Transmittal - 7/4/2021JACQUELINE M . BISKUPSKI
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Marcia L. White
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
TO: Salt Lake City Council
Charlie Luke, Chair
Date Received: 1/d-r:ffxa-~ ~1
Date sent to Council:~ i; ~1
DATE:Qc-h>bei.. r f Jo (C{
FROM: Jennifer McGrath, Department of Community & Neighborhoods, Deputy Director
t
s PLNPCM2018-00468-Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation
STAFF CONTACT: Anna Anglin, Principal Planner, anna.anglin@slcgov.com (801) 535-
6050
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance to vacate the Fern Subdivision alley, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Kathleen Bratcher, a property owner residing at 1019 East Logan Ave. has initiated a petition to vacate
an alley known as the Fern Subdivision Alley to the west and north of her property. The alley runs
north along the western portion of the applicant's property line for approximately 126'. Then runs 336'
east to the eastern edge of 1053 E. Logan A venue. Then runs south between 1053 E. and 1059 E. Logan
Ave. 126'. The alley is recorded on the Fern Subdivision plat. The alley is adjacent to 1059 E Logan
A venue and property to the north fronting on Wood A venue neither of which are part of this subdivision.
The petitioner originally asked that just the alley adjacent to her property be vacated, however, when
the application went through departmental review, it was recommended the entire alley be vacated due
to lack of use and multiple encroachments on the alley. Vacating the entire alley follows the city
preference for disposing of an entire alley. Because the application was changed to vacate the
entire alley by the City, if approved by the City Council, the City will provide the property
description for the alley. In addition, the City installed a sewer main for 1059 East Logan Avenue
in the east arm of the alley. To allow access to the sewer, the City will write an easement for it to
remain when ownership is transferred to the abutting property at 1053 East Logan Avenue.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445
P .O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY , UTAH 84114-5487
WWW.SLC .GOV
TEL 801 .535 .7712 FAX 801 .535 .6269
The petition bears the signatures of over 80% of the propetiy owners as required by Section 14.52.030
A.1 of City Ordinance and meets the Policy Considerations for Closure, Vacation, or Abandonment of
City Owned Alleys: (14.52.020) of the Salt Lake City Ordinance due to lack of use. The platted alley is
not used as an alley and there is no sign that it physically exists. Encroachments into the space make it
impassable. In addition, Plamting Cmmnission found that the petition meets the eight (8) factors found
in Section 14.52.030B: Processing Petitions -Public Hearing and Recommenda tion.fi-om the Planning
Commission.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of petition was sent to the Sugar House Community Council on July 18 , 2018. No
comments were received.
• Planning Division Open House held on October 18, 2018. Notice sent to all residents and
property owners within 300' of the alley.
• Planning Commission Public Hearing held on June 12,2019.
RELEVANT ORDINANCES:
14.52.020: Policy Considerations for Closure, VACATION or Abandonment of City
Owned Alleys: The City will not consider di sposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in
part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at
least one of the following policy considerations:
A. Lack ofUse: The City's legal interest in the propetiy appears of record or is reflected
on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site inspection that the alley
Page 12
does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it
unusable as a public right-of-way.
B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is sub stantially contributing to crime,
unlawful activity or unsafe conditions, public health probl ems, or blight in the
sunounding area.
C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a po siti ve urban
design element.
D . Community Purpo se: The Petitioners are proposing to r estrict the general public
from use of the alley in favor of a community u se, such as a neighborhood play area
or garden.
Salt Lake City Code, Section 14.52.030B: Processing Petitions -Public Hearing and
Recommendation from the Planning Commission.
B. Public Hearing And Recommendation From The Platming Cotmnissi on: Upon receipt
of a complete petition, a public hearing sh all be scheduled before the platming
commission to consider the proposed di sposition of the city owned alley propetiy.
Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the planning cotmniss ion shall make a
report and recommendation to the city council on the proposed di sposition of the subject
all ey propetiy. A positive recommendation should include an analysi s of the following
factors :
1. The city police dep artment, fire department, transportation division, and all
other relev ant city departrnent s and di v isions have no reasonable objection to the
proposed disposition of the propetiy;
2. The p e tition meets at least one of the policy considerations s tated above;
3 . Granting the petition will not deny so le access or required off street parking to
any property adjacent to the alley;
4. Granting the petiti on wi ll not r esult in an y property being landlocked;
5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the all ey propetiy which is
otherwise contrary to the policies of the city, including applicable master plans
and other adopted s tatements of policy which address, but which are not limited
to, mid-bl ock walkways , pedestrian paths , trails, and altemative tran sp ortation
u ses;
6. No opposing abutting propetiy owner intend s to build a garage requiring a ccess
from the property, or has made application for a building p ennit, or if such a
Page 13
pem1it has been issued, construction has been completed within twel ve (12)
months of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the city preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather
than a small segment of it; and
8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to
residences or for accessory uses.
These policies were evaluated in the Planning Commission staff repmt and considered by
the Pla~ming Commission (see Attachment E of the staff report) and forwarded a positive
recommendation to City Council.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4 .
5.
Page 14
Project Chronology
Notice of City Council Hearing
Planning Commission-June 12, 2019 Public Hea~·ing
A. Hearing Notice and News Paper Notice
B. StaffRepmt
C. Agenda and Minutes
Original Petition
Mailing List
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of20 19
(Vacating a city-owned a ll ey a bu tting properties located at 1597 and 1615 South 1000 East
Street and between 1019 and 1053 East Logan Avenue)
An ordinan ce vacating a n unnamed city-owned a ll ey abutting properties located at 1597
and 1615 So uth 1000 East Street and between 1019 and 105 3 East Logan A venue, pursuant to
Petition No. PLNPCM20 18-00468.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City P lanning Commission held a public hearing on June 12 ,
20 19 to consider a request made by Kathleen Bratc her , who owns property at 1019 East Logan
A ve nue ("Applicant") (Petit ion No. PLNPCM20 18-00468) on behal f herself and other property
owners to vacate an unnamed city-owned a ll ey; and
WHEREAS , at its June 12 , 2019 hearing, the planning commission vo ted in favor of
forwar ding a positi ve recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council; and
WHEREAS, the all ey in question appears on the Fern Subdivision plat recorded February
19, 1907 , but there is no evidence that the a lle y has ever been improved or used as an alley; and
WHEREAS, although several other lots ab ut the unnan1ed alle y, onl y those lots located at
1597 South 1000 East Street, 16 15 So uth 1000 East Street, 10 19 East Logan Avenue, 1025 East
Lo gan Avenue, 10 29 East Logan Avenue, 1033 East Logan Avenue, 1039 East Logan Avenue,
104 1 East Lo gan Avenue , 1049 East Logan Avenue, and 105 3 East Logan Avenue have
reversionary interests in the a ll ey i n the event that the c ity vacates the alley because those
abutt in g parcel s are in the Fern Subdivi sion and other abutting p arcel s are not. Thus, as
explain ed in Fries v . Martin, 154 P.3d 184 (Utah Ct. App. 2006), ownership ofthe alley would
re ve rt to only those abutt ing lots w ith in the s ubdi v is ion that created it upon vacation; and
WHEREAS , the city council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that the
city's interest in the city-owned alley described below is not presently necessary for use by the
public and that vacating that unnamed, city-owned a ll ey will not be adverse to the general
public's interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Vacating a City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley
abutting properties located at 1597 and 1615 South 1000 East Street and between 1019 and 1053
East Logan Avenue, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2018-00468, and which is
more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, hereby is vacated and declared not
presently necessary or available for public use.
SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above alley vacation is expressly made
subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every
description now loc ated on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to
the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or
rerouting said utilities, including the city 's water and sewer facilities. Said alley vacation is also
subject to any existing rights -of-way or easements of private third parties.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of
______ ,2019 .
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
2
Transmitted to Mayor on __________ _
Mayor's Action : ___ Approved. Vetoed. ----
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
B ill No. of20 19. ----
Publi shed: -------
Ordinance vacating alley I 019 to I 059 Logan Ave
3
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney 's Office
D•tt = l'f > 'M\f
By : Pau~emvro(Y Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of City-Owned Alley to be Vacated:
Beginning at the South East Corner of Lot 14 , FERN SUBDIVISION, as recorded at the S.L.
Co unty Recorders Office as Plat Entry Number: 2 18960, Book E, Page 030, a part of Lot 20,
Block 16 , Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 17,
Township 1 South, Range 1 East, Salt Lake Base & Meridian, thence following the west side of
an alley North 123.55 feet to the north line of FERN SUBDIVISION, thence following the north
side of said alley East 348 feet, thence following the east side of said alley South 123.55 feet to
the north line of Logan A venue, thence West 10 feet to the south east corner of Lot 1 of sai d
FERN SUBDIVISION, thence along the west side of the alley North 116.55 feet to the north east
corner of Lot 1 of said FERN SUBDIVISION, thence along the south side ofthe alley
West 328 feet to the north west corner of Lot 13 of sai d FERN SUBDIVISION, thence along the
east s ide of the alley South 116 .5 5 feet, to the south west corner of Lot 13 of said FERN
SUBDIVISION and the north line Logan Ave nue, thence West 10 feet to the south east corner of
Lot 14 of said FERN SUBDIVISION and the point ofbeginning. Contains 4 ,767 sq. ft. or 0.109
acres .
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Planning Commission Record
A. Original Notice and Postmark
B. Staff Report of June 12, 2019
C. Agenda and Minutes of June 12, 2019
4. Original Petition
5. Mailing List
Page Is
1. Project Chronology
Page 16
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PETITION: PLNPCM2018-00468-Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation
June 19 ,201 8
Jul y 18, 2018
July 18, 2018
August 16,2018
October 4, 2018
October 18, 2018
May 3 1,2019
May 31 ,2019
June 12 ,2019
Page 17
Petition for the alley vacation received by the Platming
Di v ision.
