002 of 2005 - Budget Amendment No. 4 to FY 2004-2005 0 05-1
B 04-15
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 2 of 2005
(Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004
which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document,
for Fiscal Year 2004-2005)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 63 OF
2004 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT
LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2004 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2005.
PREAMBLE
On August 24, 2004, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and finalized
the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the
fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said
budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt
Lake City, Utah.
The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,
prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted
budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which
are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and
finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget
of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file
a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing
document, with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget
Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments,
including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget
Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first
publication.
2
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 4th day of
January , 2005.
qL0- 1 01,)t./k-C__
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
IEF DEPUTY Y RE RDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on January 4, 2005
.K.
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
��?' j
,...,,, (...-----
,,...,e,
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECO DER ,Ft« b_.,s.., c!ty atl,,=,NY K )1 #CP
(SEAL)
Bill No. 2 of 2005.
Published: January 10, 2005 • f"t, -Y,Q i 1.-'4
g:\ordinance 04\budget amendment#4 2004-2005 ki re.;ig. i
s.,„„ ,_„,. ,- -: ,-,.
.. , , . .
\20,, ....„,„,,:.!
3
FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #4 — Jan uaiy
FY 2005 FY 2006
Gen.
Initiative Name Initiative Gen. Fund FTE Fund FTE
Amount Impact Impact
New Items
1. Airport Fire Captain $48,328 $48,328 1.0 $82,848 1.0
2. Leonardo Center Utilities $105,000 $105,000
3. Fee Waiver (This is the $2,283 $2,283
Place Foundation)
4. Plan Review Services $170,000 $170,000 3.0 $180,000 3.0
5. Economic Development $55,000 $55,000
6. North Temple $40,000
Improvement
7. Yale Avenue SID $205,000
8. Wal-Mart Private $50,000
Donation -Modesto Park
9. Sugarhouse CC 700 E $500
Trees
10. Justice Court $24,600
Fingerprinting System
11. Ottinger Hall $90,000
Improvements
12. Modesto Park $94,188
Improvements
13. Solid Waste Facility $2,500,000
14. 900 South SID $130,000
14 Grant Tower Design/ $25,000 $25,000
A. Commuter Rail
Grants For Existing Staff Resources
15. Rocky Mtn. HIDTA $145,800
Grants For New Staff Resources
16. Project Safe $10,000
Neighborhood
Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
17. Police Bomb Squad Van $40,205
18. American Dream Down $177,518
Payment
19. Housing Opportunities for $21,209
People with AIDS
20. FEMA Medical Response $400,000
Housekeeping
21. Refuse & Fleet Encumb $996,596
Carryover $3,337
22. Rose Park SID Increase $236,873
23. CIP & CDBG Recapture $319,625.32
$7,930.53
FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #4 — January
FY 2005 FY 2006
Gen.
Initiative Name Initiative Gen.Fund FTE Fund FTE
Amount Impact Impact
24. US Depart of Education $127,506.31
Adjustment
25. California Ave Bridge $41,447.92
26. Water Utility Carryover $3,016,682
CIP
27. Sewer Utility Carryover $1,683,495
CIP
28. Storm water Fund $240,000
Carryover CIP
29. Transportation Downtown $100,000
Master Plan
2
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Fire Department 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Airport Fire Captain Amendment#4 Initiative#1
Initiative Name Initiative Number
CJ Lawrence/John Vuvk 799-4210
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Airport Reimbursement(1952) $ 48,328.00 $ 82,848.00 $ 82,848.00
Total $ 48,328.00 $ 82,848.00 $ 82,848.00
2. Internal Service Fund
include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Fire department (at Airport) $ 48,328.00 $ 82,848.00 $ 82,848.00
Total $ 48,328.00 $ 82,848.00 $ 82,848.00
2. Internal Service Fund
include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages $ 40,670.00 $ 69,720.00 $ 69,720.00
2. Employee Benefits $ 7,658.00 $ 13,128.00 $ 13,128.00
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 48,328.00 $ 82,848.00 $ 82,848.00
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
enter the position title
Fire Captain 1 901 C $ 82,848.00
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization, or plans.
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria,
condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
cause is sometimes a d►tt►cult element to identity but is essential to a t►nd►ng. It is simply►dent►ty►ng wny the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
mananamant
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Criteria-The Fire Department would increase its staffing by one Captain Position to assign two Fire Captains to
adminstrative functions at the Airport.
Condition-The Fire Department currently has one Fire Captain assigned to administrative functions at the Airport.
Effect-The Fire Department would have the ability to separate the ARFF Training Captain and the Airport Fire Marshall
functions into two poistions allowing for better management and oversight of the assigned responsibilites for each position.
Cause-The Fire Department decreased its staffing in FY2004 to attain a cost savings for the Airport Fund. However, it has
been determined by the Airport and the Fire Department that seperating the functions would allow for better management
and oversight. The Airport has determined that the seperation is worth the additional costs it would incur.
Recommendation - It is recommended that the Fire Department increase its staffing by one Fire Captain. This position
would be assigned to the Airport and would be reimbursed by the Airport Fund.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
• for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services Department 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Salt Lake Arts Academy at the Leonardo Center Amendment#4 Initiative#2
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Greq Davis 535-6397
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Facility Maint. Rental Income 07-00093 1802 $ 105,000.00
Total $ 105,000.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Natural Gas 07-00093 2331 $ 35,000.00
Electrical 07-00093 2332-01 $ 70,000.00
Total $ 105,000.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services $ 105,000.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 105,000.00 $0 $0
Request FY05 Salt Lake Arts Academy at Leonardol l/8/20044:14 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In of
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
On July 27, 2004 the Salt Lake Arts Academy signed a lease with Salt Lake City Corporation for
15,000 square feet at the Leonardo Center. The leased space is to be used for a public charter
school. The lease payment is $8,750 per month. The leasehold period is July 1, 2004 - June 30,
2005. As part of the leasehold agreement, Salt Lake City Corporation will pay the utilities for the
leased space. It is believed that the utilities cost paid by Salt Lake City Corporation will be covered by
the lease payments being made by the Salt Lake Arts Academy. Any utilities expense not covered by
the lease payments will be recovered from the Salt Lake Arts Academy.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the incremental budget which supports the receipt of
lease payments from the Salt Lake Arts Academy and the payment of utilities, by Salt Lake City
Corporation, in support of the leased space.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Fee Waiver
This is the Place Foundation Amendment#4 Initiative#3
Initiative Name Initiative Number
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136 535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Fund Balance $ 2,283.00
Total $ 2,283.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
06-00200-2550 Refund $ 2,283.00
Total $ 2,283.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services $ 2,283.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 2,283.00
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#3 Fee Waiver This is the Place Foundl l/8/20044:35 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Chairman of This is the Place Foundation requested reimbursement of building permit fees paid
to the City from 1998 through 2003. He calculated that the fees paid totaled $27,521.24 and
requested reimbursement of$20,000 as a comprised amount.
