HomeMy WebLinkAboutProposed Ordinance - 5/14/2026SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2026
Adopting a Capital Asset Plan for the Salt Lake City General Fund
An ordinance adopting a capital asset plan for the Salt Lake City General Fund.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”) invests in long term capital asset
investments that are funded through the City’s Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City’s proposed capital asset plan provides a multi-year roadmap
regarding the City’s maintenance, improvement, and expansion of its long term capital assets;
and
WHEREAS, the City intends to update its capital asset plan on an annual basis;
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. The capital asset plan attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby adopted as the
capital asset plan for the City’s general fund.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July 1,
2026 pursuant to publication requirements outlined Utah Code § 10-3-711 and § 10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _______________,
2026.
___________________________________
Alejandro Puy, Council Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
Keith Reynolds, City Recorder
10.Ord.FY27.CAPlan 2
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
___________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Keith Reynolds, City Recorder
Bill No. _______ of 2026.
Published: ____________________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Office of the City Attorney
Date: 05/14/2026
By: /s/Jaysen Oldroyd
Jaysen R. Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND
Fiscal Years 2027-2032
Salt Lake City, Utah
E XHIBIT A
CAPITALINVESTMENT NEEDS
TOTAL OVER SIX YEARS
$1.5 billion
REPAIR & REPLACE
IMPROVE EXISTING
3.7% | $56.4 million
BUILD NEW
37.9% | $569.9 million
58.4% | $876.6 million
CAPITAL
ASSET
long-lasting
investments,
costing $50,000
or more, that
help deliver
essential
services and
public benefits
across the City
Executive Summary
Salt Lake City invests in the infrastructure that supports daily life, including
streets, bridges, buildings, parks, and public spaces. These long-term
investments, known as capital assets, are funded each year through the
Capital Improvement Program, or CIP. Examples include street
reconstruction projects, park improvements, public safety facilities, public
art and upgrades to sidewalks and traffic signals.
This Capital Asset Plan (the Plan) for the General Fund builds on the
annual CIP process by providing a multi-year roadmap for how the City
will maintain, improve, and expand infrastructure over time. By planning
ahead, the City can identify capital needs earlier and make more informed,
cost-effective decisions.
Over the six-year planning horizon, the City identified approximately
$1.5 billion in capital investments across all capital asset types in the
General Fund. Of this total, about $876.6 million is needed to repair and
replace existing infrastructure, $56.4 million to improve existing capital
assets, and $569.9 million to build new capital assets. These estimates
highlight the scale of investment required to maintain current service
levels while preparing for future growth.
The Plan focuses on capital assets paid for by the General Fund, which
deliver core services used across the community. It balances three key
priorities: maintaining existing capital assets, improving existing capital
assets, and investing in new capital assets.
• Maintaining capital assets may include projects like repairing streets,
replacing aging playground equipment, or a roof replacement.
• Improving existing capital assets may include projects like upgrading
building systems such as security systems or seismic retrofits and
improving accessibility.
• New investments may include building new facilities, new amenities
in parks, or adding new infrastructure like protected bike lanes to
transportation corridors.
Each year, the Plan is updated to reflect changing conditions and
priorities. City teams evaluate capital asset conditions, such as the
quality of pavement, the age of buildings, or the performance of irrigation
systems in parks, to determine when repairs or replacements are needed.
This work results in a six-year list of planned projects, organized into
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 1
250
Works of Art
PUBLIC ARTS
maintaining capital assets, improving or expanding existing infrastructure,
and building new capital assets.
The Plan works closely with the annual CIP process, which evaluates
and funds projects each year. CIP projects may be proposed by City
departments or submitted by community members. Examples of
constituent requests include neighborhood traffic calming measures or
park improvements. It should be noted constituent requests are not
included in the Plan. The CIP projects are reviewed by City staff and
advisory boards before sharing recommendations with the Mayor and
then revised and approved by the City Council through a public process.
Funding decisions are guided by clear priorities, including maintaining
existing infrastructure, improving safety, meeting legal requirements, and
supporting community needs. For example, projects that address failing
infrastructure, improve pedestrian safety, or meet accessibility
requirements are often prioritized.
The Plan and CIP process strengthens coordination across City
departments. An internal committee with representatives from most city
departments, known as the CAP Committee, reviews the Plan and
recommends internal CIP applications each year. This strong coordination
helps align project timing, funding strategies, design decisions, and
construction schedules so related work can move forward together. This
approach allows multiple projects, such as street reconstruction,
utility upgrades, accessibility and sidewalk improvements, to be completed
at the same time, reducing disruption to a neighborhood and saving
taxpayers’ money.
Capital projects are funded through a combination of ongoing and one-time
sources. Ongoing sources, such as General Fund transfers and dedicated
sales taxes like Funding Our Future, typically support recurring needs like
street capital maintenance, but can support improvements or new growth-
related projects. One-time sources, such as grants and bonds, can support
capital maintenance projects and larger investments, such as new buildings,
major road improvements, or park development.
The Plan is supported by City policies, master plans, and technical studies,
ensuring that investments reflect community priorities and long-term
goals. It is reviewed and updated each year and presented to the City
Council as part of the annual budget process.
Together, this approach helps Salt Lake City invest responsibly in its
infrastructure, maintain reliable services, and plan in a way that is
transparent, coordinated, and aligned with community needs.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND2
60
City Buildings
16
Fire Buildings
6
Police Buildings
52
EV Charging Stations
1,500
Lane Miles of Roads
195
Street Signals
900
Miles of Sidewalks
11,920
Curb Ramps
146
Miles of Bikeways
55
Miles of Alleys
2,711
Acres of Park Space
203
Sport Courts
63
Athletic Fields
79
Playgrounds
44
Pavilions
39
Restrooms
135
Miles of Trails
47
Miles of Bike Trails
TRANSPORTATION PARKS BUILDINGS
COST TO MAINTAIN
EXISTING CAPITAL ASSETS
$688,200,00
$111,500,000
$76,900,000
COST TO IMPROVE
EXISTING CAPITAL ASSETS
$51,200,000
$5,200,000
COST OF NEW
CAPITAL ASSETS
$279,400,000
$254,300,000
$36,100,000
COMBINED
COST
$1,018,900,000
$371,000,000
$113,000,000
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 3
Capital Asset Plan – General Fund Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 5
6-year Capital Asset Plan 7
Data Collection and Review 8
Transparency and Reporting 9
One-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) –
Annual Process Overview 10
Budget Funding/Project Life Cycle 11
Funding Priorities 12
Capital Asset Plan Roles and Partnerships 13
Funding Sources 16
City Policies, Master Plans, and Other Qualifying Studies 19
Existing Capital Asset Project Descriptions –
Capital Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement 21
Appendices 25
Appendix I Annual CIP Budget–Project Lists 26
Appendix II 6-year Expenditure Projection 57
Appendix III Analytics Reports 60
Appendix IV List of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances, -
Master Plans and Qualifying Technical Studies 63
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND4
GENERAL FUND
City’s main operating
fund used to support
the basic services,
personnel costs,
facilities, and public
infrastructure that
serve the community
each day.
Introduction
Salt Lake City invests in the infrastructure that supports daily life. This plan
only covers the capital assets in the City’s General Fund, which largely
includes our streets, bridges, buildings, parks, and public systems. Other
types of capital assets are managed separate from the General Fund
including the Airport, Public Utilities, and Waste & Recycling among others.
Each year, investments in these capital assets are funded through the
Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which focuses on major construction
projects. These capital assets are long-lasting investments, costing
$50,000 or more, that help deliver essential services and public benefits
across the City.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 5
The Capital Asset Plan (the Plan) builds on this annual process by looking
ahead. It is a multi-year roadmap that outlines how the City will build,
maintain, and pay for infrastructure over time. By planning beyond a single
year, the City can move from a reactive approach to a more proactive and
strategic one, identifying needs earlier and making more informed and
coordinated decisions.
This Plan helps balance competing priorities: maintaining the infrastructure
we already have and investing in new projects to serve a growing city.
Taking care of existing capital assets extends their useful life and protects
past investments, while new projects ensure the City can meet future
needs. The Plan also connects the Mayor and City Council’s priorities with
the City’s most critical infrastructure needs. While there are always more
needs than available funding, bringing them together into one plan
supports more transparent and thoughtful decision-making.
The Plan also improves coordination across the City and with regional
partners. It informs long-term financial planning and helps to align work
across departments, including Public Utilities and the Community
Reinvestment Agency. It also allows partners like the Utah Transit Authority
and Salt Lake County to better coordinate their projects with the City’s
plans. For residents and businesses, this can mean fewer disruptions, more
efficient construction, and greater overall impact when projects are
completed together.
The Plan will be reviewed and updated each year to reflect changing needs,
economic conditions, and community priorities—ensuring Salt Lake City
continues to invest wisely in its future.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND6
CAPITAL
ASSETS
Buildings
Streets
Parks
Public Spaces
Other Major
Infrastructure
6-Year Capital Asset Plan
The Plan focuses on infrastructure owned by the City’s General Fund, which
supports core public services. These capital assets include buildings,
streets, parks, public spaces, and other major infrastructure funded
primarily through taxes. Unlike services that are funded by user fees, such
as utilities, these investments support services used broadly across the
community and benefit residents and visitors citywide.
The Plan is a living document that is updated each year to reflect the City’s
evolving needs and priorities. This information supports better planning,
helps prioritize limited resources, and ensures public capital assets remain
safe and reliable. Updates include progress on current projects, changes in
the condition of capital assets, and new or emerging infrastructure needs.
Evaluating how capital assets such as streets, buildings, and parks are
performing helps the City determine how long they are expected to last
and when maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement may be needed.
The Plan also reflects priorities set by elected officials and updates to City
policies, ordinances, or procedures that affect how projects are funded
and delivered.
Each year, the Plan is submitted along with the Mayor’s Recommended
Budget to the City Council on the first Tuesday in May. The Council reviews
and adopts the Plan alongside the annual Capital Improvement Program
budget by September 1, in accordance with Utah Code. The Plan guides
which projects move forward into the annual CIP, ensuring that short-term
investments align with long-term priorities.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 7
Each year from September through December, City teams work together to
prepare and update the Plan. Data is provided to Finance’s CAP Team by
Community & Neighborhoods, Public Services and Public Lands
departments. The teams review existing infrastructure data, update project
information, and identify future needs.
The data collected provides an estimate of the annual funding needed to
maintain current service levels. The departments also develop and refine a
six-year list of planned projects, which helps the CAP Team develop a
citywide prioritization of investments and plan for the future.
Projects in the Plan fall into three categories:
• Existing Capital Assets – Capital Maintenance, Renewal and
Replacement. These projects focus on maintaining, repairing,
rehabilitating, or replacing capital assets that are already in service.
The goal is to sustain current service levels, preserve capital asset
conditions, extend useful life, reduce the risk of failure, and protect
prior public investment.
• Improvements to Capital Assets – These projects improve or upgrade
existing capital assets beyond their current condition. They are
intended to enhance service delivery, improve safety and accessibility,
respond to operational needs, and increase the overall performance and
usefulness of the capital assets.
• New Capital Assets – These projects create or acquire new City capital
assets, expand existing capital assets beyond their current capacity to
meet growing demand, expand public access, support development,
or advance strategic priorities. These investments help ensure the City
can serve both current and future residents and future needs.
Data Collection and Review
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND8
YEAR1
Updated Each Year
Review & Update the Plan
Presented to Mayor & City Council
City Council Considers & Adopts
ANNUAL PLAN UPDATE & ADOPTION
Project
Progress
Capital Asset
Conditions
Maintenance &
Replacement Needs
Revisions to Six-Year
Project List
WHAT THE ANNUAL UPDATE INCLUDES
Strengthens
Accountability
Builds Public
Trust
Supports Informed
Decision-Making
Investments Reflect
Community Needs
WHY REGULAR REPORTING MATTERS
Project Status
Changes
Funding
Updates
Other Impacting
Factors
ADDITIONAL UPDATES AS NEEDED
Capital Asset
Conditions
Transparency and Reporting
To support transparency and informed decision-making, the Plan is
updated each year and presented to the Mayor and City Council as part of
the City’s regular capital planning and budgeting process. The annual
update includes project progress, information on capital asset conditions,
updated maintenance and replacement needs, and revisions to the six-year
project list. The City Council has the opportunity to consider and adopt an
updated Plan each year.
Additional updates may be shared throughout the year, as needed, to
highlight significant changes in project status, funding, capital asset
conditions, or other factors that may affect implementation of the Plan.
Regular reporting strengthens accountability, builds public trust, and helps
ensure that capital investment decisions remain clear, consistent, and
accessible to the community.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 9
The Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, is the City’s annual process for
reviewing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects. CIP is an open and
competitive process where community members and City departments
submit project proposals.
Capital assets must cost at least $50,000 and have a useful life of at least
five years. Any capital asset funded with impact fees is required to have a
useful life of at least ten years.
Each year, the process begins after the previous year’s funding decisions
are completed. The City gathers new project ideas by inviting applications
from residents and identifying infrastructure needs across departments.
Community-submitted projects are reviewed and refined with City staff to
develop scope and cost estimates.
City staff, through the Capital Asset Planning Committee, evaluate and
prioritize internal project proposals utilizing established criteria and master
plans. These recommendations are forwarded alongside eligible
community-submitted applications to the Community Development and
Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board, which conducts a
public review and provides funding recommendations.
The Mayor uses these recommendations to develop a proposed CIP budget.
Each June, the Council appropriates overall funding available for CIP and
approves debt payments and ongoing obligations as part of the annual
budget. Over the summer, the Council reviews individual projects and per
state law must approve project-specific funding by September 1.
