund.
CIP Debt Load Projections Chart
Page | 3
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Each year, the Council appropriates overall funding for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and approves
debt payments and ongoing obligations as part of the annual budget in June. Over the summer, the Council
reviews individual projects and per state law must approve project-specific funding by September 1. CIP is an
open and competitive process where residents, local organizations, and City departments submit project
applications. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) resident advisory board
reviews the applications in public meetings and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor and Council. The
Mayor provides a second set of funding recommendations. The Council considers both funding
recommendations and ultimately decides on project-specific funding. Funding for capital improvements
sometimes occurs in mid-year budget amendments, but the annual CIP process is the Council’s largest annual
opportunity to fund large public construction projects. This report provides an overview of the proposed General
Fund CIP budget for FY2026 and policy questions.
Overview of the FY2026 CIP Proposed Budget
The total FY2026 CIP budget is $66 million. This is $7.8 million (19%) more than last year.
The combined $27.8 million from the General Fund and Funding Our Future transfer to CIP (first and third
rows in the table below) is 10.5% more than the FY2025 CIP transfer. Given the evolution of CIP funding
sources, Council Staff is working with the Administration to determine what metric makes most sense to
determine if the appropriate level of CIP investment, with respect to the overall City budget, is occurring. A
future briefing will provide updates on a meaningful metric that acknowledges the multiple CIP funding sources.
A funding log summarizing the CDCIP resident advisory board and mayoral funding recommendations is
available as Attachment 2. The table below details funding sources for CIP by fiscal year. See Attachment 4 for
an overview of the major CIP Funding Sources. Other highlights include:
Comparison of CIP Funding Sources by Fiscal Year
Page | 4
$99 Thousand Increase in General Funds—The General Fund transfer is the most flexible funding source
available for new projects. The Council has restricted Funding Our Future to five critical need areas, which is not
part of this amount.
$6.25 Million Increase in Class C (Gas Tax) – A significant portion of this increase is due to the Finance
Department conducting a reconciliation of the existing Class C CIP project funds. The majority of the additional
$6.25 million was identified in the Class C cash reserves/fund balance and is a one-time increase to CIP funding.
$5.9 Million Increase in Impact Fees—The proposed CIP budget includes $9.7 million in street and park
impact fees.
$3.6 Million Recaptured Funds from Completed Projects and Unfinished Projects Older than
Three Years
The CIP and Debt Management Resolution (Attachment 1) states that remaining funds should be considered for
recapture from completed projects and unfinished projects older than three years, unless there has been
significant progress. The Administration completed a review of all CIP projects and recaptured $2.9 million in
prior CIP funding to rescope for other projects. These funds come from completed projects, dormant CIP
projects older than three years with budgetary balances, and earthquake repair insurance refunds for public
buildings. See Attachment 5 for the Administration’s review of CIP funding usage. After finalizing the CDCIP
and Mayor CIP recommendations, an additional $704,490 was recaptured. The Administration suggests using
half of the additional recapture ($352,245) for Public Lands capital maintenance in addition to the already
recommended $195,573 and applying the remaining $352,245 towards CIP Project #5, Street Reconstruction
2026, which increases the total funding recommendation to $4,742,921.
$2.6 Million Increase in County 1/4¢ and 5th 5th Sales Tax for Transportation – The County 1/4¢ and
5th 5th Sales Tax are combined due to their shared eligibility requirements. These funds are available for
transportation projects per state law. $2.5 million of the FY26 increase is from the existing County 1/4¢ fund
balance. Recently, the County approved a 5th 5th sales tax which goes into effect July 1, 2025, and is projected to
provide an ongoing $600,000 for CIP projects.
$13 Million Debt and Lease Payments – $13,077,844 of the ongoing General Fund transfer to CIP
(including Funding Our Future dollars) is needed to cover debt and rental payments.
Differences between CDCIP Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
The tables below summarize the differences between the CDCIP Board and the Mayor’s funding
Mayor recommends additional funding to projects recommended by the CDCIP Board
Page | 5
Mayor recommended funding capital maintenance projects without CDCIP Board funding recommendations
POLICY QUESTIONS
1.Differences between CDCIP Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations – The Council
may wish to ask the Administration about the different funding recommendations from the CDCIP
residents advisory board and the Mayor as summarized in the two tables earlier in this report.
2.Resources to Support Constituent Applications – The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration the potential of a constituent-specific CIP project funding allotment rather than
grouping them with the city department applications. At the May 20 Public Hearing, some constituents
and a CDCIP Board Member requested some kind of division between the funding to allow for more
constituent applications to be supported.
3.Project #57: Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation – The Council may wish to have a
follow-up briefing to more fully understand the project deliverables of the $2.9 million park impact fee
allocation for the Green Loop and Civic Campus, including the estimated timeframe.
4.Capital Asset Plan Status Update – The Council may wish to request a briefing for an update on the
City’s Capital Asset Plan. The FY2024 non-departmental budget transferred $350,000 to IMS for
Capital Asset Planning software to facilitate this effort. See Attachment 6 for the Council’s potential
policy goals, metrics, and requests from a briefing in 2019.
5.Inflationary Price Increases and the Cost Overrun Account – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration how inflationary price increases have impacted departments utilizing the CIP Cost
Overrun Account, and if additional funding may be needed to avoid project scope reductions. The
Council could also re-evaluate the funding level for the account and/or the formula for the maximum
amounts a project may receive, which hasn’t been updated since 2004 (see section 11 of Attachment 1).
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Definition of a CIP Project
As defined in the Council-adopted 2017 Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution (Attachment
1), a CIP project must “involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other
physical structures, … have a useful life of five or more years, … have a cost of $50,000 or more, … or significant
functionality can be demonstrated…such as software.” The Council also set a three-year spending deadline as
part of the guiding policies. CIP accounts older than three years are periodically reviewed for recapture from
projects that finished under budget or were not pursued.
Comparison of CIP Project Requests by Year and Type
This chart was prepared by Council staff as a comparison of total project requests on the CIP funding log since
FY2017, and whether the application is from a constituent or internal to a City department. The FY2026 CIP
cycle has 60 project requests. FY2021 had the fewest with 19 project requests only from departments (it was
intentionally an “abbreviated CIP cycle” per the Administration at the time). FY2023 had the most with 90
project requests.
Page | 6
Note: this chart only includes funding requested in the competitive portion of CIP so debt service and ongoing
obligations are generally not reflected in the above figures
Cost Overrun Account
The FY2026 CIP budget includes $223,171 of additional Cost Overrun funding. The Council established this
account for projects that experience costs slightly higher than budgeted. A formula determines how much
additional funding may be pulled from the Cost Overrun account depending on the total Council-approved
budget. See Section 11 of Attachment 1 for the formula. This process allows the Administration to add funding to
a project without returning to the Council in a budget amendment. A written notification to the Council on uses
is required. The purpose is to allow projects to proceed with construction instead of delaying projects until the
Council can act on a budget amendment which typically takes a few months.
1.5% for New Art and Maintenance of Existing Artworks
The annual report required by ordinance regarding the maintenance of City artworks in the past fiscal year and
planned for the next year will be transmitted to the Council in the autumn. This timing is after the annual budget
is adopted so the amount of funding available in CIP overall allows the 1.5% to be calculated and inform how
those funds would be used.
Salt Lake City Code, Chapter 2.30, established the Percent for Art Fund and designates roles for the Art Design
Board and Arts Council related to artist selection, project review and placement. The Public Art Program also
oversees projects with funding from the Airport and CRA. In April 2021, the Council amended Chapter 2.30 to
make several changes to the ordinance including an increase from 1% to 1.5% of ongoing unrestricted CIP
funding for art. There is no ceiling so the Council could approve funding for art above 1.5%. The ordinance also
sets a range of 10%-20% for how much of the resulting annual funding is allocated to maintenance (as opposed
to new artworks). This section of the ordinance also states that before funds are deposited into the separate
public art maintenance fund a report from the Administration will be provided to the Council identifying works
of art that require maintenance and estimated costs. This created the first ongoing dedicated funding for
conservation and maintenance of the City’s public art collection consisting of over 270 pieces and counting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution 29 of 2017
2. FY2026 CIP Funding Log
3. Mayor's Recommended CIP Book FY2026
4. Overview of CIP Major Funding Sources
5. Status of Approved CIP Projects and Recapture Details for Projects Older than Three Years
6. Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
7. Administration Responses to Council CIP Questions
Page | 7
ACRONYMS
CAP – Capital Asset Plan (a five-year CIP plan)
CDBG – Community Development Block Grants
CDCIP – Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
CPTED – Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
ESCO – Energy Service Company
FY – Fiscal Year
GO Bond – General Obligation Bond
RESOLUTION NO . _29_0F 2017
(Salt Lake City Council capital and debt management policies.)
R 17-1
R 17-13
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council" or "Council") demonstrated its
commitment to improving the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to better address the
deferred and long-term infrastructure needs of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, the analysis of Salt Lake City's General Fund Capital Improvement
Program presented by Citygate Associates in February 1999, recommended that the Council
review and update the capital policies of Salt Lake Corporation ("City") in order to provide
direction to the capital programming and budgeting process and adopt and implement a formal
comprehensive debt policy and management plan; and
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program and budgeting practices have
evolved since 1999 and the City Council wishes to update the capital and debt management
policies by updating and restating such policies in their entirety to better reflect current
practices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to improve transparency of funding opportunities
across funding sources including General Fund dollars, impact fees, Class C (gas tax) funds,
Redevelopment Agency funds, Public Utilities funds, repurposing old Capital Improvement
Program funds and other similar funding sources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
That the City Council has determined that the following capital and debt management
policies shall guide the Council as they continue to address the deferred and long-term
infrastructure needs within Salt Lake City:
Capital Policies
1. Capital Project Definition-The Council intends to define a capital project as follows:
"Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of
buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must
have a useful life of five or more years. A capital improvement is not a recurring
capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine) or a maintenance
expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). In order to be
considered a capital project, a capital improvement must also have a cost of
$50,000 or more unless such capital improvement's significant functionality can
be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project (such as software).
Acquisition of equipment is not considered part of a capital project unless such
acquisition of equipment is an integral part of the cost of the capital project."
2. Annual Capital Budget Based on 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan-The Council requests that
the Mayor's Recommended Annual Capital Budget be developed based upon the 10-Year
Capital Facilities Plan and be submitted each fiscal year to the City Council for consideration
as part of the Mayor 's Recommended Budget no later than the first Tuesday of May.
3. Multiyear Financial Forecasts-The Council requests that the Administration :
a. Prepare multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts that correspond to the capital
program period;
b . Prepare an analysis of the City's financial condition , debt service levels within the capital
improvement budget, and capacity to finance future capital projects; and
c . Present this information to the Council in conjunction with the presentation of each one
year capital budget.
4. Annual General Fund Transfer to CIP Funding Goal-Allocation of General Fund revenues
for capital improvements on an annual basis will be determined as a percentage of General
Fund revenue . The Council has a goal that no less than nine percent (9%) of ongoing General
Fund revenues be invested annually in the Capital Improvement Fund.
5. Maintenance Standard-The Council intends that the City will maintain its physical assets at
a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance
and replacement costs.
6 . Capital Project Prioritization-The Council intends to give priority consideration to projects
that:
a. Preserve and protect the health and safety of the community;
b. Are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and
c. Provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in a preservation of the
community's prior investment, in decreased operating costs or other significant cost
savings , or in improvements to the environmental quality of the City and its
neighborhoods.
7. External Partnerships -All other considerations being equal, the Council intends to give fair
consideration to projects where there is an opportunity to coordinate with other agencies ,
establish a public/ private partnership, or secure grant funding .
8. Aligning Project Cost Estimates and Funding-The Council intends to follow a guideline of
approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year immediately following
the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as more time
passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital
projects in a timely manner.
9. Advisory Board Funding Recommendations-The Council intends that all capital projects be
evaluated and prioritized by the Community Development and Capital Improvement
Program Advisory Board . The resulting recommendations shall be provided to the Mayor ,
and shall be included along with the Mayor 's funding recommendations in conjunction with
the Annual Capital budget transmittal , as noted in Paragraph two above.
10. Prioritize Funding Projects in the 10-Year Plan-The Council does not intend to fund any
project that has not been included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan for at least one (1)
year prior to proposed funding, unless extenuating circumstances are adequately identified.
11. Cost Overrun Process -The Council requests that any change order to any capital
improvement project follow the criteria established in Resolution No. 65 of2004 which
reads as follows:
a. "The project is under construction and all other funding options and/ or methods
have been considered and it has been determined that additional funding is still
required.
b. Cost overrun funding will be approved based on the following formula:
1. 20% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets of $100,000 or less;
ii. 15% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets between $100,001 and $250,000;
iii. 10% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets over $250,000 with a maximum overrun cost of $1oo,ooo.
c. The funds are not used to pay additional City Engineering fees.
d. The Administration will submit a written notice to the City Council detailing the
additional funding awarded to projects at the time of administrative approval.
e. If a project does not meet the above mentioned criteria the request for additional
funding will be submitted as part of the next scheduled budget opening.
However, if due to timing constraints the cost overrun cannot be reasonably
considered as part of a regularly scheduled budget opening, the Administration
will prepare the necessary paperwork for review by the City Council at its next
regularly scheduled meeting."
12. Recapture Funds from Completed Capital Projects-The Council requests that the
Administration include in the first budget amendment each year those Capital Improvement
Program Fund accounts where the project has been completed and a project balance remains.
It is the Council's intent that all account balances from closed projects be recaptured and
placed in the CIP Cost Overrun Contingency Account for the remainder of the fiscal year, at
which point any remaining amounts will be transferred to augment the following fiscal year's
General Fund ongoing allocation.
13. Recapture Funds from Unfinished Capital Projects-Except for situations in which
significant progress is reported to the Council, it is the Council's intent that all account
balances from unfinished projects older than three years be moved out of the specific project
account to the CIP Fund Balance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, account balances for bond
financed projects and outside restricted funds (which could include grants, SAA or other
restricted funds) shall not be moved out of the specific project account.
14. Surplus Land Fund within CIP Fund Balance -Revenues received from the sale of real
property will go to the unappropriated balance of the Capital Projects Fund and the revenue
will be reserved to purchase real property unless extenuating circumstances warrant a
different use. It is important to note that collateralized land cannot be sold.
15 . Transparency of Ongoing Costs Created by Capital Projects-Any long-term fiscal impact to
the General Fund from a capital project creating ongoing expenses such as maintenance,
changes in electricity /utility usage, or additional personnel will be included in the CIP
funding log and project funding request. Similarly, capital projects that decrease ongoing
expenses will detail potential savings in the CIP funding log.
16. Balance Budget without Defunding or Delaying Capital Projects -Whenever possible,
capital improvement projects should neither be delayed nor eliminated to balance the
General Fund budget.
17. Identify Sources when Repurposing Old Capital Project Funds-Whenever the
Administration proposes repurposing funds from completed capital projects the source(s)
should be identified including the project name, balance of remaining funds, whether the
project scope was reduced, and whether funding needs related to the original project exist.
18. Identify Capital Project Details -For each capital project, the capital improvement projects
funding log should identify:
a. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board's
funding recommendations,
b. The Administration's funding recommendations,
c. The project name and a brief summary of the project,
d . Percentage of impact fee eligibility and type,
e. The project life expectancy,
f. Whether the project is located in an RDA project area,
g. Total project cost and an indication as to whether a project is one phase of a larger
project,
h. Subtotals where the project contains multiple scope elements that could be funded
separately,
1. Any savings derived from funding multiple projects together,
j. Timing for when a project will come on-line,
k. Whether the project implements a master plan,
1. Whether the project significantly advances the City's renewable energy or
sustainability goals,
m . Ongoing annual operating impact to the General Fund,
n. Any community support for the project -such as community councils or petitions,
o. Communities served,
p. Legal requirements/mandates,
q. Whether public health and safety is affected,
r. Whether the project is included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan,
s. Whether the project leverages external funding sources, and
t. Any partner organizations .
Debt Management Policies
1. Prioritize Debt Service for Projects in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan -The Council
intends to utilize long-term borrowing only for capital improvement projects that are
included in the City's 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan or in order to take advantage of
opportunities to restructure or refund current debt. Short-term borrowing might be utilized in
anticipation of future tax collections to finance working capital needs.
2. Evaluate Existing Debt before Issuing a New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration provide an analysis of the City's debt capacity, and how each proposal meets
the Council's debt policies, prior to proposing any projects for debt financing. This analysis
should include the effect of the bond issue on the City's debt ratios , the City 's ability to
finance future projects of equal or higher priority , and the City's bond ratings.
3. Identify Repayment Source when Proposing New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration identify the source of funds to cover the anticipated debt service requirement
whenever the Administration recommends borrowing additional funds.
4. Monitoring Debt Impact to the General Fund-The Council requests that the Administration
analyze the impact of debt-financed capital projects on the City's operating budget and
coordinate this analysis with the budget development process.
5. Disclosure of Bond Feasibility and Challenges -The Council requests that the
Administration provide a statement from the City's financial advisor that each proposed bond
issue appears feasible for bond financing as proposed. Such statement from the City's
financial advisor should also include an indication of requirements or circumstances that the
Council should be aware of when considering the proposed bond issue (such as any net
negative fiscal impacts on the City 's operating budget, debt capacity limits , or rating
implications).
6. A void Use of Financial Derivative Instruments -The Council intends to avoid using interest
rate derivatives or other financial derivatives when considering debt issuance.
7 . Maintain Reasonable Debt Ratios-The Council does not intend to issue debt that would
cause the City's debt ratio benchmarks to exceed moderate ranges as indicated by the
municipal bond rating industry .
8. Maintain High Level Bond Ratings-The Council intends to maintain the highest credit
rating feasible and to adhere to fiscally responsible practices when issuing debt.
9. Consistent Annual Debt Payments Preferred -The Council requests that the Administration
structure debt service payments in level amounts over the useful life of the financed
project(s) unless anticipated revenues dictate otherwise or the useful life of the financed
project(s) suggests a different maturity schedule.
10. Sustainable Debt Burden-The Council intends to combine pay-as-you-go strategy with
long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit continued AAA general
obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in case of
emergency.
11. Lowest Cost Options-The City will seek the least costly financing available when evaluating
debt financing options .
12. Avoid Creating Structural Deficits-The City will minimize the use of one-time revenue to
fund programs/projects that require ongoing costs including debt repayments.
13. Aligning Debt and Project Timelines-Capital improvement projects financed through the
issuance of bonded debt will have a debt service that is not longer than the useful life of the
project.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this -~3L.Lr_...d ___ day of
October , 2017.
ATTEST :
HB _A TTY -#64309 -v3-CIP _a nd_ Debt_ Management_Pol icies
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By 4 = ASL
CHAIRPERSON -=-::::::::____
Salt Lake City
App ed As To Form
By : ~~~~~~~.P
aysen Oldroyd
Da e: lt:>/-:z.../ 17
10,413,236$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,600,000$
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
REQUEST -$
CDCIP -$ -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,300,000$
CDCIP 2,300,000$ 230,000$ 2,070,000$
MAYOR 2,300,000$ 230,000$ 2,070,000$
COUNCIL -$
Engineering Division
Application withdrawn; funding request was in Budget Amendment #5 of FY2025
2 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026
Transportation Division
Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in
a city. While all crashes cannot be avoided, proven safety measures can help turn fatal crashes
into bumps or fender benders.
This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the
Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A) that was formulated, after being funded by
Congress, under the leadership of former SLC Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson.
https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures
The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the
Wasatch Front Regional Council, with Salt Lake City as a partner.
https://wfrc.org/programs/csap/ The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake City where
safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are
state highways, but some are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are
Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. There are many additional corridors around the
City that are in need of safety investments Some of those corridors will be addressed through
other projects in the pipeline (such as the 600 North reconstruction planned in 2025).
Since the pandemic, Salt Lake City has averaged 19 traffic fatalities a year on surface streets
(not including interstates). Since 2021 we have 66 recorded roadway fatalities in Salt Lake City
of which approximately 45% killed someone walking or riding their bike. This failing roadway
system needs to be fixed.
This program seeks targeted funds to focus on corridors with a significant crash history, and
with characteristics that can be made safer with infrastructure investments.
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
Street - Safety
Page 1
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 2,052,000$
CDCIP 1,368,000$ 912,000$ 456,000$
MAYOR 2,052,000$ 1,596,000$ 456,000$
COUNCIL -$
Public Lands Department
This project will fund the replacement of three failing restrooms of Salt Lake City's 47 park
restrooms. Detailed design will be based upon recommendations from the FY 24/25 CIP-
funded citywide restroom study, upon completion (anticipated completion by the end of 2025
or early 2026). Also, engagement conducted for the 2019 Needs Assessment showed that the
number one requested improvement for Public Lands, over all else, was safe, well-maintained
and open restrooms. This project was ranked by the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and
Trails Advisory Board (PNUT Board) as the highest priority for funding this year.
Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable year-
round, or for portions of the year, when they are intended to be open. New restrooms will be
safer, easier to maintain, less susceptible to vandalism, open more often and more predictably,
as well as be more welcoming for park users. The below locations are proposed for potential
new restrooms, based on asset condition, accessibility and ADA needs, investment equity, and
high levels of safety concerns based on Park's maintenance staff experience. Three restrooms
will be selected prior to design, and based on the above criteria, efficiencies with other projects
to enable cost savings, and highest safety concerns:
Fairmont Park, northeast restroom
Liberty Park, near the new Rotary Play Park
Riverside Park, near 600 North
Cottonwood Park
Jordan Park, near the skatepark
Herman Franks Park, both are in need of replacement
CW
Page 2
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 3,730,000$
CDCIP 2,314,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,314,000$
MAYOR 2,684,929$ 1,370,929$ 1,314,000$
COUNCIL -$
Public Lands Department
Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990 Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), which is federal civil rights law, and the 2010 ADA Standards for
Accessible Design.
In this first round of what Public Lands and the Mayor's Office ADA Coordinator anticipate will
(1) site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and accessible ground
surfacing under play areas.
Prioritization and selection of the 10 parks included in this first round's application were based
on project readiness, public usage and engagement (see Appendix F, p. 28 of the SETP),
severity of the issue, safety, and/or the 2024 Salt Lake City ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition
Plan (SETP):
- Riverside Park (Council District 1)
- Sorensen Multi-Cultural Center's fields and playground (CD2)
- Jordan Park (CD2)
- 11th Avenue Park (CD3)
- Lindsey Gardens Park (CD3)
- Victory Park (CD4)
- Ballpark Playground (formerly People's Freeway Park on West Temple St, CD5)
- Wasatch Hollow Park (CD6)
- Parley's Way Park (CD7)
- Parley's Historic Nature Park.
Additionally, failure to remove barriers excludes children and adults with disabilities from fully
participating in park activities, further limiting their access to health and social benefits.
If funding is left over, additional replacement or repair of asphalt, concrete, wood, pavers,
within parks would ensure smooth, ADA-compliant surfaces for all.
CW
Page 3
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 4,750,000$
CDCIP 3,790,676$ 1,000,000$ 2,790,676$
MAYOR 4,390,676$ 1,000,000$ 2,790,676$ 600,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 680,600$
CDCIP 1,680,600$ 1,680,600$
MAYOR 1,680,600$ 1,680,600$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 750,000$
CDCIP 750,000$ 750,000$
MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL -$
Engineering Division
700 North is a vital transportation west side connection; from housing developments on
Redwood to I-215 to industrial and airport general aviation. This project will not only repave
the deteriorated street surface, but add pedestrian and transit enhancements and safety
features, transforming the corridor for all users.
The 700 North Corridor Transformation project was selected by the Wasatch Front Regional
Council for construction funding in 2027. This CIP request will provide part of the local match
($1,680,600 required) in order to obtain $3,000,000 Federal funding programmed for this
project.
7 Public Way Concrete
Engineering Division
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility
or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 5 years has averaged
63%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
5 Street Reconstruction 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including street
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate
complete streets bicycle, pedestrian and transit access improvements. The program meets all
federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are always triggered with a
complete reconstruction.
Maintenance
CW
Maintenance
1
Maintenance
CW
8 Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System Replacement
Public Lands Department
The aeration system at Liberty Lake in Liberty Park is in disrepair and is nonfunctional. As a
result, the water quality is generally poor, and the lake is intermittently closed for safety and
well-being of all park visitors. The stagnant water and shallow depth also increases water
temperature, and increases algal blooms which are harmful to park users, dogs and wildlife
within the area.
of the lake, water quality of Red Butte Creek downstream of Liberty Park (and in turn the
Jordan River), and improve user experience and the health of flora, fauna, and park visitors. It
will also significantly reduce maintenance costs and obligations, and will reinvigorate
recreational uses of the Lake, also contributing to economic success of the Liberty Park
concessionaire and improving visitor experience.
5
Page 4
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 5,000,000$
CDCIP 1,017,515$ 1,007,515$ 10,000$
MAYOR 1,017,515$ 1,007,515$ 10,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL -$
Landscaping
Public Lands Department
This climate-forward project to replace up to 20 acres of aged irrigation systems will help shape
a water and resource-conscious future for many of our parks and public lands. It has two
essential parts: improve irrigation efficiency, and replace some turf areas with low-water,
regionally-appropriate plantings. The environmental, infrastructure, and public lands benefits
of these changes are far-reaching.
years old. They use more water and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Improved or
completely new irrigation systems can help Salt Lake City build more resilient, shady, and
enjoyable spaces in preparation for a hotter, drier future. Even if the plant selection remains
the same, new irrigation systems will use less water, require less maintenance, break less often,
keep existing and future trees healthier, and last another 30+ years. During installation,
projects may add trees and convert some turf landscaping to more waterwise options. These
two strategies can significantly reduce water use and increase resiliency.
The Department has identified priority sites to initiate changes and develop new standards for
waterwise, tree-friendly irrigation improvements within two different types of public lands. It
should be noted that this part of the funding request will not cover all of the public lands
system's needs.
Where practicable, replace turf with low-water, regionally-appropriate plantings: Updating
irrigation systems is also an opportunity to identify and make changes to the different kinds of
areas and plant cover in our parks and public lands. Low use and passive areas should be
converted into regionally appropriate, waterwise plants requiring less maintenance. There is
still a need for conventional turf that can withstand heavy use, such as playfields. These areas
should be irrigated separately for efficient use of water.
10 Bridge Preservation Program
Engineering Division
Salt Lake City is responsible for 55 bridges. Twenty-three of those are vehicle bridges, most
crossing either the Jordan River or the Surplus Canal. UDOT inspects these vehicle bridges
every two years and provides the city with a basic condition report. The city is responsible for
performing appropriate maintenance activities based on statements in the UDOT report. City
Engineering has prepared an ongoing bridge maintenance strategy with the objective of
extending the functional life of these structures, and extending the time between major repairs.
The requested funds will be used to address needed repairs and routine maintenance.
CW
Bridge -
Maintenance
CW
Page 5
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 1,107,117$
CDCIP 1,107,117$ 1,005,117$ 102,000$
MAYOR 1,107,117$ 1,005,117$ 102,000$
COUNCIL -$
Infrastructure Upgrades
Public Lands Department
A 50/50 match with Salt Lake County, per our 1957 contractual agreement, for the following
improvements, in order of priority, to Sugar House Park:
1. Replacement of the Sugar Beet Pavilion (#4 of 7) ($528,000) and the remainder of Salt Lake
City's portion of the total required SLC Dept of Public Utilities' stormwater impact fee
($37,500)
2. Hidden Grove Ped Bridge Railing Replacement and Sidewalk Upgrades ($33,890)
3. Culinary Waterline Study and Replacement ($82,000) - replaces dangerous waterline
4. WeatherTRAK Irrigation System Upgrade ($51,867) - smarter water, reduced water usage
5. Parking Lot Resurfacing ($207,000) - Improves vehicle access to 6/7 pavilions
6. Playground Shade Structures ($102,000; Parks Impact Fees) - near Parley's Creek Pavilion
playground
7. Spoke Road Resurfacing ($64,860) - resurface and improve safety and predictability of the
road and intersection just north of the pond.
a contractual agreement to jointly own the park property and appropriate funds for facilities.
The Sugar House Park Authority depends on these appropriations from SLC and SLCo to carry
out the park's purpose as an equitable Regional Park. Salt Lake City's 50% investment in these
capital project requests and deliver 100% of the reward to Salt Lake City residents.
Priorities of the park are to continue with the Pavilion Replacement Program with pavilion #4
of 7, pay fees, meet codes, provide safe drinking water, pay stormwater impact fees, improve
safety and accessibility, reduce water use and maintenance costs, and protect kids and prolong
the useful life of existing equipment. These projects are critical for the access, safety, inclusion,
and enjoyment of Sugar House Park patrons and will deliver community benefits, support
sustainability efforts, and continue Salt Lake City's and Salt Lake County's decades-long
collaborative funding and management agreement.
7
Page 6
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 1,980,868$
CDCIP 1,980,868$ 1,980,868$
MAYOR 1,980,868$ 1,980,868$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 4,000,000$
CDCIP 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 3,600,000$
MAYOR 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 3,600,000$
COUNCIL -$
Facilities Division
The Facility Renewal and Deferred Asset Management Initiative for Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) is
a targeted effort aligned with the 10-year plan. Our goal is to strategically manage the existing
backlog of deferred assets by categorizing and prioritizing them based on building and
component criticality. This involves dividing the current backlog into three equal parts,
enabling us to address an approximately consistent number of assets per year. Additionally, we
aim to proactively tackle 50% of incoming deferred assets to prevent further accumulation.
This focused approach ensures efficient resource allocation and sets the foundation for
sustained facility enhancement over the coming years.
13 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City's Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been adequately
funded for years. As a result, traffic signals throughout the city are falling into failing condition,
requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics and wiring each year. When a traffic
falls over, which can happen. More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately
detects motor vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a
simple timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in
additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light running, and
crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff attention to physical repairs
and/or resetting the signal's computers.
For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements
per year and 5 upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years.
However, since only zero, one or two signals have been funded each year, this program
continues to fall further behind.
This financially constrained request of $4 million seeks to fund full replacement of 6 ranked
signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus upgrades to
detection and/or communications equipment. Based on the current costs of signals, this
request should be $5 million.
Maintenance
CW
CW
Page 7
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 100,000$ 900,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 100,000$ 900,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,500,000$
CDCIP 1,500,000$ 150,000$ 1,350,000$
MAYOR 1,500,000$ 150,000$ 1,350,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 3,500,000$
CDCIP 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
MAYOR 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
14 Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit
Transportation Division
The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install
bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and
accessible first/last mile connections to transit. This program implements two of the key
recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe,
and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law,
particularly when streets are repaved or reconstructed.
After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop
amenities and maintains them for the life of the assets.
Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible "frequent service" brand and
enhanced amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at Frequent Transit Route
bus stops throughout the city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help
achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit access and
waiting experience.
Some of the new shelters are now equipped with lighting, which will make passengers who are
waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are
waiting.
15 Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026
Transportation Division
This program will implement one of five key moves identified in Connect SLC, the Citywide
Transportation Plan (adopted by the City Council in 2024) -- to retrofit existing streets with
walking and bicycling facilities as well as adding strategically selected segments of trails, to
create a complete network. Recent opportunistic projects, including those in the 2018 streets
bond, have made great progress. From the perspective of someone walking or bicycling,
however, these new projects are not connected seamlessly to other facilities or each other. This
annual program will connect these gaps.
Gaps are of particular safety concern because someone walking or bicycling may need to
"brave" a section of street without a sidewalk or bikeway to get to their destination.
Short segments of sidewalks are missing all over the city -- the equivalent of sidewalk OCI 0.
This year's program is likely, for example, to address a missing sidewalk near a school on L
Street in the Avenues and one or more missing sidewalks in the Glendale Neighborhood
identified in a community-council created active transportation plan.
Existing roadways without bike infrastructure, despite having had a Complete Street policy for
over 17 years, will be selected based on gaps in the network. Gaps will be addressed using
inexpensive materials like paint, bollards, and/or separation provided by parked vehicles,
similar to projects implemented in the last couple years on 200 East and 300 East. An
emphasis will be placed on bike lanes with physical separation, where possible.
Addressing these gaps may seem like "new" infrastructure. In most cases, however, people
bicycling and walking are already using these roadways without the benefit of complete
infrastructure. If the overall condition of a roadway were graded for "completeness" instead of
potholes, such locations would be "poor" to "failing."
16 Street Overlays 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the level of
CW
CW
Maintenance
CW
Page 8
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
deterioration where full reconstruction is required. Overlays include mill and overlay of street
pavement, spot curb and gutter and sidewalk replacement, drainage improvements as
necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements.
Overlays are of particular interest from a cost savings perspective, because streets of this
condition are in their last possible years before a considerably more expensive, full
reconstruction will become inevitable. This is analogous to an old house that needs its wooden
siding replaced. A few more years of rot, and you will need to replace all the framing too. A lot
more expensive.
The program incorporates federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, such as
sidewalk curb ramps and bus stop access, which are triggered with an overlay project.
Page 9
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 90,000$
CDCIP 90,000$ 90,000$
MAYOR 90,000$ 90,000$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This application seeks funding to complete a study and detailed design to expand the Jordan
Park Skatepark.
Nestled within the Glendale neighborhood of Salt Lake City lies a cultural cornerstone beloved
by locals and renowned among skateboarders nationwide - Jordan Skatepark, affectionately
known as "9th and 9th". For over 20 years, this iconic space has been a sanctuary for skaters, a
hub for community building, and a vital thread in the fabric of Glendale.
As Jordan Skatepark approaches its third decade of existence, the realities of time and use have
begun to reveal cracks in its foundation. With a surge in popularity over the years, the park
finds itself bursting at the seams, struggling to accommodate the ever-growing groups of
skaters who flock to it.
2
Page 10
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 100,000$
CDCIP 100,000$ 100,000$
MAYOR 100,000$ 100,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,000,000$
CDCIP 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 303,000$
CDCIP 303,000$ 303,000$
MAYOR 303,000$ 303,000$
COUNCIL -$
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City's bike share system, GREENbike, has received nearly $860,000 in federal funds
that require a $60,000 city match. This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-
apart stations and bikes. GREENbike's oldest equipment is over 12 years old and has been
exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. Of the 50 stations in Salt Lake system, 23 are at
the end of their lifespan; parts are no longer available for repairs. Over 130,000 individuals
have taken hundreds of thousands of rides, mashing buttons on stations, yanking or slamming
bikes into docks, or dropping bikes. Deteriorated bikes can create unsafe conditions for riders,
and stations may unexpectedly fail which can lead to personal safety concerns for people
walking from a further station than anticipated. While GREENbike is rebuilding bikes as much
as possible and cobbling together stations out of old parts, ultimately both bikes and stations
need to be replaced. CIP is not for equipment. Bikes are equipment. Bike Stations are eligible.
This funding request also includes $20,000 to replace 20+ year old bike racks owned by the
City on the public way. Racks have been hit by cars, mangled, or simply rusted out, with little
to no attention to maintenance. While this may seem minor, in at least one instance a rusted
bike rack fell over, injuring a child and leading to a payout by the city. Racks that have been
damaged beyond use have simply been removed, rather than replaced. The priority of this
request is maintenance and replacement If funds allow, some new bike racks may be installed
at business or customer request. This is maintenance and not Capital Maintenance and should
be part of the Operational Budget.
In addition to permanent bike racks, the City has a program for 15 years to seasonally replace
one car parking space with a bike rack for 10 bicycles. This is called a "bike corral." Most of the
city's racks are damaged, may be unsafe to use, and do not make a good impression. This
request will also allocate $20,000 to bike corral replacements. If funds allow, business requests
for new corrals will be considered.
Maintenance
CW
19 Livable Streets Program 2026
Transportation Division
This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to Transportation
staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable prioritization process for the
implementation of traffic calming improvements in the areas most in need. This year's funding
request is for three zones. This program is scalable; additional funding would allow
Transportation to move through the 113 total zones more quickly. At the current rate of 3-4
zones per year, the program will take around 25-30 years to address all of the areas of the city.
20 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side of road
on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave and repave 1200 E between Crandall Ave
and Zenith Ave.
CW
&
Streets -
Maintenance
7
Page 11
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
I've lived on the corner of Richmond and Zenith with my family since 2021. My family walks
across Richmond daily to get to the daycare on another corner. Many people, including kids,
families, and elderly, walk across Richmond to get to daycare, parks, bus stops, the grocery
store, and school - Richmond runs through the Nibley Park School District and the 213 bus,
which services Highland High School, Westminster University, and The U, has north- and
south-bound stops at Richmond and Zenith. Pedestrian traffic is only likely to increase as more
apartment buildings and businesses are opened in the growing Brickyard area.
Despite all the pedestrian traffic, Richmond remains a 5-lane street - a road design the city and
Sugarhouse are working to replace to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety. There is only a set
of flashing pedestrian yield signs at Richmond and Zenith, which drivers either don't notice or
choose to disregard. My family and I often stand at the Zenith corner so long, waiting for all 5
lanes to stop, that we have to hit the pedestrian crosswalk button multiple times.
In 3 years, I've witnessed at least 5 car accidents, including a car rear-ending a stopped bus and
a car rear-ending another car that stopped for a pedestrian using the crosswalk. Our backyard
fence along Richmond is destroyed because a car went through it. Countless drivers have
almost hit other cars or pedestrians, including parents with strollers and kids. Neighbors who
signed my CIP petition used the words "scary", "nightmare", and "dangerous" to describe
crossing Richmond.
My CIP application aims to make the Richmond/Zenith intersection safe for pedestrians with
the installation of a HAWK signal. The Transportation Division confirmed a HAWK signal is
the next tier of pedestrian safety for the intersection. Adding a HAWK signal on Richmond will
walk, and use transit.
7
Page 12
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 1,900,000$
CDCIP 630,000$ 630,000$
MAYOR 630,000$ 630,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,540,000$
CDCIP 385,000$ 385,000$
MAYOR 385,000$ 385,000$
COUNCIL -$
Park - Maintenance
Park - Maintenance
Public Lands Department
This project proposes, but is not limited to, replacing two to three of Salt Lake City's
approximately 110 concrete or asphalt sport courts used for tennis, pickleball, basketball, and
other activities. The targeted locations and courts include:
Westpointe Park Basketball Court: The current basketball court is undersized for the
aging and in need of replacement. Expanding and updating the court will better meet
community needs by providing modern, high-quality amenities to an underserved population.
Adding an artistic element to the court design could further enhance the sense of community
and support local identity.
Riverside Park Tennis Courts: These asphalt courts are showing significant wear, including
cracks and peeling surfacing, which hinder playability. Replacing these courts and/or
converting some to pickleball courts would improve accessibility, ensure safety, and offer a
more enjoyable recreational environment for the community.
Liberty Park Volleyball Court: The volleyball court surfacing at Liberty Park is also
deteriorating. As part of a potential public/private partnership, this court may be converted
into a street soccer court. To support this transition, resurfacing the court is recommended to
ensure a durable and safe play area.
aging facilities to create safe and engaging spaces for residents. Other court
replacement/renovation projects should also be considered, especially if higher priority
projects are identified after the initial application and funding process is complete. Alternate
locations to consider include Sunnyside Park basketball court, Warm Springs Park tennis
courts, Madsen Park basketball court, and Victory Park/10th East Senior Center tennis courts.
23 Playground Replacements
Public Lands Department
Replace and upgrade playground equipment and surfacing that are beyond their safe and
serviceable life at up to four parks.
Playgrounds typically last 20-25 years. Salt Lake City has 79 playgrounds. Replacing four per
year will ensure that children are safer, more engaged, and more consistently able to access
play features near their homes and schools. This programmatic, annual funding request
includes playground, surfacing, minor design, permitting, and community engagement costs.
Four of the following playgrounds (in alphabetical order) will be selected based on asset
condition, accessibility/ADA needs, and investment equity: 6th East Mini Park, 11th Avenue
Park, Davis Park, Lindsey Gardens Park, Parley's Way Park, Pugsley Ouray Park, Riverside
Park, Victory Park.