The Fee Fund Protocol in effect during the period in which the fees were paid did not address the
timeliness of refund requests. The City Council and Administration amended the Building Permit Fee
Refund Protocol on September 14, 2004. The amended protocol requires requests for refunds to be
provided within six months from the date the building permit fee was paid.
For this reason, it is recommended that the City Council approve a refund in the amount of $2,283.
This amount includes $1,437 in permit fees paid six months prior to the Foundation's November, 2002
request and $846 paid for permit fees subsequent to this request.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the budget and cash to facilitate this
reimbursement.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Plan Review Services Amendment#4 Initiative#4
Initiative Name Initiative Number
David Dobbins/Orion Goff 535-7236
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item CFDA#(If Applicable) in this Cell
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Building permit fees 06-00200-125101 $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Plan Check Fees 06-00200-125105 $ 140,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00
Total $ 170,000.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000.00
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Building Inspector(06-00200) $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Building Plans Examiner(06-00600) $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Development Review Planner(06-00600) $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Plan Review Outsourcing(06-00600) $ 80,000.00 $ - $ -
Total $ 170,000.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000.00
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages $ 67,500.00 $ 135,000.00 $ 135,000.00
2. Employee Benefits $ 22,500.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services $ 80,000.00 $ - $ -
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 170,000.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000.00
Request FY05 BSL Positionsll/8/20044:47 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
Building Plans Examiner 1 311 30,000
Development Review Planner 1 311 30,000
Building Inspector III 1 311 30,000
•
Request FY05 BSL Positionsi 1/8/20044:47 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization, or plans.
Plan reviews and inspections will be completed in a more timely manner. Department goal is 3 weeks review
time on plan reviews and inspection response within 24 hours of request. Current staffing levels do not allow
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria,
condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
cause rs sometimes a drttrcu►t element to identity but is essential to a finding. It is simply►dent:tying wny the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
mananamant
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Building Services and Licensing Division has seen a significant and unexpected increase in development
activity. Current resources do not allow the division to process plan reviews and perform inspections in a timely
and acceptable manner. In order to process the increased workload the division is requesting 2 new FTEs, one
building plans examiner and one development review planner. The annual plan review fee revenue is $600,000
and as of the end of October the division had collected nearly $500,000, so there is sufficient revenue to cover
this expense. Future year expenses will be covered by the unbudgeted 20% increase in the plan review fees
that are a result of the 20% building permit fee increase (plan review fee is 65% of the building permit fee).
The division is also requesting one building inspector FTE. The annual cost of the position for the current year
will be covered by the revenue so far this year that is in excess of what was budgeted.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Mayor's Office 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Economic Development Amendment#4 Initiative#5
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Sam Guevara/Alison McFarland 535-7732
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Fund Balance $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00
Total $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Mayor's Office $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00
Total $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#5 Economic Development)l/18/20042:02 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The budget is being requested to provide funding for an increase in the Economic Development
Program. The budget would cover the design and printing of marketing materials used for recruitment
expansion and retention of businesses. It would also be used for promotional advertising, advertorial in
business and economic development trade publications,credit reports run for the revolving loan fund
applicants, and professional services such as neighborhood retail study and setup of business incubator
models.
Line Item Detail:
Retention and Expansion Mailers $20,000
Layout, design, copyrighting, graphics,printing and mailing: promotional and marketing materials
(small business services,revolving loan fund,business/commercial nodes of the City and available
development opportunities). Economic development quarterly newsletter.
Research/Economic Data/Targeted Study Areas $20,000
EDCU handles a portion of the City's research. Specific projects and survey materials require expanded
research materials including study by the University of Utah Bureau of Business Research and various
economic data for comparisons in preparing expansion and retention proposals. Targeted study areas
for economic development in the City as well as evaluation of feasibility of business incubators,
technology transfer from the University of Utah and Utah State University, specific Westside
development projects, and survey of specific areas or neighborhood projects.
Seminars/Memberships: $10,000
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
International Conference of Shopping Centers (ICSC)retail trade show where City forms partnerships
with retail real estate agents to attract retailers to specific sites in the City.
International Council of Economic Development (ICED). Best case practices from economic
development practitioners around the country. Lead sharing of major businesses considering relocation,
site selection research. Revolving loan fund, venture capital funding seminars and Vest Pocket Business
Coalition Membership.
Promotion/Event Programs $5,000
Advertising/advertorial budget for trade and business publications. This line item would also provide
seed funding for the Downtown Living Tour event.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development-Transportation Division 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Yale Avenue SID
1300-1500 East Amendment#4 Initiative#7
Initiative Name
Tim HarpstlGordon Haight/lSherrie Collins 535-7148/535-7147/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
.1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-New Cost Center SID (Yale Ave) $ 205,000.00
Total $ 205,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83- New Cost Center SID (Yale Ave) $ 205,000.00
Total $ 205,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 205,000.00
6. Other(Specify))
•
Total $ 205,000.00 $0 $0
Request FY05 Yale SID Neighborhood11/9/20049:35 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The residents of Yale Ave., from 1300 to 1500 East has requested that the City proceed with creating
a street lighting SD for their neighborhood, A total of 50 households are involved with this SID and
have submitted the necessary petition to Transportation. This project would include installation of new
decorative streetlights with underground wiring on Yale Ave., 1300-1500 East.
This is the capital improvements portion of the SID and would include paying for design, engineering,
materials, construction and the associated Bond finance costs. The City is currently reviewing options
that could reduce this cost by allowing the residents to collect the funds up front to reduce Bond
finance charges or combining with other proposed SID's to share associated costs.
An additional maintenance SID will be created at a later date to facilitate on-going power and
maintenance.
It is recommended that the City Council establish a new budget to facilitate the Yale Avenue SID
Street lighting Project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Walmart Private Donation
Westside Landscaping Donation Amendment#4 Initiative#8
Initiative Name Initiative Number
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-New cost center-Westside Landscaping Donation $ 50,000.00
Modesto Park Project 83-04061
Total $ 50,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83- New cost center-Westside Landscaping Donation $ 50,000.00
Modesto Park Project 83-04061
Total $ 50,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 50,000.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 50,000.00
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#8 Walmart Donationl l/16/200412:03 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
Wal-mart Corporation has donated $50,000 to Salt Lake City Corporation to be used for landscaping
at a Westside city building or park. The donation was made after Wal-Mart determined that placing
planter boxes on the top of its parking structure at it's 1300 South 300 West store was prohibitive.
Placing planter boxes on the parking structure had been one of the conditions of approval made by the
Planning Commission for the project, but the Planning Commission subsequently removed that
condition after Wal-Mart showed that the cost to engineer the structure increased significantly with the
required landscaping.
