Transmittal - 9/10/2021ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2020-00999 – Elm Avenue Alley Vacation
STAFF CONTACT: Amanda Roman, Principal Planner
amanda.roman@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7660
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve an Ordinance to vacate the alley.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Jonas and Danielle Sappington, property owners and petition
representatives, are requesting to vacate the alley that runs south of their property, more
specifically between 1000 E and Lincoln Street. The alley is orientated east-west and the proposal
is to vacate the eastern half of the alley. The applicant is requesting to vacate this portion of the
alley in order to acquire the property and incorporate it into 968 E Elm Avenue, 974 E Elm Avenue,
980 E Elm Avenue, and 2188 S 1000 E. The applicants identify public safety and lack of use of
the public right-of-way as the main reasons for the request.
July 20, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (Jul 26, 2021 12:43 MDT)
07/26/2021
07/26/2021
The eastern portion of the alley has been
physically incorporated into the four
referenced properties and has not been used
as a public right-of-way for at least 15 years.
The lack of use could be contributed to there
being two structures that block the right-of-
way, which were built without permits. If
approved, the alley vacation could
potentially make it possible to legalize the
existing structures and use of the land
through potential lot line adjustments if the
structures comply with all applicable zoning
standards and building code regulations.
The existing alleyway is used by Rocky
Mountain Power to access utility poles and
overhead utility lines. The company did not
provide a statement in favor or opposition of
the vacation – but indicated that the alley
vacation could increase the cost of
infrastructure maintenance and potentially
hinder quick restoration in cases of power
outage.
The applicant also referenced safety concerns as a reason the alley should be vacated. They believe
that incorporating the land into private property would benefit the community because if opened,
the alley may attract unlawful activity, but did not provide evidence that a public safety issue
currently existed.
Staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City
Council with the reasoning that the vacation would not support the City’s master plan policies,
which aim to increase pedestrian connectivity and active transportation. Staff also found that the
proposal does not satisfy Section 14.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Ordinance, which states alley
vacations may be considered when the proposal satisfies a lack of use, public safety, urban design,
or community purpose policy. More information can be found in the staff report. Planning
Commission reviewed the staff report, accepted public comment, and proceeded to vote in favor
of forwarding a position recommendation to the City Council.
If the City Council votes to vacate the alley, it should be noted that the vacation does not
automatically authorize the structures that were built in the alley to remain and does not provide
an exception to applicable regulations regarding the locations of accessory structures.
Additionally, the ordinance does not affect the distribution of vacated right of way as established
in Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(2).
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to the Sugar House Community
Council on January 7, 2021. The applicant and staff attended a community council meeting on
February 8, 2021. The initial comments were generally supportive of the proposal, but prior to
the Planning Commission meeting the Community Council Chair, Judi Short, submitted a letter
in opposition of vacating the alley. The letter can be found in Attachment 4b. The community
council believes the alley should remain open to accommodate utility access, parking, and
pedestrian circulation.
Planning Commission Meeting: On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing regarding the proposed alley vacation. One citizen was concerned the city would vacate
the entire alley, which would block access to their property. Five citizens provided testimony in
support of the request. The citizens in favor of the alley vacation stated that utility access will
not be impacted because they can be accessed from private property. Those in favor also stated
that opening the alley would not improve walkability and could attract unwanted people and
activity.
The Commission discussed the timeline of when the two structures were built in the right-of-way
and if vacating the alley to accommodate private property owners would set a poor precedence.
Additionally, the Commission discussed future city plans for the alley and if vacating it would
impact utility access and increase crime levels.
The Commission voted 6-3 to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the
alley vacation, inconsistent with the staff recommendation.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of March 10, 2021 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of March 10, 2021 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of March 10, 2021 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Ordinance
2) Project Chronology
3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
4) Planning Commission
a) Public Hearing Notice
b) Community Council Comments
5) Original Petition
6) Mailing Labels
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) ORDINANCE
2) PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
3) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
4) PLANNING COMMISSION
a) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
b) COMMUNITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
5) ORIGINAL PETITION
6) MAILING LABELS
1. ORDINANCE
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ________ of 2021
(Vacating a portion of city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at 968 East Elm
Avenue, 974 East Elm Avenue, 980 East Elm Avenue, and 2188 South 1000 East Street)
An ordinance vacating a portion of an unnamed, city-owned alley adjacent to properties
located at 968 East Elm Avenue, 974 East Elm Avenue, 980 East Elm Avenue, and 2188 South
1000 East Street, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00999.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 10,
2021 to consider a request made by Jonas and Danielle Sappington (“Applicants”) (Petition No.