Petition assigned to Alma AI1glin, Principal Plrumer, for staff
analysis and processing.
Infonnation about the project was sent to the Chair of the
Sugar House Cmmnunity Council infonning them of the
petition.
The 45-day comment period for Recogniz ed Orgatlizations
ended. The SHCC Chair did not comment on the petition.
Issued notice to all abutting neighbors atld property owners
within 300 ' of the alley for open house on October 18, 2018.
Petition was presented at the Planning Divi sion Open House.
Public n oti ce posted on C ity and State websites and sent via
the Platming li st serve for the Planning Cmmnission meeting
of June 12, 20 19. Public heating notice mailed.
Public h earing notice sign with project infonnation at1d notice
of the Planning Commission public heating phys icall y posted
on the property.
Platming Conumssion Public Hearing. The Planning
Cmmnission reviewed the petition, conducted a public hearing
and voted unaninlously to forward a positive recommendation
to the City Council for the alley vacation request.
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
Page 18
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TI1e Salt Lake City Cow1cil is considering Petition PLNPCM2018-00468, a request by Kathleen
Bratcher to vacate the Fem Subdivision Alley. The platted alley is impassable due to numerous
encroaclm1ents and shows no sign of use as an alley. The westem portion runs 126 ' nmth and south the
westem side of 1019 East Logan A venue. The nmthem pmtion of the alley nms east and west 336'
from the applicant's prope1ty at 1019 East Logan A venue to 1053 East Logan A venue and then follows
the east property line of 1053 East Logan Avenue 126' nmth and south . The alley is recorded on the
Fem Subdivision and is adjacent to propetty on the nmth and east which are not part of the subdivi sion.
The subject property is located in the R -1-5000 zoning dishict and is located in council disbict 5,
represented by Erin Mendenhall.
As part of their study, the City Cow1 ci l is holding an advertised public hearing to receive conunents
regarding the petiti on. Dwing tlus heating, anyone desiring to address the City Council concetning tlus
issue will be given at1 oppottunity to speak. The heating will be held :
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
7:00p.m.
Room 315
City & Cow1ty Building
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah
If you h ave any questions relating to tills proposal or wo uld like to review the file, please call Anna
Anglin at 801-535-6050 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00p.m., Monday tlu·ough Friday or via
e-mail at atm a.anglin @s lc gov.com
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests
for reasonable accommodation, which may include altemate fonn ats, interpreters, at1d other
auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make
a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.conunents@ slcgov.com, 801 -535-
7600, or relay service 711.
Page 19
3A. Planning Commission-Original Notice and Postmark
Page l w
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING DIVISION
~~-~~_). 451 S STATE STREET ROOM 406 VJ
VJ
PO BOX 145480 :3
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 -5480
u
1-
VJ
0: u:
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
STATE t1AIL Cr6 /03/201'3
Anna Anglin-Salt Lake City Planning Division
PO Box 145480
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
, Jllu''IIP till 'Ill' rllui 11
·
11' ·" ''IJHJI I llll'lh'·'· I''''" I'
· Salt Lake City Planning Division
451 S St.:ltc Street, Room 406, PO Box 145480, Snit Lal<e City, Ut.:l h 841.14·5480
Salt L ake City Planning Commission Wednesday, June 12 ,2019,5:30 p.m.
City and County Building 451 S State Street, Room 326
A public hearing will be held ·on the following matter. Comments from the Applicant, City Staff
and the public will be taken.
Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation at approximately 1019 East Logan Avenue -
Kathleen Bratcher, who lives at 1 019 East Logan Avenue is proposing to vacate the
alley that is to the west and north of her property. The western portion runs 126' north
and south along her property line. The northern portion of the alley runs east and west
336' from the applicant's property to 1 053 E. Logan Avenue and then fqllows 1053 E.
Logan's eastern property line 126' north and south. The alley is recorded on the Fern .. · ·
Subdivision and is adjacent to property on the north that is not part of the subdivision .
The subject property is locate.d in the R-1-5000 zoning district and is located in council
district 5, represented by Erin Mendenhall . (Staff Contact: Anna Anglin at 801-535-6050
or anna.anglin@slcgov.com) Case Number PLNPCM2018-00468
S•lt Lake City Cor por a tion co mplies with all ADA guideline... People with disabilities may make rcqueslll for r eAsona bl e uecommodatlons n o Jatu tbon 48
hours in advance In order co a t tend this meeting. Acc omm odations may Include: alterna.tivc form au, Interpreters, and ot her a uxiliary a ids. This is an acce.5si blc
fullily, For odditlonlll meeting Info r mation, please sec www.lllegov.com or call80l-535-7757; TDD 53~2.20,
3B. Planning Commission Staff Report-June 12, 2019
Page 112
Staff Report
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTIY & NEIGHBORHOODS
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Anna Anglin, Principal Planner, 801-535-6050, anna.anglin@slcgov.com
Date: June 12, 2019
Re: PLNPCM2018-00468 -Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation-Between 1019 East and
and 1059 East Logan Avenue
ALLEY VACATION
PROPERTY ADDRESSES: The alley abuts nineteen (19) individual properties as follows:
1. 1019 East Logan Ave. (Petitioner's Property)
2-9. Logan Ave-1025; 1029; 1033; 1039; 1041; 1049; 153; and 1059
10-12. 1595; 1597; & 1615 S 1000 East
13-19. Wood Ave-1020; 1026; 1032; 1034; 1044; 105 and 1056.
MASTER PLAN: Central Community Master Plan
ZONING DISTRICT: R-1j5ooo -Single-Family Residential
REQUEST: Kathleen Bratcher, a property owner residing at 1019 East Logan Ave. has initiated a
petition to vacate an alley lmown as the Fern Subdivision Alley to the west and north of her property.
The alley runs north along the west ern portion of the applicant's property line for approximately 126'.
Then runs 336' east to the western edge of 1053 E. Logan Avenue. Then runs south between 1053 E.
and 1059 E. Logan Ave. 126 '. The alley is recorded on the Fern Subdivision and is adjacent t o1059 E
Logan Avenue and property to the north that is not part of this subdivision or any other subdivision.
The Planning Commission's role in this application is to provide a recommendation to the City Council
for the alley vacation request. The City Council will mal<e the final decision on this application.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings and analysis in this staff report, Planning Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the City Council
for the Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Subdivision Plat
B . Photos
Page 113
C. Project Narrative & Petition
D. Existing Conditions & Zoning
E. Analysis of Standards
F. Public Process and Comments
G. Department Review Comments
PROJECf DESCRIPTION:
The Fern Subdivison alley is highlighted on the aerial photo below in green. The alley is located north of
Logan Ave, and south of Wood Ave. at approximately 1600 South and between 1000 East and noo East
just north of the Sugar House area. The alley runs north to south along the western portion of the
applicant's property line and is about ten feet wide and 126' long. The portion of the alley that abuts the
north property line of the applicant's property runs 336' east to west to 1059 E. Logan Avenue and is
approximately seven feet wide. The alley right-of-way then follows north to south between 1053 E. and
1059 E. Logan Ave. and is 126' long and ten feet wide (10'). The alley is recorded on the Fern Subdivision
and is adjacent to property on the north that is not part of the subdivision or any other s ubdivision.
The applicant's reason for the request is due to a portion of the alley functioning as their driveway and
off-street parking. They were prompted to apply for the alley vacation after receiving notice from the Salt
Lake City Real Estate Services Division on April 20, 2018 that their driveway was half a portion of a
public alleyway. There is n o physical evidence of the alleys existence only what is on the subdivision plat
recorded in 1906. The applicant's narrative as well as the petition bearing the signature of abutting
property owners are included in Attachment C of this report. The small alley indicated on the aerial
photo below that appears to run east -west between 1595 and 1597 South 1000 East was vacated
February 8, 2000 and is not part of this application r equ est.
Page !14
KEY CONSIDERATIONS:
The key considerations listed below have been identified through the analysis of the project, n eighbor
and community input, and deparbnent review comments.
Consideration 1: Property Owner Consent
Section 14.52.030 A.1 specifies "The petition must bear the signatures of no less than eighty percent
(So%) of the neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property." There is a total of
nineteen (19) properties that abut the alley and seventeen (17) property owners signed the petition.
The property owners residing at 1025 and 1033 E Logan Avenue did not sign the petition in support
of vacating the alley but have not submitted or voiced any concerns to staff. In total, 89% of abutting
property owners have signed the petition in support of the vacation making this ordinance
requirement met.
This item is also addressed in Attachment C: Proiect Narrative & Petition and in Attachment E:
Analvsis of Standards .
Consideration 2: Creation/History of the Alley and Disposition ifVacated
The alley is recorded on the Fern Subdivision plat and the City lis t s it as a public alleyway and
r ecognizes it as City property. The Fern Subdivision was recorded as a plat in 1906. The parcels
that are part of the Fern subdivision a r e 1597 and 1615 S 1000 East and the eight properties that
are in-between the two north/south arms of the alley from 1019 thru 1053 East Lo gan Ave. The
parcels to the north adjacent to the alley and the property at 1059 East Logan Avenue all fall
outside of the recorded Fern subdivision plat.
According to the Salt Lake City Attorney's Office, alleys that are dedicated as part of a subdivision must
be conveyed to mvners within that subdivision if they are vacated. Case law in the Utah courts have
supported this position. This means the property owners adjacent to the alley on Wood Avenue and the
property at 1059 East Logan Avenue would not get a portion of the alley when it is vacated.
