Loading...
PLNZAD2022-00886 - 470 S 700 EOctober 18, 2022 ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION DECISION AND FINDINGS PLNZAD2022-00886 REQUEST: A request for an administrative interpretation regarding the contributing status of the building located at approximately 470 S 700 E (Tax ID 16-05-307-010-0000). The subject property is located in the Central City Local Historic District. The owners of the subject property dispute the EC (Eligible Contributing) rating in the 2013 Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) that was done for the Central City Local Historic District. The applicants hired SWCA Environmental Consultants to conduct an Intensive Level Survey (ILS) for the subject property and have submitted the ILS documentation as part of their request. The ILS Survey recommends the building is no longer contributing to the Central City Local Historic District. DECISION: The Zoning Administrator finds that the evaluation in the Central City 2013 (RLS) should be changed from an Eligible Contributing Structure to a Noncontributing Structure for the building located at 470 S 700 E. The Zoning Administrator finds the building no longer satisfies the definition or criteria for a contributing structure found in 21A.34.020.C.15. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located in the Central City Local Historic District, within the H (Historic Preservation Overlay District) and is subject to the standards in section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The structure is a one-story restaurant constructed in approximately 1957. Section 21A.34.020B of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance defines contributing and non- contributing structures, as follows: CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE: A structure or site within the H Historic Preservation Overlay District that meets the criteria outlined in subsection C15 of this section [21A.34.020] and is of moderate importance to the City, State, region or Nation because it imparts artistic, historic or cultural values. A contributing structure has its major character defining features intact and although minor alterations may have occurred they are generally reversible. Historic materials may have been covered but evidence indicates they are intact. NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE: A structure within the H Historic Preservation Overlay District that does not meet the criteria listed in subsection C15 of this section [21A.34.020]. The major character defining features have been so altered as to make the original and/or historic form, materials and details indistinguishable and alterations are irreversible. Noncontributing structures may also include those which are less than fifty (50) years old. Historic Resource Surveys are one of the tools used by Staff for the purpose of identifying and evaluating the quantity and quality of historic resources for land use planning purposes following the guidelines and forms of the Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The first survey conducted in the Central Local Historic District was in 1980. Buildings were evaluated and each was given one of the following ratings: • Significant • Contributory • Not Contributory • Intrusion In 1980, the site information form designated the property as “Out of Period” which is a non- contributing status. Historic surveys were also conducted in 1994 and 2013. As noted previously, when the Central City Historic District was originally created, this property was noted as Out-of-Period; it was not a contributing building in the District and not listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) at the time. In 2003 the National Register of Historic Places Salt Lake City East Side Historic Places boundary was expanded to include the west side of 700 East and the subject site, however the period of significance in the 2003 National Register Expansion only included properties from 1860 – 1953, therefore this property was noted as Out- of-Period/noncontributing at that time. The site was re-evaluated as Eligible/Contributing (EC) in a 2013 Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) which extended the period of significance to 1968. In 2013, each property within the Central City Historic District was evaluated and given one of the following ratings: • ES-Eligible/Significant • EC-Eligible Contributing • NC-Non-Contributing • OP-Out of Period The 2013 survey identifies the subject structure as an EC – Eligible Contributing. The surveys are conducted in accordance with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Standard Operating Procedures, and the surveyed resources were evaluated using criteria developed by SHPO. Buildings with a “EC” evaluation retain historic integrity but are typically not eligible for individual listing – they are good examples of types or styles of architecture but are not as well executed as “ES” rated buildings. The ILS survey submitted by the applicant notes alterations to the building that occurred sometime between 1962 and 2001 and include a side addition (to the north), vinyl replacement windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations, removal of cladding and neon letter sign from an original canted canopy, alteration of the color scheme of the building and replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS: The Ordinance criteria draws directly from the national preservation methodology and evaluation criteria developed by the U.S. Department of the Interior for the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation. In relation to evaluating a property, the National Park Service provides clarification and guidance in the National Register Bulletin 15 ‘How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Analysis on standards A and B is below. Standards C through F are not applicable because they relate to designation of a district or site, and not to reevaluating the contributing status of individual parcels within the already designated Central City Local Historic District. 21A.34.020.C.15 A. Significance in local, regional, state or national history, architecture, engineering or culture, associated with at least one of the following: 1. Events that have made significant contribution to the important patterns o f history, or 2. Lives of persons significant in the history of the city, region, state, or nation, or 3. The distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; or the work of a notable architect or master craftsman, or 4. Information important in the understanding of the prehistory or history of Salt Lake City; Analysis: The subject property is a component of the Central City Historic District. A component of a district cannot contribute to the significance of the district if it does not share the historic associations of the district. The Central City Historic District was nominated for its significance in the areas of Architecture, Community Planning & Development, and Social History, which directly relate to evaluation criteria 1, 2 & 3 under the evaluation criteria for significance in subsection 15. The Central City Historic District represents contributing architectural types and styles built over more than a century. The 2003 National Register Nomination Form (Salt Lake City East Side) identified the period of significance as from c. 1870s-1953. The NRHP nomination focused heavily on either historic residential neighborhoods or historic commercial nodes within those communities, not the specific historic character of the site. The listed historic commercial nodes in the NRHP nomination did not include the commercial developments along 700 East. The 2013 Central City Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) surveyed buildings constructed through 1968 to consider a possible amendment to extend the period of significance to 1968. The Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) that was conducted in 2013 and marked the subject building as eligible/contributing to the historic district found the types and styles of buildings present in the Central City Local Historic District related to period of the construction. The contextual periods comprise of: Initial Settlement (1847 - 1869) Transition (1870 - 1899) Mature Community (1900 – 1922) Depression and Decline (1923 – 1955) Erosion of Residential Character (1956 – 1995) Preservations vs. Progress (1996 – 2013) The subject building was constructed in 1957 for a commercial ice cream parlor and falls within the Erosion of Residential Character period of significance. Within this period 78 buildings are documented during the survey as estimated to date to this period. Most of this construction consisted of commercial and multi-family structures that centered around the central and southern portions of the district. It was during this period non-residential developers transitioned to modern elements and materials, including windowed walls and pre-cast concrete panels. However, as described above, there have been alterations to the exterior of the subject building. Cumulatively, and particularly with the addition to the north that widened the front façade of the structure as seen from 700 E, the structure has lost defining characteristics from this period. Findings: The existing contributing status is dependent on the 2013 RLS survey, which was the first survey to list the subject structure as contributory. While the site and structure retain some characteristic elements from the period of significance, alterations to the structure have negatively impacted the integrity so it’s no longer representative of the time period in which it was constructed. As such, the Zoning