This annual process supports transparency, encourages public
participation, and helps ensure that funding decisions are coordinated,
consistent, and aligned with the City’s long-term priorities.
One-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – Annual Process Overview
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND10
PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
City Council
Approves Funding
Public Dollars
Dedicated
Make Significant
Progress Within 3 Years
Some Projects
Take Longer
Successful Outcomes
for the Community
Planning
BREAKING LARGE PROJECTS INTO PHASES
Phasing helps ensure efficient delivery by spreading work over time, reducing
upfront costs, and allowing flexibility as work progresses.
Secure FundingDesign ReviewConstruction
Repeat for
Next Phase(s)
as Needed
Benefits of
Phased Delivery
Reduces
upfront costs
Faster phase
timelines
Allows ongoing
adjustments
Improves project
alignment
Benefits the
community
When the City Council approves funding for a capital project, those public
dollars are dedicated to a specific purpose. Once a project receives funding,
it is generally expected to make significant progress within three years, in
line with City policy and the CIP framework. Some projects may take longer
to complete, especially if they are delivered in multiple phases or receive
additional funding over time. Highly complex projects, or those that rely on
federal grants or other external sources, may require several years of
planning and coordination before construction can begin.
Breaking large projects into phases can help ensure efficient delivery. Early
phases may focus on planning and design, allowing the City to develop
scope and cost estimates before committing to full construction funding.
This approach reduces the need for all funding upfront, shortens the
timeline for each phase, and provides flexibility to adjust as work
progresses. Departments are then able to better coordinate project timing,
scope, and funding to support successful outcomes for the community.
Budget Funding/Project Life Cycle
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 11
Each year, Salt Lake City receives more capital project
requests than available funding. To make thoughtful
and transparent decisions, the City uses a set of funding
priorities to evaluate and compare projects in the CIP.
These priorities, established through City Council
Resolution 29 of 2017, help guide how limited resources
are invested. They focus on maintaining existing
infrastructure, reducing risk, meeting legal obligations,
and delivering projects that provide strong public value.
Together, they support responsible long-term planning
and help ensure that investments align with the City’s
needs and community priorities.
Projects are evaluated by the internal Capital Asset
Planning Committee and the public Community
Development and Capital Improvement Program
(CDCIP) Advisory Board based on the following
considerations:
Existing Capital Asset: Projects that maintain, repair,
renovate, or replace existing City infrastructure are a top
priority. Taking care of capital assets that are already in
service helps preserve past investments, extend useful life,
and reduce more costly repairs in the future.
Critical Capital Asset Failure: Projects that address
capital assets at risk of failure receive urgent attention.
These include situations that could impact public safety,
disrupt essential services, or result in significant financial
or operational consequences if not addressed quickly.
Legal and Contractual Obligations: Some projects
are necessary to meet legal, regulatory, or contractual
requirements. Funding these projects ensures the City
remains compliant, avoids penalties, and fulfills its
commitments.
Risk: Life, Health & Safety: Priority is given to projects
that address code violations, reduce crime, or
improve safety conditions, including efforts to prevent
serious injuries and fatalities related to transportation
and mobility.
Reduce Cost and Increase Efficiency: Projects
that lower long-term costs or improve efficiency
are prioritized. This may include coordinating work
with other projects, reducing maintenance needs, or
delivering services more effectively.
Balanced Budgeting: Priority is given to internal
projects from departments that have received less
capital funding in recent years or have greater unmet
needs compared to others. This helps ensure a more
balanced allocation of limited resources.
Resiliency: Projects that strengthen the City’s
ability to respond to and recover from disruptions
are an important focus. This includes preparing for
emergencies, extreme weather, and other risks that
could affect infrastructure and services.
Project Phase: Projects that are ready to move
forward, particularly those transitioning from design to
construction, are prioritized to maintain momentum.
Advancing projects in a timely manner helps control
costs and improves overall delivery.
Community Support: Constituent submitted projects
that reflect community needs and have support from
residents, stakeholders, or Community Councils are
an important part of the process. Public input helps
ensure investments align with neighborhood priorities.
Workforce Support: Internal projects that support
the physical, mental or economic well-being of City
employees are prioritized, keeping with the Mayor’s
goal of supporting “Our City Family.”
Sustainability: Projects that support long-term
environmental and financial sustainability are
encouraged. This includes efforts to improve energy
efficiency, conserve water, reduce emissions, and use
resources responsibly.
Includes Outside Funding: Projects that leverage
outside funding, such as grants or partnerships, are
prioritized when feasible. These opportunities help
stretch City resources and expand the impact of local
investments.
One City Approach: Internal projects should have
coordination among City departments and align with
the Mayor’s goals.
Community Benefit: Constituent submitted projects
that have a high public benefit.
Funding Priorities
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND12
Capital Asset Plan Roles and Partnerships
The Plan is built through collaboration across City staff, advisory groups,
elected officials, and the public. Each group plays a distinct role in
identifying needs, evaluating projects, and making funding decisions.
Together, these partnerships help ensure that capital planning is
transparent, fiscally responsible, and aligned with City priorities.
Capital Asset Planning Team
The Capital Asset Planning Team, within the Finance Department, oversees
the development and maintenance of the Plan. The team coordinates the
annual update, identifies funding needs and gaps, and ensures the Plan
remains accurate and aligned with City priorities. The team also prepares
reports and materials that clearly communicate project status, funding
needs, and investment priorities to decision-makers and the public.
Departments and Divisions
City departments and divisions identify infrastructure needs, propose
projects related to existing capital assets and to implement master plans,
and provide the technical and operational expertise needed for planning.
They help maintain accurate capital asset information, assess risks, and
coordinate with the Finance Department on project timing, funding, and
readiness. Their input ensures the Plan reflects real service needs across
the City.
Constituents
Community stakeholders help shape capital priorities by both applying for
CIP funding through constituent applications and sharing feedback on
proposed projects at public meetings. Public input helps the City
understand where investments will have the greatest impact and ensures
planning reflects the experiences of the community.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 13
Capital Asset Planning Committee (CAP Committee)
The CAP Committee brings together representatives from most City
departments to review and evaluate internal capital project proposals. The
committee helps ensure projects align with City priorities and operational
needs and provides recommendations to the CDCIP Board. This
collaborative approach supports consistent and informed decision-making
across departments.
CAP Committee members include the following City representatives (or
their respective designees):
Economic Development
Deputy Director
Sustainability
Program Manager
Community
Reinvestment Agency
Deputy Director
Police Chief
of Staff
Public Lands’ Planning &
Design Division Director
Assistant Fire Chief
Over Support
Deputy Chief
Information Officer
Public Utilities
Deputy Director
Finance’s Capital Asset
Planning Manager
Senior Advisor
to Mayor
Community &
Neighborhoods
Deputy Director
Public Services
Deputy Director
Community Development and Capital Improvement Program
Advisory Board (CDCIP Board)
The CDCIP Board provides an added level of review and public
accountability by evaluating proposed projects, funding needs, and
long-term priorities. Their recommendations help inform the City’s CIP
budget and support transparency, public awareness, and informed
decision-making.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND14
Data, Analysis,
& Reporting
Reports & Updates Public Input & Feedback
Needs, Projects,
& Expertise
ROLES & PARTNERSHIPS
CAPITAL
ASSET PLAN
Capital Asset Planning Team Constituents
• Oversees and updates
the plan
• Identify funding needs & gaps
• Prepares reports
Departments & Divisions
• Identify infrastructure needs
• Provide expertise and insight
• Coordinate funding, timing,
and readiness
• Apply for CIP funding
• Share project feedback
• Help shape priorities and
guide investments
CAP Committee
Reviews and recommends
internal project proposals.
City Council
Approves funding and
adopts the final budget.
Mayor
Sets funding priorities and
recommends a budget.
CDCIP Board
Reviews and recommends
projects and funding.
EVALUATION & DECISION-MAKING
Mayor
The Mayor provides leadership and sets priorities for capital funding.
Working with City departments and the Finance Department, the Mayor
helps ensure the Plan aligns with broader policy goals, operational needs,
and long-term strategy. The Mayor reviews the CDCIP Board’s
recommendations and may modify them to ensure capital investments
reflect community needs, fiscal responsibility, and long-term infrastructure
goals. The Mayor then transmits a Recommended CIP Budget to the City
Council alongside the annual budget.
City Council
The City Council plays a critical role in shaping the direction of the CIP,
setting policies and authorizing funding each year. By thoroughly examining
proposals and making final approvals, the Council helps guarantee that
infrastructure investments meet the priorities and needs of residents while
upholding financial stewardship and supporting the City’s long-term needs.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 15
ONGOING
FUNDING
SOURCES
General Fund
Class C
Road Funds
Transportation
Fund
Funding Our
Future
Funding Sources
Salt Lake City uses a mix of funding sources to invest in infrastructure and
deliver capital projects. The General Fund, which supports most City
services and operations, plays a key role by transferring funding each year
to support the CIP.
Capital funding sources generally fall into two categories: ongoing funding
and one-time funding.
• Ongoing funding includes revenues the City receives regularly, typically
each year. These sources provide a stable foundation for planning and
maintaining infrastructure over time.
• One-time funding includes limited or project-specific resources that
are not expected to continue year after year. These sources are typically
used for specific projects or phases of work.
Not all funding sources can be spent on all projects and matching the
funding source to the project type helps the City plan responsibly,
maintain long-term financial stability, and commit funding sources to
specific projects.
Ongoing Funding Sources
General Fund
The General Fund supports services such as public safety, parks, streets and
public art. Each year, the City Council transfers a portion of General Fund
revenues to the CIP to fund capital projects.
These are the City’s most flexible funds which can be used for any project.
General Fund revenues come from sources such as sales taxes, property
taxes, franchise taxes, permits, and fees.
Funding Our Future
A portion of the General Fund is revenue from a local option sales tax
labelled “Funding Our Future” that supports key community priorities. This
funding is dedicated to affordable housing, public transit, public safety,
streets, and parks maintenance.
The sales tax increase was adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2019 budget
following extensive public outreach. While the dedicated categories have
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND16
evolved over time, funding continues to be directed toward critical
community needs and is allocated annually through the budget process.
Class C Road Funds aka the State Gas Tax
Class C Road Funds come from the State’s gas tax and are distributed to
cities based on roadway mileage. State law limits how these funds can be
used, including qualifying roadway construction and maintenance, safety
improvements, and related costs. Salt Lake City primarily uses these funds
for street maintenance and reconstruction projects that are selected
through a structured planning process and included in the City’s pavement
management plan.
Transportation Fund Sales Taxes
The County Quarter Cent and “Fifth Fifth” Transportation Fund revenues
come from local sales taxes dedicated to improvements. These funds
support a multimodal system, including qualifying streets, sidewalks,
bike facilities, transit improvements, safety upgrades, street maintenance
and reconstruction.
Funding is shared among regional partners, including the Utah Transit
Authority and Salt Lake County, and must be used for eligible transportation
purposes as defined by state law.
One-Time Funding Sources
Impact Fees
Impact fees are one-time charges on new development that help fund the
infrastructure needed to support that growth. Impact fees help ensure that
growth contributes to the cost of the infrastructure it requires, rather than
placing the full burden on existing residents.
Since impact fees may only be used for the growth-related portion of a
project, they often fund only part of a project which also requires matching
funds from another funding source. State law generally requires these fees
to be spent or contractually committed within six years.
Grants
The City receives grants from federal, state, county, and private sources to
support capital projects. Each grant has specific requirements for how
funds can be used, along with reporting, procurement, and contracting
rules that the City must follow. Grants also often require a local match and
may be paid out through a reimbursement to the City that occurs after
costs are incurred.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 17
ONE-TIME
FUNDING
SOURCES
Impact Fees
Donations
Bonds
Public-Private
Paternships
Grants
Donations
Donations are voluntary contributions from individuals, businesses, or
organizations that support public projects. These may include cash or
in-kind contributions such as land, materials, or services.
Donations are often used for eligible capital costs and may help expand
or enhance projects. Any recognition associated with a donation follows
City policy.
Public-Private Partnerships
Public-Private Partnerships allow the City to work with private partners to
deliver infrastructure projects. These agreements may include design,
construction, financing, or ongoing operations.
This approach can help deliver projects more efficiently and share certain
risks, while maintaining public ownership and oversight.
Bonds
Bonds are a key tool the City uses to fund large capital projects. The
City borrows money from investors and repays the principal over time
with interest.
Bond funding is often limited to capital uses such as design, property
acquisition, and construction. Bond programs are typically approved
through a public process and include ongoing reporting for transparency.
There are many different types of bonds available to cities. Three of the
more common types used by the City are:
• General Obligation Bonds: These voter-approved bonds are repaid
through a dedicated property tax and are used for a wide variety of
projects such as streets, parks, and public facilities. The dedicated
property tax ends when the General Obligation bond is fully paid off.
• Revenue Bonds: These bonds are repaid from specific revenue sources.
Revenue bonds are currently repaid through sources such as Sales Tax,
Municipal Energy Tax, Franchise fees, and Class C road funds.
• Local Building Authority Bonds: These bonds are used to finance the
construction of new public buildings. The City makes lease payments
over time to repay the debt.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND18
City Policies, Master Plans, and Other Qualifying Studies
Capital projects in Salt Lake City are guided by a framework of plans,
policies, and regulations. To be eligible for CIP funding, projects must be
identified in or advance a priority in an adopted City master plan or
supported by a technical study. This approach helps ensure that
investments are thoughtful, consistent, and aligned with community
priorities. Together, these tools help align capital investments with legal
requirements, financial policies, and long-term goals. Additionally, some
projects are required to be reviewed and approved by partners, according
to state law, adding another layer of review and assurance of meeting
regional needs.