The Public Services Department is recommending that the $50,000 be used to fund a portion of the
costs for the Modesto Park project.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the budget to accept this private donation and
facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Salt Lake City Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Sugarhouse Community Council
Cash Donation-Trees 700 East Median Project Amendment#4 Initiative#9
Initiative Name Initiative Number
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-05075-700 East Median Island Project $ 500.00
Total $ 500.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-05075-700 East Median Island Project $ 500.00
Total $ 500.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay -Trees $ 500.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 500.00
Request FY05 Sugarhse CC Donation11/9/20049:57 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The East Central Community Council in a joint funded project with Salt Lake City and the Utah
Department of Transportation has committed to refurbish the 700 East Median Islands, 900 to 1300
South. The Sugarhouse Community Council has donated $500.00 cash to Public Services for the
purchase and installation of trees in the median islands. The Sugarhouse Community Council is
interested in extending this project south to the City limits at a future date.
The $500.00 donation was deposited in the 700 East Median Island Project . This request is to
increase the budget by $500.00 to facilitate expending the funds.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the budget to accept this private donation and
facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Management Services-Justice Court Division 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Administrative Office of the Courts
Donation Amendment#4 Initiative#10
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Mary Johnston Sherrie Collins 535-6421/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
•
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous - Donation $ 24,600.00
Total $ 24,600.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous $ 24,600.00
Total $ 24,600.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay - Equipment $ 24,600.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 24,600.00
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#10 Justice Court Donationl l/9/200410:06 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
vanes from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Salt Lake City Justice Court applied for and received this one time allocation of funds to purchase
a live-scan fingerprinting system. The funding agency is the Management Committee of the Judicial
Council, who voted to allocate $24,600 in one-time funds for the equipment. It is not a grant, it is a
donation or allocation.
This equipment would be used to fingerprint defendants during their arraignment at the Justice Court,
if they were not booked/fingerprinted at the time of arrest as required by CJA Rule 4-609. This is
important in order for all information to be submitted to BCI who retains arrest history of defendants.
Currently BCI is having to manually input the fingerprints sent by the Justice Court so it is not
uncommon for BCI to have the conviction information before they have the arrest information into the
system. By scanning fingerprints, the Justice Court would be able to submit the information to BCI
electronically, who would be able to compile all information in a more timely manner.
It is recommended that the City Council establish the budget to accept this one-time donation and
facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Ottinger Hall improvements
Private Donation Amendment#4 Initiative#11
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Greq Davis/Sherrie Collins 535-6397/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item NA
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 Fund New Cost Center-Donation $ 90,000.00 _
Total $ 90,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
' 1. General Fund
0 0
Total r $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund •
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 Fund New Cost Center $ 90,000.00
Total $ 90,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 90,000.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 90,000.00 $0 $0
Request FY05 Ottinger Hall improvements)l/9/200410:15 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization, or plans.
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria,
condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
cause is sometimes a d►mcu►t e►ement to identity but is essential to a tind►ng. it is simply identifying wny the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
mananamant
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
The Public Services Department's Youth and Family Division is preparing to expand the YouthCity recreation
programs into the Capitol Hills/Avenues communities at Ottinger Hall in Memory Grove. Ottinger Hall was
awarded $100,000 of US Department of Education funds for refurbishment. The Salt Lake Rotary Club, through
the Salt Lake Rotary Foundation, has committed to donate an additional $100,000 ($90,000 in cash and
$10,000 of in-kind architectural services) to this project. The SL Rotary Foundation's contribution will be
established via a contractual donation agreement between the Foundation and Salt Lake City Corporation.
These funds will be used for building improvements to include: HVAC upgrades, restroom improvements, light
fixtures, floor coverings, interior and exterior painting, and some building seismic improvements.
Recommendation:
That the City Council pass the necessary Resolution allowing the Mayor to sign and accept the donation and to
establish the budget to facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Comm Dev-Housing and Neighborhood Dev 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Modesto Park Improvements Amendment#4 Initiative#12
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Max PetersonlLuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-61361535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 -83-04061 Tranfer from other projects $ 94,188.00
CIP 83 -83-05064 Parkway Trail Lighting $ (37,000.00)
CIP 83 -83-03098 CDBG Cost Overuns $ (57,188.00)
Total $ - $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $1
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 -83-04061 Budget Increase Modesto Park Project $ 94,188.00
CIP 83 -83-05064 Parkway Trail Lighting $ (37,000.00)
CIP 83 -83-03098 CDBG Cost Overuns $ (57,188.00)
Total $ - $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify))
Total $0.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#12 Modesto Park Imp11/16/20049:04 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Modesto Park is being developed as a Nature Park with opportunities for youth and residents to
learn and understand the development of natural landscapes in the urban environment. The existing
detention basin for road run-off will remain and be upgraded to make it more aesthetically pleasing as
a natural detention and absorption basin. A ground monitoring well will be constructed so that youth
may learn about and monitor the ground water depth throughout the various seasons of the year. In
addition, trails made of natural stabilized gravel and a learning area where students from local schools
can gather to discuss the natural environment and development of natural parks will be constructed
and new trees, shrubs, etc., will be introduced to the area long with an associated drip irrigation
system.
Currently the Modesto Park project has a total budget of $164,812 allocated in years 2002 and 2004
from CDBG and a private donation. The project has been bid and the bids are higher than anticipated.
The total cost of the project is $309,000. To construct the complete project a budget increase of
$144,188. is required.
Engineering proposes to fund the $144,188 budget increase by recommending that the Wal-Mart
donation of $50,000 be allocated to this project (this request is addressed in Initiative #8 Budget
Opening); by allocating an additional $57,188 of CDBG Cost Over run funds and by reducing the
amount of the Jordan River Parkway Trail Lighting at Modesto Park project by $37,000. This project
currently has a budget of $100,000. Bids received indicate the low bid to be approximately $50,000.
Reducing the budget by $37,000 will leave a balance of$63,000 to complete the project.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the budget to facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services- Engineering Division 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Facility Amendment#4 Initiative#13
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Max Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 - new cost center Reimbursement From County $ 2,500,000.00
Total $ 2,500,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83 - new cost center $ 2,500,000.00
Total $ 2,500,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 2,500,000.00
6. Other(Specify))
Total $ 2,500,000.00 $0 $0
BA#$FY2005 Initiative#13 Landfilll l/16/20049:24 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Facility has budgeted and received approval for capital projects and
landfill permitting, leachate, air and water quality monitoring at the Landfill. In accordance with an
agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, the City provides engineering support for
projects at the landfill by designing and constructing the required facilities. The City pays the
consultant, contactors, etc., and then is reimbursed by the County.
This request establishes a budget in the amount of$2,500,000 to facilitate these projects, and to
authorize the City Engineer's Office to establish budgets within the $2,500,000 to accomplish the
projects.
It is recommended that the City Council establish the necessary budget to facilitate this project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Comm Dev-Housing and Neighborhood Dev 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
900 So.,Main to 900 West
Job No. 102004 Amendment#4 Initiative#14
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Max PetersonlLuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6736/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-83-04050 9th So. SID $ 130,000.00
Total $ 130,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP 83-83-04050 9th So. SID $ 130,000.00
Total $ 130,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 130,000.00
6. Other(Specify))
Total $ 130,000.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#14 900 So SID 11/16/200410:39 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The 900 So., Main to 900 West Project design is nearing completion with an anticipated bid date of
February 2005. An accurate estimate of the quantities of work to be assessed to the property owners
has been made. This project includes replacement of curb and gutter including base course and
excavation, 6 foot wide sidewalks, concrete driveway approach and optimal park strip sod and
irrigation. It is estimated that the total amount of the neighborhoods portion of the SID is $430,000.