Administrator finds that standard ‘A’ in section 21A.34.020.C.15 is not met. B. Physical integrity in terms of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association as defined by the national park service for the national register of histor ic places; Analysis: The National Park Service defines integrity as “the ability of a property to convey its significance.” Within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognizes seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. In relation to the seven aspects of integrity as defined by the National Park Service, several observations can be made. • Location: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed. The property was constructed in its current location; therefore, the location of the building remains intact. • Design: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. The original architectural design of this building is mid- twentieth century. The design of the structure has been altered. Based on historic aerial imagery, an addition to the north widened the front facade sometime between 1962 and 1965. This area sustained damage and was rebuilt in 1972. Windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations (near 700 East) consist of single-lite vinyl replacement windows (ca. 1995) set into the original steel casings. The structure does not retain its design integrity. • Setting: Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. This building is situated on the west side of 700 East within an area of the Historic District that includes very limited historic resources. The subject building is one of the two remaining contributing structures, all other structures are either not contributing or out-of-period. The building to the north, at approximately 444 S 700 E (Mulloy Mansion), is considered a significant structure to the district and is a significant historic structure in its own right. The 2013 Central City RLS, the survey which listed the subject property as contributing to the local historic district, identifies the blocks that span between 300 South and 500 South as, “substantially compromised by the intrusion of modern commercial and multi-family residential development”. This intrusion is described as, “so substantial as to effectively create two separate historical areas…” where only the landscaped median along 600 East ties these two historic areas together. This interruption of the historic setting is so significant that the 2013 RLS recommended that the boundary of the Local Historic District be amended to exclude the central area (which includes the subject property and those other properties along the 700 East block face) and only include the north and south portions of the Central City District. Therefore, it is concluded that the historic setting of the structure retains little integrity if any. • Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. As discussed previously, the front façade of the subject building consisted of brick and aluminum framed windows. Although the brick and aluminum windows remain on the structure, the overall form and proportions of the front façade of building were altered with the addition to the north. The vinyl replacement windows near the primary façade also negatively impacted the structure. Although some materials are intact, the overall integrity related to materials has been compromised due to alterations to the structure. • Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. The original construction of the structure was simple in design, the significant character element being the angled steel canopy attached to the structure, brick exterior, and steel windows. The structure no longer provides physical evidence of the workmanship associated with the type and style of construction due to significant alterations. • Feeling: Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. This building does not retain enough of the architectural features that convey the property’s historic character. The structure has been significantly altered through the modification of the character defining features of the property as previously noted. Although the structure does retain some elements of the mid-century modern style of construction, it no longer clearly provides a historic sense of a particular period of time. • Association: Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. Planning Staff finds no direct link between important historic events or persons in regards to the subject building. Findings: The Zoning Administrator finds that the building maintains integrity of location, however, integrity in terms of design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association have been lost. A property does not have to meet each aspect to retain integrity, however the location of the structure/where it was constructed is not enough in this case to determine the property retains integrity. The physical integrity of the building has been lost. The Zoning Administrator finds that standard ‘B’ in section 21A.34.020.C.15 is not met. SUMMARY: Section 21A.34.020.C.15 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance outlines criteria that each property within a historic district must meet to be considered “contributing” to the historic district. The findings conclude that the subject property does not meet the criteria for both standards A and B to be considered contributing. Based on the foregoing findings and analysis, the structure has been substantially altered and no longer is representative of the district’s period of significance; therefore, this structure is non-contributing to the Central City Historic District. If you have any questions regarding this interpretation, please contact Mayara Lima at 801-535- 6141 or by email at Mayara.lima@slcgov.com. APPEAL PROCESS: An applicant or any other person or entity adversely affected by a decision administering or interpreting this Title [Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance] may appeal to the Appeals Hearing Officer. Notice of appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days of the administrative decision. The appeal shall be filed with the Planning Division and shall specify the decision appealed and the reasons the appellant claims the decision to be in error. Applications for appeals are located on the Planning Division website at https://www.slc.gov/planning/applications/ along with information about how to apply and the applicable processing fee. Mayara Lima Zoning Administrator cc: Nick Norris, Planning Director Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director Casey Stewart, Development Review Supervisor Posted to Web Attachments: A. Vicinity Map B. Archive Photograph 1960s (Courtesy of Salt Lake County Assessor’s Office) C. Survey Photo (1980) D. Current Photo E. 1950 Sandborn Map F. Building Permit Card G. Central City 2013 RLS Map H. Applicable Central City 2013 RLS Descriptions I. Submitted Intensive Level Survey ATTACHMENT A: Vicinity Map ATTACHMENT B: Archive Photograph 1960s ATTACHMENT C: Survey Photo (1980) ATTACHMENT D: Current Photo ATTACHMENT E: 1950 Sandborn Map ATTACHMENT F: Building Permit Card ATTACHMENT G: Central City 2013 RLS Map ATTACHMENT H: Applicable Central City 2013 RLS Descriptions Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey Salt Lake City, Utah: Survey Report DRAFT Prepared for Salt Lake City Corporation Planning Department Prepared by Sheri Murray Ellis, MS, RPA Manager/Sr. Consultant Certus Environmental Solutions, LLC Salt Lake City, Utah Certus Project Number SLC01 February 1, 2013 Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 3 Figure 1. Location of Central City reconnaissance level survey area, Salt Lake City, Utah. Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 10 this freedom accrued to middle class workers, who soon began to eye the more distant suburbs of the Salt Lake Valley as viable residential locations away from the con gestion and pollution of the city. As a result, the exodus of single-family homeowners that had started in the Central City neighborhood in the 1910s increased. In Central City and surrounding neighborhoods, such as the Avenues and the Bryant neighborhood, numerous single-family homes were renovated to contain multiple apartments or turned into boarding houses (Giraud 2001). Such apartments and boarding houses became increasingly popular during the 1930s, while the city writhed in the throes of the Great Depression. Stand-alone, multi-story apartment building construction also increased dramatically during this period, particularly during the 1920s, with at least 10 major apartment buildings, and many smaller ones, being constructed in the Central City survey area alone. New construction of single-family housing did not completely disappear during this period, though. Most such construction occurred during the latter part of the period, following the return of soldiers from World War II. The vast majority of the Central City survey area had been completely built-out by the 1930s, with essentially no vacant space available for new construction. However, a few interior blocks had not been subdivided during earlier periods in the area’s history, and when they were subdivided during the 1940s, small tracts of World War II Era housing (WWII Era Cottages) were constructed. During the early post-war period, several of the older homes in the neighborhood were demolished to make way for new single-family and multi-family dwellings. New zoning ordinances during this period also made possible the change in the composition of the Central City neighborhood. These ordinances shifted the focus of the neighborhood away from primarily residential uses toward and increasing