Page 13
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 855,724$
CDCIP 855,724$ 678,724$ 177,000$
MAYOR 855,724$ 678,724$ 177,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 954,720$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The 600 East Byway Safety Improvements CIP aims to make safety improvements to 600 East
between 900 South at Liberty Park to the connection to N Street at South Temple. 600 East is
one of Salt Lake City's first neighborhood byways; however, this section has seen few safety
upgrades apart from improved crossings at 800 South and 900 South. In some parts of the
route, there are shared bike lane markings with no traffic calming to force slow speeds (South
Temple to 200 South and 600 South to 900 South). Between 200 South and 600 South, there
are standard painted bike lanes with no traffic calming. This area has higher traffic volumes
that make it more stressful to ride a bike or walk across the street, and is the area with the most
destinations. This project would install traffic calming throughout the route, improve walking
and biking crossings, and improve the bike lanes at key locations. 600 East is a very important
active transportation connection for the Central City community. It provides direct access to 5
grocery stores, a school, multiple retail and dining clusters, Liberty Park, lots of housing, and
completes a connection from the Lower Avenues through Central City to Liberty Wells. This
project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute
to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions for SLC's
sustainability goals.
4
25 East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-
400 South and 400- 500 South)
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The curbing & irrigation systems for these medians has fallen into serious disrepair, causing a
cascading series of issues affecting the space. During major events at the U, & day to day due to
the # of rental housing in the area, a low / no curbing along the medians allows vehicles to park
& drive over the medians, often breaking sprinkler heads & causing irrigation failures. This
failure in irrigation has caused the die off of many large, mature trees, as well as the failed
establishment of newly planted trees. Since these large medians represent a large portion of the
limited usable open space for East Central residents, this simple fix would provide a major
immediate and long-term improvement to the quality of life, longevity, and beauty of the
usage/water loss.
This project seeks to install new curbing around each island to prevent cars from driving across
the turf & will allow the soil to be raised to match the grade of the top of the root ball of the
existing trees. Replacing the irrigation systems & planting a significant number of new trees
supplementing the urban forest that remains will provide a major impact on urban heat
reduction, as well as reducing long term irrigation & water use as more turf areas are shaded,
experiencing less soil moisture loss. (See attached "1200 E. Island Rehabilitation -Overall
Plan")
The tree planting portion of the project is in support of the "Trillion Tree Campaign" in an
effort to aid in enhancing SLC's air quality. This project seeks to establish a healthy succession
tree plan replacing the dying or lost trees, as well as drastically increasing the species diversity
of what is currently planted. This phase seeks to quadruple the tree count over these spaces,
planting species recommended by SLC Urban Forestry to reduce water needs, promote
longevity, increase species diversity, & emphasize resilience to a changing climate.
Maintenance
4
Page 14
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 475,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 932,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Traffic calming measures between 900 West and the Jordan River Trail on 500 South.
* Reduce the speed of vehicles using a system of speed humps (6).
* Make pedestrian crossings shorter and make pedestrians more visible
* Marked/raised cross walks leading to the Post Street Tot Lot, The Neighborhood House, and
at the intersection of the Jordan River Parkway
27 Nevada Street Reconstruction
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
We are looking to rebuild Nevada St running from Redondo Ave north to Garfield. Then west
on Garfield for about 90ft.
Nevada St starting at Redondo Ave and running north about 900 FEET then west 90 FEET
(.17mi)
5K each ADA ramp.
3 with north end option 1 rebuild.
NW corner of Redondo Ave and Nevada St
NE corner of Redondo Ave and Nevada St
North end of Nevada, west side of street at the dogleg with Garfield
15 driveways north of Redondo on the east side with a Pipe-drive (Darin) or Overhead (Lynn)
7 driveways north of Redondo on the west side that do not have a drainpipe under the foot
Speedbumps or humps
2
Street -
Maintenance
6
Page 15
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 530,000$
CDCIP 530,000$ 79,500$ 450,500$
MAYOR 530,000$ 79,500$ 450,500$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Riverside Basketball Court is a community hub that promotes physical activity and social
interaction. However, the current condition of the court is deteriorated, and outdated, affecting
its usability and safety. This proposal outlines the need for renovation and the benefits of this
project.
Objectives-
Enhance facility to a full court NBA regulation size. Updating the aesthetics of the basketball
court and adding amenities to make it user friendly.
This would improve the overall playing experience for community members as well as foster
community engagement through recreational activities.
Scope of Work-
*Court Construction: Install durable, full court with a weather resistant surface. Mark lines for
both full and half court play. Customize with an original art mural.
*Hoop Replacement: Install new, adjustable basketball hoops to accommodate players of all
ages and skill levels.
*Additional Amenities: Install fencing, benches, trash cans to enhance the user experience
We've met and gathered input and suggestions from local residents, city council member Dan
Dugan and Arts Council staff member Renato Olmedo-Gonzales regarding the renovations.
This will ensure that the project meets the needs and preferences of those who use the court.
Renovating the Riverside Basketball Court will significantly enhance our community's
recreational facilities, promote healthy lifestyles, and foster social connections. We respectfully
request approval for this Capital Improvement Project to ensure a safe and enjoyable
environment for our Rose Park Community.
1
Page 16
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 240,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This application is submitted for, and on behalf of, the Liberty Wells Community Council.
There has been active discussion at council meetings with area residents, working to formulate
this application, with the ultimate goal of finding solutions to slow traffic traveling through the
council boundaries. The proposed project is for the addition of traffic calming measures within
the Liberty Wells community - specifically on 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E between 1700 S and
2100 S. The community has suffered under the onslaught of vehicles traveling north and south
on these streets ignoring the posted speed limit through the residential area. There are
residents in the area that have been asking Salt Lake City to explore, and provide, remedy for
the vehicles speeding through the neighborhood for over 18 years. The electronic driver
feedback boards on 400 E regularly display vehicle MPH speeds in the 30s to upper 40s, even
E, but the expected budget amount provided by the Transportation department was so high
that we knew our application would most likely be rejected. In discussion with residents, the
project area was scaled back with the rationale that 200 E has multiple curves that naturally
was reconstructed, along with it being a feeder route with a higher speed limit. Included are
photos of vehicles that were traveling through the area at high/unsafe speeds and ended up
flipping over onto the vehicle roof.
30 Downtown Farmers Market - Upgraded Electrical Service
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Our proposed project would fund new electrical service to meet needs of the Downtown
Farmers Market (DTFM) other community organizers planning events in the Pioneer Park
neighborhood and add capacity for continued growth of the market. To maintain the size and
scope of the current market during park renovations, and retain our loyal customer base the
market will be moving to the streets surrounding Pioneer Park. One of the biggest hurdles we
are facing as the market moves to the streets is a solution to power access for our 20+ prepared
food vendors. For the past 33 years we have been able to operate without the need for
individual gas powered generators, which has reduced noise and air pollution/exhaust, helping
us further our Waste Wise mission and create a better atmosphere at the market.
We have collaborated closely with Public Lands on our move to the streets during construction,
and to come up with permanent power solutions for our market vendors in the street. We have
considered adding electrical service to the park strips around Pioneer Park on 400 West and
300 South, but both of those locations come with a variety of hurdles including damaging the
root zones of historic trees. Considering these issues the best solution is to add new electrical
service to the median on 300 South. This power would help facilitate a successful move of the
market to city streets while the park is under construction, as well as provide additional power
electrical service for only 8 vendors). We foresee closures of 300 South and 400 West and use
of the new electrical service being part of market operations and park activations into the
future. We also believe that new electrical service in the 300 South median opening
opportunities for additional holiday and event lighting, and additional street activation.
4
5
Page 17
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 812,500$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 693,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Replacement of Texas Street asphalt (OCI 18) from terminus south of Hillside Middle School
one block to Redondo Avenue. Most of the "Overhead approach" driveways on the east side of
the street are in equally poor condition and need to be replaced.
32 Sweet Streets Bike Network Gap Filling
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The bike network safety CIP aims to revisit existing bike routes and make improvements at key
areas, such as busy intersections, high stress bike lanes, and filling gaps in the network. While
newly completed projects include safety elements like traffic calming, buffered lanes, protected
lanes, and intersection improvements, older projects are lacking these elements, leading to
high stress, unsafe routes. In other areas, the lack of a safe crossing could hinder the bike route
utility, leading to its disuse by people biking. This project intends to focus on the bigger picture
and isolated improvements. The project will also consider markings, signage,
beautification/art, and wayfinding to aid in navigation and encourage bicycling. The CIP
supports several City initiatives, such as Vision Zero - zero serious injuries or deaths by 2035,
the Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the Complete Streets Ordinance, and a recent technical
assistant grant (Accelerated Mobility Playbook) which will help accelerate this project. Overall,
health, and well being, and reduce congestion on our streets.
Maintenance
6
CW
Page 18
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 104,177$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Powered Pedestrian Activated Flashers
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Pedestrian Safety requirements within the East Central Community Council Area.
East Central has been identified as one the most walkable neighborhoods within Salt Lake City
(University of Utah/9th & 9th/Trolley Square/Downtown), it includes the highest transit
ridership routes (2/1300/Trax), the high percentage of traffic between the U/Downtown & the
highest rental rate within the city (73%). In addition, given our location next to the U/stadium,
anticipated growth of the U seeking to increase student population by 10,000, the number of
visitors housed within our area annually & during the 2002 Olympics, the ECC has established
this plan to ready our neighborhood to be not only inviting but safe. We appreciate SLC's
treatment of the ECC hot spots to date. Two new locations have been identified as extremely
dangerous to our community requiring pedestrian safety treatment. We are seeking pedestrian-
activated flashers at these locations. As a community, we are prioritizing pedestrian safety to
ensure that our neighborhood is not only visually appealing but also accessible & safe.
As the world prepares for the 2034 Olympics in Salt Lake City, the East Central Community
Council is embarked on an ambitious ten-year plan that will enhance our neighborhood's
aesthetic appeal and foster a stronger sense of community as we prepare to greet the world.
Given its location central in the heart of the City, imagine East Central as an inviting and safe
neighborhood complete with tree-lined streets, lush green spaces, community gathering places
that caters to residents and visitors alike and a sense of pride that radiates from every property.
This effort will not only enhance the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal but also foster a stronger
sense of community that leaves a lasting legacy for generations to come.
This is the vision we are bringing to life in East Central.
4
Page 19
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 324,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This proposal will (1) help to secure the 1893 Fisher Mansion, a city-owned and currently
vacant property, and (2) move this resource closer to serving as a catalyst for economic
development, community engagement, and pride on Salt Lake City's West Side.
The Fisher Mansion and surrounding property were purchased in 2006 by Salt Lake City to
complete the Jordan River Trail. In 2023, the city completed the restoration of the Fisher
Mansion Carriage House (located on the mansion's grounds), which now houses Public Lands
Department staff. In 2022, the Salt Lake City Council budgeted $3 million to structurally and
seismically stabilize the mansion.
This stabilization, currently scheduled to begin in spring 2025, will repair and strengthen the
Fisher Mansion's foundations, walls, and roof. There is not enough funding in this $3 million
budget, however, to secure the building via new soffits and facia, repair broken windows, or to
bring the stone porch balustrade up to public safety code.
New soffits, facia, and stone balustrades are necessary to weatherproof the Fisher Mansion and
and are considered by Salt Lake City architects to be essential repairs, regardless of the
mansion's future occupancy. This application requests funding to pay for these repairs.
Additional site improvements will allow for continued and expanded use of the grounds, and
improve functionality and safety of the Jordan River boat access and the Jordan River Parkway
and Trail, and compliments the Emerald Ribbon Action Plan.
As funds are available, limited restoration of some doors and windows will improve safety,
security and access to the building, and further the ongoing full restoration for eventual
culture and history.
35 Neighborhood Alley Way Repavement (#4195) / Repave Alley #4195
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
This project aims to repave the local alleyway, creating a safe and accessible alternative parking
solution for homeowners and improving the overall aesthetics and functionality of the
neighborhood. The repaving will address the current state of disrepair, ensuring a smoother
surface, proper drainage, and increased safety for pedestrians and vehicles alike.
By investing in the repaving of the local alleyway, the community will experience a range of
benefits that not only address immediate concerns but also contribute to the long-term health,
safety, and prosperity of the neighborhood. The collaboration of the community in this project
demonstrates a collective commitment to enhancing the quality of life for all residents and
ensuring the neighborhood remains a desirable place to live for years to come.
Maintenance
2
Maintenance
5
Page 20
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 403,010$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 429,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,002,689$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 1,078,807$ 1,078,807$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project would aim to increase safety at intersections around the city while also making it
easier to use modes of transportation outside of cars. The basic idea is to daylight intersections
to increase visibility that may otherwise be blocked by parked cars (sometimes illegally so)
using bike racks or scooter parking zones with physical infrastructure to prevent car parking in
these places. Physical infrastructure would also provide potential space for artists to create art.
38 PSB EV Charging Expansion
Facilities Division
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a vital project aimed at upgrading the
charging infrastructure at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a central facility for the
city's police and fire departments, emergency operations center, and combined dispatch unit.
The project involves the installation of (20) new Level 2 charger ports, along with back feeding
(10) pre-existing ports within the existing two-floor garage, catering to a fleet of (50) public
services, police, and fire vehicles. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn &
Sawatch, the proposed funding will support the first two phases, which include the installation
of a new utility transformer on the east end of the property to facilitate the required electrical
service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our commitment to sustainable
transportation as outlined in the City's 2020 Electrified Transportation Joint Resolution and
positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the evolving needs of our expanding EV
fleet.
36 Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project aims to repave the local alleyway, creating a safe and accessible alternative parking
solution for homeowners and improving the overall aesthetics and functionality of the
neighborhood. The repaving will address the current state of disrepair, ensuring a smoother
surface, proper drainage, and increased safety for pedestrians and vehicles alike.
By investing in the repaving of the local alleyway, the community will experience a range of
benefits that not only address immediate concerns but also contribute to the long-term health,
safety, and prosperity of the neighborhood. The collaboration of the community in this project
demonstrates a collective commitment to enhancing the quality of life for all residents and
ensuring the neighborhood remains a desirable place to live for years to come.
Maintenance
6
Multi-Modal - New CW
4
Page 21
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 176,635$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 611,879$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The First Encampment Park is in its 28th year and is a treasure in the Liberty Wells
Community but needs some capital improvements. Through funding provided by the Parks
Department, a novel path forward is being developed to present the historical information
etched on the boulders about the first pioneer settlers in the valley, and the damaged plaques
and has enabled us to move forward in our CIP requests for security and safety enhancements
to preserve the park's infrastructure which has deteriorated over the years. Since 1997, new
technology has improved providing possible upgrades for a more secure environment.
Therefore, our CIP goals are:
- Overhaul the irrigation system to better support turf, trees and new native plantings
- Replace non-native and non-historic plantings with water-wise legacy plants; replant the
Southwest corner of the park with native plants
prevent standing water and improve drainage
- Replace pavers for 300 sq feet of park pathways
- Update light poles and electrical capability with LED lighting for visitor security
- Replace in-ground ornamental lighting needed for three plaques
- Provide motion-censored pedestrian lighting
- Improve upheaval of the sidewalk on 1700 South and park strip to improve accessibility and
legal compliance with ADA
40 Plaza 349 EV Charging Expansion
Facilities Division
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a crucial project dedicated to upgrading the
charging infrastructure at Plaza 349. Situated off 200 E and University Boulevard, the Plaza
349 complex comprises an office building and a six-level parking garage, both served by a
single existing electrical service. The proposed project involves installing (20) new Level 2
charger ports and back feeding (4) pre-existing charging ports within the Plaza 349 parking
garage, which currently accommodates (38) fleet vehicles according to telematics data.
Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn & Sawatch, the initial funding will support
the first two phases, including the installation of a new utility switching cabinet and
transformer strategically placed between the main building and parking garage to facilitate the
required electrical service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our
commitment to sustainable transportation as outlined in the City's 2020 Electrified
Transportation Joint Resolution and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the
evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
5
Facilities - New 4
Page 22
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 485,837$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 93,500$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project implements traffic calming measures on 800 W and improvements on Navajo and
in the Glendale neighborhood. The project is phased to distribute efforts across multiple years based
on available funding.
The primary goal is creating a safer urban environment for all users, especially pedestrians and
cyclists. Phase 1 focuses on 800 W, a major connector between the 9-Line and California Street bike
lanes that currently lacks traffic calming measures and connects to the Sorenson Multicultural
on planned Livable Zone 12 improvements.
Phase 1 Projects:
--- Seven speed humps along 800 W between 900 S and 1300 S, providing physical speed reduction
while maintaining bike access and emergency vehicle passage.
Phase 2 Projects:
--- Emery/California intersection improvements with upgraded bike lane paint and detection
--- Raised crosswalks at Fremont/800 W and Remington Way/800 W near school bus stops
--- Neighborhood Byway signage on Emery and Navajo Streets between Indiana Avenue and
California
--- New flashing beacon (RRFB) at 800 W/900 S with pedestrian refuge island
Future Phase 3 could include chicanes, traffic circles, or additional pedestrian improvements on 800
W.
This project aims to create safer neighborhood connections, encourage active transportation, reduce
emissions, and foster a more livable environment. It aligns with Salt Lake City's sustainability goals,
public health initiatives, and Vision Zero policy to eliminate traffic injuries and fatalities by 2035.
42 1700 East Asphalt and Fence
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Asphalt slope below metal fence from 2229 South 1700 East to 2283 South 1700 East. This
notified of the weeds that are growing below the fence. The metal fence needs to be painted. It
has not been painted since it was installed in 2005.
2
Maintenance
7
Page 23
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 525,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 4,067,000$
CDCIP 2,597,000$ 2,597,000$
MAYOR 2,597,000$ 2,597,000$
COUNCIL -$
signal at the California Ave/Concord St Intersection
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project aims to increase the safety of pedestrians at an intersection used by residents
including UTA public transit riders, Glendale Branch Library visitors, and minor students at
Mountain View Elementary, Dual Immersion Academy, and Glendale Middle School, by
providing additional funding to revise previously funded plans for an RRFB at the location to a
more secure HAWK signal.
44 Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks
Public Lands Department
This project will transform several public parks into vibrant hubs for community gatherings
and public events by investing in essential event infrastructure, and replacing failing pavilions.
Funding will replace failing pavilions in select parks ideal for hosting small family and
corporate events, and add amenities such as permanent power distribution boxes, improved
lighting, restrooms, and durable areas to accommodate stages, vehicles, portable restrooms, or
other structures to make our parks more friendly and accommodating to many different kinds
of event.
These upgrades will support a variety of activities, from cultural festivals and concerts to
volunteer projects and neighborhood celebrations, fostering community connection and
enriching public spaces. By equipping our parks with the necessary infrastructure, we aim to
reduce event setup costs, minimize environmental impacts, and increase accessibility for
organizers and participants alike to make gathering with our communities more accessible.
The benefits of this application are four-fold:
(1) Reduce the current maintenance impacts of concentrating every City and special event
within the same few parks
(2) Reduce event costs for organizers
(3) Activate more of our parks, especially those that are otherwise ready to be supportive of
more events (open space, parking, etc.) in Council districts that do not traditionally host many
events
(4) Ensure that our park supply can meet event demand so that there can be more events
programmed in our parks every year
This initiative aligns with our vision of creating safe, inclusive, and engaging public spaces that
strengthen community bonds and enhance quality of life for residents and visitors.
2
CW
Page 24
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 250,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 322,996$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Install shade cloths over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the summer,
playground equipment is too hot to use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing
playgrounds, the community will enjoy increased use of play equipment for the full day in the
summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer.
1. Meadows Park
2. 17th South River Park
3. 11th Avenue Park (playground replacement included in the Public Lands Department's ADA
CIP application for FY 25/26)
4. Sherwood Park
5. Modesto Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming Parks GO
Bond and CIP-funded improvement projects along the Jordan River corridor)
6. Richmond Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming Parks GO
Bond and CIP-funded improvement project)
7. Herman Franks Park
46 Alleyway Improvements 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program, kicked off in 2021, funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated
City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary..
47 Marmalade Gateway Roundabout
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This plan is a chance to enhance the area with better "Marmalade" neighborhood branding
while also providing much-needed improvements to make the roadways safer.
This plan will serve two purposes, making Marmalade a more recognized neighborhood but at
the same time providing safety to the residents and students that attend the three surrounding
schools.
The plan seeks to redesign the 300 North 200 West intersection with a roundabout allowing a
Marmalade sign or art installation. In addition, a separate traffic calming project will install a
speed bump immediately to the west on 300 North.
CW
Maintenance
CW
3
Page 25
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 680,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 680,000$ 680,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 163,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Request repaving alley between 3rd & 4th Aves and Virginia and Alta streets
48 Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
There is a dire need for health and safety improvements along Rose Park Ln. This project would meet
all your priorities for the application year. More than a beautification, this project really addresses
your top priorities of unfinished projects, Health and Safety, Jordan River Parkway, and city-owned
land. The Urban Forestry Division has committed to providing trees and installation at the new sites
on Rose Park Lane. This project would extend and complete the Rose Park Lane trail, remove illegal
overnight commercial truck parking on unfinished land, and build infrastructure to sustain
commercial truck traffic on Rose Park Ln.
The entire stretch of Rose Park Ln is highly visible and highly neglected. The entire stretch of the
existing Rose Park Ln. was irrigated 7 years ago for the WestPointe run-off ditch (large grassy
area/detention basin at the corner of Rose Park Ln and 1700N), but this irrigation was never
extended for the remainder of that stretch of road or utilized. This lane is highly visible from I-215
with large volumes of traffic going to the beautiful soccer fields just a few feet up the road. This has
increased the traffic and speed of that traffic on Rose Park Ln. Safety is an issue as cars will continue
to use highway speeds down that road upward of 60 MPH.
Fixing the trail and planting trees with irrigation on Rose Park Ln would greatly improve community
morale and safety for the families that walk with their children and pets, and bike and run on this
trail. Adding trees along Rose Park Ln will also help in reducing air pollution, high summer heat, and
traffic noise, also repairing/replacing the sidewalk to make it ADA-compliant would also create
handicap accessibility for residents who are currently unable to utilize this walkway.
This area has been neglected for a long time and needs reinvestment to provide shade, accessibility,
and other environmental benefits to this neighborhood.
1
Maintenance
3
Page 26
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 480,000$ 480,000$
MAYOR 480,000$ 480,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,765,000$
CDCIP 140,000$ 140,000$
MAYOR -$ -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 388,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
50 Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup
Constituent Application, Public Lands Department
I wanted to bring to your attention a specific area of the river that is in great need of
improvements and enhancements. It is a city owned parcel at the end of Concord St. and
Pierpont Ave. It often goes unmaintained and has been a section with a lot of criminal issues
and illegal dumping. The city recently added a gate, a no camping sign, and a no trespass sign.
This is an area where people used to be able to walk down to the river and engage with nature;
however, due to its unmaintained and underutilized nature, it has been closed off by the city
and has been home to multiple encampments recently.
The city owns a large piece of land that accesses the river from Concord. In addition it owns the
parcels across the river to the east and west. I believe this would be the perfect location for a
bridge over the river. The neighbors in this area do not have an easy access to the Jordan river
trail, or a good way to cross I-80 as a pedestrian. If neighbors want to travel north, they have to
walk down to the freeway overpass on Navajo and down 200S to connect to the trail. Or they
have to walk out to 300 S and go east to connect to the trail at Alzheimer's Park.
Because the city owns land on both sides of the river, it should be a much easier place to work
with. Instead of a fenced off access point I would love to see the city make improvements that
the community can use.
The scope of the request will be 1) create a new public nature space on the west side of
Alzheimer's park/Jordan River, 2) add improvements to the walkway on 300 S to increase
comfort and walkability to the JRT, and 3) conduct a feasibility study for a bridge connecting
the east and west sides of the river.
51 Nature Park at Bonneville
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Nature Park at Bonneville will turn two and a half acres of unusable fire hazard into a small
nature park for the surrounding residents. We have the support of SLC's Golf Division for this
project (see Supporting Documents).
This area has been used by three generations of children in this neighborhood, but was recently
fenced off for safety reasons. It has a large amount of dead wood, creating a significant fire
hazard to neighbors in the area. We see evidence of "campsites" and drug paraphernalia left
behind; as well as large piles of concrete and asphalt chunks, dead and broken trees from the
a small nature park with a shredded bark walking path utilizing bark chips from dead wood
processed from the area; three benches, access to water to establish drought-tolerant native
material will be cleaned out, but not all - leaving a natural area on the northerwestern side for
our native wildlife habitat and protection. We will also work to protect the habitat of great
horned owls and various hawks living in the area. We propose two entrances: (1) south end of
2200 East, (2) east side of Connor St. at property line to the course. The south end is at the
current Maintenance Building and will have no access to the nature park from this area. Also
included is the addition of native trees, shrubs and pollinator plants utilizing free or low-cost
programs like the Utah Pollinator Habitat Program, currently offering 90-900 seedlings for
free each September. This will require access to water but not an irrigation system. The end
result will offer a safe, natural area for both adults and children to enjoy nature and her wildlife
habitat in our highly developed.
52 Safe Side Streets North Extension
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The project being submitted is a "completely separate project" to a past CIP project within the
bl k h h id f h bl k i h " f id j "
Park - Maintenance 2
Park - New 6
Street - Safety 7
Page 27
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 117,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
same block. The south side of the block is the "Sugar House Safe Side Streets Project."
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2023/12/08/safesidestreets/
streets involved are:
1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South)
Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 East
Wilson Avenue 1000 East - 1100 East
1000 East is an iconic byway and a prime destination for active transportation. At the south
end of the block is the heart of Sugar House and the north end a children's destination,
Westminster Park. And further north is an elementary school, Emerson Elementary.
The goal for the residents of this area is to decrease cut through traffic and slow vehicle speeds.
Also to promote safer streets for bicyclists, walkers, joggers, skateboarders and alike. The street
calming efforts within this block are not systemic. The residents of this area are asking for the
completion of street calming within the neighborhood.
*** The residents of the project area, accept the possibility that this project may have to be
achieved in sections. If so, we would like 1000 East between 1700 South to Garfield Avenue
Also, the majority of active transportation is on that byway as well.
53 Milk Block Bike Spa
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
A full service bike "spa" between Harvey Milk Blvd. bike path and sidewalk on the North side of
the Milk Block (416 E 900 S) and a similar style but slightly larger bike spa at the SLC
Downtown Library located to the SE of the main Library building to replace the existing
"alphabet" bike rack.
The purpose of these spas is for the City to go beyond merely accommodating bicyclists and
provide safe, secure, and convenient bicycle parking that will encourage citizens to leave their
car at home and ride to work, to do shopping, or to recreate. This project will accelerate and/or
accentuate City bicycle infrastructure and plans.
CW
Page 28
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 230,600$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 120,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This is a safe street crossing and air quality improvement project. Utilizing crossing signals and
appropriate road markings, the crosswalk will provide a safe signalized crossing for an
neighborhood area where k-12 school age children and community recreation users cross a 5
quality and heat island effect on the street. As of July 2024, the surface temperature of the
street was measured at 137 degrees Fahrenheit
56 1200 East Traffic Circles
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Two Traffic Circles, featuring appropriate art, to be built at two busy residential intersections
enhance vehicular, cycling and pedestrian safety with traffic calming. This project proposes to
follow the NACTO guidlines.
54 Main & Broadway Shade
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Improve and enhance the sidewalk and parking median along the north side of 300 South (ie.
Broadway in front of the historic Clift Building) extending from the alley for the 222 parking
garage to Main Street. This stretch of sidewalk lacks the greenery and other shade and seating
options that are found on most streets within the Central Business District. These deficiencies
would be addressed with planting of trees, placement of planters and bench seating. Safety
issues for bicyclists and scooters would be addressed with larger planters and street paint to
clearly delineate car lanes from the bicycle lane at the corner of Main Street.
4
6
Street - Safety 4
Page 29
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 3,000,000$
CDCIP 2,760,500$ 2,760,500$
MAYOR 3,000,000$ 99,500$ 2,900,500$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 100,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 249,865$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Public Lands Department
Where the Civic Campus and Green Loop intersect, there is a valuable opportunity to create an
iconic and vibrant event space in the heart of downtown. This request of $3,000,000 is a 20%
of the projected project cost and serves as seed money for alternative funding sources. The
Green Loop project reimagines part of the City's underutilized public rights-of-way as
functional green space with nature-based solutions to improve the environment and human
well-being.
Transformation of the public right-of-way requires design and construction of both above-
ground improvements (sidewalks, paths, bikeways, plazas, roadway, forest, plantings, park
features, and rain gardens) and below-ground infrastructure (public and private utilities).
Project costs include design and construction of above-ground green space, roadway
reconstruction, and some utility (public and private) relocation on 200 East from
approximately 350 South to 550 South.
The intent of this application is to allocate funding to bring strategic segments of the Green
Loop to construction as early as 2026, particularly where there are timely opportunities to
leverage nearby active projects, grant funds, and/or philanthropy.
Since 2019, Salt Lake City's multi-departmental Green Loop project team, comprised of staff
from Community and Neighborhoods, the Mayor's Office, Public Lands, Public Services, and
Public Utilities has been collaborating to bring this complex project to reality. In 2024, concept
design for 200 East was completed. Further design for the Civic Block will integrate the Green
Loop with Library Square visioning and Washington Square security improvements.
4
58 Wasatch Dr & 2100 South Project
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The intersection of 2100 South and Wasatch Drive has become a safety concern to residents,
motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. Residential traffic calming attempts such as signs, parked
vehicles, and traffic cones have been unsuccessful at slowing motorists. The intersection poses
a safety risk with its awkwardly placed stop signs and poor sight lines for safely crossing as a
pedestrian or cyclist. We are requesting your consideration for the installation of two Speed
Cushions and a Speed Radar Sign in advance of this intersection. We believe that installing this
traffic calming near the intersection will reduce the speeds of vehicles and thus reduce the risk
of accidents and enhance cyclist and pedestrian safety.
59 Federal Heights Safety Upgrades
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
We need speedbumps placed on key streets that receive unabated traffic, particularly downhill
streets. We receive a high volume of cut-through traffic going to and from the University of
Utah and the hospitals. Vehicles are consistently going 35mph+ on our streets, and the
cars flying down them and speeds sometimes 2x the speed limit. Many families, including ours,
on Sigsbee have young children and we're persistently worried that an accident is going to
occur, resulting in material harm to ours or neighboring kids.
6
3
Page 30
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 280,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This application is for a community Garden to be constructed on 700 East & Coatsville Ave.
Parcel is located on a UDOT parcel on the north side of Coatsville Ave. This is the second year
this project has been submitted. This is a vacant lot owned by UDOT in which SLC has a
contract to maintain it. One of the reasons the application was not approved last year because
of the uncertainly of the extent of the property required for the construction of the 700 East
Shared Use Path. That project is in the final stages of construction so that variable is now
known and UDOT would now be in a position to allow the project on the property.
Wasatch Community Gardens also was not sure they had the resources to manage another
garden last year because they were committed to open 2 very large west side community
gardens this year. The earliest this garden would become operational is the spring of 2026, so I
am confident that the bandwidth will be available.
One might point out that there is already a community garden at 1700 South and 700 East but
it is limited by the fact that they are numerous large trees on that lot so about 50% of it is
shaded for all or a portion of the day, hence it is not a very productive garden. I would estimate
that to be about 50% based on the area that is used for gardens and what is being grown there.
A corollary to this application would be to relocate that existing garden to this new proposed
and much more productive location. The local community council has a master plan on green
space in the neighborhood and the location of the existing community garden would make a
much better dog park. The green space at the recently closed Hawthorne Elementary School,
would hopefully become a new SLC neighborhood park. This would be in conjunction with a
new dog park across 1700 South and a productive community garden another half block south
of it.
5
Page 31
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Council District#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
Project Category
REQUEST 150,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 66,015,717$
CDCIP 40,180,000$ 7,000,000$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,000,000$
MAYOR 44,193,236$ 10,413,236$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,600,000$
COUNCIL -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
TOTALS
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Since 2016, the neighborhoods surrounding East High School, as per current Salt Lake City
Government protocol, have recorded and reported numerous violent incidents including, but
not limited to, groups of East High School students as well as unrecognized groups of adults
and high-school aged students circling the neighborhood in vehicles before coming to the
neighborhood and jumping unsuspecting students and/or engaging in large (60+) assault with
battery; gangs of street racers weaponizing vehicles to threaten and intimidate other students
by side and in tandem) and other high speed driving around the schools and along the 800 and
900 S corridors from 900 East to 1400 East. I have personally been working with several
specialized City departments to conceive of an engineering plan to restore safety, livability, and
hospitality to this high impact area in the nexus of East High School that will serve residents,
business, as well as predominantly westside students that visit these neighborhoods during the
school day. The departments that have been consulted are Transportation, Enforcement, and
Salt Lake City Police Department, the Mayor's Office and Council member Mano, as well as the
District Attorney's office to make sure that we are working within a legal and civil rights-
as East High School faces 1300 East and has a zero access policy to a from campus to the rear
two-thirds of campus making it impossible for the SLCSD staff to respond to violent road-
related issues that owned and operated by Salt Lake City. The challenge we face is that none of
the stakeholders within the city or school district are on the same page in addressing these
issues. What is needed is a planning effort that brings all stakeholders together to solve these
critical issues.
62 Vacant and Leased City-owned Property Maintenance
Real Estate Services Division
Note there is a total of $700,000 of which $200,000 is the general maintenance base budget
separate from the competitive portion of CIP and used for repairs, security, and utilities at
vacant and leased city-owned properties. The Administration is requesting that the $500,000
for development specific uses in FY2026 be split into two parts:
- Up to $400,000 for building improvements to the Fisher Mansion that may include historic
rehabilitation, building systems, and structural improvements.
- Up to $100,000 for expenses related to predevelopment costs and development of a
community benefits agreement for the Fleet Block.
CW
Maintenance
CW
Page 32
Categorized CIP Project Applications Project #Request
Mayor
Recommendation
Bridge - Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000
Bridge Preservation Program 10 1,000,000 1,000,000
Curb/Gutter - Maintenance 954,720 -
East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South & 400-
500 South)25 954,720 -
Facilities - Maintenance 1,000,000 500,000
Facilities - New 1,614,568 1,078,807
Facilities - Maintenance 1,980,868 1,980,868
Multi-Modal - Maintenance 100,000 100,000
Multi-Modal - New 2,094,724 855,724
Park - Maintenance 22,282,752 13,163,561
11 1,107,117 1,107,117
Park - New 6,875,000 3,590,000
Sidewalk - Maintenance 750,000 750,000
Sidewalk - New 1,730,600 1,500,000
Street - Maintenance 12,211,610 9,874,276
Street - Safety 7,816,698 4,300,000
43 525,000 -
Street - Signals 4,604,177 4,500,000
33 104,177 -
Transit 1,000,000 1,000,000
Grand Total 66,015,717 44,193,236
Mayor’s Recommended
Capital Improvement
Program Budget
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Page:
FY 2025-26 PROJECTS OVERVIEW 1
FY 2025-26 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 5
DEBT SERVICE CIP
DEBT SERVICE CIP 19
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES 23
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026 27
Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms 28
Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 29
Street Reconstruction 2026 30
700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road)31
Public Way Concrete 32
Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System Replacement 33
20 Acres of Irrigation System Replacements & Supportive Waterwise Landscaping 34
Bridge Preservation Program 35
Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical Infrastructure Upgrades 36
Facilities Replacement and Renewal 37
Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026 38
Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit 39
Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026 40
Street Overlays 2026 41
Jordan Park Skatepark Expansion 42
GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2026; Bike Rack Replacements 2026 43
Livable Streets Program 2026 44
1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street 45
Pedestrian Safety / HAWK at Richmond St. and Zenith Ave.46
Three Sport Court Replacements 47
Playground Replacements 48
Central City 600 East Byway Safety Improvements 49
Riverside Basketball Court Renovation 50
PSB EV Charging Expansion 51
Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks 52
Playground Shade 53
Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements 54
Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup 55
Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation 56
Cost Overrun 57
Percent for Art 58
Table of Contents
ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS
Dock 3 Door Replacement 62
Gateway Skybridge Door Replacement 63
34R Glycol Pump Station Modifications 64
Taxiways A&B Modifications (Design)65
Truck Water Fill Station 66
SVRA Control Tower NEPA & Siting Study 67
SVRA Dual Taxiways 68
Economy Lot Pavement Reconstruction (Design)69
Economy Lot Pavement Rehabilitation 70
Economy Parking Lot EVCS 71
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure - Phase V (FY26)72
PAB Electrical Equipment Upgrade 73
Rental Car Overflow Storage Lot Improvements 74
Rental Car QTA Equipment Replacement 75
Rental Car Reallocation 76
SkyChef Building Demolition 77
2300 West Realignment 78
NWS Sewer Main Replacement 79
Terminal Drive Resurfacing 80
GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS
Cart Path Improvements 82
Irrigation Improvements - Rose Park 83
Irrigation Improvements - Nibley Park 84
Maintenance Buildings 85
Maintenance Equipment 86
New Construction Projects 87
On Course Restroom 88
Parking Lot Surfacing 89
Pump Replacement 90
Range Fencing 91
Roof Repair 92
Tee Box Leveling 93
Windows & Doors 94
Retaining Wall on #1 and Stairs on #10 95
PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
Water Main Replacements 98
Treatment Plant Improvements 99
Deep Pump Wells 100
Meter Change-Out Program 101
Table of Contents
Water Service Connections 102
Storage Reservoirs 103
Culverts, Flumes & Bridges 104
Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)105
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)106
Treatment Plants 107
Collection Lines 108
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)109
Storm Drain Lines 110
Riparian Corridor Improvements 111
Landscaping 112
Storm Water Lift Stations 113
Detention Basins 114
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Stormwater Utility)115
Street Lighting Projects 116
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS
City Creek Daylighting 118
Japantown Art 119
900 S Freeway Underpass Infrastructure 120
Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank
CIP Summary
Documents
This page intentionally left blank
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction and Overview
Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed
to replace or expand the City’s public infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the
annual infrastructure improvements and budget schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget.
The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development & Capital Improvement Program
(CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district. The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety
of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor.
The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for
the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the
Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and
adopting the final CIP budget. The details of the recommended FY2025-26 CIP Budget are included in this book.
In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital
improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and
maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a
positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into
the decision-making process.
Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the
departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs.
The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress. All projects older than three years that do not show
significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready
projects. The Administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because
the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City’s capital improvement projects, the
City analyzes the effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio.
Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017 / Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management
Policies
Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify
the expectations of the City’s Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in
determining how to best address the City’s deferred and long-term maintenance needs.
Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include:
– A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a
recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not
include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches.
– A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of $50,000 or more, with few exceptions.
– Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and
minimize maintenance and replacement costs.
– Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are
mandated by the state and/or federal government; and provide for the renovation of existing facilities
resulting in the preservation of the community’s prior investment.
– The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an
existing balance remains on a completed project.
– Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding).
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
1 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Allocations
Salt Lake City’s FY2025-26 adopted CIP budget appropriates $267,450,797 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class “C”
Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax Funds, Community Reinvestment Agency Funds,
Enterprise Funds, and other public and private funds.
The City’s General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a
payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project. The Library Fund covers the Local
Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the
construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through
the City’s Class C Road fund. Funds to pay debt service, equaling $13,077,844, are included in the adopted annual
budget.
Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City’s capital improvement projects.
Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City.
A total of $12,255,724 was recommended for Transportation projects. Of this amount, the budget appropriates
$5,278,724 of Class C funds, $880,000 of Street Impact Fee funds, $900,000 of Funding our Future funds, and
$5,197,000 in ¼ Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax funding. Programs funded include Vision Zero Corridors & Safety
Improvements, Traffic Signal Replacement, Transit Capital, Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps, and Livable
Streets. Projects funded include GREENBike Federal Grant Match and Bike Rack Replacements, Pedestrian Safety
and Byway Safety Improvements.
The recommended budget for Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total
appropriation of $16,753,561 from the General Fund, Parks Impact Fee funds, and Funding our Future funds.