City Ordinances
City ordinances govern how certain funding sources, such as impact fees,
can be used. They also establish the role of the CDCIP Board in reviewing
projects and making funding recommendations as part of the CIP process.
City Council Resolutions
Resolutions provide policy guidance on capital planning, debt management,
handling cost overruns and ensuring responsible use of public funds.
Resolution 29
Resolution 29 of 2017 provides the foundation for how Salt Lake City
plans and funds capital improvements in a transparent and consistent
way. It defines what qualifies as a capital project, emphasizes
maintaining existing infrastructure, and supports long-term planning.
The resolution also outlines expectations for evaluating projects,
including cost, operational impacts, and community benefits. It
establishes processes for prioritizing projects, managing cost overruns,
and using available funding sources effectively.
Administrative Policies
Administrative Policies guide how projects are evaluated and prioritized.
They support consistency, transparency, and alignment with City objectives
throughout the planning process.
Title 57, Capital Asset Management
Title 57 of the Administrative Policies establishes the Capital Asset
Planning Committee, to guide the review and coordination of major
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 19
capital projects. The committee includes leadership from most City
departments and supports a coordinated, citywide approach to
infrastructure planning.
The Capital Asset Planning Committee reviews and evaluates internal
project proposals, recommends projects to the CDCIP Board, and helps
guide policies related to the Capital Asset Plan and CIP. The Finance
Department supports this work by managing the Capital Asset Plan,
coordinating CIP budgeting and reporting, and providing analysis and
administrative support to City leadership and the City Council.
Master Plans and Supporting Studies
The Capital Asset Plan reflects the priorities and values of Salt Lake City
residents. Projects are based on adopted master plans, technical studies,
and community input, ensuring that investments respond to real needs
across the city.
These plans guide investments in key areas such as transportation,
buildings, parks, and other public infrastructure. Links to relevant master
plans and supporting studies are included in the appendix.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND20
Existing Capital Assets include City-owned buildings, infrastructure like
bridges or park pavilions, and other long-lived capital assets that are
already in service and support daily operations and public services. A city
capital asset must cost at least $50,000 and have a minimum life span of 5
years, or 10 years if funded with impact fees. Maintaining these capital
assets is essential to deliver reliable services across the city.
For planning purposes, maintenance, renewal, and replacement work is
organized by capital asset type and by the department responsible for
managing those capital assets. The categories below describe the types of
projects used to keep infrastructure in good condition, extend its useful life,
maintain reliable service, and protect the City’s long-term investment.
Transportation/Engineering Divisions
Street Capital Asset Replacement and Renewal (collector, arterial, and
local streets, and alleyways)
• Street Overlay - Overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the
level of deterioration where full reconstruction is required. The overlay
program includes a 3 inch or greater depth asphalt mill and overlay,
curb and gutter replacement and sidewalk replacement in select
locations, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate
complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements.
• Street Reconstruction - Reconstruction of deteriorated City streets,
including street pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage
improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle
and pedestrian access improvements.
• Alleyways - Reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated
City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements
as necessary.
Bridge Capital Asset Replacement and Renewal
• Bridge Reconstruction – Reconstruction or major rehabilitation of
deteriorated City bridges that have reached the point where substantial
structural repair or replacement is needed. Work may include bridge
decks, structural supports, railings, joints, drainage components, and
other related elements necessary to restore safe and reliable use.
• Bridge Maintenance – Planned preservation and renewal of City
bridges to help extend their useful life and reduce the need for more
Existing Capital Asset Project Descriptions – Capital
Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 21
costly major repairs. Work may include repairs or replacement of bridge
decks, joints, railings, drainage components, protective coatings,
and other structural elements based on inspection findings and
condition assessments.
Traffic Signals, and Intersection Replacement and Renewal
• Replaces aging traffic intersections and signals that have reached the
end of their useful life, typically around 40 years, based on condition
rankings that consider equipment age, condition, maintenance history,
and staff input. Improvements may include replacing outdated
equipment—such as steel poles, span wires, signal heads, and loops—
with upgraded infrastructure like mast arm poles, new signal heads,
pedestrian countdown timers, improved detection for vehicles,
bicyclists, and pedestrians, left-turn phasing (as needed), replacement
of non-functional CCTV cameras, curb and gutter and ADA ramps.
• Upgrades computer system and software near mid-life to increase the
overall lifespan of the system to 40 years. This is budgeted at 30% of the
cost of full intersection replacement. These upgrades improve safety,
reliability, and operations for all travel modes and reduce the risk of
structural failure or signal outages.
Streets Division
Traffic Signal Maintenance–Supports the off-cycle replacement of
individual traffic signal and pedestrian infrastructure components
throughout the City. Rather than waiting for full intersection replacement,
the program addresses specific capital assets that have reached the end of
their useful life to maintain safe, reliable, and accessible operations. This
proactive approach helps reduce long-term costs compared with reactive
repairs or emergency replacement.
Public Way Concrete/Sidewalk–Addresses deteriorated or defective
concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining
walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal
and replacement.
ADA Sidewalk Ramps–Installation and upgrade of ADA-compliant curb
ramps at locations throughout the City to improve accessibility within the
public right-of-way. These improvements help the City meet requirements
under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and provide safer,
more independent travel for people with disabilities and others with
mobility limitations. By replacing outdated or missing ramps, the program
improves connections between streets and sidewalks, reduces hazards, and
helps create a more accessible and connected transportation network.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND22
Facilities Division
Building Capital Asset Renewal and Replacement–Supports planned
replacement, renewal, and major rehabilitation of City-owned buildings and
building systems. Improvements may include roofs, heating and cooling
systems, electrical and plumbing systems, structural elements, safety and
security features, and accessibility upgrades. The program helps preserve
City facilities, reduce the risk of unexpected failures, improve building
performance, and ensure that public buildings remain safe, reliable, and
capable of supporting City services.
Public Lands Department
Playgrounds–Planned renewal and replacement of playground equipment
and related site features in City parks. Improvements may include play
structures, safety surfacing, shade elements, seating, fencing, and other
components needed to maintain safe, functional, and welcoming play areas.
This helps address aging infrastructure, improve safety, and preserve
access to quality recreational spaces for children and families.
Courts–Replacement and renewal of outdoor recreational courts in City
parks and public spaces. This helps maintain safe and usable facilities for
recreation while extending the life of public capital assets.
Fields–Replacement and renewal and improvement of athletic and
recreational fields throughout the City. Work may include turf replacement,
grading, drainage improvements, irrigation upgrades, field lighting, and
related site improvements needed to maintain playability and safety. This
helps preserve recreational opportunities, improve field conditions, and
support continued community use.
Irrigation Systems–Improves irrigation efficiency and replaces some turf
areas with low-water, regionally-appropriate plantings. Many of the public
lands’ irrigation systems are 50-60 years old. They use more water, take
more time, and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Converting
irrigation systems so that trees can be watered separately from turf reduces
water usage and protects these critical assets, too. During extreme drought
conditions, upgraded irrigation systems can also dramatically reduce or
even turn off turf irrigation while continuing to water trees.
Pavilions–Renewal and replacement of pavilions, as well as associated
amenities (signage, tables, barbecues, landscaping, water, and
accessibility features).
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 23
Public Restrooms–Renewal and replacement of public restrooms in parks
and other City facilities. Improvements may include building systems,
fixtures, plumbing, accessibility upgrades, ventilation, lighting, and other
work needed to maintain safe, sanitary, and reliable service. The program
helps ensure that public restrooms remain functional, accessible, and
suitable for community use.
Park ADA Requirements–Supports improvements needed to help parks
comply with accessibility requirements under the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Work may include accessible routes, curb ramps, parking
improvements, restroom upgrades, seating access, playground accessibility
features, and other barrier-removal measures. The program helps create a
more inclusive park system by improving access, safety, and usability for
people with disabilities and others with mobility limitations
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND24
I Annual CIP Budget–Project Lists
II Six-Year Projection
III Analytics Reports
IV List of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances, Master Plans
and Qualifying Technical Studies
Appendices
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 25
Appendix I Annual CIP Budget–Project Lists
This appendix presents the City’s annual Capital Improvement Program
project lists, including projects reviewed, recommended, funded and
unfunded through the yearly open and competitive capital budgeting
process. It is intended to provide a clear record of annual capital investment
proposals and decisions and to demonstrate how near-term funding actions
support the broader goals of the Capital Asset Plan.
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
1 Street Reconstruction
Engineering Division
This program funds reconstructions of Salt Lake City streets including associated design improvements for walking,
bicycling, and transit, as required by City Ordinance and federal law. When a street is reconstructed, the entire right of
way is surveyed and deficiencies corrected to all elements including roadway, drainage, sidewalks, and street trees. The
program meets all federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are always triggered with a complete
reconstruction. This year’s funding request is higher than FY26’s $4.5 million to allow reconstruction of more lane miles,
in keeping with the ongoing deterioration of the city’s street network.
Streets tentatively to include: 200 S (Univ St to 1300 E) in prep for S Davis Connector; 600 East (100 S to 400 S) in
combination with FY26 constituent CIP; Gilmer Dr. (Douglas to 1300 E); 900 South (Diestel to LeGrande); Military Dr. (900 S
to 1700 E); Emerson Ave (1500 E to 1700 E); Texas St. (N terminus to 2100 S); Belaire Dr (Scenic to Glen Oaks); and 500
West (600 S to 900 S). This is the first year without funds from the 2018 Streets Bond; ideal funding would be closer to
$50-60 million per year.
REQUEST $8,327,500
CDCIP $7,489,500 $4,500,000 $2,989,500
MAYOR $8,327,500 $113,379 $514,536 $4,652,515 $3,047,070
COUNCIL $ -
2 Sugar House Park 50/50 Match
Public Lands Department
This project (a 50/50 cost share with Salt Lake County) will make an infrastructure improvement to Sugar House Park. The
replacement of the culinary waterline, which is nearing the end of its useful life and may soon be in a state of critical
failure. Failure of the water line would result in park closure and significant emergency maintenance costs.
REQUEST $1,000,000
CDCIP $1,000,000 $1,000,000
MAYOR $1,000,000 $1,000,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND26
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
3 GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Rack Replacements
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City’s bike share system, GREENbike, has received $792,455 in federal funds that require $57,545 in city match.
This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations . GREENbike’s oldest equipment is over 12 years old
and has been exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. The balance of this funding request will be used to replace
old, rusted, bent, or missing bike racks and/or bike corrals which primarily support Salt Lake City’s local business districts
and nodes, including many small retail and restaurant businesses. Federal grants: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality
Program (CMAQ) and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
REQUEST $65,000
CDCIP $65,000 $65,000
MAYOR $65,000 $65,000
COUNCIL $ -
4 Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027
Streets Division
Funds replacement of concrete street panels, broken sidewalks, and rehabilitation such as sawcutting & slabjacking for
safety considerations. This program has great need, and could easily use $1.5 million per year. This annual program
addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the
public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 5
years has averaged 63%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
REQUEST $750,000
CDCIP $750,000 $750,000
MAYOR $750,000 $750,000
COUNCIL $ -
5 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027
Transportation Division
Salt Lake City’s Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been adequately funded for years. As a result,
traffic signals throughout the city are falling into failing condition, requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics
and wiring each year. When a traffic signal fails, it is not as obvious as a pothole -- unless the signal pole rusts through and
the signal falls over, which can happen. More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor
vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a simple timer without being able to sense
whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage,
red-light running, and crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff attention to physical repairs and/or
resetting the signal’s computers.
For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements per year and 5 upgrades.
This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years. However, since only zero, one or two signals have been
funded each year, this program continues to fall further behind. This financially constrained request of $2.5 million seeks
to fund full replacement of 4 ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus 6
capital upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Locations tentatively to include: 1300 E 100 S; Main St.
North Temple; 600 E 500 S; 500 E 600 S. Alternates: Arapeen / Sunnyside; 1300 E 200 S.
REQUEST $2,500,000
CDCIP $2,000,000 $2,000,000
MAYOR $2,000,000 $200,000 $1,800,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 27
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
6 Street Overlay 2027
Engineering Division
Short segments of streets focused on preventing deterioration that would require a full reconstruction. Includes streets
in livable streets zones and along neighborhood byways. Streets tentatively to include: 1000 North (Featherstone Drive to
Redwood Road); 1200 West (1400 South to Andrew Avenue); 1500 West (Hayes Avenue to American Avenue); Alta Street
(Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road); Connor Street (Sunnyside Avenue to 900 South); Livingston Avenue (Star Crest
Drive to Omni Drive); Omni Drive (Omni Avenue to Livingston Avenue); South Temple Street (University Street to South
Temple traffic circle); Village View Street (Village Hill Avenue to Village Park Avenue); Brava Street (Amiga Drive to cul-de-
sac end); Reveille Circle (Colonel Road to cul-de-sac-end)
REQUEST $3,300,000
CDCIP $3,300,000 $1,842,500 $1,457,500
MAYOR $3,300,000 $1,842,500 $1,457,500
COUNCIL $ -
7 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement)
Public Lands Department
This project will fund the replacement of one failing restrooms of Salt Lake City’s 47 park restrooms, and upgrade one
(Riverside Park). Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands’ inventory are unsafe, frequently closed or unusable when
they are intended to be open due to vandalism and misuse. New restrooms will improve safety and maintenance, and
may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with the 2010 ADA Standards and increase accessibility.
REQUEST $1,136,000
CDCIP $1,136,000 $1,136,000
MAYOR $1,136,000 $1,136,000
COUNCIL $ -
8 Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements
Public Lands Department
Currently, the northern parking lot at Jordan Park is not appropriately connected to the City’s stormwater and sewer
systems, causing frequent back-ups into the parking lot and northern portion of the park. This emergency maintenance
project would allow for adequate, safe connections to the City’s sewer and stormwater systems and compliance with
Public Utilities, alleviate maintenance burdens for Parks Division operations teams, and allow for safe and healthy park
use by visitors.
