PLNZAD2022-00886 - 470 S 700 EOctober 18, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION
DECISION AND FINDINGS
PLNZAD2022-00886
REQUEST:
A request for an administrative interpretation regarding the contributing status of the building
located at approximately 470 S 700 E (Tax ID 16-05-307-010-0000). The subject property is
located in the Central City Local Historic District.
The owners of the subject property dispute the EC (Eligible Contributing) rating in the 2013
Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) that was done for the Central City Local Historic District. The
applicants hired SWCA Environmental Consultants to conduct an Intensive Level Survey (ILS)
for the subject property and have submitted the ILS documentation as part of their request. The
ILS Survey recommends the building is no longer contributing to the Central City Local Historic
District.
DECISION:
The Zoning Administrator finds that the evaluation in the Central City 2013 (RLS) should be
changed from an Eligible Contributing Structure to a Noncontributing Structure for the building
located at 470 S 700 E. The Zoning Administrator finds the building no longer satisfies the
definition or criteria for a contributing structure found in 21A.34.020.C.15.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located in the Central City Local Historic District, within the H (Historic
Preservation Overlay District) and is subject to the standards in section 21A.34.020 of the Salt
Lake City Zoning Ordinance. The structure is a one-story restaurant constructed in approximately
1957.
Section 21A.34.020B of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance defines contributing and non-
contributing structures, as follows:
CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE: A structure or site within the H Historic
Preservation Overlay District that meets the criteria outlined in subsection C15 of
this section [21A.34.020] and is of moderate importance to the City, State, region
or Nation because it imparts artistic, historic or cultural values. A contributing
structure has its major character defining features intact and although minor
alterations may have occurred they are generally reversible. Historic materials
may have been covered but evidence indicates they are intact.
NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE: A structure within the H Historic
Preservation Overlay District that does not meet the criteria listed in subsection
C15 of this section [21A.34.020]. The major character defining features have been
so altered as to make the original and/or historic form, materials and details
indistinguishable and alterations are irreversible. Noncontributing structures
may also include those which are less than fifty (50) years old.
Historic Resource Surveys are one of the tools used by Staff for the purpose of identifying and
evaluating the quantity and quality of historic resources for land use planning purposes following
the guidelines and forms of the Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
The first survey conducted in the Central Local Historic District was in 1980. Buildings were
evaluated and each was given one of the following ratings:
• Significant
• Contributory
• Not Contributory
• Intrusion
In 1980, the site information form designated the property as “Out of Period” which is a non-
contributing status. Historic surveys were also conducted in 1994 and 2013.
As noted previously, when the Central City Historic District was originally created, this property
was noted as Out-of-Period; it was not a contributing building in the District and not listed in the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) at the time. In 2003 the National Register of Historic
Places Salt Lake City East Side Historic Places boundary was expanded to include the west side of
700 East and the subject site, however the period of significance in the 2003 National Register
Expansion only included properties from 1860 – 1953, therefore this property was noted as Out-
of-Period/noncontributing at that time. The site was re-evaluated as Eligible/Contributing (EC)
in a 2013 Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) which extended the period of significance to 1968.
In 2013, each property within the Central City Historic District was evaluated and given one of
the following ratings:
• ES-Eligible/Significant
• EC-Eligible Contributing
• NC-Non-Contributing
• OP-Out of Period
The 2013 survey identifies the subject structure as an EC – Eligible Contributing. The surveys are
conducted in accordance with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Standard Operating
Procedures, and the surveyed resources were evaluated using criteria developed by SHPO.
Buildings with a “EC” evaluation retain historic integrity but are typically not eligible for
individual listing – they are good examples of types or styles of architecture but are not as well
executed as “ES” rated buildings.
The ILS survey submitted by the applicant notes alterations to the building that occurred
sometime between 1962 and 2001 and include a side addition (to the north), vinyl replacement
windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations, removal of cladding and neon
letter sign from an original canted canopy, alteration of the color scheme of the building and
replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS:
The Ordinance criteria draws directly from the national preservation methodology and evaluation
criteria developed by the U.S. Department of the Interior for the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Historic Preservation. In relation to evaluating a property, the National Park
Service provides clarification and guidance in the National Register Bulletin 15 ‘How to Apply the
National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Analysis on standards A and B is below. Standards C
through F are not applicable because they relate to designation of a district or site, and not to
reevaluating the contributing status of individual parcels within the already designated Central
City Local Historic District.
21A.34.020.C.15
A. Significance in local, regional, state or national history, architecture, engineering or
culture, associated with at least one of the following:
1. Events that have made significant contribution to the important patterns o f history,
or
2. Lives of persons significant in the history of the city, region, state, or nation, or
3. The distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; or the
work of a notable architect or master craftsman, or
4. Information important in the understanding of the prehistory or history of Salt
Lake City;
Analysis: The subject property is a component of the Central City Historic District. A
component of a district cannot contribute to the significance of the district if it does not share
the historic associations of the district. The Central City Historic District was nominated for
its significance in the areas of Architecture, Community Planning & Development, and Social
History, which directly relate to evaluation criteria 1, 2 & 3 under the evaluation criteria for
significance in subsection 15.
The Central City Historic District represents contributing architectural types and styles built
over more than a century. The 2003 National Register Nomination Form (Salt Lake City East
Side) identified the period of significance as from c. 1870s-1953. The NRHP nomination
focused heavily on either historic residential neighborhoods or historic commercial nodes
within those communities, not the specific historic character of the site. The listed historic
commercial nodes in the NRHP nomination did not include the commercial developments
along 700 East. The 2013 Central City Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) surveyed buildings
constructed through 1968 to consider a possible amendment to extend the period of
significance to 1968.
The Reconnaissance Level Survey (RLS) that was conducted in 2013 and marked the subject
building as eligible/contributing to the historic district found the types and styles of buildings
present in the Central City Local Historic District related to period of the construction. The
contextual periods comprise of:
Initial Settlement (1847 - 1869)
Transition (1870 - 1899)
Mature Community (1900 – 1922)
Depression and Decline (1923 – 1955)
Erosion of Residential Character (1956 – 1995)
Preservations vs. Progress (1996 – 2013)
The subject building was constructed in 1957 for a commercial ice cream parlor and falls
within the Erosion of Residential Character period of significance. Within this period 78
buildings are documented during the survey as estimated to date to this period. Most of this
construction consisted of commercial and multi-family structures that centered around the
central and southern portions of the district. It was during this period non-residential
developers transitioned to modern elements and materials, including windowed walls and
pre-cast concrete panels. However, as described above, there have been alterations to the
exterior of the subject building. Cumulatively, and particularly with the addition to the north
that widened the front façade of the structure as seen from 700 E, the structure has lost
defining characteristics from this period.
Findings: The existing contributing status is dependent on the 2013 RLS survey, which was
the first survey to list the subject structure as contributory. While the site and structure retain
some characteristic elements from the period of significance, alterations to the structure have
negatively impacted the integrity so it’s no longer representative of the time period in which
it was constructed. As such, the Zoning Administrator finds that standard ‘A’ in section
21A.34.020.C.15 is not met.
B. Physical integrity in terms of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling
and association as defined by the national park service for the national register of
histor ic places;
Analysis: The National Park Service defines integrity as “the ability of a property to convey
its significance.” Within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognizes
seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. In relation to the
seven aspects of integrity as defined by the National Park Service, several observations can be
made.