Projects funded include Park Restrooms, Accessible Design Upgrades, Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System
Replacement, Irrigation System Replacements & Waterwise Landscaping, Pavilion Replacement and Critical
Infrastructure Upgrades, Jordan Park Skatepark Expansion, Sport Court and Playground Replacements and
Renovations, Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements, Playground Shade, Rose Park Lane Beautification,
Trail, and Safety Improvements, Concord Street to Alzheimer’s Park Jordan River Cleanup, and Civic Campus and
Green Loop Implementation.
Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of $14,683,951. Of this
amount, the budget appropriates $3,059,675 from the General Fund, $5,221,276 of Class C funding, $1,000,000 of
Funding our Future funds, and $5,403,000 in ¼ Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax funding. Programs funded include Street
Reconstruction, 700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road), Public Way Concrete, Bridge Preservation, Facilities
Replacement and Renewal, Street Overlays, 1200 East Curb, Gutter, and Repaving, and Public Safety Building Electric
Vehicle Charging Expansion.
Capital Projects
The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2025-26 Budget. These pages provide a
breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project. The total for capital
projects in the FY2025-26 budget is $43,693,236.
Enterprise Fund Projects
The City’s enterprise functions; Airport, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Street Lighting, Community Reinvestment,
Refuse Collection and Golf – are by nature, very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to
maintain the integrity and capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality.
Airport Fund – The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports (the
Airport) has 674 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports
that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience.
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
2 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The Fiscal Year 2026 budget continues to see modest growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures.
The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) continues to benefit from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)
grants awarded for FY2025. The BIL grants, along with the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants, and the
Airport Terminal Program (ATP) grants, will continue to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital
infrastructure projects that are moving from design into actual construction. The Airport will be bringing on ten
gates located on Concourse B in October 2025. These openings bring additional staffing and maintenance staff
requirements while seeing the complete elimination of the remaining hardstand operations.
The developed FY26 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues
that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These
projects include Phase III and Phase IV of construction of gates on Concourse B. In addition, critical projects found
in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities
keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are
projecting into future years.
Public Utilities Funds – Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each operates as an independent enterprise fund, meaning they are not supported by tax dollars. Instead, funding comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally grants or subsidized loans from state or federal sources.
To support major infrastructure investments, SLCDPU is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act
(WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Additionally, a Building Resilient
Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant is supporting the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction, and
an American Rescue Plan Act grant is financing the floodplain remapping project in the Granary District Floodplain.
Utility rates, set based on cost-of-service analysis, ensure that customers pay for the services they receive. Given
the infrastructure-heavy nature of these utilities, SLCDPU relies on a long-term project and financing strategy to
effectively manage its assets.
The capital budget is organized by fund, with detailed cost centers under each. For Fiscal Year 2026, SLCDPU is
managing over 82 capital projects across its four utility funds, in addition to ongoing projects. Many capital projects
span multiple fiscal years – often designed in one year and built in the next. The budget prioritizes high-need
projects identified through the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP).
The largest project underway is the replacement of the water reclamation facility, with estimated completion in
Fiscal Year 2027. Other system components are also aging and will require increased investment in the coming
years. For instance, SLCDPU’s three water treatment plants, built in the 1950s and early 1960s, are due for major
updates. City Creek’s reconstruction is scheduled for completion in 2027, while planning is underway for two
remaining plants.
SLCDPU’s capital planning is shaped by a complex mix of federal, state, and local regulations, as well as water rights
and exchange agreement obligations – all of which influence project priorities and timeline.
CRA Funds – The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The CRA
utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the
City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The CRA’s primary
source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the
specific budget account.
The CRA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure
projects. As part of the CRA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year
funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent
on the CRA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on
the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The CRA fiscal year 2026 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects:
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
3 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
• City Creek Daylighting: Allocates an additional $100,000 towards implementation of the daylighting of City
Creek along the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. The total project, aimed at improving access to
nature, water quality, and flood mitigation, is estimated to cost between $15 million and $20 million.
• Japantown Art: Designates an additional $37,733 for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art
installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s
heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for
both residents and visitors.
• 900 S Freeway Underpass Infrastructure: Designates a total of $50,000 for improvements to the Mead
Avenue underpass. The initiative aims to support installation of improvements to enhance open space and
encourage activation.
Sustainability Fund - Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance with federal, state and local regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within
the permitted footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no projects for FY 2025-26.
Golf Fund - The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects.
In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9
holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future
projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $13,612,735 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY26. The Golf Division is in the
middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box
areas at each course and has allocated $60,000 in FY26 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division is in the middle of
a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated $625,000 for
FY26. The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course
($5,500,000) and Nibley Park golf course ($3,000,000). Other significant projects include new maintenance buildings
at Bonneville and Rose Park, on-course restrooms at 4 golf courses and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf
course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using
$501,328 in FY26 to purchase additional equipment.
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
4 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Deb
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Debt Service Projects
Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond $ 739,038 $ 739,038
Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond $ 1,966,520 $ 1,966,520
Sales Tax Series 2019A Bond $ 352,975 $ 352,975
Sales Tax Series 2022B Bond $ 2,003,475 $ 2,003,475
Sales Tax Series 2022C Bond $ 3,090,966 $ 3,090,966
ESCO Debt Service to Bond $ 924,700 $ 924,700
Fire Station #3 $ 675,575 $ 675,575
Fire Station #14 $ 496,950 $ 496,950
General Obligation Series 2025 Bond $ 2,827,645 $ 2,827,645
Debt Service Projects Total $ 13,077,844 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 13,077,844
Ong
o
i
n
g
Ongoing Projects
Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000
City Leases $ 560,000 $ 560,000
Facilities Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Urban Trail Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Public Lands Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 195,573 $ 445,573
Vacant City-owned Property Maintenance and Development
$ 700,000 $ 700,000
Ongoing Projects Total $ 2,460,000 $ 195,573 $ — $ — $ 200,000 $ — $ 2,855,573
Oth
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Other Ongoing
Public Services- ESCO County Steiner $ 155,300 $ 155,300
Public Services - Memorial House $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Other Ongoing $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 175,300 $ 175,300
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
5 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
New
C
I
P
New/Maintenance Projects Total
Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026
$ 230,000 $ 2,070,000 $ 2,300,000
Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms $ 1,596,000 $ 456,000 $ 2,052,000
Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
$ 1,370,929 $ 1,314,000 $ 2,684,929
Street Reconstruction 2026 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,790,676 $ 600,000 $ 4,390,676
700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road)$ 1,680,600 $ 1,680,600
Public Way Concrete $ 750,000 $ 750,000
Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System Replacement
$ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
20 Acres of Irrigation System Replacements & Supportive Waterwise Landscaping
$ 1,007,515 $ 10,000 $ 1,017,515
Bridge Preservation Program $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical Infrastructure Upgrades
$ 1,005,117 $ 102,000 $ 1,107,117
Facilities Replacement and Renewal $ 1,980,868 $ 1,980,868
Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026 $ 3,600,000 $ 400,000 $ 4,000,000
Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit
$ 900,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000
Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026
$ 150,000 $ 1,350,000 $ 1,500,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
6 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
New
C
I
P
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Street Overlays 2026 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000
Jordan Park Skatepark Expansion $ 90,000 $ 90,000
GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2026; Bike Rack Replacements 2026
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
Livable Streets Program 2026 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000
1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street $ 303,000 $ 303,000
Pedestrian Safety / HAWK at Richmond St. and Zenith Ave.
$ 500,000 $ 500,000
Three Sport Court Replacements $ 630,000 $ 630,000
Playground Replacements $ 385,000 $ 385,000
Central City 600 East Byway Safety Improvements $ 678,724 $ 177,000 $ 855,724
Riverside Basketball Court Renovation $ 79,500 $ 450,500 $ 530,000
PSB EV Charging Expansion $ 1,078,807 $ 1,078,807
Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks
$ 2,597,000 $ 2,597,000
Playground Shade $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements
$ 680,000 $ 680,000
Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup
$ 480,000 $ 480,000
Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation $ 99,500 $ 2,900,500 $ 3,000,000
New Projects Total $ 9,913,236 $ 3,000,000 $ 9,680,000 $ — $ 43,693,236
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
7 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Cost Overrun $ 223,171 $ 223,171
Percent for Art $ 167,378 $ 167,378
Total General Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects
$ 25,841,629 $ 3,195,573 $ 9,680,000 $ 175,300 $ 60,192,502
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
8 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Air
p
o
r
t
Airport CIP Projects
Dock 3 Door Replacement $ 400,000 $ 400,000
Gateway Skybridge Door Replacement $ 1,517,000 $ 1,517,000
34R Glycol Pump Station Modifications $ 727,000 $ 727,000
Taxiways A&B Modifications (Design)$ 3,006,000 $ 3,006,000
Truck Water Fill Station $ 260,000 $ 260,000
SVRA Control Tower NEPA & Siting Study $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
SVRA Dual Taxiways $ 5,443,000 $ 5,443,000
Economy Lot Pavement Reconstruction (Design)
$ 374,000 $ 374,000
Economy Lot Pavement Rehabilitation $ 1,578,000 $ 1,578,000
Economy Parking Lot EVCS $ 1,062,500 $ 1,062,500
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure - Phase V (FY26)
$ 1,176,000 $ 1,176,000
PAB Electrical Equipment Upgrade $ 745,000 $ 745,000
Rental Car Overflow Storage Lot Improvements $ 1,199,000 $ 1,199,000
Rental Car QTA Equipment Replacement $ 3,208,000 $ 3,208,000
Rental Car Reallocation $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
SkyChef Building Demolition $ 2,106,000 $ 2,106,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
9 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Air
p
o
r
t
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
2300 West Realignment $ 2,196,000 $ 2,196,000
NWS Sewer Main Replacement $ 199,000 $ 199,000
Terminal Drive Resurfacing $ 2,606,000 $ 2,606,000
Total Airport CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 30,302,500 $ 30,302,500
Gol
f
Golf CIP Projects
Cart Path Improvements $ 625,000 $ 625,000
Irrigation Improvements - Rose Park $ 5,500,000 $ 5,500,000
Irrigation Improvements - Nibley Park $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
Maintenance Buildings $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Maintenance Equipment $ 501,328 $ 501,328
New Construction Projects $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
On Course Restroom $ 600,000 $ 600,000
Parking Lot Surfacing $ 398,040 $ 398,040
Pump Replacement $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Range Fencing $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Roof Repair $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Windows & Doors $ 184,695 $ 184,695
Retaining Wall on #1 and Stairs on #10 $ 70,000 $ 70,000
Total Golf CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 14,114,063 $ 14,114,063
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
10 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Pub
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Public Utilities CIP Projects
Water Main Replacements $ 5,950,000 $ 5,950,000
Treatment Plant Improvements $ 63,140,000 $ 63,140,000
Deep Pump Wells $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Meter Change-Out Program $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Water Service Connections $ 4,950,000 $ 4,950,000
Storage Reservoirs $ 1,760,000 $ 1,760,000
Culverts, Flumes & Bridges $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)$ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)$ 450,000 $ 450,000
Treatment Plants $ 50,915,000 $ 50,915,000
Collection Lines $ 21,965,000 $ 21,965,000
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)$ 350,000 $ 350,000
Storm Drain Lines $ 4,897,000 $ 4,897,000
Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Landscaping $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Storm Water Lift Stations $ 1,837,000 $ 1,837,000
Detention Basins $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Stormwater Utility)
$ 300,000 $ 300,000
Street Lighting Projects $ 1,440,000 $ 1,440,000
Total Public Utilities CIP Projects $—$—$—$—$—$162,654,000 $ 162,654,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
11 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
CRA
Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) CIP Projects
City Creek Daylighting $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Japantown Art $ 37,733 $ 37,733
900 S Freeway Underpass Infrastructure $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Total CRA CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 187,733 $ 187,733
Sus
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Sustainability CIP Projects
No Projects $ —
Total Sustainability CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 207,258,296 $ 207,258,296
GRAND TOTAL $ 25,841,629 $ 3,195,573 $ 9,680,000 $ 207,433,596 $ 267,450,798
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES
¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
12 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Salt Lake City
Impact Fee Summary
Fiscal Year 2026
PROJECT Parks Impact Fees Streets Impact Fees TOTAL
Impact Fee Projects
Imp
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026 $ 230,000 $ 230,000
Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms $ 456,000 $ 456,000
Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design $ 1,314,000 $ 1,314,000
Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical Infrastructure Upgrades $ 102,000 $ 102,000
Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026 $ 400,000 $ 400,000
Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026 $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Riverside Basketball Court Renovation $ 450,500 $ 450,500
Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks $ 2,597,000 $ 2,597,000
Playground Shade $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup $ 480,000 $ 480,000
Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation $ 2,900,500 $ 2,900,500
Total Impact Fee by Type $ 8,800,000 $ 880,000 $ 9,680,000
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
13 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Salt Lake City Unfunded Projects Fiscal Year 2026
Unf
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Constituent
East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South and 400- 500 South)
1200 East between 300-400 South and 1200 East between 400-500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 954,720 $ 954,720
Constituent Poplar Grove 500 S Traffic Calming 900 West to the Jordan River Trail on 500 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 475,000 $ 475,000
Constituent Nevada Street Reconstruction Nevada Street from Redondo North to Garfield, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 932,000 $ 932,000
Constituent Slow Down Liberty Wells South 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E between 1700 S and 2100 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Constituent Downtown Farmers Market - Upgraded Electrical Service
Median on 300 South between 300 West and 400 West 350 W 300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84101
$ 240,000 $ 240,000
Constituent Texas Street Replacement 1874 to 1977 S Texas Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 812,500 $ 812,500
Constituent Sweet Streets Bike Network Gap Filling 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 693,000 $ 693,000
Constituent
East Central Community Council Proposal for Pedestrian Safety Measures - Solar Powered Pedestrian Activated Flashers
800 & 1200 East 300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 104,177 $ 104,177
Constituent Continuing Fisher Mansion Stabilization, Restoration & Site Improvements
1206 West 200 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Constituent Neighborhood Alley Way Repavement (#4195) / Repave Alley #4195
Alley #4195 between 1100 East and 1200 East, Approx. 875 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 324,000 $ 324,000
Constituent Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff
The neighborhood that is generally bounded by Parleys Way (on the south), Nevada Street (on the west), 2500 E (on the east), and Blaine Avenue (on the north), Salt Lake City, UT 84108
$ 403,010 $ 403,010
Constituent Intersection Daylighting with Parking for Bikes and Scooters Citywide $ 429,000 $ 429,000
Constituent First Encampment Park 1704 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 176,635 $ 176,635
Public Services Plaza 349 EV Charging Expansion 349 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 611,879 $ 611,879
Constituent Glendale Traffic Calming
800 West (between 1300s and 800s), Emery Street W (between California and Indiana Avenue), and Navajo Street (between Illinois and Indiana Avenues), Salt Lake City, UT 84104
$ 485,837 $ 485,837
Constituent 1700 East Asphalt and Fence 2229 to 2283 South 1700 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 $ 93,500 $ 93,500
Constituent
Glendale Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety Improvement RRFB revision to HAWK signal at the California Ave/Concord St Intersection
California Ave / Concord St (EB), Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 $ 525,000 $ 525,000
Engineering Alleyway Improvements 2026 Citywide $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Constituent Marmalade Gateway Roundabout 300 North 200 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 322,996 $ 322,996
Constituent Repave Alley Area between 3rd & 4th Aves and Virginia and Alta Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 163,000 $ 163,000
Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Total
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
14 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Unf
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Constituent Nature Park at Bonneville Bonneville Golf Course, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 2,765,000 $ 2,765,000
Constituent Safe Side Streets North Extension
1000 East between 1700 South and Garfield Avenue, Blaine Avenue at 900 East to 1100 East, and Wilson Avenue at 1000 East to 1100 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84105
$ 388,000 $ 388,000
Constituent Milk Block Bike Spa
416 E 900 S, Slat Lake City, UT 84111 and210 East 400 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
$ 117,000 $ 117,000
Constituent Main & Broadway Shade 10 W Broadway, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 $ 230,600 $ 230,600
Constituent Sunnyside Avenue and Amanda Ave Safe Crossing
Sunnyside Avenue (850 South) and Amanda Avenue (1475 East), Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Constituent 1200 East Traffic Circles 1200 East 300 & 400 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 120,000 $ 120,000
Constituent Wasatch Dr & 2100 South Project 2100 South Wasatch Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Constituent Federal Heights Safety Upgrades Sigsbee Avenue and Military Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 249,865 $ 249,865
Constituent 700 East/Coatsville Ave Community Garden 700 East and Coatsville Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 280,000 $ 280,000
Constituent East High Youth Safety Project 860 S 1200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Total Unfunded CIP Projects $ 13,596,719 $ 13,596,719
Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Total
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
15 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
This page intentionally left blank
Debt Service
Capital Improvement
Program
This page intentionally left blank
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$739,038 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds September 2014 October 1, 2034 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring,
constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property, and roads.
The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of $10,935,000. As of June 30, 2025, $6,410,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2034.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$1,966,520 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds June 2016 October 1, 2028 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the
Series 2009A Bonds. The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City
offices and other capital improvements within the City.
Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the
Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $21,715,000. As of June 30, 2025, $9,565,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2028.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$352,975 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 April 1, 2027 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of
the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the
Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown.
The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of $2,620,000. As of June 30, 2025, $665,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April
1, 2027.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2021 October 1, 2034 General Fund/Library
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021, were issued in December 2021 to refund a portion of
the Series 2013B Bonds and a portion of the LBA Series 2013A and 2014A Bonds.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
19 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The Series 2021 bonds were issued with a par amount of $15,045,000. A portion of the debt service is paid by the
Library for the LBA 2013A and 2014A (Glendale and Marmalade libraries). As of June 30, 2025, $13,065,000 in
principal remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is die semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2034.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds January 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund/CRA
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A, were issued in January 2022 to refund the Series
2012A Bonds. The Series 2012A Bonds were originally issued to fund the construction and improvement of various
City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard.
The Series 2022 A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,900,000. As of June 30, 2025, $7,050,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the CRA related to the North Temple
Viaduct project. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt
service and for the North Temple Boulevard portion.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2032.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$2,003,475 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2042 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022C
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$3,090,966 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B&C, were issued in November 2022 to finance all or a portion of
the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving capital improvement projects, including: City Cemetery irrigation
and road repairs and reconstruction; Pioneer Park; 600 North Corridor; new radio towers for City communication;
an upgrade of the electrical transformer at the Central Plant and emergency back-up generators; Westside railroad
quiet zones; Warm Spring Plunge structure stabilization; Smith's Ballpark; urban wood re-utilization equipment and
storage additions; and Fisher Mansion stabilization; and various other capital improvement program projects.
The Series 2022B bonds were issued with a par amount of $40,015,000. As of June 30, 2025, $40,015,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2042.
The Series 2022C bonds were issued with a par amount of $24,240,000. As of June 30, 2025, $20,295,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
20 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2032.
ESCO Lease Debt Service
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$96,600 Capital Lease December 2019 March 2026 General Fund
This lease provides energy-efficient equipment to Public Services Facilities Division.
ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$310,600 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient-equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of
this facility is shared 50% with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment.
ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$517,500 Capital Lease August 2012 March 2026 General Fund
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy-efficient equipment for City parks.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$496,950 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds March 2016 April 15, 2037 General Fund
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March
2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $6,755,000. As of June 30, 2025, $4,650,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature
on April 15, 2037.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$675,575 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds April 2017 April 15, 2038 General Fund
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April
2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project.
The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,115,000. As of June 30, 2025, $6,290,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on
April 15, 2038.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
21 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 April 1, 2038 CRA
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, were issued in October 2013 for the purpose
of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, and equipping a performing arts center and related
improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B.
The CRA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the CRA is unable to pay
any of the debt service, the City’s General Fund would be responsible for it.
The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000. As of June 30, 2025, $55,800,000 in principal remains
outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on
April 1, 2038.
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025
2026 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$2,827,645 Property Tax Revenue Bond TBD TBD General Fund
In November 2022, voters authorized the issuance of up to $85 million in general obligation bonds to fund eight
Parks, Trails, and Open Space projects. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2023 were sold in August 2023 as the
first issuance of the authorization. The City anticipates issuing $35 million par amount of bonds from such
authorization in 2025.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
22 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES
Crime Lab Rental Payments
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$600,000 General Fund
Yearly rental payments for Crime Evidence Lab.
City Lease Payments
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$560,000 General Fund
Yearly payments for City Leases.
Facilities Maintenance
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$350,000 General Fund
The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City’s building stock.
Urban Trail Maintenance
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$200,000 ¼ Cent Tax
These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails and trail segments
that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe
for all that use them and so they can be used year-round.
Public Lands Maintenance
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$250,000$195,573 General Fund & Funding Our Future
The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger failures in the City’s park stock.
Percent for Art
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$167,378 General Fund
To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, and other works of art. (1.5% of CIP)
Cost Overrun
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$223,171 General Fund
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
23 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
CIP Memorial House
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$20,000 Other - Rental
A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation.
Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use
of the funding is to be determined.
Vacant City-owned Property Maintenance and Development
2026 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$700,000 General Fund
Salt Lake City Corporation holds several properties in its real estate inventory that are not used for City functions
but that are either vacant or are leased to third parties. This fund is for the maintenance, security, and improvement
of these properties.
General Fund
Capital Projects
This page intentionally left blank
Project Title:Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in a city. While allcrashes cannot be avoided, proven safety measures can help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders. This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation and the federal Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A).
The Wasatch Front Regional Council recently completed a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the SS4A program, with Salt Lake City as a partner. The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake City where safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many are state highways, but some are local streets. Three priority corridors identified in the plan are Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. There are many additional corridors around the City that need safety investments.
Since 2020, Salt Lake City has averaged 19 traffic fatalities a year on surface streets (not including interstates), with approximately 45% of these being someone who was walking or bicycling. This program seeks targeted funds for corridors with significant crash histories, and with characteristics that can be made safer with infrastructure changes.
Proposal ID:487402
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $230,000 $230,000
1/4 Cent $2,070,000 $2,070,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
27 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Safe, Open, and Clean Park Restrooms
Project Address:Citywide, potential locations listed below
Project Description:
This project will fund the replacement of three failing restrooms (if fully funded) of Salt Lake City's 47 existing park restrooms. Detailed design will be based on recommendations from the FY 24/25 CIP-funded citywide restroom study (which is anticipated to be completed in 2026). This is a programmatic request that Public Lands intends to make each year.
Public engagement conducted for the 2019 Needs Assessment showed that the number one improvement requested for Public Lands, over all else, was safe, well-maintained and open restrooms. This project was ranked by the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board (PNUT Board) as the highest priority for funding this year.
Currently, some restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable either year-round or for portions of the year when they are intended to be open. New restrooms will be safer, easier to maintain, less susceptible to vandalism, open more often and more predictably, as well as be more welcoming for park users. The locations proposed for three potential restroom replacements from the following list will be based on asset condition, accessibility and ADA needs, investment equity, efficiencies with other projects to enable cost savings, and major safety concerns based on the Parks Division’s data as well as operations and maintenance staff experience. They may include:• Fairmont Park• Liberty Park (near the new Rotary Play Park)• Riverside Park (near 600 North)• Cottonwood Park• Jordan Park (near the skatepark)• Herman Franks Park (one of the two)
Proposal ID:487689
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $912,000 $1,596,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $456,000 $456,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased due to physical improvements to existing restrooms. If bathrooms are expected to be open year-round, maintenance may increase from the new baseline by approximately 1/3 annually.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
28 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design and the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is a federal civil rights law.
In this first round (of what Public Lands and the Mayor's Office anticipate will be a recurring and programmatic request based on the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (SETP), three types of park infrastructure improvements to meet standards would be possible within 10 parks (with at least one park in each Council District), if fully funded: (1) site arrival points; (2) pedestrian access routes; (3) playgrounds and accessible ground surfacing under play areas
If partially funded, it is highly recommended that the City funds all improvements required in one park before moving to the next park (and not partially funding multiple or all 10 parks). If funding is left over, additional replacement or repair of asphalt, concrete, wood, pavers, metal, or other structural materials for bridges, sidewalks, parking lots, trails, roads, and pavers within parks would ensure smooth, ADA-compliant surfaces for all.
Prioritization and selection of the 10 parks included in this first round's application were based on project readiness, public usage and engagement (see Appendix F, p. 28 of the SETP), severity of the issue, safety, and/or other elements of the SETP:Riverside Park, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center fields and playground, Jordan Park, 11th Ave Park, Lindsey Gardens Park, Victory Park, Ballpark Playground, Wasatch Hollow Park, Parley’s Way Park, Parley’s Historic Nature Park.
Failure to remove barriers excludes children and adults with disabilities from fully participating in park activities, further limiting their access to health and social benefits.
Proposal ID:487820
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,000,000 $1,370,929
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $1,314,000 $1,314,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Some improvements may minimally decrease maintenance needs, while some specific improvements (such as new poured-in-place play surfacing underneath playgrounds) will increase maintenance needs.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
29 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Street Reconstruction 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including street pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle, pedestrian and transit access improvements. The program meets all federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are always triggered with a complete reconstruction.
Proposal ID:487398
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $2,790,676 $2,790,676
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets $1,000,000 $1,000,000
5th 5th Tax $600,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
30 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road)
Project Address:700 North Street from Redwood Road to 2200 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
700 North is a vital transportation west side connection; from housing developments on Redwood to I-215 to industrial and airport general aviation. This project will not only repave the deteriorated street surface, but add pedestrian and transit enhancements and safety features, transforming the corridor for all users.The 700 North Corridor Transformation project was selected by the Wasatch Front Regional Council for construction funding in 2027. This CIP request will provide part of the local match ($1,680,600 required) in order to obtain $3,000,000 Federal funding programmed for this project.
Proposal ID:487559
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $1,680,600 $1,680,600
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No budget impact
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
31 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Public Way Concrete
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 5 years has averaged 63%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Proposal ID:487833
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $750,000 $750,000
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No budget impact
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
32 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System Replacement
Project Address:Liberty Park, 589 E 1300 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Project Description:
The aeration system at Liberty Lake in Liberty Park is in disrepair and is often non-functional. As a result, the water quality may become quite poor, and the lake is intermittently closed for the safety and well-being of all park visitors. The more-stagnant-than-desired water and shallow depth also increases water temperature, increasing the likelihood, frequency, and intensity of algal blooms, which are hazardous and harmful to park users, dogs, and wildlife within the area.
Repair of the aeration system, coupled with a complete dredging of the sediment at the bottom of Liberty Lake, will improve water quality of the lake, water quality of Red Butte Creek downstream of Liberty Park (and in turn the Jordan River), and improve user experience and the health of flora, fauna, and park visitors. It will also significantly reduce regular maintenance costs and obligations associated with regular failures and closures, and will reinvigorate recreational uses of the Lake, also contributing to economic success of the Liberty Park concessionaire and improving visitor experience. Replacement of the aeration system also includes upgrade of power infrastructure required for the new system.
If replacement is delayed, the lake will likely continue to see unexpected closures, the maintenance burden will be high (often an all-hands-on-deck operation when the system fails), and water quality and user experience in and near Liberty Park may continue to suffer until dredging and system replacement has been completed.
Proposal ID:487438
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased—anticipated decrease of $50,000 annually if fully funded.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
33 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:20 Acres of Irrigation System Replacements & Supportive Waterwise Landscaping
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This climate-forward project to replace up to 20 acres of aged irrigation systems will help shape a water and resource-conscious future for many of our parks and public lands. It has two essential parts: improve irrigation efficiency, and replace some turf areas with low-water, regionally-appropriate plantings. This is a programmatic request that Public Lands intends to make each year.
The environmental, infrastructure, and public lands benefits of these changes are far-reaching.
Improve irrigation efficiency: Many of our parks' and public lands' irrigation systems are 50-60 years old. They use more water and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Improved or completely new irrigation systems can help Salt Lake City build more resilient, shady, and enjoyable spaces in preparation for a hotter, drier future. New irrigation systems will use less water, require less maintenance, break less often, keep existing and future trees healthier, and last another 30+ years. During installation, projects may add trees and convert some turf landscaping to more waterwise options. These two strategies can significantly reduce water use and increase resiliency.
Where practicable, replace turf with low-water, regionally appropriate plantings: Updating irrigation systems is also an opportunity to identify and make changes to the different kinds of areas and plant cover that these systems irrigate in our parks and public lands. Low use and passive areas could be converted into regionally appropriate, waterwise plants requiring less maintenance. In some locations, there is still a need for conventional turf that can withstand heavy use, such as playfields. These areas should be irrigated separately for efficient use of water.
Proposed locations include passive turf areas that are currently not actively programmed in parks, natural areas, medians and islands. Please see location map for all locations.
Proposal ID:487828
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,007,515 $1,007,515
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $10,000 $10,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased; Exact expenses dependent on acres impacted
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
34 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Bridge Preservation Program
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Salt Lake City is responsible for 55 bridges. Twenty-three of those are vehicle bridges, most crossing either the Jordan River or the Surplus Canal. UDOT inspects these vehicle bridges every two years and provides the city with a basic condition report. The city is responsible for performing appropriate maintenance activities based on statements in the UDOT report. City Engineering has prepared an ongoing bridge maintenance strategy with the objective of extending the functional life of these structures, and extending the time between major repairs. The requested funds will be used to address needed repairs and routine maintenance.
Proposal ID:487543
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
35 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical Infrastructure Upgrades
Project Address:1330 E 2100 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
This project will fund Salt Lake City’s contractual obligation to match (with Salt Lake County) 50% of the capital costs for the following urgent improvements (in priority order) at Sugar House Park, per our 1957 contractual agreement:
1. Replacement of the Sugar Beet Pavilion (#4 of 7) and the remainder of Salt Lake City's portion of the total required SLC Dept of Public Utilities' stormwater impact fee (urgent for the construction of pavilions #2 and #3, already funded)2. Hidden Grove Ped Bridge Railing Replacement and Sidewalk Upgrades3. Culinary Waterline Study to determine replacement trajectory4. WeatherTRAK Irrigation System Upgrade to reduce water usage and conserve resources5. Parking Lot Resurfacing to improve vehicle access to 6 of the 7 pavilions6. Addition of playground shade structures near the Parley's Creek Pavilion playground (impact fee eligible)7. Spoke road resurfacing (north of the pond) to improve safety and predictability of the road and intersection
The completion of these projects is critical for the access, safety, inclusion, and enjoyment of Sugar House Park patrons and will deliver community benefits, support sustainability efforts, and continue Salt Lake City's and Salt Lake County's decades-long collaborative funding and management agreement.
In 1957, with the incorporation of Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City, and Salt Lake County made a contractual agreement to jointly own the park property and appropriate funds for facilities. The Sugar House Park Authority depends on these appropriations from the City and County to carry out the park's purpose as a very popular Regional Park. Salt Lake City's 50% investment in these capital projects delivers 100% benefits for Salt Lakers.
Proposal ID:487872
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,005,117 $1,005,117
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $102,000 $102,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Maintenance at the park is funded by Salt Lake County. It will likely decrease with replacement of the pavilion, bridge infrastructure, irrigation and parking lot, but the installation of shade structures will increase the County’s maintenance expenses.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
36 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Facilities Replacement and Renewal
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
The Facility Renewal and Deferred Asset Management Initiative for Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) is a targeted effort aligned with the 10-year plan. Our goal is to strategically manage the existing backlog of deferred assets by categorizing and prioritizing them based on building and component criticality. This involves dividing the current backlog into three equal parts, enabling us to address an approximately consistent number of assets per year. Additionally, we aim to proactively tackle 50% of incoming deferred assets to prevent further accumulation. This focused approach ensures efficient resource allocation and sets the foundation for sustained facility enhancement over the coming years.
Proposal ID:487881
Department:Public Services
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,980,868 $1,980,868
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decrease future maintenance and reduce operational expenses by installing more efficient units. Will also reduce maintenance calls/work orders.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
37 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Salt Lake City's Traffic Signal Replacement & Upgrade Program has been inadequately funded for years. Signalsthroughout the city are in failing condition, requiring patchwork repairs to electronics and wiring. Failing traffic signals are less obvious than potholes -- unless the signal pole rusts through and the signal falls over, which can happen.
More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor vehicle and bicycle traffic. The signal is then set on a simple timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting. This results in additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light running, and crashes. Failing signals require frequent staff attention to physical repairs and/or resetting the signal's computers.
For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements per year and 5upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years. Annual funding has been for only 0-2 signals, and the traffic signal system continues to deteriorate rapidly.
This financially constrained request of $4 million seeks to fund full replacement of 6 ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Based on the current costs of signals, this work may cost closer to $5 million and need to seek additional funds in FY27.
Proposal ID:487401
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $3,600,000 $3,600,000
Impact Fee Funds $400,000 $400,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
This project is expected to decrease the expenses of the Streets Division in maintaining aging signals.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
38 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and accessible first/last mile connections to transit. After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop amenities and maintains them for the life of the assets.
This program implements two of the key recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe, and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law, particularly when streets are repaved or reconstructed.
Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible "frequent service" brand and enhanced amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at selected bus stops throughout the city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit access and waiting experience. Some of the new shelters are now equipped with lighting, which will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are waiting.
Proposal ID:487404
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $100,000 $100,000
FOF Transit $900,000 $900,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to these projects. These otheragencies will be included in the planning and design process. Most bus stop maintenance is borne by UTA.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
39 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This program will implement one of five key moves identified in Connect SLC, the Citywide Transportation Plan(adopted by the City Council in 2024) -- to retrofit existing streets with walking and bicycling facilities as well as adding strategically selected segments of trails, to create a complete network. Recent opportunistic projects, including those in the 2018 streets bond, have made great progress. From the perspective of someone walking or bicycling, however, these new projects are not connected seamlessly to a network. People are already using these roadways without complete infrastructure – raising safety concerns. If these streets’ overall condition were graded for "completeness" instead of potholes, they would be "serious" to "failing." This annual program will fill these gaps.
Short segments of sidewalks are missing all over the city -- the equivalent of sidewalk OCI 0. This year's program is likely, for example, to address a missing sidewalk near a school on L Street in the Avenues and one or more missing sidewalks in the Glendale Neighborhood identified in a community-council created active transportation plan.
Existing roadways without bike infrastructure, despite having had a Complete Street policy for over 17 years, will be selected based on gaps in the network. Gaps will be addressed using inexpensive materials like paint, bollards, and/or separation provided by parked vehicles, similar to projects implemented in the last couple years on 200 East and 300 East. An emphasis will be placed on bike lanes with physical separation, where possible.
Proposal ID:486574
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $150,000 $150,000
¼ Cent $1,350,000 $1,350,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to these projects. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
40 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
1
Project Title:Street Overlays 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds the overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the level of deterioration where full reconstruction is required. Overlays include mill and overlay of street pavement, spot curb and gutter and sidewalk replacement, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. Overlays are of particular interest from a cost savings perspective, because streets of this condition are in their last possible years before a considerably more expensive, full reconstruction will become inevitable. This is analogous to an old house that needs its wooden siding replaced. A few more years of rot, and you will need to replace all the framing too. A lot more expensive. The program incorporates federal Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements, such as sidewalk curb ramps and bus stop access, which are triggered with an overlay project.
Proposal ID:487400
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent $3,500,000 $3,500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
41 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Jordan Park Skatepark Expansion
Project Address:1030 S 900 W Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
This application seeks funding to complete a study and detailed design to expand the Jordan Park Skatepark. The Glendale Neighborhood Council has already developed preliminary recommendations that will be incorporated into a more detailed design effort.
Nestled within the Glendale neighborhood of Salt Lake City lies a cultural cornerstone beloved by locals and renowned among skateboarders nationwide - Jordan Skatepark, affectionately known by users as "9th and 9th". For over 20 years, this iconic space has been a sanctuary for skaters, a hub for community building, and a vital thread in the fabric of Glendale. As Jordan Skatepark approaches its third decade of existence (typical life is approximately 25-35 years), the realities of time and use have begun to reveal cracks in its foundation. With a surge in popularity over the years, the park finds itself bursting at the seams, struggling to accommodate the ever-growing groups of skaters who flock to it.
Proposal ID:483234
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $90,000 $90,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
No budget impact; planning and design only.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
42 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2026; Bike Rack Replacements 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Salt Lake City's bike share system, GREENbike, has received nearly $860,000 in federal funds to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations and bikes. GREENbike's oldest equipment is 12+ years old, having been exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. Nearly half of the 50 Salt Lake stations are failing, with parts no longer available for repairs, after hundreds of thousands of uses with riders mashing buttons on stations and yanking or slamming bikes into docks. Stations may unexpectedly fail which can lead to personal safety concerns for people walking from a further station than anticipated. While GREENbike has been cobbling together stations out of old parts, they need to be replaced. The city’s $60,000 in CIP funding will be focused on bike stations, as the bikes are equipment and not eligible for CIP.
Bike racks and bike corrals on the public way are similar, city-owned assets that need capital replacement. Racks have been hit by cars, mangled, or simply rusted out. While this may seem minor, in at least one instance a rusted bike rack fell over, injuring a child and leading to a payout by the city. Bike racks are placed almost entirely by adjacent business owners’ requests; this program supports SLC’s small businesses.
Most of the city’s bike corrals, installed April to October to replace one car parking space with a bike rack for 10bicycles are damaged, may be unsafe to use, and do not make a good impression. This request includes $20,000 for racks and $20,000 for corrals. The priority is capital replacement. If funds allow, some new bike racks and corrals may be installed.
Proposal ID:487397
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $100,000 $100,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Utah BikeShare, a non-profit, is responsible for Maintenance and Operations of GREENbike stations, and expectsto experience lower costs. Bike rack capital replacements have no budget impact.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
43 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Livable Streets Program 2026
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to Transportation staff - speedingvehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in the areas most in need.
The Livable Streets Program addresses local, neighborhood streets and installs infrastructure designed to reinforce the posted 20 mile per hour speed limit. These treatments are selected with input from the local residents and businesses, and may include speed humps, mini-roundabouts, pedestrian bulb-outs, crosswalks, and other similar infrastructure.
This year's funding request is for three zones. This program is scalable; additional funding would allow Transportation to move through the 113 total zones more quickly. At the current rate of 3-4 zones per year, the program will take around 25-30 years to address all the areas of the city.
Proposal ID:487396
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to these projects. These otheragencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
44 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street
Project Address:1200 E Zenith Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side of road on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave and repave 1200 E between Crandall Ave and Zenith Ave.
Proposal ID:483282
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent $303,000.00 $303,000.00
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Increased
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
45 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Pedestrian Safety / HAWK at Richmond St. and Zenith Ave.
Project Address:1258 E Zenith Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Project Description:
This project, a constituent request, will install a HAWK signal at Zenith Avenue’s crossing of Richmond Street, a 5-lane street. The Transportation Division has confirmed that a HAWK is the appropriate treatment for this location. The constituent reports that the current pedestrian signs, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) are insufficient for a safe community experience of this crossing:
“My family walks across Richmond daily to get to the daycare on another corner. Many people, including kids,families, and elderly, walk across Richmond to get to daycare, parks, bus stops, the grocery store, and school -Richmond runs through the Nibley Park School District and the 213 bus, which services Highland High School,Westminster University, and the U, has north- and south-bound stops at Richmond and Zenith. Pedestrian traffic is only likely to increase as more apartment buildings and businesses are opened in the growing Brickyard area…. Drivers either don't notice or choose to disregard [the RRFBs]. My family and I often stand at the Zenith corner so long, waiting for all 5 lanes to stop, that we have to hit the pedestrian crosswalk button multiple times.”
“In 3 years, I've witnessed at least 5 car accidents, including a car rear-ending a stopped bus and a car rear ending another car that stopped for a pedestrian using the crosswalk. Our backyard fence along Richmond was destroyed because a car went through it. Countless drivers have almost hit other cars or pedestrians, including parents with strollers and kids. Neighbors who signed my CIP petition used the words "scary", "nightmare", and "dangerous" to describe crossing Richmond.”
Proposal ID:483184
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent $500,000 $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These otheragencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
46 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Three Sport Court Replacements
Project Address:Citywide, see potential locations below
Project Description:
This project proposes, but is not limited to, replacing or significantly rehabbing (depending on condition) two to three of Salt Lake City's approximately 110 concrete or asphalt sport courts used for tennis, pickleball, basketball, and other activities. This is a programmatic request that Public Lands intends to make each year.