A budget of$300,000 was established for this SID in 2004. This action will increase the budget by
$130,000 for a total budget of$430,000.00
It is recommended that the City Council increase the current budget of the neighborhoods portion of
the 900 So SID to facilitate the project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Mayor's Office 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Grant Tower Design Conjunction with Commuter Rail Amendment#4 Initiative#14A
Initiative Name Initiative Number
D.J. Baxter 535-7735
Prepared By Phone Number
New Item Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Fund Balance $ 25,000.00
Total $ 25,000.00 $ - $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Non Departmental $ 25,000.00
Total $ 25,000.00 $ - $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services $ 25,000.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 25,000.00 $ -
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#14A Grant Tower Design- Commuter Rail11/30/20043:47 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The budget is being requested to provide funding to conduct initial track and signal design work to
evaluate the feasibility of constructing Grant Tower reconfiguration in conjunction with commuter rail.
Total cost of the study is ($50,000)to be shared 50%with UTA.
UTA is making rapid progress on its Commuter Rail project and intends to begin construction this
spring. To bring commuter trains to the Salt Lake City Intermodal Hub, UTA's current plans call for the
construction of two new tracks, east of the Union Pacific freight lines,through the Grant Tower area
(500 North to 400 South), at an estimated cost of$10 milllion. UTA is reaching the final stages of its
design process, and is eager to remain on an aggressive schedule that will allow UTA to begin
commuter rail service by the end of 2007.
The Administration negotiated an agreement with Union Pacific in which Union Pacific agrees to
remove its trains from the 900 South line permanently if the City is able to arrange for the straightening
of the Grant Tower rail curves. The rough cost estimate for this project is $40 million. Union Pacific has
agreed to contribute $4.5 million, as well as deeding to the City all of its land along the 900 South
corridor and the Folsom Street corridor.
Our efforts to secure federal funds for Grant Tower have been unsuccessful so far, primarily for two
reasons: Senator Bennett's office has expressed doubts that the project would benefit the public, and has
questioned the City's commitment to the project without an assurance of some city funds.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
The Administration has proposed UTA's expenditure of$10 million in the area could be used to build
commuter rail track, while also furthering the Grant Tower reconfiguration project. After some
preliminary discussions, City Engineering,UTA, and Union Pacific, all believe it is both feasible and
desirable to accomplish the Grant Tower work at the same time commuter rail is being constructed. This
would potentially reduce overall costs for all entities, and would enable UTA's $10 million to complete
some major components of the reconfiguration. We believe this would help our cause in securing
federal funds,both by leveraging other funds and by reducing the amount we are requesting.
Our immediate need is to hire a rail design engineer to work with Union Pacific and UTA to further
explore the feasibility of constructing these projects (commuter rail and the Grant Tower
reconfiguration) simultaneously. The budget for this initial design work is approximately $50,000 over
the next two months, and UTA has agreed to share these costs with Salt Lake City.
Because UTA is moving the commuter rail project forward so quickly, we have a brief two-month
window in which to accomplish this work. After January 2005, our opportunity for these cost savings on
Grant Tower will disappear.
Finally, the Council should be aware that the ultimate completion of the Grant Tower realignment will
almost certainly require substantial city funds. UTA, Union Pacific, and the Federal and State
governments are other potential contributors, but because Salt Lake City has such a vested interest in
the project(the removal of trains from 900 South and the daylighting of City Creek), we will be
expected to contribute. Appropriation of the requested $25,000 does not commit Salt Lake City to any
further funding,but merely keeps the door open for us to pursue this joint venture should we decide to
do so. It will also provide us with a more reliable cost estimate for the project. If this design work
confirms our thinking about the feasibility and desirability of combining these projects, Salt Lake City
will have to make some quick decisions about whether and to what degree we are willing to fund the
project.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Police Department FY 2005
Department For Fiscal Year
Rocky Mountain HIDTA
Executive Office of the President
Office of National Drug Control Amendment#4 Initiative#15
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Jerry Burton/Sherrie Collins 799-38241535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant For Existing Staff 16.000
Type of Initiative Grant CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 145,800.00
Total $ 145,800.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 145,800.00
Total $ 145,800.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages $ 108,000.00
2. Employee Benefits $ 37,800.00
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 145,800.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#15 Police Dept RMHIDTA11/16/200410:48 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
Officers 3 501a $ 108,000.00
Benefits x 3 37,800.00
Total $ 145,800.00
Request FY05 RMHIDTAI1/9/200410:32 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization, or plans.
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria,
condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a dimwit element to identify but IS essential to a tind►ng. It is simply identifying wny the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
mananmmant
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Police Department has received regional approval to continue the Rocky Mountain High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Area (RMHIDTA) grant funded by the Executive Office of the President, Office of
National Drug Control Policy. This allocation will be used to continue to fund the 3 officers assigned to
Metro Narcotics for drug enforcement. Funding provides approximately 86% of total funding needed.
The granting agency caps benefit package reimbursement at 35% of base salary. The department
proposes to fund the required match of approximately $ 24,400 from attrition savings.
HIDTA is a multi-agency enforcement program that targets illegal distribution of drugs and drug
It is recommended that the City Council accept the grant and appropriate the necessary budget to
facilitate the Grant. The necessary resolution was previously passed, authorizing the Mayor to accept
the grant and to sign all additional agreements pertaining to this particular grant
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? Yes , What programs are funded with this
grant and what are the performance measures of each program? These funds will continue to
pay salary and benefits of 3 Officers assigned to Metro Narcotics Task Force.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? PD will continue
apply if funding is available.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? Yes
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable? Very Probable, High Community impact when city loses Officer Positions.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No, allocation is geared specifically toward
drug enforcement. Other local agencies receive same grant for same use.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Comm Development- Housing&Neighborhood Dev 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Project Safe Neighborhood
State of Utah-West Valley Pass Through Amendment#4 Initiative#16
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Jacob Brace/Sherrie Collins 535-60351535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant Requiring New Staff Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative NA
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
•
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 10,000.00
Total $ 10,000.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 10,000.00
Total $ 10,000.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages $ 10,000.00
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 10,000.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#16 WVC Project Safe11/16/200410:57 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Personnel Service Detail: FTE Grade/Step Amount
Paralegal/Executive Assistant
$16. per hr. @ 12 hrs per wk x 52 wks 1 PTE 10,000.00
Total 10,000.00
Request FY05 WVC Project Safe11/9/200410:42 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
Housing and Neighborhood Development applied for and received this pass through funding from
West Valley City. It is a State pass through grant to West Valley with the City being a Subrecipient of
West Valley. This is the second year that Salt Lake City has received these funds. This grant is being
awarded to deter gun violence in the Weed and Seed area through the adult and juvenile violent
offender re-entry pilot program, gun violence prevention education for at-risk youths, and integrating
new crime-mapping software to facilitate cross jurisdictional data sharing.