PLNPCM2020-00999) to vacate a portion of an unnamed, city-owned alley adjacent to
properties located at 968 East Elm Avenue, 974 East Elm Avenue, 980 East Elm Avenue, and
2188 South 1000 East Street on behalf of four property owners whose land abuts the portion of
alley proposed to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, two accessory structures have been placed or erected in the subject portion
of alley without authorization by Salt Lake City Corporation; and
WHEREAS, the subject portion of alley is situated within the Fairmount Springs
Addition subdivision; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(2), when a public right-of-way
is vacated by a local governmental entity with the authority to do so, ownership of the vacated
right-of-way vests in the abutting property owners, with each receiving half of the width of the
former right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the unauthorized structures placed or erected within the subject portion of
alley are situated on the centerline of the alley; and
WHEREAS, at its March 10, 2021 hearing, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on Applicants’ petition to
vacate the portion of alley described herein; and
WHEREAS, following a public hearing on this matter, the city council finds that the
city’s interest in the portion of city-owned alley described herein is not presently necessary for
use by the public and that vacating a portion of that unnamed, city-owned alley will not be
adverse to the general public’s interest; and
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That a portion of an unnamed, city-owned
alley adjacent to properties located at 968 East Elm Avenue, 974 East Elm Avenue, 980 East
Elm Avenue, and 2188 South 1000 East Street, which is the subject of Petition No.
PLNPCM2020-00999, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto,
is hereby vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use.
SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made
subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every
description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to
the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or
rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also
subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. This ordinance does
not authorize any structure(s) that may have been placed or erected in the portion of alley
described herein and does not provide an exception to applicable regulations regarding any
such structures. Additionally, this ordinance does not affect the distribution of vacated
right of way as established in Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(2).
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of
______________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021
Published: ______________.
Ordinance vacating alley adjacent to Elm Ave
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
June 28, 2021
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal description of the unnamed, city-owned
alley to be vacated:
A portion of a 16’ wide public alleyway that is to be vacated. Said alleyway is located in Block
2, Fairmount Springs Addition, as recorded in Book ‘F’, Page 88 in the Salt Lake County
Recorder’s office. Said alleyway vacation described to wit:
Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Lot 13, Block 2, said Fairmount Springs Addition, and
running thence along the north line of said Lot 13 and it’s extension N89°40’W 152.5 feet;
thence N8°32’50”W 16.19 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 7, Block 2, said subdivision;
thence S89°40’E 155 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 12, Block 2, said subdivision; thence
S00°20’W 16 feet to the point of beginning.
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2020-00999
December 15, 2020 Jonas and Danielle Sappington submitted an application to vacate the
eastern half of the alley abutting the properties at 968 E Elm Ave, 974 E
Elm Ave, 980 E Elm Ave, and 2188 S 1000 E.
January 5, 2021 Petition PLNPCM2020-00999 assigned to Mayara Lima, Principal
Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
January 7, 2021 Email sent to Recognized Community Organizations (Sugar House
Community Council) informing them of the petition.
February 8, 2021 Proposal discussed at Sugar House Community Council online meeting.
February 25, 2021 Sign posted on property.
February 26, 2021 Planning Commission hearing notices posted on City and State websites
and Planning Division listserv. Notices also mailed out to property
owners/residents.
March 3, 2021 The petition was reassigned to Amanda Roman, Principal Planner, after
Mayara Lima accepted a new position within the City.
March 10, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and held a public hearing.
The commission voted 6:3 to send a positive recommendation to the City
Council.
March 22, 2021 Ordinance review requested from City Attorney’s office.
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2020-00999 Elm Avenue Alley
Vacation – A request by Jonas & Danielle Sappington, owners of the property at approximately
968 E Elm Avenue and petition representatives, to vacate the alley that runs south of their property,
more specifically between 1000 E and Lincoln Street. The alley is oriented east-west and the
proposal is to vacate the eastern half of the alley, which abuts 4 residential properties. The affected
properties are 968 E Elm Avenue, 974 E Elm Avenue, 980 E Elm Avenue, and 2188 S 1000 E.
The properties are zoned R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and are located in Council District
7, represented by Amy Fowler.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received
through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal, please call Amanda Roman at 801-535-7660
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at
amanda.roman@slcgov.com. You may review the file online at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/Citizen/Default.aspx , by selecting the Planning tab, and entering
the petition numbers PLNPCM2020-00999.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
4.PLANNING COMMISSION
a.Public Hearing NoticeMarch 10, 2021
4.PLANNING COMMISSION
b. Community Council CommentsMarch 10, 2021
5. ORIGINAL PETITION
Petition PLNPCM2020-00999
Applicant name:
Jonas & Danielle Sappington
968 E. Elm Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Letter of Explanation:
We would like to request that this alley be vacated for the following reasons:
•Improved Community. Having been inspired by several new, strong and stylish homes
built in our neighborhood, and having a growing family of 4 children, we desire to rebuild
our home and add an ADU on the south end of our property. With the alley vacated, we
would have several more feet to make this possible, as our current lot is not large enough
to accommodate a suitable ADU. We have plans to build a home that would compliment
and add appeal to our growing area of the city while keeping family life active and evident.