This project will enhance recreational opportunities, prioritize community needs, and revitalize aging and/or failing facilities to create safe and engaging spaces for residents.
Possible court locations include: - Westpointe Park Basketball Court: The current basketball court is undersized for the community it serves and lacks proper play surfacing. The concrete and basketball standards are aging and in need of replacement. Expanding and updating the court will better meet community needs by providing modern, high-quality amenities to an underserved population. Adding an artistic element to the court design could further enhance the sense of community and support local identity. - Riverside Park Tennis Courts: These asphalt courts are showing significant wear, including cracks and peeling surfacing, which hinder playability. Replacing these courts with concrete surfaces and/or possibly converting some to pickleball courts (depending on community feedback) would improve accessibility, ensure safety, and offer a more enjoyable recreational environment for the community. - Liberty Park Volleyball Court: The volleyball court’s surface at Liberty Park is deteriorating. As part of a potential public/private partnership, this court may be converted into use for street soccer, or futsal. To support this transition, resurfacing and fencing the court is recommended to ensure a safe play area without disturbing surrounding uses.
If higher priority locations are not possible, alternate locations might include: Sunnyside Park’s basketball court, Warm Springs Park’s tennis courts, Madsen Park’s basketball court, and Victory Park/10th East Senior Center’s tennis courts.
Proposal ID:487355
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $630,000 $630,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased by approximately $5,000 annually if fully funded. Each court will decrease maintenance costs by approximately $1,700 annually.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
47 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Playground Replacements
Project Address:Citywide, see potential locations in description
Project Description:
This project will fund replacement of and upgrades to upgraded playground equipment and surfacing that are beyond their safe and serviceable life at up to four parks.
Playgrounds typically last 20-25 years. Salt Lake City has 79 playgrounds. Replacing four per year will ensure that children are safer, more engaged, and more consistently able to access play features near their homes and schools, and will allow Public Lands to not only maintain our asset replacement schedule but also reduce possible closures or expenses stopgaps. This is a programmatic request that Public Lands intends to make each year.
This programmatic, annual funding request includes playground, surfacing, minor design, permitting, and community engagement costs. If fully funded, up to four of the following playgrounds (in alphabetical order) will be selected based on asset condition, accessibility/ADA needs, efficiencies with other projects, and investment equity: 6th East Mini Park, 11th Avenue Park, Davis Park, Lindsey Gardens Park, Parley's Way Park, Pugsley Ouray Park, Riverside Park, Victory Park.
Proposal ID:487835
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $385,000 $385,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Decreased, depending on size and type of playground which will be determined during design
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
48 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Central City 600 East Byway Safety Improvements
Project Address:450 South 600 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84102
Project Description:
This project, a constituent request, will make safety improvements to 600 East between 900 South at Liberty Park to the connection to N Street at South Temple. This segment of 600 East is already a neighborhood byway.
600 East is one of Salt Lake City's first neighborhood byways; however, this section has seen few safety upgradesapart from improved crossings at 800 South and 900 South. In some parts of the route, there are shared bike lane markings with no traffic calming to force slow speeds (South Temple to 200 South and 600 South to 900 South). Between 200 South and 600 South, there are standard painted bike lanes with no traffic calming. This area has higher traffic volumes that make it more stressful to ride a bike or walk across the street and is the area with the most destinations.
This project would install traffic calming throughout the route, improve walking and biking crossings, and improve the bike lanes at key locations. 600 East is a very important active transportation connection for the Central City community. It provides direct access to 5 grocery stores, a school, multiple retail and dining clusters, Liberty Park, lots of housing and completes a connection from the Lower Avenues through Central City to Liberty Wells.
This project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035 and reduce emissions for SLC's sustainability goals.
Proposal ID:483165
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $678,724 $678,724
Impact Fee Funds
¼ Cent $177,000 $177,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These otheragencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
49 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Riverside Basketball Court Renovation
Project Address:Riverside Park, 1490 W 600 N Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
The Riverside Basketball Court is a community hub that promotes physical activity and social interaction. However, the current condition of the court is deteriorated, and outdated, affecting its usability and safety.
The objectives of this request are to enhance the facility by updating the aesthetics of the basketball court and adding amenities to make it more user friendly. This would improve the overall playing experience for community members as well as foster a better sense of community through recreational activities. Renovating the Riverside Basketball Court can significantly enhance the community's recreational facilities, promote healthy lifestyles, and foster social connections.
The scope of work includes:– Court Construction: Install a durable, post-tension concrete, full court NBA regulation size, with a weather resistant surface. Mark lines for both full and half court play. Customize with an original art mural, as feasible in coordination with the Arts Council.– Hoops: Install at least two new, adjustable basketball hoops to accommodate players of all ages and skill levels.– Additional Amenities: Install fencing, benches, and trash cans to enhance the user and spectator experience.
Proposal ID:482728
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $79,500 $79,500
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $450,500 $450,500
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Maintenance costs will increase slightly with a larger court, new surfacing, and more amenities and supportive infrastructure.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
50 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:PSB EV Charging Expansion
Project Address:475 S 300 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Project Description:
We are seeking funding for a vital project aimed at upgrading the charging infrastructure at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a central facility for the city's police and fire departments, emergency operations center, and combined dispatch unit. The project involves the installation of (20) new Level 2 charger ports, along with back feeding (10) pre-existing ports within the existing two-floor garage, catering to a fleet of (50) public services, police, and fire vehicles. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn & Sawatch, the proposed funding will support the first two phases, which include the installation of a new utility transformer on the east end of the property to facilitate the required electrical service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our commitment to sustainable transportation as outlined in the City's 2020 Electrified Transportation Joint Resolution and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
Most of the costs for the project will be for the additional transformer and associated infrastructure. It should be noted that Sustainability recently accepted a gift that provides the City access to 100 EV chargers at no cost, besides installation. If fully funded, Sustainability may contribute some of the EV chargers for this project rather than purchasing the chargers. The minimal savings will likely be consumed with recent market changes. Any surplus funds will be used to enhance the east surface parking lot with the security and access upgrades needed.
Proposal ID:487963
Department:Public Services
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,078,807
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
The anticipated cost for the Facilities Division to maintain is $0-1,200 per station per year or maintenance could be contracted out for a flat rate of a few hundred dollars per station per year.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
51 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This project will transform several public parks into vibrant hubs for community gatherings and public events by investing in essential event and gathering infrastructure. If fully funded, the project will replace failing pavilions in select parks ideal for hosting small family and community events and add amenities for all events, such as permanent power distribution boxes, improved lighting, restrooms, and durable areas to accommodate public and private organizers’ stages, vehicles, portable restrooms, or other structures to make our parks more friendly, accommodating, and accommodating for many kinds of events.
This is a potential programmatic request that Public Lands intends to make each year.
These upgrades will support a variety of activities, from cultural festivals and concerts to volunteer projects and neighborhood celebrations, fostering community connection and enriching public spaces. The benefits of these upgrades are six-fold:(1) Reduce the current maintenance impacts of concentrating every City and special event within the same few parks(2) Reduce event costs for organizers and potential organizers(3) Activate more of our parks, especially those that are otherwise ready to be supportive of more events (open space, parking, etc.) in Council districts that do not traditionally host many events(4) Ensure that our park supply can meet event demand so that there can be more events programmed in our parks every year(5) Minimize environmental impacts of required and mobile event infrastructure(6) Increase accessibility for organizers and participants alike.
This initiative aligns with Public Lands’ vision of creating safe, inclusive, and engaging public spaces that strengthen community bonds and enhance quality of life for residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:487973
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $2,597,000 $2,597,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Net maintenance is anticipated to decrease if pavilion replacement is included. If only new City and special event infrastructure is included, maintenance needs and expenses are expected to increase.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
52 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Playground Shade
Project Address:Citywide, see potential locations below
Project Description:
Funding will allow for the installation of shade cloths/sails over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the summer, playground equipment is often too hot to use by 10 am, particularly in these full-sun playgrounds. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds, the community will enjoy increased use of play equipment for the full day in the summer, and heat-related hazards will be reduced. Shade cloths/sails will also help with the prevention of skin cancer.
1. Meadows Park2. 17th South River Park3. 11th Avenue Park (playground replacement included in the Public Lands Department's ADA CIP application for FY 25/26)4. Sherwood Park5. Modesto Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming Parks GO Bond and CIP-funded improvement projects along the Jordan River corridor)6. Richmond Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming Parks GO Bond and CIP-funded improvement project)7. Herman Franks Park
Proposal ID:481191
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $500,000 $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Increased—each shade installation is anticipated to increase annual playground maintenance costs by $3,000 per playground.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
53 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements
Project Address:1700 North to 2100 North Rose Park Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Project Description:
This project would replace and improve the quality of the Rose Park Lane trail, as well as add irrigation, plantings and trees for beautification. This project would address current maintenance challenges, would be an improvement near the Jordan River Parkway Trail, and would improve safety for the families that use this road for biking, walking, and running. The addition of trees along with these improvements would increase shade, reduce air pollution, reduce high summer heat, minimize traffic noise from I-215, and make the trail ADA-compliant. The current condition of the trail makes it unusable and/or inaccessible for most.
The entire stretch of Rose Park Lane is highly visible, and in need of beautification. The park strips of Rose Park Lane were plumbed for irrigated years ago at the same time as the Public Utilities basin at 1721 North Morton Dr (Parcel 08221510200000), but the irrigation was never extended the full length of Rose Park Lane and has not worked properly. Beautification of the trail would be visible from I-215, by visitors of the Regional Athletic Complex, and anyone entering Salt Lake City from the 2100 North exist. The addition of plantings and the replacement of the trail will create a safer and more beautiful Rose Park Lane.
Proposal ID:481191
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $680,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Increased by approximately $6,000 annually
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
54 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup
Project Address:
This project would include multiple city owned parcels: 229 S Concord St. Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (Parcel # 15021550010000)231 S Concord St. Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (Parcel # 15021550020000)228 South 1200 W Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (Parcel # 15021560020000)
Project Description:
This area of the river corridor is made up of city-owned properties at the end of Concord St. and Pierpont Ave that provide possible access to the river from Concord Street, as well as the properties on the east side of the river. The benefits of this project may include easier access to and near the Jordan River, improved safety and care of the City’s property, and more positive activity along the river in line with the recommendations, vision, and goals of the Emerald Ribbon Action Plan.
If fully funded, the scope of the request will:1) Create a new public nature space on the west side of Alzheimer's Park/Jordan River2) Add improvements to the walkway on 300 S to increase comfort and walkability to/from the Jordan River Trail for people west of the river3) Depending on Army Corps and County Flood Control feedback, conduct a feasibility study for a bridge connecting the east and west sides of the river south of the I-80 bridge over the river
Proposal ID:481401
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New - Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $480,000 $480,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Increased annual maintenance by approximately $6,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
55 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation
Project Address:
Salt Lake City right-of-way at 200 East from approximately 350 South to 550 South(A primary focus is the Civic Block of 200 East between Washington Square and Library Square. Intersections north and south of the block will be included, as will some length of the block to the north and south)
Project Description:
Where the Civic Campus and Green Loop intersect, there is a valuable opportunity to create an iconic and vibrant event space in the heart of downtown. This request of $3,000,000 represents approximately 20% of the projected project construction cost and serves as seed money for alternative funding sources. The project that will be constructed is being designed with FY 24/25 CIP funding.
The Green Loop project reimagines part of the City's underutilized public rights-of-way as functional and recreational green space with stormwater management, surface flood control, pollinator habitat, and human well-being incorporated into the public realm right-of-way.
Transformation of the public right-of-way requires construction of both above-ground improvements (sidewalks, paths, bikeways, plazas, roadway, forest, plantings, park features, and rain gardens) and below-ground infrastructure (public and private utilities). Project costs include design and construction of above-ground green space, roadway reconstruction, traffic signals, and some utility (public and private) relocation on 200 East from approximately 350 South to 550 South.
The intent of this application is to allocate funding to bring strategic segments of the Green Loop to construction as early as 2026, particularly where there are timely opportunities to leverage nearby active projects, grant funds, and/or philanthropy.
Since 2019, Salt Lake City's multi-departmental Green Loop project team, comprised of staff from Community and Neighborhoods, the Mayor's Office, Public Lands, Public Services, and Public Utilities has been collaborating to bring this complex project to reality. In 2024, concept design for 200 East was completed. Further design for the Civic Block will integrate the Green Loop with Library Square visioning.
Proposal ID:486210
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $99,500
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $2,760,500 $2,900,500
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Increased; Maintenance and operational costs and needs will be developed and considered during the design process and the generation of the “Project Development and Public Space Management Guidelines”, on which work was authorized to begin by the City Council on January 21, 2025.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
56 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Cost Overrun
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
Proposal ID:NA
Department:
Project Type:Overrun
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $223,171
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
57 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Percent for Art
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to provide art at City developed projects.
Proposal ID:NA
Department:
Project Type:Art
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $167,378
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
58 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Enterprise Fund
Capital Projects
This page intentionally left blank
The Department of Airports
The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any
general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of
Airports (the Airport) has 674 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing,
and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel
experience.
The Fiscal Year 2026 budget continues to see modest growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as
expenditures. The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) continues to benefit from the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants awarded for FY2025. The BIL grants, along with the Airport Improvement
Program (AIP) grants, and the Airport Terminal Program (ATP) grants, will continue to provide much
needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects that are moving from design into
actual construction. The Airport will be bringing on ten gates located on Concourse B in October 2025.
These openings bring additional staffing and maintenance staff requirements while seeing the complete
elimination of the remaining hardstand operations.
The developed FY26 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers
and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important
capital projects. These projects include Phase III and Phase IV of construction of gates on Concourse B. In
addition, critical projects found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded
to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we
are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years.
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
61 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Dock 3 Door Replacement
Project Description:
This project will replace the existing 22 x 14 foot, 8,000 lb. overhead coil door at Dock 3 for the trash and recycling bins, with a double door system similar to what is at Dock 1. It would be preferable to use a sectional door in lieu of a coiling door similar to what is being installed on newer facilities at the Airport. Work will include removal of the existing overhead door, Installation of an 8" x 12" tube steel post in the middle of the opening, and installation of (2) 10'-4" wide doors.
Project Justification:
Dock 3 is the only dock that has a single coil door for both compactors. This door is heavy and problematic and if the door gets stuck and can't be opened, both compactors cannot be dumped. Installing sectional doors would make maintenance easier as it would match with the majority of other doors at the Airport.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 July 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$245,000 $77,000 $2,000 $2,000 $74,000 $400,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$400,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
62 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Gateway Skybridge Door Replacement
Project Description:
This project will replace the 7 foot tall, 12,000 lb. overhead coiling fire doors on the north end of the skybridges at the Terminal building. The preference would be to replace them with a similar design to what is installed in the passenger tunnels, with a roll-up door in the middle, and double doors on each end. The double doors would be on magnetic hold-opens.
Project Justification:
The overhead coil doors at the Terminal to Gateway Skybridges are extremely heavy, have long lead times, and are dangerous to operate and maintain. Each door has built-in personnel access doors to allow pass-through when lowered, and these have already sustained some damage due to raising and lowering for testing. Installing permanent personnel doors lowers operational and maintenance costs and ensures operational use in the event of a fire. Additionally, if they fail, it will take months to repair and the entire bridge will need to be shut down. The new configuration would allow the bridges to remain operational by using the double doors in the event that the coiling door in the middle needed to be shut down for repairs.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
7/1/2025 April 2026 October 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,025,000 $164,000 $10,000 $10,000 $308,000 $1,517,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,517,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
63 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:34R Glycol Pump Station Modifications
Project Description:
The pumps, valves and controls in the 34R glycol pump station have been in service for over 25 years and are approaching the end of their service life. The control panel components are obsolete and the pumps and valves are showing signs of deterioration due to the corrosive nature of the deicing fluid. New pumps and controls will be more efficient, require less maintenance, and safeguard against system failure. This pump station receives all of the runoff from the Taxiway L and 34R deicing pads. Any kind of equipment failure at this station would cripple
Project Justification:
This glycol pump station was put into service in 1997. The pumps, valves and controls are antiquated and need to be replaced. A budget quote from The Coombs-Hopkins Company, the local Gorman Rupp pump distributor, was provided for replacement of all the existing equipment inside the pump station. No excavation is anticipated and the existing underground piping and electrical would remain in place and be reused. Due to the long lead times for the equipment, purchasing the equipment in advance would allow the airport to control the timeline since the pump station is critical to airport operations. The construction contract would be to install the owner furnished equipment similar to other glycol pump station projects done in the past.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 September 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$270,000 $200,000 $3,000 $200,000 $54,000 $727,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$727,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
64 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Taxiways A&B Modifications (Design)
Project Description:
Islands will be defined and created between Taxiways A and B at 1 West and 2 West. The project will also require Taxiway B nomenclature changes that will update other signs along Taxiways A and B. The project will install the required electrical infrastructure for lights and signs, repair any damaged pavement in the area, and install new striping to bring the intersections into compliance.
Project Justification:
FAA Part 139 inspectors have recommended several changes to the islands on Taxiways A and B at 1 West and 2 West to enhance safety. This project will construct those changes to bring the airfield into compliance under FAR Part 139.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 July 2026 December 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$2,259,000 $361,000 $45,000 $2,000 $339,000 $3,006,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,974,000 $1,032,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
65 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Truck Water Fill Station
Project Description:
This project will install a 3-inch water service and meter to quickly fill large capacity Airport maintenance equipment near the vehicle wash facility at North Support for use during runway rubber and paint removal operations. Work will include asphalt pavement removal, unclassified excavation, a water service connection, back-flow prevention, installation of approximately 100 linear feet of 3-inch diameter PVC waterline, placement and compaction of engineered fill, and asphalt patching.
Project Justification:
In the past, fire hydrants were used to fill up large capacity equipment used for airfield maintenance. However, Public Utilities has determined that this practice is no longer acceptable and is requiring a metered connection. It is important to efficiently refill equipment and get it back to work, especially during runway maintenance closures. Airport maintenance equipment that will use this water service includes four (4) high pressure paint and rubber removal trucks, each with a capacity of 3,000 gallons of water, which need to be filled multiple times during a shift.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 June 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$160,000 $45,000 $2,000 $5,000 $48,000 $260,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$260,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
66 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:SVRA Control Tower NEPA & Siting Study
Project Description:
The recent Master Plan conducted for South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA) has identified that the design and construction of a modern and efficient control tower at SVRA is essential for the safe and smooth management of air traffic operations. This project will begin this process by providing the funding necessary to complete the NEPA process and a Siting Study that are required by the FAA.
Project Justification:
Airports with similar airspace challenges as South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA) generally have an Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) if they have more than 200 based aircraft and/or 80,000 operations. SVRA has approximately 100,000 annual operations and 177-based aircraft. Based on a conversation with the FAA Airport District Office (ADO), SVRA has exceeded the eligibility benchmarks and needs to begin planning for this tower.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 N/A November 2027
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$950,000 $50,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
67 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:SVRA Dual Taxiways
Project Description:
Construction of two new parallel Group II taxilanes at South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA) is needed to support continued corporate and T-Hangar development as shown on the airport's Master Plan. This project will support future development of the airport and continued migration of piston aircraft away from SLCIA to support the future FBO operator. Work will consist of unclassified excavation, stabilization, import of engineered fill, asphalt placement, and striping.
Project Justification:
This project will provide access from Taxiways A and B to the airport's future hangar development areas. This taxilane is a key access point for the continued expansion of the airport. With the overwhelming demand for both corporate and T-hangars, this project will provide an essential access into the area to enable new hangar development at SVRA.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 June 2026 October 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$3,948,000 $624,000 $79,000 $2,000 $790,000 $5,443,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$913,500 $4,529,500
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
68 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Economy Lot Pavement Reconstruction (Design)
Project Description:
This project is part of the ongoing Pavement Management Program to maintain the Airport's pavement network at an acceptable level of service while minimizing the cost of maintenance and rehabilitation. Work includes a geotechnical investigation in the west portion of the Economy Parking Lot to evaluate pavement distresses and provide recommendations for reconstruction and pavement design.
Project Justification:
Various roads and parking lots throughout the Airport campus are showing signs of distress and require corrective action to avoid further aging and deterioration. The pavement in the west portion of the Economy Parking Lot is approximately 20-years old and has reached the end of its useful life.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 October 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$374,000 $374,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$374,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
69 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Economy Lot Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Description:
This project is part of the ongoing Pavement Management Program to maintain the airport's pavement network at an acceptable level of service while minimizing the cost of maintenance and rehabilitation. The project will consist of surface preparation, crack sealing, asphalt seal coat, pavement markings, and isolated full depth repairs in the Economy Parking Lot.
Project Justification:
Various roads and parking lots throughout the airport campus are showing signs of distress and require corrective action to avoid further aging and deterioration. Maintaining and preserving a pavement in "Good" condition versus rehabilitating a pavement in "Fair to Poor" condition is four to five times less expensive and increases pavement useful life.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 May 2026 September 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,119,000 $259,000 $22,000 $10,000 $168,000 $1,578,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,578,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
70 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Economy Parking Lot EVCS
Project Description:
SLCDA has created a Master Plan for a phased installation program of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) relative to the annual purchase of electric vehicles in Utah. In the past, the airport has received rebates from Rocky Mountain Power which have reimbursed a percentage of the cost to purchase and install EVCSs on the airport campus. This year the airport will apply for funding incentives to install twenty (20) dual port Level 2 EVCS in the Economy Parking Lot. This will require new electrical switchgear and panel boards along with all associated electrical feeders, conduits, equipment racks, and housekeeping pads. Work includes trenching, conduit, wire installation and new concrete/asphalt patching. The project will include rough in electrical for a future gate at the entrance to the lot in the event the public is charged for electric vehicle charging service.
Project Justification:
Salt Lake City is designated as a Serious Non-attainment Area for EPA's 24-hour standard for particulate matter PM2.5. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 is an air pollutant resulting from motor vehicle emissions that contributeto respiratory problems. This project will promote additional options for sustainable transportation and will educe area emissions that contribute to fine particulate matter. The airport is proposing to install twenty (20) dual port Level 2 EVCS in the Economy Parking Lot. The presence of electric vehicle charging infrastructure supports the decision by airport employees and the traveling public to purchase electric vehicles and reduce their anxiety surrounding electric vehicle usage.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 November 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$804,000 $53,000 $2,000 $2,500 $201,000 $1,062,500
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$900,000 $1,062,500
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
71 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure - Phase V (FY26)
Project Description:
The Salt Lake City Department of Airports has developed a Master Plan for the phased installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) in alignment with the growing annual purchase of electric vehicles in Utah. To support this transition, new infrastructure is necessary. This project involves installing two (2) Level 3 charging stations and five (5) Level 2 charging stations in the proposed south employee parking lot. The scope of work includes providing new primary power service, electrical switchgear, branch circuits, and concrete flatwork.
Project Justification:
Salt Lake City is designated as a Serious Non-attainment Area for EPA's 24-hour standard for particulate matter PM2.5. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 is an air pollutant resulting from motor vehicle emissions that contribute to respiratory problems. This project will promote additional options for sustainable transportation and will reduce area emissions that contribute to fine particulate matter. The airport will be applying for AIP grants annually to offset the costs associated with this work. This project is a placeholder for when these grants are awarded.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 August 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$810,000 $65,000 $8,000 $50,000 $243,000 $1,176,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$750,000 $426,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
72 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:PAB Electrical Equipment Upgrade
Project Description:
The Parking Administration Building (PAB) electrical equipment has reached the end of it's life expectancy and is in need of replacement. This project will replace the existing uninterruptible power supply (UPS), the automatic transfer switch, and emergency generator because replacement parts have become difficult to procure. Along with replacing these items, it will be necessary to connect additional existing electrical circuits to the new UPS and generator to ensure seamless operation during utility power outages. Additional IT servers, data switches, and parking vendor (SP+) equipment needs to be connected to the building UPS instead of the existing stand alone rack mounted UPS.
Project Justification:
The existing electrical equipment that supports the HUB Parking system is approximately 20 years old and spare parts are difficult to procure. If the equipment fails due to power outages, it will cause major delays in vehicles exiting the parking toll plaza as well as a loss in parking lot revenue.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 November 2026 December 2027
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$507,000 $101,000 $5,000 $5,000 $127,000 $745,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$745,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
73 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Rental Car Overflow Storage Lot Improvements
Project Description:
This project will expand and secure rental car overflow storage parking at the old Continental Reservations Building site along North Temple. This includes removal of landscaping, grading, fencing improvements, and placing of asphalt millings around the existing asphalt areas expanding the area to be subdivided between rental car companies. The existing lot has limited use due to portions being located in the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The improvements will provide approximately 3.25 acres of overflow rental car storage.
Project Justification:
On-site rental car companies need storage space during slow rental periods and/or during fleetexchanges that usually occur twice a year. Rental car companies are hesitant to park/store vehicles inunsecure remote lots due to theft and vandalism. Ground Transportation utilizes the North Templearea for staging Transportation Network Companies (TNC) and other Ground Transportation (GT)providers. When this GT function moves, it will be beneficial to make improvements such as placing asurface of millings and adding fencing so that the property can generate income as it will be leased byrental car operators.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 May 2026 August 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$834,000 $173,000 $5,000 $20,000 $167,000 $1,199,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,199,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
74 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Rental Car QTA Equipment Replacement
Project Description:
The rental car Quick Turn Around (QTA) has been operational since March 2016 and systems are wearing out and beginning to fail. Needed projects include: new vacuum system to increase the capacity of the exhaust fans and to reduce excessive heat in the main vacuum room where the heat is damaging mechanical components; replacing the radiant tube heaters in the QTA and Rental Service Sites (RSS) with exterior rated and updated heaters; replacing aging QTA HVAC systems with updated Mitsubishi split systems; replacing current pressure washers in wash bays with new water cannons to eliminate the need for car wash prep stations; and replacing existing LG VRF (Variable Refrigerant Flow or Heat Pump) systems with a Mitsubishi system in the RSS sites and replacing associated piping.
Project Justification:
The QTA building belongs to the airport and needs to remain fully functional to accommodate the rental car operations that serve our customers. Failure to maintain the building and systems will result in malfunctions which would negatively impact the ability of our providers to have vehicles ready to rent in a timely fashion to arriving customers with reservations. Most of the equipment is used on a daily basis and is becoming expensive and almost impossible to repair.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 February 2026 October 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$2,394,000 $287,000 $24,000 $24,000 $479,000 $3,208,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$3,208,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
75 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Rental Car Reallocation
Project Description:
This project will reallocate space for rental car companies in the Gateway as well as in the Ready Return area on the first level of the Parking Garage by adjusting the fencing and barricades between the Parking Garage and QTA and rearranging fences, walls, and doors in the Service Site area. There are currently 7 separate areas for rental car companies in the Gateway; the walls and counter space will be readjusted to accommodate 5 rental car companies. This will include the removal of one wall between brands as well as adding a wall. In the Ready Return area of the Parking Garage, one exit booth will be removed, three new return lanes with "tiger teeth" will be added, one new exit booth will be added, existing exit booths will be moved, and barricades rearranged. At the QTA, fencing will be rearranged, a new fence added, and barricades modified. At the Service Site, fences will be repositioned around the parking areas and doors will be changed for the new arrangement.
Project Justification:
The current ready return area is approximately 600 stalls short of the justified demand for on-site rental cars. Thisdeficit will grow to over 800 stalls by 2037. With the upcoming solicitation for a new rental car agreement, it isnecessary to begin planning for rental car growth to accommodate new entrants and current deficits in rental carspace.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 November 2025 June 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,175,000 $143,000 $7,000 $7,000 $169,000 $1,500,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,500,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
76 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:SkyChef Building Demolition
Project Description:
This project will include the demolition of the existing LSG SkyChef building and associated infrastructure,including the removal of adjacent site materials, footings, and foundation elements. All demolition debris will behauled off site and disposed of as required. Existing utilities will be capped and/or removed as necessary. Cleanfill dirt will be brought in and compacted to bring the site back to grade level. A gravel top course will make thesite level with surrounding site elements such as landscaping, concrete, and asphalt. The total area affected isapproximately 51,875 s.f.
Project Justification:
The current ready return area is approximately 600 stalls short of the justified demand for on-site rental cars. Thisdeficit will grow to over 800 stalls by 2037. With the upcoming solicitation for a new rental car agreement, it isnecessary to begin planning for rental car growth to accommodate new entrants and current deficits in rental carspace.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 August 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,515,000 $182,000 $15,000 $15,000 $379,000 $2,106,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$2,106,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
77 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:2300 West Realignment
Project Description:
This project involves site development within General Aviation Zone 3, located on the east side of Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA), to facilitate future expansion. Work includes construction of a new access road, removal of existing pavements, and relocation of existing utilities.
Project Justification:
With unprecedented demand for corporate hangar developments at the SLCIA, the airport is quickly running out of development ready sites for hangars. Without this project, the site will remain unsuitable for development, and the airport may experience a loss of revenue, as well as the potential forfeiture of future leasable assets at this location.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 August 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,515,000 $323,000 $30,000 $25,000 $303,000 $2,196,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$2,196,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
78 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:NWS Sewer Main Replacement
Project Description:
This project will replace the sewer lateral at the National Weather Service building located on the east side of the Airport at 2242 West North Temple between the building and the City's main line. The sewer lateral is approximately 120 feet long and goes through the landscaping, asphalt parking lot, sidewalk, and curbing.
Project Justification:
The lateral sewer line that exits from the National Weather Service building has several large bellies in it causing sewage to get stuck resulting in backups inside the building. The existing line requires increased maintenance and periodic jetting with the concern of damage to tenant space and equipment.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 September 2025 November 2025
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$98,000 $60,000 $2,000 $10,000 $29,000 $199,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$199,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
79 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Terminal Drive Resurfacing
Project Description:
This project includes a 2-inch mill and overlay on Terminal Drive and associated ramps with localized repairs to address fatigue cracking. Three exit ramps along Terminal Drive will also be reconstructed due to a considerable amount of load-related distresses. Work includes traffic management, asphalt milling, reconditioning of the existing base course, unclassified excavation, placement of engineered fill, asphalt paving, and the application of pavement markings.
Project Justification:
As the primary entrance and exit to the airport, Terminal Drive has a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating of 65 and 63 with local areas like the 3700 West off-ramp being as low as 28, indicating pavement in "Very Poor" to "Fair" condition. If this project is delayed much longer, the roadway will likely need a more costly partial reconstruction due to damage to the base courses. Maintaining this critical roadway is an important part of providing access to the terminal.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2025 April 2026 October 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,908,000 $349,000 $38,000 $25,000 $286,000 $2,606,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$2,606,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
80 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The Salt Lake City Golf Division
The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality
recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding
cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess
revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years
and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects.
In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per
every 9 holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for
additional future projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $13,612,735 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY26. The Golf Division is
in the middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding
many of the tee box areas at each course and has allocated $60,000 in FY26 from the Golf CIP Fund. The
Golf Division is in the middle of a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new
carts paths and has allocated $625,000 for FY26. The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing
a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course ($5,500,000) and Nibley Park golf course
($3,000,000). Other significant projects include new maintenance buildings at Bonneville and Rose Park,
on-course restrooms at 4 golf courses and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will
be using $501,328 in FY26 to purchase additional equipment.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
81 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Cart Path Improvements
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing cart path improvements at all 6 courses ($625,000). Well-maintained golf cart paths are critical for the overall customer experience and for helping to preserve golf course playing conditions. The existing paths are decades behind receiving proper repair and expansion. Additionally, with slight modifications, many cart paths can be used by non-golfers during the off season or other times when conditions are not ideal for golf.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $625,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
82 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Irrigation Improvements – Rose Park
Project Address:Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing irrigation improvements at Rose Park ($5,500,000). The current mainline system is as old as 65 years and is in desperate need of replacement. This project also includes a turfgrass reduction plan and some redesign of certain holes to allow for a more efficient system, utilizing fewer heads and potential water use reduction of up to 40%.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $5,500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
83 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Irrigation Improvements – Nibley Park
Project Address:Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be making irrigation improvements at Nibley Park ($3,000,000). The Nibley Park golf course is currently the only golf course in the state that is still irrigated manually. A new system will provide needed control and efficiency providing annual water use reductions.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf Operating Fund $3,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
84 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Maintenance Buildings
Project Address:Bonneville, Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be building new maintenance buildings for Bonneville and Rose Park golf courses ($1,000,000).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $1,000,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
85 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Maintenance Equipment
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $501,328 in FY26 to purchase additional used equipment (usually lease-return equipment from high-end private courses). The plan would be to purchase equipment if available such as Sprayer, Groundsmaster, Greensmaster.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Equipment
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $501,328
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
86 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:New Construction Projects
Project Address:Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be entering into the planning phases of a new construction project at Glendale Golf Course ($1,500,000). The projects consist of a double-decker range structure and new fencing at Glendale. This project will position the Glendale driving range to take advantage of changing market conditions and will expand the range capacity and extend the use of the range by 3 to 4 additional months annually, having a significant increase in driving range revenue generation and providing an enhanced recreation opportunity for City residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Construction
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $1,500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
87 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:On Course Restroom
Project Address:Forest Dale, Glendale, Nibley Park, Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing an on course restroom at Forest Dale, Glendale, Nibley Park and Rose Park ($600,000). These courses don’t have a permanent restroom structure on the course. It is a highly requested amenity by customers.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $600,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
88 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Parking Lot Surfacing
Project Address:Glendale, Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be resurfacing the parking lots at Glendale and Nibley Park golf courses ($398,040).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $398,040
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
89 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Pump Replacement
Project Address:Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing the first of five irrigation pumps at Glendale golf course ($25,000). The replacement of these pumps will take place over a 5-year period. This is the second of 5 pumps that are nearing their life expectancy. At any time if one of these pumps goes down it will have impact on our ability to irrigate the golf course.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Replacement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $25,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
90 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Range Fencing
Project Address:Mountain Dell, Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing driving range fencing at Mountain Dell and Rose Park ($500,000). The projects consist of removal of existing damaged fencing and replacing it with new fencing material.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
91 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Roof Repair
Project Address:Forest Dale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing a new roof at Forest Dale ($150,000).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $150,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
92 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Tee Box Leveling
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing tee box leveling at all 6 courses ($60,000). Salt Lake City customer satisfaction surveys and course evaluation initiatives have shown that the biggest area of improvement needed is the condition of the tee boxes. This is an area where course labor can be utilized to perform a large portion of the work. The Golf Division proposes utilizing Golf CIP funds to pay for needed equipment and supplies. Each course has undertaken a four-year plan to address tee box leveling of existing tee boxes and to begin construction of new forward tee boxes.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Replacement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $60,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
93 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Windows & Doors
Project Address:Mountain Dell
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing the windows and doors to the clubhouse at Mountain Dell golf course (184,695).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $184,695
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
94 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Retaining Wall on #1 and Stairs on #10
Project Address:Bonneville
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be rebuilding the retaining wall on hole #1 and replacing the stairs from hole #10 that go from parking lot at the Bonneville golf course ($70,000).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $70,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
95 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
This page intentionally left blank
The Salt Lake City Public Utilities
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each operates as an independent enterprise fund, meaning they are not supported by tax dollars. Instead, funding comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally grants or subsidized loans from state or federal sources.
To support major infrastructure investments, SLCDPU is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Additionally, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant is supporting the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction, and an American Rescue Plan Act grant is financing the floodplain remapping project in the Granary District Floodplain.
Utility rates, set based on cost-of-service analysis, ensure that customers pay for the services they receive. Given the infrastructure-heavy nature of these utilities, SLCDPU relies on a long-term project and financing strategy to effectively manage its assets.
The capital budget is organized by fund, with detailed cost centers under each. For Fiscal Year 2026, SLCDPU is managing over 82 capital projects across its four utility funds, in addition to ongoing projects. Many capital projects span multiple fiscal years – often designed in one year and built in the next. The budget prioritizes high-need projects identified through the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The largest project underway is the replacement of the water reclamation facility, with estimated completion in Fiscal Year 2027. Other system components are also aging and will require increased investment in the coming years. For instance, SLCDPU’s three water treatment plants, built in the 1950s and early 1960s, are due for major updates. City Creek’s reconstruction is scheduled for completion in 2027, while planning is underway for two remaining plants.
SLCDPU’s capital planning is shaped by a complex mix of federal, state, and local regulations, as well as water rights and exchange agreement obligations – all of which influence project priorities and timeline.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
97 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Water Main Replacements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 1,300 miles of aging water pipe. To support continued operation of this system the FY 2025 -2026 budget includes $2,500,000 for the rehabilitation of the Upper Conduit transmission line. Master plan projects include: $4,000,000 for the construction of the North Bench Pump Station; $200,000 to continue to design work on the East-West Conveyance Line; and $75,000 for the pre-design of the City Creek Treatment Line to Morris Reservoir. This category also provides $425,000 for efforts on the Kearns Line Replacement, the Heughs Canyon neighborhood Water Main Replacement, and the R18 PRV Replacement. In addition, $1,250,000 is designated to support routine replacement of pipelines in poor condition at various locations in the system. The department is also working to enhance its approach to prioritizing pipeline replacements and addressing corrosion related issues within the system.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $5,950,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
98 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Treatment Plant Improvements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
All three city-owned water treatment plants (WTPs), originally built in the 1950's and early 1960's, are approaching the end of their operational life and will require full reconstruction. The City Creek WTP will be rebuilt firs, supported by a FEMA BRIC grant that provides a 70% match, up to $36.6M. Planned work in the fiscal year includes construction management services ($2,350,000), construction ($50,540,000), and continued public engagement ($200,000).
Reconstruction of the Big Cottonwood WTP will be postponed until sufficient budget is available to construct this important project. In the meantime, $600,000 is allocated to support the design and public engagement efforts of the future rebuild. However, the SLA Replacement – Cottonwoods Connection pipeline ($7,450,000) will continue as part of a regionalization strategy that allows Big Cottonwood Creek water to be treated using available capacity of the existing Little Cottonwood WTP. This pipeline will serve as redundancy to both the Big Cottonwood WTP and the portion of the Big Cottonwood Conduit that conveys drinking water from the plant to the City’s drinking water distribution system.