REQUEST $300,000
CDCIP $300,000 $300,000
MAYOR $300,000 $300,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND28
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
9 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027
Transportation Division
Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in a city. While all crashes
cannot be avoided, proven safety countermeasures can help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders.
This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Safe Streets and Roads
For All program (SS4A) that was formulated, after being funded by Congress, under the leadership of former SLC
Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures
The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the Wasatch Front Regional
Council, with Salt Lake City as a partner. https://wfrc.org/programs/csap/ The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake
City where safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are state highways,
but some are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South.
This request seeks targeted funds to focus on those corridors with a significant crash history, and with characteristics that
can be made safer with infrastructure investments.
This program funds two aspects: (1) $1.2 million Vision Zero Corridors Phase II, addressing key safety concerns on top
three identified SLC corridors in Comprehensive Safety Action Plan: 900 West, 800 South, and Redwood Road. These 3
corridors were recommended in WFRC’s 2024 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan for a total of $128.5 million. SLC is
selecting strategic and feasible projects within those recommendations to implement first. More expensive elements are
likely to be grant funded and/or combined with future street reconstructions. (2) $1.1 million safety improvements
citywide including selected crosswalks near schools.
REQUEST $2,300,000
CDCIP $2,300,000 $1,948,500 $121,500 $230,000
MAYOR $2,300,000 $1,948,500 $121,500 $230,000
COUNCIL $ -
10 Urban Trails
Transportation Division
This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024
Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine
Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport
Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban
Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and
implementing selected projects within the urban trails network.
REQUEST $450,000
CDCIP $450,000 $450,000
MAYOR $450,000 $450,000
COUNCIL $ -
11 Lighting Replacement to Improve Safety And Access
Public Lands Department
This project will replace existing lighting fixtures in parks that have neared or reached the end of their useful life. Lighting
replacement will improve safety and visibility, allow for the continued monitoring of underutilized spaces, and decrease
maintenance costs.
REQUEST $564,000
CDCIP $564,000 $564,000
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 29
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
12 Facilities Replacement and Renewal
Facilities Division
This program supports our goal of keeping City facilities safe, code-compliant, and functional by addressing existing
building assets that are beyond their useful life, nearing or at failure, or no longer meeting operational needs. Asset
management data (Cartegraph) and recent Facility Condition Assessment reports help identify likely priorities; this list is a
starting point, but facility needs require flexibility to adapt to changing conditions, funding, and real-time insights.
Consistent investment is critical and without it, the maintenance backlog will continue to grow, making it more difficult
and costly to maintain safe, reliable, and compliant facilities. These investments help prevent failures, reduce emergency
repairs, avoid service disruptions, and support ongoing regulatory compliance. Below are the definitions of priorities 1–4.
1. Life Safety & Code Compliance - Assets that ensure the building is safe for occupancy and meets legal codes and
emergency standards.
2. Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) - Assets that provide structural support and protect the building from external
elements.
3. Core Infrastructure Systems
(MEP) - Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems that support base building operations.
4. Operational Building Systems - Assets that support day-to-day function, accessibility, and internal operations.
REQUEST $2,910,000
CDCIP $2,737,500 $2,737,500
MAYOR $2,737,500 $2,737,500
COUNCIL $ -
13 Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance
Streets Division
This funding is to address the need for ongoing lifecycle replacement for traffic signal components/assets. This is to
ensure long-term cost savings compared to reactive replacement. Traffic signals and pedestrian facilities are critical
infrastructure components that directly affect safety, mobility, equity, and quality of life. It enhances accessibility for all
users, including those with disabilities.
REQUEST $750,000
CDCIP $500,000 $500,000
MAYOR $500,000 $500,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND30
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
14 Transit Capital Program 2027
Transportation Division
The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install bus shelters, benches, trash
cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and accessible first/last mile connections to transit. This program
implements two of the key recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe,
and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law, particularly when streets are
repaved or reconstructed.
After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop amenities and maintains them
for the life of the assets. Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible “frequent service” brand and enhanced
amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at Frequent Transit Route bus stops throughout the city.
These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe
and comfortable transit access and waiting experience. Some of the new shelters are now equipped with lighting, which
will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are
waiting.
REQUEST $500,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
15 Plaza 349 Balconies and Masonry Repairs and Improvements
Facilities Division
A recent condition assessment at Plaza 349 identified significant deterioration of the balcony guard walls and railings,
including failing masonry blocks and unsecured metal handrails, creating a potential life-safety hazard due to the risk of
falling materials. The existing guard rail heights also do not meet current building code requirements.
The study evaluated existing conditions through site observations, field measurements, and selective demolition to
expose concealed structural components. Findings indicate limited masonry reinforcement and inadequate anchorage of
the guard rail system. Based on these conditions, the study recommends retrofitting or reconstructing the balcony guard
walls and railings to meet current code requirements for guard height and structural loading, and to eliminate ongoing
safety risks to building occupants and the public below.
REQUEST $750,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
16 Demolition of Colfax and Odyssey House
Facilities Division
Colfax and Odyssey House are both vacant and in poor condition. Odyssey House has sustained significant structural
damage that places the building at risk of failure and poses a safety hazard to adjacent areas. Demolition of both
structures is recommended to address safety concerns and eliminate ongoing maintenance liabilities. Removal of these
buildings would allow for expanded City use of the site, with initial needs identified for Facilities and Parking Enforcement
equipment storage.
REQUEST $80,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 31
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
17 Street’s Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility
Streets Division
ADA Ramps provide a fully accessible public right-of-way, which is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cities are required to update ramps and ADA access to meet federal law (Americans with
Disabilities Act - ADA), ensure safety and independence for people with limitations, which triggers requirements for
compliant curb ramps to allow safe movement between streets and sidewalks. Outdated or missing ramps and sidewalks
force people into the street, create hazards, and disconnect neighborhoods.
REQUEST $750,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $750,000 $750,000
COUNCIL $ -
18 Irrigation Upgrades and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping Program
Public Lands Department
This climate-forward project will help shape a water and resource-conscious future with two essential components:
replacement of aged and damaged irrigation systems, improving irrigation efficiency and reducing operational costs; and
strategically replacing water-intensive turf in passive areas with climate adapted, regionally-appropriate plantings. The
project also may separate tree-specific irrigation from other area or drip irrigation zones to ensure the health of our City’s
canopy even during drought. Funding will also go towards updating and replacing water meters as required by Public
Utilities for compliance. This will be a build-to-budget request.
Possible Locations: First Encampment Park, 200 West Medians (North
REQUEST $1,200,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
19 Bikeway Gaps 2027
Transportation Division
This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024
Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine
Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport
Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban
Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and
implementing selected projects within the urban trails network.
REQUEST $125,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND32
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
20 Washington Park Septic Expansion
Public Lands Department
Currently, the capacity of the septic system at Washington Park is insufficient to serve the current use. Due to the
increased use (Salt Lake City’s most reserved pavilions and event space) and the age and capacity of the current system,
Parks Division staff spend considerable time pumping and maintaining the current system, which diminishes their
capacity to maintain other parks and costs the City more money. By upgrading the system, maintenance time and
frequency of pumping would decrease.
REQUEST $950,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $950,000 $950,000
COUNCIL $ -
21 Civic Center Construction Documents (from 200 East to the Western Library Square Crescent Wall)
Public Lands Department
This project will fund construction document design for the heart of Library Square, west of the Library’s crescent wall and
contiguous with 200 East, creating a cohesive public space serving as Salt Lake City’s “living room”. The proposed design
will replace or eliminate existing failed assets, including crumbling walls, pavers and stairs; address deferred maintenance
needs for the square waterproofing and Old Library parking structure where waterproofing has long failed; and, add
trees for shade along with level or gently sloped green spaces conducive to both events and everyday uses. The design
will create the central “room” of the Civic Center, bringing spaces and people together.
REQUEST $2,200,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
22 Parks’ Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program
Public Lands Department
Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is
federal civil rights law, and the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Three types of park infrastructure at up to
seven parks will be improved to or beyond the aforementioned standards:
(1) site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and accessible ground surfacing under play areas;
(4) access to and within restrooms. This is a build-to-budget request.
REQUEST $811,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $811,000 $324,400 $486,600
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 33
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
23 Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin)
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
A portion of Highland Park Elementary’s designated “Safe Routes to School” is lacking sidewalks and curb & gutter. It is on
Kenwood Street, right at the school’s west exit and continues on Atkin Avenue until the crosswalk (with a crossing guard)
on Imperial Street. It is a high traffic area, with many students walking or biking in an area with limited visibility, no safe
pathway, and many cars. It is dangerous we want our students to be able to safely walk and bike to school!
Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous
sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart.
REQUEST $213,000
CDCIP $213,000 $213,000
MAYOR $213,000 $213,000
COUNCIL $ -
24 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings CIP aims to make safety improvements to intersections with
neighborhood byways from 200 East to 1200 East. 6 neighborhood byways cross 1700 South through this stretch, with
many of these critical crossings lacking any kind of increased visibility, traffic control, or protection for people walking or
biking on these byways and attempting to cross 1700 South, greatly hindering the connectivity of these routes. This CIP
focuses on the crossings at 200 East, 400 East, 800 East, 1000 East, and 1200 East (McClelland Trail), covering the Liberty
Wells, East Liberty Park, and Sugar House communities. The crossing improvements would utilize strategies to reduce the
crossing distance, improve visibility, and provide physical refuge for pedestrians and cyclists, including bulb-outs and
refuge islands. This corridor provides access to schools, grocery stores, local businesses, parks, and lots of housing, and
these improvements could greatly improve the active transportation network and access to Bus Route 17. This project is
supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC’s goal of zero deaths and
severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions for SLC’s sustainability goals.
REQUEST $263,000
CDCIP $263,000 $263,000
MAYOR $263,000 $263,000
COUNCIL $ -
25 Repave Alley #4195
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Repair alley #4195 damage from SLC’s 2019 9th S reconstruction. Alley #4195 was severely damaged from contractor use of the alley to move equipment and materials from 11th E to 12th E as a convenience. The 08-2018 ELPCO meeting materials from SLC describes the impact to be 1 lane closed, driveway closures and parking restrictions.
SLC or the contractor should be responsible for damage caused outside of the construction zone of 9th S. The pre-2018 condition of the alley had semi consistent pavement and a partial storm drain infrastructure. After 9th S reconstruction; broken pavement and no effective surface or spring water management. This damaged infrastructure impacts property use, parking, safety and ADU development. Additionally, storm water and spring water have accelerated the deterioration of this public infrastructure that is necessary for public utility access as well as private property use and development.
This CIP proposal is a request for SLC to address deferred maintenance, 9th S construction impacts and impediments to reasonable access to and development of properties that abut an easement that SLC is responsible to maintain. Affected residents look forward to the opportunity to meet with the SLC departments with shared roles in managing easement-maintenance and the very real need for a solution that can bridge the existing gaps in departments, budgets and responsibility that residents must navigate to find a resolution. We are enthused that the current CIP funding has increased funding to $500K and includes surface water and alley easement issues as a priority.
REQUEST $302,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND34
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
26 EV Charging PSB Phase III
Facilities Division We are requesting funding for Phase 3, the final phase, of the EV charging infrastructure project at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a critical facility supporting Police, Fire, the Emergency Operations Center, and combined dispatch. The overall project provides 20 Level 2 charging ports to support approximately 50 Public Services, Police, and Fire vehicles.
Phases 1 and 2 establish the necessary electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer and supporting upgrades identified by Kimley-Horn & Sawatch. Phase 3 completes the project by installing the remaining chargers, allowing the charging system to be fully utilized as designed and ensuring the facility can support the City’s expanding EV fleet.
REQUEST $80,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $80,000 $80,000
COUNCIL $ -
27 Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Rose Park Elementary has been collaborating with Bike Utah, the Rose Park Community Learning Center, and SLC
Transportation since June 2024 to improve safety for students who walk and bike to school. The project purpose is to
identify the safest routes to school for students and improve intersections where even the safest routes have barriers.
This part of the project was informed by traffic safety data, 2 community bilingual open houses, and a bike safety audit
during the 2024-25 school year, resulting in the Rose Park Elementary Safe Routes to School Assessment (attached). The
school community and traffic safety data agreed: the crossings along 900W, particularly at the intersections of 800N and
900N, as well as Sterling Dr & American Dr, present major barriers for students trying to access the school neighborhood
and other amenities from their apartments. Improvements to 900W are planned, however they do not reach this
neighborhood. Rose Park Elementary, Bike Utah, and SLC Transportation are planning a quick-build installation for late
October to address these crossings temporarily. However, the proposed permanent crossing solutions are appropriate
and will bring relief to many students and other community members in this densely populated yet isolated block of the
Rose Park neighborhood. The intersection of Sterling Dr and American Beauty Dr, where students frequently cross on
their way to school, is only a two way stop and cars going north-south cut through the neighborhood.
This application proposes to make the crossings on 900W at 800N and at 900N safer through infrastructure change via
RRFB’s, concrete islands, speed feedback signs, and school crosswalks. These measures will capture the attention of
drivers and slow them down. We also propose adding stop signs at American Beauty Dr and Sterling Dr to create a
four-way stop. Together, these measures will create a safer and more comfortable route for children walking, scooting, or
biking to school.
REQUEST $362,000
CDCIP $362,000 $362,000
MAYOR $362,000 $362,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 35
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
28 Traffic Circle 700 S 500 West
Constituent Application; Transportation Department
The Granary District Alliance (GDA) hopes to fund a traffic circle at 700 South and 500 West in the heart of the Granary
District.