Any encroachments into the all ey by neighboring properties outside of the s ubdivision will n eed to b e
negotiated with the property owners Vlrithin the subdivision to split the alley property between them or
to convey it to the other party in whole or in part. This would be a private b·ansaction outside of the
purview of the City.
Consideration 3: Condition of the Alley
Approximately half of the western arm of the alley which is closest to Logan Ave (southern half) up to
the existing fence has been used as the applicant's driveway for many years. There are also m ature trees
and t elephone poles in this portion of the alley. At the fence line, the all ey has been incorporated into
the neighboring property at 1595 S 1000 East, who is also a part of the Fern Subdivision plat. It appears
Page 115
that the neighbor at 1615 S 1000 East shares the drive approach with 1019 E Logan Ave to access their
off-street parking as well . The curb cut is concrete and meets City standards. Both driveways are dirt
and covered in wood chips. The alley appears to be used as the driveway for 1019 E Logan Ave.
However, when the alley is vacat ed the western a rm Vlrill be split betw·een 1615 S. 1000 East and
1019 E Logan Ave. and between 1019 E Logan Ave . and 1597 S 1000 East for the northern portion
of the alley.
The eastern arm of the alley that runs between 1053 and 1059 East Logan Avenue has been
used as the driveway for 1053 East Logan Avenue and could potentially have some of their
detached garage encroaching into the alleyway. A portion of the 1059 East Logan Ave . house
app ears t o b e encr oaching into the alley as well. This will all need to be surveyed to fi nd out
wh ere the structures are in proximity to the property lines. Both the western and east ern
arms of the alley are partially utilized as driveways and have some encroachments into them.
In addition, Public Utilities st at ed there is a sewer lateral for 1059 E Logan Ave. that goes
through the alley and would either r equire that portion of the alley to be vacated in favor of
1059 E. or an easement needs to b e recorded.
The northern portion of the alley h as been incorporated into the adjacent neighbors' yards
and outdoor living areas. There are existing fences and accessory structures that are
encroaching into the alley by most adjacent properties. It appears that the garages at 1025 E
Logan Ave a nd 1050 E Wood Ave. may encroach into the alley way. There is no remaining
visible or physical evi dence of the alley's existence. (See attachment B)
The applicant originally requested that just the portion of the alley adjacent to their property be
vacat ed. But after reviewing the application and receiving feedback from the City Surveyor, along with
planning st aff visiting the location where the alley is located, we prompted the applicant to include the
entire alley to be vacat ed do to the number of encroachments. Vacating the entire alley is also in
keeping with the considerations when vacating an alley.
Consideration 4 : Future Public Uses for the Alley
One issue that comes up with proposals to vacate alleys are questions about the alley serving other
p otentially beneficial uses in the area. These elements could include trails for instance to help facilitate
alternative transportation and as a positive urban design element.
The Fern Subdivision is in the Central Community Master Plan. The future land use map designates
this area as Low Density Residential. The area is identified as the East Central South Neighborhood
and calls out to preserve and protect the existing low-density residential uses.
The alley runs east/west along the long axis of the block. Both Logan Avenu e and Wood Avenue have
existing s idewalks on both s ides of the street to facilitate east/west pedestrian traffic and ther e is no
public right of way that connects Wood Ave to Logan Ave. midblock. As such, this alley is not necessary
to create an alternative trail to connect 1000 E and 1100 E or Logan Ave to Wood Ave. Due to the width,
the alley would not meet city engineering standards for full vehicular access and, as such, would only
be considered for pedestrian or trail access, if it exist ed.
The alley runs through an established residential area that is made up of s ingle-family homes. There is
n o anticipated ch ange to this composition identified in the Central Community Master Plan and the
Page 116
area is unlikely to change significantly over time . The alley is no longer in physical existence and the
Master Pl a n supports the continuation oflow-density residential u ses for the area.
DISCUSSION:
The petition h as been reviewed against the City's policy considerations for alley closures located in
Chapter 14.52.020 as well as the analysis factors found in 14.52.030.B. The closure of the all ey m eets
all the analysis factors for an alley vacation. The all ey is curr ently used as the adjacent property owners
back yards and have fences along with some accessory structures encroaching into it. The closure is
supported by most adjacent property owners. City policies and the relevant Master Plan do not include
any policies that would oppose the closure of this alley. As such, staff is recommending that the
Planning Commission transmit a p ositive recommendation to the City Council for the alley vacation
for the following reasons:
1. The m ajority of the adjacent prope rty owners h ave signed the petition and support the
closure o f the alley.
2. It i s beneficial for the surrounding prope rty owners because most of tl1em have fenc es and
accessory buildings that would have to be moved or removed due to the alley
encroachments if the a lley were to remain in place.
3· The alley does not physically exist and is inco rporated into the private property of the
a djacent neighbors.
4· The Master Plan does n ot oppose to the closure of the alley.
NEXT STEPS:
Chapter 14.52 of the Salt Lake City Code regulat es the disposition of City ovvned alleys . When evalu ating
r equests to close or vacate public alleys, the City considers whether or not the continued use of the
property as a public alley is in the City's best interest. Noticed public hearings are h eld before both the
Planning Commission and City Council to consider the potential adverse impacts created by a proposal.
Once the Planning Commission h as reviewed the request, their recommendation is forwarded to the
City Council for consideration. The City Council has final decision authority with r es pect to all ey
vacations and closures.
Page [17
ATIACHMENT A: FERN SUBDIVISION PLAT
' .
-·· .--!·-·-··~·.:.• ....... --~
. i Tenln Etui.Jirul 1
;...., .Jilin 'i.~-7-!!-• '
I
t
..
,.
: . . ' I
Page l18
ATTACHMENTB:PHOTOS
Alle)"·vay looking South at 1019 E Logan
Page !19
Alley looking north at 1019 E Lo gan Av e.
Page 12o
Alleyway in between 1053 and 1059 E. Logan Ave.
Page 121
Northern arm of alley running along the property lines between 1019 E and 1053 E
Logan Ave. Adjacent to the properies north facing Wood Ave .
Page 122
(Facing west)
Page 123
Facing Nmth at 1053 E Logan
Page 124
ATTACHMENT C: PROJECT NARRATIVE & PETITION
On the following pages are the project narrative and the petition signed by 17 of the required 19 owners
of property abutting the alley requesting the clos ure of the Fern Subdivision Alley. There wer e two
a djacent property owners (at 1025 and 1033 E Logan Avenue) that did not sign the petition. These
individuals have not voiced any opposition to the closure however.
Page !25
Olga Pinney
Real Property Agent, SLC Corp
4S1 South State Street, Rm 42S
Sa lt Lake City, UT 84114-5640
Re : Salt Lake City Right-of-Way (Alley) Encroachment
Parcei#16-17-2S3-019
Dear Ms. Pinney and SLC Corp Office of Real Estate,
May 20,2018
My name is Kathleen Bratcher. My husband, Richard Kerr, and I own the home on 1019 East Logan Ave.
We are sending this letter explaining why we are requesting an alley closure. This request is being made
in response to a letter we received on May 05, 2018, from t he office of Olga Pinney.
We purchased this property August 1999 and have been using t he half-an-alley next to our home as off-
street parking. One of our neighbors who grew up in this neighborhood, Sylvia Rim mach, to ld us in the
sixty years that she has lived in this neighborhood, that she has witnessed all residents of this home use
the same half-an-alley as an off-street parki ng space. I understand now that we were unknowingly
encroaching on an alley and are wanting to remedy the situation as soon as possible. We had no ill
i ntent.
When I use the term, "ha lf-an-alley," it is because the north side of the through-alley is already closed .
The alley has not been a usable piece of through traffic for at least sixty yea rs. Richard and I are in an
agreement with all our surrounding neighbors and are willing to split the property within the Salt lake
City's existing guidelines.
I have included the signed , "Pe tition to Vacate the Alley," al ong with the outlined and dotted Sidewell
map.
We, (our neighbors, and Rich ard and I) would like to replace the aged fence at some point. Th e new
fence will r eflect the new property lines, as defined by the office of Salt lake City, Rea l Estate Services.
Please feel free to contact me, Kathleen Bratcher at (801) 879-6924 if you have any questions or
concerns. Again, we look forward to resolving this situation.
Thank you for your conside ration in this matter.
Kath l een Bratcher
1019 East Logan Ave
Salt Lake City, UT 8410S
Page 126
Anna Angl in
Planning Counter
4515outh State Street, Rm 215
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5640
Re: Salt lake City Right-of-Way (Alley) Encroachment
Parce l 1116-17-253-019
Case number PLNPCM2018-00468
Dear Ms. Anna Anglin and SLC Corp Planning Counter,
May 15,2019
My name is Kathleen Bratcher. My husband, Richard Kerr, and I own the home on 1019 East logan Ave. We are
sending this letter explaining why we are requesting an alley closure . This request is being made in response to a
letter we received on May 05, 2018, from the office of Olga Pinney.
We submitted an Alley Vacation or Closure Application last year, dated May 03,2018, with the required signatures
of our neighbors along the logan Ave alley. In August 2018, we received an email from Anna Anglin requesting
more Information, which I collected and submitted in person to Ms. Anglin. Once it was approved, our neighbors
and I received a postcard from the Salt lake Planning Division notifying and inviting stakeholders to the monthly
open house, scheduled on Oct. 18, 2018.
I attended the open house, as did one of my neighbors, Joshua B. Lenart, who lives on the next street north of us,
on Wood Ave. He was concerned that he would have to demolish his garage If his property line was moved. At the
meeting, Ange la suggested we have the entire length of the logan Ave alley surveyed from 1000 East to 1100 East
by the same engineering firm who did our initia l survey, when we submitted the original application for closure. In
talkin g to the fir m, it was made very dear that the cost of such survey is considerably difficult and cost prohibitive.
