Loading...
009 of 2005 - Budget Amendment No. 5 to FY 2004/2005 0 05-1 B 05-5 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. 9 of 2005 (Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2004-2005) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 63 OF 2004 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, INCLUDING THE EMPLOYMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2004 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2005. PREAMBLE On August 24, 2004, the Salt Lake City Council approved, ratified and finalized the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6, Title 10 of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget, including the employment staffing document, was approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 63 of 2004. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005, in accordance with the requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6, Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated. SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City's Policy and Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, with the Utah State Auditor. SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication. 2 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this 8 day of March , 2005. ,./h.., ' ti.(/.'(,‘(,7----- CHAIRP RSON ATTEST: Cimiza, . CHIEF DEPUTY C Y RE OR ER —� Transmitted to the Mayor on March 8, 2005 Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed AYOR ATTEST: CHIEF DEPU CITY ECORDER ,,.,., ; ,;,, ,.r 4 . M k, .- _:,,, 0_1t --Z - 7_ Os __ (SEAL) -,c }' Bill No. 9 of 2005. k ,_,;,. _ f Published: March 15, 2005 -,a. y;tvi;, g:\ordinance 04\budget amendment#5 2004-2005 \\ 3 FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #5 —March FY 2005 FY 2005 Initiative Gen. Fund Gen. Fund Initiative Name Amount Impact FTE Fund Balance Impact Section A New Items 1. Housing Authority Rental $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Assistance Program (TBRA) 2. SID 900 E and 900 S. $350,000.00 Streetscape 3. Utahna Drive Emery St to $25,000.00 California Ave. 4. 1300 S. Viaduct $160,000.00 Rehabilitation 5. Asphalt Overlay Class 1,500,000.00 "C" 2005-06 Funding 6. Fremont Ave. Bridge $8,000.00 Replacement- Class "C" 7. Gladiola St 900 S. to $250,000.00 California Ave.— Class "C" 8. Private Donation Land $320,000.00 Purchase Unity Center 9. Purchase of Preservation $12,344.00 Easement Airport Wetlands 10. Purchase of Property at $440,000.00 200 E. 600 S. 11. Street Lighting Power $255,000.00 $255,000.00 $255,000.00 Cost Increase 12. Energy Reduction at Plaza $67,500.00 $67,500.00 $67,500.00 349 13. County Permit Fee $47,840.50 $47,840.50 Refund on Salt Palace 14. Assistant to the Mayor $10,130.00 $10,130.00 1.0 $10,130.00 Section B Grants For Existing Staff Resources 1. US Department of $52,500.00 Education Supp Appropriation 2. Office of Crime Victims $18,133.14 Reparation Violence Against Women (VAWA) 3. Emergency Managers $24,000.00 Performance Grant 4. Metro Fire Investigation $15,000.00 Task Force FY 2005 Initiatives in Budget Amendment #5 —March FY 2005 FY 2005 Initiative Gen. Fund Gen. Fund Initiative Name Amount Impact FTE Fund Balance Impact Section C Grants For New Staff Resources Section D Housekeeping 1. Copy Center Transfer to $49,237 IMS 2. Guardsman Way Motor $(314,414.65) Fuel Bond Surplus 3. 500 West Project Closure $994,547.99 and Motor Fuel Bond 4. CIP and CDBG Recapture $(81,299.93) CIP Budget Reduction $(1,454,718.00) Only 5. Program Income $968,624.53 Section E Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1. County CDBG Utah $62,348.00 Alcoholism Foundation 2. Environmental $10,000.00 Management System 3. Economic Develop $99,410.00 Initiative 900 E 900 S Streetscape 4. No. Temple & 600 West $40,000.00 UDOT Grant 2 FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-1 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: On December 20, 2004, the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC) was notified by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that their Section 8 program budget would decrease by $740,810 beginning January 5, 2005. This cut will affect the HASLC's ability to provide housing subsides for approximately 119 families during the month of January. The HASLC Board met and agreed to use $60,000 from their reserve funds to enable continued subsidizing of their existing clientele through January. Additional reductions are not feasible and therefor, they are looking at other sources of funding to continue programming in the months following January. The HASLC has requested a one-time contribution of$30,000 from Salt Lake City to help alleviate this shortfall and the displacement of the 119 families that currently receive housing subsidies. It is anticipated that following January, the immediate need for additional funding will be met through attrition as those receiving Section 8 vouchers leave the Program. This contribution will be used as leverage for other funding sources, voucher contributions from the Salt Lake County Housing Authority and will provide needed funds for the month of March 2005 subsidies. This action reduces the Fund Balance of the General Fund by $30,000 and creates a new cost center/project in the Non-departmental to facilitate awarding the HASLC emergency funding for their Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program. The Doug Short analysis was required to prove that quid pro quo existed. This analysis has been done and a separate public hearing is being held for that issue. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary resolution authorizing the Salt Lake City Mayor to execute the grant agreement between the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake City Corporation and to appropriate the funds to facilitate this project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I 1 I Housing Authority of Salt Lake City Tenant Based Rental Assistance(TBRA) I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-1 2004-05 Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year r Community Development New Item Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By I I Telephone Contact 1 General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact ($30,000)1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 1General Fund I I 1 Total $0I $0 Internal Service Fund I I I I Total $0' I $0 Enterprise Fund I I Total 1 $01 I $01 1 Other Fund 1 I ! Total 0.00. I $01 1 1 I I Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's 01 0 1Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 Total I 0, 01 Description 1 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#a-1 Housing Authority(TBRA)1/25/20051:36 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I 1 I 1 _ Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount i I I. I I I � Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 09-New Cost Center 2580 30,000.00 I I I i Additional Accounting Details: I H I � I i I ' Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NO Is there a potential for grant to continue? NO If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NO Mill grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NO I 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NO IDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NO I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#a-1 Housing Authority(TBRA)1/25/20051:36 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Special Improvement District-Property Owner Funds 900 So.And 900 East Streetscape Enhancement Job No. 106018 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-2 Initiative Type: New Item initiative Discussion: The 900 So. and 900 East Streetscape Enhancement project was awarded $500,000 of CIP Funding in the 04-05 CIP. Process. However, the Special Improvement District (SID) component was not included in the budget approval. This request would establish the budget for the property owners portion of the SID in the amount of$350,000. Funds to be received by the abutting property owners. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to receive the property owners funds for the 900 So. and 900 East SID and to facilitate the project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Special Improvement District-Property Owners Funds 900 S.and 900 E.Streetscape Enchancement Job No.106018 Initiative Name I I BA#5 Fv2005 Initiative#A-2 2004-05 Initiative Number ! Fiscal Year Community Development (Type of Initiative) Department Type of Initiative Max Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By I I Telephone Contact (General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 !General Fund Total r $0! $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 1 $0 Enterprise Fund Total ! $0 I $0 'Other Fund 183 CIP Property Owner SID 350,000.00 Total 0i I $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 I 0 'Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 !Total 01 I 0 Description I BA#5 Fy2005 Initiative#A-2 SID 900 So-900 E1/25/20055:16 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center SID 1890 350,000.00 i I I I i I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center SID 2700 350,000.00 I ' Additional Description: i I � I I i Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will 'be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? No Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or iNon-profit sector? No BA#5 Fy2005 Initiative#A-2 SID 900 So 900 E1/25/20055:16 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Utahna Drive Phase 2, Emery Street -California to Utahna Job No. 102110 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-3 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Utahna Drive Phase 2, Emery Street was awarded $355,000 of CDBG funding in FY-04-05. However, the request did not include funding for underground streetlighting conduit. During the 04-05 CIP Process, the City Council approved an additional $70,000 of CIP to cover the costs associated with installation of underground streetlighting conduit for Utahna Phase I. Approval of this $25,000 request would maintain the consistency of the entire Utahna Street Improvement project by providing the underground conduit for Phase 2, Emery Street, California Ave. to the South leg of Utahna Drive. In addition, to add it during the course of the construction would provide a cost savings to future City funds. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate the Utahna Phase 2, underground streetlighting conduit project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Utahna Drive Phase 2, Emery Street-California to Utahna Job No. 102110 Initiative Name 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-3 2004-05 Initiative Number 1 Fiscal Year Community Development New Item Department L i Type of Initiative ax Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Contact Number � I General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund 1 Total $0I $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0' I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 $0 'Other Fund 1 Total 0; $0 Staffing Impact: !New Number of FTE's 0! 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 0, 0 'Total 01 0 'Description Request FY05 CDBG Utahnal/25/20056:00 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue:Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount ! I i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number ! Amount 83-99098 CDBG CIP Contingency 2700 (25,000.00) 183- New Cost Center CDBG CIP i i 25,000.00 Additional Description: � I I I Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? ! No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No ;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? No IWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are !eliminated? No !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No Request FY05 CDBG Utahna1/25/20056:00 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: 1300 So. Viaduct Rehabilitation Utah State Highway User Funds Class "C" 05-06 Job No. 107009 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-4 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: This project is included in the 2005-2006 FY request for funding within the Class "C" Fund. Expedited budget approval of this project is being proposed to allow needed emergency repairs to the structure. Work includes repairs to bridge expansion joints, drainage system and bridge deck and to perform additional testing of the structure's deterioration. Significant deterioration was identified in the recently completed condition assessment and bridge rehabilitation study. The City will be working with UDOT to develop a plan for financing this rehabilitation hopefully involving Federal Highway Funding. It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the 2005-2006 1300 South Viaduct Rehabilitation Class "C" budget to facilitate this project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 1300 S.Viaduct Rehabilitation Utah State Highway User Funds Class "C" 2005-06 Job No. 107009 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-4 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Community Development New Item Department j , Type of Initiative ax Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins i 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By j Contact Number General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total T $01 $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0i $0 Enterprise Fund Total I $01 I $0 1OtherFund 1 '83 CIP Class "C" Fund 2005-06 160,000.001 :FY Funding Total 160,000.001 $0 I I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0' 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 01 0 1 Description BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-4 CIP 1300 So Viaduct Class C1/26/20058:50 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March i Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center CIP Class 1381 160,000.00 "C" Funding I I II I I i I li Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount i83-New Cost Center CIP 2700 160,000.00 Additional Description: I j I ! j I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA !Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA ,If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will i be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA _ !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? NA � I (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or '.Non-profit sector? NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-4 CIP 1300 So Viaduct Class C1/26/20058:50 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Asphalt Overlay Utah State Highway User Funds Class "C" 2005-06 Funding Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-5 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: This project is included in the 2005-2006 FY request for funding within the Class "C" Fund. As in prior years, expedited budget approval of this project is being proposed to allow the work to begin in the spring of 2005 and be completed during the 05/06 construction season. The overlay will increase pavement life, provide smoother street surfaces and enhance the streetscape appearance. In addition, ADA ramps will be constructed and deteriorated curb and gutter replaced. This request also includes $100,000 to design the fiscal year 2006/2007 Overlay Project. Priority streets include 17 locations as follows: 10th Ave., B to D Street; 200 North, 400 West to West Terminus; 200 West, No. Temple to 600 No.; 300 North, 400 to 700 West; 3200 West, California Ave. to Directors Row; 400 North, Quince to 300 West; Directors Row, 3200 West to Swaner Rd.; Edgecomb Dr, Dorchester Dr. to East Capitol Blvd.; Girard Ave., West Capitol to Darwin St.; Hillside Ave., Main to State St.; K Street, 11th to 13th Ave.; Quince St., 300 to 500 North; Rio Grand St., 200 to 400 So.; South Sandrun Rd., Dorchester to East Capitol Blvd.; Sunnyside Ave., Foothill to 2300 East; Swaner Rd., California Ave. to Directors Row; Wall Street, Hillside Ave., to 300 North. It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the 2005-2006 Asphalt Overlay Class "C" budget to facilitate this project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Asphalt Overlay Utah State Highway User Funds Class "C" 2005-06 Job No. 104016 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-5 2004-05 Initiative Number i Fiscal Year Community Development New Item Department I Type of Initiative ax Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins j 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Conact Number General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund j Total $01 j $01 !Internal Service Fund 1 Total $01 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 j $0 'Other Fund 1 1 83 CIP Class"C" Funding 1,500,000.001 FY2005-06 Total 1,500,000.001 $0 Staffing Impact: ' 1New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's OI 0 Total 011 0 (Description I j _ ! • BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-5 CIP Asphalt Overlay Class C1/26/20059:10 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I I� Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! ! Amount 83-New Cost Center CIP Class "C" Fund 1381 1,500,000.00 � I I i I I � f ! l Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center CIP Class "C" Fund 2700 1,500,000.00 Additional Description: � I Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? NA I Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? I NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA jWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are leliminated? Na Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-5 CIP Asphalt Overlay Class C1/26/20059:10 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Fremont Ave. Bridge Replacement Job NO. 107006 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-6 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: This $900,000 bridge replacement project was funded through the Federal Bridge Replacement funding which requires a local match of 20%. Although the City previously budgeted for the 20% match, additional work order and cost increases were incurred requiring the City to increase the amount of it's 20% match. Those cost increases include keystone wall installation, embossed lettering, sidewalk and fence modifications, heating of lower deck/web walls and increase construction inspection fees. Federal Highway funded projects are administered through the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), therefore the City pay's UDOT the 20% match. The project is complete and the City expects to receive final billing shortly. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary increase to this budget to facilitate the 20% matching funds to the Federal Highway Funds for the Fremont Ave. Bridge replacement project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 Fremont Ave. Bridge Replacement Job No. 107006 Initiative Name 1I I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-6 2004-05 Initiative Number [ I I Fiscal Year Community Development i New Item Department I I Type of Initiative ax PetersonlLuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 1 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By ; Contact Number ! I General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund 1 1 Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund 1 1 Total $0! $0 !Enterprise Fund I I I I Total $0! I $0 I Other Fund _ I j I Total 01 $0 1 1 1 Staffing Impact: jNew Number of FTE's 01 0 !Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 1 Total 01 0 Description I 1 1 1 laACM rv')nng Inn+fa+fuc!!A_A r iP fremnnt Ave Bridge Class C1/26/20059.26 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! I Amount I I I I j I I ! I I � I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-01044 CIP Class C Project 2700 8,000.00 83-04094 Class"C" Cost Overrun Acct 2700 (8,000.00) II i I Additional Accounting Details: I I • I I ! li Grant Information: IGrant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA Ilf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will !be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA • !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA BA$5 FY2005 Initiative#A-6 CIP fremont Ave. Bridge Class C1/26/20059:26 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Gladiola Street, 900 So. To California Ave. Utah State Highway User Funds Class "C" 2005-06/ Impact Fees Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-7 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: This project is included in the 2005-2006 FY request for funding within the Class "C" and Westside Roadway Impact Fee funds. Expedited budget approval of this project is being proposed to allow the coordination of street improvements on Gladiola Street, 900 So. to California Ave. in conjunction with two private development projects located adjacent to the Gladiola and 900 South intersection. Widening and improvement of these two west side arterials will be accomplished in conjunction with curb, gutter, and pavement installation which is required of the two private developers, Ace Disposal and Geneva Pipe. It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the 2005-06 Gladiola Street and 900 South Class "C" and Westside Roadway Impact Fee budgets to facilitate this project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 1 I , Gladiola Stree 900 S.to California Ave. Utah State Highway User Funds Class"C"2005-06 Funding and Impact Fees I I Initiative Name i I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-7 2004-05 Initiative Number .I I Fiscal Year Community Development i New Item Department I Type of Initiative Max Peterson/LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-61361535-6150 Prepared By I Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund 1. Total $011 $0 Internal Service Fund 1 Total I $01 $0 Enterprise Fund I Total $01 $0 (Other Fund I 183 CIP Fund 2005-06 Class"C" Funding 250,000.00 83 CIP Fund Impact Fees(Fund 250,000.00, Balance) I 1 Total 500,000.001 1 $0 jI I I Staffing Impact: (New Number of FTE's 01 0 (Existing Number of FTE's OI 0 1 0 I of 'Total --1,Description I I I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-7 CIP Gladiola St Class C&Impact Fees1/26/20059:48 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount 83-New Cost Center CIP Class"C" Fund 1381 250,000.00 83-New Cost Center Westside Impact Fees Fund Balance 250,000.00 Roadway Impact Fees I i 1 i 1 I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center CIP Class"C" Fund 2700 250,000.00 183-New Cost Center Westside 2700 250,000.00 Roadway Impact Fees Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: ;Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA Ilf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will ,be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA ',Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-7 CIP Gladiola St Class C&Impact Fees1/26/20059:48 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Private Donation for Land Purchase for Unity Center Initiative Number: BA#5 Fy2005 Initiative #A-8 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The City used a portion of the funds from the Plaza/Glendale Community Center Trust to purchase .92 acres of property (in two .46 acre parcels). This property became available adjacent to the LDS Church-donated property which will be the site of the Unity Center. The City purchased the additional land with the firm understanding that a private donor would reimburse of the City for the full cost of obtaining the property. The purchase price is $315,000, with closing costs totaling $5,000, for a total price of $320,000. This initiative will allow the City to accept the donation and place it back in the same trust (within the Special Revenue Fund). FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 I 1 Private Donation for Land purchase for Unity Center Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-8 2004-05 Initiative Number I I Fiscal Year I _ Public Services New Item Department Type of Initiative Rick Graham,Greq Davis 535-7774,535-6397 • Parpared By I Contact Number I General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund I Total $0; I $0 Internal Service Fund I Total I $0! I $01 Enterprise Fund I I Total $0' I $0 Other Fund 1 I77 Fund Special Revenue Private 320,000.00! Donation I I I Total 320,000.001 $0 I I Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's not applicable i 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0! 0 ,Total 01 0 1 Description 1 I 1 I 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-8 Land Purchase for Unity Centerl/26/200511:19 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77-77141 1895 Private Donations 320,000.00 I II - i i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 77-77141 2700 320,000.00 I � I i I j Additional Accounting Details: I ' Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A �If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A {Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are !eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-8 Land Purchase for Unity Centerl/26/200511:19 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Purchase of Preservation Easement - Airport Wetlands Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-9 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The Airport is acquiring approximately 116 acres of real property located immediately north of Runway 17/35 at approximately 2200 North & 3200 West to reduce the possibility of future non-compatible land uses. The property will be acquired by means of a property exchange on a value-for-value basis with 620 acres of surplus land at the Airport's wetlands mitigation site and a cash differential payment. The cash difference will be funded with proceeds from the sale of property in the Buena Vista subdivision. The appraisal reports concluded a value for the 620 of wetlands property owned by the Airport at $1,423,000 and value for the proposed 116 acres at $2,100,000. Airport staff negotiated a permanent Deed of Conservation Easement across the 620 acres which reduced its value from $1,423,000 to $498,000. The City has reserved the right to use the 30-foot easement for a future trail preserved by the Deed of Conservation Easement on the 620 acres. This easement will not be used or improved until such time as the City acquires the additional property rights necessary to connect this segment with the future open-space trail corridor. Based on Federal regulation and government accounting principles, the City's General Fund must compensate the Department of Airports Enterprise Fund $2,461, which is the appraised value of the reserved easement consisting of 1.07 acres. Additionally, the City will also execute and record a "Notice of Preservation of Public Access Easement Interest" reserving a 30-foot wide public access easement located on the Airport's remaining wetlands mitigation site. This easement will consist of 4.29 acres and is valued at $9,883. The City's CIP Open Space Fund will compensate the Department of Airports Enterprise Fund for the preservation of this easement, which is contiguous to the easement on the 620 acres. The combined amount for these two easements to be transferred to the Airport Enterprise Fund from the CIP Open Space Fund is $12,344. The combined acreage for the public access easements will consist of 5.36 acres. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Purchase of Preservation Easement-Airport Wetlands Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-9 2004-05 Initiative Number i Fiscal Year Management Services New Item Department j Type of Initiative Linda Cordova 535-6308 Prepared By Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund i I Total $0! $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0�' $01 Enterprise Fund 54 Fund Land Purchase from CIP 12,344.001 (Open Space Fund Total 12,344.00! $01 Other Fund I 83 Fund Open Space Fund Balance 12,344.001 • Total 12,344.00' $01 1 Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's o1 0 (Existing Number of FTE's O. 0 Total 0' I 0 'Description I I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-9 Airport Open Space Easementl/26/200511:58 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant#and CEDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 54-03600 1784 12,344.00 83-95046 Open Space Fund Balance _ 12,344.00 � I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 54-03600 2700 12,344.00 83-95046 2710 12,344.00 I I Additional Accounting Details: I I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A IIf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 'Non-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-9 Airport Open Space Easementl/26/200511:58 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Purchase of Property at 200 East 600 South Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-10 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: In 1995 and approximately every two years thereafter, the City acquired property at the southeast corner of 200 East and 600 South for assemblage purposes to build a City-owned facility because of its proximity to the City & County Building. The assemblage of parcels creates a greater utility, therefore greater value for potential resale. Currently, there are still two properties under private ownership, which have recently become available to the City. It is recommended by the Administration that the City pursue acquisition of the remaining properties to hold the entire corner under the ownership of the City for future development or potential resale. Funding to purchase the two pracels would come from the CIP Surplus Land Account. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March • Purchase of Property at 200 Est 600 South I I Initiative Name i I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-10 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Management Services I New Item Department 1 j Type of Initiative Linda Cordova 535-6308 Prepared By I I Contact Number I General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund I I Total $01 I $0 Internal Service Fund I I I I Total I $01 $0 !Enterprise Fund I 1 • Total I $0'. I $01 'Other Fund I I _ Total 0' I $01 'I I Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's I 01 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 'Total 0' I 0 'Description I I 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-10 Land Purchase at 200 E 600 S1/26/20051:16 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CEDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number 1 Object Code Number Amount i I l 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-81000 Surplus Land Acct 2710 i 440,000.00 I � I i Additional Accounting Details: I � I � Grant Information: IGrant funds employee positions? i N/A �!Is there a potential for grant to continue? N/A I � If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A !Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A IDoes grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-10 Land Purchase at 200 E 600 S1/26/20051:16 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March `Initiative Name: Street Lighting Power Cost Increase Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-11 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Utah Power& Light has adjusted its monthly billings to the City for street light power to accurately reflect the number of street lights the city has in its inventory and the rate charged for each type of light. The increased monthly cost to the city is approximately $25,000, or $300,000 annually. Three years ago, both UP&L and the City conducted independent inventories of the City's public street lighting system. The inventories were reconciled and showed that UP&L's billings did not accurately reflect the updated inventory for its non-SID street lights. UP&L did not modify their billing practice until September 2004. This matter was discussed during the City's recent annual budgeting processes since the inventories were conducted because eventually the billings would need to be updated, but no change in the power and maintenance account was budgeted because of UP&L's inability to change their billings. The monthly power and maintenance billings have now been corrected from approximately $75,000 per month to approximately$100,000 per month. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Street Lihtinq Power Cost Increase Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 2004-05 Initiative Number j Fiscal Year • Community Development New Item Department Type of Initiative Tim Harpst/David Dobbins j 535-7236 Prepared By 1 , Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact ($255,000)! Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 jGeneral Fund Total $0• I $0 IlInternal Service Fund Total $01 $0� Enterprise Fund Total $0. $0� Other Fund Total 0 I $0 I j I I Staffing Impact: (New Number of FTE's 01 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 ,Total I 0' 0 Description H BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 Street Lighting Cost Increasel/26/20052:08 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I j r i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 09-00800 2331 255,000.00 i I I � I I I i I � I Additional Accounting Details: I I Grant Information: lls Grantfunds employee positions? N/A there a potential for grant to continue? N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A (Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are ,eliminated? N/A 1 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or INon-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-11 Street Lighting Cost Increase1/26/20052:08 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Energy Reduction at Plaza 349 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-12 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Relamping of Plaza 349 will have both financial and environmental benefits. This is in line with the City's energy saving initiative. Entire fixtures, including ballasts, would be replaced and some motion detectors would be installed. The project will replace the predominantly high energy-consuming flourescent fixtures with new energy-efficient ballasts and parabolic lamp fixtures. Utah Power has studied the project and has concluded that the cost of the project would be recovered within 3.2 years. Utah Power will agree to reimburse the City for $20,921 (approximately 30%) of the project costs. Per Utah Power's calculations, the City will have ongoing annual energy savings of $14,249 once the project is fully completed. In addition to the financial and environmental benefits, the parabolic system would provide better lighting and would be more aesthetically appealing. An agreement would be signed with Utah Power once the budget amendment is approved by the City Council. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Energy Reduction at Plaza 349 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-12 2004-05 Initiative Number I ; Fiscal Year Public Services I New Item Department l Type of Initiative Greg Davis/Steve Oliver I 535-6397 Prepared By I—H Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact ($67,500)1 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund r— Reimbursement From Utah Power I 20,900.00 1 1 Total 1 $0i 20,900.001 Internal Service Fund I I Total 1 $01 I $01 Enterprise Fund I I 1 Total 1 $0: 1 $0 Other Fund I I Total 1 01 I $01 1 1 1 I 1 Staffing Impact: iNew Number of FTE's 0'LA 0 !Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 (Total 0' I 0 !Description I I 1 I I I I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-12 Energy Reduction at Plaza 3491/26/20053:39 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount i I I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 07-00923 2240 67,500.00 II t j Additional Accounting Details: • Grant Information: !Grant funds employee positions? N/A 1ls there a potential for grant to continue? ( N/A If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? _ N/A !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? N/A 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 1 Non-profit sector? N/A ! BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-12 Energy Reduction at Plaza 3491/26/20053:39 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Reimbursement to Salt Lake County for Salt Palace Expansion Permit Fees Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-13 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: The City received a request from Salt Lake County to reimburse fees paid to the City for Phase I of the Salt Palace Expansion. The request was for a refund of $46,588.50 in building permit fees, $30,382.53 in plan review fees, and $42,648.12 in impact fees. The Administration is recommending that the building permit fee be refunded in the amount of $47,840.50 (which is the actual amount paid to the City) as provided for in the Protocol Agreement that governs such refunds/waivers. The Administration is not recommending a refund of the plan review or the impact fees as there is no provision for this in city ordinance. It is recommended that the City Council approve the necessary budget adjustment to facilitate reimbursement of Permit Fees to Salt Lake County for Phase I of the Salt Palace Expansion project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Reimbursement to Salt Lake County for Salt Palace Expansion Permit Fees-Phase I Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-13 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Community Development I New Item Department Type of Initiative David Dobbins/Sherrie Collins 535-7236/535-6150 Prepared By I Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Permit Fees 47,840.50 I I Total 47,840.50' I $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $01 'Enterprise Fund I � Total I $01 $0 lOther Fund I Total $0 Staffing Impact: INew Number of FTE's 0i 0 ;Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 Total 01 Description - I I Reauest FY05 County Fee Refund2/2/20054:52 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I I I i Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I I I 06-00200 1251-01 $ 47,840.50 I i I ; i I I I i I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 06-00200 2553 47,840.00 I � Additional Accounting Details: I � Grant Information: jGrant funds employee positions? I NA L ;Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA I If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will ,be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA 1 ' Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are ,eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA I � I Request FY05 County Fee Refund2/2/20054:52 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Assistant to the Mayor for Policy, Writing and Special Projects Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #A-14 Initiative Type: New Item Initiative Discussion: Performs and coordinates analytical work and research on policy issues and initiatives for the Mayor's Office. Designing and organizing a Salt Lake City Volunteer Program. Volunteers could assist in the following areas: Searching for missing persons Cleaning snow from the walks of seniors and disabled Raking leaves for seniors and disabled Home repair (painting, fix-up) Neighborhood Clean up Planting flowers in the spring Natural disaster(earthquake, flood, Etc.) Information/messages to residents (calling) Special events Computer data entry City/Building Tours Welcoming Visitors Work as the facilitator during the start-up phase and research and coordinate writing grant proposals for funding projects. Coordinate with organizations to form a Refugee Program for Salt Lake City. Research and coordinate writing grant proposals for funding project. Work as the liaison between the Salt Lake City Mayor's Office and Salt Lake County Mayor's Office, Salt Lake County Council's Office and Salt Lake County officials to research and resolve community issues and concerns. Research Salt Lake County's goals and policies to insure the initiatives work for both the city and the county. Work with SLCTV to expand it to Salt Lake City residents. Assist SLCTV in production and scheduling of City department updates, events and informational material to aid in the communication between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City community. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Coordination and implementation of broadcasting the Mayor's reports, City Council reports, Community Council reports, City Department reports, City meetings and City updates. Mayor's speeches,and City Council Meetings and other city department messages and announcements. This would open a new method of communication for Salt Lake City residents on television and Salt Lake Valley residents could access website online to be informed of changes in Salt Lake City that are of concern and interest. Work closely with the communications director to assist with writing critical press releases, letters and speeches for the Mayor's office. Assist with preparation for press conferences and other public access gatherings in conjunction with our SLCTV broadcasting of events. Funding requirements through the end of the 2004-2005 fiscal year will be approximately $10,130.00. The 2005-2006 funding requirements will be approximately$50,665.00. This position requires an additional FTE on the Mayor's office staffing document. We are requesting the budget amendment for 2004-05 and future from the general fund FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Assistant to the Mayor for Policy. Writing and Special Projects - Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-14 - 2004-05 -- Initiative Number L - Fiscal Year Mayor's Office New Item - - Department Type of Initiative Sam Guevara,Charleen Sylvester 535-7732/535-7705 - Prepared By 1 _ Telephone Contact - - 7General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact - ($10,130.00) ($50,665.00)1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund ,Fund Balance (10,130_00) (50,665.00)_ Total (10,130.00) (50.665.00)1 Internal Service Fund To_tali $0 $O' Enterprise Fund Total'' $0 $0 • 'Other Fund Total $Oi Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's _ - 1 - _ 1' Existing Number of FTE's 0 0' Total 0 0 Description BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-14 Assistant to the Mayor2/4/200510:20 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA _ Revenue: Cost Center Number I Object Code Number Amount 7 T Expenditure: Cos t Center Number Object Code Number - - Amount 1 08-00100 t 2111-01 - - 1.0,130.00 Additional Accounting Details: _ Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? - - NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA Ifgrant is funding aposition is it g expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? - NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? i NA 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or _ Non-profit sector? NA - - BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#A-14 Assistant to the Mayor2/4/200510:20 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: US Department of Education Supplemental Congressional Appropriation -Year 2 Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #B-1 Initiative Type: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Public Services, YouthCity Program was awarded an additional Congressional Appropriation in the amount of $894,150 from the US Department of Education in FY 2003-2004. This award was for a five year period from 2003 to 2008. The funding was allocated for continuation and expansion of the current programs YouthCity provides. The City adopted the budget for the 1st year of the 5 year appropriation in the December 2004 budget opening. This budget request is for year 2 of the 5 year award. $37,500 of these funds will continue to fund the salary & benefits of the Administrative Assistant, and hourly PTE teacher positions. No new positions are required. In addition, $5,000 has been awarded for Operating & Maintenance and $10,000 for the contractual components that provide various programs to youth at YouthCity sites which include, Fairmont, Liberty, Central City, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center and Glendale Middle School. The City Council previously adopted the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the US Department of Education appropriation and to sign any additional contracts and awards related to the grant. It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the necessary budgets for the continuation of this grant. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March US Department of Education Supplemental Congressional Appropriation Year-2 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-1 I 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Public Services Youth City Program Grant for Existing Staff Department L Type of Initiative Janet Wolf/Sherrie Collins • 535-7712/535-6150 Prepared By I Telephone Contact II General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund I { Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund � j I Total $0' $0 Other Fund I I Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's 1 0 Total 1 I 0 Description This amount includes salary&benefits 37,500.00 of 1 FTE, the YouthCity Administrative Assistant, &several PTE hourly teacher positions. No new positions are required. BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-1 Dept of Education1/25/20053:03 PM • FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 84-215K Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 j 52,500.00 II Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2199 37,500.00 72-New Cost Center 2590 15,000.00 � I ! i I ' Additional Description: I. I Grant Information: IGrant funds employee positions? Yes I Grant will continue to fund 1 current FTE position and PTE hourly teacher positions No additional FTE's are required. Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable 'Youth City is continuing to apply for Congressional appropriations. L If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? j Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes IIWill grant impact the community once the grant funds are !eliminated? j Yes I Program will continue but at a decreased level. (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or I Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-1 Dept of Education1/25/20053:03 PM • FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: State of Utah, Office of Crime Victims Reparations Violence Against Women Grant Award VAWA Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #B-2 Initiative Type: Grant for Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Salt Lake City Police Department receives this grant annually from the State of Utah, Office of Crime Victims Reparations, for partial costs associated with one Victim Advocate position. The required match is $6,459.00 which is budgeted for within the PD's General Fund Budget. These funds will be used to continue funding 50% of one-PTE victim advocate position to respond nightly and on weekends to calls for service on behalf of victims of violent crime. Services include resources, referrals, information support, community education, court advocacy and crisis intervention. In addition, position will research selected case histories of on-going violence cases, providing information to day advocates who will relay appropriate information to prosecutors, court staff, the Domestic Violence Judge, and Probation Services regarding compliance of court orders. $450, of these funds will be used to register and attend the Utah Victim Assistance Academy and a Rape and Sexual Assault Reponse Training. A Resolution was previously adopted by the City Council, authorizing the Mayor to accept and receive this grant and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to this grant. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to accept and facilitate this grant. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 I State of Utah,Office of Crime Victims Reparations Violence Against Women Grant Award VAWA Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-2 2004-05 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Police Department Grant For Existing Staff Department Type of Initiative Alana Kindness/Sherrie Collins 799-3729/535-6150 Prepared By _ I Telephone Contact General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund 1 Total $01 I $0 Internal Service Fund I 1 1 Total $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund I Total I $01 I $0 Other Fund I 72 Grant Fund 18,133.14, Total 18,133.14! I $0 ! Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's I 0'; 0 Existing Number of FTE's 1I 0 Total ! 11 0 Description 50%of 1 PTE or 1040 hrs @ 16.76 per 17,430.40 hr. 1.45 benefits 252.74 17,683.141 � I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-2 Police Dept VAWA1/25/20053:15 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March • Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: 04 VAWA-20 16.588 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number i Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 i 18,133.14 I i 1 I I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount I72-New Cost Center 2199 17,683.14 72-New Cost Center 2590 450.00 1 Additional Description: Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? • Yes 50% of 1-PTE. The Victim Admovate Program is funded annually Ito continue program which provides services to victims of domestic violence. The PD responded to 2,483 domestic violence incidents from January to September of 2004. Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable The City receives this grant annually and will continue to apply las funding is available. If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Yes Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are I ieliminated? I Yes 'Program will continue but at a decreased level. 'Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-2 Police Dept VAWA1/25/20053:15 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Emergency Managers Performance Grant State of Utah Department of Public Services US Department of Homeland Security Office of Domestic Preparedness Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #B-3 Initiative Type: Grant For Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Emergency Management Services receives this grant annually from the State of Utah, Department of Public Services. This grant is awarded to Salt Lake City to defray partial costs associated with the Emergency Managers Position, specifically salary and benefits. The remaining costs of this position are funded within the Management Services General Fund budget. This position is responsible to design, implement and apply the City's Emergency Operating Procedure manual and to educate Salt Lake City Corporation, Community Groups, and local businesses of emergency procedures and polices in the event of a natural disaster, hazardous material management and threats, bomb and terrorist attacks. A Resolution was previously adopted by the City Council, authorizing the Mayor to accept and receive this grant and to sign and accept any additional agreements related to this grant. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to accept and facilitate this grant. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Emergency Managers Performance Grant State of Utah Department of Public Service US Department of Homeland Security Office of Domestic Preparedness Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-3 2004-05 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Management Services Grant For Existing Staff Department Type of Initiative Mike Stever/Sherrie Collins 535-6030/535-6150 Prepared By I I Contact Number I General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total $0'', 1 $0 Internal Service Fund I Total I $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund I � � Total 1 $01 $01 'Other Fund 172 Fund Misc. Grants(State) 24,000.001 Total 24,000.001 $0 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 0 I Existing Number of FTE's 11 0 Total 11 I 0 Description Parital Funding for Emergency Program Directors Salary&Benefits BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-3 Emerg Mgr Homeland Sec.1/26/200510:15 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: CFDA-97.067 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center ( State Grant) 1370 24,000.00 I I I 1 i 1 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2199 24,000.00 • Additional Accounting Details: .1 � 1 Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? Yes .Partial salary & benefits will be paid for the Emergency Managers Position. The remaining cost is budgeted withing Management Services GF budget. I I Is there a potential for grant to continue? Probable The City recieves this grant annuallfy &will contiue to apply as funding is available. I � If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? Possibly ;Funding received pays partial salary and benefit costs. If Management Services 'were unable to absorb the $24,000 within their GF budget, position would be eliminated. Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are 'eliminated? _ I Yes I � Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-3 Emerg Mgr Homeland Sec.1/26/200510:15 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Metro Fire Investigations Task Force US Department of Justice Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #B-4 Initiative Type: Grant For Existing Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Fire Department receives this grant annually from the US Department of Justice for assisting the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) by participating in the Metro Fire Investigations Task Force. The purpose of the task force is to conduct a collaborative effort of Fire agencies, federal and local law enforcement in the investigation of valley wide fires to determine cause and origin. Funds are awarded for the reimbursement of the SLC Fire Department for overtime expenses incurred while providing resources to assist ATF in the task force operations. It is recommended that that City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this grant. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March • Metro Fire Investigations Task Force US Department of Justice Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-4 2004-05 Initiative Number I I Fiscal Year Fire Department Grant For Existing Staff Department Type of Initiative John Vuvk/Sherrie Collins 1 799-4210/535-6150 Prepared By Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund 1 i Total $01 1 $0 'Internal Service Fund Total $01 $0 'Enterprise Fund 1 Total $01 $0 'Other Fund 72 Fund Misc Grants 15,000.001 Total 15,000.001 I $0 1 I 1 Staffing Impact: 1 New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 'Total 01 I 0 Description I Fire Personnel OT BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-4 Fire Depart Metro Fire ATF1/26/200510:33 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 05-PH.-291-AFF,No CFDA Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: as per Justice Dept. Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I Amount 72-New Cost Center 1360 j 15,000.00 I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount '72-New Cost Center 2123 15,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: I � I I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? I No Reimbursement of personnel over-time for participation on the ATF Metro Fire Investigations Task Force. I Is there a potential for grant to continue? I Possibly Annual grant period ends in 2006. Fire will continue to apply pending the availability of Federal Funding. if grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA (Over-time only. Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are i eliminated? Yes I Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 1 Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#B-4 Fire Depart Metro Fire ATF1/26/200510:33 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Copy Center Cash and Assets Transfer to IMS Fund Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-1 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: Fiscal year 2004 was the Copy Center's (an internal service fund) last year of operation. For fiscal year 2005 an operating transfer to the General Fund was budgeted at$81,540. At June 30, 2004, net assets equaled $130,777, or$49,237 more than the budgeted transfer to the General Fund. The$49,237 budget request will allow for a small expense of$165.00 that was a carryover from the prior year and the final distribution of assets to the Information Management Services Fund. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 1 Copy Center Cash and Assets Transfer to IMS Fund 1 Initiative Name 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-1 i 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Management Services I Housekeeping Department I Type of Initiative Elwin Heilmann 535-6424 Prepared By Telephone Contact !General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact I 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 (General Fund I I Total I $0' $0 Internal Service Fund 67 Fund Copy Center 49,237i 0 65 Fund IMS 49,0721 Total 1 $98,30g I $0 Enterprise Fund I I Total I $0i $0 !Other Fund I Total 0. I $0 1 i Staffing Impact: 'New Number of FTE's o1 0 !Existing Number of FTE's 0i 0 iTotal 1 0: I 0 I Description 1 I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-1 Copy centerl/25/200511:45 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I I _Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 67-00676 Fund Balance I $ 49,237.00 65-03600 1974-67 i 49,072.00 I i - I j I I � Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount 67-00676 2981 165.00 '67-00676 12910-09 49,072.00 I I I � II Additional Accounting Detail: I � � I — I � Grant Information: 'Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? No 1 Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are Ieliminated? No (Does grant duplicate services provided by private or ;Non-profit sector? No � i I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-1 Copy centerl/25/200511:45 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Guardsman Way Motor Fuel Bond Surplus Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-2 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: On the January 2005 budget opening the Guardsman Way surplus was placed in the CIP Fund Balance in error. The funds were surplus from the motor fuel bond series 1999. We need to reserve the January 2005 budget opening amount. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 I I Guardsman Way Motor Fuel Bond Surplus • Initiative Name ' BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-2 2004-05 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Management Services j Housekeeping Department 1 Type of Initiative Gordon Hoskins 535-6394 Prepared By L 1 Telephone Contact 1 General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact 1 i Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 iGeneral Fund 1 Total $0, $01 Internal Service Fund Total $0! $01 Enterprise Fund j Total $0; I $0! Other Fund I CIP Fund 83-04099 Fund Balance (314,424.65)1 1 Total (314,424.65)1 $01 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 01 0 Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 Total I 01 j 0 Description j H i 1 � • BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-2 Guardsman Way Surplusl/25/20051:49 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue:Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 183-04099 1974-01 (314.424.65) I I I i I I _ Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-04099 27001, (314,424.65) Additional Accounting Details: II 1 Grant Information: ;Grant funds employee positions? ! N/A lls there a potential for grant to continue? N/A i 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will ,be eliminated at the end of the grant? N/A 1 (Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A `Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are ,eliminated? N/A 1Does grant duplicate services provided by private or ;Non-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-2 Guardsman Way Surplusl/25/20051:49 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: 500 West 200 S to 400 S Project Closure and Use of Surplus of Motor Fuel Bond on Local Street Project Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-3 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: Originally the 500 West 200 S. to 400 S. project was schedule to be partially funded by selling two parcels of land to the RDA for $500,000. The sale is still pending and being debated. The 500 West project costs are over the revenue without the land sale of $187,000. We need to transfer part of the motor fuel bond surplus to cover that revenue shortfall. That will close the 500 West project and free up the land sale. The remaining bond surplus will be used on the local street repairs in the CIP. That will free up the CIP general fund money from the local street repairs and can be placed in the CIP fund balance for future appropriations. All of these transfers will close out the series 1999 motor fuel bond proceeds. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number I j Amount 83-02049 1980 I 187,717.75 83-03018 1974-01 (806,830.24) 83-04099 1974-01 806,830.24 83-03118 1980 806,830.24 I 1 ! 1 I I I I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number j Amount 83-02049 2700 187,717.75 183-03018 2700 I (806,830.24) '83-04099 2700 806,830.24 183-03118 2700 806,830.24 � I 1 1 Additional Accounting Details: I � I Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? N/A Its there a potential for grant to continue? N/A jlf grant is funding a position is it expected the position will I N/A be eliminated at the end of the grant?� N/A Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? N/A !Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are leliminated? N/A i I !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? N/A BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-3 500 West and Motor Fuel Bond Surplusl/25/20052:26 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 500 West 200 S to 400 S Project Closure and Use of Surplus of Motor Fuel Bond on Local Street Project Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-3 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Management Services Housekeeping Department Type of Initiative Gordon Hoskins 535-6394 • Prepared ByTelephone Contact P General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 (General Fund Total $0'. $0I Internal Service Fund I Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0i $0 Other Fund Total 0 I $0 � ! I Staffing Impact: !New Number of FTE's 0 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 0' 0 iTotal 0; I 01 Description I i I —1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-3 500 West and Motor Fuel Bond Surplusl/25/20052:26 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Recapture General Fund CIP, CIP CDBG and other Mics. CIP Funds Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-4 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: This action will decrease the remaining budgets and/or cash balances of completed and or closed CIP Funded Projects and increase the cash and budget of CIP Fund Balance in year 2004 for CIP project cost over-runs. This action involves closing five (5) projects totaling $79,182.84 This request will also decrease the remaining budget and/or cash of twoe (2) completed Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund Projects, totaling $1,272.58 from various years and increase the cash and budget of the same years CDBG Fund Balance for project cost over-runs. In addition, this request reduces the remaining budgets in various completed or closed CIP projects. No cash is involved. The amount of deduction is $1,454,718.06. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the appropriate action to decrease the remaining budgets and/or cash of completed CIP Fund Projects and increase the 04 CIP Fund Balance account; and decrease the remaining budgets and/or cash in the completed CDBG projects and increase the budgets and/or cash of the same years CDBG Fund Balance Accounts. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March 1 I i 1 Recapture General Fund CIP,CIP CDBG I and Other Misc CIP Funds • I Initiative Name I 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-4 2004-05 Initiative Number -I Fiscal Year Community Development _ Housekeeping Department i -I Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Telephone Contact 'General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact I Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 'General Fund 1 I i i Total 1 $01 1 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $01 I $0 Enterprise Fund Total $01 1 $0 Other Fund I I • I Total $01 $0 I I I Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's I 01 1 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 1 0 Total 01 I 0 Description I I I f 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-4 CIP Recaptures1/26/20052:15 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March i _Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA#If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number _ Object Code Number Amount - I • - I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount Miscellaneous CIP Funded Projects 2700 $ (79,182.84) '83-05099 CIP Fund Balance 2700 $ 79,182.84 83-02042 Concrete Street Replacement Class $ (844.51) „C" 2700 183-04094 Class"C"Fund Balance 2700 $ 844.51 (Miscellaneous CIP CDBG Funded Projects !(See detail below). 2700 $ (1,272.58) 'Miscellaneous CIP CDBG Fund Balance Accts. $ 1,272.58 (See detail below) 2700 !Miscellaneous CIP Projects Budgets only (See !detail below) 2700 (1,454,718.06) 1 • Additional Accounting Details: CIP Fund Budget&Cash 15,000.00 _ 83-00030 Traffic Calming (18,800.00) 83-00078 Liberty Park Playground (3,491.67) 83-02050 500 West-200 to 400 South (11,334.25) _ 83-03016 Public Safety Building (32.081 83-04015 Jordan River Peace Gardens (45.524,84), 83-05099 CIP Fund Balance 79,182.84 Class"C" Fund Budget&Cash 83-02042 Concrete Street Rehabilitation (844.51) 83-04094 Class"C" Fund Balance 844.51 CDBG Fund Budget&Cash 83-03060 River Park Community Garden (979.94), 83-03098 29th Year CDBG CIP Fund Balance 979.94 83-02062 Urban Forestry (292.64) 83-02098 28th Year CDBG CIP Fund Balance 292.64 Reduce Budget Only-Miscellaneous Funds 83-00088 Landfill Module No. 7-Landfill - 1,111,487.55 83-02073 500 West-200 to 400 North-SID 71,814.00 83-03021 500 West Reconstruction -RDA 268,012.9/ 83-03030 Defective Sidewalk /th East-State Grant 3,398.91 83-03033 1-15 Gateway Street Repair-State Grant 4.63- 83-04099 Reduce Budget to match Cash Budget Only 1,454,718.06_ Grant Information: 1 I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-4 CIP Recaptures1/26/20052:15 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March (Grant funds employee positions? _ NA I _ ;Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA 'If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA ;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are ,eliminated? NA !Does grant duplicate services provided by private or 1 Non-profit sector? _ NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-4 CIP Recaptures1/26/20052:15 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Program Income Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #D-5 Initiative Type: Housekeeping Initiative Discussion: These Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funded programs, have received program income from re-payment of loans. This action establishes a budget for those funds and allows the program income to be reallocated back into the individual program for continued programming. It is a HUD Federal Guideline that Program Income be reallocated to programs that have the same eligible activity. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary adjustment for these budgets. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March i I I Program Income Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-5 2004-05 Initiative Number L _ Fiscal Year L CD-Housing and Neighborhood I Development Housingkeepinq Department ! Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins I 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By j Contact Number General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund I Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund 1 I ' 1 Total $01 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 I $0 Other Fund 72and 78 Fund Misc. Grants 968,624.531 Total 968,624.531 $0 Staffing Impact: ;New Number of FTE's 011 0 (Existing Number of FTE's 0; 0 ;Total I 01 0 1Description _! I I — I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-5 HUD Program Incomel/26/20052:50 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March ! i Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-15067 Revolving Loan 1890 436,031.16 72-17004 Housing Trust 1890 ! 339,692.37 78-00200/0021 1890 192,901.00 1Renter Rehab Income Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 172-15067 Revolving Loan 2590 I 436,031.16 72-17004 Housing Trust 2590 339,692.37 78-00200/0021 2590 192,901.00 Renter Rehab Income Additional Accounting Details: I � Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? No Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will Abe eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA 'Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or j Non-profit sector? NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#D-5 HUD Program Income1/26/20052:50 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 Marc! d —r2 Initiative Name: County CDBG-Utah Alcoholism Foundation Interlocal Agreement Between Salt Lake City & County Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #E-1 Initiative Type: CDBG Interlocal Grant With No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Utah Alcohol Foundation was awarded Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding from both Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for building improvements to three (3) of their facilities; The Women and Children's Center, the House of Hope and the Children's Treatment Center. The City awarded $33,091.00 and the County awarded $62,348. The purpose of the interlocal between the County and the City is to establish that the City will be the lead agency and administer the contract for the rehab construction as described in the interlocal. Improvements include windows, door replacement and bathroom ventilation at the Women and Children's Center; bathroom rehab, basement drain repair, driveway repairs and HVAC upgrade at the House of Hope; and, windows at the Children's Treatment Center. The Resolution was previously adopted during the City's process of the 30th Year CDBG Program authorizing the Mayor to sign the award documents and any other agreements that stem from the CDBG Program . It is recommended that that City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Foundation Interlocal Agreement Between Salt Lake City&Salt Lake County __71 SA0.503 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-1 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Community