• Location: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed. The
property was constructed in its current location; therefore, the location of the building
remains intact.
• Design: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space,
structure, and style of a property. The original architectural design of this building is mid-
twentieth century. The design of the structure has been altered. Based on historic aerial
imagery, an addition to the north widened the front facade sometime between 1962 and
1965. This area sustained damage and was rebuilt in 1972. Windows in the primary
portions of the north and south elevations (near 700 East) consist of single-lite vinyl
replacement windows (ca. 1995) set into the original steel casings. The structure does not
retain its design integrity.
• Setting: Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. This building is
situated on the west side of 700 East within an area of the Historic District that includes
very limited historic resources. The subject building is one of the two remaining
contributing structures, all other structures are either not contributing or out-of-period.
The building to the north, at approximately 444 S 700 E (Mulloy Mansion), is considered
a significant structure to the district and is a significant historic structure in its own right.
The 2013 Central City RLS, the survey which listed the subject property as contributing to
the local historic district, identifies the blocks that span between 300 South and 500 South
as, “substantially compromised by the intrusion of modern commercial and multi-family
residential development”. This intrusion is described as, “so substantial as to effectively
create two separate historical areas…” where only the landscaped median along 600 East
ties these two historic areas together.
This interruption of the historic setting is so significant that the 2013 RLS recommended
that the boundary of the Local Historic District be amended to exclude the central area
(which includes the subject property and those other properties along the 700 East block
face) and only include the north and south portions of the Central City District. Therefore,
it is concluded that the historic setting of the structure retains little integrity if any.
• Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during
a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic
property. As discussed previously, the front façade of the subject building consisted of
brick and aluminum framed windows. Although the brick and aluminum windows remain
on the structure, the overall form and proportions of the front façade of building were
altered with the addition to the north. The vinyl replacement windows near the primary
façade also negatively impacted the structure. Although some materials are intact, the
overall integrity related to materials has been compromised due to alterations to the
structure.
• Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular
culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. The original
construction of the structure was simple in design, the significant character element being
the angled steel canopy attached to the structure, brick exterior, and steel windows. The
structure no longer provides physical evidence of the workmanship associated with the
type and style of construction due to significant alterations.
• Feeling: Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a
particular period of time. This building does not retain enough of the architectural
features that convey the property’s historic character. The structure has been significantly
altered through the modification of the character defining features of the property as
previously noted. Although the structure does retain some elements of the mid-century
modern style of construction, it no longer clearly provides a historic sense of a particular
period of time.
• Association: Association is the direct link between an important historic event or
person and a historic property. Planning Staff finds no direct link between important
historic events or persons in regards to the subject building.
Findings: The Zoning Administrator finds that the building maintains integrity of location,
however, integrity in terms of design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association
have been lost. A property does not have to meet each aspect to retain integrity, however the
location of the structure/where it was constructed is not enough in this case to determine the
property retains integrity. The physical integrity of the building has been lost. The Zoning
Administrator finds that standard ‘B’ in section 21A.34.020.C.15 is not met.
SUMMARY:
Section 21A.34.020.C.15 of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance outlines criteria that each
property within a historic district must meet to be considered “contributing” to the historic
district. The findings conclude that the subject property does not meet the criteria for both
standards A and B to be considered contributing. Based on the foregoing findings and analysis,
the structure has been substantially altered and no longer is representative of the district’s period
of significance; therefore, this structure is non-contributing to the Central City Historic District.
If you have any questions regarding this interpretation, please contact Mayara Lima at 801-535-
6141 or by email at Mayara.lima@slcgov.com.
APPEAL PROCESS:
An applicant or any other person or entity adversely affected by a decision administering or
interpreting this Title [Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance] may appeal to the Appeals Hearing
Officer. Notice of appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days of the administrative decision. The
appeal shall be filed with the Planning Division and shall specify the decision appealed and the
reasons the appellant claims the decision to be in error. Applications for appeals are located on
the Planning Division website at https://www.slc.gov/planning/applications/ along with
information about how to apply and the applicable processing fee.
Mayara Lima
Zoning Administrator
cc: Nick Norris, Planning Director
Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director
Casey Stewart, Development Review Supervisor
Posted to Web
Attachments:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Archive Photograph 1960s (Courtesy of Salt Lake County Assessor’s Office)
C. Survey Photo (1980)
D. Current Photo
E. 1950 Sandborn Map
F. Building Permit Card
G. Central City 2013 RLS Map
H. Applicable Central City 2013 RLS Descriptions
I. Submitted Intensive Level Survey
ATTACHMENT A: Vicinity Map
ATTACHMENT B: Archive Photograph 1960s
ATTACHMENT C: Survey Photo (1980)
ATTACHMENT D: Current Photo
ATTACHMENT E: 1950 Sandborn Map
ATTACHMENT F: Building Permit Card
ATTACHMENT G: Central City 2013 RLS Map
ATTACHMENT H: Applicable Central City 2013 RLS Descriptions
Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey
Salt Lake City, Utah:
Survey Report
DRAFT
Prepared for
Salt Lake City Corporation
Planning Department
Prepared by
Sheri Murray Ellis, MS, RPA
Manager/Sr. Consultant
Certus Environmental Solutions, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
Certus Project Number SLC01
February 1, 2013
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
3
Figure 1. Location of Central City reconnaissance level survey area, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
10
this freedom accrued to middle class workers, who soon began to eye the more distant suburbs of
the Salt Lake Valley as viable residential locations away from the con gestion and pollution of the
city. As a result, the exodus of single-family homeowners that had started in the Central City
neighborhood in the 1910s increased. In Central City and surrounding neighborhoods, such as the
Avenues and the Bryant neighborhood, numerous single-family homes were renovated to contain
multiple apartments or turned into boarding houses (Giraud 2001). Such apartments and boarding
houses became increasingly popular during the 1930s, while the city writhed in the throes of the
Great Depression. Stand-alone, multi-story apartment building construction also increased
dramatically during this period, particularly during the 1920s, with at least 10 major apartment
buildings, and many smaller ones, being constructed in the Central City survey area alone.
New construction of single-family housing did not completely disappear during this period, though.
Most such construction occurred during the latter part of the period, following the return of soldiers
from World War II. The vast majority of the Central City survey area had been completely built-out
by the 1930s, with essentially no vacant space available for new construction. However, a few
interior blocks had not been subdivided during earlier periods in the area’s history, and when they
were subdivided during the 1940s, small tracts of World War II Era housing (WWII Era Cottages)
were constructed. During the early post-war period, several of the older homes in the neighborhood
were demolished to make way for new single-family and multi-family dwellings.
New zoning ordinances during this period also made possible the change in the composition of the
Central City neighborhood. These ordinances shifted the focus of the neighborhood away from
primarily residential uses toward and increasing mixture of uses and allowed encroachment on
historical residential neighborhoods (Giraud 2001). The ordinances provided for the presence of
fraternal organizations and clubs, medical facilities, and other non-residential uses. A handful of new
office buildings, clinics, and other professional service buildings, all adorned in the distinctive post-
war architectural styling of the time, appeared in the survey area during the latter part of the period
and were (are) oddly juxtaposed against the picturesque single-family cottages and historical 3-story
apartment buildings. Truly reflective of the burgeoning automobile culture was the construction
during this period of a “tourist court” with drive-up motel units on the southwest corner of 400
South and 600 East and an auto service center on the southeast corner of 400 South and 500 East.