•Neighborhood Unity. All potentially affected owners are aware that this application brings
to light the structures currently in the alley and the risk of them being lost to those that use
them. We have spoken at length with one another about win-win resolutions regarding the
land gained by each of us if the alley is vacated. We are all willing to risk the transparency
of the situation to reach a more beneficial situation for all.
•Safety. We and several other neighborhood homeowners have noticed the major
difference between the level of safety in and around our alley and the alleys near us. The
alley in the block east of us has already been vacated and reports no safety concerns. Our
alley is not vacated but allows no thru-traffic because of the structures mentioned above
and also experiences no safety concerns. The alley in the block west of us, however, is not
vacated and is a through-alley. This alley has been and is now extremely unsafe for
pedestrians. We hear remarkable stories of crime and vandalizing on a regular basis and
see daily for ourselves the transient campsites and drug paraphernalia in the gravel. We
are all apprehensive of this situation spreading to our block if ours became a through-alley.
Conversely, nicer homes and ADUs might improve the safety of the entire neighborhood :)
•Research. We have reached out to the Transportation and learned that there are no plans
for our particular alley. We have also consulted with the Engineering Department at length
about the implications of the vacation.
We truly believe that vacating this alley would be a smart and valuable improvement to our area
by strengthening our community in the short and long term.
Thank you for your consideration,
Jonas & Danielle Sappington
Applicant name:
Jonas & Danielle Sappington
968 E. Elm Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Alley Vacation Proposal—City Policy Satisfaction Statement
In considering the proposed partial alley vacation, we would like to address the city policies found in
Chapter 14.52.020.
A. Lack of Use: The section of the alley we have requested be vacated is physically blocked by a
variety of structures that renders it unusable as a public right of way. These structures include
sheds, a brick garage and variety of fencing. These materials have been blocking this portion of
the alley for at least 15 years. Upon on-site inspection by multiple city personnel, it is evident that
a thru-alley does not exist.* The unblocked portion of the alley is a dead end and is used for
Rocky Mountain Power utility access and as a personal driveway for one resident. (Our proposal
is to keep this unblocked portion public). This situation is visible through satellite imagery. In
addition, surrounding alleyways are no longer used by sanitation services.
*We were advised at our pre-application meeting to reach out to Transportation and Engineering.
As a result, city engineers visited our block and have seen the alley’s current status.
B. Public Safety: Right now, the obstructions in the alley blur several homeowner property lines,
making us unable to build upon or safely seal our yards. If the alley is vacated, as proposed, we
and the other affected owners intend to clarify and construct safe boundaries between us and the
rest of the alley. If our alley is not vacated and the current, illegal obstructions are removed, it will
expose our alley to severe safety concerns that exist in the thru-alley immediately west of our
block, between the streets of 9th East and Lincoln. Those safety concerns include theft,
vandalism and burglary. Our neighbors have witnessed burglars with flashlights entering through
the roof of a business of that alley in the middle of the night. A home which borders this alley was
twice invaded by the thru-alley’s wandering population and endure persistent theft. These
examples represent only a fraction of the severity of crime that goes on in this neglected space. In
addition, constant signs of illegal drug use and vandalism are prevalent. Besides being completely
dark and too narrow for vehicle and foot traffic to coexist, this roadway is unsafe for pedestrian
use due to insanitary waste, used needles and deteriorating structures—all created and/or
intensified by the transient activity. Despite their close proximity, there is a stark contrast between
the public safety conditions of our partial alley verses the sadly deteriorated state of the thru-alley
west of us.
C. Urban Design: Vacating the alley empowers homeowners to develop the wasted space behind
their homes. Personally, we plan to build a new home and use the additional space for an
accessory dwelling unit. This would allow for increased housing and conform nicely with the
current projects on our block, such as the vacated alley immediately east of us with new homes
and major development.
D. Community Purpose: While we would not be using the vacated space for a neighborhood garden
or play area, we do believe that resident-cared-for property would be visually appealing and
inspire positive community growth.
It is difficult to convey all of the details that contribute to making this decision. As homeowners, we
have done our best and are unified in our perspective. We would love for you to visit our alley or ask
us for any additional information you think we could provide. Thank you.
