HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Provided Information - 5/6/2025CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst
DATE:May 6, 2025
RE: Alley Vacation – Alley Section Adjacent to 1409 South Edison Street
(PLNPCM2024-00439)
PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE
Three people spoke during an April 15, 2025 public hearing, all supportive of the proposed partial alley
closure. They expressed concerns with waste and needles found in the alley. Commenters also said the City
doesn’t have resources to adequately maintain the alley, so residents do.
The following information was provided for previous Council meetings. It is included
again for background purposes.
BRIEFING UPDATE
During a March 18, 2025 briefing the Council discussed potentially connecting the subject alley through to
a separate alley (not included in this proposal) if property owned by the State of Utah between the two
alleys is redeveloped at some point. Planning staff reminded the Council no alley exists on that property,
and one would need to be dedicated connecting to the northern alley if the property is redeveloped in the
future. Planning staff also noted the Utah Power & Light facility immediately north of the State of Utah
property blocks that alley so a future connection to 1300 South would not be feasible.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate an approximately 11-foot by 52-foot alley segment
between the applicant’s property at 1409 South Edison Street, and property at 1404 South 200 East in City
Council District Five. The alley begins at Cleveland Avenue and dead ends at the applicant’s north property
line where it meets a concrete wall around property owned by the State of Utah.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 18, 2025
Set Date: March 25, 2025
Public Hearing: April 15, 2025
Potential Action: May 6, 2025
Page | 2
If approved by the City Council, the alley property would be divided and given to the two abutting property
owners. Both owners are supportive of the alley vacation.
Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council. The Commission reviewed this petition at its November 13, 2024 meeting and held a public
hearing at which no one spoke. Commissioners discussed the potential for the adjacent State of Utah
property being redeveloped at some point and benefits of an alley serving the property. The Commission
voted unanimously to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the
proposed alley vacation.
Goal of the briefing: Review the alley closure and determine if the Council supports moving forward
with the proposal.
Aerial image showing separate alleys (in purple) north and south of State of Utah property (outlined in red).
(An alley was never platted on the State property.) The subject alley vacation segment is indicated by a green
check mark. A red “X” indicates where the north alley is blocked adjacent to Utah Power & Light property
outlined in blue. A second red “X” indicates where Edison Street south of 1300 South terminates at the State
property. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A gate blocking the alley at the south end of the applicant’s property was illegally constructed by a previous
owner many years ago. The applicant did not realize the alley property was not his until he received a
zoning enforcement notice for blocking the alley. Property owners to the south use the alley to access their
properties and garages. This use will not be affected if the subject alley segment is vacated.
Page | 3
During the Planning Commission briefing Commissioners expressed a desire for the applicant to be able to
use the alley property while preserving options for future connectivity to the north. They asked about an
easement that would accomplish this. The Attorney’s Office said that is a possibility but would be a process
separate from the subject alley vacation.
A different alley runs between the north side of the State of Utah property mentioned above and 1300
South. It is worth noting that an alley was not platted on the State property, so the two alley sections never
connected to form a complete alley through the block between Cleveland Avenue and 1300 South. Utah
Power & Light has a power facility adjacent to the State of Utah property that blocks the alley north of the
State property.
Rocky Mountain Power has an easement on the full length of the alley from Cleveland Avenue to the
applicant’s property. This allows the company to service its overhead power lines. Access to these lines will
need to be maintained if the Council adopts the alley vacation request.
City Department Review
Attachment G of the Planning Commission staff report includes comments from City department review of
the proposal. These are summarized below. Please see the staff report for additional information.
During City review of the petition, the Engineering Division said it is generally opposed to vacating public
rights-of-way. The existing Rocky Mountain Power easement was also discussed and the requirement to
maintain access for the company to service its lines. No other responding departments or divisions
expressed concerns with the proposal.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified three key considerations during analysis of these proposals which are found on
pages 5-6 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis
please see the staff report.
Consideration 1 – Property Owner Consent
City code requires a minimum of 75% of property owners abutting alleys being considered for vacation sign
a petition expressing support. As noted above, there are two properties abutting the subject alley segment
and both property owners signed the petition.
Consideration 2 – Policy Considerations
Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation satisfies the Lack of Use policy consideration included in
the table below.
Consideration 3 – Master Plan Considerations
Planning staff reviewed how the proposed alley vacation aligns with the Central Community Master Plan
and Plan Salt Lake. Both plans support connectivity and circulation within neighborhoods. Alleys can help
provide these connections, but because the subject alley does not connect through the block between
Cleveland Avenue and 1300 South, it only serves abutting property owners. And as noted above, the
proposed vacation would impact the two property owners next to the alley segment.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment E (pages 13-15 of the Planning Commission staff report) includes factors to consider when
reviewing alley vacation requests. The following is a summary of what is in the staff report. Please see the
report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Page | 4
14.52.020 - The City will not consider disposing of its
interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it
receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that
the disposition satisfies at least one of the following
policy considerations:
A - Lack of Use- The City’s legal interest in the
property appears of record or is reflected on an
applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site
inspection that the alley does not physically exist or
has been materially blocked in a way that renders it
unusable as a public right-of-way.