We still need a way to illustrate that there are long-standing structures that were built over sixty years ago,
assuming without the knowledge of Salt lake Ci ty Corp.
We purchased this property August 1999 and have been using the half-an-alley next to our home as off-street
parking. One of our neighbors who grew up In this neighborhood, Sylvia Rim mach, told us in the sixty years that
she has lived in this neighborhood, that she has witnessed all of residents of this home use the same half-an-alley
as an off-street parking space. I understand now that we were unknowingly encroaching on an alley and are
wanting to remedy the situation. We had no ill intent.
When I use the term, "half-an-alley," it is because the north side of the through-alley i s already dosed. And ha s
been for at least sixty years. Richard and I are In an agreement with all our surrounding neighbors and are willing
to split the property within the Sa lt l ake City's existing guidelines.
We, (our neighbors, and Richard and I) would like to replace the aged fence at some poi nt. The new fence will
reflectthe new property lines, as defined by the office of Salt Lake City, Real Estate Servi ces. Plea se f eel free to
contact me, Kathleen Bratcher at (801) 879-6924 if you have any questions or concerns. Again, we look forward to
resolving this situation.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Signature on File
Kathleen Bratcher
1019 East l ogan Ave
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Page 127
PETITION TO VACATE OR CLOSE AN AllEY
r~ame of Applican t :
Kath leen A . Bratcher
Address of Applicant :
_1019 East Logan Ave Pa rce l #16-17-253-019
Date: 0 h I D ~ I t 0 r Cb
-------------------------------------
As an owner of property adja ce nt t o the alley, I agre e t o the propose d vacati on or cl osu re. t understand t hai if my
property is a commerci al business o r a renta l p ropt:>rty w ith more than three {3) dwelling units, I w ill be requ i red to pay
fair market va lue for my half of t h e alley .
Da te ....,PrintNcme Addr ess /L( 11W ature
• ~~~~~f.~R. C;rvf r ~£fc[ 5 I 000 (115~•gno ruf#h Cxr(t s~J -It[
J;>•-J-/!Uark./JMAU !tl«d t :-""j750./ccrJ{;. "~o'f!/'tl~ ,;-/s-Jy
~ ... ~~~ ~~;E.W~t\;~:~~J :~P .~t~
~. --:;;~?.?.~e-_ID ~9 /.,c;v,..,J Avf? _ {~ /VI~~'J , ~C>_l_~--\) g P -,.,l !-lome Add resc S•gna~ Dote ~f> ~/Jb"'-tq&.J t ~li2 ~1tX~-
~-% i[~\ fu u.,,.,,!0,).~5~•j "" Avt-"'"""" ---':a/;1-{t:z_o(_~ __
~ ~ ~ .. lkt> \L-aUL: .,J,?,L ~--loe>...LJc.., ALU..(\1=-.tfo_._._g y..!L..Se --f-/.l'hi--HCI.~
io ~~rt.le~2-f1 _9t):ll 5•gnuum onre ojt:z-/Jg r: ~ 16{;~<;?,. /U' t1 c< ~A;:( ,./ ~:;~z-d p__
~ ftdfj ;nh~y -/££1'--IHAIV ~ ,,; j.2z/?J1&_
~ :[e£t. iva,un!ld~,.)2_ll-i~, .... ~d::z--Jb7jlo!f_
S -printNa-;;,;--------Addrf!;._H __ -------s;on o rur ~-~---ua!e
~
Upd a t~d 7/1/17
·-.r. .
Page 128
)
'. ' .,
Name of Applicant:
i<r:R.L _
As an owner of property adjacent t o the alley, I agree to th e proposed vacation or closure . I understand that If my
prop erty is a com mercial busine ss or a rental property with more t han three (3) dwelling units, I will be requ ired t o pay
fa ir market value for my half of the alley.
Print Nome Address Signature Dote ·
() J .Da te Cv'l · 1. ~£. . oJ_/ ~.,)J_;f~
_, ___ ___;::'t_/~:-Ll "U't!J(/-f--~-
S/gnoture ~ oav
~ ?hi fK/10/t%:'.
---· Print Name Address
Othr\q ~\tw I Ot;y 6 vlt!o J Ave
Prin t Name Address ( wiu. 1 ~ IDW~I> Orv '%~-fM "'cxr)
Print Name Address
Signature
1
A.C)1.Jo/
WAJh/sr~l
Signature
1
·------·--------____..L.-~ -----------
Upda ted 7/1/17
Page 129
I
I
I
Ap ril30. 20 18
Richard Kerr and Kat hl een 11ratdwr
IO IQ E Logan Ave .
Sah Lake Cit y. UT &.J I 06
Rc : Sa h Loke City Ri ght -nf-\\'ay (A ile)') Enc rouc hm ent
Pnrcd /116-17-2 53-0 19
Dear Mr. KeJT & Mrs. !:Irate her:
111'1'-\R r:l!l-:1"·1 ·ll'U)nll'NHY
"'"' :>; I:H ; llllliiU·IO(}IJS llrli"SI\"1 . .-\:-;1\ '\Eit;HBORIIOO[)
m.n:J.oPMI·.l\1
1:1 \I I~ 1'-\TE Sf.ll\1\f.S
This lcllcr is ''Till en in regnrds to the propr:rt) lm:atcd at 10 I 9 Eas t LO!:!IIl Ave nu e . It ha s Cl>m .: tll
ou r att ention tlwt un encroac hm ent in to the public ri ght-o f-woy (alle y) exist nt the nbove referenced
property. In asmu c h as )OU do not haven CO ill ract for the private usc of public propcny. publ ic 11ay
cn c n>achrncnt s an: rc gul at cd . lkcnscd and onl y a llcmed hy 11rillc 11 nt!J~cmem . 1\C are seeking your
cooperati on to re so lve th is iss ue .
Until this is resolved . yo ur cncn>a chments nre co nsidered illeg,ol per c it y ordina nce ~ 18 .3:!.125 and
furthe r action wi ll be taken b) the Ci1y if not resolved im med iatel y. If you ha ve any lJUCS tion s
regarding thi s notice ph:asc contact the Salt Lake C ity Re al Estate Se rvices at your earliest
corwl:'nien ce so we may ossis t you .
~ Olga Pi nnc)
Renl Prope11)' Agent
Sa lt Luke C ity Cor poration
Rc a 1 Esc ate Se n ice s
(80 1)535-7184
OILm.~esh:~ll' ~cpm
Enclos ure(s)
"r s . • ~~-~~ · S•
Page l3o
A'ITACHMENT D: EXISTING CONDITIONS & ZONING
ADJACENT lAND USE
The property lies within a r esidential area. All properties that are adjacent to the alley and in the
immediate vicinity to the west of 1000 East are zoned R-1/SOOO-Single Family Reside ntial. To the
east of the alleyway, the zoning b eco mes RB -Residential Business and is dominated by retail uses and
development. This is shown on the zoning map below.
None of the property owners h ave indicated a n ee d to access their rear yard via the alley.
Page 131
Proposed Fern
Subdivision Alley to be
vacated
~I
p
t
ATIACHMENT E: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
14.52.020: Policy Considerations for Closure, VACATION or Abandonment of City
Owned Alleys: The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part,
unless it r eceives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of
the following policy considerations:
E. Lack of Use: The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is
reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site inspection
that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way
that r enders it unusable as a public right -of-way.
F. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime,
unlawful activity or unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the
surrounding area.
G. Urba n Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban
design element.
H. Community Purpose: The Petitione rs are proposing to restrict the general public
from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play
area or garden.
Discussion:
The application leans toward Policy Consideration A-Lack of use as the main driving factor for
the alley vacation request There is n o visible evidence of an alley at this location. There are trees,
fences, and other structures where the alley i s described to be and is now used as part of the adjacent
n eighbor's backyard areas.
Staff routed this petition to the Salt Lake City Engineering Department (SLCPD) for comments and it
was recommended the entire alley be vacated. The original application was to vacate only the portion
of the alley adjacent to the applicant's property. But due to the alley no l onger being functional, it is
r ecommended the entire all ey be vacated.
Finding: The alley m eets the requirements to be fully vacated due to lack of use. It is evident that the
alley has not functioned as one for many years now and there is no need to preserve a right -of-way . All
property owners access their off-street parking from the street and the alley itself has been incorporated
as a portion for the adjacent property's backyard.
Salt Lake City Code, Section 14.52.030B: Processing Petitions-Public Hearing and
Recommendation from the Planning Commission.
Upon re ceipt of a complete petition, a public h earing shall be scheduled before the Planning
Commission to consider the proposed disposition of the City owned alley property. Following the
conclusion of the public h earing, the Planning Commission shall make a report and recommendation
to the City Council on the proposed disposition of the subjec t alley property. A positive
recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors:
Page 132
Factor Finding Rationale
1 . The City Police Department, Fire
Department, Transportation
Division, and all other relevant City
Departments and Divisions h ave
no objection to the proposed
disposition of the p roperty;
2 . The p etition meets at least one of
the policy considerations stated
above;
3 · The petition must not deny sole
access or required off-street
parking to any adjacent property;
4· Th e petition will not result in a ny
property being landl ocked;
5· The disposition of the alley
property will not result in a use
which is other wise co ntrary to the
policies of the City, including
applicable master plans and other
adopted statements of policy
which address, but which are not
limit ed to, mid-block '"~rays,
pedestrian paths, trails, and
al t ernative transportation uses;
Page 133
Complies with
conditions
Co m pli es
Complies
Co m p lies
Complies
Staff requested input from pertinent City
Departments and Divisions. Comments
were received from Public Utilities,
Transportation and Engineering. The Salt
Lake City Surveyor noted that there is no
functioning alley in existence at this location
and the entire alley should be vacated and
incorporated into the adjacent p r operties.