These funds will be used to hire an hourly Paralegal/Executive Assistant to work with the Salt Lake
City Prosecutors Division in identifying and filing appropriate cases involving domestic violence and
gang and juvenile incidences with firearms that are coming from the City's Weed and Seed targeted
area. This will be an hourly position being paid approximately $16.00 per hour for providing
approximately 624 hours of services.
This is a continuation grant for expansion of the current grant related services.
The City Council previously adopted the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept the original grant
award and to accept any additional grants that stem as a result of the original grant. It is
recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate this Grant.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2- Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4- None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? Yes - it will hire a paralegal at 12 hrs per
week for approximately 624 hours of service. What programs are funded with this grant and
what are the performance measures of each program? NA.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? If funding becomes
available SLC will apply.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? Yes.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? Yes.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable? This service will not be available.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services- Fleet Mqmt Division
Police Department 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Utah Department of Public Safety
Division of Emergency Services and Homeland Security
DES-2003-ODP2-08 Amendment#4 Initiative#17
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Bryce Lindeham/Greg Davis/Sherrie Collins 535-6397/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant Requiring No New Staff 16.007
Type of Initiative Grant CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Fleet Fund 61-00020 1974-72 $ 40,205.00
Total $ 40,205.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant 1360 $ 40,205.00
Total $ 40,205.00 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Fleet Fund 61-00020 2750-01 $ 40,205.00
Total $ 40,205.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 40,205.00
Total $ 40,205.00 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services-
5. Capital Outlay $ 40,205.00
6. Other(Specify)Transfer to Fleet 2910-04 $ 40,205.00
Total $ 80,410.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#17 Homeland Sec Bomb Squad Van11/16/200410:59 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Salt Lake City Police Department received this grant from the State Division of Emergency
Services and Homeland Security. It is the same grant issued to the City to purchase the Command
Vehicle two years ago. The grant purpose is to provide Emergency Management Equipment to
various State municipalities. This can be an award of cash, equipment or both. This grant award
includes a cash reimbursement in the amount of $40,205. and equipment which includes a Remotect
Andros hazardous Duty Robot. The cash was awarded to the City for the purchase of a vehicle to
transport the Robot which will be used by the Bomb Squad. The State purchased the Robot and has
issued it to the City PD.
The Police Department has opted for a Chev Box Van with specific interior furnishings to include
insulated walls, wall cabinets, a steel desk, chair, flooring, and robot tie downs.
Because this grant involves a motor vehicle, it is necessary to include the Fleet internal service fund in
the budget opening as well as the Miscellaneous Grant Fund. Fleet will take ownership of the vehicle
and inventory it as being purchased with grant funds.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant . A
Resolution was previously adopted authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the grant and to sign any
grants or agreements resulting in the original grant.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4 - None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No. What programs are funded with this
grant and what are the performance measures of each program?
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? NA.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable? NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
American Dream Downpavment Initiative
(ADDI) Amendment#4 Initiative#18
Initiative Name Initiative Number
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant Requiring no New Staff 14.239
Type of Initiative Grant CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
$0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 177,518.00 _
Total $ 177,518.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant $ 177,518.00
Total $ 177,518.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services $ 177,518.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
• Total $ 177,518.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#18 ADDI-Amer Dream Downpaymentl l/16/200411:50 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Cost Center/Project Name Debit Credit
Miscellaneous 72 Account
Fiscal Year 2003-04 allocation $81,429.00
Fiscal Year 2004-05 allocation $96,089.00
Total Allocation $177,518.00
Request FY05 ADDI Fundsl l/9/20042:16 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria vanes from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
vanes from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The US Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded Salt Lake City funding for the
American Dream Downpayment Initiative for 2004 and 2005 in July of 2004. This program is
administered under HUD's HOME Investment Partnership Program and requires a public process.
HAND solicited project applications which were due August 2, 2004. The City Council will make their
final recommendations on November 9, 2004 for both funding the 2004 and 2005 allocations.
This action formalizes and establishes budgets for the projects recommended for funding by the City
Council on the 9th.
It is recommended that the City Council establish the appropriate budgets to accept the grant funds.
A Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the original grant agreement and any additional
agreements pertaining to the grant was adopted during the normal CDBG/HOPWA/ESG/HOME/ADDI
process.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1 - In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4- None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? NA. What programs are funded with this
grant and what are the performance measures of each program? NA.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? NA.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ? NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? NA.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
State of Utah
Department of Community&Economic Development
Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS Amendment#4 Initiative#19
HOPWA Initiative Number
Initiative Name
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant Requiring no New Staff 14.241
Type of Initiative Grant CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
$0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary -
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant (72-60513) $ 21,209.00
Total $ 21,209.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grant (72-60513) $ 21,209.00
Total $ 21,209.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services $ 21,209.00
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 21,209.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#19 State HOPWA-Housing Opportunities)l/16/200411:52 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The State of Utah, Department of Community and Economic Development has awarded an additional
$21,209 in supplemental HOPWA funds to the City. The State identified additional carryover funds, in
addition to the $100,000 already awarded, to specific HOPWA programs in fiscal year 2005. These
funds will be combined with the City's HOPWA funds and awarded to the Housing Authority of Salt
Lake City's HOPWA program to provide additional rental assistance for clients that are living with
HIV/AIDS. These funds were awarded to Salt Lake City to avoid the State and City monitoring the
same program.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the appropriate budget to accept the supplemental
funds. A Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the original grant agreement and any
additional agreements pertaining to the grant was adopted during the normal
CDBG/HOPWA/ESG/HOME/ADDI process.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—In some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4- None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? NA. What programs are funded with this
grant and what are the performance measures of each program? NA.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? NA.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ? NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? NA.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Fire Department 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
US Department of Homeland Security
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA Amendment#4 Initiative#20
Metropolitan Medical Response System(MMRS) Initiative Number
EMW-2004-GR-0750
Initiative Name
Raleigh BunchllSherrie Collins 799-4217/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Grant Requiring No New Staff 97-071
Type of Initiative Grant CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ 400,000.00
Total $ 400,000.00 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Total $0.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ 400,000.00
Total $ 400,000.00 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services- $ 366,500.00
5. Capital Outlay $ 33,500.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 400,000.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#20 Fire Fema MMRS11/16/200411:55 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The Fire Department received this continuation grant from the US Department of Homeland Security
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the 2004 Metropolitan Medical Response
System (MMRS) Program.
The grant funds were awarded to the Fire Department for the expansion and sustainability of the Salt
Lake City MMRS which is responsible for the coordination of multiple local first responder agencies
that are essential in managing the medial and public health response to mass-causality weapons of
mass destruction (WMD) terrorist attack.