Additionally, $2,000,000 is included in this cost center to replace aging or failing components as needed, ensuring regulatory compliance while larger projects are developed and be funded.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $63,140,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of $500,000 per/year (City Creek)
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
99 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Deep Pump Wells
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Deep pump wells provide the city with reliable and redundant water supplies that supplement surface water and third-party water supply agreements. The Department is working to address critical water supplies issues associated with its deep wells. This budget addresses the Artesian Well ($500,000), which was destroyed in a recent tree collapse.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $500,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
100 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Meter Change-Out Program
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The budget includes the continuation of the small meter change out program piloted in 2015 and initiated in 2018. Metering water consumption by customers is the source of our revenue. Approximately 55,000, or 68%, of the system’s water meters have been replaced with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) read meters. With optimal conditions, 10,000 to 12,000 meters per year can be replaced. Supply chain issues have created delays thus replacement is planned at 8,000 meters per year. The plan is to complete the residential AMI meter change out program in the next 2 ½ to 3 years. AMI technology provides hourly usage information instead of relying on monthly data. An online portal provides our customers with information to better manage their water usage and alerts them to the status of their water service. Better information will assist us in water conservation efforts.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $2,500,000
Priority: Ongoing program
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
101 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Water Service Connections
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Water service extends beyond the corporate boundaries of Salt Lake City. Approximately 37% of our service connections are in this outlying area. Repair and replacement of these connections are part of an ongoing program. The components of this program are service line replacements, new connections, and small and large meter maintenance and replacement. Public Utilities is proceeding to implement the EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) by performing inventories, sampling plans, public outreach, and lateral service line replacements. The plan will include resources, personnel, and capital needs. Budget associated with the LCRR includes $2,000,000 to support pothole work associated with inventory development and service line material identification.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $4,950,000
Priority: Project/need specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of $100,000 per year associated with LCRR line replacement and temporary filters.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
102 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Storage Reservoirs
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU owns and operates seven raw water reservoirs that store snow run-off. Little Dell and five of SLCDPU’s reservoirs are used to store water that is treated for drinking water. All seven of the reservoirs are a contingent way for the Department to meet exchange agreements for secondary water. Three of the reservoirs are used by ski areas for snowmaking, and three of the reservoirs are used for flood control. The raw water storage reservoir at Mountain Dell has a $250,000 proposed budget to design a rehabilitation of its spillway. SLCDPU will pursue matching grant funds for the engineering and planning of both Lake Mary Dam and Red Pine Dam’s restoration. This is supplemented by a $1,020,000 budget request for the match and additional design and emergency planning associated with the grant award. SLCDPU will proceed with the design of the rehabilitation of the piping of Little Dell Dam ($150,000). The Red Butte Dam controls has an interface and control system that needs to be repaired. The Red Butte Dam control panels will be replaced ($300,000) and concrete repairs will be made at Mountain Dell ($40,000).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $1,760,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
103 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Culverts, Flumes & Bridges
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
These secondary water conveyance systems are critical to maintaining our water exchange agreements. The Rehabilitation and Replacement of the JSL ($100,000) which will address emergent JSL replacement needs required to maintain water exchange.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $100,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
104 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 100,000,000 gallons of finished water storage in 22 tanks and reservoirs. These components require on-going inspection and maintenance. The location and elevation of these facilities is critical to the operation of the water distribution system. The budget includes $500,000 dedicated to valve replacements at the Tanner Reservoir and $500,000 associated with the interior coating of the Eastwood North Tank.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $1,000,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
105 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU is evaluating properties for future use by the department. The budgeted $450,000 is to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the SLCDPU campus at the existing location or relocating the SLCDPU campus to meet existing needs and address safety concerns. This evaluation will consider the cost benefit of campus improvements and will assess the department’s ability to mitigate financial impacts by leveraging existing assets.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $450,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
106 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Treatment Plants
Project Address:1365 West 2300 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
The largest budgeted item in this category is for the construction of a new water reclamation facility. The $48,865,000 estimate represents the continuation of a multi-year project and includes design, construction, and program management. Existing plant improvement projects include Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Upgrades for $1,300,000 and Cogeneration Controls for $750,000. These existing plant improvements are critical to maintaining existing operations while the new water reclamation facility is commissioned.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $50,915,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
The operational cost of the wastewater treatment facility is anticipated to increase by $6,000,000 annually, or by approximately 40%, with the completion of the New WRF project. This increase in operational costs is associated with increased chemical, power, and other miscellaneous operational costs attributed to the new treatment process. This estimate will be refined as construction progresses.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
107 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Collection Lines
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 667 miles of aging sewer collections pipelines. Proposed budget within this category includes pipe renewal & replacement projects, City/County/State driven projects, and master plan projects. Master plan projects budgeted item in this category and total $2,845,000. This includes $225,000 for 500 South Capacity Upgrades (3400 West to Orange Street) land and easements, $620,000 for MP30 – 200 East from 300 South to 500 South Upsizing, and $2,000,000 for 1800 North Sewer Realignment Phase 3 construction. Master plan projects identified within this category support system condition improvements and growth-related capacity constraints. Pipe renewal & replacement projects are budgeted for $17,200,000. These projects consist of the 1% System Renewal Project ($3,000,000), Beck Street Trunk Line Rehabilitation construction ($5,000,000), 1200 W Trunk Line Rehabilitation construction ($9,000,000), and design of the Elgin Ave Sewer Replacement ($200,000). Project budgets to support City, County and State driven projects are estimated at $200,000 which includes Misc. Public Services Projects. Other Collection Lines projects include the Siphon Inspection project which will perform a condition assessment of the Surplus Canal Siphon ($200,000) and the Maintenance Access Rehab Program (400,000) which will rehabilitate failed maintenance access holes. Program management and emergent project support total $1,120,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $21,965,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
108 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU is evaluating properties for future use by the department. The budgeted $350,000 is to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the SLCDPU campus at the existing location or relocating the SLCDPU campus to meet existing needs and address safety concerns. This evaluation will consider the cost benefit of campus improvements and will assess the department’s ability to mitigate financial impacts by leveraging existing assets
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $350,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
109 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Storm Drain Lines
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The SLCDPU has over 350 miles of storm drain in the system. This category has $2,387,000 for Collection Mains and $1,660,000 for projects budgeted for supporting City, County, and State driven projects. Other projects in this category total $400,000 for various collection lines and $300,000 for public utility defined projects. Other local area projects to be completed by city crews at various locations are budgeted to be $150,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $4,897,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
110 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Riparian Corridor Improvements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The city places a high value on protecting its riparian corridors and SLCDPU serves as a steward to those corridors. The planned riparian project for FY 2025/2026 is Emigration –Allen Park ($450,000). This funding will continue SLCDPU’s support of the Allen Park Work and will support construction of planned Allen Park improvements. These efforts are to be coordinated with overall capital improvement efforts by the city to open and activate Allen Park to the public. Project will consider streambank and channel stabilization, culvert removal, emergent benches, and debris basins.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $450,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
111 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Landscaping
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Stormwater landscaping provides an important role to water quality and the aesthetic value of the city. The landscaping budget includes $50,000 for the Northwest Oil Drain canal remediation. This Northwest Oil Drain budget is to reserve funding for cleanup and closeout on the remediated portions of the Northwest Drain. The Cornell Wetlands Revegetation project is to eliminate invasive vegetation and revegetate open areas of the Cornell Wetland area with hardy, open-space vegetation.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $50,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
112 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Storm Water Lift Stations
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The Stormwater Utility manages 26 stormwater lift stations. Storm water lift station work planned with the FY 25/26 budget to support the stormwater utility includes the on-going construction of the Northwest Drain Lift Station ($1,600,000). This will provide improved capacity and reliability along the Northwest Drain. Other Stormwater Lift Station efforts include an annual project which supports emergency needs ($100,000) and design for the proposed Swede Town Lift Station ($137,000).
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $1,837,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
113 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Detention Basins
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Stormwater detention basins serve a critical role in managing storms and mitigating associated flooding. Detention Basins work planned for FY 25/26 includes an annual Detention Basin emergency response if needed ($100,000)
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $100,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
114 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Stormwater Utility)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU is evaluating properties for future use by the department. The budgeted $300,000 is to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the SLCDPU campus at the existing location or relocating the SLCDPU campus to meet existing needs and address safety concerns. This evaluation will consider the cost benefit of campus improvements and will assess the department’s ability to mitigate financial impacts by leveraging existing assets
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $300,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
115 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Street Lighting Projects
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Street lighting projects planned for FY 2025/2026 are budgeted for $1,240,000 to upgrade to high efficiency lighting and other system improvements on arterial streets, collector streets, and in neighborhoods. This includes budget to hire a contractor to perform inspections on new street lighting facilities, consultant support to further develop an Implementation Plan, and budget for improvements for base level lighting services and three enhanced lighting groups. The master plan developed with the implementation plan determines and guides best practices for upgrades and new lights. A smart controller pilot project is contemplated for $200,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Street Lighting Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Funds
Enterprise Funds: $1,440,000
Priority: Ongoing program
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Reduction in electricity costs.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
116 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial
districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities.
The CRA utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects
that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental
sustainability. The CRA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and
program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account.
The CRA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned
infrastructure projects. As part of the CRA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that
anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval
process and is typically contingent on the CRA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects
costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the
City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The CRA fiscal year 2026 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects:
• City Creek Daylighting: Allocates an additional $100,000 towards implementation of the daylighting
of City Creek along the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. The total project, aimed at
improving access to nature, water quality, and flood mitigation, is estimated to cost between $15
million and $20 million.
• Japantown Art: Designates an additional $37,733 for enhancing the cultural landscape through
various art installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and
preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an
engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors.
• 900 S Freeway Underpass Infrastructure: Designates a total of $50,000 for improvements to the
Mead Avenue underpass. The initiative aims to support installation of improvements to enhance
open space and encourage activation.
Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects
117 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:City Creek Daylighting
Project Address:Folsom Corridor – North Temple Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds to support implementation of the design plan to daylight (bring to the surface) a portion of City Creek that runs north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. Project goals include increasing access to nature, improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding. Landscaping improvements and other pedestrian amenities recommended as a part of the design will be coordinated with SLC Public Lands to activate the trail and create a welcoming centerpiece for the westside community. The total cost for implementation is estimated to be between $15,000,000 and $20,000,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:CRA
Project Type:
Category:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (CRA)$100,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis, but it’s anticipated that Public Lands and Public Utilities will maintain the creek and associated amenities.
Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects
118 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:Japantown Art
Project Address:Block 67 North Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds for the Japantown Art project, totaling $336,577. The funding is designated for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art installations that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department:CRA
Project Type:
Category:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (CRA)$37,733
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects
119 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Project Title:900 S Freeway Underpass Infrastructure
Project Address:State Street Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds for improvements to the Mead Avenue underpass. Funds will support installation of improvements to enhance open space and encourage activation.
Proposal ID:
Department:CRA
Project Type:
Category:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund (CRA)$50,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects
120 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Overview of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Major Funding Sources
General Fund Dollars
(Most flexible funding source; can be spent on any project)
These are the City’s most flexible unrestricted funds available to be spent on any CIP project. The Council
transfers a portion of General Fund revenues into the CIP Fund as part of each annual budget in June.
The City collects a variety of revenue sources that all go into the General Fund such as property taxes,
sales taxes, franchise taxes, building permits and license fees, and many others. A Council audit identified
9% of ongoing General Fund revenues as an ideal funding level to help ensure the City keeps up with
capital investment needs. The City reached that 9% funding level in FY2023. In the prior two decades the
City’s annual General Fund transfer into the CIP Fund averaged closer to 7%.
Funding Our Future 0.5% Local Salt Lake City Option Sales Tax
(Critical need categories: housing, public transit, streets, and public safety; a fifth category of parks
maintenance was added in FY2023)
The 0.5% sales tax increase was authorized by the Legislature only for the capital city as part of the
State prison relocation from Draper. The City’s local option sales tax was increased as part of the
FY2019 annual budget and was branded “Funding Our Future” along with a Streets Reconstruction
Bond approved by voters (all those bond funds have now been budgeted). Prior to enacting the sales
tax increase the City conducted impact research, public hearings, open houses, workshops, letters,
online information, and other extensive outreach. The funds from the sales tax are limited to the
critical need categories as determined by the Council. The definition of the critical need categories
has evolved over the times such as expanding public safety from only police to also include 911
dispatch, fire, medical, and social workers. The number of categories was originally four and a fifth
category, parks maintenance, was added in FY2023. There is no legal limitation to the categories
which are subject to the Council’s annual appropriation process and subject to change.
Class C Funds
(State gas tax)
Class C funds are generated by the Utah State Tax on gasoline. The state distributes these funds to local
governments on a center lane mileage basis. The City’s longstanding practice has been to appropriate
Class C funds for the general purpose of street reconstruction and asphalt overlays. The Roadway
Selection Committee selects specific street segment locations as recorded in the Engineering Division’s Six
Year Pavement Plan which is regularly updated. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this
funding source and the County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation and Streets Funding.
Per state law, Class C funds may be used for:
1. All construction and maintenance on eligible Class B & C roads
2. Enhancement of traffic and pedestrian safety, including, but not limited to: sidewalks, curb and
gutter, safety features, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lighting and construction of bicycle
facilities in the highway right-of-way
3. Investments for interest purposes (interest to be kept in fund)
4. Equipment purchases or equipment leases and rentals
5. Engineering and administration costs
6. Future reimbursement of other funds for large construction projects
7. Rights of way acquisition, fencing and cattle guards
8. Matching federal funds
9. Equipment purchased with B & C funds may be leased from the road department to another
department or agency
10. Construction of road maintenance buildings, storage sheds, and yards. Multiple use facilities
may be constructed by mixing funds on a proportional basis
11. Construction and maintenance of alleys
12. B & C funds can be used to pay the costs of asserting, defending, or litigating
13. Pavement portion of a bridge (non-road portions such as underlying bridge structure are not
eligible)
County Quarter Center (0.25%) Sales Tax
(Limited to transportation and streets eligible uses per state law)
The County fourth quarter-cent transportation funding is an ongoing sales tax funding source dedicated
to transportation and streets. The City has taken a progressive view of transportation beyond a vehicle-
focused perspective and uses a multi-modal, more inclusive approach (walking, biking, public transit,
accessibility and ADA, ride-share, trails, safety, scooters, etc.). The Wasatch Front Regional Council
summarized eligible uses for this funding as “developing new roads or enhancing (e.g., widening) existing
roads; funding active transportation, including bike and pedestrian projects; or funding transit
enhancements. It can also be used for maintenance and upkeep of existing facilities.” (SB136 of 2018
Fourth Quarter Cent Local Option Sales Tax Summary June 22, 2018). Revenue from the 0.25% sales tax
increase is split 0.10% for the Utah Transit Authority or UTA, 0.10% for cities and 0.05% for Salt Lake
County as of July 1, 2019 and afterwards. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this funding
source and Class C funds.
Impact Fee Eligibility
(Four types: fire, parks, police, and transportation / streets)
Impact fees are one-time charges imposed by the City on new development projects to help fund the cost
of providing infrastructure and services to that new development. This is part of the City’s policy that
growth should pay for growth. A project, or portion of a project, must be deemed necessary to ensure the
level of service provided can continue with the additional impacts of the new developments (such as
serving more residents or workers). As a result, it’s common for a project to only be partially eligible for
impact fee funding (the growth-related portion) so other funding sources must be found to cover the
difference. It is important to note that per state law, the City has six years from the date of collection to
spend or encumber under a contract the impact fee revenue. After six years, if those fees are not
encumbered or spent then the fees are returned to the developer with interest.
General Impact Fee Guidelines:
1. Impact fees are to be used to keep a current level of service for new growth to a City.
2. Cannot be used to cure deficiencies serving existing development.
3. May not raise the established level of service in existing development.
4. Cannot include an expense for overhead, such as any cost for staff/administration, operation, and
maintenance.
5. Impact fees can only be used to pay for the portion of the project directly attributable to growth
(it’s uncommon for projects to be 100% eligible for impact fees).
6. Must be incurred or encumbered within 6 years from the date they are collected, or they shall be
returned to the developer with interest payments per state law.
7. Must use an adopted Impact Fees Facilities Plan to determine the public facilities needed to serve
new growth and set fees costs by development type.
8. Repair and replacement projects are not growth related.
9. Upgrade projects are not growth related.
10. Repair, replacement, or upgrades can be included as part of a mixed project where the scope will
create increased capacity to serve projected growth.
11. Impact fees must be spent in the same geographic boundary (service area) in which they are
collected. The City’s Impact Fee Facilities Plan designates the entire city as the service area. The
Transportation section was updated in 2020. The other three sections were adopted in 2016.
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
CIP GRAND TOTALS 351,368,406 52,152,743 75,223,985 223,991,678
3000 CIP General Fund 99,521,109 9,429,006 19,941,213 70,150,889
8316070-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Warm Springs Park, 840 N 300 W 57,978 25,087 - 32,891
8317025-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 500/700 S Reconstruction 636,768 250,480 160,535 225,753
8317049-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 UTA TIGER GRANT MATCH 138,317 99,087 39,045 185
8318045-CC11009-3000-PRG10031 Bikeways Urban Trails 69,550 - 18,806 50,744
8318047-CC30004-3000-PRG10032 Rose Park Pedestrian Byway 152,283 - 112,560 39,723
8318048-FY24B2A4-3000-Miller Park Trail Access Improvements & Historic
Structures Preservation 365,012 - 277 364,735
484,146 - 35,150 448,996
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
8323601-CC11009-3000-PRG10035 200 S Recon Trans Corridor GF 2,687,407 208,569 695,632 1,783,206
8323604-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 3Creeks West Roadway 1,359,130 82,283 33,561 1,243,286
8323607-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 990,000 447,986 77,904 464,110
8323612-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 1000 W Fairpark Traffic Circle 60,896 4,830 60,896 (4,830)
8323630-CC11009-3000-PRG10047 Livable Streets 1,976,444 1,132,367 580,522 263,554
8323705-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 CCB Restoration - Ins Reimburse 4,477,385 - 24,371 4,453,015
8323707-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Physical Sec Impro City Hall 413,133 65,565 184,492 163,076
8381200-CC11002-3000-PRG10042 Open Space Land Matching 11,600 - - 11,600
8395046-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Open Space Land Trust 11,603 - 5,800 5,803
8600001-CC11002-3000-PRG10045 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - GF 377,958 94,900 267,957 15,102
8600005-CC11002-3000-PRG10021 Crime Lab Rent 46,651 - 54,226 (7,575)
8600040-CC10603-3000-PRG10037 Percent for Art 295,622 27,820 235,771 32,031
8600042-CC10603-3000-PRG10037 Maintenance Percent for Art 98,496 - 93,236 5,259
8600401-CC35001-3000-PRG10023 Parks Maintenance 83,777 6,036 124,741 (47,000)
8600402-CC35001-3000-PRG10023 Public Lands Maintenance FOF 825,868 (4,000) 459,995 369,873
8600701-CC30005-3000-PRG10022 Facilities Maintenance 469,354 8,341 429,446 31,567
8600702-CC30005-3000-PRG10040 Facilities Asset Renewal 999,323 220,756 187,809 590,758
8619408-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 Lindsay Garden Concession 400 - - 400
8619411-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 Westside Trail Connections 249,923 - - 249,923
8621600-FY24B1D5-3000-Bridge Rehabilitation Jordan River 2,648,507 - 2,066,880 581,627
8622104-CC11009-3000-PRG10050 Rail Adjacent PavementImprvmnt 70,000 34,452 17,508 18,040
8622105-CC35001-3000-PRG10023 Trails Maintenance 86 200,000 - 190,899 9,101
8622107-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Wingate Walkway 286,750 - - 286,750
FY24B3A11-3000-Rail Spur Removal 205,000 - 150,814 54,186
FY24B5A4-3000-State Funding for Cemetery Roads and Irrigation 3,000,000 1,179,079 - 1,820,922
FY24B5A5-3000-Traffic Signal Improvement 2200W/2100 N 450,000 9,334 57,648 383,018
FY24B5D9-3000-200 South Reconstruction 625,000 - - 625,000
FY24B5D9-3000-2100 South Reconstruction 3,323,590 1,298,001 1,453,608 571,981
FY24B5D9-3000-700 South Phase 7 1,120,000 35,115 163,412 921,473
FY24B5D9-3000-Traffic Signal Upgrades (8421501)450,000 - - 450,000
FY24CIP-3000 Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning 190,000 - 394 189,606
FY24CIP-3000-200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements 234,000 56,757 142,428 34,815
FY24CIP-3000-Alleyway Improvements-FY24-FOF 250,000 - - 250,000
FY24CIP-3000-Complete Streets Reconstruction-FY24 1,294,823 134,897 163,887 996,039
FY24CIP-3000-Cost Overrun 22,214 - - 22,214
FY24CIP-3000-Cost Overrun-FOF 225,357 - - 225,357
FY24CIP-3000-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 202,000 - 374 201,626
FY24CIP-3000-Crime Lab Rent 600,000 - 592,425 7,575
FY24CIP-3000-Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements 210,000 22,600 - 187,400
FY24CIP-3000-Facilities Asset Renewal Plan-FY24 1,700,000 - - 1,700,000
FY24CIP-3000-Facilities Maintenance 350,000 30,294 73,092 246,614
FY24CIP-3000-Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension 1,148,771 148,047 515,372 485,353
FY24CIP-3000-Fire Station #14 501,400 - - 501,400
FY24CIP-3000-Fire Station #3 679,400 - - 679,400
FY24CIP-3000--Fire Station Debt Service Pmt 1,180,800 - - 1,180,800
FY24CIP-3000-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and
Amenities 438,850 - - 438,850
325,000 23,510 21,485 280,005
170,000 - - 170,000
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
FY24CIP-3000-Livable Streets Implementation-FY24-FOF 1,394,126 - - 1,394,126
FY24CIP-3000-Neighborhood Byways-FY24 440,000 - 372 439,628
FY24CIP-3000-North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements 192,689 - 20,000 172,689
FY24CIP-3000-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 82,800 11,343 8,658 62,800
FY24CIP-3000-Percent for Art-FOF 161,518 - 20,446 141,072
FY24CIP-3000-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500 1,753 15,229 236,519
FY24CIP-3000-Public Lands Maintenance 250,000 148,646 100,045 1,308
FY24CIP-3000-Public Way Concrete-FY24-FOF 750,000 243,752 397,068 109,181
FY24CIP-3000-Richmond Park Community Playground 212,000 - - 212,000
FY24CIP-3000-Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements-
FOF 30,000 - 25,583 4,417
990,000 268,002 - 721,998
500,000 - - 500,000
100,000 - - 100,000
560,000 - - 560,000
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
FY25CIP-3000-FOF-Courts & Playgrounds 54,490 - - 54,490
FY25CIP-3000-FOF-Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction
Documents 117,200 - - 117,200
FY25CIP-3000-FOF-Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration 124,000 41,340 4,980 77,680
FY25CIP-3000-FOF-Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration 858,800 87,118 - 771,682
FY25CIP-3000-Harvey Milk Blvd LGBTQ+ and Neighborhood Visibility 30,000 - - 30,000
FY25CIP-3000-Historic Markers 30,000 - - 30,000
FY25CIP-3000-HVAC Control Replacement-Public Safety Building 1,300,000 148,377 1,048,139 103,484
FY25CIP-3000-Jordan River Trail Food Forest + Partner Garden 20,000 - 19,665 335
FY25CIP-3000-Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents 804,500 - - 804,500
FY25CIP-3000-Memory Grove Park Repairs, Preservation and Maintenance Plan-
Cap Maintenance 1,910,000 - - 1,910,000
1,000,000 39,858 607,533 352,609
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
3017 CIP GO Series 2019A Bonds 890 - - 890
8320208-CC30004-3017-PRG10042 BD 100 S North Campus to 900E 889 - - 889
8320209-CC30004-3017-PRG10042 BD 900 S 950 E to West Temple 0 - - 0
3019 CIP GO Series 2022 Bonds 11,094,614 1,501,350 5,682,016 3,911,247
8323221-CC11009-3019-PRG10042 BD 1300E 2100S Citylm 2,844,200 88,285 415,693 2,340,221
8323222-CC11009-3019-PRG10042 BD Virg. St S Temple 11thAve 1,284,545 7,471 1,296,052 (18,978)
8323224-CC11009-3019-PRG10041 BD Local streets FY24 2,999,659 194,571 2,769,245 35,843
8323227-CC11009-3019-PRG10041 BD Local streets FY25 2,000,000 1,211,023 574,106 214,870
Interest-3019-GO 2022 Interest 1,966,210 - 626,919 1,339,291
3020 CIP GO Series 2020A Bonds 616,472 - 616,472 0
8321202-CC30004-3020-PRG10041 BD Local Streets 616,472 - 616,472 0
3021 CIP STRB 2022B Non-Taxable 45,984,257 10,917,442 14,036,814 21,030,001
8323211-CC11009-3021-PRG10042 BD WestS RR Quiet Zones 6,100,000 153,367 239,785 5,706,848
8323212-CC30004-3021-PRG10042 BD Warm Spring Imprv 7,987,524 2,587,405 3,579,091 1,821,028
8323213-CC30005-3021-PRG10042 BD Cemetery 11,182,029 5,362,947 5,308,816 510,265
8323214-CC11009-3021-PRG10035 BD 600N Corridor 9,752,400 356,646 2,733,987 6,661,767
8323215-CC30004-3021-PRG10042 BD Radio Tower 7,500,000 2,457,077 2,175,134 2,867,789
Interest-3021-SRTB 2022B Interest 3,462,304 - - 3,462,304
3022 CIP STRB 2022C Fed Taxable 26,041,478 4,098,441 926,736 21,016,301
8323231-CC30004-3022-PRG10042 BD CP Transform&Gener 6,091,200 4,001,746 718,200 1,371,253
8323232-CC30004-3022-PRG10042 BD Pioneer Park 10,000,000 - - 10,000,000
8323233-CC30004-3022-PRG10042 BD Fisher Mansion Imprv 2,989,623 96,695 208,536 2,684,392
8323234-CC30004-3022-PRG10042 BD Urban Wood 1,999,942 - - 1,999,942
FY25B1D15-3022-Pioneer Park Improvements 4,960,714 - - 4,960,714
3023 CIP Transportation Fund 29,089,038 2,326,682 5,037,382 21,724,974
8321620-CC11009-3023-PRG10028 Bus Service 600 N 1000 N 741,875 - 21,454 720,422
8321622-CC11009-3023-PRG10047 NBHD St Safety Livability 20,707 - 6,200 14,507
8321623-CC11009-3023-PRG10031 Urban Trails 1,102,933 2,468 676,131 424,334
8321624-CC11009-3023-PRG10033 Complete Streets Reconstructio 483,102 19,901 175,257 287,944
8321625-CC11009-3023-PRG10035 Corridor Transformations 877,849 11,079 68,527 798,243
8321626-CC11009-3023-PRG10048 Alleyway Repaving 122,938 - 19,451 103,488
8322601-CC11009-3023-PRG10042 200 S Transit Complete Street Supplt 415,800 - - 415,800
8322607-CC11009-3023-PRG10035 Corridor Transformations 282,200 - 7,154 275,046
8322609-CC11009-3023-PRG10042 Transportation Area Studies 166,200 - 82,000 84,200
8322610-CC11009-3023-PRG10042 400 South Viaduct Trail 500,000 276,941 268,623 (45,564)
8322613-CC11009-3023-PRG10032 Neighborhood Byways 806,971 56,701 276,155 474,115
8322618-CC11009-3023-PRG10031 Urban Trails FY22 766,018 171,496 184,491 410,030
8322621-CC11009-3023-PRG10028 Transportation Safety Imprvmt 322,695 - 105,301 217,394
8322638-CC11009-3023-PRG10042 600/700N FreqTrnsNtwrkImprvmts 64,095 - 55,593 8,502
8323603-CC11009-3023-PRG10035 200 S Recon Trans Corr 1/4Cent 1,300,000 6,790 336,025 957,186
8323610-CC11009-3023-PRG10033 Complete Streets 2,387,261 457,834 1,190,621 738,806
8323611-CC11009-3023-PRG10042 California Avenue Safety Imprv 100,000 12,786 21,897 65,317
8323613-CC11009-3023-PRG10028 Sunnyside Ave Pedestrian Safe 399,560 6,900 160 392,500
8600121-CC11009-3023-PRG10030 MultiModal Intersection Signal 23,657 11,109 2,654 9,893
FY24B3A15-3023-Complete Streets Reconstruction 205,177 32,767 36,171 136,240
FY24B3A15-3023-Complete Streets Reconstruction -FY24 750,000 44,340 58,745 646,914
FY24CIP-3023-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 360,000 - - 360,000
FY24CIP-3023-Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide-
FY24 3,293,000 263,275 732,300 2,297,425
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
FY24CIP-3023-Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail 1,700,000 - - 1,700,000
FY25B2A6-3023-3200 West Complete Street Additions 100,000 - - 100,000
FY25CIP-3023-400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction 860,000 - - 860,000
FY25CIP-3023-Green Loop Implementation 3,140,000 - - 3,140,000
FY25CIP-3023-Neighborhood Byways Program 950,000 902,690 - 47,310
FY25CIP-3023-Safer Crossings Citywide 300,000 - - 300,000
FY25CIP-3023-Street Overlay Program 2,750,000 49,605 - 2,700,395
FY25Key Changes-3023-Livable Streets Program 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000
FY25Key Changes-3023-Urban Trail Maintenance 200,000 - 28,148 171,853
3024 CIP GO Series 2021A Bonds 1,463,995 97,983 662,011 704,000
Interest-3024-GO 2021 Interest 1,463,995 97,983 662,011 704,000
3031 CIP CDBG 384,703 - 42,122 342,581
8319062-CC30004-3031-PRG10044 Deteriorated or Missing Concre 624 - - 624
8322061-CC30004-3031-PRG10042 SLC Trans Route 4 291,291 - 42,122 249,169
8323618-CC11009-3031-PRG10042 FY23 400 South Bus Stop Improv 92,789 - - 92,789
3032 CIP State Grants 13,704,367 7,667,903 1,696,424 4,340,040
8322425-CC30004-3032-PRG10042 Bonneville Shoreline Trail 1,300,000 299,475 1,000,187 338
8322634-CC11009-3032-PRG10042 Rose Park to Redwood Rd - UDOT 999,617 75,753 197,062 726,802
8322637-CC11009-3032-PRG10042 Railroad 4900 W 700 S Round 2 93,750 - - 93,750
8323642-CC11009-3032-PRG10042 300 West Protected Bike Lanes 2,100,000 1,166,429 396,996 536,575
FY24C6G3-3032-UDOT Contribution for HAWK Signal 155,000 - 102,178 52,822
FY25B3D4-3032-TTIF 200 South Transit Corridor Project 1,800,000 - - 1,800,000
FY25B3D5-3032-TTIF 400 South Multi Use Trail 6,356,000 6,126,247 - 229,754
FY25B3D7-3032-TTIF Westpointe/Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway 900,000 - - 900,000
3033 CIP Class C 14,769,276 2,411,878 3,927,887 8,429,511
8314031-CC11009-3033-PRG10042 Driver Feedback Signs 86,320 - 84,510 1,810
8317032-CC30004-3033-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance Program 21,164 - 5,100 16,064
8317359-CC30004-3033-PRG10042 Gladiola to Indiana 900S Seq C 112,658 - - 112,658
8318023-CC30004-3033-PRG10042 Gladiola 900 S Imp 38,047 - - 38,047
8320502-CC11009-3033-PRG10044 Street Overlay FY20 326,568 0 212,277 114,291
8321501-CC11009-3033-PRG10033 Street Reconstruction & Overlays 21 891,249 318,763 242,436 330,050
8322501-CC11009-3033-PRG10029 Street Improvements FY22 1,216,606 34,867 893,171 288,568
8322503-CC11009-3033-PRG10042 Class C Contingency 2,076,664 - 1,573,045 503,619
8323500-CC11009-3033-PRG10029 Street Improvements FY23 3,000,000 1,644,860 61,597 1,293,543
FY24CIP-3033-Complete Streets Overlay-FY24 1,250,000 28,866 546,134 675,000
FY24CIP-3033-Complete Streets Reconstruction-FY24 2,250,000 384,522 309,617 1,555,861
FY25CIP-3033-Street Reconstruction Program 3,500,000 - - 3,500,000
3035 CIP Impact Fee - Police 56,592 - 1,540 55,052
8423003-CC10504-3035-PRG10042 IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment -
Police 9,000 - 1,540 7,460
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
8417018-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 1,570 - - 1,570
8418002-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Cwide Dog Lease Imp 23,262 - 19,638 3,624
8419103-CC11009-3037-PRG10042 Imperial Park Shade Accounting 6,398 - - 6,398
8419150-CC11009-3037-PRG10042 Pioneer Park 3,052,938 1,050,562 830,103 1,172,273
8419204-CC10504-3037-PRG10042 Park's Consultant's Contract 2,638 2,596 2,596 (2,554)
8420134-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Jordan Park Event Grounds 404,139 1,649 14,304 388,186
8420136-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 9Line Orchard 149,953 - 162,067 (12,114)
8420138-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Rich Park Comm Garden 12,431 - - 12,431
8420142-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Wasatch Hollow Improvements 431,860 22,382 11,481 397,996
8420406-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 54,808 - - 54,808
8420420-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 120,893 - - 120,893
8420424-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 County #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 240,239 - 143,325 96,914
8421401-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Fisher House Exploration Center 132,208 1,400 123,813 6,996
8421403-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Trailhead Prop Acquisition 21,830 - - 21,830
8422403-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Three Creeks West Bank New Park 150,736 - - 150,736
8422408-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Green Loop 200 E Design 513,788 24,243 489,546 0
8422410-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Historic Renovation Allen Park 315,770 - 156,146 159,624
8422412-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 1,241,318 127,040 103,060 1,011,218
8422413-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 319,139 - 14,175 304,964
8422414-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 475,079 6,361 13,693 455,024
8422415-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 RAC Playground with Shade Sails 178,298 11,542 63,456 103,300
8423005-CC10504-3037-PRG10042 IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment -
Parks 9,000 - 1,540 7,460
8423405-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 RAC Playground Phase II 521,564 - - 521,564
8423406-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 900 S River Park Soccer Field 287,848 130 8,420 279,298
8423407-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 864,449 - - 864,449
8423408-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Gateway Triangle Property Park 499,457 - 5,511 493,946
8423409-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Lighting NE Baseball Field 299,269 - 220,000 79,269
8423451-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Marmalade Plaza Project 996,905 - 429,207 567,698
8423452-CC11002-3037-PRG10042 Open Space Property Acquisition (City Parks)450,000 - 33,140 416,860
8423453-CC11002-3037-PRG10042 Open Space Property Acquisition (Trails)300,000 - - 300,000
8423454-CC35001-3037-PRG10042 Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land -
Land Purchase Near RAC 0 - - 0
416,150 - - 416,150
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
3038 CIP Impact fee Streets 4,922,749 69,745 320,849 4,532,155
8406001-CC30004-3038-PRG10042 Gladiola Street 15,169 12,925 - 2,244
8412002-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 124,593 - - 124,593
8418003-CC11009-3038-PRG10031 Bikeway Urban Trails 181,303 - 136,936 44,367
8418016-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 500 to 700 S 22,744 - - 22,744
8420110-CC11009-3038-PRG10028 Transp Safety Improvements 46,883 11,820 5,480 29,583
8420120-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 Complete Street Enhancements 18,699 - - 18,699
8421500-CC11009-3038-PRG10028 Transportation Safety Improvements IF 241,135 2,558 118,188 120,388
8421501-CC11009-3038-PRG10030 Traffic Signal Upgrades 340,236 - 53,109 287,127
8422611-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 90,000 25,000 - 65,000
8422614-CC11009-3038-PRG10032 Neighborhood Byways IF 104,500 - - 104,500
8422619-CC30004-3038-PRG10031 Urban Trails FY22 IF 6,500 - - 6,500
8422620-CC11009-3038-PRG10028 Transportation Safety Improvement IF 6,316 - - 6,316
8422622-CC11009-3038-PRG10035 1700S Corridor Transformation IF 35,300 - - 35,300
8423608-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 110,000 - 5,205 104,795
FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371 - - 3,204,371
FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriated Transportation
Impact Fees 30,183 - - 30,183
110,000 - 513 109,488
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
FY25B1D15-3042-Ida Cotton Park - 2025 Construction 675,000 - - 675,000
FY25B1D15-3042-Jordan River Corridor - 2025 Design 500,000 - - 500,000
FY25B1D15-3042-Madsen Park - 2025 Construction 675,000 - - 675,000
FY25B1D15-3042-Richmond Park - 2025 or 2026 Construction 675,000 - - 675,000
FY25B1D15-3042-Steenblik Park - 2025 Construction 675,000 - - 675,000
FY25B1D15-3042-Taufer Park - 2025 or 2026 Construction 675,000 - - 675,000
Interest-3042-GO 2023A Interest 1,058,715 - - 1,058,715
7203 Misc Grants - State Grants 4,806,102 - - 4,806,102
8322071-CC30004-3014-PRG10042 Granary Dist. Flood Plain Mit 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000
8323640-CC11009-3032-PRG10042 600/700 N UDOT AT 2,400,000 - - 2,400,000
FY25B3D9-3032-TTIF Bicycle Lanes Capital Hill 406,102 - - 406,102
CIP Appropriations as of 4/30/25 Budget Encumbrances Expenditures Budgetary Balance
CIP RECAPTURE GRAND TOTALS 7,424,213 26,013 4,484,963 2,913,237
8316044-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Pedestrian Safety Improvements 1,621 - - 1,621
8316047-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Pioneer Park Improvements, 350 1,014 - - 1,014
8316074-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Jordan River Trail Bridge 3,961 - - 3,961
8317024-CC30005-3000-PRG10042 Sorenson Multicultural Center 24,262 - 12,371 11,890
8317043-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Parks and Public Lands Compreh 7,343 - - 7,343
8318028-CC30004-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance 76,504 - 4,723 71,780
8318049-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Jordan R. Flood Control 9,870 - - 9,870
8319085-CC10504-3000-PRG10036 Cost overrun 16,800 - 14,690 2,110
8319301-CC30005-3000-PRG10042 Delong & Parks Yard Improvement 28,727 - 9,811 18,916
8319401-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Glendale Park Playground Path 43,476 - - 43,476
8319403-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 RAC Shade Structure and Playgr 3,406 - - 3,406
8319406-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 11th Ave Pavilion and Signage 47,079 - 13,677 33,402
8320407-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Three Creeks Con Phase III 492,800 - - 492,800
8320602-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 Bus Stop Signal Enhancements 500,001 (1) 217,030 282,971
8322051-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Training Tower Fire Prop Upgrd 66,167 - 11,237 54,930
8322052-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Single Fam Fire Behavior Prop 12,521 - - 12,521
8322401-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Tracy Aviary FY22 35,408 - 28,698 6,710
8323422-CC30005-3000-PRG10042 Dee Glen Tennis Court Reconstr 500,000 25,414 246,761 227,825
8323802-CC11002-3000-PRG10042 RealPropertyPurchase#2 FY23 3,767,564 - 3,742,543 25,021
8619409-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 Fairmont Stream Access Beautiful 17,600 600 7,212 9,788
8619602-CC35001-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance 150,000 - - 150,000
8619622-CC10504-3000-PRG10042 Trans Master Plan 49,840 - 33,574 16,266
8619624-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 1700 S Lane Reconfiguration 53,076 - - 53,076
8620608-CC11009-3000-PRG10028 Sugarhouse 600 E Traffic Calmi 149,068 - 142,635 6,433
8620621-CC11009-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance 250,000 - - 250,000
8621601-CC11009-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance FY21 300,000 - - 300,000
8622103-CC11009-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Preservation FY22 300,000 - - 300,000
8314094-CC30005-3004-PRG10042 West Salt Lake Master Plan Imp 14,905 - - 14,905
8316079-CC11009-3004-PRG10042 University Bikeway 1,201 - - 1,201
8323644-CC30004-3014-PRG10042 Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement -
Odyssey House 500,000 - - 500,000
CIP GRAND TOTALS WITH RECAPTURE 358,792,619 52,178,756 79,708,948 226,904,915
Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City
to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to
recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior
discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended
for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council
consideration.
Bring all facilities out of
deferred maintenance
Appropriations vs. funding
need identified in Public
Services’ Facilities Dashboard
that tracks each asset
$6.8 million
annually or $68
million over ten
years
Expand the City's urban trail
network with an emphasis on
East-West connections
Total paved/unpaved network
miles; number and funding
for improved trail features;
percentage of 9-Line
completed
$21 million for 9-
Line
implementation
Increase the overall condition
index of the City's street
network from poor to fair
Overall Condition Index
(OCI); pavement condition
survey every five years
$133 million cost
estimate (in addition
to existing funding
level)
Implement the Foothill Trails
Master Plan
Distance of improved trails
completed; number and
funding for improved
trailheads
$TBD
Advance the City's
sustainability goals through
building energy efficiency
upgrades
Energy savings; carbon
emission reductions $TBD
Focus on renewal and
maintenance projects over
creating new assets
Number, funding level and
ratio of renewed assets vs.
new assets
$TBD
2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CAP projects. The idea
of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5
million, and over $5 million.
3.Measure CAP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually
measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the
CAP and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CAP. A
high alignment would indicate the CAP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs.
4.Council Adoption of CAP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CAP each year
with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding.
Does the Administration have a preference?
CIP COUNCIL Briefing Questions:
Please add responses in red text.