mixture of uses and allowed encroachment on historical residential neighborhoods (Giraud 2001). The ordinances provided for the presence of fraternal organizations and clubs, medical facilities, and other non-residential uses. A handful of new office buildings, clinics, and other professional service buildings, all adorned in the distinctive post- war architectural styling of the time, appeared in the survey area during the latter part of the period and were (are) oddly juxtaposed against the picturesque single-family cottages and historical 3-story apartment buildings. Truly reflective of the burgeoning automobile culture was the construction during this period of a “tourist court” with drive-up motel units on the southwest corner of 400 South and 600 East and an auto service center on the southeast corner of 400 South and 500 East. None of the buildings associated with these uses remain today. Erosion of Residential Character (1956 to 1995) The trend away from owner-occupancy toward rental housing continued in the Central City neighborhood during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. An increasing number of historical single-family dwellings, particularly the larger homes in the northern part of the neighborhood, were subdivided into multiple apartments and converted to rental properties. Redevelopment and affordable housing projects saw the demolition of numerous historical residences to make way for new apartment buildings. Additional zoning ordinance changes opened the door for increased commercial development in the central portion of the neighborhood, particularly in the area between roughly Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 11 200 South and 500 South. In this area, many office buildings, restaurants, retail outlets, and other commercial and institutional building have been constructed, the majority of them after 1990. Not all modern business development has resulted in the demolition of historical buildings in the Central City survey area. A number of both larger mansions and smaller single-family dwellings were converted into office or other business uses, retaining the historical character of the public view while applying concepts of adaptive reuse to the buildings. An example of this type of reuse is the Kimball mansion on 600 East, which now houses executive suites and other small office suites. A similar example of such adaptive reuse, though it occurred prior to 1950, was the conversion of the large, Neoclassical style O.J. Salisbury mansion on the corner of 100 South and 600 East, to a mortuary and funeral home. During the 1990s, the Central City neighborhood saw a small return of single-family homeowners and a resulting slight shift away from renter occupancy of single-family dwellings. This may have been, in part, a response to renewed interest by the City in the preservation of the historica l character of the city’s older neighborhoods and the designation of the Central City local historic district in 1991. A demolition ordinance put in place by the City in 1995 was part of the focus on preserving the historical character of the area. As a result, much of the modern commercial development that has taken place in the central portion of the neighborhood occurred after 1995. Preservation vs. Progress (1996 to 2013) The most recent period in the history of the Central City neighborhood—between 1996 and 2013— has been a struggle between preservation of the area’s historical resources and the furtherance of modern economic development. On the one hand, the re-establishment of a streetcar system (now represented by light-rail) through and within walking distance of most of the Central City neighborhood in the late 1990s and early 2000s, added to the attractiveness of the neighborhood for single-family occupancy, as residents who wanted to experience urban living but with a minimization of their experiences with traffic congestion, have been able to take advantage of the expanding modern transit system. This has led to a modest return to owner-occupied properties in contrast to rental properties. New housing construction has also occurred in the area, primarily in the form of multi-family apartment and condominium complexes built upon lots once occupied either by historical single- family dwellings, such as the case of Vernier Avenue (335 South) where eight Victorian -era residences were demolished for the construction of a new apartment/condominium complex. However, a small number of new single-family dwellings and attached single-family residential courts (primarily comprised of condominiums) have also appeared in the area in recent years, primarily in the northern portion of the neighborhood. Commercial development during this period has been most active in the area between 300 South and 500 South. Much of this development was accomplished by demolishing other modern (i.e., post-1968) commercial properties, but some, particularly in the vicinity of 300 South and 500 East, Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 19 styles. Examples of such properties include Minimal Traditional style apartments at 607 East 100 South and 633 East 200 South and the Early Ranch style apartments at 511 East 700 South. Commercial and other non-residential development was all but absent during the Depression years of this period. It wasn’t until the economic recovery spurred by World War II that commercial development saw a resurgence in the Central City area. By this time, the 1-part block forms of the earlier periods had largely given way to other forms that accommodated the burgeoning automobile culture in America. Such properties included service bay businesses, such as the ca. 1950 serv ice station at 503 East 900 South. In general, the commercial and public properties of the latter part of the period exhibit either non-specific architectural styles or styles that can best be categorized as either Minimal Traditional or Post general World War II styles. An example of the latter style applied to a commercial structure can be seen on the building at 607 East 200 South. Erosion of Residential Character (1956 to 1995) Seventy-eight (78) buildings documented during the Central City survey are estimated to date to this period. The majority of these buildings are commercial structures and multi-family apartment units, many constructed as part of redevelopment and affordable housing projects. Most of the new construction during this period occurred in the central and southern portions of the neighborhood. Residential properties in the Central City district from this period are almost exclusively multi-family dwellings. No single family dwellings were identified. The multi-family dwellings comprise apartment complexes exhibiting Ranch/Rambler and Post World War II style during the early part of the period and general Late 20th Century and Mansard styles in the latter part of the period, after 1970. Unlike the apartment complexes of the late 1800s and early 1900s, the complexes of this period typically incorporate off-street parking areas, including carports and similar vehicle shelters. Examples of ca. 1960s Ranch/Rambler style complexes can be seen at 564 East 600 South and 615 East 700 South. Commercial development increased in the Central City district during this period compared to earlier periods and was largely focused in the center of the district, between 200 South and 600 South. Strip malls, grocery stores, drive-thru restaurants, and office buildings proliferated in this area, particularly after 1980. In the early part of the period, non-residential developments employed Post World War II styles then transitioned in the application of Modern and Contemporary elements and then to general Late 20th Century styles. Many of the non-residential properties incorporated new construction materials and techniques, including relatively extensive use of window walls and pre-cast concrete panels. Preservation vs. Progress (1996 to 2013) Twenty-nine (29) buildings documented during the Central City survey are estimated to date to this period. Nearly all of the buildings constructed during this period are commercial structures, though a few are residential properties. Of the residential properties constructed during the period, all but two are multi-family dwellings comprising multi-story apartment courts or condominium courts. Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 23 property owners to maintain their historical buildings or their lack of sufficient funding to undertake substantial alterations to their properties. Figure 14. 