REQUEST $577,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
29 Access Control Transition to S2
Facilities Division
This project completes the transition of access control systems at the remaining 13 City facilities to the S2 platform. The
City has already begun migrating facilities to this standardized, more secure access control system, and this phase
represents the final rollout to ensure consistency across the portfolio. Upgrading these remaining locations will improve
security, system reliability, and centralized management, while reducing risks associated with outdated or unsupported
technologies and ensuring a consistent approach to access control citywide.
REQUEST $300,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
30 Poplar Grove 500 S Traffic Calming
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Traffic calming measures between 900 West and the Jordan River Trail on 500 South.
* Reduce the speed of vehicles using a system of speed humps (6).
* Make pedestrian crossings shorter and make pedestrians more visible
* Marked/raised cross walks leading to the Post Street Tot Lot, The Neighborhood House, and at the intersection of the
Jordan River Parkway
REQUEST $464,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND36
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
31 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom)
Public Lands Department
This project will fund the strategic installation of one new restroom in Salt Lake City. Currently, many restrooms in the
Public Lands’ inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable when they are intended to be open due to poor design and
vandalism. New restrooms will improve safety, maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms
will comply with ADA and increase accessibility.
REQUEST $568,000
CDCIP $568,000 $568,000
MAYOR $568,000 $568,000
COUNCIL $ -
32 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements
Fire Department; Facilities Division
The Fire Training Grounds currently has ~45,000 square feet of underutilized space, primarily covered in gravel and
weeds. The proposed site improvement project aims to enhance this area to better support firefighter training, reduce
grounds maintenance, and secure the site. The project includes the excavation and construction of paved area
surrounding fire training props to allow access for firefighters and fire vehicles as they train. Ideally this training ground
would simulate a small cross section of the structures that are in Salt Lake City and the site improvement would resemble
streets and access points like what is in the city along with the addition of the Drager Training Prop. This project is broken
into three phases:
(1) Training Ground Improvements Phase 1 - Regrading the half the field to drain to existing catch basins, clearing and
grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads.
(2) Training Ground Improvements Phase 2 - Regrading the remaining half of the field to drain to existing catch basins,
clearing and grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads.
(3) Drager Training Prop - Installation of the training prop. Prop will enable training in: fire behavior, fire control,
hydration, SCBA and safety equipment training, heat stress management, smoke and ventilation exercises, and more.
Note: This phase will be requested in a future CIP cycle.
REQUEST $1,000,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
33 Missing Sidewalks
Transportation Division
This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024
Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine
Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport
Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban
Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and
implementing selected projects within the urban trails network.
REQUEST $125,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 37
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
34 Wasatch Hollow Dog Park
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
During our meeting on June 25, 2025, the council discussed the current un-fenced, time-restricted off-leash dog area and
its challenges. After thorough deliberation and community input, the Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) voted in
favor of sending a recommendation to the City to fence an approximate 0.5-acre off-leash dog area within the park. The
motion was passed with 28 votes in favor and 1 abstention.
We believe that fencing the off-leash dog area will address the concerns raised by community members and enhance the
safety and usability of the park for all visitors.
We kindly request your support in advancing this recommendation through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
application process. We understand that the scope and funding of the project depend on the application’s acceptance. In
addition, the WHCC board would welcome a meeting with representatives from the City as the process progresses to
discuss the details of the fenced area.
REQUEST $556,000
CDCIP $556,000 $556,000
MAYOR $556,000 $556,000
COUNCIL $ -
35 Slow Down Liberty Wells South
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The addition of traffic calming measures within the Liberty Wells community - specifically on 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E
between 1700 S and 2100 S. The community has suffered under the onslaught of vehicles traveling north and south on
these streets ignoring the posted speed limit through the residential area. I personally have been asking Salt Lake City to
provide some sort of traffic calming since 2007. I live on 400 E, within sight of the electronic driver feedback boards, and
the speeds displayed on the boards regularly show in the 30 to upper 40 MPH, even though the posted speed limit is 20
MPH.
REQUEST $517,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
36 Emerson Street 1500 East -1600 East Replacement
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Replacement of the existing Emerson Ave. street from 1500 East to 1600 East.
REQUEST $390,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND38
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
37 Central 9th and Ballpark Traffic Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The Central Ninth neighborhood is one of Salt Lake City’s most walkable and transit-connected districts; however,
pedestrian and bicycle safety remains a concern. This project will deliver targeted safety upgrades that improve crossings,
visibility, and driver awareness in key locations that access open spaces, while also strengthening connections to the 9
Line Trail.
The proposal:
- New crosswalks crossing West Temple at Mead Ave, with road striping, roadway narrowing with concrete planters to
calm traffic, and solar-powered push-button LED crosswalk beacons (RRFB) for greater visibility, without the need for
trenching.
- Six solar-powered street lights located in the park strip along Mead Avenue, between West Temple and 200 W. Two lights
are positioned on the south side of Mead Avenue between West Temple and Jefferson Street. Four lights will be on the
north side of Mead Ave. between Jefferson St and 200 W, with double lights pointing at the sidewalk and street.
- Solar-powered push-button crosswalk beacons at 900 S. crossings at Jefferson St. and Washington St. enhance
pedestrian visibility.
- A street light on the southwest corner of Jefferson St. and 900 S to illuminate the 9 Line crossing of Jefferson St.
- Motion-activated LED warning signs on the 9 Line Trail crossings at West Temple and State St. alert drivers to stop for
pedestrians and cyclists.
- Angled parking striping on the north side of Mead Ave from Jefferson St to 200 W and also on the east side of Jefferson
St. from Mead Ave to Goltz Ave.
- These upgrades will make walking and biking in Central Ninth safer and more user-friendly. This project combines
proven traffic-calming strategies with highly visible crosswalk technology to meet Salt Lake City’s goals for equitable,
safe, and multimodal transportation, while reinforcing the neighborhood’s role as a vibrant and walkable area.
REQUEST $138,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
38 Texas Street Replacement
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Replacement of Texas Street asphalt (OCI 13) from terminus south of Hillside Middle School one block to Redondo
Avenue. Most of the “Overhead approach” driveways on the east side of the street are in equally poor condition and
need to be replaced. The conditions are noticeably deteriorated since submitting a CIP for this last year.
REQUEST $769,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 39
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
39 Active Transportation User Improvements - Glendale
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project is designed in response to public comments in Glendale Neighborhood Council meetings, neighbor concerns,
and data collected via the West-East connection study advocating for the concept of a safe “walkable” neighborhood. It
addresses several small budget-friendly but influential infrastructure improvements along two bus lines (UTA line 9 and
513) with a history of both chronic vehicle accidents and high pedestrian usage. The improvements can be quickly
implemented for rapid community impact as resources permit, or over a multi-year period if necessary.
Infrastructure improvements include (1) redesigning the JRT/California intersection for increased signal usage by
pedestrians, resulting in improved traffic flow and safety for cyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles, (2) implementing a
first-responder friendly speed table at a key neighborhood entry point on California Ave (East of Redwood Road) to
enforce speed limits and prevent further serious pedestrian accidents, (3) constructing a bulb-out at the intersection
adjacent to Title I K-8 school Dual Immersion Academy (DIA), a site of heavy child-pedestrian, vehicle, and UTA bus activity,
and (4) the installation of raised cross-walks at the Glendale Dr/Navajo St intersection near the same high-poverty school.
REQUEST $735,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
40 Nibley Park School Crossing
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Add new ADA ramps and crosswalk south of the driveway for Nibley Park School.
REQUEST $140,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
41 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access
Public Lands Department
This project will strategically add lighting to parks to both improve safety throughout key parks and to extend play for
sport fields and courts. Lighting added to entire parks will help improve sight lines, safety and the perception of safety,
comfort, usability, level of service, and will allow for better monitoring of historically-underutilized spaces. Sport and field
lighting will allow for extended play during darker months, and will allow spaces to be more activated during park opening
hours. This is a build-to-budget request.
REQUEST $460,000
CDCIP $460,000 $460,000
MAYOR $460,000 $460,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND40
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
42 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This project would install lighting at the popular Glendale Park pickleball and tennis courts.
REQUEST $955,000
CDCIP $955,000 $955,000
MAYOR $955,000 $955,000
COUNCIL $ -
43 Proposal for Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The streets between 200 E and 300 E, from 900 S to 1300 S, experience excessive speeding at all hours. This presents a
significant safety concern, particularly for school-aged children walking to Liberty Elementary. While a crossing guard
is stationed at 900 S, the next supported crossing is not until Herbert Avenue, leaving a long stretch without safe
pedestrian access.
To address this, I propose the installation of raised crosswalks along 300 E. In addition, smaller neighborhood streets,
Hubbard, Belmont, Williams, and Herbert, would benefit from mid-block speed cushions to reduce speeding. As a resident
of Hubbard Avenue, I recommend prioritizing this block for speed cushions, along with a raised crosswalk at 200 E.
Hubbard, which is narrower than the surrounding streets and has a history of traffic calming requests for support,
including speed trailers. It is also a primary walking route for students attending Liberty Elementary and the Salt Lake Arts
Academy. Residents have repeatedly reported excessive speeding with cars trying to avoid the lights at 900 S.
These improvements would significantly enhance pedestrian safety, support walkability, and protect the well-being of
both residents and visitors. With a growing residential population and an increase in local businesses, the city must
prioritize traffic calming measures to ensure the neighborhood remains safe and accessible for all.
REQUEST $705,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
44 Fire Alarm Additions
Facilities Division
During a recent facilities audit, it was identified that about 27 City facilities lacked fire alarm systems. This project will use
allocated funds to install compliant fire alarm systems at these locations to address safety gaps and meet code
requirements. Fire alarm systems have been averaging approximately $50,000 per facility, though costs will vary based on
building conditions and scope. As a life safety asset, installation is critical to protecting occupants, operations,
and assets.
REQUEST $1,000,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 41
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
45 Playground Shade
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Install shade clothes over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the summer, playground equipment is too hot
to use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds, the community will enjoy increased use of play
equipment for the full day in the summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer.
Potential locations include Westpointe Park, Riverside Park, Sherwood Park, Modesto Park, 1700 South River Park,
Herman Franks Park, Fairmont Park based on previous funding, overall condition of current assets, funding equity, and
efficiencies with other construction projects.
REQUEST $552,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
46 Jordan Park Basketball Court
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This project proposes the design and construction of a full-length outdoor basketball court at Jordan Park in Glendale,
Utah. The court will serve as a safe, accessible and inclusive recreational space for youth, families, and community
members of all ages. By adding this facility, we will expand opportunities for physical activity, mentorship and community-
building in a neighborhood where quality recreational spaces are limited.
REQUEST $579,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND42
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
47 Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project will make the neighborhood more livable, walkable, and safe for pedestrians, including for school children.
We have three schools in a small area (Beacon Heights Elementary, Hillside Middle School, and Cosgriff private). Due to
the increase in cut-through and speeding traffic in our neighborhood, it has become increasingly unsafe to cross the
street, especially at school drop-off/pick-up times. As a result we need to calm traffic to make safe routes.
Specifically, we request the following (each aspects can be phased):
1) 4 speed cushions on 2100 S (between Nevada St and 2600 E)
2) 3 raised crosswalks on 2100 S (between Nevada St and Wyoming St)
3) No parking signs near blind corners along 2100 S (between Nevada Street and 2600 E)
4) 3 enhanced crosswalks on Redondo St (at Texas St, Wyoming St, and 2500 E intersections)
5) 2 speed cushions on Texas Street (between 2100 S and Parley’s Way)
The speed cushions will help to slow traffic and draw the driver’s attention to safe driving. It is very common to see drivers
speeding much in excess of the speed limit on this stretch, particularly while cutting from Foothills to 2300 E, and vice
versa. The raised crosswalks will advance pedestrian safety and visibility. There is currently only one cross-walk on this
stretch of 2100 S, and its a simple painted crosswalk. For the amount of pedestrian traffic across this road, it is simply
insufficient as is.
The no parking signs will help to make turning out to 2100 S much safer, as currently turning onto 2100 S from several
intersecting roads, drivers and pedestrians cannot see the oncoming traffic, and have to inch out into the roadway too far.
The enhanced crosswalks will slow traffic and increase pedestrian visibility. The intersections on Redondo are currently
two way stop, and often have confusion about stopping/non-stopping, making it unsafe for drivers and pedestrians.
Together, these actions will improve the safety of our neighborhood.
REQUEST $438,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 43
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
48 Curtis Park Playground Replacement
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Our application seeks to revitalize Curtis Park (1421 S 2200 E, Salt Lake City, District 6), a small but high-use open space
currently hosting an outdated playground and under utilized open space. Despite its condition, the playground is heavily
used because it sits just west of Foothill Village and is surrounded by a vibrant active neighborhood.
Our project will:
- Replace the small, outdated playground with a larger modern one.
- Activate the property by lowering the earth wall on 2200 E
- Connect the public land north to south with pathways so the park can be walked and ridden on a bike in a loop. The loop
will connect to the already planned corridor running east to west that connects 2200E to the Foothill Village Mall’s new
west entrance, flowing through to the the playground.
This proposal deserves consideration because:
- Timely opportunity to leverage private funding while it’s available: Foothill Village remodel. This project ensures the park
serves as a connector, not a barrier.
- Walkability & SLC goals: Creating paths and connections supports a walkable city, reduces vehicle trips, and aligns with
SLC’s Reimagine Nature plan.
- Safety & accessibility: New playground, lighting, and safe pathways for bikes, strollers, and scooters will greatly improve
community use.