JULY 1 CIP BRIEFING COUNCIL QUESTIONS:
Project 2: Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2026
Transportation Division
- Are there any delays or additional processes we need to go through related to the
new legislation? How does the Administration plan to work through this? Will
legislation impact the timing of implementation?
o The three primary corridors that will be targeted with this funding are
Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. SB-195 requires that the City
conduct a study to get approval for “highway reduction strategy” (safety,
multimodal) projects on collectors and arterials east of I-15. The
Transportation Division has already begun work on this process and is
working closely with UDOT. Because Redwood Road and 900 West are west
of I-15, they are exempt from SB-195. Redwood Road is owned by UDOT, and
we have already been collaborating with UDOT on potential safety
enhancements on that facility. We will need approval from UDOT to invest in
800 South east of I-15, which we hope will happen this fall.
Project 3: Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms
Public Lands Department
- Because of some urgent issues in Fairmont Park, the Council would like a clearer
understanding of the funding sources and the schedule to complete these items.
The restroom improvements are the highest priority for the community at Fairmont
Park. Can you provide a list of different Fairmont Park maintenance and
improvement items and a timeframe for completing each item? Is it possible to
bring the Fairmont restrooms to the front of the schedule and make it happen as
soon as possible?
Ongoing, funded projects at Fairmont Park:
• North End Beautification ($5 million–GO Bond): The north end of Fairmont
Park will be revitalized in conjunction with community and stakeholder
involvement to create an inviting and aesthetically pleasing entrance to the park.
Of the $5 million project budget, $500,000 is currently available, from the 1st
Tranche of the GO Bond (issued October 2023), for planning, community
engagement, and design. Construction funding is not currently available.
• Safety Enhancements ($1.5 million–GO Bond): Ensuring the well-being of all
park-goers is a top priority. This project, in concert with the above, was created
following Council’s decision to change the “Reimagine Neighborhood Parks”
project for Council District 7 from the completion of the McClelland Trail to
Fairmont Park safety improvements (meeting agenda, motion sheet and
recording can be found here:
https://slc.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=3330). Of the $1.5
million project budget, $150,000 is currently available, from the 1st Tranche of
the GO Bond (issued October 2023), for planning, community engagement, and
design. Construction funding is not currently available.
• Full-Court Basketball Upgrade ($754,000 –FY24/25 CIP): Responding to
community interest, the current half-court basketball area will be expanded and
potentially relocated into a full-court facility.
• Public Art (Up to $140,000 – FY24/25 CIP 1.5 Percent-for-Art): The Salt
Lake City Arts Council’s Art Design Board has recommended the allocation of
funding for a public art commission at Fairmont Park, which will be managed by
the Salt Lake City Arts Council. This project will be integrated into the park’s
overall improvements (three bullets above) and extend into McClelland Street.
Phase one of public engagement for the consolidated Fairmont Park project was
completed in March 2025. As of June 23, 2025, we have a confirmation from the
Boys and Girls Club that they wish to remain in their existing building, with an
amended or new lease to be worked out in 2025 or 2026. Design is now underway
and will be ready to share with the public this fall. Construction is anticipated to
begin in 2027, pending the approval and availability of construction funds that are
currently planned to be included in the 3rd Tranche of the GO Bond by fall 2026.
During design, the project team will explore the possibility of “safety enhancements”
meaning the potential consolidation of structures, including restrooms, the park
ranger station, and potentially maintenance buildings. Currently, the park is over-
saturated with restroom facilities (three) based on its size and use.
It is the department’s preference and long-standing intent to complete all of the
above projects at once, with construction beginning in 2027. Though we investigated
how to potentially expedite “safety enhancements” sooner, in 2026, the benefits of
continue to consolidate the projects are several fold. This plan will lead to budget
and project delivery efficiencies, allow for the design of the full park to be considered
holistically, and ensure park closures for construction are minimized. Because of this,
it is the department’s preference to bring the Fairmont restrooms online at the same
time as the rest of the improvements within the park and informed by the citywide
restroom study. Having said this, we plan to discuss opportunities to prioritize
improvements related to safety with Council members and staff in the coming weeks.
- Is there an overlap between the previously awarded Fairmont Park bathroom funds
and this CIP project? Please describe.
The scope of the funded “Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study” (a constituent CIP
application approved in August 2024 for FY 24-25) includes conceptual design for one
restroom at Fairmont Park. This funding will be used to complete the schematic (or
40%) design for replacement of that restroom but does not include funding for
construction document development or construction. The current request for this
year (Project 3: Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms) would fund the completion of
construction document development and then the construction of that design.
- What is the status of the bathroom study, when will it be ready?
The Public Lands Department was initially received $100,000 in funding from a
constituent CIP application in FY 24-25 for the “Citywide Park Restroom Planning
Study”, the scope of which included a planning study to update citywide park
restroom policy and practices, conceptual design standards for park restrooms based
on context, and conceptual designs for a restroom replacement at Fairmont Park.
In addition, Public Lands submitted a request for additional funding to expand the
scope of this project in FY 24-25's Budget Amendment 5 in order to perform
additional analysis requested by the City Council on June 4, 2024. This additional
funding of $75,000 will expand the scope and budget (to $175,000 total) to include a
full citywide restroom assessment rather than strictly for park restrooms. Upon this
funding being approved in May 2025, Public Lands has assigned this project to the
Planning and Design Division, and the scope of work is being finalize d. A public
“request for qualifications” (RFQ) will be posted by the end of 2025 to procure a
qualified consultant to complete a portion of this work (primarily the design work,
policies, and guidelines). Much of the level of service and contextual analysi s will be
performed in-house by Public Lands Planners. The design and planning efforts are
anticipated to conclude by Summer 2026 and, again, inform the restroom design(s)
for Fairmont Park.
- If funded as recommended by the mayor, which bathrooms will be completed?
o If uncertain which bathrooms will be repaired due to funding, please share a
holistic list of Public Lands restrooms and the order in which they will be
repaired.
If fully funded ($2,052,000), up to three restrooms will be able to be fully replaced.
However, there are several ongoing, funded projects that are occurring at a few of the
proposed park locations (Fairmont GO Bond, Liberty Park Vision Plan, Cottonwood Pa rk
GO Bond). If funding is able to be leveraged with other projects, or construction costs
can be reduced by coupling projects, we may be able to accomplish more work. Each
restroom is anticipated to cost approximately $684,000.
The park locations, in order of priority are:
• Fairmont Park, northeast restroom
• Liberty Park, near the new Rotary Play Park
• Riverside Park, near 600 North
• Cottonwood Park (if funding allows)
• Jordan Park, near the skatepark (if funding allows)
• Herman Franks Park, both are in need of replacement (if funding allows)
Project 4: Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
Public Lands Department
- Please provide details on which of these projects will be funded.
The Mayor’s Recommended Budget includes funding $2,684,929 of the $3,730,000 total
request. The 10 parks in the application were selected based on recommendations from the
2024 Salt Lake City ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. At least one park in each City
Council District is included in these 10.
This application seeks to remove the most three critical types of architectural barriers at
parks: (1) arrival points, (2) playgrounds, and (3) walkways. By so doing, the City will be
expanding parks' capacity to serve a wider range of users, including adults and children with
disabilities and aging adults, ensuring more inclusive access for all people. Per the CIP
application, if partially-funded, Public Lands recommends fully funding the required
improvements at fewer parks, rather than partially funding all 10 parks.
Parks were prioritized based on severity of access issues and efficiencies with other ongoing
projects in order to maximize the impact. The individual projects within these 10 parks that
would be completed with full funding can be found in the CIP applicat ion.
SUMMARY:
• Riverside Park (District 1) $578,000
• Sorensen Multicultural Center (District 2) $132,800
• Jordan Park (District 2) $238,200
• 11th Avenue Park (District 3) $548,500
• Lindsey Gardens Park (District 3) $670,000
• Victory Park (District 4) $279,500
• Ballpark Playground (District 5) $130,000
• Wasatch Hollow Park (District 6) $139,000
• Parley’s Way Park (District 7) $546,000
• Parleys Historic Nature Park (NA) $468,000
PROJECT BREAKDOWN: The full project breakdown is included in the “supporting
documents” section of the CIP application titled “ADA Application - Park, Issue Severity,
Enhances Existing, and Impact-Visitation, and Cost Estimates”.
Park Cost Estimate
Riverside Park
Install van-accessible parking signage on the south side of the park. $ 1,000.00
Restrooms are locked. The lavatory sink and water fountain don’t work. Consider a
reassessment. n/a
Modify the south baseball field’s team seating area to allow for a wheelchair-
accessible team seating space that doesn’t overlap the route. $ 5,000.00
Reconfigure the parking spaces to accommodate a van-accessible parking space
on the north side of the park. $ 6,000.00
Install van-accessible parking signage. $ 1,000.00
Repaint the access aisles to adjoin with the accessible route. $ 1,000.00
Install or extend the route along the soccer field on the north side of the park. $ 10,000.00
Remove the post at Sutherland baseball field's team seating area. $ 3,000.00
Reinstall a compliant play structure ramp. $ 3,000.00
Install a play structure with accessible features or adjust the play structure ramp
handrails. $ 300,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 100,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 172,000.00
Park Total $ 578,000.00
Sorensen MCC (fields/playground)
Install van-accessible parking signage. $ 1,000.00
Modify the baseball field’s team seating area to allow for a wheelchair-accessible
seating space that doesn’t overlap the route. $ 5,000.00
Install a hands-free door entry button to the baseball field and outdoor play area.
Add accessible entrance signage. $ 10,000.00
Rotate the ramp on the play structure to allow for an unobstructed transfer
platform. $ 12,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play areas. $ 75,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 30,900.00
Park Total $ 132,900.00
Jordan Park
Install van-accessible parking signage. Consider dispersing ADA parking spaces. $ 1,000.00
Reconfigure or add accessible restrooms. n/a
Install proper ADA restroom signage. n/a
Adjust the restroom door hardware. n/a
Recalibrate the restroom doors. n/a
Bevel the restroom threshold. n/a
Install a side wall grab bar. n/a
Adjust the rear wall grab bar. n/a
Adjust the toilet seat height. n/a
Install insulated piping at the lavatory sink and recalibrate the faucet control. n/a
Modify the south baseball field’s team seating area to allow for a wheelchair-
accessible team seating space that doesn't overlap the route. $ 5,000.00
Add a route to the horseshoe area. n/a
Add a route to the sports court. n/a
Add an accessible ramp or bevel the bike polo threshold. Consider altering the
door hinge so that they open towards the bike polo court. $ 8,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area on the north side of the park. $ 75,000.00
Lower the rocker ground-level play component on the east side of the park. $ 10,000.00
Add a route to at least one swing in the play area on the east side of the park. $ 20,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area on the west side of the park. $ 75,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 58,200.00
Park Total $ 238,200.00
11th Avenue Park
Reconfigure parking to accommodate for a van-accessible parking space and an
ADA parking space. $ 6,000.00
Add parking lot access aisles.
Install ADA and van-accessible parking signage. $ 1,000.00
Add a ramp along the east side of the recessed sports field near the parking lot. $ 20,000.00
Repair or replace play area rubber tiles that have gaps or have warped. n/a
Install an accessible play structure with compliant features or adjust the play
structure ramp handrails. $ 300,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 70,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 158,800.00
Park Total $ 548,800.00
Lindsey Gardens Park
Add an ADA parking space and a van-accessible parking space closest to the entry
point curb ramp. $ 15,000.00
Add parking lot access aisles. $ 5,000.00
Install ADA and van-accessible parking signage. $ 1,000.00
Regrade parking spaces to have a cross slope under 1:48 or 2.08%. $ 10,000.00
Regrade routing to under 1:20 or 5% or provide level landings. $ 75,000.00
Modify the southwest baseball field’s team seating area to allow for a wheelchair-
accessible team seating space that doesn't overlap the route. $ 5,000.00
Install a play structure with accessible features or adjust the play structure ramp
handrails. $ 300,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 90,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 200,400.00
Park Total $ 670,400.00
Victory Park
Paint parking lot lines and add an access aisle. $ 500.00
Install ADA and van-accessible parking signage. $ 5,000.00
Regrade the route ramp slopes to under 1:20 or 5%. $ 75,000.00
Install an entry point ramp at Markea Avenue. $ 75,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 60,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 64,650.00
Park Total $ 279,650.00
Ballpark Playground
Repair the entry point at the play area. $ 10,000.00
Add accessible steps of at least 14 inches in depth throughout the elevated play
structure. $ 10,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 80,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 30,000.00
Park Total $ 130,000.00
Wasatch Hollow Park
Repair parking lot potholes. n/a
Regrade ADA parking space cross slopes to under 1:48 or 2.08%. $ 75,000.00
Install ADA and van-accessible parking signage. $ 1,000.00
Replace the parallel wooden slats found between the play areas with
perpendicular slats. n/a
Install proper ADA restroom signage. n/a
Recalibrate the restroom doors. n/a
Recalibrate the toilet flush control or add a hands-free option. n/a
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 90,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 49,800.00
Park Total $ 139,800.00
Parley's Way Park
Repair the entry point asphalt along East Parleys Way. $ 10,000.00
Install a play structure with accessible features. $ 300,000.00
Install accessible ground surfacing at the play area. $ 80,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 156,000.00
Park Total $ 546,000.00
Parley's Historic Nature Park
ADA Park Entrance Improvements $ 80,000.00
Erosion Mitigation $ 80,000.00
West Water Access Stabilization $ 100,000.00
East Water Access Stabilization $ 100,000.00
Soft Costs (contingencies, design, permits and PM fees) $ 108,000.00
Park Total $ 468,000.00
APPLICATION TOTAL $3,731,750.00
Project 6: 700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road)
Engineering Division
-Project 6 - The $680,600 requested was not a typo. This was the full amount
requested by the Applicant. This CIP request will provide part of the local match
($1,680,600 required) in order to obtain $3,000,000 Federal funding programmed for
this project. This is correct.
Project 7: Public Way Concrete - See exhibit for additional details
Engineering Division
-Please provide the condition list from Cartograph and share what the worst areas
are that will be focused on.
o This program can cover both sidewalks and ADA ramps. A condition list for
both types of assets was emailed to Kate Werrett.
o In general, locations will be selected on a worst-first basis. However, Project
Managers will also look at areas that have a high number of issues and direct
contractors to those areas to gain econom ies of scale and stretch program
funding further.
Project 9: 20 Acres of Irrigation System
Public Lands Department
-COUNCIL STAFF: Kat said that $600,000 is the minimum amount of useful funding
for this project.
-PUBLIC LANDS: This statement serves as a confirmation that the above sentence is
accurate. In addition, more precise locations will be determined based on (1) Parks
Division priorities and (2) existing irrigation systems’ OCI (overall condition index),
based on the FY 25/26 funding allocated.
Project 12: Facilities Replacement & Renewal - See exhibit for additional details
Facilities Division
-Public Services provided the list of projects associated with this.
Project 15: Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026
Transportation Division
-When departments have similar requests, can the Administration provide details on
how the departments are working together on the related items?
o The Transportation, Engineering, and Streets Divisions collaborate closely on
every project. For sidewalks in particular, Streets leads on replacing broken
sidewalk and Transportation leads on identifying gaps. Engineering does the
design and construction management for new sidewalks and ensures ADA
compliance.
-What areas will this focus on? Is the Upper Avenues near Ensign Elementary on the
list?
o For bikeways, this effort will focus on gaps in the existing network relative to
the network outlined in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The Bicycle
Advisory Committee is assisting in the effort to identify and prioritize these
gaps. For sidewalks, we plan on focusing in areas of greatest need, such as
near schools. The gap on L Street near Ensign Elementary is one of those high
priority gaps.
Project 57: Civic Campus & Green Loop Implementation
Public Lands Department
-Please provide details on when impact fees will expire:
o COUNCIL STAFF: Finance has shared the following impact fee expiration
details:
▪Police - Next expiration is January 2031
▪Fire - Next expiration is January 2031
▪Parks - Next expiration is in October 2027
▪Streets - Next expiration is in December 2027
-What are the other Public Lands projects that the Park Impact Fees could be used
for if not used for the Civic Campus?
From Finance: Parks impact fees can currently be used for new park acreage and
improvements that maintain the level of service and offset the burden caused by
growth in population.
FY26 Public Lands projects that are potentially Parks Impact Fee Eligibility:
1.Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms - $456,000 - Eligibility is based on making 2 of
the 3 restrooms open year around. This is a 50% increase or 1/3 or the time for
growth.
2.Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design -
$1,314,000
3.Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical
Infrastructure Upgrades - -$102,000 – For the shade structure
4.East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300 -400
South and 400- 500 South) (Constituent Request) - $232,470 – ADA, new trees, new
benches, pollinator garden
5.Riverside Basketball Court Renovation (Constituent request) - $85% of $490,000 is
eligible. Art is ineligible. Eligibility based on full court 6 baskets and fencing. Any
partial funding and/or scope change will alter the eligibility percentage. $40k for Art
is ineligible.
6.Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements for Vibrant, Safe City Parks -
$2,597,000
7.Playground Shade (Constituent request) - $500,000
8.Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements (Constituent
Request) - $170,000 - Irrigation and new landscaping are eligible.
9.Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup (Constituent Request) - $480,000 –
The $20k for bridge study is ineligible.
10. Nature Park at Bonneville (Constituent request) - $2,765,0000
From Public Lands:
Page 13 of the “Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget” for FY 25 -26
summarizes the overall recommendation to allocate a total of $8,800,000 in Parks Impact
Fees to eight Public Lands projects proposed for the FY 25-26 CIP, including $2,900,500 for
this “Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation” application, Project 57. In short, the
recommended $2,900,500, the City’s first construction dollars allocated to the Green Loop
project, will be used as a match for philanthropic requests and grant funding.
As an update on the $3,140,000 allocated in FY 24-25:
•Construction document development for the Civic Center block of the Green Loop on
200 East is underway.
•A capital campaign feasibility study for the entire Green Loop is also currently
underway.
•The project team for the conceptual design of the 500 West segment of the Green
Loop is currently selecting a qualified design consultant team.
In addition, Public Lands believes that the following projects could potentially require
additional Parks Impact Fees in the future. Please note, the Public Lands Strategic Capital,
Acquisition and Asset Management Plan (SCAAMP) is in development and will make more
accurate projections of our level of service and project needs, particularly those eligible for
and requiring Impact Fees. This plan is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2025.
Disclaimer: Parks Impact Fee eligibility for all of these improvements has yet to be
determined.
•Glendale Park (Phases 2+) (design in 2025, construction 2026-2028): $3M to $5 M
more (excluding outdoor pool costs)
•Fleet Block (design in 2025-2026, construction 2027-2029): $3M to $5M more
•Allen Park (Phases 2+) (design in 2025): minimum of $4M to $6M more
Please note, the full build-out cost for Allen Park is estimated at $30-$50
million in the Adaptive Reuse and Management Plan. Parks Impact Fee
eligibility for all of these improvements has yet to be determined.
•Cottonwood Park (design in 2025): $2M to $4M more
•Gateway Triangle Park: up to $1M more
•Green Loop (before 2034): Total cost $300M to $350M more (parks portion approx
30% of total cost)
•Additional Jordan River Corridor projects (before 2030): up to $10M
•Property acquisition based on SCAAMP: $5M (before 2027), $20M to $50M (before
2040)
•Regional Athletic Complex (6-8 more fields, full buildout): up to $18M more
Public Lands would also like to make one correction from the July 1, 2025, City Council Work
Session regarding Glendale Park. At one point, it was mentioned that Glendale Park
completion would cost $60 million, per the adopted master plan. However, with the
currently allocated GO Bond and impact fee funding, the park’s full buildout may only
require an estimated additional $3-5 million for the completion of Phases 1 and 2.
JULY 8 CIP BRIEFING COUNCIL QUESTIONS:
Project 18: GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2026; Bike Rack Replacements 2026
Transportation
•Where are the bike racks that will be replaced? Is there potential to overlap these
replacements with other applicable CIP applications?
Bike rack replacements are citywide with specific locations to be identified. Salt
Lake City has had a bike rack installation program for over 20 years, installing racks
primarily in the downtown and Sugar House business districts, but also by business
request citywide. The bike corral program is also citywide. Based on sample field
comparisons between existing bike racks compared to the database of original rack
locations, approximately 15-20% of bike racks installed have gone missing, primarily
due to being hit by motor vehicles. Some of these requests are for big trip
generators like Urban Lounge and could use 5–10 racks on a large pad. Others are
simpler, like a single U rack on a concrete pier.
In the 15 years of the bike corral program, nearly all of the original 20 bike corrals
have also been damaged and need to be replaced. There are 2 constituent requests
related to bike parking, neither of which are replacement bike racks. The Milk Block
Bike SPA (Secure Parking Area) concept as proposed by the constituent is an
exemplary bicycle parking accommodation in keeping with the Milk Block’s location
along the well-used 9-Line Trail. If a Bike SPA were desired to be added to Project 18,
a significant increase in this funding amount would be needed. Otherwise, t he Milk
Block could possibly receive 3-4 new basic inverted U racks if this application
receives full funding. There are 43 additional outstanding requests for new bike
parking – these are either from businesses or customers. The combination of
replacements, replacement corrals, and the already-received new rack requests
would more than expend the requested funding. Realistically, we could repair and
install hundreds of racks if we had the resources. The intersection daylighting /
bicycle parking constituent request could be added to this project with significant
additional funding per that project’s proposed budget. The daylighting concept is
beyond the scope of this current request.
GREENbike match and bicycle racks are anticipated to be an ongoing funding need
as part of the city’s CIP program.
Project 19: Livable Streets Program 2026 - See exhibit for additional details
Transportation
•Can you share a map/location of what the next areas to be completed are?
o Sent to Kate Werrett on 07/14
•Is the area included in Project #41 within one of your zones? If yes, do you have an
estimate on when that zone will be completed?
o In regards to Project #41 (Glendale Traffic Calming), it spans two Livable
Streets zones, 12 and 49. Please note the Council has given us direction to
complete the first 25 zones in ranked priority order. After that, the Council
has mentioned that they want to discuss how to prioritize/order the
remaining zones. Our current estimate is that we will complete the first 25
zones by sometime in 2028 or 2029. Zone 12 will be constructed in 2026 and
the Zone 49 would be sometime between 2032 and 2047, depending on
funding levels.
o Project #41 elements included within Zone 12:
▪Neighborhood Byway signage on Emery St between Indiana Ave and
California Ave
▪Neighborhood Byway signage on Navajo St between Indiana Ave and
Illinois Ave
▪Note that the Livable Streets Zone 12 project does not include
installing byway signage on Indiana Ave or Navajo St. However, as part
of the zone project, there are five speed humps proposed on Emery St
between Indiana Ave and California Ave, and five humps proposed on
Navajo St between Indiana Ave and Illinois Ave.
o Project #41 elements included within Zone 49:
▪Seven speed humps on 800 W between 900 S and 1300 S
▪Emery/California intersection improvements with upgraded bike lane
paint and detection
▪Raised crosswalks at Freemont/800 W and Remington Way/800 W
near school bus stops
▪RRFBs at 800 W 900 S with Pedestrian Refuge Island
▪In a future phase: chicanes, traffic circles or additional pedestrian
improvements on 800 W
o California Avenue is a city arterial street. Emery at California borders
multiple zones and would typically be considered by a program such as
Vision Zero or Neighborhood Byways, rather than Livable Streets.
•Please define the difference between livable streets, complete streets, and vision
zero
o Livable Streets: traffic calming program
▪City has been split up into 113 zones and the completion of these
improvements are considered holistically on a zone-by-zone basis
▪Focuses on local streets
▪The zone approach helps to mitigate possible diversion from one local
street to another
o Complete Streets: funded with street reconstruction & street overlay
▪The name of a 2010 city ordinance which requires all Salt Lake City
street reconstruction projects to include state-of-the-practice bicycle
and pedestrian facilities in keeping with U.S. design manuals.
▪In the past, some reconstruction projects were funded without
sufficient funding for needed Complete Streets elements,
supplemental funds were requested.
▪No longer its own category
▪Sidewalk to sidewalk improvements – multi-modal concept
o Vision Zero Corridors:
▪This program seeks targeted funds to focus on corridors with a
significant crash history, and with characteristics that can be made
safer with infrastructure investments.
▪Focuses on major streets and crossings of major streets
Project 20: 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street
Engineering
•Has the department considered consolidating curb replacements into an annual
maintenance item?
o Curb replacements may be done as part of the Public Way Concrete Program
which is setup to be used for sidewalks, curb & gutter, ADA ramps, et c...
However, this section of 1200 East does not have curb & gutter currently so
the project would install new curb & gutter.
o Generally, like projects are bundled for purposes of design, bid, and
construction.
Project 23: Playground Replacements
Public Lands
•Please add Curtis Park to the list of playgrounds that will be considered for
playground replacement.
We have noted this request and will consider the replacement of Curtis Park’s playground in
our analysis of playground conditions and replacement needs citywide.
•Please provide a Cartegraph report with the status of the park maintenance (for
parks included on the list).
Council staff corrected their original question after July 15, 2025, and asked Public Lands to
answer the below, additional question from July 15.
•ADDITIONAL QUESTION (7/15): If possible, please provide a Cartegraph report of
the playground equipment status at the parks included in Project 23.
Please see below for the Cartegraph Overall Condition Indices (OCI) for each playground
that is listed in this application for potential replacement, including Curtis Park (highlighted),
per the Council’s above question. OCIs are out of 100 possible points, and the lower the
score, the worse the condition of the asset. Please note, OCI data from Cartegraph is
currently being updated for accuracy with the Public Lands SCAAMP. The decision to select
these playgrounds for replacement in this application (except Curtis Park) was based not
only on OCI, but also on inspections, ground truthing by Parks Division staff, the ages of
assets, and the need for investment in these parks.
Asset Location Estimated OCI Installation
VICTORY PARK 57.5 6/1/1990
6TH EAST PARK 25.7 4/1/1999
PUGSLEY OURAY PARK 27.14 4/1/1999
11TH AVENUE PARK 84.43 4/1/2004
DAVIS PARK 90.5 4/1/2004
RIVERSIDE PARK 86.25 4/1/2009
PARLEYS WAY PARK 87.07 4/1/2009
CURTIS PARK 88.29 4/1/2009
PARLEYS WAY PARK 78.09 4/1/2011
Project 25: East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal
(300-400 South & 400- 500 South)
Public Lands
•Why was this project not recommended for funding when CIP project #20 was?
•What can the applicant do to score higher on this project? They have applied for
several years. Is it possible to itemize different elements of the project and
associated costs to allow for partial funding for the first few phases?
Please consult the CDCIP Board Meeting minutes for their rationale on why this constituent
CIP application was not recommended by them to the Mayor for $954,720, or less, in CIP
funding:
https://webdme.slcgov.com/BoardsCommissions/Browse.aspx?id=7038646&dbid=0&repo
=SLC.
As for assistance in improving their applications, Public Lands typically refers constituent
applicants to the Finance Department’s Capital Asset Planning Team, which oversees the CIP
process, and to consider the feedback their applications received from the CDCIP Board and
the City Council.
• ADDITIONAL QUESTION (7/15): Can you break this project into smaller
pieces/phases and provide a cost estimate for each phase? The Council is leaning
towards funding at least the curb portion this year, possibly the irrigation and turf as
well. They would like to know the cost for these elements broken out individually.
Public Lands staff worked extensively with the constituent applicants to develop cost
estimates for all of the elements of their proposed scope ($954,720) as well as a partial
funding/first phase alternative ($598,784). These can be found in application’s “Budget
Narrative” section and its attachments, entitled “1200 East Medians Cost Estimates
(Complete and Partial Funding Scenarios) - Prepared by Public Lands, 12-19-2024" and
“Constituent CIP Staff Comments (1200 East Medians, provided by Tom Millar, 12 -19-
2024)”. See table below for a summary of a potential partially-funded, phased first
approach.
Project Scope Elements Partial Scope Funding Notes
Other demolition, erosion control, tree
protection, TTC, earthwork, mobilization
$ 50,000
Remove curb, 8" curb, no gutter, 2' asphalt tie -in
(4 islands, 700 LF each)
$ 210,000
Irrigation system replacement + tree specific
watering
$ 150,000
Sod removal, 1" new top soil, and at least 50%
new sod for 4 islands
$ 45,000 Partial sod replacement
Trees (x56 new) $ 8,000 20 trees only
New median island noses/extensions + ADA
access/crosswalks (x3) + pollinator gardens
No median island extensions,
new crosswalks, or
pollinators in them
Benches (x16) $ 4,800
Public Art No art
Soft Costs (PM, design + construction
contingencies, design, two yrs inflation)
$ 130,984
TOTAL $ 598,784
In addition, during the February 24, 2025, CDCIP Board meeting, board member Joseph
Murphy asked about options for partially funding the application’s $954,720 in proposed
scope (starting at the 1:14:40 timestamp and ending around 1:28:00 on the recording
(https://webdme.slcgov.com/BoardsCommissions/Browse.aspx?id=7038646&dbid=0&repo=
SLC). That exchange, including the following questions and answers between Mr. Murphy
and one the constituent applicants/presenter, Mr. Quigley, clarify the constituent’s intent, if
the application is to be partially funded.
Note: The below transcript also includes a clarifying question from Mr. Millar, representing
the Public Lands Department, and confirmation from Mr. Murphy that the CDCIP Board did in
fact have in their possession the complete CIP application submitted in D ecember 2024
($954,720) and not the original, draft by the constituent from September 2024 ($500,000):
Mr. Murphy: “While there are multiple line items for improvement, which would you say are
the most important, if we would recommend partial funding?”
Mr. Quigley: “We ultimately did identify a priority list, or a partial scope of what we’d like to
see. Ultimately, the baseline of curb, gutter, tree replacement, irrigation is the highest
priority. As far as reducing this to a partial scope, if these plans [the City’s Urban Forestry
Division] can likely provide these trees at no cost, that’s a $22,000 reduction. Even in the
full scope, we don’t believe a full turf replacement is necessary. Just the partial turf
replacement saves another $80,000 right there. And additionally, a partial irrigation
replacement with new valves and heads utilizing the existing network rather than a full, new
network from scratch is $100,000 reduction. Ultimately, we’d love to see the pedestrian
bulbouts and pollinator pockets. If those end up being too expensive, we’d like to see
baseline critical infrastructure get built now and then hopefully, down the road, we can
identify funding mechanisms for planting, or internal East Central Community Council
volunteer community event to help plant these native plants with one of our local native
plant and garden groups. Ultimately, if possible, get critical infrastructure in now and then
identify superfluous or additional things that could be funded later.
Mr. Millar: “I’m looking at the application that I have. I just want to confirm with the board,
in your applications and in your packets for this application, do you have the budget
breakdown? Does it say anything, because mine [the one he had downloaded prior to the
meeting from the Finance Department’s SharePoint drive and not the one he had helped
prepare with the constituent before the December 2024 deadline] says zero dollars?”
Mr. Murphy: “Ours says $954,000.”
Mr. Millar: “Okay, I must have the wrong one then. Great. I’m glad that you have the right
one.”
Mr. Murphy: “We can see the budget [breakdown] online. Thanks.”
Link to February 24th meeting minutes (for project #25 – East Central Community Council
1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300 -400 South and 400-500 South):
https://webdme.slcgov.com/BoardsCommissions/DocView.aspx?id=7263057&dbid=0&re
po=SLC
Link to February 19th meeting minutes (for project #20 – 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and
Repave Street):
https://webdme.slcgov.com/BoardsCommissions/DocView.aspx?id=7238059&dbid=0&re
po=SLC
Note that projects #25 (District 4) and #20 (District 7) are both for segments of 1200 East,
but not near each other
Project 51: Nature Park at Bonneville
Public Lands
• Could we use the $140,000 recommended by the mayor to clean up the area
without purchasing it?
Funding the “Nature Park at Bonneville” constituent CIP application was not recommended
by the Mayor for funding in her FY 25-26 budget.
Impact fees cannot be used for maintenance or operational costs like cleaning.
General Questions for Departmental Applications :
All departments & divisions
• Please confirm which of your departmental projects that have received a mayoral
funding recommendation are for studies, design work, and construction/work
completion. Can you share which projects have been studied or designed already?
Application question #27 asks about project phase (Pre-planning/Study, Design,
Construction, Design-Build)
• The Council would appreciate feedback on why some studies or designs are being
proposed/funded instead of putting funding towards projects that are “shovel -
ready”.
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT’S RESPONSES TO THE TWO GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Recommended Project FY 25-26 Type Previous Design or Study
Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms Construction
Citywide Park Restroom
Planning Study (FY 24 -25)
Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA
Standards for Accessible Design Construction
Salt Lake City ADA Self-
Evaluation and Transition Plan
(2024)
20 Acres of Irrigation System Replacements
and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping Construction NA
Sugar House Park 50/50 Cost Share for One
Pavilion Replacement and Critical
Infrastructure Upgrades Construction
Pavilion designs based on
previous SLCo standard
utilized for three replacements
thus far
Jordan Park Skate Park Expansion Design
Constituent Led Jordan
Skatepark Expansion Vision
Study (2024)
Three Sportcourt Replacements Construction NA
Playground Replacements Construction NA
Riverside Basketball Court Renovation Construction NA
Event Infrastructure and Pavilion
Replacements Construction NA
Rose Park Beautification, Trail, and Safety
Improvements Study, Construction NA
Concord St. to Alzheimer's Jordan River
Cleanup Construction NA
Civic Campus and Green Loop
Implementation Construction
Green Loop Vision Plan and
Design (2023-2024)
It should also be noted that the following four Public Lands Department planning/study
efforts are currently funded (from previous FYs) and either underway or about to be: (1)
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study; (2) Liberty Park CLR and Vision Plan; (3) Memory
Grove Park CLR and Preservation & Maintenance Plan; and (4) Strategic Capital, Acquisition,
and Asset Management Plan (SCAAMP).
The Department of Public Lands does not make funding recommendations directly. Instead,
all proposed projects are submitted through the CIP process, where they are reviewed and
prioritized by the CAP Committee and the constituent CDCIP Advisory Board.
Recommendations are then forwarded to the Mayor for consideration in her budget, and
ultimately to the City Council for their deliberation and final approval.
In some cases, studies or design efforts are prioritized because they are necessary steps to
advance projects to a “shovel-ready” stage. These early-phase efforts help the City pursue
external funding opportunities, refine project scopes, and ensure that future construction
projects are budgeted appropriately, feasible, and aligned with community needs.
Project 7: Public Way Concrete
Attachment 7, Project 7 Exhibit
SALT LAKE CITY
•Funding received for this project is used to hire a contractor to
perform:
•Slab replacement: Replacing certain small sections of
sidewalk
•Mud jacking: Material is placed under a sidewalk to raise it
to the height of the surrounding sidewalk
•Upon receipt of funding staff reviews the OCI, as well as oldest
reports of damaged sidewalk
•Funding is allocated on a worst first, first in first out
regarding constituent reports, basis
•To find economies of scale contractors after certain areas are
selected, the surrounding sidewalk issues are also addressed.
Narrative
SALT LAKE CITY
Sidewalk OCI
OCI # of
Segments
<25 212
25-40 304
40-65 3271
>65 11397
SALT LAKE CITY
Sidewalk Constituent Reports
174 Reports
SALT LAKE CITY
Sidewalk Mud Jack Candidates
990 segments
SALT LAKE CITY
Sidewalk Slab Replacement Candidates
75 segments
THANK YOU
For questions contact department
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
1
Department of Public Services - Facilities Division
facilities@slc.gov | (801) 535-7280
Attachment 7, Project 12 Exhibit
Department of Public Services -October 2023
The primary objective is to ensure that critical City
functions are supported by maintaining well-
functioning facilities, with a focus on strategic
renewal, replacement, and enhancement. While
some level of reaction to asset failures will be
necessary, it can be minimized through these
proactive measures.
$2,350,000
Recommended*Actual*
BUDGET FUNDING COMPARISION
$9,240,000
CURRENT STATE
Consistent underfunding has pushed Facilities to allocate its’ limited resources to costly emergency
projects instead of preventive maintenance, leaving a growing backlog of critical maintenance projects.
PROJECT FUNDING COMPARISON
Cost of proactivereplacement, renewal, &enhancement
Cost of responding toa failure
PLAN OBJECTIVE
TEN YEAR PLAN
Divide backlog into three equal parts to address
per year AND address 50% of the incoming
deferred assets to prevent further accumulation.
Phase 1
2024 to 2026
Phase 2
2027 to 2033
Reduce the backlog in half each year AND
address 75% of the incoming deferred assets to
maintain control over asset deferrals.
HIERARCHY OF
A HEALTHY
BUILDING
These three foundational components
are supported through strategic asset
replacement, renewal, and enhancement.
Contact Information:JPGoates,DeputyDirector|jonathan.goates@slcgov.com|801-535-6290
ANNUALLY
Using a comprehensive list of backlog and incoming deferred assets, work will be prioritized by most to
least critical, as defined by Facilities, and then further by facility criticality.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Snapshot…Page 2
Current State…Page 4
Objectives…Page 6
Ten Year Plan…Page 10
Fiscal Year 2025-2026…Page 13
Appendix…Page 16
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
4
CURRENT STATE
Considering our current challenges, it’s crucial to maintain the funding levels outlined in
our 10-year plan to ensure we stay on track. Last year, we received funding for the first
year of this plan, which allowed us to begin addressing critical needs and reducing deferred
maintenance. However, this was the first step. To sustain this momentum and achieve the
long-term goals outlined in our plan, continued investment over the next nine years is
essential. Falling behind now would not only jeopardize our progress but also exacerbate
the challenges of underfunding, resource constraints, and a growing maintenance backlog.
Issues at Hand
Funding
BASELINE COMPARISON
• National Benchmark: IFMA recommends $2.44 per square foot for internal systems
and $0.64 per square foot for external maintenance for city governments.
o Given our three million square feet, our recommended budget should be
$9,240,000 (3 million sq. ft. * $3.08 per sq. ft.).
CURRENT CAPITAL FUNDING
• Operations Budget for Asset Replacement: $350,000.
• Capital Improvement Fund: $2.7 million received last year through the CIP approval
process.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
5
In summary, our current funding situation is not to industry standard; we have a growing
backlog of deferred asset renewals and resource allocation must be used towards asset
failure responses.
Items of Note
In 2023, we undertook an in-depth facility condition assessment covering a significant
portion of City-owned properties to better understand our facilities’ health. This
assessment aims to provide detailed insights into component and structural asset life
expectancies, renewal and replacement cost estimates, and maintenance
recommendations, all essential for long-term planning.
Please note that all estimates in this report are preliminary and expected to change. Due to
unforeseen delays, the project timeline has extended beyond early 2024, and a small
portion of the buildings are still awaiting assessment. The project remains active, and data
will be updated as the remaining assessments are completed.
*The estimates in this report are subject to significant change with a complete facility
condition assessment. Dollar amounts will change substantially and be updated in this
format.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
6
OBJECTIVES
Our primary objective with this capital plan is to ensure that Salt Lake City's critical
functions, including the efficient operation of government services, firefighting capabilities,
and law enforcement activities, are supported by maintaining well-functioning facilities.
This is achieved through preventive maintenance along with recommissioning assets and
strategic asset renewal, replacement, and enhancement, resulting in cost savings and
optimal operational efficiency.
RENEWAL VS. REPLACEMENT
Renewal is restoring and extending the life of an existing asset through various methods,
while replacement is necessary when a part or an asset is no longer viable.
SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
A more in-depth replacement or enhancement improving
or modernizes an existing system to enhance its
performance, capabilities, or efficiency.
Deferred Assets
Our capital plan primarily centers around addressing our
critically deferred assets.
These are critical investments that have been postponed
and have the ability to compromise the function or use of an entire facility. It is therefore
imperative that we strategically allocate resources and efforts to ensure renewal,
replacement, or enhancement takes place as necessary.
1 Data excludes Golf Division, Property Management, and the Ballpark. Subject to change, please refer
to page 4.
ASSETS BY CATEGORY 1
Category Quantity Value
Total Assets (Priority 1-7) 5,190 $73,434,639.68
Total Critical Assets (Priority 1-3) 3,152 $35,840,468.35
Total Deferred Assets 990 $26,951,069.59
Total Assets not Assessed 1,253 Unknown
Total Critically Deferred Assets 543 $8,262,806.76
DEFINITIONS
Critically Deferred Assets
Assets that have surpassed
their anticipated useful
lifespan and are related to life
safety and human hazards, as
well as structural deterioration
and property damage.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
7
With the implementation of Cartegraph, Facilities has effectively managed our asset
inventory and is continually updating the data. Our data analysis initiatives have pinpointed
assets that have exceeded their anticipated useful lifespan, as well as those on track to do
so within the upcoming ten years. To tackle these expired assets, we will give them priority
consideration based on two key factors.