None of the buildings associated with these uses remain today.
Erosion of Residential Character (1956 to 1995)
The trend away from owner-occupancy toward rental housing continued in the Central City
neighborhood during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. An increasing number of historical single-family
dwellings, particularly the larger homes in the northern part of the neighborhood, were subdivided
into multiple apartments and converted to rental properties. Redevelopment and affordable housing
projects saw the demolition of numerous historical residences to make way for new apartment
buildings. Additional zoning ordinance changes opened the door for increased commercial
development in the central portion of the neighborhood, particularly in the area between roughly
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
11
200 South and 500 South. In this area, many office buildings, restaurants, retail outlets, and other
commercial and institutional building have been constructed, the majority of them after 1990.
Not all modern business development has resulted in the demolition of historical buildings in the
Central City survey area. A number of both larger mansions and smaller single-family dwellings were
converted into office or other business uses, retaining the historical character of the public view
while applying concepts of adaptive reuse to the buildings. An example of this type of reuse is the
Kimball mansion on 600 East, which now houses executive suites and other small office suites. A
similar example of such adaptive reuse, though it occurred prior to 1950, was the conversion of the
large, Neoclassical style O.J. Salisbury mansion on the corner of 100 South and 600 East, to a
mortuary and funeral home.
During the 1990s, the Central City neighborhood saw a small return of single-family homeowners
and a resulting slight shift away from renter occupancy of single-family dwellings. This may have
been, in part, a response to renewed interest by the City in the preservation of the historica l
character of the city’s older neighborhoods and the designation of the Central City local historic
district in 1991. A demolition ordinance put in place by the City in 1995 was part of the focus on
preserving the historical character of the area. As a result, much of the modern commercial
development that has taken place in the central portion of the neighborhood occurred after 1995.
Preservation vs. Progress (1996 to 2013)
The most recent period in the history of the Central City neighborhood—between 1996 and 2013—
has been a struggle between preservation of the area’s historical resources and the furtherance of
modern economic development. On the one hand, the re-establishment of a streetcar system (now
represented by light-rail) through and within walking distance of most of the Central City
neighborhood in the late 1990s and early 2000s, added to the attractiveness of the neighborhood for
single-family occupancy, as residents who wanted to experience urban living but with a minimization
of their experiences with traffic congestion, have been able to take advantage of the expanding
modern transit system. This has led to a modest return to owner-occupied properties in contrast to
rental properties.
New housing construction has also occurred in the area, primarily in the form of multi-family
apartment and condominium complexes built upon lots once occupied either by historical single-
family dwellings, such as the case of Vernier Avenue (335 South) where eight Victorian -era
residences were demolished for the construction of a new apartment/condominium complex.
However, a small number of new single-family dwellings and attached single-family residential
courts (primarily comprised of condominiums) have also appeared in the area in recent years,
primarily in the northern portion of the neighborhood.
Commercial development during this period has been most active in the area between 300 South
and 500 South. Much of this development was accomplished by demolishing other modern (i.e.,
post-1968) commercial properties, but some, particularly in the vicinity of 300 South and 500 East,
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
19
styles. Examples of such properties include Minimal Traditional style apartments at 607 East 100
South and 633 East 200 South and the Early Ranch style apartments at 511 East 700 South.
Commercial and other non-residential development was all but absent during the Depression years
of this period. It wasn’t until the economic recovery spurred by World War II that commercial
development saw a resurgence in the Central City area. By this time, the 1-part block forms of the
earlier periods had largely given way to other forms that accommodated the burgeoning automobile
culture in America. Such properties included service bay businesses, such as the ca. 1950 serv ice
station at 503 East 900 South. In general, the commercial and public properties of the latter part of
the period exhibit either non-specific architectural styles or styles that can best be categorized as
either Minimal Traditional or Post general World War II styles. An example of the latter style
applied to a commercial structure can be seen on the building at 607 East 200 South.
Erosion of Residential Character (1956 to 1995)
Seventy-eight (78) buildings documented during the Central City survey are estimated to date to this
period. The majority of these buildings are commercial structures and multi-family apartment units,
many constructed as part of redevelopment and affordable housing projects. Most of the new
construction during this period occurred in the central and southern portions of the neighborhood.
Residential properties in the Central City district from this period are almost exclusively multi-family
dwellings. No single family dwellings were identified. The multi-family dwellings comprise
apartment complexes exhibiting Ranch/Rambler and Post World War II style during the early part
of the period and general Late 20th Century and Mansard styles in the latter part of the period, after
1970. Unlike the apartment complexes of the late 1800s and early 1900s, the complexes of this
period typically incorporate off-street parking areas, including carports and similar vehicle shelters.
Examples of ca. 1960s Ranch/Rambler style complexes can be seen at 564 East 600 South and 615
East 700 South.
Commercial development increased in the Central City district during this period compared to
earlier periods and was largely focused in the center of the district, between 200 South and 600
South. Strip malls, grocery stores, drive-thru restaurants, and office buildings proliferated in this
area, particularly after 1980. In the early part of the period, non-residential developments employed
Post World War II styles then transitioned in the application of Modern and Contemporary
elements and then to general Late 20th Century styles. Many of the non-residential properties
incorporated new construction materials and techniques, including relatively extensive use of
window walls and pre-cast concrete panels.
Preservation vs. Progress (1996 to 2013)
Twenty-nine (29) buildings documented during the Central City survey are estimated to date to this
period. Nearly all of the buildings constructed during this period are commercial structures, though a
few are residential properties. Of the residential properties constructed during the period, all but two
are multi-family dwellings comprising multi-story apartment courts or condominium courts.
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
23
property owners to maintain their historical buildings or their lack of sufficient funding to undertake
substantial alterations to their properties.
Figure 14. 2013 eligibility ratings of buildings in the Central City local historic district.
Because the current reconnaissance-level survey is updating the district records to include buildings
constructed during or prior to 1968 as historical resources, a large number of buildings categorized
during previous surveys as out-of-period are now in-period. Many of these buildings retain sufficient
historical integrity for their architectural type and style and their period of construction to warrant
contributing status (EC ratings). As a result, the total number of contributing resources within the
district has increased since the establishment of the district.
The local historic district has seen several losses of historical resources. Approximately 50 historical
buildings have been demolished since the reconnaissance-level surveys for the establishment of the
district. Of these, the majority were contributing resources. Areas most affected by the demolition of
historical buildings include 500 East between 200 South and 500 South, 600 East between 300 South
and 500 South, 700 East between 100 South and 300 South, and Vernier Avenue in the 500 East
block, where all of the historical buildings on the street were demolished.
When the local historic district is examined as a whole, the picture is somewhat less encouraging.
The central portion of the district—between 300 South and 500 South—has been substantially
compromised by the intrusion of modern commercial and multi-family residential development. The
intrusion is so substantial as to effectively create two separate historical areas: North Central City
and South Central City. Aside from the landscaped median along 600 East, there is very little to
28
472
52
85
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
ES - Eligible/Significant
EC - Eligible/Contributing
NC - Ineligible/Non-contributing
OP - Out-of Period
ES EC NC OP
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
24
visually tie the two areas together as a single historical neighborhood, let alone a cohesive district.
Recommendations for how to address this condition are provided below (see Recommendations).