- Vibrant hub: Updating the park alongside Foothill Village’s remodel transforms underused land into an inviting, modern
public space.
REQUEST $433,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
49 9-Line Greening: Transforming 9.5 Blocks of 900 South from Gray to Green
Public Lands Department
This project will convert gray gravel to green landscaping on nine and a half blocks along 900 South (9-Line Trail) from 650
West to 500 East. This is the final phase of the transformation of 900 South into an urban greenway, putting the bow --
and the green space amenities -- on top of the 900 South Reconstruction project, completed in early 2024. The
reconstruction project had budget sufficient to install only gravel along many of the spaces that were ideally intended for
vegetation, landscaping, and park-like amenities. This project will complete the street transformation with irrigation, trees,
landscaping, and other amenities to turn the gravel patches along the side of the street into a functional public greenway.
REQUEST $2,000,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND44
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
50 800 E Traffic Islands
Constituent Application, Transportation Division
800 E between 1700 S and 2100 S is a wide street without any breaks so speeding vehicles regularly usually use this street
as an alternative to 700 E and 900 E (north and south bound) especially when it is rush hour traffic. The city had a
proposal to build traffic calming islands a few years ago and all residents got mailers from the city about this project but
from my conversations with the City’s Transportation Division, the project has been shelved due to funding issues. The
entire section of 800 E between 900 S and 2100 S did function as a walkable, live and play street during COVID and it was
amazing for residents and pedestrians. The city converted a portion of 800 E between 1700S and 1300 S permanently into
a live/play street which is super nice but the other sections have gone back to vehicular traffic as the project has been
shelved due to funding issue.
The proposal here is to revive this project to install traffic calming island and other such features to be installed between
1700S and 2100 S with some green elements such as trees and shrubs included in these islands/ Chicanes. This section of
800 E between 1700S and 2100 S is arguably more important to have these traffic calming features due to its proximity to
2100 S and all the vehicular traffic flows into our neighborhood making it quite dangerous for our kids and pets.
REQUEST $1,400,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
51 Gregson Avenue / Lincoln Street Asphalt Speed Bumps
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Install two concrete speedbumps that are separated by 200 feet along the curved intersection of Gregson Avenue and
Lincoln Street in Sugarhouse, Salt Lake City.
REQUEST $60,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
52 700 South Neighborhood Byway and 700 East Crossing
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The 700 South Neighborhood Byway CIP aims to make safety improvements to 700 South between 300 East and 900 East,
including intersection curb extensions, traffic calming, and, vitally, provide a safe and signalized walking and biking
crossing on 700 East, connecting the Central City and East Central
REQUEST $1,119,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 45
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
53 Justice Courts Interim Improvements
Facilities Division
This project provides interim improvements to the Justice Court facility while a new building is planned. Upgrades will
focus on enhancing security, improving space utilization, and supporting operational efficiency. Specific improvements
may include addressing an egress code issue, security lighting additions, glazing improvements, modifications to optimize
workspace layout, and enhancements to access control and other security systems. These measures will help protect City
assets, ensure life safety, and support the Justice Court’s ability to continue operations effectively until a permanent
facility is constructed
REQUEST $450,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
54 McClelland Trail Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
I live in the East Liberty Park Community Organization’s (ELPCO) boundaries and I am concerned about the McClelland
trail crossings in my neighborhood. Specifically, the streets that cross the McClelland trail between 1560 S and 1300 S
(Bryan, Kensington, Emerson, Roosevelt, Browning, and Harrison Avenue). Emerson Elementary school children regularly
walk or bike this trail on the way to and from school. The trail is heavily used by people in the neighborhood. The existing
cross walks with the signage, safety islands on street margins, and pink color help, but some kind of speed bump, raised
crosswalk, and/or flashing light would really make it a lot safer because based on my and other neighbor’s observations,
some cars ignore the signage and speed though the crosswalks. I’ve been in contact with a staff member at Salt Lake City
DOT about this application. I had a discussion with him about what might work best at the crossings. Both of us think that
a raised crosswalk would slow traffic and flashing lights on the trail crossing signs connected to a push button
(Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons or RRFBs) at each trail crossing would help in increasing pedestrian safety
particularly because they could be installed on the safety islands along the street margins where they would be much
more visible. Speed bumps near the crossings would accomplish the same goal as the raised crosswalks, and may be a
more economic alternative because they would not require alteration of the current crossings.
REQUEST $571,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
55 Repave Alley 3rd & 4th Ave, and Alta & Virginia
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Requesting repavement of our alley between 3rd and 4th avenue and Virginia and Alta streets Salt Lake City, Utah 84103.
REQUEST $214,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND46
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
56 Roxbury & Kensington Pedestrian Safety
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The East Bench Community Council and the Indian Hills Elementary School Community Council have collaborated to
jointly propose important improvements for pedestrian safety in two areas of the St. Mary’s neighborhood near school
catwalks. These projects address pedestrian safety hazards in school zones and will protect children, improve walkability
for all residents, and align with Salt Lake City’s goals for safe routes to school and Vision Zero.
1. There are no sidewalks on either side of Beacon Drive (east of Wasatch Dr.) leading to a school catwalk accessing Indian
Hills (approximately 2570 E. Beacon Dr); nor are there any on Kensington Ave. At this time, a number of the residents
on Beacon Dr. are adamantly opposed to the installation of sidewalks, so we propose a sidewalk on Kensington Ave.,
where the neighbors are more amenable to a sidewalk cutting through their property.
2. Roxbury Road borders the east side of Indian Hills Elementary School. Two school crosswalks extend across the street,
leading to a catwalk that provides school access. Excessive speeding is a major concern in this area, especially at the
wide intersection of Roxbury & Canterbury.
To address these safety concerns, we propose:
*Raising crosswalks
*Speed bump(s) south of the catwalk
* Road narrowing treatments, such as bollards and high-visibility paint to reduce lane width, discourage speeding, and
prevent illegal parking near crosswalks, possibly similar to the attached picture from Westminster Road in SLC.
* Center island or raised median at the Canterbury” “Roxbury Intersection
REQUEST $380,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
57 Main & Broadway Street Activation
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
The Downtown Community Council and the owners of the Clift Building seek to improve and activate the northwest
corner of Main Street and Broadway, arguably one of the most prolific downtown corners for crime, vandalism, and drug
use. The applicants are proposing new sidewalk improvements on Broadway from the alley for the 222 parking garage to
Main street. This stretch of sidewalk was not completed in Salt Lake City’s shade tree planting program. In its current
state, this area acts as a sun-drenched heat island out of character aesthetically with sidewalks and streets in the
surrounding area. These deficiencies will be addressed with planting of trees, placement of planters and seating.
Safety issues for bicyclists and scooters will be addressed with appropriate placement of bollards and larger planters
to clearly delineate car lanes from the bicycle lane at the corner of Main Street. The historic Clift Building is located on
this corner. The Clift Building owners are willing to install outdoor dining at this location for its retail tenants if the
city is willing to put in planters, trees and other street amenities that the city has already installed in the Central
Business District.
The City did not previously install trees in this area due to a misunderstanding about the sidewalk’s structural weight
capacity. The proposed improvements include planters and other trees in the sidewalk to create a shade canopy that
would have normally been installed. The activation of this portion of Main Street will help reduce crime on
Main Street and help attract new businesses to the downtown central business district.
Staff note: The Engineering Division has identified potential feasibility concerns due to sidewalk weight limitations at the
proposed location which may require further inquiry.
REQUEST $247,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 47
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
58 1300 South CIP
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Project is proposed as a Phase 1 for the California Trail, a proposed multi-use path on the south side of 1300 S, between
Foothill and 2300 E.
The proposal is meant to help achieve three objectives:
1) Better address traffic conflicts between all modes of transportation, - pedestrian, bicycle/scooter, vehicular in the area
to allow people of all ages (especially younger and older citizens) with different abilities to safely travel on foot, bikes,
and the like without being forced to use the roadway. Current sidewalks bring these individuals and modalities in
conflict with each other. Also, we would hope to provide signs or similar to allow slower people to move safely and
avoid user conflicts.
2) Create a neighborhood identity for Saint Mary’s/Sunnyside/East Bench by placing monument signage along the trail to
better identify 1300 South as the gateway to the St Mary’s and east bench neighborhood and better address pass
through traffic resulting
from significant increases in traffic that have occurred incrementally over the last 60 years. The neighborhood plans to
pay for the monument signage.
3) Memorialize the path of the California Pioneer Trail (Donner Party) with a” trail marker (s)” as well as the identification
of historical features that are located in or adjacent to the area. We would also focus on the preservation of existing
trees, and/or planting of new trees. These costs would be covered outside this CIP application.
Specifically, the following are included:
-- A 12 Foot Wide, Concrete, Multi Use Path on 1300 South (focus of this funding request). Existing sidewalk and park strip
will be maintained. New trail/concrete will be built adjacent to (north of) existing park strip.
-- Custom Neighborhood Identity and/or California trail historical marker signs (paid for by neighbors).
Importantly, J Development, developers of property just east of Foothill, will contribute $200,000 toward the trail
improvements.
Staff note: The outside funding is not guaranteed at this time therefore the request will remain at $278,000.
REQUEST $278,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
59 Greenway Connector - Chapman Library to Jordan River Parkway
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
As a resident of Poplar Grove, I would like to propose a greenway project that I believe would bring significant benefits to
our neighborhood. This project would improve traffic safety, enhance public accessibility, address concerns related to
homelessness, and help mitigate urban heat island effects with over 20 new trees for the West Side. Most importantly, it
would create a stronger and more welcoming connection between the Jordan River Parkway and the Chapman Library.
The Chapman Library serves as a historic landmark, a gathering place, and a vital hub for our community. By creating an
island of green space and a traffic circle along 600 South between 900 West and 1000 West, we could transform this
stretch of road into a safer, more attractive, and more functional space. This improvement would also complement the
design of the street on the opposite side of the circle park, creating a more cohesive and enjoyable experience for both
residents and visitors as they move between these two key community destinations.
REQUEST $528,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND48
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
60 Safe Side Street North Extension
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The project being submitted is a “completely separate project” to a past CIP project within the same block of zone 46. The
south side of zone 46 is the “Sugar House Safe Side Streets Project.”
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2023/12/08/safesidestreets/
We are seeking the continuation of traffic calming on the north portion of zone 46.
The streets involved are:
1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South)
Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 East
Wilson Avenue 900 East - 1100 East
1000 East is an iconic byway and a prime destination for active transportation. At the south end of the block is the heart of
Sugar House and the north end a children’s destination, Westminster Park. And further north is an elementary school,
Emerson Elementary.
The goal for the residents of this area is to decrease cut through traffic and slow vehicle speeds. Also to promote safer
streets for bicyclists, walkers, joggers, skateboarders and alike to travel this neighborhood byway. Within this block the
street calming efforts are not systemic. The residents of this area are asking for the completion of street calming within
the neighborhood.
This application has the signatures of 120 residents of the area. It also has the support of Landon Clark Sugar House
Community Council Chair and Chris Longhurst Sugar House Community Council Transportation Committee Chair.
REQUEST $412,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
61 700 E Beautification Project
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
700 E is one of the busiest roads in the city. This industrial-looking road emits substantial air pollution and is a source of
immense heat affecting health and quality of life for residents in the adjoining neighborhoods. The proposed project aims
to plant close to 125 tree saplings along the central median and the curb on the east side of 700 E.
Project Location: From 1300 S to 2100 S on 700 E
Benefits:
i) The lung space created through this project will help absorb toxic green house gases emitted by the traffic.
ii) Contains noise pollution
iii) Reduces the heat emanating from concrete and asphalt surfaces.
iv) Aesthetically pleasing approach road will also lead to increased congregation of people improving economic activity
along this road.
v) Water percolation along the permeable median created as part of this project can also improve the ground water table
which will ultimately benefit the Great Salt Lake.
Project details: 700E is a state road, SR-71, which needs coordination with UDOT for project implementation but there are
multiple examples of state roads improved by Salt Lake City recently including US-89, SR-186.
While 700E is as big of a road as foothill drive or state street with 6 lanes total running through several neighborhoods but
is cared for less. The proposed project is an attempt to rectify years of neglect and also use this opportunity to address
climate change and make Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park and Sugarhouse communities resilient for the future.
REQUEST $2,328,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 49
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
62 Pedestrian Placemaking at the Ballpark Library Lab
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The new Ballpark Library Lab, which opened on May 23, 2025, is expected to draw a significant increase in children,
families, and neighbors walking to and from West Temple and 1400 South. This section of West Temple currently has
limited pedestrian infrastructure, only a single marked crosswalk north of 1400 South, and is a corridor where drivers
often travel at high speeds. Without additional investment, the increased foot traffic generated by the Library Lab will
create serious safety concerns for residents, library visitors, and students walking to nearby schools.
This project proposes safety-focused placemaking to reduce risk and improve visibility for pedestrians in the immediate
vicinity of the Library Lab. Project elements would include:
- Two high-visibility, book-themed painted crosswalks to slow vehicle speeds and reinforce driver awareness of frequent
crossings.
- Pedestrian safety and library signage to alert drivers before they approach the library block.
- Additional street markings and wayfinding cues that clearly designate pedestrian priority zones.
These improvements would directly support Salt Lake City’s Vision Zero commitment and the Transportation Master Plan
goal of safer, multimodal corridors. By investing in traffic-calming measures now, the City can prevent collisions, reduce
speeding, and ensure that the Ballpark Library Lab opens as a safe, accessible, and family-friendly destination.
This project addresses a clear infrastructure gap while also creating a replicable model for pairing new civic facilities with
proactive pedestrian safety measures. It is a cost-effective intervention that protects vulnerable users and strengthens
neighborhood connections.