B - Public Safety- The existence of the alley is
substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity
or unsafe conditions, public health problems, or
blight in the surrounding area.
C - Urban Design- The continuation of the alley does
not serve as a positive urban design element.
D - Community Purpose- The petitioners are
proposing to restrict the general public from use of
the alley in favor of a community use, such as a
neighborhood play area or garden.
Complies
Planning staff found the alley vacation
request is consistent with policy
consideration A – Lack of Use.
Section 14.52.030.B Salt Lake City Code directs the Planning Division to analyze factors in the following
table. Planning staff found the proposed alley meets six of the eight factors.
Factor Planning Staff Finding
The City Police Department, Fire Department,
Transportation Division, and all other relevant City
Departments and Divisions have no objection to the
proposed disposition of the property.
Does not comply.
The Engineering Division noted it
generally opposes any vacation of public
rights-of-way.
The petition meets at least one of the policy
considerations stated above.
Complies with Policy Consideration A –
Lack of Use.
The petition must not deny sole access or required off-
street parking to any adjacent property.
Complies
The petition will not result in any property being
landlocked.
Complies
The disposition of the alley property will not result in a
use which is otherwise contrary to the policies of the
City, including applicable master plans and other
adopted statements of policy which address, but which
are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian
paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses.
Complies
No opposing abutting property owner intends to build
a garage requiring access from the property, or has
made application for a building permit, or if such a
permit has been issued, construction has been
completed within 12 months of issuance of the
building permit.
Complies
The petition furthers the City preference for disposing
of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it;
and
Does not comply.
The request is to vacate only a segment
of the alley.
The alley is optional for actual or potential rear access
to residences or for accessory uses.
Complies
Page | 5
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
•July 12, 2024 – Petition submitted to Salt Lake City Planning Division.
•July 18, 2024 – Petition assigned to Diana Martinez, Senior Planner.
•August 21, 2024 –
o Early notification sent to the Liberty Wells Community Council Chair.
o 45-day input period begins.
•August 22, 2024 – Early notification letter sent to abutting property owners and tenants within
300 feet of the alley segment requested to be vacated.
•October 7, 2024 – 45-day comment period for recognized organizations ends.
•November 1, 2024 – Public hearing notice signs with project information posted at the applicant’s
address and at the beginning of the alley on Cleveland Avenue.
•December 13, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous
negative recommendation to the City Council for the proposed amendments.
•November 14, 2024 – Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office
•February 21, 2025 – Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office.
•March 4, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office.
ALLEY CLOSURE PROCESS
The alley closure process is dictated by Chapter 14.52 Salt Lake City Code which is included below for reference.
14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS:
The City supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part, with
regard to City owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth herein. (Ord.
24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR ABANDONMENT OF
CITY OWNED ALLEYS:
The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a
petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy
considerations:
A. Lack Of Use: The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable
plat; however, it is evident from an on site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been
materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way;
B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity,
unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area;
C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; or
D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley
in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS:
There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of City owned alleys under this section.
Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a
recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council.
A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The City administration will determine whether or
not the petition is complete according to the following requirements:
1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the neighbors
owning property which abuts the subject alley property;
2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition;
3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in the
block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located;
Page | 6
4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the appropriate
community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60 of this Code; and
5. The appropriate City processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has been
paid.
B. Public Hearing And Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a complete
petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the Planning Commission to consider the proposed
disposition of the City owned alley property. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning
Commission shall make a report and recommendation to the City Council on the proposed disposition of
the subject alley property. A positive recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors:
1. The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division, and all other relevant City
departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the property;
2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above;
3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property adjacent
to the alley;
4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked;
5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the
policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which
address, but which are not limited to, mid block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative
transportation uses;
6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property,
or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been
completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment
of it; and
8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory
uses.
C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from the
Planning Commission, the City Council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of the subject
alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the City Council will make a decision on the
proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 22-19, 2019: Ord. 58-13, 2013: Ord. 24-11,
2011)
14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION:
If the City Council grants the petition, the City owned alley property will be disposed of as follows:
A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low density
residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low density residential
use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin home residential uses.
B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts
properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the alley will be
closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the City of the fair market value of that alley property, based
upon the value added to the abutting properties.
C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density
residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density residential
properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold for fair market value.
(Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)
14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW:
Any party aggrieved by the decision of the City Council as to the disposition of City owned alley property
may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (30) days after the City Council's decision
becomes final, in the 3rd District Court. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002)