1. Backlog: Our foremost concern is the remediation of assets that have significantly
exceeded their expected lifespan; posing immediate risk of failure. Our top priority
is to address these critical issues promptly.
2. Facility Type: Through this methodical approach, we aim to address our most
pressing concerns systematically while making judicious use of resources to
enhance the operational efficiency, safety, and comfort of our facilities.
After identifying the critically deferred assets for a fiscal year, our Facilities Team will
undertake a review and give final approval for the list. It's important to note that while
Cartegraph may flag certain items as critically deferred, such as a door, there is a possibility
that these items are still in perfectly functional condition. While automation has been
crucial, it's worth acknowledging that the individuals who possess the most intimate
knowledge of our facilities are the occupants and our maintenance technicians.
Proactive Spending
Cost Savings
By investing in the replacement or renovation of city facilities prior to failure, planned work
typically comes at a much lower cost. Over time, facilities can wear down or become
outdated. For instance, replacing an expired valve is generally less expensive than waiting
until failure that has the potential to cause extensive damage, which would require costly
repairs.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
8
Subject to change, please refer to page 4.
This chart compares the proposed ten-year funding plan (blue) with the consequences of
maintaining the current trend of deferred assets (gray). The green columns represent the
resources allocated for addressing deferred assets, while the gray columns show the
outcome if we operate with current funding levels which primarily address current failures.
As you can see, if we don't strategically address our backlog and incoming deferred assets,
we risk quadrupling deferred over ten years. By allocating a consistent amount of funds
per year we can effectively tackle this issue. It's far more manageable to address $2 to $6
million in deferred assets annually than postponing to what would be an accumulated $40
million backlog.
By following the proposed capital plan, we anticipate saving more than $5 million over the
next decade in inflation-related costs. Moreover, these preventive measures are likely to
mitigate costly failures, that yield additional savings.
Inflation
Inflation refers to the gradual increase in the prices of goods and services over time. When
we delay facility improvement projects, we are likely to encounter higher costs in the future
due to inflation. Materials, labor, and equipment used in construction and maintenance
tend to become more expensive over time. By investing in facility upgrades now, we can
secure today's prices and avoid paying more in the future.
In summary, investing in the replacement and renewal of city facilities has significant
financial benefits. It not only prevents further deterioration and ensures better
$-
$5,000,000.00
$10,000,000.00
$15,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$25,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$35,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$45,000,000.00
$50,000,000.00
FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY10
CO
S
T
FISCAL YEAR
RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT -CAPITAL PROJECTION
Inaction Scenario
10 Year Plan
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
9
functionality but also takes advantage of today's lower costs while shielding budgets from
the impact of future inflation.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
10
TEN YEAR PLAN
Renewal and Replacement
Over the next decade, our primary objective is to address our backlog of critically deferred
assets. The presence of these deferred assets poses a significant risk to our operations as
they increase our vulnerability to failures, necessitating frequent emergency repairs, which
have become increasingly prevalent. Without intervention, our deferred will experience an
increase of approximately 88% over the next ten years.
Backlog Reduction Strategy
PHASE 1: 2024-2026
Objective: Reduce the existing backlog of critically deferred assets.
• Backlog Reduction Target: Divide the current backlog of assets into three equal parts,
aiming to address an approximately consistent number of assets per year.
• Incoming Deferred Assets: Address 50% of the incoming deferred assets for the years
2024-2027 to prevent further accumulation.
PHASE 2: 2027-2033
Objective: Continue backlog reduction with a focus on reaching a more manageable
deferred asset list.
• Backlog Reduction Target: Aim to address 50% of backlogged assets every year.
• Incoming Deferred Assets: Address 75% of the incoming deferred assets for the years
2027-2033 to maintain stabilization of asset deferrals.
Monitoring and Flexibility
• Regularly monitor progress and adjust priorities as needed based on asset criticality
and resource availability.
• Stay flexible with resource allocation to address assets with varying levels of
urgency.
By following this phased approach, we aim to reduce the backlog of critically deferred
assets while effectively managing incoming deferred assets, ultimately ensuring the safety
and reliability of our facilities.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
11
*Subject to change, please refer to page 4.
This table visually distinguishes between assets that are going to become deferred (light
blue), we are targeting to address (dark blue), and the remaining backlogged deferred
assets (purple). It also highlights the potential backlog growth (gray) if we do not act. This
visual representation emphasizes the urgency of our asset management strategy.
System Enhancement and Projects
It's important to note that some of the projects aimed at renewing or replacing assets
could potentially evolve into a system enhancement project if a particular component
requires architectural services and the cost exceeds $50,000.
We are committed to enhancing the overall functionality and safety of our facilities. This
initiative will encompass a variety of projects designed to go beyond simple component
replacements, addressing specific needs identified by our Facilities team, Safety and
Security Director, Office Facilitators, tenants, and everyday employees.
These enhancement projects will generally follow a two-phase approach:
1. Project Development: This phase involves comprehensive assessments and
planning, including building surveys, security evaluations, obtaining quotes, and
detailed design work. During this stage, we will thoroughly analyze the requirements
of each project to ensure alignment with our overarching goals.
2. Project Implementation: Once the scope of the project has been outlined, the
project moves into the implementation stage. This is where the actual construction
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY10
QU
A
N
T
I
T
Y
FISCAL YEAR
RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT -CAPITAL PLAN
Inaction Scenario
Incoming Deferred
Total Addressed
Remaining Backlog
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
12
and renovation work begins, translating the plans and designs into tangible
improvements to our facilities.
Our commitment to engaging a diverse group of stakeholders in identifying and executing
these projects reflects our dedication to creating a safer and more productive environment
for all. These enhancements are not only essential for the well-being of our facilities but
also for the well-being and satisfaction of our occupants and employees. Through this
holistic approach, we aim to foster a space that supports our collective growth and success.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
13
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
As we enter the fiscal year 2025-2026, our Facilities team has conducted a thorough
assessment of incoming deferred maintenance and backlog. While our Cartegraph system
offers a general overview, it is our Facilities team that truly possesses an in-depth
knowledge of our facilities. Their records, on-ground expertise, and daily presence at these
locations have granted them a profound understanding of the intricacies and nuances that
may not be evident from data alone.
This analysis has provided valuable insights into the condition of our assets, enabling us to
identify the immediate priorities necessary to stay in line with our ten-year plan. In this
report, we present the recommendations that have emerged from this assessment,
focusing on practical steps for efficient resource management and sustainable growth
considering evolving challenges and opportunities.
Renewal and Replacement
Subject to change, please refer to page 4.
The list provided below is not exhaustive and should not be considered as a
comprehensive representation. It is subject to modifications, updates, and changes based
on inspection, evaluation, and prioritization. Furthermore, the estimates within this report
are preliminary and subject to significant alterations upon the completion of the ongoing
Facilities Condition Assessment. Dollar amounts and other related figures may change
substantially and will be updated accordingly within this format. Users are advised to
exercise caution and consult with relevant authorities or entities for the most current,
accurate, and finalized information.
MINOR COMPONENTS
These assets have an individual value below $50,000, but when combined, exceed $50,000
in total worth. According to the stipulations in Resolution No. 29 of 2017, these items have
also been classified as maintenance. Nevertheless, they have traditionally been funded
through capital improvement funds due to the inadequacy of the Operations budget.
Total $312,192.47
MAJOR COMPONENTS
These major assets have individual values that meet or exceed $50,000. These are larger
scale replacement tasks that meet the project definition outlined in Resolution 29.
Total $1,668,675.21
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
14
DISMISSED COMPONENTS
Certain components could be excluded from consideration for various reasons, which may
include, but are not limited to, instances where they have already been replaced and
Cartegraph was not updated to reflect this change, when assets have been inspected and
found to be in excellent working condition without a Cartegraph update, when they are
scheduled for replacement as part of another project, or when the asset is deemed
unnecessary.
Total Saved $2,141,566.93
System Enhancements
Subject to change, please refer to page 4.
Capital Improvement Projects
The projects outlined below are not a part of the replacement and renewal program and
have separate CIP applications, but they will address deferred components.
PLAZA 349
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a crucial project dedicated to
upgrading the charging infrastructure at Plaza 349. Situated off 200 E and University
Boulevard, the Plaza 349 complex comprises an office building and a six-level parking
garage, both served by a single existing electrical service. The proposed project involves
installing (20) new Level 2 charger ports and back feeding (4) pre-existing charging ports
within the Plaza 349 parking garage, which currently accommodates (38) fleet vehicles
according to telematics data. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn &
Sawatch, the initial funding will support the first two phases, including the installation of a
new utility switching cabinet and transformer strategically placed between the main
building and parking garage to facilitate the required electrical service for efficient EV
charging. This initiative aligns with our commitment to sustainable transportation and
positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the evolving needs of our expanding
EV fleet.
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a vital project aimed at upgrading the
charging infrastructure at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a central facility for the
city's police and fire departments, emergency operations center, and combined dispatch
unit. The project involves the installation of (20) new Level 2 charger ports, along with back
feeding (10) pre-existing ports within the existing two-floor garage, catering to a fleet of (50)
Attachment 7, Project 19 Exhibit
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
15
public services, police, and fire vehicles. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn
& Sawatch, the proposed funding will support the first two phases, which include the
installation of a new utility transformer on the east end of the property to facilitate the
required electrical service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our
commitment to sustainable transportation and positions our city at the forefront of
accommodating the evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
16
APPENDIX
Critical Assets Per Facility
Subject to change, please refer to page 4.
Below, you'll find a list of critical assets scheduled for attention in the upcoming fiscal year.
Art Barn
Total $6,523.87
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
ABB-HTT-001 Heat Trace 1/1/2023 2 $6,523.87 Minor
Central Plant
Total $1,980,867.68
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
ABB-HTT-001 Heat Trace 1/1/2023 2 $6,523.87 Minor
BLR-ASC-001 Access Control System 1/1/2022 1 $6,955.64 Major
CCB-PTM-Pressure Transmitter
LEO-PTM-Pressure Transmitter
VFD
Variable Frequency
Drive Chilled Water
VFD
Variable Frequency
Drive Condenser
VFD
Variable Frequency
Drive Chilled Water
VFD
Variable Frequency
Drive Chilled Water
VFD
Variable Frequency
Drive Chilled Water
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
17
BLR-VFD-008
Variable Frequency
Drive Chilled Water
Pump 16 9/1/2014 3 Minor
CCB-CAM-
CCB-CAM-
041 Security Camera 1/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
CCB-CAM-
003 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
012 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
18
CCB-CAM-
019 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
CCB-CAM-
023 Security Camera 1/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
GEF General Exhaust Fan
GEF General Exhaust Fan
CCB-AHU-
023 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
027 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
CCB-AHU-
032 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
19
CCB-AHU-
039 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-HWP-
CCB-MOT-
020 Fan Motor 1/1/2014 3 $14,926.13 Major
CCB-WCC-
021 Chilled Water Coil 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-FCU-
501N Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-502 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $23,485.92 Major
CCB-FCU-503 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-507 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-513 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-514 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-523 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-524 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-533 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-534 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-542 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-545 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-546 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-547 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-548 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-549 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
20
CCB-FCU-550 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-553 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
COM-CAM-
007 Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
S07-GEF-005 Exhaust Fan 3/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Major
S07-KEF-001 Kitchen Exhaust Fan 3/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Major
S07-OHD-
S07-OHD-
004 Overhead Door 3/15/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
Fire Suppression
S13-OHD-
002 Overhead Door 12/12/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
Fire Suppression
GEF General Exhaust Fan
KEF Kitchen Exhaust Fan
GAF-CAM-
001 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CTV
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
21
GAF-CAM-
CRT-SNO-
001 Snow Melting System 12/1/2025 1 $5,970.26 Major
CRT-CAM-
004 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
008 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
013 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
016 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
22
CRT-CAM-
LEO
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
LCO-FAS-001 Fire Alarm System 2/27/2026 1 $15,657.28 Major
Fire System Dry
LYF-CTV-001
Security Camera
Server 7/1/2021 2 $11,592.74 Major
CER
Concrete & Expansion
Joint Repairs 1/1/2022 2 $54,024.42 Major
LPS-CAM-006 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-007 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-008 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-009 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-010 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-011 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-012 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-013 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-014 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-015 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-016 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LIB-RTD-001
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
003 Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
23
OTT-CAM-
OTT-CTV-001 Server 7/1/2021 2 $11,592.74 Major
Elevator Motor
Elevator Motor
PSB-MOT-
022 Elevator Motor 7/5/2025 3 $78,286.39 Major
Elevator Motor
Elevator Motor
TRF-FTH-001 Water Heater 1/1/2014 3 $1,304.77 Minor
City Hall
Total $1,050,360.90
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
CCB-CAM-
005 Security Camera 1/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
024 Security Camera 1/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
025 Security Camera 1/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
041 Security Camera 1/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
24
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
CCB-CAM-
CCB-CAM-
007 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
012 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
018 Security Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CCB-CAM-
GEF General Exhaust Fan
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
25
CCB-GEF-003 General Exhaust Fan 1/1/2026 1 $4,566.71 Minor
CCB-AHU-
023 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
CCB-AHU-
027 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
032 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-AHU-
037 Air Handling Unit 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-HWP-
CCB-HWP-
005 Heating Water for CCB 1/1/2014 3 $19,571.60 Minor
CCB-MOT-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
26
CCB-WCC-
021 Chilled Water Coil 1/1/2014 3 $20,876.37 Major
CCB-WCC-
CCB-FCU-
501N Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-502 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $23,485.92 Major
CCB-FCU-503 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-507 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-513 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-514 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-523 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-524 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-533 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-534 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-542 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-545 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-546 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-547 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-548 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-549 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-550 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-551 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-552 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
CCB-FCU-553 Fan Coil Unit 3/15/2014 3 $18,266.82 Major
Compliance
Total $5,216.73
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
COM-CAM-
003 Camera 1/1/2023 2 $1,738.91 Minor
COM-CAM-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
27
Fire Station 07
Total $69,152.98
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
S07-GEF-005 Exhaust Fan 3/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Major
S07-KEF-001 Kitchen Exhaust Fan 3/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Major
S07-OHD-
001 Overhead Door 3/15/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
S07-OHD-
002 Overhead Door 3/15/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
S07-OHD-
003 Overhead Door 3/15/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
S07-OHD-
Fire Station 10
Total $4,697.18
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
S10-FSR-001
Fire Suppression
Fire Station 13
Total $54,278.56
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
S13-OHD-
002 Overhead Door 12/12/2022 2 $11,742.96 Minor
S13-FSR-001
Fire Suppression
System in Range 12/15/2022 1 $4,697.18 Minor
S13-GEF-001 General Exhaust Fan 12/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Minor
S13-KEF-001 Kitchen Exhaust Fan 12/15/2022 1 $6,523.87 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
28
Global Artways at Fairmont
Total $25,504.03
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
GAF-CAM-
001 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
GAF-CTV-001
Security Camera
Server 7/1/2021 2 $11,592.74 Major
GAF-CAM-
002 Security Camera 7/2/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
GAF-CAM-
GAF-CAM-
008 Security Camera 7/8/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Justice Courts
Total $94,275.32
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
CRT-ASC-001 Access Control System 1/1/2022 1 $57,004.65 Major
CRT-SNO-
001 Snow Melting System 12/1/2025 1 $5,970.26 Minor
CRT-CAM-
001 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
29
CRT-CAM-
007 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
011 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CRT-CAM-
015 Security Camera 3/1/2026 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Leonardo
Total $391.43
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
LEO-RTD-001
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
BTU Meter 10/15/2022 2 $391.43 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
30
Liberty Concession Building
Total $139,610.73
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
LCO-FAS-001 Fire Alarm System 2/27/2026 1 $15,657.28 Major
LCO-FSR-001
Fire System Dry
Liberty Youth and Family
Total $23,765.12
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
LYF-CAM-001 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-002 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-003 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-004 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-005 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-006 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CAM-007 Security Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LYF-CTV-001
Security Camera
Server 7/1/2021 2 $11,592.74 Major
Library Parking Structure
Total $73,152.45
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
LPS-CER-001
Concrete & Expansion
Joint Repairs 1/1/2022 2 $54,024.42 Major
LPS-CAM-006 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-007 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-008 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-009 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-010 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-011 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
LPS-CAM-012 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
31
LPS-CAM-014 Security Camera 7/1/2022 2 $1,738.91 Minor
Library
Total $391.43
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
LIB-RTD-001
RTD Temperature
Transmitter for Steam
Ottinger Hall
Total $26,808.80
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
OTT-CAM-
001 Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
OTT-CAM-
002 Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
OTT-CAM-
006 Camera 7/1/2021 2 $1,738.91 Minor
CTV
OTT-FTH-002
Domestic Water
Heater 1/1/2014 3 $1,304.77 Minor
Facilities Capital Plan |2025-2026
32
Public Safety Building
Total $391,431.96
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
PSB-MOT-
020 Elevator Motor 7/5/2025 3 $78,286.39 Major
Elevator Motor
Elevator Motor
Elevator Motor
PSB-MOT-
024 Elevator Motor 7/5/2025 3 $78,286.39 Major
Traffic Control Building
Total $1,304.77
Asset Tag Asset Type Priority Classification
TRF-FTH-001 Water Heater 1/1/2014 3 $1,304.77 Minor
County of Salt Lake, Utah Geospatial Resource Center, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph,
GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census
Bureau, USDA, USFWS
Winter/Spring 2025-2026
Spring/Summer 2026
SLC Boundary
SLC Livable Streets Upcoming Construction
Zone 7
Zone 6 Zone 14
Zone 13
Zone 9
Zone 8
Zone 5
Zone 12
Zone 15
µ
Attachment 7, Project 19 Exhibit
Budget FY 25 -26
Presented by Rachel Molinari & Mike Atkinson
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY26 APPLICATION MAP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
https://tinyurl.com/CIPMapFY26
FY26 APPLICATION SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Overview
Total # of Applications 60
# of Internal Application 24
# of Constituent Applications 36
Total # of Projects Recommended 30
Total $ Funding Requested $65,515,717
Total $ Funding Recommended $43,693,236
# of Constituent Projects Recommended 8
Total Constituent $ of Recommended $3,938,724
$0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000
Engineering
Public Lands
Public Services
Transportation
Requested Funding
2026 REQUESTS – CONSTITUENT ~$17,000,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$2,858,600 , 17%
$7,216,355 , 43%
$6,618,609 , 40%
Engineering Public Lands Transportation
2026 REQUESTS – INTERNAL ~$49,000,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
$45,000,000 $10,930,600 , 23%
$3,595,436 , 7%
$10,900,000 , 22%
Engineering Public Lands Public Services Transportation
ONGOING EXPENSES ~$16.5M
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Total
Sales Tax Bonds $8,152,973
ESCO Debt Service $924,700
Fire Station #3 $675,575
Fire Station #14 $496,950
General Obligation Series Bond 2025 (2nd Tranche of Parks Bond)
Debt Service Projects Total $13,077,843
On
g
o
i
n
g
Crime Lab $600,000
City Leases $560,000
Facilities Maintenance $350,000
Urban Trails Maintenance (1/4 Cent)$200,000
Public Lands Maintenance $250,000
Public Lands Maintenance (FOF)$195,573
Vacant Property Maintenance $700,000
Public Services- ESCO County Steiner
- Memorial House
Other Ongoing Total $565,849
Estimated Total
2026 AVAILABLE FUNDING
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
General
Fund Class C
Parks
Impact
Fee
Streets
Impact
Fees
FOF
Street
FOF
Other
FOF
Transit
¼ Cent &
5th 5th Tax Total
Available (est.)$9,913,236 $10,500,000 $8,800,000 $3,600,000 $1,000,000 $1,100,000 $900,000 $10,600,000 $46,413,236
Recommended $9,913,236 $10,500,000 $8,800,000 $880,000 $1,000,000 $1,100,000 $900,000 $10,600,000 $43,693,236
Remaining $0 $0 $0 $2,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,720,000
•The remaining balance in Streets Impact Fees is the result of a limited number of eligible projects.
•Class C funding includes $6M in one-time funding from Class C fund balance revenues coming in higher than budgeted
•¼ Cent funding includes $2.5 M one-time funding from the Transportation fund balance
•5th 5th Sales Tax is $600,000 and is recommended for Street Reconstruction
MAYOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Dept/Div Council District Application Title Recommended Funding
Transportation CW $2,300,000
Public Lands CW $2,052,000
Public Lands CW $2,684,929
Engineering CW $4,390,676
Engineering $1,680,600
Engineering CW $750,000
Public Lands 5 $1,000,000
Public Lands CW $1,017,515
Engineering CW $1,000,000
Public Lands 7 - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pavilion Replacement & Critical $1,107,117
Public Services CW $1,980,868
Transportation CW $4,000,000
Transportation CW $1,000,000
Transportation CW $1,500,000
Engineering CW $3,500,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MAYOR RECOMMENDATIONS CONT.
Dept/Div Council District Application Title Recommended Funding
Public Lands 2 $90,000
Transportation CW Federal Grant Match 2026; Bike Rack Replacements 2026 $ 100,000
Transportation CW $2,000,000
Engineering 7 $303,000
Transportation 7 $500,000
Public Lands CW $630,000
Public Lands CW $385,000
Transportation 4 $855,724
Public Lands 1 $530,000
Public Services 4 $1,078,807
Public Lands CW $2,597,000
Public Lands CW $500,000
Public Lands 1 $680,000
Public Lands 2 $480,000
Public Lands 4 Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation $3,000,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIP PROJECT TOTALS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
THANK YOU
For questions contact Rachel Molinari or Mike Atkinson
Approved As To Form
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date ______________________________
Sign __/s/Jaysen Oldroyd_____________
Jaysen Oldroyd
SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION
NO._________OF 2025
Adopting Capital Improvement Program Allocations for fiscal year 2025-2026.
A resolution adopting the attached Capital Improvement Program Allocations for the
fiscal year 2025-2026.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ____ of 2025, the Salt Lake City
Council (“City Council”) adopted a final budget for the Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”)
fiscal year 2025-2026; and
WHEREAS, the budget adopted by the City included a budget for the capital
improvement program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to formalize the appropriations for the capital
improvement program.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt the capital
improvement allocations for the City for fiscal year 2025-2026.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Capital Improvement Allocations. The capital improvement
allocations for fiscal year 2025-2026, which were included within the 2025-2026 budget, shall be
and hereby are adopted according to the specific terms and conditions set forth on Exhibit A
attached hereto.
SECTION 3. Public Inspection. The City budget officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of these capital improvement program allocations in the office
of said budget officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which allocations shall be available
for public inspection during regular business hours.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of _____________, 2025.
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
_______________________ _______________________________
CITY RECORDER CHAIRPERSON
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
REQUEST -$
CDCIP -$ -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,300,000$
CDCIP 2,300,000$ 230,000$ 2,070,000$
MAYOR 2,300,000$ 230,000$ 2,070,000$
COUNCIL 2,300,000$ 230,000$ 2,070,000$
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Engineering Division
Application withdrawn; funding request was in Budget Amendment #5 of
FY2025
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Division
Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable
result of traveling in a city. While all crashes cannot be avoided, proven
safety measures can help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders.
This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, and the Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A)
that was formulated, after being funded by Congress, under the leadership
of former SLC Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson.
https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures
The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
(CSAP) through the Wasatch Front Regional Council, with Salt Lake City as
a partner. https://wfrc.org/programs/csap/ The CSAP identifies key
corridors in Salt Lake City where safety improvements are likely to result in
fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are state highways, but some
are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are
Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. There are many additional
corridors around the City that are in need of safety investments Some of
those corridors will be addressed through other projects in the pipeline
(such as the 600 North reconstruction planned in 2025).
Since the pandemic, Salt Lake City has averaged 19 traffic fatalities a year
on surface streets (not including interstates). Since 2021 we have 66
recorded roadway fatalities in Salt Lake City of which approximately 45%
killed someone walking or riding their bike. This failing roadway system
needs to be fixed.
This program seeks targeted funds to focus on corridors with a significant
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 2,052,000$
CDCIP 1,368,000$ 912,000$ 456,000$
MAYOR 2,052,000$ 1,596,000$ 456,000$
COUNCIL 2,052,000$ 1,596,000$ 456,000$
Public Lands Department
This project will fund the replacement of three failing restrooms of Salt
Lake City's 47 park restrooms. Detailed design will be based upon
recommendations from the FY 24/25 CIP-funded citywide restroom study,
upon completion (anticipated completion by the end of 2025 or early
2026). Also, engagement conducted for the 2019 Needs Assessment
all else, was safe, well-maintained and open restrooms. This project was
ranked by the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory
Board (PNUT Board) as the highest priority for funding this year.
Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe,
closed, or unusable year-round, or for portions of the year, when they are
intended to be open. New restrooms will be safer, easier to maintain, less
susceptible to vandalism, open more often and more predictably, as well as
be more welcoming for park users. The below locations are proposed for
potential new restrooms, based on asset condition, accessibility and ADA
maintenance staff experience. Three restrooms will be selected prior to
design, and based on the above criteria, efficiencies with other projects to
enable cost savings, and highest safety concerns:
Fairmont Park, northeast restroom
Liberty Park, near the new Rotary Play Park
Riverside Park, near 600 North
Cottonwood Park
Jordan Park, near the skatepark
Herman Franks Park, both are in need of replacement
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 3,730,000$
CDCIP 2,314,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,314,000$
MAYOR 2,684,929$ 1,370,929$ 1,314,000$
COUNCIL 2,684,929$ 1,370,929$ 1,314,000$
Accessible Design
Public Lands Department
Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is federal civil rights law, and
the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design.
In this first round of what Public Lands and the Mayor's Office ADA
Coordinator anticipate will be a recurring and programmatic request, three
types of park infrastructure at 10 parks (at least one park in each Council
District) will be improved to or beyond the aforementioned standards: (1)
site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and
accessible ground surfacing under play areas.
Prioritization and selection of the 10 parks included in this first round's
application were based on project readiness, public usage and engagement
(see Appendix F, p. 28 of the SETP), severity of the issue, safety, and/or the
2024 Salt Lake City ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (SETP):
- Riverside Park (Council District 1)
- Sorensen Multi-Cultural Center's fields and playground (CD2)
- Jordan Park (CD2)
- 11th Avenue Park (CD3)
- Lindsey Gardens Park (CD3)
- Victory Park (CD4)
- Ballpark Playground (formerly People's Freeway Park on West Temple St,
CD5)
- Wasatch Hollow Park (CD6)
- Parley's Way Park (CD7)
- Parley's Historic Nature Park.
Additionally, failure to remove barriers excludes children and adults with
disabilities from fully participating in park activities, further limiting their
access to health and social benefits.
If funding is left over, additional replacement or repair of asphalt, concrete,
wood, pavers, metal, or other structural materials for bridges, sidewalks,
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 4,750,000$
CDCIP 3,790,676$ 1,000,000$ 2,790,676$
MAYOR 4,390,676$ 1,000,000$ 2,790,676$ 600,000$
COUNCIL 4,390,676$ 1,000,000$ 2,790,676$ 600,000$
REQUEST 680,600$
CDCIP 1,680,600$ 1,680,600$
MAYOR 1,680,600$ 1,680,600$
COUNCIL 1,680,600$ 1,680,600$
REQUEST 750,000$
CDCIP 750,000$ 750,000$
MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$
COUNCIL 750,000$ 750,000$
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
5 Street Reconstruction 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City
streets, including street pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage
improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle,
pedestrian and transit access improvements. The program meets all
federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are
always triggered with a complete reconstruction.
6 700 North (2200 West to Redwood Road)
Engineering Division
700 North is a vital transportation west side connection; from housing
developments on Redwood to I-215 to industrial and airport general
aviation. This project will not only repave the deteriorated street surface,
but add pedestrian and transit enhancements and safety features,
transforming the corridor for all users.
The 700 North Corridor Transformation project was selected by the
request will provide part of the local match ($1,680,600 required) in order
to obtain $3,000,000 Federal funding programmed for this project.
7 Public Way Concrete
Engineering Division
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete
sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the
public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement.
Funding for this vital program in the last 5 years has averaged 63%.
Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal
8 Liberty Lake Dredging and Aeration System Replacement
Public Lands Department
The aeration system at Liberty Lake in Liberty Park is in disrepair and is
nonfunctional. As a result, the water quality is generally poor, and the lake
is intermittently closed for safety and well-being of all park visitors. The
stagnant water and shallow depth also increases water temperature, and
increases algal blooms which are harmful to park users, dogs and wildlife
within the area.
Repair of the aeration system, coupled with dredging of Liberty Lake will
improve water quality of the lake, water quality of Red Butte Creek
downstream of Liberty Park (and in turn the Jordan River), and improve
user experience and the health of flora, fauna, and park visitors. It will also
significantly reduce maintenance costs and obligations, and will
reinvigorate recreational uses of the Lake, also contributing to economic
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 5,000,000$
CDCIP 1,017,515$ 1,007,515$ 10,000$
MAYOR 1,017,515$ 1,007,515$ 10,000$
COUNCIL 1,017,515$ 1,007,515$ 10,000$
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
Waterwise Landscaping
Public Lands Department
This climate-forward project to replace up to 20 acres of aged irrigation
systems will help shape a water and resource-conscious future for many of
our parks and public lands. It has two essential parts: improve irrigation
efficiency, and replace some turf areas with low-water, regionally-
appropriate plantings. The environmental, infrastructure, and public lands
benefits of these changes are far-reaching.
Improve irrigation efficiency: Many of our parks' and public lands'
irrigation systems are 50-60 years old. They use more water and cost more
to maintain than newer systems. Improved or completely new irrigation
systems can help Salt Lake City build more resilient, shady, and enjoyable
spaces in preparation for a hotter, drier future. Even if the plant selection
remains the same, new irrigation systems will use less water, require less
maintenance, break less often, keep existing and future trees healthier, and
last another 30+ years. During installation, projects may add trees and
convert some turf landscaping to more waterwise options. These two
strategies can significantly reduce water use and increase resiliency.
new standards for waterwise, tree-friendly irrigation improvements within
two different types of public lands. It should be noted that this part of the
funding request will not cover all of the public lands system's needs.
Where practicable, replace turf with low-water, regionally-appropriate
plantings: Updating irrigation systems is also an opportunity to identify
and make changes to the different kinds of areas and plant cover in our
parks and public lands. Low use and passive areas should be converted into
regionally appropriate, waterwise plants requiring less maintenance. There
is still a need for conventional turf that can withstand heavy use, such as
playfields. These areas should be irrigated separately for efficient use of
10 Bridge Preservation Program
Engineering Division
Salt Lake City is responsible for 55 bridges. Twenty-three of those are
vehicle bridges, most crossing either the Jordan River or the Surplus Canal.
UDOT inspects these vehicle bridges every two years and provides the city
with a basic condition report. The city is responsible for performing
appropriate maintenance activities based on statements in the UDOT
report. City Engineering has prepared an ongoing bridge maintenance
strategy with the objective of extending the functional life of these
structures, and extending the time between major repairs. The requested
funds will be used to address needed repairs and routine maintenance.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 1,107,117$
CDCIP 1,107,117$ 1,005,117$ 102,000$
MAYOR 1,107,117$ 1,005,117$ 102,000$
COUNCIL 1,107,117$ 1,005,117$ 102,000$
Infrastructure Upgrades
Public Lands Department
A 50/50 match with Salt Lake County, per our 1957 contractual agreement, for the following
improvements, in order of priority, to Sugar House Park:
1. Replacement of the Sugar Beet Pavilion or Hidden Grove Pavilion (#4 of 7) ($528,000) and
the remainder of Salt Lake City's portion of the total required SLC Dept of Public Utilities'
stormwater impact fee ($37,500)
2. Hidden Grove Ped Bridge Railing Replacement and Sidewalk Upgrades ($33,890)
3. Culinary Waterline Study and Replacement ($82,000) - replaces dangerous waterline
4. WeatherTRAK Irrigation System Upgrade ($51,867) - smarter water, reduced water usage
5. Parking Lot Resurfacing ($207,000) - Improves vehicle access to 6/7 pavilions
6. Playground Shade Structures ($102,000; Parks Impact Fees) - near Parley's Creek Pavilion
playground
7. Spoke Road Resurfacing ($64,860) - resurface and improve safety and predictability of the
road and intersection just north of the pond.
In 1957, with the incorporation of Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City, and Salt Lake County
made a contractual agreement to jointly own the park property and appropriate funds for
facilities. The Sugar House Park Authority depends on these appropriations from SLC and
SLCo to carry out the park's purpose as an equitable Regional Park. Salt Lake City's 50%
investment in these capital project requests and deliver 100% of the reward to Salt Lake City
residents.
Priorities of the park are to continue with the Pavilion Replacement Program with pavilion #4
of 7, pay fees, meet codes, provide safe drinking water, pay stormwater impact fees, improve
safety and accessibility, reduce water use and maintenance costs, and protect kids and
prolong the useful life of existing equipment. These projects are critical for the access, safety,
inclusion, and enjoyment of Sugar House Park patrons and will deliver community benefits,
support sustainability efforts, and continue Salt Lake City's and Salt Lake County's decades-
long collaborative funding and management agreement.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 1,980,868$
CDCIP 1,980,868$ 1,980,868$
MAYOR 1,980,868$ 1,980,868$
COUNCIL 1,980,868$ 1,980,868$
REQUEST 4,000,000$
CDCIP 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 3,600,000$
MAYOR 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 3,600,000$
COUNCIL 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 3,600,000$
Facilities Division
The Facility Renewal and Deferred Asset Management Initiative for Fiscal
Year 2026 (FY26) is a targeted effort aligned with the 10-year plan. Our
goal is to strategically manage the existing backlog of deferred assets by
categorizing and prioritizing them based on building and component
criticality. This involves dividing the current backlog into three equal parts,
enabling us to address an approximately consistent number of assets per
year. Additionally, we aim to proactively tackle 50% of incoming deferred
assets to prevent further accumulation. This focused approach ensures
efficient resource allocation and sets the foundation for sustained facility
enhancement over the coming years.
13 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2026
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City's Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been
adequately funded for years. As a result, traffic signals throughout the city are
falling into failing condition, requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics
and wiring each year. When a traffic signal fails, it is not as obvious as a pothole --
unless the signal pole rusts through and the signal falls over, which can happen.
More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor
vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a simple
timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in
additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light
running, and crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff
attention to physical repairs and/or resetting the signal's computers.
For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal
replacements per year and 5 upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each
year for 10 years.
However, since only zero, one or two signals have been funded each year, this
program continues to fall further behind.
ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies,
plus upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Based on the
current costs of signals, this request should be $5 million.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 1,000,000$
CDCIP 1,000,000$ 100,000$ 900,000$
MAYOR 1,000,000$ 100,000$ 900,000$
COUNCIL 1,000,000$ 100,000$ 900,000$
REQUEST 1,500,000$
CDCIP 1,500,000$ 150,000$ 1,350,000$
MAYOR 1,500,000$
14 Transit Capital Program 2026 / Funding Our Future Transit
Transportation Division
The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install
bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and
accessible first/last mile connections to transit. This program implements two of the key
recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible,
safe, and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law,
particularly when streets are repaved or reconstructed.
After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop
amenities and maintains them for the life of the assets.
Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible "frequent service" brand and
enhanced amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at Frequent Transit
Route bus stops throughout the city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations
can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit
access and waiting experience.
waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are
waiting.
15 Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps 2026
Transportation Division
This program will implement one of five key moves identified in Connect SLC, the
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 3,500,000$
CDCIP 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
MAYOR 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
COUNCIL 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
y p ( p y y 4)
existing streets with walking and bicycling facilities as well as adding strategically
selected segments of trails, to create a complete network. Recent opportunistic
projects, including those in the 2018 streets bond, have made great progress. From
the perspective of someone walking or bicycling, however, these new projects are
not connected seamlessly to other facilities or each other. This annual program will
connect these gaps.
Gaps are of particular safety concern because someone walking or bicycling may
need to "brave" a section of street without a sidewalk or bikeway to get to their
destination.
Short segments of sidewalks are missing all over the city -- the equivalent of
sidewalk OCI 0. This year's program is likely, for example, to address a missing
sidewalk near a school on L Street in the Avenues and one or more missing
sidewalks in the Glendale Neighborhood identified in a community-council created
active transportation plan.
Existing roadways without bike infrastructure, despite having had a Complete
Street policy for over 17 years, will be selected based on gaps in the network. Gaps
will be addressed using inexpensive materials like paint, bollards, and/or
separation provided by parked vehicles, similar to projects implemented in the last
couple years on 200 East and 300 East. An emphasis will be placed on bike lanes
with physical separation, where possible.
Addressing these gaps may seem like "new" infrastructure. In most cases, however,
people bicycling and walking are already using these roadways without the benefit
of complete infrastructure. If the overall condition of a roadway were graded for
"completeness" instead of potholes, such locations would be "poor" to "failing."
16 Street Overlays 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the
level of deterioration where full reconstruction is required. Overlays include mill
and overlay of street pavement, spot curb and gutter and sidewalk replacement,
drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and
pedestrian access improvements.
this condition are in their last possible years before a considerably more expensive,
full reconstruction will become inevitable. This is analogous to an old house that
needs its wooden siding replaced. A few more years of rot, and you will need to
replace all the framing too. A lot more expensive.
The program incorporates federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA)
with an overlay project.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 90,000$
CDCIP 90,000$ 90,000$
MAYOR 90,000$ 90,000$
COUNCIL 90,000$ 90,000$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This application seeks funding to complete a study and detailed design to expand
the Jordan Park Skatepark.
Nestled within the Glendale neighborhood of Salt Lake City lies a cultural
cornerstone beloved by locals and renowned among skateboarders nationwide -
Jordan Skatepark, affectionately known as "9th and 9th". For over 20 years, this
iconic space has been a sanctuary for skaters, a hub for community building, and a
vital thread in the fabric of Glendale.
As Jordan Skatepark approaches its third decade of existence, the realities of time
and use have begun to reveal cracks in its foundation. With a surge in popularity
over the years, the park finds itself bursting at the seams, struggling to
accommodate the ever-growing groups of skaters who flock to it.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 100,000$
CDCIP 100,000$ 100,000$
MAYOR 100,000$ 100,000$
COUNCIL 100,000$ 100,000$
REQUEST 2,000,000$
CDCIP 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
MAYOR 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
REQUEST 303,000$
CDCIP 303,000$ 303,000$
MAYOR 303,000$ 303,000$
COUNCIL 303,000$ 303,000$
2026
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City's bike share system, GREENbike, has received nearly
$860,000 in federal funds that require a $60,000 city match. This funding
will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations and bikes.
GREENbike's oldest equipment is over 12 years old and has been exposed
to weather and the public 24/7/365. Of the 50 stations in Salt Lake system,
23 are at the end of their lifespan; parts are no longer available for repairs.
Over 130,000 individuals have taken hundreds of thousands of rides,
mashing buttons on stations, yanking or slamming bikes into docks, or
dropping bikes. Deteriorated bikes can create unsafe conditions for riders,
and stations may unexpectedly fail which can lead to personal safety
concerns for people walking from a further station than anticipated. While
GREENbike is rebuilding bikes as much as possible and cobbling together
stations out of old parts, ultimately both bikes and stations need to be
replaced. CIP is not for equipment. Bikes are equipment. Bike Stations are
eligible.
This funding request also includes $20,000 to replace 20+ year old bike
racks owned by the City on the public way. Racks have been hit by cars,
mangled, or simply rusted out, with little to no attention to maintenance.
While this may seem minor, in at least one instance a rusted bike rack fell
over, injuring a child and leading to a payout by the city. Racks that have
The priority of this request is maintenance and replacement If funds allow,
some new bike racks may be installed at business or customer request. This
is maintenance and not Capital Maintenance and should be part of the
Operational Budget.