REQUEST $140,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
63 Traffic Calming for Sherman Avenue
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Installing traffic calming measures on Sherman Avenue between 1300 East and 1500 East in order to minimize vehicles
speeding on our street.
REQUEST $72,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND50
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
64 Median Conversion to Parklet
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This project will fund trees, new code compliant curb and gutter, a new efficient irrigation system, a bench and drought-
tolerant landscaping. Curb and gutter are critical infrastructure improvements. This project will fund the new curb and
gutter. Curb and gutter will direct storm runoff. Adequate curbing provides safety, separating the median from the street.
Curb cuts allow improved access. This project funds a new efficient irrigation system. Turf reduction and water
conservation are critical. Turf reduction and proper irrigation will reduce water usage, lowering water bills.
This project will fund the installation of trees. Trees are vital to our urban communities. Trees provide shade and cooler
temperatures, combatting the heat island effect. They sequester carbon, fight climate change and capture runoff. Trees
boost our mental health and improve our wellness.
This project will fund a bench, for comfort and relaxing, landscape boulders for their aesthetic appeal and drought-
tolerant landscaping.
Let’s create an inviting parklet on this under-utilized public open space. The median is the property of Salt Lake City,
Department of Public Lands/Parks.
REQUEST $52,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
65 First Encampment Park
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This project will remove the deteriorated chain-link fence surrounding First Encampment Park, along with the trees and
stumps that have grown through and damaged the fence line. The current fence is broken, unsafe, easily climbed, and
heavily compromised by overgrowth, creating concealment opportunities and attracting harmful activity. Replacing it with
a full-height, solid privacy fence will provide a safe, uniform, and durable perimeter that reflects the dignity of this historic
Pioneer landmark. This improvement will also allow neighbors to restore their own affected landscaping and will give the
park a clean, intentional appearance from the street inward.
REQUEST $53,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
66 Sunnyside Ave & Amanda Safe Street Crossing
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This is a safe street crossing for everyone, transit and trail connecting, urban heat island mitigation and air quality
improvement project. A rapid flashing beacon signalized crosswalk with landscape island and user refuge will provide a
safe signalized crossing for a neighborhood area where k-12 school age children and youth, employees, and recreational
users cross a 5 lane street on a daily basis. A landscape island will provide an opportunity to mitigate severe heat island
effect - which also includes polluted air induced by urban heat island effect. As of August 2025, the street temperature has
been measured at 140 F.
REQUEST $350,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 51
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
67 Virginia Street Safety and Mobility Improvements
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
I am writing to urge the use of Capital Improvement Program funds to restore safety and function to Virginia Street. I
propose funding (1) the removal of five of the seven speed humps and (2) construction of an off-Virginia bike lane behind
Shriners Hospital connecting Alta Street to the Popperton Park Trailhead via an existing sidewalk and dirt trail. Virginia
Street is more dangerous post redesign. Four speed humps on the steepest slope, combined with narrowed intersections,
create hazards for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians. Drivers brake abruptly while cyclists continue at constant speed,
leading to near misses. The right lane down now ends abruptly, forcing bikes around cars into concrete barriers. Vehicles
swerve into bike lanes to use cutouts. Humps are placed between, not at, crosswalks, so cars accelerate into crossings. On
a 10% grade, the humps make braking and accelerating dangerous; in winter, plows leave ice and at humps, creating slick
surfaces. These placements conflict with FHWA and ITE guidelines, which advise against humps on grades above 6%.
According to city data, there was no history of serious crashes here, but if and when they happen, it will be the city’s fault.
The current design harms quality of life. Residents face longer commutes, more wear on vehicles, and delayed emergency
response. Stop-and-go traffic has increased noise, pollution, and brake dust, and diverted traffic to previously quiet L
Street, Fairfax, and Alta. Mobility is impaired. 88 percent of neighborhood workers commute by car, and the speed humps
on Virginia have made their life worse. Two fixes address this: remove four humps above 4th Avenue and the redundant
hump between 1st and 2nd, leaving two on the flatter section. Second, improve the Alta-to-11th Avenue route: add curb
cuts, pave the dirt path, and adapt the sidewalk. This provides a safe, shaded, low-traffic option connecting directly to
Popperton Park and 11th Avenue.
REQUEST $161,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
68 Atkin Avenue Curb and Gutter
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
We request the installation of curb and gutter on Atkin Avenue between Highland Drive and Beverly Street (approximately
1 city block), particularly on the south side of the street. There are 9 houses on the south side of the street that front
Atkin. The north side of the street has two houses that front Atkin and several others that are adjacent to Atkin. We
believe the curb and gutter will improve the overall stormwater system. Likewise, the 1300 East project has resulted in
Atkin Ave. being used as a detour regularly. Curb and gutter on Atkin would be a nice, inexpensive addition to the overall
1300 East project. Curb and gutter on Atkin would improve the aesthetic of the street and make street parking and snow
removal easier.
Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous
sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart.
REQUEST $218,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND52
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
69 Outdoor Calisthenics Equipment
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Construct outdoor fitness equipment similar to that at Murray Park in the underused northeast corner of 9th
South River Park.
Open to other amenable locations, just want this somewhere reasonably accessible in the city
REQUEST $87,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
70 Rosslyn Heights Corridor Island
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
We are requesting an island to be placed within the wide area of 2000 E. St. between 2280 S and 2300 S (approx.) This
proposal includes a raised crosswalk for safe pedestrian travel and traffic calming. Four additional speed humps are
proposed along 2000 E to provide consistent vehicle speed control.
This proposal would address the following concerns:
- Auto and bus traffic have no lanes to funnel safely through the area. (lack pavement markings to delineate travel lanes)
- This is an ever-evolving neighborhood, where there are many young families with children continuously using the roads
and sidewalks on bike, scooters, skates, and strollers, etc.
- Entering or departing the Rosslyn Heights Sports Complex means that cars, buses and pedestrians, are crossing through
two-way traffic with no marked lanes.
- There is not a crosswalk for pedestrians. This road is very wide, and well populated!
- Snow plows often block driveways and sidewalks with their extra large loads, creating difficulty for homeowners, cars,
and pedestrians.
- Parking on the street can be two-deep in the wide area, and at times, becomes a crowded parking lot.
REQUEST $487,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
71 Event Infrastructure for Vibrant, Safe City Parks Program
Public Lands Department
This project will add infrastructure, such as power, concrete walkways and pads, and lighting, to allow several public
parks to serve as active, vibrant hubs for community gatherings and public events. This project will reduce event setup
costs, minimize environmental impacts, and increase accessibility for organizers and participants alike to make gathering
as communities more accessible. A primary goal of this project is also to alleviate maintenance burdens on parks that
receive an excess of events now and to spread out impacts, opportunities, and events in other parks throughout the City.
REQUEST $580,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 53
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
72 Public Pet Memorial
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
A statue, statues, or placemaking feature of pets on a public space. Radiating out from the placemaking feature will be
memorial bricks, benches, and landscaping/trees etc. The bricks and landscaping can be sponsored by the public in
memory of pet that person has lost. The bricks can be engraved with the pets name and put in the ground and area can
grow over time. The landscaping or trees can have a small plaque listing the pets name and information. Adding a
memorial/donation element will ensure that the memorial always continues to grow and is taken care of. Also drinking
fountains for both humans and pets.
REQUEST $200,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
73 Nature Park at Bonneville Golf Course
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Nature Park at Bonneville will turn two and a half acres of unusable fire hazard into a small nature park for the
surrounding residents. We have the support of SLC’s Golf Division for this project (see Supporting Documents). The height
of the fence from the driving range will be increased for safety.
This area has been used by three generations of children in this neighborhood, but was recently fenced off for safety
reasons. It has a large amount of dead wood, creating a significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area. We see evidence
of “campsites” and drug paraphernalia left behind; as well as large piles of concrete and asphalt chunks, dead and broken
trees from the golf course, and broken or obsolete golf course equipment.
We propose the area be converted to a small nature park with a shredded bark walking path utilizing bark chips from
dead wood processed from the area; three benches, access to water to establish drought-tolerant native trees, shrubs
and pollinator plants (utilizing free or low-cost programs like the Utah Pollinator Habitat Program, currently offering
90-900 seedlings for free each September). This will require access to water but not an irrigation system.
This area will be cleared of junk and debris. Some dead tree material will be cleaned out, but not all, leaving a natural
area on the northwestern side for our native wildlife habitat and protection. We will also work to protect the habitat of
great horned owls and various hawks living in the area.
We propose two entrances: (1) southend of 2200 East, (2) east side of Connor St. at property line to the course. There may
also be a southern entrance from the golf course. The end result will offer a safe, natural area for both adults and children
to enjoy nature and her wildlife such as great horned owls, red tailed hawks, deer, foxes, and other wild creatures losing
habitat in our highly developed city.
Staff Note: The “significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area” represents the constituent’s opinion and does not reflect a
designation made by the Fire Department. An evaluation of the area would need to be completed by the Fire Department prior to
assigning the level of fire risk.
REQUEST $1,268,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND54
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
74 Hubbard Ave (200 East to 300 East)
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The 200/300 East block of Hubbard Ave (the block directly south of 900 S) desperately needs the city to implement traffic
mediation devices to SLOW and potentially divert traffic from the very narrow street. The street is a 2-way street has
approximately less that 14ft between parked cars. With the increased motor/vehicle/human traffic on the 9th South
corridor, the 200/300 block of Hubbard Ave has seen an overwhelming increase in overflow activity and crime (I have
saved footage from my security cameras). Recently, numerous residents of this block met to discuss possible solutions.
Some of the solutions that were discussed were: speed humps, increased street lighting, and the possibility to chance the
dual traffic flow to a one-way street.
The general consensus of the Hubbard constituents are quite grateful of the city’s involvement and vision with the 9th
South Corridor. That said, there was also some resentment because the city hasn’t given much consideration to the
overflow “growing pains” of the 9th South Corridor. Some residents of the street have actually taken it upon themselves to
purchase speed bumps and paint portions of the street to try and slow down the visitors to the 9th South Corridor. Albeit
illegal for people to paint the street and place speed bumps, please note those actions were taken out of sheer
desperation for the safety of our street and to protect the lives of many children that reside on our street. Numerous
families on Hubbard Ave have reached out to our representative (Darin Mano, who is not seeking reelection) and city
employees in the Division of Transportation. The only action Hubbard Ave has seen has been the removal of the
constituent placed speed bumps. That has sent a message to many that the city is actually hearing complaints but are
taking counterproductive measures that essentially make the street less safe. Any proactive measures taken to slow traffic
and increase security and safety will be greatly appreciated.
REQUEST $100,000
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $ -
COUNCIL $ -
75 Glendale Park
Mayor Added Project, Public Lands Department
This funding will help to advance Phase II improvements, which could include improvements in the center of the site or
adjacent to the Jordan River, as identified in the Vision Plan. Design to confirm which amenities will advance in Phase II is
now underway with construction anticipated to begin on Phase II in 2026.
This funding will also be used for Glendale Park project contingency.
REQUEST
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $6,000,000 $6,000,000
COUNCIL $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 55
#Totals General
Fund
Restricted
Property
Tax
Funding
Our Future
(FOF)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Streets
Impact Fees
Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th
Sales Taxes
Title, Lead Office, and Description
76 Bike Racks
Mayor Added Project, Transportation Division
This funding will be used for the purchase and installation of new bicycle racks citywide with a focus near local businesses
in high-demand areas to support cyclists and improve access to nearby shops and services. Funds will not be used for
renewal or replacement.