2013 eligibility ratings of buildings in the Central City local historic district. Because the current reconnaissance-level survey is updating the district records to include buildings constructed during or prior to 1968 as historical resources, a large number of buildings categorized during previous surveys as out-of-period are now in-period. Many of these buildings retain sufficient historical integrity for their architectural type and style and their period of construction to warrant contributing status (EC ratings). As a result, the total number of contributing resources within the district has increased since the establishment of the district. The local historic district has seen several losses of historical resources. Approximately 50 historical buildings have been demolished since the reconnaissance-level surveys for the establishment of the district. Of these, the majority were contributing resources. Areas most affected by the demolition of historical buildings include 500 East between 200 South and 500 South, 600 East between 300 South and 500 South, 700 East between 100 South and 300 South, and Vernier Avenue in the 500 East block, where all of the historical buildings on the street were demolished. When the local historic district is examined as a whole, the picture is somewhat less encouraging. The central portion of the district—between 300 South and 500 South—has been substantially compromised by the intrusion of modern commercial and multi-family residential development. The intrusion is so substantial as to effectively create two separate historical areas: North Central City and South Central City. Aside from the landscaped median along 600 East, there is very little to 28 472 52 85 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ES - Eligible/Significant EC - Eligible/Contributing NC - Ineligible/Non-contributing OP - Out-of Period ES EC NC OP Central City RLS Survey Report Draft 24 visually tie the two areas together as a single historical neighborhood, let alone a cohesive district. Recommendations for how to address this condition are provided below (see Recommendations). In conducting the reconnaissance-level survey update for the local historic district, the surveyor interacted with numerous property owners and area residents and observed a fair amount of restoration, rehabilitation, and renovation work underway amidst the historical building stock. In the course of these interactions, two facts became apparent—many property owners and residents are unaware of the historic district and most are unaware of potential tax credits for historically appropriate repair, rehabilitation, and restoration projects. This general lack of information is likely due in large part to owner and resident turn over since the time the district was initially established. New outreach to property owners and residents of the area may provide increased opportunities to preserve both individual historical properties and the overall historical character of the area. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the integrity of the local historic district and interactions with district residents, Certus recommends two actions: adjust the boundaries of the local historic district and conduct educational outreach to residents. The boundary of the local historical district should be adjusted in one of two ways—either to create a single district with two separate sections or to more closely match that of the National Register district. As noted above, the modern intrusions in the central portion of the local historic district have created two visually distinct areas within the district—a North Central City area (north of 300 South) and a South Central City area (south of 500 South). The only element connecting these two areas and lending some indication they are historically associated with each other is the landscaped median along 600 East. The local historic district boundary could be adjusted to include exclude the central area and exist as the north and south areas described here. Application of historical design guidelines to the central portion of the district may unnecessarily restrict the modern commercial and residential development that is already occurring and planned to occur in this area. Alternatively, the local district boundary should be adjusted to approximate that of the National Register district, which is a better reflection of the historical integrity of the area. Some refinement of this National Register district boundary would be appropriate to exclude areas where contributing historical buildings have been demolished (e.g., along Vernier Avenue) and to include resources (e.g., Ambassador Plaza at 150 South 600 East) that were considered out-of-period at the time the National Register district was established but are now in-period and contributing to the local historic district. As to owner and resident education, Certus believes a new effort to inform current property owners and residents of the district boundaries, design guidelines, potential tax credits, and process for obtaining approval for planned construction projects would go a long way toward increasing resident support for the district, pride in the district, and preservation of its historical resources. Most residents encountered during the field survey appeared willing to preserve their properties but Central City RLS Survey Report Draft B-10 HOUSE # STREET NAME RATING1 150 S. 700 EAST ES 154 S. 700 EAST EC 160 S. 700 EAST EC 210 S. 700 EAST NC 220 S. 700 EAST NC 302 S. 700 EAST NC 314 S. 700 EAST EC 320 S. 700 EAST OP 328-330 S. 700 EAST NC 358 S. 700 EAST OP 424 S. 700 EAST OP 440 S. 700 EAST EC 444 S. 700 EAST ES 46 S. 700 EAST EC 470 S. 700 EAST EC 538 S. 700 EAST ES 54 S. 700 EAST EC 540 S. 700 EAST ES 544 S. 700 EAST OP 630 S. 700 EAST EC 632 S. 700 EAST EC 634 S. 700 EAST NC 644 S. 700 EAST EC 652-654 S. 700 EAST EC 656 S. 700 EAST EC 680 S. 700 EAST EC 702 S. 700 EAST OP 722 S. 700 EAST EC 724 S. 700 EAST EC 726 S. 700 EAST EC 728 S. 700 EAST EC 730 S. 700 EAST NC 734 S. 700 EAST NC 740 S. 700 EAST NC 744 S. 700 EAST EC 750 S. 700 EAST EC 756 S. 700 EAST EC 760 S. 700 EAST EC 766 S. 700 EAST EC 772 S. 700 EAST EC 778 S. 700 EAST EC ATTACHMENT I: Submitted Intensive Level Survey Precise Interpretation: Ineligible/Non-Contributing The applicant interprets the building at 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, as Ineligible/Non-Contributing per the Intensive Level Survey performed by SWCA and published on September 2, 2022. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Matt Abbott, Development Manager Alta Terra Real Estate 1441 West Ute Boulevard, Suite 130 Park City, Utah 84098 From: Christina Olson, Lead Architectural Historian, SWCA Environmental Consultants Trevor Mark, Assistant Staff Architectural Historian, SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: September 2, 2022 Re: Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah INTRODUCTION Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra) contracted SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to provide support in evaluating the eligibility of the property at 470 S. 700 East in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (Figure A-1 and Figure A-2 in Appendix A) for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and for state and local registers. The property was originally Fendall’s Ice Cream (or Fendall’s) and is now Big Daddy’s Pizza. The following tasks were identified in the scope of work: • Document the history of the property, which was built in 1957, to include research in historic newspapers and archives held by the University of Utah and Utah Division of State History, with an emphasis on locating historic imagery of the building. • Photographically document the present appearance of the building exterior and interior, particularly public areas of the building such as the former ice cream parlor. • Prepare an intensive level survey form to the standards of the Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), to include an evaluation of the historic significance of the property, its historic integrity, and its eligibility for the NRHP. EVALUATING ELIGIBILITY A property that is eligible for the NRHP must be of historic age; must be significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture; and must retain integrity sufficient to convey its significance. The significance of properties is evaluated using the following four criteria: • The property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history (Criterion A) Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 2 • The property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past (Criterion B) • The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction (Criterion C) • The property yields, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (Criterion D) Resources considered significant under one or more of these criteria must also be evaluated for integrity in the aspects of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To be eligible for the NRHP, a property must possess integrity of those elements directly related to the criterion or criteria under which it would be determined eligible (National Park Service 1997). The property at 470 S. 700 East has previously been evaluated at the reconnaissance level only. In Utah, all architectural resources documented at this level are evaluated using a rating system established by the historic buildings program at the Utah Division of State History. This rating system allows for the assignment of one of the following four ratings to historic buildings and structures based on the degree to which they retain architectural integrity (Utah SHPO 2020): • Eligible/Significant (ES) Built within the Historic period and retains integrity; an excellent example of a style or type; unaltered or only minor alterations or additions. Properties with this rating are considered individually eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C. • Eligible/Contributing (EC) Built within the Historic period and retains integrity; a good example of a style or type but not as well preserved or well executed as ES buildings and has more substantial alterations or additions than ES buildings, although overall integrity is retained. Properties with this rating are considered eligible for the NRHP as part of a potential historic district and/or under Criterion A. • Not eligible/Non-contributing (NC) Built during the Historic period but has had major alterations or additions; no longer retains integrity. Properties with this rating are considered not eligible for the NRHP under any criterion. • Not eligible/Out-of-period (OP), built after the Historic period • Not eligible for the NRHP EXISTING DOCUMENTATION The Central City Historic District is a NRHP-listed district as