In conducting the reconnaissance-level survey update for the local historic district, the surveyor
interacted with numerous property owners and area residents and observed a fair amount of
restoration, rehabilitation, and renovation work underway amidst the historical building stock. In the
course of these interactions, two facts became apparent—many property owners and residents are
unaware of the historic district and most are unaware of potential tax credits for historically
appropriate repair, rehabilitation, and restoration projects. This general lack of information is likely
due in large part to owner and resident turn over since the time the district was initially established.
New outreach to property owners and residents of the area may provide increased opportunities to
preserve both individual historical properties and the overall historical character of the area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the integrity of the local historic district and interactions with district residents, Certus
recommends two actions: adjust the boundaries of the local historic district and conduct educational
outreach to residents.
The boundary of the local historical district should be adjusted in one of two ways—either to create
a single district with two separate sections or to more closely match that of the National Register
district. As noted above, the modern intrusions in the central portion of the local historic district
have created two visually distinct areas within the district—a North Central City area (north of 300
South) and a South Central City area (south of 500 South). The only element connecting these two
areas and lending some indication they are historically associated with each other is the landscaped
median along 600 East. The local historic district boundary could be adjusted to include exclude the
central area and exist as the north and south areas described here. Application of historical design
guidelines to the central portion of the district may unnecessarily restrict the modern commercial
and residential development that is already occurring and planned to occur in this area.
Alternatively, the local district boundary should be adjusted to approximate that of the National
Register district, which is a better reflection of the historical integrity of the area. Some refinement
of this National Register district boundary would be appropriate to exclude areas where contributing
historical buildings have been demolished (e.g., along Vernier Avenue) and to include resources (e.g.,
Ambassador Plaza at 150 South 600 East) that were considered out-of-period at the time the
National Register district was established but are now in-period and contributing to the local historic
district.
As to owner and resident education, Certus believes a new effort to inform current property owners
and residents of the district boundaries, design guidelines, potential tax credits, and process for
obtaining approval for planned construction projects would go a long way toward increasing
resident support for the district, pride in the district, and preservation of its historical resources.
Most residents encountered during the field survey appeared willing to preserve their properties but
Central City RLS Survey Report
Draft
B-10
HOUSE # STREET NAME RATING1
150 S. 700 EAST ES
154 S. 700 EAST EC
160 S. 700 EAST EC
210 S. 700 EAST NC
220 S. 700 EAST NC
302 S. 700 EAST NC
314 S. 700 EAST EC
320 S. 700 EAST OP
328-330 S. 700 EAST NC
358 S. 700 EAST OP
424 S. 700 EAST OP
440 S. 700 EAST EC
444 S. 700 EAST ES
46 S. 700 EAST EC
470 S. 700 EAST EC
538 S. 700 EAST ES
54 S. 700 EAST EC
540 S. 700 EAST ES
544 S. 700 EAST OP
630 S. 700 EAST EC
632 S. 700 EAST EC
634 S. 700 EAST NC
644 S. 700 EAST EC
652-654 S. 700 EAST EC
656 S. 700 EAST EC
680 S. 700 EAST EC
702 S. 700 EAST OP
722 S. 700 EAST EC
724 S. 700 EAST EC
726 S. 700 EAST EC
728 S. 700 EAST EC
730 S. 700 EAST NC
734 S. 700 EAST NC
740 S. 700 EAST NC
744 S. 700 EAST EC
750 S. 700 EAST EC
756 S. 700 EAST EC
760 S. 700 EAST EC
766 S. 700 EAST EC
772 S. 700 EAST EC
778 S. 700 EAST EC
ATTACHMENT I: Submitted Intensive Level Survey
Precise Interpretation: Ineligible/Non-Contributing
The applicant interprets the building at 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, as
Ineligible/Non-Contributing per the Intensive Level Survey performed by SWCA and published
on September 2, 2022.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Abbott, Development Manager
Alta Terra Real Estate
1441 West Ute Boulevard, Suite 130
Park City, Utah 84098
From: Christina Olson, Lead Architectural Historian, SWCA Environmental Consultants
Trevor Mark, Assistant Staff Architectural Historian, SWCA Environmental Consultants
Date: September 2, 2022
Re: Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
INTRODUCTION
Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra) contracted SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to provide
support in evaluating the eligibility of the property at 470 S. 700 East in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake
County, Utah (Figure A-1 and Figure A-2 in Appendix A) for the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP), and for state and local registers. The property was originally Fendall’s Ice Cream (or Fendall’s)
and is now Big Daddy’s Pizza.
The following tasks were identified in the scope of work:
• Document the history of the property, which was built in 1957, to include research in historic
newspapers and archives held by the University of Utah and Utah Division of State History, with
an emphasis on locating historic imagery of the building.
• Photographically document the present appearance of the building exterior and interior,
particularly public areas of the building such as the former ice cream parlor.
• Prepare an intensive level survey form to the standards of the Utah State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO), to include an evaluation of the historic significance of the property, its historic
integrity, and its eligibility for the NRHP.
EVALUATING ELIGIBILITY
A property that is eligible for the NRHP must be of historic age; must be significant in American history,
architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture; and must retain integrity sufficient to convey its
significance. The significance of properties is evaluated using the following four criteria:
• The property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of our history (Criterion A)
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
2
• The property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past (Criterion B)
• The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction,
or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant
and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction (Criterion C)
• The property yields, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history
(Criterion D)
Resources considered significant under one or more of these criteria must also be evaluated for integrity
in the aspects of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To be eligible
for the NRHP, a property must possess integrity of those elements directly related to the criterion or
criteria under which it would be determined eligible (National Park Service 1997).
The property at 470 S. 700 East has previously been evaluated at the reconnaissance level only. In Utah,
all architectural resources documented at this level are evaluated using a rating system established by the
historic buildings program at the Utah Division of State History. This rating system allows for the
assignment of one of the following four ratings to historic buildings and structures based on the degree to
which they retain architectural integrity (Utah SHPO 2020):
• Eligible/Significant (ES)
Built within the Historic period and retains integrity; an excellent example of a style or type;
unaltered or only minor alterations or additions. Properties with this rating are considered individually
eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C.
• Eligible/Contributing (EC)
Built within the Historic period and retains integrity; a good example of a style or type but not as well
preserved or well executed as ES buildings and has more substantial alterations or additions than ES
buildings, although overall integrity is retained. Properties with this rating are considered eligible for
the NRHP as part of a potential historic district and/or under Criterion A.
• Not eligible/Non-contributing (NC)
Built during the Historic period but has had major alterations or additions; no longer retains integrity.
Properties with this rating are considered not eligible for the NRHP under any criterion.
• Not eligible/Out-of-period (OP), built after the Historic period
• Not eligible for the NRHP
EXISTING DOCUMENTATION
The Central City Historic District is a NRHP-listed district as well as a locally designated district. The
boundaries of the NRHP district were expanded in 2001 (Giraud 2001); the boundaries of the local district
do not correlate to those of the NRHP district (Ellis 2013; Giraud 2001; Miller 1994). The Salt Lake City
East Side Historic District (East Side Historic District) boundary expansion in 2003 consolidated the 1996
Central City Historic District boundaries with the 2001 expanded boundary of the Central City Historic
District, along with the Bryant and Bennion-Douglas neighborhoods (Broschinsky 2002). The period of
significance for the Central City Historic District is 1870 to 1946; the period of significance for the Salt
Lake City East Side Historic District is 1860 to 1953.