However , a legal description written b y a
licensed surveyor for the entire alleyway is
required when application is submitted with
the City's Real Estate Service grou p . In
addition, the sewer lateral for 1059 E Logan
Ave which is in the alley right-of-way will
need t o be addressed through an agreed
easement or mvnership will need to be
conveyed to them. (See attachment G).
The proposed all ey closure satisfi es the Lack
of Use poli cy considerations of 1 4 .52.020 for
the p etit ion to b e p rocessed. See t h e
discussion and findi ngs in the previous
section of this report fo r more d etails.
None of the properties that abut the alley
appear to use it for access to their off-street
parking or access to their property, aside
from 1019 E Logan Ave; 1615 S 1000 East,
an d 1053 E Logan Ave . As such, none will be
denied vehicle access due t o the closure of
the alley .
No prop erties wo uld be re n de red l andlocked
by this pr oposal.
The petitioner is requesting closure of the
alleyway to come into compliance with the
City Real Estate Service group. The method
of disposition for low density residential
areas is to vacate the alley to properties
adjacent to it that are '"rithin the same
recorded subdivision. The neighbors to the
n orth are not in the same subdivision. The
alley in its entirety wo ul d be given to the
houses facing Logan Street and 1615 S 1000
E and 1597 S 1000 East and then
incorporated into their backyard as they are
currently being used. The applicant and
6. No opposing abutting property
owner intends to build a garage
requiring access from the property,
or has made application for a
building permit, or if such a permit
has been issued, construction has
been completed ·within 12 months
of issuance of the building permit;
7. The petition furthers the City
preference for disposing of an
entire alley, rather than a small
segment of it; and
8. The alley is not necessary for actual
or potential rear access to
residences or for accessory uses.
NOTES:
Page 134
Complies
Complies
Complies
property ovvner at 1615 S 1000 East v.rill need
to come to an agreement and address the
current off-street parking arrangement
through ovmership or easement.
No abutting property owners have opposed
the alley vacation. No applications for a
permit have been made.
The applicant initially requested a partial
closure to the alley that is in adjacent to their
west property lines. However, the City
Engineering Division stated that since there
is no physical evidence of the alley's
existence, it should be entirely vacated to
reflect the current physical use of the land.
The application was changed to complete
vacation of the alley.
The all ey has ceased to be used for functional
access to the back of properties and no
property owners have indicated that the access
is necessary for that purpose. The exception is
for the applicant's property at 1019 E Logan
Ave, 1615 S 1000 East, and 1053 E Logan Ave.
ATIACHMENT F: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS
Public Notice, Meetings, Comments
The foll owin g is a list of publi c meetings that have b een h eld, a nd other p ubli c input opportunities,
r elated t o the proposed project:
• Notice of the proj ect a nd r e qu est for co mments sent to the Ch a ir of the Sugar H o use
Co mmunity Council o n July 18, 2018 in order t o soli cit comm ent s .
• Staff did n ot receive any comments from the Suga r House Community Council
• Staff held a n open h ou s e on October 18 , 2018 a nd s ent n oti ce t o all r es iden ces and
property owners within 300' of the alley . There was o n e concern r aised at the open h ouse
b y the prop erty owner a t 1026 E Wood Ave . He wasn 't sur e if his accessory b u il ding was
in the alley right-of-way (see attached)
• The 45-day recogni zed organization co mment period expired on August 16 , 2018
Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included:
• Public h earing n otice maile d on: May 3 1 , 2019 ,
• Public h earing n otice sign p osted on the p roperty: May 3 1 , 2 0 19
• Public n otice p ost ed on Ci ty an d Stat e webs ites & Pl a nning Divisi on lis t serve: June 1 ,
2 019
Page 135
OPEN HOUSE
PUBLIC COMMENT FORM
October 18, 2018
PlnllDing nn d Zoning Divis ion
Department of Conununity and Economic
Development
Logan Street Alley Vacation-PLNPCM2018-00468
Name: 'Jr,GkJ V .f-(__ etJfb.\
Address:
SL.C. u '(
I
Phone: ~-=E-mail
Comments:
Ra:.:.J t:o!·c'l;c:.I;:> ONcC ,~ate W r
.:J:S V~CATfL;> 5o nfr..-T L.YoW A~
Ldof"];l Les,:::Y vVV;:R. ~~.~--sn_A/3 .T..J~SIR~(ve_cC"""
e_, , C :-e:A (5 ,/{) s ~Tc...
Please provide y u co ntact in fo rma · n so we can notify you of other m lings or hearings on thls issue. You
may submit this sheet before the end of the Open House, or you can provide your comments via e-mail at
anna.anglin@s lcgov.com or via mail at th e following address: Anna Anglin, Salt Lake City Planning D iv ision,
PO Box 145480, Sal t L ake City, UT 84114-5480. ----11~¥-You
r ~
Page 136
ATIACHMENT G: DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
The proposed alley closure request was sent out for internal review. The following comments
were received:
Engineering -Public Way Assets (Victoria Ostradicky)
This alleyway is not passable by either a car or by walking. Looking at the aerial view
of the alley, it seems to me that almost everybody is encroaching into the alley. So, to
clear it, \•vhy don't we close the whole alley. If we don't, because it is encroachment
into public way, we would have to send everybody a letter telling them that they are
encroaching into public right of way. This would create a lot of work for the property
management and also make some people upset. People who don't agree with a
vacation, they would have to think twice, if they are encroaching. Also, if this "'rill go
through, they need the legal description written by a licensed surveyor. The one
included in the document wouldn't do.
Public Utilities (Jason Draper)
No utility issues '"rith the proposed alley vacation around 1019 E Logan. If the entire
alley is vacated, the re is a sewer lateral for 1059 E Logan that goes through the alley
and would either require that portion of the alley to be vacated in favor of 1059 or an
easement needs to be recorded.
Transportation (Michael Barry)
Transportation does not object to clos ing the alley.
Fire Code (Ted Itchon)
The property has fire depa rtment access from Logan Ave and the closure would not be a
hardship.
Page 137
3C. Planning Commission Agenda & Minutes for June 12, 2019
Page 138
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
In Room 326 of the City & County Building
June 12, 2019, at 5:30 p.m.
(The order of the items may change at the Commission's discretion)
FIELD TRIP-The field trip is scheduled to leave at 4:00 p.m.
DINNER-Dinner will be served to the Planning Commissioners and Staff at 5:00 p.m. in Room 126 of
the City and County Building. During the dinner break, the Planning Commission may receive training
on city planning related topics, including the role and function of the Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30PM IN ROOM 326
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MAY 22,2019
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Subdivision/Planned Development Amendment at approximately 1570 S Main -Moda on Main -
Brock Loomis of J.F. Capital is re questing app ro va l from the C ity to create an 11-unit residential
subdivision for the previously approved Planned Development at 1570 S. Ma in. The configuration of
two multi-family buildings with a combined total of 11 units has not changed, however each unit is now
being proposed on its own sellable lot with shared common space. The pr oject requ ires approval for
the amended Planned Development and the subdivision. The following two petitions are associated
with this request:
a. Preliminary Subdivision Plat -A request to subdivide and reconfigure three parcels into 11 new
parcels w ith shared common yard and parking areas. Case number PLNSUB2019-00133
b. Planned Development Amendment -A request to amend the Planne d Development approval to
address the creation of 11 lots that do not independently have street f r ontage, yards setbacks, or
the minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet in the CC Zone but are part of a larger common lot
which meets the standards. Case number PLNSUB2018-00057
The subject property is located in Council Distri ct 5 represented by Er in Mendenhall. (Staff contact: Eric
Daem s at 801-535-7326 or eric.daems@slcgov.com).
2. Planned Development and Conditional Building and Site Design Review at approximately 45
South 600 West-A reque st by Auggie Wasmund, from C.W. Urban , for a Planned Development and
Conditional Buil d ing and Site Design Review (CBSDR) to build a four story 48-unit residential building
at approximately 45 S 600 West in the Gateway Mixed Use (G-MU) zoning district. Pla nned
Development approval is required for all new construction in the G-MU zoning district. The applicant is
also requesting a reduction of parking lot landscap ing through the Planned Development process and
the proposed exterior building materials require approval through the CBSDR process . The subj ect
property is within Council District 4 represented by Ana Valde moros (Staff Contact: Amy Thompson at
801-535-7281or amy.thompson@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNSUB2019-00128 and
PLNPCM2019-00129
3. Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation at approximately 1019 East Logan Avenue-Kathleen Bratcher ,
who lives at 1019 East Log an Avenue is proposing to vacate the alley that is to the west and north of
her property. The western portion runs 126 ' north and south along her property line . T he northern
Page 139
portion of the alley r uns east and west 336' from the applicant's property to 1053 E. Logan Avenue and
then follows 1053 E. Logan 's eastern property line 126' north and south. The alley is recorded on the
Fern Subdivision and is adjacent to property on the north that is not part of the subdivision. The subject
property is located in the R-1-5000 zoning district and is located in council district 5, represented by
Er in Mendenhall. (Staff Contact: Anna Anglin at 801-535-6050 or anna.anglin@s lcgov.com) Case
Number PLNPCM2018-00468
4. Sugar Alley Conditional Building and Site Design Review at approximately 2188 S Highland
Drive-Ben Lo we, representing the property owner Sugarhouse Dixon , LLC , has requested Conditional
Building and Site Design Review approval to build an eight-story mixed-use bu ild ing at 2188 S Highland
Drive . The development is proposed to be approximately 85' in height and include 186 apartments and
16 ,000 square feet of retail space . Buildings over 50' in height in the Sugar House Business District-1
zone are required to go through the Conditional Building and Site Design Review process , and as the
building exceeds this height it is proceeding through this process . Th rough this process applicant is
also seeking a mod ification to a 15' upper floor step-back requirement for the north-east portion of their
building that faces Hig hland Drive. The property is in the Sugar House Bus iness District-1 (CSHBD -1 )
zone and is in Council District 7, repr esen ted by Amy Fowler. (Staff contact: Daniel
Echeverria, daniel.echeverria@slcqov.c om or 801-535-7165) Case number PLNPC2019-00264
5. Sugar House Business District Design Standards Text Amendment -A request by the Ma yo r to
amend the Sugar House Business District (CS HBD ) zoning district regu lations . The amendments would
apply additional design standards to development in the zone. Des ign standa rds incl ude regulations
pertaining to such things as windows , entrances, and bui lding materials. Currently, there are a limited
number of design standards for small developments in Sugar Ho use, whereas la rge developments
have many more standards to comply with. The proposed additional design standards are meant to
bridge this gap and help ensure that new small buildings support a h igh quality, pedestrian oriented
environment in Sugar House. Other miscellaneous related changes and clarifications to the zoning
code are also included in the amendments . The proposal affects both the CSHBD-1 and CSHBD-2
zoning districts . The zone is located w ith in Council District 7, represented by Amy Fo wler. (Staff
Contact: Daniel Echeverria, daniel.echeverria@slcqov.com or 801 -5 35-7165) Case number
PLNPCM2018-0021 0
The files for the above items are available in the Planning Division offices, room 406 of the City and County
Building. Please contact the staff planner for information , Visit the Plann ing Divisio n's website at
www.slcgov.com /pla nning for copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes.
Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they
are ratified, which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.
Planning Commission Meetings may be watched live on SLCTV Channel17; past meetings are recorded
and archived, and may be viewed at www.slctv.com . The City & County Building is an accessible facility.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate
formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services . Please make requests at least two business
days in advance. To make a request, please contact the Planning Office at 801 -535-7757, or relay service
711.
Page 140
7 :22:10 PM
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City & County Building
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation at approximately 1019 East Logan Avenue -Kathleen
Bratcher, who lives at 1019 East Logan Avenue is proposing to vacate the alley that is to the west
and north of her property . The western portion runs 126' north and south along her property line .
The northern portion of the alley runs east and west 336' from the applicant 's property to 1053 E.
Logan Avenue and then follows 1053 E . Logan 's eastern property line 126' north and south . The
alley is recorded on the Fern Subdivision and is adjacent to property on the north that is not part
of the subdivision. The subject property is located in the R-1-5000 zoning district and is located
in council district 5, represented by Erin Mendenhall. (Staff Contact: Anna Anglin at 801-535-6050
or anna.anglin@slcgov.com) Case Number PLNPCM2018-00468
Anna Anglin, Principal Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in
the case file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positi ve
recommendation to the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Whether there was a survey conducted regard ing what utility lines are in the alley
• Whether the gas line was included as part of a condition
• Clarification as to who would be responsible for conducting a survey
Kathleen Bratc her, applicant, provided e xplanation for the petition and was available for questions
from the Commission.
The Commission and Applicant discussed the following :
• Clarification was requested on the subdivision
• Clarity on how the city enforces surveys required by property owners
PUBLIC HEARING 7:34:28 PM
Chairperson Bachman opened the Public Hearing;
Alan Bloom-Provided feedback regarding his view on the petition.
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Bachman closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION 7:36:08 PM
Commissioner Bell stated, based on the findings and analysis in the staff report,
testimony, and discussion at the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission
transmit a positive recommendation to the City Council for the Fern Subdivision Alley
Vacation, file PLNPCM2018-00468 for the reasons listed in the staff report.
Commissioner Scheer seconded the motion. Commissioners Lyon, Barry, Clark, Hoskins,
Scheer and Bell voted "Aye". The motion passed unanimously.
Page 141
4. Original Petition
Page 142
Page 143
Alley Vacation or Closure
OFFICE USE ONL Y
Date Received: 1;;;;;&M ,;;w;s-LXJ~tbS'
--r---~~~R~~~r_e ______ _
FORMATION
location of the Alley :
Name of Applican t :
Kathlee n A. Bratc her
Address of Applicant: Ave I ' r !OlO! 0 ~1\-N H" L. VJU/
E-mail of Applicant:
afkb @ms n.com
Applicant's Interest in Subject Property:
U-r
~ Owner D Contractor Archit ect D Other:
Phone :
801-879-6924
Na me of Prop erty wner abutting the alley if different frQm applicant): ( lr:f\1 I?().
&J A o o / . o ~ .»1.1.1::1 At;UI 1 o ex:> E . ')
E-mail of Property Owner : 1 N r..U. ... A: tMA g..e-:
pau laca rl @xmission.com & sy lvierim masc h@gm ail.com _J 801-596-1669 & 80 1-67 1-2835
\ Pleas e note that additional information m ay be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
i nformat ion is provi d ed fo r st aff analysis. All i nform at ion required for staff analysi s will be r.opied i:lnd
made public, i ncluding pro fes sional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
r ev iew by any i nterest ed pa rty .
A VAILABL E CONSULTATION
\ Plan n ers are avai labl e for consultation prior t o submitting this application. Plea se call (801) 535-7700 if you
have any questions regarding th e requirements o f th is application .
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APP LICATION
Moiling Address: Pl ann i ng Counter
PO Box 145471
Sa lt lake Ci ty, UT 84114
\ Fil ing fee of $253
In Person:
REQU I RED FEE
\ Plus additional fee for required publ ic notices
SIGNATURE
~~--~---------------Planning Counter
451 South State Street, Room 21 5
Telephone: (801) 535-7700
\ If applicable, a notari;:ed st at ement of consen t authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. r .. , ~5/03/2018
~ .. ·;;
~ a::
:::
<t .;;
D 0
D [TI
D 0
D [TI
D [TI
D 0
D [ZJ
SUBMIITAL REQU I REME NTS
Please include with the application : (pleas e attach additional sheet )
1. A letter exp l aining why yo u are requesting this alley vacation or closure .
2. A Sidwe ll map showing the area of the proposed alley v acation or clos u r e. On the map please:
a. Highlight the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure.
b. Indicate w ith co lored dot the property owners who su pport the petition.
c. Submit O t~e paper co~ and a digital (PD F) copy ol the maa -.e ~i.t...U.d ~
3. CJ. ~ ·d fsh~~o f~n m~~l~ ~f ~ ~P s k~ey ~c~~~b~~s~r g3 ~\VjC5V .(6M
• A f ina l le ga l description prepared by a licensed e gineer will be r equired later.
4 . Th e name, address and signatures of all abutting property owners who support the pet ition .
Petition mu st incl ude the signatu res of no less than 80% of the abutting pro perly owners.
Signatures should be from the property owne rs and not from the pro perty ren ters.
You may use the form atta ched to this appl ica tion or provide your own form with sig na ture s.
WHAT IS AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE?
As pa rt of the subd ivis ion process, e.arly developer s we re required to create alleys which were then deeded to the
City. They were use d for coa l delivery, garbage pickup and other services. They also allow ed.access to ga rage$. Today,
the City is officially the owne r of these alleys. In sit uations where it can be demonstrated that t here is an over-riding
public purpose for vacating the alley, the City may re l inqu is h its pro perty int erest in the alley.
When an alley is next to or abuts a sing le family or duplex re side ntial property, the City vacates the alley, divide s it in
half, nnd the property is conv eyed to the abu tting prope11y owners. If an alley is nex t to o r abuts a non -re side ntial, or
multifamily re siden tial (3 o r more dwelli ng units) property, the Cit y may cl ose the alley and then sell the land at f air
market va l ue to the abutting property owners .
WHAT THE CITY CONSIDERS BEFORE VACATING OR CLOSING AN ALLEY
1. The City police department, fire department, tra nsportation division, and ali other rele vant Ctty departments
have no rea sonable objection to the proposed disposition of the property;
2. Granting t he petition will not deny so le access or required off -s treet parking t o any pro petty adjacent t o t he al ley,
3. Granting the petition w ill no t re sult in any property being landlocke d;
4 . Granting the petition will not res ult in a use of the alley property which is otherwise co ntrary t o the policies of
t he Ci t y, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which
are not lim ited to, mid-block walkways, ped estrian paths, trails, and alterna t ive transportation uses;
5. No opposi ng abutting property owner intends to build a garage req uiring acc ess fro m t he p ro perty, o r has
ma de appl icatio n for a building permit, o r if such a pe rmit ha s be en issued, cons t ruction has be en completed
within 12 months of iss uance of the b uilding pe rmit;
6. The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small se gment of it; and
7. Th e alley property i s not necessary for actual or potentia l rea r access to res idences o r for accessory uses.
INCOMPLETE APP LICATI ONS Will NOT BE ACCEPTED -------------
Updotecl 7/1/17
Page 144
Olga Pinney
Real Property Agent, SLC Corp
4S1 South State Street, Rm 42S
Salt La ke City, UT 84114-5640
Re: Salt lake City Right -o f-Way (Alley) Encroachment
Parcel #16-17-2S3-019
Dear Ms. Pinney and SLC Corp Office of Real Estate,
May 20, 2018
My name is Kathl ee n Bratcher. My husband, Richard Kerr, and I own the home on 1019 East Logan Ave .
We are sending this letter explaining why we are requ esti ng an alley closure . This request is being made
in response to a l etter we received on May 05, 2018, from the office o f Olga Pinney.
We purchased this property August 1999 and have been using the half-an-alley next to ou r home as off-
street parking. One of our neighbors who grew up in this neighborhood, Sylvia Rim mach, to ld us in the
sixty years that she ha s lived in this neighborhood, that she has witnessed all residents of this home use
the same half-an-a lley as an off-street parki ng space. I understand now that we were unknowing ly
encroaching on an alley and are wanting to remedy the situation as soon as possible. We had no ill
intent.
When I use the te rm, "half-an-alley," it is because the north side of the through-alley is already closed .
The alley has not been a usable piece of th ro ugh traffic: for at lea st sixty years. Richard and I are i n an
agreement w ith all our surrou ndi ng neighbors and are willing to split the property within the Salt l ake
City's existing guide lines.
I hav e in cluded the signed , "Petition to Vacate the Alley," along with the outlined and dotted Si d ewell
map.
We, (our neighbors, and Richard and I) would like to replace the aged fence at some point. The new
fence will reflect the new property lines, as defined by the office of Salt Lake City, Real Estate Services .
Please feel f ree to contact me, Kathl een Bratcher at······if yo u have any questions or
concerns . Again, we loo k forward t o resolvi ng this situation.
Thank you for your considera tion in this matter.
Kathleen Bratcher
1019 East Logan Ave
Sal t Lake City, UT 8410S
Page 145
BLOC K 16 . 5-AC RE PLA T A.
-l
..... ~ c ••• ~:
·--. -~ -... t.._,_ ........... -.-..... __ _ ... _, ___ '"' _ .. ,. ---.. ·-··---_ ... ···-·-.... . . --...... ·-..... -·-..... -~ ... --... '"-... -·-.... ·--......
j£_
Page 146
ParcellllG-17-253-019 Alley Closure
Written Descrip tion with measurements of the proposed alley closure .
For frames of refe rence, we have enclosed a printed copy of a boundary survey we paid for th is pa st
January, performed by Horrocks Engineers . The outlined area is the alleyway we wish to close .
Ou r home f aces south . For clarity in the following description, "south," refers to the front of t he
property (Logan Ave side), and "north" refers to be abutti ng property line and alleyway we are
proposing to be closed.
All the below measurements were comp leted by my husband and myself working as a team and are
approximate.
The numbers 1.) to 3 .) descriptions and measurements below corre late to t he and numbered areas on
the enclosed survey map.
1.) North/south length of alley, measured from the southern side of the property, (i.e . northern
edge of sidewalk) to the wooden fence in t he bac kyard (abutting line)-114.25 feet
Outlined in blue on map.
2.) North/south side length from true, su rveyed property li ne (measured from set survey cap) to
wooden fence (ab utting line)-5.83 feet
Outlined in red on map.
Th e fence was already installe d , and already aging, when I purcha se d t he property in 1999 .
3.) East/west length of alley, measured on southern side of property, west neighbor's existing fence
to survey cap set-20.33 feet
Outlined in purple on map. ••••••
Page 147
; _,
' ,
.I
Page 148
I
I
1 I
-~I
f
~ ~
. :
I
I I
I
I
I
l:
!.1
I
~ I rj il
il I' '·:
''-4 ~)-~~-,_1,• . ·;·
" l 'L -·
!~~ :~r;_.
I
\
~I .. . ,-
1
I
, I
' I
-,,
-,-.-·
;~·~D.;: -:--~ 1
\ ··-.-I --'
I
I i
Page 149
I I
I
' I
j l
~~
'·
·-·
:::
---. ~~:.::"~'" ... ~ . .,. ··~" ... . --
~L
I
I
I : !+
!
_I ,,
" i'.
~-
·,
BRATCH E~R~=PR---0 --~!::.;.._...,,,~,.~, PERTY
••J tarr•.•
_ll~Ut-IOARY SURVEy
~~~~~ .v>l•.-.u..•u.~u:.u•.
.·~-
I
_J
I
1 i !
I
i
, I,..
I 00 • • .., 0 I a I ~
I "
K lgnt-or-way
Page I so
PETI TION TO VAC ATE OR CLO SE AN ALLE Y
Name of Appli cant:
Ka thleen A . Bratcher
Addres s o f Applicant:
10 19 East Logan Ave Parcel #16-17 -253-019 _______ -----------
Date: Oh / D~ J ~0 TCZJ
---------------------------
As an ow n er o f prope r ty adj acent t o t he alley, I agree t o the proposed va cation or clos ure. I u nd erstand that if my
property is a com m er cia l bu siness or a r ental property w ilh more than three (3) dwel li n g units, I w ill be requ ired to pay
fair market value for my ha lf of th e al ley.
Date _.PrinrNcml! Address /'L( f.ittJ""rure
• ~~~~~!:./(. Upo f J ~£1e?: 5 /000 £)~5~ignotufirt/q Cxrjt s: J ~ !{"
);:> ..... Ula rk.iJ'.u,.(lz <'d. 1 »"'l7 !;,. loa;;;:_ ,f:i;;o'f! 71-~ ,-/.-Jy
~ H ~&J /::E .~/± :·w~ '"'&tlLt ~.'tE l~
--Pri,•t Nomr Address 5igna rure Do te ~
~ ~ -s;~3~rz-__ !D "l9_ /._~,._10 Av e>_ ~~ {vi ~~'J, ~~!~-
~ g P ••:1 No m~ Addres • Sign~gr;: Dote
~ ~ -#u~LJ h~ _j4f~UJ~~ Dore _ ~Jj)(<l_ __
~ .<;l, f.[ o.r~l\.~~!~vl~·j---=IU\-'-Prv._;_;_l-_ ---4.74'4· --1"'-"'L---
~ ~ ~-U; \l-aW--j .?,l"' £ ~lobi!N !Y.f. --k::f:/k.~~=---0 · ~ ~. l (Q
io ~~~rl,!£1.-ll _li~~~., Dare '6/t-~J rg r: ~ 4;9';"!0" &rf-<~1!( , ... .>.~zJAt?~P~
~ ftc.~/J;»th~y f!/.'Ld¥11'1 ~ ,.,h.2z/2£'/&
~ -lf.~ tu,/Jk)}~).P_?Jli~l!f., ... ~--l.b?!zoJJ>_
·---------·---------·---·--F'rintNoTr.e Address Si[tllOIVf" Gate
-" .
Page lSI
)
·ii ... I':··
• ' !: ~ .• • PETITION :fO'VA<;:ATE .ORClOSE -AN ALLEY · -. I ' ',~
~ .....
Name of App li cant: ·--,---:---,--.JG1_f_h~ 9:-)2,£ i-1Aki,
Address of Applicant:
LOtC( E . LeJsv Alit:.. .~t: 8<JLOj
Date :
As an owner of property adjacent to the alley, I agree to the proposed vacation or cl os ure. I underst and that If my
property Is a commerc ial busin ess or a r ental property with more than three (3) dwelling units, I will be requ ired to p ay
fa i r market va l ue f or my half of the all ey.
Print Name Address Signature Date ·
:R~ t\~U' 1.?43 5
Print Name Address
(ClOD E r//~ J-J:~ 'if -/0 -f 8" Sign~/ V ~ ";) ;Date CVJ;
. J~. ov_, ~;;>J,.r ~
--:-:--:-:-:-----------::-:-o-------::--,--~i-1.~:_ Ll. .. Ut.IJr!Lc; 9/iV
Prin t Name Address Signature 'f1L Dav
1 O<;(( f; ~J 4vt ~ 2bi 8\/t 0 I I'%-"'
Address -=--'( _/,;,:_;_
1
"'I.-,-'-'-" ,=---=cSI-gn-at_u_r_e -,-4-.._,...
1
-,.-J----""'-D--'at'e"" '-'-'-'--..:.......,"-----
olv /,)'.-~.-~ VJ I,V ) v '-1 '80 1-r18~;J~t:-
u -1 £XI · 6WJhl .. 5 L/ 1060 £..