well as a locally designated district. The boundaries of the NRHP district were expanded in 2001 (Giraud 2001); the boundaries of the local district do not correlate to those of the NRHP district (Ellis 2013; Giraud 2001; Miller 1994). The Salt Lake City East Side Historic District (East Side Historic District) boundary expansion in 2003 consolidated the 1996 Central City Historic District boundaries with the 2001 expanded boundary of the Central City Historic District, along with the Bryant and Bennion-Douglas neighborhoods (Broschinsky 2002). The period of significance for the Central City Historic District is 1870 to 1946; the period of significance for the Salt Lake City East Side Historic District is 1860 to 1953. The property at 470 S. 700 East lies within the boundaries for the locally designated Central City Historic District and the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Broschinsky 2002; Ellis 2013). The Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 3 property was initially recorded in a 1994 reconnaissance level survey (RLS) as a non-contributing property to the East Side Historic District (Miller 1994). In 2013, the property was re-recorded during RLS and identified as contributing to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Ellis 2013). The 2013 RLS expands the sub-periods of significance identified in the 2001 Central City Historic District expansion; Fendall’s is listed as E/C under the 1923–1955 sub-period of significance, although the actual construction date of the Fendall’s building is 1957, putting it in the 1956–1995 sub-period (Ellis 2013). While the property was recommended as contributing and is considered so locally by the City of Salt Lake, it has never been incorporated into the NRHP districts in which it lies as a contributing property. RESEARCH METHODS Alta Terra provided SWCA with a current chain of title for the property on August 12, 2022. Between August 12 and August 16, 2022, SWCA searched photographs in the University of Utah J. Willard Marriott Digital Library, U.S. Geological Survey publications, and newspaper articles to document the property’s history. On August 17, 2022, SWCA Architectural Historian Trevor Mark conducted a site visit to document and record the property. Historic research was used in conjunction with information recorded during the site visit to evaluate the property’s NRHP eligibility and its status within the East Side Historic District. A summary of the property’s history is provided in Table 1 and Appendix A contains images supporting the documentation and evaluation contained in this memorandum. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The building at 470 S. 700 East is a single-story irregular plan commercial building constructed in 1957. It is oriented east-west with an alley on the south and west sides and a parking area on the north side. The primary entrance is in the east elevation, along S. 700 East. A sidewalk runs along the property’s east side. The building is located on the west side of the street. As originally constructed, the building is a one-part commercial block with a mid-century contemporary style façade and a flat roof. The façade (located on the east elevation) consists of brick veneer with paneling over a canted canopy. Originally, the canopy supported a lettered Fendall’s Ice Cream sign outlined in neon. The façade is punctuated by two double doors with aluminum frames and a single fixed glass panel that make up the primary entrance and a fixed single-lite plate glass window with an aluminum frame. A low stone planter is present along the east elevation between the primary entry and the northeast corner of the building (Figure A-3 and Figure A-). Windows in the west elevation and along the secondary portions of the north and south elevations consist of original four-lite steel casements (Figure A-5 and Figure A-6). A metal overhead delivery bay door is present toward the west end of the north elevation (Figure A-7). The original interior of the ice cream parlor contained a marble soda fountain counter and a rear wooden bar with multiple mirrors (Figure A-8); these interior features have been removed, date unknown (Figure A-9). The building foundation is a combination of formed concrete with a basement, at grade concrete block, and a poured concrete slab; the overall structure consists of reinforced concrete block. Based on historic aerial imagery, a side addition was constructed off the north elevation sometime between 1962 and 1965 (Historic Aerials 1962, 1965; Lile 1972). It is likely that the stone planter along the east (front) elevation was extended at this time as well. In 1972, a semitruck crashed through the northeast corner of the building (the circa 1963/1964 addition), after which the damaged portion of the building was rebuilt (Deseret News 1972). Windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations (near S. 700 East) consist of single-lite vinyl replacement windows (ca. 1995) set into the original steel casings (Figure A-, Figure A-11, and Figure A-12). Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 4 The contemporary style canopy on the east elevation is attached at an angle and projects approximately 3 feet from the façade. On the south elevation, the canopy projects 6 feet farther from the façade. The canopy is supported by two metal posts but otherwise appears to be cantilevered. Although the steel frame canopy was originally clad in metal, the cladding was removed between 2011 and 2014 (Google 2011, 2014). The lettered neon canopy sign was also removed, date unknown. (see Figure A-). The original color scheme of the east elevation emphasized the different materials and associat ed textures, with the paneled area above the canopy being a lighter color, contrasting with the darker brick veneer. Between August 2007 and June 2008, the building had a buff color paint scheme with faux brick coining along the east elevation corners, with the canted canopy painted teal and the original Fendall’s neon sign still present on the pole in front of the building (Google 2007, 2008). By July 2011, the building was painted white with the canted canopy painted red; portions of the metal cladding on the canopy were peeling off or missing. The neon Fendall’s pole sign was still present (Google 2011). Between July 2014 and July 2018, the building was painted red with the canted canopy painted black (Google 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018). By July 2014, the metal cladding on the canted canopy had been completed removed (Google 2014). The neon Fendall’s pole sign was still present in July 2018 (Google 2018). By August 2021, the original Fendall’s sign on the pole in front of the building was replaced with the current neon pizza sign (Figure A-13) (Google 2021, 2022a, 2022b). The original soda fountain and rear bar have been removed from the building, date unknown. Other alterations to the building include the early 1960s side addition (rebuilt in 1972), vinyl replacement windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations ca. 1995, removal of cladding and neon letter sign from the canted canopy and alteration of the color scheme of the building between 2014 and 2018, and replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building ca. 2021. HISTORY Fendall’s Ice Cream Company was established in Salt Lake City in 1910. Joseph Rimensberger, a pastry chef, became partners with Edmund Fendall after relocating from the Waldorf Astoria in New York City to the Hotel Utah in Salt Lake City. After the untimely death of Fendall in 1919, Rimensberger continued the company under the Fendall name, “thinking that it looked better on the marquee” (Phillips 2010). The company moved to 470 S. 700 East in 1957, constructing the original portion of the existing building, which contained an ice cream parlor in the front and a manufacturing facility in the rear (Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram 1957; Phillips 2010). Fendall’s closed in 1997 and the property became a pizza shop in 1999 (Phillips 2010; Alta Terra 2022). A summary of the property’s history is presented in Table 1. Table 1. Chronological Summary of the History of 470 S. 700 East Year, Month (if known) Description Reference 1911–1950 Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 are occupied by two brick buildings and three outbuildings at 460 and 464 E. 700 South. Sanborn Map Company 1911 1950 460 and 464 S. 700 East still present, less one outbuilding at 464½ S. 700 East. Sanborn Map Company 1950 1957, April 7 Building permit submitted for a “retail store and factory at 470 7th East, $22,500.” Salt Lake Tribune 1957 1957, April 22 Sale of Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 from Huber & Roland Construction Company to Fendall Ice Cream Company Alta Terra 2022 1957, August 16 Fendall’s Ice Cream opens at 470 S. 700 East. Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram 1957 Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 5 Year, Month (if known) Description Reference 1972, August 14 Refrigerator truck crashes into the northeast corner of the building, causing the roof to partially collapse. Deseret News 1972 1972, August 18 Building permit issued for $5400 in repairs to the building by contractor Rulon Construction Daily Record 1972 1972 Aerial photograph of the building. It is unclear if it was taken pre- or post-crash. Lile 1972 1979, August 1 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Carl J. and Darline Rimensberger Alta Terra 2022 1979, December 27 Grant of access easement to Lots 1 and 8 of Block 32 Alta Terra 2022 1981, April 2 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Fendall Investment Co. Alta Terra 2022 1989 Fendall’s Ice Cream photographed with a profile of the business, ownership, and history. Stewart 1989 1993, June 2 Quitclaim deed from Carl/Darline Rimensberger Family Trust to Carol Jo Radlinger Alta Terra 2022 1999 Pizza Pipeline in business at 470 S. 700 East Daily Utah Chronicle 1999 2004 Quitclaim deed from Carol Jo and Gunter Radlinger to GCR Enterprises Alta Terra 2022 2010 Notice of default Alta Terra 2022 2011 Special Warranty Deed from Velocity Commercial Capital to Micelli Group LLC Alta Terra 2022 2011 Painted white from older teal and off white Google 2011 ca. 2011–2014 Painted red and black Google 2014 ca. 2019–2021 Sign painted Google 2021 2022, March 16 Special Warranty Deed from Micelli Group LLC to Properties KP6 LLC Alta Terra 2022 ELIGIBILITY Based on the 2013 RLS, 470 S. 700 East is currently identified as eligible for the NRHP as a contributing property to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Broschinsky 2002; Ellis 2013). These districts are significant under Criteria A and C in the themes of Architecture, Community Planning and Development, and Social History. The period of significance for the Central City Historic District is 1870 to 1946; the period of significance for the East Side Historic District is 1860 to 1953 (Broschinsky 2002; Giraud 2001). While the property is associated with the development of the ice cream industry at a local level in Salt Lake City during the twentieth century, the effects to integrity in the areas of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association have diminished the property’s conveyance of significance under the themes of Community Planning, and Social History within the period of significance identified for either historic district. As such, the property is recommended non-contributing to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts and not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A. The property is not associated with the lives of historically significant persons and is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion B. The impacts to design, materials, and workmanship have effaced any distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. The property is not representative of the work of a master, nor does it Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 6 possess high artistic value. Additionally, the loss of integrity in these areas has depreciated the property as architecturally representative of either historic district within the identified periods of significance. Therefore, the property is recommended non-contributing to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts and not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C. The property is not likely to yield information important to prehistory or history. Therefore, the property is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion D. Although the property is 50 years or more in age and has maintained integrity in the areas of location and setting, alterations to the property have diminished integrity in the areas of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Installation of vinyl replacement windows in the north and south elevations, along with removal of cladding and signage from the canopy, has affected the property’s integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. In addition, removal of the canopy signage, along with the removal of the soda fountain counter and back bar from the interior, has erased the feeling and association of the space as an ice cream parlor. While the replacement neon sign on the pole in front of the building is similar in design, materials, and workmanship to the original Fendall’s neon sign, the association with the ice cream parlor and manufacturing facility has not been maintained. The current paint scheme also affects the original aesthetic of the building—and therefore integrity of design and materials—by diminishing architectural details and erasing the differentiation between materials, specifically on the east elevation. Due to the substantial loss of integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, 470 S. 700 East is recommended not eligible and non-contributing to either the Central City Historic District or the Salt Lake City East Side Historic District. Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 7 REFERENCES CITED Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra) 2022 Chain of Title for 470 S 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Prepared by Alta Terra Real Estate, Park City, Utah. Broschinsky, Korral 2002 Salt Lake City East Side Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah. Daily Record 1972 S.L. City Building Permits. Daily Record 18 August:8. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/681928964. Accessed August 16, 2022. Daily Utah Chronicle 1999 Grand Opening!. Daily Utah Chronicle 8 March:99. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430068373. Accessed August 16, 2022. Deseret News 1972 Truck Rams Into Ice Cream Parlor. Deseret News 14 August:19. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/596682055. Accessed August 15, 2022. Ellis, Sheri Murray 2013 Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of State History, Salt Lake City. Giraud, Elizabeth Egleston 2001 Central City Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation/Planning Division, Salt Lake City, Utah. Google 2007 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102 /@40.7588702,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591 072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2008 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591 072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2011 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591 072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 8 2014 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d 40.7591072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2015 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591 072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2016 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. May. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:0 x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072! 4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2017 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f :0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.759107 2!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2018 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12 f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.759107 2!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2021 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887 02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072 !4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2022a Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. January. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75910 82,-111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2022b Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75910 82,-111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022. Historic Aerials 1962 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022. 1965 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022. Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 9 Lile, Edward P. 1972 Utah State Historical Society Classified Photo Collection. Salt Lake City-Aerial Views P.21. Utah Department of Culture & Community Engagement. Available at: https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60g5365. Accessed August 16, 2022. Miller, Lisa 1994 Standard Reconnaissance Level Survey, Central City Historic District, Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of State History, Salt Lake City. National Park Service 1997 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Rev ed. National Register Bulletin 15. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022. Phillips, Valerie 2010 Frozen in time: Fendall’s celebrates 100 years of making ice cream. Deseret News March 17. Available at: https://www.deseret.com/2010/3/17/20102599/frozen-in-time-fendall-s- celebrates-100-years-of-making-ice-cream. Accessed August 16, 2022. Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960 Photograph associated with Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Salt Lake City, Utah. Salt Lake Tribune 1957 Building Permits. Salt Lake Tribune 7 April:41. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/598554146. Accessed August 15, 2022. Sanborn Map Company 1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. Map No. 271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_007/. Accessed August 16, 2022. 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. July. Map No. 271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_013/. Accessed August 16, 2022. Stewart, Isaiah 1989 Lots of hard work lies behind that delicious cone. Daily Utah Chronicle 1 March:89. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430262389/. Accessed August 16, 2022. Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 2020 Reconnaissance Level Survey: Guidelines for Architectural Resources. February. Available at: https://history.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PRES_RLS-Guidelines-2020.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022. APPENDIX A Figures A-1 Figure A-1. Site map. A-2 Figure A-2. Location map. A-3 Figure A-3. Early 1960s-era photograph of 470 S. 700 East as it appeared originally, prior to the north addition and truck accident (Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960). A-4 Figure A-4. Front door and primary façade windows, facing west. A-5 Figure A-5. Steel frame window on south elevation, facing northeast. A-6 Figure A-6. Detail of steel frame casement window, north elevation. A-7 Figure A-7. Delivery bay door in north elevation, facing southeast. A-8 Figure A-8. Interior of Fendall’s Ice Cream, ca. 1960 (Phillips 2010). A-9 Figure A-9. Current interior of Big Daddy’s Pizza. A-10 Figure A-10. Detail of vinyl replacement window, south elevation. A-11 Figure A-11. 470 S. 700 East, north and east elevations (vinyl replacement windows in north elevation), facing southwest. A-12 Figure A-12. 470 S. 700 East, south and east elevations (vinyl replacement windows in south elevation), including frame of canted canopy, facing northwest. A-13 Figure A-13. Replacement neon sign. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 1 HISTORIC SITE FORM 1. Identification Name of Property: Big Daddy’s Pizza/Fendall’s Ice Cream Address: 470 S 700 East City, County: Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County Current Owner Name: SALT LAKE CITY PROPERTIES KP6, LLC Current Owner Address: 1441 West Ute Blvd., Suite 130, Park City, Utah 84098 Township: 1S Range: 1E Section: 05 Latitude/Longitude (degr-dec): 40.75914, -111.87141 USGS Map Name and Date: Fort Douglas, 2020 Tax Number: 16053070100000 Legal Description (include acreage): Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 32 Plat “B” Salt Lake Survey which point is also the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 32, Plat “B” Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence West 148.5 feet, thence North 92.5 feet; then ce East 148.5 feet, thence South 49.5 feet to the place of beginning. 2. Status / Use Property Category Evaluation ☒ Building(s) ☐ Eligible / Contributing ☐ Structure(s) ☒ Ineligible / Non-Contributing ☐ Site ☐ Out of Period ☐ Object Use: Original Use: Commercial/Restaurant Current Use: Commercial/Restaurant 3. Documentation Research Sources Check all sources consulted, whether useful or not. ☒ Abstract of Title ☒ Newspapers ☒ Tax Card and Photo ☐ City / County Histories ☐ Building Permit ☐ Personal Interviews ☐ Sewer Permit ☒ USHS History Research Center ☒ Sanborn Maps ☒ USHS Preservation Files ☐ Obituary Index ☒ USHS Architects File ☒ City Directories / Gazetteers ☐ LDS Family History Library ☐ Census Records ☐ Local Library: ☐ Biographical Encyclopedias ☒ University Library(ies): University of Utah J. Willard Marriott Digital Library Photos Drawings and Plans Dates: Dates: Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 2 Research Sources Check all sources consulted, whether useful or not. ☐ Slides: ☐ Measured Floor Plans: ☐ Prints: ☒ Site Sketch Map: 2022 ☒ Historic: Salt Lake County Assessor 2022 ☐ Historic American Building Survey: ☐ Original Plans Available at: ☐ Other: Bibliographical References Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra) 2022 Chain of Title for 470 S 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Prepared by Alta Terra Real Estate, Park City, Utah. Broschinsky, Korral 2002 Salt Lake City East Side Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah. Daily Record 1972 S.L. City Building Permits. Daily Record 18 August:8. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/681928964. Accessed August 16, 2022. Daily Utah Chronicle 1999 Grand Opening!. Daily Utah Chronicle 8 March:99. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430068373. Accessed August 16, 2022. Deseret News 1972 Truck Rams Into Ice Cream Parlor. Deseret News 14 August:19. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/596682055. Accessed August 15, 2022. Ellis, Sheri Murray 2013 Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of State History, Salt Lake City. Giraud, Elizabeth Egleston 2001 Central City Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation/Planning Division, Salt Lake City, Utah. Google 2007 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102 /@40.7588702,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d- 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2008 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d- 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 3 2011 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d- 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2014 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d 40.7591072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2015 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d 12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d- 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2016 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. May. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:0 x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d - 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2017 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f :0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d- 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2018 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12 f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d - 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2021 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,- 111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d - 111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2022a Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. January. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7591082,- 111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022. 2022b Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7591082,- 111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f: 0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022. Historic Aerials 1962 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022. 1965 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022. Lile, Edward P. 1972 Utah State Historical Society Classified Photo Collection: Salt Lake City-Aerial Views P.21. Utah Department of Culture & Community Engagement. Available at: https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60g5365. Accessed August 16, 2022. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 4 Miller, Lisa 1994 Standard Reconnaissance Level Survey, Central City Historic District, Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of State History, Salt Lake City. National Park Service 1997 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Rev ed. National Register Bulletin 15. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB- 15_web508.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022. Phillips, Valerie 2010 Frozen in time: Fendall’s celebrates 100 years of making ice cream. Deseret News March 17. Available at: https://www.deseret.com/2010/3/17/20102599/frozen-in-time-fendall-s-celebrates-100-years-of-making-ice- cream. Accessed August 16, 2022. Salt Lake County Assessor 2022 Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Parcel Details. Salt Lake City, UT. May 22. Available at: https://slco.org/assessor/new/valuationInfoExpanded.cfm?parcel_id=16053070100000. Accessed August 16, 2022. Sanborn Map Company 1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. Map No. 271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_007/. Accessed August 16, 2022. 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. July. Map No. 271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_013/. Accessed August 16, 2022. Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960 Photograph associated with Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Salt Lake City, UT. Salt Lake Tribune 1957 Building Permits. Salt Lake Tribune 7 April:41. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/598554146. Accessed August 15, 2022. Stewart, Isaiah 1989 Lots of hard work lies behind that delicious cone. Daily Utah Chronicle 1 March:89. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430262389/. Accessed August 16, 2022. Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 2020 Reconnaissance Level Survey: Guidelines for Architectural Resources. February. Available at: https://history.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PRES_RLS-Guidelines-2020.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022. 4. Architectural Description Building Style / Type: One-part commercial block with contemporary façade Number of Stories: 1 Foundation Material: Formed concrete Wall Material(s): Concrete block with regular brick Additions Alterations ☐ None ☐ None ☒ Minor ☐ Minor ☐ Major (Describe Below) ☒ Major (Describe Below) Number of Associated Outbuildings: None and/or Structures: None Description The building at 470 S. 700 East is a single-story irregular plan commercial building constructed in 1957. It is oriented east-west with an alley on the south and west sides and a parking area on the north side (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The primary entrance is in the east elevation, along S. 700 East. A sidewalk passes on the east side. The building is located on the west side of the street. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 5 As originally constructed, the building is a one-part commercial block with a mid-century contemporary style façade and a flat roof (Figure 3). The façade (located on the east elevation) consists of brick veneer with paneling over a canted canopy. Originally, the canopy supported a Fendall’s Ice Cream lettered sign outlined in neon (Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6). The façade is punctuated by two double doors with aluminum frames and a single fixed glass panel that make up the primary entrance, and fixed single lite plate glass with aluminum frame (Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, and Figure 10). A low, stone planter is present along the east elevation between the primary entry and the northeast corner of the building (Figure 11). Windows in the west elevation and along the secondary portions of the north and south elevations consist of original four-lite, steel casements. A metal overhead delivery bay door is present toward the west end of the north elevation (Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, and Figure 16). The original interior of the ice cream parlor contained a marble soda fountain counter and a rear wooden bar with multiple mirrors; these interior features have been removed, date unknown (Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20, and Figure 21). The building foundation is a combination of formed concrete with a basement, at grade concrete block, and a poured concrete slab; the overall structure consists of reinforced concrete block (Figure 22 and Figure 23). Based on historic aerial imagery, a side addition was constructed off the north elevation sometime between 1962 and 1965 (Historic Aerials 1962, 1965; Lile 1972). It is likely that the stone planter along the east elevation was extended at this time as well. In 1972, a semi-truck crashed through the northeast corner of the building (the circa 1963/1964 addition), after which the damaged portion of the building was rebuilt (Deseret News 1972). Brick at the point between the new and original part of the building are visually different (Figure 24) Windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations (near S. 700 East) consist of single-lite vinyl replacement windows (c. 1995) set into the original steel casings. The contemporary style canopy on the east elevation is attached at an angle and projects approximately 3 feet from the façade. On the south elevation, the canopy project a further 6 feet from the façade. The canopy is supported by two metal posts, but other wise appears to be cantilevered. Although the steel frame canopy was originally clad in metal, the cladding was removed between 2011 and 2014 (Google 2011, 2014). The lettered neon canopy sign was also removed, date unknown. The original color scheme of the east elevation emphasized the different materials and associated textures, with the paneled area above the canopy being a lighter color, contrasting with the darker brick veneer. Google Street View between August 2007 and June 2008 indicates that the building had a buff color paint scheme with faux brick coining along the east elevation corners, with the canted canopy painted teal and the original Fendall’s neon sign still present on the pole in front of the building (Google 2007, 2008). By July 2011, the building was painted white with the canted canopy painted red; portions of the metal cladding on the canopy were peeling off or missing. The Fendall’s n eon pole sign was still present (Google 2011). Between July 2014 and July 2018, the building was painted red with the canted canopy painted black (Google 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018). By July 2014, the metal cladding on the canted canopy had been completed removed (Google 2014). The Fendall’s neon pole sign was still in July 2018 (Google 2018). By August 2021, the original Fendall’s neon sign on the pole in front of the building was replaced with the current neon pizza sign (Google 2021, 2022a, 2022b). The original soda fountain and rear bar have been removed from the building, date unknown. Other alterations to the building include the early 1960s north elevation addition (rebuilt in 1972), vinyl replacement windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations circa 1995, removal of cladding and neon letter sign from the canted canopy and alteration of the color scheme of the building between 2014 and 2018, and replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building circa 2021. 5. History Architect / Builder: Huber & Roland Construction Date of Construction: 1957 Historic Themes Mark themes related to this property with ‘S’ or ‘C’ (S = significant, C = Contributing) Agriculture Conservation Invention Science Architecture Economics Landscape Architecture Social History Archaeology Education Law Transportation Art Engineering Literature Other: Commerce Entertainment / Recreation Maritime History Communications Ethnic Heritage Military Community Planning & Development Exploration / Settlement Performing Arts Health / Medicine Politics / Government Industry Religion History Fendall’s Ice Cream Company was established in Salt Lake City in 1910. Joseph Rimensberger, a pastry chef, became partners wi th Edmund Fendall after relocating from the Waldorf Astoria in New York City to the Hotel Utah in Salt Lake City. After the untimely death of Fendall in 1919, Rimensberger continued the company under the Fendall name, “thinking that it looked better on the marquee” (Phillips 2010). The company moved to 470 S. 700 East in 1957, constructing the original portion of the existing building, which contained an ice cream parlor in the Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 6 front and a manufacturing facility in the rear (Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram 1957; Phillips 2010). Fendall’s closed in 1997 and the property became a pizza shop in 1999 (Alta Terra 2022; Phillips 2010). A summary of the property’s history is presented in below. Year, Month (if known) Description Reference 1911–1950 Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 are occupied by two brick buildings and three outbuildings at 460 and 464 E. 700 South. Sanborn Map Company 1911 1950 460 and 464 S. 700 East still present, less one outbuilding at 464½ S. 700 East. Sanborn Map Company 1950 1957, April 7 Building permit submitted for a “retail store and factory at 470 7th East, $22,500.” Salt Lake Tribune 1957 1957, April 22 Sale of Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 from Huber & Roland Construction Company to Fendall Ice Cream Company Alta Terra 2022 1957, August 16 Fendall’s Ice Cream opens at 470 S. 700 East. Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram 1957 1972, August 14 Refrigerator truck crashes into the northeast corner of the building, causing the roof to partially collapse. Deseret News 1972 1972, August 18 Building permit issued for $5400 in repairs to the building by contractor Rulon Construction Daily Record 1972 1972 Aerial photograph of the building. It is unclear if it was taken pre- or post-crash. Lile 1972 1979, August 1 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Carl J. and Darline Rimensberger Alta Terra 2022 1979, December 27 Grant of access easement to Lots 1 and 8 of Block 32 Alta Terra 2022 1981, April 2 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Fendall Investment Co. Alta Terra 2022 1989 Fendall’s Ice Cream photographed with a profile of the business, ownership, and history. Stewart 1989 1993, June 2 Quitclaim deed from Carl/Darline Rimensberger Family Trust to Carol Jo Radlinger Alta Terra 2022 1999 Pizza Pipeline in business at 470 S. 700 East Daily Utah Chronicle 1999 2004 Quitclaim deed from Carol Jo and Gunter Radlinger to GCR Enterprises Alta Terra 2022 2010 Notice of default Alta Terra 2022 2011 Special Warranty Deed from Velocity Commercial Capital to Micelli Group LLC Alta Terra 2022 2011 Painted white from older teal and off white Google 2011 ca. 2011–2014 Painted red and black Google 2014 ca. 2019–2021 Sign painted Google 2021 2022, March 16 Special Warranty Deed from Micelli Group LLC to Properties KP6 LLC Alta Terra 2022 Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 7 Figure 1. Location map. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 8 Figure 2. Site map. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 9 Figure 3. Early 1960s-era photograph of 470 S. 700 East as it appeared originally, prior to the north addition and truck accident (Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960). Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 10 Figure 4. Property photograph from 2011 (Google 2011). Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 11 Figure 5. North and east elevations, facing southwest. Figure 6. South elevation, facing northwest. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 12 Figure 7. Sign, facing north. Figure 8. South and east elevations, facing north. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 13 Figure 9. South elevation and canted canopy, facing west. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 14 Figure 10. Storefront, east elevation, facing west. Figure 11. Front flagstone wall, facing north. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 15 Figure 12. Original window frame detail, south elevation. Figure 13. North elevation, facing southeast. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 16 Figure 14. North elevation, facing south. Figure 15. North elevation, facing southeast. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 17 Figure 16. South and west elevations, facing northeast. Figure 17. Interior front door, facing southeast. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 18 Figure 18. Interior counter, facing northeast. Figure 19. Dining area, facing northeast. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 19 Figure 20. Meeting point of addition (left) and original building (right). Figure 21. Original cabinets. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 20 Figure 22. Concrete block foundation detail. Figure 23. Foundation detail. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91) Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022 21 Figure 24. Junction point of original (left) and historic bricks (right).