The property at 470 S. 700 East lies within the boundaries for the locally designated Central City Historic
District and the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Broschinsky 2002; Ellis 2013). The
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
3
property was initially recorded in a 1994 reconnaissance level survey (RLS) as a non-contributing
property to the East Side Historic District (Miller 1994). In 2013, the property was re-recorded during
RLS and identified as contributing to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Ellis 2013). The
2013 RLS expands the sub-periods of significance identified in the 2001 Central City Historic District
expansion; Fendall’s is listed as E/C under the 1923–1955 sub-period of significance, although the actual
construction date of the Fendall’s building is 1957, putting it in the 1956–1995 sub-period (Ellis 2013).
While the property was recommended as contributing and is considered so locally by the City of Salt
Lake, it has never been incorporated into the NRHP districts in which it lies as a contributing property.
RESEARCH METHODS
Alta Terra provided SWCA with a current chain of title for the property on August 12, 2022. Between
August 12 and August 16, 2022, SWCA searched photographs in the University of Utah J. Willard
Marriott Digital Library, U.S. Geological Survey publications, and newspaper articles to document the
property’s history. On August 17, 2022, SWCA Architectural Historian Trevor Mark conducted a site
visit to document and record the property. Historic research was used in conjunction with information
recorded during the site visit to evaluate the property’s NRHP eligibility and its status within the East
Side Historic District. A summary of the property’s history is provided in Table 1 and Appendix A
contains images supporting the documentation and evaluation contained in this memorandum.
BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The building at 470 S. 700 East is a single-story irregular plan commercial building constructed in 1957.
It is oriented east-west with an alley on the south and west sides and a parking area on the north side. The
primary entrance is in the east elevation, along S. 700 East. A sidewalk runs along the property’s east
side. The building is located on the west side of the street.
As originally constructed, the building is a one-part commercial block with a mid-century contemporary
style façade and a flat roof. The façade (located on the east elevation) consists of brick veneer with
paneling over a canted canopy. Originally, the canopy supported a lettered Fendall’s Ice Cream sign
outlined in neon. The façade is punctuated by two double doors with aluminum frames and a single fixed
glass panel that make up the primary entrance and a fixed single-lite plate glass window with an
aluminum frame. A low stone planter is present along the east elevation between the primary entry and
the northeast corner of the building (Figure A-3 and Figure A-). Windows in the west elevation and along
the secondary portions of the north and south elevations consist of original four-lite steel casements
(Figure A-5 and Figure A-6). A metal overhead delivery bay door is present toward the west end of the
north elevation (Figure A-7). The original interior of the ice cream parlor contained a marble soda
fountain counter and a rear wooden bar with multiple mirrors (Figure A-8); these interior features have
been removed, date unknown (Figure A-9).
The building foundation is a combination of formed concrete with a basement, at grade concrete block,
and a poured concrete slab; the overall structure consists of reinforced concrete block. Based on historic
aerial imagery, a side addition was constructed off the north elevation sometime between 1962 and 1965
(Historic Aerials 1962, 1965; Lile 1972). It is likely that the stone planter along the east (front) elevation
was extended at this time as well. In 1972, a semitruck crashed through the northeast corner of the
building (the circa 1963/1964 addition), after which the damaged portion of the building was rebuilt
(Deseret News 1972). Windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations (near S. 700
East) consist of single-lite vinyl replacement windows (ca. 1995) set into the original steel casings (Figure
A-, Figure A-11, and Figure A-12).
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
4
The contemporary style canopy on the east elevation is attached at an angle and projects approximately 3
feet from the façade. On the south elevation, the canopy projects 6 feet farther from the façade. The
canopy is supported by two metal posts but otherwise appears to be cantilevered. Although the steel frame
canopy was originally clad in metal, the cladding was removed between 2011 and 2014 (Google 2011,
2014). The lettered neon canopy sign was also removed, date unknown. (see Figure A-).
The original color scheme of the east elevation emphasized the different materials and associat ed textures,
with the paneled area above the canopy being a lighter color, contrasting with the darker brick veneer.
Between August 2007 and June 2008, the building had a buff color paint scheme with faux brick coining
along the east elevation corners, with the canted canopy painted teal and the original Fendall’s neon sign
still present on the pole in front of the building (Google 2007, 2008). By July 2011, the building was
painted white with the canted canopy painted red; portions of the metal cladding on the canopy were
peeling off or missing. The neon Fendall’s pole sign was still present (Google 2011). Between July 2014
and July 2018, the building was painted red with the canted canopy painted black (Google 2014, 2015,
2016, 2017, 2018). By July 2014, the metal cladding on the canted canopy had been completed removed
(Google 2014). The neon Fendall’s pole sign was still present in July 2018 (Google 2018). By August
2021, the original Fendall’s sign on the pole in front of the building was replaced with the current neon
pizza sign (Figure A-13) (Google 2021, 2022a, 2022b).
The original soda fountain and rear bar have been removed from the building, date unknown. Other
alterations to the building include the early 1960s side addition (rebuilt in 1972), vinyl replacement
windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations ca. 1995, removal of cladding and neon
letter sign from the canted canopy and alteration of the color scheme of the building between 2014 and
2018, and replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building ca. 2021.
HISTORY
Fendall’s Ice Cream Company was established in Salt Lake City in 1910. Joseph Rimensberger, a pastry
chef, became partners with Edmund Fendall after relocating from the Waldorf Astoria in New York City to
the Hotel Utah in Salt Lake City. After the untimely death of Fendall in 1919, Rimensberger continued the
company under the Fendall name, “thinking that it looked better on the marquee” (Phillips 2010). The
company moved to 470 S. 700 East in 1957, constructing the original portion of the existing building,
which contained an ice cream parlor in the front and a manufacturing facility in the rear (Deseret News and
Salt Lake Telegram 1957; Phillips 2010). Fendall’s closed in 1997 and the property became a pizza shop in
1999 (Phillips 2010; Alta Terra 2022). A summary of the property’s history is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Chronological Summary of the History of 470 S. 700 East
Year, Month
(if known)
Description Reference
1911–1950 Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 are occupied by two brick buildings
and three outbuildings at 460 and 464 E. 700 South.
Sanborn Map Company 1911
1950 460 and 464 S. 700 East still present, less one outbuilding at
464½ S. 700 East.
Sanborn Map Company 1950
1957, April 7 Building permit submitted for a “retail store and factory at 470
7th East, $22,500.”
Salt Lake Tribune 1957
1957, April 22 Sale of Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 from Huber & Roland
Construction Company to Fendall Ice Cream Company
Alta Terra 2022
1957, August 16 Fendall’s Ice Cream opens at 470 S. 700 East. Deseret News and Salt Lake
Telegram 1957
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
5
Year, Month
(if known)
Description Reference
1972, August 14 Refrigerator truck crashes into the northeast corner of the
building, causing the roof to partially collapse.
Deseret News 1972
1972, August 18 Building permit issued for $5400 in repairs to the building by
contractor Rulon Construction
Daily Record 1972
1972 Aerial photograph of the building. It is unclear if it was taken
pre- or post-crash.
Lile 1972
1979, August 1 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Carl J. and
Darline Rimensberger
Alta Terra 2022
1979, December 27 Grant of access easement to Lots 1 and 8 of Block 32 Alta Terra 2022
1981, April 2 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Fendall
Investment Co.
Alta Terra 2022
1989 Fendall’s Ice Cream photographed with a profile of the
business, ownership, and history.