In addition to permanent bike racks, the City has a program for 15 years to
seasonally replace one car parking space with a bike rack for 10 bicycles.
This is called a "bike corral." Most of the city's racks are damaged, may be
unsafe to use and do not make a good impression This request will also 19 Livable Streets Program 2026
Transportation Division
This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to
Transportation staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable
prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in
the areas most in need. This year's funding request is for three zones. This program
is scalable; additional funding would allow Transportation to move through the 113
total zones more quickly. At the current rate of 3-4 zones per year, the program will
take around 25-30 years to address all of the areas of the city.
20 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and Repave Street
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west
side of road on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave and repave 1200 E
between Crandall Ave and Zenith Ave.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL 500,000$ 500,000$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
I've lived on the corner of Richmond and Zenith with my family since 2021. My family walks
across Richmond daily to get to the daycare on another corner. Many people, including kids,
families, and elderly, walk across Richmond to get to daycare, parks, bus stops, the grocery
store, and school - Richmond runs through the Nibley Park School District and the 213 bus,
which services Highland High School, Westminster University, and The U, has north- and
south-bound stops at Richmond and Zenith. Pedestrian traffic is only likely to increase as
more apartment buildings and businesses are opened in the growing Brickyard area.
Despite all the pedestrian traffic, Richmond remains a 5-lane street - a road design the city
and Sugarhouse are working to replace to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety. There is only
a set of flashing pedestrian yield signs at Richmond and Zenith, which drivers either don't
notice or choose to disregard. My family and I often stand at the Zenith corner so long,
waiting for all 5 lanes to stop, that we have to hit the pedestrian crosswalk button multiple
times.
In 3 years, I've witnessed at least 5 car accidents, including a car rear-ending a stopped bus
and a car rear-ending another car that stopped for a pedestrian using the crosswalk. Our
backyard fence along Richmond is destroyed because a car went through it. Countless drivers
have almost hit other cars or pedestrians, including parents with strollers and kids. Neighbors
who signed my CIP petition used the words "scary", "nightmare", and "dangerous" to describe
crossing Richmond.
My CIP application aims to make the Richmond/Zenith intersection safe for pedestrians with
the installation of a HAWK signal. The Transportation Division confirmed a HAWK signal is
the next tier of pedestrian safety for the intersection. Adding a HAWK signal on Richmond
will slow traffic and make it safer and more attractive for the growing population in the area
to bike, walk, and use transit.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 1,900,000$
CDCIP 630,000$ 630,000$
MAYOR 630,000$ 630,000$
COUNCIL 630,000$ 630,000$
REQUEST 1,540,000$
CDCIP 385,000$ 385,000$
MAYOR 385,000$ 385,000$
COUNCIL 385,000$ 385,000$
Public Lands Department
This project proposes, but is not limited to, replacing two to three of Salt Lake City's
approximately 110 concrete or asphalt sport courts used for tennis, pickleball, basketball, and
other activities. The targeted locations and courts include:
Westpointe Park Basketball Court: The current basketball court is undersized for the
community it serves and lacks proper play surfacing. The concrete and basketball standards
are aging and in need of replacement. Expanding and updating the court will better meet
Adding an artistic element to the court design could further enhance the sense of community
and support local identity.
Riverside Park Tennis Courts: These asphalt courts are showing significant wear, including
cracks and peeling surfacing, which hinder playability. Replacing these courts and/or
converting some to pickleball courts would improve accessibility, ensure safety, and offer a
more enjoyable recreational environment for the community.
Liberty Park Volleyball Court: The volleyball court surfacing at Liberty Park is also
deteriorating. As part of a potential public/private partnership, this court may be converted
into a street soccer court. To support this transition, resurfacing the court is recommended to
ensure a durable and safe play area.
This project will enhance recreational opportunities, prioritize community needs, and
revitalize aging facilities to create safe and engaging spaces for residents. Other court
replacement/renovation projects should also be considered, especially if higher priority
projects are identified after the initial application and funding process is complete. Alternate
locations to consider include Sunnyside Park basketball court, Warm Springs Park tennis
courts, Madsen Park basketball court, and Victory Park/10th East Senior Center tennis
courts.
23 Playground Replacements
Public Lands Department
Replace and upgrade playground equipment and surfacing that are beyond their safe and
serviceable life at up to four parks.
Playgrounds typically last 20-25 years. Salt Lake City has 79 playgrounds. Replacing four per
year will ensure that children are safer, more engaged, and more consistently able to access
play features near their homes and schools. This programmatic, annual funding request
includes playground, surfacing, minor design, permitting, and community engagement costs.
Four of the following playgrounds (in alphabetical order) will be selected based on asset
condition, accessibility/ADA needs, and investment equity: 6th East Mini Park, 11th Avenue
Park, Davis Park, Lindsey Gardens Park, Parley's Way Park, Pugsley Ouray Park, Riverside
Park, Victory Park.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 855,724$
CDCIP 855,724$ 678,724$ 177,000$
MAYOR 855,724$ 678,724$ 177,000$
COUNCIL 855,724$ 678,724$ 177,000$
REQUEST 954,720$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
24 Central City 600 East Byway Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The 600 East Byway Safety Improvements CIP aims to make safety
improvements to 600 East between 900 South at Liberty Park to the
connection to N Street at South Temple. 600 East is one of Salt Lake City's
first neighborhood byways; however, this section has seen few safety
upgrades apart from improved crossings at 800 South and 900 South. In
some parts of the route, there are shared bike lane markings with no traffic
bike lanes with no traffic calming. This area has higher traffic volumes that
make it more stressful to ride a bike or walk across the street, and is the
area with the most destinations. This project would install traffic calming
throughout the route, improve walking and biking crossings, and improve
the bike lanes at key locations. 600 East is a very important active
transportation connection for the Central City community. It provides
direct access to 5 grocery stores, a school, multiple retail and dining
Lower Avenues through Central City to Liberty Wells. This project is
supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would
contribute to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and
reduce emissions for SLC's sustainability goals.
25 East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-
400 South and 400- 500 South)
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The curbing & irrigation systems for these medians has fallen into serious disrepair, causing a
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
g g y p , g
cascading series of issues affecting the space. During major events at the U, & day to day due
to the # of rental housing in the area, a low / no curbing along the medians allows vehicles to
park & drive over the medians, often breaking sprinkler heads & causing irrigation failures.
This failure in irrigation has caused the die off of many large, mature trees, as well as the
failed establishment of newly planted trees. Since these large medians represent a large
portion of the limited usable open space for East Central residents, this simple fix would
provide a major immediate and long-term improvement to the quality of life, longevity, and
beauty of the neighborhood. It would also significantly reduce long term maintenance costs
and reduce water usage/water loss.
This project seeks to install new curbing around each island to prevent cars from driving
across the turf & will allow the soil to be raised to match the grade of the top of the root ball of
the existing trees. Replacing the irrigation systems & planting a significant number of new
trees supplementing the urban forest that remains will provide a major impact on urban heat
reduction, as well as reducing long term irrigation & water use as more turf areas are shaded,
experiencing less soil moisture loss. (See attached "1200 E. Island Rehabilitation -Overall
Plan")
The tree planting portion of the project is in support of the "Trillion Tree Campaign" in an
effort to aid in enhancing SLC's air quality. This project seeks to establish a healthy succession
tree plan replacing the dying or lost trees, as well as drastically increasing the species diversity
of what is currently planted. This phase seeks to quadruple the tree count over these spaces,
planting species recommended by SLC Urban Forestry to reduce water needs, promote
longevity, increase species diversity, & emphasize resilience to a changing climate.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 475,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 932,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Traffic calming measures between 900 West and the Jordan River Trail on 500 South.
* Reduce the speed of vehicles using a system of speed humps (6).
* Make pedestrian crossings shorter and make pedestrians more visible
at the intersection of the Jordan River Parkway
27 Nevada Street Reconstruction
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
We are looking to rebuild Nevada St running from Redondo Ave north to
Garfield. Then west on Garfield for about 90ft.
Nevada St starting at Redondo Ave and running north about 900 FEET
then west 90 FEET (.17mi)
5K each ADA ramp.
3 with north end option 1 rebuild.
NW corner of Redondo Ave and Nevada St
NE corner of Redondo Ave and Nevada St
North end of Nevada, west side of street at the dogleg with Garfield
Overhead (Lynn)
7 driveways north of Redondo on the west side that do not have a drainpipe
under the foot Speedbumps or humps
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 530,000$
CDCIP 530,000$ 79,500$ 450,500$
MAYOR 530,000$ 79,500$ 450,500$
COUNCIL 530,000$ 79,500$ 450,500$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Riverside Basketball Court is a community hub that promotes physical
activity and social interaction. However, the current condition of the court
is deteriorated, and outdated, affecting its usability and safety. This
proposal outlines the need for renovation and the benefits of this project.
Objectives-
Enhance facility to a full court NBA regulation size. Updating the aesthetics
of the basketball court and adding amenities to make it user friendly.
as well as foster community engagement through recreational activities.
Scope of Work-
*Court Construction: Install durable, full court with a weather resistant
surface. Mark lines for both full and half court play. Customize with an
original art mural.
*Hoop Replacement: Install new, adjustable basketball hoops to
accommodate players of all ages and skill levels.
*Additional Amenities: Install fencing, benches, trash cans to enhance the
user experience
We've met and gathered input and suggestions from local residents, city
Gonzales regarding the renovations. This will ensure that the project meets
the needs and preferences of those who use the court.
Renovating the Riverside Basketball Court will significantly enhance our
community's recreational facilities, promote healthy lifestyles, and foster
social connections. We respectfully request approval for this Capital
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 240,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
29 Slow Down Liberty Wells South
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This application is submitted for, and on behalf of, the Liberty Wells Community
Council. There has been active discussion at council meetings with area residents,
working to formulate this application, with the ultimate goal of finding solutions to
slow traffic traveling through the council boundaries. The proposed project is for
the addition of traffic calming measures within the Liberty Wells community -
specifically on 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E between 1700 S and 2100 S. The
community has suffered under the onslaught of vehicles traveling north and south
on these streets ignoring the posted speed limit through the residential area. There
are residents in the area that have been asking Salt Lake City to explore, and
provide, remedy for the vehicles speeding through the neighborhood for over 18
years. The electronic driver feedback boards on 400 E regularly display vehicle
MPH speeds in the 30s to upper 40s, even though the posted speed limit is 20
MPH. Our initial CIP proposal also included 200 E and 500 E, but the expected
budget amount provided by the Transportation department was so high that we
knew our application would most likely be rejected. In discussion with residents,
the project area was scaled back with the rationale that 200 E has multiple curves
that naturally work to slow traffic and 500 E already has raised crosswalks that
were added when the roadway was reconstructed, along with it being a feeder route
with a higher speed limit. Included are photos of vehicles that were traveling
through the area at high/unsafe speeds and ended up flipping over onto the vehicle
roof.
30 Downtown Farmers Market - Upgraded Electrical Service
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Our proposed project would fund new electrical service to meet needs of the Downtown
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
( ) y g p g
neighborhood and add capacity for continued growth of the market. To maintain the size and
scope of the current market during park renovations, and retain our loyal customer base the
market will be moving to the streets surrounding Pioneer Park. One of the biggest hurdles we
are facing as the market moves to the streets is a solution to power access for our 20+
prepared food vendors. For the past 33 years we have been able to operate without the need
for individual gas powered generators, which has reduced noise and air pollution/exhaust,
helping us further our Waste Wise mission and create a better atmosphere at the market.
We have collaborated closely with Public Lands on our move to the streets during
construction, and to come up with permanent power solutions for our market vendors in the
street. We have considered adding electrical service to the park strips around Pioneer Park on
400 West and 300 South, but both of those locations come with a variety of hurdles including
damaging the root zones of historic trees. Considering these issues the best solution is to add
new electrical service to the median on 300 South. This power would help facilitate a
successful move of the market to city streets while the park is under construction, as well as
provide additional power options for market vendors in the future when it returns to the park
(current park plans include electrical service for only 8 vendors). We foresee closures of 300
South and 400 West and use of the new electrical service being part of market operations and
park activations into the future. We also believe that new electrical service in the 300 South
median opening opportunities for additional holiday and event lighting, and additional street
activation.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 812,500$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 693,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Replacement of Texas Street asphalt (OCI 18) from terminus south of Hillside Middle School
the street are in equally poor condition and need to be replaced.
32 Sweet Streets Bike Network Gap Filling
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The bike network safety CIP aims to revisit existing bike routes and make improvements at
key areas, such as busy intersections, high stress bike lanes, and filling gaps in the network.
While newly completed projects include safety elements like traffic calming, buffered lanes,
protected lanes, and intersection improvements, older projects are lacking these elements,
leading to high stress, unsafe routes. In other areas, the lack of a safe crossing could hinder
the bike route utility, leading to its disuse by people biking. This project intends to focus on
the bigger picture of the bicycling network, unlike other projects like Livable Streets, which
focus on limited zones and isolated improvements. The project will also consider markings,
signage, beautification/art, and wayfinding to aid in navigation and encourage bicycling. The
CIP supports several City initiatives, such as Vision Zero - zero serious injuries or deaths by
2035, the Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the Complete Streets Ordinance, and a recent
technical assistant grant (Accelerated Mobility Playbook) which will help accelerate this
project. Overall, this project will expand the safe transportation options for Salt Lakers,
promote active mobility, health, and well being, and reduce congestion on our streets.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 104,177$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Solar Powered Pedestrian Activated Flashers
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Pedestrian Safety requirements within the East Central Community Council Area.
East Central has been identified as one the most walkable neighborhoods within Salt Lake
City (University of Utah/9th & 9th/Trolley Square/Downtown), it includes the highest transit
highest rental rate within the city (73%). In addition, given our location next to the
U/stadium, anticipated growth of the U seeking to increase student population by 10,000, the
number of visitors housed within our area annually & during the 2002 Olympics, the ECC has
established this plan to ready our neighborhood to be not only inviting but safe. We
appreciate SLC's treatment of the ECC hot spots to date. Two new locations have been
identified as extremely dangerous to our community requiring pedestrian safety treatment.
We are seeking pedestrian-activated flashers at these locations. As a community, we are
prioritizing pedestrian safety to ensure that our neighborhood is not only visually appealing
but also accessible & safe.
As the world prepares for the 2034 Olympics in Salt Lake City, the East Central Community
Council is embarked on an ambitious ten-year plan that will enhance our neighborhood's
aesthetic appeal and foster a stronger sense of community as we prepare to greet the world.
Given its location central in the heart of the City, imagine East Central as an inviting and safe
neighborhood complete with tree-lined streets, lush green spaces, community gathering
places that foster a sense of belonging, innovative public art, a thriving neighborhood
business district that caters to residents and visitors alike and a sense of pride that radiates
from every property.
This effort will not only enhance the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal but also foster a
stronger sense of community that leaves a lasting legacy for generations to come.
This is the vision we are bringing to life in East Central.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 324,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This proposal will (1) help to secure the 1893 Fisher Mansion, a city-owned and currently
vacant property, and (2) move this resource closer to serving as a catalyst for economic
development, community engagement, and pride on Salt Lake City's West Side.
The Fisher Mansion and surrounding property were purchased in 2006 by Salt Lake City to
complete the Jordan River Trail. In 2023, the city completed the restoration of the Fisher
Mansion Carriage House (located on the mansion's grounds), which now houses Public Lands
Department staff. In 2022, the Salt Lake City Council budgeted $3 million to structurally and
seismically stabilize the mansion.
This stabilization, currently scheduled to begin in spring 2025, will repair and strengthen the
Fisher Mansion's foundations, walls, and roof. There is not enough funding in this $3 million
bring the stone porch balustrade up to public safety code.
New soffits, facia, and stone balustrades are necessary to weatherproof the Fisher Mansion
and allow the public to safely access this building. All of these elements require immediate
attention and are considered by Salt Lake City architects to be essential repairs, regardless of
the mansion's future occupancy. This application requests funding to pay for these repairs.
Additional site improvements will allow for continued and expanded use of the grounds, and
improve functionality and safety of the Jordan River boat access and the Jordan River
Parkway and Trail, and compliments the Emerald Ribbon Action Plan.
As funds are available, limited restoration of some doors and windows will improve safety,
security and access to the building, and further the ongoing full restoration for eventual
occupancy. Artwork as a temporary feature on the boarded coverings will highlight
community, culture and history.
35 Neighborhood Alley Way Repavement (#4195) / Repave Alley #4195
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
This project aims to repave the local alleyway, creating a safe and accessible alternative
parking solution for homeowners and improving the overall aesthetics and functionality of
the neighborhood. The repaving will address the current state of disrepair, ensuring a
smoother surface, proper drainage, and increased safety for pedestrians and vehicles alike.
By investing in the repaving of the local alleyway, the community will experience a range of
benefits that not only address immediate concerns but also contribute to the long-term
project demonstrates a collective commitment to enhancing the quality of life for all residents
and ensuring the neighborhood remains a desirable place to live for years to come.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 403,010$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 429,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,002,689$
CDCIP -$
36 Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project will make the neighborhood more livable, walkable, & safe for pedestrians,
including for school children.We have three schools in a small area (Beacon Heights
Elementary, Hillside Middle School, & Cosgriff private). Due to the increase in cut-through &
speeding traffic in our neighborhood, it has become increasingly unsafe to cross the street,
especially at school drop-off/pick-up times. As a result we need to calm traffic to make safe
routes. Specifically, we request the following:
1) 4 speed cushions on 2100s (between Nevada St and 2600 E)
2) 2 speed cushions on Texas Street (between 2100s and Parley's Way)
3) 3 raised crosswalks on 2100s (between Nevada St and Wyoming St)
4) No parking signs near blind corners along 2100s (between Nevada Street and 2600 E)
5) 3 enhanced crosswalks on Redondo St (at Texas St, Wyoming St, and 2500 E intersections)
very common to see drivers speeding much in excess of the speed limit on this stretch,
particularly while cutting from Foothills to 2300 E, and vice versa. The raised crosswalks will
advance pedestrian safety and visibility. There is currently only one cross-walk on this stretch
of 2100s, and it’s a simple painted crosswalk, with a newly installed plastic in-road sign. For
the amount of pedestrian traffic across this road, it is simply insufficient as is. The no parking
signs will help to make turning out to 2100s much safer, as currently turning onto 2100s from
several intersecting roads, drivers cannot see the oncoming traffic, and have to inch out into
the roadway too far. The enhanced crosswalks will slow traffic and increase pedestrian
visibility. The intersections on Redondo are currently two way stop, and often have confusion
about stopping/non-stopping, making it unsafe for drivers and pedestrians. Together, these
actions will improve the safety of our neighborhood.
37 Intersection Daylighting with Parking for Bikes and Scooters
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project would aim to increase safety at intersections around the city while also
making it easier to use modes of transportation outside of cars. The basic idea is to
daylight intersections to increase visibility that may otherwise be blocked by parked
cars (sometimes illegally so) using bike racks or scooter parking zones with physical
infrastructure to prevent car parking in these places. Physical infrastructure would
also provide potential space for artists to create art.
38 PSB EV Charging Expansion
Facilities Division
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a vital project aimed at upgrading the
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
g g y y g, y
city's police and fire departments, emergency operations center, and combined dispatch unit.
The project involves the installation of (20) new Level 2 charger ports, along with back
feeding (10) pre-existing ports within the existing two-floor garage, catering to a fleet of (50)
public services, police, and fire vehicles. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn
& Sawatch, the proposed funding will support the first two phases, which include the
installation of a new utility transformer on the east end of the property to facilitate the
required electrical service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our
commitment to sustainable transportation as outlined in the City's 2020 Electrified
Transportation Joint Resolution and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the
evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 176,635$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 611,879$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Facilities Division
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a crucial project dedicated to upgrading
the charging infrastructure at Plaza 349. Situated off 200 E and University Boulevard, the
Plaza 349 complex comprises an office building and a six-level parking garage, both served by
a single existing electrical service. The proposed project involves installing (20) new Level 2
charger ports and back feeding (4) pre-existing charging ports within the Plaza 349 parking
garage, which currently accommodates (38) fleet vehicles according to telematics data.
Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn & Sawatch, the initial funding will
support the first two phases, including the installation of a new utility switching cabinet and
transformer strategically placed between the main building and parking garage to facilitate
the required electrical service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our
commitment to sustainable transportation as outlined in the City's 2020 Electrified
Transportation Joint Resolution and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the
evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
39 First Encampment Park
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The First Encampment Park is in its 28th year and is a treasure in the Liberty Wells
Community but needs some capital improvements. Through funding provided by the Parks
Department, a novel path forward is being developed to present the historical information
etched on the boulders about the first pioneer settlers in the valley, and the damaged plaques
and signage on the monuments are being replaced. This assistance has been greatly
appreciated and has enabled us to move forward in our CIP requests for security and safety
enhancements to preserve the park's infrastructure which has deteriorated over the years.
Since 1997, new technology has improved providing possible upgrades for a more secure
environment.
Therefore, our CIP goals are:
- Overhaul the irrigation system to better support turf, trees and new native plantings
- Replace non-native and non-historic plantings with water-wise legacy plants; replant the
Southwest corner of the park with native plants
- Connect the park's northwest drainage area directly to the City's storm drain on 1700 South
to prevent standing water and improve drainage
- Replace pavers for 300 sq feet of park pathways
- Update light poles and electrical capability with LED lighting for visitor security
- Replace in-ground ornamental lighting needed for three plaques
- Provide motion-censored pedestrian lighting
- Improve upheaval of the sidewalk on 1700 South and park strip to improve accessibility and
legal compliance with ADA
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 485,837$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL 76,118$ 76,118$
REQUEST 93,500$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project implements traffic calming measures on 800 W and improvements on
Navajo and Emery Streets, from 1300 S/California Avenue to 800/900 S,
enhancing pedestrian and cyclist safety in the Glendale neighborhood. The project
is phased to distribute efforts across multiple years based on available funding.
The primary goal is creating a safer urban environment for all users, especially
pedestrians and cyclists. Phase 1 focuses on 800 W, a major connector between the
9-Line and California Street bike lanes that currently lacks traffic calming measures
and connects to the Sorenson Multicultural Center. Phase 2 integrates Navajo and
Emery Streets into the Neighborhood Byways system, building on planned Livable
Zone 12 improvements.
Phase 1 Projects: Council approved funding for Phase 1 only
--- Seven speed humps along 800 W between 900 S and 1300 S, providing physical
speed reduction while maintaining bike access and emergency vehicle passage.
Phase 2 Projects:
--- Emery/California intersection improvements with upgraded bike lane paint and
detection
--- Raised crosswalks at Fremont/800 W and Remington Way/800 W near school
bus stops
--- Neighborhood Byway signage on Emery and Navajo Streets between Indiana
Avenue and California
--- New flashing beacon (RRFB) at 800 W/900 S with pedestrian refuge island
Future Phase 3 could include chicanes, traffic circles, or additional pedestrian
improvements on 800 W.
This project aims to create safer neighborhood connections, encourage active
transportation, reduce emissions, and foster a more livable environment. It aligns
with Salt Lake City's sustainability goals, public health initiatives, and Vision Zero
policy to eliminate traffic injuries and fatalities by 2035.
42 1700 East Asphalt and Fence
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Asphalt slope below metal fence from 2229 South 1700 East to 2283 South 1700 East. This
should be done in order to kill the weeds that are growing below this fence. The SHCC has
been notified of the weeds that are growing below the fence. The metal fence needs to be
painted. It has not been painted since it was installed in 2005.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 525,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 4,067,000$
CDCIP 2,597,000$ 2,597,000$
MAYOR 2,597,000$ 2,597,000$
COUNCIL 2,597,000$ 2,597,000$
Public Lands Department
This project will transform several public parks into vibrant hubs for community gatherings
and public events by investing in essential event infrastructure, and replacing failing
pavilions. Funding will replace failing pavilions in select parks ideal for hosting small family
and corporate events, and add amenities such as permanent power distribution boxes,
improved lighting, restrooms, and durable areas to accommodate stages, vehicles, portable
restrooms, or other structures to make our parks more friendly and accommodating to many
different kinds of event.
These upgrades will support a variety of activities, from cultural festivals and concerts to
volunteer projects and neighborhood celebrations, fostering community connection and
enriching public spaces. By equipping our parks with the necessary infrastructure, we aim to
reduce event setup costs, minimize environmental impacts, and increase accessibility for
organizers and participants alike to make gathering with our communities more accessible.
The benefits of this application are four-fold:
(1) Reduce the current maintenance impacts of concentrating every City and special event
within the same few parks
(2) Reduce event costs for organizers
(3) Activate more of our parks, especially those that are otherwise ready to be supportive of
events
(4) Ensure that our park supply can meet event demand so that there can be more events
programmed in our parks every year
This initiative aligns with our vision of creating safe, inclusive, and engaging public spaces
that strengthen community bonds and enhance quality of life for residents and visitors.
43 Glendale Neighborhood Pedestrian Safety Improvement RRFB revision to
HAWK signal at the California Ave/Concord St Intersection
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project aims to increase the safety of pedestrians at an intersection used by residents
including UTA public transit riders, Glendale Branch Library visitors, and minor students at
Mountain View Elementary, Dual Immersion Academy, and Glendale Middle School, by
providing additional funding to revise previously funded plans for an RRFB at the location to
a more secure HAWK signal.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL 500,000$ 500,000$
REQUEST 250,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 322,996$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Install shade cloths over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the
summer, playground equipment is too hot to use by 10am. By providing shade to
for the full day in the summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of
skin cancer.
1. Meadows Park
2. 17th South River Park
3. 11th Avenue Park (playground replacement included in the Public Lands
Department's ADA CIP application for FY 25/26)
4. Sherwood Park
5. Modesto Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming
Parks GO Bond and CIP-funded improvement projects along the Jordan River
corridor)
6. Richmond Park (playground upgrades or replacement included in the upcoming
Parks GO Bond and CIP-funded improvement project)
7. Herman Franks Park
46 Alleyway Improvements 2026
Engineering Division
This annual program, kicked off in 2021, funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of
deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary..
47 Marmalade Gateway Roundabout
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This plan is a chance to enhance the area with better "Marmalade" neighborhood branding
while also providing much-needed improvements to make the roadways safer.
This plan will serve two purposes, making Marmalade a more recognized neighborhood but at
the same time providing safety to the residents and students that attend the three
surrounding schools.
The plan seeks to redesign the 300 North 200 West intersection with a roundabout allowing a
Marmalade sign or art installation. In addition, a separate traffic calming project will install a
speed bump immediately to the west on 300 North.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 680,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 680,000$ 680,000$
COUNCIL 680,000$ 680,000$
REQUEST 163,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
There is a dire need for health and safety improvements along Rose Park Ln. This project
would meet all your priorities for the application year. More than a beautification, this project
really addresses your top priorities of unfinished projects, Health and Safety, Jordan River
Parkway, and city-owned land. The Urban Forestry Division has committed to providing trees
and installation at the new sites on Rose Park Lane. This project would extend and complete
the Rose Park Lane trail, remove illegal overnight commercial truck parking on unfinished
land, and build infrastructure to sustain commercial truck traffic on Rose Park Ln.
The entire stretch of Rose Park Ln is highly visible and highly neglected. The entire stretch of
the existing Rose Park Ln. was irrigated 7 years ago for the WestPointe run-off ditch (large
grassy area/detention basin at the corner of Rose Park Ln and 1700N), but this irrigation was
never extended for the remainder of that stretch of road or utilized. This lane is highly visible
from I-215 with large volumes of traffic going to the beautiful soccer fields just a few feet up
the road. This has increased the traffic and speed of that traffic on Rose Park Ln. Safety is an
issue as cars will continue to use highway speeds down that road upward of 60 MPH.
Fixing the trail and planting trees with irrigation on Rose Park Ln would greatly improve
community morale and safety for the families that walk with their children and pets, and bike
and run on this trail. Adding trees along Rose Park Ln will also help in reducing air pollution,
high summer heat, and traffic noise, also repairing/replacing the sidewalk to make it ADA-
compliant would also create handicap accessibility for residents who are currently unable to
utilize this walkway.
This area has been neglected for a long time and needs reinvestment to provide shade,
accessibility, and other environmental benefits to this neighborhood.
49 Repave Alley
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Request repaving alley between 3rd & 4th Aves and Virginia and Alta
streets
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 480,000$ 480,000$
MAYOR 480,000$ 480,000$
COUNCIL 480,000$ 480,000$
REQUEST 2,765,000$
CDCIP 140,000$ 140,000$
MAYOR -$ -$
50 Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup
Constituent Application, Public Lands Department
I wanted to bring to your attention a specific area of the river that is in
great need of improvements and enhancements. It is a city owned parcel at
the end of Concord St. and Pierpont Ave. It often goes unmaintained and
has been a section with a lot of criminal issues and illegal dumping. The
an area where people used to be able to walk down to the river and engage
with nature; however, due to its unmaintained and underutilized nature, it
has been closed off by the city and has been home to multiple
encampments recently.
The city owns a large piece of land that accesses the river from Concord. In
addition it owns the parcels across the river to the east and west. I believe
this would be the perfect location for a bridge over the river. The neighbors
in this area do not have an easy access to the Jordan river trail, or a good
way to cross I-80 as a pedestrian. If neighbors want to travel north, they
have to walk down to the freeway overpass on Navajo and down 200S to
connect to the trail. Or they have to walk out to 300 S and go east to
connect to the trail at Alzheimer's Park.
Because the city owns land on both sides of the river, it should be a much
easier place to work with. Instead of a fenced off access point I would love
to see the city make improvements that the community can use.
The scope of the request will be 1) create a new public nature space on the
west side of Alzheimer's park/Jordan River, 2) add improvements to the
walkway on 300 S to increase comfort and walkability to the JRT, and 3)
51 Nature Park at Bonneville
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Nature Park at Bonneville will turn two and a half acres of unusable fire hazard into a
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 388,000$
CDCIP -$
p g pp
for this project (see Supporting Documents).
This area has been used by three generations of children in this neighborhood, but was
recently fenced off for safety reasons. It has a large amount of dead wood, creating a
significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area. We see evidence of "campsites" and drug
paraphernalia left behind; as well as large piles of concrete and asphalt chunks, dead and
broken trees from the golf course, and broken or obsolete golf course equipment. We propose
the area be converted to a small nature park with a shredded bark walking path utilizing bark
chips from dead wood processed from the area; three benches, access to water to establish
drought-tolerant native trees, shrubs and pollinator plants. This area will be cleared of junk
the northerwestern side for our native wildlife habitat and protection. We will also work to
protect the habitat of great horned owls and various hawks living in the area. We propose two
entrances: (1) south end of 2200 East, (2) east side of Connor St. at property line to the
course. The south end is at the current Maintenance Building and will have no access to the
nature park from this area. Also included is the addition of native trees, shrubs and pollinator
plants utilizing free or low-cost programs like the Utah Pollinator Habitat Program, currently
irrigation system. The end result will offer a safe, natural area for both adults and children to
enjoy nature and her wildlife such as great horned owls, red tailed hawks, deer, foxes, and
other wild creatures that are losing habitat in our highly developed.
52 Safe Side Streets North Extension
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The project being submitted is a "completely separate project" to a past CIP
j i hi h bl k h h id f h bl k i h "
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 117,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
A full service bike "spa" between Harvey Milk Blvd. bike path and sidewalk on the North side
of the Milk Block (416 E 900 S) and a similar style but slightly larger bike spa at the SLC
Downtown Library located to the SE of the main Library building to replace the existing
"alphabet" bike rack.
The purpose of these spas is for the City to go beyond merely accommodating bicyclists and
provide safe, secure, and convenient bicycle parking that will encourage citizens to leave their
car at home and ride to work, to do shopping, or to recreate. This project will accelerate
and/or accentuate City bicycle infrastructure and plans.
project within the same block. The south side of the block is the "Sugar
House Safe Side Streets Project."
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2023/12/08/safesidestreets/
We are seeking the continuation of traffic calming effects on the north
portion of our block. The streets involved are:
1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South)
Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 East
Wilson Avenue 1000 East - 1100 East
1000 East is an iconic byway and a prime destination for active
transportation. At the south end of the block is the heart of Sugar House
and the north end a children's destination, Westminster Park. And further
north is an elementary school, Emerson Elementary.
The goal for the residents of this area is to decrease cut through traffic and
slow vehicle speeds. Also to promote safer streets for bicyclists, walkers,
joggers, skateboarders and alike. The street calming efforts within this
block are not systemic. The residents of this area are asking for the
completion of street calming within the neighborhood.
*** The residents of the project area, accept the possibility that this project
may have to be achieved in sections. If so, we would like 1000 East between
1700 South to Garfield Avenue (1860 South) be completed first. The
majority of speeding vehicles are on that stretch of byway. Also, the
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 230,600$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 120,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Improve and enhance the sidewalk and parking median along the north side of 300 South (ie.
Broadway in front of the historic Clift Building) extending from the alley for the 222 parking
garage to Main Street. This stretch of sidewalk lacks the greenery and other shade and seating
options that are found on most streets within the Central Business District. These deficiencies
would be addressed with planting of trees, placement of planters and bench seating. Safety
issues for bicyclists and scooters would be addressed with larger planters and street paint to
clearly delineate car lanes from the bicycle lane at the corner of Main Street.
55 Sunnyside Avenue and Amanda Ave Safe Crossing
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This is a safe street crossing and air quality improvement project. Utilizing crossing signals
and appropriate road markings, the crosswalk will provide a safe signalized crossing for an
neighborhood area where k-12 school age children and community recreation users cross a 5
lane street on a daily basis. A landscape island will provide an opportunity to mitigate severe
air quality and heat island effect on the street. As of July 2024, the surface temperature of the
street was measured at 137 degrees Fahrenheit
56 1200 East Traffic Circles
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Two Traffic Circles, featuring appropriate art, to be built at two busy residential intersections
that are along two main corridors into the University of Utah campus. These will be designed
to follow the NACTO guidelines.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 3,000,000$
CDCIP 2,760,500$ 2,760,500$
MAYOR 3,000,000$ 99,500$ 2,900,500$
COUNCIL 3,000,000$ 99,500$ 2,900,500$
REQUEST 100,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 249,865$
CDCIP -$
58 Wasatch Dr & 2100 South Project
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The intersection of 2100 South and Wasatch Drive has become a safety concern to residents,
motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. Residential traffic calming attempts such as signs, parked
a safety risk with its awkwardly placed stop signs and poor sight lines for safely crossing as a
pedestrian or cyclist. We are requesting your consideration for the installation of two Speed
Cushions and a Speed Radar Sign in advance of this intersection. We believe that installing
risk of accidents and enhance cyclist and pedestrian safety.
59 Federal Heights Safety Upgrades
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
We need speedbumps placed on key streets that receive unabated traffic, particularly downhill
streets. We receive a high volume of cut-through traffic going to and from the University of
57 Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation
Public Lands Department
Where the Civic Campus and Green Loop intersect, there is a valuable opportunity to create
an iconic and vibrant event space in the heart of downtown. This request of $3,000,000 is a
20% of the projected project cost and serves as seed money for alternative funding sources.
The Green Loop project reimagines part of the City's underutilized public rights-of-way as
functional green space with nature-based solutions to improve the environment and human
well-being.
Transformation of the public right-of-way requires design and construction of both above-
ground improvements (sidewalks, paths, bikeways, plazas, roadway, forest, plantings, park
features, and rain gardens) and below-ground infrastructure (public and private utilities).
Project costs include design and construction of above-ground green space, roadway
reconstruction, and some utility (public and private) relocation on 200 East from
approximately 350 South to 550 South.
The intent of this application is to allocate funding to bring strategic segments of the Green
Loop to construction as early as 2026, particularly where there are timely opportunities to
leverage nearby active projects, grant funds, and/or philanthropy.
Since 2019, Salt Lake City's multi-departmental Green Loop project team, comprised of staff
from Community and Neighborhoods, the Mayor's Office, Public Lands, Public Services, and
Public Utilities has been collaborating to bring this complex project to reality. In 2024,
concept design for 200 East was completed. Further design for the Civic Block will integrate
the Green Loop with Library Square visioning and Washington Square security
improvements.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
g g g g y
Utah and the hospitals. Vehicles are consistently going 35mph+ on our streets, and the
downhill traffic is typically the worst. These streets have limited stop signs on them, resulting
in cars flying down them and speeds sometimes 2x the speed limit. Many families, including
ours, on Sigsbee have young children and we're persistently worried that an accident is going
to occur, resulting in material harm to ours or neighboring kids.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 280,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This application is for a community Garden to be constructed on 700 East & Coatsville Ave.
Parcel is located on a UDOT parcel on the north side of Coatsville Ave. This is the second year
this project has been submitted. This is a vacant lot owned by UDOT in which SLC has a
contract to maintain it. One of the reasons the application was not approved last year because
of the uncertainly of the extent of the property required for the construction of the 700 East
Shared Use Path. That project is in the final stages of construction so that variable is now
known and UDOT would now be in a position to allow the project on the property.
Wasatch Community Gardens also was not sure they had the resources to manage another
garden last year because they were committed to open 2 very large west side community
gardens this year. The earliest this garden would become operational is the spring of 2026, so
I am confident that the bandwidth will be available.
One might point out that there is already a community garden at 1700 South and 700 East
but it is limited by the fact that they are numerous large trees on that lot so about 50% of it is
shaded for all or a portion of the day, hence it is not a very productive garden. I would
estimate that to be about 50% based on the area that is used for gardens and what is being
grown there. A corollary to this application would be to relocate that existing garden to this
new proposed and much more productive location. The local community council has a master
plan on green space in the neighborhood and the location of the existing community garden
would make a much better dog park. The green space at the recently closed Hawthorne
Elementary School, would hopefully become a new SLC neighborhood park. This would be in
conjunction with a new dog park across 1700 South and a productive community garden
another half block south of it.
Streets
Impact Fees FOF Transit FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General
Fund
FOF
Other
Parks
Impact
Fees
REQUEST 150,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL 500,000$ 500,000$
REQUEST 66,015,717$
CDCIP 40,180,000$ 7,000,000$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,000,000$
MAYOR 44,193,236$ 10,413,236$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,600,000$
COUNCIL 44,193,236$ 10,413,236$ 1,100,000$ 8,800,000$ 880,000$ 900,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 10,600,000$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
62 Vacant and Leased City-owned Property Maintenance
Real Estate Services Division
Note there is a total of $700,000 of which $200,000 is the general
maintenance base budget separate from the competitive portion of CIP and
used for repairs, security, and utilities at vacant and leased city-owned
properties. The Administration is requesting that the $500,000 for
development specific uses in FY2026 be split into two parts:
- Up to $400,000 for building improvements to the Fisher Mansion that may
include historic rehabilitation, building systems, and structural improvements.
- Up to $100,000 for expenses related to predevelopment costs and
development of a community benefits agreement for the Fleet Block.
TOTALS
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Since 2016, the neighborhoods surrounding East High School, as per current Salt Lake City
Government protocol, have recorded and reported numerous violent incidents including, but
not limited to, groups of East High School students as well as unrecognized groups of adults
and high-school aged students circling the neighborhood in vehicles before coming to the
neighborhood and jumping unsuspecting students and/or engaging in large (60+) assault
with battery; gangs of street racers weaponizing vehicles to threaten and intimidate other
(both side by side and in tandem) and other high speed driving around the schools and along
several specialized City departments to conceive of an engineering plan to restore safety,
livability, and hospitality to this high impact area in the nexus of East High School that will
serve residents, business, as well as predominantly westside students that visit these
neighborhoods during the school day. The departments that have been consulted are
Transportation, Enforcement, and Salt Lake City Police Department, the Mayor's Office and
Council member Mano, as well as the District Attorney's office to make sure that we are
working within a legal and civil rights-friendly framework. We have also received support
from the SLCSD and the new EHS Principal as East High School faces 1300 East and has a
zero access policy to a from campus to the rear two-thirds of campus making it impossible for
the SLCSD staff to respond to violent road-related issues that owned and operated by Salt
Lake City. The challenge we face is that none of the stakeholders within the city or school
district are on the same page in addressing these issues. What is needed is a planning effort
that brings all stakeholders together to solve these critical issues.