REQUEST
CDCIP $ -
MAYOR $50,000 $50,000
COUNCIL $ -
TOTALS
REQUEST $58,094,500
CDCIP $25,969,000 $7,000,000 $ - $3,100,000 $2,539,000 $230,000 $4,500,000 $8,600,000
MAYOR $34,884,000 $4,680,879 $3,463,036 $3,100,000 $8,863,400 $430,000 $4,652,515 $9,694,170
COUNCIL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND56
Asset Status Category Asset Year
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Existing Buildings Life Safety & Code
Compliance $2,880,000 $90,000 $200,000 $400,000 $420,000 $470,000
Structural Integrity &
Envelope (Shell) $6,360,000 $430,000 $1,340,000 $1,950,000 $1,450,000 $1,280,000
Core Infrastructure
Systems (MEP)$14,010,000 $10,420,000 $3,210,000 $6,080,000 $1,750,000 $5,520,000
Operational Building
Systems $3,510,000 $750,000 $1,610,000 $730,000 $300,000 $830,000
Interior & Exterior
Fixtures & Functional
Layouts
$4,340,000 $1,220,000 $ - $ - $570,000 $420,000
Comfort, Efficiency, &
Aesthetics $ - $430,000 $1,150,000 $940,000 $510,000 $1,330,000
Buildings Total $31,110,000 $13,340,000 $7,490,000 $10,110,000 $5,000,000 $ 9,840,000
Parks Green House
Replacement $ - $2,160,000 $ - $ - $2,430,000 $2,530,000
Jordan River Repair $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,250,000 $2,340,000 $2,430,000 $2,530,000
Other Park Structure
Replacement $1,530,000 $1,590,000 $1,650,000 $1,720,000 $1,790,000 $1,860,000
Parking Lot and Road
Replacements $1,560,000 $1,620,000 $1,690,000 $1,750,000 $1,820,000 $1,900,000
Parks Legal
Compliance with ADA
Standards for
Accessible Design
$1,870,000 $1,950,000 $2,020,000 $2,110,000 $2,190,000 $2,280,000
Pavilion
Replacements $1,530,000 $1,590,000 $1,650,000 $1,720,000 $1,790,000 $1,860,000
Playground
Replacement $1,790,000 $2,180,000 $2,270,000 $2,180,000 $2,260,000 $2,750,000
Safe Open and Clean
Restrooms $1,920,000 $2,000,000 $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,240,000 $2,330,000
Appendix II 6-year Expenditure Projection
This appendix provides the City’s six-year capital expenditure projection,
identifying anticipated investment needs and the planned timing of capital
expenditures over the planning horizon. It is intended to support long-
range planning, improve financial forecasting, and provide greater
transparency regarding the scale and sequencing of future capital needs.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 57
Asset Status Category Asset Year
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Skate Park
Replacements $2,080,000 $ - $ - $2,340,000 $ - $ -
Sports Court $2,030,000 $2,520,000 $3,030,000 $ 3,690,000 $2,660,000 $3,050,000
Parks Total $16,390,000 $17,770,000 $16,640,000 $20,000,000 $19,630,000 $21,090,000
Transportation Alleyways $5,540,000 $5,770,000 $6,000,000 $6,240,000 $6,480,000 $6,740,000
Bridge
Reconstruction $9,330,000 $9,710,000 $10,090,000 $10,500,000 $10,920,000 $11,360,000
Existing Renwal &
Replacement Street
Signals
$2,600,000 $2,700,000 $2,810,000 $2,920,000 $3,040,000 $3,160,000
Public Way Concrete
Replacement $750,000 $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000
Street OverLays $38,670,000 $40,210,000 $41,820,000 $43,500,000 $45,240,000 $47,050,000
Street Reconstruction $45,110,000 $46,920,000 $48,790,000 $50,750,000 $52,780,000 $54,890,000
Street’s Legal ADA
Compliance $750,000 $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000
Traffic Signal Capital
Maintainance $1,000,000 $1,040,000 $1,080,000 $1,120,000 $1,170,000 $1,220,000
Transportation
Total $103,760,000 $107,910,000 $112,220,000 $116,710,000 $121,380,000 $126,240,000
Existing Total $151,250,000 $139,020,000 $136,360,000 $146,820,000 $146,010,000 $157,170,000
Improvement Parks
Irrigation
Replacement and
Supportive
Waterwise
Landscaping
$780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 $950,000
Parks Total $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 $950,000
Transportation Transit Capital
Program $14,660,000 $2,000,000 $6,550,000 $11,820,000 $15,300,000 $890,000
Transportation
Total $14,660,000 $2,000,000 $6,550,000 $11,820,000 $15,300,000 $ 890,000
Improvement
Total $15,440,000 $2,810,000 $7,400,000 $12,690,000 $16,210,000 $1,830,000
New Buildings Life Safety & Code
Compliance $650,000 $310,000 $ - $110,000 $ - $ -
Structural Integrity &
Envelope (Shell) $170,000 $4,160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Core Infrastructure
Systems (MEP)$50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Operational Building
Systems $4,350,000 $11,100,000 $10,840,000 $3,040,000 $170,000 $730,000
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND58
Asset Status Category Asset Year
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Interior & Exterior
Fixtures & Functional
Layouts
$150,000 $310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Buildings Total $5,370,000 $15,880,000 $10,840,000 $3,150,000 $170,000 $730,000
Parks
Emerald Ribbon
Action Plan
Transformational
Projects
$ - $ - $8,440,000 $8,770,000 $9,120,000 $9,490,000
Event Infrastructure
& Pavilion
Replacement For Safe
City Parks
$2,600,000 $1,800,000 $1,870,000 $1,950,000 $2,030,000 $2,110,000
Downtown
Beautification
Corridors
$310,000 $320,000 $340,000 $350,000 $360,000 $380,000
Playground Shade $520,000 $540,000 $560,000 $580,000 $610,000 $320,000
Soft Surface Trails-
NEW ASSETS $2,200,000 $22,300,000 $ - $38,440,000 $ - $19,010,000
Civic Center $14,220,000 $46,980,000 $6,690,000 $6,960,000 $26,060,000 $18,070,000
Parks Total $19,850,000 $71,940,000 $17,900,000 $57,060,000 $38,190,000 $49,370,000
Transportation Bike Share & Bike
Racks $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $120,000 $120,000 $130,000
Downtown
Beautification
Corridors
$2,090,000 $2,170,000 $2,260,000 $2,350,000 $2,450,000 $2,540,000
Livable Streets $420,000 $430,000 $450,000 $470,000 $490,000 $510,000
Missing Sidewalks
and Bikeway Gaps $1,140,000 $1,620,000 $3,600,000 $1,290,000 $1,580,000 $1,710,000
Neighborhood
Byways $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,250,000 $2,340,000 $2,430,000 $2,530,000
New Street Signals &
Roundabouts $520,000 $3,240,000 $3,600,000 $12,990,000 $11,590,000 $3,800,000
Urban Trails $9,520,000 $10,280,000 $7,310,000 $3,580,000 $6,270,000 $9,870,000
Vision Zero $ - $5,410,000 $ - $5,850,000 $18,250,000 $6,330,000
West-East
Connections $14,220,000 $46,980,000 $6,690,000 $6,960,000 $26,060,000 $18,070,000
Transportation
Total $30,090,000 $72,410,000 $26,280,000 $35,940,000 $69,240,000 $45,480,000
New Total $55,310,000 $160,230,000 $55,020,000 $96,150,000 $107,600,000 $95,570,000
Grand Total $222,010,000 $302,060,000 $198,770,000 $255,670,000 $269,820,000 $254,580,000
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 59
Appendix III Analytics Reports
This appendix includes supporting analytical reports used to inform capital
planning, funding decisions, and long-term investment strategies. These
materials provide additional context regarding historical trends, current
budget conditions, and project-level information to support informed
decision-making and public transparency.
a. Historical Actual Funding
This section provides historical information on capital funding levels over
prior years. It is intended to show how the City has invested in capital
assets over time and to provide context for understanding current funding
needs and future planning considerations.
Historal Funding
Row Labels 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Bonds $21,455,027 $23,779,454 $90,284,342 $24,366,000 $8,672,609 $55,355,027
Buildings $379,454 $12,100,000 ($3,000,000) $3,237,371
Parks $955,027 $23,531,342 $24,366,000 $5,719,428 $50,382,140
Transportation $20,500,000 $23,400,000 $54,653,000 $5,953,181 $1,735,516
Class C $2,046,329 $2,716,306 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,250,000 $10,500,000
Transportation $2,046,329 $2,716,306 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,250,000 $10,500,000
General Fund $10,979,190 $12,175,065 $24,873,605 $29,515,760 $37,479,652 $14,784,549
Buildings $4,928,710 $2,295,373 $10,298,588 $6,329,046 $8,415,300 $3,333,557
Parks $1,164,973 $3,957,609 $4,618,108 $2,509,275 $8,101,996 $8,751,379
Transportation $4,885,507 $5,922,083 $9,956,909 $20,677,439 $20,962,356 $2,699,613
Impact Fees $2,962,282 $ 7,991,970 $13,766,533 $6,363,496 $19,174,800 $9,912,470
Buildings $587,282 $130,275
Parks $500,000 $7,506,950 $9,133,198 $2,728,850 $19,174,800 $ 8,800,000
Transportation $1,875,000 $485,020 $4,633,335 $3,504,371 $1,112,470
Transportation Fund $8,695,770 $4,852,000 $8,000,000 $7,905,177 $13,800,000 $11,151,000
Parks $1,967,000 $1,038,500 $200,000 $200,000
Transportation $6,728,770 $3,813,500 $8,000,000 $7,905,177 $13,600,000 $10,951,000
Grand Total $46,138,598 $51,514,795 $139,924,480 $71,650,433 $83,377,061 $101,703,046
* includes an anticipated $49 million Public Lands Bond tranche.
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND60
b. Projected Revenue
This section summarizes revenue information related to capital investment
and funding capacity. It is intended to provide context regarding the
resources available to support capital projects and to illustrate trends in
both ongoing and one-time funding sources. Note the table only shows
major ongoing funding sources and not one-time funding sources
such as bonds.
c. Capital Asset Projects–Remaining Existing Budget
This section identifies capital asset projects with remaining budget
authority from prior appropriations. It is intended to improve transparency
regarding previously approved funding, provide context for project delivery
timelines, and help inform future capital budgeting and funding decisions.
Forecasted
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Class C $4,500,000 $4,590,000 $4,680,000 $4,770,000 $4,870,000 $4,970,000
General Fund $20,000,000 $20,400,000 $20,810,000 $21,230,000 $21,650,000 $22,080,000
Impact Fees $9,800,000 $10,000,000 $10,200,000 $10,400,000 $10,610,000 $10,820,000
Transportation Fund $9,000,000 $9,180,000 $9,360,000 $9,550,000 $9,740,000 $9,930,000
Grand Total $43,300,000 $44,170,000 $45,050,000 $45,950,000 $46,870,000 $47,800,000
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 61
Capital Asset Project Category Budget*
Buildings $18,232,400
Facilities Capital Asset Renewal and Replacement $13,156,380
New/Improvements Facilities $2,545,913
New/Improvements Fire $171,422
Operational Maintenance $877,907
Other Capital Maintenance $1,480,779
Parks $89,816,884
New/Improvements Parks $70,696,670
Operational Maintenance $2,686,963
Other $338,642
Other Capital Maintenance $4,622,028
Pavilions $1,107,117
Playgrounds/Courts $4,355,605
Public Lands ADA Compliance $2,684,929
Public Lands Irrigation Improvements $1,197,932
Public Restrooms $2,127,000
Transportation $103,883,802
Alleyways $933,247
Bridge Maintenance $1,142,573
Bridge Reconstruction $7,835,794
Complete Street Un-related to Overlay or Reconstruction $4,944,895
Livable Streets $4,999,898
Neighborhood Byways $2,171,263
New/Improvements Engineering $8,600,806
New/Improvements Transportation $4,183,760
Other $684,608
Other Capital Maintenance $43,905
Public Way Concrete $988,954
Street Overlay $7,668,823
Street Reconstruction $36,608,026
Traffic Safety/Safer Crossings/Zero Fatalities $5,923,468
Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade $6,395,942
Transit $5,309,107
Transportation Corridor $5,448,733
Grand Total $211,933,086
* as of 03/31/2026. Includes $51 million of encumbered funds.
Does not include anticipated $49 million Public Lands Bond tranche.
Includes General Fund, Funding our Future, Transportation Fund, Class C, Impact Fees and Bonds
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND62
Appendix IV List of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances,
Master Plans and Qualifying Technical Studies
This appendix compiles the principal policies, resolutions, ordinances,
master plans, and qualifying technical studies that guide the City’s capital
planning and investment decisions. It provides the policy and planning
framework that supports the Capital Asset Plan and demonstrates how
proposed investments align with adopted City direction, legal requirements,
and long-term planning objectives.
Policies, Resolutions, and Ordinances
This section identifies the governing policies, resolutions, and ordinances
that shape the City’s approach to capital planning, project eligibility,
funding decisions, and program administration. Together, these documents
establish the legal and policy framework for consistent, transparent, and
accountable capital investment.
a. City Council Resolutions
i. Guiding Document for CIP - Resolution 29 of 2017
ii. Allocation of Funds from the Cost Overrun Account - Resolution
65 of 2004
i. Policy for Preparing Master Plans - Resolution 14 of 2020
b. Code of Ordinances
i. Establishing City Boards and Commissions Chapter 2.07 - City
Boards and Commissions
ii. CDCIP Board Bylaws Chapter 2.33 - Community Development and
Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board
iii. Impact Fee Policy Chapter 18.98 - Impact Fees
iv. Disposition of Proceeds Chapter 2.58 – City Owned Real Property
v. Dedicating Private Streets to the Public Chapter 14.54 – Dedication
of Private Streets to Public Ownership
vi. Complete Streets Policy Chapter 14.06 - Accommodation of
Bicyclists and Pedestrians at All City Owned Transportation Facilities
in the Public Right of Way
vii. Creation of Capital Projects Fund within the Recreation Enterprise
Fund Chapter 15.28 - Capital Projects Fund
viii. Allocation to public art and responsibilities of Arts Council Design
Board in regards to CIP Chapter 2.30 - Salt Lake Art Design Board
ix. Responsibilities of Parks, Natural Lands, Trails and Urban Forestry
Advisory Board in regards to CIP Chapter 2.94 - Parks, Natural
Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 63
x. Public Facility investments within Historic Districts Chapter
21A.06.050 - Historic Landmark Commission
xi. Information needed for City Council to make decisions Chapter
2.04 – Office of the Mayor
c. Administrative Policies
i. Sustainable Infrastructure Policy Chapter 56.3 - Air Quality &
Climate Change
ii. Capital Asset Planning Committee Chapter 57.10 – Capital
Asset Management
iii. Debt Financing Management Practices Chapter 53.11 –
Debt Financing
iv. Impact Fee Policy Chapter 57.11 - Impact Fee Expenditures
d. State Legislation
i. Utah’s State Impact Fee Act Chapter 11.36a - Utah Impact Fee Act
Master Plans and Adopted Plans
This section includes the adopted master plans and related planning
documents that help identify infrastructure needs, establish community
priorities, and support project eligibility for capital funding. These plans
help ensure that capital investments are aligned with broader City goals,
long-range planning efforts, and adopted policy direction.
The City’s General Plan, Plan Salt Lake, sets the big-picture vision of Salt
Lake City. The collection of plans below focusses on specific details either
at a smaller geographic area or subject matter.
a. Engineering Division: Engineering-Six-Year-Plan-Executive-Summary-
2022-Transmittal
b. Planning Division: https://www.slc.gov/planning/general-plans
c. Transportation Division: https://www.slc.gov/transportation/
plans-studies
d. Public Lands Department: Public Lands Master Plan and Qualifying
Study List
CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND64