015 of 2001 - budget amendment no. 7 for fiscal year 2000-2001 0 01-1
B 01-6
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. LSD of 2001
(Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 51 of 2000
which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2000-2001)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 51 OF
2000 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT
LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2000 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001.
PREAMBLE
On June 29, 2000, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and finalized the
budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the
fiscal year beginning July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said
budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt
Lake City, Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
The City Council fixed a time and place for a public hearing to be held on March
20, 2001 to consider the attached proposed amendments to the budget, including the
employment staffing document, and ordered notice thereof be published as required by
law.
Notice of said public hearing to consider the amendments to said budget,
including the employment staffing document, was duly published and a public hearing to
consider the attached amendments to said budget, including the employment staffing
document, was held on March 20, 2001, in accordance with said notice at which hearing
all interested parties for and against the budget amendment proposals were heard and all
comments were duly considered by the City Council.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and
finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 51 of 2000.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
2
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 20 day of
March , 2001.
/
CHAIRPERSON b�
ATTEST:
Y REC ,DER
Transmitted to the Mayor on March 20, 2001
Mayor's Action: r Approved Vetoed
M R
3
ATTEST:
ITY REc RDEf'
(SEAL) c�; `',4
Bill No. 15 of 2001. ,, 14
'4
Published: March 28, 2001 +��,` •
� RAT' -"
4.x+vrvM "'"''
G\Ordina0l\Amending budget 3-20 doe
4
Initiatives in Budget Amendment - March
Initiative Name Initiative Gen. Fund
Amount Impact
1. Olympic Planning $44,230 $-0-
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Department For Fiscal Year
Management Services 2000-2001
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Olympic Planning BA#7lnitiative#1
Prepared By Phone Number
John Sittner 535-7733
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03
1. General Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund (detail below)
Olympic Planning $44,230
Non Departmental contingency -$44,230
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund (detail below)
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages $48,572
2. Employee Benefits $16,028
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply $9,000
4. Charges and Services -$33,370 0 0
5. Capital Outlay $4,000
6. Other(Specify)
Total $44,230 $0 $0
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
Director-Olympic Planning no change NA 29,600
Olympic Planning Assistant 1.00 208 16,000
Olympic Event Planner 1.00 310 14,000
Olympic Communication Assistant 0.50 208 4,800
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E.Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F.Issue Discussion
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected.It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis can't be effective.The criteria varies from issue to issue.In straightforward cases,it can be an ordinance or
policy.In other cases,it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices.It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference,if any,between the condition and criteria.It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact.If an effect cannot be identified,there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding.It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria.Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management or personnel issues.
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause.By doing so,it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
The budget amendment is being sought to better develop the City's vision for benefiting from being the Host City of
the Olympics.The goal is to improve communication with the local and visiting public constituencies as well as
implementing an economic development program.Together these efforts will enhance the City's image and marketability
as well as improve the public perception of Salt Lake City's wisdom in hosting the Games.
The program that was in place through 20 December,2000 was effectively planning solely for the effect of meeting
the needs of The Organizing Committee,for example,assuring that security,fire,transportation and public services
would be able to operate in such a manner that the public would not be disenfranchised during the period of service
delivery to the SLOC. The opportunities were not being explored or exploited.
The benefit of the additional funding is to cement the planning that will be needed for the City Administration and the
City Council to know that Salt Lake City has a well organized program that will take maximum advantage of the Games
given the limited amount of time remaining.
The reason that this program is being enhanced is the implementation of a much broader and comprehensive vision of
the City's Olympic opportunities.
This funding is essential to begin implementing the plan that has been outlined to the City Council.