These funds will be used to purchase equipment including geographical information system software,
automated vehicle locators, hazardous materials inventory software, a fourth radio control station for
Salt Lake City Fire Department, a redundant disaster recovery system, 30 wireless mobile data
terminals and modems, pharmaceutical cache supplies, and radiation detectors. In addition, the
award provides for the Salt Lake MMRS to offer a total of$64,000 for sub-grants of$8,000 each to the
fire departments for the cities of South Salt Lake, Midvale, Murray, Sandy, West Valley, South Jordan,
West Jordan and the United Fire Authority for on-site MMRS property managers, who will serves as a
point of contact for information dissemination and to maintain equipment/pharmaceutical cache
inventories. Salt Lake City Fire Department will retain Dr. Steven Joyce as the Salt Lake MMRS
Coordinator. The Coordinator is responsible for providing medical oversight to the emergency
preparedness planning of the Salt Lake MMRS and to liaise with the all Salt Lake area hospitals.
The grant funds will also fund an Executive Assistant to provide administrative support to the MMRS
Coordinator and the MMRS Steering Committee and to serve as a point of contact for existing and
new MMRS agencies. Finally, the Fire Department will contract with City IMS to develop a Salt Lake
MMRS website that will serve as a community emergency response preparedness resource for the
public and for MMRS agencies.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
G. Grant Criteria: A grant will satisfy one of the following four criteria.
1—ln some cases, the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund of the City will use grant funding for
projects or programs that have been identified by the Council for future funding. The General
Fund or Enterprise Fund will provide funding once grant funding
2—Grant funding will be used when the use of the_grant money will result in long-term financial
savings or operating efficiencies.
3—Grant funding will allow the City to build internal capacity to continue the service in the future.
4- None of the above.
Question 1 - Will this grant fund employee positions? No. Contractual Components include
the Coordination and Medical Oversight. What programs are funded with this grant and what
are the performance measures of each program? The SLC Fire Department acts as the
Coordinator over the MMRS Weapons of Mass Destruction Planning and response program.
Question 2 - What is the potential for continued grant funding for the position? NA - However the
City will continue to apply if funds are available.
Question 3 - Is it expected that the positions can be eliminated once the grant funds are
unavailable? NA.
Question 4 - Is the program that the grant funds, a program that can accomplish its goals within the
grant funding time frame? NA.
Question 5 - Will there be a significant service level impact on the community once the grant funds
become unavailable ? NA.
Question 6 - Does the grant duplicate services that are provided in the private or non-profit sector?
Is there a better fit in another jurisdiction or entity? No.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Public Services Fleet and Refuse Divisions 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Refuse and Fleet Encumb Carryovers Amendment#4 Initiative#21
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Greg Davis 535-6397
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping
Type of Initiative Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
Estimated future $
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
61 Fund Fleet Fund Balance $ 996,596.00
Total $ 996,596.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
57 Fund Refuse Reserve $ 3,337.00
Total $ 3,337.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
61 Fund Fleet $ 996,596.00
Total $ 996,596.00 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
57 Fund Refuse $ 3,337.00
Total $ 3,337.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply $ 26,618.00
4. Charges and Services $ 2,378.00
5. Capital Outlay $ 970,937.00
6. Other(Specify)
$ 999,933.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#21 Encumb carryover Fleet and Refusel1/9/20044:55 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
D. Encumbrance Roll Detail Object Code Amount
Refuse Fund
2222 701
2295 397
2289 67
Total O&M 1,165
233609 45
2305 640
233609 135
254970 1,352
Total C&S 2,172
Fleet Fund
2212 15
2233 48
2234 9,282
2298 944
2299 4,989
223401 214
224101 706
224104 8,971
224106 106
224111 178
Total O&M 25,453
2395 151
254970 55
Total C&S 206
Bronto Fire Apparatus 2750 959,040
Band Saw&Drill Press 2750 11,897
Total Capital 970,937
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#21 Encumb carryover Fleet and Refusel l/18/20042:33 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization, or plans.
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below; criteria,
condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identity but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying wny the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
mananamant
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
State law requires that all budgets, except that of the Capital Project Fund, lapse at June 30th or fiscal year
end. Historically, purchase orders encumbered near the end of the fiscal year are not paid by June 30th and
therefore the payment will occur in the next fiscal year. Because the budget from the prior fiscal year lapsed, it
is necessary to again appropriate funds to cover the purchase commitments made in the prior year and paid in
the current year. The funding source for this type of transaction is fund balance. Cash or revenue collected in
the prior year and not spent lapses to fund balance or cash reserves and is therefore available to cover the
commitments made. This amendment request will appropriate budget in the Refuse Fund of$3,337 and in the
Fleet Fund of$996,596. There is adequate fund balance and reserves available in the funds to accomplish this
request.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development-Transportation Division 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Rose Park SID Amendment#4 Initiative#22
Budget Increase Initiative Number
Initiative Name
Tim Harpst!Gordon Haight//Sherrie Collins 535-71481535-71471535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Fund 30 Miscellaneous SID Accounts $ 236,873.00
Total $ 236,873.00 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Fund 30 Miscellaneous SID Accounts $ 236,873.00
Total $ 236,873.00 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 236,873.00
6. Other(Specify))
Total $ 236,873.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#22 SID Roseparkl l/12/20041:46 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Cost Center/Project Name Current Budget Increase Amount New Budget
30-12700 $ 71,000.00 $ 27,567.00 $ 98,567.000
30-13000 $ 200.00 135,428.00 $ 135,628.000
30-23100 $ 90,000.00 40,533.00 $ 130,533.000
30-34100 $ 30,000.00 28,887.00 $ 58,887.000
30-24800 $ 6,000.00 4,458.00 $ 10,458.000
$ 197,200.00 $ 236,873.00 $ 434,073.00
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#22 SID Roseparkl l/12/20041:46 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
Several of the Fund 30 cost centers for the Rose Park Lighting SID have collected more cash than
available budget. This action increases the budgets in those cost centers to facilitate the expenditure
of the actual cash received.
The Rose Park Lighting SID was established to provide additional decorative street lighting and to
replace existing lighting within the Rose Park area as needed.