Development Grant With No New Staff Department Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6135/535-6150 Prepared By Contact Number General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total $0 $0 Internal Service Fund Total $0 $0 Enterprise Fund Total $0 $0 Other Fund 72-Fund Grant 62,348.00 Total 0 $0 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 0 Total 0 0 Description BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-1 County Alcohol Foundation.xls3/28/20059:44 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 14.218 Revenue: _ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 71 New CDBG Cost Center 1-890 62,348.00 74-30068 1310 72-60511 Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 71 New CDBG Cost Center 2700 62,348.00 7440068 _ 72-60511 Additional Description: Grant Information: _ Grant funds employee positions? No _ _ No Is there a potential for grant to continue? No If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? No Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? No Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? No Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-1 County Alcohol Foundation.xls3/28/20059:44 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: Development and Application of Environmental Management System State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #E-2 Initiative Type: Grant With No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Management Services applied for and received this grant from the State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to assist the Salt Lake City School District in developing and implementing an Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Plan. The EMS Plan will create a process by which the School District can identify the environmental impacts that they have and take steps to minimize or eliminate those impacts. Typical items identified include waste reduction, use of less hazardous materials, and energy and water use reductions. These improvements translate to greater efficiencies, and usually cost savings. The City will hire a contractor to complete the research and written EMS Plan. Meetings will be held with the SLC School District to identify their specific needs and current environmental management status. A complete review will be completed to establish state-of-the-art best practices for schools. Plan will include detailed information based on needs identified and distributed to DEQ, SLC Corp. and the School District. Comments will be incorporated and a completed document will be made available as well as published on the internet by DEQ. It is recommended that the City Council sign the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality Agreement and to sign any additional agreements or awards as a result of this grant, and to appropriate the necessary budget to facilitate the project. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March • Development and Appication of • Environmental Management System State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality 1 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-2 2004-05 Initiative Number Fiscal Year Management Services Grant With No New Staff Department Type of Initiative Vickie Bennett/Sherrie Collins 535-6540/53-6150 Prepared By 1 Contact Number General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact 1 Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total $01 $0 Internal Service Fund Total f $01 $01 Enterprise Fund I I � I Total $0 I $0 Other Fund I 72 Fund Misc Grants(State) 10,000.001 i Total 10,000.001 $01 1 I 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0' 0 Existing Number of FTE's 0 ! 0 Total 01 0 Description 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-2 Environmental Mgmt System Grantl/26/200511:06 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Accounting Detail Grant#and CFDA# If Applicable: 66.708 Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1370 10,000.00 t Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2590 10,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: Grant Information: 1 Grant funds employee positions? No Contract Conultant to develop & implement EMS Plan. Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA ;Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? Yes Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? No BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-2 Environmental Mgmt System Grantl/26/200511:06 AM • FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Economic Development Initiative (EDI) - Special Project 9th & 9th Streetscapes Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #E-3 Initiative Type: Grant With No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: Salt Lake City applied for and received an Economic Development Initiative (EDI) grant from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), for streetscape improvements to the intersection at 900 South and 900 East. The goals of the 9th & 9th streetscape improvements are to create a distinct small neighborhood business district with enhancements to support merchants, increase vitality to the area, create a model walkable community and improve the infrastructure in an aging section of the City. The EDI funds will used for sidewalk repairs, installation of ADA corner ramps, update traffic signals, additional pedestrian scale street lights and countdown signals, replacement of bus benches and new landscaping. Construction of these improvements will be performed in conjunction with the other work planned for the 9th &9th area. It is recommended that the City Council pass the necessary Resolution authorizing the Mayor to accept this grant, and to adopt the necessary budget to facilitate expenditures of this grant . FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March � I I US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)Economic Development Initiative(EDI)9th&9th Streetscape Initiative Name I BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-3 • 2004-05 Initiative Number I Fiscal Year Community Development I Grant With No New Staff Department I Type of Initiative LuAnn Clark/Sherrie Collins 535-6136/535-6150 Prepared By Contact Number General Fund ( Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund I ' Total r $01 $0 Internal Service Fund Total I $01 $01 Enterprise Fund Total $01 I $0 Other Fund 72 Fund Misc. Grants(Federal) 99,410.001 Total 99,410.001 $0 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 Existing Number of FTE's 01 0 Total 01 0 Description BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-3 HUD Econ Dev 900 E 900 S1/26/20051:34 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I I I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: _ Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 1890 99,410.00, - I i li I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 72-New Cost Center 2590 99,410.00 Additional Accounting Details: i Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NO Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? ! NA 'Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? YES Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NO Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NO BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-3 HUD Econ Dev 900 E 900 S1/26/20051:34 PM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March Initiative Name: North Temple Improvements No. Temple and 600 West - UDOT Grant Initiative Number: BA#5 FY2005 Initiative #E-4 Initiative Type: Grant With No New Staff Resources Initiative Discussion: The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) agreed to provide funding in conjunction with the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (RDA) in 2004, for improvements to include new safety lighting, ADA sidewalk replacement, asphalt, and concrete curb and gutter and other drainage improvements under the west end of the North Temple viaduct at 600 West. The RDA budgeted $60,000 for this project and UDOT agreed to provide an additional $13,320. As the construction plans were finalized, engineering's construction estimate clearly indicated that. additional funds would be needed. The City approached UDOT who agreed to provide $40,000 for this project. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the necessary budget to facilitate this project and to pass the Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept the funding and any additional agreements that stem from the original. FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March North Temple Improvements North Temple, 600 West-UDOT Grant 1 1 Initiative Name BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-4 2004-05 Initiative Number j Fiscal Year Community Development i Grant With No Staff Resources Department 1 I Type of Initiative L Tim HarpstlGordon Haight/Sherrie Collins 535-7148/535-7147/535-6150 Prepared By i Telephone Contact 1 General Fund (Fund Balance) Impact Revenue Impact By Fund: 1st Year 2nd Year FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 General Fund Total $0' I $01 Internal Service Fund Total $01 $01 Enterprise Fund • Total $0' $01 (Other Fund 83-CIP State Grant 40,000.001 Total 40,000.001 1 $01 1 Staffing Impact: New Number of FTE's 0 01 Existing Number of FTE's 0! 0 Total p1 I of Description 1 BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-4 No Temple-600 W. UDOT Grant2/2/200510:21 AM FY 2005 Budget Amendment#5 March I I Accounting Detail Grant# and CFDA# If Applicable: NA Revenue: Cost Center Number Object Code Number Amount 83-New Cost Center 1370 $ 40,000.00 ti I , � I Expenditure: Cost Center Number Object Code Number ! Amount 83-New Cost Center 2700 i 40,000.00 Additional Accounting Details: _ I � Grant Information: Grant funds employee positions? NA Is there a potential for grant to continue? NA If grant is funding a position is it expected the position will be eliminated at the end of the grant? NA Will grant program be complete in grant funding time frame? NA Will grant impact the community once the grant funds are eliminated? NA Does grant duplicate services provided by private or Non-profit sector? NA BA#5 FY2005 Initiative#E-4 No Temple-600 W. UDOT Grant2/2/200510:21 AM