Applicant name:
Jonas & Danielle Sappington
968 E. Elm Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Written description of of proposed alley vacation
The alley 155’ in length from east to west and 16’ in width from north to south, between
parcels 1620137004000, 1620137005000, and 1620137006000 on the north boundary
and 1620137023000 and 1620137018000* on the south boundary and 1000 East on
the east boundary as further illustrated/highlighted on the attached Salt Lake County
Sidwell map.
*A small portion (1.5’) of this property borders the proposed vacation in order to make a
clean line.
6.MAILING LABELS
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_UNIT OWN_CITY OWN_STATOWN_ZIP
AARON N STEVENSON; CAITLIN B STEVENSON (JT)956 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ABRAHAM SMITH; KIMBERLY COLTON (JT)2186 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ANGELA M WAAGEN; KIM C WAAGEN (JT)924 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
AURELIO RUELAS 1015 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
BARRY NOLEN 2767 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
BEHUNIN PROPERTIES LLC 4087 W FENWICK CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009
BENJAMIN M MCADAMS; JULIE J MCADAMS (JT)2205 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CAMERON SHANER 1002 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CATHERINE M VANIER 2208 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CIH REV TRUST 1380 BONITA BAHIA BENICIA CA 94510
DARREN D FARNSWORTH; BRENNA GARDNER (JT)2204 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
DAVID SALAS WHEELER; MICHELLE M WHEELER (JT)2196 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
DEVLIN ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED 2156 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
DIANE P STEWART; SAMUEL S STEWART (JT)2204 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
DIXON PLACE LLC 2319 S FOOTHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109
ERIC L SMITH; LAURIE L SMITH (JT)1010 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
FOREST ROBERT GOOD 2187 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
GARETT MILES; HALEY MILES (JT)42843 CHAMPNEY CT BROADLANDS VA 20148
HAO NGOC EVANS TRUST 12/23/2015 1024 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
INGRAM BARTON HOLDINGS, LLC 733 N MAIN ST SPANISH FORK UT 84660
ISAIAH RAMIREZ; TANYA MANIFOLD (JT)1059 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
JAMES FLEEGE 922 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
JOHN W CARLISLE; BETH E DREES (JT)2195 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
JONAS I SAPPINGTON; DANIELLE K SAPPINGTON (JT)968 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
JOSEPH TUENGE 980 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
KRISTI M JOHNSON; MARSHA GIBSON (JT)2187 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
LAVENA M SMITH 5303 S PENGUIN CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117
LC ROCKWOOD INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES 5882 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121
LIBERTY VILLAGE PROPERTIES, LLC 6440 S WASATCH BLVD # 100 HOLLADAY UT 84121
LINDA S COLLARD 2211 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
MARC W TAYLOR; JOANNE TAYLOR (JT)2200 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
MARK E PITTMAN REVOCABLE TRUST 10/16/2015 2195 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
MP VENTURES LC 2157 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
PATRICK REIMHERR 482 E TWELFTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
PRINCIPAL DEVELOPMENT LLC 2157 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
ROBERT DEVLIN 2160 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ROBERT J HART 2190 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ROSA M CASTRO TRUST 01/31/2018 2192 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
RYANS ON ELM, LLC 948 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
SAMUEL & DIANE STEWART FAMILY TRUST 03/19/2019 269 N A ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103
SCOTT BREEN; ALAINA BROWN (JT)2197 S LINCOLN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
SCSC LEASING LC 2202 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
SMITH'S FOOD KING PROPERTIES INC 1014 VINE ST 7TH FLOOR CINCINNATI OH 45202
SUGARHOUSE VETERINARY HOSPITAL BUILDING PTRN 2206 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
SUGARMONT PLACE DEVELOPMENT LLC 733 N MAIN ST SPANISH FORK UT 84660
TIMO RINNE 974 E ELM AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
TOHLER PROPERTIES LLC 1525 E REDONDO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
TREMBLAY SIMES FAMILY TRUST 09/19/2017 8769 S WILLOW GREEN DR SANDY UT 84093
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
VALERIE MURDOCK 2193 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
ZHONGLIANG ZHAO; WEI TANG (JT)8156 S MAIO DR SANDY UT 84093
Current Occupant 922 E 2100 S Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2195 S 900 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 910 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 916 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 932 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 940 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2198 S LINCOLN ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2204 S LINCOLN ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2205 S 900 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2215 S 900 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 975 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2185 S 900 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2198 S LINCOLN ST #NFF Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2131 S LINCOLN ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2134 S 1000 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2140 S 1000 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 960 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2203 S LINCOLN ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2207 S LINCOLN ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2188 S 1000 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2208 S 1000 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 968 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 1003 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 1007 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2141 S 1000 E Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2150 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 1014 E ELM AVE Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2170 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2190 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 2216 S MCCLELLAND ST Salt Lake City 84106 UT
Current Occupant 1040 E SUGARMONT DR Salt Lake City 84106 UT