It is recommended that the City Council increase the budgets in the various Fund 30 Cost Centers for
the Rose Park Lighting SID to facilitate expenditure of the actual cash received.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Community Development 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Recaptured CIP General Fund 2000-2003 Amendment#4 Initiative#23
&Recaptured CIP CDBG 2003 Initiative Number
Initiative Name
LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
$0.00 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP Fund 83-04099 Fund Balance $ 319,625.32
CIP Fund Miscellaneous General Fund Projects $ (319,625.32)
CIP Fund 83-03098 CDBG Fund Balance $ 7,930.53
CIP Fund Miscellaneous CDBG Fund Projects $ (7,930.53)
Total $ - $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP Fund 83-04099 Fund Balance $ 319,625.32
CIP Fund Miscellaneous General Fund Projects $ (319,625.32)
CIP Fund 83-03098 CDBG Fund Balance $ 7,930.53
CIP Fund Miscellaneous CDBG Fund Projects $ (7,930.53)
Total $ - $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $0 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#23 CIP Recaptures11/12/20041:53 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Cost Center/Project Name Debit Credit
CIP Fund (Genral Fund Funding Source) #
83-99006 Backflow Prevention, Phase II $ 428.83
83-00008 Drinking Fountain Cross Connection _ 1,666.22
83-02022 Jordan River Peace Garden Irrigation 34.44
83-02048 Guardsman Way 314,424.65
83-03013 Sugarhouse Business District 3,071.18
83-04099 CIP Fund Balance $ 319,625.32
Total GF $ 319,625.32 $ 319,625.32
CIP Fund(CDBG Funding Source)
83-03057 100% Sidewalk Replacement 7,930.53
83-03098 CDBG Fund Balance $ 7,930.53
Total CDBG $ 7,930.53 $ 7,930.53
Total all funds $ 327,555.85 $ 327,555.85
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#23 CIP Recaptures)l/12/20041:53 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
This action will decrease the remaining budgets and cash balances of completed and or closed CIP
Funded Projects from Years 1999-2003 and increase the budget and cash of CIP Fund Balance in
year 2004 for CIP project cost over-runs. This action involves closing five (5) projects totaling
$319,625.32.
In addition, this request will decrease the remaining budget of one (1) completed Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund Project, totaling $7,930.53 from Year 2003 and increase the
budget of the same years CDBG Fund Balance for project cost over-runs.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate action to decrease the remaining
budgets and cash of completed CIP Fund Projects and increase the 04 CIP Fund Balance account;
and decrease the remaining budget in the completed CDBG project and increase the 03 CDBG Fund
Balance.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Comm Development - Housing&Neighbor Dev 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
US Department of Education Amendment#4 Initiative#24
Budget Adjustments Initiative Number
Initiative Name
Greg Davis/Sherrie Collins 535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative NA
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A.Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1.General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3.Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4.Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ 127,506.31
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ (127,506.31)
$ $0 $0
B.Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1.General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2.Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4.Other Fund
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ 127,506.31
72 Fund Miscellaneous Grants $ (127,506.31)
$ - $0 $0
C.Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4.Charges and Services
5.Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)
Total $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#24 EDGAR11/12/20041:54 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Reduce Budget Increase Budget Remaining
Budget
72-63001 Fairmont Cottage Programming $ 16,032.54 $ 47,406.00
72-63002 Ottinger Hall Programming $ 17,163.36 $ 52,406.00
72-63003 Liberty Park Programming $ 64,904.67 $ 57,406.00
72-63004 Sorenson Center Programming $ 7,161.72 $ 32,000.00
72-63005 Central City Programming $ 14,881.89 $ 10,000.00
72-63006 Global Artways Programming $ 13,255.30 $ 40,500.00
72-63008 Grant Admin year 1 - No Change $ 19,586.63
72-63009 Fairmont/Ottinger Refurbishment $ 6,295.41 $ 100,000.00
72-63010 Boxing Building Refurbishment/Admin Offices $ 81,055.11 $ 60,000.00
72-63011 2nd year Admin $ 34,262.62 $ 147,454.97
Total $ 127,506.31 $ 127,506.31 $ 566,759.60
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#24 EDGAR11/12/20041:54 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The first US Department of Education appropriation ($1.2 Million), received in FY 02-03 has a current
balance of $566,729.80. This request is to make adjustments to the current budget by reducing
various budgets of completed projects and/or where the original budget established will not be
expended before the end of the grant period; and by increasing various budgets where additional
funds are needed to continue programs at various Youth City sites.
The revised budgets are as follows:
It is proposed to reduce the Youth City program budgets at Fairmont Cottage by $16,032.54, Ottinger
Hall by $17,163.36 and Global Artways by $13,255.30. These budgets currently pay the site FTE
Coordinator's salary and the PTE teachers who provide services at each site. It is also proposed to
reduce the Boxing Building refurbishment budget by $81,055.11 leaving a remaining budget of
$60,000 to facilitate the refurbish admin office space.
The proposed increases include the Youth City program budgets at Liberty Park by $64,904.67 and
Central City by $14,881.89 to support increased costs within these two (2) budgets due to program
expansion. Program expansion will increase at Sorenson Center by $7,161.00. These three (3)
budgets currently pay the FTE site Coordinator's salary and the PTE teachers who provide programs
at the sites. It is proposed that the Fairmont/Ottinger budget be increased by $6,295.41 creating a
budget of$100,000 for refurbishments that are currently underway. It is proposed that the 2nd year
Admin budget be increased by $34,262.62. This budget pays for supplies, equipment, O&M, and
contracts with outside providers. All budget adjustments have been approved by the Department of
Education pending approval of the Council's recommendations.
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budget changes to facilitate this
Appropriation.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Comm Develop-Housing and Neighbor Dev 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
California Ave. Bridge Amendment#4 Initiative#25
Job No. 107004 Initiative Number
Initiative Name
Max PetersonlLuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-61361535-6150
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping Enter Grant CFDA#As Applicable
Type of Initiative Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP Fund -Class"C"Cost Overrun 83-04094 $ (41,447.92)
CIP Fund - New cost center Class"C" $ 41,447.92
Total $ - $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
CIP Fund -Class"C"Cost Overrun 83-04094 $ (41,447.92)
CIP Fund - New cost center Class"C" $ 41,447.92
Total $ - $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance
4. Charges and Services Final UDOT Bill $ 41,447.92
5. Capital Outlay
6. Other(Specify)) Transfer from Overrun $ (41,447.92)
Total $ - $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#25 California Ave Bridget l/10/20041:33 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
F. Issue Discussion: A complete justification will contain a discussion of each of the elements mentioned below;
criteria, condition, effect, cause and recommendation.
Criteria is a definition of what is expected or what can be expected. It provides a basis for comparison without which
analysis cannot be effective. The criteria varies from issue to issue. In straightforward cases, it can be an ordinance or
policy. In other cases, it may be an industry standard or comparable data from another city.
Condition is a description of current practices. It is the information to which the criteria is compared.
Effect is the difference, if any, between the condition and criteria. It is best described in terms of a dollar impact or a
service level impact. If an effect cannot be identified, there is no finding.
Cause is sometimes a difficult element to identify but is essential to a finding. It is simply identifying why the condition
varies from the criteria. Sometimes the answer is as simple as a change in policy or budget but often goes deeper into
management
Recommendation is made in a way that addresses the cause. By doing so, it is most likely to result in improving the
condition to be in line with the criteria.
Issue Discussion:
Type discussion here. Use additional cells if necessary.
The California Ave., Jordan River Bridge Replacement project received a UDOT grant under the
Federal Bridge Replacement Program in 1997. These grants require a 20% Match. In the March
2004 budget opening, a Class "C" Cost Overrun Account was established by recapturing funds from
old and completed Class "C" projects. This overrun account was created to cover the City's share of
cost over-runs of Class "C" Projects, to pay final invoices of completed UDOT administered projects
and to meet the City required match for these grants.