Print Name
Print Nom e Address
Signature Da te tSJ!o/IB
S1.A '3ClY'\ ~~ cJ'Vl 1 5~'i S I ootl {;
Print Name Address
---y;:·~V ). L-v~ /OZ~· E Woo) ~L
Prin t Name Address Sl{lnot Dote
~-~ N~~£.e_io~c.fl:-1-Alo-a.olt1u~, ~~ o-2h-t ~
Print Name A dress Signature Date
_L!Ji./~ dl,.//!r[ le£t%~1-1n.-. __.('/#-~ Q-22-#1
Pri nt Name '--,IV -Address Signal~~ Date
~ ~ A~~r~ss/p £<)~ ~. ~ii!!t~---D-o te 1-J-("g_ ___ _
iJYr£--~ /03.~ \Q~WL ~ <::j.·l/·1&
Print Name Address Signature Da te
El-li e-t+ir:hk{LjQ32 WIJO\) __ ~ ~lAAA ~-~~~-
Prlnt Name jddress Signa~~~ Date
(\?'~ . .\;e. ]e.-vl-\.k~.t.\ \Obo Wt>Oc:\ Ave.. Ao c:Af~o/l'B
Print Name Address Sl~ Dote
.... -------------~---
Updated 7/1/17
Page 152
I
I
5. Mailing List
Page I 53
Name Address1 Address2
980 BRYAN LLC 980 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84 105-2310
AIR VIEW SERVICE INC 1646 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2440
ASZMANN, JOSEPH G 1059 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84 105-2409
BAIRD , J ENN IFE R 10 BROADRICK RD SINGAPORE, 43947-5
BA IRD , JENNIFER PO BOX 521237 SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84152-1237
BATES, DANIEL & JOSAL YN ; JT 1067 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2411
BA THEN , JOHN C 1033 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2409
BENTLEY, ANNABEL & PA TRICK 1066 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84 105-2402
M; JT
BERNHISEL, ASHLIE A 2 740 E W ILSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84109-1 633
BEVACQUA, BRUCE & PAULA; JT 1020 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2410
BICKNELL, RACHEL M; TR 1621 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2358
SIEGING, ER IK & KAISER, 1029 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2409
JENNIFER; JT
BLAKE, GARRY L 1598 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84 105-2357
BLUHM, ALAN & PAMALA; TRS 1053 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2409
BRATCHER, KATHLEEN A & 1019 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2409
KERR, R ICHARD P ; JT
BROWN , ROBERT B & LILIAN M 1038 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2402
BRYAN WOOD CONDM COMMON 4285 S PARKVIEW DR SALT LAKE CI TY , UT 84124-3446
AREA MASTER CARD:
BURT ON, STEPHEN M 2686 E SKYLINE DR SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84108-2855
CARL, PAULA E; TR (PEC RE V LIV 1020 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE C ITY , UT 84105-2412
TRUST)
CLAYTON , ANDREA; TR (AC TR) 1038 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE C ITY , UT 84105-2410
CORTEZ, ALEX & JANET F; TC 1036 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84105-2410
COYNE , DAV ID ; JT MILLER, 1056 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2412
OLIVIA; JT
CROFT, ROGER G 1615 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2331
DEMKOV, JAMES S & CASSIDY; 1041 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-3421
J T
DONNER, PETER N 1034 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84105-2402
EICHENBERGER, PAUL 1050 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84105-2402
EM IGRATION CREEK LLC 6860 CANYON DR PARK CITY, UT 84098
FOLEY, DANIEL P & FOX-FOLEY, 2112 COUNTRY COVE CT LAS VEGAS, N V 89 135-1556
MARI SSA; J T
FROST, KATHRYN A ; TR 1045 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-3421
GARDNER, JOHN P ET AL 2050 S 1400 E STGEORGE , UT 84790
GARDNER, NOEL C & CONNIE L ; 1026 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2410
TRS (G FA M TR)
G-BAR VENTURES LLC 1570 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2441
GI ANNOPOULOS I NVESTMENTS 2537 S 1900 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106-4153
LC
GORDON , WILLIAM J PO BOX 521563 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152-1563
GREIS, PATRICK & HIRSHBERG, 1384 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-1613
ELIOTTE ; JT
HAAG, M ICHELLE L 1568 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2441
HAINES , JAMES R ; TR 6931 S 825 E MIDVALE , UT 84047
HAK,KATE 1034 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2412
HALE , ABBEY & DRUMOND, 976 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2310
TYLER; JT
Page I 54
HARPER, PETER 1593 S 1000 E SALT LAKE C ITY , UT 84105-2379
HICKEN , DREW D & PAISLEE; 2397 E MAYWOOD DR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84109-1609
TRS (D&PHFL TRUST}
HIGGINS, TRINA A 1050 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2412
HINNERS, SARAH J & PASKO, 1648 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-2359
CHRISTOPHER P ; JT
HOFFMAN, BENGTA 1066 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2412
HUTCHISON , WARREN J & 1056 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2410
BECKYW; JT
J&DWT ET AL 3553 E SUTTON CIR COTTONWOOD HTS, UT 84121-
6150
JENSEN, JAN D PO BOX 526434 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152 -6434
JOHNSON, DAVID E & 1589 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2379
ANDERSON, SUSAN M; TRS
KING, RAYMOND 1118 S W IND SOR ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-1312
LENART, JOSHUA & TANNER ; JT 1026 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2412
MORAHAN, JU STINE & LEBEDA, 1594 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84 105-2357
KEITH T; TC
NAY, CATRINA Y & TRAVIS W; JT 1590 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2357
NEIL PAYNE VELSEY FAM TR 864 GRAND AVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92109
THORNTON , RICHARD N; TR
NELSON , TRENT L & LAURA Q; JT 1044 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2402
NETMENDERS LLC 955 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2329
NIELSON, WILLIAM F 1032 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2410
OLSON, KEVIN 1028 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2402
OPHEIKENS , STEVEN C & 1025 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2409
ROBYN R; TR S (0 FAM TRUST}
PAUL & KAREEN SWENSON FAM 1064 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-1 521
TR ET AL
PEDERSEN , BRENT S 1602 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2332
PINE , TIMOTHY A 1049 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2409
POCOCK, DOROTHY V; TR 1435 S EL REY ST SALT L AKE CITY, UT 84108-2613
POOLE, CHRISTOPHER 1600 S 1100 E SALT L AKE CITY, UT 84105-2414
PRICE , NICKOLAS W; JT PRICE, 986 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2310
CARLY; JT
REDFORD , DONNALEY E 1633 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2358
Res ident 979 E LOGAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2329
Resident 981 E LOGAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2329
Resident 1606 S 1000 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2332
Resident 1640 S 1000 E #1 Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-2378
Resident 1640 S 1000 E #2 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2378
Resident 1640 S 1000 E #3 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2 378
Resident 1640 S 1000 E #4 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2378
Resident 1620 S 1000 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-235 9
Resident 1573S 1000E #A Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2355
Residen t 1573S 1000 E #B Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2355
Resident 1573S 1000E #C Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-2355
Resident 1573 S 1000 E #D Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2355
Resident 1007 E WOOD AVE Salt La ke City, UT 84105-2411
Resident 1575 S 1000 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2355
Resident 1022 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2402
Page I 55
Resident 1032 E WOOD AVE Sal t Lake City, UT 84105 -2412
Resident 1060 E WOOD AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -241 2
Resident 1072 E WOOD AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2412
Resident 1041 E LOGAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2409
Resident 1043 E LOGAN AVE Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-2409
Resident 1069 E LOGAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -24 09
Resident 1592S1100E Salt Lak e City, UT 84105-2454
Resident 1594 S 1100 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2454
Resident 1604 S 1100 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2414
Resident 1616S1100E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2414
Res ident 1627 S 1000 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2358
Resident 1005 E 1700 S Salt Lak e City, UT 84105-3421
Resident 1641 S 1000 E Salt Lak e City, UT 84105 -2358
Resident 1009 E 1700 S Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -3421
Resident 1011 E 1700S Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-3421
Resident 1035 E 1700 S Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3421
Resident 1063 E 1700 S #1 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3427
Resi dent 1063 E 1700 S #2 Sal t Lak e City, UT 84105 -3427
Resident 1063 E 1700 S #3 Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -3427
Resident 1063 E 1700 S #4 Salt Lake Ci t y, UT 84105-3427
Resident 1063 E 1700 S #5 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3427
Resident 1063 E 1700 S #6 Salt Lak e City, UT 841 05-34 27
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #1 Sal t Lake City, UT 84105-3426
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #2 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3426
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #3 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3426
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #4 Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-3426
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #5 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3426
Resident 1067 E 1700 S #6 Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -3426
Resident 1624 S 1100 E Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-2440
Resident 1640 S 1100 E Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2440
Resident 1068 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2402
Resident 1069 E WOOD AVE Salt Lake City, UT 84105 -241 1
Resident 1630 S 1000 E Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-2359
Resident 1019 E 1700 S #1 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3428
Resident 1019 E 1700 S #2 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3428
Resident 1019 E 1700 S #3 Salt Lak e City, UT 84105 -3428
Resident 1019 E 1700S #4 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3428
Residen t 1019E 1700S #5 Salt Lake City, UT 84105-3428
Resident 1019E 1700S #6 Sa lt Lake City, UT 84105-3428
RIMMASCH, SYLVIA & MARK H ; 1597 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CI T Y, UT 84105-2379
J T
ROG ERS , DAVIS J & VAN ESSA H; 105 W SUMMER ST OJAI , CA 93023
JT
ROMBOY , RODERICK P & 1067 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAKE CI T Y, UT 84105-2409
CONNIE J; JT
SCHLAUDERAFF , CALE B; ET AL PO BOX 2222 SHELTON, WA 98584-5051
SIMPSON, GREGORY & JILLIAN; 1040 E LOGAN AVE SALT LAK E CI T Y, UT 84105-2410
JT
SJ COMMERCIAL RENTALS, LLC 5334 S CASTLE GATE DR MURRAY, UT 84117-7363
Page ls6
SMITH, LONDA F & DE LA CRUZ, 1070 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2402
ANA M ; JT
SNOW, JINNY LEE ; TR (JLS REV 4285 S PARKVIEW DR SALT LAKE C ITY , UT 84124-3446
TR}
STEELE, CHRISTOPHER & 1047 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY , UT 84105-3421
WANG, CHANG H; JT
SUMSION, JOSEPH E & ANN H; 1039 E 1700 S SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84105-3421
JT
THOMAS, FRANK L; TR 1044 E WOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2412
TRAYNHAM, LEE E 818 N QUINCY ST A PT2 103 ARLINGTON, VA 22203-2086
WHITEHALL, LLC 3505 S LITTLE FARM L N SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84109-3432
WINTERS, ALAN R & BRIDGETTE 1024 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-2402
A; JT
WJM REAL ESTATE, LLC 1487 EARLINGTON DR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103-4427
WOODRU FF, A LYS IA 1 039 E LOGAN AVE SALT L AKE C ITY, UT 84105-2409
YORK FAMILY PARTNERSHIP , 2257S1100E SALT LAKE C ITY, UT 84106-2320
THE
Anna Anglin -Salt La ke City PO Bo x 145480 Salt Lake City , Utah 84114
Planning Division
Page I 57