Stewart 1989
1993, June 2 Quitclaim deed from Carl/Darline Rimensberger Family Trust to
Carol Jo Radlinger
Alta Terra 2022
1999 Pizza Pipeline in business at 470 S. 700 East Daily Utah Chronicle 1999
2004 Quitclaim deed from Carol Jo and Gunter Radlinger to GCR
Enterprises
Alta Terra 2022
2010 Notice of default Alta Terra 2022
2011 Special Warranty Deed from Velocity Commercial Capital to
Micelli Group LLC
Alta Terra 2022
2011 Painted white from older teal and off white Google 2011
ca. 2011–2014 Painted red and black Google 2014
ca. 2019–2021 Sign painted Google 2021
2022, March 16 Special Warranty Deed from Micelli Group LLC to Properties
KP6 LLC
Alta Terra 2022
ELIGIBILITY
Based on the 2013 RLS, 470 S. 700 East is currently identified as eligible for the NRHP as a contributing
property to the Central City and East Side Historic Districts (Broschinsky 2002; Ellis 2013). These
districts are significant under Criteria A and C in the themes of Architecture, Community Planning and
Development, and Social History. The period of significance for the Central City Historic District is 1870
to 1946; the period of significance for the East Side Historic District is 1860 to 1953 (Broschinsky 2002;
Giraud 2001).
While the property is associated with the development of the ice cream industry at a local level in Salt
Lake City during the twentieth century, the effects to integrity in the areas of design, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and association have diminished the property’s conveyance of significance under
the themes of Community Planning, and Social History within the period of significance identified for
either historic district. As such, the property is recommended non-contributing to the Central City and
East Side Historic Districts and not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A.
The property is not associated with the lives of historically significant persons and is recommended not
eligible for the NRHP under Criterion B.
The impacts to design, materials, and workmanship have effaced any distinctive characteristics of a type,
period, or method of construction. The property is not representative of the work of a master, nor does it
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
6
possess high artistic value. Additionally, the loss of integrity in these areas has depreciated the property as
architecturally representative of either historic district within the identified periods of significance.
Therefore, the property is recommended non-contributing to the Central City and East Side Historic
Districts and not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C.
The property is not likely to yield information important to prehistory or history. Therefore, the property
is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion D.
Although the property is 50 years or more in age and has maintained integrity in the areas of location and
setting, alterations to the property have diminished integrity in the areas of design, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and association. Installation of vinyl replacement windows in the north and south
elevations, along with removal of cladding and signage from the canopy, has affected the property’s
integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. In addition, removal of the canopy signage, along with
the removal of the soda fountain counter and back bar from the interior, has erased the feeling and
association of the space as an ice cream parlor. While the replacement neon sign on the pole in front of
the building is similar in design, materials, and workmanship to the original Fendall’s neon sign, the
association with the ice cream parlor and manufacturing facility has not been maintained. The current
paint scheme also affects the original aesthetic of the building—and therefore integrity of design and
materials—by diminishing architectural details and erasing the differentiation between materials,
specifically on the east elevation. Due to the substantial loss of integrity of design, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and association, 470 S. 700 East is recommended not eligible and non-contributing
to either the Central City Historic District or the Salt Lake City East Side Historic District.
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
7
REFERENCES CITED
Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra)
2022 Chain of Title for 470 S 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Prepared by Alta
Terra Real Estate, Park City, Utah.
Broschinsky, Korral
2002 Salt Lake City East Side Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic
Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake
City Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Daily Record
1972 S.L. City Building Permits. Daily Record 18 August:8. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/681928964. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Daily Utah Chronicle
1999 Grand Opening!. Daily Utah Chronicle 8 March:99. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430068373. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Deseret News
1972 Truck Rams Into Ice Cream Parlor. Deseret News 14 August:19. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/596682055. Accessed August 15, 2022.
Ellis, Sheri Murray
2013 Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of
State History, Salt Lake City.
Giraud, Elizabeth Egleston
2001 Central City Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places
Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City
Corporation/Planning Division, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Google
2007 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102
/@40.7588702,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591
072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2008 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591
072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2011 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591
072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
8
2014 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d
40.7591072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2015 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591
072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2016 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. May. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:0
x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!
4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2017 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f
:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.759107
2!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2018 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12
f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.759107
2!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2021 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75887
02,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072
!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2022a Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. January. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75910
82,-111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2022b Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.75910
82,-111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Historic Aerials
1962 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Accessed August 16, 2022.
1965 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Accessed August 16, 2022.
Determination of Eligibility for 470 S. 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
9
Lile, Edward P.
1972 Utah State Historical Society Classified Photo Collection. Salt Lake City-Aerial Views P.21.
Utah Department of Culture & Community Engagement. Available at:
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60g5365. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Miller, Lisa
1994 Standard Reconnaissance Level Survey, Central City Historic District, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Utah Division of State History, Salt Lake City.
National Park Service
1997 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Rev ed. National Register
Bulletin 15. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service. Available at:
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. Accessed
August 16, 2022.
Phillips, Valerie
2010 Frozen in time: Fendall’s celebrates 100 years of making ice cream. Deseret News March 17.
Available at: https://www.deseret.com/2010/3/17/20102599/frozen-in-time-fendall-s-
celebrates-100-years-of-making-ice-cream. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives
c. 1960 Photograph associated with Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Salt Lake Tribune
1957 Building Permits. Salt Lake Tribune 7 April:41. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/598554146. Accessed August 15, 2022.
Sanborn Map Company
1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. Map No.
271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_007/. Accessed August 16, 2022.
1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. July. Map
No. 271. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_013/. Accessed August 16,
2022.
Stewart, Isaiah
1989 Lots of hard work lies behind that delicious cone. Daily Utah Chronicle 1 March:89.
Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430262389/. Accessed August 16,
2022.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
2020 Reconnaissance Level Survey: Guidelines for Architectural Resources. February. Available
at: https://history.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PRES_RLS-Guidelines-2020.pdf.
Accessed August 16, 2022.
APPENDIX A
Figures
A-1
Figure A-1. Site map.
A-2
Figure A-2. Location map.
A-3
Figure A-3. Early 1960s-era photograph of 470 S. 700 East as it appeared originally, prior to the
north addition and truck accident (Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960).
A-4
Figure A-4. Front door and primary façade windows, facing west.
A-5
Figure A-5. Steel frame window on south elevation, facing northeast.
A-6
Figure A-6. Detail of steel frame casement window, north elevation.
A-7
Figure A-7. Delivery bay door in north elevation, facing southeast.
A-8
Figure A-8. Interior of Fendall’s Ice Cream, ca. 1960 (Phillips 2010).
A-9
Figure A-9. Current interior of Big Daddy’s Pizza.
A-10
Figure A-10. Detail of vinyl replacement window, south elevation.
A-11
Figure A-11. 470 S. 700 East, north and east elevations (vinyl replacement windows in north
elevation), facing southwest.
A-12
Figure A-12. 470 S. 700 East, south and east elevations (vinyl replacement windows in south
elevation), including frame of canted canopy, facing northwest.
A-13
Figure A-13. Replacement neon sign.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
1
HISTORIC SITE FORM
1. Identification
Name of Property: Big Daddy’s Pizza/Fendall’s Ice Cream
Address: 470 S 700 East
City, County: Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County
Current Owner Name: SALT LAKE CITY PROPERTIES KP6, LLC
Current Owner Address: 1441 West Ute Blvd., Suite 130, Park City, Utah 84098
Township: 1S
Range: 1E
Section: 05
Latitude/Longitude (degr-dec): 40.75914, -111.87141
USGS Map Name and Date: Fort Douglas, 2020
Tax Number: 16053070100000
Legal Description (include acreage): Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 32 Plat “B” Salt Lake Survey which point is also the
Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 32, Plat “B” Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence West 148.5 feet, thence North 92.5 feet; then ce East
148.5 feet, thence South 49.5 feet to the place of beginning.
2. Status / Use
Property Category Evaluation
☒ Building(s) ☐ Eligible / Contributing
☐ Structure(s) ☒ Ineligible / Non-Contributing
☐ Site ☐ Out of Period
☐ Object
Use:
Original Use: Commercial/Restaurant
Current Use: Commercial/Restaurant
3. Documentation
Research Sources
Check all sources consulted, whether useful or not.
☒ Abstract of Title ☒ Newspapers
☒ Tax Card and Photo ☐ City / County Histories
☐ Building Permit ☐ Personal Interviews
☐ Sewer Permit ☒ USHS History Research Center
☒ Sanborn Maps ☒ USHS Preservation Files
☐ Obituary Index ☒ USHS Architects File
☒ City Directories / Gazetteers ☐ LDS Family History Library
☐ Census Records ☐ Local Library:
☐ Biographical Encyclopedias ☒ University Library(ies):
University of Utah J. Willard Marriott Digital Library
Photos Drawings and Plans
Dates: Dates:
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
2
Research Sources
Check all sources consulted, whether useful or not.
☐ Slides: ☐ Measured Floor Plans:
☐ Prints: ☒ Site Sketch Map: 2022
☒ Historic: Salt Lake County
Assessor 2022
☐ Historic American Building Survey:
☐ Original Plans Available at:
☐ Other:
Bibliographical References
Alta Terra Real Estate (Alta Terra)
2022 Chain of Title for 470 S 700 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Prepared by Alta Terra Real Estate,
Park City, Utah.
Broschinsky, Korral
2002 Salt Lake City East Side Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration
Form (NPS Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Daily Record
1972 S.L. City Building Permits. Daily Record 18 August:8. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/681928964. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Daily Utah Chronicle
1999 Grand Opening!. Daily Utah Chronicle 8 March:99. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430068373. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Deseret News
1972 Truck Rams Into Ice Cream Parlor. Deseret News 14 August:19. Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at:
https://www.newspapers.com/image/596682055. Accessed August 15, 2022.
Ellis, Sheri Murray
2013 Central City Standard Reconnaissance-Level Survey Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of State History, Salt
Lake City.
Giraud, Elizabeth Egleston
2001 Central City Historic District (Boundary Increase). National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS
Form 10-900, Oct. 1990, OMB No. 10024-0018). Salt Lake City Corporation/Planning Division, Salt Lake City,
Utah.
Google
2007 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102
/@40.7588702,-111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2008 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
3
2011 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2014 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d
40.7591072!4d-111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2015 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d
12f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2016 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. May. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:0
x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d -
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2017 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f
:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2018 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. July. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12
f:0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d -
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2021 Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. August. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7588702,-
111.8720655,438m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!2s470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102!3b1!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d -
111.8714374!3m4!1s0x8752f5. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2022a Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. January. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7591082,-
111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022.
2022b Google Street View. 470 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84102. June. Available at:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/470+700+E,+Salt+Lake+City,+UT+84102/@40.7591082,-
111.8719846,219m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8752f5685467d12f:
0x99ca7540cf39b7be!8m2!3d40.7591072!4d-111.8714374. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Historic Aerials
1962 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022.
1965 Imagery Viewer. NetrOnline. Available at: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Lile, Edward P.
1972 Utah State Historical Society Classified Photo Collection: Salt Lake City-Aerial Views P.21. Utah Department of
Culture & Community Engagement. Available at: https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60g5365. Accessed
August 16, 2022.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
4
Miller, Lisa
1994 Standard Reconnaissance Level Survey, Central City Historic District, Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah Division of
State History, Salt Lake City.
National Park Service
1997 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Rev ed. National Register Bulletin 15. Washington,
D.C.: National Park Service. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-
15_web508.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Phillips, Valerie
2010 Frozen in time: Fendall’s celebrates 100 years of making ice cream. Deseret News March 17. Available at:
https://www.deseret.com/2010/3/17/20102599/frozen-in-time-fendall-s-celebrates-100-years-of-making-ice-
cream. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Salt Lake County Assessor
2022 Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Parcel Details. Salt Lake City, UT. May 22. Available at:
https://slco.org/assessor/new/valuationInfoExpanded.cfm?parcel_id=16053070100000. Accessed August 16,
2022.
Sanborn Map Company
1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. Map No. 271. Available at:
https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_007/. Accessed August 16, 2022.
1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. Vol. 3. July. Map No. 271. Available
at: https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn08891_013/. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Salt Lake County Records Management and Archives
c. 1960 Photograph associated with Parcel 16-05-307-010-0000. Salt Lake City, UT.
Salt Lake Tribune
1957 Building Permits. Salt Lake Tribune 7 April:41. Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/598554146.
Accessed August 15, 2022.
Stewart, Isaiah
1989 Lots of hard work lies behind that delicious cone. Daily Utah Chronicle 1 March:89. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Available at: https://www.newspapers.com/image/legacy/430262389/. Accessed August 16, 2022.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
2020 Reconnaissance Level Survey: Guidelines for Architectural Resources. February. Available at:
https://history.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PRES_RLS-Guidelines-2020.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2022.
4. Architectural Description
Building Style / Type: One-part commercial block with contemporary façade
Number of Stories: 1
Foundation Material: Formed concrete
Wall Material(s): Concrete block with regular brick
Additions Alterations
☐ None ☐ None
☒ Minor ☐ Minor
☐ Major (Describe Below) ☒ Major (Describe Below)
Number of Associated Outbuildings: None
and/or Structures: None
Description
The building at 470 S. 700 East is a single-story irregular plan commercial building constructed in 1957. It is oriented east-west with an alley on
the south and west sides and a parking area on the north side (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The primary entrance is in the east elevation, along S. 700
East. A sidewalk passes on the east side. The building is located on the west side of the street.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
5
As originally constructed, the building is a one-part commercial block with a mid-century contemporary style façade and a flat roof (Figure 3).
The façade (located on the east elevation) consists of brick veneer with paneling over a canted canopy. Originally, the canopy supported a
Fendall’s Ice Cream lettered sign outlined in neon (Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6). The façade is punctuated by two double doors with
aluminum frames and a single fixed glass panel that make up the primary entrance, and fixed single lite plate glass with aluminum frame (Figure
7, Figure 8, Figure 9, and Figure 10). A low, stone planter is present along the east elevation between the primary entry and the northeast corner
of the building (Figure 11). Windows in the west elevation and along the secondary portions of the north and south elevations consist of original
four-lite, steel casements. A metal overhead delivery bay door is present toward the west end of the north elevation (Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure
15, and Figure 16). The original interior of the ice cream parlor contained a marble soda fountain counter and a rear wooden bar with multiple
mirrors; these interior features have been removed, date unknown (Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20, and Figure 21).