The bridge project was completed in July of 2002. In July 2004, UDOT finalized the project and
billed the City for the remainder of the project match in the amount of$67,731.00. Of this amount,
Public Utilities portion is $26,283. leaving a balance of$41,448 to be paid from the City's Class "C"
Fund. The timeframe of the project being finalized and invoicing the City for final payment, is typical of
UDOT administered projects.
The Engineering Division is requesting that a new budget in the amount of $41,448 be created in the
83 fund, reducing the Class "C" Cost Overrun Account budget and cash by the same amount to pay
the final invoice submitted to the City by UDOT.
It is recommended that the City Council establish a new budget and reduce the Class "C" Cost
Overrun Account budget and cash in the amount of$41,448 to facilitate final payment to UDOT.
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Public Utilities-Water Utility Fund 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Carryover Capital Projects Amendment#4 Initiative#26
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Prepared By Phone Number
Housekeeping CFDA#(If Applicable)in this Cell
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
2nd year of biennium Biennial Period
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
51 Water Fund Carryover projects-Reserves $ 3,016,682.00
Total $ 3,016,682.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund •
51 Water Fund Carryover projects $ 3,016,682.00
Total $ 3,016,682.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 298,000.00
6. Other(Specify) Capital Improvements $ 2,718,682.00
Total $ 3,016,682.00 $0 $0
• BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#26 Water Carryover Capital Imp11/16/200411:57 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
The Water Department will require this amendment to complete projects that have been
delayed or started but not completed at year end, which require funding in this fiscal year.
F. Issue Discussion: The Water Utility is asking to amend the 2004-2005 budget for carryover
projects and equipment purchases.
Criteria- The Water Utility is requesting that the budget be amended to fund projects which
were budgeted in the prior year, but not expended until this year. This will allow the
continuation of the Utilities capital improvement program.
Condition - This is an established annual process to open the budget for carryover projects
for each of the Utility Enterprise Funds.
Effect- The major impact of this amendment is a shift of funding from last year to this year.
cause Due to the fiscal year ending on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of
a normal summer construction period. Projects are started in one budget period and
completed in the next. The Utility tries to anticipate the amount of projects which will
carryover into the next year, however projects and timing always change.
Recommendation - We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement program to continue as approved.
Issue Discussion:
Carryover Waterlines - $2,718,682
Carryover Equipment - 298,000
Total Amendment $3,016,682
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Public Utilities-Sewer Fund 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Sewer Carryover Capital Projects/New CIP Project Amendment#4 Initiative#27
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Parpared By Phone Number
Housekeeping CFDA#(If Applicable)in this Cell
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
2nd year of biennium Biennial Period
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
52 Fund Carry over projects/capital outlay-Reserves $ 683,495.00
52 Fund CIP Oil Drain project-Donations $ 1,000,000.00
Total $ 1,683,495.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
52 Fund Carry over projects/capital outlay $ 683,495.00
52 Fund CIP Oil Drain project $ 1,000,000.00
Total $ 1,683,495.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell,add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 113,495.00
6. Other(Specify) Capital Improvements $ 1,570,000.00
Total $ 1,683,495.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#27 Sewer Carryover Capital Imp1 1/1 6/20041 1:59 AM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions, structure and organization
The Sewer Utility will require this amendment to complete projects that have been delayed or
started but not completed at year end, which require funding in this fiscal year.
F. Issue Discussion: The Sewer Utility is asking to amend the 2004-2005 budget for carryover
projects and equipment purchases. The Utility is also asking for increased funding for the Oil
Drain Project. The original budget was for our share of the project only. The budget needs to
be increased to include the portion of the project funded by donations from the other
participating agencies.
Criteria- The Sewer Utility is requesting that the budget be amended to fund projects which
were budgeted in the prior year, but not expended until this year. This will allow the
continuation of the Utilities capital improvement program.
Condition - This is an established process to open the budget for carryover projects for each
of the Utility Enterprise Funds.
Effect- The major impact of this amendment is a shift of funding from last year to this year.
Cause Due to the fiscal year ending on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of
a normal summer construction period, Projects are started in one budget period and
completed in the next. The Utility tries to anticipate the amount of projects which will
carryover into the next year, however projects and timing always change.
Recommendation - We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement program to continue as approved.
Issue Discussion:
Carryover Sewerlines - $ 170,000
Carryover Equipment- 113,495
Cogeneration System - 400,000
Oil Drain Project - 1,000,000
Total Amendment $ 1,683,495
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
Please enter information into green shaded cells where applicable
Public Utilities -Stormwater Fund 2004-05
Department For Fiscal Year
Stormwater Carryover Capital Projects Amendment#4 Initiative#28
Initiative Name Initiative Number
Jim Lewis 483-6773
Parpared By Phone Number
Housekeeping CFDA#(If Applicable)in this Cell
Type of Initiative CFDA Number
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Change
2nd year of biennium Biennial Period
A. Revenue Impacted by Fund and Source: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
53 Fund Carry over-Reserves $ 240,000.00
Total $ 240,000.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
B. Expenditures Impacted by Fund and Source:
1. General Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
2. Internal Service Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
3. Enterprise Fund
53 Fund Carry over-Capital Imp Projects $ 240,000.00
Total $ 240,000.00 $0 $0
4. Other Fund
Include detail in this cell, add rows if necessary
Total $0 $0 $0
C. Expenditure Impact Detail
1. Salaries and Wages
2. Employee Benefits
3. Operating and Maintenance Supply
4. Charges and Services
5. Capital Outlay $ 240,000.00
6. Other(Specify)
Total $ 240,000.00 $0 $0
BA#4 FY2005 Initiative#28 Stormwater Carryover Capital Imp11/16/200412:00 PM
Salt Lake City Corporation
Management and Fiscal Note Worksheet
for
Budget Development and Budget Amendment
E. Measured or measurable Impact on functions,structure and organization
The Stormwater Utility will require this amendment to complete projects that have been
delayed or started but not completed at year end, which require funding in this fiscal year.
F. Issue Discussion: The Stormwater Utility is asking to amend the 2004-2005 budget for
carryover projects and equipment purchases.
Criteria- The Stormwater Utility is requesting that the budget be amended to fund projects
which were budgeted in the prior year, but not expended until this year. This will allow the
continuation of the Utilities capital improvement program.
Condition - This is an established annual process to open the budget for carryover projects
for each of the Utility Enterprise Funds.
Effect- The major impact of this amendment is a shift of funding from last year to this year.
Cause Due to the fiscal year ending on June 30th of each year, which falls in the middle of
a normal summer construction period. Projects are started in one budget period and
completed in the next. The Utility tries to anticipate the amount of projects which will
carryover into the next year, however projects and timing always change.
Recommendation - We recommend approval of the amendment to allow the existing capital
improvement program to continue as approved.
Issue Discussion:
400 West Lift Station - $ 70,000
1910 West Lift Station - 50,000
800 North Starcrest Drive 120,000
Total Amendment $ 240,000