The building foundation is a combination of formed concrete with a basement, at grade concrete block, and a poured concrete slab; the overall
structure consists of reinforced concrete block (Figure 22 and Figure 23). Based on historic aerial imagery, a side addition was constructed off the
north elevation sometime between 1962 and 1965 (Historic Aerials 1962, 1965; Lile 1972). It is likely that the stone planter along the east
elevation was extended at this time as well. In 1972, a semi-truck crashed through the northeast corner of the building (the circa 1963/1964
addition), after which the damaged portion of the building was rebuilt (Deseret News 1972). Brick at the point between the new and original part
of the building are visually different (Figure 24) Windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations (near S. 700 East) consist of
single-lite vinyl replacement windows (c. 1995) set into the original steel casings.
The contemporary style canopy on the east elevation is attached at an angle and projects approximately 3 feet from the façade. On the south
elevation, the canopy project a further 6 feet from the façade. The canopy is supported by two metal posts, but other wise appears to be
cantilevered. Although the steel frame canopy was originally clad in metal, the cladding was removed between 2011 and 2014 (Google 2011,
2014). The lettered neon canopy sign was also removed, date unknown.
The original color scheme of the east elevation emphasized the different materials and associated textures, with the paneled area above the
canopy being a lighter color, contrasting with the darker brick veneer. Google Street View between August 2007 and June 2008 indicates that the
building had a buff color paint scheme with faux brick coining along the east elevation corners, with the canted canopy painted teal and the
original Fendall’s neon sign still present on the pole in front of the building (Google 2007, 2008). By July 2011, the building was painted white
with the canted canopy painted red; portions of the metal cladding on the canopy were peeling off or missing. The Fendall’s n eon pole sign was
still present (Google 2011). Between July 2014 and July 2018, the building was painted red with the canted canopy painted black (Google 2014,
2015, 2016, 2017, 2018). By July 2014, the metal cladding on the canted canopy had been completed removed (Google 2014). The Fendall’s
neon pole sign was still in July 2018 (Google 2018). By August 2021, the original Fendall’s neon sign on the pole in front of the building was
replaced with the current neon pizza sign (Google 2021, 2022a, 2022b).
The original soda fountain and rear bar have been removed from the building, date unknown. Other alterations to the building include the early
1960s north elevation addition (rebuilt in 1972), vinyl replacement windows in the primary portions of the north and south elevations circa 1995,
removal of cladding and neon letter sign from the canted canopy and alteration of the color scheme of the building between 2014 and 2018, and
replacement of the neon sign on the pole in the front of the building circa 2021.
5. History
Architect / Builder: Huber & Roland Construction
Date of Construction: 1957
Historic Themes
Mark themes related to this property with ‘S’ or ‘C’ (S = significant, C = Contributing)
Agriculture Conservation Invention Science
Architecture Economics Landscape Architecture Social History
Archaeology Education Law Transportation
Art Engineering Literature Other:
Commerce Entertainment / Recreation Maritime History
Communications Ethnic Heritage Military
Community Planning &
Development
Exploration / Settlement Performing Arts
Health / Medicine Politics / Government
Industry Religion
History
Fendall’s Ice Cream Company was established in Salt Lake City in 1910. Joseph Rimensberger, a pastry chef, became partners wi th Edmund
Fendall after relocating from the Waldorf Astoria in New York City to the Hotel Utah in Salt Lake City. After the untimely death of Fendall in
1919, Rimensberger continued the company under the Fendall name, “thinking that it looked better on the marquee” (Phillips 2010). The
company moved to 470 S. 700 East in 1957, constructing the original portion of the existing building, which contained an ice cream parlor in the
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
6
front and a manufacturing facility in the rear (Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram 1957; Phillips 2010). Fendall’s closed in 1997 and the
property became a pizza shop in 1999 (Alta Terra 2022; Phillips 2010). A summary of the property’s history is presented in below.
Year, Month
(if known)
Description Reference
1911–1950 Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 are occupied by two brick buildings and
three outbuildings at 460 and 464 E. 700 South.
Sanborn Map Company 1911
1950 460 and 464 S. 700 East still present, less one outbuilding at 464½ S.
700 East.
Sanborn Map Company 1950
1957, April 7 Building permit submitted for a “retail store and factory at 470 7th
East, $22,500.”
Salt Lake Tribune 1957
1957, April 22 Sale of Lots 1 and 8 in Block 32 from Huber & Roland Construction
Company to Fendall Ice Cream Company
Alta Terra 2022
1957, August 16 Fendall’s Ice Cream opens at 470 S. 700 East. Deseret News and Salt Lake Telegram
1957
1972, August 14 Refrigerator truck crashes into the northeast corner of the building,
causing the roof to partially collapse.
Deseret News 1972
1972, August 18 Building permit issued for $5400 in repairs to the building by
contractor Rulon Construction
Daily Record 1972
1972 Aerial photograph of the building. It is unclear if it was taken pre- or
post-crash.
Lile 1972
1979, August 1 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Carl J. and Darline
Rimensberger
Alta Terra 2022
1979, December 27 Grant of access easement to Lots 1 and 8 of Block 32 Alta Terra 2022
1981, April 2 Quitclaim deed from Fendall Ice Cream Co. to Fendall Investment
Co.
Alta Terra 2022
1989 Fendall’s Ice Cream photographed with a profile of the business,
ownership, and history.
Stewart 1989
1993, June 2 Quitclaim deed from Carl/Darline Rimensberger Family Trust to
Carol Jo Radlinger
Alta Terra 2022
1999 Pizza Pipeline in business at 470 S. 700 East Daily Utah Chronicle 1999
2004 Quitclaim deed from Carol Jo and Gunter Radlinger to GCR
Enterprises
Alta Terra 2022
2010 Notice of default Alta Terra 2022
2011 Special Warranty Deed from Velocity Commercial Capital to Micelli
Group LLC
Alta Terra 2022
2011 Painted white from older teal and off white Google 2011
ca. 2011–2014 Painted red and black Google 2014
ca. 2019–2021 Sign painted Google 2021
2022, March 16 Special Warranty Deed from Micelli Group LLC to Properties KP6
LLC
Alta Terra 2022
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
7
Figure 1. Location map.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
8
Figure 2. Site map.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
9
Figure 3. Early 1960s-era photograph of 470 S. 700 East as it appeared originally, prior to the north addition and truck accident (Salt
Lake County Records Management and Archives c. 1960).
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
10
Figure 4. Property photograph from 2011 (Google 2011).
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
11
Figure 5. North and east elevations, facing southwest.
Figure 6. South elevation, facing northwest.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
12
Figure 7. Sign, facing north.
Figure 8. South and east elevations, facing north.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
13
Figure 9. South elevation and canted canopy, facing west.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
14
Figure 10. Storefront, east elevation, facing west.
Figure 11. Front flagstone wall, facing north.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
15
Figure 12. Original window frame detail, south elevation.
Figure 13. North elevation, facing southeast.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
16
Figure 14. North elevation, facing south.
Figure 15. North elevation, facing southeast.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
17
Figure 16. South and west elevations, facing northeast.
Figure 17. Interior front door, facing southeast.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
18
Figure 18. Interior counter, facing northeast.
Figure 19. Dining area, facing northeast.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
19
Figure 20. Meeting point of addition (left) and original building (right).
Figure 21. Original cabinets.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
20
Figure 22. Concrete block foundation detail.
Figure 23. Foundation detail.
Utah State Historic Preservation Office Historic Site Form (10-91)
Researcher / Organization: Trevor Mark / SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: 09/02/2022
21
Figure 24. Junction point of original (left) and historic bricks (right).